research topics in wood technology

• Architecture and Design
• Asian and Pacific Studies
• Business and Economics
• Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
• Computer Sciences
• Cultural Studies
• Engineering
• General Interest
• Geosciences
• Industrial Chemistry
• Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies
• Jewish Studies
• Library and Information Science, Book Studies
• Life Sciences
• Linguistics and Semiotics
• Literary Studies
• Materials Sciences
• Mathematics
• Social Sciences
• Sports and Recreation
• Theology and Religion
• Publish your article
• The role of authors
• Promoting your article
• Abstracting & indexing
• Publishing Ethics
• Why publish with De Gruyter
• How to publish with De Gruyter
• Our book series
• Our subject areas
• Your digital product at De Gruyter
• Contribute to our reference works
• Product information
• Tools & resources
• Product Information
• Promotional Materials
• Orders and Inquiries
• FAQ for Library Suppliers and Book Sellers
• Repository Policy
• Free access policy
• Open Access agreements
• Database portals
• For Authors
• Customer service
• People + Culture
• Journal Management
• How to join us
• Working at De Gruyter
• Mission & Vision
• De Gruyter Foundation
• De Gruyter Ebound
• Our Responsibility
• Partner publishers

Your purchase has been completed. Your documents are now available to view.

A brief overview on the development of wood research

Wood science covers in particular the areas of the formation and composition as well as the chemical, biological and physical-mechanical properties of wood. First comprehensive studies have already been published in the last century. Detailed knowledge of wood is required for the processing of wood, the production of wood-based materials, and the utilization of wood and wood-based materials as buildings and various other products such as furniture. This review gives a brief overview on the progress in wood chemistry, wood biology (including photosynthesis and biodeterioration), and physical-mechanical properties of wood and wood-based materials. These fundamentals are also essential for understanding technological processes and product development.

1 A short introduction to wood science

Wood is one of the most remarkable natural products and has been used by humans for thousands of years. With the development of powerful civilizations in ancient times, wood played an important role in their daily life and the demand for wood for buildings, as fuel, for the construction of ships, etc. was constantly increasing. Over time, this led to severe regional and transregional deforestation, as in Mesopotamia in the Middle East or in the Mediterranean region during the ancient Greek and Roman eras ( Dotterweich 2013 ; Hughes 2011 ; Kaplan et al. 2009 ), followed by soil erosion, karstification or even desertification. Later, especially in the seventeenth and eighteenth century, an increasing demand for construction, the mining industry, as firewood in Central Europe as well as an increasing conversion of forest land into farm land led to a dramatic decline in forested areas. As a consequence, these devastating environmental changes were accompanied by massive timber shortages. Hans Carl von Carlowitz (1645–1714) developed the visionary concept of sustainability with the reforestation of cleared forest sites to ensure production of sufficient quantities of timber for the future. At the transition from the eighteenth to the nineteenth century, the importance of forest management knowledge and establishment of sustainability strategies led to the foundation of the first academic forestry institutions in several European countries such as in Russia, France, Germany, Sweden and former Austria-Hungary. At this time, basic knowledge in wood science was increasingly included in forestry education programmes. Kisser et al. (1967) provided details on the historical development of wood anatomy with numerous pioneering contributions already from the nineteenth century, followed by excellent microscopic descriptions in the first half of the twentieth century. Until the early twentieth century, however, there was no targeted wood research with corresponding research institutes. Research was still more or less focused on forestry and forest utilization. According to Köstler et al. (1960) , modern wood research began in 1910 with the foundation of the Forest Products Laboratory in Madison/Wisconsin in the United States (see book on 100 years FPL Madison), see also Anderson (2010) . Earlier, in 1906, a Forest Products Research Institute was founded in Dehradun, India. In Germany, the first real wood research institute was founded in 1932 at the Technical University of Darmstadt and in 1934 as the Prussian Wood Research Institute in Eberswalde (later the “Reichsanstalt für Holzforschung”) under the direction of Franz Kollmann (1906–1987). At this time, numerous wood research institutes were established in almost all industrialized countries ( Table 1 ). Nowadays, wood science is subdivided in great detail, either into techniques such as molecular biology and its related biotechnological approaches, or into other specific areas adopted from botany, e.g., taxonomy, cell biology, physiology and pathology. Wood science education programs are in most cases part of Bachelor and Master programmes at several universities worldwide with degrees directly in wood science or wood materials science, in sub-disciplines such as wood technology or in combination with other programmes such as forestry with a degree in forestry and wood science. In addition to these educational wood institutes, numerous wood research institutions were established, which are nowadays mostly integrated into larger units for research in the field of natural resources and they are associated with units for, e.g., forestry, agriculture, geology, or even fisheries. These often national institutes provide science-based support for policy and decision-makers, are involved in monitoring activities and represent their countries in international scientific commissions.

Overview of wood research institutes in different countries (Niemz. 1993, Niemz and Sonderegger 2021 ).

2 Wood chemistry

Wood chemistry is primarily concerned with the chemical compounds that make up wood, particularly the xylem. These compounds are structural polymers (“lignocellulose”) of the cell wall (cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin) and various low molecular weight compounds (mostly organic), the extractives. The most important extractives (phenolics, terpenoids) are secondary plant compounds that can strongly influence the properties of wood. Primary plant compounds, which mostly occur in lumens of living wood cells (parenchyma cells), may also determine the wood properties, but are less considered in wood chemistry.

The French chemist Anselme Payen (1795–1871) coined the term cellulose in 1838 ( Payen 1938 ) ( Figure 1 ). In the years 1837–1842, he discovered that all plants contain a white substance with the same composition as starch (about 44% carbon, 6% hydrogen, and 49% oxygen) and distinguished between “la cellulose” und “l’incrustation ligneuse”. He also found cellulose in cotton and decompounded it into glucose via sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Emil Fischer (1852–1919, Nobel Prize in 1902) at the University of Berlin (nowadays Humboldt University, Germany) performed pioneering work in the area of sugar chemistry. In 1891, he elucidated the structure of d -glucose, d -mannose and d -arabinose and the stereochemistry of sugars. Fischer developed the nomenclature of linear monosaccharides (“Fischer nomenclature”) and the three-dimensional presentation method (“Fischer projection”). Walter Norman Haworth (1883–1950, Nobel Prize in 1937) at the University of Birmingham (UK) elucidated the ring (glucopyranose) structure of the sugar units in the polysaccharides and developed the three-dimensional presentation method of five- and six-membered monosaccharide rings (“Haworth-projection”). Karl Freudenberg at the University of Heidelberg (1886–1983) and Haworth provided strong evidence for the β-1,4-glycosidic linkages in cellulose. Hermann Staudinger (1881–1965, Nobel Prize in 1953), the father of polymer chemistry at the University of Freiburg (Germany), established the polymeric structure and the final chain conformation of cellulose. He and his co-worker H. Eilers found that the structural difference between cellulose and starch relies on the conformation of the anomeric glucose unit, which leads to α-glycosidic (starch) and β-glycosidic bonds (cellulose) ( Staudinger and Eilers 1936 ). The elucidation of the crystalline structure of cellulose began with the development of X-ray crystallography by Max von Laue in Germany (Nobel Prize in 1914). In 1913, Shōji Nishikawa (1884–1952) and his fellow student S. Ono in Japan were the first who showed that cellulose exhibits definite diffraction rings formed by rod-like shaped crystallites and Nishikawa later postulated the discontinuous nature of cellulose ( Nishikawa and Ono 1913 ). Reginald Herzog and his collaborator Willi Jancke at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Fibre Chemistry in Berlin (Germany) used the Debye–Scherrer-procedure to confirm the crystalline structure of cellulose in widely different sources such as cotton, ramie, wood, jute, and flax, which has become commonly known as the “native” cellulose form ( Hon 1994 ). In the 1920th, Michael Polanyi at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Fibre Chemistry in Berlin, Olenus Lee Sponsler at the University of California in Los Angeles (USA) and Haworth (1928) have published early intensive studies on the composition of cellulose and on its elementary unit cell. In 1928/29, Meyer and Mark were the first to postulate a monoclinic unit cell for native cellulose. Albert Frey-Wyssling at ETH Zürich (Switzerland) has developed a frequently cited model for the ultra-structure of cellulose and studied the orientation of microfibrils in the different cell wall layers of wood. He described distinct crystalline and amorphous sections in native cellulose. In contrast, Reginald D. Preston at the University of Leeds (UK) postulated that native cellulose is a continuous crystalline polymer with occasional dislocations (lattice distortions), meaning that the amorphous parts do not form discrete domains. In 1937, Kurt H. Meyer and Lore Misch at the University of Geneva (Switzerland) determined the dimensions of the unit cell of ramie cellulose by X-ray diffractometry ( Meyer and Misch 1937 ). In their model, the glucan chains are located at the four edges of the unit cell and run in one direction (parallel), while the central chain runs in the opposite direction (anti-parallel) ( Gardner and Blackwall 1974 ). In 1974, however, the groups of Anatole Sarko at SUNY ESF (College of Environmental Science and Forestry), Syracuse (USA) and John Blackwell at the Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (USA) showed independently that all the chains in the unit cell of native cellulose run parallel. For regenerated celluloses (cellulose II), however, both groups reported an anti-parallel orientation of the centre chain, which is now both widely accepted.

Selected scientists from the field of wood chemistry. Copyright: Freudenberg: Archive of Freudenberg & Co. KG Weinheim/Germany; Higuchi : courtesy of Satoru Tsuchikawa, Kyoto University/Japan; Brunow : courtesy of Stefan Brunow, Sweden; all others: Wikimedia Commons.

In 1984, Rajai H. Atalla at the Institute of Paper Chemistry, Appleton (USA) and David L. Vanderhart of the National Bureau of Standards, Washington (USA) first reported the existence of two distinct crystalline forms of native cellulose based on 13 C-NMR data – cellulose I α (dominant in bacteria and algae) and cellulose I β (dominant in higher plants such as wood). In 1992, Shiro Kobayashi and Shin-ichiro Shoda from the Tohoku University in Sendai (Japan) reported the first synthesis of cellulose via a non-biosynthetic path by using β- d -cellobiosyl fluoride as substrate for cellulose in an organic solvent mixture ( Kobashi et al. 1992 ).

The industrial exploitation of cellulose fibres from wood (mostly together with the hemicelluloses) relies on chemical pulping according to the sulphite process and the sulphate process. The sulphite process using calcium bisulphite was first patented by Benjamin Chew Tilghman (USA) in 1867. Based on studies of Carl Daniel Ekman, the first industrial magnesium sulphite pulp mill started operation at Bergvik, Sweden. The first calcium sulphite pulp mill in Germany started production in Hannoversch Münden in 1879 based on the developments of Alexander Mitscherlich. Sulphate cooking was invented by Carl F. Dahl in 1879 in Danzig, Prussia (then Germany), who called it “kraft” process from the Germany word Kraft (strength). In 1890, the process was first applied in a pulp mill in Sweden.

In addition to the utilization of cellulose for paper production, regenerated cellulose and cellulose derivatives have been produced from dissolving pulp after about 1850. This class of products provided basic materials for the textile and chemical industry. In 1857, Matthias E. Schweizer (1818–1860) at the University of Zürich (Switzerland) discovered that cellulose dissolves in aqueous tetraamine-copper-(II)-hydroxid (cuprammonium solution, also called Schweizer’s reagent). Max Fremery and Johann Urban filed a patent in 1897 on the procedure to gain filaments from this solution by reprecipitation of the cellulose, but initially only used the filaments in light bulbs. In 1899, the industrial production of cuprammonium rayon (“Cupro”) for textiles started in the Vereinigte Glanzstoff-Fabriken AG in Wuppertal-Elberfeld (Germany). In 1901, Edmund Thiele developed a spinning process at the J. P. Bemberg AG in Wuppertal-Oberbarmen (Germany) to produce “artificial silk” based on the cuprammonium process. Charles Frederick Cross, Edward John Bevan and Clayton Beadle patented the viscose process (“viscose” due to the highly viscous mixture) to produce “artificial silk” in 1894. The process is based on solubilisation of cellulose as cellulose xanthate and subsequent reprecipitation. The company Courtaulds Fibres (UK) produced the first commercial viscose rayon in 1905. The development of the Lyocell process, which relies on dissolving bleached wood pulp, started in 1972 at the American Enka Company, Enka (USA).

The first cellulose derivative was nitrocellulose (cellulose nitrate) produced with nitric acid. Its unstable precursor “xyloïdine” was first synthesized in 1832 by the French chemist Henri Braconnot. In 1845, Christian Schönbein in Germany was able to produce the first stable nitrocellulose using a mixture of nitric acid and sulfuric acid. Georges Audemars in France produced the first cellulose textile fibre by using solutions of nitrocellulose in alcohol-ether mixtures in 1855 and called it “rayon”. In 1889, the French chemist Hilaire de Chardonnet patented a nitrocellulose fibre marketed as “artificial silk”. Commercial production of Chardonnet’s silk started in 1891. In 1869, John W. Hyatt (USA) developed celluloid, a nitrocellulose softened with camphor and obtained the patent to produce billiard balls from celluloid. The French chemist Paul Schützenberger produced the first cellulose acetate by reaction of cotton with acetic anhydride in 1865. The process was further developed by the Dutch chemist Antoine Paul Nicolas Franchimont, who used sulfuric acid or zinc chloride as a catalyst in 1879. Other approaches of cellulose derivatisation involved graft-copolymerization of the cellulose backbone with synthetic polymers such as polystyrene or polyacrylonitrile. Vivian T. Stannett of North Carolina State University (USA) published early works in this area. The liquid crystalline behaviour of cellulose derivatives was studied by Derek G. Gray at McGill University, Montreal (Canada) and Peter Zugenmaier at Clausthal University of Technology (Germany) starting around 1982.

Research studies related to microcrystalline cellulose and nanocellulose started in the 1950s, when O. A Battista at the Textile Research Institute, Princeton (USA) obtained microcrystalline cellulose by controlled hydrolysis of cellulose fibres and subsequent sonification treatment ( Batista 1950 ). This led to the first commercialisation of microcrystalline cellulose.

At about the same time, B. Rånby from the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm (Sweden) for the first time reported the generation of colloidal suspensions of cellulose nanocrystals (one type of nanocellulose) after hydrolysis of cellulose. The production of microfibrillated cellulose (another type of nanocellulose) was first described in patents by F. W. Herrick and by A. F. Turbak and co-workers from the ITT Rayonier labs in Whippany (USA). The company commercialized the production of microfibrillated cellulose.

Today, the chemical and semi-crystalline structure of cellulose has been largely elucidated. Future basic research is therefore likely to focus primarily on the interactions of cellulose with other cell wall components and the elucidation of the three-dimensional cell wall structure. Further developments in instrumental analysis will play an important role in this. Recent and expected future developments regarding the utilisation will focus on the functionalisation of cellulose, especially nanocellulose, to produce materials that are responsive and adaptive towards changing ambient conditions for medicine and engineering (“smart materials”). Novel innovative composites based on cellulose derivatives will be produced. In addition, research will continue into the targeted decomposition of polysaccharides to produce biofuels (“biorefinery”) and various platform chemicals.

The German chemist Ernst Schulze at the University of Zürich (Switzerland) first used the term hemicelluloses in 1891 ( Schulze 1891 ) for all sugars of the plant cell wall that are released during hydrolysis by weak mineral acids, such as galactose, mannose, arabinose or xylose. Schulze falsely believed that these sugars were precursors to cellulose. Since the late 1950s, Tore E. Timell and his coworkers at the College of Forestry in Syracuse (USA) have elucidated the chemical composition and structure of hemicelluloses from softwoods ( Timell 1967 ) (arabinoglucuronoxylans and galactoglucomannans) and hardwoods (glucuronoxylans and glucomannans). Several other researchers have studied hemicelluloses with respect to their chemical behaviour during alkaline sulphate pulping (e.g., its endwise degradation). Horace S. Isbell at the National Bureau of Standards, Washington D.C. (USA), Olof Samuelson at Chalmers University of Technology (Sweden), Kuniyoshi Shimizu at Kyushu University, Fukuoka (Japan) and Eero Sjöström at Helsinki University of Technology (Finland) provided significant findings in this area. As for cellulose, recent and possible future research fields are functionalisation, finding novel medical and technical applications (e.g., food amendments, gels, paper sizing agents) and targeted decomposition of hemicelluloses (biofuels, platform chemicals).

The term lignin was first introduced by the Swiss botanist Augustin Pyramus de Candolle (1778–1841) at the University of Geneva (Switzerland) in 1813 ( de Candella 1813 ). It derives from the Latin word for wood lignum . In 1856, Franz Ferdinand Schulze at the University of Rostock (Germany) used the term lignin for the non-hydrolysable constituent of wood ( Schulze 1856 ). The beginnings of lignin chemistry date back to 1874, when Ferdinand Tiemann and Wilhelm Haarmann at the Friedrich-Wilhelms-University of Berlin (nowadays Humboldt-University of Berlin) isolated coniferin from the cambial sap of Norway spruce wood and developed a process to produce vanillin from coniferin. Around 1893, Peter Klason (1848–1937) began systematic studies on lignin chemistry at the KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm (Sweden). He was the first to suggest that lignin is a polymer of coniferyl alcohol, which made him the “father of lignin chemistry”. Klason also developed the first method to determine the lignin content of wood (“Klason lignin”). Around 1933, Holgar Erdtman at the Stockholm University (Sweden) developed the idea that lignification proceeds via radical coupling of substances similar to coniferyl alcohol. He dehydrogenated isoeugenol with crude fungal extract (containing laccase) and identified a dimer with a phenylcumarane bond (β-5 bond). Based on Erdtman’s studies, Karl Freudenberg (1886–1983) at the University of Heidelberg (Germany) further elucidated the structure and synthesis of lignin ( Freudenberg and Neish 1968 ). He and his co-workers were able to synthesise an artificial lignin (dehydrogenated product, DHP) from coniferyl alcohol using oxidative, radical-inducing enzymes (laccase, peroxidase), which displayed similar properties as lignin isolated from Norway spruce wood. Freudenberg distinguished two types of synthesis methods that produced different types of polymers by a free radical coupling mechanism: the “Zutropfexperiment” yielded an “end-wise” polymer and the “Zulaufexperiment” yielded a “bulk polymer”. Studies on the structure and constitution of lignin were continued in Germany by Horst Nimz at the Universities of Heidelberg, Karlsruhe and Hamburg. Nimz described the occurrence of the β-1 bond in lignin for the first time in 1965 ( Nimz 1965 ), which was later shown to derive from a spirodienone structure by John Ralph’s group at the University of Wisconsin (USA).

In his study, Nimz collaborated with Hans-Dietrich Lüdemann from the University of Regensburg (Germany) who conducted the identification of lignin structures by Nuclear-Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Several other researchers have further elucidated the structure and reactions of lignin by 13 C-NMR and other more advanced NMR techniques such as Charles H. Ludwig at Georgia Pacific Corporation Bellingham, Washington (USA), Josef Gierer at the Swedish Pulp and Paper Research Institute - STFI (Sweden), Larry Landucci at the USDA Forest Products Laboratory (USA), Josef Gratzl and Dimitris Argyropoulos at North Carolina State University (USA), Knut Lundquist at Chalmers University of Technology (Sweden) and John Ralph at the University of Wisconsin (USA). Oskar Faix at the Federal Research Institute for Forestry and Forest Products (now Thünen Institute of Wood Research in Hamburg (Germany) has done pioneering work on infrared (IR) spectroscopy. Another important method to analyse the composition of lignin is thioacidolysis developed by Catherine Lapierre at INRA (France) around 1985. In 1995, Gösta Brunow (1936–2013) and his co-workers from the University of Helsinki have first described the dibenzodioxocin (octagonal) structure in lignin ( Karhunen et al. 1995 ). Several groups have studied the structure, biosynthesis and fungal biodegradation of lignin such as Kyosti S. Sarkanen at the University of Washington (USA), David A. I. Goring at the Pulp and Paper Research Institute, Montreal (Canada), Takayoshi Higuchi at the University of Kyoto (Japan), Karl-Erik Erickson at STFI (Sweden) as well as the University of Georgia (USA), Kent Kirk at the USDA Forest Products Laboratory in Madison (WI), Michael H. Gold at the Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology (USA), Bernard Monties and Bernard Kurek at INRA (France), Jean-Paul Joseleau and Katia Ruel at the University of Grenoble (France), as well as Wolfgang Fritsche and Martin Hofrichter at the University of Jena (Hofrichter later at the International Graduate School Zittau), (Germany).

With the emergence of molecular biological methods, the research base on lignin biosynthesis has expanded considerably. Extensive research has been carried out by the groups of Wout Boerjan at Ghent University (Belgium) and Marie Baucher at the University of Brussels (Belgium). For a long time, the coupling of enzymatically induced radicals during lignification has been considered a random process in which the already formed polysaccharide matrix serves as a template. From 1995 to 2000, however, Norman G. Lewis and his co-workers at Washington State University (USA) sparked controversy when they postulated the existence of dirigent proteins that may exert a specific control over the lignification process. In recent years, lignin valorisation has become an increasingly important issue, as the emergence of lignin as a by-product will predictably increase due to the bio-economic utilization of all wood constituents. Several approaches to lignin utilisation have previously been elaborated. The groups of Horst Nimz in Hamburg, Alois Hüttermann at the University of Göttingen and Gerhard Kühne at the Technical University of Dresden (all Germany) were probably the first to produce particleboards with a lignin-based adhesive - the two latter by applying laccase as catalyst. Wolfgang Glasser at the Polytechnical Institute of Virginia (USA) is a pioneer in the field of chemical modification of lignin to produce graft-copolymers to form polyurethane foams, adhesives, and coatings ( Glasser and Sarkanen 1989 ).

Recently, there has been a renaissance in lignin research driven by aim to produce biofuels from ligno-cellulose. For the future, further research efforts are expected with regard to the genetic modification of lignin as well as the investigation of lignin composition and the interaction of lignin with other cell wall components. As is already the case today, the valorisation of the technical lignin obtained as a by-product of pulp and biofuel will gain in importance in the future. Possible utilisations of technical lignin are as polymer materials, carbon fibres, activated carbon, antioxidant, antimicrobial actives, biochemical and smart materials.

The use of wood extractives and tree exudates partly dates back to Neolithic times. Examples are exudates (as varnishes, lacquers, gums), tannins, dyes, perfumes, rubber, and medicines. Special types of extractives are “naval stores”, a term that has been used since the 17th century. These materials, derived from pine resin, were originally applied as tar and pitch used in building and maintaining wooden sailing ships ( Hillis 1989 ). The major constituents of softwood resins belong to the chemical class of terpenes. Inspired by early studies of the French Chemist Pierre Eugène Marcelin Berthelot, August Kekulé (1829–1896) at the Universities of Gent (Belgium) and Bonn (Germany) coined the name “terpenes” for the hydrocarbons occurring in turpentine oil (German “Terpentin”) around 1860 ( Dev 1989 ). Later on, the term was extended also to other related compounds (the isoprenoids). Since 1955, the term “terpenoid” has gradually become the preferred generic name for this chemical class. “Terpenoid” is nowadays used synonymously with “terpene”. Otto Wallach at the Universities of Bonn and Göttingen (Germany) conducted pioneer studies and elucidated the chemical structure of terpenes. He discovered that terpenes are composed of isoprene (C 5 H 8 ) units and received the Nobel Prize in 1910. Wallach’s findings were published in the book “Terpene und Campher” ( Wallach 1909 ). Another pioneer of terpene chemistry was Adolf von Baeyer (1835–1917, Nobel Prize in 1905) at the University of Munich (Germany), who conducted comprehensive investigations on cyclic terpenes. Friedrich Wilhelm Semmler at the Polytechnic University of Breslau (then Germany) for the first time elucidated the chemical formula of a sesquiterpene, santalene, in 1910. Based on earlier findings of Berthelot and Wallach, Leopold Ružička (Nobel Prize in 1939) at ETH Zürich (Switzerland) formulated the “biogenetic isoprene rule” for terpenes (isoprenoids) in 1922. In the field of isoprenoids, Ružička mainly studied the chemistry of higher terpenes and steroids. Feodor Lynen at the Max Planck Institute for Cell Chemistry (nowadays Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry) in Munich as well as the University of Munich (Germany) and Konrad Bloch at Harvard University in Cambridge (USA) elucidated the biosynthesis of terpenes. In 1964, both researchers received the Nobel Prize of Physiology of Medicine in equal shares.

Tannins are a major group of polyphenols that can strongly influence certain properties of wood such as dimensional stability and durability. The term “tannin” derives from the ability of these compounds to turn animal skin into leather. Most probably, the Ancient Greeks of the archaic period (ca. 800–500 BC) first used this process with tannin preparations from oak galls. The structural elucidation of hydrolysable tannins started with the isolation of gallic acid from oak-galls by the Swedish chemist Carl Wilhelm Scheele in 1786. Gallic acid received its name from the French chemist Henri Braconnot (because of its origin from oak-galls), who also discovered ellagic acid and pyrogallic acid in 1831 at the University of Nancy (France). Julius Löwe at the University of Gießen (Germany) succeeded in the first synthesis of ellagic acid from gallic acid in 1868. Maximilian Nierenstein at the University of Bristol isolated ellagic acid from oak bark and other sources in 1905. Emil Fischer, Max Bergmann und Karl Freudenberg at the University of Berlin (Germany) showed that hydrolysable tannins are derivatives of glucose and digallic acid. In 1920, Freudenberg divided the tannins into the flavonoid-derived condensed tannins and into hydrolysable tannins. He also discovered the catechin structure and the synthesis of epicatechin (both structural units in condensed tannins) in 1925. Richard Willstätter at the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institute of Chemistry, Berlin (Germany) prepared pure anthocyanin in 1915 and Robert Robinson at the University of Oxford (UK) for the first time synthesised an anthocyanin in 1931.

After the Second World War, tannins and other polyphenols have been studied with increasing intensity in various plant-related scientific fields such as agriculture, ecology, food science and nutrition, and medicine rather than in wood science. Around 1950, Edgar Charles Bate-Smith and Tony Swain at the University of Cambridge (UK) investigated the phenolic constituents of plants using paper chromatography and suggested hexahydroxydiphenic acid to be part of the hydrolysable tannins. In 1956, Otto T. Schmidt and Walter Mayer at the University of Heidelberg (Germany) postulated that hexahydroxydiphenoyl esters are formed by oxidative coupling of galloyl ester groups. In 1951, Bate-Smith for the first time developed a coloration method to detect condensed tannins in plant materials. Early works of Bate-Smith and Swain as well as David G. Roux at the University of Orange Free State, Bloemfontein (South Africa) and of others revealed that condensed tannins are essentially polymers composed of flavanoid units. Tannins and other polyphenols have also been intensively studied by Edwin Haslam at the University of Sheffield (UK), who provided the first comprehensive definition of plant polyphenols referred to as the White–Bate-Smith–Swain–Haslam (WBSSH) definition in 1966 ( Quideau 2011 ). In wood technology, tannins found practical application as adhesives with low formaldehyde emission for wood-based panels. Antonio Pizzi at the University of Lorraine in Nancy (France) and Edmone Roffael at the University of Göttingen (Germany) have done important research in this area.

Suberin is a hydrophobic (lipophilic) substance typically found in the bark of the cork oak ( Quercus suber ), which is associated with a complex mixture of waxes. Robert Hooke first described suberin layers in 1665, when he examined suberised cork cells from the bark of Q. suber ( Kolattukudy and Espelie 1989 ). In 1877, Franz von Höhnel discovered the lamellar structure of suberin ( von Höhnel 1877 ). More than 60 years later, I. Ribas and E. Blasco found that glycerol is a part of suberin ( Ribas and Blasko 1940 ). Since the 1980s, the chemical structure of suberin with its aliphatic and phenolic (lignin-like) domain has been progressively elucidated with pioneer work being done by the group of Pappachan E. Kolattukudy at Washington State University, Pullman and at Ohio State University, Columbus, USA ( Kolattukudy 1980 ; Kolattukudy and Espelie 1989 ).

In the future, wood and lignocellulose will be used to produce platform chemicals that can replace petroleum-based basic chemicals currently used in the chemical industry. In this way, lignocelluloses could gradually replace petroleum as a source of raw materials for the chemical industry, thus placing wood chemistry at the centre of the chemical industry. This can be seen as a significant step in the economic transformation toward a bioeconomy. In addition to wood-based platform chemicals, also cell wall-based polymers and composites might play a pivotal role in future material research. Novel wood-based materials that respond and adapt to changing environmental conditions could become more important in the future data-driven society. By developing tunable materials, novel building blocks could be created that can be integrated into more complex future technologies.

3 Wood biology

Wood is defined as the tissue formed by the cambium through a periodical release of new cells to the inside thus forming growth increments. Such wood tissue is responsible for mechanical support of trees and shrubs, for the axial and radial transport of water and mineral solutes as well as for storage of reserve material. The botanical term for wood is “xylem”. Wood biology is a sub-discipline of wood science and deals with the formation and structure of xylem tissues and is based on analyses on macroscopic, microscopic, and molecular levels. Cambium and its activities as the meristematic tissue responsible for xylem formation generally are included in wood biological research. Wood biology also comprehends the physiological processes of wood-forming plants during their entire life, their interactions with the environment as well as endogenically driven processes, including obligatory heartwood formation representing secondary changes as the final step in the life cycle of xylem tissue of many tree species. Other secondary changes such as facultative heartwood formation and discolouration of wood in the living or freshly felled tree are associated with the biology of wood and may be caused by active responses of living tissue, by invading microorganisms or by biochemical reactions. Pathological aspects such as attack and decay by microorganisms play an important role in the understanding of the biology of wood. Xylem with annual layers may variously be used as an archive for interactions with the environment and climate. The scientific sub-discipline recording and interpreting such information is called dendrochronology, which allows the exact dating of tree-rings to the year they were formed. Dendroclimatology as one subfield of dendrochronology focusses on the reconstruction of present and past climates, whereas the other subfield called dendroecology deals with changes in local forest environments. Taxonomy is part of wood biological research using anatomical, chemical and genetic characteristics.

Scientific progress in wood biology was in the past and nowadays still is closely related to the methodological progress in biological sciences. A central point for such a relation in earlier times is the development of microscopy. In parallel to the improvement of light microscopy in the nineteenth and twentieth century, the introduction of electron microscopy in the 50s of the twentieth century, as well as the application of spectroscopic methods and synchrotron radiation during the last decades revealed more and more details on the tissue, cell, and molecular level. In the following, an overview on the history of wood biology is given, which is often combined with studies on general plant anatomy.

The beginnings date back into the seventeenth century, where Robert C. Hooke, Marcello Malpighi, Nehemiah Grew and Antoni van Leeuwenhoek were the first to start using simple light microscopes ( Figure 2 ). Hooke (1635–1703), as a universal microscopist, used his enormous technical skills for improving microscope quality, especially through optimized illumination and control of height and angle. He finally achieved magnifications of up to 50× and examined a variety of objects. In 1665, Robert C. Hooke published the book “Micrographia“, which contains details on the porosity of charcoal and the structure of cork. Hooke prepared thin hand sections and was able to identify “empty spaces” surrounded by “walls”. For the first time the term “cells” was used for those units. Around the same time, in the second half of the 17th century, Marcello Malpighi (1628–1694) and Nehemiah Grew (1628–1711) began a systematic approach to studying plant anatomy. Marcello Malpighi published his macroscopic and microscopic observations on plant structures in 1675 in the book entitled “Anatome Plantarum”. The rough inner structure of the bark could be revealed, vessels with spiral thickenings were identified as well as the ray system and some for this time astonishing details like bordered pits in softwoods and tyloses in hardwoods. With regard to the physiological role of the discovered plant structures, however, Malpighi oriented himself too much to animal tissue, which led him to too speculative and false interpretations ( Freund 1951 ; Metcalfe 1979 ). A few years later, in 1682, Nehemiah Grew published his principle work “The Anatomy of Plants” with comparative microscopic descriptions of the internal structure of hardwood and softwood species in relation to their three-dimensional appearance. Although Grew, like Malpighi, made some misinterpretations regarding structure-function relationships, he observed “little bladders” (or “cells”) evidencing the cellular structure of the plant body. Grew also demonstrated the existence of vessels in the “ligneous body” (i.e. xylem), bark fibres, pith tissue, and the so-called “inserted pieces” (i.e. the rays) ( Freund 1951 ; Metcalfe 1979 ). Especially, Grew clearly stated that his work should have the aim to search for common and distinguishing anatomical characteristics, which can be understood as the initiation of systematic plant anatomy. Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (1632–1722), the third pioneer of microscopical plant anatomy, described characteristics of numerous hardwoods and some softwoods. With his self-made and perfected microscope lenses, van Leeuwenhoek was able to recognize details such as bordered pits, perforation rims in vessels, and a macrofibrillar substructure of the cell wall ( Baas 1982a , b ). Additionally, he recognized relationships between tree-ring widths and wood quality when studying fast-growing ring-porous hardwoods with wide rings displaying better quality than slow-growing ring-porous trees with narrow rings; van Leeuwenhoek also realized that these relationships are the opposite in softwoods. As already mentioned for Malpighi and Grew, also van Leeuwenhoek compared some plant structures and their functions with those in animals, which in turn led to a number of misinterpretations. Nevertheless, van Leeuwenhoek’s achievements undoubtedly have to be acknowledged so that Malpighi, Grew and van Leeuwenhoek can be regarded as the fathers of wood anatomy and wood biology ( Baas 1982a ). As the 18th century was one of stagnation without significant progress in wood biology, the next milestones were reached in the 19th century with the work of several well-known botanists like Anton de Bary (1831–1888), Gottlieb Haberlandt (1854–1945), Theodor Hartig (1805–1880), Robert Hartig (1839–1901), Charles Francois Brisseau de Mirbel (1776–1854), Hugo von Mohl (1805–1872), Carl Wilhelm von Nägeli (1817–1891), Anselme Payen (1795–1871), Johann Evangelist Purkinje (1787–1869), Ludwig Radlkofer (1829–1927), Julius von Sachs (1832–1897), Karl Gustav Sanio (1832–1891), Hermann Schacht (1814–1864), Matthias Jakob Schleiden (1804–1881), Franz Joseph Unger (1800–1870), Julien Vesque (1848–1895), and Julius Wilhelm Albert Wigand (1821–1886). The discovery of the cambium and its description as a “building tissue” has to be highlighted as an important step in understanding and explaining secondary tree growth. A more detailed overview on the development of the concept of cambium as a cellular tissue responsible for wood and bark formation is given in Larson (1994) . Based on the early observations by de Mirbel and the use of Grew’s term “cambium”, the work of Unger, Schleiden, von Mohl, Purkinje, and especially von Nägeli substantially contributed to the understanding of the role of the cambium through the discovery of cell division as the central process for secondary growth and the protoplasm as the cell content responsible for all activities of living cells. Schleiden focused his work on the cytological aspects of plant cells creating the new field of plant cytology.

Selected scientists from the field of wood biology (see also Figure 4 with portraits of G.L. Hartig and R. Hartig). Copyright: von Nägeli : Wikimedia Commons; Bailey : Collection of Historical Sci. Instr., Harvard University/USA; Frey-Wyssling : ETH Zürich/Switzerland; Johannes Liese : courtesy of Walter Liese, Hamburg/Germany; Dadswell : CSIRO Melbourne/Australia; Wardrop : CSIRO Melbourne/Australia; Bosshard : ETH Zürich/Switzerland; Hillis : courtesy of Jugo Ilic, Melbourne/Australia; Schweingruber : WSL Birmensdorf/Switzerland.

Already at that time, increasing attention was paid to the structure of woody cell walls. Von Mohl was the first to describe the lamellar structure of a woody cell wall by applying polarized light microscopy, distinguishing only between primary and secondary lamellae without recognizing the tertiary lamella, which was identified later by Theodor Hartig; also, most structural details of bordered pits in conifers have been correctly shown by von Mohl. Payen has taken a chemical approach to the woody cell wall introducing the term “cellulose” for one of the constituents, which is “similar to starch”. Von Nägeli identified the cell wall consisting of crystalline cellulose and Mulder used the term “lignin” for “another constituent different to cellulose”. In 1850, Wigand resolved the problem of how two adjacent plant cells adhere to each other and was the first to identify a common middle lamella, which was confirmed a few years later by Sanio. Around 1870, some principles of formation and structure of woody cell walls have already been known. During the last decades of the 19th century, Robert Hartig established the new scientific branch of forest pathology and also published the first descriptions of fungal wood decay.

The twentieth century brought manifold technical progress, so that microstructural and chemical characteristics as well as physiological processes could be analyzed in much greater detail. Using conventional light microscopy as well as so called indirect methods such as polarization microscopy, X-ray diffraction and staining techniques, Irving W. Bailey (1884–1967) made a name for himself in the early decades and published several papers on the fine structure of wood tissues. He established the uninucleate condition of the fusiform cambial initials; together with his co-workers Kerr, Vestal and Berkley, Bailey also revealed details of the fine structure of the wood cell wall, especially the non-cellulosic nature of the middle lamella ( Scott 1955 ; Kerr and Bailey 1934 ). These studies finally aimed at an early and rather precise model of wood cell wall layering ( Kerr and Bailey 1934 ). Albert Frey-Wyssling (1900–1988) and Reginald Dawson Preston (1908–2000) substantially contributed to the knowledge about the fine structure of the wood cell wall by using light microscopy-based techniques. Johannes Liese (1891–1952) combined his knowledge on wood anatomy and decay mechanisms with intense studies on wood protection. Johannes Liese’s research in this field aimed at detailed descriptions of standardized testing methods for natural durability and wood preservatives.

With the introduction of the electron microscope to wood biology at around 1950, this novel tool opened a new dimension of structural wood biology. Pioneers in this field, who steadily improved preparation procedures, were Walter Liese (Germany) (*1926), Hiroshi Harada (Japan) (1923–1991), Wilfred Arthur Côté (USA) (1924–2012), Reginald Dawson Preston (UK), Alan Buchanan Wardrop (1921–2003), and Herbert Eric Dadswell (Australia) (1903–1964), Albert Frey-Wyssling, Kurt Mühlethaler (1919–2002) and Hans Heinrich Bosshard (Switzerland) (1925–1996). These early electron microscopic observations revealed numerous details of wood cell walls, such as precise wall layering, orientation of cellulose microfibrils, fine structure of pit membranes, and the occurrence of warts ( Liese and Côté 1960 ; Nimz 1965 ). The first electron micrograph of a pine bordered pit membrane ( Figure 3 ) taken in 1950 by Walter Liese at the institute of Ernst and Helmut Ruska in Berlin (in 1986 E. Ruska received the Nobel prize in physics for “his fundamental work in electron optics and for the design of the first electron microscope”). Central torus and peripheral margo fibrils are well visible. In the second half of the 20th century, Sherwin Carlquist (USA) (*1930), William Edwin (Ted) Hillis (Australia) (1921–2008), and Fritz Hans Schweingruber (Switzerland) (1936–2020) in particular made significant contributions to wood anatomy, representative for a number of other wood scientists all around the world working in the frame of the International Association of Wood Anatomists (IAWA).

First electron micrograph of a pine bordered pit membrane (photo courtesy of Walter Liese, Hamburg/Germany).

With the further improvement of methodology in recent decades, wood scientists and also botanists increasingly focused on biochemical as well as molecular aspects of wood formation ( Fromm 2013 ). Biochemistry in general deals with the structure and function of biological molecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates and lipids in all processes in a living tree, whereas molecular biology is usually defined as a subdiscipline of biochemistry that focuses only on the nucleic acids. A breakthrough in molecular biology has been achieved during the last 10–15 years by sequencing whole genomes of trees. Complete DNA sequences of forest trees were first published in 2006 for Populus trichorcar ( Tuskan et al. 2006 ) and in 2014 for Eucalyptus grandis ( Myburg et al. 2014 ). As the first conifer species, Picea abies was sequenced in 2013 ( Nystedt et al. 2013 ). Since then, the sequencing of several more tree genomes has been completed.

In the future, such molecular techniques open a new dimension of genetic engineering, primarily aiming at developing transgenic trees with modified characteristics, such as resistance to insect pests and harsh environmental conditions, improved growth for higher biomass production or even altered lignin contents (e.g., less lignin for chemical pulp production and more lignin for energy purposes). Another technique uses DNA markers for precisely tracing the origin of traded wood. This is very promising to further strengthen future activities to combat illegal logging. Besides these molecular techniques also classical macroscopic and microscopic wood identification are indispensable for supporting authorities in the control of globally traded wood. This is also true for the identification of CITES-protected species (CITES: Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora). Within the next few decades, it is expected that a high number of so-called lesser-known species will be increasingly traded, therefore existing databases on wood identification have to be continuously extended. Currently, in several laboratories scientists are working on the development of reliable automatic identification systems. Wood biology with its diverse research fields, e.g., on cell wall formation processes, on cell wall fine structure, and aspects on structure-function relationships, remains important also through large overlapping with research activities in wood chemistry and wood physics.

4 Wood physics

wood chemistry

wood anatomy and biology as well as

classical physics, mechanics and strength of materials

Wood physics is understood as the “theory of the physical and mechanical properties of wood and wood-based materials”. Figure 4 shows selected important scientists.

Selected scientists from the fields of wood physics and wood based materials (with a focus on wood physics). Copyright: Duhamel de Monceau, Cotta, R. Hartig, P. Hartig, Perkitny, Flemming, Klauditz, Vorreiter, Trendelenburg, Keylwerth, Bodig : Niemz and Sonderegger (2021) ; Ugolev: P. Niemz ; Schneider, Kollmann: Holzforschung München/Germany ; Skaar, Siau, Maloney, Stamm : Forest Products Laboratory, Madison/USA.

the behaviour of wood related to moisture (basics of moisture sorption, swelling and shrinkage)

the influence of temperature on the wood properties, the heat conduction and the heat storage and

the mechanical, rheological and acoustic properties of wood and wood-based materials.

Wood physics also deals with the theory of the relationships between structure and properties of solid wood and wood-based materials and their modelling. Due to the natural character of wood as a biological material, a number of material-specific properties are to be taken into account compared to other materials such as steel and concrete. Some examples are inhomogeneity, anisotropy and hygroscopic behaviour of wood. All wood properties depend on wood moisture, temperature and time.

Knowledge of the mechanical-physical properties is an important basis for the production of timber and wood-based materials, their processing and appropriate use. The development and the use of modern manufacturing processes and computer-aided manufacturing also require comprehensive knowledge of the physical-mechanical properties of wood and wood-based materials.

In industrial manufacturing, physical effects or properties are increasingly used for quality control. Examples include lumber grading, colorimetry and detection of wood defects (e.g., tracheid effect). In the field of quality control, today, e.g., sound propagation, eigenfrequency measurement, colorimetry, X-ray radiation, laser technology and NIR spectroscopy as well as electrical property measurements (for humidity measurement) are used. Almost all methods of classical material research are used in wood research today (nanoindentation, atomic force microscopy, mechanical testing in the environmental scanning microscope, spectroscopy (e.g., IR, NIR, FTIR, RAMAN) including correlations with physical and mechanical properties. Various optical methods of strain measurement are state of the art today (e.g., based on photogrammetry as digital image correlation).

The first scientific approaches to characterize physico-mechanical properties of wood date back to e.g., Henri Louis Duhamel du Monceau (1700–1782) and Georges-Louis Leclerc de Buffon (1707–1788). Leclerc de Buffon was the first to describe the correlation between wood density and strength ( Köstler et al. 1960 ). He already carried out tests to compare the properties of small specimens with those of large ones. But, a lot of basic work was also done earlier (material characteristics, density measurements), which is described in older encyclopaedias [e.g., Johann Georg Krünitz (1728–1796), “Oekonomische Encyclopädie” (The Oeconomic Encyclopaedia), published between 1773 and 1858, 242 volumes with 600–800 pages each] ( Matejak and Niemz 2011 ).

Between 1750 and 1830 there was a flood of publications on wood production and utilization (Beckmann 1780). In particular, works by Georg Ludwig Hartig (1764–1837) and Heinrich Cotta (1763–1844) with the focus on strength properties should be mentioned here. During this time, the linear thermal expansion of wood was also investigated for the first time (Struwe, Glatzel, Villari), however, the hygroscopic behaviour of wood was not yet sufficiently taken into account. Building on all this work, Karl Karmarsch published an overview on the properties and processing (technology) of wood in the “Handbook of Mechanical Technology” in 1837 ( Karmarsch 1851 ). Academic education at universities in the field of forest and wood dates back to this time. In Germany, the first forestry departments were founded at the beginning of the nineteenth century (e.g., in Tharandt, Hannoversch-Münden) ( Scamoni 1960 ).

Extensive work on recording the properties of wood began in the middle of the nineteenth century ( Hartig 1885 ). Nördlinger published detailed properties of wood in 1860 ( Nördlinger 1860 ). The work of B. Volbehr in Kiel, Germany (1896), on wood swelling should also be mentioned. At the beginning of the twentieth century, Janka in Austria carried out extensive studies on wood hardness and strength ( Köstler et al. 1960 ). In this way, many elements of today’s wood science were developed, but there was not yet a “science of wood” in the true sense. This is not least due to the fact that there was no targeted wood research in corresponding research institutes until 1910. The research was more or less focused on forestry or forest utilization. This is still the case today in some countries.

First summaries of the state of the art of wood science were presented in 1936 by Franz Kollmann (1906–1987), ( Kollmann 1936 ) and in 1939 by Reinhard Trendelenburg (1907–1941) ( Trendelenburg 1939 ). In this context, the work of Leopold Vorreiter (1904–1984) published in 1949 should also be mentioned ( Vorreiter 1949 ). Kollmann’s book in the second, greatly expanded edition under the title “Technology of Wood and Wood-Based Materials” (in German) is still a standard work in wood research today ( Kollmann 1951 ). This has primarily documented the status of the scientific work. In collaboration with Wilfred Arthur Côté Jr, it also was published in an English version ( Kollmann and Côté 1968 ). In the USA, the Wood Handbook of the Forest Products Laboratory was first issued in 1935 and slightly revised in 1939. The most recent edition was published in 2010, which is available online. The focus of this book to date has been on the transfer of scientific knowledge into the practice of wood use. Alfred Stamm ( Stamm 1964 ) summarized in particular the physical properties of wood in his book “Wood and Cellulose Science”. Joachim Radkau published a very interesting overview of the history of timber use (in German: Radkau 2007 ; in English: Radkau 2012 ).

The founding of wood research institutes, the industrialisation of wood processing, the increased use of wood in construction and the development of wood materials (plywood since 1900 in Germany, fibreboard since 1900 in England, particleboard since 1940 in Germany), led to a large number of publications in the field of wood physics.

From the beginning to the middle of the twentieth century, wood physics research was intensively pursued in the field of mechanical engineering and aviation engineering. Many well-known scientists were active in this field. Particularly worth mentioning are Franz Kollmann (Germany), Rudolf Keylwerth (Germany), R. L. Hankinson (USA), and Arvo Ylinen (Finland). Well-known contributions also came from the physics itself such as the study of piezoelectric properties by Alexei V. Shubnikov ( Shubnikov 1946 ) and Eiichi Fukada ( Fukada 1955 ). A trend that is increasingly appreciated today.

Many studies on mechanics date back to the period around Second World War, when a great deal of wood research was carried out worldwide ( Anderson 2010 ; Steinsiek 2008 ). After the Second World War physical research focused on the physics of wood-based materials (Rudolf Keylwerth (1912–1969), Wilhelm Klauditz (1903–1963) both Germany, Fred Fahrni Switzerland (1907–1979)). Thomas Maloney (1938–2014) made a major contribution to the development of wood-based materials in the United States at Washington State University ( Maloney 1999 ).

Research into the fundamentals of the basics of structural mechanics and fracture behaviour has gained considerable importance, in particular through the use of modern computational methods (e.g., finite element method, multi-scale modelling), see e.g. Kent Persson (2000) . Substantial work has been done in particular in the USA, Japan, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Russia (e.g., Ugolev 1986 , 2014 ), and Sweden ( Table 2 ).

Overview of selected works on wood physics ( Niemz 1993 ; Niemz and Sonderegger 2021 ).

In 1982, Bodig (1934–2007) and Jayne published the first overview of the structural and fracture mechanics of wood and wood-based materials in their book “Mechanics of Wood and Wood Composites” ( Bodig and Jayne 1982 ).

The rheological properties of wood (e.g., Roth (1935), Dinwoodie, Niemz (1982), Martensson, Ranta-Maunus, Hunt, Gressel (1972), Hanhijärvi (1995)

The fracture behaviour of wood and wood-based materials by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and acoustic emission analysis (e.g., Beall, Kitayama, Nogouchi, Landis),

The determination of defects and quality control of wood and wood-based materials on the basis of wood-physical effects (especially in USA: Galligan, Pellerin, Beall, and Japan: Fukada, Tsuchikawa)

Colour measurements

Grading and quality control of wood and wood-based materials (strength, internal defects, colour deviations, structural defects, e.g., Glos, TU Munich/Germany).

In recent years, research has also been increasingly devoted to the microscopic, submicroscopic and molecular fields (e.g., Bodig and Jayne 1982 ; Geitman and Gril 2018 ).

Modern wood physics research requires cooperation of experts from different disciplines (e.g., wood science, physics, chemistry, mechanics, materials science) ( Geitman and Gril 2018 ; Montero et al. 2012 ). Only in this way can methods such as computed tomography in the synchrotron, X-ray microtomography, neutron tomography or wave propagation in wood be successfully applied.

Acknowledgments

This article is an adapted version of a chapter by Peter Niemz, Carsten Mai and Uwe Schmitt, in: Niemz, Peter, Teischinger, Alfred and Sandberg, Dick (Eds.). Handbook of wood science and technology . Springer, Heidelberg. The book is expected to be published in 2022. The use of material from the said chapter in the present article is granted with kind permission from Springer, Heidelberg. The present review includes several parts that were previously published in Niemz and Sonderegger (2021) . The selected sections of the original publication were translated into English, and the content has been expanded and adapted to the structure of the Springer Handbook of wood science and technology . The authors and Springer, Heidelberg are grateful to Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich for having granted kind permission. The authors would like to thank Prof. i.R. Dr. rer. nat. habil. Otto Wienhaus, TU Dresden for a fruitful discussion.

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: None declared.

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

Anderson, J. (2010). USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory celebrating a century of accomplishments . Madison: USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory One Gifford Pinchot Drive Madison. Search in Google Scholar

Baas, P. (1982a). Antoni van Leeuwenhoek and his observations on the structure of the woody cell wall. IAWS Bulletin 3: 3–6, https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000737 . Search in Google Scholar

Baas, P. (1982b). Systematic, phylogenetic, and ecological wood anatomy - history and perspectives. In: Baas, P. (Ed.). New perspectives in wood anatomy . The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 23–58. 10.1007/978-94-017-2418-0_2 Search in Google Scholar

Battista, O.A. (1950). Hydrolysis and crystalization of cellulose. Ind. Eng. Chem. 42: 502–507, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50483a029 . Search in Google Scholar

Bodig, J. and Jayne, B. (1982). Mechanics of wood and wood composites . New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Search in Google Scholar

De Candolle, M. (1813). Theorie elementaire de la botanique ou exposition des principes de la classification naturelle et de l’Art de decrire et d’etudier les vegetaux . Paris: Detervill. Search in Google Scholar

Dev, S. (1989). Terpenoids. In: Rowe, J. (Ed.), Natural products of woody plants , Vol. 1. Berlin, Springer, pp. 691–807. 10.1007/978-3-642-74075-6_19 Search in Google Scholar

Dotterweich, M. (2013). The history of human-induced soil erosion: geomorphic legacies, early descriptions and research, and the development of soil conservation – a global synopsis. Geomorphology 201: 1–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.07.021 . Search in Google Scholar

Freudenberg, K. and Neish, A.C. (1968). Constitution and biosynthesis of lignin . Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-85981-6 Search in Google Scholar

Freund, H. (1951). Geschichte der Anatomie des Holzes. In: Schmucker, T.J. (Ed.). Handbuch der Mikroskopie in der Technik. Band V, Teil 1 . Frankfurt, Umschau, pp. 1–78. Search in Google Scholar

Fromm, J. (Ed.) (2013). Cellular aspects of wood formation . Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-36491-4 Search in Google Scholar

Fukada, E. (1955). Piezoelectricity of wood. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 10: 149–154, https://doi.org/10.1143/jpsj.10.149 . Search in Google Scholar

Glasser, G. and Sarkanen, S. (1989). Lignin: properties and materials . In: ACS Symposium Series 397. American Chem. Soc., Washington. 10.1021/bk-1989-0397 Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, K.H. and Blackwell, J. (1974). The structure of native cellulose. Biopolymers 13: 1975–2001, https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.1974.360131005 . Search in Google Scholar

Geitman, A. and Gril, J. (Eds.) (2018). Plant biomechanics: from structure to function at multiple scales . Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-79099-2 Search in Google Scholar

Hartig, R. (1885). Das Holz der deutschen Nadelbäume . Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-91659-5 Search in Google Scholar

Hillis, W. (1989). Historical uses of extractives and exudates. In: Rowe, J. (Ed.), Natural products of woody plants , Vol. 1. Berlin, Springer, pp. 1–13. 10.1007/978-3-642-74075-6_1 Search in Google Scholar

Hon, D.N.S. (1994). Cellulose: a random walk along its historical path. Cellulose 1: 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00818796 . Search in Google Scholar

Hughes, J. (2011). Ancient deforestation revisited. J. Hist. Biol. 44: 43–57, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-010-9247-3 . Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, J., Krumhardt, K., and Zimmermann, N. (2009). The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe. Quat. Sci. Rev. 28: 3016–3034, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.09.028 . Search in Google Scholar

Karhunen, P., Rummako, P., Sipilä, J., Brunow, G., and Kilpeläinen, I. (1995). Dibenzodioxocins: a novel type of linkage in softwood lignins. Tetrahedron Lett. 36: 169–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-4039(94)02203-n . Search in Google Scholar

Karmarsch, K. (1851). Handbuch der mechanischen Technologie . Hannover: Hellwingsche Hofbuchhandlung. Search in Google Scholar

Kerr, T. and Bailey, I. (1934). The cambium and its derivative tissues: No. X. Structure, optical properties and chemical composition of the so-called middle lamella. J. Arnold Arboretum 15: 327–349, https://doi.org/10.5962/p.185316 . Search in Google Scholar

Kisser, J.G., Ylinen, A., Freudenberg, K., Kollmann, F., Liese, W., Thunell, B., and Stamm, A.J. (1967). History of wood science. Wood Sci. Technol. 1: 161–190, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00350460 . Search in Google Scholar

Kobayashi, S., Kashiwa, K., Shimada, J., Kawasaki, T., and Shoda, S. (1992). Enzymatic polymerization: the first in vitro synthesis of cellulose via nonbiosynthetic path catalyzed by cellulase. Macromol. Symp. 54: 509–518, https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.19920540138 . Search in Google Scholar

Kolattukudy, P. (1980). Biopolyester membranes of plants: cutin and suberin. Science 208: 990–100, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.208.4447.990 . Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Kolattukudy, P.E. and Espelie, K.E. (1989). Chemistry, biochemistry, and function of suberin and associated waxes. In: Rowe, J.W. (Ed.), Natural products of woody plants , Vol. 1. Berlin, Springer, pp. 304–368. 10.1007/978-3-642-74075-6_11 Search in Google Scholar

Kollmann, F. (1936). Technologie des Holzes . Berlin: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Kollmann, F. (1951). Technologie des Holzes und der Holzwerkstoffe. Bd.1 , 2nd ed., Part 1. Berlin: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Kollmann, F. and Côté, W.Jr. (1968). Principles of wood science and technology . Part 1. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-87928-9 Search in Google Scholar

Köstler, J.N., Kollmann, F., and v. Massov, V. (1960). Denkschrift zur Lage der Forstwirtschaft und Holzforschung . Wiesbaden: Steiner. Search in Google Scholar

Larson, P. (1994). The vascular cambium. Development and structure . Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-78466-8 Search in Google Scholar

Liese, W. and Côté, W. (1960). Electron microscopy of wood: results of the first ten years of research . In: Proc. 5th World Forestry Congress, Vol. 2. Seattle/USA, pp. 1288–1298. Search in Google Scholar

Maloney, T. (1999). Wood research and technology (1949–1999) . Pullmann City/Washington: Washington State University. Search in Google Scholar

Matejak, M. and Niemz, P. (2011). Das Holz in deutschen Texten zwischen 1587 und 1922 . Holzphysik: ETH Zürich, Institut für Baustoffe (research collection in ETH library), Zürich. Search in Google Scholar

Metcalfe, C. (1979). History of systematic anatomy. Part 1: general anatomy. In: Metcalfe, C. and Chalk, L. (Eds.), Anatomy of the dicotyledons , 2nd ed., Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–4. Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, K. and Misch, L. (1937). Positions des atomes dans le nouveau modèle spatial de la cellulose. Helv. Chim. Acta 20: 232–244, https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.19370200134 . Search in Google Scholar

Montero, C., Gril, J., Legeas, C., Hunt, D.G., and Clair, B. (2012). Influence of hygromechanical history on the longitudinal mechanosorptive creep of wood. Holzforschung 66: 757–764, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2011-0174 . Search in Google Scholar

Myburg, A., Grattapaglia, D., Tuskan, G.A., Hellsten, U., Hayes, R.D., Grimwood, J., Jenkins, J., Lindquist, E., Tice, H., Bauer, D., et al.. (2014). The genome of Eucalyptus grandis. Nature 510: 356–362, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13308 . Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Niemz, P. (1993). Physik des Holzes und der Holzwerkstoffe . Leinfelden-Echterdingen: DRW Weinbrenner. Search in Google Scholar

Niemz, P. and Sonderegger, W. (2021). Physik des Holzes und der Holzwerkstoffe , 2nd ed. München: Carl Hanser. Search in Google Scholar

Nimz, H. (1965). Über die milde Hydrolyse des Buchenlignins, II. Isolierung eines 1,2-Diaryl-propan-Derivates und seine Überführung in ein Hydroxystilben. Chem. Ber. 98: 3160–3164, https://doi.org/10.1002/cber.19650981010 . Search in Google Scholar

Nishikawa, N. and Ono, S. (1913). Transmission of X-rays through fibrous, lamellar and granular substances. Proc. Tokyo Math. Phys. Soc. 7: 131–138. Search in Google Scholar

Nördlinger, H. (1860). Die technischen Eigenschaften der Hölzer . Stuttgart: Cottascher. Search in Google Scholar

Nystedt, B., Street, N.R., Wetterbom, A., Zuccolo, A., Lin, Y.-C., Scofield, D.G., Vezzi, F., Delhomme, N., Giacomello, S., and Alexeyenko, A. (2013). The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 497: 579–584, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12211 . Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Payen, A. (1838). Mémoire sur la composition du tissu propre des plantes et du ligneux (Memoir on the composition of the tissue of plants and of woody [material]). C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 7: 1052–1056. Search in Google Scholar

Persson, K. (2000). Micromechanical modelling of wood and fibre properties . Lund: Lund University. Search in Google Scholar

Quideau, S.D.-C. (2011). Plant polyphenols: chemical properties, biological activities, and synthesis. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50: 586–621, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201000044 . Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Radkau, J. (2007). Holz: Wie ein Naturstoff Geschichte schreibt . München: Oecom. Search in Google Scholar

Radkau, J. (2012). Wood: a history . Cambridge: Polity. Search in Google Scholar

Ribas, I. and Blasko, E. (1940). Investigaciones sobre el corcho. I. Sobre la existencia de glicerina. An. R. Soc. Esp. Fis. Quim. 36B: 141–147. Search in Google Scholar

Scamoni, A. (1960). Die Entwicklung der forstlichen Lehre und Forschung in Berlin und Eberswalde. Forst und Jagd 10: 536–539. Search in Google Scholar

Schulze, E. (1891). Zur Kenntnis der chemischen Zusammensetzung der pflanzlichen Zellmembranen. Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Ges. 24: 2277–2287, https://doi.org/10.1002/cber.18910240210 . Search in Google Scholar

Schulze, F. (1856). Beitrag zur Kenntniß des Lignins und seines Vorkommens im Pflanzenkörper . Rostock: Universität Rostock. Search in Google Scholar

Scott, L. (1955). Plant anatomy researches of I.W. Bailey. Nature 116: 709–710, https://doi.org/10.1038/176709a0 . Search in Google Scholar

Shubnikov, A. (1946). Piezoelectric textures. Moskova, Russia: Izvestiya Akademii Nauk, Seriya Biologicheskaya . Moscow, Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences, Biological Series, p. 84. Search in Google Scholar

Stamm, A.J. (1964). Wood and cellulose science . New York: Ronald. Search in Google Scholar

Staudinger, H. and Eilers, H. (1936). Über hochpolymere Verbindungen. 136. Mitteil.: Über den Bau der Stärke. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 69: 819–848, https://doi.org/10.1002/cber.19360690433 . Search in Google Scholar

Steinsiek, M.P. (2008). Forst- und Holzforschung im “Dritten Reich” . Remhagen: Kessel. Search in Google Scholar

Timell, T. (1967). Recent progress in the chemistry of wood hemicelluloses. Wood Sci. Technol. 1: 45–70, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00592255 . Search in Google Scholar

Trendelenburg, R. (1939). Das Holz als Rohstoff . München: Hanser. Search in Google Scholar

Tuskan, G.A., DiFazio, S., Jansson, S., Bohlmann, J., Grigoriev, I., Hellsten, U., Putnam, N., Ralph, S., Rombauts, S., Salamov, A., et al.. (2006). The genome of Black Cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313: 1596–1604, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128691 . Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ugolev, B. (1986). Holzkunde und Grundlagen der Holzwarenkunde . Moscow: Lensn. Prom. (in Russian). Search in Google Scholar

Ugolev, B. (2014). Historische Meilensteine der Holzforschung in Russland und Blick in die Zukunft . Moscow: Bauman University (in Russian). Search in Google Scholar

Von Hohnel, F. (1877). Über den Kork und das verkorkte Gewebe überhaupt. Sitzungsberichte der Wiener Akad. Wiss. 76: 507–562. Search in Google Scholar

Vorreiter, L. (1949). Holztechnologisches Handbuch . Wien: Fromme. Search in Google Scholar

Wallach, O. (1909). Terpene und Campher . Leipzig: Veit. Search in Google Scholar

© 2021 Carsten Mai et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

• X / Twitter

Supplementary Materials

Please login or register with De Gruyter to order this product.

Journal and Issue

Articles in the same issue.

Official Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society

Aims and scope

The Journal of Wood Science is the official journal of the Japan Wood Research Society. This journal provides an international forum for the exchange of knowledge and the discussion of current issues in wood and its utilization. The journal publishes original articles on basic and applied research dealing with the science, technology, and engineering of wood, wood components, wood and wood-based products, and wood constructions. Articles concerned with pulp and paper, fiber resources from non-woody plants, wood-inhabiting insects and fungi, wood biomass, and environmental and ecological issues in forest products are also included. In addition to original articles, the journal publishes review articles on selected topics concerning wood science and related fields. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts from any country.

Open access

All articles published by the Journal of Wood Science  are made freely and permanently accessible online immediately upon publication, without subscription charges or registration barriers. Further information about open access can be found here .

As authors of articles published in the Journal of Wood Science you are the copyright holders of your article and have granted to any third party, in advance and in perpetuity, the right to use, reproduce or disseminate your article, according to the SpringerOpen copyright and license agreement .

For those of you who are US government employees or are prevented from being copyright holders for similar reasons, SpringerOpen can accommodate non-standard copyright lines. Please contact us if further information is needed.

Article processing charges (APC)

Authors who publish open access in Journal of Wood Science are required to pay an article processing charge (APC). The APC price will be determined from the date on which the article is accepted for publication.

The current APC, subject to VAT or local taxes where applicable, is: £1190.00/$1990.00/€1690.00

Visit our open access support portal and our Journal Pricing FAQs for further information.

Open access funding

Visit Springer Nature’s open access funding & support services for information about research funders and institutions that provide funding for APCs.

Springer Nature offers agreements that enable institutions to cover open access publishing costs. Learn more about our open access agreements to check your eligibility and discover whether this journal is included.

Springer Nature offers APC waivers and discounts for articles published in our fully open access journals whose corresponding authors are based in the world’s lowest income countries (see our APC waivers and discounts policy for further information). Requests for APC waivers and discounts from other authors will be considered on a case-by-case basis, and may be granted in cases of financial need (see our open access policies for journals for more information). All applications for discretionary APC waivers and discounts should be made at the point of manuscript submission; requests made during the review process or after acceptance are unable to be considered.

Indexing Services

All articles published in Journal of Wood Science are included in:  

• Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch)
• Current Contents/Engineering, Computing and Technology
• Science Citation Index
• El Compendex
• Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition
• Google Scholar
• EBSCO Discovery Service
• Cat Discovery Service
• ProQuest-ExLibris Summon
• Gale Academic OneFile
• ProQuest-ExLibris Primo
• Japanese Science and Technology Agency (JST)
• Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China
• Elsevier Biobase
• Chemical Abstract Service (CAS)
• CAB Abstracts

The full text of all articles is deposited in  digital archives  around the world to guarantee long-term digital preservation. You can also access all articles published by SpringerOpen on  SpringerLink . 

We are working closely with relevant indexing services including PubMed Central and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) to ensure that articles published in Journal of Wood Science will be available in their databases when appropriate.

Peer-review policy

Peer-review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal. You can read more about the peer-review process here .

Journal of Wood Science operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Publication of research articles by Journal of Wood Science is dependent primarily on their scientific validity and coherence as judged by our external expert editors and/or peer reviewers, who will also assess whether the writing is comprehensible and whether the work represents a useful contribution to the field. Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates already published work, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. Reviewers will also be asked to indicate how interesting and significant the research is. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board.

Citing articles in Journal of Wood Science

Articles in Journal of Wood Science should be cited in the same way as articles in a traditional journal. Because articles are not printed, they do not have page numbers; instead, they are given a unique article number.

Article citations follow this format:

Authors: Title. J Wood Sci [year], [volume number]:[article number].

e.g. Roberts LD, Hassall DG, Winegar DA, Haselden JN, Nicholls AW, Griffin JL: Increased hepatic oxidative metabolism distinguishes the action of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor delta from Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma in the Ob/Ob mouse. J Wood Sci 2009, 1 :115.

1 :115 refers to article 115 from Volume 1 of the journal.

Editorial policies

All manuscripts submitted to Journal of Wood Science should adhere to SpringerOpen's editorial policies .

Once your article is accepted, it will be processed by production and published shortly afterwards. In some cases, articles may be held for a short period of time prior to publication. If you have any concerns or particular requirements please contact the Journal.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appeals and complaints

Authors who wish to appeal a rejection or make a complaint should follow the procedure outlined in the BMC Editorial Policies .

Benefits of publishing with SpringerOpen

High visibility.

Journal of Wood Science 's open access policy allows maximum visibility of articles published in the journal as they are available to a wide, global audience. 

Speed of publication

Journal of Wood Science offers a fast publication schedule whilst maintaining rigorous peer review; all articles must be submitted online, and peer review is managed fully electronically (articles are distributed in PDF form, which is automatically generated from the submitted files). Articles will be published with their final citation after acceptance, in both fully browsable web form, and as a formatted PDF; the article will then be available through Journal of Wood Science and SpringerOpen.

Flexibility

Online publication in Journal of Wood Science gives you the opportunity to publish large datasets, large numbers of color illustrations and moving pictures, to display data in a form that can be read directly by other software packages so as to allow readers to manipulate the data for themselves, and to create all relevant links (for example, to PubMed , to sequence and other databases, and to other articles).

Promotion and press coverage

Articles published in Journal of Wood Science are included in article alerts and regular email updates.  In addition, articles published in Journal of Wood Science may be promoted by press releases to the general or scientific press. These activities increase the exposure and number of accesses for articles published in Journal of Wood Science . 

Authors of articles published in Journal of Wood Science retain the copyright of their articles and are free to reproduce and disseminate their work (for further details, see the copyright and license agreement ).

For further information about the advantages of publishing in a journal from SpringerOpen, please click here .

• Editorial Board
• Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal

Annual Journal Metrics

2022 Citation Impact 2.9 - 2-year Impact Factor 3.0 - 5-year Impact Factor 1.269 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper) 0.641 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

2023 Speed 18 days submission to first editorial decision for all manuscripts (Median) 119 days submission to accept (Median)

2023 Usage 662,652 downloads 62 Altmetric mentions

Associated Society

Journal of Wood Science is affiliated with The Japan Wood Research Society .

Submit your manuscript in Editorial Manager

• ISSN: 1611-4663 (electronic)

• Hispanoamérica
• Work at ArchDaily
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy

From Tradition to Innovation: How Modern Technologies are Transforming the Potential of Wood

• Written by Maria-Cristina Florian
• Published on September 21, 2023

Wood, one of the oldest building materials, has been continuously reinvented throughout history. As contemporary architecture becomes more and more concerned with sustainability and environmental responsibility, the popularity of the material has also increased. As trees absorb carbon dioxide during their growth, their wood stores that carbon, keeping it out of the atmosphere. The materials derived from wood are thus associated with less greenhouse gas emissions on the condition of trees being harvested from sustainably managed forests. But in order to capture the full potential of this material, a plethora of techniques and modifications have evolved with the purpose of adapting and customizing wood’s characteristics to the demands of modern design and construction. From t hermal modification to engineered wood or versatile particle boards , these methods not only enhance wood’s suitability for the rigors of contemporary architecture but also expand the usability of this sustainable material to an unprecedented scale.

Engineered Wood : Laminating and Gluing

Engineered wood is a large category describing construction materials created by binding together layers of particles of wood using adhesives and advanced manufacturing processes. The processes are used to optimize the strength, stability, and dimensional consistency of the material while also enabling the creation of large structural elements out of trees with relatively small sections. Some of the most common types of laminated panels, also commonly referred to as ‘mass timber ,’ are Glued Laminated Timber (Glulam ), Cross Laminated Timber (CLT ), and Laminated veneer lumber (LVL).

Related Article

The structural qualities of these materials depend on the manufacturing process. Glulam is created by bonding individual segments of wood with industrial adhesives. As the fibers of the wood are oriented in the same direction, this type of wood is best used for large-sized structural elements such as beams or columns. On the other hand, CLT consists of planks of sawn and glued wood, with each layer oriented perpendicular to the previous one. This creates structural stiffness in both directions, similar to plywood , but with thicker components. CLT panels can function as structural walls, floors, furniture, ceilings, and roofs, with their thickness and dimensions adapted during the prefabrication phase. LVL is built by combining thin layers of veneer with the grain running in the same direction, with uses similar to Glulam, but featuring a higher performance and allowing for smaller cross sections compared to softwood glulam.

Read more: The Meteoric Rise of Cross-Laminated Timber Construction: 50 Projects that Use Engineered-Wood Architecture

Pressure and Heat Treatments

Thermal modification is a wood treatment process involving exposure to high temperatures in kilns, reducing moisture content to nearly 0%. This eliminates bonding water and free water within wood cells, which reduces deformations and stabilizes the wood. Steam is then applied, bringing humidity to 4-7%, making it viable. Thermally Modified Timber (TMT) is more stable and moisture resistant compared to untreated wood, reducing the risk of cracking and warping while maintaining its natural appearance.

Pressure treatments are used to force wood preservatives or fire retardants into the internal structure of the wood. This can prolong the timber ’s longevity by safeguarding it against wood-eating insects and fungal decay. Additionally, fire retardant treatments also increase the versatility of wood by minimizing the smoke and flames produced during a fire. The applications expand from interior framing to wood exposed to outside conditions, including utility poles, railroad ties, deck boards and fence pickets.

Read more: How Thermal Modification Can Make Wood in Architecture Last a Lifetime

Aggregating Wood Particles

Wood particle boards are one of the most versatile and widely used construction materials, often used as wall coverings, furniture, ceilings, and even flooring. To obtain them, wood fibers, particles, or fragments are bonded together with adhesives and resins, resulting in robust panels with various properties depending on the type of aggregates and adhesives.

Oriented Strand Board (OSB) is known for its strength and cost-effectiveness. While OSB panels are most commonly used as sheathing as one of the many invisible layers of a building, many designers have also explored their potential in interior design . Medium-Density Fiberboard (MDF) features smooth surfaces, becoming a preferred material for carpentry, while Medium-Density Particleboard (MDP) uses wood debris such as sawdust mixed with resin, offering a lower-cost solution. Plywood boards are processed similarly to CLT , but at a different scale, created by overlapping wood sheets glued perpendicularly and heat pressed.

Read more: Wooden Boards: Differences Between MDF, MDP, Plywood, and OSB

Surface Treatments

There are numerous surface treatments that can be applied to wood to enhance its appearance, durability, and protection. Some common types of surface treatments for wood include painting, staining, varnishing, lacquering, and oil and wax finishes. While some of these rely on modern materials, vernacular and traditional techniques also sought to prolong the longevity of wood. One such technique is the Japanese craft of carbonizing wood. The method, now over three hundred years old, involves burning the outer layer of the wood, creating a layer of charred material that protects the inner structure from termites, fungi, and other natural elements.

Read more: Carbonized Wood: A Traditional Japanese Technique That Has Conquered the World

Most wooden structures and applications of wood in architecture employ wood shaped into straight elements such as beams and flat panels. Wood , however, has its own elasticity, a property that can be explored and heightened through various techniques. Steam bending is one of the first ones used, as exemplified by German carpenter Michael Thonet who pioneered the method at the beginning of the 1800s, creating furniture designs that continue to be popular to this day. Glued Laminated Wood also allows for shape modifications by gluing pieces following a mold of the desired curvature while respecting the material restrictions of the type of wood used. This opens the possibility of creating larger pieces fit for architectural use. The Kerf Cut method, on the other hand, gives more flexibility but also weakens the structural qualities of the resulting element.

Read more: How to Bend Wood

Post-Tensioning

Post-tensioning, a form of prestressing, is a technique most commonly used for concrete structures to improve their structural performance and allow for thinner elements. When talking about wood, post-tensioning integrates structural elements made of engineered timber , like beams, walls, or columns, with steel bars or tendons. The steel elements are affixed to the timber components and are then tensioned using hydraulic jacks, introducing a force within the timber element to counterbalance the expected external loads. The resulting elements feature increased seismic resilience in addition to the added structural efficiency.

Read more: Learn About Seismic Design of Wooden Buildings With These Online Resources

This article is part of the ArchDaily Topics: The Future of Wood in Architecture presented by Tantimber ThermoWood .

Tantimber ThermoWood brings the timeless warmth of wood to modern design. Natural, renewable, and non-toxic, they transform sustainably sourced wood species into dimensionally stable and durable wood products for use in residential and commercial building and design projects. Find out more about how the enduring beauty of ThermoWood brings warmth to the built environment.

Every month we explore a topic in-depth through articles, interviews, news, and architecture projects. We invite you to learn more about our ArchDaily Topics . And, as always, at ArchDaily we welcome the contributions of our readers; if you want to submit an article or project, contact us .

Image gallery

• Sustainability

世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!

想浏览archdaily中国吗, you've started following your first account, did you know.

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.

• Poznań University of Life Sciences
• Virtual dean's office

Research topics

Researching activity.

At present in Department of Wood Science a research in two main filds there is being carried out:

• ecological (biological) wood science - a  a relation environment – forest – tree – wood,
• technical wood science - in relation wood – various interactions – wood properties: resonance wood, propagation of ultasound, ultastructure of wood, hygro-mechanical properties of wood (creep of wood), moisture content (strength of earlywood and latewood).

Copyright © 2020

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

• Publications
• Our Methods
• Short Reads
• Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

About 1 in 5 U.S. teens who’ve heard of ChatGPT have used it for schoolwork

Roughly one-in-five teenagers who have heard of ChatGPT say they have used it to help them do their schoolwork, according to a new Pew Research Center survey of U.S. teens ages 13 to 17. With a majority of teens having heard of ChatGPT, that amounts to 13% of all U.S. teens who have used the generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot in their schoolwork.

Teens in higher grade levels are particularly likely to have used the chatbot to help them with schoolwork. About one-quarter of 11th and 12th graders who have heard of ChatGPT say they have done this. This share drops to 17% among 9th and 10th graders and 12% among 7th and 8th graders.

There is no significant difference between teen boys and girls who have used ChatGPT in this way.

The introduction of ChatGPT last year has led to much discussion about its role in schools , especially whether schools should integrate the new technology into the classroom or ban it .

Pew Research Center conducted this analysis to understand American teens’ use and understanding of ChatGPT in the school setting.

The Center conducted an online survey of 1,453 U.S. teens from Sept. 26 to Oct. 23, 2023, via Ipsos. Ipsos recruited the teens via their parents, who were part of its KnowledgePanel . The KnowledgePanel is a probability-based web panel recruited primarily through national, random sampling of residential addresses. The survey was weighted to be representative of U.S. teens ages 13 to 17 who live with their parents by age, gender, race and ethnicity, household income, and other categories.

This research was reviewed and approved by an external institutional review board (IRB), Advarra, an independent committee of experts specializing in helping to protect the rights of research participants.

Here are the  questions used for this analysis , along with responses, and its  methodology .

Teens’ awareness of ChatGPT

Overall, two-thirds of U.S. teens say they have heard of ChatGPT, including 23% who have heard a lot about it. But awareness varies by race and ethnicity, as well as by household income:

• 72% of White teens say they’ve heard at least a little about ChatGPT, compared with 63% of Hispanic teens and 56% of Black teens.
• 75% of teens living in households that make $75,000 or more annually have heard of ChatGPT. Much smaller shares in households with incomes between $30,000 and $74,999 (58%) and less than $30,000 (41%) say the same.

Teens who are more aware of ChatGPT are more likely to use it for schoolwork. Roughly a third of teens who have heard a lot about ChatGPT (36%) have used it for schoolwork, far higher than the 10% among those who have heard a little about it.

When do teens think it’s OK for students to use ChatGPT?

For teens, whether it is – or is not – acceptable for students to use ChatGPT depends on what it is being used for.

There is a fair amount of support for using the chatbot to explore a topic. Roughly seven-in-ten teens who have heard of ChatGPT say it’s acceptable to use when they are researching something new, while 13% say it is not acceptable.

However, there is much less support for using ChatGPT to do the work itself. Just one-in-five teens who have heard of ChatGPT say it’s acceptable to use it to write essays, while 57% say it is not acceptable. And 39% say it’s acceptable to use ChatGPT to solve math problems, while a similar share of teens (36%) say it’s not acceptable.

Some teens are uncertain about whether it’s acceptable to use ChatGPT for these tasks. Between 18% and 24% say they aren’t sure whether these are acceptable use cases for ChatGPT.

Those who have heard a lot about ChatGPT are more likely than those who have only heard a little about it to say it’s acceptable to use the chatbot to research topics, solve math problems and write essays. For instance, 54% of teens who have heard a lot about ChatGPT say it’s acceptable to use it to solve math problems, compared with 32% among those who have heard a little about it.

Note: Here are the  questions used for this analysis , along with responses, and its  methodology .

• Artificial Intelligence
• Technology Adoption
• Teens & Tech

Olivia Sidoti is a research assistant focusing on internet and technology research at Pew Research Center

Jeffrey Gottfried is an associate director focusing on internet and technology research at Pew Research Center

Many Americans think generative AI programs should credit the sources they rely on

Americans’ use of chatgpt is ticking up, but few trust its election information, q&a: how we used large language models to identify guests on popular podcasts, striking findings from 2023, what the data says about americans’ views of artificial intelligence, most popular.

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Energy Smart Appliances: launch of an EU Code of Conduct for interoperability

First 10 manufacturers commit to the EU Code of Conduct which aims to ensure interoperability of home appliances. This would contribute to a greater demand-side flexibility of households and help achieve a more stable and optimised power grid.

As renewables’ penetration renders the energy supply in the EU increasingly decentralised and reliant on variable resources, demand-side flexibility offered by households gains importance for ensuring the development and operation of the power grid at lowest costs for consumers.

Energy smart appliances (ESA) in homes enable consumers to shift electricity use depending on the preferences and other parameters, contributing to the stability of the power grid, or potentially lowering the electricity bill of the household. An example is running a heat pump or turning on a dishwasher when renewable generation is most abundant, whilst still delivering the service expected by the consumer (e.g. certain minimum temperatures, or to finish a wash cycle before a certain time).

Any energy control unit can usually manage automatically the energy consumption of an ESA. Unlike non-interoperable appliances, which have specific control systems and services depending on their manufacturers, interoperable ESA should offer common services and exchange the same information to enable them. These will allow for instance enabling a flexible start of a device or simply limiting its consumption regardless of the manufacturer.

To bring about cross-brand interoperability of widely used ESA, the JRC and the Commission’s Directorate-General for Energy developed a Code of Conduct (CoC) together with manufacturers.  This voluntary initiative aims to increase the number of interoperable energy smart appliances placed on the EU market.

The objective of the Code of Conduct is to define common demand flexibility services and the information that needs to be exchanged to enable them, at a semantic level that can work even where different technical communication protocols are used by manufacturers.

Product manufacturers (from the products in scope of this version), industry associations, NGOs, academia, and Member States were all involved in the process of creating this first version of the Code of Conduct. While the commitment is taken by the manufacturers of the products in scope, other relevant actors of the energy system are asked to acknowledge this Code of Conduct.

This first version of the Code of Conduct covers a range of appliances that have an energy label:

• white goods: washing machines, tumble driers, washer-driers, dishwashers;
• heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), including heat pumps and water heating.

It also includes the following “use cases”:

• flexible start
• power consumption monitoring
• limitation of power consumption
• incentive table-based power consumption management
• manual operation (provision of necessary information in case of user driven manual operation of ESA)

At the time of the launch, we have received the commitment of 10 companies producing appliances in the scope of this first version, namely Arçelik, Clivet, Daikin, Electrolux, Miele, Mitsubishi Electric, Panasonic, Vaillant Group, Vestel and Viessmann . The manufacturers have committed to develop interoperable connected products within a year . In addition, a Home Energy Management System manufacturer, GEO, has committed to support compliant ESA through their products.

Besides being beneficial for consumers, products that comply with the Code of Conduct would ultimately help several objectives through the increase of demand side flexibility, such as to improving the environmental impact of energy use over the whole energy system, contributing to grid stability and security of supply, and economical optimisation.

Related links

Code of Conduct for Interoperability of Energy Smart Appliances project website

Code of Conduct on energy management related interoperability of Energy Smart Appliances (V.1.0) (PDF)

Survey on interoperability of Energy Smart Appliances

EU Energy Day at the Hannover Fair

• Energy solutions

More news on a similar topic

• General publications
• 8 March 2024

• News announcement
• 26 February 2024

• 14 February 2024

Share this page

Magnetic microcoils unlock targeted single-neuron therapies for neurodegenerative disorders

Magpatch array features single-neuron precision for advanced cochlear implants and vagus nerve stimulation in the future.

Researchers deploy an array of microscopic coils to create a magnetic field and stimulate individual neurons. The magnetic field can induce an electric field in any nearby neurons, the same effect created by an electrode but much more precise. They used an array of eight coils, which combined can induce electric fields using much less current per coil, and employed soft magnetic materials, which boost the magnetic strength of the coils. The researchers constructed a prototype of their coil array, called MagPatch, and encapsulated it within a biocompatible coating.

Neural stimulation is a medical technique used to treat many illnesses affecting the nervous system. It involves applying energy to neurons to encourage them to grow and make connections with their neighbors. Treatments for epilepsy can often include neural stimulation, and similar treatments exist for Parkinson's disease, chronic pain, and some psychiatric illnesses.

In the Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A , by AIP Publishing, researchers from the University of Minnesota deployed an array of microscopic coils -- microcoils -- to create a magnetic field and stimulate individual neurons.

Existing devices are effective, but lack the necessary precision needed for some applications, such as cochlear implants or vagus nerve stimulators.

"There are several neurostimulation devices on the market -- some are already FDA-approved for patient trials, some are pending approval," said author Renata Saha. "But each of them has one caveat -- they stimulate a large population of neurons, including neighboring cells that are not supposed to be stimulated. The medical device industry is in search of a device or technique that can stimulate neurons at a single-cell resolution."

Instead of using an electrode, Saha and her team turned to magnetic coils of wire. Over two centuries ago, physicist Michael Faraday described how electric current running through a coil of wire can create a magnetic field. This magnetic field can then induce an electric field in any nearby neurons -- the same effect created by an electrode but much more precise. However, this technique comes with a major downside.

"To achieve the desired threshold of electric field capable of stimulating neurons, the amount of current these microcoils need to drive is extremely high," said Saha. "It is almost three times the amount of current that needs to drive an electrode to achieve the same threshold."

To solve this problem, the team made two improvements. First, rather than a single microcoil, they used an array of eight coils, which combined can induce electric fields using much less current per coil. The authors made further improvement to these microcoil arrays by employing soft magnetic materials, which boost the magnetic strength of the coils.

"Adding these soft magnetic materials at the core of the microcoils increases the electric field without the need to increase the current through the microcoils," said Saha.

The researchers constructed a prototype of their coil array, called MagPatch, and encapsulated it within a biocompatible coating. They then tested it with human neuroblastoma cells to demonstrate its effectiveness. The cells were affected by the magnetic fields without being harmed by the coating, suggesting the potential to use this device in clinical settings.

The authors plan to continue developing and testing the MagPatch device to ensure its safety and utility. They hope it helps to improve the next generation of cochlear implants.

• Medical Devices
• Medical Imaging
• Nervous System
• Disorders and Syndromes
• Brain Injury
• Medical Technology
• Energy Technology
• Electricity
• Magnetic field
• Electrical conduction
• Transformer
• Power station
• Magnetic resonance imaging
• Three-phase electric power
• Radiant energy
• Electromagnetic radiation

Story Source:

Materials provided by American Institute of Physics . Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference :

• Renata Saha, Onri J. Benally, Sadegh Faramarzi, Robert Bloom, Kai Wu, Denis Tonini, Maple Shiao, Susan A. Keirstead, Walter C. Low, Theoden I. Netoff, Jian-Ping Wang. Planar microcoil arrays for in vitro cellular-level micromagnetic activation of neurons . Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B , 2024; 42 (3) DOI: 10.1116/6.0003362

Cite This Page :

Explore More

• Fossil Frogs Share Their Skincare Secrets
• Fussy Eater? Most Parents Play Short Order Cook
• Precise Time Measurement: Superradiant Atoms
• Artificial Cells That Act Like Living Cells
• Affordable and Targeted Anticancer Agent
• This Alloy Is Kinky
• Giant Galactic Explosion: Galaxy Pollution
• Flare Erupting Around a Black Hole
• Two Species Interbreeding Created New Butterfly
• Warming Antarctic Deep-Sea and Sea Level Rise

Trending Topics

Strange & offbeat.

Suggestions or feedback?

MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology

• Machine learning
• Social justice
• Black holes
• Classes and programs

Departments

• Aeronautics and Astronautics
• Brain and Cognitive Sciences
• Architecture
• Political Science
• Mechanical Engineering

Centers, Labs, & Programs

• Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL)
• Picower Institute for Learning and Memory
• Lincoln Laboratory
• School of Architecture + Planning
• School of Engineering
• School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences
• Sloan School of Management
• School of Science
• MIT Schwarzman College of Computing

Professor Emeritus Bernhardt Wuensch, crystallographer and esteemed educator, dies at 90

Press contact :.

Previous image Next image

MIT Professor Emeritus Bernhardt Wuensch ’55, SM ’57, PhD ’63, a crystallographer and beloved teacher whose warmth and dedication to ensuring his students mastered the complexities of a precise science matched the analytical rigor he applied to the study of crystals, died this month in Concord, Massachusetts. He was 90.

Remembered fondly for his fastidious attention to detail and his office stuffed with potted orchids and towers of papers, Wuensch was an expert in X-ray crystallography, which involves shooting X-ray beams at crystalline materials to determine their underlying structure. He did pioneering work in solid-state ionics, investigating the movement of charged particles in solids that underpins technologies critical for batteries, fuel cells, and sensors. In education, he carried out a major overhaul of the curriculum in what is today MIT’s Department of Materials Science and Engineering (DMSE).

Despite his wide-ranging research and teaching interests, colleagues and students said, he was a perfectionist who favored quality over quantity.

“All the work he did, he wasn’t in a hurry to get a lot of stuff done,” says DMSE’s Professor Harry Tuller. “But what he did, he wanted to ensure was correct and proper, and that was characteristic of his research.”

Born in Paterson, New Jersey, in 1933, Wuensch first arrived at MIT as a first-year undergraduate in the 1950s. He earned bachelor’s and master’s degrees in physics before switching to crystallography and earning a PhD from what was then the Department of Geology (now Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences). He joined the faculty of the Department of Metallurgy in 1964 and saw its name change twice over his 46 years, retiring from DMSE in 2011.

As a professor of ceramics, Wuensch was a part of the 20th-century shift from a traditional focus on metals and mining to a broader class of materials that included polymers, ceramics, semiconductors, and biomaterials. In a 1973 letter supporting his promotion to full professor, then-department head Walter Owen credits Wuensch for contributing to “a completely new approach to the teaching of the structure of materials.”

His research led to major advancements in understanding how atomic-level structures affect magnetic and electrical properties of materials. For example, Tuller says, he was one of the first to detail how the arrangement of atoms in fast-ion conductors — materials used in batteries, fuel cells, and other devices — influences their ability to swiftly conduct ions.

Wuensch was a leading light in other areas, including diffusion, the movement of ions in materials such as liquids or gases, and neutron diffraction, aiming neutrons at materials to collect information about their atomic and magnetic structure.

Tuller, a DMSE faculty member for 49 years, tapped Wuensch’s expertise to study zinc oxide, a material used to make varistors, semiconducting components that protect circuits from high-voltage surges of electricity. Together, Tuller and Wuensch found that in such materials ions move much more rapidly along the grain boundaries — the interfaces between the crystallites that make up these polycrystalline ceramic materials.

“It’s what happens at those grain boundaries that actually limits the power that would go through your computer during a voltage surge by instead short-circuiting the current through these devices,” Tuller says. He credited the partnership with Wuensch for the knowledge. “He was instrumental in helping us confirm that we could engineer those grain boundaries by taking advantage of the very rapid diffusivity of impurity elements along those boundaries.”

In recognition of his accomplishments, Wuensch was elected a fellow of the American Ceramics Society and the Mineralogical Society of America and belonged to other professional associations, including The Electrochemical Society and Materials Research Society. In 2003 he was awarded an honorary doctorate from South Korea’s Hanyang University for his work in crystallography and diffusion-related phenomena in ceramic materials.

“A great, great teacher”

Known as “Bernie” to friends and colleagues, Wuensch was equally at home in the laboratory and the classroom. “He instilled in several generations of young scientists this ability to think deeply, be very careful about their research, and be able to stand behind it,” Tuller says.

One of those scientists is Sossina Haile ’86, PhD ’92, the Walter P. Murphy Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at Northwestern University, a researcher of solid-state ionic materials who develops new types of fuel cells, devices that convert fuel into electricity.

Her introduction to Wuensch, in the 1980s, was his class 3.13 (Symmetry Theory). Haile was at first puzzled by the subject, the study of the symmetrical properties of crystals and their effects on material properties. The arrangements of atoms and molecules in a material is crucial for predicting how materials behave in different situations — whether they will be strong enough for certain uses, for example, or can conduct electricity — but to an undergraduate it was “a little esoteric.”

“I certainly remember thinking to myself, ‘What is this good for?’” Haile says with a laugh. She would later return to MIT as a PhD student working alongside Wuensch in his laboratory with a renewed perspective.

Previous item Next item

“He just made seemingly esoteric topics really interesting and was very astute in knowing whether or not a student understood.” Haile describes Wuensch’s articulate speech, “immaculate” handwriting, and detailed drawings of three-dimensional objects on the chalkboard. Haile notes that his sketches were so skillful that students felt disappointed when they looked at a figure they tried to copy in their notebooks.

“They couldn’t tell what it was,” Haile says. “It felt really clear during lecture, and it wasn’t clear afterwards because no one had a drawing as good as his.”

Carl Thompson, the Stavros V. Salapatas Professor in Materials Science and Engineering at DMSE, was another student of Wuensch’s who came away with a broadened outlook. In 3.13, Thompson recalls Wuensch asking students to look for symmetry outside of class, patterns in a brick wall or in subway station tiles. “He said, ‘This course will change the way you see the world,’ and it did. He was a great, great teacher.”

In a 2005 videorecorded session of 3.60 (Symmetry, Structure, and Tensor Properties of Materials), a graduate class that he taught for three decades, Wuensch writes his name on the board along with his telephone extension number, 6889, pointing out its rotational symmetry.

“You can pick it up, turn it head-over-heels by 180 degrees, and it’s mapped into coincidence with itself,” Wuensch said. “You might think I would have had to have fought for years to get it, an extension number like that, but no. It just happened to come my way.”

(The class can be watched in its entirety on MIT OpenCourseWare .)

Wuensch also had a whimsical sense of humor, which he often exercised in the margins of his students’ papers, Haile says. In a LinkedIn tribute to him, she recalled a time she sent him a research manuscript with figures that was missing Figure 5 but referred to it in the text, writing that it plotted conductivity versus temperature.

“Bernie noted that figures don’t plot; people do, and evidently Figure 5 was missing because ‘it was off plotting somewhere,’” Haile wrote.

Reflecting on Wuensch’s legacy in materials science and engineering, Haile says his knowledge of crystallography and the manual analysis and interpretation he did in his time was critical. Today, materials science students use crystallographic software that automates the algorithms and calculations.

“The current students don’t know that analysis but benefit from it because people like Bernie made sure it got into the common vernacular at the time when code was being put together,” Haile said.

A multifaceted tenure

Wuensch served DMSE and MIT in innumerable other ways, serving on departmental committees on curriculum development, graduate students, and policy, and on School of Engineering and Institute-level committees on education and foreign scholarships, among others. “He was always involved in any committee work he was asked to do,” Thompson says.

He was acting department head for six months starting in 1980, and in 1988-93 he was the director of the Center for Materials Science and Engineering, an earlier iteration of today’s Materials Research Center.

For all his contributions, there are few things Wuensch was better known for at MIT than his office in Building 13, which had shelves lined with multicolored crystal lattice models, representing the arrangements of atoms in materials, and orchids he took meticulous care of. And then there was the cityscape of papers, piled in heaps on the floor, on his desk, on pullout extensions. Thompson says walking into his office was like navigating a canyon.

“He had so many stacks of paper that he had no place to actually work at his desk, so he would put things on his lap — he would start writing on his lap,” Haile says. “I remember calling him at one point in time and talking to him, and I said, ‘Bernie, you’re writing this down on your lap, aren’t you?’ And he said, ‘In fact, yes, I am.’”

Wuensch was also known for his kindness and decency. Angelita Mireles, graduate academic administrator at DMSE, says he was a popular pick for graduate students assembling committees for their thesis area examinations, which test how prepared students are to conduct doctoral research, “because he was so nice.”

That said, he had exacting standards. “He expected near perfection from his students, and that made them a lot deeper,” Tuller says.

Outside of MIT, Wuensch enjoyed tending his garden; collecting minerals, gemstones, and rare coins; and reading spy novels. Other pastimes included fishing and clamming in Maine, splitting his own firewood, and traveling with his wife, Mary Jane.

Wuensch is survived by his wife; son Stefan Wuensch and wife Wendy Joseph; daughter Katrina Wuensch and partner Jason Staly; and grandchildren Noemi and Jack.

Friends and family are invited to a memorial service Sunday, April 28, at 1:30 p.m. at Duvall Chapel at 80 Deaconess Road in Concord, Massachusetts. Memories or condolences can be posted at obits.concordfuneral.com/bernhardt-wuensch .

Share this news article on:

Related links.

• Materials Research Laboratory
• Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Related Topics

• Education, teaching, academics
• Energy storage
• Materials science and engineering

Related Articles

A green hydrogen innovation for clean energy

Harry Tuller honored for career advancing solid-state chemistry and electrochemistry

Harry Tuller wins Egleston Medal for his electroceramics work

More mit news.

Mapping the brain pathways of visual memorability

Read full story →

How light can vaporize water without the need for heat

“No one can work in civil engineering alone”

This tiny chip can safeguard user data while enabling efficient computing on a smartphone

Researchers detect a new molecule in space

Erin Bahm, Steven Parks named 2024–25 UPS Fellows

• More news on MIT News homepage →

Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, USA

• Map (opens in new window)
• Events (opens in new window)
• People (opens in new window)
• Careers (opens in new window)
• Accessibility
• Social Media Hub
• MIT on Facebook
• MIT on YouTube
• MIT on Instagram

Journal of the International Academy of Wood Science

Volume 57, Issue 3

Hygroscopy and adaptive architectural façades: an overview.

• Rana El-Dabaa
• Sherif Abdelmohsen

Modification with carboxymethylation-activated alkali lignin/glutaraldehyde hybrid modifier to improve physical and mechanical properties of fast-growing wood

A novel three-dimensional model for the prediction of ultrasonic velocity in wood considering its orthotropy

• Jérôme Sonagnon Afoutou
• Frédéric Dubois
• Mokhfi Takarli

Physicomechanical properties of raw and comminuted pine and poplar shavings: energy consumption, particle size distribution and flow properties

• Paweł Tryjarski
• Aleksander Lisowski
• Paweł Obstawski

Fractal dimension of wood cell wall pores from pore size distribution: insights from nitrogen gas adsorption analyzer

• Dessie T. Tibebu
• Stavros Avramidis
• Christopher Walters

Prediction of moisture-induced cracks in wooden cross sections using finite element simulations

• Florian Brandstätter
• Maximilian Autengruber
• Josef Füssl

Effect of heat treatment on the electrical conductivity of carbon–nitrogen onion nanomaterial based on the interpolyelectrolyte complex lignosulfonate–chitosan

• Olga Brovko
• Irina Palamarchuk
• Nikolay Bogdanovich

A route of polyethylene glycol-based phase change heat storage wood with AlN as the thermal conductive filler

• Weiye Zhang

Effect of solvent type and pH degree on the chemical composition of kraft black liquor via ARAS method

• Esra Ceylan
• Ayben Kilic-Pekgözlü

Toward a logistic model of dynamic mold growth on wood

• Pavel Kopecký
• Kamil Staněk
• Jan Tywoniak

Maturation-related phenolic compounds in cachaça aged in oak barrels: influence of reuses

• Mariana Costa Castro
• Giovanni Casagrande Silvello
• André Ricardo Alcarde

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Harvard Kennedy School faculty members get creative and collaborative in a new artificial intelligence course module

“The Science and Implications of Generative AI” equips learners with the skills to use AI technology responsibly for societal benefit.

Since Open AI’s ChatGPT arrived at the end of 2022, generative artificial intelligence has been big news, with many companies scrambling to develop their own tools. The technology is already changing the way people work and learn, provoking excitement about its potential and anxiety about misuse.

To help Harvard Kennedy School students better understand generative AI — technology that can generate images or text based on prompts, such as ChatGPT—faculty members Sharad Goel, Dan Levy, and Teddy Svoronos developed an interdisciplinary course module, DPI-681M , “The Science and Implications of Generative AI ,” which they are teaching for the first time this semester. The course provides a background in how the technology works, plenty of hands-on exercises, and a curriculum that emphasizes how HKS students—future policymakers and public leaders—“can harness AI technology responsibly for the benefit of society.” They have also made much of the module materials public —including short videos, readings, and exercises—so that more people can benefit from these lessons.

“It’s important that when people leave the Kennedy School to go into policy positions, they have knowledge and informed opinions about generative AI.”

Teddy svoronos.

Sharad Goel , a professor of public policy, recalls that the idea for the course started in the early fall 2023. A number of HKS faculty members were experimenting with generative AI in the core courses, including an AI tool they called StatGPT that helped students in the core MPP courses practice and learn statistics. Goel found students were coming to him in office hours looking to learn about generative AI, and he realized there weren’t many opportunities at Harvard to do so. 

The hope, Goel says, is that HKS students “become sophisticated and responsible users of AI.”

Goel worked with Levy , a senior lecturer in public policy, and Svoronos , a lecturer in public policy, to develop the module quickly, despite full teaching loads. It was important and timely. Svoronos says he was concerned about people brushing off the technology and underestimating it. “If policymakers have a perspective that this is not a big deal, we are in deep trouble,” he says. “A lot of people making these tools see the potential. If we have a divide where the people who were going to potentially regulate it or think about the public good are not really paying attention to it, that’s quite troubling. It’s important that when people leave the Kennedy School to go into policy positions, they have knowledge and informed opinions about generative AI.”

To provide students with a thorough grounding of the technology and its implications, the course is divided into units on the science of how generative AI works, how individuals and organizations can use the technology, and its implications for society. “Designing this course represented a really exciting challenge. The field is evolving so rapidly that it is hard to keep up,” Levy says. “So, we sought to strike a balance between helping students learn things that are likely to be helpful regardless of how AI evolves while at the same time adapting in real time to the changes that might make some course ideas obsolete or irrelevant.”

Much of the classroom experience is hands-on. For example, to help understand the science, the instructors have an exercise with students acting as neurons in a deep neural network, a layered machine learning algorithm that mimics the way the human brain processes information. In class, students get their computers out, experiment with prompts to generate interesting results, build chatbots, and document what they are seeing. “We’re focusing on collaborative activities to get people to experiment,” Svoronos says, “because the goal is for people to shift their mindsets toward experimenting more and being comfortable enough with the tools to see what they can do and then decide whether they should use them.”

“Our hope is that they become sophisticated and responsible users of AI.”

Sharad goel.

Levy says that teaching with Goel and Svoronos was a special experience. “All three of us are in the classroom in every class session, with one of us at the front of the room at any one time,” he says. “This means that there are sessions where one or two of us gets to experiment what it feels like to be a student in the classroom. It is an incredible privilege and joy to be in a classroom to learn, especially about a field as exciting as this one.”

While “The Science and Implications of Generative AI” is a new module this spring, the teaching team hopes to develop it into a semester-long course and bring similar lessons into HKS Executive Education programming. A new HKS webpage also pulls together information on courses, events, and other resources on artificial intelligence.

Faculty-created chatbots and AI tools

Beyond the course Goel, Levy, and Svoronos teach, experimentation on AI abounds at HKS, with faculty members using machine learning in their teaching and research in a variety of ways. Instructors are using the latest version of StatGPT, which is now dubbed PingPong, to help their students learn, ask questions, and walk through problems—along with other customized bots. These tools give students additional support, complementing the work of the teaching teams.

For students—or anyone, really—hoping to make their writing more effective, there is an AI tool created by Todd Rogers , the Weatherhead Professor of Public Policy. Rogers, who studies the science of behavior change, built a free “ AI for Busy Readers ” email coaching tool. It edits emails so they are easy to skim by applying the principles from his book Writing for Busy Readers , coauthored with Jessica Lasky-Fink. You can submit any email and the AI tool will suggest a revision. “We developed this AI tool to help my students see what their emails could look like if they were written specifically for busy readers,” Rogers says. “To my surprise, students keep using the tool—and sharing it! In just the last few months we’ve exceeded 100,000 uses—and it’s still growing exponentially.”

“We sought to strike a balance between helping students learn things that are likely to be helpful regardless of how AI evolves while at the same time adapting in real time to the changes that might make some course ideas obsolete or irrelevant.”

And Julia Minson , an associate professor of public policy, is using the power of artificial intelligence to roleplay and take on personas. Minson, who studies the psychology of disagreement, is developing a bot to simulate conversations with someone with whom you might disagree. This tool will give people the opportunity to practice the hard skills of constructive conversation in a low-stakes environment. “One of the greatest challenges of improving your skills around disagreement is willingness to practice,” Minson says. “But practice is hard when there are serious interpersonal stakes attached. A chatbot can really take that pressure off.”

While the technology behind artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly sophisticated at an astonishing rate, School faculty members are experimenting to help students become more thoughtful, knowledgeable, and responsible future policy professionals.

Photographs by Jessica Scranton; Portraits by Martha Stewart

More from HKS

Artificial intelligence at hks, hks experts discuss how to harness, and how to rein in, artificial intelligence, using ai to combat medical misdiagnosis and improve patient care.

Get smart & reliable public policy insights right in your inbox.