speaker evaluation examples essay

Speech Evaluation Essay

Writing and doing public speaking can be both a fun and exciting experience, and a scary one at the same time. But to be able to have someone evaluate the way you make your speech can also be a scary thing. However, this should not be seen as such. Rather, having to know how to improve on your speech is the best thing you can do to make yourself better. To be able to improve yourself. Speech evaluation essays can range from any type of speech that can be evaluated. Informative speeches, Persuasive speeches, and even self reflection speeches.

4+ Speech Evaluation Essay Examples

1. speech evaluation essay template.

Size: 103 KB

2. Sample Speech Evaluation Essay

Size: 57 KB

3. Speech Evaluation Essay in PDF

Size: 881 KB

4. Printable Speech Evaluation Essay

Size: 74 KB

5. Persuasive Speech Evaluation Essay

Size: 64 KB

Definition of Evaluation

Evaluation means to judge something through its quality, value, and importance. To appraise something by means of understanding its worth through a criteria or a rubrics set by standards. In this case, evaluating a speech, you must follow a set of criteria to understand its value, the quality of the speech and the way it was written out.

Definition of Informative Essay

An informative essay is a type of essay that teaches your audience on the topic you are talking or writing about. Your informative essay speech can be used to define a word, to compare two or more things. In addition to that, it can also analyze the data present, and provide steps. However, this type of essay speech is not used to persuade your audience, nor to be able to present an opinion.

Definition of Persuasive

This type of essay speech is written to persuade your audience to agree or to disagree with you. Depending on the topic you are writing about.  This essay speech is also known as the argumentative essay. The reason for this is because you will be discussing topics that would need other people’s opinions or point of views. This essay speech uses logic, analytical thinking and reasoning to show one or more ideas.

Definition of Essay

An essay is a short piece of writing that gives the author a way to express his or her own opinions. The author’s arguments and point of view are written in a way that may be too vague since they often overlap with other sources of writing. This is also a written composition that explores a certain topic where the author gets to share their opinions.

Definition of Personal Speech

A personal essay speech as the term states is something personal . A self introduction type of speech that is often used for introducing yourself to people. This type of speech is used to introduce a particular thing of your life on a more personal level.

Importance of Speech Evaluation

The purpose of speech evaluation is not to embarrass the author or the speaker. Rather it is to present a general overview of the speech. To be able to target the corrections needed so the speaker can improve on their next public speaking. When this is done in a respectful manner, this does not come out as something opinionated nor criticized.

Tips for Writing Speech Evaluation

You are now ready to be writing your speech evaluation. But before you do that, here are some tips you can use to make a good and polite speech evaluation. This is to avoid getting a lot of backlash and a lot of arguments from the person you are giving the evaluation.

• Review the guidelines – before you start to write your evaluation, review the guidelines presented to you. Your guidelines may be in the form of a checklist or a rubrics. Follow the guidelines and review them carefully.
• Listen and judge for yourself – Once you are done reviewing the guidelines, listen to the speaker. Make feedback only after they are done and not in the middle of their speech. If you wish to take note of what you noticed, write them down. Judge for yourself but do it quietly.
• Avoid using third person- This is often taken for granted but, avoid using third person when you are giving feedback. Do not make the person feel like they have done something wrong. You are not there to make the evaluation sound like they have done everything wrong. Rather, if you want to give good feedback, use I phrases. Like “I should have…”
• Avoid negative language and tone – this goes with the third tip. Avoid negative languages and tone. Do not yell at the person you are giving the evaluation for. Talk to them in a polite and professional manner.
• Give positive feedback as well – Do not focus on the negative. Give some positive feedback as well. Not only will this make them feel better, but it will also give them more reason to improve.

How do I make the evaluation essay more effective?

You may begin with stating a few things you want to discuss with the speaker.

Do I need to follow the rubrics when I evaluate someone’s essay speech?

Yes. As the rubrics are there to guide you on how to evaluate a person’s essay speech.

Is there a better way to express my feedback?

Tell the person you are giving feedback to, to sit down. Explain why you are doing this and how it is going to help the speaker improve on some things.

Essay evaluations are unavoidable. But they don’t have to be scary or embarrassing. Rather, they are great means to use to help you improve on some levels of your speech. As your evaluation is based solely on how you present as well as a rubrics. Do your best, understand the feedback given. The next time you give a speech, you know where to improve. As for those who give out the evaluation, remember to use positive tone and language. Avoid having to put too much negativity that the person may refuse to improve. You are not there to bring them down, rather you are there to help them.

Speech Evaluation Essay Generator

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

Evaluate the persuasive techniques used in a classmate's speech for your Speech Evaluation Essay.

Discuss the effectiveness of the speaker's use of body language in a Speech Evaluation Essay.

• Speech Writing
• Delivery Techniques
• PowerPoint & Visuals
• Speaker Habits
• Speaker Resources

Speech Critiques

• Book Reviews
• Browse Articles
• ALL Articles
• Learn About Us
• About Six Minutes
• Meet Our Authors
• Write for Us
• Advertise With Us

Speech Analysis #1: How to Study and Critique a Speech

The Speech Analysis Series is a series of articles examining different aspects of presentation analysis. You will learn how to study a speech and how to deliver an effective speech evaluation. Later articles will examine Toastmasters evaluation contests and speech evaluation forms and resources.

• How to Study and Critique a Speech
• The Art of Delivering Evaluations
• Modified Sandwich Technique for Evaluations
• Evaluation Forms, Tools, and Resources
• Toastmasters Evaluation Contests

The first in the series, this article outlines questions to ask yourself when assessing a presentation . Ask these questions whether you attend the presentation, or whether you view a video or read the speech text. These questions also apply when you conduct a self evaluation of your own speeches .

The Most Important Thing to Analyze: The Speech Objectives

Knowing the speaker’s objective is critical to analyzing the speech, and should certainly influence how you study it.

• What is the speaker’s goal? Is it to educate , to motivate , to persuade , or to entertain ?
• What is the primary message being delivered?
• Why is this person delivering this speech ? Are they the right person?
• Was the objective achieved ?

The Audience and Context for the Speech

A speaker will need to use different techniques to connect with an audience of 1500 than they would with an audience of 15. Similarly, different techniques will be applied when communicating with teenagers as opposed to communicating with corporate leaders.

• Where and when is the speech being delivered?
• What are the key demographic features of the audience ? Technical? Students? Elderly? Athletes? Business leaders?
• How large is the audience?
• In addition to the live audience, is there an external target audience ? (e.g. on the Internet or mass media)

Speech Content and Structure

The content of the speech should be selected and organized to achieve the primary speech objective. Focus is important — extraneous information can weaken an otherwise effective argument.

Before the Speech

• Were there other speakers before this one ? Were their messages similar, opposed, or unrelated?
• How was the speaker introduced ? Was it appropriate?
• Did the introduction establish why the audience should listen to this speaker with this topic at this time ?
• What body language was demonstrated by the speaker as they approached the speaking area? Body language at this moment will often indicate their level of confidence .

The Speech Opening

Due to the primacy effect , words, body language, and visuals in the speech opening are all critical to speaking success.

• Was a hook used effectively to draw the audience into the speech? Or did the speaker open with a dry “ It’s great to be here today. “
• Did the speech open with a story ? A joke ? A startling statistic ? A controversial statement ? A powerful visual ?
• Did the speech opening clearly establish the intent of the presentation?
• Was the opening memorable ?

The Speech Body

• Was the presentation focused ? i.e. Did all arguments, stories, anecdotes relate back to the primary objective?
• Were examples or statistics provided to support the arguments ?
• Were metaphors and symbolism use to improve understanding?
• Was the speech organized logically ? Was it easy to follow?
• Did the speaker transition smoothly from one part of the presentation to the next?

The Speech Conclusion

Like the opening, the words, body language, and visuals in the speech conclusion are all critical to speaking success. This is due to the recency effect .

• Was the conclusion concise ?
• Was the conclusion memorable ?
• If appropriate, was there a call-to-action ?

Delivery Skills and Techniques

Delivery skills are like a gigantic toolbox — the best speakers know precisely when to use every tool and for what purpose.

Enthusiasm and Connection to the Audience

• Was the speaker enthusiastic ? How can you tell?
• Was there audience interaction ? Was it effective?
• Was the message you – and we-focused , or was it I- and me-focused ?
• Was humor used?
• Was it safe and appropriate given the audience?
• Were appropriate pauses used before and after the punch lines, phrases, or words?
• Was it relevant to the speech ?

Visual Aids

• Were they designed effectively?
• Did they complement speech arguments ?
• Was the use of visual aids timed well with the speaker’s words?
• Did they add energy to the presentation or remove it?
• Were they simple and easy to understand ?
• Were they easy to see ? e.g. large enough
• Would an additional visual aid help to convey the message?

Use of Stage Area

• Did the speaker make appropriate use of the speaking area?

Physical – Gestures and Eye Contact

• Did the speaker’s posture display confidence and poise?
• Were gestures natural, timely, and complementary ?
• Were gestures   easy to see ?
• Does the speaker have any distracting mannerisms ?
• Was eye contact effective in connecting the speaker to the whole audience?

Vocal Variety

• Was the speaker easy to hear ?
• Were loud and soft variations used appropriately?
• Was the speaking pace  varied? Was it slow enough overall to be understandable?
• Were pauses used to aid understanding, heighten excitement, or provide drama?
• Was the language appropriate for the audience?
• Did the speaker articulate clearly?
• Were sentences short and easy to understand?
• Was technical jargon or unnecessarily complex language used?
• What rhetorical devices were used? e.g. repetition, alliteration, the rule of three , etc.

Intangibles

Sometimes, a technically sound speech can still miss the mark. Likewise, technical deficiencies can sometimes be overcome to produce a must-see presentation. The intangibles are impossible to list, but here are a few questions to consider:

• How did the speech make you feel ?
• Were you convinced ?
• Would you want to listen to this speaker again?
• Were there any original ideas or techniques?

Next in the Speech Analysis Series

The next article in this series – The Art of Delivering Evaluations – examines how best to utilize speech evaluation skills as a teaching tool.

Please share this...

This is one of many public speaking articles featured on Six Minutes . Subscribe to Six Minutes for free to receive future articles.

Image credit: Cate by James Duncan Davidson ( CC BY 2.0 )

Add a Comment Cancel reply

E-Mail (hidden)

Subscribe - It's Free!

Similar articles you may like....

• Speech Analysis #5: Toastmasters Evaluation Contests
• Speech Analysis #4: Evaluation Forms, Tools, and Resources
• Speech Analysis #3: Modified Sandwich Technique for Evaluations
• Speech Analysis #2: The Art of Delivering Evaluations
• Four Stages of Speaking Competence
• How to get Useful Feedback: A Speaker’s Guide

Find More Articles Tagged:

40 comments.

I absolutely loved this article. It gave me a major idea of what to write on my speech critique. Great information, organized, and detailed!

Great post. I have to say, it was when I started to do exactly what you say that my skills took off.

If anyone wants to go farther, just teach a class on public speaking. You do not need a degree to teach continuing ed. It will help you, as some of my students who went on to teach to improve even more. This is because not only are you observing your students for these points. You are actually teaching them how to attain some of these skills.

oh my god….thank you!! i had no idea where to even start my speech analysis!

Excellent article. Will refer members of my club to it.

Dear Eugenia You refer to “members of your club” and I wanted to know an online public speaking club. Does this exist. Regards Berty

Your article is very informative. Hope you post more tips on writing a speech and how to analyse it!! 😎

Thanks for providing this information. I am writing an essay critiquing my own speech in third person. A tough task, but these pointers made it easier. Thank you.

i loved this information very much.now i am preparing for my examination and i think this article will help me to get good mark. thanks

Great summary/overview on basic things to evaluate while listening to a speech. Will be very much helpful when i have to do evaluations for speech class!

Thank you sooooo much for this article!! This is helping me soooo much for my speech analysis!

Thank you so so much! You are awesome and very helpful plus amazing too!

Great job once again! I liked the clarity with which these concepts were explained. Self explanatory and useful for both novice and advanced speakers. Keep it up!

Such a great article, thank you! It truly helped

I have to look at this for a class project and really learned some new tips from this.

This helped immensely; thank you so much!

thank you, you helped me a lot

Best article I found for speech critique and analysis. Definitely a place to come back for speech resource.

Thank you Andrew, great articles and valuable information. I recently joined a Toastmaster’s group and this will really help. Once I figure out how to “tweet” I will be “tweeting” this site to Kwantlen University Students and Alumni.

I absolutely loved this article it gave me a major idea of what to write on my speech critique great information, organized, and detailed!

Fantastic article. For someone that is new to Taostmasters this gives me at least an idea of how I should approach giving an evaluation…frigthening me more than giving a speech!! Thanks!

hi Andrew, this is a great article for someone who is a beginner to evaluate a speech. thanks a lot. -Venkat

very informative article will certainly help me to develop my speech technique.

Thus really helpful…we always read text resurfacely I gained alot from this article. now I know where to start when I want to present information through speech to the public

thank you this helped me vey much.

thanks a lot this just help me with my paper. you explain it better than my teacher

I am a toastmaster who loves to compete. I believe these articles will help me help other to deliver their speeches and both of us can grow.

Hi Andrew Dlugan, i am really happy to come across your site as new trainee in the public speaking and writing profession. i am programmer but i have passion for writing especially poems.Do you have any advice or resources to help me survive in the world of speaking and writing.

Thank You, Best Regards, Lawal Abdulateef Olawle

I came here looking for a speech review but reading this article helped me a lot in my opening speech. I hope many people who are having trouble in analysing there speech they should really open this website. Thank you

This is a helpful source to me. Thanks a lot

Great article. I am preparing to critique a public speaking competition this weekend and I found this article quite helpful Thanks a lot

Hi Andrew, May I use your article in our club newsletter? It is particularly timely as we approach the contest season in Toastmasters. I will source it to your web site and also include a link under the Articles about speaking of our club website.

John Sleigh Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia

Amazing breakdown of how to not only analysis a speech but to also push yourself that inch further to get more scope for marks. I really recommend this webpage. Thank you

Thank you for this amazing information, your 6 minutes guide is great and I am learning so much with it.

Really GREAT JOB! thanks so much! Best! Rasha

I really love this and would want more of this

This information was very informative and knowledgeable.Thank you.

Your articles are very thorough. I really enjoyed reading the first one.

Can you give me some examples of relevant puns used in speeches?

One more treasure trove on the internet. Thanks for sharing DLugan.

Recent Tweets

How to Study and Critique a Speech -A quick How to for #College Students: https://t.co/z9z7ODho2n by @6minutes — @cdbond Oct 28th, 2015

You can improve your own public speaking skills by learning to study & critique a speech https://t.co/zttJVKM5Oj @6minutes #presentation — Alison Gray (@skillfluence) Jan 17th, 2016

A Good Read | Speech Analysis #1: How to Study and Critique a #Speech https://t.co/gBUPcE70ao — Prezentt (@Prezentt) Jan 27th, 2016

Speech Analysis: How to Critique a Speech https://t.co/p1wogOQb1k by @6minutes — @DivaFrazier Jan 28th, 2016

#TuesdayTips @6minutes explains how to study and critique a speech. Self-evaluation is important for improvement. https://t.co/GAUAKSm10e — PitchVantage (@pitchvantage) Feb 9th, 2016

Speech Analysis #1: How to Study and Critique a Speech https://t.co/yOHzQQvuqt by @6minutes — @SleimanSkaf Apr 20th, 2016

Speech Analysis: How to Critique a Speech https://t.co/Bn8xUiE3zw — @Dayra_Beltre May 23rd, 2016

Ένα άρθρο που περιλαμβάνει το σύνολο των δεξιοτήτων επιγραμματικά που θα πρέπει να διαθέτει ένας ομιλητής https://t.co/qakNApWWkS — @toastmasters_el Dec 17th, 2016

Speech Analysis: How to Critique a Speech https://t.co/guUHFM6PrP by @6minutes — @timleaman_sun Apr 5th, 2017

Preparing for the Educational Moment for Totem #41 Toastmasters. Speech evaluations are a critical part of a meetin… https://t.co/U62bkMGbzc — @_MewsNews Nov 3rd, 2018

7 Blog Links

Evaluation Contest Resources | World Champion Evaluator — Mar 3rd, 2010

Evaluation Contest Resources | World Champion Evaluator « Brinker Toastmasters — Mar 3rd, 2010

ToastMASTERY » Evaluation Contest Resources | World Champion Evaluator — Mar 3rd, 2010

The 25 Essential Presentation Skills for Public Speaking | David Edgerton Jr — May 6th, 2010

State of the Union 2012 « E-126 — Jan 31st, 2012

Speech Evaluations | Plantation Toastmasters — May 27th, 2012

Fall 2012 Club Contest | — Aug 6th, 2012

Featured Articles

• Majora Carter (TED, 2006) Energy, Passion, Speaking Rate
• Hans Rosling (TED, 2006) 6 Techniques to Present Data
• J.A. Gamache (Toastmasters, 2007) Gestures, Prop, Writing
• Steve Jobs (Stanford, 2005) Figures of speech, rule of three
• Al Gore (TED, 2006) Humor, audience interaction
• Dick Hardt (OSCON, 2005) Lessig Method of Presentation

Books We Recommend

Six Minutes Copyright © 2007-2022 All Rights Reserved.

Read our permissions policy , privacy policy , or disclosure policy .

Comments? Questions? Contact us .

• Games, topic printables & more
• The 4 main speech types
• Example speeches
• Commemorative
• Declamation
• Demonstration
• Informative

Introduction

• Student Council
• Speech topics
• Poems to read aloud
• How to write a speech
• Using props/visual aids
• Acute anxiety help
• Breathing exercises
• Letting go - free e-course
• Using self-hypnosis
• Delivery overview
• 4 modes of delivery
• How to make cue cards
• How to read a speech
• 9 vocal aspects
• Vocal variety
• Diction/articulation
• Pronunciation
• Speaking rate
• How to use pauses
• Eye contact
• Body language
• Voice image
• Voice health
• Public speaking activities and games
• About me/contact
• Speech delivery
• Speech evaluation

Speech evaluation: getting good feedback

How to give & get useful feedback, plus a printable public speaking evaluation form

By:  Susan Dugdale   | Last modified: 06-08-2023

Did you know that receiving an informed speech evaluation is an invaluable part of developing public speaking competence and confidence?

Even though it might seem scary to ask for, and then to receive, specific suggestions and comments about what you've done, how else do you learn what worked and what needs further refinement?

If you want to move forward, to improve your presentation skills, receiving, and giving, good feedback is vital.

Use this page to find out more

If you want informative feedback and you're not a member of a public speaking club, this page is for you. 

You'll find out how a speech is formally assessed:

• the aspects/areas focused on  in an evaluation,
• the 5-point sliding scale used to rate performance ,
• how to get a meaningful speech evaluation ,
• how to use an evaluation to improve your performance
• and there's a  printable public speaking evaluation form to download.

What is a good speech evaluation? 

And how do you get one.

Unfortunately there are few situations outside of specialist public speaking programs, like those in schools, or clubs like Toastmasters International , where you can get a thorough and useful speech evaluation.

Despite the ability to present well being recognized as a desirable skill it's seldom encouraged with careful, thoughtful feedback. Often the most you can hope for is a generalized " It was OK ", " Great ", or the dreaded: " Mmm, perhaps we'll give xxx a turn next time " type of comment.

Nice or nasty, it doesn't tell you anything useful.

What is rated in a speech evaluation?

The areas most commonly focused on are:

• Did it capture attention & interest?
• Was the topic introduced clearly?
• Was the topic related to the audience?
• Did the speaker have topic-credibility?
• Was the body of the speech previewed?
• Were the main points clear?
• Were the main points supported?
• Were the main points logically presented?
• Were the transitions between main points clear & effective?
• Was the transition to the end of the speech signaled?
• Was there a summary of principal points?
• Was there an effective close and/or call to action?
• Was the language used appropriate for the topic & the audience
• Was the language varied?
• Were the notes, visual aids etc. organized before the start?
• Was the beginning poised?
• Was there good use of eye contact?
• Was the body language (posture & gesture) controlled & effective?
• Was the speaking rate flexible & effective?
• Was the speaking volume appropriate & varied?
• Was there fluency, an absence of fillers like 'ahs' & 'ums'?
• Was vocal variety used, changes in pitch & tone, & good use of pausing?
• Did the speaker show enthusiasm for the topic?
• Were there visual aids & were they appropriate & integrated into the speech?
• Did the speech finish with poise?

Overall evaluation

• Did the speaker achieve the assignment's purpose?
• Was the topic researched?
• Did the topic adapt well to the audience?
• Were the audience interested?
• Was the speech completed within the time limit?

How are these areas/aspects rated?

In a formal speech evaluation , such as one done by a teacher in a high school public speaking class, variations on a sliding scale are used.

The most common is a  5 point scale :

• P  (poor)
• F  (fair)
• A  (average)
• G  (good)
• E  (excellent)

You can see this scale in use on the downloadable public speaking evaluation form available from the link at the foot of the page.

The person doing the rating will actively listen and watch the speech evaluating each element.

The final assessment will generally show a range (up and down the scale) over most of the aspects. Therefore a speech can be seen to be  'good'  in some areas,  'excellent'  in others and perhaps  'fair'  in one or two.

Getting a thorough speech evaluation

If you're not in a public speaking class or a member of an organization like Toastmasters International and the people you work with don't provide criteria-based feedback you have two options.

• find a class or a  Toastmasters  group in your area.
• organize your own feedback givers using the information outlined above with the suggestions below.

Organizing you own speech evaluators

• Ask a person whose judgement and maturity you respect whether they'll accept the role, and be present at your next speech or presentation. Perhaps you can team up with them and trade evaluations taking turn about. 
• Download and print off several copies of the speech evaluation form.
• Go through the form with your evaluator explaining the process. Highlight any areas you particularly want noticed.
• Establish how you want the rating scale interpreted. A good way to set the benchmark is to listen to an excellent speaker. You could choose one from here:  The Top 100 American Speeches
• Have your evaluator listen to your speech and provide feedback  before  you give it in front of an audience. This will provide a foundation for their comments when they complete your speech evaluation 'proper'.

Working with your speech evaluation

You've got your evaluation. Now what do you with it?

Go through it with your evaluator. Bear in mind  before  you do:

• that an evaluation is an opinion. At best it is an informed one with knowledge and experience behind it.   If you find areas you disagree over, do try and understand them from the evaluator's point of view. Often what we  think  we do and what we  actually do  are two completely different things.
• that a poor or fair rating represents an opportunity to develop rather than a reason to give up public speaking.

Use the ratings as a guide on where to focus your energy.

For example, if you're rated well on the delivery items but have fallen on the content, (introduction, body, conclusion), you know that for your next speech you'll spend the bulk of your preparation time organizing your content.

Keep your completed speech evaluation forms. It's great to be able to refer back to them to see how far you've come and it's interesting to compare how different evaluators pick up on different aspects to comment on.

Toastmasters International

For more information on the importance of evaluations and the role they play in improving public speaking skills visit Toastmasters International - Effective Evaluation .

I got my first really helpful feedback once I joined Toastmasters. It didn't happen as part of my teacher training, which is extraordinary given that teaching IS presentation.

Neither was it part of other work places I got to know. 

Good presentation skills are not innate. Like other skills they need to be learned.  Giving and receiving evaluations will speed your progress. 

Download a printable speech evaluation form

It's simple to use & suitable for:

• students  wanting to know more about the assessment criteria for their prepared speeches
• anybody wanting structured feedback on their public speaking.

The form lists all the important elements that collectively make a successful speech alongside a 5 point rating scale. Download the speech evaluation form

Do you want to know more about planning, writing and rehearsing speeches?

• Here's a sample speech outline page. It has a handy downloadable blank speech outline form ready and waiting for your notes.
• You'll find more about planning your speech here. This page takes you through the sequence of planning decisions and shows you how they are guided by knowledge of your audience.
• When you've done all your planning you can find out about how to write your speech
• And then it's fun time. Find out how to rehearse. Yes, practice does make perfect!
• Return to top of the speech evaluation page

speaking out loud 

Subscribe for  FREE weekly alerts about what's new For more see  speaking out loud  

Top 10 popular pages

• Welcome speech
• Demonstration speech topics
• Impromptu speech topic cards
• Thank you quotes
• Impromptu public speaking topics
• Farewell speeches
• Phrases for welcome speeches
• Student council speeches
• Free sample eulogies

From fear to fun in 28 ways

A complete one stop resource to scuttle fear in the best of all possible ways - with laughter.

Useful pages

• Search this site
• About me & Contact
• Blogging Aloud
• Free e-course
• Privacy policy

©Copyright 2006-24 www.write-out-loud.com

Designed and built by Clickstream Designs

7 Steps for How to Write an Evaluation Essay (Example & Template)

In this ultimate guide, I will explain to you exactly how to write an evaluation essay.

1. What is an Evaluation Essay?

An evaluation essay should provide a critical analysis of something.

You’re literally ‘evaluating’ the thing you’re looking up.

Here’s a couple of quick definitions of what we mean by ‘evaluate’:

• Merriam-Webster defines evaluation as: “to determine the significance, worth, or condition of usually by careful appraisal and study”
• Collins Dictionary says: “If you evaluate something or someone, you consider them in order to make a judgment about them, for example about how good or bad they are.”

Here’s some synonyms for ‘evaluate’:

So, we could say that an evaluation essay should carefully examine the ‘thing’ and provide an overall judgement of it.

Here’s some common things you may be asked to write an evaluation essay on:

This is by no means an exhaustive list. Really, you can evaluate just about anything!

Get a Pdf of this article for class

Enjoy subscriber-only access to this article’s pdf

2. How to write an Evaluation Essay

There are two secrets to writing a strong evaluation essay. The first is to aim for objective analysis before forming an opinion. The second is to use an evaluation criteria.

Aim to Appear Objective before giving an Evaluation Argument

Your evaluation will eventually need an argument.

The evaluation argument will show your reader what you have decided is the final value of the ‘thing’ you’re evaluating.

But in order to convince your reader that your evaluative argument is sound, you need to do some leg work.

The aim will be to show that you have provided a balanced and fair assessment before coming to your conclusion.

In order to appear balanced you should:

• Discuss both the pros and cons of the thing
• Discuss both the strengths and weaknesses of the thing
• Look at the thing from multiple different perspectives
• Be both positive and critical. Don’t make it look like you’re biased towards one perspective.

In other words, give every perspective a fair hearing.

You don’t want to sound like a propagandist. You want to be seen as a fair and balanced adjudicator.

Use an Evaluation Criteria

One way to appear balanced is to use an evaluation criteria.

An evaluation criteria helps to show that you have assessed the ‘thing’ based on an objective measure.

Here’s some examples of evaluation criteria:

• Strength under pressure
• Longevity (ability to survive for a long time)
• Ease of use
• Ability to get the job done
• Friendliness
• Punctuality
• Ability to predict my needs
• Calmness under pressure
• Attentiveness

A Bed and Breakfast

• Breakfast options
• Taste of food
• Comfort of bed
• Local attractions
• Service from owner
• Cleanliness

We can use evaluation criteria to frame out ability to conduct the analysis fairly.

This is especially true for if you have to evaluate multiple different ‘things’. For example, if you’re evaluating three novels, you want to be able to show that you applied the same ‘test’ on all three books!

This will show that you gave each ‘thing’ a fair chance and looked at the same elements for each.

3. How to come up with an Evaluation Argument

After you have:

• Looked at both good and bad elements of the ‘thing’, and
• Used an evaluation criteria

You’ll then need to develop an evaluative argument. This argument shows your own overall perspective on the ‘thing’.

Remember, you will need to show your final evaluative argument is backed by objective analysis. You need to do it in order!

Analyze first. Evaluate second.

Here’s an example.

Let’s say you’re evaluating the quality of a meal.

You might say:

• A strength of the meal was its presentation. It was well presented and looked enticing to eat.
• A weakness of the meal was that it was overcooked. This decreased its flavor.
• The meal was given a low rating on ‘cost’ because it was more expensive than the other comparative meals on the menu.
• The meal was given a high rating on ‘creativity’. It was a meal that involved a thoughtful and inventive mix of ingredients.

Now that you’ve looked at some pros and cons and measured the meal based on a few criteria points (like cost and creativity), you’ll be able to come up with a final argument:

• Overall, the meal was good enough for a middle-tier restaurant but would not be considered a high-class meal. There is a lot of room for improvement if the chef wants to win any local cooking awards.

Evaluative terms that you might want to use for this final evaluation argument might include:

• All things considered
• With all key points in mind

4. Evaluation Essay Outline (with Examples)

Okay, so now you know what to do, let’s have a go at creating an outline for your evaluation essay!

Here’s what I recommend:

4.1 How to Write your Introduction

In the introduction, feel free to use my 5-Step INTRO method . It’ll be an introduction just like any other essay introduction .

And yes, feel free to explain what the final evaluation will be.

So, here it is laid out nice and simple.

Write one sentence for each point to make a 5-sentence introduction:

• Interest: Make a statement about the ‘thing’ you’re evaluating that you think will be of interest to the reader. Make it a catchy, engaging point that draws the reader in!
• Notify: Notify the reader of any background info on the thing you’re evaluating. This is your chance to show your depth of knowledge. What is a historical fact about the ‘thing’?
• Translate: Re-state the essay question. For an evaluative essay, you can re-state it something like: “This essay evaluates the book/ product/ article/ etc. by looking at its strengths and weaknesses and compares it against a marking criteria”.
• Report: Say what your final evaluation will be. For example you can say “While there are some weaknesses in this book, overall this evaluative essay will show that it helps progress knowledge about Dinosaurs.”
• Outline: Simply give a clear overview of what will be discussed. For example, you can say: “Firstly, the essay will evaluate the product based on an objective criteria. This criteria will include its value for money, fit for purpose and ease of use. Next, the essay will show the main strengths and weaknesses of the product. Lastly, the essay will provide a final evaluative statement about the product’s overall value and worth.”

If you want more depth on how to use the INTRO method, you’ll need to go and check out our blog post on writing quality introductions.

4.2 Example Introduction

This example introduction is for the essay question: Write an Evaluation Essay on Facebook’s Impact on Society.

“Facebook is the third most visited website in the world. It was founded in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg in his college dorm. This essay evaluates the impact of Facebook on society and makes an objective judgement on its value. The essay will argue that Facebook has changed the world both for the better and worse. Firstly, it will give an overview of what Facebook is and its history. Then, it will examine Facebook on the criteria of: impact on social interactions, impact on the media landscape, and impact on politics.”

You’ll notice that each sentence in this introduction follows my 5-Step INTRO formula to create a clear, coherent 5-Step introduction.

4.3 How to Write your Body Paragraphs

The first body paragraph should give an overview of the ‘thing’ being evaluated.

Then, you should evaluate the pros and cons of the ‘thing’ being evaluated based upon the criteria you have developed for evaluating it.

Let’s take a look below.

4.4 First Body Paragraph: Overview of your Subject

This first paragraph should provide objective overview of your subject’s properties and history. You should not be doing any evaluating just yet.

The goal for this first paragraph is to ensure your reader knows what it is you’re evaluating. Secondarily, it should show your marker that you have developed some good knowledge about it.

If you need to use more than one paragraph to give an overview of the subject, that’s fine.

Similarly, if your essay word length needs to be quite long, feel free to spend several paragraphs exploring the subject’s background and objective details to show off your depth of knowledge for the marker.

4.5 First Body Paragraph Example

Sticking with the essay question: Write an Evaluation Essay on Facebook’s Impact on Society , this might be your paragraph:

“Facebook has been one of the most successful websites of all time. It is the website that dominated the ‘Web 2.0’ revolution, which was characterized by user two-way interaction with the web. Facebook allowed users to create their own personal profiles and invite their friends to follow along. Since 2004, Facebook has attracted more than one billion people to create profiles in order to share their opinions and keep in touch with their friends.”

Notice here that I haven’t yet made any evaluations of Facebook’s merits?

This first paragraph (or, if need be, several of them) should be all about showing the reader exactly what your subject is – no more, no less.

4.6 Evaluation Paragraphs: Second, Third, Forth and Fifth Body Paragraphs

Once you’re confident your reader will know what the subject that you’re evaluating is, you’ll need to move on to the actual evaluation.

For this step, you’ll need to dig up that evaluation criteria we talked about in Point 2.

For example, let’s say you’re evaluating a President of the United States.

Your evaluation criteria might be:

• Impact on world history
• Ability to pass legislation
• Popularity with voters
• Morals and ethics
• Ability to change lives for the better

Really, you could make up any evaluation criteria you want!

Once you’ve made up the evaluation criteria, you’ve got your evaluation paragraph ideas!

Simply turn each point in your evaluation criteria into a full paragraph.

How do you do this?

Well, start with a topic sentence.

For the criteria point ‘Impact on world history’ you can say something like: “Barack Obama’s impact on world history is mixed.”

This topic sentence will show that you’ll evaluate both pros and cons of Obama’s impact on world history in the paragraph.

Then, follow it up with explanations.

“While Obama campaigned to withdraw troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, he was unable to completely achieve this objective. This is an obvious negative for his impact on the world. However, as the first black man to lead the most powerful nation on earth, he will forever be remembered as a living milestone for civil rights and progress.”

Keep going, turning each evaluation criteria into a full paragraph.

4.7 Evaluation Paragraph Example

Let’s go back to our essay question: Write an Evaluation Essay on Facebook’s Impact on Society .

I’ve decided to use the evaluation criteria below:

• impact on social interactions;
• impact on the media landscape;
• impact on politics

Naturally, I’m going to write one paragraph for each point.

If you’re expected to write a longer piece, you could write two paragraphs on each point (one for pros and one for cons).

Here’s what my first evaluation paragraph might look like:

“Facebook has had a profound impact on social interactions. It has helped people to stay in touch with one another from long distances and after they have left school and college. This is obviously a great positive. However, it can also be seen as having a negative impact. For example, people may be less likely to interact face-to-face because they are ‘hanging out’ online instead. This can have negative impact on genuine one-to-one relationships.”

You might notice that this paragraph has a topic sentence, explanations and examples. It follows my perfect paragraph formula which you’re more than welcome to check out!

4.8 How to write your Conclusion

To conclude, you’ll need to come up with one final evaluative argument.

This evaluation argument provides an overall assessment. You can start with “Overall, Facebook has been…” and continue by saying that (all things considered) he was a good or bad president!

Remember, you can only come up with an overall evaluation after you’ve looked at the subject’s pros and cons based upon your evaluation criteria.

In the example below, I’m going to use my 5 C’s conclusion paragraph method . This will make sure my conclusion covers all the things a good conclusion should cover!

Like the INTRO method, the 5 C’s conclusion method should have one sentence for each point to create a 5 sentence conclusion paragraph.

The 5 C’s conclusion method is:

• Close the loop: Return to a statement you made in the introduction.
• Conclude: Show what your final position is.
• Clarify: Clarify how your final position is relevant to the Essay Question.
• Concern: Explain who should be concerned by your findings.
• Consequences: End by noting in one final, engaging sentence why this topic is of such importance. The ‘concern’ and ‘consequences’ sentences can be combined

4.9 Concluding Argument Example Paragraph

Here’s a possible concluding argument for our essay question: Write an Evaluation Essay on Facebook’s Impact on Society .

“The introduction of this essay highlighted that Facebook has had a profound impact on society. This evaluation essay has shown that this impact has been both positive and negative. Thus, it is too soon to say whether Facebook has been an overall positive or negative for society. However, people should pay close attention to this issue because it is possible that Facebook is contributing to the undermining of truth in media and positive interpersonal relationships.”

Note here that I’ve followed the 5 C’s conclusion method for my concluding evaluative argument paragraph.

5. Evaluation Essay Example Template

Below is a template you can use for your evaluation essay , based upon the advice I gave in Section 4:

6. 23+ Good Evaluation Essay Topics

Okay now that you know how to write an evaluation essay, let’s look at a few examples.

For each example I’m going to give you an evaluation essay title idea, plus a list of criteria you might want to use in your evaluation essay.

6.1 Evaluation of Impact

• Evaluate the impact of global warming on the great barrier reef. Recommended evaluation criteria: Level of bleaching; Impact on tourism; Economic impact; Impact on lifestyles; Impact on sealife
• Evaluate the impact of the Global Financial Crisis on poverty. Recommended evaluation criteria: Impact on jobs; Impact on childhood poverty; Impact on mental health rates; Impact on economic growth; Impact on the wealthy; Global impact
• Evaluate the impact of having children on your lifestyle. Recommended evaluation criteria: Impact on spare time; Impact on finances; Impact on happiness; Impact on sense of wellbeing
• Evaluate the impact of the internet on the world. Recommended evaluation criteria: Impact on connectedness; Impact on dating; Impact on business integration; Impact on globalization; Impact on media
• Evaluate the impact of public transportation on cities. Recommended evaluation criteria: Impact on cost of living; Impact on congestion; Impact on quality of life; Impact on health; Impact on economy
• Evaluate the impact of universal healthcare on quality of life. Recommended evaluation criteria: Impact on reducing disease rates; Impact on the poorest in society; Impact on life expectancy; Impact on happiness
• Evaluate the impact of getting a college degree on a person’s life. Recommended evaluation criteria: Impact on debt levels; Impact on career prospects; Impact on life perspectives; Impact on relationships

6.2 Evaluation of a Scholarly Text or Theory

• Evaluate a Textbook. Recommended evaluation criteria: clarity of explanations; relevance to a course; value for money; practical advice; depth and detail; breadth of information
• Evaluate a Lecture Series, Podcast or Guest Lecture. Recommended evaluation criteria: clarity of speaker; engagement of attendees; appropriateness of content; value for monet
• Evaluate a journal article. Recommended evaluation criteria: length; clarity; quality of methodology; quality of literature review ; relevance of findings for real life
• Evaluate a Famous Scientists. Recommended evaluation criteria: contribution to scientific knowledge; impact on health and prosperity of humankind; controversies and disagreements with other scientists.
• Evaluate a Theory. Recommended evaluation criteria: contribution to knowledge; reliability or accuracy; impact on the lives of ordinary people; controversies and contradictions with other theories.

6.3 Evaluation of Art and Literature

• Evaluate a Novel. Recommended evaluation criteria: plot complexity; moral or social value of the message; character development; relevance to modern life
• Evaluate a Play. Recommended evaluation criteria: plot complexity; quality of acting; moral or social value of the message; character development; relevance to modern life
• Evaluate a Film. Recommended evaluation criteria: plot complexity; quality of acting; moral or social value of the message; character development; relevance to modern life
• Evaluate an Artwork. Recommended evaluation criteria: impact on art theory; moral or social message; complexity or quality of composition

6.4 Evaluation of a Product or Service

• Evaluate a Hotel or Bed and Breakfast. Recommended evaluation criteria: quality of service; flexibility of check-in and check-out times; cleanliness; location; value for money; wi-fi strength; noise levels at night; quality of meals; value for money
• Evaluate a Restaurant. Recommended evaluation criteria: quality of service; menu choices; cleanliness; atmosphere; taste; value for money.
• Evaluate a Car. Recommended evaluation criteria: fuel efficiency; value for money; build quality; likelihood to break down; comfort.
• Evaluate a House. Recommended evaluation criteria: value for money; build quality; roominess; location; access to public transport; quality of neighbourhood
• Evaluate a Doctor. Recommended evaluation criteria: Quality of service; knowledge; quality of equipment; reputation; value for money.
• Evaluate a Course. Recommended evaluation criteria: value for money; practical advice; quality of teaching; quality of resources provided.

7. Concluding Advice

Evaluation essays are common in high school, college and university.

The trick for getting good marks in an evaluation essay is to show you have looked at both the pros and cons before making a final evaluation analysis statement.

You don’t want to look biased.

That’s why it’s a good idea to use an objective evaluation criteria, and to be generous in looking at both positives and negatives of your subject.

Read Also: 39 Better Ways to Write ‘In Conclusion’ in an Essay

I recommend you use the evaluation template provided in this post to write your evaluation essay. However, if your teacher has given you a template, of course use theirs instead! You always want to follow your teacher’s advice because they’re the person who will be marking your work.

Good luck with your evaluation essay!

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 5 Top Tips for Succeeding at University
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 50 Durable Goods Examples
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 100 Consumer Goods Examples
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 30 Globalization Pros and Cons

2 thoughts on “7 Steps for How to Write an Evaluation Essay (Example & Template)”

What an amazing article. I am returning to studying after several years and was struggling with how to present an evaluative essay. This article has simplified the process and provided me with the confidence to tackle my subject (theoretical approaches to development and management of teams).

I just wanted to ask whether the evaluation criteria has to be supported by evidence or can it just be a list of criteria that you think of yourself to objectively measure?

Many many thanks for writing this!

Usually we would want to see evidence, but ask your teacher for what they’re looking for as they may allow you, depending on the situation.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

• PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
• EDIT Edit this Article
• EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
• Browse Articles
• Learn Something New
• Quizzes Hot
• This Or That Game New
• Train Your Brain
• Explore More
• Support wikiHow
• About wikiHow
• Log in / Sign up
• Education and Communications
• Communication Skills
• Public Speaking

How to Evaluate a Speech

Last Updated: October 7, 2023 Fact Checked

This article was co-authored by Patrick Muñoz . Patrick is an internationally recognized Voice & Speech Coach, focusing on public speaking, vocal power, accent and dialects, accent reduction, voiceover, acting and speech therapy. He has worked with clients such as Penelope Cruz, Eva Longoria, and Roselyn Sanchez. He was voted LA's Favorite Voice and Dialect Coach by BACKSTAGE, is the voice and speech coach for Disney and Turner Classic Movies, and is a member of Voice and Speech Trainers Association. There are 7 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 131,111 times.

Evaluating someone else’s speech and offering feedback is a great way to improve your own public speaking skills, but what should you be focusing on? This wikiHow will teach you how to listen actively to a speech, break it down, and analyze the most important elements, like tone, content, and organization. You’ll also find tips on how to offer your feedback in a constructive, encouraging way.

Listening Actively

• Turn off all electronic devices and put away any distractions. Look at the speaker while the speech is being given. You shouldn't have anything in your hands but maybe a notepad for taking notes.
• Don't ever evaluate a speech based on the text alone. In other words, don't read the speech and offer feedback. Have the speaker perform the speech. If something is designed to be spoken, it needs to be heard if it is to be appropriately evaluated.

• If you can't find the main idea of the speech, try to guess what you think the speaker is trying to prove. Write it down. When you're evaluating the speech later, this will be helpful feedback.
• For some speeches, like a toast, a tribute, or a thank you, the main idea might be obvious, but play dumb. Is the speaker getting across the idea clearly? Or is the occasion doing too much of the work? Could the speaker do more to make the point of the speech obvious?

• If you’re listening to a persuasive speech, try to come up with responses, questions, and retorts that you might use for feedback later. What was confusing? Were there any supporting points that could be made more clear? Did you find any holes in the argument?
• If you’re listening to an informal speech, like a toast or a congratulatory speech, focus on the organization of the information that we’re getting. Does it make sense? Does it follow? Does it seem to jump around?

• Write down particularly memorable quotes or moments from the speech to praise. Write down any time the speaker gets a good crowd reaction, or a negative response.

Evaluating Specific Details

• Was the content clear and well-articulated?
• Was the argument supported with research? Good examples?
• Was the content made clear to the audience?
• Did the speaker prove their point?

• Was the supporting argument logically structured?
• Was the speech easy to follow? Difficult? Why?
• Do the speaker’s points flow logically from one to the next?
• What could be included to clear up the speech for you?

• How would you describe the style of the speech and the speaker?
• Did the style of the speech work for the content, or against it? Why?
• How convincing was the speaker?
• How was the timing of the speech? Was it easy to follow?

• Who is the audience for the speech? What are their expectations of the speech and the speaker?
• How would you describe the tone of the speech?
• Did it match the content? How?
• If not, how might the tone be improved?
• How well will the tone match the audience for the speech?

Giving Constructive Feedback

• For some speech classes, you may have to fill out a rubric or assign a grade to a speech. Follow the specific class instructions regarding this and assign a grade appropriate.

• Try to start your response with things like, “What I heard you saying is…” or “What I got from this speech was…”
• A good summary should be several sentences in the evaluation, perhaps slightly less than half of your feedback. Identify the main idea and the main supporting points of the speech. The summary should focus on content only.

• If the speaker is mostly a wet blanket, focus on how the content could better match the speaking style and how the tone might be changed to match. These are changeable things. Telling a speaker to be "more dynamic" or "funny" isn't good feedback.

• If you thought the speech was boring, instead learn to say something like, "It was subdued, which I think works well for the occasion."
• If the speaker seemed nervous, try to reassure them with some compliments, "You seemed confident up there. The material really speaks for itself."

• Don’t say, “I didn’t like the jokes you used,” say, “Next time, I think you could leave the jokes out and the speech would move a little quicker.”

• Focus first on content corrections, the organization of the speech, and the tone before you focus on anything else in the speech. These are the most important categories for improvement, and the best ways to quickly improve the speech. Think of these as the highest order of concern.
• Worry about the specifics of the delivery later. Whether or not the timing of the joke at the end of the speech works should be one of the last things a speaker worries about. If the speech is already very good, feel free to move onto these secondary concerns.

Community Q&A

• Refer to your notes only if you are giving a formal or written evaluation. Thanks Helpful 15 Not Helpful 1
• Always begin and end your evaluation with praise. Thanks Helpful 12 Not Helpful 3

You Might Also Like

• ↑ Patrick Muñoz. Voice & Speech Coach. Expert Interview. 12 November 2019.
• ↑ https://www.uiltexas.org/speech/extemp/criteria-for-evaluating-informative-speakers
• ↑ http://erie.cce.cornell.edu/resources/4-h-public-presentation-speech-rubric
• ↑ http://docencia.ac.upc.edu/master/MIRI/PD/docs/11-PresentationEvaluation.pdf
• ↑ https://www.wheaton.edu/academics/services/writing-center/writing-resources/style-diction-tone-and-voice/
• ↑ https://www.amherst.edu/system/files/Evaluating%2520Handout%2520Final%2520PDF%25202020.pdf
• ↑ https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/en/blogue-blog/methode-sandwich-method-eng

About This Article

To evaluate a speech, start by listening attentively to the speaker and taking notes to help you identify the main arguments they are trying to make. Then, determine if the content of the speech was clear and supported by examples. Additionally, consider whether the information was organized so that it was easy to follow. Next, identify strengths and weakness in the delivery of the speech, including the tone and style of the speaker. Finally, write down your feedback, focusing on 3 areas to improve on and at least 1 thing the speaker did well. For tips on giving feedback to the speaker without offending them, keep reading. Did this summary help you? Yes No

• Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

Chio Valdez

Jan 23, 2018

Did this article help you?

Ravish Kumar

Oct 4, 2016

Featured Articles

Trending Articles

Watch Articles

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Do Not Sell or Share My Info
• Not Selling Info

Get all the best how-tos!

Sign up for wikiHow's weekly email newsletter

• Find a Club
• Start a Club
• Toggle Search

Your First Few Speech Evaluations

Learn to report on what you see and hear..

By Bill Brown, DTM

Sooner or later that day is going to arrive—the day when you’ll give your first speech evaluation. I suspect you’ll have a few concerns as that time approaches. You might ask, “What do I look for? How do I put my thoughts together? What if the speaker is much better than I am?” As you prepare for your first evaluation, try to learn ahead of time which manual the speaker is using. I recommend you read the whole project through, but if you don’t get the chance to do that before the meeting, at least look at the questions on the Evaluation Guide at the end of the project to familiarize yourself with the speech requirements.

As you read those questions, you may be thinking: This is a long list! On my first evaluations I found those lists overwhelming, so I picked three criteria from the Evaluation Guide to focus on. That gave me something more manageable, something that didn’t seem like such a daunting task.

I took a sheet of paper and divided it into quadrants. I did this by drawing a vertical line down the center of the page and a horizontal line halfway down. That gave me four boxes.

I gave the first three boxes a heading of one of the three criteria listed in the manual. In the fourth box, I wrote “Anything Else That I See.” As I listened to the speaker deliver his speech, I listed my observations in the appropriate box.

You might want to take the same approach. It will help you organize your thoughts and keep you focused. If you come up with an empty box, it means that you need to look closer at the criteria you had chosen.

Before you know it, the speech will be over. Now is the time to prepare your oral evaluation. Take a look at your observations and find three or four positive comments. Number them in the order that you will deliver them. Next, look for one or two areas for improvement. Number those, as well. Then come up with an encouraging comment as a conclusion. Congratulations, you are now ready to present your first speech evaluation!

Yes, I know. That one big question remains: “What can I tell the best speaker in the club if I don’t see any room for improvement?”

I will answer that question by telling a personal story. I have delivered a lot of speeches over the last 10-plus years, which means I have received a lot of evaluations. However, there is one I think about on a regular basis, and that one ­occurred about five years ago. It was from a relatively new Toastmaster. What did she say that was so memorable?

“Bill, you are a really good speaker. There isn’t anything that I can tell you—except that you keep playing with the flap on the pocket of your sports jacket.”

Great input! You see, I had a nervous habit—it was an obvious habit that was sure to drive my audience crazy. Why didn’t the more advanced Toastmasters ever mention it? It’s because they had been looking only at speech structure, body language and other traditional criteria. They didn’t see my habit because they had looked right past it.

You, as a new member, are in a unique position to help the advanced speakers in your club because you observe their speeches through fresh eyes. So if you are evaluating someone who is a much better speaker than you are, ask yourself, Are they doing anything that seems a little strange?

Evaluating a speech is relatively simple. It involves reporting on what you see and hear—in a friendly, helpful manner. As you learn more, your evaluations will become richer in content. Yes, eventually you will look at speech structure and body language. And for those of you who haven’t yet started in the Pathways learning experience—Toastmasters’ new education program—you’ll get lots of practice with speech evaluations when Pathways is introduced in your district. But for now, start where you are today, and recognize that you are in a unique position to help every member in your club.

Additional resources are available in the Toastmasters Online Store: 

• The Art of Effective Evaluation Power­Point presentation (Item # 251CD) and its ­coordinating workbook (Item # 251B). 
• The Individual Speech Evaluation Form , set of 25 (Item # 165).

Learn more about the award-winning publication.

About magazine.

Discover more about the award-winning publication.

Magazine FAQ

Answers to your common magazine questions.

Submissions

How to submit an article query, photo, or story idea.

Meet the editorial team.

Speech Evaluation: Martin Luther King, Jr. Essay

Introduction, introduction of the speech, attention-getting method, transitions, list of transitions, various conclusion techniques, effectiveness of the speech.

Speech is an essential way to persuade and deliver information to the audience. It helps a speaker to share his/her thoughts and ideas about a current situation or any other matter. It was born in ancient Greece (Saxonhouse, 2005). However, the complexity and importance dramatically evoked, as it is the primary way of communication between the leader and the audience.

It could be said that all of the leaders were successful speakers since they were able to provide the audience with thrilling examples and arguments (Carnegie, 2011). One of them is Martin Luther King. The presentation pays close attention to him the most famous speech “I have a dream.” He inspired people to improve the current conditions and change the reality to the better world. The analysis of the speech helps to understand various tools and techniques, which he implemented to find the way to reach the audience.

It is important to include an introduction to every speech, as it provides general ideas about the topic and gives a listener an understanding of the speaker’s intentions. The speech of Martin Luther King could be divided into several parts.

The first part shows that he is thankful to stand in front of the audience. Moreover, he uses the pronoun “We” to show the unity of the nation in the United States of America (King, 2015, para.1). It could be said that after that, he continues with the main topic. He focuses on Emancipation Proclamation and its influence on slavery situation in the country.

The next step of Martin Luther King is to deliver his main point to the audience. He claims that despite ‘the freedom’ African Americans are still discriminated, and their rights are not respected in the modern society. In order to emphasize the significance of the problem, he uses parallel sentence structure such as “One hundred years later” (King, 2015, para. 3). He strongly suggests that nothing has changed in one hundred years.

It is vital for a speaker to attract the attention of the audience from his/her first words. As it was mentioned previously, Martin Luther King thanks the audience and then continues with the description of the problem.

Starting with the persuasive description of the problem is crucial, as it delivers the main thoughts and ideas of the speaker to the audience (Morreale, 2010). It is critical to keep the audience focused on the issue. In this case, parallelism is used. There are three sentences, which start with “One hundred years later” (King, 2015, para.3). It is clear that Martin Luther King implies nothing changed in a century. This method is rather stable, as it allows people to understand that the problem still exists, and the situation has to change. Additionally, he also uses the word “Negro” multiple times (King, 2015, para. 3). Listeners could establish a connection between two repetitive words and understand the fundamental aspects of the problem, as racial problems still exist in America.

Transition words and phrases are used to connect logically sentences with each other ( Transitional words and phrases, 2014). One of the examples is “And so we’ve come here today to dramatize a shameful condition” (King, 2015, para. 3). ‘And so’ is a sequential transition, which is used to describe the conclusion. It could be said that Martin Luther King use this phrase multiple times to highlight the conclusion, “And so, we’ve come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice” (King, 2015, para.5).

‘But’ is another transition, which shows contrast ( Transitional words and phrases, 2014). “But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt”, Martin Luther King says (King, 2015, para.5). This sentence allows the listeners to understand a current problem.

• “But”, it is an adversative transition (King, 2015, para.3).
• “And so” is an effect (King, 2015, para.5).
• “Still” is a concession (King, 2015, para. 3).
• “Also” is an addition (King, 2015, para. 6).

Moreover, as it was mentioned earlier, repletion of the certain phrases can be referred as transitions. Although, it has to be said that not only emphasize the importance of the issue but also show the connections between the sentences.

There are different techniques, which could be used for the conclusion, such as a rhetorical question, quotation, humor, and request for action ( Conclusion techniques, 2015 ). As for Martin Luther King speech, it could be said that he finishes it with the citation: “Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!” (King, 2015, para. 31). This quotation helps to understand a primary intention of the speech. This quote helps the speaker show his emotions and has a particular effect on the audience.

Moreover, as a speech is persuasive, it could be concluded that Martin Luther King requests a possible action from the audience. The passion and emotionality expressed in the quote might be the key drivers for the successful change of the situation.

Speaking of the effectiveness, it could be said that the speech was successful. On the picture displayed on the slide, it could be seen that the crowd surrounds the leader ( What Dr. King can teach us about acting, 2015 ). From the emotions displayed on the people’s faces, it could be noticed that the speech had an individual impact and gave people hope for a better future.

As for the use of various techniques, the speech is rich in examples and quotes. These techniques help the listeners to understand and support ideas of Martin Luther King.

In conclusion, it could be said that in order to be effective speech has to use various sentence structures and techniques. Moreover, using sentence parallelism is also one of the efficient methods, as it helps the speaker emphasize a significance of the issue. Additionally, usage of the word ‘we’ shows equality of all members of society and brings the leader closer to the public. All of these techniques were implemented in Martin Luther King’s speech. These facts allowed him to deliver a persuasive message and change the history of the United States of America.

Carnegie, D. (2011). Stand and deliver: How to become a masterful communicator and public speaker. New York, NY: Simon & Shuster.

Conclusion techniques . (2015). Web.

King, M. (2015). I have a dream.

Morreale, S. (2010). The competent public speaker. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.

Saxonhouse, A. (2005). Free speech and democracy in Ancient Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Transitional words and phrases. (2014).

What Dr. King can teach us about acting [Image]. (n.d.). Web.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2022, October 18). Speech Evaluation: Martin Luther King, Jr. https://ivypanda.com/essays/speech-evaluation-martin-luther-king-jr/

"Speech Evaluation: Martin Luther King, Jr." IvyPanda , 18 Oct. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/speech-evaluation-martin-luther-king-jr/.

IvyPanda . (2022) 'Speech Evaluation: Martin Luther King, Jr'. 18 October.

IvyPanda . 2022. "Speech Evaluation: Martin Luther King, Jr." October 18, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/speech-evaluation-martin-luther-king-jr/.

1. IvyPanda . "Speech Evaluation: Martin Luther King, Jr." October 18, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/speech-evaluation-martin-luther-king-jr/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Speech Evaluation: Martin Luther King, Jr." October 18, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/speech-evaluation-martin-luther-king-jr/.

• Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial Foundation
• Leadership Lessons From Martin Luther King Jr.
• "I Have a Dream" Speech by Martin Luther King Jr
• Analysis of “I Have a Dream “, by Martin Luther King, Jr.
• Martin Luther King Jr’s “I Have a Dream” Speech Critique
• Political Theories of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr.
• Motivation Evaluation: Martin Luther King Jr.
• The Life and Work of Martin Luther King Jr.
• Martin Luther King, Jr.
• Historical Figures: Martin Luther King Jr.
• Booker T. Washington’s Atlanta Exposition Speech
• "Return to Normalcy" Speech by Warren G. Harding
• The Nature of Arguments and Critical Thinking
• Rhetorical Argument in the Community Gardens
• Rhetorical Techniques in “Letter From Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King

The Skill of Crafting the Perfect Speech Evaluation

Hrideep barot.

• Public Speaking , Speech Writing , Toastmasters

When I was asked to give a speech evaluation, I thought to myself, “How difficult can this be? All I have to do is give some feedback.” And we ALL are GREAT at giving feedback, aren’t we? We’re great at solving the problems of other people.

But have you ever faced a situation where you have given someone “amazing” feedback and you wonder why they don’t listen to you or apply what you have recommended to them? Since most of us come from a background of criticism, I quickly realized that giving a speech evaluation is not really the same thing as giving generic feedback. Giving a good, helpful evaluation is not that easy.

A speech evaluation does not refer to a “sandwich” of commendation, mild recommendations followed by thoughtless encouragement (“Good luck in your next speech!”). A true speech evaluation refers to the ability to truly understand a speech and say things of value which actually help the speaker improve. At the end of it, that’s what public speaking is all about – saying something of value and helping someone improve.

How do you start a speech evaluation?

Rhetorical questions.

An easy way of connecting with the audience is to start your evaluation speech by asking questions. The question can be as simple as, “I thoroughly enjoyed John’s speech and could definitely relate to it. Wasn’t it?”

Quotes: A simple and effective way to start an evaluation. 

For instance, Abraham Lincoln once said, “It’s not the years in your life that count. It’s the life in your years”. Dear fellow Toastmasters and guests, after listening to Jack’s speech I understood what it feels like to lead a purposeful life and add “life to the years”. 

Another technique to start your evaluation speech is by adding lighthearted humor at the beginning of the speech. 

For instance, if a speech is based on the speaker dealing with perfectionism, you could start your evaluation with, “After hearing Liam’s speech, one thing is clear to me…I will never go drinking to a bar with Liam, the perfectionist because the bar will never be set high enough.”

Cringy? I know…

Which is why it’s important to know your audience. You’ll be surprised how many times this line has people giggling for the remainder of the evaluation when delivered in front of the right audience. 

References from the speech

Starting your evaluation speech with references from the speech not only makes you credible but also positions you as a good and attentive listener. However, it should be kept in mind to use these references in a creative way to make you stand apart from the rest. 

For instance, for a speech on ‘Go Green’, the evaluation speech can begin with, “Toastmaster Jake has not only taught us to reuse, reduce and recycle but has also effectively used the principles of reuse, reduce and recycle in delivering speeches. He has reduced unnecessary stage movement, reused his vocal variety to create maximum impact and recycled our enthusiasm to go green.” 

Finding the perfect speech opening line can be challenging as it needs to be attention-grabbing, quirky, and also give the audience a motive to listen to the rest of your speech. Read our extensively written article on 50 Speech Opening Lines (& How to Create Your Own) l The Ultimate Guide to get ideas on how to start your evaluation speech. 

Before the speech

An evaluation is as good as the amount it actually helps the speaker you are evaluating. And to truly help the speaker, we must first understand what they want to be helped with.

Before the speech, approach the speaker, introduce yourself if you haven’t done so already and ask them if there is anything specific you would like them to observe in your speech. Perhaps there have been some constraints that the speaker may have faced in the past that they have addressed in this speech.

Knowing these things not only help you connect with the speaker but also raises your credibility in the eyes of the speaker. Think about it, if your evaluator came up to you before your speech and asked you these questions, wouldn’t you be happy that she is taking that small extra step to ensure that her evaluation is actually valuable to you?

This small step will help you be an effective evaluator even before the speech begins.

During the speech

It’s not about you.

When we are asked to evaluate on stage, the idea is to not only to help the speaker of course but also to let the other audience members benefit from the evaluation. But we should keep in mind that a speech evaluation (while it is technically a speech) is not your time to shine on stage. And many of us, myself included, tend to forget that. We tend to make our evaluations like speeches in itself.

And don’t get me wrong. There is nothing wrong in delivering an entertaining or well-spoken evaluation. The only thing to keep in mind is that our focus should be on one question only – how do I help the speaker improve? Your focus on delivery should not over-power the main reason of a speech evaluation, which is – to evaluate.

However, when giving an evaluation, don’t ignore the rest of the crowd. While your focus should be on your speaker, you should not ignore the rest of the crowd as well.

So instead of addressing just the speaker by saying “Your speech was structured really well”, you can address the entire crowd and say, “The speaker had beautifully structured her speech”.

Keep the Evaluation simple

This ties back to the previous point – we are not evaluating to impress anyone. It’s all about expressing your honest opinion of the speech in a fashion that best helps the speaker. So, there is no need to use big fancy words and try to show off about the things you know so well.

The most effective evaluations are simple. Because simplicity helps the speaker relate to your evaluation and they are much more likely to apply your recommendations when they truly understand them.   

Where did you connect with the speech?

While evaluations tend to focus on the technicals of public speaking, we should not forget about building a connection with the speaker and her speech.

I learned this by one of my mentors. He told me, “When you go on stage to evaluate a speaker, the first few seconds should be spent on informing the speaker how her speech related to you. It will help establish a degree of credibility and validation to show that you really connected with the speech.”

For example, if someone spoke about sports, I would probably start off by saying that I too am a sports enthusiast and really connected/related to what the speaker said.

Any statement like this, even if it’s downright simple, which helps you connect with the topic, idea or message of the speech, will help.

Speak less, but with impact

Evaluations are supposed to be crisp and concise in nature.

The reason for this is that we do not want to overstuff the speaker with a whole bunch of recommendations which they will find hard to remember and apply.

Evaluation is most effective when it addresses one or two key areas that can be improved upon and specific actions the speaker can take to improve upon it.

So, focus on just one, two, or at the most three key areas your speaker can improve upon along with specific examples and call to actions as to how they can improve.

Validate your evaluation with appropriate reasons

The difference between a great evaluation as compared to a novice one is ‘ reasons’ .

When providing a recommendation or a commendation to someone, it’s important to back them with reasons and examples.

For instance, if an evaluator tells you that they did not like your speech ending and you should improve upon it, that’s not very helpful, is it?

But what if your evaluator tells you something along the lines of, “Your speech conclusion was something that could be worked upon. When you ended your speech, it seemed very abrupt. I personally, was not sure if the speech had actually ended or not. Maybe next time, you can try and make the ending a lot more evident – maybe end with summarizing the major points in your speech and a specific action that you would like the audience to take. It will help make your conclusion much stronger while helping the audience remember the major points in your speech.”

Wouldn’t this be way more helpful than simply saying, “I did not like the way your speech ended. You can improve upon it,”? We are not here to throw random opinions.

So, when you provide a recommendation, follow this process – state what can be improved upon, why it requires improvement and recommendations on how they can improve. It will make your argument much stronger and much more valuable.

The same process should be followed when giving a commendation as well. Don’t simply state what you liked about a speech. State why you liked it and maybe give a few examples from the speech to reinforce your point.

For example, instead of saying, “I liked the way you used voice modulation”, it would be more helpful to say something along the lines of, “I really liked your use of voice modulation. For instance, when you transitioned from the happy moment of your speech to the sadder moments, your tone of voice reflected that mood which helped create a much deeper impact.”

Know your speaker and their familiarity with public speaking

The evaluations that have helped me the most are the ones that address what I can improve upon with regard to what level I am on in my public speaking journey .

This is crucial.

If a speaker is giving a speech for the first time in her life, it wont make sense to tell her to improve her body language or voice modulation. Since she is new to the stage, it’s only natural that her body and voice will take time to adjust to the stage. The evaluation is just not helpful in that case.

Instead, if you can point one or two specific points that you believe a new speaker can improve upon, it would be so much more helpful.

For instance, when I gave my very first speech, my evaluator did not tell me to use more hand gestures or to be more “dynamic on stage”. That would not have been the most helpful advice considering I was so new to public speaking. He instead gave me one simple recommendation – to smile more.

Apparently, I was frowning a lot throughout my speech. “A few smiles will help lighten the speech up”, he said. This was useful to me. A simple recommendation, but one that I can easily work on and apply with regard to the level I am on in my public speaking journey .

Conclude on a positive note

Always conclude the evaluation on a positive note. I know, this is typical. But it really does help. Especially for new speakers, it leaves them feeling encouraged.

Ending on a positive note does not mean “I wish you all the very best for your future speeches.” It means reinforcing the fact that the speaker has taken the right decision by showing the courage to go up on a stage and speak. They are also much more likely to apply the feedback that was given to them if the evaluation ends on a positive note.

Don’t forget to enjoy the speech

While evaluating a speech, it’s easy to get lost in the evaluation process. You might be taking down notes, you might be trying to come up with what the speaker is doing right or wrong, etc. In all of this, we forget something very important – to actually enjoy the speech.

This does not mean you don’t take down notes. It simply means you don’t have to be so engrossed in taking notes that you miss a lot of what the speaker is saying.

I’ve seen this happen a few times – where an evaluator is just writing, writing and writing while her speaker is on stage. Then, when she does go to evaluate – she has missed out on a large portion of the speech simply because she was too caught up in taking down notes as opposed to actually listening to the speech.

Try to enjoy the speech, absorb it. It will help you understand the true essence of the speech that go beyond content and delivery. Then, your evaluation will be so much more effective and relevant .

After the evaluation

Effective evaluators do not consider their job done after they have delivered their speech evaluation. After the evaluation ends, go up to the speaker and ask her if she related to the evaluation. Ask her if there was something else she would like to know in terms of what she could improve upon or what she did particularly well.

This helps clear any miscommunication as well as gives you the opportunity to provide further comments that you could/did not say in your evaluation speech.

Speech Evaluations at Toastmasters

If you’re wondering how to deliver an evaluation in a Toastmasters meeting, the same tips apply. In Toastmasters, to give a valuable evaluation, despite the points stated above, you must also keep the speech objectives as the core focus of your evaluation. If someone is delivering a speech where their objective is related to speech structuring, don’t spend time commenting on their body language or tone of voice.

How long are speech evaluations in Toastmasters?

You typically have 2 to 3 minutes to give an evaluation in Toastmasters. Use them effectively and make sure your comments are in line with the objectives of the project your speaker is delivering.  

Evaluating an Ice-Breaker speech

An ice-breaker speech is the first speech a Toastmaster member delivers.

To gain in-depth knowledge about what exactly is an icebreaker and how to write one, read our article on Delivering a Fiery Icebreaker at Toastmasters: Holistic Guide & Sample Speeches as it contains the A to Z details of an icebreaker.

The first thing to keep in mind when evaluating one is that it is the first speech, as mentioned above. The speaker is probably coming on stage for the first or second time. Their main job which added the most value to them was simply coming up on stage and attempting to deliver a speech.

Even if the speech was absolutely terrible, the fact that someone decided to tackle their fear of public speaking is an achievement in itself. So commend them on that.

Make them feel good that they finally came upon a stage. A good chunk of your evaluation should focus on what they did good and how they can leverage their strengths. I am by no means saying that you should be fake or overly positive about this.

But ice-breakers don’t call for harsh evaluations because the speaker did what he/she was supposed to do – go up on stage and introduce themselves.

When evaluating an ice-breaker, the major mistake I see evaluators making is providing very generic feedback that can be applied to any speech.

Things like body language, voice modulation, stage movement, eye contact, etc. are not things to suggest to improve for ice-breakers. These things are life-long public speaking learnings which take time to be worked on. When someone is delivering their first speech, of course, they won’t be proficient with their body or voice.

So it does not make sense to suggest these pointers in an ice-breaker evaluation. So what do you talk about?

Reflect on their speech small tweaks they can make to their speech to make it better right from the get-go. That means providing recommendations which won’t take them time to implement. Small tweaks that they work on right away to improve their speech can be amazingly helpful.

For instance, if a speaker spoke about her life journey – don’t tell her that she could have used the stage better. Tell her that she could have probably added more depth into her speech by telling the audience about one major event that got her to be the person she is today.

It’s something the speaker can improve upon from the get-go.

Here’s a great example of Toastmaster evaluation from a champion evaluator:

To know more tips about evaluating an icebreaker, read our extensively written article on How to Evaluate an Icebreaker? (Tips and Sample Evaluation) .

What to expect when you are getting evaluated?

We understand a great deal about evaluations when we get evaluated ourselves. When you’re about to be evaluated by another speaker (especially at Toastmasters) don’t expect some life-changing advice.

I mean, don’t get me wrong. The evaluation can prove to be very valuable.

But the thing is you might not always know who your evaluator is. Unless they themselves are credible speakers, the evaluation provided can be incorrect or downright useless.

When being evaluated, have an open mind. But also use a filter.

If you know the speaker giving the evaluation is not very credible, still hear them with an open mind. But make sure you go to a speaker you look up to who would be present in the audience and ask them for a personal, informal evaluation as well.

Another thing to keep in mind is that an evaluator is usually always good-intentioned. They will be wanting to help you but might provide you light criticism as they feel they may hurt you.

So if you felt the evaluation was a bit too “nice”, if you want raw and honest feedback, go to your evaluator after your speech and ask them in person – is there anything else you could improve upon? Tell them that they can be blunt if they like – in the end, the more honest the evaluation, the more you can grow as a speaker.

Apply this to your evaluation as well. When you provide an evaluation, think about it as if you were the speaker. What would you benefit the most from hearing? It will help you give a more relevant and action-driven evaluation.

Speech evaluation sample script 

Speech being evaluated:

Hello everyone, and Hello to ______ (name of your speaker) in particular. I remember reading this somewhere, “And suddenly you just know it’s time to start something new and trust the magic of beginnings.” This is your magical beginning, [NAME]. Congratulations on taking your first step. 

Getting to your evaluation…let’s start with the commendations. Your speech was enjoyable. I especially liked how you began by explaining to us the perils of having a lesser-known name. As someone who has the same last name, I could totally relate to that bit. Using self-deprecating humor right at the start is a very powerful technique to ease the audience into listening to you and staying with you throughout the speech. Well done with that.

I also liked the humility used in your voice. Even when the achievements were being stated, it was balanced well with your mistakes and an understanding of the fact that even when things are going well, they can go dark at any time. 

Humour and humility are your strengths that stand out right off the bat. It’s something that we need to hone further to amplify. 

Getting to your recommendations…

There seemed to be a consistent pace in your voice. This can lead to monotony. A simple to stop that is to sprinkle in a few pauses. Considering that you used the literary device of self-deprecating humor a couple of times, it could have been paired with pausing. This would have generated a greater impact.

That was something technical. But on a more fundamental level, the purpose of an Icebreaker is to introduce yourself to the audience which you did but instead of just dropping snippets of your life and whetting our appetite, what you could have done is shared one, two or three key stories from your life.

A good speech always consists of interesting anecdotes. You could have spoken about an incident from school perhaps where your lesser-known name got you into some funny situation.

You could have also elaborated on the aspect of how you fell in love with music, maybe talk about your first tryst with it. We would have loved to hear about how you helped build your college’s first music society as well. You see, three narratives and you would have left us mesmerized.

But these are things that come with time. Right now, the speech was delivered with ease and didn’t seem like it was done so by a first-time public speaker. 

I believe that if we continue to focus on your strengths and add in some powerful elements of pausing and narrative structures, I have no doubt that you will be able to take your speech from good to great.

All the Best and looking forward to more speeches from you.

Beyond the stage

Learning to become an effective speech evaluator is something that helps build a critical skill when it comes to communication – the art of criticism . Sometimes, even if your intentions are good, most people are thin-skinned and can get easily upset when they receive criticism.

But applying the principles of speech evaluations – focusing on the other person instead of yourself, validating your positive and negative points with reasons, concluding on a positive note – the way you communicate criticism to your boss, colleague, subordinate, etc. can be very, very effective.

Remember, giving criticism is a skill. It can be mastered through practice and speech evaluations are an amazing way to practice just that!

Enroll in our transformative 1:1 Coaching Program

Schedule a call with our expert communication coach to know if this program would be the right fit for you

How to Negotiate: The Art of Getting What You Want

10 Hand Gestures That Will Make You More Confident and Efficient

Interrupted while Speaking: 8 Ways to Prevent and Manage Interruptions

• [email protected]
• +91 98203 57888

Get our latest tips and tricks in your inbox always

Copyright © 2023 Frantically Speaking All rights reserved

Kindly drop your contact details so that we can arrange call back

Select Country Afghanistan Albania Algeria AmericanSamoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Romania Rwanda Samoa San Marino Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Tajikistan Thailand Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Wallis and Futuna Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe land Islands Antarctica Bolivia, Plurinational State of Brunei Darussalam Cocos (Keeling) Islands Congo, The Democratic Republic of the Cote d'Ivoire Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Guernsey Holy See (Vatican City State) Hong Kong Iran, Islamic Republic of Isle of Man Jersey Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Lao People's Democratic Republic Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Mozambique Palestinian Territory, Occupied Pitcairn Réunion Russia Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan Da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Sao Tome and Principe Somalia Svalbard and Jan Mayen Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tanzania, United Republic of Timor-Leste Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S.

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer
• QuestionPro

• Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case NPS+ Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
• Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home Surveys

Speaker evaluation form: Guide to an essential tool for every event 

Whether they’re in person, hybrid, or fully online, conferences, forums, and seminars are —still!— all the rage in the business world. However, most of them —if not all— have a big problem. Some speakers are simply not up to the task, or at least not tuned into the conference’s main theme.

Some of them reuse and recycle their presentations or can’t handle a breakout room; audiences don’t respond well to that. But, hear us out: they might not actually know that they bombed a talk—because nobody measured their effectiveness! Read on to see how a speaker evaluation form can be a game-changer and a quick solution to improve your events and make the audience engaged effectively.

LEARN ABOUT: course evaluation survey examples

What is a speaker evaluation form?

A speaker evaluation form is a questionnaire or survey used to collect data on how well a speaker delivered a speech and its effectiveness for the audience. This feedback can be essential both for the speaker and for the talk organizers to have quality, inspiring and enjoyable content for the attendees.

LEARN ABOUT: Event Surveys

Organizations also use a speaker evaluation form to allow attendees to provide feedback on the event. This feedback will help the organization to build a better plan to ensure its success and improve its events based on accurate data and not individual opinions.

Why is it important to have a speaker evaluation form? 

A good speaker evaluation form can be an essential tool to measure the effectiveness of an event . In addition, it can be used to measure the contribution it makes to the objectives of an organization, whether these are educational evaluation , branding, lead generation , or anything else. Finally, it’s essential to measure that the efforts being made are correctly reaching the audience.

What to include in a speaker evaluation form?

A speaker evaluation form should always contain the following questions. All questions should have a Likert-scale rating, except for the open-ended questions .

• Speaker’s name and/or session’s name

This will allow attendees to know which session or speaker they’re evaluating. It’s always a good idea to make this part as clear as possible, so attendees know right away who they’re evaluating and to avoid confusion among the audience.

Example: Session name “How to write for writers” Speaker’s name “Maria Parra”.

• Speaker’s session rating

Let the audience know that this section is meant to help improve the quality of future presentations. Here, your audience will have to rate the speaker’s knowledge about the topic and his presentation skills.

It’s important always to add the feedback question : ”Did this presentation meet your expectations?” and leave an open-ended question for those who didn’t like it.

Example: “Did this presentation meet your expectations?” [Likert scale rating] If it didn’t, please let us know why [start of open-ended question]

• Overall event ratings: 

Having an Overall event rating will help you to know the satisfaction measure of all attendees with a single insight.

Example: “Overall evaluation of this presentation” [Likert scale rating] 

If you need more question ideas, in these templates, you can find some to create your own evaluation:

• Event Feedback Survey Questions
• Event Evaluation survey
• Event Feedback Survey

Or visit our survey template library to access over +300 templates created by experts from various industries.

What do we do when we get the answers? 

Once the forms are collected, event organizers should gather the results into a report that summarizes them to measure how effectively the event met the audience’s needs and what can be done in the future to improve it. The top 4 questions that this report should answer are: 

• What did we do well?
• What could have been done differently?
• What is something we cannot do for future events?
• What can we improve for future events?

Summarizing results is an excellent way to report to the event planners and come up with actions based on the insights gathered from the survey . 

Need a tool to create a speaker evaluation form?

QuestionPro is here to help! We have a long list of features that can help you improve your events and get feedback from your attendees.

Get started today and design your perfect survey. Add multiple question types for event evaluation, logic, and personalized branding . Deploy in seconds and analyze your data in real time. You can access over 88 features and customizable templates.

Sign up free

Authors:  Guille Santana & Satoshi Komatsuzaki

MORE LIKE THIS

Government Customer Experience: Impact on Government Service

Apr 11, 2024

Employee Engagement App: Top 11 For Workforce Improvement 

Apr 10, 2024

Top 15 Employee Evaluation Software to Enhance Performance

Event Feedback Software: Top 11 Best in 2024

Apr 9, 2024

Other categories

• Academic Research
• Artificial Intelligence
• Assessments
• Brand Awareness
• Case Studies
• Communities
• Consumer Insights
• Customer effort score
• Customer Engagement
• Customer Experience
• Customer Loyalty
• Customer Research
• Customer Satisfaction
• Employee Benefits
• Employee Engagement
• Employee Retention
• Friday Five
• General Data Protection Regulation
• Insights Hub
• Life@QuestionPro
• Market Research
• Mobile diaries
• Mobile Surveys
• New Features
• Online Communities
• Question Types
• Questionnaire
• QuestionPro Products
• Release Notes
• Research Tools and Apps
• Revenue at Risk
• Survey Templates
• Training Tips
• Uncategorized
• Video Learning Series
• What’s Coming Up
• Workforce Intelligence

Sample Speaker Evaluation Forms and Summary Reports

Blend Images / Dave and Les Jacobs / Getty Images

• Event Planning
• Retail Small Business
• Restauranting
• Real Estate
• Nonprofit Organizations
• Import/Export Business
• Freelancing & Consulting
• Food & Beverage
• Construction
• Operations & Success
• Becoming an Owner
• Western Illinois University
• DePaul University

Anyone working on an educational program recognizes the importance of developing a speaker evaluation form to measure the effectiveness of an overall program or individual break out session . It's a challenge for most meeting and event planners, and it’s a step that many would like to overlook.

A good speaker evaluation form can be used as an important tool to measure the effectiveness of a given program, and it can be used as a tool the measure the contribution that a meeting has on an organization’s objectives.

Perhaps the biggest challenge of a speaker evaluation form is making it easy to complete. Although most attendees expect to complete an evaluation, it’s helpful to remember that they are usually more interested in leaving a session immediately than filling out a lengthy evaluation form.

Recognizing this challenge, some planners provide an incentive for attendees to complete the form. It is an opportunity for the planner to have some fun and reinforce the company and may include promotional items from the organization or even gift certificates.

The most important point that meeting planners should remember is to keep the evaluation form brief (one page). Other tips include:

• Provide clear, brief instructions.
• List the session name and speaker.
• Measure the effectiveness in a maximum of five options.
• Ask if the session objectives were met.
• Ask if the session was perceived as valuable.
• Ask an open-ended question for more information.
• Keep the form optionally anonymous.
• Ask if there’s any interest in follow-up contact.

To be sure, feedback on evaluation forms will be subjective, as the comments are based on many personal factors of who is responding.

For example, those who attend a given program will likely be at different levels of professional experience with a given topic, and that will impact how they respond. Their feedback may also vary based on different expectations of a program before attending.

Sample Speaker Evaluation Form

The National Speakers Association (NSA), Tempe, AZ, has developed a speaker evaluation form template that it uses at meetings to evaluate its own educational sessions.

“We ask all of our speakers to provide us with learning outcomes for their sessions, which we print in the program with our session descriptions," explains Marsha Mardock, NSA spokesperson. “Then we ask our attendees to measure the success of the session against the learning outcomes.”

Specific questions include:

• Please rate how well this session’s learning objectives were met.
• What value did you receive from this session?
• What is the best idea you heard in this session that you plan to use?

NSA was established in 1973 and is a leading organization for professional speakers, providing resources and education designed to advance the skills, integrity, and value of the speaking profession.

Summarize Results

Once the evaluation forms are collected, event organizers should compile the results into a report that summarizes all the results. It includes information about speaker ratings in the various categories measured, as well as the comments themselves.

Such reports are used to measure how effectively a seminar or conference session met the needs of the audience, and what may be improved in the future. Motivational speaker Pegine Echevarria of Team Pegine Inc., Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, suggests that meeting planners tally results in a report called an After Action Report.

The After Action Report provides more information than a speaker session evaluation. It’s an evaluation of the program itself, including the planning process. Pegine provides an After Action Report after each speaking engagement. “My clients know about the report before each event, and they love receiving it after, it is an added value to them.” She answers questions for meeting planners, including:

• What did they do well?
• What could have been done differently?
• What ideas do I have for future events?

"We learned this from the military,” Pegine explains. “Everyone in the Army writes an After Action Report to share with their superiors, including what worked, what didn’t and solutions for improvement after each project or task. We provide the same. The reports include not only the audience results but also information from my speaking and consulting experience.”

Walter Reed Army Medical Center outlines its After Action Report guidelines for planning educational programs with speakers. Information is presented in a report/table format, and the summary includes the following elements:

• Activity overview
• Activity content
• Guest speakers
• Planning process
• Activity materials
• Evaluation forms
• Activity administration
• Budget data
• Performance Improvement Plan
• The 5 Goals of Employee Performance Evaluation
• Important Marketing Skills That Employers Value
• 10 Key Tips for Effective Employee Performance Reviews
• The 3 New Roles of the Human Resources Professional
• Meeting Planning - Organizing Conventions & Conferences
• Measuring the Value of Events and Meetings
• Top Tips for Increasing Business Meeting Attendance
• What Is a Seminar?
• Engage Your Audience With Interactive Conference Ideas
• How to Talk About Nonprofit Impact from Inputs to Outcomes
• How to Write the Evaluation Section of Your Grant Proposal
• How to Write a Welcome Letter for an Incentive Trip
• Annual Performance Reviews Will NOT Ensure Employee Success
• How to Write a Letter of Inquiry to a Foundation
• How to Select the Perfect Keynote Speaker

Evaluation Essay

Evaluation Essay - Definition, Examples, and Writing Tips

13 min read

People also read

Learn How to Write an Editorial on Any Topic

Best Tips on How to Avoid Plagiarism

How to Write a Movie Review - Guide & Examples

A Complete Guide on How to Write a Summary for Students

Write Opinion Essay Like a Pro: A Detailed Guide

How to Write a Thematic Statement - Tips & Examples

How to Write a Bio - Quick Tips, Structure & Examples

How to Write a Synopsis – A Simple Format & Guide

How to Write a Comparative Essay – A Complete Guide

Visual Analysis Essay - A Writing Guide with Format & Sample

List of Common Social Issues Around the World

Writing Character Analysis - Outline, Steps, and Examples

11 Common Types of Plagiarism Explained Through Examples

Article Review Writing: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide with Examples

A Detailed Guide on How to Write a Poem Step by Step

Detailed Guide on Appendix Writing: With Tips and Examples

Are you unsure about what it takes to evaluate things from your perspective in an evaluation essay?

If you’re having a hard time understanding how to present a balanced assessment of the subject, worry not!  We are here to help you get through the evaluation essay writing process.

In this blog, you will learn all about evaluation essays. From the definition, writing process, topics, tips, and a lot more, you’ll learn how to write an evaluation essay effortlessly!  

Continue reading to get a better idea.

• 1. What is an Evaluation Essay?
• 2. Evaluation Essay Structure
• 3. How to Start an Evaluation Essay?
• 4. How to Write an Evaluation Essay?
• 5. How to Format Your Evaluation Essay?
• 6. Evaluation Essay Examples
• 7. Evaluation Essay Topics For College Students
• 8. Evaluation Essay vs. Review

What is an Evaluation Essay?

Let’s first understand the evaluation essay meaning, here is the standard definition:

An evaluation essay offers a value judgment or an opinion of something. It presents an overall view of a particular subject’s quality. Moreover, it provides a critical analysis and a complete evaluation of something.

What is the Purpose of an Evaluation Essay?

The main purpose of an evaluation essay is to present an opinion and evaluate a topic critically. This type of writing determines the condition, worth, or significance by careful appraisal and study.  

This essay features the writer’s opinion, but when done correctly, it does not sound opinionated. Instead, it provides the facts and evidence to justify the opinions about the essay’s subject.

To write a good evaluation essay, you need to master critical evaluation and present the evaluation in an unbiased manner. You may also discuss both the pros and cons of the subject.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job

Evaluation Essay Structure

The four different ways to format and organize the evaluation essay are as follows.

1. Chronological Structure

It is a sequential organization that could be used for evaluating historical or current events. It tells how something works and assesses the effectiveness of a mechanism, procedure, or process.

2. Spatial Structure

The spatial organization structure is used for evaluating or describing art or architecture. Here, you will define one element of the artifact and spatially move to the next. 

3. Compare and Contrast Structure

The compare and contrast structure is used to evaluate or review the culinary or music genre. Here the writer evaluates a subject by comprising and contrasting it with the known subject.

4. Point-by-Point Structure

The point-by-point structure is also used for culinary and music reviews. But, in this structure, you describe one element and then evaluate it, describe the second element and evaluate it, and so on.

After setting the criteria and collecting evidence for strengthening your judgment, you’ll start your evaluation essay. Let’s see what are the steps involved in starting an evaluation essay.

How to Start an Evaluation Essay?

When you start writing an evaluation essay, grabbing the reader’s attention is essential. For this, hook the reader from the beginning until the end to ensure that your essay’s opening follows an engaging tone. 

Step 1. Choose an Interesting Topic

Deciding the topic and evaluation essay criteria is important. Make sure it's not just compelling and interesting, but also informative so that you can find enough material for a detailed evaluation. 

Step 2. Set the Evaluation Essay Criteria

For an evaluation essay, you have to set the criteria for evaluation first. Criteria are the standards or measures by which someone assesses the quality or value of the subject. 

Some key points to establish the criteria are:

• Identifying relevant aspects that relate to the subject 
• Defining the criteria clearly so that it is specific and understandable for readers
• Your criteria should be directly relevant to the nature of the subject
• Always consider the audience’s expectations and standards while setting the criteria
• Your thesis statement should always align with your evaluation criteria

Step 3. Collect Evidence for Your Judgment

The author’s judgment of the subject states whether the subject is good or bad. It is an overall assessment or the opinion supported by the evidence. The judgment corresponds to the benchmarks set by the author in the essay criteria. 

The evidence is a combination of supporting data and facts. Using the evidence, the author demonstrates how well the subject meets the judgment. The evidence serves as the foundation of your evaluation. 

Without providing strong and accurate evidence, you will not be able to convince the readers of your judgment. 

Step 4. Decide the Essay Structure

After that, decide on the structure that you want to follow. It can be a chronological or point-by-point structure

Step 5. Craft the Essay Outline

When you create an essay outline , evaluate what should be added and removed. If you skip this step before writing, you may lose track of what to include in your essay while you write.   

So, writing an outline for your evaluation essay is a critical step that eases your writing journey. 

Here is a sample evaluation essay outline:

Step 6. Declare Your Thesis Statement

For an evaluation essay that keeps the reader hooked from the start, opt for a catchy thesis statement . The thesis should state the main point of the evaluation. 

In the thesis statement, you should always express your stance on the subject clearly. In doing so, the readers will have a clear idea about the purpose and direction of your essay. 

Now, understand how to write an evaluation essay by following the detailed procedure mentioned below.

Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!

How to Write an Evaluation Essay?

Here is a step-by-step guide for you to write an evaluation essay.

Step 1. Write the Introduction

The introduction is the first impression your readers will have of you, so it's crucial to make a good one. It should capture attention and excite readers, drawing them into what you have to say about this topic. 

The following are the elements that you should consider while writing the introduction:

• Start with an interesting hook statement so that you can get the reader’s attention.
• Provide background information about the topic for the reader to understand the subject
• Establish the evaluation essay thesis statement. It sets out the overall purpose of the evaluation, so make sure it is apparent and to the point

Read this evaluation essay introduction example, and you’ll understand exactly what to pen down in yours:

Step 2. Draft the Body Section

The body of the essay consists of three paragraphs. Each paragraph holds different ideas related to one another and flows smoothly from start to finish, just like how a good story should be told.

Here are the important points that must be included in the body paragraphs.

• Start with the topic sentence that presents your judgment about the topic
• Present the supporting evidence to back up the topic sentence and your viewpoint.
• Present a balanced evaluative argument to show impartiality
• Compare and contrast the subject to another subject to show the strengths and weaknesses
• Present the evaluation from multiple perspectives, while being both positive and critical
• Always use transition words between your paragraphs to ensure a smooth and coherent flow for the reader. 

Step 3. Write the Conclusion

It is the final chance to convince your reader to agree with your point of view. You’re supposed to summarize and conclude the essay. In the conclusion , you present your final evaluation of the essay. 

Keep in mind the following aspects while writing a closing paragraph of an evaluation essay. 

• Summarize the points and evaluative arguments that you made in the body section.
• Justify your thesis statement.
• Provide a concrete and secure conclusion to your argument by ultimately leaving the reader convinced by your evaluation.

Step 4. Proofread, Revise, and Edit

The final step is proofreading and editing. Always spend enough time reading your essay carefully. It will help you catch the unintentional mistakes you have made and recover them. If needed, you can also revise your essay 2–3 times.

How to Format Your Evaluation Essay?

For formatting your evaluation essay, follow the standard academic writing guidelines. You can opt for different formatting styles like APA, MLA, or Chicago. 

In general, you should stick to the below formatting guidelines: 

Font and Size:

• Use a legible font such as Times New Roman or Arial.
• Choose a standard font size, often 12-point.
• Set one-inch margins on all sides of the paper.
• Double-space the entire essay, including the title, headings, and body paragraphs.
• Create a title for your essay that reflects the subject and purpose of the evaluation.
• Center the title on the page.
• Use title case (capitalize the first letter of each major word).
• Include a header with your last name and page number in the top right corner.
• Follow the format “Last Name Page Number” (e.g., “Smith 1”).

Citations (if applicable):

• Include citations for any sources used in your evaluation.
• Follow the citation style specified by your instructor or the required style guide (APA, MLA, Chicago).

Counterargument (if included):

• Clearly label and present any counterargument.
• Provide a well-reasoned response to the counterargument.

References or Works Cited Page (if applicable):

• Include a separate page for references or a works cited page if your essay includes citations.
• List all sources in the appropriate citation style.

Well, the time has come to look at some great evaluation essay examples. Getting help from sample essays is always a great way to perfect your evaluation papers.

Evaluation Essay Examples

Evaluation can be written on any topic, i.e., book, movie, music, etc. Below, we have given some evaluation essay examples for students: 

Evaluation Essay Sample PDF

Movie Evaluation Essay Example

Critical evaluation Essay Example PDF

Product Evaluation Essay PDF

Source Evaluation Essay Example PDF

Employee Self-Evaluation Essay Example

How to Start A Self-Evaluation Essay Example PDF

Evaluation Essay Topics For College Students

For writing an amazing evaluation essay, the first thing that you require is an essay topic.  Here are some incredible topic ideas for college students. You can use or mold them according to your preference. 

• Artificial intelligence's impact on society: A double-edged sword?
• Evaluate the online teaching and on-campus teaching styles
• Analyze and evaluate the Real Madrid football team and their performance
• Is media a threat to cultural cohesion or a source of enrichment?
• Compare and evaluate recorded music and live performance
• Evaluate how a university's football team impacts students' personalities
• Critically evaluate a remake of an original movie you have watched recently
• Analyze how the roles of females and males changed in recent romantic movies
• Evaluate your favorite restaurant, its food, aroma, and everything
• Critically evaluate gender disparities in college majors and career choices.

Evaluation Essay vs. Review

At first glance, an evaluation essay might look like a review. But, there are some notable differences between them. See this table to see how both pieces of writing differ from each other.

To conclude, 

After reading the step-by-step guide and examples, you must have learned the art of writing a good evaluation essay. We’re confident that you’re now able to provide a balanced and effective evaluation of the topics you choose for your essay.

But writing a perfect essay is not that simple; you require a lot of practice and experience to become a good writer. That is why we are here to help you write any type of academic essay. 

MyPerfectWords.com is a professional essay writing service that offers help for all academic writing assignments. We have a team of professional writers who are experts in writing all types of essays and evaluation papers. 

So what are you waiting for? Let us handle your evaluation essay worries and have a sigh of relief! 

Frequently Asked Questions

1. what are the four components of an evaluation essay.

The four components of an evaluation essay are:

• Introduction
• Background information

2. What are the 4 types of evaluation?

The four types of evaluation are:

Write Essay Within 60 Seconds!

Dr. Barbara is a highly experienced writer and author who holds a Ph.D. degree in public health from an Ivy League school. She has worked in the medical field for many years, conducting extensive research on various health topics. Her writing has been featured in several top-tier publications.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!

Keep reading

Jun 29, 2023

Evaluation Essay Examples: Master the Art of Critical Assessment with Examples and Techniques

Want to turn good evaluation essays into great ones? We've got you covered with the guidance and insights you need. Join us as we delve into the art of critical assessment!

An evaluation paper's main purpose is to assess entities like a book, movie, restaurant, or product and provide constructive criticism. This writing style can be approached with serious objectivity or with humor and sarcasm. Reviewing is a common form of academic writing that serves to assess something and is often used in various fields as a research method. For example, research papers might include literature reviews or case studies, using evaluation as an analytical tool.

Evaluation reports can also take the form of analyses and critiques. A critique of a scientific study would look at its methodology and findings, while an analysis of a novel would focus on its themes, characters, and writing style. It's essential to consider your audience and your purpose before starting an evaluation document.

Evaluation papers are a versatile and meaningful writing form that can both educate and entertain audiences. Regardless of whether the tone is serious or humorous, objective or subjective, a well-written review can engage and educate.

To understand everything about evaluation essays, from their definition and purpose to potential topics and writing tips, read on.

What are Evaluation Essays?

An evaluation essay allows the author to make a claim and offer a verdict on a topic. This essay type can be used to identify the best option among several alternatives, or to analyze a specific method, product, or situation. It is a common academic task across all levels. Evaluation essays come in different forms, from online product reviews to business cases prepared by management professionals.

In contrast to a descriptive essay, an evaluation essay aims to express the author's judgment. However, this essay type is defined by an objective tone. The author's judgment should be based on careful examination of the available evidence. This differs from a persuasive essay, which seeks to convince the reader to adopt the author's point of view. An evaluation essay starts with the facts and forms conclusions based on these facts.

How to Write an Evaluation Essay?

To write an effective evaluation essay, follow these essential writing tips:

1. Select a Topic

The essay topic is crucial. It should be both educational and interesting, providing enough information to fill an entire essay.

2. Draft an Evaluation Essay Outline

Professional writers always advise creating an evaluation essay outline before writing the essay itself. This aids in writing and ensures content coherence. An outline is also easier to modify than a complete essay. Think about what should be included and excluded when designing your essay's outline. However, skipping this step and diving straight into the essay writing can create extra work later, as it can mean editing and revising the entire piece.

The general components of an evaluation essay outline include:

a. Introduction

The introduction is vital as it forms the readers' first impression. It should engage readers and arouse their interest in the topic. The aspects to consider when writing the introduction are as follows:

Begin with a compelling hook statement to capture the reader's interest.

Provide background information on the topic for better understanding.

Formulate a clear and concise thesis statement, outlining the main objective of the evaluation.

b. Body Section

The body of the essay consists of three paragraphs. Each paragraph should deliver several related ideas and flow seamlessly from start to finish. The key ideas to cover in the body paragraphs include:

Start with a sentence that presents your view on the topic.

Provide arguments that support the topic sentence and your stance.

Present a well-rounded argument to show impartiality.

Compare the subject to a different topic to showcase its strengths and weaknesses.

Present the evaluation from various angles, applying both approving and critical thinking.

c. Conclusion

This is your final chance to convince the reader of your viewpoint. The conclusion should summarize the essay and present the overall evaluation and final assessment. When composing an evaluation essay's conclusion, keep the following points in mind:

Restate your main points and arguments from the essay body.

Present evidence to support your thesis.

Conclude your argument convincingly, ultimately persuading the reader of your assessment.

3. Review, Edit, and Proofread

The final steps after writing the essay are editing and proofreading. Carefully reading your essay will help identify and correct any unintentional errors. If necessary, review your draft multiple times to ensure no mistakes are present.

Structure of an Evaluation Essay

An evaluation essay, like any good piece of writing, follows a basic structure: an introduction, body, and conclusion. But to make your evaluation essay standout, it's crucial to distinctly outline every segment and explain the process that led you to your final verdict. Here's how to do it:

Introduction

Start strong. Your introduction needs to captivate your readers and compel them to read further. To accomplish this, begin with a clear declaration of purpose. Provide a brief background of the work being evaluated to showcase your expertise on the topic.

Next, rephrase the essay prompt, stating the purpose of your piece. For example, "This essay will critically assess X, utilizing Y standards, and analyzing its pros and cons." This presents your comprehension of the task at hand.

Wrap up your introduction with a thesis statement that clearly outlines the topics to be discussed in the body. This way, you set the stage for the essay's content and direction, sparking curiosity for the main body of the work.

Body of the Essay

Dive deep, but not without preparation. Before delving into the assessment, offer an unbiased overview of the topic being evaluated. This reaffirms your understanding and familiarity with the subject.

Each paragraph of the body should focus on one evaluation criterion, presenting either support or criticism for the point. This structured approach ensures clarity while presenting evidence to substantiate each point. For instance, discussing the benefits of a product, you can outline each advantage and back it up with supporting evidence like customer reviews or scientific studies.

Ensure a smooth flow of thoughts by linking paragraphs with transitional phrases like "in addition," "moreover," and "furthermore." Each paragraph should have a clear topic sentence, explanation, and supporting evidence or examples for easy understanding.

Your conclusion is where you make your final, compelling argument. It should focus on summarizing the points made according to your evaluation criteria. This isn't the place for new information but rather a concise summary of your work.

To conclude effectively, revisit your thesis and check whether it holds up or falls short based on your analysis. This completes the narrative arc and provides a solid stance on the topic. A thoughtful conclusion should consider the potential impact and outcomes of your evaluation, illustrating that your findings are based on the available data and recognizing the potential need for further exploration.

Evaluation Essay Examples

Now that we've covered the structure, let's take a look at some examples. Remember, an evaluation essay is just one type of essay that can be generated using tools like Jenni.ai. This AI-powered software can produce high-quality essays on any topic at impressive speeds. Here are some ideas to kickstart your assessment essay writing journey.

Evaluation Essay: Online Teaching vs. On-campus Teaching

In the face of technological evolution, education has seen a shift in teaching styles, with online learning platforms providing an alternative to traditional on-campus teaching. This essay will evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these two teaching styles, delving into various factors that contribute to their strengths and weaknesses.

The landscape of education has transformed significantly with the advent of online learning. This essay will scrutinize and juxtapose the effectiveness of online teaching against traditional on-campus teaching. The evaluation will take into account numerous factors that contribute to the success of each teaching style, focusing on their individual benefits and drawbacks.

On-campus Teaching

On-campus teaching, the time-tested method of education, has proven its effectiveness repeatedly. The physical classroom setting provides students direct access to their teachers, promoting immediate feedback and real-time interaction. Moreover, the hands-on learning, group discussions, and collaborative projects intrinsic to on-campus teaching cultivate crucial soft skills like communication and teamwork.

A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research reveals that students attending on-campus classes show higher academic performance and are more likely to complete their degrees compared to those in online classes (Bettinger & Loeb, 2017). However, on-campus teaching isn't without its challenges. It offers limited flexibility in scheduling and requires physical attendance, which can be inconvenient for students residing far from campus or those with mobility constraints.

Online Teaching

Online teaching, propelled by technological advancements and digital learning platforms, offers a compelling alternative. The most significant benefit of online teaching is its scheduling flexibility. Students can access classes and course materials from anywhere, at any time, providing a superior balance for work, family, and other commitments.

Online teaching democratizes education by enabling access for students in remote areas or with mobility challenges. The use of innovative teaching methods like interactive multimedia and gamification enhances engagement and enjoyment in learning.

Despite its numerous advantages, online teaching presents its own set of challenges. A major drawback is the lack of direct interaction with teachers and peers, potentially leading to delayed feedback and feelings of isolation. Furthermore, online classes demand a higher degree of self-motivation and discipline, which may be challenging for some students.

Both online teaching and on-campus teaching present their unique benefits and drawbacks. While on-campus teaching fosters direct interaction and immediate feedback, online teaching provides unmatched flexibility and accessibility. The choice between the two often depends on factors such as the course content, learning objectives, and student preferences.

A study by the University of Massachusetts reports that the academic performance of students in online classes is on par with those attending on-campus classes (Allen & Seaman, 2017). Furthermore, online classes are more cost-effective, eliminating the need for physical classrooms and related resources.

In conclusion, while both teaching styles have their merits, the effectiveness of each is heavily dependent on the subject matter, learning objectives, and the individual needs and preferences of students.

Citations: Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group. Bettinger, E., & Loeb, S. (2017). Promises and pitfalls of online education. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring 2017, 347-384.

Evaluation essay: Analyze how the roles of females and males changed in recent romantic movies

Romantic movies have long been a popular genre, offering a glimpse into the complex and varied world of relationships. Over the years, the portrayal of gender roles in romantic movies has evolved significantly. This essay aims to evaluate and analyze how the roles of females and males have changed in recent romantic movies.

Historical Context of Gender Roles in Romantic Movies:

Gender roles have played a significant role in shaping the portrayal of romantic relationships in movies. In the past, traditional gender roles were often reinforced, with women playing the role of the damsel in distress, and men playing the role of the protector and provider.

However, over the years, the feminist movement and other social changes have led to a more nuanced portrayal of gender roles in romantic movies. Women are no longer just passive objects of desire, and men are not just dominant figures. Instead, both genders are portrayed as complex and multifaceted individuals with their desires, needs, and struggles.

Analysis of Recent Romantic Movies:

In recent years, romantic movies have become more diverse and inclusive, featuring a wider range of gender identities, sexual orientations, and cultural backgrounds. As a result, the portrayal of gender roles in these movies has also become more nuanced and complex.

One significant trend in recent romantic movies is the portrayal of female characters as strong, independent, and empowered. Female characters are no longer just passive objects of desire, waiting for the male lead to sweep them off their feet. Instead, they are shown to be capable of taking charge of their own lives, pursuing their goals, and making their own decisions.

For example, in the movie "Crazy Rich Asians," the female lead, Rachel, is portrayed as a strong and independent woman who stands up for herself and refuses to be intimidated by the wealthy and powerful people around her. Similarly, in the movie "The Shape of Water," the female lead, Elisa, is portrayed as a determined and resourceful woman who takes action to rescue the creature she has fallen in love with.

Another trend in recent romantic movies is the portrayal of male characters as vulnerable and emotionally expressive. Male characters are no longer just stoic and unemotional but are shown to have their insecurities, fears, and vulnerabilities.

For example, in the movie "Call Me By Your Name," the male lead, Elio, is shown to be sensitive and emotional, struggling with his feelings for another man. Similarly, in the movie "Moonlight," the male lead, Chiron, is shown to be vulnerable and emotionally expressive, struggling with his identity and his relationships with those around him.

However, while there have been significant changes in the portrayal of gender roles in recent romantic movies, there are still some aspects that remain problematic. For example, female characters are still often portrayed as objects of desire, with their value determined by their physical appearance and sexual appeal. Male characters are still often portrayed as dominant and aggressive, with their masculinity tied to their ability to assert control over others.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the portrayal of gender roles in recent romantic movies has evolved significantly, with female characters being portrayed as strong, independent, and empowered, and male characters being portrayed as vulnerable and emotionally expressive. These changes reflect the shifting social norms and values of our society and offer a more nuanced and complex portrayal of romantic relationships.

However, there are still some problematic aspects of the portrayal of gender roles in romantic movies, such as the objectification of female characters and the perpetuation of toxic masculinity. Filmmakers and audiences need to continue to push for greater diversity, inclusivity, and nuance in the portrayal of gender roles in romantic movies so that everyone can see themselves reflected in these stories.

"Crazy Rich Asians" Directed by Jon M. Chu, performances by Constance Wu, Henry Golding, and Michelle

Final Thoughts

The step-by-step guide and examples provided should have equipped you with the skills necessary to write a successful evaluation essay. However, crafting the perfect essay isn't a simple task; it demands practice, patience, and experience.

Incorporate Jenni.ai into your academic journey to revolutionize your writing experience. This advanced AI writing tool is designed to assist with a range of academic writing projects. With Jenni.ai, you can confidently tackle essays on any topic, easing your writing tasks considerably. Don't hesitate to register with Jenni.ai today ! Discover a world of writing opportunities and take your essay writing skills to new heights!

Try Jenni for free today

Create your first piece of content with Jenni today and never look back

• Testimonials

Free Custom «The Outside of Class Speaker Evaluation Paper» Sample Essay

• How it works

Have any Questions?

Support center

The speech analyzed in this essay was made during a seminar for youths.

The speaker managed to maintain eye contact with the audience throughout her speech. It was, in fact, the best of what the listener could learn in her speech delivery. Owing to the fact that she kept looking at the audience, this seems to have instilled some trust into the audience. Throughout the speech, one could feel that friendliness that hung in the air due to her good maintenance of eye contact. She did not seem to notice that she had some small cards lying on the podium before her since her notes did not seem to matter then. Instead, she looked at the audience in an assuring and fulfilling manner. No part of the audience was left unseen by her eyes as she interacted with those directly in front of her, those to her right, and those to her left. Moreover, she could be looking at some people, specifically and directly, in the course of her speech delivery. She seemed to have achieved the audience’s attention and trust as it could be seen that the audience was keen to let her continue her speech as they kept looking at her. They looked attentive and seemed to agree with her. At one point, the speaker looked at me, and I through that look, could feel the truth and validity in what she was saying.

The speaker was very vocal in her speech. She was loud enough for the audience to hear each and every word in her speech. One could feel that she was very enthusiastic about her speech, and this, definitely, appealed to the audience. Most particular was the way she pronounced her words. In fact, all words came out clearly and were well-articulated. The way she put stress on some of the words and sentences in her speech was very appealing. Every word she uttered seemed to have its own special effect as she went through her pronunciation of it. Her voice could be heard going through several variations throughout the speech. She seemed interested in the subject of her speech, and the audience could be seen to have gained so much interest from the way she managed her voice throughout the speech. Her rate of speaking was moderate, and she seemed to have no intention of rushing through her speech. One step at a time appeared to be her rule. The way she varied her tone was particularly interesting. She could be heard speaking at a slower rate when she was delivering the key points of her speech. When going through background material in the speech, she could be heard talking quicker. One could tell that she was not there solely to inform the audience of what they already knew but, instead, to offer them something entirely or almost new.

Limited Time OFFER

Get 19% OFF

            At some point, her speech varied. Its inflection rose and the speaker’s volume increased slightly together with her speaking rate. It could be seen that virtually all the heads that were facing down would turn up to look at the speaker. Her vocal variations triggered attention of the audience. She varied her voice and put stress on some words. Through this, the audience could clearly get various meanings of her speech.

            The most interesting thing about the speaker’s speech was the way she used pauses. In fact, these pauses were effective enough. One felt her speech was well-punctuated and could easily separate her thoughts from each other in her speech. She would also pause in between major ideas to let the audience capture them distinctively. Moreover, she would purposely pause after mentioning difficult concepts. The reason for this was to give the audience time to contemplate these concepts.

            She did not ignore the effective use of gestures and facial variations. She would, for instance, point her fingers towards the audience when telling them that they are the future of their country. What is more, she frowned when she recalled that the government has not done enough to help the youth. Furthermore, when expressing hope, she smiled.

            Logic and consistency was embraced in her speech. She started from the general views and would then go to specific concepts. During the delivery of these concepts, she would give clear-cut examples of each. It was impressive how she went gracefully from one concept to another without any errors. As a result, this made her speech easily comprehensible.

            The speaker lacked in her ability to wholly engage the audience. Despite her effective employment of eye contact and gestures, the speaker failed to involve the audience’s side and perspective on the speech or subject of the speech. She ought to have sought feedback from the audience in order to insure that her speech was properly understood. Although she got such response indirectly through the audience’s nods and partly facial expressions, it would be more effective if she got it through their direct involvement. For example, she could take questions from the audience or use them as examples in the speech as well as ask the audience about their view on certain ideas. However, this would require an appropriate response from the speaker.

  Benefit from Our Service: Save 25% Along with the first order offer - 15% discount , you save extra 10% since we provide 300 words/page instead of 275 words/page

            Another way she could improve her future presentations is to embrace the use of body movements. During her speech, she maintained the same position, namely on the podium. However, there was enough space on the stage. Thus, she ought to have moved around the stage in order to capture the audience’s attention and to explore her examples further. 

Related Analysis essays

• Ubaid Culture
• Playing With Reader’s Feelings: Truman Capote’s A Christmas Memory
• Concert Reflection
• Legally Blonde
• Villains in "Pride and Prejudice"
• Li-Young Lee

Our Customers' Testimonials

• Eviction Notice Forms
• Power of Attorney Forms Forms
• Bill of Sale (Purchase Agreement) Forms
• Lease Agreement Forms
• Rental Application Forms
• Living Will Forms Forms
• Recommendation Letters Forms
• Resignation Letters Forms
• Release of Liability Agreement Forms
• Promissory Note Forms
• LLC Operating Agreement Forms
• Deed of Sale Forms
• Consent Form Forms
• Support Affidavit Forms
• Paternity Affidavit Forms
• Marital Affidavit Forms
• Financial Affidavit Forms
• Residential Affidavit Forms
• Affidavit of Identity Forms
• Affidavit of Title Forms
• Employment Affidavit Forms
• Affidavit of Loss Forms
• Gift Affidavit Forms
• Small Estate Affidavit Forms
• Service Affidavit Forms
• Heirship Affidavit Forms
• Survivorship Affidavit Forms
• Desistance Affidavit Forms
• Discrepancy Affidavit Forms
• Guardianship Affidavit Forms
• Undertaking Affidavit Forms
• General Affidavit Forms
• Affidavit of Death Forms
• Evaluation Forms

FREE 14+ Speaker Evaluation Forms in PDF

Sample Speech Evaluation Forms - 9+ Free Documents in Word, PDF

7+ seminar evaluation form samples - free sample, example ..., 7+ conference evaluation form samples - free sample, example ..., what is a speaker evaluation form.

A speaker evaluation form is a document that is used whenever an individual or the audience will have to assess and rate the speaker of an event. Collecting data about the way the speaker delivered his speech is the purpose of requesting the crowd to complete the evaluation form . Additionally, the evaluation form will also serve as a tool for creating valuable decisions especially when it comes to determining the winner of a debate, as well as distinguishing when should the speaker be called up again to grant his speech.

With the help of the evaluation form, an organization will be less likely to deal with speakers who are not appropriate for the activity evaluation and who will not be inspiring enough for the crowd. The form is also used by organizations to allow the crowd or the judges of an event in writing down their speaker and event feedback , which will aid the organization in constructing a better plan for assuring their success and addressing their failures with a resolution.

General Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 166 KB

Club Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 29 KB

Engineering Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 110 KB

Event Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 10 KB

Guest Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 68 KB

What’s in a Speaker Evaluation Form?

Speaker evaluation forms may have varying formats and arrangements but this document should have the following:

Details of the Event

This refers to the general information of the event including its type whether it is a debate, a public announcement or broadcast, or if it is for an organization meeting presentation evaluation . The date and place of the event are two of the data that are found in this primary section.

Name of the Speaker

Some speakers come in groups or class and in varying speech or topic categories. With this, it is essential that the form will indicate the legal name of the person presenting in front, especially for contest purposes, to assure that the speaker is the exact individual who is expected in the program evaluation .

Speaker’s Questions Rating

The purpose of why the speaker will ask a set of questions is to communicate and involve the audience with the topic. The relevance of his questions to the topic and the point that he clearly shows to the audience are significant to be assessed by the individual who will grant the evaluation.

The Rate of the Whole Presentation

A speaker evaluation form will have a separate section for the overall total. In order for the evaluating personnel action to acquire the total score, he needs to sum up the scores from the varying tables and rating scales.

Comments and Suggestions

Requesting for the speaker to speak louder and clearer is an example of a comment that an evaluating personnel can include in his evaluation. However, the evaluating personnel should make sure that his comments and employee suggestions are constructive and exact. The personnel should also be aware of the types of words and phrases that he will be using to avoid mistakenly delivering a negative impact to any speaker.

Law Committee Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 13 KB

Program Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 183 KB

Public Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 134 KB

Seminar Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 48 KB

Senate Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 60 KB

Examples of Speaker Evaluation Forms

Although there are numerous kinds of speaker evaluation forms, here are some of the commonly used and known by the population of any event that demands a speaker to present himself:

• Club Speaker Evaluation Form  – Clubs or organizations are composed of people with the same interests about a particular subject. This is the type of group where a club speaker speech evaluation form will serve a great use. The form will assess how the speaker balanced his plot, tone, diagrams, or the slides that he used for his presentation, as well as how he manages the questions of his audience. Additional paperwork such as a detailed group workshop evaluation can be attached to the form to allow an in-depth understanding of the factors that may have affected the ratings given to the speaker.
• Engineering Speaker Evaluation Form  – Engineers are prone to doing risk assessments for their projects, as well as various evaluation documents that are either for their company or directly addressed for them. For events that deal with engineering subjects and matters, an engineering speaker evaluation form is needed for the critiques of the event. The form will center on the sequence of the speaker’s speech presentation, the clarity, the coverage of the speaker’s topic, and the total effect that the speaker and his speech was able to achieve throughout the presentation feedback duration.
• Guest Speaker Evaluation Form – Whether it is a funeral or a motivational inauguration ceremony, a guest speaker should go under a speaker evaluation procedure to assure that he will be speaking terms that are acceptable to the crowd during the event form . An evaluation form for a guest speaker will highlight the interest of the speaker toward the topic, the length of his speech, and whether the goal of his presentation was clearly met such as providing an action plan for a company or inviting people into opening their own businesses.
• Public Speaker Evaluation Form – This evaluation form has areas or sections that are similar to a conference feedback form as it contains questions that demand the user to state his plans after witnessing the motivational speech of the speaker. Although evaluation forms should be kept short and simple with rating scores for the speaker, this document needs to be completed by the user with a sentence or two for his explanations of each question.
• Seminar Speaker Evaluation Form – Seminar evaluations are essential to any organization or group in obtaining the thoughts of their audience about improvements, determining appropriate program, and solving glitches. With a seminar speaker evaluation form, the audience and the judges for the event can state their impressions and assessments. It is important to use this form in order to collect contact information about the suitability of the speaker’s words and message for the learning and experience of the audience.

Speaker Evaluation Form Sample

Size: 77 KB

Speaker Evaluation Short Form

Size: 52 KB

Speaker Presentation Evaluation Form

Size: 24 KB

Speaker’s Bureau Evaluation Form

Teacher Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 131 KB

Tips for Speaker Evaluations

These tips will aid you in providing an effective and complete speaker evaluation form:

Listen, identify, and list

Most speakers are trained to communicate for a variety of audiences and target application in order for them to integrate a familiarity about the topic as well as the expectations of the people whom they should entertain. This is why as the individual who is responsible for doing the evaluation, you must fully listen to the speaker and determine what his main idea is. By acknowledging the speaker’s main idea, you will be able to know if his arguments and supporting details coordinate to each other or not.

Evaluate the content and organization of the speech

As you list down the main point that the speaker is delivering along with his arguments and details, you need to do a  job assessment of whether the whole content of his speech is relevant for the audience or not. The speaker’s organization such as his arrangement of the arguments starting from a strong introduction to a persuasive closing statement should be considered as you begin filling out ratings on your evaluation.

Assess the speaker’s tone and style

Doing a speaker evaluation does not merely mean that you will only focus on assessing the speaker but you must also do a thorough speech presentation evaluation . This refers to evaluating the tone of the speaker’s voice, his body language, how he managed to stand as a confident individual in front as well as his style of convincing the audience.

Praise the speaker

When evaluating, you must center yourself in giving out a constructive evaluation report and assessment rather than providing a destructive one. Beginning your evaluation with words of praise from the speaker’s presentation is an effective move in lightening the mood of a competition or at any event. If the speaker is obviously shaking in front of the crowd due to nervousness, ease up his imbalanced confidence by voicing out a positive performance review to be followed by steps or suggestions of how he can improve his speech construction.

State a feedback

Your feedback can include the warmth of the event’s hosts, the appropriateness of the event’s venue, and how the speaker’s topic suits the event. How you can provide the feedback can depend on what the event planner and organizers have given to you as they can hand out separate evaluation and feedback forms or even integrate a feedback section at the bottom of the evaluation sheet to use lesser papers and inks.

The aforementioned examples and tips will not only aid a judge through speaker evaluation but will also allow him to indicate points and state his satisfaction rating. Nonetheless, organizations who will hire or call out speakers for their event should secure that the individual is knowledgeable enough, has a background verification  that can be related to the subject that he will preach, and has a reputation that can motivate all the people in the location.

Related Posts

Free 11+ sample peer evaluation forms in pdf | ms word | excel, free 10+ employee performance evaluation forms in pdf | ms word | excel, free 5+ varieties of sports evaluation forms in pdf, free 8+ sample course evaluation forms in pdf | ms word | excel, free 8+ website evaluation forms in pdf | ms word, free 9+ sample marketing evaluation forms in pdf | ms word, free 11+ internship evaluation forms in pdf | excel | ms word, free 14+ retreat evaluation forms in pdf, free 9+ training evaluation forms in pdf | ms word, free 9+ conference evaluation forms in ms word | pdf | excel, free 3+ construction employee evaluation forms in pdf | ms word, free 20+ sample training evaluation forms in pdf | ms word | excel, free 21+ training evaluation forms in ms word, free 14+ interview evaluation forms in ms word | pdf | excel, free 10+ sample technical evaluation forms in pdf | ms word | excel, 19 presentation feedback forms in pdf, evaluation form examples, sample conference feedback forms - 9+ free documents in word ..., 36 presentation evaluation forms.

• Sample Forms

FREE 10+ Sample Speaker Evaluation Forms in MS Word | PDF

Event and program speakers help a lot especially if their knowledge about the topic that they are talking about is evident. Speakers are usually the people who have found and attained success in the industry where a specific program or event is for. They are requested to talk for them to share their experiences and expertise to the attendees of the event.

Speaker Evaluation Form

Presentation evaluation forms – 8+ free samples, examples ..., program evaluation form - 7+ download free documents in pdf ..., sample seminar evaluation form - 10+ examples in word, pdf.

A speaker needs to be evaluated for the organizers to know his or her effectiveness with regards to inspiring others and allowing them to know the processes that are needed to achieve success in the field that they have chosen to practice. We can provide you with speaker evaluation form templates and other  Sample Forms  that you may use in other functions other than speaker evaluations.

Sample Guest Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 68 KB

Speaker Presentation Evaluation Form

Size: 14 KB

Speaker Conference Evaluation Form

Size: 41 KB

Speaker Event Evaluation Form in PDF

Size: 16 KB

Public Speaker Evaluation Form

Speaker Evaluation

A speaker may be evaluated based on the following items:

• the character of the speaker as a professional and how he or she was able to present him or herself to the crowd;
• the items that are included in the topic of the speaker and how he or she provided samples and other interesting facts about the specific topic;
• the knowledge that the speaker was able to provide with regards to the subject matter being discussed;
• the speaker’s ability to insert real encounters and other factual details that may help the attendees better understand about the processes of the field where the speaker is practicing his or her expertise;
• the information that the speaker has provided that may help the attendees improve their work performance, which may then result to a better career track and professional growth and goal achievement;
• the speaker was able to inspire the attendees to work harder to be more efficient in producing outputs that will provide improvements in their craft;
• the answers of the speaker to specific questions with regards to what he or she is talking about.

Other than our speaker evaluation form samples, you may also be interested to download our  Performance Evaluation Forms  and  Interview Evaluation Forms .

Speaker Program Evaluation Form

Size: 230 KB

Seminar Speaker Evaluation Form

Size: 17 KB

Speaker Speech Evaluation Form

Speaker Evaluation Form Example

Size: 24 KB

Speaker Evaluation Form for Teacher

Size: 37 KB

Speaker Bureau Evaluation Form

Size: 166 KB

Presentation Elements

Other than the speaker’s personal and professional sharing, a speaker may also be evaluated through the presentation that he or she have provided. A few of the items that are included in evaluation specific presentation elements are as follows:

• the assessment of the topic being discussed by the speaker;
• the knowledge that the people have gathered from a specific program where the speaker provided a talk;
• the relevant information that attendees may use in their daily work functions;
• the presentation’s appropriateness to the attendees, their needs, and their professional field of expertise;
• the value of the presentation and how it is of interest to the attendees;
• the development of the entire presentation and how specific information and processes were relayed;
• the creativity of the presentation that allowed the attendees to enjoy while learning;
• the delivery method of the speaker that helped in improving the content of the presentation;
• the effectivity of the materials that are used in the presentation; and
• the transition of all the areas of the presentation.

There are many ways that a speaker may be evaluated. What is important is that this process will help not only the organizers of the event and the people who have attended, but the speakers as well by knowing the areas where they are good at and the presentation areas where they can improve. Other than our speaker evaluation form samples, we also have downloadable Workshop Evaluation Forms.

Related Posts

Free 8+ sample leave request forms in ms word | pdf, free 12+ sample deed of gift forms in pdf, free 9+ sample photography consent forms in ms word | pdf, free 11+ sample parts order forms in ms word | pdf, free 13+ requisition form samples in pdf | ms word, free 17+ ach form samples in pdf, free 9+ sample vendor evaluation forms in ms word | pdf, free 17+ w2 form samples in pdf, free 23+ minor form samples in ms word | pdf, free 9+ sample students feedback forms in pdf | ms word, free 18+ check form samples in ms word | google docs | pages | pdf, free 21+ notification form samples in ms word | outlook | pdf, free 7+ sample audition forms in pdf | ms word, free 10+ school clearance form samples & templates in ms word | pdf, free 19+ study form samples in ms word | pdf, sample meeting feedback form - 9+ examples in word, pdf, sample general evaluation - 5+ documents in pdf, word, sample employee suggestion form - 7+ documents in pdf, word, sample presentation evaluation - 7+ examples & format.

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

• Essay Database >
• Essay Examples >
• Essays Topics >
• Essay on Rhetoric

Good Essay On Speaker:

Type of paper: Essay

Topic: Rhetoric , Speech , Speaker , Public Relations , Audience , Career , Cinema , Life

Published: 12/05/2020

ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS

Venue: Speech: Charlie Chaplin Body of the Speech At the beginning of the speech, the speaker was visibly nervous, which was betrayed by her heavy breathing. However, the speaker’s unease was overshadowed by her witty introduction to the speech, which was not only humorous but also managed to get the attention of the audience. The mention of the controversial figure, Hitler, added humor to the speech, and got the audience hooked. The speaker then went ahead and informed the audience of the objective of the speech, which made the speech focused. The contents of the speech were well connected to the speech as the speaker went through the early life of the character, later focusing on his career. The organization was done chronologically, which made the speech easy to follow. The speaker maintained her focus on the speech, providing supporting details in form of film statics to support her point.

The Speech Conclusion

The conclusion was suitable for an informative speech since the speaker highlighted the significant parts of the character’s life, focusing on his achievements in his career. The conclusion adequately gave a summary of the whole speech.

Delivery Techniques

The speaker was enthusiastic about her topic as she appeared confident and smiled often to show that she was comfortable with the topic and well equipped for the task. She connected with the audience by maintaining constant eye contact. The speech was well paced, with pauses in the right places with a good flow of information. The downside was the speaker’s distracting mannerism; she paced to too frequently, and had heavy breathing. These made the hand gestures non-complementary while the frequent movements made the speaker appear nervous. The speaker was audible enough and employed appropriate tonal variation. The speaker’s language was appropriate for the audience. She also employed correct terminology and appropriate use of grammar. This speech was delivered to a class audience to inform them about Charlie Chaplin’s career in film. The speaker met the objectives of the speech by delivering relevant and detailed information. Appropriate sources were incorporated, for example, Chaplin’s biography.

Cite this page

Share with friends using:

Removal Request

Finished papers: 1110

This paper is created by writer with

If you want your paper to be:

Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate

Original, fresh, based on current data

Eloquently written and immaculately formatted

275 words = 1 page double-spaced

Get your papers done by pros!

Other Pages

I have a dream essays, hoplite essays, katabasis essays, externalist essays, chorobates essays, misidentification essays, phenix essays, buran essays, metis essays, enterobacteriaceae essays, flaming essays, people in america essays, web dubois essays, free literature review on autism in special education, example of essay on discussion question managerial accounting and strategic decision making, example of the kinds of betrayal in the film fatal attraction research paper, example of article review on magazine international journal of production research, example of essay on health perception and health management, free essay on criminal justice policy making, lab number and title report examples, free research paper on burlington v ellerth, example of argumentative essay on watching tv makes you smarter, emerging cyber security technology research paper sample, essay on autism, example of deficit spending pros cons essay, article review on theoretical foundations of comparative advantage, survey results essay, essay on employee announcement consolidation on webuybooks, apple inc essay examples, headquarters overhead cost allocation at korea auto insurance co inc case study example, essay on name 7, understanding the life and works of joyce carol oates research paper, example of aldi the dark horse discounter case study, expansion of burger king in ukraine reports examples, free movie review about death of a salesman, essay on research prospectus if provided with appropriate specified accomodation will students with disabilities be successful during assessments, good example of whirlpool supply chain case study, free argumentative essay on the imaginative creation of truth, good what makes college students become outsiders essay example, rheocasting process research paper sample, my childhood college essays, mein kampf college essays, father and son college essays.

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .

Now you can download documents directly to your device!

Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.

or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone

The sample is NOT original!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline