tok exhibition essay criteria

• Customer Reviews
• Extended Essays
• IB Internal Assessment
• Theory of Knowledge
• Literature Review
• Dissertations
• Essay Writing
• Research Writing
• Assignment Help
• Capstone Projects
• College Application
• Online Class

IB TOK Exhibition Rubric: Learn About the Assessment Criteria

by  Antony W

January 9, 2024

This guide covers everything you need to know about TOK exhibition rubric. We’ve included everything you need to know about the assessment criteria so that you can have an easy time working on the assignment.

Introduced to the TOK syllabus in 2022, the ToK Exhibition  subject is a replacement for the ToK Presentation. 

The exhibition is an individual project worth 33% of the total grades awarded to the Theory of Knowledge subject.

Although the TOK Exhibition is a relatively new subject, it’s not complicated because the concepts taught in the subject are easy to understand.

Your TOK teacher is the one to moderate the work, so you do have the opportunity to ask as many questions as you can to get the assignment right.

The aim of the Theory of Knowledge Exhibition is to assess your ability to apply ToK concepts  to the real world.

If you can demonstrate your ability to discuss the subject matter that you’ve studied in the classroom, based on evidence, you’re already a step ahead to score good marks for the exhibition.

Once you have looked at exhibition examples and understood the basic requirements of the TOK exhibition, spend some time to understand how your teacher evaluates and marks the work.

You will get the information in the assessment instrument that your teacher will share with you.

TOK Exhibition Rubric Explained

Below is a detailed explanation of the TOK Exhibition rubric:

Scoring a zero means you failed to meet the standards that IB set for the TOK exhibition project.

In other words, either you’ve failed to submit your assignment or it doesn’t reflect the standards set out by other levels in this assessment criteria.

Also, it’s possible to get a zero if your TOK exhibition doesn’t answer one of the topics provided in the IA prompts .  

Rudimentary (1 to 2)

A student who earns rudimentary score has identified the three TOK exhibition objects but failed to explain their real-world context.

Also, you score 1 to 2 marks if you present generic images instead of real-world objects - or images of objects.

IB teachers also award 1 to 2 points to students who link minimally between their IA prompts and the objects.

More often than not, tenuous linking means a student isn’t sure about what they’re trying to communicate.

Rudimentary marks show that a student offered minimal justification for including the three objects in their exhibition.

Also, the commentary isn’t descriptive enough or includes assertions that you haven’t attempted to support.

Basic (3 to 4)

IB students who earn 3 to 4 marks for their exhibition are those who have identified the three objects in their exhibition but failed to state the real-world context of these objects.

They have made link between their selected IA prompt and the objects, but they don’t offer a comprehensive and convincing explanation of the link.

If you score the basic marks, it’s because your justification for including the objects in the commentary is but superficial. And although you’ve given reasons for including the three objects in your work, you’ve not backed them with relevant evidence.

Basic marks is also an indication that your commentary has a series of repetition in the text.

Satisfactory (5-6)

You have successfully identified three objects in the TOK exhibition. However, your objects’ real-world context is vague.

While you’ve explained the link between the IA prompt and the three objects, your explanation doesn’t meet the standards set by the TOK Exhibition assessment criteria because it’s weak.

 In other words, you only include brief explanation for including each object in the exhibition, backing only a few of your points with evidence.

If you score a 7 or an 8, it means you’ve identified the three objects, explained their real-world context, linked the three objects to each other, and explained how each object (or image of objects) relates to your IA prompt.

In addition to justifying the contributions the objects make to the exhibition, you’ve included evidence and reference link to the IA prompt to make your work as comprehensive as you possibly can.

However, your work isn’t suitable for the excellent marks because it lacks clarity and precision in some parts.

Excellent (9-10)

It’s the highest score awarded to TOK learners whose exhibitions identify three objects, their definite real-world contexts, and make clear links between the selected IA prompts and the three objects.

Your exhibition demonstrates strong justification for the specific contribution that individual objects make and provides appropriate evidence for all the   points you’ve made.

Also, your work includes clear references from each object back to your chosen IA prompt.

The TO Exhibition Assessment Cornerstone

The overriding objective of the TOK exhibition is to show how theory of knowledge (TOK) manifests itself in the real world.

To do this, you have to demonstrate four skill sets in your exhibition.

These include the following:

1. Interlinking Ideas

 Your exhibition commentary should explain the links or connections between your chosen objects and the IA prompt.

You also need to make distinct references to the IA prompt

2. Justification for Ideas

Your TOK commentary should feature a bold justification for why you have chosen the objects for your exhibition.

You should do this within the core theme context or one of the optional themes in TOK .

3. Using Evidence

Support all the points you make in your commentary with evidence.

Hinge all opinions and ideas you use on real-life situations and you can even use ideas by top thinkers to support your points or opinions.

4. Identifying the Real-world Context

In TOK exhibition, you have to go beyond identifying the three objects – or images of the objects. You also have to explain their real-world context.

In other words, you have to choose images of objects or real objects as opposed to just generic objects.

Final Thoughts

Page 47 of the TOK subject guide outlines the rubric for the exhibition.

The criteria include information on what you should do to get the highest marks, so you should aim to get a 7 to an 8 if not a 9 to a 10.

About the author 

Antony W is a professional writer and coach at Help for Assessment. He spends countless hours every day researching and writing great content filled with expert advice on how to write engaging essays, research papers, and assignments.

IB ToK Exhibition - The Definitive Guide

Ace your IB ToK Exhibition with the definitive guide of 2023! Nail IB and become a standout in your class. Read it now!

Table of content

Without further adieu, let’s dive in!

Hola Folks!

It’s been quite a roller coaster for students who have opted for the TOK (Theory Of Knowledge) Diploma Programme, with the new syllabus introduced in August 2020. TOK Exhibition is probably the most important addition. Replacing the previous Presentation Assessment, the TOK Exhibition explores how TOK manifests in our world.

The IB has introduced the TOK Exhibition to inspire students to relate the knowledge gained in the classroom to the world beyond. The Assessment Model has seen a massive change, but since TOK Essay is the same old, TOK Exhibition is what we’ll discuss in this guide!

This change in the TOK Diploma Programme structure is effective from August 2020 and will be first examined for the students taking the examination in May 2022. 

Changes/Modifications can easily haunt you without proper guidance. We at Nail IB are committed to serving premium content, helping you prepare, and updating you regularly. For premium content and notes, head to our specially curated treasure trove of  IB Resources!  To evaluate yourself, check out our  Question Bank  today!

Before we take you through this guide’s contents, we will briefly outline the critical changes the DP Theory of Knowledge(TOK) course has seen, introduced only last August. 

• The new core theme on “knowledge and the knower.” Students will be encouraged to think of themselves as today’s knowers and strongly link to the IB learner profile. 
• Optional Themes- “knowledge and technology” and “knowledge and politics” introduced.
• Ethics is a critical requirement for every part of the course.
• TOK Exhibition replaces the previous presentation IA with a different task and moderation process. This new assessment instrument aims at showing how TOK manifests in the real world. 

You must know that the two Assessment tasks for TOK are

• Theory of Knowledge Exhibition
• Theory of Knowledge Essay on a title prescribed by the IB

The IB prescribes the Assessment objectives to be as follows:(these will guide you to get a hands-on idea about what the IB expects of your TOK Assessments)

• To demonstrate TOK thinking through the critical examination of knowledge questions.
• To identify and explore links between knowledge questions and the world around us.
• To identify and explore connections between knowledge questions and areas of knowledge.
• To develop relevant, clear and coherent arguments.
• To use examples and evidence effectively to support a discussion. 
• To demonstrate awareness and evaluation of different points of view.
• To consider the implications of opinions and conclusions.

Before moving on, we recommend you check out our  IB TOK Essay Guide , which makes for 2/3rd (67%) of your IB Assessment grade.  This  guide will help you understand the subject’s fundamental concepts and eventually produce a top-notch IB TOK Essay.

And for the IB TOK Exhibition, continue reading!

First and foremost, you need to understand what the newly added TOK Exhibition is. Weighing 33% of your total TOK grade, the TOK Exhibition requires you to  create an exhibition of three objects with accompanying commentaries to highlight your engagement with the concepts you have learnt  in the class. You’re supposed to carry out the Exhibition individually and ensure the objects you choose don’t overlap with someone else’s at your school. The TOK Exhibition is marked internally and then perhaps externally moderated. 

Now is the time to briefly list the differences between the previous IB TOK Presentation and the newly added- IB TOK Exhibition. These differences will help you get a clear and coherent idea about precisely what has changed and how you can nail your TOK Assessment! 

The entire process that goes into completing your TOK exhibition includes

• Preparing the file of work of your Exhibition (noun) - Students need to produce a single file comprising the content of their TOK exhibition.
• Exhibition(verb) of your work

The document you prepare for the work you have done is marked internally and externally moderated. Your work's Exhibition (verb) is a part of the assessment but doesn't get graded. Your TOK Exhibition file should include

• A clear title that indicates the IA prompt selected,
• Images of the three objects used.
• A typed commentary includes identifying the objects, their real-world relation, their relevance to the Exhibition and their link with the IA prompt selected.
• Relevant citations and references.

The Exhibition of your work is not a part of the formal assessment, and there is a great deal of flexibility in how your teacher chooses to go ahead with the Exhibition. A few ideas, as listed by the IB, are

• A classroom Exhibition,
• A virtual Exhibition,
• A school held an Exhibition open for all parents and other school members.

Let's break it down into points to understand what the TOK Exhibition covers .

• The Exhibition is not assessed; only your work folder needs to be submitted for grading. 
• The IA Prompt you choose
• Images of the three objects you pick,
• Typed Commentary.
• The IB strictly permits up to 950 words for your document(not including citations, references, bibliographies, footnotes etc.).
• Excellent (9-10) -  Convincing, Lucid, Precise
• Sound (7-8) -  Focused, Relevant, Coherent\
• Satisfactory (5-6) -  Adequate, Competent, Acceptable
• Primary (3-4) -  Simplistic, Limited, Underdeveloped
• Rudimentary (1-2) -  Ineffective, Descriptive, Coherent
• The Exhibition will take place in the first year of TOK teaching, i.e., the first year of the diploma.

Let us elaborate a little more on how you are supposed to pick an IA prompt, choose three relevant objects, and go about the commentary and other essential pointers. 

• What counts as knowledge? 
• Are some types of knowledge more useful than others?
• What features of knowledge have an impact on its reliability? 
• On what grounds might we doubt a claim? 
• What counts as good evidence for a claim? 
• How does the way that we organise or classify knowledge affect what we know? 
• What are the implications of having, or not having, knowledge?
• To what extent is certainty attainable?
• Are some types of knowledge less open to interpretation than others? 
• What challenges are raised by the dissemination and/or communication of knowledge?
• Can new knowledge change establish values or beliefs?
• Is bias inevitable in the production of knowledge?
• How can we know that current knowledge is an improvement upon past knowledge?
• Does some knowledge belong only to particular communities of knowers?
• What constraints are there on the pursuit of knowledge?
• Should some knowledge not be sought on ethical grounds?
• Why do we seek knowledge?
• Are some things unknowable?
• What counts as a good justification for a claim?
• What is the relationship between personal experience and knowledge?
• What is the relationship between knowledge and culture?
• What role do experts play in influencing our consumption or acquisition of knowledge?
• How important are material tools in the production or acquisition of knowledge?
• How might the context in which knowledge is presented influence whether it is accepted or rejected?
• How can we distinguish between knowledge, belief and opinion?
• Does our knowledge depend on our interactions with other knowers?
• Does all knowledge impose ethical obligations on those who know it?
• To what extent is objectivity possible in the production or acquisition of knowledge?
• Who owns knowledge?
• What role does imagination play in producing knowledge about the world?
• How can we judge when evidence is adequate?
• What makes a good explanation?
• How is current knowledge shaped by its historical development?
• In what ways do our values affect our acquisition of knowledge?
• In what ways do values affect the production of knowledge? 

The TOK Exhibition Instrument says that an exhibition that does not reflect one of the prescribed prompts will be awarded a zero. 

You are then expected to base the Exhibition on your IA prompt.

This brings us to the next step: selecting three relevant objects or images of things that mean something to you

• Ensure that the chosen item has a real-world context.
• Links among the three things must also be given.
• All three selected items should link to the prompt chosen. 
• IB encourages students to base their Exhibition on one of the TOK themes- core or optional. 

A few essential pointers to note while selecting the three objects

• Though there can be many options to pick your objects from, it is best to narrow them down by basing your Exhibition on the core or optional themes. 
• The objects you pick should be of personal interest to you and should portray their value to you. For example, a regular cricket bat won't hold much significance, but it has much more importance and buy when it belongs to you. 
• Objects can be both physical and digital. However, IB recommends using digital things such as a picture of a famous artist's painting since it is impossible to produce it physically. 
• IB permits using objects created by the student, but these objects must have an older relevance and should not be made for the Exhibition's sole purpose. The TOK Exhibition objects' purpose is to relate the theory studied in the classroom to what we see daily.
• A basketball is used by the student during their physical education lessons.
• A news article from the popular website Buzzfeed
• The student's extended essay (EE).
• Identification of the objects or the objects' images is necessary, and proper referencing must be done. If the thing is your creation, identify and acknowledge it.

The third very important part of your file work is the typed commentary. Let us understand what it is

• You have to write a short commentary on the objects you have chosen, clearly identifying them, justifying why you included them in the Exhibition of the selected prompt and specifying their real-world context. 
• The 950 words you must include in your document include the typed commentaries for each of the three objects you chose. 
• All the while drafting your document, ensure you follow the assessment rubric as prescribed by the IB. The only surefire way to write a paper that gets a top score follows all the points included in the title.

The best guidance comes from the course teacher; therefore, you are advised to seek your TOK teacher's support, i.e. planning your Exhibition while you are working on it. Verbal and written advice should be sought from the teacher, but taking assistance from them to edit your draft is strictly prohibited. Your TOK teacher will provide you with the TOK Subject Guide and the MyIB repository examples for TOK Exhibition. 

And that's that!

We hope these little points will help you explore further the vast realms of the Theory of Knowledge Course. It might seem confusing with the changes the DP Course has seen, but you will surpass your expectations with the proper guidance and support! On this note, we wish you all the very best for your IB TOK Exhibition :)

Want some A-quality guidance? Look no further; at Nail IB, we have assembled premium content for you to ace your IBs, and you might want to check out our resources for a smooth IB experience. Click  here  for top-notch IB resources or to assess how your prep is going! 

We hope this guide helped clear all your doubts regarding the new TOK Exhibition and gave you the headstart you needed!

IB Resources you will love!

Nan + free ib flashcards, -1 + free ia samples, nan + ib videos by experts, -1 + ib sample practice questions, ib resources for nan + subjects.

Example essays

As part of theory of knowledge (TOK), each student chooses one essay title from six issued by International Baccalaureate®(IB). 

The titles change in each examination session. 

Upcoming and past questions include: 

• “To what extent are areas of knowledge shaped by their past? Consider with reference to two areas of knowledge.”
•  “'There is no reason why we cannot link facts and theories across disciplines and create a common groundwork of explanation.' To what extent do you agree with this statement?”
• “There is no such thing as a neutral question. Evaluate this statement with reference to two areas of knowledge.”
• “'The task of history is the discovering of the constant and universal principles of human nature.' To what extent are history and one other area of knowledge successful in this task?”

Further guidance on the TOK essay and exhibition can be found in the IB’s Programme Resource Centre (PRC) .

Materials in the PRC are only available to existing IB World Schools. These materials are free.

There are a number of resources on TOK in the IB Store , which are available to everyone.

Find out how to become an IB World School .

We use cookies on this site. By continuing to use this website, you consent to our use of these cookies.   Read more about cookies

TOK Essay Assessment Criteria

TOK and TOK Essay a Definitive Guide Series: Part 4

TOK and TOK Essay: a Definitive Guide Series Part 4

Welcome to our Theory of Knowledge (TOK) and TOK Essay a Definitive Guide Series! In this series of articles, you will learn everything there is to know about the IB TOK course, TOK exhibition, and writing a compelling TOK essay. So let’s get started!

In order to excel in writing a successful TOK (Theory of Knowledge) essay one needs a clear understanding of the assessment criteria. In this article, we will explore the key aspects that examiners consider when evaluating  TOK essays. Understanding these criteria will enable you to write a well-structured and insightful essay that demonstrates your critical thinking skills. So, let’s delve into the TOK essay assessment criteria and learn how to succeed in this task.

Clear, Coherent, and Critical Exploration

The primary criterion for a TOK essay is whether the student provides a clear, coherent, and critical exploration of the essay title. It is essential to maintain focus on the central question throughout your essay. By continuously relating your arguments and analysis to the essay title, you demonstrate your ability to stay on topic and present a well-developed response.

Emphasize How We Know, Not What We Know

A crucial aspect of the TOK essay is to focus on the process of knowledge acquisition rather than merely presenting factual information. Instead of providing lengthy descriptions  of knowledge, your essay should explore how we acquire, produce, and pass on knowledge within the areas of knowledge. It is crucial to reflect on the methods, biases, limitations, and implications of knowledge within these areas.

Effective Use of Examples

While discussing the process of knowledge acquisition, it is essential to support your arguments with relevant examples. These examples can be drawn from subject lessons or real-life situations. By using examples, you can illustrate your points effectively and provide concrete evidence to support your claims. However, be cautious not to make your essay overly descriptive; instead, maintain a focus on critical analysis.

Coherence and Flow

A well-structured essay is coherent and allows the examiner to follow your line of reasoning. Introduce your ideas clearly and use appropriate connectives and paragraphs to enhance the flow of your writing. Ensure that your arguments are logically connected, allowing the examiner to understand the progression of your thoughts. This coherence and flow contribute to the overall quality of your essay.

Consider Multiple Perspectives

An excellent TOK essay incorporates and analyzes several perspectives on the given topic. It is vital to explore different angles and present a balanced view. Your essay should not offer a one-sided answer but should rather showcase your ability to consider multiple viewpoints. By engaging with various perspectives, you demonstrate your critical thinking skills and make your essay more compelling.

Implications and Significance

Consideration of the implications and significance of your claims is a crucial element of a strong TOK essay. When presenting your arguments or conclusions, analyze the broader implications they have for the quality, reliability, or nature of knowledge within the specific area of knowledge. Reflect on how your ideas connect to knowledge as a whole, exploring the larger implications of your claims.

Answer the Essay Prompt

Addressing the essay prompt directly is of utmost importance. Even if you manage to cover all the necessary elements required for an excellent essay, failure to answer the prompt itself can significantly impact your score. Ensure that you understand the essay question and frame your arguments accordingly. This clarity of purpose will enhance the coherence and relevance of your essay.

Concluding Remarks

Crafting a successful TOK essay requires adherence to the assessment criteria outlined by examiners. By providing a clear, coherent, and critical exploration of the essay title, emphasizing the process of knowledge acquisition, utilizing relevant examples, ensuring coherence and flow, considering multiple perspectives, and reflecting on implications, you can create a compelling essay that showcases your intellectual abilities.

Official Assessment Criteria

Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Can I use personal experiences as examples in my TOK essay?

Yes, personal experiences can be used as examples in your TOK essay, as long as they are relevant and contribute to the critical exploration of the essay topic.

How many perspectives should I include in my TOK essay?

There is no fixed number of perspectives you should include. The key is to present multiple viewpoints that offer a well-rounded analysis of the topic, ensuring that your essay remains focused and coherent.

Should I include a conclusion in my TOK essay?

Yes, a conclusion is essential to summarize your main points and provide a final reflection on the essay topic. It helps bring your essay to a logical close and reinforces the overall argument.

Can I use rhetorical questions in my TOK essay?

Yes, rhetorical questions can be effective in engaging the reader and encouraging critical thinking. However, use them sparingly and ensure they contribute to the coherence and flow of your essay.

How can I ensure my TOK essay is unique and avoids plagiarism?

To maintain uniqueness and avoid plagiarism, ensure that you express ideas in your own words and properly cite any sources you reference. Take care to provide proper attribution for any quotes, examples, or evidence used in your essay.

About the Author

Anzhelika is a PhD candidate in Genetics and a marketing consultant at U4Success from Vienna, Austria. She leads our website and social media content strategy.

Share this:

Our Policies

• Terms of Service
• Terms and Conditions
• Cookie Policy (EU)
• Privacy Policy

Discover more from U4Success | IB tutoring

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Continue reading

• How It Works
• Prices & Discounts

Writing a ToK Exhibition Essay: From Confusion to Clarity

Table of contents

It’s a good day, and you’re sitting in your class waiting for your IB professor to come in. Just as your professor enters the room, they announce the Theory of Knowledge (ToK) Exhibition assessment.

At first, you feel like this might just be like another academic essay. But boy, were you wrong.

[FREE] Professional IB Samples by Expert Writers

As your professor explains the requirements, purpose, and procedure of completing your ToK assessment, you spiral into confusion. You wonder, “How do I write a ToK Exhibition essay?”.

Don’t panic. You’ve come to the right place.

In this article, we’ll tell you how to write a solid ToK exhibition essay without losing your mind.

What is an IB ToK Exhibition

Theory of Knowledge is a crucial subject that allows you to score three extra points, which will be added to your final IB score. For this assessment, you are required to write an essay and give an exhibition which collectively will make your ToK score.

Writing the essay as well as the exhibition can get overwhelming because working on this assignment will require innate knowledge of multiple academic disciplines, helping you deliver a high-quality paper .

The crux of this assessment is finding innovative and unconventional examples or objects that support both the claim and the counterclaim for your essay and exhibition.

The purpose of the ToK essay and exhibition revolves around answering the ‘why’ behind all the research. You can derive vast awareness of the knowledge that is needed to have a perspective of the world beyond.

By the end of the assignment, you are sure to have a unique perception and will appreciate the diversity of thoughts and ideas.

What is a good ToK Exhibition?

Well, it's all about picking three objects that really speak to the topic you've been given. Think of objects that connect deeply with real-world stuff and hit the nail on the head of your assigned prompt. The key is to show off your understanding of how knowledge works - how it's shared, how it's personal, and why it's so important to us as individuals and a society.

How many words is the ToK exhibition?

The ToK exhibition commentary has a limit of 950 words. But remember, it's not just about filling the page - make every word count!

What counts as good evidence for a claim ToK exhibition?

Good evidence for a claim is usually something that's precise, directly linked to your claim, and comes from a credible source. Remember, the evidence should also demonstrate a clear connection between your real-world scenario and the knowledge question at hand.

Here’s a visual breakdown by Emiliano Ruiz-Ayala of what the ToK exhibition is all about.

How to Approach Your ToK Exhibition Essay

The ToK Exhibition weighs 33% of your total ToK grade. This process requires you to create an exhibition of three objects that come along with a commentary.

This commentary is added to help in highlighting the concepts that you have learned with these objects, in relation to your subject in school.

This exhibition is strict and students are to perform individually and not in groups. This ensures that your chosen objects don't overlap or mix with some other student in your class.

These three objects are picked out through the context of your assessment prompt, which you’ll narrow down from 35 different prompts given to you.

The complete process of finishing the essay includes

1. preparing a file of the content of your exhibition.

• a clear title regarding the IA prompt that you’ve selected;
• images of the three particular objects used;
• a typed commentary that includes the identification of the objects, their relation to the real world, their relevance of use in the exhibition, and their link to the chosen prompt;
• relevant references, citations, and examples.

2. The exhibition of your work

• A classroom exhibition.
• A virtual exhibition.
• An event that encourages parents and school members to view the exhibition.

How to structure your Exhibition Essay for IB

Before we dissect the essay into four parts, keep the following tips for writing a ToK essay in mind.

Tips for writing an exhibition essay in mind

1. Don't neglect what the ToK essay title is asking of you, and make sure you identify and understand the key terms. These terms will be your essay’s anchor and can help you write content that gravitates around them. Brainstorm with your ToK coordinator, if required.

2. Ask yourself what kind of knowledge is being showcased.

3. When choosing the areas of knowledge (AoK) and ways of knowing (WoK), be sure to find evidence that not just supports your evidence but also challenges your claims.

4. Just as you would write any other academic essay, keep in mind to generate a proper thesis statement and include topic sentences for an easier readability rate.

Your essay will constitute four broad segments

Introduction.

A strong introduction allows its readers to understand the knowledge question that you’re required to answer easily.

Introduce your ToK Essay title accurately and give a few interesting points about it. Next, you should write down the thesis statement clearly, as this statement is the basic gist of your entire essay where you’re defining key terms and interpreting the primal question.

Lastly, state your essay’s roadmap, as this can help your professors understand the direction of your essay.

The body paragraphs are further divided into three segments.

1st and 2nd segments

Here you research your first Area of Knowledge and draw parallels between it and your question.

Since these claims are general and do not need a particular area of knowledge as a reference, they can help you structure your essay and push you to investigate the question further.

You then need to further describe examples of real-life situations that support your stated claim.

State and expand on your counterclaim to show the other perspective on the topic. Reference real-life examples to show how they can support your counterclaim.

It is important to weave your WoK (ways of knowing) into your body paragraphs to take account of the source of your knowledge. Make it a point to question if your knowledge would have been different if you had acquired it in another way or through another source.

Add a mini conclusion after each segment of the body paragraph to analyze your examples in reference to your claims and counterclaims. These must connect to the thesis statement and the selected essay title.

3rd segment

This portion of your essay will consist of you comparing and contrasting various Areas of Knowledge. Connect them to your thesis statement and your chosen title showing how your arguments relate to it.

The conclusion of your essay is meant to tie all the arguments, evidence, and points in one paragraph. You need to:

• Include your reiterated thesis statement.
• Use the mini conclusions of each of the body paragraph segments to develop a final conclusion.
• Write down the significance of understanding the meaning behind the selected objects.
• Offer another perspective and how it can affect the claims/counterclaims you made in the essay.

Bibliography

Cite all your references, sources, and selected examples in a neat and organized MLA or APA-style bibliography.

What Makes a Good Exhibition Essay Object

If you are trying to find relevant objects or images of objects for the ToK Exhibition, it is important to take note that if these objects do not reflect in even one of the prescribed prompts that you’ll pick to write your essay on, you will get a failing grade.

To ensure your three objects are related to the essay prompt, you must

• Choose objects that have a real-world context.
• All three selected objects should be linked to your selected prompt.
• There should also be a proper link between the three objects.
• You should be able to draft a 950-word commentary set within the context of the objects.

Here are some tips to consider while choosing objects for your ToK exhibition

1. The chosen objects can be in a physical form or even digital -- such as images of an object, a tweet or comment by a person, a picture of a painting made by a famous artist, etc. However, IB recommends using digital objects because not every object can be produced in class physically.

2. The object that you’ve picked should be of personal interest to you and should showcase its significance or value at the exhibition.

3. A real-world connection should be present in all three objects, as well as they shouldn't be generic examples of something. Generality does not highlight the object’s value.

4. Creating new objects just for the exhibition is not allowed, whereas you can create something that has an older relevance to you. The very purpose of the ToK Exhibition’s objects is to relate the theory that’s studied in school to objects we see around us in everyday life.

5. Always remember to give an identification of the selected objects in the exhibition. Proper referencing and citing of the objects are necessary to be included.

6. You must include a typed commentary that identifies the objects you’ve chosen, justifying why you thought of including these specific objects in the exhibition and specifying their real-world context.

Understanding the Theory of Knowledge (ToK) Exhibition is essential to mastering the overall ToK assessment. The exhibition represents a third of your total ToK grade, requiring a selection and explanation of three objects tied to a real-world context. It's an individual task that demands critical thinking, correlation of concepts, and presentation skills. But don't worry, if you are finding the process daunting, we have a detailed guide on ' How to Write a ToK Essay ' on our blog, which can provide you with a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter and even help you ace your essay and exhibition.

ToK Exhibition and Essay are an integral and challenging part of an IB student’s life, and just as it comprises a major grade of your final assessment, it is important to deliver a quality A-grade essay and a flawless exhibition.

We hope this guide will answer all your questions pertaining to writing ToK essays.

If you’re still confused, you can reach out to us at Writers Per Hour. Our professional IB writers can help you write a compelling ToK essay that leaves your professors impressed and gets you that coveted grade.

Share this article

Achieve Academic Success with Expert Assistance!

Crafted from Scratch for You.

Ensuring Your Work’s Originality.

Transform Your Draft into Excellence.

Perfecting Your Paper’s Grammar, Style, and Format (APA, MLA, etc.).

Calculate the cost of your paper

Get ideas for your essay

Deconstructing a 10/10 TOK Exhibition: How to score full marks!

What happened to this post? HackIB has been acquired by MyIBTutor . All content is now available on the MyIBTutor Blog with more exciting IB content to come! Click here to see it for yourself!

The TOK Exhibition is a new assessment in the revised TOK syllabus for first examination in 2022. Since it is a new format, there is quite a bit of confusion on how to do well on it. The best way to learn is to look at what the IB considers to be a 10/10 full mark TOK Exhibition. So let’s deconstruct the below perfect scoring exhibition and find out what merits it has to do so well in the eyes of the IB.

The key to any assessment is to look at the grading criteria. For the TOK exhibition, you can find out more about the criteria and key specifications in my explainer article . But taking it straight from the TOK guide, the summary of the criteria includes:

• Has three objects with clear real-world context
• The connection between each of the three objects and the prompt chosen is clear
• Each object’s place in the exhibition is justified
• Every point you make is directly related to the prompt and explained with evidence from the object

The Example

So let’s take a look at this 10/10 TOK Essay example:

Here is what the IB said about this piece of work:

This is an example of an excellent exhibition. It was awarded a mark of 10/10. The student has clearly identified three specific objects and has effectively linked each one to the selected prompt. There is also a strong justification for the selection of each object. This student has included an introduction to their work. It should be noted that this is not required, but students are free to include a short introduction if they wish to do so. In this case the introduction is helpful as the student clearly identifies their selected prompt and theme, and explains why they have focused particularly on issues around subtext and connotation. The student then makes explicit references to the prompt throughout the response. In their discussion of the third object, the student makes a comparison between the dictionary and the song. It should be noted that there is no requirement that students make connections or comparisons between their objects. They may choose to do so, but it is also perfectly acceptable to discuss each of the three objects entirely individually. The piece of work should be judged holistically using the marking instrument, which means that, for example, the discussion of the dictionary should be rewarded wherever it appears in the response, not just where it appears under the section labelled object two.

Keys to success

After looking at the exhibition, you can see a few properties within this assessment example that clearly connects with the criteria as the IB has pointed out.

To see me explain the keys to success, read the full article for free on MyIBTutor .

Hopefully, by deconstructing a 10/10 example of a TOK Exhibition, you had a few takeaways as to what makes a good exhibition and know what you need to do to improve! Any questions, chuck it in the comments!

Share this:

Leave a comment cancel reply.

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

US IB Theory of Knowledge: TOK Essay

• Knowledge Framework in TOK
• TOK & The Learner Profile Attributes
• The Learner Profile Attributes Quiz
• Areas of Knowledge
• Optional Themes
• Knowledge Questions
• TOK Exhibition
• TOK Exhibition Prompts
• TOK Exhibition Rubric
• Ways of Knowing (Pre 2022)
• Recommended Reading
• RSS News Feeds

TOK Prescribed Titles

The International Baccalaureate Organization releases six TOK essay titles, twice a year for submission either in May or November. So you need to know which cohort you're submitting with. The essay titles for submission in May are released in the previous September. The essay titles for submission in November are released the previous March.

• May 2022 topics
• November 2021 topics
• May 2021 topics
• November 2020 topics
• May 2020 topics
• November 2019 topics
• May 2019 topics
• November 2018 topics
• May 2018 topics
• November 2017 topics

"A" example Essays

• Reason vs Emotion in Ethics
• Breaking Conventions
• Context is All
• Moral Wisdom
• Valuable Knowledge
• Experience & Culture

Essay Guidelines

The word count is 1600 words. This includes quotations. You have to write down the number of words when you submit the essay. The examiner will not read past 1600 words. References, maps/charts/illustrations and bibliographies are not included in the word count. You can choose any standard referencing system, but be consistent with the one you chose.

Assessment Criteria: Markscheme from the TOK Guide (as of Class of 2022)

TOK Essay Frequently Asked Questions

Here are some questions that students and teachers frequently ask about the TOK essay. Read through these questions and the answers to check that you are doing the right thing.

What’s the most important thing to bear in mind?

The first thing is to BE CLEAR! Most students do not even manage to communicate their ideas clearly to the examiner. Regardless of whether or not your answer is stunningly original or crammed with a variety of interesting examples, if it is clear then you will already have a massive head start over the majority of other students from elsewhere in the world. That is why it is absolutely vital to plan in detail – if you have a clear plan you will write a clear essay. If you start the essay without a clear plan then the chances are you will not do very well.

The second thing is to remain focused on the question. It is really easy to lose focus and when you do your score will instantly drop. A slight switch from discussing ‘what we believe is true’ to ‘what is true’ might be enough to make most of your answer irrelevant to the question that you have been asked so you have to be really, really careful here. Always ask yourself whether you are correctly focused on the question.

If my answer is not completely different to everyone else’s will I lose?

Most good essays will offer well balanced, plausible and convincing answer to the knowledge question that has been asked. Clearly there is not an infinite variety of plausible and convincing answers to any question and so you should not expect your answer to be completely different to everyone else’s and nor should you strive to make it bizarrely and outlandishly strange in an attempt to seem original. A good answer will usually point out that x is true in some case cases because of a certain set of reasons, while it is less true in other cases and pretty much completely untrue elsewhere. Students who take very extreme positions tend not to do so well in TOK because, unlike in English where you can usually find some evidence to back up even the most unusual reading, TOK is meant to be firmly grounded in the real world and so, for instance, it is not really that plausible to argue that we can never know anything because that just doesn't fit with how we live our daily lives. Similarly, answers which are overly simply probably won't do that well because most things in TOK just aren’t that clear cut. For example students who claim that Art is completely subjective and that we can never know whether one painting is better than another have trouble when accounting for how the IB award some students Level 7s in art while failing others.

So in this sense your essay might be balanced in the same way as someone else’s but the difference between your essay and everyone else’s should be in exactly how you strike that balance, exactly which discriminations you make and the kinds of evidence that you use to persuade me that your answer is correct. The more convincing your position: the better you will do.

How many examples do I need?

In terms of number of examples there is no set answer. However, in a 1600 word essay you should try to have about 4-6 main body points with one clear example that is central to each one. The best marks will not go to those students who have lots of examples but those who choose examples that support their point really well and then go on to consider the counterclaims against this position (possibly using the same example or a different one) and then respond to this counterclaim (again using the same example or a different one - however three examples in paragraph might be getting a bit too much).

How important is it to talk about myself?

It is important to demonstrate personal engagement, indeed the highest marks will really only be awarded to essays that create a sense that the writer has really engaged and got to grips with the question that they have chosen to answer. However, there are a number of different ways to do this. Using the personal pronoun ‘I’ and talking about something that has happened to you is one way to do this but it will not score highly unless it is a strong example that convincingly supports the point you are trying to make. For example, you will are unlikely to get any points for a personal example about your summer holiday or your Mum’s noodle soup unless it clearly and convincingly supports your answer to the question.

Other ways to demonstrate personal engagement and independent thought are by offering personal definitions of key words and researching original examples that you have come up with yourself rather than the obvious example or the one that everyone else in your class is using because that is the one that the teacher gave you.

Ultimately the best way to demonstrate your personal engagement with the question is through your tone of voice and the sense that you have really ‘got’ what this question is asking and honestly offered your own answer to it. However, this can be hard to identify for an examiner so it is probably best if you try to cover all of the different methods mentioned above in order to come across as a student who is thinking for themselves and relating this question to experiences in their own education.

Should I offer definitions of all the words in my title?

Obviously not – beginning your essay with a list of personal definitions does not make for a very engaging start.   However, there may be some terms in your question title that it is important to define and so you might need to start by doing this. In these case it is best to offer a   brief   personal definition (avoid Dictionary.com!), but be careful with going into any more detail than that. Otherwise the best way to show that you understand what the words in the title mean is to continually link back to the key words from the question throughout your essay. Just like in an English essay you would usually do this at the beginning or end of a paragraph but the best students will be able to make the link clear throughout.

One handy trick to bear in mind when thinking about definitions is that, considering different definitions of key words can actually be a good way of incorporating different perspectives into your essay. For example, if your essay question asks you whether progress is equally possible in the sciences and the arts then how you answer that question might depend on how you define progress and a good structure for the essay might be to start by considering one definition of progress (i.e. progress from one perspective) and then go on to contrast this with the answer that we get if we consider a different definition of progress from another perspective.

Is it a good idea to argue that it’s impossible to know anything at all?

Generally no … TOK examiners tend to be quite dismissive of essays that argue either that we can’t know anything at all or that you can have your ‘truth’ and I can have my ‘truth’ and that these truths are both true. The first of these approaches is often called ‘lazy scepticism’ and the second ‘easy relativism’ and you can see that the names imply that these are not particularly impressive positions to adopt. This is not to say that it’s impossible to be sceptical about knowledge and argue that there are problems with it because clearly there are. It’s also not to say that it’s impossible to argue that in some situations the ‘truth’ might actually be different for different people. However, by and large TOK is looking at how we can know things despite the problems we face when acquiring with knowledge or in spite of the different opinions that exist. TOK is in many ways a pragmatic and realistic subject that is trying to move away from creating the impression that we just can't know anything at all. As such, the best essays will admit that the acquisition of knowledge may not be straight-forward, but will go on to consider how we can overcome these obstacles in the successful pursuit of knowledge.

Do I have to cover every AOK and WOK in my essay?

No, you won’t have enough space. However, you should start by considering all of the   AOKs   and   WOKs   when you begin planning your essay and then narrow it down to the 2 or 3   AOKs   or   WOKs   where you can say the most interesting things. Make it clear that this narrowing down is a conscious decision that you have made and you can even briefly explain the reasons why you have made the choice that you have, if you think that it is relevant. Remember that the highest marks will go to the students who explore a few really key ideas in depth rather than those who try to cover everything. Remember also that the best and most original ideas are not necessarily going to be the ones that spring to mind first so try to use   AOKs   or   WOKs   that not everyone else is using – as long as they work.

So how do I know which   AOKs   or   WOKs   would be good ones to pick?

In general, it can be good to compare an AOK where a statement 'x' really applies well and contrast that with one where it doesn't or doesn't seem to. So for example 'All knowledge is subjective' seems to fit well with The Arts and Ethics, but less with Maths and Science so if you just talk about The Arts and Ethics then you are just going to have an essay that keeps saying ... and this is also true in Ethics, and we can see another example of subjectivity in the Arts, etc. It would be much better to say that this is true in the arts because of xyz reasons and not true in Maths because of   abc   reasons.

If you are really confident with TOK you might try inverting an obvious stereotype about an AOK and seeing if you can find examples where that isn’t true. For example, most students’ first reactions are that the Arts are a subjective subject whereas Maths is a subject which contains objective, universal truths. While there is some   truth to this stereotype   it is not true all the time and the best students will be able to explore where that stereotype breaks down and why it breaks down.   For example, while judgement in art is subjective, some truths – e.g. that this picture was painted by   Da   Vinci - are empirical and so we can have objective agreement about them. Additionally, even the subjective truths aren't allowed to be absolutely anything - even my Mum doesn't think that my Primary School paintings are as good as   Da   Vinci's. This kind of subtlety is what marks out the best answers.

In addition, do not make sweeping statements about aspects or areas of knowledge that imply that what you are saying is always and absolutely true without exception. Instead, phrase things in a way that acknowledges the limitations of your own knowledge and experience: for example ‘Accepting for the moment the premise that … then we can say …’

Do I have to use TOK words like ‘Areas of Knowledge’ in my essay?

Yes you do as this will demonstrate a good understanding of the course but be wary of just throwing them in everywhere: judicious and correct use of TOK terminology is better than going over the top. The words that should come up more frequently are the key words from the question to show that you are remaining focused on the question and not getting distracted by anything else.

Do I have to include any Philosophy or Philosophical words?

No   - the IB have made it clear that TOK is not a philosophy course, instead it is meant to be grounded in the real world and your own experiences as a student. As such you should try to avoid including complex philosophical points unless you really understand them and they really are fully relevant to the essay, even then it is often to put these points into your own words rather than quote philosophers because TOK is about you thinking for yourself rather than quoting someone else’s thoughts.

Do I have to research the quotations in the question title?

It is a good idea to know where the quotation came from, who said it and why but you wouldn’t necessarily include any of this in your essay. In fact, the quotation may not really be relevant at all to the essay question as they are sometimes just used to give you a flavor of   the what   the essay is about. For example in the ‘What I Tell You Three Times is True’ question – the number ‘three’ and the fact that this comes from Lewis Carroll are not necessarily as important as the point about repetition and so detailed research into the works of Lewis Carroll will not really help you with this question.

Can I use quotations from famous people to back up my argument?

Students often like starting essays, concluding essays or supporting points with quotations from famous people like Oscar Wilde or Albert Einstein. The fact that these people are experts tends to lend an air of credibility to your argument. However, the opinion of someone like Oscar Wilde is only going to be relevant in certain, very specific circumstances, for example, if you are exploring esthetics (the theory about what makes beautiful things beautiful) then it might be worth considering Oscar Wilde’s perspective on this topic as he was an artist… but you have to remember that his view is only one perspective and just because Wilde said it, it doesn’t mean that he has the best or most convincing theory about beauty. You should also remember that, outside of the topic of esthetics, it might not be a such good idea to quote Oscar Wilde at all: his opinions on how to live a good life, for example, can be sharply witty and sound quite appealing ... but we need to remember that he did die penniless and alone in Paris so is he really someone that we want to listen to?

Similarly, Einstein is a hugely important figure in the history of science and it might be worthwhile quoting him if you were exploring the forces that drive or inspire genius. However, again you should bear in mind that Einstein’s personal statement about what inspires him is not necessarily something that is going to be true of all thinkers. On top of that you should remember that it has been almost 100 years since the publication of Einstein’s last great work, the General Theory of Relativity, so if you are looking for an up to date comment on the nature of scientific knowledge then it might be best to look elsewhere.

In general the rule with quotations is that you should only quote from someone when they are an expert in the relevant field and even then you have to bear in mind that their opinion is nothing more than that, an opinion. Just like your opinions have to be backed up with evidence and proof, so do the opinions of experts… just because Einstein said it, it doesn’t mean it’s true until you show me the proof. One danger you should also be aware of if you quote too much is that the expert’s voice can come to replace your own and so you should only quote opinions sparingly. One additional way to prevent the expert’s voice from dominating your essay is to use quotations from them in your counterclaims; if you go on to disagree with the expert then that’s usually a clear indication that you are thinking for yourself.

Finally, be careful where you get your quotation from. ‘Brainyquote.com’ might be a repository of thousands of fantastic and completely accurate quotations but it doesn’t create a great impression of your ability to select reliable sources so try to find the original source for your quotation and quote that!

Do I need to include different perspectives in my essay?

Definitely, although remember that ‘different perspectives’ can mean a range of different things. One nice way to include different perspectives is by considering the question from the ‘perspective’ of the different   AOKs . So, for example, you might answer the question from the perspective of the sciences and then compare this with the perspective of the arts – this is a particularly nice trick because it also enables you to draw in some comparisons between the   AOKs   at the same time. However, there are other perspectives that you considering and exploring different cultural, political, philosophical, historical and intellectual perspectives or different schools of thought within an AOK can lead to a more interesting and more convincing essay.

Do I have to distinguish between ‘personal’ and ‘shared’ knowledge in my essay?

It’s definitely a good idea to consider these ideas in your planning but, as with anything, you should only really include them if they are relevant to your essay. One effective way to include these different kinds of knowledge in your essay is to treat them as different perspectives on the same issue. For example, if you are looking at whether it is possible to make progress in the arts then the answer might be quite different depending on whether I am talking about progress at a personal level (clearly I can get better at drawing) or at a shared / communal level because it’s not entirely clear what it would mean for art overall to get ‘better’. This links nicely with the previous point as a way of considering different perspectives on the same issue and can be a good way of killing two birds with one stone.

From www.mrhoyestokwebsite.com

• << Previous: Knowledge Questions
• Next: TOK Exhibition >>
• Last Updated: Sep 23, 2022 1:19 PM
• URL: https://asmadrid.libguides.com/IBtheoryofknowledge

Overview of the TOK essay and exhibition

Assessment in TOK is based on one TOK essay and one exhibition. The TOK essay is an external assessment (EA) which is marked by IB markers. IB subject teachers must authenticate an EA but they are not involved in the actual marking of it. The TOK exhibition is an internal assessment (IA). This means that the subject teacher marks it and the exhibition file and the marks are submitted to the IB for moderation.

For the essay, six prescribed titles are published by the IB for each cohort. Each student picks one of the six titles and writes a response in the form of an essay. The final TOK essay and the TOK essay Planning and Progress Form (TK/PPF) are submitted to the IB. The essay has changed a bit from the previous curriculum so be a bit cautious if you are looking at essay samples from a previous cohort.

In the exhibition, students choose one of thirty-five prompts. These prompts do not change from cohort to cohort and are listed in the TOK Subject Guide. Students also choose three objects that are the foundation of their response to the prompt and write a commentary. Students submit an exhibition file to the IB and they also exhibit their work in the school. The exhibition is marked by the teacher and marking is subject to moderation by the IB.

Privacy Overview

• Jul 8, 2023

Deconstructing a 10/10 TOK Exhibition: How to Score FULL MARKS!

The TOK Exhibition is a new assessment in the revised TOK syllabus for first examination in 2022. Since it is a new format, there is quite a bit of confusion on how to do well on it. The best way to learn is to look at what the IB considers to be a 10/10 full mark TOK Exhibition. So let's deconstruct the below perfect scoring exhibition and find out what merits it has to do so well in the eyes of the IB.

The key to any assessment is to look at the grading criteria. For the TOK exhibition, you can find out more about the criteria and key specifications in my explainer article . But taking it straight from the TOK guide, the summary of the criteria includes:

Has three objects with clear real-world context

The connection between each of the three objects and the prompt chosen is clear

Each object's place in the exhibition is justified

Every point you make is directly related to the prompt and explained with evidence from the object

The Example

So let's take a look at this 10/10 TOK Essay example:

Here is what the IB said about this piece of work:

This is an example of an excellent exhibition. It was awarded a mark of 10/10. The student has clearly identified three specific objects and has effectively linked each one to the selected prompt. There is also a strong justification for the selection of each object. This student has included an introduction to their work. It should be noted that this is not required, but students are free to include a short introduction if they wish to do so. In this case the introduction is helpful as the student clearly identifies their selected prompt and theme, and explains why they have focused particularly on issues around subtext and connotation. The student then makes explicit references to the prompt throughout the response. In their discussion of the third object, the student makes a comparison between the dictionary and the song. It should be noted that there is no requirement that students make connections or comparisons between their objects. They may choose to do so, but it is also perfectly acceptable to discuss each of the three objects entirely individually. The piece of work should be judged holistically using the marking instrument, which means that, for example, the discussion of the dictionary should be rewarded wherever it appears in the response, not just where it appears under the section labelled object two.

Keys to success

After looking at the exhibition, you can see a few properties within this assessment example that clearly connects with the criteria as the IB has pointed out.

Objects and their real world contexts

There is a lot of confusion between students about what constitutes an object and what it means by the real world context of objects. I did a full explainer on exactly this here. But to briefly recap, almost anything can be objects from tweets to textbooks to songs. However, you must be specific as to where and how this object exists and is used in the real world. In this particular example, the three objects they have chosen are:

Starbucks cup used in 2017 during the holiday season

The author's personal translation dictionary which they use to translate between English and Chinese

The song 'Strange Fruit' by Billie Holliday.

In each case, you will see that they aren't TOO specific as to every single detail of their object, but only the ones relevant to their exhibition. Often, students interpret having to convey a clear real world example as listing irrelevant details like publisher or author or date of publishing, etc. Sometimes, it is simply unnecessary as this real world context means the object's 'place in the world'. If it is clear where the object would be seen, when it would be seen, and how it would be used or interacted with, there is no need to add any additional frivolous details.

For the first object - the starbucks cup, for example, the student didn't really go into detail about the specific designer, locations or even the season in which this cup was introduced. However, their introduction was already quite clear that this was an object which existed in the world during a particular time (2017) in a particular place (Starbucks) and interacted with in a particular way (to hold a drink obviously, but also to communicate a message). Similarly, the second object doesn't really go into detail about when and who published the dictionary, et cetera, but the key here is the focus on how the author uses the object (as a translation tool) as that is relevant to the whole knowledge and language theme of the exhibition. So the guidance for how to introduce the real-world contexts of an object is very clear: you don't need to list anything and everything about the object itself, but only the key details that establishes the object's place in the world. If that still isn't quite clear to you, you can check if you have done the real-world contexts well if your introduction can answer the following questions:

What is the object used for

How it exists in the world - physical or digital, personal to you or something you found, how people perceive the object (whether it is how you see it if it is a personal object, or how the wider public sees it)

As to the issue of researched vs personal objects, there is no clear answer. This example uses two 'researched' objects and one object which has a clear personal connection. In the TOK Guide, the IB recommends that you derive your objects from personal experience, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the object has to belong to you. However, I do recommend having at least one personal object just like the example, which can really demonstrate your 'connection' with the object and your experience with the issue presented in the TOK IA Prompt.

An interesting comment made by the examiners is that the exhibition is viewed as a whole rather than as each individual object's commentary. So you can draw links between each other, or not, and both should be equally rewarded. But the bigger picture here is that you must ensure each object tells a 'unique' story, and contribute equally to the exhibition in revealing a different perspective or a variation on your overall answer to the IA prompt. This is something I have talked about more extensively in my article on structuring your exhibition .

Finally, each object is justified within the exhibition as required by the criteria. You can see that the overall theme of the exhibition is how subtexts and the hidden connotations of language can present challenges to how knowledge is communicated. However, each object tells a slightly unique aspect towards this point. The starbucks cup focuses on how vague language can promote all sorts of different connotations that may be positive or negative, while the second object - the dictionary, convinces us the challenge of communicating knowledge due to different languages, and finally, the song reveals that these subtexts which are so key to communicating knowledge can often change based on personal experiences and cultural differences that presents yet another challenge to knowledge communication. The result is a cohesive answer to prompt, and yet a nuanced one, as each object is justified by introducing a unique perspective to the prompt.

Discussing the IA Prompt

This particular exhibition closely resembles the structure that I have proposed to use for a good exhibition . As the IB Examiner noted, it is not necessary to have an introduction at the very beginning of your exhibition. In fact, there is no requirement to even seperate the dicussion of each object as the whole exhibition is marked together, not as a commentary of each object. However, what I do think is important to take away from this is that it is very important to outline the particular theme you will be focusing on, the prompt that you are using and the angle you will be tackling the prompt from. It is actually not necessary to have a single theme to your exhibition, but I highly recommend that you do as it provides the necessary focus for your exhibition. You can do this through an exhibition, or alternatively, integrate this theme clearly into the rest of your discussion to save a little on the tight word count.

The example does make comparisons between objects, but this is not expected nor is it needed to score good marks. I personally believe that you should use those extra words to elaborate on the discussion of the object instead to boost their relevance to the prompt.

So how is the discussion done? You can see that it is in very simple language. Unlike the TOK Essay, this is a less 'academic' piece of work. It is meant to be more like a personal reflection on the manifestations of TOK in your life which you have noticed. So the ideal tone for the task would be one that is formal, yet personal rather than academic. I encourage you to use first person for the exhibition as it really drives home this idea that this is a non-academic piece of writing. At the same time though, there are still standards of academic integrity, so anything that you got from the internet must still be cited and referenced.

You can see that the example doesn't waste any words going around the prompt but tackles it head on - pointing out the immediate challenges with communicating knowledge in each of the three objects. The starbucks cup for example centres around the many different interpretations of subtexts, and their effects on different communities. If you are having trouble finding things to say for your object, I recommend that you focus on the different communities of knowers that may interact with your object and how their interactions differ. I also urge you to read the TOK Guide in depth, particularly on the various themes as it already prompts several questions and dicussion points for you to use within the exhibition. The language they use is also exactly the type of terms they expect from your exhibition. Treat the TOK Guide as the TOK Bible and never deviate from it!

One final thing: word count is truly very constrained in this task. You must be concise, and every sentence you use must be clear, reflective and actually useful. There is no room for fluff or rambling (unlike the TOK Essay). So this means that for many, there won't be enough words within the 950 word requirement for an introduction or conclusion, or another idea that you wish to discuss. When it comes to prioritising your ideas, you should place utmost importance on your object's discussion as it contributes to most of the criteria, and then all the accesories like introductions and conclusions.

Hopefully, by deconstructing a 10/10 example of a TOK Exhibition, you had a few takeaways as to what makes a good exhibition and know what you need to do to improve! Any questions, chuck it in the comments!

Recent Posts

November 2024 TOK Essay Prescribed Titles with Examples and Detailed Explanation

How to learn TOK

Key Concept in Economics IA

IB TOK Exhibition examples

Type a search phrase to find the most relevant TOK Exhibition examples for you

Not sure what to search for? You can always look through our example Internal Assessments below for inspiration.

All TOK Exhibition Examples

Filter exemplars, does some knowledge belong only to particular communities of knowers, how can we know that current knowledge is an improvement upon past knowledge, want to get full marks for your tok exhibition allow us to review it for you 🎯, how important are material tools in the production or acquisition of knowledge, how can we distinguish between knowledge, belief and opinion, fast track your coursework with mark schemes moderated by ib examiners. upgrade now 🚀, what is the relationship between knowledge and culture, how is current knowledge shaped by its historical development, ¿qué desafíos plantea la difusión o la comunicación del conocimiento, is bias inevitable in the production of knowledge, what challenges are raised by the dissemination and/or communication of knowledge, should some knowledge not be sought on ethical grounds, what is the relationship between personal experience and knowledge, who owns knowledge, why do we seek knowledge, what constraints are there on the pursuit of knowledge, does some knowledge belong only to particular communities or knowers concept: culture, how important are material tools in the production or acquisitions of knowledge, to what extent is certainty attainable, are somethings unknowable, who owns knowledge, what challenges are raised by the dissemination and/or communication of knowledge, what is the relationship between knowledge and culture, 材料工具在产生或获取知识中有多么重要, can new knowledge change established values or beliefs, what is the relationship between personal experience and knowledge, is bias inevitable in the production of knowledge, what are the implications of having, or not having, knowledge, on what grounds might we doubt a claim.

TOK exhibition commentary

TOK Home > Free TOK notes > TOK exhibition > TOK exhibition commentary

The TOK exhibition commentary

So, you understand the exhibition  rubric , you’ve selected your  IA prompt , and you’ve chosen your  objects . What happens next?   Now you have to write your TOK exhibition commentary. This is a 950-word exploration of the IA prompt, explaining why you have chosen your three objects, and demonstrating how TOK manifests itself in the real world, within the context of the core theme , or one of the optional themes .

Writing the TOK exhibition commentary

Before you begin writing your commentary, make sure that you have seen the exemplar exhibitions, that are found on ‘MyIB’ – your teacher will give you access to these. This is a fantastic way of seeing exactly what you are trying to do with you exhibition.   You’re trying to do several things simultaneously when you write the commentary. First, you’re answering the  IA prompt  that you’ve chosen from the list of 35 options. These all ask a question about the nature of knowledge, and how we use it: make sure your exhibition commentary addresses this question.   Second, you are outlining the real-world context of your  objects , and justifying why you have chosen them for your exhibition. How do your objects link to the IA prompt? How do they relate to your personal experiences? What makes them special, or original, or particularly resonant?   Third, you are showing your knowledge of the  core theme , or one of the optional themes , by referring to ideas relevant to this aspect of TOK, key thinkers that you’ve come across during the course, and real-life situations that have engaged you.   Overall, you are trying to demonstrate how TOK manifests itself in the real world. This means showing how the ideas and concepts that we encounter during the course are relevant to the way in which we lead our lives, and the society in which we exist.   Keep in mind the four different strands of the  assessment rubric : you should be prepared to discuss with your teacher how you are hitting these targets. Also consider the three characteristics of a top level exhibition: precise, lucid, and convincing. How is your exhibition all of these three things?

TOK exhibition pages

The TOK exhibition rubric

Learn about how the exhibition is marked, and the skills you are expected to demonstrate in order to succeed. Find out more here .

The TOK exhibition prompts

Find out about the IA prompts used to write your exhibition commentary, and tips on choosing the right one. Read more here .

The TOK exhibition objects

Find out what ‘exhibition objects’ are, how to choose effective ones, and linking them to a theme and prompt. Read more here .

Learn about the 950-word exhibition commentary, ways to link it to your IA prompt, and how to set it within a theme. Find out more here .

Putting on the exhibition

Get tips on how to set up a TOK exhibition, talking in public, and showing off your TOK knowledge to a public audience. Find out more here .

More support for the TOK exhibition

Make sure that your TOK teacher has given you access to all the documents and online material that support the exhibition. These include the TOK Subject Guide (for the 2022 syllabus) – where you’ll find the IA prompts, and the exhibition rubric – and the exemplar TOK exhibitions (found in ‘MyIB’, which is accessible to teachers).   Follow the links above to take you to the three different elements of the TOK exhibition; we’ve also created a page giving some tips on how to put on your exhibition if your school is running a public ‘exhibition day’ which you can visit  here . It suggests ways of presenting ideas to an audience.   If your school is a member of theoryofknowledge.net, we have designed a series of lessons on the exhibition, with three practice exhibition tasks. These will familiarize you with the IA prompts, how to select effective objects, and the assessment rubric. If you are signed into the site, you can access these lessons  here .   You can also find out our thoughts on the TOK exhibition (and the TOK essay) in several webinars that we have delivered. The main one is the TOK Assessment 2022 webinar, but we also consider this form of assessment in our free webinars on the 2022 course. You can see these webinars on  this page  of the site.

FAQs about the exhibition commentary

How long should the tok exhibition commentary be, and what happens if i go over this limit.

Your commentary should be 950 words long, not including the footnotes and references (but don’t use the trick of writing lengthy footnotes to get across ideas that you want to present in the main body of your commentary!). Examiners will stop reading after 950 words, so it’s a complete waste of time going over this limit.

How much help can I get for my TOK exhibition commentary?

You’re allowed to consult extensively with your teacher about the appropriateness of your objects, the clarity of the ideas in your commentary, and other issues, such as how relevant your ideas are to the IA prompt, the context of the commentary, etc. Your teacher may give you written comments on one draft, but they’re not allowed to edit your work. They can’t look at more than one draft.

How do I submit my TOK exhibition commentary?

Your commentary should be presented within a single file, along with images of your exhibition objects. You should also include references for ideas, and for the objects themselves. This file will then be uploaded to your IB dashboard.

Get real with TOK by subscribing to the newsletter

Step into the real and unpackaged world by subscribing to our unique monthly TOK newsletter. You’ll receive links to great media sources from all over the world that place the TOK themes and areas of knowledge into an authentic context.

You’ll meet great thinkers and ideas, hone your understanding of key TOK concepts, and build up a library of examples for the essay and exhibition. Subscribe HERE !