family bonding in pandemic essay

• Coronavirus Disease 2019

How the Pandemic Changed Family Dynamics

The potential impact of covid-19 on adolescents’ social development..

Posted August 2, 2021 | Reviewed by Abigail Fagan

• The social effects of quarantine hit younger adolescents particularly hard, derailing typical development.
• During COVID-19, family was more influential than friends during a developmental period when the opposite would normally be true.
• Siblings may have functioned as a buffer against the social effects of quarantine for older adolescents.

The social landscape has looked wildly different over the past year and a half. Because of the quarantines and social restrictions made necessary by the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person social interactions were greatly reduced in 2020 as many found themselves spending the majority of their time at home with family, and away from friends and colleagues. Previous research has already connected quarantine and increased mental health issues that have been observed during the pandemic (e.g., Chahal et al., 2020; Ghebreyesus et al., 2020).

Adolescence is a time of social exploration where peers begin to play a greater role than parents as teens move toward independence, so the disruption of this normative timeline, and particularly interactions with friends, is cause for concern (Ellis et al., 2020; Orben, Tomova, Blakemore, 2020). Cross-sectional studies on the effects of COVID-19 have shown that maintaining friendships is something children and adolescents were bothered by and that while online social connections can be beneficial, in-person interactions are more effective (Ellis et al., 2020; Orben et al., 2020).

A recent study led by Dr. Reuma Gadassi-Polack in our lab expanded what is known about the effects of COVID-19 quarantine by looking at adolescents’ social interactions and depressive symptoms before and during the pandemic (Gadassi Polack et al., in press). Researchers collected data from kids using short questionnaires completed daily, a year before COVID and again at the beginning of the pandemic. Each day, participants reported both positive and negative interactions with family members and peers and their depressive symptoms.

The study looked at 112 participants (age 8-15) who completed daily questionnaires in both the initial pre-COVID data collection (Wave 1) and the data collection during COVID (Wave 2). Researchers were able to capture information about both individual relationships and how they affect one another via “spillover,” a concept that will be discussed further below.

COVID Had Greater Negative Effects on Younger Adolescents

In typical development, we would expect to see uniform increases in interactions with peers alongside decreases in interactions with parents (e.g., Lam et al., 2012; Larson et al., 1991; Larson et al., 1996). Instead, younger (but not older) participants had significantly fewer positive interactions with peers during COVID compared to pre-COVID. For participants 13 and older, significantly more positive interactions with siblings were seen during COVID vs. before. This led to a greater negative impact on younger adolescents, who lost positive interactions with peers without gaining any positive interactions with siblings like older adolescents. In fact, younger adolescents had more negative interactions with siblings than friends or parents.

For both age groups, negative interactions with friends significantly decreased while there were no other significant decreases in other relationships. This finding presents a different facet of the move to online school: for some, this was an opportunity to escape a negative environment.

Altogether, the lack of the expected increase in interactions with friends suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic has derailed the typical trajectory of social development. The larger effect can potentially be credited to less social development as younger adolescents are experiencing the same effects earlier in development, with less social skills in place. A further implication of these results is that in-person interactions cannot be neatly substituted with virtual interaction.

Family Members Were More Influential than Friends During the Early Stages of COVID-19

Looking at a process named “spillover” allowed researchers to understand the connections within the family, family subsystems, and peer relationships. The concept of spillover is grounded in the idea that our social world is made up of subsystems, including those within the family: the mother and father is a subsystem, as is the parent and child, or the siblings. These subsystems are of course connected (e.g., the mother-father relationship is related to the mother-child relationship), but not without some boundaries . When these boundaries become weaker, interactions in one subsystem can affect interactions in other subsystems via spillover (e.g., Chung et al., 2011; Flook & Fuligni, 2008; Kaufman et al., 2020; Krishnakumar & Buehler, 2000; Mastrotheodoros et al., 2020).

For example, an argument between parents can cause each parent to be more likely to argue with their child. What began as a negative interaction in the mother-father relationship has then spilled over into the parent-child relationship. This example would be considered negative spillover, where negative occurrences in one subsystem lead to negative interactions or feelings in another. Positive spillover occurs when the same thing happens with positive occurrences. For example, being praised by their mother might cause a child to be kinder to their sibling . Then, a positive interaction in the mother-child relationship has spilled over into the sibling relationship.

COVID-19 appeared to create a more closed family system, with fewer spillover effects from outside and more inside. In other words, interactions with family members impacted interactions with friends to a lesser degree during COVID. Separate interactions with family and friends are expected to affect each other less as adolescents develop typically. However, in the context of the pandemic, this was particularly detrimental for those who already had more negative family relationships prior to COVID as there was less day-level positive spillover and increased negative spillover on the individual level.

Increase in Depressive Symptoms Related to Family Interactions

Changes were not only seen in interactions, but also in levels of depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms increased significantly by almost 40 percent during COVID-19, regardless of age. This signifies the severity of COVID-19’s impact on adolescent mental health, above and beyond any increase in depression typically seen in development (e.g., Salk et al., 2016). The occurrence of less positive and more negative interactions with family members significantly predicted depressive symptoms during COVID-19.

More Positive than Negative Interactions and a New Role for Siblings

The effects of the social changes wrought by the COVID-19 pandemic were not wholly negative, however. Overall, most kids reported five times more positive interactions than negative interactions. Importantly, having more positive interactions with family members was associated with smaller increases in depressive symptoms during COVID.

The effect of the pandemic on sibling relationships was also more positive. Few would be surprised to hear siblings had a high number of negative interactions – much higher compared to any other relationship. However, increased positive interactions without an increase in negative interactions with siblings was seen in older adolescents, suggesting that siblings can compensate at least somewhat for the decrease in in-person peer interactions.

Combined with prior research on siblings’ positive effects on mental health and loneliness (McHale, Updegraff, & Whiteman, 2012; Wikle, Ackert, & Jenson, 2019), these results suggest that the presence of siblings is beneficial during a time of social isolation .

In general, this research shines a light on how important peer interactions are for normative development and the necessity of ensuring children and adolescents are given opportunities to spend time, especially in-person, with peers.

Take-Home Points

• Family negativity predicted the increase in depressive symptoms during COVID-19. In families with more positive interactions, there was less of an increase.
• Siblings potentially functioned as a buffer for the social effects of quarantine for older adolescents.

Anna Leah Davis, a Yale undergraduate, contributed to the writing of this blog post.

Chahal, R., Kirshenbaum, J. S., Miller, J. G., Ho, T. C., & Gotlib, I. H. (2020). Higher executive control network coherence buffers against puberty-related increases in internalizing symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Biological Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.08.010

Chung, G. H., Flook, L., & Fuligni, A. J. (2011). Reciprocal associations between family and peer conflict in adolescents' daily lives. Child Development, 82, 1390–1396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01625.x

Ellis, W. E., Dumas, T. M., & Forbes, L. M. (2020). Physically isolated but socially connected: Psychological adjustment and stress among adolescents during the initial COVID-19 crisis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 52, 177-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000215

Flook, L., & Fuligni, A. J. (2008). Family and school spillover in adolescents’ daily lives. Child Development, 79, 776-787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01157.x

Gadassi Polack, R. Sened, H., Aubé, S., Zhang, A., Joormann, J., & Kober, H. (in press) Connections during Crisis: Adolescents’ social dynamics and mental health during COVID-19. Developmental Psychology.

Ghebreyesus, T.A. (2020). Addressing mental health needs: an integral part of COVID-19 response. World Psychiatry, 19, 129–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20768

Hankin, B. L., Stone, L., & Wright, P. A. (2010). Corumination, interpersonal stress generation, and internalizing symptoms: accumulating effects and transactional influences in a multiwave study of adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409990368

Kaufman, T. M., Kretschmer, T., Huitsing, G., & Veenstra, R. (2020). Caught in a vicious cycle? Explaining bidirectional spillover between parent-child relationships and peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 32, 11-20. doi: 10.1017/S0954579418001360.

Krishnakumar, A., & Buehler, C. (2000). Interparental conflict and parenting behaviors: A meta‐analytic review. Family Relations, 49, 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00025.x

Lam, C. B., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (2012). Parent–child shared time from middle childhood to late adolescence: Developmental course and adjustment correlates. Child Development, 83, 2089-2103. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01826.x

Larson, R., & Richards, M. H. (1991). Daily companionship in late childhood and early adolescence: Changing developmental contexts. Child Development, 62, 284-300. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131003

Larson, R. W., Richards, M. H., Moneta, G., Holmbeck, G., & Duckett, E. (1996). Changes in adolescents' daily interactions with their families from ages 10 to 18: Disengagement and transformation. Developmental Psychology, 32, 744–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.4.744

Mastrotheodoros, S., Van Lissa, C. J., Van der Graaff, J., Deković, M., Meeus, W. H., & Branje, S. J. (2020). Day-to-day spillover and long-term transmission of interparental conflict to adolescent–mother conflict: The role of mood. Journal of Family Psychology. doi: 10.1037/fam0000649.

McHale, S. M., Updegraff, K. A., & Whiteman, S. D. (2012). Sibling Relationships and Influences in Childhood and Adolescence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 74, 913–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01011.x

Orben, A., Tomova, L., & Blakemore, S. J. (2020). The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S2352-4642(20)30186-3

Salk, R. H., Petersen, J. L., Abramson, L. Y., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). The contemporary face of gender differences and similarities in depression throughout adolescence: Development and chronicity. Journal of Affective Disorders, 205, 28-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.071

Wikle, J. S., Ackert, E., & Jensen, A. C. (2019). Companionship patterns and emotional states during social interactions for adolescents with and without siblings. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 2190–2206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01121-z

Jutta Joormann, Ph.D ., is a professor of psychology at Yale University who studies risk factors for depression and anxiety disorders.

• Find a Therapist
• Find a Treatment Center
• Find a Psychiatrist
• Find a Support Group
• Find Teletherapy
• United States
• Brooklyn, NY
• Chicago, IL
• Houston, TX
• Los Angeles, CA
• New York, NY
• Portland, OR
• San Diego, CA
• San Francisco, CA
• Seattle, WA
• Washington, DC
• Asperger's
• Bipolar Disorder
• Chronic Pain
• Eating Disorders
• Passive Aggression
• Personality
• Goal Setting
• Positive Psychology
• Stopping Smoking
• Low Sexual Desire
• Relationships
• Child Development
• Therapy Center NEW
• Diagnosis Dictionary
• Types of Therapy

Understanding what emotional intelligence looks like and the steps needed to improve it could light a path to a more emotionally adept world.

• Affective Forecasting
• Neuroscience

Parenting in a pandemic: How to develop stronger family relationships during  COVID-19

Assistant Professor, Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, Associate Member, Department of Psychiatry, and Director of Childhood Anxiety and Regulations of Emotions (C.A.R.E.) Research Group, McGill University

Disclosure statement

Tina Montreuil has received funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), les Fonds de recherche du Québec - Société et culture (FRQSC), Fonds de recherche du Québec - Nature et technologie (FRQNT), the McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity (Mi4), McGill Social Sciences and Humanities Development Grants, and Le Récit.

McGill University provides funding as a member of The Conversation CA.

McGill University provides funding as a member of The Conversation CA-FR.

View all partners

The COVID-19 pandemic has undoubtedly affected us. It has increased our worries and concerns about physical health . COVID-19 has added to the existing challenges parents face, and has also created greater awareness surrounding the fragility of mental health.

Yet, the second wave has also paved the way for a larger discussion on ways to promote mental well-being .

As a researcher and a clinical psychologist, I lead a research group that investigates how emotion regulation, values and beliefs affect the development and inter-generational transmission of mental or behavioural disorders, and how these problems can impact educational achievement.

The Childhood Anxiety and Regulation of Emotions (C.A.R.E.) research group has developed a school-based program as well as a parenting program , both of which teach core coping skills that have been associated with resilience. Resilience is the capacity for an individual to remain engaged, available and optimistic instead of withdrawn, overwhelmed and defeated when faced with hardship and adversity.

Our research group believes that when parents are aware of their own emotional self-regulation, and when they can find space to structure meaningful family activities that promote mutual bonding, both they and their children are in a better position to learn core coping skills that will benefit individuals and family relationships.

Impact of the pandemic on family life

A recent report by the Australian Human Rights Commission investigated COVID-19-related concerns experienced by children aged five and older and emerging adults from January to April 2020. The report suggested that “mental health concerns resulting from COVID-19” and “impacts on family life” were among the top five concerns endorsed by youth.

Similarly, a July 2020 Statistics Canada report revealed three out of four parents experienced concerns and worries about balancing child care, their child’s schooling and their own professional work irrespective of the child’s age. More than half of parents surveyed reported greater difficulty managing their child’s emotions as well as their own.

The arising parenting challenges surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic may represent an opportune time for us to improve our resilience and model more adaptive strategies and skills. In turn, such skills can promote the development of resilient behaviours in our children.

Read more: How to build children's resilience, and your own, amid coronavirus unknowns

As the picture below illustrates, not everyone reacts in the same way to a given situation. The ability to manage strong negative emotions and shift our mindset to a more adaptive perspective can be developed at any age. Since our brain is most adept at performing a new task early in life, it’s most beneficial for people to become socialized in these fundamental life skills early. This will help children to become self-regulated, adaptive and thriving adults.

Parental emotions

Findings from our research group’s recent study , conducted with mothers, suggest that parents’ abilities to regulate their own emotions predicted how frequently and effectively they rely on supportive parenting practices. Supportive practices are things like comforting children when they experience negative emotions; engaging in problem-solving strategies aimed at reducing children’s distress; and discussing children’s emotional experiences with them. As such, these results suggest that supportive parenting is associated with children who are better at managing difficult emotions.

We also found that invalidating children’s emotional expression or ignoring or dismissing the child’s emotions contributed to poorer emotion regulation skills in children , and that such less-supportive parenting practices were linked to anxiety in adulthood. When parents themselves match or exceed their child’s emotions, they also offer less adaptive emotional coaching.

Parents may have heard the airplane safety tip to always don one’s own oxygen mask before helping a child: the same applies with emotional regulation. As parents, when we prioritize managing our own stress, tolerating greater uncertainty and engaging in self-care activities like exercise, good sleep hygiene and relaxation, this expands our capacity to respond calmly. This teaches our children that they too can cope and manage stress and related threats .

Supportive parenting is best achieved when a connected, caring and responsive relationship with children is fostered early on. Supportive parenting that builds resilience is comparable to an early investment that grows with time. It is key to create as many early positive and reinforcing experiences as possible.

Failure: An opportunity for growth

Parenting is difficult and striving for perfection is unrealistic and unattainable. We can instead chose to model that mistakes and failures can be a renewed opportunity for growth. Raising resilient children means that we value teaching them self-compassion, gratitude, delayed gratification and self worth to leverage life experiences that facilitate the development of their sense of purpose.

It is as critical for parents to value teaching children these core social emotional skills, just as much as we might encourage them to become expert swimmers or gifted mathematicians.

When supportive parenting and strong family relationships consistently provide opportunities to strengthen coping skills and the ability to regulate emotions, these are also opportunities for children to become skilled at accepting hardship and remaining committed toward achievement. Supportive parental practices contribute to children’s long-term healthy emotional and psychological development.

Parents can help their children develop these key social-emotional abilities in a variety of ways.

As a first step, parents should evaluate whether their own emotional and psychological needs are met and do their best to find, advocate for or create structures or supports to meet these. In return, they may gain the capacity to model these adaptive behaviours.

Parents can learn more about core coping skills like emotional regulation . This includes the ability to pay attention to and accept (not judge) our emotions, to label and differentiate emotions. It also means understanding varying levels of emotional intensity, to learn how to tolerate and be open to the experience of distressing emotions and to control our emotions by changing how we think about the situation at hand. Mindfulness and problem solving can also be easily taught through interactive read-along activities and lessons.

Regardless of a family’s structure, parents can improve family relationships and connectedness. They can do this by dedicating common time for the family members to congregate and bond with one another through activities like meal time, game or movie night and outdoor or sport activities.

Parents can work on identifying mutual family values through activities like developing a values coat of arms . Identifying mutual values can be useful when seeking to carve out time spent together based on identified commonalities and shared interests.

Adversity creates accidental opportunities to build skills to endure ongoing or future hardship. This is the essence of resilience: accepting that a door has closed behind us, and being optimistic about what awaits. By being more emotionally and mentally grounded as parents, parents can lead collectively stronger families. Let’s stay strong together!

• Mental health
• Adolescents
• Coronavirus
• Emotional regulation
• Family health
• Family relationships

Faculty of Law - Academic Appointment Opportunities

Operations Manager

Senior Education Technologist

Audience Development Coordinator (fixed-term maternity cover)

Lecturer (Hindi-Urdu)

Family Coping During the Coronavirus

• Posted April 16, 2020
• By Jill Anderson

As the world navigates the current pandemic, there has been a dramatic increase in how much time families are spending together, leading many parents and caregivers to feel pressured into being everything — parent, friend, teacher — for their child. Child developmental psychologist Junlei Li says it doesn’t have to be that way — and families can look to China’s working families for examples of how to find balance and support through the isolation.

“Being with your children doesn’t have to be yet another stressor, but can offer a sense of relief, even for grownups,” Li says. “Parents feel a lot of burden. They are not used to being with their kids all this time, especially with young children. Parents can feel the pressure of having to accompany them this whole time. Instead of trying to be everything at all times, think about the small, even brief, kind of quality moments of play we can have with our children.”

Li participated in work that was led and organized by the child development and family support research center of the China Welfare Institute , which has helped families during that country’s nationwide quarantine. In an ongoing series of “corona-fighting family wisdoms,” the initiative solicited coping strategies from both urban and rural families, and shared out the stories.

We asked Li to share three of these lessons from China for American families to adopt as they face extended time at home during the coronavirus.

Find ways to connect and share within and beyond your family

Children can pick up on the stress being felt by their caregivers, Li says. The China Welfare Institute tried not to add to growing stress levels, and instead focused on simple efforts at home.

“Instead of going out and telling parents — here are the top 10 things you need to do for your kid — they asked for videos and photos submissions of things parents and children are doing together,” Li says. The organization solicited and shared stories from a diverse range of families, providing a glimpse of what support can look like. The outcome stressed the value of families being able to connect and better understand their role in children’s lives. Li suggests that all families should find similar ways to enjoy being with each other that relieve pressure for all members of the family.

“Children process and deal with these things right along with grownups,” Li says.

Emphasize play over learning  

Despite the reputation of Chinese culture for its dedication to academic learning, Li reports that the China Welfare Institute deviated from that ideal by placing a larger emphasis on play.

Play provides a way for children to process their emotions, says Li. “Part of the richness of play is — playing either alone or playing together with other children or with us, with the grownups — it can start to meet children's developmental need,” he says. “Children need a way to express their own uncertainty, handle anxiety, and assert control.”

Families should plan time to play every day without trying too hard to drive the experience. Children should take the lead in thinking about how they want to play, what they want to play, and whom they want to play with. Although many children have limited opportunity right now, Li says families can create the environment where children can match their needs through play. 

Find ways to create new modes of learning

Li witnessed many families in China take advantage of learning through observation and doing, which has long been a part in rural and indigenous communities where children are often active participants in family life.

He suggests finding simple ways to let your child pitch in. Consider when children demand what they want or don’t want to eat and take advantage of this time to let children take part in cooking. For example, have children come up with something they want to cook with their parents and then eat it.  

Li adds that young children, in particular, really like to help. “They feel really important if they can pitch in,” he says. “Right now it almost seems more doable because there is so much more time since we’re stuck at home so it’s easier to incorporate.”

Along the way, Li says it helps restore some sense of control and agency in children too. “You know, for children right now, it’s ‘I can’t go to school, I can’t go outside, I can’t go to the playground,’” he says, “I can’t play all the time. … There’s a lot of ‘I can’t, I can’t. I can’t.’ Finding family appropriate ways for children to pitch in can turn into a ‘I can do this.’”

Ultimately, these small adjustments can help the whole family as everyone gets used to differences in their daily lives.

“As adults we can have quite a bit of empathy. I think for once we're in a situation where we’re very similar to children. We're uncertain. We're anxious. We don't know when this ends,” Li says.

Key Takeaways

• Focus on the simple pleasures that additional family time provides.
• Take time for play.
• Find ways for children to contribute around the house.

Usable Knowledge

Connecting education research to practice — with timely insights for educators, families, and communities

Related Articles

Making a Smooth Transition

Hope Amid Challenges in the COVID Era

Q+ A: Janhvi Kanoria, Ed.M.’10

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• My Account Login
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 06 January 2021

Responding to the pandemic as a family unit: social impacts of COVID-19 on rural migrants in China and their coping strategies

• Shuangshuang Tang   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3097-1903 1 , 2 &

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications volume  8 , Article number:  8 ( 2021 ) Cite this article

11k Accesses

29 Citations

16 Altmetric

Metrics details

In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has created tremendous chaos in people’s daily lives around the world. However, the related social impacts vary across social groups. Compared to people with abundant resources, the more disadvantaged tend to suffer greater negative social impacts from disasters. Although it is a crucial topic, there has been limited research on the social impacts of disastrous epidemics on uninfected people in developing countries. To bridge the gap, this study investigates the social impacts of the spread of COVID-19 on rural migrants and their coping strategies through face-to-face interviews with rural migrants in Nanjing, China. The household perspective is highlighted to explore how rural migrants deal with various threats induced by COVID-19 spread. The study finds that rural migrants suffered from serious social impacts due to COVID-19, especially during the associated lockdown period. Despite some similar impacts, influences of COVID-19 varied among rural migrants at different life-cycle stages, due to variations in human capital, family burdens, role in a household, and ability to find part-time work. Receiving little support from governments and employers, rural migrants tended to adopt household strategies to deal with difficulties related to COVID-19. Within a household, they assisted each other and worked as a unit to maximize resources and reduce risks. Traditional family values were highly praised by rural migrant households during the period. Findings also suggest that both central and local governments need to provide practical aid to this group and to improve the social security system for rural migrants.

Similar content being viewed by others

Integrating socio-cultural value system into health services in response to Covid-19 patients’ self-isolation in Indonesia

Yety Rochwulaningsih, Singgih Tri Sulistiyono, … Fajar Gemilang Purna Yudha

Socioeconomic impacts of COVID-19 in low-income countries

Anna Josephson, Talip Kilic & Jeffrey D. Michler

Immediate health and economic impact of the Tigray war on internally displaced persons and hosting households

Aregawi Gebreyesus, Afework Mulugeta, … Yibrah Alemayehu

Introduction

On January 23, 2020 (one day before China’s Spring Festival), Wuhan closed the city in order to control the spread of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). By January 25, 30 provinces in China initiated the “level one response” to major public health emergencies, which involved implementation of measures to control the spread of COVID-19 at the strictest level. In the context of lockdown, in urban communities and villages of China, a series of measures were carried out to prevent people from moving freely. Since the society is unequal, the strict control measures may have had different social impacts on different groups in the population. In particular, the severely restricted mobility of the population, either due to the lockdown or to fears of infection, may have deepened the existing gap between populations from rural and urban areas. In China, rural migrants are typically more disadvantaged than urban residents, due to the institutional barrier of the hukou system (residential registration system) and inequality in education, welfare, and social capital (Song et al., 2008 ; Yue et al., 2013 ). Thus, it is assumed that rural migrants in China, who were either trapped in their rural hometown or in destination cities during the period of COVID-19 spread that lasted from late January to early March, were more likely to experience risks and uncertainties and fall into difficult situations. In fact, it was reported that around 25 million rural migrants in China were either unemployed or waiting to return to work by the end of February; these migrants suffered sharp reductions in income and reduced job opportunities (International Labour Organization, 2020 ). In order to deal with the difficulties, rural migrants had to carry out a series of coping strategies in the absence of help from governments and employers.

In the existing research, it is widely accepted that disasters, including natural disasters and disastrous epidemics, are social events, the outcomes of which are associated with pre-existing social inequalities. Research in some western countries has focused on how ethnic people and minorities, who tend to be marginalized, deal with social impacts of disasters and adopt coping strategies that are distinct from those faced by the majority population. Typically, during and after disasters, these people are more likely to lose their incomes and homes (Zottarelli, 2008 ; Elliott and Paris, 2006 ), and have more difficulty in recovering from disasters (Peacock et al., 1997 ; Aptekar, 1990 ). Despite a body of relevant literature, research gaps remain. First, most studies have been concerned with the impacts of natural disasters (e.g. hurricane and earthquake) on differentiated social groups rather than the impacts of disastrous epidemics. Although a few studies have elaborated the topic by unfolding the impacts on infected people or their caregivers, such as nurses or doctors, the related influences on uninfected people are largely ignored in existing research. However, the risks of infection induced by disastrous epidemic on differentiated people may be different from those due to the direct impacts of natural disasters. In particular, lockdown, movement control, and social distancing associated with disastrous epidemics, however can directly result in negative consequences (i.e. loss of home and income) for the affected groups. Second, although a few COVID-19-related studies have been carried out in China, the differentiated social impacts of disasters and the qualitative nature of coping strategies have been little investigated in China, where the inequalities caused by institutional schemes and social class are obvious. Further, characteristics of Chinese culture, such as Confucian ideology, also give rise to distinct circumstances. Third, it is reported that disadvantaged people tend to take the entire family as a unit when they make decisions and cope with difficulties (Stark and Bloom, 1985 ). In the face of a severe public crisis such as COVID-19, a household strategy is vital for those who are neglected by the existing welfare system. Particularly among marginalized groups, family is an essential source of support to which individuals turn to relieve their suffering. Previous studies have referred to the importance of social capital in dealing with disasters, but little attention has been paid to this issue from the household perspective. A household approach to crisis is pervasive in China because family values are highly emphasized in traditional Chinese culture (Fei, 1983 ), but how such an approach affects the coping strategies of disadvantaged groups, such as rural migrants in China, remains underexplored.

Based on face-to-face in-depth interviews with rural migrants, this paper contributes to existing literature by focusing on the social impact of COVID-19 spread on rural migrants and their coping strategies in the Chinese setting. In particular, it emphasizes how household strategy is adopted by rural migrants in China to combat social impacts induced by the COVID-19 pandemic. By focusing on migrant groups in different life stages, the study also elaborates variations among rural migrants in China. This research not only extends theories about social inequalities by analyzing the social impacts of disastrous epidemics (COVID-19 pandemic) on a group of disadvantaged people, but also provides insights on policymaking for vulnerable people during and after disasters.

The remainder of this paper is organized into the following sections: A review of relevant research, a description of the data and research area, and an analysis of social impacts and coping strategies of rural migrant workers in China. The final section presents conclusions based on the study findings.

Literature review

Inequalities in the social impacts of disasters.

A disaster, whether a natural disaster or a disastrous epidemic such as Ebola or severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), is a crisis that can result in large-scale damage to people and hinder their recovery. It is acknowledged that disasters are social events that are linked with social processes and differentiated social groups (Peacock et al., 1997 ). In addition to physical and psychological impacts, disasters can exert social impacts on people, and people adopt various coping strategies to deal with disasters. The social impacts and coping strategies for disasters are determined not only by the event itself, but also by socio-economic features and different conditions under which people face those disasters (Blaikie et al., 1994 ). That is, social stratification shapes and differentiates the outcomes of disasters. More specifically, social impacts and coping strategies can vary among differentiated groups of people as a result of pre-existing social inequalities. In existing research, the social impacts of disaster are typically found to be worse for marginalized groups.

In many countries, marginalized groups are distinguished from the majority population by race, ethnicity, or class, and they are often poorly integrated into mainstream societies. The majority of marginalized people are working in low-end manual labor sectors with low incomes, and many are employed only part-time or even unemployed (Fothergill et al., 1999 ; Elliott and Paris, 2006 ). As a consequence, when a disaster occurs, these groups tend to have insufficient resources and tend to be neglected by authorities, making it impossible for them to minimize the associated negative influences or to recover quickly. In general, marginalized groups in each society vary on the basis of local social, economic, cultural, and political contexts (Che et al., 2020 ). For instance, in the USA or Western Europe, the term “socially disadvantaged group” often refers to those who are minorities (e.g. Blacks), who lack legal status (e.g. illegal immigrants), or who have specific religious beliefs (e.g. Muslins), while in countries such as China or India, sharp rural–urban divisions and associated institutional barriers have made the plight of internal migrants, i.e. rural-to-urban migrants, the concern of the public and governments (Che et al., 2020 ; Rahman, 2020 ).

Empirical studies have explored the social impacts of disasters on marginalized people, and migrants in particular, through a variety of lenses. First, it is understood that disaster may damage local economies and result in job loss, due to migrations out of the impact zone, relevant financial crises, and disrupted workplaces. Normally, marginalized people have a higher chance of losing their jobs after a disaster because their jobs are not only low-paying, but also relatively unstable, especially when businesses close or move after a disaster (Morrow, 1999 ). For instance, black workers were more likely to suffer job loss than their white counterparts after Hurricane Katrina (Zottarelli, 2008 ; Elliott and Paris, 2006 ), and the frequently changing residence by ethnic group after a hazard is negatively associated with high-level and stable employment (Zottarelli, 2008 ). Large disparities between African-Americans and whites are also observed in the loss of full-time employment status after a disastrous storm (Chaganti and Waddell, 2015 ).

Second, disaster may cause housing instability, including loss of home, resettlement, and moving. Marginalized people may encounter more serious housing problems in the context of a disaster. Dwellings of marginalized people are more likely to sustain greater damage during a disaster because their dwellings are often poorly maintained and located in disadvantaged locations that bear the brunt of the disasters (Morrow, 1999 ). Meanwhile, low-income people and minorities have more difficulty finding housing after a disaster (Bolin and Stanford, 1998 ; Bolton et al., 1993 ). That is probably because the quantity of affordable housing normally shrinks and demand increases in a housing market after a disaster, which could reduce the housing available to the marginalized population, adding to the precarity of their socio-economic situations (Pais and Elliott, 2008 ; Masozera et al., 2007 ). Moreover, it is generally easier for landlords to evict low-income tenants as compared to higher-income tenants. As a consequence, lower-income people have to move more frequently (Haas et al., 1977 ) and, after a disaster, a large share of them move to local shelters and have no homes to return to (Brodie et al., 2006 ). Even among homeowners, substantial class disparities in social impacts exist. It is observed that, after a hurricane, low-income homeowners are less likely to return to their pre-disaster homes and need more assistance than affluent homeowners (Elliott and Paris, 2006 ).

In addition to effects on employment and housing, disasters have other long-lasting influences on disadvantaged groups, making it difficult for these groups to recover. For instance, after natural disasters, ethnic populations are more likely to receive insufficient settlement amounts and insurance payouts, and be left out of distributions by formal aid networks, thereby slowing down the recovery process (Peacock et al., 1997 ; Aptekar, 1990 ). After Hurricane Andrew, the recovery from the storm was slower and more difficult for minority populations, which can be explained by limited human capital, inadequate insurance payouts, lack of financial resources, and governmental neglect (Dash et al., 2007 ). Moreover, marginalized people commonly have difficulty in applying for governmental loans because governmental disaster recovery programs tend to reject applicants who have low incomes and low credit ratings (Masozera et al., 2007 ). Additionally, during the spread of disastrous epidemics, marginalized people tend to be less aware of the channels through which they can seek assistance and their needs are often ignored (Sastry and Dutta, 2017 ).

Migrant household strategies

It has been argued that decisions are often not made by an isolated individual, but by the entire household (Stark, 1991 ). People’s planning and decision-making are often made in consideration of family needs and household interactions (Ryan et al., 2009 ). In line with this, people may adopt strategies to cope with difficulties by taking the entire household as a unit, for taking care of the well-being of individuals within the family, via approaches including reciprocity and affections. The household strategy is particularly pervasive among disadvantaged families, including in migrant populations, since such families typically lack institutional mechanisms to guarantee household benefits and to minimize household risks (Gubhaju and de Jong, 2009 ). The household strategy approach focuses on social actors in a household and it is a “bottom up” perspective (Wallace, 2002 ).

Empirical studies have found that household strategies are often used by disadvantaged people to cope with difficulties, including disasters and unemployment. This is especially true for migrants from underdeveloped countries with large rural populations, such as China and India. The informal or disadvantaged status (e.g., the lack of local hukou or belonging to a lower caste ) and limited personal capacities (lower educational level and lack of marketable skills) of rural-to-urban migrants in these countries can constrain their eligibility to receive public benefits and limit their abilities to combat negative social impacts of disasters. Accordingly, it was reported that, as the COVID-19 pandemic spread, rural migrants in these countries were fast becoming some of the populations subject to the most suffering (Che et al., 2020 ; Rahman, 2020 ). They were experiencing severe threats to health, worsened living environments, and poverty.

It is observed that disadvantaged people such as migrants tend to rely on kinship networks when they experience disasters. Although it is argued that extended families are too poorly organized to effectively respond to disasters, disadvantaged people are inclined to depend on family members’ help rather than help from others (Clifford, 1956 ). Among the disadvantaged, support from informal kinship networks is frequently used to respond to a disaster (Messias et al., 2012 ; Richards et al., 2015 ). In addition to its use in coping with disasters, a household strategy is also adopted by disadvantaged people when they encounter economic recession and unemployment. For instance, kinship networks are an important means for migrants to find employment opportunities (Sacchetto and Vianello, 2015 ). Refugees also turn to family members to help them find jobs—typically unskilled and low-paying—in an unfamiliar environment (Ray, 2018 ). In order to deal with uncertainties, migrants tend to reinforce their kinship networks and fulfill family obligations to other family members within a household (Ryan, 2004 ). In the context of economic recession, childcare is often arranged by two working parents in the form of work shifts, and extended family members also provide childcare and housing to support each other (Pratt and Hanson, 1991 ). Informal and domestic work also play a role in the arrangement of work practices in a disadvantaged family (Pahl, 1984 ; Mingione, 1994 ).

Moreover, compared to other disadvantaged groups, migrant families often adopt a split-household strategy because they can benefit from the migrant’s earnings in the destination while maintaining economic and social resources in the hometown (Fan and Li, 2020 ). Despite living in destinations for long periods, many migrants still maintain links with their origins and hold open the possibility of return (Mberu et al., 2013 ). In Britain, Polish migrants take into account both economic and emotional factors when they consider whether to separate or reunite family members (Ryan and Sales, 2013 ). Household strategies are also found in Italy among Ukrainian grandmothers who support their grandchildren by sending back remittances (Marchetti and Venturini, 2013 ).

In China, migrant families also adopt a household strategy for combating crisis. Family in China has been treated as the basic unit for coping with crises or threats, and the underdeveloped welfare system in China has further enhanced the importance of family for individuals. Therefore, mutual assistance within the family are common practices. For instance, a household strategy is applied by migrants when deciding whether to bring children to cities or leave them behind. Constrained by high living costs in cities and difficulties accessing local public schools, migrant parents often send children back to the origin under the care of grandparents, or arrange to have one parent supervise the children’s schooling in the hometown, while the other one continues to work outside to support the family financially (Unger and Siu, 2019 ). Grandparents also engage in household strategies in that they provide childcare and undertake domestic work to support their migrant children (Tang, 2020 ). Cultural traditions, including patricentric thinking and filial piety, have dominated familial decision-making and the functioning of household strategy (Lee, 2015 ; Qi, 2018 ). For instance, patricentric thinking, that is, an emphasis on the benefits and responsibilities of sons for family development, has led to gender differences in the familial domain and made males both the beneficiaries of family assets and the major bearers of family obligations (Qi, 2018 ). Although it is true that gender equality is slowly increasing in contemporary China, many rural families still subscribe to patricentric thinking, which directly affects interactions between parents and children, between siblings and between spouses. For instance, in a heterosexual married couple, the male is regarded as the major provider for the family, while the female is considered to be responsible for domestic activities. Also, notions of filial piety and family cohesion, which emphasize collectivism and the obedience of junior family members to senior members, tend to increase the willingness (or decrease the resistance) of individuals to sacrifice their own benefits for the welfare of the family (Lee, 2015 ). Therefore, in the context of the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, traditional family values in China are very likely to impact an individual’s approach to cope with risks and disasters, which may make their response patterns distinct from those of their counterparts in other countries and cultures.

Social vulnerability and rural migrants in China

Social vulnerability, normally measured by individual characteristics such as age, race, gender, occupation, income, and citizenship status, is a product of social inequalities that influence the ability to respond to various types of disasters (Cutter et al., 2003 ; Blaikie et al., 1994 ; Stanturf et al., 2015 ). Due to the inequalities in resources, some people have a higher vulnerability to disasters and greater difficulty recovering from disasters (Durant, 2011 ).

In the Chinese context, rural migrants are often considered vulnerable people when they are in urban areas. Since the mid-1980s, vast numbers of laborers have been migrating from rural hometowns to cities in pursuit of employment opportunities. Despite working and living in cities, the so-called rural migrants often encounter unequal treatment and fall into vulnerable situations. First, the working conditions of rural migrants are normally disadvantaged. Due to the hukou system, rural migrants who hold rural hukou are likely to be excluded from some urban industries and from urban social welfare programs (Wong et al., 2007 ). For them, employment in manual, private or informal sectors is prevalent. In addition, they are inclined to encounter forms of discrimination in the urban labor market, such as lower wages, delays in wage payment, long working hours and unwritten contracts (Li, 2010 ; Demurger et al., 2009 ). The urban labor market is highly segregated (Chan et al., 1999 ). Due to limited human capital caused by inequalities in education, rural migrants tend to engage in low-end manual work and the job mobility of this social group remains very low (Wong et al., 2007 ). This further results in significant wage differences from their urban counterparts (Zhang et al., 2016 ; Cai and Du, 2011 ).

Second, rural migrants tend to encounter housing problems in cities. Due to the hukou system, rural migrants are excluded from urban housing welfare, including government-subsidized affordable housing (Wang and Murie, 2000 ). The urban housing sector only offers limited choices for rural migrants (Wu, 2002 ). In the urban housing market, available housing for rural migrants is quite scarce and this group typically takes low-skilled and low-income jobs. As a consequence, the majority of rural migrants cannot afford to rent good-quality private housing (Wong et al., 2007 ). Employer-provided dormitories and housing in old neighborhoods or urban villages are major sources of housing for rural migrants (Wu, 2002 ; Li and Duda, 2010 ). These living places usually have poor living standards, such as crowded living spaces, inadequate facilities, and lack of security and public community space (Song et al., 2008 ). In addition, the residential areas of rural migrants are often isolated from those of urban residents (Zhu, 2016 ), resulting in the creation of a residential “invisible wall” between the host society and rural migrant workers in cities (Chan and Buckingham, 2008 ).

Third, rural migrant workers usually have limited social security and medical benefits. Due to the hukou system, rural migrants have long been excluded from urban social security systems such as pension benefits, medical insurance, and unemployment insurance. Despite reforms of social security programs by some local governments in recent decades, employers still tend to pay their rural migrant employees only a low level of benefits or none at all (Wang, 2011 ), which means that rural migrants can benefit only minimally from social insurance in cities. More generally, the coverage of urban welfare and insurance programs is highly selective (Huang and Guo, 2017 ) and varies among people with different human capital and occupational status (Qin et al., 2015 ). In Chinese cities, a large number of rural migrants are employed in unstable jobs in the informal sector, where their social security rights are usually not protected. Therefore, the participation rate of rural migrants in urban insurance programs is much lower than that of their urban counterparts (Wong et al., 2007 ).

To summarize, although studies have analyzed the social impacts of natural disasters on disadvantaged people in the USA, Africa, and elsewhere, little attention has been paid to the social impacts of disastrous epidemics on disadvantaged people in China in particular. Additionally, the indirect consequences of disastrous epidemics on disadvantaged people rather than infected people has been little explored. Moreover, since disadvantaged people tend to consider the entire family as a unit when they deal with difficulties, the household perspective needs to be highlighted. To bridge these gaps in existing research, this paper investigates the social impacts of the spread of COVID-19 on rural migrants and their coping strategies in the Chinese setting.

Study area and data

Nanjing is adopted as the study area of this paper. Nanjing, located in the eastern coastal region of China, is the capital of Jiangsu province and the sub-center of Yangtze River Delta. Due to its fast-growing economy, Nanjing has become a developed city, attracting a considerable number of migrants from rural areas inside and outside Jiangsu province. In 2018, Nanjing had 8.44 million permanent residents, of which migrants accounted for ~20 per cent. In addition, unlike manufacturing-based cities, the gross domestic product (GDP) of Nanjing’s service sector accounted for around 60 per cent of the total GDP. These statistics indicate that Nanjing not only accommodates numerous rural migrants, but also attracts rural migrants engaged in diversified sectors. Thus, Nanjing is an ideal city to investigate the thoughts and behaviors of rural migrants.

On January 24 (just one day after the lockdown of Wuhan), Nanjing initiated a “level one response” to control the spread of COVID-19. Since then, Nanjing has carried out a series of measures, including the shutoff of large-scale activities, the closure of public facilities and parks, strict health quarantine, disinfection management of public spaces, and strict control of urban communities. Due to the strict measures, a number of workplaces where rural migrants tend to work, including factories, restaurants, and shops, were closed. In addition, many rural migrants were trapped in their rural hometowns for one or several months because of the lockdown of villages and the strict control of intercity traffic. Moreover, despite the transfer from “level one response” to “level two response” on February 24 in Nanjing, economic and human activities had not yet recovered. That is to say, rural migrants were affected for longer than one month, even though some of them did not return to their home villages.

Research data and materials for this study are interspersed with face-to-face in-depth interviews conducted with rural migrants working and living in Nanjing for at least half of the year. Because the COVID-19 control measures have gradually eased and many rural migrants have returned to work since March, the interviews were carried out from April to July. Finally, we interviewed 29 rural migrants. The participants were recruited through a variety of channels, including local survey associations, snowballing and the authors’ own networks. Since this research was designed to display coping strategies of rural migrants in different life stages in the context of COVID-19, age, gender, marital status, occupation, and rural origins were considered when recruiting the respondents. The age of participants in our interviews ranged from 20 to 60 years. Fourteen participants were female, which accounted for almost 50 per cent of the total participants. Among the respondents, 14 were single and most of them were younger than 30. Fifteen were married, who were mainly middle aged or older and had one or more children. Specifically, seven participants were younger migrants with young children and eight were older migrants with adult children. We mainly focused on participants who work in certain labor sectors, such as construction, manufacturing, and services. The occupation selection of respondents refers to the report from the 2019 Rural Migrants’ Survey conducted by the National Bureau of Statistics (National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China, 2020 ). The majority of these occupations are low-end manual labor, a sector that has undergone serious disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic, due to social distancing, movement controls, and public concerns about transmission of the virus. These measures and public perceptions had direct impacts on the industries in which our respondents work. As a result, rural migrant workers became one of the social groups in China that suffered the most during the pandemic (Che et al., 2020 ; International Labour Organization, 2020 ).

All of the interviews were conducted face-to-face, using a semi-structured interview schedule. Interview topics mainly included the socio-economic backgrounds of respondents (including their employment, income, and social interactions within and outside their families), their experiences and coping strategies before, during and after the period of COVID-19 spread, and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on their lives. The interviews employed a life narrative methodology (Andrews et al., 2006 ), which allows each participant to state their views and experiences before, during, and after the spread of COVID-19. Each participant not only talked about their personal experiences, but also told the stories of their entire families during the period. Each interview lasted for one to two hours. All interviews were audio recorded and subsequently transcribed verbatim, enabling content analysis of the transcription. To guarantee the anonymity of respondents in the analysis, the quotations are accompanied by gender, age, and a fictitious name.

Social impact and coping strategy

During and after the spread of COVID-19, Chinese governments have been inclined to provide aid to enterprises and households below the local poverty level. Nevertheless, the current social welfare system cannot fully provide for all needs, including the needs of rural migrants dealing with disasters such as COVID-19. Rural migrants are typically neither eligible for urban welfare programs, as they have no local hukou or insurance-covered formal jobs in destination cities, nor qualified for related home village assistance, since their incomes are normally above the rural poverty level in their hometowns. As a consequence, despite experiencing difficult times, they must rely on themselves to a large extent.

Previous studies show that disadvantaged people tend to consider benefits to the household when they make decisions in response to challenges, in order to maximize resources and avoid risks (Stark and Bloom, 1985 ). Therefore, it is assumed that disadvantaged people will adopt household strategies when encountering disasters. In the Chinese setting, the household strategy may be pervasively adopted among rural migrants because the Confucian ideology that is embedded in traditional Chinese culture praises family harmony highly. Following this ideology, family is the basic unit of society. A person is not only an individual, but also a member of a family (Wong and Ahuvia, 1998 ). For an individual, family is essential to survival and achievement (Cao et al., 2011 ). Supporting family members is a moral obligation and an aspect of personal integrity. When disasters occur, it is possible that rural migrants have a sense of family duty and solidarity. Thus, in this paper, the household perspective is highlighted to investigate the coping strategies of rural migrants in the Chinese setting.

Social impacts and coping strategies may vary among rural migrants at different stages of the life-cycle, probably due to differences in human and social resources, roles in a household and other capabilities. In this paper, we attend to the experiences of participants at different life-cycle stages. Since marriage and child-rearing are important household events and tasks across the life-courses of rural migrants that significantly influence their decisions (Fan, 2009 ), rural migrants can be categorized into three groups, including single migrants, younger migrant couples with young children and older migrant couples with adult children. In the paper, the participants’ narratives were organized based on this classification. The analysis of participants’ narratives enables a comprehensive understanding of the experiences of rural migrants at different life-cycle stages during the period of COVID-19 spread.

Single migrants: children under one “roof”

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic had direct influences on the job opportunities and incomes of rural migrants. For younger generations of rural migrants, it not only resulted in severe economic constraints, but also caused severe disruptions to their housing situations and financial conditions. Given the absence of social welfare assistance and employers’ subsidies, the younger generation, especially migrants who were in their 20s and had limited savings, had to rely on family members such as parents and siblings to live through these difficulties.

In China, rural migrants normally get married at an earlier age than their urban peers. Most single participants in this study are in their 20s. The major social impact of COVID-19 on singles is related to their employment. Most single respondents reported that their income dropped sharply during the period of COVID-19 spread. Due to the strict controls in the city, many workplaces of young rural migrants were forced to shut down for several months. Although those workplaces were gradually reopened after the strict movement controls were relaxed, business was worse than before because most customers avoided going to central public spaces such as restaurants and shops. Meanwhile, orders from factories declined significantly due to the decrease in demand in the market. At the same time, due to the lockdown of villages and strict control of intercity traffic, a number of rural migrants were trapped in their hometowns for several months. Without private cars, most of them had to wait for public transport to resume, which occurred after roads were reopened to private cars. They were thus unable to return to work, even after their workplaces re-opened. As a result, their earnings largely declined. The majority of them had basic wages or no wages, and some of them even lost their jobs due to cost cutting by their employers.

“We are normally quite busy during the Spring Festival, but most customers canceled their reservations this year. We only received very few customers each day. At that time, every day the work was cleaning the restaurant…In early February, the restaurant was closed. When it reopened in April, some of our staff were not told that they could return to work.” (Mr. Xie, waiter, age 24)

The negative influences of COVID-19 on single migrants’ employment have extended into their other life domains. First, they were at risk of being homeless in urban destinations. This situation is different from the one that occurs after natural disasters, when high housing demand and sharp shrinkage of housing resources creates a gap between supply and demand (Pais and Elliott, 2008 ; Masozera et al., 2007 ). During and after the spread of COVID-19 in China, there have been sufficient housing resources to meet the needs of migrants, but some single rural migrants have not been able to afford the rents or continue living in former employer-provided dormitories due to shrinking earnings and job loss. Compared to older migrants, single rural migrants are more likely to have unstable jobs and little savings, which exacerbates their instabilities. The situation becomes more serious when encountering a disaster such as COVID-19. Consequently, some of them had to move out of their former “decent homes” to temporary living places with worse living conditions.

“I waited for my salary to pay my rent, but I did not get the salary. The landlord called the police and kicked me out…I finally found a job delivering take-out food, and they provided a dormitory for me to live in temporarily.” (Mr. Xie, deliveryman, age 24)

“I used to live in the dormitory of a hotel. Due to the virus, the hotel had little business, so they let me go. I had to look for a short-term hostel to stay in.” (Mr. Xu, waiter, age 33)

Second, the group of single respondents were at greater financial risks than other migrant groups. Young and single rural migrants normally earn little and have negligible savings, but they tend to spend a lot on purchasing fancy goods (e.g. designer clothes and famous brand cosmetics) like their urban peers. This is probably because they are influenced by modern media, and a large share of them work in the service industry, enabling them to have more encounters with urban culture (Tang et al., 2020 ). To meet their demands for consumption and to make ends meet, they take out loans from online platform credit companies such as huabei , which they are normally able to pay off monthly. However, their jobs were seriously affected by COVID-19, resulting in salary suspension, shrinking salaries, or job loss. Hence, some of them had no capacity to pay off their loans, causing tremendous mental stress.

“When I have income, I can pay off the loans each month. But this year, I stayed at my rural home and had no salary for three months, so I cannot afford to pay off my loans…I felt quite stressed because huabei called me to tell me to pay off the loans constantly and I had to pay the increasing interest if I delayed.” (Miss Wang, make-up assistant, age 26)

In order to deal with the chaos associated with COVID-19, single migrant respondents adopted various strategies. For them, their parents’ home functioned as a “roof,” sheltering them from the chaos induced by the pandemic. In light of traditional Chinese culture, unmarried migrants are still considered children under the “roof” of their parents’ home. This means they are cared for and protected by their parents and siblings. Thus, kinship networks typically played an important role during the crisis. Those trapped in rural hometowns normally had their basic needs, such as food, provided for by their parents. Hence, during the period of lockdown, they did not need to worry about their survival in home villages. In addition to obtaining basic necessities from their parents in home villages, many single migrant respondents reported that their family cohesion was enhanced during the period. First, they perceived the fact of being trapped at home for several months as a chance for them to enjoy a family reunion after years of family separation that they had undergone to make a living in cities. Second, the main family concern during the period (from late January to early March) had been how this pandemic would affect the health and economic situations of family members. Since mutual reliance among family members was the major and sometimes only strategy that they could rely on during the outbreak, family bonds were strengthened.

Meanwhile, in addition to receiving assistance in home villages, those who had siblings and returned to cities during the period of COVID-19 spread found their siblings willing to help them. As newcomers, young rural migrants tend to move to cities where their siblings or relatives live. They also pay particular attention to kinship networks in their daily lives. In this way, they can rely on kinship networks to somewhat offset the insufficiency of social capital in unfamiliar surroundings and to combat difficulties caused by unstable income and inadequate social security in cities. Also, among most rural migrants, affection among siblings is highly praised, which is influenced by the strong family values embedded in Confucian ideology. Therefore, younger brothers and sisters respect and support their elder siblings. In the context of the spread of COVID-19 in China, kinship support played an especially crucial role in coping with difficulties for single migrants. In addition, related challenges of COVID-19 motivated many single migrants to relocate to cities that are closer to their parents or where their siblings or relatives live. Both single migrants and their family members believe that single migrants can cope with difficulties more easily under the one “roof” of the family because they can receive support from their parents and siblings.

“My older sister was married. She bought an apartment and settled down in Nanjing. When I returned to work from our hometown this year, I visited my sister’s home once a week. My sister said that I can live with her if I have no place to stay.” (Miss Qi, shop assistant, age 27)

“My older sister lives in Nanjing. She treats me like my half-mother. When she heard that I cannot pay off my loans because of my salary reduction, she gave me the money.” (Miss Wang, make-up assistant, age 26)

“I used to work in Chongqing, but due to the virus, my parents have encouraged me to work in Nanjing because it is much closer to my rural hometown.” (Mr. Shi, waiter, age 20)

During the period of COVID-19 spread, single rural migrants were not only the recipients of help from their parents and elder siblings; as the young labor force in their families, they also supported their parents and helped them with difficulties. Compared to their parents, single rural migrants are normally better-educated and can more easily access information through social media. This enables them to offer help to their parents during difficult times, including through information and instrumental help. Moreover, since their parents also experienced financial loss due to COVID-19, some single migrants even provided financial support. By assisting each other, family members worked as a unit to overcome the disaster.

“During the period of strict control, it was really hard to buy a mask. But I know some friends who have mask resources and I bought some for my parents who were in our hometown…I also told them how to protect themselves.” (Mr. Yang, factory worker, age 27)

“My parents are poorly educated, so I am responsible for the expenses of my family. During the period of virus spread, I controlled the expenses and avoided unnecessary consumption.” (Mr. Gao, chef, age 23)

“My parents have a little butcher’s shop. Because of the virus, their business is bad. Hence, I often use my salary to buy some food to share their financial burdens.” (Miss Li, shop assistant, age 20)

Younger migrant couples with young children: burden-sharing among spouses and support from elder parents

As with the single migrants discussed above, for young migrant couples, the major hazards induced by COVID-19 are job loss and reduced income. However, couples’ situations are more complicated than those of singles because couples have children to raise and mortgages to pay. Therefore, younger migrant couples have to rearrange the roles of a husband and wife, and some of them even have to rely on assistance from their parents to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic.

During the interviews, we found that most young migrant couples earn higher salaries than single rural migrants due to work experience and qualifications. As skilled workers, they tended to retain their jobs during the period of COVID-19 spread, but their earnings declined sharply. Many participants mentioned that a sharp decline in earnings caused them serious stress and unease. First, they usually bear heavy family burdens, especially their expenses related to their children. Second, despite working in cities for a long time, they are still disadvantaged due to institutional barriers and limited resources. Therefore, when COVID-19 occurs, they are inclined to feel vulnerable and helpless in cities.

“Due to the virus, I had no salary for two months. I felt quite stressed those days because I have two kids; one is four and the other is two. And I have the mortgage on my apartment. I have to earn money.” (Mr. Li, office worker, aged 41)

“The restaurant was closed for three months. I had no salary if I did not work. My wife also had no salary. I felt very stressed. I could not stay at home and wait.” (Mr. He, chef, aged 31)

In addition to the impacts on salaries, COVID-19 also influences the family plans of younger migrant couples. After having children and working in cities for a period of time, most young migrant couples begin to think about long-term household plans, such as children’s education, buying a house, and where they might want to settle. However, for rural migrants, institutional barriers and low human capital typically lead to unstable working and living conditions in cities (Lu and Zhou, 2008 ; Qian and Li, 2013 ). The sudden spread of COVID-19 tended to change their former plans because it brought about more uncertainties. As a consequence, young migrant couples had to delay or modify their visions for the near future to reduce risks.

“We planned to purchase an apartment in suburban Nanjing, but now we have to delay the plan because we are uncertain about our jobs in the future. If we lose our jobs, we cannot afford the housing loans.” (Mrs. Zhang, hotel assistant, age 34)

“My son is five. He has to go to primary school in the near future. We intended to purchase an apartment in Nanjing for his education, but it would cause us too much stress now. Probably, we will return to the county, near our rural hometown, to settle down, and my son can go to a good primary school there.” (Mrs. Zhong, waitress, age 28)

Compared to singles, young migrant couples had greater family burdens and adopted different strategies to deal with difficulties. They tried their best to increase income by seeking part-time jobs. They also rearranged the division of labor in their households and controlled costs with the help of family members inside the household. As opposed to staying at home and waiting for their workplaces to reopen, younger migrant couples more often actively searched for new job opportunities. Nevertheless, due to the difficulty of finding stable jobs, they tended to search for part-time jobs during the period of COVID-19 spread, often with the goal of simply being able to feed their families. There was a clear notion of gender difference reflected in ideas of who within the family should continue to work during the period. Normally, the arrangement followed the patricentric notion that husbands should work outside so that the family can cope with financial difficulties, whereas wives should stay at home to care for their young children. The shutdown of shops and restaurants during the period led to a sharp increase in delivery services and labor in this sector was in great demand, which helped to absorb redundant migrant labor from closed shops and factories. In addition, online platforms now make it easier to access part-time job opportunities than it was in the past. Male and married migrants were able to find part-time jobs and obtain daily pay in delivery-related sectors. Some of them even took two jobs to make a living. Despite low wages, these jobs helped young migrant couples to make it through the most difficult times.

“When the restaurant was closed, I delivered take-out food. The wage is low, but it can cover the basic living costs of my family.” (Mr. He, chef, age 31)

“I found two jobs through internet: one is to deliver take-out food and the other is to clean windows, air-conditioning systems, and range hoods.” (Mr. Wang, cleaner, age 41)

In addition to searching for temporary jobs to deal with shrinking salaries, younger migrant couples control their expenses. They largely reduced the recreation costs and expenses on consumer goods. Moreover, some of younger migrant couples plan to find stable jobs in the future. In urban China, most rural migrants are employed in private and informal workplaces where the employers tend to offer a low level of social insurance or none at all, in order to limit costs (Wang, 2011 ). In the past, rural migrants accepted higher salaries in lieu of social insurance, but during the period of COVID-19 spread, their basic salaries and welfares could not be guaranteed. Consequently, they began to think more about the importance of stability for their families. Nevertheless, the urban labor market is segregated (Chan et al., 1999 ) and it is still difficult for them to find a stable job.

“When we had no salary, we only bought food. In order to reduce expenses, we didn’t buy other things…I want to find a more stable job in a restaurant run by the government. At least they can provide basic salary and welfare…but this kind of job is hard to find.” (Mr. He, chef, aged 31)

While younger migrant couples make their own efforts to cope with difficulties, they also receive help from their parents. The major form of support from parents is care for young children. Rural migrants tend to work overtime and are low-paid. In addition, due to institutional barriers, migrant children are normally unable to access local public schools in cities (Huang et al., 2020 ). Although the problems of “left-behind” children have become obvious and the relationship between parents and children may be affected negatively (Unger and Siu, 2019 ), many younger migrant couples have to leave their children behind in the countryside, especially in difficult times. The responsibility of caring for the children is thus turned over to the children’s grandparents in the home village.

“Now, my mother helps me care for my son in our rural hometown. Bringing my son to Nanjing would increase our living costs, and due to the requirements of my job, I have no time to look after him…I gave money to my mother, but she didn’t use it and she returned it to me. She knows we are now facing difficulties in the city.” (Mrs. Wang, hotel assistant, age 34)

“My mother now cares for my two children in our hometown. I telephone them twice a week. Without children, I can live in a free dormitory to save money.” (Mr. Yang, gatekeeper, age 30)

Some parents of the younger migrant couples would join to provide childcare for their grandchildren. They have to leave their familiar surroundings and live with their sons or daughters in crowded and shabby living spaces in old urban neighborhoods or urban villages. In addition to childcare, parents also take up domestic work like cooking and cleaning at home to ease the heavy burdens on younger migrant couples.

“My husband is quite busy. I usually work until very late and I have to work on the weekends. My mother-in-law helps us in Nanjing by looking after our son.” (Mrs. Zhong, waitress, age 28)

Instead of receiving remittances from children, some parents provide younger migrant couples financial support, even if the parents are in marginalized conditions themselves. In general, in traditional Chinese culture, Confucian ideology praises family values. When encountering disasters, the sense of solidarity appears to become stronger. In their arrangement of household labors, family members of rural migrants observed traditional distinctions between male and female roles, and between the roles of young couples and their parents.

Older migrant couples having adult children: maintaining a precarious life

Compared to the younger generation, older rural migrants typically have more years of working and personal experiences. Nevertheless, in terms of the labor market, they have relatively low levels of human capital, and they typically perform manual labor in the construction industry or work as cleaners or maids in cities. As with rural migrants in other stages of the life-cycle, their jobs have been seriously impacted by COVID-19. Construction sites in cities were shut down for several months. In the service sector, a number of families fired their maids and nannies because they were worried about being infected. In addition, compared to the younger cohort, older rural migrants are not familiar with searching for jobs through online platforms. As a result, most of them stayed at home with little or no earnings during the period of COVID-19 spread. They were likely to suffer more than the younger generation.

“I used to work for three families, but due to the virus, two of them did not let me continue. Now I only work three hours each day…I have been in the market for a new job, waiting to find one, but I haven’t found one yet.” (Mrs. Shi, hourly maid, age 53)

“I stayed in Nanjing and didn’t return to my hometown. I kept my job. But my husband’s work was seriously affected. He has two jobs, one delivering goods from a furniture store and another decorating apartments. But due to the virus, he did not work for two months and had no wages.” (Mrs. Fang, gatekeeper, age 44)

During the period of COVID-19 spread, older migrant couples not only experienced sharp reductions in incomes, but also faced stress caused by significant financial obligations. It is thought that older migrant couples encounter fewer financial difficulties because they normally retain a strong notion for saving more and spending less in preparation for family crisis resulted from sickness or unemployment, due to the absence of associated social welfare supports. Nevertheless, most of the older migrants still bear heavy burdens. Mainly, these are of two kinds. First, they may still need to pay the living expenses of their adult children. In China, children of rural migrants tend to obtain a lower level of education than their urban peers, and have difficulty securing white-collar jobs with good pay in cities. Thus, in order to reduce costs, many unmarried adult migrants in cities live with their parents, who cover the living costs of the entire household. Moreover, because their offspring are low paid, some parents even provide money to support them. Second, older migrants also need to pay off loans for the marriage of their children, especially their sons. In the minds of many Chinese parents who hold traditional attitudes, parents are obligated to make the preparations for their child’s wedding. This means that they need to cover not only the cost of the wedding itself, but also purchase an apartment and a car. It is common that parents of the groom offer housing and wedding gifts, whereas the bride’s family provides cars and furniture. This all costs a lot for older migrant couples, and they normally use up most or all their savings. Some of them have to borrow money from relatives or friends. Hence, when incomes quickly shrank due to COVID-19, older migrant couples tended to face serious challenges, which increased their sense of stress.

“My daughter graduated from a vocational school in Nanjing. Now she works in a cake shop and lives with us. She has a low salary, so I often give her some money to buy clothes and cosmetics…Due to the virus, I think we will have no savings this year.” (Mrs. Fang, gatekeeper, age 44)

“For my son’s wedding, I purchased a car and an apartment in the county. Thus, I have a debt of 200 thousand RMB…. I feel quite stressed because of the salary reduction...I want to increase my earnings, but I have no means to do so.” (Mrs. Jia, hourly maid, age 51)

Lacking means to increase earnings and holding financial burdens, older migrant couples are inclined to adopt some passive strategies to deal with difficulties. For instance, most of the older participants mentioned that they greatly reduced household expenses to maintain a basic standard of living. Meanwhile, their adult children living with them also learned to control their expenses. Another strategy is to return to the hometown. Many of the older migrant respondents have lived in their current cities for a long period. They also have purchased housing in towns or counties near the hometown, or retain old housing in home villages. Although most of them are now more familiar with their urban lives and their children tend to stay in the cities, returning to the hometown remains a last-ditch option for them to escape financial pressures. They can normally earn only a little in the hometown, but they can live a simpler life without the high living costs of the city.

“My wife now controls the household expenses and we don’t buy meat often…My son lived with us…I sometimes tell my son that your dad has no salary. He understands this and reduces his spending…...I may return to my hometown because of my economic circumstances. Probably, living in the village will be less convenient than living in Nanjing, but I don’t care. The living cost is quite low there.” (Mr. Chen, decoration worker, age 55)

In addition to reducing expenses or even planning to return to home villages, older migrant couples assisted their children and accepted help from their children in times of difficulty. We found that when senior rural migrants faced challenges related to COVID-19, they perceived the roles of children in a variety of ways. First, for families with only one (adult) child, the parents provided assistance to their child and did not ask for help in return. Second, those who had sons and daughters had different notions of different children during the period of COVID-19 spread. Some of these respondents mentioned that they asked their sons to save their wages, but they accepted daughters’ money if they were having difficulty.

“My son and his wife now live with us and we cover their living costs; he needs to save money to feed his family….When my son got married, my daughter used her savings to help him. If we are in serious difficulty, I think she will also give me her money.” (Mrs. Jia, hourly maid, age 51)

“My son lives with us. He saves his salary because he needs to prepare for his future. If he can’t afford an apartment, I think no girl will marry him.” (Mr. Chen, decoration worker, age 55)

The coping strategies of senior migrant couples were derived from their traditional patricentric thinking, particularly the notion that a son will become the head of the family in the future and have the responsibility to care for the parents in their old age. Hence, based on reciprocal logic, the parents tend to concentrate all their efforts on supporting their sons and expect that their sons, rather than their daughters, will care for them in the future.

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the lives of many people around the world and its impacts have varied among people with different socioeconomic backgrounds. Normally, disadvantaged people are more likely to suffer from a disaster and to bear tremendous negative social impacts. Hence, two important questions are raised concerning disadvantaged people in the context of COVID-19: which social impacts they faced and which strategies they adopted to cope with difficulties. In China, rural migrants are disadvantaged in cities because of institutional barriers and inequalities in education, welfare, and social capital (Song et al., 2008 ; Yue et al., 2013 ). They are known to rely on kinship networks and most of them subscribe to the family values embedded in traditional Chinese culture. Through face-to-face interviews, this paper investigates social impacts on rural migrants resulting from the spread of COVID-19 and their coping strategies during this period. It offers an empirical picture of the differentiated experiences of disadvantaged people at different stages of the life cycle in the context of a disaster. This paper not only extends relevant theories by focusing on rural migrants in the Chinese setting, but also provides insights into coping mechanisms from a household perspective.

The findings show that rural migrants suffered seriously from the COVID-19 pandemic, no matter which life-cycle stage they were at. Urban labor markets are highly segregated such that rural migrants normally undertake low-end manual jobs in cities, such as waiter, shop assistant, or factory worker (Chan et al., 1999 ). Unlike many white-collar workers, they typically cannot make a living working online while they are trapped at home. They have to be present at their working places, which was prevented by movement controls implemented to reduce the spread of COVID-19. This gave rise to great challenges in connection with their employment and income. In addition, rural migrants tend to be employed in informal or private workplaces that rarely guarantee basic social insurance (Wang, 2011 ). At the same time, rural migrants are neither local urban residents nor villagers below the poverty level, so they are largely ignored by governments. As a consequence, due to the spread of COVID-19, rural migrants pervasively encountered difficulties such as sharp reductions in income and job loss, but were largely ineligible for support from employers and governments.

Despite facing some similar challenges, the social impacts of COVID-19 varied among rural migrants at different stages of the life cycle, due to variations in human capital, family burdens, role in the household, and ability to find part-time work. In relation to their position in the life course, single rural migrants tend to suffer from shrinking incomes, job loss, living instability and delayed ability to pay loans. Despite having no family burdens, this group of rural migrants is more likely to be trapped in unstable working and living conditions in cities due to limited human capital, work experience, and social resources. A sudden disaster heightens the precarity of their situations in cities. Younger migrant couples usually bear heavy family burdens. They have to shoulder familial responsibilities and while they struggle for a better life in cities. As a result of COVID-19, their long-term household plans were modified or delayed. The ideal of settling down and becoming true citizens in cities became less attainable for them. Influenced by traditional culture, older migrant couples still take responsibility for their children (especially their sons), thereby transferring some financial burdens to the older generation. However, without useful sources of information to find part-time jobs, these older parents were more likely than their adult children to fall into financial difficulties during the period of COVID-19 spread, had to control their living costs strictly, and in some cases had to return to home villages. Despite working and living in cities for a long period, they are still marginal people in cities, floating between urban areas and their rural hometowns. Overall, it is apparent that these disadvantaged people at all life cycle stages fell into a more vulnerable situation in cities during the spread of COVID-19.

In urban China, rural migrants normally have limited interactions with local urban residents. In addition, upward social mobility is quite low among rural migrants with humble backgrounds (Unger and Siu, 2019 ). Therefore, compared to urban residents, who are covered by most social welfare systems when facing crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, rural migrants in China have to turn to kinship networks, which play a more crucial role in their urban lives. Previous studies found that household strategy is important to survival when disadvantaged people encounter difficulties. This study is consistent with prior findings that highlighted the importance of household strategy to disadvantaged people in difficult times. For rural migrants at different life-cycle stages, they have differentiated socio-economic features; by adopting household strategies, they tried their best to cope with the threats induced by the spread of COVID-19. For single rural migrants, parents offer the safety of a “roof” in the home village, while siblings help when they encounter difficulties; meanwhile, single rural migrants provide emotional and instrumental support to their parents. In the homes of younger migrant couples, husbands seek part-time jobs outside, while wives stay at home to care for young children. Older parents also help to look after grandchildren and undertake domestic work, in order to ease the heavy burdens on younger migrant couples. As for the older migrant couples, they co-reside with or provide financial or instrumental support to their adult children; meanwhile, they receive understanding and practical help from children and spouses.

The stories of our participants display how the concept of “family as a unit” was constructed during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in the Chinese setting where family values embedded in Confucian ideology are emphasized. Despite the process of modernization and urbanization in China, traditional family values remain important, as highlighted by rural migrants during the COVID-19 spread in China. During the period, single rural migrants showed their filial piety and obedience to their parents and older siblings, and they received care and protection from these older family members. Among younger migrant couples, a clear gender arrangement was found within a household: husbands were the financial providers, whereas wives were responsible for domestic work and care for children at home. Older migrant couples expressed the notion that supporting their children was their obligation, even when they sacrificed their own benefits and obtained no material returns. In sum, when facing the COVID-19 pandemic, family members assist each other within a household, in the form of reciprocity and emotional support and with emphases on family cohesion and harmony. Based on the norms of the Confucian ideology, these values become critical to the constitution of family structure and the underlying rules that guarantee the proper functioning of a family unit. In this way, family members of rural migrants can work as a unit to maximize resources and reduce risks during the period of COVID-19 spread.

Receiving little support from government and employers, rural migrants in China have to adopt a household strategy as a means of survival when they cope with disaster. If governments want to reduce the burden of COVID-19 on disadvantaged households, they need to pay more attention to rural migrants, even though they are neither local urban residents nor actual rural residents. On the one hand, since the major impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural migrants is related to employment, governments need to make full use of public and private platforms to help rural migrants find jobs in difficult times. Training with knowledge and skills related to employment are also necessary for rural migrants to increase their capacity to find high-paying jobs. Additionally, the government should not only offer subsidies to local urban residents and villagers below the poverty level, but also take into account the so-called “floating population” in cities. Direct financial aid would be particularly helpful in enabling disadvantaged people to endure difficulties in cities. In the long term, the social security system for rural migrants should be further improved. It is necessary to expand the accessibility of basic social services, such as medical insurance, housing funds, and pensions to rural migrants, and to include rural migrants in the housing security system, in case they experience difficult times.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to confidentiality reasons, but are available in a codified form from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Andrews G, Kearns R, Kontos P et al. (2006) Their finest hour: older people, oral histories, and the historical geography of social life. Soc Cult Geogr 7:153–177

Article   Google Scholar  

Aptekar L (1990) A comparison of the bicoastal disasters of 1989. Behav Sci Res 24:73–104

Blaikie P, Cannon I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, New York

Google Scholar  

Bolin R, Stanford L (1998) The northridge California earthquake: community-based approaches to unmet recovery needs. Disasters 22:21–38

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Bolton P, Liebow E, Olson J (1993) Community context and uncertainty following a damaging earthquake: low-income Latinos in Los Angeles, California. Environ Prof 15:240–247

Brodie M, Weltzien E, Altman W et al. (2006) Experiences of Hurricane Katrina evacuees in Houston shelters: implications for future planning. Am J Public Health 96:1402–1408

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Cai F, Du Y (2011) Wage increases, wage convergence and the Lewis turning point in China. China Econ Rev 22:601–610

Cao Y, Chen X, Fan R (2011) Toward a Confucian family-oriented health care system for the future of China. J Med Philos 36:452–465

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Chaganti S, Waddell J (2015) Employment change among Hurricane Katrina evacuees: impacts of race and place. J Public Manag Soc Policy 22:1–16

Chan KW, Buckingham W (2008) Is China abolishing the hukou system? China Q 195:582–606

Chan KW, Liu T, Yang Y (1999) Hukou and non-Hukou migrations in China: comparisons and contrasts. Int J Popul Geogr 5:425–448

Che L, Du H, Chan K (2020) Unequal pain: a sketch of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on migrants’ employment in China. Eurasian Geogr Econ. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2020.1791726

Clifford R (1956) The Rio Grande flood. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, Washington

Cutter S, Boruff B, Shirley W (2003) Social vulnerablity to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84:242–261

Dash N, Morrow B, Mainster J et al. (2007) Lasting effects of Hurricane Andrew on a working-class community. Nat Hazards Rev 8:13–21

Demurger S, Gurgand M, Li S et al. (2009) Migrants as second-class workers in urban China? A decomposition analysis. J Comp Econ 37:610–628

Durant T (2011) The utility of vulnerability and social capital theories in studying the impact of Hurricane Katrina on the elderly. J Fam Issues 32:1285–1302

Elliott J, Paris J (2006) Race, class, and Hurricane Katrina: social differences in human responses to disaster. Soc Sci Res 35:295–321

Fan C, Li T (2020) Split households, family migration and urban settlement: findings from China’s 2015 national floating population survey. Soc Incl 8:252–263

Fan CC (2009) Flexible work, flexible household: labor migration and rural families in China. Res Sociol Work 19:377–408

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Fei X (1983) Problem of providing for the senile in the changing family structure. J Peking Univ (Philos Soc Sci) 3:6–15

Fothergill A, Maestas E, Darlington J (1999) Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: a review of the literature. Disasters 23:156–173

Gubhaju B, de Jong GF (2009) Individual versus household migration decision rules: gender and marital status differences in intentions to migrate in South Africa. Int Migration 47:31–55

Haas J, Kates R, Bowden M (1977) Reconstruction following a disaster. MIT Press, Cambridge

Huang Y, Guo F (2017) Welfare progeamme participation and the wellbeing of non-local rural migrants in metropolitan China: a social exclusion perspective. Soc Indic Res 132:63–85

Huang Y, Liang Z, Song Q et al. (2020) Family arrangements and children’s education among migrants: a case study of China. Int J Urban Reg Res 44:484–504

International Labour Organization (2020) China: rapid assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on employment. Available via ILO. https://www.ilo.org/emppolicy/areas/covid/WCMS_752056/lang--en/index.htm . Accessed 29 July 2020

Lee S (2015) Intimacy and family consent: a Confucian ideal. J Med Philos 40:418–436

Li B, Duda M (2010) Employers as landlords for rural-to-urban migrants in Chinese cities. Environ Urban 22:13–31

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Li S (2010) The economic situation of rural migrant workers in China. China Perspect 4:4–15

CAS   Google Scholar  

Lu P, Zhou T (2008) Housing for rural migrant workers: consumption characteristics and supply policy. Urban Policy Res 26:297–308

Marchetti S, Venturini A (2013) Mothers and grandmothers on the move: labour mobility and the household strategies of Moldovan and Ukrainian migrant women in Italy. Int Migration 52:111–126

Masozera M, Bailey M, Kerchner C (2007) Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: a case study of New Orleans. Ecol Econ 63:299–306

Mberu B, Ezeh A, Chepngeno-Langat G et al. (2013) Family ties and urban–rural linkages among older migrants in Nairobi informal settlements. Popul Space Place 19:275–293

Messias D, Barrington C, Lacy E (2012) Latino social network dynamics and the Hurricane Katrina disaster. Disasters 36:101–121

Mingione E (1994) Life strategies and social economics in the postfordist age. Int J Urban Reg Res 18:24–45

Morrow B (1999) Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters 23:1–18

National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. (2020) Statistical bulletin of the People’s Republic of China on the 2019 National Economic and Social Development. National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China

Pahl R (1984) Divisions of labour. Basil Blackwell, New York

Pais J, Elliott J (2008) Places as recovery machines: vulnerability and neighborhood change after major hurricanes. Soc Forces 84:1415–1453

Peacock W, Morrow B, Gladwin H (1997) Hurricane Andrew: ethnicity, gender, and the sociology of disasters. Routledge, New York

Pratt G, Hanson S (1991) On the links between home and work: family household strategies in buoyant labor market. Int J Urban Reg Res 15:55–74

Qi X (2018) Floating grandparents: rethinking family obligation and intergenerational support. Int Sociol 33:761–777

Qian W, Li B (2013) Consumption determinants of migrant workers from the uncertainty perspective: based on a national survey in China. Chin Rural Econ 11:51–71

Qin M, Zhuang Y, Liu H (2015) Old age insurance participation among rural–urban migrants in China. Demogr Res 33:1047–1066

Rahman S (2020) Social distancing during COVID-19: the metaphors and politics of pandemic response in India. Health Sociol Rev 29:131–139

Ray M (2018) Crossing borders: family migration strategies and routes from Burma to the US. J Ethinc Migration Stud 44:773–791

Richards P, Amara J, Ferme M et al. (2015) Social pathways for Ebola virus disase in rural Sierra Leone and some implications for containment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9:e0003567

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   CAS   Google Scholar  

Ryan L (2004) Family matters: (e)migration, familial networks and Irish women in Britain. Sociol Rev 52:351–370

Ryan L, Sales R (2013) Family migration: the role of children and education in family decision-making strategies of Polish migrants in London. Int Migration 51:90–103

Ryan L, Sales R, Tilki M et al. (2009) Family strategies and transnational migration: recent Polish migrants in London. J Ethinc Migration Stud 35:61–77

Sacchetto D, Vianello F (2015) Unemployed migrants coping with the economic crisis: Romanians and Moroccans in Italy. J Int Migration Integr 17:839–852

Sastry S, Dutta M (2017) Health communication in the time of Ebola: a culture-centered interrogation. J Health Commun 22:10–14

Song Y, Zenou Y, Ding C (2008) Let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water: the role of urban villages in housing rural migrants in China. Urban Stud 45:313–330

Stanturf J, Goodrick S, Warren M et al. (2015) Social vulberability and Ebola virus disease in rural Liberia. PLoS ONE 10:e0137208

Stark O (1991) The migration of labor. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge

Stark O, Bloom DE (1985) The new economics of labor migration. Am Econ Rev 75:173–178

Tang S (2020) Determinants of migration and household member arrangement among poor rural households in China: the case of North Jiangsu. Popul Space Place 26:e2279

Tang S, Hao P, Feng J (2020) Consumer behavior of rural migrant workers in urban China. Cities 106:102856

Unger J, Siu K (2019) Chinese migrant factory workers across four decades: shifts in work conditions, urbanization and family strategies. Labor Hist 60:765–778

Wallace C (2002) Household strategies: their conceptual relevance and analytical scope in social research. Sociology 36:275–292

Wang YP, Murie A (2000) Social and spatial implications of housing reform in China. Int J Urban Reg Res 24:397–417

Wang Z (2011) Social security for China’s migrant workers. Int Labour Rev 150:177–187

Wong KDF, Li CY, Song HX (2007) Rural migrant workers in urban China: living a marginalised life. Int J Soc Welf 16:32–40

Wong N, Ahuvia A (1998) Personal taste and family face: luxury consumption in Confusian and western societies. Psychol Mark 15:423–441

Wu W (2002) Migrant housing in urban China: choices and constraints. Urban Aff Rev 38:90–119

Yue Z, Li S, Jin X et al. (2013) The role of social networks in the integration of Chinese rural–urban migrants: a migrant–resident tie perspective. Urban Stud 50:1704–1723

Zhang L, Sharpe R, Li S et al. (2016) Wage differentials between urban and rural–urban migrant workers in China. China Econ Rev 41:222–233

Zhu P (2016) Residential segregation and employment outcomes of rural migrant workers in China. Urban Stud 53:1635–1656

Zottarelli L (2008) Post-hurricane Katrina employment recovery: the interaction of race and place. Soc Sci Q 89:592–607

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [42071179]; Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China under Grant [19YJCZH146]; Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190548]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [7191101210] and the Dutch Research Council [482.19.607].

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China

Shuangshuang Tang

Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Jiangsu, China

College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Jiangsu, China

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Li .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Tang, S., Li, X. Responding to the pandemic as a family unit: social impacts of COVID-19 on rural migrants in China and their coping strategies. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8 , 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00686-6

Download citation

Received : 01 August 2020

Accepted : 01 December 2020

Published : 06 January 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00686-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Large-scale online job search behaviors reveal labor market shifts amid covid-19.

• Hengshu Zhu

Nature Cities (2024)

Mental health experiences and coping strategies of BAME care workers who worked in nursing and residential care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Luton, England

• Isabella Kabasinguzi
• Nasreen Ali
• Peter Ochepo

BMC Public Health (2023)

Latent profiles of adolescents’ relationships with parents and siblings: Associations with emotional and behavioral responses during the COVID-19 pandemic

• Yingying Tang
• Yingmiao Shao

Current Psychology (2023)

Factors associated with symptoms of poor mental health among women factory workers in China’s supply chain

• K. K. Sznajder
• S. D. Harlow

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health (2022)

Word of Mouth from Left-Behind Children in Rural China: Exploring Their Psychological, Academic and Physical Well-being During COVID-19

• Chunhai Gao
• Endale Tadesse
• Sabika Khalid

Child Indicators Research (2022)

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Our websites may use cookies to personalize and enhance your experience. By continuing without changing your cookie settings, you agree to this collection. For more information, please see our University Websites Privacy Notice .

UConn Today

• School and College News
• Arts & Culture
• Community Impact
• Entrepreneurship
• Health & Well-Being
• Research & Discovery
• UConn Health
• University Life
• UConn Voices
• University News

February 9, 2021 | Jaclyn Severance

An Intimate Reflection on Motherhood, Family, Academia, and Inequality During a Pandemic

How three scholars took an untraditional approach to exploring the experiences of new mothers during the pandemic.

The unequal experience of working mothers in comparison to their male peers, and especially in contrast to working fathers, is not new. What is new, though, is the glaring and disparate impact of the pandemic. (Getty Images)

“Love is my way to protect you from everything I do not know.”

“Always remember: you were born with EVERYTHING you need to survive, it is within you.”

“You mark the present with your contributions, your past is shaped by the women and men that came before you, and don’t forget to create a future your mama can only visit in her wildest dreams.”

First-time motherhood is hard. From the physical and mental exhaustion, to the adjustment to a completely new way of living, the experience of new motherhood can be overwhelming. It can also be extremely lonely.

Throw in a global pandemic, and the often limited opportunities for new mothers to engage in social interactions quickly evaporate.

Mix in the pressures of a typically male-dominated work environment – like academia – and the social and racial inequities heightened by the pandemic, and it makes for a perfect storm of colliding challenges for women, and particularly women of color, who are both mothers and scholars.

“My daughter was born two weeks before the pandemic,” says Rupal Parekh, an assistant professor with UConn’s School of Social Work, “and things just stopped.”

The image Parekh had built through her pregnancy of a post-partum period filled with family support – she had been dreaming of taking a photo with her mother and new daughter, three generations of women together – was dashed by the realities of the coronavirus.

“I needed help with breastfeeding,” she says, “and I needed help with supportive services that just weren’t there. I felt so lonely. I was in a small Brooklyn apartment, and experiencing COVID in New York with a baby, that just felt so isolating.”

For Parekh, though, comfort and community as a new mother ultimately came from thousands of miles away, and friendship formed through the bond of new mothers in academia led to a powerful exploration of ancestral knowledge, cultural bonds, and mothering during an unprecedented time recently published in the journal, Genealogy .

“I kind of connected all of us,” says Miriam Valdovinos, an assistant professor at the University of Denver’s Graduate School of Social Work. A former faculty member of the UConn School of Social Work, she became a new mother herself around the same time as Parekh. As did Noralis Rodríguez-Coss, an assistant professor of Women’s and Gender Studies at Gonzaga University in Washington, who had gone to graduate school with Valdovinos.

The three women began having conversations, talking about their experiences, joys, fears, and anxieties as new mothers in a pandemic, when the journal’s call for papers opened a door for them to take an untraditional approach to scholarship.

“Through our conversations, it became clear that we wanted to leave something for our children,” Valdovinos says.

“We started with a reflection,” says Rodríguez-Coss.

My dear baby Lorenzo Enrique

  To my dearest first born, Malik

  To my dear Chandni (moonlight)

Those reflections are at the heart of their work, a creative swirling of personal testimonios – first-person narrations of socially significant experiences , here in the form of letters written to their infant children – entwined with empirical evidence and discussion of the issues faced by mothers during the pandemic and, in particular, mothers of color navigating the world of academia. Their work is centered around the theoretical framework of indigenous or ancestral knowledge – a connection to a person’s ancestors, homelands, traditions, beliefs, and assumptions – and how that knowledge offers way “to persist, transform, and heal during these challenging times.”

“Part of why we centered ancestral knowledge was really trying to understand – right now, while we feel so lonely and isolated –what is it that we can learn from our matriarchs, our ancestors?” Valdovinos says. “Going back to decolonizing methodologies and understanding how we create knowledge, it really spoke to us when we were thinking about what is helping us get through this right now.”

“I think anything we do is informed in some way by our ancestors and what we have learned from them,” says Rodríguez-Coss. “As I was giving birth at the beginning of the pandemic, and also during the process of being pregnant, and then during postpartum, making decisions around safety for the baby, I kept going back, I think, to these lessons that I have learned from the women in my family.”

Abuela Justina would have loved to meet you, but instead, she decided to accompany me in the journey of receiving you to this planet. I saw her smiling in my dreams.

  As a Black Chicano, you are blessed with beautiful African roots. These roots go deep and they also come with painful histories of great-great-grandparents who were transported to the United States and enslaved. Never forget this: transported and enslaved (but not broken).

  You were born the week the “earthshines”—sunlight reflects from the Earth onto the dark side of the moon, slightly illuminating it. As you very well know, your name in Sanskrit means moonlight. And just like the moonlight controls our Earthly tides, bodies of water, and the seasons; you, my dear, have full control over our hearts .

The unequal experience of working mothers in comparison to their male peers, and especially in contrast to working fathers, is not new. What is new, though, is the glaring and disparate impact of the pandemic.

“The struggle of work–life balance for motherscholars has only been heightened by a pandemic that underscores the systemic fissures and social inequalities deeply ingrained in our society, including higher education,” the researchers write. “For Women of Color professors in tenure-track positions, the intersections of capitalism, sexism, and racism exacerbate the challenges faced by motherscholars. This may entail finding reliable childcare outside the home that fits an equitable pay scale within the family’s budget. It may require defending our passions to pursue our career to our family members who may have had different mothering experiences. It may consist of microaggressions in collegial interactions, including maternal microaggressions. We are navigating multiple systems that were not built with our interests in mind.”

Preliminary research on social inequalities during the pandemic, they write, indicate that people of color are at greater risk of COVID-related death and that women of color are at the most risk of losing their jobs. They noted one study found that more than 44 percent of women, especially working mothers, have suffered more job losses than men and have handled significantly greater responsibility for childcare during the pandemic.

“There is a critical need,” they write, “to advocate for policies that mitigate the discrimination and limitations faced by academic mothers and subsequently lead to long-term gender equality in a profession whose policies have historically favored males.”

“Academia really doesn’t want you to be a mother, and this is something that men do not face,” says Rodríguez-Coss. “Men can be fathers, and it doesn’t feel like they’re sacrificing anything from their careers. As women of color, we also have to work harder – that continues to be a reality. We have to work double the time to convince institutions that we deserve tenure.”

As you fall asleep on my shoulder, I think about that love that earlier generations gave to my grandmother and this love that I give you and that you will pass to your loved ones.

You will always be loved unconditionally by your parents and we will reflect through your piercing eyes- esos ojos que enamoran – this deep love forever. I love you my son. We continue in our ceremony of life, always- until the dream ceases to exist.

Although none of us were prepared for this type of complexity in our lives, I am confident your spirit will meet the challenges of today’s world. I will do my best to guide you and give you advice as this historical mark will be part of your legacy.

The writing of the paper, the researchers say, brought them together to share their testimonios to their children and to serve each other as a social support system at a time when other systems are both inaccessible and inequitable.

“To me, writing this paper is not about feeling sad that we are mothers in the pandemic,” says Rodríguez-Coss. “It’s telling the truth about the situation that we’re facing, nationally and globally, in academia. This is how we are being seen by the system. But still, here we are. We’re going to go through the pandemic, and we’re going to take care of our babies, and we’re going to love them, and we’re going to defend joy. I think we were aspiring, and we are working, for a different reality for us, and I think the pandemic has helped, actually, for us to rethink who we want to be. What’s the kind of life I want to have?”

Their hope is that sharing of their thoughts and experiences will help to foster connection and collegial support between other women of color and motherscholars in academia and beyond.

“It’s becoming clear to me that, to be able to survive these places that were not meant for us, we have to make these spaces for ourselves,” says Valdovinos. “Because no one’s going to make it for us. Just sitting in your power, owning that voice – honestly I honestly think this paper elevated me to that space, and it’s a really liberating feeling. I continue to evolve, but it’s projects like these that are that are going to help us, I feel, just to be able to survive these spaces.”

“The experience I had with these women and how much that impacted my experience of motherhood during this time – it’s giving voice,” Parekh says. “Also, it made me realize that I could expand my scope, I don’t need to be afraid to do that. This allowed me to say,’ Ok, I don’t have to pretend to be something I’m not. I can be who I am and still do well in this field, and feel whole.’ So that’s really beautiful.”

Recent Articles

April 12, 2024

Graduate Education at UConn Soars in New National Rankings

Read the article

April 11, 2024

Metanoia 2024 Kick-Off on Wednesday, April 17

Advancing Approaches to Physical Therapy

• Hi, My Account Subscriptions --> My KT Trading Contact Us Privacy Notice Sign Out

Mon, Apr 15, 2024 | Shawwal 5, 1445

Dubai 20°C

• Expo City Dubai
• Emergencies
• Ras Al Khaimah
• Umm Al Quwain
• Life and Living
• Visa & Immigration in UAE
• Banking in UAE
• Schooling in UAE
• Housing in UAE
• Ramadan 2024
• Saudi Arabia
• Philippines
• Cryptocurrency
• Infrastructure
• Currency Exchange
• Horse Racing
• Local Sports

Entertainment

• Local Events

Dubai World Cup

• Track Notes
• Big Numbers
• Daily Updates
• Arts & Culture
• Mental Health
• Relationships
• Staycations
• UAE Attractions
• Tech Reviews
• Motoring Reviews
• Movie Reviews
• Book reviews
• Restaurant Reviews
• Young Times

Supplements

• Back To School
• Eid-Al-Adha
• It’s Summer Time
• Leading Universities
• Higher Education
• India Real Estate Show
• Future Of Insurance
• KT Desert Drive
• New Age Finance & Accounting Summit
• Digital Health Forum
• Subscriptions
• UAE Holidays
• Year of the 50th
• Latest News
• Prayer Timings
• Cinema Listings
• Inspired Living
• Advertise With Us
• Privacy Notice

KT APPDOWNLOAD

• coronavirus

Covid-19: Strong family bonds can help overcome challenges

Abu dhabi - medical experts emphasise on improving bonding as international day of families is marked in country..

• Follow us on

Published: Sat 15 May 2021, 7:27 PM

Last updated: Sat 15 May 2021, 8:41 PM

Developing a stronger family relationship holds the key to recovering from testing life events like the pandemic, top officials and experts said during the International Day of Families on May 15.

“Despite the challenges that accompanied the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic, families have demonstrated their essential role in containing the crises and optimally dealing with childcare,” said Dr Bushra Al Mulla, Executive Director, the Community Development Sector at the Department of Community Development (DCD) – Abu Dhabi.

With work from home, remote learning and change in lifestyle becoming the new normal, medical experts emphasised on improving family bonding to understand the difficulties of other members, and offering support.

“Children face stress from missing regular interaction with friends, and emotional disturbances like depression. Parents face additional stress from having to complete their work as well as supervise online learning. The fear of Covid infection and losing dear ones, adds to this stress. It is crucial during such time for members of the family to recognise the difficulty others in the family are facing, empathise with them and support each other,” said Dr Sridhar Kalyanasundaram, consultant neonatologist, head of neonatology, Danat Al Emarat Hospital for Women and Children in Abu Dhabi.

Dr Kalyanasundaram said parents need to strategise and work together with their employers, teachers and others in the family to enhance mental well-being.

Dr Sanjay Perkar, specialist pediatrician, Fakeeh University Hospital, Dubai, underlined that families are going through a lot of stress and can emerge stronger through greater cohesion.

“Parents are facing stress due to financial and occupational challenges, whereas kids are dealing with the challenges of online schooling and lack of physical activity leading to excessive boredom and behavioural issues. We cannot emphasise more on the value of family bonding and emotional support on both the fronts.”

The United Nations theme for this year’s International Day of Families is ‘Families and new technologies’. Doctors noted there has been an increased dependency on online and social media platforms.

Dr Kalyanasundaram added: “It is important to be aware of the negative impact of technology. In younger kids, limiting screen time is very important for their development and no screen time is the best for infants. Safety of the internet for older children is another important factor. Parents should remember they are role models for children when it comes to these issues, and they should be strict about their own screen use.”

Meanwhile, the government has taken several family-oriented policies and measures during the pandemic. Dr Al Mulla noted the DCD has reached the final stages of launching Abu Dhabi’s ‘Family’s Quality of Life’ strategy. It focuses on studying and analysing the current and future social challenges that affect the quality and stability of family life, including issues like divorce, reluctance to marry and work-family life balance and more.

[email protected]

Top Stories

Embracing the bright side: A guide on how to cultivate optimism

The power of solitude: Why you should go on a solo trip

How to get your kids to read: Essential tips for parents

More news from

Now, use uae pass for sharjah property deeds.

The emirate's real estate market has seen unprecedented demand and growth ever since it allowed non-Arab nationals to also buy property

realty 4 hours ago -->

Ruthless Tsitsipas defeats Ruud for third Monte Carlo title

The 12th-ranked Greek, who will return to top 10 on Monday, also won the Monte Carlo title in 2021 and 2022

tennis 4 hours ago -->

Back-to-school season: UAE parents gear up as children return after three-week break

Students enrolled in international curriculum schools enjoyed a three-week break for the spring holidays, which commenced on March 25

uae 4 hours ago -->

Iran attacks Israel: Flights between over a dozen routes impacted due to conflict

Israel and Jordan closed their airspace on Sunday but reopened later in the day, allowing commercial planes to use their airspace

aviation 5 hours ago -->

Landslides kill 14 on Indonesia's Sulawesi island

Emergency response efforts have been complicated by poor weather conditions

asia 5 hours ago -->

Germany's Scholz kicks off China trip amid tensions over EVs, Russia

Upon arrival, Scholz condemned the Iranian strikes on Israel

world 5 hours ago -->

IPL 2024: Iyer pleased with Kolkata's comprehensive win over Lucknow

Phil Salt's rapid 89 and three wickets for Mitchell Starc set up the easy win for Kolkata Knight Riders

cricket 5 hours ago -->

French-Canadian gets 'Oscars of Science' prize for cancer treatment

His work has led to the development of a new form of therapy called CAR-T

europe 5 hours ago -->

Type your keywords

Human-Nature Interactions during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic in Moscow, Russia: Exploring the Role of Contact with Nature and Main Lessons from the City Responses

• Discipline of Landscape Architecture

Research output : Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Urban green spaces (UGS) as essential elements of the urban environment provide multiple ecosystem services including benefits for physical and mental health. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions have influenced human relationships with nature. Based on empirical research, this article explores the pathways and implications of human-nature interactions during and after COVID-19 and how human health and well-being could be supported by contact with nature. The article discusses the reasons that attract people to visit UGS (value of UGS, their perceptions, ways of contact with urban nature, etc.). It also analyses the effects of social isolation on the usage and perception of UGS during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The research revealed current needs for UGS and their role in adaptation of urban development and greening strategy. For this purpose, an online questionnaire survey among residents of Moscow was conducted in April–July of 2020 when restrictive measures were imposed in the city in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, non-participatory observations and photo documentation were used to supplement the data on UGS visitation and use. The GIS mapping method was applied to analyze the UGS provision (availability and accessibility of UGS). Moreover, expert interviews were conducted aiming to explore the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on the urban fabric and life of the citizens. The aim was to reveal the main tendencies that can be used in the adaptation of urban development plans, especially regarding UGS and human-nature interactions. The results show that citizens (both survey respondents and experts) highly value urban nature as a tool for coping with COVID-19 challenges. They underlined a need for accessible UGS, most notably for breathing fresh air, reducing stress, relaxing, and observing and enjoying nature. The survey also revealed the particular health effects resulting from the reduction of UGS visitations due to COVID-19 restrictions. Several changes in human-nature interactions were also observed: many respondents especially missed spending time outdoors and meeting other people. That highlights the fact that while UGS normally provides places for social integration and socializing, during the COVID-19 isolation UGS were especially valued in regard to physical health and well-being (self-recovery). Both respondents and experts expressed their opinions regarding the future development of UGS network and how the UGS’s structure and design should be adapted to the current challenges. The claimed interests/preferences included the need for providing all residents equal access to UGS in a time of pandemics and post pandemics. A set of limitations and directions for future research of UGS was suggested.

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

• 10.3390/land11060822 Licence: CC BY

Other files and links

• Link to publication in Scopus

Fingerprint

• Urban Arts and Humanities 100%
• Pandemic Arts and Humanities 100%
• Humans Psychology 100%
• Space Arts and Humanities 76%
• ExPeRT Arts and Humanities 14%
• Citizens Arts and Humanities 9%
• Challenges Arts and Humanities 9%
• Residents Arts and Humanities 9%

T1 - Human-Nature Interactions during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic in Moscow, Russia

T2 - Exploring the Role of Contact with Nature and Main Lessons from the City Responses

AU - Dushkova, Diana

AU - Ignatieva, Maria

AU - Konstantinova, Anastasia

AU - Vasenev, Viacheslav

AU - Dovletyarova, Elvira

AU - Dvornikov, Yury

PY - 2022/6

Y1 - 2022/6

N2 - Urban green spaces (UGS) as essential elements of the urban environment provide multiple ecosystem services including benefits for physical and mental health. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions have influenced human relationships with nature. Based on empirical research, this article explores the pathways and implications of human-nature interactions during and after COVID-19 and how human health and well-being could be supported by contact with nature. The article discusses the reasons that attract people to visit UGS (value of UGS, their perceptions, ways of contact with urban nature, etc.). It also analyses the effects of social isolation on the usage and perception of UGS during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The research revealed current needs for UGS and their role in adaptation of urban development and greening strategy. For this purpose, an online questionnaire survey among residents of Moscow was conducted in April–July of 2020 when restrictive measures were imposed in the city in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, non-participatory observations and photo documentation were used to supplement the data on UGS visitation and use. The GIS mapping method was applied to analyze the UGS provision (availability and accessibility of UGS). Moreover, expert interviews were conducted aiming to explore the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on the urban fabric and life of the citizens. The aim was to reveal the main tendencies that can be used in the adaptation of urban development plans, especially regarding UGS and human-nature interactions. The results show that citizens (both survey respondents and experts) highly value urban nature as a tool for coping with COVID-19 challenges. They underlined a need for accessible UGS, most notably for breathing fresh air, reducing stress, relaxing, and observing and enjoying nature. The survey also revealed the particular health effects resulting from the reduction of UGS visitations due to COVID-19 restrictions. Several changes in human-nature interactions were also observed: many respondents especially missed spending time outdoors and meeting other people. That highlights the fact that while UGS normally provides places for social integration and socializing, during the COVID-19 isolation UGS were especially valued in regard to physical health and well-being (self-recovery). Both respondents and experts expressed their opinions regarding the future development of UGS network and how the UGS’s structure and design should be adapted to the current challenges. The claimed interests/preferences included the need for providing all residents equal access to UGS in a time of pandemics and post pandemics. A set of limitations and directions for future research of UGS was suggested.

AB - Urban green spaces (UGS) as essential elements of the urban environment provide multiple ecosystem services including benefits for physical and mental health. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions have influenced human relationships with nature. Based on empirical research, this article explores the pathways and implications of human-nature interactions during and after COVID-19 and how human health and well-being could be supported by contact with nature. The article discusses the reasons that attract people to visit UGS (value of UGS, their perceptions, ways of contact with urban nature, etc.). It also analyses the effects of social isolation on the usage and perception of UGS during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The research revealed current needs for UGS and their role in adaptation of urban development and greening strategy. For this purpose, an online questionnaire survey among residents of Moscow was conducted in April–July of 2020 when restrictive measures were imposed in the city in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, non-participatory observations and photo documentation were used to supplement the data on UGS visitation and use. The GIS mapping method was applied to analyze the UGS provision (availability and accessibility of UGS). Moreover, expert interviews were conducted aiming to explore the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on the urban fabric and life of the citizens. The aim was to reveal the main tendencies that can be used in the adaptation of urban development plans, especially regarding UGS and human-nature interactions. The results show that citizens (both survey respondents and experts) highly value urban nature as a tool for coping with COVID-19 challenges. They underlined a need for accessible UGS, most notably for breathing fresh air, reducing stress, relaxing, and observing and enjoying nature. The survey also revealed the particular health effects resulting from the reduction of UGS visitations due to COVID-19 restrictions. Several changes in human-nature interactions were also observed: many respondents especially missed spending time outdoors and meeting other people. That highlights the fact that while UGS normally provides places for social integration and socializing, during the COVID-19 isolation UGS were especially valued in regard to physical health and well-being (self-recovery). Both respondents and experts expressed their opinions regarding the future development of UGS network and how the UGS’s structure and design should be adapted to the current challenges. The claimed interests/preferences included the need for providing all residents equal access to UGS in a time of pandemics and post pandemics. A set of limitations and directions for future research of UGS was suggested.

KW - COVID-19 pandemic

KW - green infrastructure

KW - green recovery in a (post) COVID world

KW - human-nature relations

KW - urban green space

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131751587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/land11060822

DO - 10.3390/land11060822

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85131751587

SN - 2073-445X

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Sage Choice

The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Family Affair

A new viral illness called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently spreading throughout the world at an alarming rate ( Dong et al., 2020 ). As family nursing practitioners, educators, and researchers, we work from a guiding assumption that health and “illness is a family affair” ( Wright & Bell, 2009 , p. ix). Patients, clients, residents, and their families are inextricably connected. The science and practice of Family Nursing is based on a systemic premise offered by Wright and Leahey (2013) that serious illness and life challenges impact the family unit, and reciprocally, the functioning of the family unit (including their structure, development, and function) influences the health and well-being of each family member. This especially holds true for the current coronavirus pandemic which is creating unique hardships and suffering in an alarmingly large number of patients and their families around the world.

Impact of COVID-19 on Families

The assumption that disease and its prevention is a family affair is manifested in the full spectrum and scale of the current coronavirus pandemic. Measures that have been taken in many countries to control the spread of the coronavirus are having a disruptive effect on relationships in general and family relationships specifically. Families are reporting loss of community and freedom of movement in response to quarantine/lock down measures. Other tangible losses include income, access to resources, and planned activities or celebrations. Compelling and heartbreaking stories of the challenges and suffering that families are experiencing engulf us. Individuals and families who are most vulnerable are particularly at risk.

Patients, Clients, and Residents Miss Their Family and Loved Ones

Residents in long-term care facilities miss their partners and children who are no longer allowed to visit because of the COVID-19 policies to contain the spread of the coronavirus. People with intellectual disabilities who live in institutions are upset because their father, mother, brothers, or sisters are no longer allowed to visit, and they often cannot understand why.

Distressing stories abound of patients who have to deal with the news of their COVID-19 diagnosis all by themselves without a family member present and those patients who are admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) who have to say goodbye to their family in the emergency department not knowing whether they will see each other again. A nurse working at the front line of triage reported, “His family was not allowed to come to the hospital, because they may also be infected. He was alone and couldn’t say goodbye.”

Families are Concerned About Their Loved Ones

Many of these patients, clients, and residents are members of families who miss their loved ones and who are worried. Mothers, fathers, and other family members of children receiving psychiatric care report being unable visit their child for an extended period of time and are afraid their child will become ill from the coronavirus. Families of very seriously ill and dying patients are not allowed to visit their loved one and may not be able to say a final goodbye.

Families and Family Relationships Are Under Pressure

The lockdown/quarantine measures instituted in many countries have also invited vulnerability and risk within families. Schools are being closed which leads to distress in many families not accustomed to being so closely confined for a long time period. Moreover, as a result of the COVID-19 crisis, much, if not all, of the support given to families who provide long-term care for an ill parent, partner, or child is lost. Families with a child who requires specialized care and guidance now have to care for their child 24 hr a day without the outside guidance provided by medical nursery, daycare, or special education services. Families who care for a father, mother, or partner with dementia or other serious illness now have to manage without day care or daytime activity. School closures have created a family environment where children are rarely allowed to leave the house and are confronted by the vulnerabilities of a family member’s addiction, aggression, and violence. Children of divorced co-parents are suddenly being refused alternating parental care because one of the parents now works from home and cannot provide child care. All of these families and their interrelationships are often under great pressure as a result of the stresses created by coronavirus pandemic.

The Urgent Need for Family Nursing Now and in the Aftermath of COVID-19

Health care professionals, including nurses and doctors, are also going through a very intensive and perhaps traumatic time. As a nurse working in the ICU reported, “Many people die without family present. The sorrow that comes with it hurts the nurses mentally.” It is encouraging to see how innovative and creative many nurses are becoming during this pandemic as they find ways to involve families. Despite being committed to the care of the ill person, they assure families that their family member is being cared for and will not die alone. They are sometimes able to connect family members to each other using new technology. Mobile phone or video conference calls made by the nurse allow family members to “see” the patient in the ICU or in the nursing home.

Our concerns also focus on the long-term implications for patients and their families; how will they cope once the coronavirus is under control? How will they be able to resume normal life again? Individuals and families are often flexible and resilient ( Walsh, 2016 ) and many will likely be able to process the experiences of this pandemic and resume their lives. However, there will also be long-term mental and physical health consequences or even permanent damage.

For example, how will patients and families recover after a long period of intensive care? Research has documented that many patients experience many physical and psychological problems after such a long period of ventilation, even after discharge to their home environment ( Rawal et al., 2017 ). We also know that family members of these patients also suffer greater levels of depression and anxiety ( Davidson et al., 2012 ).

We also hold our hearts out for families who have lost someone without being able to say goodbye and without being able to be present in the final dying phase of their loved one. How will we assist these families to cope with their loss and complex grief?

Our concerns also go out to the health care professionals, especially nurses and doctors, in the aftermath of this COVID-19 crisis. They too will need support in recovering from their suffering and distress.

The good news is that there is compelling evidence that our family nursing assessment and intervention skills can assist families to heal. This pandemic makes us more deeply aware of the important role of family in the lives of patients, clients, and residents. We anticipate that this increased awareness will help us advocate even more strongly for the importance of family nursing during and after this coronavirus crisis. Rightfully, a great amount of money and resources are now being spent to fight the COVID-19 virus. But lives saved must also be lives worth living afterwards.

We believe that family nursing knowledge, developed over the last 40 years, unequivocally offers the necessary skills to help families recover and heal from the expected and unexpected long-term consequences of this pandemic ( International, Family, Nursing, & Association, 2015 , 2017 ). The aftermath of COVID-19 calls for a substantial increase in the resources needed to (a) enable nurses to assess and intervene with families in need of support, (b) educate nurses to offer highly skilled family nursing care, and (c) conduct research which provides compelling evidence that family nursing assessment and intervention is effective in addressing illness suffering ( Wright, 2017 ; Wright & Bell, 2009 ) and optimizing family health. Family nursing has never been more relevant or more urgently needed than now.

This Guest Editorial has been written by members of the FAM ily health in E urope- R esearch in N ursing (FAME-RN) group:

Marie Louise A. Luttik, PhD, RN, Professor in Family Nursing & Family Care, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Research Group Nursing Diagnostics, Groningen, the Netherlands. Email: [email protected] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7853-9773

Romy Mahrer-Imhof, PhD, Professor for Family-Centered Care, Nursing Science & Care Limited, Winterthur, Switzerland; Visiting Professor, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark. Email: [email protected] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8587-3817

Cristina García-Vivar, PhD, RN, Senior Associate Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre; Researcher, IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Spain. Email: [email protected] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-559X

Anne Brødsgaard, PhD, RN, Senior Researcher, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager Hvidovre; The Capital Region of Denmark & Section for Nursing, Department of Public Health; The Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Denmark. Email: [email protected] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5029-9480

Karin B. Dieperink, PhD, RN, Associate Professor, Head of research, Family focused health care research Center (FaCe) and Vice Head, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Email: [email protected] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4766-3242

Lorenz Imhof, PhD, Professor for Community-Based Care, Nursing Science & Care Limited, Winterthur, Switzerland. Email: [email protected] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8441-3598

Birte Østergaard, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark. Email: kd.uds.htlaeh@draagretseob ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9094-8123

Erla Kolbrun Svavarsdottir, RN, PhD, FAAN, Professor, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Iceland. Email: si.ih@ske ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1284-1088

Hanne Konradsen, PhD, Professor, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Denmark, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Associate Professor, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, NVS, Karolinska Instituttet, Sweden. Email: [email protected] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7477-125

Advertisement

Struggling with rising cases and low vaccination rates, Moscow announces a lockdown.

Like many countries, Russia has seesawed between tighter and looser pandemic restrictions. As the coronavirus claims more victims, the pendulum is now swinging toward tightening.

• Share full article

By Andrew E. Kramer

• Oct. 21, 2021

MOSCOW — Schools, shops and restaurants in the city of Moscow will close next week, municipal officials said, in one of the tightest lockdowns in the Russian capital since the pandemic began, a measure made necessary by low vaccination rates.

Russia’s coronavirus response, like that of many other countries, has seesawed between strict controls and lax enforcement of mask-wearing and vaccination rules. Russia pivoted again this week toward tighter lockdowns as reports of new cases and Covid-19 deaths climbed.

Reported cases are up 33 percent over the last two weeks, reaching more than 32,400, according to a New York Times database . And on average over the past week, 983 people a day died from the coronavirus ; on some days that number exceeded 1,000. Only Russian-made coronavirus vaccines are available in the country, and many people are hesitant to get them. Russia’s vaccination rate of 33 percent of the population is lower than the global average of 37 percent and far behind the rates in most of Europe.

To combat the surge in cases and deaths, President Vladimir V. Putin on Wednesday declared a countrywide “nonworking” week from Oct. 30 to Nov. 7 , extending a regular fall holiday by several days. The restrictions the city of Moscow announced on Thursday were even stricter.

Mayor Sergey Sobyanin ordered schools and nonessential businesses to close two days sooner, starting on Oct. 28. He said in a statement posted online that the spread of the virus had gone “by the worst scenario” and that Moscow would soon be setting daily records for new cases.

Early in the pandemic, Moscow locked down more strictly than many Western countries did. Residents were prohibited from leaving their apartments other than to shop at grocery stores or pharmacies, attend medical appointments or walk their dogs.

The city also lifted many restrictions this year before other European countries did on a wide scale, a move that became a point of pride. Mr. Putin contrasted Moscow’s bustling restaurants with the continuing lockdowns abroad.

Over the summer, Moscow imposed, but then dropped, a requirement that patrons be vaccinated to eat in some restaurants or to visit bars. Enforcement of mask-wearing rules in Russia is generally lax.

Andrew E. Kramer is a reporter based in the Moscow bureau. He was part of a team that won the 2017 Pulitzer Prize in International Reporting for a series on Russia’s covert projection of power. More about Andrew E. Kramer