sustainable fashion brand case study

In search of fashion’s sustainability seekers

Young, urban fashion consumers actively seek out sustainable options, but most shoppers remain neutral to the idea. In fact, many find it challenging to figure out what actually constitutes “sustainability,” with a long, complex list of potential factors to consider.

This could change, however, as millennials and Gen Zers reach both the age and income levels to apply their eco-conscious values and beliefs to their wardrobes. In turn, this demand could spur clearer messaging and more sustainable practices from brands.

These findings are from a recent McKinsey survey in the United Kingdom that looked at consumer sentiment about sustainability in clothing, footwear, and accessories. 1 Our survey was conducted in October 2021 with more than 850 UK consumers. Despite increased awareness about the importance of sustainability, the fashion industry’s environmental footprint remains significant. Companies create far more products than they can sell, and more than half of all global fiber produced is polyester, a material that requires a great deal of energy for extraction and processing and that lingers in the environment for a long time. 2 Ruth Alden Wicker, “Why, exactly, is polyester so bad for the environment?,” EcoCult , January 19, 2021. In total, the fashion industry emits  about the same quantity of greenhouse gases (GHGs) per year as the economies of France, Germany, and the United Kingdom combined.

As environmental, social, and governance (ESG) transparency continues to grow in importance, fashion companies will likely feel pressure to do more. For example, starting next year, the UK government will require listed companies to publish net-zero transition plans and set company targets to mitigate their climate risk. Certain public companies will also be required to disclose climate-related financial information that follows standards set by the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

Sustainability seekers

One-quarter of respondents to our survey indicated that they are concerned about sustainability-related issues (Exhibit 1). These consumers go out of their way to buy secondhand items and to look for clothing made with environmentally friendly material, such as recycled polyester. Our research shows that this group, which is willing to pay 15 percent more for sustainable options, is more likely to consist of urban millennial women with moderate to high incomes (Exhibit 2). The factors that these sustainability seekers care most about are the lowering of GHG emissions, the preservation of natural habitats for animals, practices that don’t harm animals, and the use of renewable energy (Exhibit 3).

In contrast, about half of our survey respondents were ambivalent about sustainability, while another one-quarter emerged as a strong counterbalancing contingent. These consumers said that they were actively not interested in seeking out sustainable fashion choices.

As environmental, social, and governance (ESG) transparency continues to grow in importance, fashion companies will likely feel pressure to do more.

One factor that is likely holding these consumers back is a general confusion about the term “sustainability.” Customers rely most on brand websites and product tags when evaluating fashion brands and products (Exhibit 4). But these sources often contain a bewildering array of sustainability features, credentials, and claims, impairing a consumer’s ability to make easy, educated choices. No shared understanding exists among consumers (or brands) about what exactly “sustainability” means, which features matter most, or where to find information about a particular brand’s sustainability commitment. It can be even harder to find independent sources that help distinguish between authentic sustainability claims and greenwashing.

Fashion brands have a significant opportunity to deliver clear, straightforward information on their practices (both at and before the point of sale), as well as frictionless postpurchase options that consumers can use to mitigate the impact of their fashion choices.

Fashion brands have a significant opportunity to deliver clear, straightforward information on their practices.

The opportunity for circular fashion

Although most consumers in our survey said that sustainability does not actively influence their purchasing decisions, responses were different when we asked about an item’s end of life. Only 24 percent of respondents said they go out of their way to buy products from sustainable brands, while some 46 percent of consumers said they would want to purchase items that could be easily donated to charity (Exhibit 5).

This finding highlights a fertile landscape for the development of circular business models. Because fashion will always be driven by a desire to seek novelty, a sustainability paradox is inevitable: in our survey, the consumers most engaged with sustainability are also those most likely to generate waste by renewing their wardrobes every season (Exhibit 6). To create more value for these shoppers, brands can design their products to be repurposed once a consumer is finished with them. This sustainable loop, if managed well, would lessen consumers’ dependence on entirely new products, allow companies to do more with less, and reduce the fashion industry’s planetary impact.

As the fashion and textile industries strive to reduce their environmental footprint and consumers grow increasingly aware of our changing climate, we expect consumers’ desires for sustainable fashion to grow. Brands that help people to understand and mitigate the impact of their fashion choices place themselves in a leadership role on this important issue and in a stronger position to drive sustainable growth.

Explore a career with us

Related articles.

Closing the loop: Increasing fashion circularity in California

State of Fashion Technology Report 2022

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

Research: How to Position a Luxury Brand as Sustainable

• Gwarlann de Kerviler,
• Elodie Gentina,
• Nico Heuvinck

Highlight your company’s commitment to craftsmanship.

With a growing demand for companies to produce products that meet high ESG standards, luxury goods companies need to find a way to present their products as something other than markers of wealth and social status, all while preserving these cachets. This article argues that they can best square this circle by focusing on authenticity through their commitment to the craftsmanship and art of their employees in their customer engagement. The authors present French luxury goods company Hermès as a case in point.

A 2018 global survey by Accenture Strategy of 30,000 consumers in 35 countries indicated that nearly two-thirds of them (62%) find brands with high ethical values attractive.    That’s potentially a problem for companies in the luxury sector, because people often see luxury goods as a wasteful self-indulgence and potentially damaging to the environment, especially if they are highly engineered or decorative.

• GK Gwarlann de Kerviler is a professor at IESEG School of Management in Paris, France.
• EG Elodie Gentina is a professor at IÉSEG School of Management in Lille, France.
• NH Nico Heuvinck is a professor of Marketing and academic director of the MSc in Digital Marketing & CRM at IESEG School of Management ibn Lille, France.

Partner Center

Sustainability in the Textile and Apparel Industries pp 71–87 Cite as

Environmental and Social Sustainability in Fashion: A Case Study Analysis of Luxury and Mass-Market Brands

• Carmela Donato 4 ,
• Antonella Buonomo 4 &
• Matteo De Angelis 4  
• First Online: 20 March 2020

3484 Accesses

3 Citations

Part of the Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry book series (STPPMC)

In this chapter, we discuss the importance of embracing sustainable activities within the fashion industry, with a specific focus on the environmental and the social dimension of sustainability. The chapter revolves around the discussion of four case studies of fashion brands. Two of them (Mara Hoffman and Ankura) are luxury fashion brands, while the other two (Quagga and Krochet Kids intl.) are mass-market fashion brands. Moreover, two of them (Mara Hoffman and Quagga) are examples of fashion brands especially committed to the pursuit of environmental sustainability, while the other two (Ankura and Krochet Kids intl.) are examples of fashion brands especially committed to the pursuit of social sustainability. The analysis of such case studies witnesses that fashion brands operating in both the luxury and the mass-market sector are increasingly making sustainability a core part of their mission and strategy.

• Environmental sustainability
• Social sustainability
• Mass-market

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Downloads/_content_dam_Deloitte_in_Documents_ consumer-business_Report_GPLG2019_Final.pdf.

https://about.lindex.com/en/redesign/

https://www.globallaborjustice.org/gap , https://www.globallaborjustice.org/hm/

https://www.stellamccartney.com/ )

https://www.bluesign.com/en

https://www.global-standard.org/the-standard/general-description.html

Achabou MA, Dekhili S (2013) Luxury and sustainable development: is there a match? J Bus Res 66(10):1896–1903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.011

Article   Google Scholar  

Amatulli C, De Angelis M, Costabile M, Guido G (2017) Sustainable luxury brands: Evidence from research and implications for managers. Palgrave Macmillan, Springer, London (UK). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60159-9

Arrigo E (2013) Corporate responsibility management in fast fashion companies: the Gap Inc. case. J Fash Mark Manag Int J 17(2):175–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-10-2011-0074

Aspers P, Skov L (2006) Encounters in the global fashion business. Curr Sociol 54:745–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392106066817

Beckham D, Voyer BG (2014) Can sustainability be luxurious? A mixed-method investigation of implicit and explicit attitudes towards sustainable luxury consumption. Adv Consum Res 42:245–250

Google Scholar  

Bhaduri G, Ha-Brookshire JE (2011) Do transparent business practices pay? Exploration of transparency and consumer purchase intention. Cloth Text Res J 29(2):135–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302x11407910

Bocken NM, Short SW, Rana P, Evans S (2014) A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J Clean Prod 65:42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039

Bocken NM, de Pauw I, Bakker C, van der Grinten B (2016) Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J Ind Prod Eng 33(5):308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124

Davies IA, Lee Z, Ahonkhai I (2012) Do consumers care about ethical-luxury? J Bus Ethics 106(1):37–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1071-y

De Angelis M, Adıgüzel F, Amatulli C (2017) The role of design similarity in consumers’ evaluation of new green products: an investigation of luxury fashion brands. J Clean Prod 141:1515–1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.230

De Brito MP, Carbone V, Blanquart CM (2008) Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: organisation and performance. Int J Prod Econ 114(2):534–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.06.012

Easey M (ed) (2009) Fashion marketing. Wiley, Oxford

Elkington J (1998) Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ Qual Manag 8(1):37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106

Emberley V (1998) Venus and furs: the cultural politics of fur. I. B. Tauris & Co., London

Fabietti L (2015) Quagga l’emblema dell’eco-fashion. Available at https://www.lastampa.it/tuttogreen/2015/07/31/news/quagga-l-emblema-dell-eco-fashion-br-1.35247156

Fernandez C (2018). How can fashion embrace the circular economy? The Business of Fashion. Available at https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/voices/how-can-fashion-embrace-the-circular-economy

Fisk P (2010) People planet profit: how to embrace sustainability for innovation and business growth. Kogan Page Publishers, London/Philadelphia

Fletcher K (2010) Slow fashion: an invitation for systems change. Fash Pract 2(2):259–265. https://doi.org/10.2752/175693810x12774625387594

Forno F, Ceccarini L (2006) From the street to the shops: the rise of new forms of political actions in Italy. South Eur Soc Polit 11(2):197–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608740600645501

Gershoff AD, Frels JK (2015) What makes it green? The role of centrality of green attributes in evaluations of the greenness of products. J Mark 79(1):97–110. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0303

Global Fashion Agenda, Boston Consulting Group (2017) Pulse of the Fashion Industry report

Grappi S, Romani S, Barbarossa C (2017) Fashion without pollution: how consumers evaluate brands after an NGO campaign aimed at reducing toxic chemicals in the fashion industry. J Clean Prod 149:1164–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.183

Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Van den Bergh B (2010) Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. J Pers Soc Psychol 98(3):392. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346

Hardy A (2019) Interview: Designer Mara Hoffman on sustainability in fashion. Available at https://www.teenvogue.com/story/interview-designer-mara-hoffman-sustainability-in-fashion

Hill J, Lee HH (2012) Young generation Y consumers’ perceptions of sustainability in the apparel industry. J Fash Mark Manag Int J 16(4):477–491. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021211265863

Hill J, Lee HH (2015) Sustainable brand extensions of fast fashion retailers. J Fash Mark Manag Int J 19(2):205–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-09-2012-0056

Huang MH, Rust RT (2011) Sustainability and consumption. J Acad Mark Sci 39(1):40–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0193-6

Janssen C, Vanhamme J, Lindgreen A, Lefebvre C (2014) The Catch-22 of responsible luxury: effects of luxury product characteristics on consumers’ perception of fit with corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 119(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1621-6

Joy A, Sherry JF Jr, Venkatesh A, Wang J, Chan R (2012) Fast fashion, sustainability, and the ethical appeal of luxury brands. Fash Theory 16(3):273–295. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174112x13340749707123

Kagawa F (2007) Dissonance in students’ perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability: implications for curriculum change. Int J Sustain High Educ 8(3):317–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370710817174

Kant R (2012) Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard. Nat Sci 4(1):22–26. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2012.41004

Kapferer JN, Michaut-Denizeau A (2014) Is luxury compatible with sustainability? Luxury consumers’ viewpoint. J Brand Manag 21(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51127-6_7

Kapferer JN, Michaut-Denizeau A (2019) Are millennials really more sensitive to sustainable luxury? A cross-generational international comparison of sustainability consciousness when buying luxury. J Brand Manag 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-019-00165-7

Khan S (2016) Sustainable fashion in Peru. Available at https://www.organicspamagazine.com/2016/07/31/sustainable-fashion-peru/

Klein N (2000) No logo. Flamingo, London. Anita Harris and Chilla Bulbeck, 52

Kozlowski A, Searcy C, Bardecki M (2018) The reDesign canvas: fashion design as a tool for sustainability. J Clean Prod 183:194–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.014

Laufer D, Gillespie K (2004) Differences in consumer attributions of blame between men and women: the role of perceived vulnerability and empathic concern. Psychol Mark 21(2):141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10119

Li J, Leonas KK (2019) Trends of sustainable development among luxury industry. In: Sustainable luxury. Springer, Singapore, pp 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0623-5_6

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Lochard C, Murat A (2011) Luxe et développement durable: La nouvelle alliance. Editions Eyrolles, Paris

Lorek S, Spangenberg JH (2014) Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy–beyond green growth and green economies. J Clean Prod 63:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.045

Luo X, Du S (2015) Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation. Mark Lett 26(4):703–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9302-5

Maignan I, Ferrell OC (2001) Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument-concepts, evidence and research directions. Eur J Mark 35(3/4):457–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560110382110

Moisander J, Personen S (2002) Narratives of sustainable ways of living: constructing the self and others as a green consumer. Manag Decis 40(4):329–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740210426321

Mont O, Plepys A (2008) Sustainable consumption progress: should we be proud or alarmed? J Clean Prod 16(4):531–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.01.009

Mortara A, Fragapane S (2016) Moda, made in Italy e sostenibilità: un connubio possibile? Riv Trimest Sci Ammin 4:1

Mustonen M, Pal R, Mattila H, Mashkoor Y (2013) Success indicators in various fashion business models. J Glob Fash Mark Int J 4(2):74–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2013.763476

Niinimäki K, Hassi L (2011) Emerging design strategies in sustainable production and consumption of textiles and clothing. J Clean Prod 19(16):1876–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.020

Paradisi G (2016) Ankura a Peruvian ecosustainable fashion brand. Available at https://www.treedom.net/en/blog/post/ankura-a-peruvian-ecosustainable-fashion-brand-1897

Pulse of the Fashion Industry (2017) Global Fashion Agenda & Boston Consulting Group. Available at https://globalfashionagenda.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Pulse-of-the-Fashion-Industry_2017.pdf

Report of McKinsey & Company (2019) The state of fashion 2019. Available at https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Retail/Our%20Insights/The%20State%20of%20Fashion%202019%20A%20year%20of%20awakening/The-State-of-Fashion-2019-final.ashx

Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. The Brundtland Commission to the United Nations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Seidman D (2007) How we do anything means everything. Wiley, Hoboken

Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16(15):1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020

Shaw D, Duff R (2002, May) Ethics and social responsibility in fashion and clothing choice. In Proceedings of the EMAC conference, Braga

Shen B, Wang Y, Lo CK, Shum M (2012) The impact of ethical fashion on consumer purchase behavior. J Fash Mark Manag Int J 16(2):234–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021211222842

Spiegel C, Mohsen H (2019) Mara Hoffman receives REPREVE® Champions of Sustainability Award at NYFW: the shows. The award honors Mara Hoffman’s contributions to sustainable fashion

Turk R (2019) Mara Hoffman recognized at NYFW for sustainability. Available at https://fashionunited.com/news/people/mara-hoffman-recognized-at-nyfw-for-sustainability/2019021126078

Turker D, Altuntas C (2014) Sustainable supply chain management in the fast fashion industry: an analysis of corporate reports. Eur Manag J 32(5):837–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.02.001

Widloecher P (2010) Luxe et développement durable: Je t’aime, moi non plus. Luxefrancais

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Business and Management, LUISS University, Rome, Italy

Carmela Donato, Antonella Buonomo & Matteo De Angelis

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmela Donato .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Head of Sustainability, SgT and API, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu

Centro de Estudios para el Lujo Sustentable, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Miguel Angel Gardetti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter.

Donato, C., Buonomo, A., De Angelis, M. (2020). Environmental and Social Sustainability in Fashion: A Case Study Analysis of Luxury and Mass-Market Brands. In: Muthu, S., Gardetti, M. (eds) Sustainability in the Textile and Apparel Industries. Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38532-3_5

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38532-3_5

Published : 20 March 2020

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-38531-6

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-38532-3

eBook Packages : Earth and Environmental Science Earth and Environmental Science (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Sustainable Eco Fashion: Kharakapas -A case study

Today environment and health concerns are a top priority of every sector all over the world. In the past decades or so, there has been a conscious effort to move towards eco-friendly products across industries. Textile industry, one of the oldest industries in the world has also seen similar movement with increasing emphasis on products made from organic and natural fabrics. This case study talks about a budding entrepreneur trying to create a niche for herself in the hotly contested fashion world with eco sustainable fashion products made from natural fabrics especially cotton. Apart from being a good read for business leaders this case study can be very helpful for B - school academicians in understanding the risk and challenges faced by today’s entrepreneurs. The author has charted the journey of Shilpi Yadav the founder of “Kharakapas- its origin, evolution and vision through face to face interactions and secondary research.

Related Papers

GOPALAKRISHNAN DURAISAMY

Green fashion provides consumers with healthier and more eco-friendly apparel choices. The fashion supply chain is one of the most polluting industries in the world, being a huge consumer of water, electricity and chemicals, and discharging massive quantities of wastes to land. Going green has seeped into the nation's consumer consciousness. Synthetic fabrics and clothing fibers processed with heavy chemical agents are facing a declining popularity there because of the harmful and enduring effects on the planet and people's health. Concerned consumers are also becoming increasingly health conscious and actively support greener lifestyles. A review of the environmental impacts associated with apparel across the entire product life cycle revealed that impacts from the production and processing and apparel consumer use stage dwarf those of transportation and product end-of-life. Global pollution and increased awareness are prompting consumers to seek healthier living choices including clothing in these countries. However, the same has not happened in India. Neither textile manufacturers are doing much for sustaining green fashion, nor the lack of awareness about green fashion among customers driving them to go green not only in their own interest but also in the interest of environment. And while some industries have received more attention than others, research has shown that even for consumers with knowledge of environmental impacts resulting from apparel production and manufacture, purchasing green over conventional apparel has not historically been a concern for many consumers. The business interests of these manufacturers act as deterrents for going green. They say that they need to look at all sides of this issue including the end cost of the process. The areas to look at include not only the cost, but also time and even pollution levels caused by the transition to green. Stakeholder's and customer's pressure on sustainability has pushed companies to transform general environmental sustainability concepts into business practices. This is the reason that green clothing is hitting the runways, not only as a fashion, but as a way of life in many countries around the globe. However, a few contributions have offered a comprehensive analysis of the practices employed in the fashion supply chain to reduce its environmental impact. In this paper, a theoretical perception and impact of sustainable green consumption practices in the greener lifestyle is presented.

Dr Vaibbhavi Pruthviraj Ranavaade , Anjali Karolia

The relevance of khadi fabric-the fabric of ages ; to Indian textiles and the fashion system is indisputable. The review paper explores three core aspects of khadi as the iconic Indian brand, the sustainable brand-classic case of slow fashion and a fashion brand with a glocal appeal. This paper presents core brand values for Khadi reinforced in an acronym RUSHI : responsible, unique, sustainable, handmade, Indian –Swadeshi (economic self reliance).Its essential to position the hand-spun and hand-woven khadi fabric as artisanal luxury with a unique texture.

Julie Lantry

Attentiveness to ethical and ecological sustainable practice is building in the garment industry. However, many researchers still consider the garment-making manufacturing system to be ethically and ecologically unsustainable. This thesis explores how industry connections between emerging Australian designers and traditional artisans in India can foster new possibilities for ethically sustainable collaborations. It draws on the experiences of forty-two fashion students collaborating with Indian textile artisans as well as the researchers twenty five years as a fashion practitioner, collaborating with Indian manufacturers. It is argued that firsthand experience for students working with artisans, suppliers and ethical manufacturing practices will increase awareness of the complexities of a sustainable fashion future. This research offers a sustainable model of collaborative practice for future generations of emerging designers, which will build a deeper understanding for better ways to source and design. For artisans, the significance of this thesis could be to build an economically sustainable practice considering contemporary design. It suggests ways to engage in ethical and sustainable practices working with Indian artisans. The outcome of this research aims to contribute to a growing field of ethical practice in fashion and textiles.

IJESMR Journal

Ethical Eco-fashion is sustainable fashion, yet its marketing practices is a topic where we are still in phases and cycles of learning about. The word ethical has been added to the ecological part of the product because though the concept began as niche market and appealed to few consumer, generally found to be of higher social strata or social class in the society. With innovative strategic marketing strategies and tactics, it is being presented before the masses and hence it is a big turnaround towards environmental sustainability. The research study here tries to explore and find out as to how ethics and self of a consumer plays a remarkable role in maintaining the ecological sustainability by purchase of organic or green labelled products. The research also investigates as to how Eco-Fashion is growing, either as fad, or future mantra or utopia in the new millennium. Study also finds out the compelling interest of fashion conglomerates to produce, process and promote – what is eco-friendly and environmentally sustainable, including the maximum possible usage of moral, ethical ways of manufacturing and production of these sustainable, non-harmful products. Interestingly the study aims to find out if the Eco-friendly green products are becoming the mainstream gradually in India and aspects of future consumer buying behaviour in real as well as virtual world.

Confidence Foundation

Sakshi Mahindroo

Debbie Moorhouse

Fashion is widely considered the second most destructive industry to the environment , with a global supply chain employing 58 million people worldwide. During the period of 2000–14, clothing production increased by 50 per cent, as fast-fashion evolved and the luxury sector ascended. Recently, a number of high-profile fashion designers are taking the decision to consciously depart from the constraints of the seasonal fashion calendar, enabling them to reconnect with the creative process, focusing on quality and customer experience. 'With fashion there is too much fear, not enough time, and not enough love' (Elbaz 2017). While sustainable fashion has often been considered a consumer-led movement, which brands have been pressured to act upon, it is important that businesses demonstrate social responsibility through a collaborative approach incorporating design, innovation, technology and communication to successfully create desirable sustainable products

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH I J E T M R JOURNAL

The purpose of this study is to understand the buying behavior towards sustainable and eco-clothing. This paper presents the facts, figures and general awareness about eco fashion and eco clothing. It also elaborates the environmental impacts about the raw material and manufacturing process used for clothing and suggests Sustainable Raw Material be preferred for sustainable clothing's in India, The purpose of this paper is also to examine the relationship between eco fashion and their willingness to pay a premium for eco-clothing's with the focus on gender and age group. This paper classifies the consumer into 7 types with respect to specific attitude to sustainable and eco-clothing within the sample of 119 in Pune region. The findings will help fast fashion retailers, marketers, environmental activists, ecological researchers, charity institutions and public policy makers.

anika kozlowski

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the reported indicators in corporate sustainability reports, other documents and the websites of 14 apparel brands belonging to the Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC). Design/methodology: A content analysis of the corporate sustainability reports, other documents and websites of the 14 SAC apparel brands was conducted to identify indicators related to sustainability. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected on all reported sustainability initiatives, actions and indicators. A normative business model was developed for the categorization of the indicators and a cross-case analysis of the apparel brand’s sustainability reporting was conducted. Findings: Eighty-seven reported corporate sustainability indicators were identified. The study finds that there is a lack of comparability among them. The majority of the indicators dealt with performance in supply-chain sustainability while the least frequently reported indicators were in the areas of business innovation and consumer engagement. Originality: This paper provides one of the first in-depth reviews of the indicators reported by apparel brands within their websites and other forms of corporate sustainability reporting. Keywords: CSR reporting; sustainability reporting; sustainable apparel; sustainability indicators; corporate social responsibility; Sustainable Apparel Coalition; Global Reporting Initiative

Saransh Goyal

RELATED PAPERS

Journal of Statistical Physics

Dieter Mayer

Oscarina Susana Vilela Conceição

Revista científica

Jhony Alexander Villa-Ochoa

Jody Langdon

Susanne Kreim

International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH

Henni Gusfa

Ching-min Chen

AIP Advances

ID on line REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA

RAUL RORISTON GOMES DA SILVA

mohammad kamali

Resumos do...

Larissa Santos

REICE: Revista Electrónica de Investigación en Ciencias Económicas

Felipe Tovar

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Maznah Dahlui

Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal bilimler Enstitüsü dergisi

Revista Portuguesa de Educação

Patricia Grossi

Achmad Ali Fikri

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Richard Bach

Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis

Willi Suter

La lettre du Collège de France

Luca d'Ambrosio

Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks

Silvana Dalmazzone

The Chinese Journal of Physiology

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE

Geraldine Tassin

Gaceta Judicial

Unidad Académica de Investigaciones Jurídicas del Poder Judicial del Estado de Guanajuato

See More Documents Like This

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Practice of sustainable fashion design considering customer emotions and personal tastes.

• Department of Clothing and Textiles, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea

This study aimed to determine a sustainable design practice approach that can satisfy customer emotions and personal tastes, which designers need in the early stages of the SFD process, and improve environmental performance. The research was conducted through a case study and interviews. For case studies, the specific design methods of fashion brands, which have been ranked sustainable over the last 3 years in the world’s top fashion magazines favored by the public, were researched. The results of the case studies were used to draw questions for the in-depth interviews. The results are as follows: first, the design approaches of SFBs were categorized into “eco-friendly materials,” “functional durability design,” “reuse and remanufacturing,” “emotional durability design,” and sustainable fashion technology. Each type’s specific design approach methods were organized into a checklist for the practice of SFD and then reflected in the interview questions. From the results of the interviews, it was noted that the sustainable design approaches perceived by Korean designers were “eco-friendly materials,” “reuse and remanufacturing,” and “functional durability design.” Moreover, it was mentioned that specific methods of emotional durability design and sustainable fashion technology need to be acquired. By applying the checklist to the interviewees, interview participants could conveniently and quickly recognize how to apply sustainable design through the inventory. This study is significant because it presents a checklist, an efficient tool for sustainable design approaches, and a sustainable design practice method that can satisfy customer emotions and personal tastes and improve environmental performance.

Introduction

The fashion industry is one of the industries that have contributed significantly to the growth of the global consumer goods industry for decades. Nevertheless, the environmental damage caused by water pollution and CO2 produced at each stage of the fashion supply chain is the second largest after the oil industry ( Villemain, 2019 ). Hence, the fashion industry’s responsibility for sustainable environmental development and its obligation to restore the environment are emphasized, as much as the share of the fashion industry in the global industry ( Caniato et al., 2012 ; Dissanayake and Sinha, 2015 ; Lawless and Medvedev, 2016 ; Maldini et al., 2019 ; O’Connell, 2020 ). Since the mid-2000s, industrial supply systems around the world have been affected by sustainability and have struggled to develop environmental management strategies ( Reoberto and Esposito, 2016 ). Previous studies have stated that a green supply system based on a circular economy is important in presenting a vision for sustainable manufacturing ( Zhu et al., 2011 ; Stahel, 2016 ; Geissdoerfer et al., 2017 ). H&M has regularly published public reports on sustainability activities since it launched an ethical fashion brand called “Conscious Collection” in 2011 ( Baker, 2011 ). In addition to mainstream brands such as Nike and M&S, it is considered a leader in sustainable business execution ( Kozlowski et al., 2019 ; Claxton and Kent, 2020 ). Many fashion companies, including Uniqlo, North Face, and New Balance, also recognize the importance of sustainability and supply chain management ( Shen, 2014 ). Early studies on sustainable fashion focused on eco-designs, which focused on the environmental harm during the product life cycle, from using materials to production and disposal. They were followed by studies on various tools for measuring performance in the three aspects of sustainability and strategies for sustainable fashion design (SFD) ( Pigosso et al., 2013 ; Rossi et al., 2016 ; Ahmad et al., 2018 ; Karell and Niinimäki, 2020 ). Emotionally durable design aims at a circular economy as a design approach that extends the life of a product by encouraging a more durable and resilient relationship with the product through the emotional experience that occurs between the product and the consumer ( Haines-Gadd et al., 2018 ). It can be said that it is a design method that allows modern people who consume selectively and wisely to choose sustainable product design according to their sensibility and personal taste. In previous studies, consumers agreed to the practice of sustainability but rejected sustainable products that did not fit their tastes ( Karell and Niinimäki, 2020 ). Additionally, while about 80% of sustainability impacts are determined at the design stage, which is an early stage in the production process, design methods still tend to rely on the designer’s intuition ( Ramani et al., 2010 ; Ribeiro et al., 2013 ; Ahmad et al., 2018 ; Keshavarz-Ghorabaee et al., 2019 ; Karell and Niinimäki, 2020 ). Designers play an essential role in sustainable environmental performance and decisively impact the future environmental effects of their products ( Boks, 2006 ; Ramani et al., 2010 ; Ribeiro et al., 2013 ; Ahmad et al., 2018 ; Keshavarz-Ghorabaee et al., 2019 ; Karell and Niinimäki, 2020 ). Nevertheless, fashion designers still need to understand the complexity of sustainable fashion issues and the unpredictable future of fashion design related to diversity, rapidly changing trends, and consumers ( Kozlowski et al., 2019 ). The world’s well-known fashion magazines, such as Vogue, Elle, and Harper’s Bazaar, rank and release articles on fashion products of sustainable fashion brands (SFBs). This implies that the public interest in sustainable fashion products is high. Thus, it is imperative to propose practical methods for easy-to-use SFD, in which the complexity of sustainability and the intuition and experience of designers are objectified.

The purpose of this study is to support the circular economy by satisfying customers’ sensibility and personal taste, improving environmental performance, and determining a design approach that designers can easily use in SFD.

Literature review

Sustainable fashion design.

Sustainability means that businesses must address social goals such as environmental conservation, social justice, and economic development ( Yıldızbaşı et al., 2021 ). It is in the same vein as the importance of business performance measured by considering the three dimensions of sustainability in the overall green industry ( Pattnaik et al., 2021 ). SFD refers to design that considers the social, environmental, and economic impacts associated with the fashion products in the entire life cycle until the end of their life, from the raw materials to the use and disposal ( Niinimäki, 2006 ; Kozlowski et al., 2019 ). Ecological, economic, and social factors have been the basis of many studies as the triple bottom line (TBL) of sustainability ( Raza et al., 2021 ). Today’s SFD has evolved into a system that plans products to suppress the occurrence of environmentally hazardous elements in the fashion product supply chain ( Ceschin and Gaziulusoy, 2016 ; Kozlowski et al., 2019 ). In the fashion industry, three out of five apparel items are discarded within a year of production ( Puspita and Chae, 2021 ). Problem-solving in sustainable fashion requires improving the complex apparel supply chain and the consumers, companies, and governments involved. Several previous studies have noted that designers are crucial to influencing changes in the sustainable design industry ( Lawless and Medvedev, 2016 ; Hur and Cassidy, 2019 ; Kozlowski et al., 2019 ). To achieve the sustainability goals of fashion products, designers should play an active role in design from the early stage of the production process by predicting the ethical behavior of fashion product production and consumption ( Ceschin and Gaziulusoy, 2016 ). For SFD, Kozlowski et al. (2019) stated that aesthetic and cultural dimensions should also be considered along with performance in three aspects: the environmental, social, and economic aspects of sustainability. These aspects must be regarded because sustainable fashion products that have been produced so far have become another environmentally hazardous factor because they have not been chosen as consumers’ tastes are not met. Currently, various tools are used to predict the performance of sustainable fashion supply chains ( Bovea and Pérez-Belis, 2012 ; Kozlowski et al., 2019 ). However, considering that approximately 80% of the sustainability impact over the entire life cycle of fashion products are determined in the design stage ( Ribeiro et al., 2013 ; Ahmad et al., 2018 ), it is necessary to explore various approaches to SFD.

Sustainable fashion brand

Fashion companies such as Zara, Nike, and H&M, including Kering, which currently has a portfolio of luxury brands, regularly publish public reports describing their sustainability activities ( Kozlowski et al., 2019 ). Most sections of the fashion industry, such as general apparel, sportswear, shoes, and underwear, are paying attention to sustainable product development in consideration of environmental, economic, and social issues. In 2010, H&M announced the first sustainable collection made from sustainable materials such as organic cotton, linen, recycled polyester, and Tencel of wood pulp fabric ( Portuguez, 2010 ). Then, in 2011, it launched a new “Conscious” collection and pledged to develop the Sustainable Apparel Coalition, an initiative devised to expand the use of organic and sustainable materials, educate cotton farmers, and measure the environment, impact, and labor practices for apparel and shoe manufacturing ( Baker, 2011 ). In 2011, Patagonia also started the “Do Not Buy This Jacket” campaign, which promotes conscious buying, upcycling, and product use changes ( Bandyopadhyay and Ray, 2020 ). Simultaneously, Patagonia operated a recycling program called the Common Threads Initiative, which focused on the “4 Rs” to enable the recycling of its products. It aims to reduce resale through eBay and recycling based on customer partnerships ( Patagonia Inc, 2011 ). One of the interests of Patagonia was in ethics for the life of workers, and Patagonia became one of the first fashion brands to take responsibility in partnership with Fair Trade USA. This movement has advocated for improved social and environmental standards since 2014 ( Teen Vogue, 2019 ; Bandyopadhyay and Ray, 2020 ). In 2014, to develop a roadmap to create a more sustainable supply chain and conserve endangered forests in Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, Stella McCartney, H&M, Eileen Fisher, Patagonia, and Inditex/Zara formed a group of promising forest conservation policies. The group created a shared “knowledge map” for the viscose supply chain to facilitate the removal of endangered forest fibers and pledged to support a long-term conservation solution for high-priority forest areas, such as rainforests in Indonesia and rainforests and subarctic forests in Canada. Furthermore, they have pledged to support the development of sustainable fabric alternatives made of recycled fabrics, recycled materials, and agricultural byproducts such as straw ( Sustainable brands, 2014 ). Stella McCartney is a London-based luxury brand belonging to Kering that does not use unsustainable animal materials, such as fur, leather, and feathers. It is known to operate a brand with ceaseless sustainable thinking. Their 2019 collection was rated as the most sustainable among the past collections because 75% of the collection used Econyl and recycled polyester, while the rest used organic cotton or upcycled denim. They announced Koba faux fur made from corn byproducts mixed with recycled polyester as an alternative to plastic options ( Frost, 2019 ).

In 2015, Kering announced Environmental Profit and Loss (EP and L), a sustainability statement calling for industry accountability. In 2016, EP and L were applied to all brands of Kering. Further, the EP and L demanded environmental and ethical responsibility across the supply chain from damage to environmental impacts caused by fashion products and not to evade fair-trade labor practice, carbon imprint, and energy and resource conservation ( Social Media Today, 2015 ). It started with upcycling fashion brands in 2008 and evolved as Kolon Industries, a large fashion company, launched “RE: CODE,” an upcycling fashion brand that introduced fashion products manufactured by recycling fashion products to be incinerated and automotive parts ( Park and Kim, 2014 ). RE: CODE was launched in 2012 as a sustainable brand by Kolon Industries, Inc., a large fashion company in South Korea. It creates new value based on upcycling, which refers to making new clothes by recycling deadstock and clothing waste. RE: CODE breaks fashion stereotypes, creates new uses, and encourages the world to participate in environmental and sustainable societal movements ( Kolon Industries, 2012 ). Kolon Industries has been working on the Noah Project since 2016 as a campaign to protect endangered animals and plants in South Korea. “Kolon Sports” of Kolon Industries applied 100% eco-friendly materials and techniques to all products in the collection in 2020 as part of the Noah Project ( Park, 2020 ).

As described above, the sustainable activities of fashion companies are group activities and campaigns focused on eco-friendly materials and material recycling. More and more fashion brands were putting the concept of sustainability at the forefront of their design goals.

Sustainable design approach and method

Previous studies have dealt with guides for various conceptual design tools and strategies to help apparel designers implement sustainability. Ceschin and Gaziulusoy (2016) classified sustainable design approaches and methods into “green design and eco-design,” “emotionally durable design,” “nature-inspired design,” “cradle-to-cradle design,” “biomimicry design,” “design for the base of the pyramid,” “sustainable product-service system design,” and “design for system innovations and transitions.” Rossi et al. (2016) summarized design approaches with “design for X concept” and classified them into “design for disassembly,” “design for remanufacturing,” design for material recycling, and “design for energy efficiency.” Based on some previous studies, Irwin (2015) and Sumter et al. (2020) classified design approaches by adding “design for a circular economy” to “eco-design,” “nature-inspired design,” “sustainable product-service systems,” “design for low resource settings,” “design for social innovation,” and “transition design.” De Pauw et al. (2014) conducted exploratory case studies to compare “eco-design” as an eco-friendly method to the methods of “biomimicry” and “cradle-to-cradle.” Väänänen and Pöllänen (2020) stated that the introduction of craft techniques into recycling and upcycling products makes products aesthetically pleasing and meaningful, which can be associated with the emotional durability of products that increases consumer attachment. Attachment can be one of the solutions to these problems because sustainability products in the past have not elicited empathy for respecting the individualities and tastes of consumers, compared to the increase in environmental awareness among consumers ( Karell and Niinimäki, 2020 ). Ramani et al. (2010) have classified “modular design,” “part standardization,” “take-back management,” “design for disassembly,” “design for reuse and remanufacturing,” and “design for material recovery” as design methods for improving end-of-life (EOL) management that enables multiple life cycles of “cradle-to-cradle.” Ramani et al. (2010) mentioned developing a laser-based manufacturing process to reduce material waste. Further, it involves not releasing hazardous elements during design and processes using computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided process planning (CAPP), which can affect the design in the early stage.

Figure 1 summarizes the classification of design approaches by researchers in previous studies. Based on these earlier studies on sustainable design, we classified design approaches into five categories in the early stage of sustainable design in this study. These include “eco-design,” “cradle-to-cradle,” “biomimicry,” “design for reuse and remanufacturing,” and “emotionally durable design,” which were used in the case analysis of sustainable designs in the next section. Figure 1 shows the process of deriving five sustainable design approaches based on the classifications of the five previous studies.

Figure 1. Process of classifying sustainable design approaches based on previous studies.

Methodology

The research was conducted through a case study and interviews. The research procedure is (1) classifying sustainable design approaches through a review of previous research; (2) based on this, the sustainable design approach and detailed design method for fashion designers were investigated in the world’s top fashion magazines favored by the public, (3) using the results of the case study as a tool for an in-depth interview with designers of SFB in Korea, and (4) determining design approaches that designers can easily use in the early stages of the SFD process. Figure 2 illustrates the framework of the study.

Figure 2. Framework of this study.

Regarding the research method, it analyzed the cases for the representation methods of SFBs that were ranked in the world’s top fashion magazines based on the sustainable design approaches derived through the literature review. The analysis focused on a total of 141 SFBs in nine articles searched using “the best SFB” in Vogue, Elle, and Harper’s Bazaar, which are the world’s top popular fashion magazines for 3 years from 2019 to 2021. Additionally, for the analysis of the design approaches of the collected 149 SFBs, additional design methods were identified in the introduction window and product introduction of brand websites, along with the contents of the articles. Table 1 summarizes the titles of the nine articles for the top-ranking fashion brands in the analyzed fashion magazines.

Table 1. Articles on sustainable fashion brands (SFBs) selected from the world’s top popular fashion magazines.

The interviews were conducted from 14 September 2021 to 30 March 2022. The interview participants were randomly selected from among the brands selected or applied for the SFB support project of the Korean or local government. Eleven designers from sustainable fashion start-ups in Korea participated in the interviews. Each interview was conducted face-to-face or via Zoom and lasted approximately 40–50 min. Table 2 shows the contents related to the interview participants, including Sustainable Fashion Branding Experience, Fashion Designer Experience, and fashion products designed by them. Letters were assigned according to the order of the interviews to ensure anonymity.

Table 2. Interview participants.

The interviews were recorded and transcribed with the consent of the interviewees. Semi-structured questions were used for the interview, and additional questions were asked to obtain specific answers and opinions. As shown in Figure 3 , the interview questions were mainly composed of three questions. The first part concerned the launch date of SFB, the goal of sustainable development, and cognition of triple bottom line (TBL) of sustainability. The second part was to identify the difference between the design approach currently used by the interviewed designers and the design method shown in the world’s best fashion magazines favored by the public, through the SFB design approach checklist based on the case study results. Finally, the third part consisted of comments and suggestions on practical tools for a sustainable design approach after the interview participants had used the checklist. Figure 3 is the frame of the interview question extraction process based on the checklist derived from the case study.

Figure 3. Interview questions on sustainable fashion brands’ (SFBs) design approach methods.

Case study of sustainable fashion brands’ design approach

A total of 149 SFBs were ranked by the world’s most popular fashion magazines for 3 years. Among them, 34 SFBs appeared twice or more, indicating that the SFB market has not yet been established stably. This may be an obvious result because it has only been approximately 10 years since fully fledged SFBs emerged. However, 35 brands were ranked only once in 2019, 19 in 2020, and 56 in 2021. Fashion brand activities were reduced in 2020 because of the SFB market shrinkage caused by COVID-19. Nevertheless, it can be seen that public interest in SFBs has increased since the number of new fashion brands in popular fashion magazines grew significantly in 2021. Thus, it is necessary to suggest a practical design approach for SFD that consumers can directly choose. Figure 4 shows the design classification process of the SFB based on the sustainable design approach classification derived from the literature review and was used as the category for the following case study.

Figure 4. Design approach classification process of sustainable fashion brand (SFB).

As a result of the case analysis based on the sustainable design approach of the previous studies, the design approaches of SFBs were categorized into: “eco-friendly materials,” “functional durability design,” “fashion for reuse and remanufacturing,” “emotionally durable design,” and “sustainable fashion technology.” Furthermore, case analysis was conducted for the specific design approaches applied in the early stage of the design process of SFB based on these categories as follows:

Eco-friendly materials

The use of eco-friendly materials is one of the metrics of sustainable fashion. Specifically, as eco-friendly materials are used, the sustainability of each product increases ( Wang and Shen, 2017 ). The environmental impact during the product life cycle can be minimized only by choosing eco-friendly materials ( Ribeiro et al., 2013 ; Ahmad et al., 2018 ; Claxton and Kent, 2020 ). In particular, sustainable fashion products made of organic fabrics are fundamental to the supply chain because they contain fewer chemicals that harm the environment ( Shen, 2014 ). At the initial design stage, designers should consider using biodegradable materials that can be returned to the soil without causing additional damage to nature ( Gurova and Morozova, 2018 ).

The study of SFB product cases revealed that the selection of eco-friendly materials was required in almost all companies as a design approach. It appeared with eco-friendly materials, 100% organic cotton materials, a method tracing the origin of materials, or using vegetable materials. Additionally, it adopted a short-distance distribution to use eco-friendly materials near the production site as SFB’s design strategy to reduce CO2 emissions.

1. Certified sustainable materials using 100% organic cotton materials include Patagonia (Nagurney and Yu, 2012), H&M Conscious ( Bédat, 2019 ), Stella McCartney ( McCartney, 2020 ), Mara Hoffman ( Bédat, 2019 ), and Theory ( Elle Fashion Team, 2020 ), Burberry ( Wang, 2020 ), House of Sunny ( Davis, 2021 ), BITE Studios ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ), Reformation ( Bédat, 2019 ), Baserange ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ), and Yasmina Q ( Davis, 2021 ), among others.

2. Tracing the origin of eco-friendly materials: Stella McCartney has adopted a method of tracing the origin of trees supplying viscose raw materials used strategically to help the environment by protecting endangered forests ( Davis, 2021 ) and, further, including those facilitating tracing of all eco-friendly materials on the brand’s website ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ).

3. Using vegetable materials: Vegan materials include Bleusalt’s signature fabric, an entirely vegan material with beech ( Penrose and Hearst, 2019 ). Moreover, notably, Alohas made shoes with two vegan types of leather from cactus and corn ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ). VEJA’s sneakers used organic cotton for fair trade and soles made of rubber grown in the Amazon rainforest ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ). Additionally, Allbirds often makes soles with sugarcane and manufacture uppers using eucalyptus or natural merino wool ( Davis, 2021 ).

4. Net zero: Mulberry produces bags by developing the lowest carbon leather ( Vogue, 2021 ). Sonia Carrasco uses only organic or vegan materials for clothes and tags, labels, packaging, and papers ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ). Wright Le Chapelain maintained a transparent supply chain of sustainability and fabrics sourced from UK factories over short distances ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ). Tretorn also launched eco-friendly sneakers made of locally sourced canvases ( Davis, 2021 ).

Functional durability design

The properties and quantity of materials and the shape of the clothes used by fashion designers affect the quality and durability, which can remarkably impact the life of clothes ( Claxton and Kent, 2020 ). Connor-Crabb et al. (2016) argued that trans -seasonal, multi-functionality, modularity, alterability, and physical emotional durability are approaches to functional durability design. Further, they stated that on-demand production is included in this category. According to Rahman and Gong (2016) , functional durability design extends the physical life of durable, organic, and recyclable fabric materials from a technical perspective. Moreover, it is a method of extending aesthetic life based on the emotional durability of the product. This study separated the approaches to emotional durability and discussed them. Transformable apparel provides two or more functional or aesthetic alternative styles ( Rahman and Gong, 2016 ) and can extend the life of clothes. Modularized garment design is the task of dividing a garment into several parts based on the functional analysis of different parts. As many examples of various functions and specifications are included in each piece, user-oriented clothes can be designed quickly and flexibly ( Zhou et al., 2016 ). According to the case study, the method of functional durability design appeared to be on-demand production, quality, durability, multi-functionality, and alterability.

1. On-demand production: The House of Sunny works on only two seasonal collections per year and produces small quantities based on orders. The design team spends more time researching sustainable fabrics, manufacturing methods, and sourcing materials ( Elle Fashion Team, 2020 , 2021 ; Davis, 2021 ). Further, Maison Cléo minimizes waste by selling it only once a week ( Elle Fashion Team, 2020 ). Mary produces timeless limited editions based on orders without inventory ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ).

2. Quality and durability: Everlane has chosen the finest materials and manufacturing methods for timeless products, such as the highest class cashmere sweaters, Italian shoes, and Peruvian Pima t-shirts ( EVERLANE, 2021 ).

3. Alterability: Misha Nonoo’s “Easy 8” collection features eight pieces that can produce 22 changeable looks ( Davis, 2021 ). Nynne has included various styling options and is placed in a seam line across the leather skirt so that the length can be reduced if the user gets bored of the size and introduced reversible shearling jackets for two completely different looks ( Davis, 2021 ). The CAES has proposed timeless items that can be worn throughout the year by adding a premium to slow fashion with a concept that compares clothes to protective “cases” that cover our bodies ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ). Petit Pli designed clothes that can be worn for a long time, even if the body changes, by creating variable garments that can be increased or decreased in length depending on the wearer in a chic-pleated manner. Cho proposed varying designs with clothes that could be adjusted in size based on a detachable panel in the style of clothes manufactured using recycled plastic bottles and ethically sourced ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ).

Fashion for reuse and remanufacturing

Energy is required for designing and producing new products ( DeLong et al., 2014 ). Therefore, sustainable fashion designers should consider valuable new product design methods that facilitate multiple life cycles by reusing and reconstructing discarded products. Janigo and Wu (2015) classified design approaches for reuse and remanufacturing into repair and alteration, upcycle, downcycle, post-consumer used and secondhand clothing, post-consumer recycled clothing, and redesigned clothing. Gurova and Morozova (2018) stated that upcycling, reuse, and repurposing methods exist.

In the case study of the SFB approach, the methods of reuse and remanufacturing were sourcing sustainable yarns from waste, redesigning clothing, and repurposing.

1. Recycled yarns: Burberry heritage trench coats and lightweight classic car coats are produced using Econyl, a sustainable nylon yarn made of recycled fishing nets, fabric scraps, and industrial plastics ( Wang, 2020 ). Baum und Pferdgarten uses recycled denim and recycled polyester from plastic bottles ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ; Vogue, 2021 ). Maggie Marilyn sourced 100% of synthetic fibers discarded after consumption ( Marius, 2020 ). Prada launched Prada Re-Nylon, a line of sustainable bags and accessories made of discarded cloth and recycled plastics collected from the sea and fishing nets ( Elle Fashion Team, 2020 ). JW Anderson introduced belt totes made of recycled plastic ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ). PAPER London launched swimsuits produced using recycled yarns from fishing nets, which would have taken 600 years to discompose ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ). The Pringle of Scotland, known as knitwear, has used 100% recycled fibers to produce limited-edition jumpers and recycled clothing tags ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ).

2. Redesigned clothing: Acne Studios has designed super-sized jackets and unique mini-skirts of modern images that the brand has as products that recycled discarded black denim and red leather ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ). Rave Review introduced luxurious upcycled fashions using fabrics and deadstock clothes and created tufty overcoats by upcycling vintage bedspreads ( Wang, 2020 ). Marine Serre has sourced discarded scarves, secondhand shirts, and wetsuit materials, turning them into futuristic practical wear from parkas to panel dresses ( Lim, 2019 ).

3. Repurposing: Mulberry bags aim to extend product life through repair, restoration, buyback, reselling, and repurposing ( Vogue, 2021 ). Matty Bovan sourced the fabrics and prints used in its collection by working with the Liberty Fabric Archives. In a previous collection, they recycled soccer pads to inflate the shoulders and redesigned old fur into new shapes ( Bonacic, 2020 ).

Emotionally durable design

An emotionally durable fashion design approach can extend the product life cycle based on the emotional attachment between consumers and products ( Claxton and Kent, 2020 ). Emotionally durable fashion originates from a business environment in which products connect consumers and manufacturers and provide conversation pieces that facilitate the ease of upgrades, services, and repairs ( Chapman, 2005 ). Consumers are attached to physical objects through complex interactions between cultural norms, personal preferences, and behaviors ( Connor-Crabb et al., 2016 ). Fashion customers with a taste for handcrafted and luxurious products are emotionally attracted to secondhand clothes reborn with felt, quilt, and dye and purchase them ( Janigo and Wu, 2015 ). Consumers stay attached for longer to products that elicit amazement and endless pleasure ( Armstrong et al., 2016 ). Consumers’ attachment to products that meet their personal characteristics and tastes leads to an extension of their product life. Design strategies that encourage social contact through sharing or group use may lead to attachment ( Armstrong et al., 2016 ). Upcycling designs using heirlooms or garments with strong personal attachment have emotional durability ( DeLong et al., 2014 ). Furthermore, handicrafts made by artisans have substantial value as a medium of sustainable fashion with devotion, as sustainable design reflecting local resources and culture can lead to the derivation of narratives ( Sandhu, 2020 ).

In the study of SFBs, emotionally durable fashion designs appeared to collaborate with artisans and artists in the production area, handwoven material sourcing, and emotional design concepts.

1. Collaboration with artisans: Bite Studios creates sustainable fashion products by collaborating with emerging and existing artists in various works, such as natural dyeing techniques, printmaking, and handmade jewelry ( Vogue, 2021 ). Chopova Lowena ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ) pursues uniqueness with vibrant combinations of Bulgarian folk handcraft materials made through craftsmanship and English tailoring ( Elle Fashion Team, 2020 ; BROWNS FASHION, 2021 ). Hereu’s bags and shoes are products made by local artisans at the home of the founding designer of Spanish nationality ( Elle Fashion Team, 2021 ). Ballen Pellettiere accessories commemorate Colombian fashion and artisans’ crafts, and playful embroidery paired with a unique shape is a trademark of their handmade bags ( Penrose and Hearst, 2019 ).

2. Handwoven material sourcing: Bethany Williams’ recycled tents and handwoven denim ensembles reflect their signature multicolor patchwork and streetwear sentiments ( Lim, 2019 ), while wooden buttons handcrafted by carving are discarded birches that reflect consumers’ individualities and preferences ( Bonačić, 2021 ). Bodes are brands that use recycled vintage cloth as materials and have unique handcrafted works containing stories of quilting, mending, and appliances by sourcing fabrics from all over the world, including Victorian quilts and 100-year-old linens ( BODE, 2021 ). Brother Vellies’ shoes and handbags are handmade in South Africa, Ethiopia, Kenya, and Morocco, combining the expertise of local artisans.

3. Personal design concept: Nynne approaches sustainable fashion consumer sentiment with a unique design concept named “Diana” dress as the brand’s signature work ( Davis, 2021 ).

Sustainable fashion technology

Digital tools can be used to find new behaviors in existing materials by modifying their structures, and a new understanding based on this can expand the possibilities provided to designers. By extensively using 3D design software, designers can design complex woven clothing, even if they have little understanding of weaving or weaving software ( Chapman, 2005 ). Sustainable fashion technology is related to creative pattern cutting, which can reduce environmental impact. Zero-waste pattern cutting is making fabric using the predetermined width and length to minimize the fabric’s loss in the cutting stage ( Townsend and Mills, 2013 ). Zero-waste fashion can show new expressions while reducing or eliminating waste in product production by mixing creative design practices and zero-waste pattern cutting ( McQuillan, 2019 ). Applying this method requires intuition and experience. However, in recent years, innovative designs and technological progress have made it easier to adopt creative practices. Software such as CLO enables fast initial design creation and facilitates the development of highly innovative woven shapes by visualizing 2D patterns, 3D shapes, and waste generated during garment design ( McQuillan, 2019 ).

In this study, the zero-waste fashion approach also included cases in which technologies that did not affect a sustainable environment were utilized.

1. 3D technique: PRISM Squared swimwear, sportswear, underwear, and shapewear produced by a seamless 3D knitting technique are created with almost no loss of fabrics during the production process (Elle team, 2020).

2. Digital printing: Hoffman performs digital printing directly on finished sweaters to ensure that the loss of fabric caused by pattern matching will not occur ( Marius, 2020 ; Offman, 2021 ).

3. Lasers and robotics: Levis produced jeans in a way that is better for the environment by combining lasers and robotics ( Elle Fashion Team, 2020 ; Davis, 2021 ).

Checklist from the result of the case study

Figure 5 shows a summary of the specific methods for each design approach category, which can be applied in practical design in the early design phase of SFBs based on the experimental techniques derived from the case studies for each SFD approach category.

Figure 5. Representation methods by sustainable fashion brand (SFB) design approach category.

The interview was conducted in three stages. In the first stage, questions were about fashion designers and SFB practical experience, cognitions related to TBL of sustainability, and whether and how TBL performance was applied to the company. In the second stage, an interview was conducted to find out the current practical approach of the interviewees using the SFD approach checklist derived from the SFBs case study results that appeared in the world’s top popular fashion magazines. The third stage was an interview on whether the checklist can be used as a practical tool for a sustainable design approach. Eleven brands participated in interviews.

Experience related to running a sustainable fashion brand and triple bottom line of sustainability

Designers can have a significant impact on the environment by intervening early in the sustainable fashion industry supply chain. With this in mind, the first question was about knowledge of TBL and designer experience. The brands participating in the interviews ranged from micro-sized companies with one person to small- and medium-sized companies with fewer than ten employees. The duration of the SFB operation of the interviewees was between 2 and 12 years. Some of the interviewers were aware of the value and performance of the TBL of sustainability and able to properly explain the application cases in practice. The others could explain corporate SDGs, but misunderstood the TBL of sustainability. That is, most interviewees were aware of environmental values, whereas some had difficulty approaching economic and social values. In particular, they misunderstood the economic value of sustainable environmental development as the economic performance of the company. This is consistent with previous studies in which designers discussed inadequate knowledge about sustainability and the lack of time to acquire it ( Knight and Jenkins, 2009 ; Bovea and Pérez-Belis, 2012 ). The results support that tools for a sustainable design approach should be designed as effective learning mechanisms.

“From the social aspect of TBL, we actively hire women who have lost their careers to provide jobs for women who can be marginalized. From an environmental point of view, the use of recycled plastic bottles was actively introduced in all of the brand’s products, design, manufacturing method, and packing. We strive to reduce the impact of the environment through disposal, end-of-life treatment, which also contributes to sustainable environmental development and economic performance.” (Interviewee A)

This interviewee’s case was characteristic in that it aimed to expand the use of recycled plastic bottles. On the other hand, Interviewee D argued “to minimize the environmental impact, even plastic should not be used.”

Interviewee A and D had opposite views of sustainable development. In the report “Synthetics Anonymous” released by the Changing Markets Foundation (2021) , it is noted that downcycling plastic made from recycled plastic bottles, that is, clothing using recycled polyester, will eventually end up in landfill or incineration rather than circulating fashion. The use of PET bottles as a material for recycling is expected to be controversial in the future.

The role of designers is to create an opportunity to increase the sustainability of fashion design. Further, it is a critical change agent in sustainable fashion ( Niinimäki and Hassi, 2011 ). Most interviewees were aware of the importance of the designer’s role in attaining the value of sustainability. Interviewees A, B, C, D, and E discussed the importance of designers in reaching the value of sustainability because designers influence the life cycle of fashion products, and the design process is organically intertwined with all other areas. Interviewee I explained that a designer’s sense of design determined customers’ product selection and utilization. Moreover, they discussed the importance of design considering customer emotions and personal tastes to induce consumption of sustainable fashion products. Interviewees F and K stated that the role of designers is to convey the importance of sustainability to customers or boost sustainability in customer emotions and personal tastes. Through the interview results, designers can reflect on customer emotions and personal preferences in sustainable fashion products and exert influence throughout the design process to achieve sustainable goals. Designers can effectively implement sustainable fashion if there are tools that make the sustainable design approach more specific, practical, and easy to use.

Design approaches of sustainable fashion brands in Korea through the checklist

The interview on SFB’s approach to sustainable design practice in Korea was conducted by presenting a checklist derived from the case analysis results in the previous chapter. As a result of participating in the checklist, the SFD approach of the brands which participated in the interview mainly utilized “eco-friendly materials,” “functional durability design,” and “fashion for reuse and remanufacturing.” Some brands were new to or unfamiliar with the detailed expression methods of “emotionally durable design” and “sustainable fashion technology.” However, it is thought that it will be helpful for the expansion of sustainable design approaches in the future by realizing that the design process that is currently being implemented for customizing consumer tastes and the design inspired by their own culture belong to this area during the interview. The “eco-friendly materials” design approach is the design approach that most interviewees used, and there were various design expression methods. For example, Interviewee B used leather from the mulberry bark or cactus. Conversely, Interviewee D used sustainable materials, such as organic linen produced even on land unsuitable for grain production with low water consumption and pollution, and GOTS-certified organic cotton. Most of the brands interviewed chose green materials as a sustainable design approach, similar to a case study of SFB products presented by the world’s leading fashion magazines that are popular with the public. However, there was no mention of a method of tracing the origin of eco-friendly materials or tracking the use of eco-friendly materials at a short distance, which is a specific design approach shown in the results of the case study.

In the case study of fashion magazines, “functional durability design” presented specific design methods such as a pre-order method without stock, quality and design that can be worn over time, high-quality sewing, and a manual showing various styling with the few fashion items. Similarly, SFBs in Korea used manual finishing and preorder on-demand methods to ensure the robustness of their products and taught them various styling methods and easy repairs.

”As a company that produces sustainable bags and clothing, it enhances the solid finish with high-quality sewing using hand-sewn in the final finishing process.” (Interviewee B)

”We are adopting the slow business model as a seasonal, non-fashionable design method.” (Interviewee C)

“By connecting the small-volume production method of preorder with brand membership, we create a customer group with high loyalty to the brand. This avoids unnecessary production, resulting in environmental and economic performance. It gives advice to consumers on styling when they cannot use the purchased product and provides customers with information on laundry and care. Buying well-made products from good materials will extend the lifespan of your clothes.” (Interviewee K)

In the case study, “fashion for reuse and remanufacturing” was shown to be resourcing sustainable yarns from waste, or redesigning and repurposing. That is, recycled fishing nets, pieces of cloth, fabrics resourcing from plastic bottles, vintage clothing, outworn bedding, etc., were recycled and redesigned, and the original use of the material was changed. Similarly, in Korea’s SFB interviews, “fashion for reuse and remanufacturing” was found to use resourced materials from waste plastic bottles, use scrap or stock fabrics, or recycle discarded clothing. Among the design expression methods shown in the case study results, most expression methods were used by the brands participating in the interviews, except for recycling waste generated in the agro-food industry as a material.

“In Korea, the domestic waste plastic bottle market is active and has been developed using various materials. So, companies who want to use it can easily purchase it.” (Interviewee A)

“Among the clothes purchased from our brand, we collected the clothes the customer wanted to discard and upcycled it in the direction the customer wanted. The customer liked it very much.” (Interviewee K)

“We are producing hand-knitted handbags by collecting materials thrown away during the clothing-making process.” (Interviewee G)

“The main item is a fabric book cover, and the direction of our brand is to collect discarded scraps and waste subsidiary materials and recreate them as marketable products using handicraft techniques.” (Interviewee I)

“We produce and provide digital patterns that are used to remodel used clothing and provide tutorials for redesigning used clothes into clothing and accessories.” (Interviewer J)

In some cases, wastes with poor function for sports or leisure were recycled and developed into clothing.

”Leisure sports materials such as paragliding, glamping, tents, sails which have been destroyed for safety reasons, but have no problem in actual use, are collected, dismantled, washed, and recycled through a series of processes such as cutting and sewing.” (Interviewer H)

As mentioned above, the approaches of “emotionally durable design” and “sustainable fashion technology” were utilized in conjunction with “functional durability design” or “fashion for reuse and remanufacturing.”

“Emotionally durable design” was a method recognized and applied by only a small number of brands participating in the interview. Interviewee E understood that this design approach is sustainable after checking the design approach of “emotionally durable design” in the checklist.

The specific method of “emotionally durable design” shown in the case study was collaboration with local craftspeople and artisans, folklore handcrafted touches, handwoven material sourcing, personal design concept focusing on the user’s personality and taste, and brand signature pieces.

In Korea’s SFB interviews, “emotionally durable design” appeared as an inspirational approach to handicrafts such as knitting, quilting, and traditional elements of Korea.

“Through work that mixes handicraft with everyday products, we want to appeal to consumers’ sensibility and emphasize to consumers that everything from cutting to finishing is done manually.” (Interviewer I)

“Because we produce products using the preorder method of “Saekdong,” a traditional Korean element, as our brand signature item, we can reflect the individuality and taste of consumers.” (Interviewer E)

“Sustainable fashion technology” is the design approach adopted the least by the brands that participated in the interview. Although it was recognized as a sustainable design approach, designers faced barriers. This was consistent with a previous study, establishing that designers are limited in their adoption of tools for sustainable design or are unable to use them because they are unaware of their existence ( Kozlowski et al., 2019 ). Among the brands that participated in the interview, Interviewees A and B, whose company size was large, actively used seamless 3D knitting techniques, digital printing, and laser cutting technology for finished fashion products but did not mention robotic technology.

“We know that digital printing technology is a sustainable fashion technology, but it is economically burdensome for our head office to have digital printers.” (Interviewee F)

“Our brand also produces knits and jerseys; thus, we know 3D knitting is a comfortable and sustainable way to wear it, but do not know how to approach it.” (Interviewee G)

“Sustainable fashion technology” had a high barrier for interview participants to approach. This is because the size of the brands participating in the interview was small. Notwithstanding, considering that the scale of SFBs is small- and medium-sized, sustainable fashion technology is a sustainable design approach that requires active support or investment from the government.

Opinion on practical tools for sustainable fashion design approach

After using the suggested checklist, interviewees were asked for their opinions and suggestions on the checklist as a practical tool. Regarding the advantages of using the inventory, the interviewees stated that the checklist, a valuable tool for a sustainable design approach, can help clarify a brand’s strategy and easily learn sustainable design approaches. This is considered a tool that can overcome the barriers and limitations of the sustainable design approach. Additionally, they stated that the direction of the sustainability concept could be identified more clearly if the checklist was used when establishing a sustainable brand strategy or planning a new product that pursues sustainability.

“The checklist provides guidelines for SFD. I thought it existed only in theory, but if I checked it when making a product, one could address the missing parts. Furthermore, sustainable brands pursue different goals. It is helpful to think about which side we focus on and value more.” (Interviewee C)

“It is an opportunity to check the brand design direction once more while checking the checklist.” (Interviewee F)

“I think I can check the brand concept by looking at this checklist when doing a new project.” (Interviewee H)

They said learning new sustainable design expression methods is also an advantage.

“While going over the checklist, I thought sustainability could be expressed this way. If we focus on what we are doing in practice, there would be insufficient time to review other things. Thus, the checklist can enable easy and quick understanding.” (Interviewee B)

“I was worried about not practicing it or overlooking it because of ignorance. If there is a tool that is easily accessible like this, I believe it would be convenient to practice.” (Interviewee G)

The advantage of the checklist mentioned by the interviewees is that it enables them to recognize the goals of sustainable development and clarify the design approach according to the concept of the brand. Moreover, the checklist is a tool for effectively learning the design approach to sustainability.

As suggestions for the checklist as a practical tool, constant updates, quantification for objective verification, and more in-depth details were mentioned.

“It seems that new ways to express design that pursue sustainability are emerging as time passes. New methods are proposed yearly for ease of recycling and economy, such as using single-component materials, design, and manufacturing that are easy to repair, reward policy, and lightweight to reduce carbon emissions. Therefore, new methods must be updated over time.” (Interviewee A)

“When it comes to dyeing, the abuse of water becomes a problem. I have encountered a dry dyeing technique that saves approximately 90% of water use, but it is not on the checklist. It would be good if new methods are constantly updated.” (Interviewee F)

Brand A participating in the interview presented numerical values for objective verification.

“Among famous overseas sustainable brands, there are brands that numerically represent sustainability. There is an objective feeling that numbers give. It shows the depth of our participation in sustainability together.”

“The checklist is easy to understand and accessible, but I wish it were detailed. The consideration of sustainable design expressions is controversial. For example, in the case of plant leather, natural materials are raw materials, but in some cases, the surface is plasticized to resemble leather during processing. It is said to be an effort toward sustainable development, but I think it may be risky.” (Interviewee D)

Suppose the constant update of design expression methods and numerical values for objective verification are supplemented. In that case, the checklist can be a practical method for designers to innovate or change sustainably. Furthermore, it can provide designers with in-depth sustainable knowledge if additional data on items that require discussion are provided.

This study identified a sustainable design practice method to satisfy customer sensibility and individual taste that designers need in the early stage of the SFD process. The SFB design approach was categorized through a literature review. Through the SFB case study, specific design expression methods for each category of the SFB design approach considering customer sensibility and personal taste were derived. The contents derived from this process were made into a checklist, and the design approach of Korean SFBs was confirmed through an interview.

It has been about 10 years since global brands in the fashion industry started to develop sustainability initiatives for a circular economy. As a result of case studies, 149 SFBs appeared in articles ranking the SFBs of the world’s top popular fashion magazines. In total, 35 brands emerged in the articles in 2019, 19 brands in 2020, and 56 brands in 2021. Although there was a market contraction due to Corona 19, the number of fashion brands increased significantly in 2021 is considered to be related to increased consumer interest in SFD. Given the weight of the impact of the fashion industry on the environment and the design method of a fashion designer can have an influence of 80% on the environment ( Ribeiro et al., 2013 ; Ahmad et al., 2018 ), a specific SFD method considering the circular economy of products selected by consumers is required. In the sustainable fashion sector, the environmental impact is divided into the manufacturing phase of textile and apparel production and the transportation, product use, and end-of-life phases. In the end, the environmental impact depends on the lifespan of the product and the behavior of consumers, and it can be said that it is essentially caused by the production process in which the product is manufactured and the stage of use ( Benkirane et al., 2022 ). From this point of view, this study focused on the sustainable design method of fashion products preferred by consumers. In other words, a design approach that meets the sensibility and taste of consumers is also related to product life extension, remanufacturing, and recycling, thereby forming a virtuous cycle structure of a circular economy.

In this study, in order to find a sustainable design method that consumers can like, a case study of specific design methods of SFBs appearing in the world’s top fashion magazines with many subscribers was conducted. Here, it was confirmed that various design approaches are used for each category proposed in previous studies as a design method for a sustainable circular economy.

In the “eco-friendly materials” design approach to maintain a sustainable raw material supply, “using certified sustainable materials,” “highly traceable and non-toxic material,” “dyeing process of green peace-certified,” “local or nearby materials,” and “using packages of organic materials” was applied in a specific way. “Functional durability design” that can reduce consumption, which is the ultimate goal of achieving a circular economy, was oriented toward slow manufacturing by “the quality and durability,” “on-demand production,” and “changeable design.” “Fashion for reuse and remanufacturing,” which aims to realize a sustainable circular economy through a virtuous cycle of resources, is the most well-known SFD approach. “Use recycled materials,” “sourcing 100% of synthetic fibers waste,” “upcycled waste clothing,” “repurposing,” and “repair and restoration” emerged as specific methods. A specific method that was impressive in the case study was “recycling of plastic bottles into yarn and fabric.” Recycling plastic bottles are being recycled in terms of circular economy theory and practice ( Qu et al., 2019 ). Nevertheless, there are still negative views. In the report “Synthetics Anonymous ( Changing Markets Foundation, 2021 )” published by the Changing Markets Foundation (2021) , downcycling plastic made from recycled plastic bottles, that is, clothes using recycled polyester, will eventually end up in landfill or incineration instead of circulating fashion. However, from the perspective of the circular economy, it is considered necessary to recycle the waste. Alternatives should be provided in the sense that today’s consumers’ product selection is determined by their sensibility and taste. Emotionally durable design is a design strategy that makes it possible to extend the life of a product by “strengthening the user-product relationship” ( Norman, 2007 ; Chapman, 2009 ; Cooper, 2016 ). In particular, emotionally durable design has been proposed as an important principle of circular design by some scholars, but the concrete details of how emotional attachment and trust can be achieved in practice are not sufficiently presented ( Haines-Gadd et al., 2018 ).

In the case analysis of this study, “emotionally durable design” appeared as “collaboration with local artisans,” “folklore handcrafted touches,” “handwoven material sourcing,” “personal design concept,” and “brand signature pieces.”

In an interview survey of SFBs in Korea, the approach of “emotionally durable design” was applied by only a few brands as a sustainable design method. Some of the participants even understood that this design approach was a sustainable design approach, after checking the checklist for a specific design approach of “emotionally durable design.” Compared to other design approaches, “emotionally durable design” is composed of abstract keywords, so it is considered that it is not well recognized according to individual characteristics.

Sustainable fashion technology, which reduces fabric loss, “seamless garment technology,” “digital printing to reduce water use,” and “combined laser robotics” appeared as SFD-specific approaches relatively few compared to other design approaches. The checklist of this study is meaningful in that it can be a tool for designers to easily reach the SFD approach in design practice. However, it is a limitation of the study that we were unable to include a large number of interviewees by conducting interviews with SFBs supported by the Korean government.

This study aimed to identify a sustainable design practice. Based on an empirical case study with a theoretical background, a checklist was developed as a tool for sustainable fashion design methods. The inventory for the sustainable design approach suggested as a result of the case study is expected to provide an efficient design method by lowering barriers to practitioners who have had difficulty accessing the concept and design method of sustainable design.

In the sustainable design approach, some items need discussion according to the producer’s values. Concerns have been raised about the sustainability of fashion brands as a marketing tool in this regard. Accordingly, designers’ acquisition of sustainable knowledge is essential. Furthermore, it improves the emotional durability of fashion products, reflecting customer emotions and personal tastes, thereby increasing the sustainability of fashion products. Therefore, the designer’s active role is required. This study is significant in that it presents a checklist, an easy and efficient tool to address designers’ inadequate knowledge and lack of awareness of sustainability, and a sustainable design practice method that can satisfy customer emotions and personal tastes and improve environmental performance.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the patients/participants or patients/participants legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

YY contributed to the conception and design of the study. SK performed the interview and wrote sections of the manuscript. Both authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Ahmad, S., Wong, K. Y., Tseng, M. L., and Wong, W. P. (2018). Sustainable product design and development: A review of tools, applications, and research prospects. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 132, 49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Armstrong, C. M., Niinimäki, K., and Lang, C. (2016). Towards design recipes to curb the clothing carbohydrate binge. Design J. 19, 159–181. doi: 10.1080/14606925.2016.1109207

Baker, R. (2011). H&M Launches Ethical Fashion Brand. Available online at: https://www.marketingweek.com/hm-launches-ethical-fashion-brand/ (accessed Jul, 21, 2021).

Google Scholar

Bandyopadhyay, C., and Ray, S. (2020). Finding the sweet spot between ethics and aesthetics: A social entrepreneurial perspective to sustainable fashion brand (juxta)positioning. J. Glob. Mark. 33, 377–395. doi: 10.1080/08911762.2020.1772935

Bédat, M. (2019). How Sustainable are These “Eco-Friendly” Fashion Brands?. Available online at: https://www.harpersbazaar.com/fashion/trends/a30078962/new-standard-institute-fashion-sustainability-rating/ (accessed Jun, 21, 2021)

Benkirane, R., Thomassey, S., Koehl, L., and Perwuelz, A. (2022). A new longevity design methodology based on consumer-oriented quality for fashion products. Sustainability 14:7696. doi: 10.3390/su14137696

BODE (2021). Bode. Availabe online at: https://www.bodenewyork.com/pages/about (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Boks, C. (2006). The soft side of ecodesign. J. Clean. Prod. 14, 1346–1356. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.015

Bonacic, D. (2020). The Who, What, When & Where of Mapping Out a Sustainable London Fashion Week. Available online at: https://www.10magazine.com/news/london-fashion-week-sustainable-phoebe-english-woolmark-richard-malone-roland/ (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Bonačić, D. (2021). Bethany Williams. Available online at: https://londonfashionweek.co.uk/designers/bethany-williams (accessed Dec, 21, 2021).

Bovea, M. D., and Pérez-Belis, V. (2012). A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. J. Clean. Prod. 20, 61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012

BROWNS FASHION (2021). Chopova Lowena. Available online at: https://www.brownsfashion.com/uk/shopping/woman/chopova-lowena?pageIndex=1&pageSize=120&sort=price&sortDirection=asc (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Caniato, F., Caridi, M., Crippa, L., and Moretto, A. (2012). Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: An exploratory case-based research. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135, 659–670. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.06.001

Ceschin, F., and Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Des. Stud. 47, 118–163. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002

Changing Markets Foundation (2021). Synthetics Anonymous. Available online at: https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/SyntheticsAnonymous_FinalWeb.pdf (accessed Jul, 25, 2022).

Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences, and Empathy. Milton: Milton. London: Routledge.

Chapman, J. (2009). Design for (emotional) durability. Design Issues. 25, 29–35. doi: 10.1162/desi.2009.25.4.29

Claxton, S., and Kent, A. (2020). The management of sustainable fashion design strategies: An analysis of the designer’s role. J. Clean. Prod. 268:122112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122112

Connor-Crabb, A., Miller, K., and Chapman, J. (2016). Design strategies for the eternal reoccurrence of the new. Fashion Pract. 8, 22–43. doi: 10.1080/17569370.2016.1147806

Cooper, T. (2016). Longer Lasting Products: Alternatives to the Throwaway Society. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Davis, J. (2021). Our Favorite Sustainable Brands. Availabe online at: https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/fashion/what-to-wear/g19491797/the-best-and-still-chic-sustainable-brands/ (accessed Jun, 21, 2021)

De Pauw, I. C., Karana, E., Kandachar, P., and Poppelaars, F. (2014). Comparing Biomimicry and Cradle to Cradle with ecodesign: A case study of student design projects. J. Clean. Prod. 78, 174–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.077

DeLong, M., Heinemann, B., and Reiley, K. (2014). Redefining, redesigning fashion: Designs for sustainability. Fashion Pract. 6, 125–130. doi: 10.2752/175693814X13916967095073

Dissanayake, G., and Sinha, P. (2015). An examination of the product development process for fashion remanufacturing. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 104, 94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.008

Elle Fashion Team (2020). 24 Sustainable Clothing Brands That Are Anything but Boring. Available online at: https://www.elle.com.sg/2020/08/20/best-sustainable-clothing-brands-fashion/ (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Elle Fashion Team (2021). 55 Sustainable Clothing Brands That Are Anything but Boring. Available online at: https://www.elle.com/uk/fashion/what-to-wear/g22788319/sustainable-fashion-brands-to-buy-from-now/ (accessed Jun 21, 2021).

EVERLANE (2021). We believe we can all make a difference. Available online at: https://www.everlane.com/about (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Frost, R. (2019). Stella McCartney Launches Most Sustainable Collection to Date at PFW. Available online at: https://www.euronews.com/green/2019/10/02/stella-mccartney-launches-most-sustainable-collection-to-date-at-pfw (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., and Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – a new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 143, 757–768. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

Gurova, O., and Morozova, D. (2018). A critical approach to sustainable fashion: Practices of clothing designers in the Kallio neighborhood of Helsinki. J. Con. Cult. 18, 397–413. doi: 10.1177/1469540516668227

Haines-Gadd, M., Chapman, J., Lloyd, P., Mason, J., and Aliakeseyeu, D. (2018). Emotional durability design Nine—A tool for product longevity. Sustainability 10:1948. doi: 10.3390/su10061948

Hur, E., and Cassidy, T. (2019). Perceptions and attitudes towards sustainable fashion design: Challenges and opportunities for implementing sustainability in fashion. Int. J. Fashion Des. Technol. Educ. 12, 208–217. doi: 10.1080/17543266.2019.1572789

Irwin, T. (2015). Transition design: A proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. Des. Cult. 7, 229–246. doi: 10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829

Janigo, K. A., and Wu, J. (2015). Collaborative redesign of used clothes as a sustainable fashion solution and potential business opportunity. Fashion Pract 7, 75–97. doi: 10.2752/175693815X14182200335736

Karell, E., and Niinimäki, K. (2020). A mixed-method study of design practices and designers’ roles in sustainable-minded clothing companies. Sustainability 12:4680. doi: 10.3390/su12114680

Social Media Today (2015). Social Media Today. Who’s Winning the Sustainable Luxury Fashion Challenge?. Available online at: https://www.socialmediatoday.com/technology-data/localspeak/2015-08-15/whos-winning-sustainable-luxury-fashion-challenge-kering-vs (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Govindan, K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., and Antucheviv̌ienė, J. (2019). An integrated TYPE-2 fuzzy decision model based on waspas and Seca for evaluation of sustainable manufacturing strategies. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 27, 187–200. doi: 10.3846/jeelm.2019.11367

Knight, P., and Jenkins, J. O. (2009). Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: A practitioner’s perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 17, 549–558. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.10.002

Kozlowski, A., Bardecki, M., and Searcy, C. (2019). Tools for sustainable fashion design: An analysis of their fitness for purpose. Sustainability 11:3581. doi: 10.3390/su11133581

Lawless, E., and Medvedev, K. (2016). Assessment of sustainable design practices in the fashion industry: Experiences of eight small sustainable design companies in the Northeastern and Southeastern United States. Int. J. Fashion Des. Technol. Educ. 9, 41–50. doi: 10.1080/17543266.2015.1116616

Lim, K. (2019). Our favorite sustainable fashion brands right. Available online at: https://www.voguehk.com/en/article/fashion/the-best-sustainable-designers-right-now/ (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Maldini, I., Stappers, P. J., Gimeno-Martinez, J. C., and Daanen, H. A. M. (2019). Assessing the impact of design strategies on clothing lifetimes, usage and volumes: The case of product personalization. J. Clean. Prod. 210, 1414–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.056

Marius, M. (2020). 25 Sustainably Made Goods to Recharge your Winter Wardrobe. Available online at: https://www.vogue.com/slideshow/sustainable-fashion-vogue-values (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

McCartney, S. (2020). Sustainability. Available online at: https://www.stellamccartney.com/ie/en/sustainability/sustainability.html (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

McQuillan, H. (2019). Hybrid zero-waste design practices. Zero-waste pattern cutting for composite garment weaving and its implications. Des. J. 22, 803–819. doi: 10.1080/14606925.2019.1613098

Niinimäki, K. (2006). Ecodesign and textiles. Res. J. Text. Apparel. 10, 67–75. doi: 10.1108/RJTA-10-03-2006-B009

Niinimäki, K., and Hassi, L. (2011). Emerging design strategies in sustainable production and consumption of textiles and clothing. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 1876–1883. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.020

Norman, D. (2007). Emotional Design: Why we Love (or hate) Everyday Things. New York, NY: Basic book.

O’Connell, M. (2020). Lux Perpetua: Future pioneers utilizing historical precedent as design innovation within fashion. Textile 18, 209–226. doi: 10.1080/14759756.2019.1663573

Offman, M. (2021). Our Manufacturing. Available online at: https://marahoffman.com/pages/our-manufacturing (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Park, J. H., and Kim, Y. H. (2014). A study on fashion design for up-cycled waste resources. J. Korean Soc. Costum. 64, 138–154. doi: 10.7233/jksc.2014.64.8.138

Park, W. (2020). Why Sustainable Fashion?. Available online at: http://www.kfashionnews.com/news/bbs/board.php?bo_table=knews&wr_id=3173 (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Patagonia Inc (2011). Patagonia Launches Common Threads Initiative: A Partnership with Customers to Consume Less. Available online at: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/patagonia-launches-common-threads-initiative-a-partnership-with-customers-to-consume-less-129372068.html (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Pattnaik, S., Nayak, M. M., Abbate, S., and Centobelli, P. (2021). Recent trends in sustainable inventory models: A literature review. Sustainability 13:11756. doi: 10.3390/su132111756

Penrose, N., and Hearst, A. (2019). 22 Eco-Friendly Brands to Shop on Earth Day. Available online at: https://www.elle.com/fashion/shopping/g27194622/sustainable-brands-earth-day/ (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Pigosso, D. C. A., Rozenfeld, H., and McAloone, T. C. (2013). Ecodesign maturity model: A management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies. J. Clean. Prod. 59, 160–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040

Portuguez, E. (2010). H&M’s First Sustainable Collection. Available online at: https://www.instyle.com/news/hms-first-sustainable-collection (accessed Jul, 21, 2021).

Puspita, H., and Chae, H. (2021). An explorative study and comparison between companies’ and customers’ perspectives in the sustainable fashion industry. J. Glob. Fashion Mark. 12, 133–145. doi: 10.1080/20932685.2020.1853584

Qu, S., Guo, Y., Ma, Z., Chen, W. Q., Liu, J., Liu, G., et al. (2019). Implications of China’s foreign waste ban on the global circular economy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 144, 252–255. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.004

Rahman, O., and Gong, M. (2016). Sustainable practices and transformable fashion design – Chinese professional and consumer perspectives. Int. J. Fashion Des. Technol. Educ. 9, 233–247. doi: 10.1080/17543266.2016.1167256

Ramani, K., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W. Z., Zhao, F., Sutherland, J., Handwerker, C., et al. (2010). Integrated sustainable life cycle design: A review. J. Mech. Des. 132, 910041–9100415. doi: 10.1115/1.4002308

Raza, F., Alshameri, B., and Jamil, S. M. (2021). Assessment of triple bottom line of sustainability for geotechnical projects. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23, 4521–4558. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00786-y

Kolon Industries (2012). Kolon industries. Available online at: http://kolonindustries.com/Eng//Product/product05_03.asp (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Reoberto, C., and Esposito, M. (2016). A systematic review of supply chain knowledge management research: State of the art and research opportunities. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 182, 276–292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.006

Ribeiro, I., Peças, P., and Henriques, E. (2013). A life cycle framework to support materials selection for ecodesign: A case study on biodegradable polymers. Mater. Des. 51, 300–308. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.043

Rossi, M., Germani, M., and Zamagni, A. (2016). Review of ecodesign methods and tools. Barriers and strategies for effective implementation in industrial companies. J. Clean. Prod. 129, 361–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.051

Sandhu, A. (2020). Fashioning wellbeing through craft: A case study of Aneeth Arora’s strategies for sustainable fashion and decolonizing design. Fashion Pract. 12, 172–192. doi: 10.1080/17569370.2020.1769362

Shen, B. (2014). Sustainable fashion supply chain: Lessons from H&M. Sustainability. 6, 6236–6249. doi: 10.3390/su6096236

Stahel, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nature 531, 435–438. doi: 10.1038/531435a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sumter, D., de Koning, J. I. J. C., Bakker, C. A., and Balkenende, R. (2020). Circular economy competencies for design. Sustainability 12:1561. doi: 10.3390/su12041561

Sustainable brands (2014). Fashion and Textile Leaders for Forest Conservation Begin Shift to Forest-Free Viscose. Available online at: https://sustainablebrands.com/read/collaboration-cocreation/fashion-and-textile-leaders-for-forest-conservation-begin-shift-to-forest-free-viscose (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Teen Vogue (2019). Patagonia’s Fair-Trade Program Is the Future of Fashion. Available online at: https://www.teenvogue.com/story/patagonia-fair-trade-program-future-fashion (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Townsend, K., and Mills, F. (2013). Mastering zero: How the pursuit of less waste leads to more creative pattern cutting. Int. J. Fashion Des. Technol. Educ. 6, 104–111. doi: 10.1080/17543266.2013.793746

Väänänen, N., and Pöllänen, S. (2020). Conceptualizing sustainable craft: Concept analysis of literature. Des. J. 23, 263–285. doi: 10.1080/14606925.2020.1718276

Villemain (2019). Un Launches Drive to Highlight Environmental Cost of Staying Fashionable. Available online at: https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/03/1035161 (accessed Jul, 21, 2021).

Vogue (2021). 11 Brands Taking Positive Steps this Earth Day. Available online at: https://www.vogue.co.uk/fashion/gallery/earth-day-fashion-brand-initiatives (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Wang, L., and Shen, B. (2017). A product line analysis for eco-designed fashion products: Evidence from an outdoor sportswear brand. Sustainability 9:1136. doi: 10.3390/su9071136

Wang, N. (2020). Earth Day 2020: How Sustainable Luxury Brands are Making A Change. Available online at: https://harpersbazaar.my/fashion/earth-day-2020-bazaar-rounds-up-our-favourite-sustainable-luxury-designers-for-eco-friendly-fashion/ (accessed Jun, 21, 2021).

Yıldızbaşı, A., Öztürk, C., Efendioğlu, D., and Bulkan, S. (2021). Assessing the social sustainable supply chain indicators using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods: A case study of Turkey. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23, 4285–4320. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00774-2

Zhou, H., Xu, Y., Wang, L., and Chen, Y. (2016). A garment design method based on modularization. Text. Res. J. 86, 1710–1715. doi: 10.1177/0040517515595027

Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., and Lai, K. M. (2011). Environmental supply chain cooperation and its effect on the circular economy practice-performance relationship among chinese manufacturers. J. Indust. Ecol. 15, 405–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00329.x

Keywords : sustainable fashion, sustainable design approach, sustainability, SFB, emotional durability

Citation: Kam S and Yoo Y (2022) Practice of sustainable fashion design considering customer emotions and personal tastes. Front. Psychol. 13:976471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976471

Received: 23 June 2022; Accepted: 09 September 2022; Published: 04 October 2022.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2022 Kam and Yoo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Youngsun Yoo, [email protected]

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

The Business of Fashion

Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.

News & Analysis

• Professional Exclusives
• The News in Brief
• Sustainability
• Direct-to-Consumer
• Global Markets
• Fashion Week
• Workplace & Talent
• Entrepreneurship
• Financial Markets
• Newsletters
• Case Studies
• Masterclasses
• Special Editions
• The State of Fashion
• Read Careers Advice
• BoF Professional
• BoF Careers
• BoF Insights
• Our Journalism
• Work With Us
• Read daily fashion news
• Download special reports
• Sign up for essential email briefings
• Follow topics of interest
• Receive event invitations
• Create job alerts

Case Study | Fashion’s Race for New Materials

• Rachel Deeley

Hermès is a luxury brand that prides itself on being steeped in heritage and traditional craftsmanship. So when it emerged in 2021 that the maker of the iconic Birkin bag was working on an experiment with MycoWorks , a Californian start-up that manufactures a new mushroom-based alternative to leather, it sent a powerful signal to the rest of the industry: change is coming.

Fashion joins countless other industries to play a role in global sustainability efforts, racing towards targets to slash greenhouse gas emissions within this decade and grappling with waste, water usage and the negative social outcomes of poorly traced supply chains. While estimates of fashion’s contribution to the climate crisis vary, industry body Global Fashion Agenda (GFA) and consultancy McKinsey & Company place it at roughly 4 percent of total global emissions. Raw material production alone accounts for 38 percent of the fashion industry’s total emissions, their analysis found. In 2018, that amounted to some 800 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent.

For some companies, the materials shakeup that Hermès is signalling has the potential to be radical. After all, fashion has long relied on largely the same roster of materials — notably polyester, wool, cotton and leather — to produce clothes, footwear and accessories. Entire companies’ design, supply chain and manufacturing strategies have been built around these materials.

While Hermès is breaking with tradition on just one bag for now, other fashion brands are pushing further ahead to transform how they manufacture and use materials that are more environmentally and socially sustainable.

Some companies, including German sportswear brand Adidas, have vowed to eliminate virgin polyester, using recycled resources for the fabric instead. Others like US outdoor wear company Timberland have committed to source cotton, leather, wool and rubber from regenerative farms, focusing on responsible land management and positive ecological outcomes. Others are turning to alternatives to virgin animal leather, with Danish brand Ganni phasing out the material altogether in an effort to cut its overall carbon footprint.

The race to develop new materials and processes is gaining momentum thanks to fast-maturing technology and more substantial, profound partnerships between brands and innovators, which often used to be “slow on the action front,” said Georgia Parker, innovation manager at sustainable project accelerator Fashion for Good.

However, there are significant challenges to overcome, including competing with incumbents to achieving sufficient scale. Material innovators — from textile recyclers to mycelium growers — need upfront capital to build capacity. Brands can help support this growth through minority equity investments or by making long-term buying commitments.

While the buzz around new materials is helping them gain traction, billions of dollars worth of additional capital and further innovation are needed to achieve the industrial scale that would enable alternative materials to compete in a system designed to maximise business growth and profit, rather than minimise negative environmental impact.

Understanding which, if any, of these sustainable materials will spur a paradigm shift to generate widespread adoption of sustainable materials is not straightforward.

This case study examines three innovations in raw materials production that are gaining some traction and offer opportunities for the fashion industry to reinvent the destructive materials and practises on which it has long relied.

• Bolt Threads
• Natural Fiber Welding
• Ralph Lauren
• Global Fashion Agenda
• Manufacturing
• Supply Chain
• Venture Capital/Private Equity
• Water & Chemicals

© 2024 The Business of Fashion. All rights reserved. For more information read our Terms & Conditions

H&M Places New Bet on the Future of Fashion Recycling

The fast-fashion giant has joined Vargas and TPG to back a new polyester recycling venture following its failed bet on Renewcell.

What Will It Take to Tackle Fashion’s Climate Financing Gap?

Meeting the industry’s emissions targets will require more collective action and new financing models, according to a new report by leading manufacturers.

Beware the ‘Sheinification’ of Fashion

The ‘instant fashion’ juggernaut’s explosive growth is attracting imitators. But keeping up with Shein’s relentless churn puts the industry on a perilous course when it comes to sustainability, writes Kenneth P. Pucker.

AI, Outlets, Recycling: Can Luxury Solve Its Billion-Dollar Excess Inventory Problem?

LVMH and Kering wrote down billions of dollars of unsold inventory last year. What to do with it has become an increasingly complex challenge.

Subscribe to the BoF Daily Digest

The essential daily round-up of fashion news, analysis, and breaking news alerts.

Our newsletters may include 3rd-party advertising, by subscribing you agree to the Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy .

Our Products

• BoF Insights (Opens in new window)

Best sustainable fashion brands that put a focus on ethical and responsible practices

W hilst the conflict between sustainability and fashion is obvious, buying with a more conscious mindset from brands that give something back is more important than ever - especially now shopping with an eco-conscious twist doesn’t mean you’re limited for choice.

The terminology can get tricky, with words like ‘ethical’, ‘sustainable’, and ‘responsible’ being bandied about left, right and centre, but try to not get too bogged down in the jargon. Broadly speaking, brands that take into account their impact on the environment, social issues, and workers conditions are the ones to look out for as well as those that offer charitable donations with each purchase.

Perhaps it’s Asket , who have full transparency on their manufacturing process, from the CO2 emissions to the source of the fabric, Re/Done , who use landfill-destined clothing to create unique luxury pieces, or House Of Sunny, an independent label that creates limited runs, often using a pre-order system, to minimise waste - whatever the sustainable direction, investing in pieces from brands minimising their footprint on the planet is the way to go.

And it’s important to do your research - with sustainability as a sales-boosting keyword, it’s easy to fall prey to those who are masters in greenwashing, appearing sustainable to conscious shoppers with no real substance to their claims. Look out for official sustainability reports for reassurance on their practices - or if something appears vague or uncertain, don’t be afraid to reach out directly for some clarification.

You don’t need to buy new, either. With vintage shops , charity shops , and rental services galore, investing in circular fashion has never been easier - and is even making moves to replace the fast fashion powerhouses - all you need to do is look at the sponsor of Love Island 2022, eBay , in place of their traditional partners, to see that buying pre-owned is on the up.

So, to save you the legwork, we’ve put together a handy guide of brands that fit the responsible bill without compromising on style, with options for both men and women.

Happy guilt-free shopping!

Best sustainable fashion brands at a glance:

Womenswear & menswear.

• Best for full transparency and traceable fabrics: Asket
• Best for verifiable carbon negativity: Sheep Inc
• Best for an expansive offering of wonderfully stylish and sustainable clothes: Everlane
• Best for designer sustainability: Daniel W. Fletcher
• Best for one of a kind pieces: Re/Done
• Best for groovy Y2K-inspired silhouettes and Seventies aesthetics: House of Sunny
• Best for ultimate comfort: Pangaia
• Best for commitment to causes beyond sustainability: Unfolded
• Best for sustainably-produced style: Omnes
• Best for independent thinkers: BITE Studios
• Best for versatility: Aligne
• Best for transitional pieces: Nobody's Child
• Best for dopamine dressing: Stine Goya
• Best for prioritising sustainable manufacturing: Wax London
• Best for relaxed dressing: SMR Days
• Best for protecting endangered and vulnerable wildlife: Love Brand & Co.

Best for: full transparency and traceable fabrics

Price range: £40-£125

Size range: Men's - XS-XXL, Women's - XXS-XXL

It doesn’t get any more sustainable than Asket . Not only does the brand offer full transparency, including information on CO2 emissions, direct cost for each garment, and traceable fabrics, but it also commits to a lifecycle responsibility to encourage caring for, repairing, and disposing of garments responsibly - and to top it off, the pieces are timeless classics that will never go out of fashion, so you can keep them in your wardrobe for years to come.

From denim to jersey, cashmere to merino wool, the brand uses sustainable fabrics to create a range of well made wardrobe staples for men and women. Starting the journey back in 2015 in the search for the perfect men’s T-shirt, they’ve since grown by roughly three to four wardrobe essentials per year, including the overshirt, the pique polo, and the standard jeans.

Buy now , Asket

Winner of Positive Luxury’s ‘Environmental Innovator of the Year’ award and the first carbon negative clothing brand, Sheep Inc are leading the way for sustainable fashion.

From designing T-shirts, hoodies, cardigans, and jumpers using ZQ-certified merino wool from regenerative carbon negative New Zealand based farms, to creating detachable tags for each garment that let you trace your jumper back to the exact sheep that it came from, the label combines age-old practices with modern technologies to end up with first-class knitwear for men and women that you’ll cherish all season. The only problem - you’ll want every colour.

Buy now , Wolf & Badger

Best for: an expansive offering of wonderfully stylish and sustainable clothes

Price range: £90-£200

Size range: Men's - XS-XXL, Women's - XXS-XL

Creating wardrobe essentials for men and women that have the least impact on the planet is Everlane ’s MO. The offering is expansive, from quality denim, to the perfect T-shirt, to the comfy knitwear you’ll never want to take off - there’s something for everyone.

The brand has a focus on using sustainable materials, like recycled fibres and organic cotton, reducing carbon emissions to become Net-Zero by 2050 (or sooner), and enhancing livelihoods worldwide, including donating $1.4m to fund social and environmental efforts and ensuring the factories pay higher than minimum wage. It’s aiming to leave the fashion industry cleaner than when it started.

Buy now , Everlane

Daniel W. Fletcher

Best for: designer sustainability

Price range: £90-£8,500

Size range: 38-50

You may know designer Daniel W. Fletcher for his stint on Netflix’s Next In Fashion where he reached the final, or for his work as the creative director at Fiorucci - either way, he’s one to watch.

A London-based designer, he’s an expert in casual luxury - from expert tailoring, and luxe fabrics, to classic silhouettes - and draws on British culture, current affairs, and social issues to inform his thoughtful collections. Originally a menswear brand but offering more womenswear in each collection, his pieces have a genderless feel with a mix of masculinity and femininity.

Known for his use of leftover fabrics, his signature patchwork method where he uses small scraps of fabrics to create an intricate textile that forms the basis of uses jackets, shorts, and blankets, is a case in point of his clever use of sustainabile methods without compromising on design.

Buy now , Daniel W. Fletcher

Best for: one of a kind pieces

Price range: £95- £400

Size range: W23 - W32 / XS-L

If you’re into one of a kind pieces that pack a sustainable punch, look no further than LA-based brand Re/Done , which takes the old and makes it new again. From transforming vintage Levi’s into contemporary designs, to reinterpreting iconic G.H.Bass loafers using carefully sourced fabrics, the label is a master in reimagining heritage American pieces.

It’s a brand that has been setting an example for the fashion industry since 2014 by diverting over 240,000 garments from landfill, leading the way in recycled T-shirts with a collaboration with Hanes, and more recently launching Re/Sell to allow customers to give pre-loved Re/Done pieces a second life. Not to mention, the label also donates to countless charities, and places importance on manufacturing responsibly as well as on the wellbeing of its employees.

Buy now , Net-A-Porter

House Of Sunny

Best for: groovy Y2K-inspired silhouettes and Seventies aesthetics

Price range: £40-£300

Size range: XS-3XL

Wavy prints, Y2K silhouettes and a Seventies aesthetic - mash it all together and you’ve got hype-about Gen Z favourite, House Of Sunny. Founded in 2011, the brand’s now all over your Instagram feed, amassing an impressive over 613k followers in the decade since - and it’s clear to see why.

From the bright colours to the bold designs, not to mention it’s responsible manufacturing practices, including the use of sustainable fabrics, a pre-order system, and the use of leftovers to make accessories ensuring zero waste, the label has all of the desirable credentials for the sustainably-minded younger generation - and it’s affordable price point means it’s accessible for everyone.

Buy now £0.00, House Of Sunny

Pangaia is trail blazing when it comes to science-based development of sustainable materials. Fabrics range from FLWRDWN, a down-fill material made from a combination of wildflowers, a biopolymer and aerogel used to fill puffer jackets, to C-FIBER, a jersey cotton alternative that combines eucalyptus pulp and seaweed powder for a water-saving and energy efficient textile.

Whether you’re in the market for a quality T-shirt, activewear, boxy tailoring, or a tracksuit, there’s something for everyone - and every garment comes in just about every colour.

Buy now , Pangaia

Best for: commitment to causes beyond sustainability

Price range: £20-£50

Size range: 6-24

A wonderfully sustainable, waste-reducing brand, Unfolded works with existing customers to design every item in order to ensure that clothes that they know you'll love are the only ones to hit the digital shelves. Made-to-order, Unfolded ensures that they only produce garments that are actually wanted and needed. What's more, every order helps fund a child's education in the communities where the clothes are made thanks to the brand's partner, Pratham.

Buy now , Unfolded

Best for: sustainably-produced style

Price range: £20-£85

Size range: 6-20

Perhaps one of the only officially climate-positive fashion brands which produces clothing at an affordable price, Omnes has been taking strides to lead the high street fashion community and e-commerce world into a better future. Having partnered with Earthly to measure their carbon emissions per head, Omnes is dedicated to going beyond carbon neutrality by contributing 110 per cent of their overall carbon footprint.

Yet Omnes is also aware that carbon offsetting isn’t the sole solution. The brand is making further efforts to ensure the entire production process is both ethical and sustainable – a process which you can read more about here.

If you’re looking for flouncy yet understated dresses alongside funky, summer-ready co-ords – Omnes is the website for you. They’ve even got a dedicated wedding season edit , through which you can shop for the chicest, silkiest and sexiest slip dresses. We also particularly love that this brand provides the option to shop by material – whether you’re into eco-friendly viscose, recycled polyester or deadstock fabrics, filter your search to find what’s best for you.

Who said sustainability couldn’t also mean affordability? Omnes certainly didn’t.

Buy now , Omnes

BITE Studios

Best for: sustainably-produced style:

Price range: £90-£900

Size range: XS-XL / 4-14

Meaning ‘By Independent Thinkers for the Environment’, it’s clear to see that Stockholm and London based brand BITE is committed to creating clothes responsibly with as little impact on the planet as possible. The designs are pared down, classic, and super chic, with a focus on using top quality sustainable materials to create a capsule wardrobe that will stand the test of time.

For its entire collections, 96 per cent of the fabrics used are from recycled, organic, or low-impact origin, meaning each piece is created with the lightest environmental footprint. Even better, you can send back any unwanted garments for a 20 per cent refund of its selling price through BITE buyback, meaning the brand can extend the lifespan of textiles that could otherwise end up in landfill.

Buy now , BITE Studios

Best for: versatility

Price range: £90-£400

Size range: 6-22

For easy to wear, versatile, and well-made clothes at a great price point, Aligne is the place to go, whether you’re in the market for knitwear, denim, dresses, or outerwear. The best part? The entire ethos is built around ethical practices.

Each design is made from at least 50 per cent ssustainable materials and over half of the collection as 100 per cent sustainable, while it stresses the importance of regulating the partner factories. The label ensures workplace standards and conscious methods like zero waste, waterless production, and renewable energy are used, even down to the packaging which is made using recycled fibres.

Buy now , Aligne

Nobody’s Child

Best for: transitional pieces

Price range: £28-£90

Size range: 4-18

Nobody’s Child offers transitional pieces that are designed to be worn time and time again and not end up in the landfill, from floaty floral dresses to boxy tailoring to cosy knitwear.

Fabric choice accounts for up to 80 per cent of a garment’s social and environmental footprint, so the brand’s focus is on sourcing materials that are made using more sustainable fibres and finding factories that ensure good working conditions and manufacturing processes.

Encouraging you to shop with a conscience, the brand has created initiatives to reduce textile waste such as creating the collections in small quantities, repurposing leftover fabric as well as donating unused fabric to up and coming designers to support the next generation.

Buy now , Nobody’s Child

Best for: dopamine dressing

Price range: £100-£400

Size range: XS-L

Since founding her eponymous label in 2006, Stine Goya has been spreading joy with vibrant colours and hand-painted prints that inject confidence in the lives of her loyal fan base. The collections are categorised by sparkly two-pieces, bright knitwear, and optimistic outerwear.

The brand has a commitment to sustainable practices, from reducing waste and sourcing responsible fabrics, like recycled polyester and organic cotton, down to the design of the new store they’re opening in London which has been thought up in collaboration with design duo Wang & Söderström, who use 3D printed elements and responsibly sourced materials.

Buy now , Selfridges

Best for: prioritising sustainable manufacturing

Size range: XS-XXL

London-based label Wax London creates timeless menswear using carefully sourced materials and manufacturing processes that have less impact on the planet.

The brand’s signature overshirt, for example, is made from a fabric created in a family-run, hydroelectricity-powered mill in France using recycled and organic cotton, as well as sustainably sourced buttons. Like the rest of the collection, it’s a year-round staple designed with versatility in mind - whether you’d like to dress it up for the evening or down on the weekend.

Buy now , Wax London

Best for: relaxed dressing

Size range: XS-XXXL

Relaxed dressing is at the heart of SMR Days, with a sense of ease laced through their laid back shirts, relaxed suiting, and breezy trousers. Whether you’re on a boat in the Greek Islands or having a laid back evening at home, the brand’s pieces, which are always made using natural fibres like cotton, silk, and bamboo flax, are designed to be thrown on for an effortless yet stylish ensemble.

Using centuries-old techniques like bandhani dyeing, ikat weaving, and intricate hand embroidery, the label has a commitment to working with Indian artisans to keep the ancient techniques alive for the younger generations. What’s more, the factories and producers are certified to provide equal pay and safe working conditions for their employees.

Buy now , MatchesFashion

Love Brand & Co

Best for: protecting endangered and vulnerable wildlife

Price range: £50-£200

Size range: S-XXL

Love Brand & Co. was founded by Oliver Tomalin in 2010 with a commitment to protecting endangered and vulnerable wildlife. Members of 1% For The Planet, the brand donates a percentage of annual net revenue to fund worldwide projects that promote human-wildlife coexistance, as well as donating products to communities as a gesture of thanks for their important role in ensuring a future for endagered wildlife - at the moment, they’re working with families in the Assam region in India who help with elephant conservation.

With stores in Chelsea, Notting Hill and Barbados, the brand offer a range of swimwear, polos, t-shirts and linen pieces for men and children. The swimwear is created from recycled plastic bottles with bold prints that take inspiration from the conservation projects that the label supports with rhino, tuna and elephant designs.

Buy now , Love Brand & Co

Register now for one of the Evening Standard’s newsletters. From a daily news briefing to Homes & Property insights, plus lifestyle, going out, offers and more. For the best stories in your inbox, click here .

• Science & Sustainability
• News & Media
• Seek Together Blog
• Markets & Products

• Ambition & Values
• Beliefs & Culture
• Global Citizenship
• The K-12 Project
• Sports Marketing
• Contact Venture Capital
• Supplier Information
• Supplier Invoice Status
• Work with Us
• Public Policy
• Issues & Challenges
• Codes of Conduct

• Search Jobs & Apply
• Working at Dow
• Hiring Process
• Join the Talent Community
• Career Areas
• Internships
• Recent Graduates
• Apprenticeships

• 2025 Sustainability Goals
• Ending plastic waste
• Commitment to protect the climate
• Sustainability Targets
• Working Together
• Sustainability Product Portfolio

• Press Releases
• Media Gallery
• Press Contacts

Combining expertise for more sustainable fashion

May 23, 2022

Ever wonder how much water was used to make your favorite cotton T-shirt? About  2,700  liters, or roughly three years of drinking water. What first comes to mind is probably the water that was essential to growing the cotton crop. Surprisingly, cotton is a  drought-tolerant plant , and often less recognized is the strain that can be put on water resources to dye cotton textiles.

Progress is being made across the industry to lessen the strain on our precious water resources. Over the past several years, we’ve collaborated with Cotton Incorporated to research and validate our product, ECOFAST™ Pure Sustainable Textile Treatment, that can help drastically reduce water and chemical use during the dyeing process.

Cotton dyeing uses up to 5 trillion liters of water a year globally

Cotton dyeing is very resource-intensive and puts strain on local waterways. A large amount of water is used in the dyeing process – up to  5 trillion  liters a year, or nearly enough to supply all of humanity with drinking water. Significant amounts of chemicals and dye are needed to get the desired colors consumers expect too. This is part of the reason textile mills account for  20%  of industrial water pollution globally. Wastewater from the dyeing process can be polluting and require costly treatment, and these challenges are found in regions that already face water scarcity.

Combining materials science and industry expertise to create sustainable textile treatment

Reforming processes in an industry as established as textiles is no easy feat. Collaboration across the sector is needed to bring about sustainable change. With that in mind, Cotton Incorporated approached Dow. They wanted help scaling a cotton technology to support more sustainable textile dyeing. It turned out we were developing a similar technology that had improved performance, and we were looking for help too. Leveraging Cotton Incorporated’s industry expertise and Dow’s material science knowledge, we worked together to understand and validate the benefits of our patented  ECOFAST™ Pure Sustainable Textile Treatment .

Why is collaborating across the value chain essential?

Collaboration is critical for change to be meaningful and sustainable. As a not-for-profit focused on conducting research to benefit every link in the cotton supply chain, Cotton Incorporated has a unique expertise that complements our own. Working with Cotton Incorporated gave important insights about our product in application. Insights that would have taken much longer to discover without the industry expertise they offered.

We also announced our collaboration with Ralph Lauren , the first fashion brand to apply this technology for more sustainable cotton dyeing. Building on our work with Cotton Incorporated, we’ve collaborated closely with Ralph Lauren to optimize the use of ECOFAST Pure as part of their new Color on Demand platform. We released a detailed  manual  on how to use ECOFAST Pure as a tool to encourage adoption and help standardize more sustainable cotton dyeing in the fashion and textile industries.

We will continue to reach across the value chain – working with brands, mills and others – to color cotton with integrity. Will you join us?

To learn more about advances in cationic cotton technologies, including ECOFAST™ Pure,  view our joint webinar  with Cotton Incorporated.

To help us scale more sustainable dyeing with ECOFAST™ Pure,  contact us .

WE ARE DREAMING IN BIGGER, BOLDER WAYS TO IMAGINE A BETTER WORLD

Welcome to the future of performance apparel

Transforming cotton dyeing through collaboration

A more sustainable way to dye cotton fabric

Sign up for our newsletter.

Submitting... Please wait.

You’re almost finished!

Check your inbox to confirm your email and finalize your registration to Seek Together Digest.