site logo

Partnership

Sole proprietorship, limited partnership, compare businesses, employee rights, osha regulations, labor hours, personal & family, child custody & support, guardianship, incarceration, civil and misdemeanors, legal separation, real estate law, tax, licenses & permits, business licenses, wills & trusts, power of attorney, last will & testament, living trust, living will.

  • Share Tweet Email Print

REAL ESTATE LAW

What is a deed of trust with assignment of rents.

By Rebecca K. McDowell, J.D.

February 24, 2020

Reviewed by Michelle Seidel, B.Sc., LL.B., MBA

Learn About Our Review Process

Our Review Process

We write helpful content to answer your questions from our expert network. We perform original research, solicit expert feedback, and review new content to ensure it meets our quality pledge: helpful content – Trusted, Vetted, Expert-Reviewed and Edited. Our content experts ensure our topics are complete and clearly demonstrate a depth of knowledge beyond the rote. We are incredibly worried about the state of general information available on the internet and strongly believe our mission is to give voice to unsung experts leading their respective fields. Our commitment is to provide clear, original, and accurate information in accessible formats. We have reviewed our content for bias and company-wide, we routinely meet with national experts to educate ourselves on better ways to deliver accessible content. For 15 years our company has published content with clear steps to accomplish the how, with high quality sourcing to answer the why, and with original formats to make the internet a helpful place. Read more about our editorial standards .

assignment of rents without a mortgage

  • What Is a Corporate Assignment of Deed of Trust?

A deed of trust is a written instrument granting a lien on real property. While slightly different from a mortgage, they are functionally nearly the same. Some states use deeds of trust instead of mortgages while others allow both. Either way, a deed of trust used to secure a commercial loan may also include an assignment of rents , which gives the lender the right to collect rental income from the property in the event of default.

What Is a Deed of Trust?

A ​ deed of trust ​ is a document that a borrower may execute in favor of a lender to give the lender a lien on a parcel of real estate. Like a mortgage, a deed of trust secures the loan by allowing the lender to foreclose on the real estate if the loan isn't paid (although in some states that use deeds of trust, a foreclosure isn't necessary).

​ Read More: ​ How to Research a Deed of Trust

Deed of Trust vs. Mortgage

A deed of trust is very similar to a mortgage in that it pledges property to secure a loan. A mortgage, however, is simpler; the property owner executes a mortgage document in favor of the lender, and the lender records the mortgage and has a lien , but the property owner still holds title to the property.

A deed of trust, on the other hand, grants an actual ownership interest in the property to a trustee, who holds the property in trust for the lender until the obligation is paid.

What Is an Assignment of Rents?

An ​ assignment of rents ​ is extra security granted to a lender that provides a commercial loan. Commercial loans are loans that are not made for family or household use but for business purposes.

When a borrower grants a mortgage or deed of trust on real estate and the real estate has tenants who pay rent, the lender can demand an assignment of rents in addition to the mortgage or deed of trust.

The assignment of rents means that if the borrower defaults on the loan, the lender can step in and collect the rents directly from the tenants.

Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents

A deed of trust may contain an assignment of rents clause for that same property. In addition to a clause in the deed of trust, the lender may also require the borrower to execute a separate document called an "Assignment of Rents" that is recorded with the register of deeds.

Whether the assignment is written in the deed of trust only or is also contained in a separate document, it is binding on the borrower as long as its language is clear and sufficient to create an assignment under state law.

Exercising an Assignment of Rents

When a lender decides to collect the rents on the borrower's property, the lender is said to be exercising the assignment of rents. The lender cannot exercise the assignment unless the borrower has defaulted on the loan. Once that happens, the lender can send a written demand to the tenant or tenants, requiring that the rents be paid directly to the lender.

Absolute Assignments of Rents

An assignment of rents most likely will contain language that the assignment is an ​ absolute assignment ​. In most states, an absolute assignment gives the lender an immediate interest in the rents. This means that the lender actually owns the rents and is simply allowing the borrower to collect them on license until an event of default. Once a default occurs, the lender can intercept the rents without taking any court action; a letter to the tenants is all that's needed.

Every state's laws are different; the law of the state where the property is located will dictate how a lender can exercise an assignment of rents.

​ Read More: ​ What Is the Difference Between a Deed and a Deed of Trust?

  • Companies Incorporated: Mortgage States and Deed of Trust States
  • American Bar Association: Commercial Real Estate FAQs
  • Schulte Roth & Zabel: Sixth Circuit Upholds Assignment of Rents to Secured Lender
  • Findlaw: California Civil Code - CIV § 2938
  • Legal Beagle: What Is the Difference Between a Deed and a Deed of Trust?
  • Legal Beagle: How to Research a Deed of Trust
  • Legal Beagle: Documents Needed to Refinance a Mortgage
  • Legal Beagle: How to File a Property Lien

Rebecca K. McDowell is a creditors' rights attorney with a special focus on bankruptcy and insolvency. She has a B.A. in English from Albion College and a J.D. from Wayne State University Law School. She has written legal articles for Nolo and the Bankruptcy Site.

Related Articles

  • Who Can Act As Trustee in a Texas Deed of Trust?
  • The Definition of a Leasehold Deed of Trust
  • How to Waive Right of Redemption After Foreclosure

assignment of rents without a mortgage

Assignment of Rents – What, Why, and How?

Assignment of Rents – What, Why, and How

Article by:

Madelaine prescott, esq., share this post:.

  • November 29, 2023

These days, almost all commercial loans include an Assignment of Rents as part of the Deed of Trust or Mortgage. But what is an Assignment of Rents, why is this such an important tool, and how are they enforced?

An Assignment of Rents (“AOR”) is used to grant the lender on a transaction a security interest in existing and future leases, rents, issues, or profits generated by the secured property, including cash proceeds, in the event a borrower defaults on their loan. The lender can use the AOR to step in and directly collect rental payments made by the tenant. For an AOR to be effective, the lender’s interest must be perfected, which has a few fairly simple requirements. The AOR must be in writing, executed by the borrower, and recorded with the county where the property is located. Including an AOR in the recorded Deed of Trust or Mortgage is the easiest and most common way to ensure the AOR meets these requirements should it ever need to be utilized.

When a borrower defaults, lenders can take advantage of AORs as an alternative to foreclosure to recoup their investment. With a shorter timeline and significantly lower costs, it is certainly an attractive option for lenders looking to get defaulted borrowers back on track with payments, without the potential of having to take back a property and attempting to either manage it or sell it in hopes of getting your money back out of the property. AORs can be a quick and easy way for the lender to get profits generated by the property with the goal of bringing the borrower out of default. But lenders should carefully monitor how much is owed versus how much has been collected. If the AOR generates enough funds so that the borrower is no longer in default, the lender must stop collecting rents generated by the property.

Enforcement of an AOR can also incentivize borrowers to work with the lender to formulate a plan, as many borrowers rely on rental income to cover expenses related to the property or their businesses. Borrowers are generally more willing to come to the table and negotiate a mutual, amicable resolution with the lender in order to protect their own investment. A word of warning to lenders though: since rental income is frequently used to pay expenses on the property, such as the property manager, maintenance, taxes, and other expenses, the lender needs to ensure they do not unintentionally hurt the value of the property by letting these important expenses fall behind. This may hurt the lender’s investment as well, as the property value could suffer, liens could be placed on the property, or the property may fall into disrepair if not properly maintained. It is also important for lenders to be aware of the statutes surrounding the payment of these expenses when an AOR is being used, as some state’s statutes require the lender to pay certain property expenses out of the collected rents if requested by the borrower.

In addition to being shorter and cheaper than foreclosure, AORs can be much easier to enforce. In California, the enforcement of an AOR is governed by California Civil Code §2938. This statute specifies enforcement methods lenders can use and restrictions on use of these funds by the lender, among other things. Under CA Civil Code §2938(c), there are 4 ways to enforce an AOR:

  • The appointment of a receiver;
  • Obtaining possession of the rents, issues, profits;
  • Delivery to tenant of a written demand for turnover of rents, issues, and profits in the correct form; or
  • Delivery to assignor of a written demand for the rents, issues, or profits.

One or more of these methods can be used to enforce an AOR. First, a receiver can be appointed by the court, and granted specific powers related to the AOR such as managing the property and collecting rents. They can have additional powers though; it just depends on what the court orders. This is not the simplest or easiest option as it requires court involvement, but this is used to enforce an AOR, especially when borrowers or tenants are uncooperative. Next is obtaining possession of the rents, issues, profits, which is exactly as it seems; lenders can simply obtain actual possession of these and apply the funds to the loan under their AOR.

The third and fourth options each require delivery of a written demand to certain parties, directing them to pay rent to the lender instead of to the landlord. Once the demand is made, the tenant pays their rent directly to the lender, who then applies the funds to the defaulted loan. These are both great pre-litigation options, with advantages over the first two enforcement methods since actual possession can be difficult to obtain and courts move slowly with high costs to litigate. The written demands require a specific form to follow called the “Demand To Pay Rent to Party Other Than Landlord”, as found at CA Civil Code §2938(k). There are other notice requirements to be followed here, so it is essential to consult with an experienced attorney if you are considering either of these options. California Civil Code §2938 specifically provides that none of the four enforcement methods violate California’s One Action Rule nor the Anti-Deficiency Rule, so lenders can confidently enforce their AORs using the above methods with peace of mind that they are not violating other California laws.

Whether you are looking to originate a new loan, or you are facing a default by your borrower, understanding what an Assignment of Rents is and how it operates can be extremely beneficial. Enforcing an AOR can be an easier option than foreclosure and can help promote a good relationship with your borrower when handled correctly. If you have any questions about AORs, or need further details on how to enforce them, Geraci is here to help.

Geraci LLP Elevates Steven E. Ernest, Esq., to Partner, Reinforcing Commitment to Excellence in Legal Representation

Geraci LLP Elevates Steven E. Ernest, Esq., to Partner, Reinforcing Commitment to Excellence in Legal Representation

IRVINE, February 9, 2024 – Geraci LLP, the nation’s foremost private lending law firm, proudly announces the promotion of Steven E. Ernest, Esq., to the

Navigating the Maze: Understanding Service of Lawsuits in California

Navigating the Maze: Understanding Service of Lawsuits in California

When it comes to the legal landscape of California, the process of serving a lawsuit is akin to navigating a complex maze. For anyone embarking

What Constitutes a Good Set of Loan Documents

What Constitutes a Good Set of Loan Documents?

Sometimes, people are afraid to ask the basic questions, for fear that the questions are too obvious or that they should know better. But a

Private Lending 101 Foundational Considerations in Forming a Debt Fund

Private Lending 101: Foundational Considerations in Forming a Debt Fund

In the dynamic landscape of private lending, the strategic establishment of a debt fund becomes a pivotal move for those who seek to be a

Geraci Law Firm Logo

  • (949) 379-2600
  • 90 Discovery, Irvine, CA 92618

Subscribe to our Newsletters

Receive attorney-authored articles, legislative updates, webinar reminders, magazines, and more straight to your inbox. Choose the newsletters below you’d like to receive.

CONNECT WITH US

  • Create an Account

theBrokerList Blog

Assignments of Rents: Lenders Beware!

assignment of rents without a mortgage

Contributed by    R. Kymn Harp   author of   Intent to Prosper  and attorney at  RSP Law , Chicago, Illinois.

assignment of rents without a mortgage

Assignments of Rents. Here’s a topic that doesn’t pop up in light conversation very often.

Assignments of Rents. Virtually every commercial real estate financing includes an assignment of rents – either as a separate instrument, or in the mortgage, or both. We think we know what it means, and what protection it provides. But do we?

Assignments of Rents. What could assignments of rents possibly have to do with Pink Floyd?

It has been suggested on occasion, only half-jokingly, that I don’t like lenders. That is really not true. Lenders are valuable participants in the commercial real estate market. Without lenders, few of my clients could buy, develop or own commercial real estate projects. Commercial lenders provide valuable liquidity to the market (usually) and allow commercial real estate developers and investors to leverage available resources.

For years, I have described commercial lenders and their borrows as “friendly adversaries”. Friendly, because they need each other. Adversarial, because their interests are not always completely aligned. They are each necessary complements to the other.

In good times, all typically works well, with lenders and borrowers sharing a common goal -financing a viable commercial project that makes each of them an attractive return.

In troubled times, like we have seen over the past several years, lenders and borrowers can find themselves at odds. The current economic downturn has been particularly brutal because the commercial real estate market has seen an unprecedented collapse in property values and tenant rental revenue. Lenders often blame the borrower, because the loan has ended up in default. Realistically, for most commercial real estate borrowers, there is little if anything they could have done to prevent a default, save not acquiring and financing the project in the first place – which, in hindsight, most borrows wish, as much as most lenders wish, had been the case. But neither borrowers nor lenders foresaw the dramatic financial debacle we have been experiencing since 2008.

Still, we are where we are. Commercial real estate borrowers are holding projects with substantially lower values than existed five or six years ago, and may be in default of their mortgage loans. Not unreasonably, commercial real estate lenders want their money back.

Assuming the lender has properly documented and administered its commercial real estate loan, the lender should be in the driver’s seat. All else being equal, with a properly documented and administered commercial loan, a lender has a powerful arsenal of enforcement tools at its disposal.

That said, lenders must still comply with the law. Assuming they can pass the test of having a properly documented loan that has been properly administered in a manner that does not violate the rights and interests of the borrower, the mere fact that a lender is owed millions of dollars and has a secured interest in the borrowers project (including, yes, an assignment of rents) does not mean a lender can do whatever it wishes to collect its loan without regard to applicable law.

Do I dislike lenders? No. What I abhor are lenders and their attorneys who ignore the law – which already wildly favors lenders – and take steps in direct contravention of the law to collect their loans. With the legal enforcement deck already stacked in their favor, there is no excuse for lenders to overreach and violate the law in their enforcement efforts. When they do, they should fully expect that I will object on behalf of my borrower clients and seek to hold them accountable. We will pursue compensatory and punitive damages, when appropriate, petition to have their unlawful actions reversed, and will press to have their equitable remedies, including their equitable remedy of foreclosure, curtailed or barred.

Follow the law, and a lender should expect to get what the law provides. Violate the law, and a lender should expect to suffer the consequences.

Enforcement of an Assignment of Rents is a case in point. The law in Illinois, and in most other states, is crystal clear. It is an extension of common law doctrine that has developed over centuries. If a lender is going to require an Assignment of Rents, and plans to enforce the Assignment of Rents, it is incumbent upon the lender to know the law governing Assignments of Rents.

The leading case in Illinois on the effect and enforceability of an Assignment of Rents provision, whether in the mortgage or in a separate document, is Comerica Bank-Illinois vs. Harris Bank Hinsdale, et al, 284 Ill.App.3d 1030, 220 Ill.Dec. 468, 673 N.E.2d 380 (1st. Dist. 1996).

The Comerica case involved a dispute between a property owner/mortgagor and a first and second mortgagee as to who was entitled to collect the rents from shopping center tenants after the mortgagor’s default in payment of the a first mortgage and second mortgage.

The assignment of rents provision in the mortgage provided that, after a default, Comerica could collect rents from the property without taking possession of the property, and without exercising other options under the mortgage.

Comerica, the first mortgagee, sent a notice to tenants that the mortgagor was in default under its mortgage and that under the assignment of rents provision in its mortgage Comerica was entitled to collect the rents. Thereupon Comerica began collecting rents.

The property owner/mortgagor and the second mortgagee objected.

In summary, the Comerica court held as follows:

1. At common law, it was strictly held that the mortgagee must take actual possession before being entitled to rents.

2. A clause in a real estate mortgage pledging rents and profits creates an equitable lien upon such rents and profits of the land, which may be enforced by the mortgagee upon default by taking possession of the mortgaged property.

3. The possession requirement reflects the public policy in Illinois which seeks to prevent mortgagees from stripping the rents from the property and leaving the mortgagor and the tenants without resources for maintenance and repair.

4. Courts will not enforce private agreements that are contrary to public policy.

5. “To obtain the benefits of possession in the form of rents, the mortgagee must also accept the burdens associated with possession – the responsibilities and potential liability that follow whenever a mortgage goes into default. The mortgagee’s right to rents, then, is not automatic but arises only when the mortgagee has affirmatively sought possession with its attendant benefits and burdens”.

6. A mortgagee may be entitled to rents once a receiver is appointed as an incidence of being in “constructive possession”, since having a receiver appointed constitutes affirmative action by the mortgagee, under court authorization.

7. In a foreclosure action, the mortgagee is not entitled to rents until judgment has actually been entered unless the mortgage agreement permits the mortgagee to obtain prejudgment possession.

8. A mere filing of a foreclosure action or request for appointment of a receiver is not sufficient to trigger a mortgagee’s right to collect rents. The receiver must actually be appointed. “The mortgagee is not entitled to the rents until the mortgagee or a receiver appointed on the mortgagee’s behalf has taken actual possession of the real estate after default.”

9. Where a mortgagee does not obtain prejudgment possession of the property (through a court appointed receiver or as a mortgagee in possession), and where rents are collected during a time while the mortgagor remained in possession of the property, the rents so collected belong to the mortgagor.

In making its ruling, the Comerica court relied on Illinois case law, but, noting that the U.S. Supreme Court has required bankruptcy courts to apply State law in determining a mortgagee’s entitlement to rents [Butner v United States, 440 U.S. 48, 99 S. Ct. 914 (1979)], the Comerica court also found relevant bankruptcy decisions and Federal case law to be thorough and persuasive. Among other cases, the Comerica court found persuasive the bankruptcy court opinion in In re. J.D. Monarch Development Co. 153 B.R.829 (Bankr. S.D.Ill 1993).

In the case of In re. J.D. Monarch Development Co. 153 B.R.829 (Bankr. S.D.Ill 1993), the bankruptcy court, applying Illinois law, held as follows:

1. Illinois law recognizes the validity of an assignment of rents included in a mortgage of real estate.

2. Such an assignment creates a security interest in rents that is perfected as to third parties upon recording the mortgage in the real estate records.

3. As between the mortgagee and the mortgagor, however, the mortgagee is not entitled to the rents until the mortgagee or a receiver appointed on the mortgagee’s behalf has taken actual possession of the real estate after default.

4. This is so even though the mortgage instrument contains a specific pledge of the rents.

5. The mortgage does not create a lien upon rents to the same extent that it creates a lien upon the land. Rather, the inclusion of rents in a mortgage merely gives the mortgagee the right to collect rents as an incident of possession of the mortgaged property, and the mortgagee, after default, must take affirmative action to be placed in possession of the property to receive such income.

6. The requirement that a mortgagee enforce its lien on rents by possession of the real estate renders an assignment of rents different from security interests in other property.

7. Typically, a perfected lien gives the creditor an interest in a specific piece of property, whereas an assignment of rents allows the mortgagee to collect rents that come due after the mortgagee takes control of the property. To obtain the benefits of possession in the form of rents, the mortgagee must also accept the burdens associated with possession.

Notwithstanding the clarity of the law on this topic, there are lenders, and lenders’ counsel, and occasionally receivers, who ignore the law or choose to intentionally violate the law by seeking to take the benefits of rental projects by control of rents without accepting the burdens that come with possession. They want the good, but not the bad. The dessert, but not the main course. The pudding, but not the meat.

[Hence my opening reference to Pink Floyd: “How can you have any pudding, if you don’t eat your meat?” Even Pink Floyd understood the public policy applicable to assignments of rents!]

So what is the property owning borrower’s remedy for a lender violating the law by exercising dominion or control over rents payable to the borrower without first obtaining possession of the project?

How about conversion/civil theft? Let’s check-off the elements:

A proper complaint for conversion must allege the four elements of a cause of action for conversion:

(1) an unauthorized and wrongful assumption of control, dominion, or ownership by a lender over a borrower’s personalty (identifiable “rents” count); [ √ check]

(2) borrower’s right to the rents; [ √ check]

(3) borrower’s right to immediate possession of the rents; [ √ check]

(4) borrowers’ demand for possession of the rents. [easy to do: √ check]

“Punitive damages” are available where a defendant willfully or wantonly converts the property of another. Is there any legitimate doubt – especially in Illinois – especially since the court’s clear and unequivocal Comerica decision in 1996 – that a lender who unilaterally converts the rents of a borrower to its own use without taking lawful possession of the rental project does so “willfully or wantonly” in disregard of the project owners’ rights to those rents?

If a lender is intentionally violating the law as it relates to the security for its loan, particularly as it relates to an assignment of rents executed within or in conjunction with a mortgage debt, might the lender also be guilty of “unclean hands” relative to the mortgage security, with the result that a lender might be equitably barred from foreclosing its mortgage in a court of equity? Stay tuned…

The point is not that I wish to prevent a lender from enforcing its legal rights under its loan documents. The point is, a lender must enforce its legal rights within the bounds of the law, just like everyone else.

I didn’t make the rules, but I will enforce them. If a lender insists on violating the law vis-à-vis one of my borrower clients, it should expect to suffer the consequences.

This is not a threat – it is a promise.

Thanks for listening. Kymn

R. Kymn Harp is a seasoned attorney and trusted advisor to commercial real estate investors, lenders, and developers. He is a partner in the Chicago, Illinois law firm of Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd. and may be reached at (312) 456-0378 or  [email protected] . For more information, visit his website  http://www.rsplaw.com

Article Source:  http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=R._Kymn_Harp

assignment of rents without a mortgage

R. Kymn Harp

R. Kymn Harp is a recognized thought leader and resourceful advocate for commercial real estate investment and development in Illinois, Indiana and throughout the USA. Kymn is a solutions-oriented attorney who takes a practical approach to all real estate and business transactions. He is a frequent speaker at CE seminars, and is a widely published author on commercial real estate legal topics.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

theBrokerList

  • 1031 Exchange (1)
  • 1031 Myths (1)
  • 1031education (1)
  • 1031Exchange (1)
  • Best Commercial Real Estate Advice (2)
  • Best Practices (1,801)
  • Brokerage Life & Leadership (466)
  • Brokers to Watch (1)
  • Business Owner (1)
  • Business Trends (523)
  • Buyer Representation (1)
  • checklist (1)
  • Commercial Deal Underwriting (1)
  • Commercial Land (3)
  • commercial land for sale (1)
  • commercial lease (1)
  • Commercial Real Estate (5)
  • Commercial Real Estate Buyer Representation (1)
  • Commercial Real Estate Education (1)
  • Commercial Real Estate Is (6)
  • Commercial Real Estate Professionals (97)
  • Commercial real estate technology (5)
  • CRE Leaders to Watch (1)
  • CRE Market Reports (470)
  • CRE Marketing (247)
  • CRE Promotions/Job Changes (47)
  • CREMarketing Leaders to Watch (1)
  • Dear Business Owner (1)
  • Development (1)
  • Development Site (1)
  • DNA of #CRE (13)
  • Done Deals (458)
  • due diligence (3)
  • due diligence checklist (1)
  • Environmental (1)
  • Estate planning (1)
  • Events & Conferences (122)
  • High Net Worth (1)
  • Hospitality (1)
  • How To Use theBrokerList (96)
  • Industrial (1)
  • Investment Property (35)
  • Investment Strategy (1)
  • land brokerage (1)
  • Land Due Diligence (1)
  • Land Listing (1)
  • land listing checklist (1)
  • lease rate (1)
  • lease review (1)
  • Marketplace Partners (3,287)
  • Meybohm (1)
  • Meybohm Commercial (1)
  • Off Market (1)
  • Press Releases (229)
  • Pursuit Development (1)
  • Sale-Leaseback (1)
  • Seller Representation (1)
  • Shout-Out (7)
  • SimpLEASity (1)
  • Single Tenant Net Lease (2)
  • Site Selection (2)
  • Sponsored Blog Posts (3)
  • theBrokerList Podcast (1)
  • Tidal Wave (1)
  • Top 10+ CRE Blogs (6)
  • Uncategorized (6)
  • Warehouse (1)

assignment of rents without a mortgage

Jessica Molligan is an attorney with twenty years of experience in family law, bankruptcy, and litigation.

Peter L. on ContractsCounsel

Experienced in house counsel with expertise in contracting, labor and employment, regulatory and compliance and healthcare

Mariah M. on ContractsCounsel

McGhee at Law is a purpose-driven law firm located in Indiana. We are focused on assisting Clients with creating opportunities of advancement. Our strategy is to assist, advise and support our Clients in fulfilling their vision for their personal lives and businesses through the practice of law.

Scott M. on ContractsCounsel

Skilled/versatile attorney (and RE broker) with 10+ years' experience and diverse background in real estate, business law, injury litigation, estate planning. Select Experience: • Former General Counsel (and current Of Counsel) for a prominent real estate developer touching on all aspects of business in a hands-on and advisory role, including Lease and PSA contract negotiations; • Years of successful injury litigation practice as associate and solo (primarily plaintiff, some defense) with multiple six-figure settlements; • Years of expertise in business law for a variety of industries as well as estate planning for small to mid-size entities.

Shanon G. on ContractsCounsel

Have experience in contract, family law, municipality work, criminal defense, litigation, some wills and estates as well. Been practicing law for over 22 years.

Heather B. on ContractsCounsel

I currently focus on estate planning, uncontested divorces, mobile real estate closings, and contract review for small businesses after starting my firm after leaving my position a partner at a national law firm specializing in creditor rights and real property.

Suzanne E. on ContractsCounsel

I have been an attorney for 30 years. I am a Colorado native with many years in Alaska. I have a Bachelors in Biology, Chemistry and French, JD from Seattle University and Masters in Environmental Science and Law from Vermont Law School. I have traveled extensively, mostly in Europe, and speak several languages with more or less proficiency. I practiced law in Alaska and Colorado, much of it in remote areas but also large cities. I have taught in an environmental masters program and run large environmental nonprofits and a hot springs resort. I have worked with and run business incubators, a process I love. Empowering people to build their own futures is a passion.

Find the best lawyer for your project

How it works.

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Real Estate lawyers by top cities

  • Austin Real Estate Lawyers
  • Boston Real Estate Lawyers
  • Chicago Real Estate Lawyers
  • Dallas Real Estate Lawyers
  • Denver Real Estate Lawyers
  • Houston Real Estate Lawyers
  • Los Angeles Real Estate Lawyers
  • New York Real Estate Lawyers
  • Phoenix Real Estate Lawyers
  • San Diego Real Estate Lawyers
  • Tampa Real Estate Lawyers

Assignment Of Leases And Rents lawyers by city

  • Austin Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
  • Boston Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
  • Chicago Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
  • Dallas Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
  • Denver Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
  • Houston Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
  • Los Angeles Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
  • New York Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
  • Phoenix Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
  • San Diego Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
  • Tampa Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers

related contracts

  • Addendum to Lease
  • ALTA Statement
  • Apartment Lease
  • Apartment Rental Agreement
  • Assignment of Lease
  • Boundary Line Agreement
  • Brokerage Agreement
  • Building Contract
  • Building Lease
  • Buyer Agency Agreement

other helpful articles

  • How much does it cost to draft a contract?
  • Do Contract Lawyers Use Templates?
  • How do Contract Lawyers charge?
  • Business Contract Lawyers: How Can They Help?
  • What to look for when hiring a lawyer

assignment of rents without a mortgage

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

assignment of rents without a mortgage

Assignment of Rents: Substance Over Form and Meaning of `Property of the Estate’

By Adam L. Rosen and Sheryl P. Giugliano

Adam L. Rosen

At the beginning of a Chapter 11 single asset real estate case a debtor may encounter resistance from its secured lender over the debtor’s postpetition use of rents which are subject to an assignment of rents agreement. Secured lenders may argue that rents subject to an assignment of rents are not property of the estate, and therefore, are not cash collateral available for use by the debtor. Secured lenders have had some success in argument that upon a debtor’s default under the loan documents, title to the rents vests in the secured lender, eliminating any interest the debtor may have held in the rents. See, e.g., In re Soho Retail, LLC , Ch. 11 Case No. 10-15114, Adv. No. 11-1286, 2011 BL 85874 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2011); In re Loco Realty Corp. , No. 09-11785, 2009 BL 137139 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. June 25, 2009). A recent decision by Judge Stong of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York suggests that single asset real estate debtors can successfully defeat these arguments if the bankruptcy court is either willing to look beyond the label of a document to the lender’s post-default actions, or recognize a debtor’s “equitable” interest in postpetition rents as sufficient to render the rents “property of the estate.” See In re S. Side House, LLC , 474 B.R. 391, 406 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2012).

See In re S. Side House, LLC , 474 B.R. 391, 396 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2012) (stating that in order to determine whether postpetition rental income is property of the estate and cash collateral, “the Court must start with New York law, which defines the property interests of borrowers and lenders under assignments of rent, and then consider whether the [d]ebtor’s prepetition property interests in the Rents meets the definition of property of the estate under Bankruptcy Code §541(a)”).

Clear Language of the Bankruptcy Code.

“Accordingly, all post-petition rents are property of the bankruptcy estate. Whiting Pools mandates this result: Until title has transferred, property controlled by a secured creditor, unless subject to an exception, must be turned over to the estate.” In re Amaravathi Ltd. P’ship , 416 B.R. 618, 633 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2009).

Debtor’s Interest in Rents.

Despite the express language of Bankruptcy Code §541(a)(6), and perhaps recognizing the distinction made by Kenneth N. Klee, courts often focus on determining whether, as of the commencement of the case, a debtor had any legal or equitable interest in the rents under applicable state law. See, e.g., Sovereign Bank v. Schwab , 414 F.3d 450 , 452 (3d Cir. 2005) (“[D]etermining whether the rents here are property of the bankruptcy estate requires an inquiry into whether the debtor had any legal or equitable interests in those rents as of the date of the bankruptcy petition.”); In re Jason Realty, L.P. , 59 F.3d 423 , 426 (3d Cir. 1995) (“Property of the estate consists of all property in which the debtor holds an interest upon the commencement of bankruptcy.” (citing 11 U.S.C. §541(a)(6) )). See also, In re S. Side House, LLC , 474 B.R. 391, 402 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2012) (citing Taub v. Taub (In re Taub) , 427 B.R. 208, 219 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2010) (stating “[w]hether or not a debtor has an interest in property sufficient to bring it within the ambit of ’property of the estate’ is determined by state law or other applicable nonbankruptcy law”).

The determination under state law of what relative rights a secured lender and debtor held prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy case, with respect to rents subject to an assignment of rents, depends (at first glance at least) on whether the assignment of rents “was intended to be for ‘collateral’ or whether it was intended to be an absolute assignment.” David R. Kuney & Alex R. Rovira, The Single Asset Real Estate Case: Basic Principles and Strategies, 60 ( Joel M. Aresty, Am. Bankr. Instit. 2012). Cf. In re S. Side House , 474 B.R. 391, 403 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2012) (“New York courts interpret rent assignment clauses to be additional security even when they contain terms such as ‘absolute’ and ‘unconditional.’ This is because courts look beyond the language used in rent assignment clauses … .”).

Understanding `Collateral’ Versus `Absolute’ Assignments.

Although case law suggests that the label of an assignment of rents is not determinative, and therefore it is a difference without a distinction in the end, debtors and secured lenders should still understand how “absolute” assignments of rents differ from “collateral” assignments of rents. See, e.g., Fin. Ctr. Assocs. of E. Meadow, L.P. v. TNE Funding Corp. (In re Fin. Ctr. Assocs. of E. Meadow, L.P.) , 140 B.R. 829, 832 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1992). “[A]n absolute assignment of rents operates to transfer the right to [rents to the lender] automatically upon the happening of a specified condition, such as default.” In re Amaravathi Ltd. P’ship , 416 B.R. 618, 630 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2009) (quoting Taylor v. Brennan , 621 S.W.2d 592 , 293 (Tex. 1981)). Alternatively, a collateral assignment of rents “occurs when the debtor pledges the property’s rents to the mortgage lender as additional security for a loan,” and then, after an event of default occurs, “the lender may assert rights not only to the property subject to the mortgage but also to the rents generated by the mortgage property.” Id. See also, In re S. Side House, LLC , 474 B.R. at 403 (“When an assignment is for additional security, the lender has a lien on the rents, but title to the rents remains with the borrower. But when an assignment is absolute, title to the rents vests in the lender upon execution of the agreement, and the borrower is granted a revocable license to collect the rents that may terminate immediately and permanently upon default.”).

The View of Assignments in New York.

Other states apply the same method of looking beyond the label of an assignment of rents agreement to determine whether it is “absolute” or “given as additional security.” See, e.g., In re Senior Hous. Alt., Inc. , 444 B.R. 386, 392-93 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2011) (holding under Tennessee state law that “an assignment of rents absolute on its face will nevertheless be viewed as a security interest if given in connection with a mortgage loan and not in exchange for a present consideration … .”) (citations omitted); In re Hrapchak , No. 07-1668, 2008 BL 79636 , at *5 (Bankr. N.D. W. Va. Apr. 16, 2008) (holding under West Virginia law that although assignment of rents agreement was labeled “absolute,” after examining the facts and circumstances, “the right to collect rents is given as security and the rents themselves constitute property of the bankruptcy estate”).

Although under New York state law, assignments of rents are generally given as additional security for the loan, and are not “absolute,” two recent decisions out of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in the Second Circuit held that postpetition rents are not property of the estate available as cash collateral because, even though the assignment of rents was “collateral,” the lender’s efforts were sufficient to cut off the debtor’s property interest in the rents prior to the commencement of the case, or because the language of the agreement made it clear that the assignment of rents was “absolute.” See, e.g., In re Soho 25 Retail, LLC , Ch. 11 Case No. 10-15114, Adv. No. 11-1286, 2011 BL 85874 , at *7 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. March 31, 2011) (finding no need to determine whether an “absolute” assignment of rents is permissible under New York law, because regardless, the lender had taken “sufficient affirmative steps” to make the assignment of rents effective). See also, In re Loco Realty Corp. , No. 09-11785, 2009 BL 137139 , at *5-6 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. June 25, 2009) (recognizing most courts in New York find assignments of rents to be collateral, finding assignment of rents agreement was “absolute” in light of clear language labeling it as such, but recognizing that “an absolute assignment of rents prepetition does not necessarily mean that the estate has no interest in the rents for the purposes of §541 analysis”).

Courts Look Beyond Labels.

See Travelers Indem. Co. v. Grant Assocs. (In re Grant Assocs.) , No. M – 47 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 5, 1991) (holding “the finding that the assignment was absolute does not necessarily compel the conclusion … that the [lender] thereby holds more than a security interest in the rents or that [the d]ebtor retains no interest in the rents … .”); In re Charles D. Stapp of Nev., Inc. , 641 F.2d 737 , 740 (S.D.N.Y. 1981) (concluding that notwithstanding an absolute assignment under Georgia law, the debtor retained a residual interest in the rents which were assigned); In re Princeton Overlook Joint Venture , 143 B.R. 625, 633 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1992) (concluding that the mortgagor retained a “collection interest” in the rents, and thus, the rents were part of the bankruptcy estate pursuant to Bankruptcy Code §541). See In re Loco Realty Corp. , No. 09-11785, 2009 BL 137139 , at *6 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. June 25, 2009) (finding absolute assignment of rents to be “absolute” in New York, but recognizing “an absolute assignment of rents prepetition does not necessarily mean that the estate has no interest in the rents for purposes of a §541 analysis”) (citations omitted); Amaravathi Ltd. P’ship , 416 B.R. 618, 637 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2009) (concluding postpetition rents are property of the estate regardless of whether the assignment of rents was absolute or collateral because “[t]he only difference between such assignments is the fact that the lender must take affirmative steps to ‘activate the ‘collateral’ assignment… . [once the lender takes those affirmative steps], however, the lender’s rights with respect to the debtor and the rents are identical under either type of assignment.”). In re Constable Plaza Assocs., L.P. , 125 B.R. 98, 102-03, 106 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1991) (holding appointment of receiver prior to commencement of the case “did not cut off all of the debtor’s property interests in the future rents” because “the debtor continues to possess a residual interest in the rents which results in characterizing such rents as property of the estate within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. §541 ”). Some courts will not find that a debtor’s residual interest in property is sufficient to render the rents property of the estate because, according to those courts, if under state law the debtor would not have the right to collect the rents, then in bankruptcy the debtor does not have any greater rights. In re S. Pointe Assocs. , 161 B.R. 224, 227 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1993) (rejecting debtor’s argument rents are property of the estate because of debtor’s “residual interest,” where lender acted to activate its rights to collect the rents, and therefore, as of the commencement of the case, under Missouri state law, “the [d]ebtor has no right to the immediate collection of the apartment rents”). It is obvious, but worth highlighting, that if a court finds an assignment of rents agreement is “absolute” and the debtor does not maintain a residual interest in the postpetition rents, then, absent some alternative financing, the debtor’s Chapter 11 single asset real estate case cannot continue.

In sum, depending on the facts, an assignment of rents agreement may not be an impediment to a successful single-asset real estate case, or to using a lender’s cash collateral. The debtor’s chances for success seem to rest on the court’s willingness either to look beyond the label of a document, or to recognize the breadth of “property of the estate,” including a debtor’s “residual” interest in postpetition rents.

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

Learn about bloomberg law.

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.

Logo Brian D. Moreno Law Corporation APC

(888) 578-9673

  • What is an assignment of rents?

by Brian D. Moreno, Esq., CCAL | General Real Estate Law , Homeowners Association

assignment of rents without a mortgage

With the collection of assessments, community associations are always looking for creative ways to increase the chance of recovery.  One underutilized remedy that may provide associations good results is an assignment of rents.  If an owner-landlord fails to pay HOA assessments but continues to collect rent payments from his or her tenant, the association should consider rent assignment.  There are prejudgment and post-judgment rent assignment remedies that can be pursued with regard to the delinquency.  A post-judgment rent assignment can be pursued by way of a request to the court after a Judgment is entered against the owner-landlord.

A prejudgment rent assignment can be pursued even before filing a lawsuit if executed properly.  In California, Civil Code Section 2938 regulates the formation and enforcement of the assignment of rents and profits generated by a lease agreement relating to real property.  It provides that “[a] written assignment of an interest in leases, rents, issues, or profits of real property made in connection with an obligation secured by real property. . .shall, upon execution and delivery by the assignor, be effective to create a present security interest in existing and future leases, rents, issues, or profits of that real property. . . .”   Once a written assignment of rents is properly authorized and formed, the law creates a security interest (i.e., lien) against the rents and profits paid by a tenant. 

The question then is whether the association’s CC&Rs, by itself, creates an assignment of the right to a tenant’s rent payment in favor of the association.  Indeed, section 2938(b) provides that the assignment of an interest in leases or rent of real property may be recorded in the same manner as any other conveyance of an interest in real property, whether the assignment is in a separate document or part of a mortgage or deed of trust.  Since a homeowners association’s CC&Rs is a recorded document and contains covenants, equitable servitudes, easements, and other property interests against the development, it follows that the assignment of rents relief provided in Section 2938(b) can be extended to community associations provided the CC&Rs contains an appropriate assignment of rents provision.

Section 2938, however, does not clarify whether the CC&Rs document on its own creates a lien and enforceable assignment right.  Moreover, a deed of trust is much different than a set of CC&Rs, in that the deed of trust creates a lien against the trustor’s property upon recordation, while a homeowners association would not have a lien until an owner becomes delinquent with his or her assessments and the association records an assessment lien against the property.  Therefore, depending on the scope of the assignment of rents provision in the CC&Rs, a homeowners association would likely need to record an assessment lien first before pursuing rents from a tenant.  Moreover, even after a lien is recorded, homeowners associations should consider adding a provision in the assessment lien giving notice to the delinquent owner that an assignment right is in effect upon recordation of the assessment lien.  Nevertheless, association Boards should consult with legal counsel to ensure proper compliance with the law.

Once the assignment right becomes enforceable, the next issue is how the Association can and should proceed.  Section 2938(c)(3) allows the association to serve a pre-lawsuit demand (a sample of which is included in the statute) on the tenant(s), demanding that the tenant(s) turn over all rent payments to the association.  This can be a powerful tool for homeowners associations.  Moreover, if the tenant complies, the association will receive substantial monthly payments that can be applied towards the assessment debt, and collecting the funds does not appear to preclude the association from pursuing judicial or non-judicial foreclosure proceedings at a later time.

While homeowner associations have the option of pursuing a lawsuit against the delinquent owner and seeking to collect the rent payments after a judgment has been obtained, there are obvious advantages to enforcing the assignment of rents provision prior to pursuing litigation.  A pre-lawsuit assignment of rents demand may prove to be more effective and cheaper.  Additionally, the tenant affected by the assignment of rents demand may place additional pressures on the delinquent owner/landlord having received such a demand.  Given this, the options available pursuant to Section 2938, including the pre-lawsuit demand for rents, should at least be considered and analyzed before action is taken.

Truly, the initial pre-lawsuit demand for rents may persuade the landlord-owner to resolve the delinquency with the association in the face of the potential disturbance of the landlord-tenant relationship.  Even if the tenant fails to comply with the demand and/or the owner fails to bring the account current, the association could nonetheless pursue foreclosure remedies and/or seek to have a receiver appointed to specifically enforce the assignment of rents provision.

In sum, if a delinquent homeowner is leasing the property to a tenant, the homeowners association should consider making a pre-lawsuit demand for rent payments.  If the association’s CC&Rs does not contain an assignment of rents provision, the board of directors should consider amending the CC&Rs to include an appropriate provision.  Without question, the pre-lawsuit demand for rents could provide an excellent opportunity for recovery of unpaid assessments during these difficult economic times.

Recent Posts

  • HOA Recall Elections – Must They Be Held Within 90 Days?
  • Judgment Enforcement: What can an association do to collect an old small claims judgment?
  • Encroachment Disputes: New considerations based on recent laws

Blog Archives

New Law Clarifies Lenders’ Rights to Collect Rent From Tenants of a Borrower

March 21, 2023

assignment of rents without a mortgage

When a landlord defaults on a mortgage of its rental property, the lending institution will typically seek to collect rent from the borrower’s tenants in order to secure repayment of the loan.

Due to a confusing patchwork of laws and regulations applicable to a landlord/borrower’s assignment of rent to the lending institution, the Uniform Law Commission drafted a model law to clarify and streamline applicable procedures. Recently, Michigan adopted a modified version of the model act, known as the Michigan Uniform Assignment of Rents Act, effective September 22, 2022. MCL 554.1051 et seq .

Under the Michigan version of the UARA, a “presently effective security interest” in rental payments can be created through a written assignment from the borrower/landlord to the lending institution. The assignment can either be a separate assignment agreement or it can be contained within the mortgage documents.

Where the borrower/landlord has agreed to assign rents to the lender and the borrower/landlord has defaulted on the mortgage, the lender will enforce the assignment by recording a notice and serving it on the borrower/landlord. Such notice will entitle the lender to receive the gross rents payable by the tenant(s). Following notice that the security interest (lien) has been recorded, the borrower/landlord is obligated to turn over all gross rents it receives to the lender.

The MUARA also addresses a problem that often arose under prior statutes: a mortgage being discharged without the lender also discharging the related assignment of rents that was the subject of a separate agreement. Under the act, an assignment of rents made with a security agreement is automatically discharged when the security agreement itself is discharged by the lender.

If you are a lender, a landlord/borrower or a tenant, it is important to know your rights and obligations under the Michigan Uniform Assignment of Rents Act. If you have questions relating to this or other real estate law matters, please contact a Kerr Russell real estate attorney.

Practice Areas

  • Real Estate

Other posts to consider:

November 9, 2022

Commercial Lease Terminations in Michigan

Aside from the contractually agreed upon early termination clauses (whether fault-based or based upon economics, business needs or other factors) and a landlord’s statutory remedy of terminating a lease...

January 19, 2023

Indication of Interest vs. a Letter of Intent

While many economists are predicting that the United States economy will experience a recession during 2023, resulting in a decline in M&A activity, there are many M&A experts who...

December 16, 2022

Five Tips to Prepare for Civil Litigation

These apply equally to governments, private companies, and individuals of all backgrounds facing litigation. Following these tips should foster better relationships with counsel, and potentially lead to lower costs,...

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. By continuing to use our site, you consent to our use of cookies. If you do not consent, you may disable cookies in your browser settings. Please note that disabling cookies may affect the functionality of our website.

A banker asked us: General vs specific assignments of rents and leases in Ontario

Q: What is the difference between a general assignment of rents and leases and a specific assignment of rents and leases, and when should I include them in my term sheet for a commercial real estate financing of an Ontario property?

A: In situations where a borrower owns real property in Ontario that either is or will be leased to third party tenants, a lender should consider obtaining either a general assignment of rents and leases or a specific assignment of rents and leases in addition to a mortgage on the secured property. Like a mortgage, an assignment of rents and leases should be registered against title to the subject property, and in addition, should be registered under the applicable personal property security legislation as the rents and leases that are being secured by the assignment fall within the definition of personal property under that legislation. [1]

An assignment of rents and leases, be it a general assignment of rents and leases or a specific assignment of rents and leases, provides a lender with two principal benefits which may be realized by the lender after an event of default:

  • it permits the lender to receive the rent payments that the borrower/landlord would otherwise be entitled to, and this revenue stream from the tenants is a significant asset that should be secured; and,
  • it permits the lender to step into the shoes of the borrower/landlord and exercise all of the rights and remedies available to the landlord to ensure that the full benefit and value of the lease is realized by the lender, which includes for example, the right to demand payment in the event of non-payment of rent by a tenant and to assign the lease to a purchaser in the event of a power of sale proceeding.

The only difference between a general assignment of rents and leases and a specific assignment of rents and leases is the revenue streams and leases to which they apply. A general assignment of rents and leases applies to all present and future rental income and leases in respect of a particular property. Once in place, a general assignment of rents and leases gives the lender a right to the rental income and the ability to exercise all of the rights of the landlord under a lease in respect of all leases of the property, including but not limited to any new leases, subleases or assignments of lease entered into after the assignment is granted and registered. In contrast to this, a specific assignment of rents and leases only applies to leases which are specifically listed in the document. In the event that any of the specifically listed leases expire or are terminated, and/or a new lease or sublease is put in place, the specific assignment of leases will not apply to this new lease or sublease and the lender will have no right to the rental income or rights resulting from the new lease or sublease.

In most lending situations, the lender will prefer a general assignment of rents and leases as it provides the most comprehensive security. The lender will have security over all rental income, and be able to exercise the rights of the landlord, regardless of who the tenants are in the future, or what leases the borrower has in place at the time of default under the terms of the loan or credit facility. However, where there is a principal or anchor tenant that represents a preponderance of the rental income, and/or the borrower objects to a general assignment of rents and leases securing all rents and leases as too broad a security interest, the lender may only be interested in securing the rental income and landlord rights associated with a specific principal or anchor lease, or a particular group of leases. In such a situation, a specific assignment of rents and leases may be a reasonable compromise position for a lender to adopt. Alternatively, in situations where multiple lenders are taking security in a particular parcel of real property, specific assignments of rents and leases allow the various lenders to divide the rental income and leases among themselves, with each lender only obtaining security in a specifically agreed upon lease or group of leases.

The above is a general overview of general and specific assignments of rents and leases. The professionals in Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP’s financial services practice group would be pleased to discuss your lending and real property security needs in greater detail, and help you chose the security documents most appropriate for your lending needs.

[1] Some financial institutions have chosen to incorporate into their Standard Charge Terms for their mortgages various provisions that serve as a general assignment of rents, and they do not register a separate general assignment of rents as a result.

Photo of Rosa Lupo

Related Insights & Resources

person paying by machine with watch at store

assignment of rents without a mortgage

At SmartCapitalMind, we're committed to delivering accurate, trustworthy information. Our expert-authored content is rigorously fact-checked and sourced from credible authorities. Discover how we uphold the highest standards in providing you with reliable knowledge.

Learn more...

What is an Assignment of Rents?

An assignment of rents and leases is an agreement between the owner of a particular property and a designated second party. The terms and conditions allow that second party to collect any rental payments paid by tenants and to manage that property for a period of time. This type of arrangement is most commonly utilized to settle a loan or some sort of credit extended by the second party to the property owner, and remains in effect until the debt is settled in full.

For the duration of the assignment of rents, the property owner remains the owner of record for the property. There is no transfer of title, although the lender is usually given the privilege of managing the property as he or she sees fit. This means that for the duration of the agreement, the lender can use part of the collected proceeds to maintain the property, while applying the remainder of the collected rent payments toward the outstanding balance of the loan amount.

Choosing to create an assignment of rents usually takes place because the property owner is in need of a quick infusion of resources for some reason. Rather than going with a loan and simply using the property as collateral , the assignment of rents effectively allows the property owner to borrow against future income, which is realized as tenants make regular rental payments. As with any type of loan situation, there is a rate of interest applied to the outstanding balance, with a portion of each month’s proceeds going to retire a part of the principle as well as some of the interest due.

The benefit to the property owner is that loans with this stipulation often carry very competitive rates of interest. This means that over the life of the loan, the owner is likely to pay much less interest on the loan installments. Since an assignment of rents can easily be structured between two individuals, there is also the advantage of not having to go through a bank or mortgage company at all. If the property owner can find an angel lender who is willing to advance money now and receive payments back from the rental proceeds each month, the paperwork is kept to a minimum, and the owner can receive the advance of funds almost immediately.

It is not unusual for an assignment of rents to also contain clauses that protect the interests of both the property owner and the lender. These provisions give the lender protection in the event that the collected rentals slip below a certain point due to vacancies. At the same time, the owner is protected from the lender attempting to gain ownership of the property as long as the monthly payments amount to a minimum figure.

After many years in the teleconferencing industry, Michael decided to embrace his passion for trivia, research, and writing by becoming a full-time freelance writer. Since then, he has contributed articles to a variety of print and online publications, including SmartCapitalMind, and his work has also appeared in poetry collections, devotional anthologies, and several newspapers. Malcolm’s other interests include collecting vinyl records, minor league baseball, and cycling.

You might also Like

Recommended, as featured on:.

Logo

Related Articles

  • What Is an Assignment of Proceeds?
  • What is an Assignment of Mortgage?
  • What is Rental Property Management Software?
  • What is a Tenant?
  • What is a Wage Assignment?

Discussion Comments

Post your comments.

  • By: dbvirago An assignment of rents is an agreement between the owner of a property and a designated second party that may allow that second party to manage the property for a period of time.
  • What is an Assignment of Rents?

WHAT IS AN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS?

An assignment of rent is a binding contract between a lender and a borrower stipulating that in the event the borrower defaults on the mortgage, the lender will be entitled to collect any rent payments made by a tenant occupying the property. If the lender is aware that the borrower intends to use the mortgaged property as a rental property, the lender may include an assignment of rents clause in the mortgage agreement to further protect its interest. A lender may choose to enter a general assignment of rents or a specific assignment of rents.

In a general assignment of rents, the agreement is binding on all future leases. A specific assignment of rents is only binding on the specific parties listed in the agreement. In the context of a real estate transaction, an assignment of rents, whether general or specific, may be registered on title. An assignment of rent may also be registered under the Personal Property Security Act as a secured interest. An assignment of rents is typically only deleted from the title when the corresponding mortgage is discharged and paid in full.

Contact us if you require legal assistance with your real estate transaction. Our real estate law team has the experience and knowledge to assist you throughout every step of the transaction.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is not to be construed as legal advice. The content is drafted and published only for the purpose of providing the public with general information regarding various real estate and business law topics. For legal advice, please contact us.

About the Author:

Shahriar Jahanshahi is the founder and principal lawyer at Jahanshahi Law Firm with a practice focus on representing business star-ups and investors in the province of Ontario. For further information about Shahriar Jahanshahi, click here .

assignment of rents without a mortgage

Real Estate Law Insights

  • Can a Lawyer Represent both the Lender And the Barrower In a the same Transaction?
  • Can a Lawyer Represent both the Buyer and the Seller in a Real Estate Transaction?
  • Understanding the Difference between Chattels and Fixtures
  • Understanding the Difference Between Conditions and Warranties and Representations in Real Estate Transactions
  • Understanding Easements, Encroachments, and Rights of Way in Real Estate Transactions
  • How is Commission Paid to the Real Estate Agent(s)
  • How to Invest in Private Mortgages in the Province of Ontario
  • When is HST Payable on the Purchase Price of Real Estate in Ontario?
  • Understanding the Difference Between Joint Tenancy and Tenants in Common
  • What is a Power of Attorney?
  • What is Title Insurance?
  • What are the Typical Costs Involved in a Real Estate Transaction
  • The Difference Between Variable and Fixed Rate Mortgages
  • What is a Lender Fee?
  • What is a Broker Fee?
  • What are Mortgage Instructions?
  • What are Standard Charge Terms?
  • What is a CMHC Mortgage?
  • What is the Cooling-Off Period for the Purchase of Pre-Construction Condominiums in Ontario?
  • What is a Cross-Collateral Mortgage?
  • What is a Real Estate Deposit?
  • What is a Loan Agreement?
  • What is a Mortgage Commitment?
  • What is a Mortgage Guarantee?
  • What is a Mortgage Investment Corporation?
  • What is a Mortgage Term?
  • What is a Prepayment Penalty?
  • What is a Private Mortgage?
  • What is a Property Survey?
  • What is a Real Estate Assignment?
  • What is a Reverse Mortgage?
  • What is a Statement of Adjustments?
  • What is a Status Certificate?
  • What is a Syndicated Mortgage?
  • What is a Title Search?
  • What is a Transfer Deed?
  • What is a Real Estate Trust Agreement?
  • What is an Amortization Period?
  • What is an Appraisal?
  • What is an Institutional Mortgage?
  • What is an Occupancy Closing?
  • What is Form 9D?
  • What is Form 9E?
  • What is Kitec Plumbing?
  • What is Land Transfer Tax?
  • What is the Role of a Lawyer in a Real Estate Transaction?
  • What is the Role of Real Estate Agents in a Real Estate Transaction?

assignment of rents without a mortgage

Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

Drafting and Enforcing Assignments of Rent: Collateral vs. Absolute Assignments, Receiverships, Bankruptcy Issues

Best practices in drafting an assignment of rents and leases.

Recording of a 90-minute premium CLE video webinar with Q&A

Conducted on Tuesday, February 20, 2024

Recorded event now available

This CLE webinar will focus upon the drafting and enforcement of assignments of rent in state and bankruptcy courts and how parties to assignments of rent in a commercial mortgage transaction can protect their rights.

Description

State and federal courts, including bankruptcy courts, have struggled with issues involving the creation of an enforceable assignment of rents and the exercise by a mortgagee, or lender, of its rights to collect and retain rents thereunder. The issues are critical when the mortgagor, or borrower, is the subject of a bankruptcy case.

Over time, two types of assignments of rent have developed. Under a collateral assignment, a security interest in favor of the lender is created and the borrower retains title to the rents and collects rents until a triggering event or action occurs.

Under an absolute assignment, title to the rents or leases passes to the lender at the time the assignment is made and the lender allows the borrower to collect rents, usually pursuant to a license, until a triggering event or action occurs.

Whether the lender or the borrower owns the rents is critical, particularly in the event of a borrower’s bankruptcy, since ownership will control whether the rents are property of a debtor’s estate constituting cash collateral that can be used by the debtor.

The creation and enforcement of assignments of rent is governed by state law (with the overlay of bankruptcy laws such as the automatic stay), and different states have adopted different laws. While the Uniform Assignment of Rents Act was adopted nearly 20 years ago, very few states have adopted it.

Listen as our authoritative panel discusses the enforcement of assignments of rents, including an introduction into various laws, practices and recent caselaw.

  • A distinction without a difference?
  • Chapter 11 versus Chapter 7
  • Property of the Estate and Automatic Stay Issues
  • Cash Collateral and Cash Management Concerns
  • Debtor vs. Lender Approaches
  • Importance of State Law
  • Recent Decisions (including In re Town Center Flats (6th. Cir. 2017))
  • Conflicts of Law
  • State Adoption
  • Enforcement Mechanisms
  • Receiverships and Assignments for the Benefit of Creditors
  • Drafting Recommendations & Panel Tips

The panel will review these and other vital issues:

  • What is the significance of an assignment of rents in a commercial mortgage transaction, and why is it sometimes a separate document from the mortgage?
  • How and when is an assignment of rents perfected, and what are the implications for enforcement?
  • What is collateral assignment as opposed to an absolute assignment, and why might a lender prefer one over the other?
  • How does the asset class impact the efficacy of an assignment of rents and the practical viability of enforcement mechanisms?
  • How do pre-petition enforcement efforts affect the borrower's access to property revenues during the pendency of a bankruptcy?

Lesser, Scott

As a leader on the firm’s highly experienced Commercial Real Estate Workout Team, Mr. Lesser uses his knowledge and expertise to avoid and resolve his clients' concerns before they develop into true issues. He prides himself on guiding his clients and fellow practitioners alike to practical solutions to distressed real estate and finance situations. In pursuing this end, he co-authors the Michigan Chapter on Receiverships for Strategies For and Against Distressed Businesses, co-authors the "Foreclosure of Mortgages and Land Contracts: Receiverships" chapter in the LexisNexis Practice Guide to Michigan Real Estate Litigation, and is a frequent speaker on distressed asset topics. In addition to representing special servicers, financial institutions, private investors and other creditors, Mr. Lesser also leverages his real estate litigation experience to help title insurance companies, receivers, property owners, real estate investors involved in ownership disputes, real estate developers and others work through difficult circumstances.

Reperowitz, Deborah

Ms. Reperowitz is a nationally recognized bankruptcy and commercial litigation attorney and mediator. Debbie has been a partner at “Biglaw” firms and served as senior vice president, chief litigation counsel at CIT Group and general counsel to a financial advisor with an excess of $20 billion under management. Ms. Reperowitz’ bankruptcy and litigation experience is extensive. She has represented virtually all constituents in bankruptcy cases, including pre-petition, DIP and exit lenders, unsecured creditors, investors and asset acquirers. Her practice has been focused upon complex, often high stakes, cases, involving confirmation disputes, fraudulent transfer issues, lien avoidance/priority claims, business torts, breach of contract, fraud, misrepresentation, conversion and class and mass actions. Ms. Reperowitz also has a robust ADR practice, serving as a mediator and arbitrator in business disputes.

Webb, A.J.

Mr. Webb counsels companies facing varying degrees of financial uncertainty and distress, working to proactively identify and assess insolvency issues. He represents parties (secured/unsecured creditors, debtors, committees, purchasers, and borrowers) in all phases of bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings, with an emphasis on selling or acquiring distressed assets and assisting parties in restructurings or out-of-court workouts. Additionally, Mr. Webb counsels clients on general corporate and commercial matters and has also prosecuted or defended numerous avoidance actions. He has represented clients throughout the country in debtor, committee, senior secured lender, distressed acquisition, and retail/landlord engagements.

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

CLE On-Demand Webinars include video streaming of the full program plus handouts. Listen to the entire program in one sitting or take a break and return to the place where you left off. Strafford offers one-year of continuous access to every on-demand program you purchase.

Downloads include the entire presentation including Q&A. Presentation materials can be viewed on your screen. PDFs of the presentations are also available on each program's web page.

Can't attend the live event? Order Other Formats

Strafford webinars are backed by our 100% Unconditional Money-Back Guarantee: if you are not satisfied with any of our products, simply let us know and get a full refund. Contact us at 1-800-926-7926 .

David A. Barksdale Partner Norton Rose Fulbright

Brian W. Blaesser Partner Of Counsel Dinsmore & Shohl

James P. Bobotek Partner Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman

Ronald B. Grais Counsel Raines Feldman Littrell

Clark T. Thiel Partner Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman

We were given simple and clear answers to complex questions, lots to work with.

Patrick R. Kelly Glenn, Feldmann, Darby & Goodlatte

I liked the combined depth of information and speed of presentation. Well done!

Andre Dalbec SAANYS

Very clearly presented and very practical advice.

Winthrop Rutherfurd, Jr. White & Case

See Related Courses

Strafford's live courses offer you a high quality and convenient Continuing Legal Education and Continuing Professional Education option. We have been serving the legal and accounting community for over 30 years.

1,000+ webinars per year 8,200+ webinars completed 6,300+ on-demand webinars 190,000+ satisfied customers 10,500+ expert practitioners

assignment of rents without a mortgage

  • Social Responsibility
  • Real Estate
  • Wills & Estates
  • Notary & Commissioner
  • Business Lawyer
  • Corporate Lawyer
  • Litigation Lawyer
  • Employment Law
  • News & Resources
  • Client Portal

Assignment of Rents

What you need to know about Assignment of Rents and Leases

Anna Dunaeva DLegal

A small number of banks - including Monzo and Starling Bank - run soft credit checks, which won't affect your credit score. 

In the first of a new series of special reports, Sky's people and politics correspondent Nick Martin spent a week in Hastings, a town on the front line of all that is wrong with the housing system, with evictions, social housing shortages and Airbnb all causing issues.

This video report is a difficult watch at times but is well worth 15 minutes of your commute home or evening...

EasyJet is opening its first new UK base in 12 years.

The company says its operation at Birmingham Airport could help cut fares - and will also create 140 direct jobs for pilots and crew, as well as support a further 1,200 indirect jobs.

EasyJet's last new base was at Southend Airport in 2012.

Three planes at the West Midlands airport will service 16 new routes from this summer - including Antalya in Turkey, the Greek island of Kos, and Sharm el Sheikh in Egypt.

Read the full story here ...

This property listing for a four-bed semi in London is getting a lot of attention on social media - as it provides an eye-watering illustration of London property prices.

The house is up for £3,500,000 - and, by way of comparison, people on X have found a six-bedroom country mansion in Durham for £1,750,000.

The 1950s-style semi isn't even in central London. It's in Canonbury, half a mile from the nearest Tube station (Highbury and Islington). 

It's 0.4 miles from Upper Street, which is a popular night life spot with lots of decent restaurants and trendy shops - so this could explain some of bumper price.

The inside has been renovated and is a sizeable 3,650sq ft - you can decide here if you think it's worth it ...

We looked at sale records for the area and found a similar property in 1996 sold for 10 times less - £312,000.

Primark has begun sealing its carrier bags with large "sold" stickers in a bid to clamp down on shoplifting.

Checkout staff have been placing blue labels, which include Primark's logo and the word "Sold", near the handles of the bags as part of a trial across 18 stores.

The move comes amid reports that thieves are using the chain's paper bags to steal goods.

Now, customers who try to leave stores without stickers on their bags will be stopped by security.

"The thieves would put anything in which didn't have a tag and wouldn't set off an alarm," a worker at a branch in southeast London told The Sun .

"They could blend in with customers because you can only get bags from the checkouts. It was very hard for security guards to spot."

A Primark spokesperson told Sky News that antisocial behaviour and retail crime was "rising right across the retail industry" and it had a range of security measures in place "to help prevent stock loss".

"We'll be keeping an eye on this and monitoring the impact these new measures have, listening to feedback from our colleagues and customers," they said.

The spokesperson added the firm would not be disclosing which Primark branches are trialling the scheme - given it is a security measure.

By James Sillars , business reporter

It's a fairly directionless start on the FTSE 100.

Energy and some consumer stocks drove a slight uptick at the market open, with the index rising just 0.1% to 7,733.

Currys, the electricals retailer, was among stocks gaining more widely.

That was put down to bolstered annual profit guidance despite downwards pressure from the end-of-bid interest in the firm last week.

Potential suitors had included China's JD.com.

Across financial markets, it's worth keeping an eye on the oil price this week

Brent crude has been creeping up since February and is at $85 a barrel currently and nearing $86.

Upwards pressure is being applied by signs of increased demand in China and the impact of the conflict in the Middle East.

Attacks on Russia's energy infrastructure amid the war with Ukraine have been a more recent factor.

The upshot of rising oil costs is fuel price hikes.

They can add to costs in the wider economy at a time when the battle against inflation is far from over.

While data this week is expected to show another easing in the main consumer prices index measure, the Bank of England is worried about the outlook.

The minutes of its latest interest rate-setting meeting on Thursday, which is widely expected to hold off on a cut, will give further clues on the prospects for price growth ahead.

A life insurance firm infamous for its controversial adverts (including  this one featuring Harold Shipman ) has told customers it is unable to take new business.

DeadHappy posted this message on its website...

Existing policyholders can still manage their accounts online as normal, according to the company.

Anyone seeking "a little extra peace of mind" is advised to get in touch with the intermediary.

In January 2023, DeadHappy faced backlash for this advert featuring serial killer Harold Shipman...

It later conceded it had made a mistake.

DeadHappy has been around since 2013, focusing on so-called "Deathwishes" – a policy feature allowing people to say how their payout should be spent. 

The average price of a newly marketed home jumped by more than £5,000 month-on-month in March, Rightmove says.

The property website said it was a sign "we now seem to be past the bottom of the market".

The 1.5% increase pushed the average asking price to £368,118.

This is still £4,776 below a peak seen in May 2023.

Agreed sales and buyer demand are higher than this time last year, Rightmove said, although the market remains sensitive to pricing.

The average time to find a buyer is now 71 days, which is the longest at this time of year since 2019, the website said.

Tim Bannister, Rightmove's director of property science, said: "March is typically a strong month for asking price growth, as both buyer and seller activity levels rise and the spring selling season gets under way.

"However, the stronger-than-usual price growth this March indicates that new sellers are feeling much more confident, with some perhaps being overoptimistic, that there is enough buyer activity and affordability in their local market to achieve a higher price."

Mr Bannister said there was a "window of opportunity"... "as we now seem to be past the bottom of the market".

Every Monday we put your financial dilemmas or consumer disputes to industry experts. You can find out how to submit yours at the bottom of this post.

This week, Sky News reader  Joe H  asks...

"I purchased a vehicle from a car dealer. On the original advert, which I still have, the vehicle was listed as ULEZ compliant. It turns out the vehicle is not compliant, and I received £630 of fines from TFL. What legal rights do I have in this situation?"

Stuart Masson, editorial director at The Car Expert, says this...

There are a couple of pieces of legislation that protect consumers in this sort of situation. The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 protects against false or misleading information being given to describe a vehicle, which would include claiming a vehicle is ULEZ compliant when it's not. In addition, the Consumer Rights Act 2015 includes provision that a car must match its description.

If you still have the original advertisement that claims this vehicle is ULEZ compliant, you should be entitled to a full refund.

It may have been an innocent mistake rather than anything nefarious, but the dealer is still liable for the cars they sell. Hopefully, in this case the dealer will acknowledge the error and arrange a swift refund (and compensate you for the fines). You are not obliged to take a different vehicle or credit towards another car and should not be persuaded in that direction. Take the money and start your search again.

If the dealer doesn't want to play nicely, then unfortunately you will have to take action to exercise your legal rights. If the dealership is accredited by the Motor Ombudsman, you can ask it to resolve the dispute. However, there are thousands of dealers – especially smaller traders – who are not signed up to the Motor Ombudsman service. If that's the case, you'll need to seek legal advice to bring a claim against the dealer. The good news is that if you have the original ad containing the incorrect information, you should have a strong case.

For anyone buying a used car anywhere near London, you should always check the TFL website yourself before signing any contract, rather than relying on a dealer's description or promises. Regardless of your consumer rights, it's always much easier to change your mind beforehand than afterwards. 

Signing a contract and paying a deposit should be the final steps in your car buying process, after you've inspected the car, test driven it, looked at the service records, checked the MOT history and status, run a vehicle history check, arranged a mechanical inspection, checked that you can get insurance at a reasonable price and confirmed that the car is ULEZ compliant if necessary. If you short-cut any of those steps, you increase your chances of running into trouble.

This feature is not intended as financial advice - the aim is to give an overview of the things you should think about. Submit your dilemma or consumer dispute, leaving your name and where in the country you are, in the form above or by emailing [email protected] with the subject line "Money blog". Alternatively, WhatsApp us  here .

Be the first to get Breaking News

Install the Sky News app for free

assignment of rents without a mortgage

IMAGES

  1. Assignment Leases Rents Form

    assignment of rents without a mortgage

  2. USA Assignment of Rents and Repurchase Agreement

    assignment of rents without a mortgage

  3. Assignment Of Lease Template

    assignment of rents without a mortgage

  4. Landlord Assignment Of Lease Form For Manufactured Homes

    assignment of rents without a mortgage

  5. Assignment Of Rents By Lessor Example Template

    assignment of rents without a mortgage

  6. Carlsbad California Short Form Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents

    assignment of rents without a mortgage

VIDEO

  1. Rents are finally coming down #MortgageByRob

COMMENTS

  1. How Lenders Can Enforce the Assignment of Rents

    Lennar Fla. Holdings, Inc., 645 So. 2d 490, 498 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) ("[A]n assignment of rent creates a lien on the rents in favor of the mortgagee, and the mortgagee will have the right to foreclose that lien and collect the rents, without the necessity of foreclosing on the underlying mortgage.").

  2. What Is a Deed of Trust With Assignment of Rents?

    A deed of trust is a document that a borrower may execute in favor of a lender to give the lender a lien on a parcel of real estate. Like a mortgage, a deed of trust secures the loan by allowing the lender to foreclose on the real estate if the loan isn't paid (although in some states that use deeds of trust, a foreclosure isn't necessary).

  3. Assignment Of Rents

    An Assignment of Rents ("AOR") is used to grant the lender on a transaction a security interest in existing and future leases, rents, issues, or profits generated by the secured property, including cash proceeds, in the event a borrower defaults on their loan. The lender can use the AOR to step in and directly collect rental payments made ...

  4. Assignments of Rents: Lenders Beware!

    The assignment of rents provision in the mortgage provided that, after a default, Comerica could collect rents from the property without taking possession of the property, and without exercising other options under the mortgage. Comerica, the first mortgagee, sent a notice to tenants that the mortgagor was in default under its mortgage and that ...

  5. Assignment of Leases and Rents: Absolutely Collateral

    Conclusion. Mortgage lenders should not rely on assignments of leases and rents, whether as a clause in the mortgage or as a separate agreement, to protect their interests in the income from their ...

  6. Assignment Of Leases And Rents: Definition & Sample

    The assignment of leases and rents, also known as the assignment of leases rents and profits, is a legal document that gives a mortgage lender right to any future profits that may come from leases and rents when a property owner defaults on their loan. This document is usually attached to a mortgage loan agreement.

  7. II. Assignment of Rents and Profits

    Without special language in the security instrument (i.e., mortgage or deed of trust), the creditor has no right to possession or rent before the foreclosure sale. Accordingly, most deed of trust forms contain an assignment of rents and profits clause , which gives the beneficiary a right to collect rents immediately on the trustor's default.

  8. Enforceability of Assignment-of-Rents Provisions

    Most state and federal courts hold that while the assignment-of-rents clause in a mortgage creates a valid lien on the rents upon recording, the mortgagee must take additional steps to properly "enforce" the clause and obtain "ownership" of the rents. For example, courts have allowed mortgagees to collect rents after the mortgagees have ...

  9. Assignment of Rents: Substance Over Form and Meaning of `Property of

    See In re S. Side House, LLC, 474 B.R. 391, 406 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2012). Whether postpetition rental income subject to an assignment of rents is "property of the estate," and therefore cash collateral, depends on whether, (1) under relevant state law the rental income would be considered property of the debtor's estate, and (2) the extent ...

  10. Still Crazy After All These Years: The Absolute Assignment of Rents in

    THE ABSOLUTE ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS IN MORTGAGE LOAN TRANSACTIONS. and to make payments on the mortgage loan. 3 . After a default on the mortgage loan, a borrower, facing the possibility of losing the property to ... or terminate leases" without the lender's consent or to accept prepayments of rent, and tenants are often "required to acknowledge ...

  11. What is an assignment of rents?

    It provides that " [a] written assignment of an interest in leases, rents, issues, or profits of real property made in connection with an obligation secured by real property. . .shall, upon execution and delivery by the assignor, be effective to create a present security interest in existing and future leases, rents, issues, or profits of ...

  12. New Law Clarifies Lenders' Rights to Collect Rent From Tenants of a

    Recently, Michigan adopted a modified version of the model act, known as the Michigan Uniform Assignment of Rents Act, effective September 22, 2022. MCL 554.1051 et seq. Under the Michigan version of the UARA, a "presently effective security interest" in rental payments can be created through a written assignment from the borrower/landlord ...

  13. A banker asked us: General vs specific assignments

    A: In situations where a borrower owns real property in Ontario that either is or will be leased to third party tenants, a lender should consider obtaining either a general assignment of rents and leases or a specific assignment of rents and leases in addition to a mortgage on the secured property. Like a mortgage, an assignment of rents and ...

  14. Assignment Of Rents Without A Mortgage

    The Assignment of Rents without a mortgage is a useful tool for property owners who may require immediate funds without having to go through the lengthy process of obtaining a mortgage or other forms of financing. By assigning the right to collect rental income, property owners can secure a loan or utilize the rental income for other financial ...

  15. Assignment of Rent definition and explanation

    What is an Assignment of Rent: The document protects the lender mainly since without it the owner might continue to collect revenues even after having stopped making the mortgage payments. In some cases the Assignment of Rent is a full document while in other cases it is just a clause of the mortgage contract.

  16. Herrmann v Coletti (2017 NY Slip Op 27220)

    Moreover, and of particular relevance here, an assignment of rents provision does not create an automatic conveyance of the rents, even "if the assignment is made as further security for the mortgage debt" (641 Ave. of Ams. L.P. v 641 Assoc., Ltd., 189 BR 583, 590 [Bankr SD NY 1995]).

  17. PDF Who owns the rents? Recent cases highlight uncertainty as to ...

    (awarding rents from default, notwithstanding that demand for rent was not made until one month later: "where an assignment of rents is a present tense assignment . . . the mortgage lender is entitled to all rents"); Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp. v. Dutch Lane Assocs., 775 F. Supp. 133, 139-40 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) (upon notice of default, mortgagee

  18. What is an Assignment of Rents?

    An assignment of rents and leases is an agreement between the owner of a particular property and a designated second party. The terms and conditions allow that second party to collect any rental payments paid by tenants and to manage that property for a period of time. This type of arrangement is most commonly utilized to settle a loan or some ...

  19. ASSIGNMENTS OF RENTS

    The assignment of rents provision in the mortgage provided that, after a default, Comerica could collect rents from the property without taking possession of the property, and without exercising other options under the mortgage. Comerica, the first mortgagee, sent a notice to tenants that the mortgagor was in default under its mortgage and that ...

  20. What is an Assignment of Rents?

    An assignment of rent is a binding contract between a lender and a borrower stipulating that in the event the borrower defaults on the mortgage, the lender will be entitled to collect any rent payments made by a tenant occupying the property. If the lender is aware that the borrower intends to use the mortgaged property as a rental property ...

  21. Assignment of Rents Enforcement After a Default

    Description. State and federal courts, including bankruptcy courts, have struggled with issues involving the creation of an enforceable assignment of rents and the exercise by a mortgagee, or lender, of its rights to collect and retain rents thereunder. The issues are critical when the mortgagor, or borrower, is the subject of a bankruptcy case.

  22. Assignment of Rents

    An assignment of rents refers to a legal agreement where a property owner (usually the landlord or the owner of a property) assigns or transfers their right to receive rental income from tenants to another party, often a mortgage lender or a financial institution. This assignment typically occurs as collateral for a loan or mortgage.

  23. PDF framework the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD's

    Budget-Based Rent Adjustments for Mark-to-Market Properties ... Contract assignment or renewal, applicable previous participation review, applicable ... Renewal Contract, based on streamlined underwriting and without restructuring the mortgage debt). 13 3.4. FASS Findings. At Final Submission and Closing, all findings recorded in the FASS with

  24. Money blog: Four-bed semi in London goes viral for £3.5m asking price

    A four-bed semi in London is getting a lot of attention on social media for its £3.5m asking price. Read this and all the latest personal finance and consumer news below - and leave a comment, or ...