reflection paper in practical research 1

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Assignments

• Annotated Bibliography
• Analyzing a Scholarly Journal Article
• Group Presentations
• Dealing with Nervousness
• Using Visual Aids
• Grading Someone Else's Paper
• Types of Structured Group Activities
• Group Project Survival Skills
• Leading a Class Discussion
• Multiple Book Review Essay
• Reviewing Collected Works
• Writing a Case Analysis Paper
• Writing a Case Study
• About Informed Consent
• Writing Field Notes
• Writing a Policy Memo
• Writing a Reflective Paper
• Writing a Research Proposal
• Generative AI and Writing
• Acknowledgments

Reflective writing is a process of identifying, questioning, and critically evaluating course-based learning opportunities, integrated with your own observations, experiences, impressions, beliefs, assumptions, or biases, and which describes how this process stimulated new or creative understanding about the content of the course.

A reflective paper describes and explains in an introspective, first person narrative, your reactions and feelings about either a specific element of the class [e.g., a required reading; a film shown in class] or more generally how you experienced learning throughout the course. Reflective writing assignments can be in the form of a single paper, essays, portfolios, journals, diaries, or blogs. In some cases, your professor may include a reflective writing assignment as a way to obtain student feedback that helps improve the course, either in the moment or for when the class is taught again.

How to Write a Reflection Paper . Academic Skills, Trent University; Writing a Reflection Paper . Writing Center, Lewis University; Critical Reflection . Writing and Communication Centre, University of Waterloo; Tsingos-Lucas et al. "Using Reflective Writing as a Predictor of Academic Success in Different Assessment Formats." American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 81 (2017): Article 8.

Benefits of Reflective Writing Assignments

As the term implies, a reflective paper involves looking inward at oneself in contemplating and bringing meaning to the relationship between course content and the acquisition of new knowledge . Educational research [Bolton, 2010; Ryan, 2011; Tsingos-Lucas et al., 2017] demonstrates that assigning reflective writing tasks enhances learning because it challenges students to confront their own assumptions, biases, and belief systems around what is being taught in class and, in so doing, stimulate student’s decisions, actions, attitudes, and understanding about themselves as learners and in relation to having mastery over their learning. Reflection assignments are also an opportunity to write in a first person narrative about elements of the course, such as the required readings, separate from the exegetic and analytical prose of academic research papers.

Reflection writing often serves multiple purposes simultaneously. In no particular order, here are some of reasons why professors assign reflection papers:

• Enhances learning from previous knowledge and experience in order to improve future decision-making and reasoning in practice . Reflective writing in the applied social sciences enhances decision-making skills and academic performance in ways that can inform professional practice. The act of reflective writing creates self-awareness and understanding of others. This is particularly important in clinical and service-oriented professional settings.
• Allows students to make sense of classroom content and overall learning experiences in relation to oneself, others, and the conditions that shaped the content and classroom experiences . Reflective writing places you within the course content in ways that can deepen your understanding of the material. Because reflective thinking can help reveal hidden biases, it can help you critically interrogate moments when you do not like or agree with discussions, readings, or other aspects of the course.
• Increases awareness of one’s cognitive abilities and the evidence for these attributes . Reflective writing can break down personal doubts about yourself as a learner and highlight specific abilities that may have been hidden or suppressed due to prior assumptions about the strength of your academic abilities [e.g., reading comprehension; problem-solving skills]. Reflective writing, therefore, can have a positive affective [i.e., emotional] impact on your sense of self-worth.
• Applying theoretical knowledge and frameworks to real experiences . Reflective writing can help build a bridge of relevancy between theoretical knowledge and the real world. In so doing, this form of writing can lead to a better understanding of underlying theories and their analytical properties applied to professional practice.
• Reveals shortcomings that the reader will identify . Evidence suggests that reflective writing can uncover your own shortcomings as a learner, thereby, creating opportunities to anticipate the responses of your professor may have about the quality of your coursework. This can be particularly productive if the reflective paper is written before final submission of an assignment.
• Helps students identify their tacit [a.k.a., implicit] knowledge and possible gaps in that knowledge . Tacit knowledge refers to ways of knowing rooted in lived experience, insight, and intuition rather than formal, codified, categorical, or explicit knowledge. In so doing, reflective writing can stimulate students to question their beliefs about a research problem or an element of the course content beyond positivist modes of understanding and representation.
• Encourages students to actively monitor their learning processes over a period of time . On-going reflective writing in journals or blogs, for example, can help you maintain or adapt learning strategies in other contexts. The regular, purposeful act of reflection can facilitate continuous deep thinking about the course content as it evolves and changes throughout the term. This, in turn, can increase your overall confidence as a learner.
• Relates a student’s personal experience to a wider perspective . Reflection papers can help you see the big picture associated with the content of a course by forcing you to think about the connections between scholarly content and your lived experiences outside of school. It can provide a macro-level understanding of one’s own experiences in relation to the specifics of what is being taught.
• If reflective writing is shared, students can exchange stories about their learning experiences, thereby, creating an opportunity to reevaluate their original assumptions or perspectives . In most cases, reflective writing is only viewed by your professor in order to ensure candid feedback from students. However, occasionally, reflective writing is shared and openly discussed in class. During these discussions, new or different perspectives and alternative approaches to solving problems can be generated that would otherwise be hidden. Sharing student's reflections can also reveal collective patterns of thought and emotions about a particular element of the course.

Bolton, Gillie. Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development . London: Sage, 2010; Chang, Bo. "Reflection in Learning." Online Learning 23 (2019), 95-110; Cavilla, Derek. "The Effects of Student Reflection on Academic Performance and Motivation." Sage Open 7 (July-September 2017): 1–13; Culbert, Patrick. “Better Teaching? You Can Write On It “ Liberal Education (February 2022); McCabe, Gavin and Tobias Thejll-Madsen. The Reflection Toolkit . University of Edinburgh; The Purpose of Reflection . Introductory Composition at Purdue University; Practice-based and Reflective Learning . Study Advice Study Guides, University of Reading; Ryan, Mary. "Improving Reflective Writing in Higher Education: A Social Semiotic Perspective." Teaching in Higher Education 16 (2011): 99-111; Tsingos-Lucas et al. "Using Reflective Writing as a Predictor of Academic Success in Different Assessment Formats." American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 81 (2017): Article 8; What Benefits Might Reflective Writing Have for My Students? Writing Across the Curriculum Clearinghouse; Rykkje, Linda. "The Tacit Care Knowledge in Reflective Writing: A Practical Wisdom." International Practice Development Journal 7 (September 2017): Article 5; Using Reflective Writing to Deepen Student Learning . Center for Writing, University of Minnesota.

How to Approach Writing a Reflection Paper

Thinking About Reflective Thinking

Educational theorists have developed numerous models of reflective thinking that your professor may use to frame a reflective writing assignment. These models can help you systematically interpret your learning experiences, thereby ensuring that you ask the right questions and have a clear understanding of what should be covered. A model can also represent the overall structure of a reflective paper. Each model establishes a different approach to reflection and will require you to think about your writing differently. If you are unclear how to fit your writing within a particular reflective model, seek clarification from your professor. There are generally two types of reflective writing assignments, each approached in slightly different ways.

1.  Reflective Thinking about Course Readings

This type of reflective writing focuses on thoughtfully thinking about the course readings that underpin how most students acquire new knowledge and understanding about the subject of a course. Reflecting on course readings is often assigned in freshmen-level, interdisciplinary courses where the required readings examine topics viewed from multiple perspectives and, as such, provide different ways of analyzing a topic, issue, event, or phenomenon. The purpose of reflective thinking about course readings in the social and behavioral sciences is to elicit your opinions, beliefs, and feelings about the research and its significance. This type of writing can provide an opportunity to break down key assumptions you may have and, in so doing, reveal potential biases in how you interpret the scholarship.

If you are assigned to reflect on course readings, consider the following methods of analysis as prompts that can help you get started :

• Examine carefully the main introductory elements of the reading, including the purpose of the study, the theoretical framework being used to test assumptions, and the research questions being addressed. Think about what ideas stood out to you. Why did they? Were these ideas new to you or familiar in some way based on your own lived experiences or prior knowledge?
• Develop your ideas around the readings by asking yourself, what do I know about this topic? Where does my existing knowledge about this topic come from? What are the observations or experiences in my life that influence my understanding of the topic? Do I agree or disagree with the main arguments, recommended course of actions, or conclusions made by the author(s)? Why do I feel this way and what is the basis of these feelings?
• Make connections between the text and your own beliefs, opinions, or feelings by considering questions like, how do the readings reinforce my existing ideas or assumptions? How the readings challenge these ideas or assumptions? How does this text help me to better understand this topic or research in ways that motivate me to learn more about this area of study?

2.  Reflective Thinking about Course Experiences

This type of reflective writing asks you to critically reflect on locating yourself at the conceptual intersection of theory and practice. The purpose of experiential reflection is to evaluate theories or disciplinary-based analytical models based on your introspective assessment of the relationship between hypothetical thinking and practical reality; it offers a way to consider how your own knowledge and skills fit within professional practice. This type of writing also provides an opportunity to evaluate your decisions and actions, as well as how you managed your subsequent successes and failures, within a specific theoretical framework. As a result, abstract concepts can crystallize and become more relevant to you when considered within your own experiences. This can help you formulate plans for self-improvement as you learn.

If you are assigned to reflect on your experiences, consider the following questions as prompts to help you get started :

• Contextualize your reflection in relation to the overarching purpose of the course by asking yourself, what did you hope to learn from this course? What were the learning objectives for the course and how did I fit within each of them? How did these goals relate to the main themes or concepts of the course?
• Analyze how you experienced the course by asking yourself, what did I learn from this experience? What did I learn about myself? About working in this area of research and study? About how the course relates to my place in society? What assumptions about the course were supported or refuted?
• Think introspectively about the ways you experienced learning during the course by asking yourself, did your learning experiences align with the goals or concepts of the course? Why or why do you not feel this way? What was successful and why do you believe this? What would you do differently and why is this important? How will you prepare for a future experience in this area of study?

NOTE: If you are assigned to write a journal or other type of on-going reflection exercise, a helpful approach is to reflect on your reflections by re-reading what you have already written. In other words, review your previous entries as a way to contextualize your feelings, opinions, or beliefs regarding your overall learning experiences. Over time, this can also help reveal hidden patterns or themes related to how you processed your learning experiences. Consider concluding your reflective journal with a summary of how you felt about your learning experiences at critical junctures throughout the course, then use these to write about how you grew as a student learner and how the act of reflecting helped you gain new understanding about the subject of the course and its content.

ANOTHER NOTE: Regardless of whether you write a reflection paper or a journal, do not focus your writing on the past. The act of reflection is intended to think introspectively about previous learning experiences. However, reflective thinking should document the ways in which you progressed in obtaining new insights and understandings about your growth as a learner that can be carried forward in subsequent coursework or in future professional practice. Your writing should reflect a furtherance of increasing personal autonomy and confidence gained from understanding more about yourself as a learner.

Structure and Writing Style

There are no strict academic rules for writing a reflective paper. Reflective writing may be assigned in any class taught in the social and behavioral sciences and, therefore, requirements for the assignment can vary depending on disciplinary-based models of inquiry and learning. The organization of content can also depend on what your professor wants you to write about or based on the type of reflective model used to frame the writing assignment. Despite these possible variations, below is a basic approach to organizing and writing a good reflective paper, followed by a list of problems to avoid.

Pre-flection

In most cases, it's helpful to begin by thinking about your learning experiences and outline what you want to focus on before you begin to write the paper. This can help you organize your thoughts around what was most important to you and what experiences [good or bad] had the most impact on your learning. As described by the University of Waterloo Writing and Communication Centre, preparing to write a reflective paper involves a process of self-analysis that can help organize your thoughts around significant moments of in-class knowledge discovery.

• Using a thesis statement as a guide, note what experiences or course content stood out to you , then place these within the context of your observations, reactions, feelings, and opinions. This will help you develop a rough outline of key moments during the course that reflect your growth as a learner. To identify these moments, pose these questions to yourself: What happened? What was my reaction? What were my expectations and how were they different from what transpired? What did I learn?
• Critically think about your learning experiences and the course content . This will help you develop a deeper, more nuanced understanding about why these moments were significant or relevant to you. Use the ideas you formulated during the first stage of reflecting to help you think through these moments from both an academic and personal perspective. From an academic perspective, contemplate how the experience enhanced your understanding of a concept, theory, or skill. Ask yourself, did the experience confirm my previous understanding or challenge it in some way. As a result, did this highlight strengths or gaps in your current knowledge? From a personal perspective, think introspectively about why these experiences mattered, if previous expectations or assumptions were confirmed or refuted, and if this surprised, confused, or unnerved you in some way.
• Analyze how these experiences and your reactions to them will shape your future thinking and behavior . Reflection implies looking back, but the most important act of reflective writing is considering how beliefs, assumptions, opinions, and feelings were transformed in ways that better prepare you as a learner in the future. Note how this reflective analysis can lead to actions you will take as a result of your experiences, what you will do differently, and how you will apply what you learned in other courses or in professional practice.

Basic Structure and Writing Style

Reflective Background and Context

The first part of your reflection paper should briefly provide background and context in relation to the content or experiences that stood out to you. Highlight the settings, summarize the key readings, or narrate the experiences in relation to the course objectives. Provide background that sets the stage for your reflection. You do not need to go into great detail, but you should provide enough information for the reader to understand what sources of learning you are writing about [e.g., course readings, field experience, guest lecture, class discussions] and why they were important. This section should end with an explanatory thesis statement that expresses the central ideas of your paper and what you want the readers to know, believe, or understand after they finish reading your paper.

Reflective Interpretation

Drawing from your reflective analysis, this is where you can be personal, critical, and creative in expressing how you felt about the course content and learning experiences and how they influenced or altered your feelings, beliefs, assumptions, or biases about the subject of the course. This section is also where you explore the meaning of these experiences in the context of the course and how you gained an awareness of the connections between these moments and your own prior knowledge.

Guided by your thesis statement, a helpful approach is to interpret your learning throughout the course with a series of specific examples drawn from the course content and your learning experiences. These examples should be arranged in sequential order that illustrate your growth as a learner. Reflecting on each example can be done by: 1)  introducing a theme or moment that was meaningful to you, 2) describing your previous position about the learning moment and what you thought about it, 3) explaining how your perspective was challenged and/or changed and why, and 4) introspectively stating your current or new feelings, opinions, or beliefs about that experience in class.

It is important to include specific examples drawn from the course and placed within the context of your assumptions, thoughts, opinions, and feelings. A reflective narrative without specific examples does not provide an effective way for the reader to understand the relationship between the course content and how you grew as a learner.

Reflective Conclusions

The conclusion of your reflective paper should provide a summary of your thoughts, feelings, or opinions regarding what you learned about yourself as a result of taking the course. Here are several ways you can frame your conclusions based on the examples you interpreted and reflected on what they meant to you. Each example would need to be tied to the basic theme [thesis statement] of your reflective background section.

• Your reflective conclusions can be described in relation to any expectations you had before taking the class [e.g., “I expected the readings to not be relevant to my own experiences growing up in a rural community, but the research actually helped me see that the challenges of developing my identity as a child of immigrants was not that unusual...”].
• Your reflective conclusions can explain how what you learned about yourself will change your actions in the future [e.g., “During a discussion in class about the challenges of helping homeless people, I realized that many of these people hate living on the street but lack the ability to see a way out. This made me realize that I wanted to take more classes in psychology...”].
• Your reflective conclusions can describe major insights you experienced a critical junctures during the course and how these moments enhanced how you see yourself as a student learner [e.g., "The guest speaker from the Head Start program made me realize why I wanted to pursue a career in elementary education..."].
• Your reflective conclusions can reconfigure or reframe how you will approach professional practice and your understanding of your future career aspirations [e.g.,, "The course changed my perceptions about seeking a career in business finance because it made me realize I want to be more engaged in customer service..."]
• Your reflective conclusions can explore any learning you derived from the act of reflecting itself [e.g., “Reflecting on the course readings that described how minority students perceive campus activities helped me identify my own biases about the benefits of those activities in acclimating to campus life...”].

NOTE: The length of a reflective paper in the social sciences is usually less than a traditional research paper. However, don’t assume that writing a reflective paper is easier than writing a research paper. A well-conceived critical reflection paper often requires as much time and effort as a research paper because you must purposeful engage in thinking about your learning in ways that you may not be comfortable with or used to. This is particular true while preparing to write because reflective papers are not as structured as a traditional research paper and, therefore, you have to think deliberately about how you want to organize the paper and what elements of the course you want to reflect upon.

ANOTHER NOTE: Do not limit yourself to using only text in reflecting on your learning. If you believe it would be helpful, consider using creative modes of thought or expression such as, illustrations, photographs, or material objects that reflects an experience related to the subject of the course that was important to you [e.g., like a ticket stub to a renowned speaker on campus]. Whatever non-textual element you include, be sure to describe the object's relevance to your personal relationship to the course content.

Problems to Avoid

A reflective paper is not a “mind dump” . Reflective papers document your personal and emotional experiences and, therefore, they do not conform to rigid structures, or schema, to organize information. However, the paper should not be a disjointed, stream-of-consciousness narrative. Reflective papers are still academic pieces of writing that require organized thought, that use academic language and tone , and that apply intellectually-driven critical thinking to the course content and your learning experiences and their significance.

A reflective paper is not a research paper . If you are asked to reflect on a course reading, the reflection will obviously include some description of the research. However, the goal of reflective writing is not to present extraneous ideas to the reader or to "educate" them about the course. The goal is to share a story about your relationship with the learning objectives of the course. Therefore, unlike research papers, you are expected to write from a first person point of view which includes an introspective examination of your own opinions, feelings, and personal assumptions.

A reflection paper is not a book review . Descriptions of the course readings using your own words is not a reflective paper. Reflective writing should focus on how you understood the implications of and were challenged by the course in relation to your own lived experiences or personal assumptions, combined with explanations of how you grew as a student learner based on this internal dialogue. Remember that you are the central object of the paper, not the research materials.

A reflective paper is not an all-inclusive meditation. Do not try to cover everything. The scope of your paper should be well-defined and limited to your specific opinions, feelings, and beliefs about what you determine to be the most significant content of the course and in relation to the learning that took place. Reflections should be detailed enough to covey what you think is important, but your thoughts should be expressed concisely and coherently [as is true for any academic writing assignment].

Critical Reflection . Writing and Communication Centre, University of Waterloo; Critical Reflection: Journals, Opinions, & Reactions . University Writing Center, Texas A&M University; Connor-Greene, Patricia A. “Making Connections: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Journal Writing in Enhancing Student Learning.” Teaching of Psychology 27 (2000): 44-46; Good vs. Bad Reflection Papers , Franklin University; Dyment, Janet E. and Timothy S. O’Connell. "The Quality of Reflection in Student Journals: A Review of Limiting and Enabling Factors." Innovative Higher Education 35 (2010): 233-244: How to Write a Reflection Paper . Academic Skills, Trent University; Amelia TaraJane House. Reflection Paper . Cordia Harrington Center for Excellence, University of Arkansas; Ramlal, Alana, and Désirée S. Augustin. “Engaging Students in Reflective Writing: An Action Research Project.” Educational Action Research 28 (2020): 518-533; Writing a Reflection Paper . Writing Center, Lewis University; McGuire, Lisa, Kathy Lay, and Jon Peters. “Pedagogy of Reflective Writing in Professional Education.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (2009): 93-107; Critical Reflection . Writing and Communication Centre, University of Waterloo; How Do I Write Reflectively? Academic Skills Toolkit, University of New South Wales Sydney; Reflective Writing . Skills@Library. University of Leeds; Walling, Anne, Johanna Shapiro, and Terry Ast. “What Makes a Good Reflective Paper?” Family Medicine 45 (2013): 7-12; Williams, Kate, Mary Woolliams, and Jane Spiro. Reflective Writing . 2nd edition. London: Red Globe Press, 2020; Yeh, Hui-Chin, Shih-hsien Yang, Jo Shan Fu, and Yen-Chen Shih. “Developing College Students’ Critical Thinking through Reflective Writing.” Higher Education Research and Development (2022): 1-16.

Writing Tip

Focus on Reflecting, Not on Describing

Minimal time and effort should be spent describing the course content you are asked to reflect upon. The purpose of a reflection assignment is to introspectively contemplate your reactions to and feeling about an element of the course. D eflecting the focus away from your own feelings by concentrating on describing the course content can happen particularly if "talking about yourself" [i.e., reflecting] makes you uncomfortable or it is intimidating. However, the intent of reflective writing is to overcome these inhibitions so as to maximize the benefits of introspectively assessing your learning experiences. Keep in mind that, if it is relevant, your feelings of discomfort could be a part of how you critically reflect on any challenges you had during the course [e.g., you realize this discomfort inhibited your willingness to ask questions during class, it fed into your propensity to procrastinate, or it made it difficult participating in groups].

Writing a Reflection Paper . Writing Center, Lewis University; Reflection Paper . Cordia Harrington Center for Excellence, University of Arkansas.

Another Writing Tip

Helpful Videos about Reflective Writing

These two short videos succinctly describe how to approach a reflective writing assignment. They are produced by the Academic Skills department at the University of Melbourne and the Skills Team of the University of Hull, respectively.

• << Previous: Writing a Policy Memo
• Next: Writing a Research Proposal >>
• Last Updated: Mar 6, 2024 1:00 PM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/assignments

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

7 Writing the Research Paper

Writing in a formal, academic, and technical manner can prove a difficult transition for clinicians turned researchers; however, there are several ways to improve your professional writing skills.  This chapter should be considered a collection of tools to consider as you work to articulate and disseminate your research.

Chapter 7: Learning Objectives

This is it! You’re ready to tell the world of the work you’ve done. As you prepare to write your research paper, you’ll be able to

• Discuss the most general components of a research paper
• Articulate the importance of framing your work for the reader using a template based on the research approach
• Identify the major components of a manuscript describing original research
• Identify the major components of a manuscript describing quality improvement projects
• Contrast the specifications of guidelines and protocols
• Identify the major components of a narrative review

Guiding Principles

Although it is wise to identify a potential journal or like avenue as you begin to write up you research, this is not always feasible. For this reason, it is a good idea to have an adequate understanding of the general expectations of what is required of written research articles and manuscripts. Here are some things to keep in mind:

Consider the articles you read

As you begin to research potential research interests, pay close attention to the style of writing found in peer-reviewed and academic journals.  You will notice that the ‘tone’ of ‘voice’ is often formal and rarely uses the first-person narrative.  You will be expected to develop writing of this caliber in order to be published in a reputable peer-reviewed forum.  One of the most difficult concepts for novice researchers to understand is that professional or technical writing is very different from casual or conversational writing.  There is little room for anecdotes, opinions, or overly descriptive narratives.  Keep your writing succinct and focused.

Keep it simple, silly! (KISS)

Recall when you were first introduced to writing a paper in an early English Composition course.  It is likely that you were told that the key components of a paper are the introduction, body, and conclusion.  This is truly the foundational structure of any good paper.  Consider the following outline for your writing assignments:

Introduction

• Brief overview of the topic which identifies the gap of understanding about a particular topic that you hope to address (why is it important?)
• Statement of problem (what issue are you going to address?)
• Purpose statement/thesis statement (what is the objective of this paper?)

Typically the body of the paper will be broken down into themes or elements outlined in the introduction.  Occasionally rather than themes or topics to be addressed, the ‘body’ of the paper will have specific components such as a literature review, methodology, data analysis, discussion, and/or recommendation section.  Each of these sections may have specific requirements within that section. Later in this chapter, you will be introduced to specific requirements of different types of research papers.

The body of any paper is the ‘meat and potatoes’ of the work.  That is, this is the section wherein you both present and explain your ideas in support of the purpose of the paper (described in the introduction).  The body of your paper, regardless of specific structure, is where the majority of your evidentiary base should be included.  That is, many of the statements you make in these sections will require substantiation from outside resources.  It is vital to include appropriate citations of all references used. To save yourself time, cite and reference correctly as you write. Doing so will help ensure that you stay organized as your work evolves.

Sections such as methods or data analyses, will not require as much substantiation and should be considered very ‘cut and dry’. That is, there will be little to no discussion or interpretation of the evidence here. Results sections, similarly, should be focused on the presentation of results specific to your investigation, including statistical analyses. When reporting results of your work consider the format and whether it makes sense to summarize results in a table, figure, or appendix. The appropriate method will depend on both the type and amount of information that you are trying to convey.

The discussion section is the point at which you should frame your results in the context of your interpretation of the existing literature and how your work addresses the gap in knowledge. You’ll work to substantiate your interpretation by utilizing references to present evidence to support your rational. Pay close attention to your approach as you discuss your results and the impact of your work. Be careful not to make declarative statements if your data does not support a cause-and-effect relationship. Additionally, be careful not to draw inference as a result of bias. That is, use caution in skewing the evidence to support your hypothesis.

The conclusion is exactly that.  This is your opportunity to wrap your thoughts up succinctly.  A good conclusion will remind the reader of the point or focus of the paper, reiterate the arguments outlined in the body as well as summarize any discussion or recommendations posed in those respective sections, and articulate what the content of the paper added to the knowledge base of the subject.  This is not a time to introduce new arguments, concepts, or evidence.  The reader should be able to finish the paper understanding the purpose of the paper, the main arguments, and the impact of the work on the subject.

References should be cited correctly in text as well as appropriately formatted at the end of each body of work. The format of your references will depend on the guidelines required of the intended journal or forum you’re submitting to. For example, papers written utilizing the American Psychological Association (APA) formatting standards will include reference pages which are organized on a separate page, titled ‘References’, and organized alphabetically by author surname. If you’re not quite sure of where you’ll be submitting your paper for publication, it may be best to write using APA format; because the references are listed in ascending alphabetical order, adding or removing references during the revision process will be minimally impactful on the designation of subsequent references. Altering your references can then be done once you identify a method of dissemination and review specific guidelines.

Understanding how to present your work can be difficult. It’s one thing to plan and do the research; it’s quite another to put it down on paper in a logical and articulate way. As we discussed in chapters 1 and 2, planning is essential to the success of your research. Similarly, planning the layout of your manuscript will help ensure that you stay both organized and focused. Although most articles can be generalized as having an introduction, body, and conclusion; the specific components within each of those sections varies depending on the approach to research.

Original Research

Although many journals may outline specific requirements for how your manuscript or research paper is to be formatted, there are some generally acceptable formats. One of the most generalizable formats is referred to as IMRaD. IMRaD is an acronym and includes the following elements:

• Introduction- 25%
• Methods- 25%
• Results- 35%
• Discussion/conclusion- 15%
• Clearly state the focus for the work. Provide a brief overview of the issue and the gap in knowledge identified; including both a problem and purpose statement in the context of what is currently understood about the topic. This is where you ‘reel’ the reader in and also highlight the important themes which are consistently addressed in the existing literature.
• General and specific approaches
• Participant selection/randomization
• Instrumentation/measurements utilized
• Here is where you report specific findings and outcomes of your work. There should be very little discussion in this section. Rather, you should present your results and comment, briefly, on how this may relate to the existing literature and state the bottom line. That is, what do these findings suggest. These succinct comments should frame the lens of the discussion section.
• In the discussion section you can further elaborate on your interpretation, based in the evidence, of how your findings relate to what other researchers have found. You can discuss flaws in your work as well as suggestions for direction of future research. You should address each of the main points you presented in your introduction section(s).

QI Projects

When presenting your QI project; a systematic reporting tool, such as the SQUIRE method , is helpful to ensure that you appropriately present the information in a way that both adds to the understanding of the problem as well as a descriptive approach to solving the issue.

SQUIRE Method

Titling your QI project

• Your title should indicate that the project addresses a specific initiative to improve healthcare.

Example of QI Project title

Quality Improvement Initiative to Standardize High Flow Nasal Cannula for Bronchiolitis: Decreases Hospital and Intensive Care Stay

• Addresses specific initiative to improve healthcare
• Directly identifies the bounds and focus of the project
• Provide enough information to help with searching and indexing of your work
• Summarize all key findings in the format required by the publication. Typical sections include background (including statement of the problem), methods, intervention, results, and conclusion
• Include a description on the nature and significance of the problem
• Summary of what is currently understood about the problem
• Overview of framework, model, concepts and/or theory used to explain the problem. Include an assumptions, delimitations, or definitions used to both describe the problem as well as develop the intervention and why the intervention was intended to work.
• Describe the purpose of the project
• Describe the contextual elements relevant to both the problem and intervention (e.g. environmental factors contributing to the problem)
• Include team-based approach, if applicable
• Describe the approach used to assess the impact of the intervention as well as what approach was used to evaluate/assess the intervention
• What tools did you use to study both the process and intervention and why?
• What tools are in place for ongoing assessment of efficacy of the project?
• How is completeness and accuracy of the data measured?
• Describe the quantitative/qualitative methods used to draw inference from the data collected
• Describe how ethical considerations were addressed and whether the project was overseen by an Institutional Review Board (IRB)
• Initial steps of intervention and evolution over time; including modifications to the intervention or project
• Details of the process measures and outcome
• Key findings including relevance to the rational and specific aims
• Strengths of the projects
• Nature of the association between intervention and outcome
• Comparison of the findings with those of other publications
• Impact of the project
• Reasons for differences between observed and anticipated outcomes; include contextual rationale
• Costs and strategic implications
• Limits to the generalizability of the work
• Factors that may have limited internal validity (e.g. confounding variables, bias, design)
• Efforts made to minimize or adjust for limitations
• Usefulness of the work
• Sustainability
• Potential for application to other contexts
• Implications for practice and further study
• Suggested next steps
• This section would be included if you received funding for the projects.

Narrative Reviews

As mentioned in chapter 2, development of either guidelines or protocols is an intensive process which often requires a systematic team approach to ensure that the scope and purpose of the work is as generalizable as possible. The best approach for the development of guidelines can be found by reviewing the World Health Organization handbook for guideline development .

Presenting a narrative review of a topic is an excellent way to contribute to the knowledge base on a particular subject as well as to provide framework for development of a protocol or guideline. The elements included in presentation of a narrative review are not all that different from those of traditional research studies; however, there are some notable differences. Here is a brief outline of what should be included in a quality narrative review, adapted from Green, Johnson, and Adams (2006) and Ferarri (2015):

• Objective: State the purpose of the paper
• Background: Describe why the paper is being written; include problem statement and/or research question
• Methods: Include methods used to conduct the review; including those used to evaluate articles for inclusion into your work
• Discussion: Frame the findings of the review in the context of the problem
• Conclusion: State what new information your work contributes as a result of your review and synthesis
• Key words: List MeSH terms and words that may help organize and/or locate your work
• Clearly state the focus for the work. Provide a brief overview of the issue and the gap in knowledge identified; including both a problem and purpose statement
• Provide an overview of how information related to the review was located. This includes what terms were searched and where as well as why studies were included in your review. Delimiting your search is important to describe the scope of the review
• Themes or constructs should be identified throughout the review of the literature and arranged in a way such that the discussion of the theme and the link to the evidence should directly address the purpose of your inquiry
• What sets a review apart from an annotated bibliography is synthesis of the evidence around major points identified consistently throughout the research (i.e. themes). Both consensus and diverging approaches should be included in the discussion of the evidence. This should not be considered simply a comparison of the existing evidence, but should be framed through the lens of the author’s interpretation of that evidence.
• Tie back to the purpose as well as the major conclusions identified in the review. No new information should be discussed here, apart from suggestions for future research opportunities

An extremely important part of disseminating your work is ensuring that you have correctly attributed thoughts and content that you did not create. Depending on the nature of your research, discipline, or intended publication, the format by which you list your references or outline resources utilized may differ. Regardless of referencing formatting guidelines, it is imperative to keep your references organized as you draft different iterations of your work. For example, it may be easier to draft your work utilizing American Psychological Association (APA) formatting guidelines, which arrange references by author’s last name, in ascending alphabetical order, than in other formats which require that references be numbered in order of appearance in the text. As you add, delete, or rearrange references within the text of your manuscript, it may be both difficult and time consuming to constantly re-number each of your references. Note : Depending on the reference guidelines for your intended journal, you may be required to list the abbreviated names of journals. Finding this information can be difficult. Consider this resource for locating and identifying how best to list journal titles within a reference.

Key Takeaways

• Identifying an appropriate outline for the research approach you selected is essential to developing a publishable manuscript
• Academic writing is formal in both voice and tone
• Academic writing is technical
• Refrain from the use of the first person narratives, including anecdotes, or interjecting your unsubstantiated opinion
• All research papers have an introduction, body, and conclusion
• Specific components of the introduction and body will vary depending on the approach
• Proper citation, referencing, or attributing must be included in all work

Green, B.N., Johnson, C.D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 3 (5), 101-117.

Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. The European Medical Writers Association, 2 4(4), 230-235. doi: 10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329

SQUIRE. (2017). Explanation and elaboration of SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines . SQUIRE. http://www.squire-statement.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.ViewPage&pageId=504

World Health Organization. (2020). WHO handbook for guideline development, 2nd Ed . World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/145714

Practical Research: A Basic Guide to Planning, Doing, and Writing Copyright © by megankoster. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book

Guide on How to Write a Reflection Paper with Free Tips and Example

A reflection paper is a very common type of paper among college students. Almost any subject you enroll in requires you to express your opinion on certain matters. In this article, we will explain how to write a reflection paper and provide examples and useful tips to make the essay writing process easier.

Reflection papers should have an academic tone yet be personal and subjective. In this paper, you should analyze and reflect upon how an experience, academic task, article, or lecture shaped your perception and thoughts on a subject.

Here is what you need to know about writing an effective critical reflection paper. Stick around until the end of our guide to get some useful writing tips from the writing team at EssayPro — a research paper writing service

What Is a Reflection Paper

A reflection paper is a type of paper that requires you to write your opinion on a topic, supporting it with your observations and personal experiences. As opposed to presenting your reader with the views of other academics and writers, in this essay, you get an opportunity to write your point of view—and the best part is that there is no wrong answer. It is YOUR opinion, and it is your job to express your thoughts in a manner that will be understandable and clear for all readers that will read your paper. The topic range is endless. Here are some examples: whether or not you think aliens exist, your favorite TV show, or your opinion on the outcome of WWII. You can write about pretty much anything.

There are three types of reflection paper; depending on which one you end up with, the tone you write with can be slightly different. The first type is the educational reflective paper. Here your job is to write feedback about a book, movie, or seminar you attended—in a manner that teaches the reader about it. The second is the professional paper. Usually, it is written by people who study or work in education or psychology. For example, it can be a reflection of someone’s behavior. And the last is the personal type, which explores your thoughts and feelings about an individual subject.

However, reflection paper writing will stop eventually with one very important final paper to write - your resume. This is where you will need to reflect on your entire life leading up to that moment. To learn how to list education on resume perfectly, follow the link on our dissertation writing services .

Unlock the potential of your thoughts with EssayPro . Order a reflection paper and explore a range of other academic services tailored to your needs. Dive deep into your experiences, analyze them with expert guidance, and turn your insights into an impactful reflection paper.

Free Reflection Paper Example

Now that we went over all of the essentials about a reflection paper and how to approach it, we would like to show you some examples that will definitely help you with getting started on your paper.

Reflection Paper Format

Reflection papers typically do not follow any specific format. Since it is your opinion, professors usually let you handle them in any comfortable way. It is best to write your thoughts freely, without guideline constraints. If a personal reflection paper was assigned to you, the format of your paper might depend on the criteria set by your professor. College reflection papers (also known as reflection essays) can typically range from about 400-800 words in length.

Here’s how we can suggest you format your reflection paper:

How to Start a Reflection Paper

The first thing to do when beginning to work on a reflection essay is to read your article thoroughly while taking notes. Whether you are reflecting on, for example, an activity, book/newspaper, or academic essay, you want to highlight key ideas and concepts.

You can start writing your reflection paper by summarizing the main concept of your notes to see if your essay includes all the information needed for your readers. It is helpful to add charts, diagrams, and lists to deliver your ideas to the audience in a better fashion.

After you have finished reading your article, it’s time to brainstorm. We’ve got a simple brainstorming technique for writing reflection papers. Just answer some of the basic questions below:

• How did the article affect you?
• How does this article catch the reader’s attention (or does it all)?
• Has the article changed your mind about something? If so, explain how.
• Has the article left you with any questions?
• Were there any unaddressed critical issues that didn’t appear in the article?
• Does the article relate to anything from your past reading experiences?
• Does the article agree with any of your past reading experiences?

Here are some reflection paper topic examples for you to keep in mind before preparing to write your own:

• How my views on rap music have changed over time
• My reflection and interpretation of Moby Dick by Herman Melville
• Why my theory about the size of the universe has changed over time
• How my observations for clinical psychological studies have developed in the last year

The result of your brainstorming should be a written outline of the contents of your future paper. Do not skip this step, as it will ensure that your essay will have a proper flow and appropriate organization.

Another good way to organize your ideas is to write them down in a 3-column chart or table.

Do you want your task look awesome?

If you would like your reflection paper to look professional, feel free to check out one of our articles on how to format MLA, APA or Chicago style

Writing a Reflection Paper Outline

Reflection paper should contain few key elements:

Introduction

Your introduction should specify what you’re reflecting upon. Make sure that your thesis informs your reader about your general position, or opinion, toward your subject.

• State what you are analyzing: a passage, a lecture, an academic article, an experience, etc...)
• Briefly summarize the work.
• Write a thesis statement stating how your subject has affected you.

One way you can start your thesis is to write:

Example: “After reading/experiencing (your chosen topic), I gained the knowledge of…”

Body Paragraphs

The body paragraphs should examine your ideas and experiences in context to your topic. Make sure each new body paragraph starts with a topic sentence.

Your reflection may include quotes and passages if you are writing about a book or an academic paper. They give your reader a point of reference to fully understand your feedback. Feel free to describe what you saw, what you heard, and how you felt.

Example: “I saw many people participating in our weight experiment. The atmosphere felt nervous yet inspiring. I was amazed by the excitement of the event.”

As with any conclusion, you should summarize what you’ve learned from the experience. Next, tell the reader how your newfound knowledge has affected your understanding of the subject in general. Finally, describe the feeling and overall lesson you had from the reading or experience.

There are a few good ways to conclude a reflection paper:

• Tie all the ideas from your body paragraphs together, and generalize the major insights you’ve experienced.
• Restate your thesis and summarize the content of your paper.

We have a separate blog post dedicated to writing a great conclusion. Be sure to check it out for an in-depth look at how to make a good final impression on your reader.

Need a hand? Get help from our writers. Edit, proofread or buy essay .

How to Write a Reflection Paper: Step-by-Step Guide

Step 1: create a main theme.

After you choose your topic, write a short summary about what you have learned about your experience with that topic. Then, let readers know how you feel about your case — and be honest. Chances are that your readers will likely be able to relate to your opinion or at least the way you form your perspective, which will help them better understand your reflection.

For example: After watching a TEDx episode on Wim Hof, I was able to reevaluate my preconceived notions about the negative effects of cold exposure.

Step 2: Brainstorm Ideas and Experiences You’ve Had Related to Your Topic

You can write down specific quotes, predispositions you have, things that influenced you, or anything memorable. Be personal and explain, in simple words, how you felt.

For example: • A lot of people think that even a small amount of carbohydrates will make people gain weight • A specific moment when I struggled with an excess weight where I avoided carbohydrates entirely • The consequences of my actions that gave rise to my research • The evidence and studies of nutritional science that claim carbohydrates alone are to blame for making people obese • My new experience with having a healthy diet with a well-balanced intake of nutrients • The influence of other people’s perceptions on the harm of carbohydrates, and the role their influence has had on me • New ideas I’ve created as a result of my shift in perspective

Step 3: Analyze How and Why These Ideas and Experiences Have Affected Your Interpretation of Your Theme

Pick an idea or experience you had from the last step, and analyze it further. Then, write your reasoning for agreeing or disagreeing with it.

For example, Idea: I was raised to think that carbohydrates make people gain weight.

Analysis: Most people think that if they eat any carbohydrates, such as bread, cereal, and sugar, they will gain weight. I believe in this misconception to such a great extent that I avoided carbohydrates entirely. As a result, my blood glucose levels were very low. I needed to do a lot of research to overcome my beliefs finally. Afterward, I adopted the philosophy of “everything in moderation” as a key to a healthy lifestyle.

For example: Idea: I was brought up to think that carbohydrates make people gain weight. Analysis: Most people think that if they eat any carbohydrates, such as bread, cereal, and sugar, they will gain weight. I believe in this misconception to such a great extent that I avoided carbohydrates entirely. As a result, my blood glucose levels were very low. I needed to do a lot of my own research to finally overcome my beliefs. After, I adopted the philosophy of “everything in moderation” as a key for having a healthy lifestyle.

Step 4: Make Connections Between Your Observations, Experiences, and Opinions

Try to connect your ideas and insights to form a cohesive picture for your theme. You can also try to recognize and break down your assumptions, which you may challenge in the future.

There are some subjects for reflection papers that are most commonly written about. They include:

• Book – Start by writing some information about the author’s biography and summarize the plot—without revealing the ending to keep your readers interested. Make sure to include the names of the characters, the main themes, and any issues mentioned in the book. Finally, express your thoughts and reflect on the book itself.
• Course – Including the course name and description is a good place to start. Then, you can write about the course flow, explain why you took this course, and tell readers what you learned from it. Since it is a reflection paper, express your opinion, supporting it with examples from the course.
• Project – The structure for a reflection paper about a project has identical guidelines to that of a course. One of the things you might want to add would be the pros and cons of the course. Also, mention some changes you might want to see, and evaluate how relevant the skills you acquired are to real life.
• Interview – First, introduce the person and briefly mention the discussion. Touch on the main points, controversies, and your opinion of that person.

Writing Tips

Everyone has their style of writing a reflective essay – and that's the beauty of it; you have plenty of leeway with this type of paper – but there are still a few tips everyone should incorporate.

Before you start your piece, read some examples of other papers; they will likely help you better understand what they are and how to approach yours. When picking your subject, try to write about something unusual and memorable — it is more likely to capture your readers' attention. Never write the whole essay at once. Space out the time slots when you work on your reflection paper to at least a day apart. This will allow your brain to generate new thoughts and reflections.

• Short and Sweet – Most reflection papers are between 250 and 750 words. Don't go off on tangents. Only include relevant information.
• Clear and Concise – Make your paper as clear and concise as possible. Use a strong thesis statement so your essay can follow it with the same strength.
• Maintain the Right Tone – Use a professional and academic tone—even though the writing is personal.
• Cite Your Sources – Try to cite authoritative sources and experts to back up your personal opinions.
• Proofreading – Not only should you proofread for spelling and grammatical errors, but you should proofread to focus on your organization as well. Answer the question presented in the introduction.

'If only someone could write my essay !' you may think. Ask for help our professional writers in case you need it.

Do You Need a Well-Written Reflection Paper?

Then send us your assignment requirements and we'll get it done in no time.

Related Articles

Assessment on Level of Effectiveness of Practical Research 1 in Preparing Grade 11 Humanities and Social Sciences Strand Students for Practical Research II in Bestlink College of the Philippines

• Abegael Airan
• Susette Golilao
• Jessica Madria
• Jerimay Jadap
• Ralphjay Pacquit
• Midel Mirasol

This study will improve the students’ researching skills and learning abilities. These students who are doing research can share the best practices that are important for learners with other researchers. These students become confident in studying, increase their awareness and understanding of their colleagues, and become accountable for their classroom performance and learning, which is one of the most important goals of reflective researching through research. When these students consider their studies and can identify and acknowledge the issues and concerns of their classrooms and their co-students, they become empowered and independent to solve the problems in the school. The researchers used descriptive research to assess the effectiveness of Practical Research 1 in preparing Grade 11 Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS) Strand students. The researchers also administered a survey questionnaire to gather information from the students with a Monday-Wednesday-Friday schedule. A random sampling technique was utilized to select 100 HUMSS Strand respondents in Bestlink College of the Philippines. A total of 75 out of 100Grade 11 students indicated that the level of effectiveness for Practical Research 1 to prepare students for Practical Research II has effects on their academic performance, especially in terms of collaborative works and availability of learning materials because they suffer from this problem. A total of 65 out of 100Grade 11 students indicated that the research is the most important reason that can affect their comprehension. Meanwhile, the advantage was the main problem of other respondents. The researchers found that the level of effectiveness of Practical Research 1 in preparing Grade 11 HUMSS Strand students for Practical Research II is the main problem of students because other students may have a practical result, which affects their academic performance. The researchers suggested that a research seminar about practical research should be conducted to help the students improve their skills about their topics such as the benefits of research on the academic performance of the students.

How to Cite

• Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

• Dindie Grace Magana, Elizabeth Barce, Necel Ellema, Jasmin Jetajobe, Roymar Angelo Soriso, Midel Mirasol, Benefits of HUMSS Strand to Develop Self-Esteem of Grade 11 Students , Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, Vol.2, No1, March 2020
• Christine Nicole Cajes, Sheila Ebrado, Monica Olaer, Rica Sarao, Queen Ahyen Tepait, Midel Mirasol, Factors Affecting Preferred College Courses of Grade 12 HUMSS Strand Students at Bestlink College of the Philippines, S.Y. 2019–2020 , Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, Vol.2, No1, March 2020
• Jhunrey Mora, Camille Joy Cabarle, Maurise Silverio, Cecille Nueva, Jessica Bo, Midel Mirasol, Effects of Peer Pressure on Academic Performance of Grade 12 HUMSS Strand Students in Bestlink College of the Philippines , Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, Vol.2, No1, March 2020
• Rohaima Pulalon, Christian Paredes, Hara Mia Pastor, Aljohn Pedrosa, Edna Rejuso, Midel Mirasol, Academic Performance of Selected Grade 12 Humanities and Social Sciences Students of Bestlink College of the Philippines as Influenced by Socioeconomic Factor , Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, Vol.2, No1, March 2020
• Ruth Anne Narciso, Angelika Felises, Shaene Villanueva, Divina Rocha, Clifford John Villareal, Midel Mirasol, Factors that Affect Choosing College Courses of Grade 12 HUMSS Strand Students in Bestlink College of the Philippines , Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, Vol.2, No1, March 2020
• Hanna Ria Kempis, Mae Enriquez, Jessa Harochoc, Szaira Cristine Huevia, Sittie Aina Indad, Midel Mirasol, ProblemsEncountered by Grade 12 HUMSS Strand Students on their Creative Writing Subject in Bestlink College of the Philippines: Basis for Proposed Guidelines , Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, Vol.2, No1, March 2020
• Christian Sabado, Gilbert Atillano, Karylle Kaye Cotoner, Bob Darrel Padrino, Joel Razos Jr., Midel Mirasol, Impactsof Parent Involvement on Academic Performance of Selected Grade 12 Humanities and Social Sciences Strand Students in Bestlink College of the Philippines , Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, Vol.2, No1, March 2020
• Hannah Ladrero, Angella Venus Villanueva, Midel Mirasol, Factors that Cause Low Academic Performances among Grade 12 HUMSS Strand Students in Bestlink College of the Philippines , Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, Vol.2, No1, March 2020
• Krisha Valen Candeluna, Hacel Ann Garcia, Roselee An Lagrimas, Erica Morales, Joanne Rojas, Midel Mirasol, Benefits of Whole Day Class Schedule in Grade 12 Humanities and Social Sciences Students at Bestlink College of the Philippines , Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, Vol.2, No1, March 2020
• Gimarie Vila, Roland Dela Cruz, Jomari Icay, Alexandra Domaoal, Patricia Mae Macaranas, Midel Mirasol, Effects of Stress on Study Habits of Grade 12 HUMSS Strand Students in Bestlink College of the Philippines , Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, Vol.2, No1, March 2020

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• CBE Life Sci Educ
• v.22(2); Summer 2023
• PMC10228263

Reflective Practices in Education: A Primer for Practitioners

Haleigh machost.

1 Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903

Marilyne Stains

Associated data.

Reflective practices in education are widely advocated for and have become important components of professional reviews. The advantages of reflective practices are many; however, the literature often focuses on the benefits to students, rather than the benefits for the educators themselves. Additionally, the extant literature concerning reflective practices in education is laden with conflicting terminology and complex studies, which can inhibit educators’ understanding of reflective practices and prevent their adoption. As such, this Essay serves as a primer for educators beginning reflective practices. It briefly describes the benefits to educators and different classifications and modalities of reflection and examines some of the challenges that educators may encounter.

INTRODUCTION

“Reflection” has become a buzzword in academia and has vast array of implications across fields, disciplines, and subdisciplines. When considering reflection about teaching practices, John Dewey, a psychologist and philosopher who was heavily influential in educational reform, provides a relevant description: reflection is ‘‘the active, persistent and careful consideration of any belief or supposed form of knowledge in the light of the grounds that support it and the further conclusions to which it tends” ( Dewey, 1933 , p. 9). The act of reflection in this context is meant to indicate a process , with Dewey highlighting the necessity of active thinking when encountering obstacles and problems. In less philosophical phrasing, reflection entails considering past or present experiences, learning from the outcomes observed, and planning how to better approach similar situations in the future. Consequently, Dewey suggests that educators embark on a journey of continual improvement when engaging in reflective practices. This is in stark contrast to how reflection is used in higher education. For many educators, the only time they engage in reflection is when they are asked to write documents that are used to evaluate whether they should be promoted, receive a raise, or be granted tenure. Reflection, within an evaluation framework, can be counterproductive and prevent meaningful reflections due to perceptions of judgment ( Brookfield, 2017 ).

This gap may result from the particular adaptation of reflections by some academics. The origin of reflective practices lies not in the realm of academia, but rather in professional training. It is often traced back to Donald Schön’s instrumental 1983 work The Reflective Practitioner , which, while aimed at his target audience of nonacademic professionals, has become foundational for reflective practices in teaching ( Munby and Russell, 1989 ).

In the varied topography of professional practice, there is a high, hard ground where practitioners can make effective use of research-based theory and technique, and there is a swampy lowland where situations are confusing “messes” incapable of technical solution. The difficulty is that the problems of the high ground, however great their technical interest, are often relatively unimportant to clients or to the larger society, while in the swamp are the problems of greatest human concern. ( Schön, 1983 , p. 42)

Schön’s work on the education of various professionals gained traction, as he diverged from common norms of the time. In particular, he disagreed with separating knowledge and research from practice, and methods from results ( Schön, 1983 ; Newman, 1999 ). In doing so, he advocated for practical as well as technical knowledge, enabling professionals to develop greater competency in the real-world situations they encounter. Research in the ensuing decades focused on both gaining evidence for the effectiveness of reflective practices ( Dervent, 2015 ; Zahid and Khanam, 2019 ) and understanding the obstacles that can prevent reflective practices from being adopted ( Davis, 2003 ; Sturtevant and Wheeler, 2019 ).

This Essay is not intended to provide a comprehensive review of this work for use by education researchers; rather, the goal of this Essay is to provide a guide, grounded in this literature, to inform beginning reflective practitioners about the benefits of reflections, the different types of reflections that one can engage in, practical advice for engaging in reflective practices, and the potential challenges and corresponding solutions when engaging in reflective practices. It is also intended as a resource for professional development facilitators who are interested in infusing reflective practice within their professional development programs.

WHY SHOULD I ENGAGE IN REFLECTIVE PRACTICES?

Perhaps the best place to begin when discussing reflective practices is with the question “Why do people do it?” It is common to conceptualize reflection about teaching situations as a way to help “fix” any problems or issues that present themselves ( Brookfield, 2017 ). However, this view is counterproductive to the overarching goal of reflective practices—to continually improve one’s own efficacy and abilities as an educator. Similar to how there is always a new, more efficient invention to be made, there is always room for improvement by even the most experienced and well-loved educators. People choose to be educators for any number of personal reasons, but often the grounding desire is to help inform, mentor, or guide the next generation. With such a far-reaching aim, educators face many obstacles, and reflective practices are one tool to help mitigate them.

Classrooms are an ever-changing environment. The students change, and with that comes new generational experiences and viewpoints. Updates to technology provide new opportunities for engaging with students and exploring their understanding. New curricula and pedagogical standards from professional organizations, institutions, or departments can fundamentally alter the modes of instruction and the concepts and skills being taught. As described by Brookfield, reflection can act as a “gyroscope,” helping educators stay balanced amid a changing environment ( 2017 , p. 81). Through the process of reflection, practitioners focus on what drives them to teach and their guiding principles, which define how they interact with both their students and their peers. Furthermore, reflective practitioners are deliberately cognizant of the reasoning behind their actions, enabling them to act with more confidence when faced with a sudden or difficult situation ( Brookfield, 2017 ). In this way, reflection can help guide educators through the challenging times they may experience in their careers.

One such obstacle is imposter syndrome, which is all too familiar for many educators ( Brems et al. , 1994 ; Parkman, 2016 ; Collins et al. , 2020 ). It is a sense that, despite all efforts put in—the knowledge gained, the relationships formed, and the lives changed—what one does is never enough and one does not belong. These feelings often lead to a fear of being “discovered as a fraud or non-deserving professional, despite their demonstrated talent and achievements” ( Chrousos and Mentis, 2020 , p. 749). A part of reflective practices that is often overlooked is the consideration of everything that goes well . While it is true that reflective practitioners are aware of areas for improvement in their teaching, it is also true that they acknowledge, celebrate, and learn from good things that happen in their classrooms and in their interactions with students and peers. As such, they are more consciously aware of their victories, even if those victories happen to be small ( Brookfield, 2017 ). That is not to say that reflective practices are a cure-all for those dealing with imposter syndrome, but reflections can be a reminder that their efforts are paying off and that someone, whether it be students, peers, or even the practitioner themselves, is benefiting from their actions. Furthermore, reflecting on difficult situations has the potential for individuals to realize the extent of their influence ( Brookfield, 2017 ).

In a similar vein, reflective practices can help educators realize when certain expectations or cultural norms are out of their direct ability to address. For example, educators cannot be expected to tackle systemic issues such as racism, sexism, and ableism alone. Institutions must complement educators’ efforts through, for example, establishment of support systems for students excluded because of their ethnicity or race and the implementation of data-driven systems, which can inform the institutions’ and educators’ practices. Thus, through reflections, educators can avoid “self-laceration” ( Brookfield, 2017 , p. 86) and feelings of failure when the problems experienced are multifaceted.

In addition to alleviating “self-laceration,” developing reflective practice and reflective practitioners has been identified as one of four dominant change strategies in the literature ( Henderson et al. , 2011 ). Specifically, developing reflective practitioners is identified as a strategy that empowers individual educators to enact change ( Henderson et al. , 2011 ). One avenue for such change comes with identifying practices that are harmful to students. Reflecting on teaching experiences and student interactions can allow educators to focus on things such as whether an explanatory metaphor is accessible to different types of students in the class (e.g., domestic and international students), if any particular group of students do not work well together, and whether the curriculum is accessible for students from varied educational and cultural backgrounds. Thus, through the process of reflection, educators grow in their ability to help their students on a course level, and they are better positioned to advocate on their students’ behalf when making curricular decisions on a departmental or institutional level.

An additional part of reflection is gathering feedback to enable a holistic view of one’s teaching practices. When feedback is given by a trusted peer, this invaluable information can guide chosen teaching methods and ways of explaining new information. When feedback is given by students and that feedback is then acted upon, it demonstrates to the students that their opinions and experiences are taken seriously and fosters a more trusting environment ( Brookfield, 2017 ). Furthermore, when discrepancies arise between the intention of the teacher and the interpretation of the students, reflection also aids practitioners in verbalizing their reasoning. Through reflection, educators would need to consider past experiences, prior knowledge, and beliefs that led to their actions. As such, reflective practitioners are able to have honest and informed discussions with their students who may be confused or unhappy with a particular decision. Explaining this to students not only models the practice of continuous inquiry and of considering one’s actions, but it also allows students to understand the rationale behind decisions they may not personally agree with, fostering a more productive student–teacher relationship ( Brookfield, 2017 ).

WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF REFLECTION?

This section aims to summarize and clarify the different ways reflection has been conceptualized in the literature ( Table 1 ). Specifically, reflections have been described based on their timing, depth, and content. Notably, practitioners of reflective practices must utilize multiple types of reflection in order to more effectively improve different aspects of their teaching ( Griffiths and Tann, 1992 ).

The various conceptualizations and associated types of reflections along with examples of guiding questions

Time-Dependent

To understand the time-dependent conceptualization of reflection, we return to Schön (1983 ). He defines two particular concepts—“reflection-in-action” and “reflection-on-action”—which are delineated based on the time that the reflection takes place. Reflection-in-action is characterized as practitioners reflecting while simultaneously completing the relevant action. Reflection-on-action encompasses a practitioner reflecting on a past action, analyzing the different influences, and carefully considering the observed or potential outcomes. Reflection-in-action is perceived as more difficult due to the multiple factors that teachers have to consider at once while also ensuring that the lesson carries on.

Later work built on this initial description of time-dependent reflections. In particular, Loughran renamed the original two timings to make them more intuitive and added one time point ( Loughran, 2002a ). The three categories include: “anticipatory,” “contemporaneous,” and “retrospective,” wherein actions taken, or to be taken, are contemplated before, during, and after an educating experience, respectively. It should be noted that both Loughran’s and Schön’s models are able to function in tandem with the depth- or content-based understandings of reflections, which are described in the next sections.

Depth of Reflections

Conceptualizing reflection in terms of depth has a long history in the literature (see Section 5.1 in the Supplemental Material for a historical view of the depth-based model of reflections). Thankfully, Larrivee (2008a) designed a depth-classification system that encompasses an array of terminologies and explanations pre-existing in the literature. This classification includes a progression in reflective practices across four levels: “pre-reflection,” “surface,” “pedagogical,” and “critical reflection.”

During the pre-reflection stage, educators do not engage in reflections. They are functioning in “survival mode” ( Larrivee, 2008a , p. 350; Campoy, 2010 , p. 17), reacting automatically to situations without considering alternatives and the impacts on the students ( Larrivee, 2008a ; Campoy, 2010 ). At this stage, educators may feel little agency, consider themselves the victims of coincidental circumstances, or attribute the ownership of problems to others such as their students, rather than themselves ( Larrivee, 2008a ; Campoy, 2010 ). They are unlikely to question the status quo, thereby failing to consider and adapt to the needs of the various learners in their classrooms ( Larrivee, 2008a ; Campoy, 2010 ). While the description of educators at this level is non-ideal, educators at the pre-reflection level are not ill intended. However, the pre-reflective level is present among practitioners, as evidenced in a 2015 study investigating 140 English as a Foreign Language educators and a 2010 analysis of collected student reflections ( Campoy, 2010 ; Ansarin et al. , 2015 ). The presence of pre-reflective educators is also readily apparent in the authors’ ongoing research. As such, being aware of the pre-reflection stage is necessary for beginning practitioners, and this knowledge is perhaps most useful for designers of professional development programs.

The first true level of reflection is surface reflection. At this level, educators are concerned about achieving a specific goal, such as high scores on standardized tests. However, these goals are only approached through conforming to departmental norms, evidence from their own experiences, or otherwise well-established practices ( Larrivee, 2008a ). In other words, educators at this level question whether the specific pedagogical practices will achieve their goals, but they do not consider any new or nontraditional pedagogical practices or question the current educational policies ( Campoy, 2010 ). Educators’ reflections are grounded in personal assumptions and influenced by individuals’ unexamined beliefs and unconscious biases.

At the pedagogical level, educators “reflect on educational goals, the theories underlying approaches, and the connections between theoretical principles and practice.” ( Larrivee, 2008a , p. 343). At this level, educators also consider their own belief systems and how those systems relate to their practices and explore the problem from different perspectives. A representative scenario at this level includes: teachers contemplating their various teaching methods and considering their observed outcomes in student comprehension, alternative viewpoints, and also the current evidence-based research in education. Subsequently, they alter (or maintain) their previous teaching practices to benefit the students. In doing so, more consideration is given to possible factors than in surface reflection. This category is quite broad due to the various definitions present in the literature ( Larrivee, 2008a ). However, there is a common emphasis on the theory behind teaching practices, ensuring that practice matches theory, and the student outcomes of enacted teaching practices ( Larrivee, 2008a ).

The last level of reflection categorized by Larrivee is critical reflection, wherein educators consider the ethical, moral, and political ramifications of who they are and what they are teaching to their students ( Larrivee, 2008a ). An approachable way of thinking about critical reflection is that the practitioners are challenging their assumptions about what is taught and how students learn. In doing so, educators evaluate their own views, assertions, and assumptions about teaching, with attention paid to how such beliefs impact students both as learners and as individuals ( Larrivee, 2005 , 2008b ). Through practicing critical reflection, societal issues that affect teaching can be uncovered, personal views become evidence based rather than grounded in assumptions, and educators are better able to help a diverse student population.

Larrivee used this classification to create a tool for measuring the reflectivity of teachers (see Section 4.1 of the Supplemental Material).

Content of Reflections

The third type of reflection is one in which what is being reflected on is the defining feature. One such example is Valli’s five types of reflection ( 1997 ): “technical reflection,” “reflection-in and on-action,” “deliberative reflection,” “personalistic reflection,” and “critical reflection.” Note that Valli’s conceptions of the two types of reflection—reflection-in and on-action, and critical reflection—are congruent with the descriptions provided in the Time-Dependent and Depth sections of this Essay , respectively, and will thus not be detailed in this section.

In a technical reflection, educators evaluate their instructional practices in light of the findings from the research on teaching and learning ( Valli, 1997 ). The quality of this type of reflection is based on the educators’ knowledge of this body of work and the extent to which their teaching practices adhere to it. For example, educators would consider whether they are providing enough opportunities for their students to explain their reasoning to one another during class. This type of reflection does not focus on broader topics such as the structure and content of the curriculum or issues of equity.

Deliberative reflection encompasses “a whole range of teaching concerns, including students, the curriculum, instructional strategies, the rules and organization of the classroom” ( Valli, 1997 , p. 75). In this case, “deliberative” comes from the practitioners having to debate various external viewpoints and perspectives or research that maybe be in opposition. As such, they have an internal deliberation when deciding on the best actions for their specific teaching situations. The quality of the reflection is based on the educators’ ability to evaluate the various perspectives and provide sound reasoning for their decisions.

Personalistic reflection involves educators’ personal growth as well as the individual relationships they have with their students. Educators engaged in this type of reflection thoughtfully explore the relationships between their personal and professional goals and consider the various facets of students’ lives with the overarching aim of providing the best experience. The quality of the reflection is based on an educator’s ability to empathize.

To manage the limitations of each type of reflections, Valli recommended that reflective practitioners not focus solely on a specific type of reflection, but rather engage with multiple types of reflections, as each addresses different questions. It is important to note that some types of reflections may be prerequisite to others and that some may be more important than others; for example, Valli stated that critical reflections are more valuable than technical reflections, as they address the important issues of justice. The order of Valli’s types of reflection provided in Table 1 reflects her judgment on the importance of the questions that each type of reflection addresses.

HOW CAN I ENGAGE IN REFLECTION?

Larrivee suggested that there is not a prescribed strategy to becoming a reflective practitioner but that there are three practices that are necessary: 1) carving time out for reflection, 2) constantly problem solving, and 3) questioning the status quo ( Larrivee, 2000 ). This section of the Essay provides a buffet of topics for consideration and methods of organization that support these three practices. This section is intended to assist educators in identifying their preferred mode of reflection and to provide ideas for professional development facilitators to explicitly infuse reflective practices in their programs.

For educators who are new to reflective practices, it is useful to view the methods presented as “transforming what we are already doing, first and foremost by becoming more aware of ourselves, others, and the world within which we live” ( Rodgers and Laboskey, 2016 , p. 101) rather than as a complete reformation of current methods.

Focus of the Reflection: Critical Incident

When practicing reflection, a critical incident may be identified or presented in order to ignite the initial reflection or to foster deeper thought by practitioners ( Tripp, 2011 ). Critical incidents are particular situations that become the focus of reflections. Farrell described critical incidents in education as unplanned events that hold the potential to highlight misconceptions and foster greater and newer understanding about teaching and learning ( 2008 ). These can be situations ranging from students not understanding a foundational concept from a previous course to considering how to navigate the analysis of a data set that includes cultural background and socioeconomic status.

Critical incidents are used, because meaningful reflection is often a result of educators experiencing a problem or some form of cognitive dissonance concerning teaching practices and approaches to their students ( Lee, 2005 ). Therefore, it is most effective to combine techniques, which are outlined later in this section, with a critical incident to force practitioners into a new and difficult positions relating to education. Larrivee details that a sense of “uncertainty, dissonance, dilemma, problem, or conflict” is extremely valuable to personal reflection and growth ( 2008b , p. 93). Thus, unsettling experiences encourage changes to action far more than reflecting on typical teaching/learning interactions. This is an inherently uncomfortable experience for the practitioner, as feelings of self-doubt, uncertainty, anger, and self- or peer-rejection can come to the surface ( Larrivee, 2008b ). Yet, it is when educators are in an uncomfortable position that they are best able to challenge their learned assertions about what they are teaching and how they are supporting their students’ learning. This requires a conscious effort on the part of the educator. Humans tend to function automatically based on their past experiences and ingrained beliefs. This results in certain aspects of events being ignored while others become the driving force behind reactions. In a sense, humans have a “filter system” that can unconsciously eliminate the most effective course of action; this results in humans functioning in a cycle in which current, unquestioned beliefs determine which data and experiences are given attention ( Larrivee, 2000 , p. 295).

Critical incidents highlight any dissonance present in one’s actions, enabling practitioners to tackle social, ethical, political, and pedagogical issues that may be systemic to their departments, their fields, or their cultures. Critical incidents foster critical reflection (under the depth- and content-based models) even in novice teachers ( Pultorak, 1996 ; Griffin, 2003 ). It is because of the difficulty and uncertainty posed by critical incidents that they are widely promoted as an invaluable aspect of reflective practices in education. Therefore, the analysis of critical incidents, whether they are case studies or theoretical examples, has been used in educating both pre-service ( Griffin, 2003 ; Harrison and Lee, 2011 ) and current educators ( Benoit, 2013 ).

Scaffoldings Promoting Reflections

Once a critical incident has been identified, the next step is structuring the reflection itself. Several scaffolding models exist in the literature and are described in Section 3 of the Supplemental Material. As reflections are inherently personal, educators should use the scaffolding that works best for them. Two scaffoldings that have been found to be useful in developing reflective practices are Bain’s 5R and Gibbs’s reflective cycle.

Bain et al. (2002) created the 5R framework to support the development of pre-service teachers into reflective practitioners. The framework includes the following five steps ( Bain et al. , 2002 ):

• Reporting involves considering a particular experience and the contextual factors that surround it.
• Responding is when the individual practitioners verbalize their feelings, thoughts, and other reactions that they had in response to the situation.
• Relating is defined as teachers making connections between what occurred recently and their previously obtained knowledge and skill base.
• Reasoning then encourages the practitioners to consider the foundational concepts and theories, as well as other factors that they believe to be significant, in an effort to understand why a certain outcome was achieved or observed.
• Finally, reconstructing is when the teachers take their explanations and uses them to guide future teaching methods, either to encourage a similar result or to foster a different outcome.

This framework facilitates an understanding of what is meant by and required for reflective practices. For a full explanation of Bain’s scaffolding and associated resources, see Sections 1.2 and 3.3 in the Supplemental Material.

A popular scaffolding for promoting reflective practices is the reflective learning cycle described by Gibbs (1988) . This cycle for reflection has been extensively applied in teacher preparation programs and training of health professionals ( Husebø et al. , 2015 ; Ardian et al. , 2019 ; Markkanen et al. , 2020 ). The cycle consists of six stages:

• Description: The practitioner first describes the situation to be reflected on in detail.
• Feelings: The practitioner then explores their feelings and thoughts processes during the situation.
• Evaluation: The practitioner identifies what went well and what went wrong.
• Analysis: The practitioner makes sense of the situation by exploring why certain things went well while others did not.
• Conclusions: The practitioner summarizes what they learned from their analysis of the situation.
• Personal action plans: The practitioner develops a plan for what they would do in a similar situation in the future and what other steps they need to take based on what they learn (e.g., gain some new skills or knowledge).

For a full explanation of Gibbs’s scaffolding and associated resources, see Sections 1.3 and 3.4 in the Supplemental Material.

We see these two models as complementary and have formulated a proposed scaffolding for reflection by combining the two models. In Table 2 , we provide a short description of each step and examples of reflective statements. The full scaffolding is provided in Section 3.6 of the Supplemental Material.

Proposed scaffolds for engaging in reflective practices a

a An expanded version is provided in Section 3.6 of the Supplemental Material.

Even with the many benefits of these scaffolds, educators must keep in mind the different aspects and levels of reflection that should be considered. Especially when striving for higher levels of reflection, the cultural, historical, and political contexts must be considered in conjunction with teaching practices for such complex topics to affect change ( Campoy, 2010 ). For instance, if equity and effectiveness of methods are not contemplated, there is no direct thought about how to then improve those aspects of practice.

Modalities for Reflections

The different scaffolds can be implemented in a wide variety of practices ( Table 3 ). Of all the various methods of reflection, reflective writing is perhaps the most often taught method, and evidence has shown that it is a deeply personal practice ( Greiman and Covington, 2007 ). Unfortunately, many do not continue with reflective writing after a seminar or course has concluded ( Jindal‐Snape and Holmes, 2009 ). This may be due to the concern of time required for the physical act of writing. In fact, one of the essential practices for engaging in effective reflections is creating a space and time for personal, solitary reflection ( Larrivee, 2000 ); this is partially due to the involvement of “feelings of frustration, insecurity, and rejection” as “taking solitary time helps teachers come to accept that such feelings are a natural part of the change process” while being in a safe environment ( Larrivee, 2000 , p. 297). It is important to note that reflective writing is not limited to physically writing in a journal or typing into a private document; placing such a limitation may contribute to the practice being dropped, whereas a push for different forms of reflection will keep educators in practice ( Dyment and O'Connell, 2014 ). Reflective writings can include documents such as case notes ( Jindal‐Snape and Holmes, 2009 ), reviewing detailed lesson plans ( Posthuma, 2012 ), and even blogging ( Alirio Insuasty and Zambrano Castillo, 2010 ; van Wyk, 2013 ; Garza and Smith, 2015 ).

Common methods to engage in reflective practices

The creation of a blog or other online medium can help foster reflection. In addition to fostering reflection via the act of writing on an individual level, this online form of reflective writing has several advantages. One such benefit is the readily facilitated communication and collaboration between peers, either through directly commenting on a blog post or through blog group discussions ( Alirio Insuasty and Zambrano Castillo, 2010 ; van Wyk, 2013 ; Garza and Smith, 2015 ). “The challenge and support gained through the collaborative process is important for helping clarify beliefs and in gaining the courage to pursue beliefs” ( Larrivee, 2008b , p. 95). By allowing other teachers to comment on published journal entries, a mediator role can be filled by someone who has the desired expertise but may be geographically distant. By this same logic, blogs have the great potential to aid teachers who themselves are geographically isolated.

Verbal reflections through video journaling (vlogs) follows the same general methods as writing. This method has the potential to be less time intensive ( Clarke, 2009 ), which may lower one of the barriers facing practitioners. Greiman and Covington (2007) identified verbal reflection as one of the three preferred modalities of reflection by student teachers. By recording their verbal contemplations and reflections, practitioners can review their old thoughts about different course materials, enabling them to adjust their actions based on reflections made when observations were fresh in their mind. Students learning reflective practices also noted that recorded videos convey people’s emotions and body language—reaching a complexity that is not achievable with plain text or audio ( Clarke, 2009 ).

If writing or video journaling is not appealing, another method to facilitate reflective practices is that of making video recordings of teaching experiences in vivo. This differs from vlogs, which are recorded after the teaching experiences. A small longitudinal qualitative study indicated that the video recordings allowed participants to be less self-critical and to identify effective strategies they were employing ( Jindal‐Snape and Holmes, 2009 ). Additionally, beginning teachers found the most value in videotaping their teaching as compared with electronic portfolios and online discussions ( Romano and Schwartz, 2005 ). By recording their teaching practices, practitioners can use a number of clearly outlined self- and peer-assessments, as detailed in Section 4 of the Supplemental Material. However, it should be noted that all three technology-driven methods used in the study by Romano and Schwartz (2005) were helpful for the participants, and as reflective practices are inherently personal, many methods should be considered by practitioners new to purposeful reflection.

Group efforts, such as group discussions or community meetings, can foster reflective thinking, thereby encouraging reflective practices. “The checks and balances of peers’ and critical friends’ perspectives can help developing teachers recognize when they may be devaluing information or using self-confirming reasoning, weighing evidence with a predisposition to confirm a belief or theory, rather than considering alternative theories that are equally plausible” ( Larrivee, 2008b , p. 94). These benefits are essential to help educators reach the higher levels of reflection (i.e., pedagogical reflection and critical reflection), as it can be difficult to think of completely new viewpoints on one’s own, especially when educators are considering the needs of diverse students yet only have their own experiences to draw upon. Henderson et. al . (2011) review of the literature found that successful reports of developing reflective practitioners as a strategy for change had two commonalities. One of these was the presence of either a community where experiences are shared ( Gess-Newsome et al. , 2003 ; Henderson et al. , 2011 ) or of an additional participant providing feedback to the educator ( Penny and Coe, 2004 ; McShannon and Hynes, 2005 ; Henderson et al. , 2011 ). The second commonality was the presence of support by a change agent ( Hubball et al. , 2005 ; Henderson et al. , 2011 ), which is far more context reliant.

Even in the absence of change agent support, peer observation can be implemented as a tool for establishing sound reflective practices. This can be accomplished through informal observations followed by an honest discussion. It is vital for the correct mindset to be adopted during such a mediation session, as the point of reflection is in assessing the extent to which practitioners’ methods allow them to achieve their goals for student learning. This cannot be done in an environment where constructive feedback is seen as a personal critique. For example, it was found that peers who simply accepted one another’s practices out of fear of damaging their relationships did not benefit from peer observation and feedback ( Manouchehri, 2001 ); however, an initially resistant observer was able to provide valuable feedback after being prompted by the other participant ( Manouchehri, 2001 ). One approach to ensure the feedback promotes reflections is for the observer and participant to meet beforehand and have a conversation about areas on which to focus feedback. The follow-up conversation focuses first on these areas and can be expanded afterward to other aspects of the teaching that the observer noticed. Observation protocols (provided in Section 4.2 in the Supplemental Material) can also be employed in these settings to facilitate the focus of the reflection.

For those interested in assessing their own or another’s reflection, Section 4 in the Supplemental Material will be helpful, as it highlights different tools that have been shown to be effective and are adaptable to different situations.

WHAT BARRIERS MIGHT I FACE?

It is typical for educators who are introducing new practices in their teaching to experience challenges both at the personal and contextual levels ( Sturtevant and Wheeler, 2019 ). In this section, we address the personal and contextual barriers that one may encounter when engaging in reflective practices and provide advice and recommendations to help address these barriers. We also aim to highlight that the difficulties faced are commonly shared by practitioners embarking on the complex journey of becoming reflective educators.

Personal Barriers

Professional development facilitators who are interested in supporting their participants’ growth as reflective practitioners will need to consider: 1) the misunderstandings that practitioners may have about reflections and 2) the need to clearly articulate the purpose and nature of reflective practices. Simply asking practitioners to reflect will not lead to desirable results ( Loughran, 2002b ). Even if the rationale and intent is communicated, there is also the pitfall of oversimplification. Practitioners may stop before the high levels of reflection (e.g., critical reflection) are reached due to a lack of in-depth understanding of reflective practices ( Thompson and Pascal, 2012 ). Even if the goals are understood and practitioners intend to evaluate their teaching practices on the critical level, there can still be confusion about what reflective practices require from practitioners. The theory of reflective practices may be grasped, but it is not adequately integrated into how practitioners approach teaching ( Thompson and Pascal, 2012 ). We hope that this Essay and associated Supplemental Material provide a meaningful resource to help alleviate this challenge.

A concern often raised is that the level of critical reflection is not being reached ( Ostorga, 2006 ; Larrivee, 2008a ). Considering the impacts that student–teacher interactions have on students beyond the classroom is always a crucial part of being an educator. In terms of practicality, situations being considered may not be conducive to this type of reflection. Consider an educator who, after a formative assessment, realizes that students, regardless of ethnicity, nationality, or gender, did not grasp a foundational topic that is required for the rest of the course. In such a case, it is prudent to consider how the information was taught and to change instructional methods to adhere to research-based educational practices. If the information was presented in a lecture-only setting, implementing aspects of engagement, exploration, and elaboration on the subject by the students can increase understanding ( Eisenkraft, 2003 ). If the only interactions were student–teacher based and all work was completed individually, the incorporation of student groups could result in a deeper understanding of the material by having students act as teachers or by presenting students with alternative way of approaching problems (e.g., Michaelsen et al. , 1996 ). Both of these instructional changes are examples that can result from pedagogical reflection and are likely to have a positive impact on the students. As such, educators who practice any level of reflection should be applauded. The perseverance and dedication of practitioners cannot be undervalued, even if their circumstances lead to fewer instances of critical reflection. We suggest that communities of practice such as faculty learning communities, scholarship of teaching and learning organizations, or professional development programs are excellent avenues to support educators ( Baker et al. , 2014 ; Bathgate et al. , 2019 ; Yik et al. , 2022a , b ), including in the development of knowledge and skills required to reach critical reflections. For example, facilitators of these communities and programs can intentionally develop scaffolding and exercises wherein participants consider whether the deadlines and nature of assignments are equitable to all students in their courses. Professional development facilitators are strongly encouraged to be explicit about the benefits to individual practitioners concomitantly with the benefits to students (see Section 2 in the Supplemental Material), as benefits to practitioners are too often ignored yet comprise a large portion of the reasoning behind reflective practices.

At a practitioner’s level, the time requirement for participating in reflective practices is viewed as a major obstacle, and it would be disingenuous to discount this extensive barrier ( Greiman and Covington, 2007 ). Reflective practices do take time, especially when done well and with depth. However, we argue that engagement in reflective practice early on can help educators become more effective with the limited time they do have ( Brookfield, 2017 ). As educators engage in reflective practices, they become more aware of their reasoning, their teaching practices, the effectiveness of said practices, and whether their actions are providing them with the outcomes they desire ( Thompson and Pascal, 2012 ). Therefore, they are able to quickly and effectively troubleshoot challenges they encounter, increasing the learning experiences for their students. Finally, we argue that the consistent engagement in reflective practices can significantly facilitate and expedite the writing of documents necessary for annual evaluations and promotions. These documents often require a statement in which educators must evaluate their instructional strategies and their impact on students. A reflective practitioner would have a trail of documents that can easily be leveraged to write such statement.

Contextual Factors

Environmental influences have the potential to bring reflective practices to a grinding halt. A paradigm shift that must occur to foster reflective teacher: that of changing the teacher’s role from a knowledge expert to a “pedagogic expert” ( Day, 1993 ). As with any change of this magnitude, support is necessary across all levels of implementation and practitioners to facilitate positive change. Cole (1997) made two observations that encapsulate how institutions can prevent the implementation of reflective practices: first, many educators who engage in reflective practices do so secretly. Second, reflections are not valued in academic communities despite surface-level promotions for such teaching practices; institutions promote evidence-based teaching practices, including reflection, yet instructors’ abilities as educators do not largely factor into promotions, raises, and tenure ( Brownell and Tanner, 2012 ; Johnson et al. , 2018 ). The desire for educators to focus on their teaching can become superficial, with grants and publications mattering more than the results of student–teacher interactions ( Cole, 1997 ; Michael, 2007 ).

Even when teaching itself is valued, the act of changing teaching methods can be resisted and have consequences. Larrivee’s (2000) statement exemplifies this persistent issue:

Critically reflective teachers also need to develop measures of tactical astuteness that will enable them to take a contrary stand and not have their voices dismissed. One way to keep from committing cultural suicide is to build prior alliances both within and outside the institution by taking on tasks that demonstrate school loyalty and build a reputation of commitment. Against a history of organizational contributions, a teacher is better positioned to challenge current practices and is less readily discounted. (p. 298)

The notion that damage control must be a part of practicing reflective teaching is indicative of a system that is historically opposed to the implementation of critical reflection ( Larrivee, 2000 ). We view this as disheartening, as the goal of teaching should be to best educate one’s students. Even as reflective practices in teaching are slowly becoming more mainstream, contextual and on-site influences still have a profound impact on how teachers approach their profession ( Smagorinsky, 2015 ). There must be a widespread, internal push for change within departments and institutions for reflective practices to be easily and readily adopted.

The adoption of reflective practices must be done in a way that does not negate its benefits. For example, Galea (2012) highlights the negative effects of routinizing or systematizing this extremely individual and circumstance-based method (e.g., identification of specific areas to focus on, standardized timing and frequency of reflections). In doing so, the systems that purportedly support teachers using reflection remove their ability to think of creative solutions, limit their ability to develop as teachers, and can prevent an adequate response to how the students are functioning in the learning environment ( Tan, 2008 ). Effective reflection can be stifled when reflections are part of educators’ evaluations for contract renewal, funding opportunities, and promotions and tenure. Reflective practices are inherently vulnerable, as they involve both being critical of oneself and taking responsibility for personal actions ( Larrivee, 2008b ). Being open about areas for improvement is extremely difficult when it has such potential negative impacts on one’s career. However, embarking on honest reflection privately, or with trusted peers and mentors, can be done separately from what is presented for evaluation. We argue that reflections can support the writing of documents to be considered for evaluation, as these documents often request the educators to describe the evolution of their teaching and its impact on students. Throughout course terms, reflections conducted privately can provide concreate ideas for how to frame an evaluation document. We argue that administrators, department chairs, and members of tenure committees should be explicit with their educators about the advantages of reflective practices in preparing evaluative documents focused on teaching.

CONCLUDING THOUGHTS

Reflective practices are widely advocated for in academic circles, and many teaching courses and seminars include information regarding different methods of reflection. This short introduction intends to provide interested educators with a platform to begin reflective practices. Common methods presented may appeal to an array of educators, and various self- and peer-assessment tools are highlighted in Section 4 in the Supplemental Material. Reflective practices are a process and a time- and energy-intensive, but extremely valuable tool for educators when implemented with fidelity. Therefore, reflection is vital for efficacy as an educator and a requirement for educators to advance their lifelong journeys as learners.

To conclude, we thought the simple metaphor provided by Thomas Farrell best encapsulates our thoughts on reflective practices within the context of teaching: Reflective practices are “a compass of sorts to guide teachers when they may be seeking direction as to what they are doing in their classrooms. The metaphor of reflection as a compass enables teachers to stop, look, and discover where they are at that moment and then decide where they want to go (professionally) in the future” ( Farrell, 2012 , p. 7).

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments.

We would like to thank Annika Kraft, Jherian Mitchell-Jones, Emily Kable, Dr. Emily Atieh, Dr. Brandon Yik, Dr. Ying Wang, and Dr. Lu Shi for their constructive feedback on previous versions of this article. This material is based upon work supported by NSF 2142045. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

• Alirio Insuasty, E., Zambrano Castillo, L. C. (2010). Exploring reflective teaching through informed journal keeping and blog group discussion in the teaching practicum . Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development , 12 ( 2 ), 87–105. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ansarin, A. A., Farrokhi, F., Rahmani, M. (2015). Iranian EFL teachers’ reflection levels: The role of gender, experience, and qualifications . Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics , 2 ( 2 ), 140–155. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ardian, P., Hariyati, R. T. S., Afifah, E. (2019). Correlation between implementation case reflection discussion based on the Graham Gibbs Cycle and nurses’ critical thinking skills . Enfermeria Clinica , 29 , 588–593. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bain, J., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., Lester, N. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspectives . Flaxton, QLD, Australia: Post Pressed. [ Google Scholar ]
• Baker, L. A., Chakraverty, D., Columbus, L., Feig, A. L., Jenks, W. S., Pilarz, M., Wesemann, J. L. (2014). Cottrell Scholars Collaborative New Faculty Workshop: Professional development for new chemistry faculty and initial assessment of its efficacy . Journal of Chemical Education , 91 ( 11 ), 1874–1881. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bathgate, M. E., Aragón, O. R., Cavanagh, A. J., Frederick, J., Graham, M. J. (2019). Supports: A key factor in faculty implementation of evidence-based teaching . CBE—Life Sciences Education , 18 ( 2 ), ar22. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Benoit, A. (2013). Learning from the inside out: A narrative study of college teacher development [Doctoral Dissertation, Lesley University] . Graduate School of Education. https://digitalcommons.lesley.edu/education_dissertations/29
• Brems, C., Baldwin, M. R., Davis, L., Namyniuk, L. (1994). The imposter syndrome as related to teaching evaluations and advising relationships of university faculty members . Journal of Higher Education , 65 ( 2 ), 183–193. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brownell, S. E., Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and … tensions with professional identity? CBE—Life Sciences Education , 11 ( 4 ), 339–346. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Campoy, R. (2010). Reflective thinking and educational solutions: Clarifying what teacher educators are attempting to accomplish . SRATE Journal , 19 ( 2 ), 15–22. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chrousos, G. P., Mentis, A.-F. A. (2020). Imposter syndrome threatens diversity . Science , 367 ( 6479 ), 749–750. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Clarke, L. (2009). Video reflections in initial teacher education . British Journal of Educational Technology , 40 ( 5 ), 959–961. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cole, A. L. (1997). Impediments to reflective practice: Toward a new agenda for research on teaching . Teachers and Teaching , 3 ( 1 ), 7–27. [ Google Scholar ]
• Collins, K. H., Price, E. F., Hanson, L., Neaves, D. (2020). Consequences of stereotype threat and imposter syndrome: The personal journey from Stem-practitioner to Stem-educator for four women of color . Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education , 19 ( 4 ), 10. [ Google Scholar ]
• Davis, M. (2003). Barriers to reflective practice: The changing nature of higher education . Active Learning in Higher Education , 4 ( 3 ), 243–255. [ Google Scholar ]
• Day, C. (1993). Reflection: A necessary but not sufficient condition for professional development . British Educational Research Journal , 19 ( 1 ), 83–93. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dervent, F. (2015). The effect of reflective thinking on the teaching practices of preservice physical education teachers . Issues in Educational Research , 25 ( 3 ), 260–275. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think . Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dyment, J. E., O'Connell, T. S. (2014). When the ink runs dry: Implications for theory and practice when educators stop keeping reflective journals . Innovative Higher Education , 39 ( 5 ), 417–429. [ Google Scholar ]
• Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5 E model: A purposed 7 E model emphasizes “transfer of learning” and the importance of eliciting prior understanding . Science Teacher , 70 ( 6 ), 56–59. [ Google Scholar ]
• Farrell, T. S. (2008). Critical incidents in ELT initial teacher training . ELT Journal , 62 ( 1 ), 3–10. [ Google Scholar ]
• Farrell, T. S. (2012). Reflecting on reflective practice: (Re) visiting Dewey and Schon . TESOL Journal , 3 ( 1 ), 7–16. [ Google Scholar ]
• Galea, S. (2012). Reflecting reflective practice . Educational Philosophy and Theory , 44 ( 3 ), 245–258. [ Google Scholar ]
• Garza, R., Smith, S. F. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ blog reflections: Illuminating their growth and development . Cogent Education , 2 ( 1 ), 1066550. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching . American Educational Research Journal , 40 ( 3 ), 731–767. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods . London, England: Further Education Unit. [ Google Scholar ]
• Greiman, B., Covington, H. (2007). Reflective thinking and journal writing: Examining student teachers; perceptions of preferred reflective modality, journal writing outcomes, and journal structure . Career and Technical Education Research , 32 ( 2 ), 115–139. [ Google Scholar ]
• Griffin, M. L. (2003). Using critical incidents to promote and assess reflective thinking in preservice teachers . Reflective Practice , 4 ( 2 ), 207–220. [ Google Scholar ]
• Griffiths, M., Tann, S. (1992). Using reflective practice to link personal and public theories . Journal of Education for Teaching , 18 ( 1 ), 69–84. [ Google Scholar ]
• Harrison, J. K., Lee, R. (2011). Exploring the use of critical incident analysis and the professional learning conversation in an initial teacher education programme . Journal of Education for Teaching , 37 ( 2 ), 199–217. [ Google Scholar ]
• Henderson, C., Beach, A., Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 48 ( 8 ), 952–984. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hubball, H., Collins, J., Pratt, D. (2005). Enhancing reflective teaching practices: Implications for faculty development programs . Canadian Journal of Higher Education , 35 ( 3 ), 57–81. [ Google Scholar ]
• Husebø, S. E., O'Regan, S., Nestel, D. (2015). Reflective practice and its role in simulation . Clinical Simulation in Nursing , 11 ( 8 ), 368–375. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jindal-Snape, D., Holmes, E. A. (2009). A longitudinal study exploring perspectives of participants regarding reflective practice during their transition from higher education to professional practice . Reflective Practice , 10 ( 2 ), 219–232. [ Google Scholar ]
• Johnson, E., Keller, R., Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2018). Results from a survey of abstract algebra instructors across the United States: Understanding the choice to (not) lecture . International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education , 4 , 254–285. [ Google Scholar ]
• Larrivee, B. (2000). Transforming teaching practice: Becoming the critically reflective teacher . Reflective Practice , 1 ( 3 ), 293–306. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1080/14623940020025561 [ Google Scholar ]
• Larrivee, B. (2005). Authentic classroom management: Creating a learning community and building reflective practice . Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. [ Google Scholar ]
• Larrivee, B. (2008a). Development of a tool to assess teachers’ level of reflective practice . Reflective Practice , 9 ( 3 ), 341–360.  10.1080/14623940802207451 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Larrivee, B. (2008b). Meeting the challenge of preparing reflective practitioners . New Educator , 4 ( 2 ), 87–106. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee, H.-J. (2005). Understanding and assessing preservice teachers’ reflective thinking . Teaching and Teacher Education , 21 ( 6 ), 699–715. [ Google Scholar ]
• Loughran, J. J. (2002a). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modelling . London, UK: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ]
• Loughran, J. J. (2002b). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching . Journal of Teacher Education , 53 ( 1 ), 33–43. [ Google Scholar ]
• Manouchehri, A. (2001). Collegial interaction and reflective practice . Action in Teacher Education , 22 ( 4 ), 86–97. [ Google Scholar ]
• Markkanen, P., Välimäki, M., Anttila, M., Kuuskorpi, M. (2020). A reflective cycle: Understanding challenging situations in a school setting . Educational Research , 62 ( 1 ), 46–62. [ Google Scholar ]
• McShannon, J., Hynes, P. (2005). Student achievement and retention: Can professional development programs help faculty GRASP it? Journal of Faculty Development , 20 ( 2 ), 87–93. [ Google Scholar ]
• Michael, J. (2007). Faculty perceptions about barriers to active learning . College Teaching , 55 ( 2 ), 42–47. [ Google Scholar ]
• Michaelsen, L. K., Fink, L. D., Black, R. H. (1996). What every faculty developer needs to know about learning groups . To Improve the Academy , 15 ( 1 ), 31–57. [ Google Scholar ]
• Munby, H., Russell, T. (1989). Educating the reflective teacher: An essay review of two books by Donald Schon . Journal of Curriculum Studies , 21 ( 1 ), 71–80. [ Google Scholar ]
• Newman, S. (1999). Constructing and critiquing reflective practice . Educational Action Research , 7 ( 1 ), 145–163. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ostorga, A. N. (2006). Developing teachers who are reflective practitioners: A complex process . Issues in Teacher Education , 15 ( 2 ), 5–20. [ Google Scholar ]
• Parkman, A. (2016). The imposter phenomenon in higher education: Incidence and impact . Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice , 16 ( 1 ), 51. [ Google Scholar ]
• Penny, A. R., Coe, R. (2004). Effectiveness of consultation on student ratings feedback: A meta-analysis . Review of Educational Research , 74 ( 2 ), 215–253. [ Google Scholar ]
• Posthuma, B. (2012). Mathematics teachers’ reflective practice within the context of adapted lesson study . Pythagoras , 33 ( 3 ), 1–9. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pultorak, E. G. (1996). Following the developmental process of reflection in novice teachers: Three years of investigation . Journal of Teacher Education , 47 ( 4 ), 283–291. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rodgers, C., Laboskey, V. K. (2016). Reflective practice . International Handbook of Teacher Education , 2 , 71–104. [ Google Scholar ]
• Romano, M., Schwartz, J. (2005). Exploring technology as a tool for eliciting and encouraging beginning teacher reflection . Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education , 5 ( 2 ), 149–168. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action . New York, NY: Basic Books. [ Google Scholar ]
• Smagorinsky, P. (2015). The role of reflection in developing eupraxis in learning to teach English . Pedagogies: An International Journal , 10 ( 4 ), 285–308. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sturtevant, H., Wheeler, L. (2019). The STEM Faculty Instructional Barriers and Identity Survey (FIBIS): Development and exploratory results . International Journal of STEM Education , 6 ( 1 ), 1–22. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tan, C. (2008). Improving schools through reflection for teachers: Lessons from Singapore . School Effectiveness and School Improvement , 19 ( 2 ), 225–238. [ Google Scholar ]
• Thompson, N., Pascal, J. (2012). Developing critically reflective practice . Reflective Practice , 13 ( 2 ), 311–325.  10.1080/14623943.2012.657795 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tripp, D. (2011). Critical incidents in teaching (classic edition): Developing professional judgement . London, England: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ]
• Valli, L. (1997). Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States . Peabody Journal of Education , 72 ( 1 ), 67–88. [ Google Scholar ]
• van Wyk, M. M. (2013). Using blogs as a means of enhancing reflective teaching practice in open distance learning ecologies . Africa Education Review , 10 ( Suppl 1 ), S47–S62. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yik, B. J., Raker, J. R., Apkarian, N., Stains, M., Henderson, C., Dancy, M. H., Johnson, E. (2022a). Association of malleable factors with adoption of research-based instructional strategies in introductory chemistry, mathematics, and physics . Frontiers in Education , 7 , 1016415. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yik, B. J., Raker, J. R., Apkarian, N., Stains, M., Henderson, C., Dancy, M. H., Johnson, E. (2022b). Evaluating the impact of malleable factors on percent time lecturing in gateway chemistry, mathematics, and physics courses . International Journal of STEM Education , 9 ( 1 ), 1–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zahid, M., Khanam, A. (2019). Effect of Reflective Teaching Practices on the Performance of Prospective Teachers . Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology—TOJET , 18 ( 1 ), 32–43. [ Google Scholar ]

• Search Menu
• Advance articles
• Editor's Choice
• Author Guidelines
• Submission Site
• Open Access
• About The British Journal of Social Work
• About the British Association of Social Workers
• Editorial Board
• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network
• Self-Archiving Policy
• Dispatch Dates
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

Introduction, research context, research aims, methodology, focus groups, limitations, acknowledgements.

• < Previous

Evidencing Reflective Practice in Social Work Education: Theoretical Uncertainties and Practical Challenges

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

George Wilson, Evidencing Reflective Practice in Social Work Education: Theoretical Uncertainties and Practical Challenges, The British Journal of Social Work , Volume 43, Issue 1, February 2013, Pages 154–172, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr170

• Permissions Icon Permissions

Reflective practice has become an increasingly influential idea in social work education and, in the UK context, it has recently been acknowledged as key to ensuring that social workers are better equipped to engage in complex decision making and effective practice. However, there remains a lack of clarity about how this concept is defined and operationalised in teaching and learning and there has been little systematic empirical examination of its utility in facilitating professional development. Drawing on research with undergraduates at Queen's University Belfast, this paper aims to develop understanding of students' experience of reflective practice. The results suggest that agency systems that have become over-reliant on rules and procedures present formidable obstacles to learning both at an individual and at an organisational level. The paper argues that the relationship between how reflective practice is taught and how it is enacted in practice needs to be better understood if such obstacles are to be overcome. The paper concludes by considering the implications of the findings for developing reflective practice in social work education and practice and highlights the challenges that need to be addressed if reflection and critical thinking are to become more firmly embedded within agency systems and practice cultures.

The practice of reflection is now recognised internationally as key to ensuring that students are prepared to address the complexities, uncertainties and challenges encountered in contemporary working environments ( Dolan et al. , 2006 ; Yip, 2006 ; Ruch, 2007 ). Recent reviews of social work education and practice in the UK, which have taken place in the wake of a succession of tragic child deaths, have further reinforced the importance of reflective practice for the development of the profession ( Orme et al. , 2009 ; Munro, 2010 , 2011 ). However, it has been argued that concerns to minimise risk and ensure accountability have led to social work becoming dominated by a bureaucratic-instrumental bias and an over-reliance on proceduralised and controlling forms of practice that, paradoxically, make it more difficult to protect children ( Broadhurst et al. , 2010 ; Munro, 2010 ). For practitioners to become better equipped to engage in complex decision making and ensure safe and effective practice, Munro (2010) contends that it is essential to reconceptualise child protection services as adaptive systems and develop a new culture of reflection that facilitates both organisational learning and individual professional development. Unfortunately, however, although reflective practice has become a key paradigm in social work and the subject of extensive theorising and philosophical debate, the ideas and practices associated with its application are not well defined operationally ( Ixer, 1999 ; Ruch, 2007 ). Operational aspects remain under-researched and there continues to be a lack of clarity about how different practice milieu and organisational systems impact on practitioner commitment and ability to practise reflectively.

This paper reports a research study of students' operational experience of reflective practice and contributes to the current debate by highlighting the complexities surrounding how this concept is taught and enacted within employing agencies. The main aim of the study, which was part of a larger longitudinal project focusing on the professional development of Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) students at Queen's University Belfast (QUB), was to examine respondents' experience of reflective practice on placement. Although highlighting the importance of reflective practice in professional development, the results suggest that agency systems that have become over-reliant on rules and procedures present formidable obstacles to developing critical reflection in the way envisaged by Munro (2010) . The paper argues that the relationship between how reflective practice is taught and how it is enacted needs to be better understood if such obstacles are to be overcome and suggests changes that need to occur to embed reflection and critical thinking more firmly within agency systems and practice cultures. The paper also highlights the theoretical uncertainty that continues to surround the definition and meaning of reflective practice and considers how learning and teaching in this field can be further developed within the new social work curriculum.

Together with more recent aspirations to improve social work education and professional decision making, academic interest in reflection has also been driven by scepticism about the of value of competence-based learning and evidence-based approaches to practice ( Sheldon, 2001 ; Webb, 2001 ; Wilson and Kelly, 2010 ). Criticisms of competence-based learning in social work education have tended to highlight the inherent limitations of this approach, including its instrumental bias, functionalist emphasis on superficial technical skills and reliance on formulaic responses to service users that are inimical to good practice and effective decision making ( Wilson and Kelly, 2010 ; Munro, 2010 ). It has been argued that competence-based approaches have tended to degrade professional social work and both reflect and nurture over-reliance on accountability and procedure-driven forms of practice, which hitherto have been considered key to improving performance ( Rose and Barnes, 2008 ; Munro, 2010 ).

Whilst there would be little dispute that practice interventions and complex decision making should be grounded as much as possible on research evidence of ‘what works’, the evidence-based practice paradigm has also been criticised for failing to provide an adequate basis for developing professional knowledge in social work ( Sheldon, 2001 ; Webb, 2001 ). One of the central criticisms of an evidence-based approach is that social work interventions invariably take place in situations that are unique and not open to the type of ‘scientific’ enquiry normally associated with more positivistic, measurement-based understandings of practice ( Sheldon, 2001 ; Webb, 2001 ). Thus, an approach to intervention and decision making that works in one situation may not work in another.

In contrast, it has been argued that the ‘artistry’ associated with reflective practice elevates social work beyond the positivist culture of evidenced-based practice, which restricts knowledge to demonstrable scientific facts ( Schon, 1987 ; Yip, 2006 ; Ruch, 2007 ). In essence, Schon's (1987) formulation of the reflective practitioner as someone who is self-aware and able to both reflect and prepare for action by using a process of self-evaluation and critical analysis has an obvious appeal in the field of social work in which each practice situation is unique and routine formulaic prescriptions for intervention and complex decision making will not suffice ( Heron, 2005 ; Taylor, 2006 ). As a competing paradigm to the functionalist and technocratic underpinnings of competence-based learning, a reflective approach is, therefore, more compatible with the goal of creating adaptive learning organisations and producing practitioners capable of improving practice and achieving better decision making through critical reflection on rules and processes ( Fook, 2004 ; Lam et al. , 2007 ; Munro, 2010 ).

However, in spite of its appeal, considerable ambiguity continues to surround the definition and meaning of reflective practice in social work education and practice. A variety of terms with different meanings stemming from different intellectual traditions have been applied, often interchangeably, to describe reflective practice, including reflection, reflexivity, critical reflection and critical self-reflectivity ( Fook, 2004 ; Taylor, 2006 ; Lam et al. , 2007 ; Ruch, 2007 ). A review of the literature reveals a multiplicity of theories that give rise to different taxonomies and formulations of the meaning and nature of reflective practice ( Ruch, 2007 ). Clegg et al. (2002) have observed that much of the literature on reflective practice has taken an ‘idealist turn’ with the emergence of a dominant ‘cognitivist strain’ in studies that often tend to focus on its more philosophical and cerebral aspects and either ignore or undervalue empirical discourses on action and the importance of the practice environments in which learning takes place—a domain of particular significance in social work. In addition to problems with definition, the range of variables that may either promote or inhibit reflective learning is not fully understood. Researching students' operational experience of reflective practice will illuminate the key variables that impact on their commitment and ability to practise reflectively and at the same time provide an insight into the challenges social work organisations are likely to encounter in embedding this concept in practice. Although the study focuses on the Northern Ireland and UK context, the insights gained are of relevance to other countries seeking to develop reflective practice.

The Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) degree at QUB is among the largest social work education and training programmes in the UK, providing both a three-year undergraduate route (UGR) and a two-year route for graduates with relevant degrees (RGR). Students undertaking both the UGR and RGR routes are taught a mix of generic and more specialised social work modules. Both BSW routes include two assessed practice learning opportunities (PLOs), the first of eighty-five days' and the second of 100 days' duration. Both UGR and RGR student groups are taught together during the first semester of their final year of social work education at QUB and undertake PLOs at the same time during the second semester. This study focuses on the experiences of students undertaking both BSW routes at different stages during the final year of their social work education.

The BSW curriculum stresses the importance of reflective practice as an integral component of both academic and practice learning and as a basis for continuing professional development ( NISCC, 2003 ). Whilst performance during practice learning on the BSW is not academically graded, practice teachers responsible for supervising students on placement are expected (as part of their pass/fail judgement of performance) to directly observe and assess all aspects of student practice including their ability to perform key social work roles and critically reflect on individual pieces of work with service users. During practice learning, students are required to produce at least three written ‘tuning-in’ exercises (defined by Shulman (2008) as the preparation phase prior to contact with service users) and written reflections on their practice following planned interventions. From the outset of the course, students are encouraged to maintain a reflective learning log known on the course as the Personal and Professional Development Workbook (PPDW) to record their reflections on their practice experience, including critical incidents and other significant learning points. While students are encouraged to maintain regular entries to their PPDW, reflective logs are not assessed and students are not required to share the contents with tutors or practice teachers. To further embed reflective practice into the curriculum, social work students are required to produce an assessed Reflective Practice Assignment (4,000 words) at the end of each placement. The Reflective Practice Assignment (RPA) counts as two modules (to reflect the weight given to this topic within the curriculum) and students in this assignment are assessed on their ability to both reflect on the development of their professional knowledge, skills and values during their final practice learning opportunity and their personal ‘learning journey’ through the whole of the BSW programme.

The main aim of this study was to develop understanding of social work students' experience of how reflective practice is taught and how it is enacted operationally in practice. The research, which was completed during 2009, examined the relationship between a range of variables including support arrangements, the organisational context, demographic factors and students' experience of reflective practice.

The specific objectives of the research were:

to examine students' experience of reflection, including their use of reflective learning tools in developing professional, skills, knowledge and values;

to examine the relationship between a range of variables, including organisational context, support arrangements, the demographic characteristics of students and their experience of reflective practice;

to consider the implications of the findings for developing reflective practice in social work education and practice.

It was decided that a mixed methodological approach was the most suitable way to address the research aims of the project. This consisted of a three-stage survey of social work students and focus groups conducted with a purposive sample of the same student cohort before, during and after their final practice learning opportunity ( Barbour, 2007 ). Adopting this dual methodology enabled collection of quantitative and qualitative data through the survey and more in-depth qualitative data via focus group discussion. The research project was approved by the University Ethics Committee prior to the commencement of data collection and the purpose of the survey was explained to participants before they were completed. Students were informed that their participation was voluntary and that all information collected would be anonymised. Surveying students at different stages during the final year of the BSW facilitated the collection of data on their perceptions of the adequacy of preparatory teaching on reflection, their use of learning tools during practice learning and their perceived level of reflective practice competence at the end of the BSW course. Data on assessment outcomes were only collected at the end of the BSW programme after all assessment decisions had been shared with students.

The survey was conducted with the combined UGR/RGR student group ( N = 116) over three stages prior to the beginning, halfway through and on completion of their final practice learning opportunity. The questionnaire developed for the study had four sections and collected the following data: demographic information about each student; satisfaction with university preparatory teaching on reflective practice; current practice learning experience and use of reflective learning tools; and reflective learning needs and outcomes. The three questionnaires consisted mainly of closed pre-coded questions, although students were also given the opportunity to add qualitative comments about their satisfaction with preparatory teaching and their experience of reflective practice and using reflective learning tools during placement. Quantitative data from the survey were coded and inputted into the SPSS version 12 for Windows computer software package for statistical analysis. The analysis of quantitative data included investigation of cross-tabulations and more complex statistical testing as well as basic analysis of descriptive data. In addition, the qualitative data that emerged from a number of open-ended questions was inductively analysed and illustrated thematically using selected quotations to represent common and divergent themes. This was achieved through transcribing all comments made by respondents and undertaking a content analysis to construct thematic categories of these narratives.

Two focus groups were conducted with a purposive sample of students who had completed the survey both before ( n = 9) and after ( n   =  12) their final practice learning opportunity. The first group consisted of seven females and two males, and the second group included eleven females and one male. The purpose of the focus groups with students was to enable further exploration of the quantitative findings from the surveys and analysis of student experiences of reflection and the meanings they attributed to these experiences ( Krueger and Casey, 2005 ). Focus group members included students from both UGR and RGR cohorts who had undertaken a range of practice learning experiences across different service user groups and statutory and voluntary sector settings with both on-site and off-site practice teacher supervision arrangements. Analysis of key findings from the survey was used to inform focus group topics. Students were also encouraged to add new topics including concerns derived from their experience of practice learning. With the agreement of students, focus groups were digitally recorded and data were inductively analysed to identify thematic categories that linked to findings from the survey and to draw out new themes that emerged from students' understanding of their experience of both academic and practice learning.

One of the most significant limitations of this study is that it focused on student self-reporting and did not include the views of tutors, practice teachers or others who may have had a significant impact on their experience. It is acknowledged that consideration of other variables might have resulted in a more comprehensive triangulated study. Assessing reflective experiences is a complex matter and use of standardised surveys as an approach is potentially problematic, not least because of the diverse meanings attached to this concept. In the UK context, government use of student satisfaction surveys has become a key measure of academic performance, although their use as quality enhancement tools has been controversial. For example, although National Student Satisfaction Surveys (NSS) can point to areas of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with teaching and learning, it is evident that studies of this nature may fail to capture ambiguities and underlying student expectations and areas of concern ( Gaffney-Rhys and Jones, 2008 ). The student experience of teaching and learning has previously been a neglected area and social work students' operational experience of reflective practice has been under-researched. The core aim of this project was to investigate student perspectives and the inclusion of qualitative data from focus groups enriched the data gathered and ensured the research was not entirely reliant on questionnaire responses.

Although there were some variations in numbers of responses as the attendance of the student group at data collection time changed at each stage, a good response rate was achieved during all stages, with ninety-six students completing the first survey, ninety-five the second and eighty-three students completing the final questionnaire. However, although the changing number of respondents had minimal impact, the low numbers of males, school leavers and disabled students in this sample meant that exploration of these particular demographic factors was more limited.

The main themes that emerged from this study are discussed under the following headings: student experience of reflective practice learning opportunities and support; use of learning tools and experience of the reflective learning process; reflective learning outcomes.

Profile of the students

Over two-thirds of students (71 per cent) already possessed a university degree prior to undertaking the BSW. Twelve per cent of students joined the BSW as school leavers and 17 per cent came from the Further Education (FE) sector, having undertaken access courses to gain entry. Six per cent of students in the sample had a disability. A large majority of students were female (85 per cent). Nearly two-thirds (64 per cent) of students were aged thirty years or younger and 10 per cent were aged forty or over. Sixty per cent of students were undertaking the UGR and 40 per cent the RGR routes to the BSW degree. Over two-thirds of students (69 per cent) had experience of working in health and social care prior to undertaking the BSW.

Reflective practice learning opportunities and support

The results indicated that a large majority of students (80 per cent) were satisfied or very satisfied with their preparatory teaching on reflective practice. The number of students who reported feeling competent or very competent about their ability to reflect on their practice increased from 71 per cent ( N = 95) prior to the start of the final practice learning opportunity to 98 per cent ( N = 82) at the end of this period. For their final practice learning opportunity (PLO), students worked with a variety of service user groups. While the majority of students were placed in family and child-care (36 per cent) placements, the PLOs covered a range of service user groups, including people with mental health problems, physical disabilities, learning disabilities, older people and people involved with criminal justice services. Students were placed in a range of settings, with nearly two-thirds (61 per cent) in fieldwork or community-based settings, 8 per cent in hospital, 13 per cent in day-care and 18 per cent in a variety of residential settings. The vast majority of students (93 per cent) reported feeling satisfied or very satisfied with their PLOs and, as indicated in Table  1 , over two-thirds either agreed or strongly agreed with the statement ‘The agency I am currently placed with encourages reflective practice’. However, a significant minority of students (32 per cent) were uncertain about how to respond to this statement or disagreed with it.

Agency encouragement of reflective practice

The data in Table  1 were cross-tabulated with a range of demographic variables and Pearson chi square and Cramer's V value tests were conducted. The results indicate that there were no statistically significant variations between student responses to the question of agency encouragement of reflective practice and their age, previous educational setting, degree route being undertaken, disability or level of previous social work experience. However, a Pearson chi square value of 10.329, p   <  0.01, indicated a significant association between gender and how students perceived agency support for reflective practice. A Cramer's V value of 0.335 suggested a moderately weak association between these variables. The findings show that 43 per cent of males either disagreed or strongly disagreed with this statement, and 14 per cent agreed or strongly agreed. In contrast, female students were more likely than male students to report that the agency they worked for encouraged reflective practice, with 73 per cent agreeing or strongly agreeing with the statement and 13 per cent either disagreeing or strongly disagreeing.

I'm more descriptive than I am critical, (my practice teacher) knew what my learning style was. I am an activist I like to get in there and do instead of reflect … she has been very good in helping me adjust.

My practice teacher and on site facilitator and the team leaders I am involved with are very helpful and supportive—this has helped develop my self-awareness and reflective practice. You're thrown into more challenging situations on your final placement, you sort of just have to kind of talk about reflecting in all situations.

No supervision from practice teacher or very little of it—more clinical directions than reflection. Not very much support from team … I think that social workers are often too busy to think about and reflect on their practice to see if what they are doing is oppressive to service users. You want to be seen as fit for practice … I almost became like a robot, I stepped out of every emotion I have and just went into work … the stress in this has been unbelievable.

Observation of another SW's practice was very positive … if I was ever faced with a similar situation I would be able to reflect on the approach and utilise what I felt would have a positive outcome for the client.

How do you know what is expected of a social worker if there is no one there to guide you? Would a trainee teacher be sent to a school with no teachers? Or a nurse be sent to a setting with no nurses?

Use of learning tools and experience of the reflective learning process

Students were asked to report on how frequently during the final year of their social work education they used their Personal and Professional Development Workbook (PPDW) to reflect on and record their learning. As indicated in Table  2 , a minority of students (14 per cent) reported that they often or always used their PPDW and nearly half of the cohort (44 per cent) seldom or never used it.

Use of personal and professional workbook (PPDW)

A Person chi square value of 10.482, p   <  0.05, indicated a significant association between previous degree qualifications and how frequently students made entries to their PPDW and a Cramer's V value of 0.366 suggested a moderately weak association between these variables. Students who already possessed undergraduate degrees were more likely to make entries to their PPDW than those without. For example, 44 per cent of those with an undergraduate degree said they sometimes made entries, 33 per cent said seldom and 7 per cent said never, whereas, for those with no undergraduate degree, 33 per cent said sometimes, 28 per cent said seldom and 33 per cent said never.

PPDW is essential to the reflection skills required in the profession. Yes. I believe this has significantly developed my reflection, learning and practice.

PPDW is hard to keep …. Did not find this useful. Supervision and talking to other professionals helped more. Did not find writing it down beneficial.

Reflection during supervision tends to follow practice teacher's agenda and not what I feel I need to reflect on … I think there's too much emphasis on written work and not enough focus on the actual experience of learning. You're told at the start you have to tune-in with every service user … they were 4000 words … there wasn't that much thought put into it … you're doing it very superficially … you don't get to delve into why am I thinking like this, why am I doing this.

There's even disparity between that very focused tuning-in work and evaluation and what you're meant to be doing critically at university … the agency work because it's not critical enough, it's not reflective enough. I found the course very focused on theory rather than practice so when you enter the work placement you have to learn … how to carry out assessments, protocols, filling out forms, keeping records, risk assessments.

Reflective learning outcomes

To explore the factors that might be important for reflective learning outcomes, student marks (expressed as degree classifications) for the Reflective Practice Assignments (RPA) were cross-tabulated with a range of demographic variables (see Figure  1 ).

Demographics and Reflective Practice Assignment Classification

There were no statistically significant variations in the level of marks obtained between students in relation to age, gender, previous social work experience, disability or degree route. However, a Pearson chi square value of 13.092, sig.  =  0.042, p   <  0.05, indicated a significant association between the last educational setting and marks obtained in the RPA. The strength of this association was moderately weak (Cramers V = 0.297). The findings indicated, for example, that 7 per cent of those students who had entered the programme from the Further Education sector obtained a third, 60 per cent obtained a lower second-class degree, 26 per cent obtained an upper second, with 7 per cent obtaining a first. In contrast, of those students who had come to the course having previously attended university, 3 per cent obtained a third, 25 per cent obtained a lower second-class degree, 54 per cent obtained an upper second and 18 per cent obtained a first.

Whilst there was no significant association between the frequency with which students made entries into their PPDW and their RPA mark, the findings indicated that there was a significant association between frequency of entries to PPDW and students' overall degree classification (chi squared  =  9.906, sig.  =  0.042, p   <  0.05). The Cramers V value of 0.254 suggests a weak association. For example, 33 per cent of students who obtained a first stated the frequency of entries to their PPDW had increased during practice learning. This was only 26 per cent for those who obtained an upper second-class and 10 per cent for those who obtained a lower second-class degree. For those who obtained a lower second-class degree, 60 per cent stated the frequency decreased during practice learning, whereas this was only 22 per cent for those who obtained an upper second class and 33 per cent for those who obtained a first.

Balancing agency work with Queen's projects is extremely stressful. Would be beneficial to have a break between placement and handing in projects. Type and amount of evidence required for practice learning has been of detriment to the final University pieces which are crucial for our degree classification.

The results indicate that students who participated in this research project were a very well-qualified group from a range of educational backgrounds with different levels of previous social care experience. The low proportion of school leavers, high proportion of graduates (including those on the three-year degree route) and large numbers of students with previous social work/social care experience support the findings of a previous study, which suggested that selection processes for the programme at QUB tend to privilege older, more experienced applicants ( Wilson and Kelly, 2010 ). The low numbers of male respondents in this study and small number of students with disabilities are consistent with other studies, suggesting such demographic characteristics may be typical of many social work programmes throughout the UK ( Perry and Cree, 2003 ).

Overall, the findings provide some reassurance about both the quality of University preparatory teaching on reflective practice and the learning opportunities and support provided by agencies. Nearly all questionnaire respondents (98 per cent) felt either competent or very competent in their ability to reflect on their practice by the end of the course and most students had found supervision by practice teachers helpful in facilitating their learning. However, it is possible that the high level of positive responses may reflect the impact of the Hawthorne effect on students who completed the questionnaire. In contrast, it was notable that qualitative findings from focus groups, during which these results were explored, were significantly more negative about students' experience of reflection. Nonetheless, the results were still very positive in that the overwhelming majority of students passed both their PLO and the related Reflective Learning Assignment, with a majority achieving an upper second-class degree classification (Figure  1 ). The positive correlations found between graduate status and reflective learning outcomes suggest that a degree-level education is significant for at least academic attainment in this important area of learning. Apart from the way males perceived agency support for reflective practice more negatively than females, gender differences were not significantly associated with any key aspects of student experience of reflective learning. These results tend to contradict the findings of other studies, which indicate that male students can experience more difficulties with reflective learning than females and recommend that this factor should be taken into account by educators in how they facilitate reflective practice ( Clegg et al. , 2002 ). However, caution is needed in interpreting these findings, as the numbers of male respondents in this study were small and further research that included a larger sample of this group would be necessary to examine this issue in greater depth.

So, what lessons can be taken from this research about how reflective practice might be further developed in social work education and what insights do the results provide about the challenges employers are likely to encounter in developing reflection within organisational systems and practice cultures? Perhaps one of the most important messages for educators is the need to ensure that students gain direct experience of observing good professional practice and positive role models in order to facilitate their reflective learning and professional socialisation. Students valued having support tailored to suit their individual learning needs and felt that they had benefited in situations in which reflective learning was encouraged by practice teachers and team colleagues. The latter finding supports the view that practice teachers who personalise their approach and tailor their support to match students' individual learning needs, style and stage of development are more likely to be effective in enabling them to develop their reflective practice skills ( Gardiner, 1989 ).

One of the main challenges facing both social work educators and employers is how best to develop an organisational culture in which reflective practice can flourish. Whilst, as Munro (2010) has suggested, senior management commitment to developing reflective practice will be essential, the findings from this research suggest that existing practice cultures and staff attitudes may present deeply engrained obstacles to such development. The results revealed a strong level of student dissatisfaction and frustration with overly prescriptive and ‘routinised’ approaches to reflection in supervision, which they felt had inhibited their learning. The findings provided further evidence that engaging in reflection can be an anxiety-provoking and not always constructive experience ( Rossiter, 2005 ; Litvack et al. , 2010 ). It was concerning that a significant minority of students in this study were dissatisfied with the extent to which agency working environments had encouraged reflective practice and were unhappy with the support they received from practice teachers and team colleagues. It is clearly essential for social work students to learn to competently follow agency policies and procedures. However, students' negative experiences of reflection appear to reflect the prevailing instrumental bias of working environments dominated by over-reliance on rules and procedures and supervision processes characterised by a focus on accountability ( Munro, 2010 ; Beddoe, 2010 ).

Agency cultures dominated by procedural forms of practice that fail to encourage and reinforce a reflective approach may have a pervasive (and possibly long-term) adverse influence on students' (and qualified social workers') attitudes and orientation towards reflective practice. There is a danger that immersion in such cultures may lead to ‘ritualisation’ of reflective practice to the point at which it becomes, ironically, a ‘tick box’ exercise that is inimical to the development of critical thinking and undermines the learning process. For example, in this study, it was significant that students who had made frequent use of a reflective learning journal (PPDW) felt this had helped to facilitate their professional development and there was a positive correlation between increased use of this learning tool and the quality of social work degree they obtained. However, in contrast to ‘orthodox’ understandings that highlight the value of this learning tool, the results indicated that many students did not make regular entries to their PPDW during practice learning and found this process unhelpful and/or did not intend to maintain a reflective journal post qualification ( Boud, 2001 ). Clearly, if students' practice experience reinforces the view that professional performance is measured by ability to follow rules and procedures, it is perhaps not surprising that they will be less likely to see the value or invest time and effort in more reflective learning.

Reflective practice is a complex concept and the findings of this study suggest that the uncertainty and ambiguity surrounding its definition and meaning not only impact on students' operational experience of this concept, but may have implications for how it can be developed within organisations in the way envisaged by Munro (2010) . Qualitative feedback indicated that students had been confused by the disjunction between the prescriptive, instrumental focus of written reflection expected by practice teachers and what they perceived to be the more analytical and critically reflective focus on theory and literature required for academic assignments. The risk of this developing into a compartmentalised approach to learning echoes the results of previous studies, which point to the existence of competing forms of competence in social work education: academic competence , which is linked more to the knowledge base of the discipline, and vocational competence , which is grounded on agency policy and procedure ( Barnett, 1994 ; Wilson and Kelly, 2010 ). Arguably, a focus on superficial, instrumental concerns tends to reinforce a ‘single loop’ approach to learning and inhibits development of critical, holistic forms of reflection and the type of ‘double loop’ learning felt to be essential for effective social work decision making ( Argyris, 1991 ; Munro, 2010 ). Such findings highlight the tensions for educators seeking to develop critically reflective thinkers and, at the same time, meet the training needs of employers for competent practitioners skilled in working within agency policy and procedures ( Wilson and Kelly, 2010 ). The results suggest that a key challenge will be to develop a more integrated model of reflective practice, which meets the needs of both academics and employers. The proposals for closer working partnerships between academic institutions and employers in the UK will provide new opportunities to explore such issues and develop a shared agenda to improve practice ( Department of Health, 2009 ).

The results of this study indicate that a range of variables, including variations in support, organisational and practice cultures, together with demographic factors, may have a significant impact on students' experience of evidencing process and demonstrating reflective learning outcomes. The finding of significant levels of dissatisfaction with ‘routinised’ and instrumental approaches to reflection resonate with Munro's (2010) argument about the dominance in the UK of risk-averse and procedurally driven forms of practice. Disjunction between academic and practice learning and different approaches to reflective practice alongside students' ambivalence about the utility of particular learning tools also present formidable challenges to educators seeking to develop reflective practice within social work programmes. To create the type of learning organisations in which reflective practice is more likely to flourish, both employers and social work educators need to be aware of the dangers of risk-averse and ‘routinised’ approaches embedded in current working practices ( Munro, 2010 ). A key challenge will be to find ways of supporting reflective practice and changing professional attitudes at all levels that currently sustain an over-reliance on rules and procedures. Developing a greater level of consistency in the operationalisation of reflective practice in academic and practice learning would be an important step forward and help provide a firmer foundation for continuing professional development.

The research referred to in this article was supported by a grant from the Social Policy and Social Work Subject Centre. The other members of the research team were Berni Kelly and Leanne O'Hara. I also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Google Scholar

Google Preview

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

• Recommend to your Library

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1468-263X
• Print ISSN 0045-3102
• Copyright © 2024 British Association of Social Workers
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.