research title example for public administration

[100+] Public Administration Research Topics With Free [Thesis Pdf] 2023

Are You Searching Research Topics For Public Administration ,   Topics For Public Administration Research Paper, Public Administration Research Topics For Students, Research Topics Ideas For Public Administration, Public Administration Research Topics For PhD, Public Administration PhD Topics. So You are in right place. 

In this article, we provide you latest research topics for Public Administration with a full Phd thesis. By these research topics for Public Administration you can get idea for your research work. On this website, you can get lots of Public Administration Research Topics for College Students,  PhD, Mphil, Dissertations, Thesis, Project, Presentation, Seminar or Workshop. Check the suggestions below that can help you choose the right research topics for Public Administration: You can also Free Download Public Administration Research PhD Thesis in Pdf by the given link.

Now Check 100+Public Administration Research Topics List

Table of Contents

Research Topic For Public Administration 2023

Public administration research topics for dissertation, research topics ideas for public administration, public administration research topics ideas for college students, topics for public administration research paper, public administration research topics for thesis, public administration research topics for students, public administration research topics for undergraduate students, public administration research topics for university students, public administration research topics for phd, research topics for phd in public administration, research topics for mphil public administration, public administration phd topics, research paper topics for public administration, public administration research paper topics, phd thesis topic for public administration, research topics for public administration subject, public administration research topics for fisheries, research topics for public administration, public administration research topics examples.

Note: All Research Work Idea on this website is inspired by Shodhganga: a reservoir of Indian Theses. We provide you mostly research work under Creative Commons Licence. Credit goes to https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/

If you find any copyright content on this website and you have any objection than plz immediately connect us on [email protected]. We Will remove that content as soon as.

This Post is also helpful for: Public Administration Thesis Pdf, Public Administration Thesis Topics, Public Administration Dissertation Topics, Public Administration Thesis, Catchy Title For Public Administration, Phd Thesis Topic for Public Administration, Public Administration Research Paper Topics, Public Administration Phd Topics, Public Administration Research Topics, Research Topics For Public Administration Students in India, Public Administration Research Topics For College Students.

14 thoughts on “[100+] Public Administration Research Topics With Free [Thesis Pdf] 2023”

• Pingback: Home - Research Scholar
• Pingback: Home Page 3 - Research Scholar
• Pingback: How To Write Master Thesis Pdf: Step By Step Example and Quickly Tips - Research Scholar
• Pingback: How To Do Research in Computer Science 2023 - Research Scholar
• Pingback: How to do Research In Geography 2023 - Research Scholar
• Pingback: How To Do Research in Statistics 2023 - Research Scholar
• Pingback: How To Do Research in Agriculture 2023 - Research Scholar
• Pingback: How To Do Research in Public Administration 2023 - Research Scholar
• Pingback: How To Do Research in Applied Psychology 2023 - Research Scholar
• Pingback: How To Do Research in Political Science 2023 - Research Scholar
• Pingback: How To Do Research in Organic Chemistry 2023 - Research Scholar
• Pingback: How To Do Research in Pharmacy 2023 - Research Scholar
• Pingback: How To Do Research in Geology 2023 - Research Scholar
• Pingback: How To Do Research in Zoology 2023 - Research Scholar

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

100+ Public Administration Research Paper Topics You Can Use

Oct 24, 2023

Oct 24, 2023 | Topics

Public administration research paper topics can be a little tricky to find. There are many public administration research paper topics, but you might not know where to look for them or how to use your research time effectively. Thankfully, I have compiled a list of public administration research paper topics for your consideration!

People Also Read

• Top 100 Chemistry Research Paper Topics
• Explore a Wide Range of Engaging Research Paper Topics
• Top 100 Controversial Topics For Research Paper

Best Public Administration Research Paper Topics

• How to improve public service delivery in rural areas?
• How to ensure efficient and effective service delivery by government agencies?
• What are the challenges facing public administration in India?
• What are the methods of improving efficiency in Public Administration?
• What is the role of leadership in public administration practices?
• How can public administration be made relevant to the people?
• What are the different models of administrative reforms?
• How can corruption in public administration be reduced?
• How can public administration be made more effective?
• What is the role of bureaucracy in the Indian government?
• How can the bureaucracy be made responsive to citizens’ needs?
• How can better governance be achieved through public administration?

Interesting Public Administration Research Paper Topics

• Emergency Management
• Urban Planning
• Disaster Mitigation Planning and Response
• Economic Development Policy and Practice in the United States
• Federalism: The Role of States in Public Administration
• Effective Leadership Practices for Public Administrators
• The Role of Public Administration in Economic Development Planning, Implementation and Evaluation of a Community-Based Disaster Mitigation Plan
• How Political Science Concerns Affect Public Administration
• Understand Ethics and Their Effect on Political Decisions
• How Public Administration Relates to Government Accountability

Simple Public Administration Research Paper Topics

• How did the United States react to September 11, 2001?
• How does government handle crises in America?
• What role does technology play in law enforcement operations?
• How do politicians use social media to campaign for office?
• What is the role of local government in making cities work?
• What are the challenges facing small towns and rural areas in America today?
• How do voters view political leaders elected for a second or third time?
• What is the role of the media in politics today?
• How do political parties define their platforms, and why is it important to voters?
• How does the government use technology to enhance its operations?

Controversial Public Administration Research Paper Topics

• Is it ethical for governments to limit social media use?
• Should governments increase their role in the economy?
• Should the government increase taxes on soda and sugar-sweetened beverages, or should we cut them instead?
• Should we ban plastic bags?
• Should government intervene in the housing market to help low-income people find affordable homes?
• Should states be allowed to collect taxes on internet sales made by out-of-state businesses like Amazon and eBay?

Public Administration Research Paper Topics for Middle School

• The role of government in solving problems faced by society
• The effectiveness and efficiency of government agencies at the local level
• A comparison between two different types of governing bodies
• How do decision-making processes differ between local/state/federal levels?
• The effectiveness of political campaigns in influencing voters to make a certain decision
• The impact of new technologies on how government agencies handle daily operations
• The importance of information literacy and how it can improve the quality of service delivery at the local level
• How should government agencies manage their budgets to deliver more value for money?
• The role that social media plays in driving public opinion about controversial issues
• How does democracy work at local, state and federal levels?
• How does the media influence public opinion on certain issues (e.g., healthcare access and immigration policy)?
• How does the government use its power to influence public opinion?
• How does government influence the media?
• How do political campaigns influence voters?
• What key factors impact the effectiveness of political campaigns?
• How can government agencies use social media to improve public service delivery?
• What examples of effective strategies have government agencies used in their communication campaigns?

Public Administration Research Paper Topics for High School

• What are the benefits and drawbacks of implementing a public-private partnership in local government?
• How should local governments manage their limited resources during tough economical times?
• How can technology be used to improve the quality of life for citizens living in disadvantaged communities?
• How can local governments use social media to improve public service delivery?
• What examples of effective strategies have local governments used in their communication campaigns?
• How does public administration impact the lives of citizens?
• How can public administrators improve their communication strategies?
• The Concept of Democracy: A Review of Modern Democratic Theories
• The Role of Public Opinion in the Politics of Developing Countries
• An Introduction to Political Parties and Pressure Groups in India
• How Stakeholders Influence Government Decisions about Water Resources Management
• An Analysis of the Tax Reforms in India: Impact on Revenue Generation, Distribution and Economic Growth
• How Globalization Affects the Indian Economy and What Is Our Response to It?
• How Population Growth Can Lead To Environmental Degradation In A Country Like India And What Can Be Done About This Situation!
• Assessing Administrative Reforms In India After Independence

Public Administration Research Paper Topics for College

• The Role of Public Administration in the Government
• Trends in Public Administration
• Challenges Faced by Public Administrators
• Functions of a Public Administrator
• Issues Facing Public Administration
• The History and Future of Public Administration
• How to Become a Successful Public Administrator
• The Importance of Ethics to the Profession

Public Administration Research Questions

• What is the importance of public administration education in developing countries?
• How can we improve the effectiveness of the political system in Africa?
• What are the challenges facing public sector reforms in Africa?
• How can we strengthen democratic accountability in Africa?
• What are some ways to develop public service delivery in Nigeria?
• Why should we replace traditional institutions with modern ones when changing our government structure?
• How does corruption affect our society’s development, and what can be done about it?
• Is there anything new in management that has not been tried before yet could work effectively
• How can we build an effective public service in Africa?
• What are the challenges facing public administration education in developing countries?
• How do we improve the effectiveness of the political system in Africa?
• How does corruption affect our society’s development?

Need Our Help with your Public Administration Research Paper?

If you need help writing your term paper, look no further than our professional writing service. We can provide you with all the tools you need to complete the job. Our team of experienced writers is here to assist you every step of the way. Please place your order today by clicking the ORDER NOW button above, and let us start working on your project!

As you can see, there are plenty of topics you can use for your papers. Whether you write about one of the many government organizations or agencies listed here or go beyond that list and find your topic, we hope this article has helped make the decision easier for you. Good luck!

With a passion for education and student empowerment, I create blog content that speaks directly to the needs and interests of students. From study hacks and productivity tips to career exploration and personal development

• Top 100 Cancer Research Paper Topics

Most Popular Articles

Racism thesis statement example, how to rephrase a thesis statement, capstone project topic suggestions, how to write an abortion essay, should students wear school uniforms essay, list causal essay topics write, respect essay, signal words, great synonyms, informative speech examples, essay writing guide, introduction paragraph for an essay, argumentative essay writing, essay outline templates, write an autobiographical essay, personal narrative essay ideas, descriptive essay writing, how to write a reflective-essay, how to write a lab report abstract, how to write a grant proposal, point of view in an essay, debate topics for youth at church, theatre research paper topics, privacy overview.

Home > School, College, or Department > CUPA > Public Administration > Theses

Public Administration Dissertations and Final Research Papers

Theses/dissertations from 2017 2017.

Employee Engagement and Marginalized Populations , Brenna Miaira Kutch

Theses/Dissertations from 2015 2015

Impact of a State Evidence-Based Practice Legislative Mandate on County Practice Implementation Patterns and Inpatient Behavioral Health Discharge , Carl William Foreman

Theses/Dissertations from 2014 2014

A Case Study of Collaborative Governance: Oregon Health Reform and Coordinated Care Organizations , Oliver John Droppers V

Higher Education Reform in Oregon, 2011-2014: A Policy and Legislative History , Sean Pollack

Theses/Dissertations from 2013 2013

The Institutional Context that Supports Team-Based Care for Older Adults , Anna Foucek Tresidder

Theses/Dissertations from 2011 2011

Attaining a Sustainable Future for Public Higher Education: The Role of Institutional Effectiveness and Resource Dependence , Mirela Blekic

Governance in the United States Columbia River Basin: An Historical Analysis , Eric Thomas Mogren

Theses/Dissertations from 2010 2010

Use of Media Technologies by Native American Teens and Young Adults: Evaluating their Utility for Designing Culturally-Appropriate Sexual Health Interventions Targeting Native Youth in the Pacific Northwest , Stephanie Nicole Craig Rushing

Theses/Dissertations from 2009 2009

Oregon Physicians' Perception of the Drug Enforcement Administration's Use of Enforcement Discretion Related to the Use of Opioids in the Treatment of Chronic Pain , Robert Dale Harrison

City Management Theory and Practice: A Foundation for Educating the Next Generation of Local Government Administrators , Scott Douglas Lazenby

Theses/Dissertations from 2008 2008

The Institutionalization of Diversity and Gender Equity Norms and Values in Higher Education Settings , Rowanna Lynn Carpenter

Organizational Complexity in American Local Governance: Deploying an Organizational Perspective in Concept and Analytic Framework Development , Charles David Crumpton

Multi-Level Environmental Governance : a Comparative Case Study of Five Large Scale Natural Resource Management Programs , Shpresa Halimi

Police Organizations : an Empricial Examination of American Sheriff's Offices and Municipal Police Agencies , Matthew Adam Jones

Measuring Community-Engaged Departments: A Study to Develop an Effective Self-Assessment Rubric for the Institutionalization of Community Engagement in Academic Departments , Kevin Kecskes

Creating a Theoretical Framework for Understanding Homeland security using Multiple Frame Analysis , Linda Ann Kiltz

Emerging Governance at the Edge of Constrained Federalism : Public Administrators at the Frontier of Democracy , Gary Lloyd Larsen

George Lakoff"s Theory of Worldview : a Case Study of the Oregon Legislature , Catherine Law

Who Benefits? : a Multilevel Analysis of the Impact of Oregon's Volunteer Mentor Program for Postsecondary Access on Scholarship Applicants , Alisha Ann Lund-Chaix

Organizational Change in Corrections Organizations : the Effect of Probation and Parole Officer Culture on Change in Community Corrections , Shea Brackin Marshman

Lost in Translation : Ideas of Population Health Determinants in the American Policy Arena , Maria Gilson Sistrom

Representation without Taxation : China's Rural Development Initiatives For a New Millenium , Minzi Su

How Organizational Arrangements Affect High Reliability in Public Research Universities: Perceptions of environmental Health and Safety Directors , Rita Finn Sumner

The Washington State Patrol, Accountability-Driven Leadership, and the Organizational Factors that Propelled their Success: An Organizational Analysis , Timothy Carl Winchell

Theses/Dissertations from 2007 2007

The Changing Paradigm of Emergency Management : Improving professional development for the Emergency Manager , Robert Edward Grist

Global Civil Society Finding Collective Voice in Diversity , Kristen Marie Magis

Information Technology Training in the Public Sector : Essential Planning Elements , Betty Jean Reynolds

From Prison to the Community : the Role of Citizen Participation in Female Prisoner Reentry , Dana Roderick Torrey

Network Analysis of a Shared Governance System , Debra Reifman Whitall

Theses/Dissertations from 2006 2006

Presidential Values : Implications for Foreign Policy , Jordan Katherine Durbin

The Interactions between Carbon Regulation and Renewable Energy policies in the United Kingdom , Hal Thomas Nelson

Theses/Dissertations from 2005 2005

Reorganizing the Oregon Department of Human Services : an Exploratory Case Study of Organizational Change , Charles Anthony Gallia

Theses/Dissertations from 2003 2003

Portrayals of Disability in the Professional Preparation of Speech-language Pathologists , Jane Eric Sleeper Gravel

Theses/Dissertations from 2002 2002

The Effects of Parent Care and Child Care Role Quality on Work outcomes among dual-earner couples in the sandwiched generation , Angela Rickard

Theses/Dissertations from 2000 2000

The Role and Performance of Governmental and Nongovernmental Organizations in Family Planning implementation : Jordan as a Case Study , Khalaf al Hadded

Theses/Dissertations from 1999 1999

The Value of Independence in Old Age , Paula C. Carder

American Indian Elderly and Long-Term Care : Interorganizational Barriers to the Use of Oregon's Home and Community-Based Medicaid Waiver , Jo Lynn Isgrigg

The Effects of Mentoring on Work-parenting Gains and Strains in a Sample of Employed Predominately Female AFDC Recipients , Charlene Rhyne

Theses/Dissertations from 1998 1998

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Physician Assistants , Roderick Stanton Hooker

Theses/Dissertations from 1997 1997

State Funding for Special Education in Oregon : Calculating Cost Differentials of special education for handicapped students in Oregon school districts , Kyung-Sup Kim

Theses/Dissertations from 1996 1996

Scenery as Policy: Public Involvement in Developing a Management Plan for the Scenic Resources of the Columbia River Gorge , Gordon Mathews Euler

Impact of the Medical Library Assistance Act of 1965 on Health Sciences Libraries in the Pacific Northwest: an Interorganizational Approach , Leonoor Swets Ingraham

Administrative Reform in China: Its Impact on Economic Development After Mao , Meiru Liu

Theses/Dissertations from 1994 1994

Oregon Primary Care Physicians' Support for Health Care Reform , Timothy Alan Baker

Advanced Search

• Notify me via email or RSS
• Featured Collections
• All Authors
• Schools & Colleges
• Dissertations & Theses
• PDXOpen Textbooks
• Conferences
• Collections
• Disciplines
• Faculty Expert Gallery
• Submit Research
• Faculty Profiles
• Terms of Use
• Feedback Form

Home | About | My Account | Accessibility Statement | Portland State University

Privacy Copyright

KU ScholarWorks

• Enroll & Pay
• KU Directory
•   KU ScholarWorks
• Public Affairs and Administration, School of

Public Administration Dissertations and Theses

Search within this collection:

Recent Submissions

Street-Level Judgments: How the Role of Judges Influences the Decision to Collaborate in Juvenile Courts 

The Influence of Business Interest Groups in Urban Policymaking: An Empirical Exploration of a Low Salience Policy Setting 

Beyond Adoption: The Influence of Local Institutional Arrangements on Sustainability Policy Implementation and Management 

Three Essays on the Economics of For-Profit Colleges 

What Happens at the Intersection of Policy and Practice? Examining Role Conflict and Professional Alienation of Occupational Therapy Professionals in Complex Environments 

OMBUDS AND TITLE IX COORDINATORS: PROCEDURAL CONVERGENCE OF UNIVERSITY DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS FOR HANDLING SEXUAL MISCONDUCT 

Financial Health of Nonprofit Organizations 

The Effect of Collaboration on Performance in Public Management: Evidence from Community Policing 

Accountability Remade: The Diffusion and Reinvention of Offices of Inspectors General 

Does the Race of Police Officers Matter? Police Officers on Interactions with Citizens and Police Procedures 

Pathways to Change: Explaining the Effectiveness in Community Based Development Organiztions 

Specifying and Testing a Multi-Dimensional Model of Publicness: An Analysis of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities 

FOLLOWING THE LEADER OR LEADING THE FOLLOWER? THE EFFECTS OF MISSION-DRIVEN VS. LEADER-DRIVEN COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 

Rule Bending and Red Tape: Organizational and Individual Influences and the Effect of Ethical Climate 

COST ACCOUNTING IN US CITIES: TRANSACTION COSTS AND GOVERNANCE FACTORS AFFECTING COST ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENT AND USE 

Sustainable Public Administration: the Search for Intergenerational Fairness 

Administrative morality in Colombia 

Welcoming the Outsider: Local Construction of the Law towards Immigrants 

Public Management as Citizen Compliance: A Case Study of Income Tax Compliance Behavior in Thailand 

Collective Bargaining in Municipal Government: How Unionization Impacts Employee's Attitudes, Behaviors, and Values 

The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, [email protected] , 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785)864-6414, 711 TTY.

• Search Menu
• Advance Articles
• Editor's Choice
• Author Guidelines
• Submission Site
• Open Access
• About Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
• About the Public Management Research Association
• Editorial Board
• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network
• Self-Archiving Policy
• Dispatch Dates
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

Introduction.

Research Design and Analytic Approach

Empirical Evidence

Discussion and conclusion, acknowledgements.

• < Previous

Theorizing from Qualitative Research in Public Administration: Plurality through a Combination of Rigor and Richness

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

Rachel Elizabeth Ashworth, Aoife Mary McDermott, Graeme Currie, Theorizing from Qualitative Research in Public Administration: Plurality through a Combination of Rigor and Richness, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , Volume 29, Issue 2, April 2019, Pages 318–333, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy057

• Permissions Icon Permissions

Scholars emphasize the need for additional rigor in qualitative research. This inadvertently encourages formulaic and standardized approaches that undermine the benefits of theorizing from rich data. Our study extends debate by emphasizing the importance of sound qualitative public administration research that blends rigor with richness and thereby facilitates effective theorization. Evidence from a narrative review of 31 qualitative studies published within six leading public administration journals demonstrates that effective theorizing is linked to transparency in research design, analytic approach, and theoretical contribution. In-depth interrogation of four studies that illustrate “inductive theorizing” and “abductive theorizing” identifies plurality in the balance struck between rigor and richness. We derive a broad set of principles that enable researchers to make a convincing “conceptual leap” between data, analysis, and contribution. We also emphasize the need to accommodate pluralistic approaches to theorizing by nuancing requirements for essential aspects of qualitative reporting, versus those amenable to variation.

Qualitative research has made a significant contribution to theory in the field of public administration ( Andrews and Esteve 2015 ; Riccucci 2010a ), evidenced by landmark studies, such as Selznick’s research in the Tennessee Valley Authority ( Selznick 1949 ) and recent contributions that include Watkins-Hayes’ study of race and representative bureaucracy ( 2011 ) and an analysis of institutional work from Cloutier et al. (2016) . These contributions reflect the ability of qualitative research to push theoretical boundaries and generate theoretical insights ( Bansal and Corley 2012 ). Theorizing involves making convincing inferences to explanations grounded in data, such that it is a process of abstraction by the researcher that maintains a capacity to frame understanding and interpretation for others ( Cornelissen and Durand 2014 ; Welch et al. 2011 ). Historically, public administration scholars have undertaken significant efforts to boost rigor in qualitative research (see Brower, Abolafia, and Carr 2000 ; Feldman et al. 2004 ; Ospina, Esteve, and Lee 2018 , for examples), but have devoted much less attention to theorizing. This is a concern given evidence from management and organization studies that indicates addressing rigor in qualitative inquiry may privilege a focus on methods—fashioned in the image of quantitative research—that serves to undermine pluralism in qualitative theorizing ( Cornelissen 2017 ; Delbridge and Fiss 2013 ; Langley 1999 ).

In light of these critiques, in this study, we contribute to the longstanding debate on qualitative research in public administration by emphasizing the importance of blending rigor with richness. In doing so, we illustrate plurality in the process of effective theorizing. Our analysis is premised on results from a two-stage investigation focused on the subfield of network and collaborative governance. The first stage entailed a systematic narrative review of 31 qualitative studies published within six leading public administration journals ( Andrews and Esteve 2015 ). The second stage involved the development of a detailed narrative account of four case study articles— Bate (2000) , Waring, Currie, and Bishop (2013) , Ferlie and McGivern (2014) , Saz-Carranza and Ospina (2011) —and illustrates depth and variety in the application of two common theorizing methods: “inductive theorizing” and “abductive theorizing.”Our analysis suggests the need for transparency, consistency and connection in three component elements that underpin theorizing from qualitative research: research design, analytic approach, and theoretical contribution ( Albert et al. 2008 ). In addition, we highlight and emphasize reporting elements that are essential for high quality theorizing, along with those that may vary. As such, the study facilitates rigorous theorizing by supporting qualitative researchers to make a convincing “conceptual leap” between data, analysis, and contribution—regardless of whether they are using a deductive, inductive, or abductive approach—while recognizing and accommodating plurality in terms of the balance between richness and rigor ( Bansal and Corley 2012 ).

The article is structured as follows. First, we review studies of qualitative research in public administration and focus attention on the process and practice of theorizing through qualitative scholarship. Next, we present detail on our methodological approach and research design, before the review and analysis of our empirical evidence. The manuscript concludes by detailing an over-arching framework that comprises a broad set of principles designed to support better qualitative reporting, in a manner that blends rigorous research design with the richness of the qualitative approach, and underpins theorization.

Theorizing in Qualitative Research in Public Administration

In the field of public administration, most commentators have focused on the ways that qualitative scholars can enhance their research reporting ( Jensen and Rodgers 2001 ; Perry and Kraemer 1986 ). Many criticize the derivation of qualitative accounts as opaque ( Brower, Abolafia, and Carr 2000 ; Justice 2007 ; Ospina, Esteve, and Lee 2018 ; Tummers and Karsten 2012 ) and cite the need to make “choices explicit, consistent, and transparent throughout the research process” ( Dodge, Ospina, and Foldy 2005 , 297). Calls for transparency relate to research design, to the transition from data collection to analysis, and to how the data underpin the claimed contribution ( Brower, Abolafia, and Carr 2000 ; Ospina, Esteve, and Lee 2018 ). Yet agreement on standard assessment criteria has proved challenging, due to the plurality of qualitative approaches. Qualitative studies can span rich single case ethnography, through to comparative cases and large data sets premised on a range of data gathering techniques, such as interviews, direct and participant observations, and document collation and review. This results in multiple forms of qualitative data including direct quotes, textual notes, and documentary excerpts.Although quantitative studies also display methodological diversity, the underpinning philosophical differences evident across qualitative methods make it difficult to apply a generic template to assess rigor ( Haverland and Yanow 2012 ; Jensen and Rodgers 2001 ), especially when standard tests of validity and reliability do not easily apply to qualitative approaches ( Dodge, Ospina, and Foldy 2005 ; Ospina 2011 ; White 1986 ). Thus authors raise the concern that judgements of qualitative research are often “based on a problematic definition of quality and misguided criteria” ( Jensen and Rodgers 2001 , 235), with scholars either embracing this version of rigor in ways that reduce the plurality of qualitative research ( Delbridge and Fiss 2013 ), or rejecting the concept in ways that undermine its legitimacy ( Harley 2016 ). This suggests there is a need to achieve a better balance between rigor and richness and develop broad principles to underpin theorizing in qualitative research that accommodate plurality in approach ( McCurdy and Cleary 1984 ; Stout 2013 ; White 1986 ).

Theorizing involves making convincing inferences to explanations grounded in data, and is commonly premised on deduction, induction, or abduction. Deduction involves inference about a particular empirical instance, based on the general case ( Mantere and Ketokivi 2013 ). Deductive approaches start with the generation of expectations from theory. These are interrogated (tested) in research data, with the theory potentially modified as a consequence of empirical findings ( Tavory and Timmermans 2014 ). However, despite their value in predicting, confirming, and disconfirming expectations, deductive approaches are poor at ruling out alternative explanations ( Mantere and Ketokivi 2013 ). This reduces the likelihood of purely deductive qualitative studies. In contrast, induction involves inference to generalization based on the observation of specific instances ( Glaser 1998 ; Eisenhardt 1989 ; Mantere and Ketokivi 2013 ). Researchers familarize themselves with empirical observations and aggregate through comparison ( Glaser and Strauss 1967 ; Gioia, Corley, and Hamilton 2013 ). Thus, inductive approaches are grounded in data and initially premised on abstraction independent of theoretical preconceptions.

However, recent studies have flagged concern that purely inductive empirically derived insights serve to underplay the importance of pre-existing theory ( Reichertz 2010 ). As a result, abduction is receiving increasing attention. Abduction stems from a puzzle, whereby there is an absence of an existing or sufficient theoretical explanation for data, causing the search for a new explanation. As a result, abduction implies a wider and more extended engagement with extant theories than induction (end-stage) and deduction (outset) and is increasingly associated with the development of “new” hypotheses ( Mantere and Ketokivi 2013 ; Tavory and Timmermans 2014 ). Puzzles prompt exploratory inference, and subsequent development of the best-fitting explanations, thereby combining deduction and induction to produce theoretical and empirical insights ( Klag and Langley 2013 ; Mantere and Ketokivi 2013 ; Reichertz 2010 ). This reflects potential for data and theory to augment each other, such that theory enables the researcher to see things in the data that might otherwise be taken for granted and shape new theoretical propositions that, in turn, empirical observations help to evaluate ( Tavory and Timmermans 2014 ).

To summarize, we note that deductive approaches start from extant theoretical understandings, inductive approaches start with an empirical orientation, and abductive approaches often utilize a combination of deductive and inductive aspects in grappling with puzzles. Despite these differences, deduction, induction, and abduction can each enable and support the generation of the conceptual leaps that underpin theorizing—although their trajectories will likely differ.

The process of theorizing can be employed to produce different types of theoretical contribution that include theory generation (also known as building), theory elaboration, or theory testing ( Cornelissen and Durand 2014 ; Lee, Mitchell, and Sablynski 1999 ; Riccucci 2010b ). Deduction is commonly used to test theory, while induction and abduction can be used to elaborate or generate theory. Regardless of approach, Peirce (1931–1935, vol. I, p. X) identifies “finding” and “checking” as distinct and essential components of the theorizing process. So processes of methodological decision making, and the way these are explained, reported, and supported are essential for effective theorizing. Indeed “method is not the enemy of creative theorization, but its closest ally” ( Tavory and Timmermans 2014 , 51). How authors convey their data is an important part of this process as “data never stand on their own” ( Golden-Biddle and Locke 1997 , 57), but both look back to the research situation, and forward to theoretical resolutions.Theorizing tends to occur when authors both show their data, and tell their significance ( Golden-Biddle and Locke 1997 ). In qualitative scholarship and in a practical sense, “showing” tends to involve providing direct quotes or document extracts in the text or tables, while telling is heavier on author interpretation and often presented in the form of a narrative or description that highlights salient characteristics and theoretically significant aspects. Decisions on data analysis and presentation in the form of “showing” and “telling” are critical in underpinning the “conceptual leap” between research data and theoretical contribution—a pivotal moment in theorizing that is not without challenge, in terms of making sense of the data and finding ways to articulate this in theoretical terms ( Gehman et al. 2018 ; Gioia, Corley, and Hamilton 2013 ; Klag and Langley 2013 ).

Finally, in considering theorization in public administration, it is important to reflect on concerns that theorizing from qualitative data has been colonized by modes more typically the preserve of quantitative methods ( Cornelissen 2017 ; Cornelissen and Durand 2014 ; Delbridge and Fiss 2013 ; Llewelyn 2003 ). This is argued to be evident both in how qualitative research is reported, and also in a trend toward translating qualitative data into transferable explanatory factors ( Bluhm et al. 2011 ). Although this shift has enhanced methodological rigor, there are some inherent trade-offs including a loss of plurality in the field, and potential reduction in explanatory richness both empirically and theoretically ( Cornelissen 2017 ). This prompts the question: “ What, then, might allow us to develop more diverse but robust and persuasive theorizing in the future ?” ( Delbridge and Fiss 2013 , 330).

In summary, commentaries on qualitative research highlight a variety of approaches to theorizing. However, they also note a dilemma in terms of strengthening rigor while maintaining the richness of qualitative data. This suggests a need to identify appropriate criteria to underpin theorizing in public administration ( McCurdy and Cleary 1984 ; Stout 2013 ; White 1986 ). We consider next how scholars have addressed these challenges in a specific field of public administration—network and collaborative governance.

A Focus on Network and Collaborative Governance

Previous studies of qualitative research in public administration have been designed to provide systematic and comprehensive overviews of research practices across the discipline (see Ospina, Esteve, and Lee 2018 , for a recent example). In contrast, this manuscript aims to facilitate rigorous theorizing through qualitative research focused on a discrete area of public administration—network and collaborative governance. We select this subdiscipline because the relatively recent shift from hierarchy to collaborative forms of governance has posed a series of novel theoretical puzzles for public administration researchers ( O’Toole 1997 , 2015 ). Although qualitative and quantitative scholars have responded to this challenge in relatively even measure, it is argued that qualitative research is able to make a particularly significant contribution because it is especially able to advance the field in areas of new and limited research through addressing alternative questions (e.g., Watkins-Hayes 2011 ). These include shedding light on what works, where, and why and “generating new hypotheses by examining how complex causal pathways actually occur” ( Moynihan 2012 , 574; O’Toole 1997 ; Rhodes and William 1996 ).

Research in this subfield of public administration tends to focus on configurations, such as service-based networks, public–private partnerships and strategic alliances, predicated on the basis that hierarchies and markets insufficiently address persistent policy problems ( Entwistle 2010 ; McGuire 2006 ). Exploration of a range of issues is evident, including: the internal dynamics of collaboration and the “unique” strategies and skills of collaborative management ( Agranoff 2006 ; Campbell 2012 ; McGuire 2006 ; Meier and O’Toole 2001 ; O’Leary and Vij 2012 ); collaborative leadership ( Waugh and Streib 2006 ); and the behavioral dimensions and experiences of collaboration ( Purdy 2012 ; Reynaers 2014 ). However, our core interest is the theorizing process through qualitative research leading to the production of these insights, rather than network and collaborative governance per se. In the following section of this article, we elaborate on the selection criteria used to identify our study sample.

Selecting and Evaluating Qualitative Studies on Networks and Collaborative Governance

This section outlines further detail on our research design, reports on data collection decisions and explains the analytic approach underpinning our study. In essential terms, data collection entailed the identification of a set of qualitative journal articles relating to network and collaborative governance for further analysis and discussion. This involved a team of three researchers working through four key stages that are described below, and illustrated in figure 1 .

Stage 1: Review

Consistent with the argument that “a review of qualitative research is best served by reliance upon qualitative methods themselves” ( Jones 2004 , 95), the research team engaged in a systematic narrative review ( Greenhalgh et al. 2004 ; Powell, Rushmer, and Davies 2009 ; Powell and Davies 2016 ). The narrative review approach is designed to provide an interpretive, holistic, and nuanced interpretation of qualitative research ( Jones 2004 , 96). The review focused on six leading international journals— Governance, International Public Management Journal, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Public Administration , Public Administration Review , and Public Management Review —selected on the basis that they are the source of world-leading public management scholarship, as indicated in prior research ( Andrews and Esteve 2015 ; Ospina, Esteve, and Lee 2018 ). Articles published within the period 2000–17 were considered, to capture research prompted by the development of “joined-up” organizations and collaborative structures, consistent with a shift toward the “new public service” ( Denhardt and Denhardt 2000 ).

Studies were identified by using the search terms “network governance” and “collaborative governance.” Admittedly, these topics are relatively wide-ranging, so it is important to be specific about what types of studies were included under these headings. To provide a focus for the review, qualitative articles that shed light on the organization, management, and performance of public sector networks were selected for inclusion. However, studies such as those on the role of political actors (e.g., the EU) or the development of policy networks were not included (e.g., Damgaard 2006 ; Le Galès 2001 ). Nor were those focused on governance more broadly (e.g., Behagel and Arts 2014 ). Articles were also excluded on methodological grounds. For example, the study of a collaborative natural disaster system by Wang and Yin (2013) adopts a mixed-methods rather than a purely qualitative approach, and so was omitted. Studies were also excluded if they failed to present empirical qualitative research, or provided reflections on network governance derived from wider qualitative datasets or case studies but did not explicate detail about research design and primary data gathering (e.g., Leach 2006 ; Purdy 2012 ; Weber and Khademian 2008 ). This stage of the analysis resulted in the initial selection of a sample of 43 journal articles.

Stage 2: Refinement

The review team conducted a more detailed analysis of the 43 qualitative articles within the sample. Twelve further articles were excluded at this stage on the basis of their focus, for example, where networks or collaborations were a feature but not a central element of the article’s theoretical contribution. Or when under closer inspection the article did not address issues pertaining to the organization, management, and performance of networks. For example, Gains’ (2009) study of local governance networks in the United Kingdom highlights on the shifting context for local government elites, rather than the organization, management, and performance of the network itself. A sample of 31 articles remained after refinement.

Stage 3: Analysis

In stage 3, the review team began the process of analysis, that involved open and inclusive discussion of the 31 articles. This technique marked the first stage of a process that applied a series of thematic criteria to underpin analysis. Here, these included: theoretical perspective (fields covered within the literature review); qualitative method (case study, interview, observation, documentary analysis); analytic approach (detail of thematic analysis and/or coding procedures employed to support the shift from data to claims) ; presentation of evidence (whether data is “told” in the form of a research narrative, and/or “shown” in quotation or table format); and key contribution to theory. With respect to analytic approach , we anticipated that this would vary depending upon the type of theorizing in play. As previously noted, inductive approaches start with an empirical orientation, deductive approaches start from extant theoretical understandings, and abductive approaches utilize both. In some cases data may be coded, while in others they may be analyzed in broad thematic terms and even though these trajectories will differ, all three approaches should facilitate the generation of the conceptual leaps that underpin theorizing. The emphasis on analytic approach in this study is designed to capture how theory informed the analysis, whether the study was inductive, deductive, or abductive, and how data were analyzed by the researcher.

However, it should be noted it was not possible to discern this information for all cases due to a level of ambiguity within many studies. Consequently, we have sought to provide a summary interpretation of the analytic approach adopted in each case. Further, we note that our sample did not include any examples of purely deductive research. Iterating between the studies and the criteria set, the team then proceeded to agree a summary of each article.

Stage 4: Identifying Illustrative Cases

The 31 studies were then subject to a further stage of narrative review by the research team. This process involved the identification of a subset of four studies that were selected as they provide neat illustrations of the variation in approaches to theorizing through qualitative research. The studies are Bate (2000) , Waring, Currie, and Bishop (2013) , Ferlie and McGivern (2014) , Saz-Carranza and Ospina (2011) (for reference these are marked * in the first column of Supplementary Table 1 ). The first two studies each adopt an inductive approach but execute this in quite different ways. Bate (2000) provides an example of thick description based on ethnography, while the article by Waring, Currie, and Bishop (2013) is indicative of interpretive or thematic analyses that have been identified as underrepresented in leading management journals ( Cornelissen 2017 ). The latter two studies engage in different forms of abductive theorizing, combining deduction and induction. Ferlie and McGivern (2014) is noteworthy for its strong upfront utilization of theory and Saz-Carranza and Ospina (2011) provide a particularly comprehensive overview of their analytic approach. Discussion of these cases facilitated the opportunity to develop a broad set of principles to support theorizing in qualitative public administration research. These are presented and reviewed in detail in the closing sections of this article.

Having discussed the research design and analytic approach, we employed in the context of this study, the following section of the article reports on the research findings that emerged from the narrative review. It begins by providing a summary characterization and analysis of the full set of qualitative studies.

Summary of Qualitative Research on Network and Collaborative Governance

Detailed analysis of the full set of studies (which is reported in full in Supplementary Table 1 ) indicates that scholars are addressing significant and important theoretical questions on network and collaborative governance through qualitative research. However, the reporting of information on qualitative methods and data collection among these studies is variable and somewhat ad hoc. Some authors afford particular attention to the sampling rationale, when for other studies this could be more systematically addressed. Similarly, on occasions data gathering is extensively detailed, while elsewhere it is pithily described and, in a minority of articles, only briefly mentioned. Beyond an often broad characterization of analytic approach, there is sometimes a lack of specification of processes underpinning the review, incorporation, and presentation of data. Authors vary in their description of the derivation of themes and codes, and differ in the detail provided regarding the link between data and conceptual claims. Few studies discuss these in detail and those that do, tend to demonstrate abductive theorizing (seldom labeled as such) that combines elements of inductive and deductive approaches.

It is interesting to observe that few articles explicitly identify with, and conform to, a pure grounded theory approach, despite the common perception that most qualitative research adopts this perspective ( Suddaby 2006 ; Tummers and Karsten 2012 ). In terms of the presentation of data and empirical findings, many of the articles rely more on “telling” rather than “showing” their data, but it is important to emphasize that qualitative scholars often face a pragmatic challenge in balancing “showing” data with providing a coherent narrative within a limited word count. Sometimes these “trade-offs”’ are discussed explicitly in concluding sections, along with reflections on the generalizability of the research—for example, Moynihan (2009) identifies that the loss of rich data is associated with his decision to analyze multiple cases. However, in most cases, these choices remain implicit, along with reflections on the wider applicability, implications, and generalizability of findings.

Our overview of the set of 31 qualitative studies on network and collaborative governance provides some support for claims that qualitative studies are developing greater theoretical ambition and sophistication in the specification of their contributions (e.g., Saz-Carranza, Iborra, and Albareda 2016 ; Walker et al. 2013 ). However, our findings resonate with others in identifying that all too often aspects of the qualitative research process remain opaque ( Ospina, Esteve, and Lee 2018 ). This potentially undermines the value of qualitative research and places limitations on the quality of theorizing, especially when there is an inadequate account of the steps taken between data collection, analysis, argument and conclusions.

On the basis of this review, we propose that theorizing in qualitative public administration is likely to be most effective when authors provide transparent accounts for, and outline the connections between, their research design, analytic approach, and theoretical contribution. To further unpack these elements and elaborate examples of the theorizing process, we now move to discuss four illustrative studies derived from the wider set.

Case Studies of Theorizing in Qualitative Research on Network and Collaborative Governance

To demonstrate alternative approaches to theorizing from qualitative research in public administration, we select four contrasting studies to illustrate two common theorizing methods: “inductive theorizing” and “abductive theorizing.” These studies helpfully illuminate pluralist approaches to theorizing through qualitative research, although it should be noted from the outset that the studies highlight the practical challenges of reporting qualitative research and, as such, they do not fully meet the guiding principles proposed in the concluding section of the article.

Inductive Theorizing

The first of the two studies that exhibit inductive theorizing is Bate (2000) . Bate’s study is focused upon implementation problems associated with networked governance and is especially inductive in approach, even for qualitative studies. Eschewing a detailed literature review, the research problem is set out as one of cultural fragmentation that stymies attempts at networked governance. Bate reports on a method that blends action research with ethnography (“action ethnography”) and the reader is promised a dynamic account of change underpinned by an emergent interview schedule, consistent with an inductive approach. Indeed, very soon into the article, Bate launches into rich and contextualized description and manages to organize the data in a coherent manner to capture the chaotic nature of organizational life, without drawing upon themes derived from literature. In the process he avoids a common pitfall of qualitative research, where scholars represent the “messiness” of the “real world” but often render a complex research account that inhibits a strong storyline. A number of implicit analytic strategies are evident in Bate’s presentation of findings. The article temporally brackets the process of change, providing a clear sequencing that assists the reader, while also ordering data to demonstrate organizational problems, early impressions, subsequent diagnosis, and solution ( Langley 1999 ; Langley et al. 2013 ). In this sense, he describes a networked governance process that is ongoing, rather than linear, and one with no end point yet visible. Further, he is careful to avoid a “glossy” story about managerial success, describing the subsequent change as “home-grown” and bottom up.

The persuasiveness of Bate’s account, and underlying theorizing, derives from the transparency he provides within his detailed explication of his research design (see the excerpt provided in figure 2 as an example). The author’s immersion in the empirical setting is evident. He reports that he carried out 150 visits (500 days) over a 2-year period, with myriad opportunities for observation, as well as a large number of interviews (approximately 100). Given his embeddedness within the organizational setting, there are a larger number of direct interview quotes and observations than would be usual, even within qualitative studies. The overall effect of this is one of vicarious engagement with the research site as the reader feels they are transported into the organization in a way that proves particularly engaging. The ethnographic approach prompts an account that incorporates pluralist emotions, interests, and politics that underpin complexity of organizational cultures, with a strong sense of respondents’ voices, as evident in the quote below (taken from Bate 2000 , 492).

Extract from “Implementing Change: The ‘Action Research’ Approach” ( Bate 2000 , 487)

So you’ve got this incredible situation where the doctors won’t cooperate because they’re terrified of losing power; you’ve got managers who can’t make a decision because they’re afraid if they do, there will be a vote of no confidence and they lose their job. And you’ve got the nurses who are, as usual, trying to keep the thing going. (Senior Nurse)

Bate’s approach to analysis is discussed only in general terms and there is an absence of detail on data coding. However, the volume of primary data helps to convince the reader of a body of evidence supporting a “conceptual leap.” A wide range of voices are represented, mitigating the prospect that quotations have been “cherry-picked” to illuminate a predetermined storyline. Finally, given the inductive, emergent and co-created nature of the research process, it is refreshing to read Bate’s critical reflection on his own position within the research study and reassuring to be informed of the robust steps he has taken between research questions, data, analysis, and theory ( Bate 2000 , 488).

Neutrality and even-handedness were central to this process. We were positioned in the space between management and workforce, strenuously avoiding being seen as management-centric (the traditional bias of organization development) and worker-centric … mediating between the different interests and perspectives …

Our second example of inductive theorizing comes from Waring, Currie, and Bishop (2013) , a study that differs significantly from Bate as a theoretical gap and rationale is evident from the outset. Focused on neglected “downstream issues” that play out at the intra-organizational level, the authors aim to unpack the “black box” of network governance to develop a better understanding of management practice. The strength of theorizing observed within Waring, Currie, and Bishop (2013) lies partly in an inductive approach applied to understand and explain the impact of partnership configuration on local implementation. This allows the authors to challenge dominant perceptions of network governance effects and, as a result, specify and present a theoretical model in figure form ( figure 3 ; Waring, Currie, and Bishop 2013 , 324). The figure emphasizes the explicit links between empirical findings and key conceptual relationships, thereby outlining the “conceptual leap” by underscoring both the rigor of the underpinning study and the theorizing processes at work.

Waring, Currie, and Bishop (2013 , 324) Model of Empirical Findings and Conceptual Relationships

Similar to Bate (2000) , Waring, Currie, and Bishop (2013) adopt an inductive approach to this research, that involves “an iterative process of close reading of the data, coding, constant comparison, elaboration of emerging themes and re-engagement with the wider literature” (317). However, Waring, Currie, and Bishop (2013) boost explication of theorizing significantly by detailing the research process through eight paragraphs of text and a supporting figure summarizing coding and thematic analysis (see extract in figure 4 ). To deliver transparency in research design and facilitate theoretical generalization, they provide background on their comparative cases to situate their analysis and elaborate on their sampling strategy. To reduce ambiguity in their analysis, they demonstrate how they developed and tested three levels of codes, including first-order concepts, adhering to respondents’ terms; second-order themes, subsuming first-order codes; and third-order aggregate dimensions ( Gioia, Corley, and Hamilton 2013 ). These stages are especially significant as they inform the oppositional dimensions that subsequently capture differences between their cases and underpin the “conceptual leap” in providing the basis for theory elaboration.

Extract from Figure Summarizing Coding Thematic Analysis ( Waring, Currie, and Bishop 2013 , 318)

Finally, Waring, Currie, and Bishop (2013) reinforce theorizing through a transparent attempt to connect analysis, the presentation of their data and theoretical contribution—bringing both evidence of the research process, and credibility to the account. In so doing, supporting extracts from illustrative examples of coded data are provided in tables, while narrative reporting incorporates illustrative quotes. Note, Waring, Currie, and Bishop (2013) are unusual in actively reporting on a full range of data, including that derived from policy documents and clinical operating procedures (see figure 5 , for examples).

Document Excerpts from Waring, Currie, and Bishop (2013 , 320)

Abductive Theorizing

The theoretical contributions in our next pair of studies are underpinned by an abductive approach that combines deductive and inductive theorizing techniques. In the first study, provided by Ferlie and McGivern (2014) , theoretical concerns are again apparent from the outset. Labeled as iterative, but displaying abductive characteristics, Ferlie and McGivern (2014) puzzle on the long-term shift to indirect governance. They identify extant accounts as incomplete, and aim to enrich theorization. In the light of this, they incorporate a theoretical perspective from the social sciences previously unapplied to a public service context—Foucault’s theory of governmentality 1 —and in so doing they use the presumptive and conjectural premise of abduction ( Mantere and Ketokivi 2013 ). Development of an interview proforma deductively informed by governmentality and competing theoretical perspectives enables empirical interrogation in pursuit of their theoretical objectives. On this basis, Ferlie and McGivern examine the role of the neo-liberal health care state in the United Kingdom and conclude that the introduction of “managed” networks prompted a degree of enthusiasm for evidence-based management amongst practitioners within case study organizations. They note that their conjecture is upheld, with their proffered approach providing the “best-fitting” set of explanations.

Theorizing is strengthened in this study by an unambiguous set of research questions and a highly transparent account of theoretical implications in the discussion section of the article. Here, a series of contributions is clearly articulated and given further emphasis through the provision of a helpful table (see excerpt provided in table 1 ) that elaborates five aspects of “added value” from an Anglo-governmentality perspective, vis-à-vis the network governance paradigm. The table summarizes the authors’ contention that Anglo-governmentality extends knowledge in public administration, while two additional novel contributions premised on their empirical analysis are also presented.

Extract from “The Key Arguments of Anglo-Governmentality and Network Governance Contrasted Together with our Contribution” ( Ferlie and McGivern 2014 , 77)

Note: Extract is two of seven rows from the full original table.

Although Ferlie and McGivern provide a helpful and clear account of their theoretical contribution, we argue that theorizing also requires a high degree of transparency in research design and analytic approach. In this regard, in the discussion of their methodology, the authors make an explicit and weighty case for the adoption of a qualitative case study approach to their analysis and spend some time considering how case study research can “move beyond surface level descriptions” ( Ferlie and McGivern 2014 , 67). Their ability to provide theoretical generalization is delivered through a comparative case approach, combined with explicit connection with theory to boost external validity. Ideally, the rationale for the research setting and sample could be better explained and connected to subsequent methodological choices. And while their theoretical framework and contribution is elaborated in some detail, little information is given on coding procedures and analytic steps for the two case studies. In particular, the inductive aspects of their analysis are not explicated.

So while Ferlie and McGivern (2014) provide a high degree of transparency in their application of a Foucauldian theoretical perspective to enrich traditional theoretical conceptualizations of governance, and deliver helpful clarity on their research design, some steps taken within their analysis remain opaque. This serves to marginally undermine clarity in their theorizing and somewhat obscures their conceptual leap. Nevertheless, a significant amount of primary data from both cases is reported which allows the reader to engage with the context and gain insight into the effects experienced by those working within the network. Last, the authors do recognize compromises in the presentation of qualitative research, noting, “there is a trade-off between thick description (internal validity) and conceptualization (external validity)” ( Ferlie and McGivern 2014 , 67).

Our second study characterized by an abductive theorizing approach comes from Saz-Carranza and Ospina (2011) . This article unpacks the behavioral dimensions of network governance by examining how network members govern and improve the performance of the “whole” network, while also exploiting collaborative benefits for their home organizations. The authors shed light on the “unity–diversity tension,” identified as a key disruptor of network performance in goal-directed networks and inherent within “whole” systems of network and collaborative governance ( Milward and Provan 2006 ). However, beyond an empirical contribution focused on the behavioral dimensions of network governance, theorizing is explicit and convincing from the outset. In outlining their theoretical contribution, Saz-Carranza and Ospina explain that their research illuminates “the hows and whys of network governance” ( Saz Carranza and Ospina 2011 , 359) and present their claims in bold terms. This is striking considering that claims in qualitative articles tend to be more tentatively written, with caveats regarding the transferability of findings. This certainty stems from a transparent and convincing “conceptual leap,” explanation and evidence that is presented along the way. However, Saz-Carranza and Ospina are a little more circumspect when presenting a framework for governing whole networks, using words such as “tentative,” “emergent,” and “preliminary.” This shift from proposition to suggestion serves to further distinguish between the theory-building and theory-elaborating contributions and builds to their conclusion. Indeed, the article conveys a degree of specificity in the transparency of research design, analytic approach, and theoretical contribution—and the connection between the three—that is, rarely seen within qualitative research.

Theorizing in this study is especially convincing due to the clarity and consistency of detail offered in the documentation of research design and analytic approach. The authors present a rationale for the adoption of a qualitative approach, while also detailing their sampling frame, both in the text and in tabulated form. Running for almost seven pages, the qualitative methods section is one of the most transparent and informative published in public administration. However, we observe that the article runs to nearly 40 pages, emphasizing the trade-off between length and depth in qualitative research and demonstrating the importance of editorial discretion. Greater flexibility in this regard, as well as alternative strategies—such as enabling the placement of methodological material in online appendices—may help to facilitate the publication of qualitative research that provides rigor and richness.

Of particular note in this study is the established connection between the analytic approach underpinning the two phases of study and the subsequent theoretical contribution. Ospina et al. describe the open-ended, inductive, and exploratory first phase of the study, designed to “theory-build” through narrative inquiry, and distinguish this from the second phase of their study where an abductive approach provided “theory elaboration.” Coding processes applied to data in both phases of the research are explained through three paragraphs of text, but also in a tabulated form (see extract provided in table 2 ). Interview data is privileged, relative to the analysis of observation and documentary data, but the explicit and thorough analytic account facilitates a transparent and convincing basis for theorizing and stands in contrast to the fleeting references sometimes found within qualitative studies. Finally, evidence from each of the cases is “shown” using six tables of illustrative quotes (see extract in table 3 ), supplemented by a discussion that “tells” a nuanced account of the experience of managing network dilemmas, with selective quotations that lend credibility to theorizing.

Extract Illustrating Links between Codes across Phases of the Research ( Saz-Carranza and Ospina 2011 , 337)

Note: Extract is 3 of 15 rows from the full original table.

Extract Illustrating Tensions Relative to Diversity and Unity in Networks from Saz-Carranza and Ospina (2011 , 347)

Note: Extract is one of eight rows from the full original table.

Having summarized a set of qualitative studies on network and collaborative governance and illustrated alternative theorizing approaches, we next discuss the implications arising from our review and present a framework that facilitates rigorous theorizing from qualitative research in public administration.

This study presents evidence derived from a two-stage investigation of theorizing in qualitative public administration research, focused on a subset of studies in the field of network and collaborative governance. In line with Tavory and Timmermans (2014 , 7) who reflect, “whatever the theoretical resources the researchers draw upon, one of the seductions of qualitative research is the sense of intellectual adventure,” our analysis of 31 articles underlines the potential “value added” derived from qualitative research. The review indicates that distinctive sets of research questions had been addressed, including those with an exploratory and explanatory orientation drawn from a range of theoretical perspectives.

However, the systematic review also illustrates wide differences in the accounts of qualitative research provided across the set of studies. This suggests the need for a set of broad guiding principles to aid authors and reviewers in providing and prompting greater transparency in accounts of the qualitative research process. In response, in table 4 , we draw together and summarize these principles relative to three key component elements of the research process: research design , analytic approach , and contribution . Research design is fundamentally concerned with how authors report on how their research has been conducted. Analytic approach focuses on how authors move from an account of their data collection to offer interpretation and a series of claims. Finally, contribution involves the way authors articulate and highlight the impact of their theorizing, in terms of whether it enables them to test, elaborate, or generate theory. Our evidence indicates that theoretical claims are more convincing when studies demonstrate sufficient levels of transparency both in their approach to, and representation of, each of these three elements of the research process.

Procedural Assessment Criteria to Underpin Theorizing in Qualitative Research

Nonetheless, we are mindful of previously noted concern regarding the unintended consequences of formulaic and standardized quality criteria. Reflecting this, our review of four illustrative studies also suggests the need for some further nuance. For example, while Bate (2000) and Saz Carranza and Ospina (2011) both provide transparent accounts of research design, they adopt highly differentiated approaches to describing their process of analysis. Specifically, Bate (2000) describes analysis of his action-ethnography in broad procedural terms, noting use of a temporal bracketing strategy, for example. He provides rich description and substantial supporting data without detailed elaboration of the derivation of inductive themes. In contrast, for their comparative case analysis, Saz Carranza and Ospina (2011) focus on explicating coding, detailing specific steps, and providing examples. Both, in different ways, provide convincing support for their theoretical claims.Consequently, a “non-negotiable” element of qualitative research is a comprehensive account of research design, linked explicitly to a study’s research objectives, within the methods section of an article ( Ospina, Esteve, and Lee 2018 ). Theorizing will be less effective in studies that are deficient in these terms. In contrast, it seems there is likely to be greater variation in the reporting of the analytic approach. Although authors should be transparent, we should expect and accommodate plurality in forms of data analysis, coding, and reporting. So, while we are clear that high levels of transparency in all elements of the research process boost theorizing, our guiding principles are reflective of the absence of a set template and standard for explicating analytic approach. As such, they signal that we should be open to diversity in approach to, and the format of, reporting.

Given the plurality of forms of qualitative data and approaches, as well as differentiation in the forms of theorizing undertaken, the guiding principles (and those relating to analysis, in particular) need to be viewed in the round. All of which is consistent with previous research that suggests there is no “one best way” of undertaking and publishing qualitative research ( Haverland and Yanow 2012 ; Jensen and Rodgers 2001 ). However, we do suggest common tenets of good practice and in particular highlight that the link between research design, analytic approach, and theoretical contribution should be made transparent as this is the “golden thread” that supports effective theorizing. The conceptual leap underpinning a theoretical contribution is certainly more substantial and convincing when these elements are expertly and explicitly connected. Consequently, we emphasize and encourage a holistic approach to transparency, both in terms of the provision of detail on each element of the research process and in terms of the connection between research design, analytic approach, and theoretical contribution.

Extant literature highlights that theorizing can contribute in a variety of ways—by testing, elaborating, or generating theory, premised on deductive, inductive, or abductive analysis. In this study, we observe diversity in approaches to theorizing that are inductive and abductive. Our case study analysis portrays different ways that “conceptual leaps” can be made and articulated, with evidence that theorizing is being underpinned by different levels, dimensions, and combinations of rigor and richness. For example, Bate (2000) convinces through a synthesis of rich thick description of data, with rigor derived from a highly transparent account of the research design and underpinning rationale. In contrast, Waring, Currie, and Bishop (2013) provide a rich range of data sources and are highly transparent regarding their analytic approach, delivering rigor in the derivation of their claims. Ferlie and McGivern (2014) demonstrate richness in a convincing application of a novel theoretical perspective to their data, and rigor in transparent mapping of the derivation of their theoretical contribution. However, of the four considered studies, Saz-Carranza and Ospina (2011) satisfies the widest range of criteria as rigor and richness are evidenced in a detailed, persuasive, and reflexive research account that underpins a clear and convincing theoretical contribution. As such, this study best meets requirements specified by Golden-Biddle and Locke (1997 , 65) who argue that theorizing occurs when authors both show their data, and tell their significance.

Our findings indicate that convincing qualitative studies provide different, but sufficient, combinations of rigor and richness. So, contrary to common assertions that there is an oppositional relationship between the two, and an inherent trade-off in their pursuit, we suggest that there is clear potential for both rigor and richness to be attained in qualitative research. Indeed, we would argue that effective theorizing in qualitative research should reflect a complementary synergy between the two. Further, our case studies illustrate that rigor, richness, and their combinations come in a variety of forms. In response, and in the face of concerns raised about the quantitative restyling of qualitative research, we highlight and indeed support and encourage the continuation of plural forms of theorizing through qualitative scholarship, while mindful of the need to fulfill the good practice transparency requirements highlighted earlier.

The study suffers from a series of limitations. For example, our narrative review is focused upon a specific topic within public administration—network governance—and analysis of a different field could potentially yield an alternative set of findings. The field is young relative to other comparators in public administration, and has been at the forefront of recent demands for policy and practice insight. These factors likely influence the kinds of research questions being addressed and types of theorizing in evidence in this subdiscipline. Future research that systematically reviews qualitative study in other subfields of public administration might reveal more or less plurality in theorizing. In addition, we note that our study is premised on review of published articles. These are unlikely to capture the full detail of qualitative studies, their research design or the richness of their data. The articles have also been subject to review processes, such that the preferences of editors and referees, together with journal conventions, may have constrained plurality.

To conclude, this study was designed to extend debate by emphasizing the importance of sound qualitative research in public administration that blends rigor with richness and thereby facilitates effective theorization. We contribute to long-running discussions of qualitative scholarship in public administration and we generate evidence that suggests the need for an over-arching but nuanced set of principles that address the need for consistency and connection within the research process. The proposed guiding principles serve to emphasize essential elements for high quality theorizing, along with those that may vary, given the pluralism evident within, and characteristic of, qualitative research. So we look forward to the wider application, development, and refinement of our ideas in future analyses of qualitative research in other subfields of public administration. We also note that our findings are likely to have relevance beyond qualitative research, with clear potential to speak to debates on mixed methods research ( Atkins and Wilkins 2013 ), where the need for a convincing conceptual leap between theory and data is equally imperative. Finally, we hope that greater attention to theorizing in qualitative research in public administration may result in an improved representation of qualitative scholarship in journals in the field, leaving the discipline better positioned to capitalize upon “its ability to expose theoretical boundaries and push theoretical insights” whether these are generated on an inductive, abductive, or deductive basis ( Bansal and Corley 2012 , 513).

Graeme Currie’s time writing the manuscript was funded by National Institute for Health Research CLAHRC (Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care) West Midlands’. The views expressed here are his own.

We are grateful for support received from the editors and helpful comments received from our three anonymous reviewers. We note our thanks for permission from the authors and from Oxford University Press on behalf of the Public Management Research Association to reuse material from “Ferlie, Ewan and Gerry McGivern. 2014. Bringing Anglo-governmentality into public management scholarship: The case of evidence-based medicine in UK health care. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(1): 59–83” and from “Saz-Carranza, Angel, and Sonia Ospina. 2011. The behavioural dimension of governing interorganizational goal-directed networks – Managing the unity-diversity tension. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(2): 327–365.” We also note our thanks for permission from Wiley to reuse material from “Bate, Paul. 2000. Changing the culture of a hospital: From hierarchy to networked community. Public Administration 78(3): 485–512.”. © 2000 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Reprinted with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. We also acknowledge permission from Wiley to reuse material from “Waring, Justin, Graeme Currie, and Simon Bishop. 2013. A contingent approach to the organization and management of public–private partnerships: An empirical study of English health care. Public Administration Review 73(2): 313–326.” © 2013 by The American Society for Public Administration. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12020.

Agranoff , Robert . 2006 . Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers . Public Administration Review 66 ( s1 ): 56 – 65 .

Google Scholar

Albert , Mathieu , Suzanne Laberge , Brian D. Hodges , Glenn Regehr , and Lorelei Lingard . 2008 . Biomedical scientists’ perception of the social sciences in health research . Social Science and Medicine 66 : 2520 – 31 .

Andrews , Rhys , and Marc Esteve . 2015 . Still like ships that pass in the night? The relationship between public administration and management studies . International Public Management Journal 18 : 31 – 60 .

Atkins , Danielle N. , and Vicky M. Wilkins . 2013 . Going beyond reading, writing, and arithmetic: The effects of teacher representation on teen pregnancy rates . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 : 771 – 90 .

Bansal , Pratima , and Kevin Corley . 2012 . Publishing in AMJ—Part 7: What’s different about qualitative research ?. Academy of Management Journal 55 : 509 – 13 .

Bate , Paul . 2000 . Changing the culture of a hospital: From hierarchy to networked community . Public Administration 78 : 485 – 512 .

Behagel , Jelle Hendrik , and Bas Arts . 2014 . Democratic governance and political rationalities in the implementation of the water framework directive in the Netherlands . Public Administration 92 : 291 – 306 .

Bluhm , Dustin J. , Wendy Harman , Thomas W. Lee , and Terence R. Mitchell . 2011 . Qualitative research in management: A decade of progress . Journal of Management Studies 48 : 1866 – 91 .

Brower , Ralph S. , Mitchel Y. Abolafia , and Jered B. Carr . 2000 . On improving qualitative methods in public administration research . Administration and Society 32 : 363 – 97 .

Campbell , David . 2012 . Public managers in integrated services collaboratives: What works is workarounds . Public Administration Review 72 : 721 – 30 .

Cloutier , Charlotte , Jean-Louis Denis , Ann Langley , and Lise Lamothe . 2016 . Agency at the managerial interface: Public sector reform as institutional work . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 : 259 – 76 .

Cornelissen , Joep P . 2017 . Preserving theoretical divergence in management research: Why the explanatory potential of qualitative research should be harnessed rather than suppressed . Journal of Management Studies 54 : 368 – 83 .

Cornelissen , Joep P. , and Rodolphe Durand . 2014 . Moving forward: Developing theoretical contributions in management studies . Journal of Management Studies 51 : 995 – 1022 .

Damgaard , Bodil . 2006 . Do policy networks lead to network governing ? Public Administration 84 : 673 – 91 .

Delbridge , Rick , and Peer Fiss . 2013 . Editors’ comments: Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge . Academy of Management Review 38 : 325 – 31 .

Denhardt , Robert B. , and Janet Vinzant Denhardt . 2000 . The new public service: Serving rather than steering . Public Administration Review 60 : 549 – 59 .

Dodge , Jennifer , Sonia M. Ospina , and Erica Gabrielle Foldy . 2005 . Integrating rigor and relevance in public administration scholarship: The contribution of narrative enquiry . Public Administration Review 65 : 286 – 300 .

Eisenhardt , Kathleen M . 1989 . Building theories from case study research . Academy of Management Review 14 : 532 – 50 .

Entwistle , Tom . 2010 . Collaboration . In Public service improvement: Theories and evidence , eds. Rachel Ashworth , Entwistle Tom and Boyne George , 162–183. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press .

Google Preview

Foucault, Michel. 2007. Questions on geography. Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography, 173–182.

Feldman , Martha S. , Kaj Sköldberg , Ruth Nicole Brown , and Debra Horner . 2004 . Making sense of stories: A rhetorical approach to narrative analysis . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 : 147 – 70 .

Ferlie , Ewan , and Gerry McGivern . 2014 . Bringing Anglo-governmentality into public management scholarship: The case of evidence-based medicine in UK health care . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 : 59 – 83 .

Gains , Francesca . 2009 . Narratives and dilemmas of local bureaucratic elites: Whitehall at the coalface ? Public Administration 87 : 50 – 64 .

Gehman, Joel, Vern L. Glaser, Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, Denny Goia, Ann Langley and Kevin G. Corley. 2018 . Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building . Journal of Management Inquiry 27 : 284 – 300 .

Gioia , Dennis A. , Kevin G. Corley , and Aimee L. Hamilton . 2013 . Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the Gioia methodology . Organizational Research Methods 16 : 15 – 31 .

Glaser , Barney G . 1998 . Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions . Mill Valley : Sociology Press .

Glaser , Barney G. , and Anselm L. Strauss . 1967 . The discovery of grounded theory . New York : Aldine .

Golden-Biddle , Karen , and Karen D. Locke . 1997 . Composing qualitative research . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.

Greenhalgh, Trisha., Glenn Robert., Fraser MacFarlane., Paul Bate and Olivia Kyriakdou 2004 . Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations . The Milbank Quarterly , 82 : 581 – 629 .

Harley , Bill . 2016 . Can qualitative researchers reclaim rigour? Challenging positivist conceptualisation of rigour in management scholarship . Paper presented at the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management , Brisbane , December 6–9 .

Haverland , Markus , and Dvora Yanow . 2012 . A hitchhiker’s guide to the public administration research universe: Surviving conversations on methodologies and methods . Public Administration Review 72 : 401 – 8 .

Jensen , Jason L. , and Robert Rodgers . 2001 . Cumulating the intellectual gold of case study research . Public Administration Review 61 : 235 – 46 .

Jones , Kip . 2004 . Mission drift in qualitative research, or moving toward a systematic review of qualitative studies, moving back to a more systematic narrative review . The Qualitative Report 9 : 95 – 112 .

Justice , Jonathan. B . 2007 . Purpose and significance of research design . In Handbook of research methods for public administration , eds. K. Yang and G. J. Miller , 75 – 92 . New York, NY : CRC Press .

Klag , Malvina , and Ann Langley . 2013 . Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research . International Journal of Management Reviews 15 : 149 – 66 .

Langley , Ann . 1999 . Strategies for theorizing from process data . Academy of Management Review 24 : 691 – 710 .

Langley , Ann , Clive Smallman , Haridimos Tsoukas , and Andrew H. Van de Ven . 2013 . Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow . Academy of Management Journal 56 : 1 – 13 .

Leach , William D . 2006 . Collaborative public management and democracy: Evidence from western watershed partnerships . Public Administration Review 66 ( s1 ): 100 – 10 .

Lee , Thomas W. , Terrence R. Mitchell , and Chris J. Sablynski . 1999 . Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999 . Journal of Vocational Behavior 55 : 161 – 87 .

Le Galès , Patrick . 2001 . Urban governance and policy networks: On the urban political boundedness of policy networks. A French case study . Public Administration 79 : 167 – 84 .

Llewelyn , Sue 2003 . What counts as ‘theory’ in qualitative management and accounting research? Introducing five levels of theorizing . Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 16 : 662 – 708 .

Mantere , Saku , and Mikko Ketokivi . 2013 . Reasoning in organization science . Academy of Management Review 38 : 70 – 89 .

McCurdy , Howard E. , and Robert E. Cleary . 1984 . Why can’t we resolve the research issue in public administration ? Public Administration Review 44 : 49 – 55 .

McGuire , Michael . 2006 . Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it . Public Administration Review 66 ( s1 ): 33 – 43 .

Meier , Kenneth J. , and Laurence J. O’Toole . 2001 . Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: A model with evidence from US public education . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 : 271 – 294 .

Miller, Peter and Nikolas Rose. 2008. Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity.

Milward , H. Brinton , and Keith G. Provan . 2006 . A manager’s guide to choosing and using collaborative networks , vol. 8 . Washington, DC : IBM Center for the Business of Government .

Moynihan, Donald P. 2009 . The network governance of crisis response: Case studies of incident command systems . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 : 895 – 915 .

———. 2012 . Extra network organizational reputation and blame avoidance in networks: The hurricane Katrina example . Governance 25 : 567 – 88 .

O’Leary , Rosemary , and Nidhi Vij . 2012 . Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going ? The American Review of Public Administration 42 : 507 – 22 .

O’Toole , Laurence J , Jr . 1997 . Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration . Public Administration Review 57 : 45 – 52 .

———. 2015 . Networks and networking: The public administrative agendas . Public Administration Review 75 : 361 – 71 .

Ospina , Sonia M . 2011 . Public administration research and the Field’s identity . Public Administration Review 71 : 957 – 63 .

Ospina , Sonia , Marc Esteve , and Seulki Lee . 2018 . Assessing qualitative studies in public management research . Public Administration Review 78 : 593 – 605 .

Peirce , Charles S . 1931–1935 . The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce , vol. 8 . Cambridge : Harvard Univ. Press .

Perry , James L. , and Kenneth L. Kraemer . 1986 . Research methodology in the “Public Administration Review,” 1975–1984 . Public Administration Review 46 : 215 – 26 .

Powell , Alison E. , and Huw. T. O. Davies . 2016 . Doctors and managers: A narrative literature review . London : Nuffield Trust .

———. 2009 . A systematic narrative review of quality improvement models in healthcare . Edinburgh : Quality Improvement Scotland .

Purdy , Jill M . 2012 . A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes . Public Administration Review 72 : 409 – 17 .

Reichertz , Jo . 2010 . Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory . Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 11 : Art. 13 . http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1001135

Reynaers , Anne-Marie . 2014 . Public values in public–private partnerships . Public Administration Review 74 : 41 – 50 .

Rhodes , Roderick , and Arthur William . 1996 . The new governance: Governing without government . Political Studies 44 : 652 – 67 .

Riccucci , Norma M . 2010a . Envisioning public administration as a scholarly field in 2020: Rethinking epistemic traditions . Public Administration Review 70 (special issue): 304 – 6 .

———. 2010b . Public administration: Traditions of inquiry and philosophies of knowledge . Washington, DC : Georgetown Press .

Saz-Carranza , Angel , Susanna Salvador Iborra , and Adrià Albareda . 2016 . The power dynamics of mandated network administrative organizations . Public Administration Review 76 : 449 – 62 .

Saz-Carranza , Angel , and Sonia Ospina . 2011 . The behavioural dimension of governing interorganizational goal-directed networks—Managing the unity-diversity tension . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 : 327 – 65 .

Selznick , Phillip . 1949 . TVA and the grass roots: A study of politics and organization , vol. 3 . Berkeley, CA : Univ. of California Press .

Suddaby , Roy . 2006 . From the editors: What grounded theory is not . Academy of Management Journal 49 : 633 – 42 .

Stout , Margaret . 2013 . Preparing public administration scholars for qualitative inquiry: A status report . Public Administration Research 2 : 11 – 28 .

Tavory , Iddo , and Stefan Timmermans . 2014 . Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research . Chicago : The Univ. of Chicago Press .

Tummers , Lars , and Niels Karsten . 2012 . Reflecting on the role of literature in qualitative public administration research: Learning from grounded theory . Administration and Society 44 : 64 – 86 .

Walker , Helen , Fredo Schotanus , Elmer Bakker , and Christine Harland . 2013 . Collaborative procurement: A relational view of buyer–buyer relationships . Public Administration Review 73 : 588 – 98 .

Wang , Feng , and Haito Yin . 2013 . Case analysis of the collaborative natural disaster system in the Zhejiang Province of China . International Public Management Journal 15 : 429 – 53 .

Waring , Justin , Graeme Currie , and Simon Bishop . 2013 . A contingent approach to the organization and management of public–private partnerships: An empirical study of English health care . Public Administration Review 73 : 313 – 26 .

Watkins-Hayes , Celeste . 2011 . Race, respect, and red tape: Inside the black box of racially representative bureaucracies . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , 21 ( Supp 2 ): i233 – 51 .

Waugh , William L. , and Gregory Streib . 2006 . Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management . Public Administration Review 66 : 131 – 40 .

Weber , Edward. P. , and Anne. M. Khademian . 2008 . Wicked problems, knowledge challenges and collaborative capacity builders in network settings . Public Administration Review 68 : 334 – 49 .

Welch , Catherine , Rebecca Piekkari , Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki , and Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki . 2011 . Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research . Journal of International Business Studies 42 : 740 – 62 .

White , Jay D . 1986 . Dissertations and publications in public administration . Public Administration Review 46 : 227 – 34 .

As cited in Ferlie and McGivern (2014) , Foucault (2007 , 108) defines governmentality as “the ensemble formed by institutions, procedures, analyses and reflections, calculations and tactics . . . that has the population as its target, political economy as its major form of knowledge and apparatuses of security as its essential technical element.”

Supplementary data

Email alerts, citing articles via.

• Recommend to your Library

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1477-9803
• Print ISSN 1053-1858
• Copyright © 2024 Public Management Research Association
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

School of Public Affairs and Administration

Research by students.

Graduate students in the School of Public Affairs and Administration work in a variety of research topics from public administration and policy. A list of recent M.P.A. capstone portfolio completions and Ph.D. dissertation titles is provided below. Other research produced by students individually as well as in collaboration with other students and faculty is not listed here.

Recent and archived doctoral dissertation topics

Hussein N. N. Chalabi  - "Developing a model to measure public sector knowledge management performance using the analytic network processing" (March 2022)

Christopher Surfus, Ph.D. - "Michigan municipal manager perceptions on LGBTQ+ inclusion: A narrative policy framework case study" (June 2021)

Ruth Bates-Hill, Ph.D. - "A study of communication practices between office and field-based personnel in home healthcare agencies" (May 2021)

Michael Mendenhall, Ph.D. - "Considerations for acquiring excess military equipment by police leaders" (May 2021)

Derik Van Baale, Ph.D. - "Ally or enemy: The impact of leadership on United States army combat veterans' deployment experiences who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan (August 2020)

Brandon Koch, Ph.D. - "Increasing odds: The impact of casino gaming size, location, and economic stream style on county revenue in Pennsylvania" (June 2020)

Burak Onur Tan, Ph.D. - "Food insecurity: A closer look at how households cope with food insecurity and how this phenomenon affects their overall health" (June 2020)

Mohammed Aljanahi, Ph.D. - "Leadership, satisfaction, commitment, and turnover intention in the UAE public sector" (December 2019)

Adel H. Aladlani, Ph.D. - "Governance and economic growth in the Arab world: Evidence from panel data analysis" (June 2019)

Li Cheng, Ph.D. - "Are we globalized? Transformative education and internationalization within NASPAA program" (April 2019)

Archived Doctoral dissertation topics

Recent M.P.A. Capstone Portfolio Completion

Note: Transitioned from an analytically-focused project papers into a reflective capstone portfolio

Bradley, Kara -Capstone Portfolio in Nonprofit Leadership and Administration.

Ford, Kevin -Capstone Portfolio in Public Management.

Ngnigone Obiang, Eddie Charlie -Capstone Portfolio in Human Resources Administration.

Schafer, Laura -Capstone Portfolio in Nonprofit Leadership and Administration.

Glasser, Chris -Capstone Portfolio in Public Management.

Johnston, Angel -Capstone Portfolio in Nonprofit Leadership and Administration.

Spring 2023

Bradley, Kara -Capstone Portfolio in Human Resources Administration.

Campbell, William -Capstone Portfolio in Public Policy.

Gardner, Janai -Capstone Portfolio in Health Care Administration.

Hernandez Rovelo, Kathy -Capstone Portfolio in Nonprofit Leadership and Administration.

Pena Cabreja, Daniela -Capstone Portfolio in Nonprofit Leadership and Administration

Rossiter, Thomas -Capstone Portfolio in Joint Degree

Xuereb, Randi -Capstone Portfolio in Health Care Administration.

Archived project paper list

Home > College of Business and Public Administration > Public Administration > Public Administration Theses, Projects, and Dissertations

Public Administration Theses, Projects, and Dissertations

Theses/projects/dissertations from 2020 2020.

A NEED FOR RICHER PUBLIC SERVICE MOTIVATION , Adam Dallas Levitus

PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ASYNCHRONOUS ONLINE DISCUSSIONS AS A SUPPLEMENT TO FACE TO FACE INTERACTIONS: A META REVIEW , Rachel Lisa Worrell

Theses/Projects/Dissertations from 2019 2019

Higher Education Financial Health - A Case Study of the California State University (CSU) , Amber Blakeslee

Theses/Projects/Dissertations from 2018 2018

The 'Lean In' Theory, Validated by Three Supreme Court Justices , Celene Valenzuela

Theses/Projects/Dissertations from 2017 2017

E-GOVERNMENT AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY , Marcos A. Ybarra

Theses/Projects/Dissertations from 2016 2016

The Cost of Earmarks , Nicholis John Zappia

Theses/Dissertations from 2005 2005

The council-manager plan, or, Managing for results?: Profiles and management styles of eight city managers in San Bernardino County , Leatricia Michelle Cash

Achieving effective asset management for water and wastewater utilities: A comparison of policy options for a special district and a medium city , Cari K Dale

An analysis of nitrate contaminated water in Cherry Valley , Adriana Hernandez-Romo

Theses/Dissertations from 2000 2000

A comparative analysis of the California Regional Center: Fair hearing process for individuals with developmental disabilities , Deborah Kay Crudup

The development of California State College in Coachella Valley , Abby Mozoras

Theses/Dissertations from 1998 1998

Crafton Hills College computer hardware/software tracking system , Catherine Pace-Pequeño

Theses/Dissertations from 1997 1997

Municipal layoffs in Southern California: Should seniority outweigh productivity? , Timothy Paul Ousley

Creating a government that works better and costs less: A historical analysis of Civil Service reform , James William Thomas

An analysis of the California State Department of Parks and Recreation's "Quality Management Program" , Celena Turney

The effects of education on the birth rates of "workfare" program participants: Implications for future welfare reform , Bryan Anderson Wing

Theses/Dissertations from 1996 1996

Auditing troubled employees in the public sector , Lila Mehdiyar

The management and regulation of the beneficial use of sewage sludge as an agricultural soil amendment in Riverside County , William Ernst Prinz

Theses/Dissertations from 1995 1995

Implementing total quality management in the public sector , Cynthia J. Lewis

Federal public policy and bilingual education , Dorothy Lewis

Regional planning in Germany , James Walter Morrissey

The Agua Mansa enterprise zone: An empirical analysis , Paul E. Ogu

Theses/Dissertations from 1994 1994

Participative management style in a state transportation agency regional office , Linda Renee Grimes

Intergovernmental fiscal policy in California: The 1993 property tax shift , Lynndee Ann Kemmet

California conservatorships: An examination into ethics, standards, and judical monitoring , Lucille Castillo Lyon

Long range planning at the University of California Riverside: A case study , Janice Jo Martin

Assessment administration for county service areas , Shawn Dwayne Nelson

Alternative dispute resolution and public policy conflict: Preemptive dispute resolution negotiated rulemaking , Allen G. Norman

Strengthening the power of the mayor's office: An examination of the city of Riverside , Michael William Radford

A study of the affirmative action employee selection process in California community colleges , Mary Elizabeth Sampson

Intergovernmental cooperation and coordination at the local government level: The case of economic development in Riverside County , Alozie Donatus Udeh

Theses/Dissertations from 1993 1993

Determining the parks and recreation services of the Fontana community , Mitchell James Assumma

Leadership in local government computer service organizations within the state of California , Robert Benjamin Beavan

A study to determine what factors influence employee sick leave usage in the Riverside County Department of Mental Health Administration , Sally Aguilar Beavan

Wellness programs in police departments and how they effect workers' compensation claims , Herbert G. McKee Jr.

Proposition 111 and congestion management programs: A case of over-bureaucratization , Scott Richard Priester

The assessment of writing ability: A comparative cost effectiveness study of indirect and direct measures , Kristine Marie Smith

Theses/Dissertations from 1992 1992

Police culture, management and public image: Problems in implementing community oriented policing , Kenneth L. Becknell

Leadership in community oriented policing , John H. Boyd

Software pilferage in government agencies , Katherine Marie Foley

The use of privatization in the public sector: A focused study on the Inland Empire , John David Jamerson

Overcoming communications barriers in local government: Establishing networks through the public management forum , Anthony Michael Snoodgrass

Residential fire sprinklers requirement in single and multi-family homes: Survey of attitudes among the citizens of the city of Indio , David Arnold Yegge

Theses/Dissertations from 1991 1991

Analysis of the United States Trustee program , M. Shannon Goetsch

The effect of the 1964 Civil Rights Act on black Americans , Quentin Jamil Moses

A strategic analysis of budgeting for integrated logistical support of defense systems , Bruce Richard Suchomel

Theses/Dissertations from 1990 1990

Computer literacy in master of public administration classes , Penni Kaye Overstreet

Theses/Dissertations from 1989 1989

A case study to identify and evaluate the pricing policy for geothermal energy in the San Bernardino Municipal Geothermal District heating system , Kevin Perry Fisher

A study to determine the feasibility of constructing and operating a student fee funded recreational sports complex for California State University, San Bernardino , Helga Lingren

The role of the chief information officer in the contemporary university , James Jon Scanlon

Theses/Dissertations from 1987 1987

A matching process: More effective placement procedures for court dependent children , Lester M. Kushner

Theses/Dissertations from 1986 1986

The East Mojave National Scenic Area: Multiple use or national park? , Jeanne Hopkins Herr

Norton Air Force Base and San Bernardino: Communities in symbiosis , Clayton H. Snedeker

Theses/Dissertations from 1984 1984

The effects of governmental regulation on research and development in the pharmaceutical industry: An investigation into the relationship between patents, product substitution and regulatory policies , Linda Dianne Acosta

The impact of the Reagan Administration on equal employment opportunity, affirmative action for women and minorities in the public sector , Sandra Lucille Johnson

The Patton project: A demonstration program in deinstitutionalization , Harold Pitchford

The evolution of personality liability for public sector employees , Brian C. Turnbull

Theses/Dissertations from 1983 1983

Recycling the poor laws: A history of welfare, cross-sectional and longitudinal statistical studies concerning general relief policies in California , Carolyn Lea Clark-Daniels

Government administration in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia , George T. Fitzgerald

Controlling the uncontrollables: An examination of the capacity of Congress to reduce government expenditures for entitlements , David Lawrence Horne

Theses/Dissertations from 1982 1982

Regionalization of public service with an emphasis on fire service , Gerald M. Newcombe

Theses/Dissertations from 1981 1981

A model program for the development of humanistic administrative techniques in a California community college , Elaine Francisco-Davis

Theses/Dissertations from 1980 1980

Revenue practices used by California's municipal water districts , John Wesley Gebb

Congressional budget reform , Diane M. Precour

The evaluation of recent public service employment programs , Bruce Rose

Theses/Dissertations from 1979 1979

The accrual method of accounting in the federal government history and analysis , Aly Saleh A. Saleh

The Medi-Cal program , William H. Tillery

Theses/Dissertations from 1978 1978

An investigation to determine the impact of public financing on the Joint Powers Authority , Louis M. Jarcho

A comparative analysis of electric utility ownership in California , Robert E. Tremont

Theses/Dissertations from 1977 1977

A current medical reimbursement practices and prospects for national health insurance , Wallace D. Kinney

Organization closure a study of mobility versus satisfaction , Roy N. Mattke

Advanced Search

• Notify me via email or RSS
• Department, Program, or Office
• Disciplines

Author Corner

• CSUSB Public Administration Department

A service of the John M. Pfau Library

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Copyright Acrobat Reader

• Harvard Library
• Research Guides
• HKS Library & Research Services

Public Policy & Public Administration

• HKS Research & Publications
• Overviews & Introductions
• In-Depth Research
• News & Current Affairs
• Data & Statistics
• Directories & Lists
• Research Methods
• Related Research Guides

This research guide seeks to give you a first overview of library resources relevant to your research in public policy and public administration. 

If you are new to the topic, start with surveys provided in specialized handbooks and encyclopedias  and bibliographies and literature reviews . Once you have become more familiar with the extant scholarship, move on to in-depth research in research databases , leading public policy journals , and, of course, a treasure trove of books available through Harvard Library. 

Depending on your specific area of interest, you may also want to consult Harvard Library-subscribed directories of government institutions and policymakers or brush up on research methods for public policy analysis.  

Last but not least, check out news coverage , including  podcasts , on current issues in wide array of public policy areas. 

• Next: HKS Research & Publications >>
• Last Updated: Aug 3, 2023 9:39 AM
• URL: https://guides.library.harvard.edu/hks/public_administration

Harvard University Digital Accessibility Policy

Home > DISSERTATIONS_THESES > MPA-Pace

Master in Public Administration Theses

Submissions from 2021 2021.

Implementing Housing First Initiatives and Programs for the Persistently Homeless Individuals and Families in Iredell County, North Carolina , Laketha Bobish

Effective Cognitive Learning Solutions for Special Education Students of NYC Public Schools in Underserved Communities Prepared for: Dr. Sheying Chen Pace University , Nicole N. Garvin

Submissions from 2015 2015

An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Use of Social Media by United Way of Westchester and Putnam , Dian Xi and Ziyun Gao

Submissions from 2014 2014

Incentivizing Employees Through Benefits and Recognition Programs at Pace University , Diana Dumitru

Complexity in National Policy Implementation: A Top-Down Look at the Failure of Healthcare.gov , Samuel Fandrich

The Impact of Patient Centered Medical Home on the Patient’s Experience , Courtne Flynn

Health Professionals’ Attitude Towards Substance Abusers : A Part of the Health Professionals’ Value and Belief System Which Prevails in Society , Ana Gotay

Correctional Education: Society Essential for Progressive Growth or a Detrimental Use of Taxpayers Money? , Danilo Guy

Pace University Athletics: Increasing Profitability and Performance , Jhanay Harris

Does Having a Major and Lucrative Sports Arena Improve a Neighborhood’s Economy & Quality of Life? , Natalie Hernandez

How Does Geriatric Care Management Affect Health Outcomes of Geriatric Patients in Hospitals , Elaina Tate

Law Enforcement and Training , Erika Tremblay

Roadmap to Recovery: A Strategic Plan for Westchester County Government to Increase Office Occupancy and Revitalize the I-287 Corridor , Britta Vander Linden

Investigating Stigma Among Public Administration Students , Cora Venson

Submissions from 2013 2013

Evaluation of the Marketing Strategies of the Case Management Society of America , Veronica Chepak

Wireless Cell Towers and Antennae: Municipal and Private Relationship , James M. Collins

The Persistence of Bullying at School and Public Policy Responses: What Ails? , Rajeet Guha

A Youth Revolt: Discerning the Impact of “One-and-Done” Rule On Major Collegiate Championship Teams at the Division I Level , Erik Harris

How Successful was Kickstarter in Raising Funds for Library for All? , Yeerang Jang

Submissions from 2010 2010

New York State and Mid-Hudson Valley Nonprofits: The Impacts of Late Contract Payments , Jodi Fernandes

Submissions from 2009 2009

Venture Philanthropy in 2009: Developments in the Field Since "Virtuous Capital" , Annika Many

Economic Development in Downtown Ossining Since 1969 , Lutonya Russell-Humes

How an Ethnic Store Impacts a Community - The Case of Kam Sen Foods in White Plains , Tiantian Tang

Submissions from 2008 2008

The Relationship of Patient Falls to Prevention Policies in Hospitals: A Case Study , Cornelia Branzan

Artificial Transitive Fatty Acid (TFA) Ban in Restaurants in US Cities: NYC-DOH TFA Ban as a Model for Proactive Public Health Policy , Vidia S. Ramdeen

Health Insurance Policy in New York City and Westchester County , Colin Stone

Environmental Stewardship of the Vermont Ski Industry and the Public's Willingness to Support , Karina V. Warshaw

Advanced Search

• Notify me via email or RSS
• Master of Public Administration - Pace
• Pace University Libraries
• Pace on Youtube
• Collections
• Disciplines

Author Corner

• Submit Work

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Copyright

132 Public Administration Essay Topics

🏆 best essay topics on public administration, 🌶️ hot public administration essay topics, 👍 good public administration research topics & essay examples, 🎓 most interesting public administration research titles, 💡 simple public administration essay ideas, ❓ public administration research questions.

• Public Administration as a Discipline
• Public Policy and Administration: The Theories of Departmentalization and Division of Labor
• What Is Public Administration? Essay Example
• Cybercrimes: The Effect on Public Administration
• Corruption as a Problem in Public Administration
• Public and Private Administration. Comparative Analysis
• Managing Diversity Within Public Administration
• Classical and New Public Administration Theories To make public administration more effective, it is essential to utilize a new theoretical paradigm that is deeply rooted in the classical public administration theory.
• Public Administration: Formal and Informal Organizations The main idea of formal organizations is to increase profitability of the business while that of informal ones is to protect the interests and welfare of their members.
• Sanitation, Inspection and Public Health Administration Public healthcare administration is the science of preventing, improving, and promoting the health of the community at large.
• Master of Public Administration and the Career Master of Public Administration emphasizes leadership duties such as policy development and management of public finances and people management.
• Recruitment and Selection in “The New Public Personnel Administration” The objective of this reflection paper is to discuss why learning about the topic of recruitment and selection is relevant to aspiring personnel in public administration.
• The Purpose of Administrative Law and Public Administration The purpose of administrative law is to introduce constraints that ensure that public agencies focus on the public good while staying within certain boundaries.
• Role of Cultural Diversity in Public Administration Nowadays, an increase in cultural diversity is a reality in most societies, first of all, because of the process of globalization and growing migration rates.
• Public Administration: Trait Approach to Leadership The article tells about the results of researches, the purpose of which was to identify the personal qualities and character traits of leaders that make them so.
• Managing Diversity in Public Administration and Policy Diversity becomes an integral part of everyday life as individuals are exposed to communication with various groups daily.
• Accountability in Public Administration The widespread corruption and mismanagement of resources inherent in the public sector necessitates the development of checks and balances.
• Public Administration Definition and Theories The paper informs readers about the existing perspectives on public administration and theories associated with the given concept.
• Public Administration and Concepts of Procedural Fairness This is a brief manual to guide employees on administrative law. It addresses concepts of procedural fairness: discretion, credibility, bias and the extent of duty to give reasons.
• The Cybercrime Effect on Public Administration Cybercrime incidents occur in almost all government and public sectors and in the daily lives of individuals; such moments violate stability and the usual way of life.
• Constructive Criticism in Public Administration Criticism is a form of sharing views and looking for consensus. I believe constructive criticism is crucial in the sphere of public administration.
• Public Administration and Ethics The paper discusses the connection between ethics and public administrators and explores the role of reform in the context of ethics.
• Public Administration Research and Theory This paper will discuss what public administration is, what jobs exist in the field, and what changes may come in the future.
• Social Equity and Public Administration The analysis of social equity and public administration help in the tax redistribution as the fiscal space will administer equity by lowering taxes on the property.
• Machine Learning for Public Administration The purpose of this article is to identify how machine learning can provide a solution to data analysis in public administration.
• Strong Central Government: Public Administration A strong central government is a political system whereby, all the laws that are supposed to govern a country are made by the central government.
• Public Administration and Its Role This paper examines the role of civil servants in the formulation and implementation of public administration through policymaking.
• Public Administration and Fiscal Policy This paper discusses what are the various types of taxes used by governments, who are the actors that make funding decisions, and how are they accountable to the public.
• Public Health/Health Administration Program During the latest quarter of the 1800s and the first quarter of the 1900s, scientific development, especially in microbiology, steered a novel aspect of public health.
• Issue of Social Equity in Public Administration and Criminal Justice The concept of social equity in public administration is based on race and gender issues in terms of employment, democratic participation, and service delivery.
• Public Administration and Its Modern Activities The essential character of public administration’s actions is associated with the notions of political neutrality, democracy, public interests, and new public management.
• Judicial Process of Public Administration: Baker vs. Canada The case of Baker vs. Canada is which Ms. Baker overstayed her immigration visa and was ordered deported is a administrative law judgment and shades light on what procedural fairness is all about.
• Public Administration: Public Budgeting Methods Public budgeting refers to a field of administration that revolves around the assessment of the available resources and their allocation to the various activities of a firm or organization.
• Public Administration: The Trump Public Charge Rule The paper analyzes the Trump public charge rule through the lenses of public administration theories like classical public administration theory.
• Ethical Awareness in American Public Administration The American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) ensures respect for the Constitution, democratic procedures, and accountability in public institutions.
• Public Policy and Its Administration Decision-Making Resolutions offered by CCHS are necessary for workplace environment improvement, caseload, and overwhelming paperwork issues addressing reconsideration.
• Two Scholarly Articles in Public Administration Both Public Administration Review and the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory are well-recognized professional peer-reviewed journals.
• Social Equity and Public Administration Privilege favors and benefits the majority groups, and it works by refusing to share a space with dissonant views.
• New York’s Public Administration Agenda New York is facing the issue of criminal activities that involve violations of human rights. The agenda would address the crime issue by targeting the youths and the employed.
• Organizational Socialization in Public Administration This article shows the effects of organizational socialization on the integration of new members of a company.
• Role of Washington: Public Administration Washington is mainly through the actions of organized groups that the public’s opinion shapes policymaking and thus helps assure that policies are responsive to popular preference.
• Public Administration and Policy Matters This essay discusses the basic principles of such political acts as the Doctrine of Privilege, the Pendleton Act of 1883, and the interpretation of certain Supreme Court cases.
• Big Data for Public Administration and Government The idea of using big data in the public and government sectors seems to be beneficial to gather many opinions, control human activities, and predict crimes.
• Livonia City’s Goals and Public Administration The purpose of this paper is to give a detailed discussion on the best option that can support Livonia’s goals and eventually meet the needs of its citizens.
• Public Administration: United Operations Association The UOA is a non-profit organization that is funded via contracts and membership dues received from the parent organization, The American United Operations Association (AUOA).
• Public Administration: Employment Equity The paper will examine responsibilities of employers to accommodate designated groups in workplace settings. Additionally, the paper will discuss employment equity.
• Hurricane Katrina and Public Administration Action This paper discusses public administration action during Hurricane Katrina, examines key omissions, Super Dome, a “location of last resort,” and other related issues.
• Economics and Technology in Public Administration Policy analysis is a crucial aspect of public administration, and each person should understand a variety of economic, technological, strategic planning.
• Public Administration Studies and Its Role in the US Public administration is the only solution to problems facing modern governments. The study of public administration would allow civil servants to understand how devolution works.
• Public Administration: Planning and Economics The paper defines the processes of gentrification and privatization, the aims of public administration and influences of the executive branch of government on the latter.
• Public Administration: Ideal Governance Bureaucratic systems of governance hinder the ability of the public office incumbents to make the right decisions due to overdependence on the established protocols.
• HIV/AIDS: Public Administration of Western Nations Despite the numerous misconceptions that characterized the advent of the epidemic, great strides have been undertaken to combat the human immunodeficiency viruses.
• Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration: Theoretical and Empirical Challenges
• Public Administration: British Art Versus European Technocracy
• Acquiring Leadership Skills Necessary for Public Administration
• The Dichotomy Between Politics and Public Administration
• Centralization, Decentralization, and Theories of Public Administration
• Barriers That Hinder Political Oversight of Public Administration
• How Does Public Administration Impact Our Life?
• Legal Knowledge and Agility in Public Administration
• Africa Public Administration Governing Body
• The Constitutional Context of U.S. Public Administration
• Canada and the Connection Between Public Administration and Politics
• Institutional Capacity Building and Legal Reform in Iraq: Toward Innovation and Public Administration Modernization
• Aspects Regarding the Implementation of Quality Management in the Public Administration
• Public Administration and Global Governance: From National to International Competency Frameworks
• Globalization and Public Administration: A Complex Relationship
• Cloud Computing and Public Administration: Approaches in Several European Countries
• Public Administration Management: Challenges and Possible Solutions
• Financing Methods for the Romanian Local Public Administration Authorities
• Managing Knowledge and Data for a Better Decision in Public Administration
• Bureaucrats’ Corruption and Competition in Public Administration
• Ethics and Public Administration Progress
• Clear Rule and Regulation in State Department Basic for Effectiveness Public Administration
• Public Administration and Management: Advantages and Disadvantages of Partnerships
• Public Administration Through Different Forms of Management
• American Public Administration and Politics
• Cohen and Osborne’s Ideas on Public Administration
• Public Administration and Its Evolving Forms
• Issues With Implementing ERP in the Public Administration
• Public Administration: Budgeting and Human Resource
• Mental Illness, Homelessness, and Public Administration
• Global Financial Crisis, Public Administration and Governance: Do New Problems Require New Solutions?
• Comparison Between Private and Public Administration
• The Economic and Social Impact of Public Administration Europeanization
• Monitoring the Management Quality of the Public Administration Area by Using the Computer Applications
• Health Care Expenditures, Public Administration and the Business Cycle
• Government-Business Relations in Greater China and Challenges for Public Administration
• Ethical Conduct and Public Administration
• Public Administration for Safe and Secure Environment: The Case of Slovak Republic
• Communication Processes, Public Administration and Performance Evaluation
• Managerial Strategies for Public Administration
• The Classical Model Theory of Public Administration
• John Hume’s Public Administration Achievement
• Human Resources Policies and Strategies in the Light of Romanian Public Administration
• Public Administration Between the 1930s and 1950s
• Organizational Change and Public Administration
• Demographic Predictors Within Local Public Administration
• Public Administration Under the King Ashoka
• Law Enforcement and Public Administration
• Conflict, Collaboration, and Accommodation in Public Administration
• Professional Ethics and Public Administration
• Why Is Woodrow Wilson Considered the Father of Public Administration?
• What Are the Theories of Public Administration?
• How Does the Public Administration Deal With the Amount of Dissatisfaction With the Government Due to Bureaucracy?
• How Does Ethics Affect Public Administration?
• What Is Public Choice Theory in Public Administration?
• Is Public Administration a Social Science?
• How to Create a Plan to Instill Trust With Citizens in Regard to Public Administration?
• What Participatory Approaches Are Often Advocated in Public Administration?
• What Is the Relevance of Sociology to Public Administration?
• How Can the Various Theories of Organization Be Applied Within the Context of Public Administration?
• What Are the Branches of Public Administration?
• What Role Should the Private Sector Play in Rethinking Public Administration?
• Is It Important to Involve Citizens in Public Administration?
• What Is Bureaucracy in Terms of Public Administration?
• What Is the Importance of Scientific Management for the Development of Public Administration?
• How Are Public Administration and Economics Related?
• Should Some of the Current Public Administrative Functions Be Left to the Private Sector?
• What Is the Ecology of Public Administration?
• How Does Being an Effective Manager Apply to Public Administration?
• What Is the Difference Between Political Science and Public Administration?
• How Has Public Administration Evolved Over Time?
• How Does Herbert Simon and Dwight Waldo Perspectives Influence Public Administration Today?
• What Are Research Methods in Public Administration?
• Why Do Economists Emphasize Efficiency as an Important Goal of Public Administration?
• What Ethical Challenges Do Public Administrators Face?
• How Is the Competitive Model Used in Public Administration?
• Can Citizens Influence Public Administration?
• Does Public Administration Guarantee Equal Access and Social Justice?
• What Is the Difference Between Business Administration and Public Administration?
• How Does the Federal Budget Influence Decisions About Public Administration?

Cite this post

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2023, January 27). 132 Public Administration Essay Topics. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/public-administration-essay-topics/

"132 Public Administration Essay Topics." StudyCorgi , 27 Jan. 2023, studycorgi.com/ideas/public-administration-essay-topics/.

StudyCorgi . (2023) '132 Public Administration Essay Topics'. 27 January.

1. StudyCorgi . "132 Public Administration Essay Topics." January 27, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/public-administration-essay-topics/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "132 Public Administration Essay Topics." January 27, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/public-administration-essay-topics/.

StudyCorgi . 2023. "132 Public Administration Essay Topics." January 27, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/public-administration-essay-topics/.

These essay examples and topics on Public Administration were carefully selected by the StudyCorgi editorial team. They meet our highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, and fact accuracy. Please ensure you properly reference the materials if you’re using them to write your assignment.

This essay topic collection was updated on January 9, 2024 .

Public Administration: A Bibliometric Research

• Living reference work entry
• First Online: 02 September 2021
• Cite this living reference work entry

• Pedro Antonio Martín Cervantes 2 ,
• María del Carmen Valls Martínez 2 &
• Salvador Cruz Rambaud 2  

16 Accesses

1 Citations

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bakker FGAD, Groenewegen P, Hond FD (2005) A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Bus Soc 44(3):283–317

Article   Google Scholar  

Cuccurullo C, Aria M (2017) Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informet 11(4):959–975

Cuccurullo C, Aria M, Sarto F (2013) Twenty years of research on performance management in business and public administration domains. Acad Manag Proc 2013:14270

Cuccurullo C, Aria M, Sarto F (2016) Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics 108:595–611

Farazmand A (1998) Administration of the Persian achaemenid world-state empire: implications for modern public administration. Int J Public Adm 21(1):25–86

Farazmand A (1999a) Bureaucracy and the alternatives in the Middle East. In: Henderson K, Dwivedi O, Shaw TM (eds) Bureaucracy and the alternatives in world perspective, International political economy series. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 244–268

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Farazmand A (1999b) The elite question: toward a normative elite theory of organization. Adm Soc 31(3):321–360

Farazmand A (1999c) Globalization and public administrarion. Public Adm Rev 59(6):509–522

Farazmand A (2002) Privatization and globalization: a critical analysis with implications for public management education and training. Int Rev Adm Sci 68(3):355–371

Farazmand A (2006) Chapter 18. Global administrative reforms and transformation of governance and public administration. In: Farazmand A, Pinkowski J (eds) Handbook of globalization, governance, and public administration, Public administration and public policy, vol 130. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 351–373

Farazmand A (2009) Hurricane Katrina, the crisis of leadership, and chaos management: time for trying the “surprise management theory in action”. Public Organ Rev 9(4):399–412

Farazmand A (2010a) Bureaucracy and democracy: a theoretical analysis. Public Organ Rev 10(3):245–258

Farazmand A (2010b) Bureaucracy, democracy, and public administration: editor’s brief introduction to the symposium. Public Organ Rev 10(3):205–207

Farazmand A (2011a) Chapter 2. Comparative and development public administration: past, present, and future. In: Farazmand A (ed) Handbook of comparative and development public administration, Public administration and public policy, 2nd revised and expanded edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 9–23

Google Scholar  

Farazmand A (2011b) Chapter 4. Learning from ancient Persia: administration of the Persian achaemenid world-state empire. In: Farazmand A (ed) Handbook of comparative and development public administration, Public administration and public policy, 2nd revised and expanded edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 33–60

Farazmand A (2015) Chapter 2. Governance in the age of globalization: challenges and opportunities for South and Southeast Asia. In: Jamil I, Aminuzzaman S, Haque S (eds) Governance in South, Southeast, and East Asia: trends, issues and challenges, Public administration, governance and globalization, vol 15. Springer, Cham, pp 11–26

Farazmand A (2016) Chapter 2. Hurricane Katrina as a global case of grand failure: lessons for future crisis and emergency management. In: Farazmand A (ed) Global cases in best and worst practice in crisis and emergency management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 17–32

Farazmand A (2017) Chapter 25. Learning from the Katrina crisis: a global and international perspective with implications for future crisis management. In: Farazmand A (ed) Crisis and emergency management: theory and practice, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 461–476

Pritchard A (1969) Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? J Doc 25(4):348–349

Suzuki I, Kaneko Y (2016) Chapter 3. Fukushima nuclear disaster and ensuring necessary government crisis and risk communication. In: Farazmand A (ed) Global cases in best and worst practice in crisis and emergency management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 33–52

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Economics and Business Department, University of Almería, Almería, Spain

Pedro Antonio Martín Cervantes, María del Carmen Valls Martínez & Salvador Cruz Rambaud

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Antonio Martín Cervantes .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA

Ali Farazmand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Martín Cervantes, P.A., Valls Martínez, M.d.C., Cruz Rambaud, S. (2021). Public Administration: A Bibliometric Research. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_4260-1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_4260-1

Received : 15 January 2021

Accepted : 15 June 2021

Published : 02 September 2021

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-31816-5

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-31816-5

eBook Packages : Springer Reference Economics and Finance Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• UNO Criss Library

Public Administration Research Guide

• Sample Search Terms
• What Is A Scholarly Journal?
• Find Articles
• Government Documents
• Associations
• Career Information

Sample Search Terms for Public Administration Topics

Sample research methods search terms.

• Citation Help This link opens in a new window
• Administrative law
• Benchmarking
• Boards of directors
• Budget – government policy
• Bureaucracy
• Bureaucratization
• Cities & towns
• Citizen participation
• City councils
• Communication in public administration
• Community involvement
• Community services
• Contracting out
• Cost control
• Cost shifting
• Council-manager
• County government
• Customer services
• Decision making
• Deliberative democracy
• Direct democracy
• Expenditures, public
• Federal aid to nonprofit organizations
• Financial crises – government policy
• Financial performance
• Government accountability
• Government paperwork
• Government policy
• Governors (Machinery)
• Health care reform
• Health services accessibility
• Interlocal agreements
• Interorganizational relations
• Local finance
• Local government
• Local officials & employees
• Mayor-council
• Metropolitan government
• Municipal government
• Municipal officials & employees
• Municipal services – United States
• New public management
• Nonprofit organizations
• Organizational accountability
• Organizational development
• Organizational governance
• Performance evaluation
• Performance management
• Performance standards
• Private sector
• Privatization
• Public administration
• Public administration – citizen participation
• Public goods
• Public interest
• Public officers
• Public safety
• Public sector
• Public services commissions
• Public sphere
• Public-private sector cooperation
• Rational choice theory
• Regulatory failure
• Service quality
• State governments
• Transaction cost theory
• Waste in government spending
• Case Management
• Case Studies
• Classification
• Clinical Case Studies
• Clinical Trial
• Correlation
• Data Quality
• Demographic Characteristics
• Dependent Variable
• Empirical Study
• Ethnography
• Experimental Replication
• Experimental Study
• Followup Study
• Generalization
• Hypothesis Testing
• Independent Variable
• Literature Review
• Longitudinal Study
• Mathematical Model
• Meta-Analysis
• Methodology
• Methodology (Data Collection)
• Non-Clinical Case Study
• Problem Solving
• Program Evaluation
• Qualitative
• Quantitative
• Questionnaires
• Random Sample
• Replication
• Research Design
• Research Methodology
• Retrospective Study
• Review of the Literature
• Risk Assessment
• Sample Size
• Sociological Research
• Systematic Review
• Test Construction
• Test Validity
• Treatment Outcome
• << Previous: Career Information
• Next: Citation Help >>
• Last Updated: Nov 21, 2023 7:48 AM
• URL: https://libguides.unomaha.edu/publicadministration

• Skip to Content
• Skip to Main Navigation
• Skip to Search

Indiana University Bloomington Indiana University Bloomington IU Bloomington

• High-impact Practices
• Bachelor of Science in Public Affairs (BSPA)
• Bachelor of Science in Environmental Science (BSES)
• Bachelor of Arts in Environmental and Sustainability Studies (BAESS)
• Bachelor of Science in Healthcare Management and Policy (BSHMP)
• Bachelor of Science in Arts Management (BSAM)
• Minors & Certificates
• Advising Staff
• General Ed and Intro
• Topics V450
• Topics V456
• O’Neill Launch
• Director’s Welcome
• Rising Leaders Program
• NextGeneration Leadership Program
• Indiana Leadership Program
• Courses & Faculty
• Estimated Costs
• Student Spotlights
• O'Neill Expo
• Required Internship
• Accelerated Master's Program
• O'Neill + Maurer JD
• Current IU Bloomington Students
• High School Students
• Transfer students
• For Current Students
• For Incoming Students
• Non-O’Neill Funding Opportunities
• Contact & Visit
• Academic & Leadership Programs
• Leadership Seminar Series
• Mission and Goals
• Core Curriculum
• Concentrations
• Washington, D.C. Accelerator Program
• Experiential Requirement
• Components & Concentrations
• Master of Environmental Sustainability (MES)
• Practicum Experience
• Executive Certification
• Master of International Affairs (MIA)
• MPA-MIA Dual Degree
• Experiential Requirements
• Faculty Profiles & Publications
• For Jacobs Students
• For Doctoral Students
• MAAA-MPA Dual Degree
• Additional Dual Degrees
• Certificates
• How to Apply
• Fellowships & Financial Resources
• Prior Professional Experience Benefits
• Peace Corps
• Teach for America
• Military and Veteran Benefits
• Funding for Current Students
• Funding for International Students
• Federal Financial Aid
• Subscribe to our Newsletter
• Virtual Sessions & Webinars
• Experience Day
• Schedule a Visit
• Connect with a Current Student
• O'Neill Visits You
• Why O'Neill?
• Environmental Policy
• Public Finance
• Public Management
• Public Policy Analysis
• Ph.D. in Environmental Science
• Environmental Science Fellowships
• On the Job Market
• Recent Placements
• Current Students
• Dissertations
• Why O’Neill ?
• Our Mission and Goals
• Degree Requirements and Curriculum
• O’Neill Online Week
• Nonprofit Management
• Public & Nonprofit Evaluation
• Tuition & Fees
• Financial Aid
• Meet Our Students
• Meet Our Alumni
• For Professionals
• For Military Students
• Helping You Succeed
• Information Sessions
• Executive Education
• Faculty Directory
• Environmental Research and Policy
• Racial Justice
• Research Areas
• Faculty Research Publications
• Laboratories
• Centers & Initiatives
• Working Research Groups
• Speaker Series
• Journals & Books
• Explore Careers & Outcomes
• Register Your Internships
• Internship Funds and Scholarships
• For Employers
• Careers Login
• Life at O’Neill
• Life in Bloomington
• For International Students
• Resilience and Wellbeing Initiative
• O’Neill International
• Leadership Opportunities
• Student Organizations
• Virtual Tour
• Dean’s Welcome
• Strategic Goals and Progress
• About Paul H. O'Neill
• 50th Anniversary
• Environment, Climate, and Sustainability
• Mission, Vision, and Values
• School Profile
• Vietnam Young Leaders Award
• Activate O'Neill
• Support & Resources
• Bloomington & Indianapolis
• Careers at O'Neill
• Administration & Staff Directory
• Dean’s Council
• Get Involved
• Alumni Events
• Alumni Recognition
• Distinguished Alumni Council
• Alumni Board of Directors
• Areas to Support
• Ways to Give
• Our Supporters
• Alumni Communications

Paul H. O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs

• Alumni & Giving
• Faculty & Research

Public Management and Leadership

Our research interests in the field of public management and leadership include:

• The political environment surrounding public organizations
• Public organizations’ relationships with citizens, organized interests, elected officials, legal institutions, private for-profit and not-for-profit organizations and other public organizations
• Government accountability and performance
• The structure and design of public organizations and public policy implementation regimes
• Organizational strategy, decision making and leadership in public organizations
• Public employee motivation, job satisfaction and other work-related attitudes
• Governmental reform and organizational change
• Administrative rule making, policy implementation and service delivery, administrative law, and government procurement and outsourcing

Faculty Members

Lisa Amsler

Distinguished Professor, Keller-Runden Professor of Public Service

Claudia N. Avellaneda

O'Neill Professor; Fischer Faculty Fellow; and Faculty Affiliate to the Ostrom Workshop, the Political Science Department, and the Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies (CLACS)

Paolo Belardinelli

Assistant Professor

Clinical Associate Professor

Jennifer Brass

Associate Professor

Scott Burgins

Clinical Assistant Professor

Leonor Camarena

Daniel Cole

Sameeksha Desai

Associate Professor; Director, Manufacturing Policy Initiative; Associate Director, Institute for Development Strategies

Aaron Deslatte

Sergio Fernandez

Burnell Fischer

Clinical Professor Emeritus

Beth Gazley

Paul Helmke

Director, Civic Leaders Center; Professor of Practice

Robert S. Kravchuk

Professor Emeritus

Leslie Lenkowsky

Professor Emeritus in Public Affairs and Philanthropic Studies

Deanna Malatesta

Antonette McCaster

Senior Lecturer

Temirlan T. Moldogaziev

Jill Nicholson-Crotty

Professor; Director, Master of Public Affairs Program and O'Neill Online MPA Program

Sean Nicholson-Crotty

O'Neill Professor; Director, Graduate Mentoring Center; Adjunct Professor of Political Science, College of Arts and Sciences

James Perry

Distinguished Professor Emeritus , Chancellor's Professor of Public and Environmental Affairs Emeritus

Orville Powell

Clinical Associate Professor Emeritus

Thomas M. Rabovsky

Kenneth R. Richards

Amanda Rutherford

Daniel Simon

Henry K. Wakhungu

Teaching Professor

Paul H. O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs social media channels

• Give to the O’Neill School

Additional links and resources

Assessing Qualitative Studies in Public Administration Research

Systematic reviews of research methods in the public administration field have assessed the progress of research practice and offered relevant recommendations to further develop research quality. But most recent reviews examine quantitative studies, and the few assessments of qualitative scholarship tend to focus on specific dimensions. This article calls attention to the overall practice of qualitative research in the field of public administration. The authors analyzed 129 qualitative studies published during a five-year period (2010–14) in the six top public administration journals, combining bibliometric and qualitative analyses. Three findings are drawn from the analysis. First, qualitative work represents a very small percentage of the journal articles published in the field. Second, qualitative research practice uses a small range of methodologies, mainly case studies. Finally, there is inconsistency in reporting methodological decisions. The article discusses the implications of these findings and offers recommendations to ensure methodological rigor while considering the integrity of the logic of inquiry and reporting standards of qualitative research practice.

Public Administration: Writing a Literature Review

• Getting Started
• Writing a Literature Review
• Find Articles
• Public Health Statistics
• Laws and Crime Statistics
• Compensation & Benefits
• Disabilities in the Workplace
• Employment + Labor Relations
• Employment + Labor Statistics
• Academic Integrity & Plagiarism

What is a Literature Review?

A literature review is a critical summary of what the scientific literature (books, articles, studies, theses and dissertations) says about your specific topic or question. Often student research in APA fields falls into this category. Your professor might ask you to write this kind of paper to demonstrate your familiarity with work in the field pertinent to the research you hope to conduct.

A literature review typically contains the following sections:

Introduction section (why is this topic important?)

List and analysis of references

Some instructors may also want you to write an abstract for a literature review, so be sure to check with them when given an assignment. Also, the length of a literature review and the required number of sources will vary based on course and instructor preferences.

(Adapted from the Purdue Online Writing Lab)

What should a literature review include?

Introduction :  Explain why this research topic is important.  Outline what direction your review will take: i.e., what aspects of the topic you’re focusing on.  

Body :  Present your summaries and evaluations of the sources in a clear, logical, and coherent manner.  Some options for organizing your review include chronological, order of importance, two sides of a controversial problem, differences in perspective or viewpoint.  Your review must “read” like a coherent paper, not a list.

Note :  Most literature reviews describe only the main findings, relevant methodological issues, and/or major conclusions of other research.

Ensure your final list of references includes all sources you’ve discussed, and use the citation style required in your discipline.

(Adapted from the Purdue Online Writing Lab) 

Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students

A tutorial by North Carolina State Universtiy

Subject Guide

• << Previous: Getting Started
• Next: Find Articles >>
• Last Updated: Jul 16, 2019 10:59 AM
• URL: https://liu.brooklyn.libguides.com/publicadministration