model pembelajaran critical thinking and problem solving

seni belajar untuk hidup

Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving (Penjelasan Lengkap)

Pengertian Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving

Model pembelajaran problem solving adalah model yang mengutamakan pemecahan masalah dalam kegiatan belajar untuk memperkuat daya nalar yang digunakan oleh peserta didik agar mendapatkan pemahaman yang lebih mendasar dari materi yang disampaikan. Seperti yang diungkapkan Pepkin (dalam Shoimin, 2017, hlm. 135) bahwa metode problem solving adalah suatu model pembelajaran yang melakukan pemusatan pada pengajaran dan keterampilan pemecahan masalah yang diikuti dengan penguatan keterampilan.

Problem solving dalam pembelajaran memegang peranan yang sangat penting. Mengapa? Karena dengan mengetahui cara menyelesaikan masalahnya, pembelajaran akan merekat jauh lebih dalam dan tidak mudah untuk dilupakan. Dampaknya hampir sama dengan pembelajaran kontekstual, karena pada akhirnya masalah adalah hal sehari-hari yang akan ditemui oleh siswa. Pemecahan masalah merupakan keterampilan penting yang dibutuhkan pada abad-21 .

Sementara itu Purwanto (dalam Chotimah & Fathurrohman, 2018, hlm. 280-281) berpendapat bahwa model problem solving adalah suatu proses dengan menggunakan strategi, cara, atau teknik tertentu untuk menghadapi situasi baru, agar keadaan tersebut dapat dilalui sesuai keinginan yang ditetapkan.

Model ini sering disebut sebagai metode pula karena boleh dibilang merupakan salah satu penerapan problem based learning (PBL) yang sudah memiliki langkah-langkah konkret. Namun di balik itu, metode ini juga cukup dinamis untuk dimodifikasi dan disesuaikan dengan keadaan siswa atau sekolah. Oleh karena sifatnya yang dinamis, terdapat berbagai turunan dari model ini, misalnya model pembelajaran creative problem solving             .

Menurut Murray, Hanlie, et al. (dalam Huda, 2015, hlm. 273) model pembelajaran problem solving merupakan salah satu dasar teoretis dari berbagai strategi pembelajaran yang menjadikan masalah (problem) sebagai isu utamanya. Artinya akan terdapat beberapa tipe atau setting yang dapat dinaunginya.

Model problem solving adalah sebuah metode pembelajaran yang mengharuskan siswa berperan aktif dan mampu berpikir. Karena dalam problem solving siswa diharuskan mampu menganalisis materi mulai dengan mencari data sampai dengan menarik kesimpulan. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran problem solving adalah model yang memusatkan pembelajaran pada pemecahan masalah sehingga siswa dapat memperkuat daya nalar dengan menyusun cara, strategi, atau teknik baru untuk menyelesaikan suatu permasalahan.

Lalu seperti apa prosedur, sintaks, atau langkah-langkah dari model ini? Berikut adalah penjelasannya.

Sintaks Pembelajaran Problem Solving

Terdapat sintaks atau acuan dasar dari seluruh fase yang harus dilakukan dalam menyelenggarakan model pembelajaran problem solving. Menurut Chotimah & Fathurrohman (2018, hlm. 287-288) sintaks model pembelajaran problem solving terdiri dari 6 tahap sebagai berikut.

• Merumuskan masalah Kemampuan ini diperlukan untuk mengetahui dan merumuskan masalah secara jelas.
• Menelaah masalah Untuk menggunakan model problem solving, menelaah masalah diperlukan agar peserta didik dapat menggunakan pengetahuan untuk memerinci dan menganalisis masalah dari berbagai sudut.
• Merumuskan hipotesis Kemampuan yang diperlukan lainnya adalah berimajinasi dan menghayati ruang lingkup, sebab-akibat, dan alternatif penyelesaian.
• Mengumpulkan dan mengelompokkan data (sebagai bahan pembuktian hipotesis) Tahap ini berfungsi untuk memancing kecakapan mencari dan menyusun data serta menyajikan data dalam bentuk diagram, gambar, atau tabel.
• Pembuktian hipotesis Kecakapan menelaah dan membahas data, kecakapan menghubung-hubungkan dan menghitung, serta keterampilan mengambil keputusan dan kesimpulan.
• Menentukan pilihan penyelesaian Tahap ini akan membuat peserta didik mampu untuk membuat alternatif penyelesaian serta kecakapan menilai pilihan dengan memperhitungkan akibat yang akan terjadi pada setiap pilihan.

Langkah Langkah Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving

Terdapat langkah-langkah konkret yang dapat digunakan untuk menyelenggarakan model pembelajaran problem solving. Langkah-langkah pembelajaran menggunakan model pembelajaran problem solving menurut Sani (2019, hlm. 243) adalah sebagai berikut.

• Pendidik menjelaskan tujuan pembelajaran.
• Guru memberikan permasalahan yang perlu dicari solusinya.
• Pendidik (guru) menjelaskan prosedur pemecahan masalah yang benar.
• Peserta didik mencari literatur yang mendukung untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan yang diberikan guru.
• Siswa atau peserta didik menetapkan beberapa solusi yang dapat diambil untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan.
• Peserta didik melaporkan tugas yang diberikan guru.

Tujuan Model Problem Solving

Dalam metode pembelajaran problem solving, pembelajaran tidak hanya difokuskan dalam upaya mendapatkan pengetahuan sebanyak-banyaknya. Justru bagaimana menggunakan segenap pengetahuan yang didapat tersebut adalah fokusnya. Dengan kata lain, model pembelajaran ini mengutamakan peningkatan keterampilan untuk menggunakan pengetahuan sebagiamana nantinya akan digunakan pada dunia nyata atau kehidupan sehari-hari.

Siswa yang dapat mengerjakan atau dapat memecahkan masalah yang diberikan oleh guru dapat dikatakan telah telah menguasai pelajaran dengan baik. Bersinggungan dengan hal tersebut, menurut Chotimah & Fathurrohman (2018, hlm. 282) tujuan dari pembelajaran problem solving adalah sebagai berikut.

• Peserta didik menjadi terampil menyeleksi informasi yang relevan kemudian menganalisisnya dan akhirnya meneliti kembali hasilnya.
• Kepuasan intelektual akan timbul dari dalam sebagai hasil intrinsik bagi peserta didik.
• Potensi intelektual peserta didik meningkat.
• Peserta didik belajar bagaimana melakukan penemuan dengan melalui proses melakukan penemuan.

Kelebihan dan Kekurangan Pembelajaran Problem Solving

Setiap model pembelajaran pasti mempunyai kelebihan masing-masing. Salah satunya yakni model pembelajaran problem solving yang tentunya mempunyai kelebihan dan kekurangan pula. Di bawah ini akan dipaparkan beberapa kelebihan dan kekurangan dari model ini.

Secara umum salah satu kelebihan dari model pembelajaran problem solving adalah meningkatnya daya kritis siswa dalam pembelajaran. Selain itu, menurut Shoimin (2017, hlm. 137-138) kelebihan dari model pembelajaran problem solving adalah sebagai berikut.

• Membuat peserta didik lebih menghayati pembelajaran berdasarkan kehidupan sehari-hari.
• Melatih dan membiasakan para peserta didik untuk menghadapi dan memecahkan masalah secara terampil.
• Dapat mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir peserta didik secara kreatif.
• Peserta didik sudah mulai dilatih untuk memecahkan masalahnya dari semenjak sekolah (sebelum memasuki kehidupan nyata).
• Melatih siswa untuk mendesain suatu penemuan.
• Membuat peserta didik berpikir dan bertindak kreatif.
• Memecahkan masalah yang dihadapi secara realistis.
• Mengidentifikasi dan melakukan penyelidikan.
• Menafsirkan dan mengevaluasi hasil pengamatan.
• Merangsang perkembangan kemajuan berpikir siswa untuk menyelesaikan masalah yang dihadapi dengan cara yang tepat.
• Dapat membuat pendidikan sekolah lebih relevan dengan kehidupan, khususnya dunia kerja.

Sementara itu, menurut Sanjaya (2016, hlm. 220) keunggulan dari metode problem solving adalah sebagai berikut.

• Merupakan teknik pembelajaran yang cukup bagus agar siswa lebih memahami isi pelajaran.
• Menantang kemampuan siswa serta memberikan kepuasan untuk menemukan pengetahuan baru bagi siswa.
• Dapat meningkatkan aktivitas pembelajaran siswa.
• Membantu siswa bagaimana mentransfer pengetahuan mereka untuk memahami masalah dalam kehidupan nyata.
• Dianggap lebih menyenangkan dan disukai siswa.

Menurut Sanjaya (2016, hlm. 220) kelemahan dari metode problem solving adalah sebagai berikut ini.

• Manakala siswa tidak memiliki minat atau tidak mempunyai kepercayaan bahwa masalah yang dipelajari sulit untuk dipecahkan, maka mereka akan merasa enggan untuk mencoba.
• Keberhasilan strategi pembelajaran melalui PBL membutuhkan cukup waktu untuk persiapan.
• Tanpa pemahaman mengapa mereka berusaha untuk memecahkan masalah yang sedang dipelajari, maka mereka tidak akan belajar apa yang mereka ingin dipelajari.
• Chotimah, C., & Fathurrohman, M. (2018). Paradigma Baru Sistem Pembelajaran dari Teori, Metode, Model, Media, Hingga Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
• Huda, Miftahul. (2015). Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran: Isu-Isu Metodis dan Paradigmatis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
• Sani, R.A. (2019). Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
• Sanjaya, Wina (2016). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan ( Cetakan ke 12). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
• Shoimin, A. (2017). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Artikel Terkait

Gabung ke percakapan.

Terima kasih, sangat membantu bagi saya, semakin mengerti model pembelajaran problem solving.

Batalkan balasan

Alamat email Anda tidak akan dipublikasikan. Ruas yang wajib ditandai *

Simpan nama, email, dan situs web saya pada peramban ini untuk komentar saya berikutnya.

Beritahu saya akan tindak lanjut komentar melalui surel.

Beritahu saya akan tulisan baru melalui surel.

Tinggalkan Komentar

Implementation of problem-solving learning model assisted by student worksheets to improve critical thinking skills in the context of reaction rate

How to cite.

• Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Author Biographies

This research aims to describe the implementation of the problem-solving learning model, students' activities, critical thinking skills, learning outcomes, and students' responses toward learning model implementation. Methods of the research used are pre-experimental with one group pretest-posttest design. The research subjects were 36 students of class 11 th grade MIPA 1 at Senior High School 19 Surabaya, Indonesia. It is found that the problem-solving learning model was implemented during two meetings obtained an average percentage of 96.57% and 98.68%. Secondly, students' relevant activities for enhancing critical thinking skills during two meetings received 96.24% and 97.61%. Thirdly, critical thinking skills on the four indicators have increased in the high criteria as the N-gain score represents for the interpretation indicator is 0.86, analysis is 0.75, evaluation is 0.86, and inference is 0.89. Fourth, student learning outcomes classically get a percentage of 97.22%. Fifth, students give positive responses to implementing the problem-solving learning model assisted by student worksheets with a responses percentage of 94.61%. The result represented that the problem-solving learning model assisted by student worksheets can train students' critical thinking skills on reaction rate material.

Safitri, R. M., Andayani, Y., & Jamaluddin. (2020). Korelasi Kecenderungan Berpikir Kritis dengan Hasil Belajar IPA Peserta Didik SMP Negeri se-Lombok Barat. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 15(3), 219-222.

Ariyanto, M., Kristin, F., & Anugraheni, I. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Guru Kita, 2(3), 106-115.

Sidiq, M. A., & Prasetyo, T. (2020). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving dan Discovery Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(2), 361-370.

Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1), 2239-2253.

Qomariyah, E. N. (2016). Pengaruh Problem Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis IPS. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 23(2), 132-141.

Suryanti, N., & Nurhuda (2021). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning with an Analytical Rubric on the Development of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 665-684. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14237a

Warsah, I., Morganna, R., Uyun, M., Hamengkubuwono., & Afandi, M. (2021). The Impact of Collaborative Learning on Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 443-460.

Lismayani, I., Parno, & Mahanal, S. (2017). The Correlation of Critical Thinking Skill and Science Problem-Solving Ability of Junior High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 5(3), 96–101.

Al-Zoubi, A. M., & Suleiman, L. M. (2021). Flipped Classroom Strategy Based on Critical Thinking Skills: Helping Fresh Female Students Acquiring Derivative Concept. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 791-810. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14244a

Simanihuruk, D. P., Maipita, I., & Ruslan, D. (2021). Development of Assessment Instruments Based on Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) to Measure Critical Thinking Students of Class XI IPS Private Senior High School of Sultan Iskandar Muda Medan TP 2020/2021. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(4), 9321-9331. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.2944

Gabel, D. (1998). The Complexity of Chemistry and Implications for Teaching. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Musya’idah, Effendy, & Santoso, A. (2016). POGIL, Analogi Model FAR, KBI, dan Laju Reaksi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA, 1, 671-680, Universitas Negeri Malang, 8 October 2016. Malang: Pascasarjana UM.

Murad, T. A. K. (2019). The Impact of Problem Solving Strategy in The Development of Creative Thinking Among The Second Middle School Students in The City of Tabuk. British Journal of Education, 7(2), 19-32.

Prihatinah, T., Haryono, & Utami, B. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Berbantuan Metode Peer Tutoring Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Stoikiometri Kelas X MIA 3 SMA Batik 2 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 7(1), 48-54.

Wahyuni, N. T., Utomo, S. B., Masykuri, M., & Paerah. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Berbantuan Tutor Sebaya Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan Siswa Kelas XI IPA 5 SMA Negeri 3 Boyolali Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 6(2), 154-160.

Polya G. (1973). How to Solve It. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Sulistyaningkarti, L., Utami, B., & Haryono, H. (2016). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Dilengkapi LKS Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan Kelas XI SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Karanganyar Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 5(2), 1-9.

Sari, E. N, Rudibyani, R. B., & Sofya, E. (2018). Pengaruh LKS Berbasis Problem Solving untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 19(2), 75-86.

Intani, P. P., Mulyani, B., & Setyowati, W. A. E. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Dilengkapi Media Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis serta Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Kelas XI IPA 3 Semester II SMA Negeri 2 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2017/2018. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 8(1), 152-160.

Pratiwi, G. A. D., & Azizah, U. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Pada Materi Laju Reaksi Kelas XI SMA. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 7(2), 154-159.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Riduwan. (2015). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Nuryadi, Astuti, T. D., Utami, E. S., & Budiantara, M. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Statistik Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Sibuku Media.

Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement Versus Traditional Methods: a Six Thousand Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data For Introductory Physic Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.

Suryosubroto. (2009). Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta : PT Rineka. Cipta.

Choirudin, Anwar, M. S., & Khabibah, N. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Problem Solving. Fraktal: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 1-13.

Facione, P. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is And Why Its Counts. London: In Measured Reason and The California Academic Press.

Hadi, A. M. (2021). Penggunaan LKPD Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Materi Matriks. DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan, 27(2), 153-164.

Jamaluddin, Jufri, A. W., Muhlis, & Bahtiar, I. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Pada Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 15(1), 13-19.

Hidjrawan, Y., Khaldun, I., & Sari, S. A. (2016). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga di SMA Negeri 7 Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 4(1), 154-165.

Susilawati, Jamaluddin, & Bachtiar, I. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah (PBM) Berbantuan Multimedia Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas VII SMP Negeri 2 Mataram Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Akademik. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 12(2), 64-70.

Suryabrata, S. (2002). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Grafindo Perkasa Rajawali.

Syah, M. (2006). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ernida, R., Hamid, A., & Nurdiniah, H. S. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Dengan Multi Representasi dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam. Journal of Chemistry and Education, 1(1), 119-130.

Nadhifa Is'ad, Chemistry Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, State University of Surabaya

Sukarmin sukarmin, chemistry education study program, faculty of mathematics and natural science, state university of surabaya.

Copyright (c) 2022 Nadhifa Is'ad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

The following terms apply to authors who publish in this journal: 1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal first publication rights, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License (CC-BY License ) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and first publication in this journal.

2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal. 3. Before and during the submission process, authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access ).

Similar Articles

• R. Ayu Sofiah Wilatika, Bertha Yonata, Implementation of guided inquiry learning model to exercise students critical thinking skills on reaction rate material , Jurnal Pijar Mipa: Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022): January 2022
• Soesilowaty Halim, Didimus Tanah Boleng, PM Labulan, Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning dan Number Head Together Terhadap Aktivitas, Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa , Jurnal Pijar Mipa: Vol. 14 No. 1 (2019): Maret
• Maryam Maryam, Kusmiyati Kusmiyati, I Wayan Merta, I Putu Artayasa, Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas XI MIA MAN 2 Mataram , Jurnal Pijar Mipa: Vol. 14 No. 3 (2019): September
• Nurussaniah Nurussaniah, Ira Nofita Sari, Process-Oriented Inquiry Learning Enhances Studentsââ¬â¢ Critical Thinking Skills , Jurnal Pijar Mipa: Vol. 14 No. 3 (2019): September
• Dhevira Aptia Firmanda, Dian Novita, Guided inquiry learning model application to train the students analysis skills on factors that affect reaction rate materials , Jurnal Pijar Mipa: Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022): January 2022
• Kumala Ratna Dewi, Dadi Setiadi, I Wayan Merta, Pengaruh Pembelajaran Online Berbasis Kooperatif dan Outcome Based Education Terintegrasi Kearifan Lokal Terhadap Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis , Jurnal Pijar Mipa: Vol. 16 No. 2 (2021): Maret 2021
• Malahayati Rahayu Sulastri, Jannatin ‘Ardhuha, Muhammad Zuhdi, The development of learning media and critical thinking skill instrument based on 5E learning cycle model on harmonic vibration material , Jurnal Pijar Mipa: Vol. 16 No. 4 (2021): September 2021
• Anggun Yunita Wisela, Hairunisyah Sahidu, Syahrial Ayub, Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Dan Hasil Belajar Fisika , Jurnal Pijar Mipa: Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020): Januari
• Fidiani Fidiantara, Ayudya Lestari, Norma Juniati, Abdul Syukur, Jamaluddin Jamaluddin, Innovation of learning methods during the covid-19 pandemic at junior high school in Mataram City and West Lombok Regency , Jurnal Pijar Mipa: Vol. 16 No. 4 (2021): September 2021
• Muhammad Turmuzi, Sripatmi Sripatmi, Syahrul Azmi, Nurul Hikmah, PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA , Jurnal Pijar Mipa: Vol. 13 No. 1 (2018): MARET

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >   >>  

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Nationally Accredited

Decree Number: 79/E/KPT/2023

Main Indexing

Manuscript Template

OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS

The FKIP University of Mataram Journals is Open Access Journals provides quality journal publication services to documenting and preserving scientific article from the results of your researc.

•     Phone. (0370) 7505654
•     Mail. [email protected]
•     Web. https://fkip.unram.ac.id

Information

• For Authors
• For Readers
• For Librarians

Pembelajaran EDP-Problem Solving Project untuk Melatih Siswa Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Penyelesaian Masalah

• Dani Setiawan Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 1 Bulakamba, Kabupaten Brebes

Indonesian students still need to strengthen their ability to integrate information, draw conclusions, and introduce their knowledge to other things. Indonesian students are still weak in answering questions with a level of reasoning. So the purpose of this study is to find out the critical thinking skills and problem-solving of students in class VII-A SMPN 1 Bulakamba academic year 2018/2019 can be improved through learning EDP-Problem Solving Project. EDP-Problem Solving Project facilitates students to implement the engineering design process in conducting problem-solving projects. EDP-Problem Solving Project learning activities consist of stages (1) ask (formulate questions), (2) imagine, (3) plan (plan), (4) creat (make), (5) test (try out), (6) analyze (analyze), (7) conclude (conclude), (8) communicate (communicate), and (9) improve (develop). The study was conducted with a class action research procedure. Data on critical thinking skills and problem-solving are analyzed descriptively. The results showed that critical thinking skills and problem-solving for students of class VII-A SMPN 1 Bulakamba in the 2018/2019 academic year could be improved through learning the EDP-Problem Solving Project.

Arikunto, S., Suhardjono, & Supardi. (2015). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Berland, L., Steingut, R., & Ko, P. (2014). High School Student Perceptions of the Utility of the Engineering Design Process: Creating Opportunities to Engage in Engineering Practices and Apply Math and Science Content.Journal of Science Education and Technology (J Sci Educ Technol), 705-720.

Fuad, N. M., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2015). Profil Hasil Belajar, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Siswa serta Strategi Pembelajaran yang Diterapkan Guru SMP di Kabupaten Kediri. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi dan Pembelajarannya (hal. 807-8015). Malang: Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UM.

Fuad, N. M., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). (2017). Improving Junior High Schools' Critical Thinking Skills Based on Test Three Different Models of Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 101-116.

Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2016). . Preparing Teacher-students for Twenty-firstcentury Learning Practices (PREP 21): A Framework for Enhancing Collaborative Problem-solving and Strategic Learning Skills. Teacher and Teaching theory and practice, 1-17.

Herayanti, L., & Habibi. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Simulasi Komputer Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Calon Guru Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 1(1), 61-66.

Herzon, H. H., Budijanto, & Utomo, D. H. (2018). Pengaruh Problem-Based Learning (PBL) terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(1), 42-46.

Hikmah, N., Budiasih, E., & Santoso, A. (2016). Pengaruh Strategi Project Based Learning (Pjbl) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas XI IPA pada Materi Koloid. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(11), 2248-2253.

Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Bahri, A., & Dinnurriya, M. S. (2016). Improving students’ critical thinking skills through Remap NHT in biology classroom. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2).

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Science. Dipetik May 2, 2019, dari http://timssandpirls.bc.edu: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/wp-content/uploads/filebase/full%20pdfs/T15-International-Results-in-Science-Grade-8.pdf

Ningsih, P. R., Hidayat, A., & Kusairi, S. (2018). Penerapan Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas III. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(12), 1587-1593.

Pratama, H., & Prastyaningrum, I. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Berbantuan Media Pembelajaran Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Mikrohidro terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 6(2), 44-50.

Purnomo, E. A., & Mawarsari, V. D. (2014). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Melalui Model Pembelajaran Ideal Problem Solving Berbasis Project Based Learning. Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika (JKPM), 1(1), 25-31.

Redhana, I. W. (2017). Redhana, Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah untuk Peningkatan Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah dan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 46(1), 76-86.

Roekel, D. (2018). Preparing 21st Century Students for a Global Society. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.

Sagala, N. L., Rahmatsyah, & Simanjuntak, M. P. (2017). The Influence of Problem Based Learning Model on Scientific Process Skill and Problem Solving Ability of Student. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(4), 01-09.

Sastrika, I. A., Sadia, I. W., & Muderawan, I. W. (2013). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS PROYEK TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP KIMIA DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA, 3(2).

Silaban, B. (2014). Hubungan antara Penguasaan Konsep Fisika dan Kreativitas dengan Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah pada Materi Pokok Listrik Statis. Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Pendidikan Vol. 20 No. 1, 65-75.

Simamora, R. E., Sidabutar, D. R., & Surya, E. (2017). Improving Learning Activity and Students' Problem Solving Skill through Problem Based Learning (PBL) in Junior High School. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 33(1), 321-331.

Siswanto, R., Sugiono, S., & Prasojo, L. (2018). The Development of Management Model Program of Vocational School Teacher Partnership with Business World and Industry Word (DUDI). Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(3), 365-384. doi:10.26811/peuradeun.v6i3.322

Suarsana, I. M., & Mahayukti, G. (2013). Pengembangan E-Modul Berorientasi Pemecahan Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(2), 264-275.

Sujarwanto, E., Hidayat, A., & Wartono. (2014). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika pada Modelling Instruction pada Siswa SMA Kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Volume 3 No. 1, 65-78.

Sutia, C., & Mahdalena, M. (2017). Motivasi Belajar Siswa SMA dan Kemampuan Merancang Pemecahan Masalah Lingkungan melalui Pembelajaran Engineering Design Process. Seminar Penelitian Bidang IPA 2017 (hal. 32-40). Bandung: SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Science.

Syafii, W., & Yasin, R. M. (2013). Problem Solving Skills and Learning Achievements through Problem-Based Module in Teaching and Learning Biology in High School. Asian Social Science Vol. 9 No. 12, 220-228.

Syukri, M., Soewarno, S., Halim, L., & Mohtar, L. (2018). The Impact of Engineering Design Process in Teaching and Learning to Enhance Students’ Science Problem-Solving Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (JPII), 7(1), 66-75.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Amerika: JosseyBass Wiley.

• PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

How to Cite

• Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .

FORM BECOME EDITORIAL

Current Issue

Content Use Policy

Problem Solving: A Learning Model to Foster Argumentation and Critical Thinking Ability for Students with Different Academic Abilities

Research articles, how to cite.

• Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Author Biographies

One of the efforts to improve students' argumentation and critical thinking skills in 21st century learning is to apply problem solving learning models by paying attention to students' academic abilities. The type of research used is quasi-experimental with a 2x2 factorial design. The study population was students of class VIII SMPN 18 Padang, while the research sample was students of class VIII.8 and class VIII.7 by taking samples based on certain criteria. The instrument is a data collection technique with a written test. Data analysis was performed by testing the two-way ANOVA hypothesis using SPSS. The results showed that: (1) the problem-solving learning model affected students' argumentative skills and critical thinking. (2) the problem-solving learning model affects the argumentative and critical thinking abilities of students with high and low academic abilities. (3) there is no interaction between the problem-solving learning model and the academic ability of students 'argumentation skills (4) there is an interaction between the problem-solving learning model and the academic ability of students' critical thinking skills. To sum up, problem solving learning model is able to realize students who have critical thinking skills and arguments that can compete in the era of globalization needed in this 21st century education

Alberida, & Barlian, E. (2019). Enhancing Student’s Science Process Skills Through Problem Solving Model: An Effectiveness Study. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317 (1), 012181. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012181

Alberida, & Handayani, D. (2020). Pengembangan Asesmen Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Materi Sistem Sirkulasi untuk Siswa SMA Kelas XI. SIMBIOSA, 9 (1), 39-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.33373/simbio.v9i1.2434

Alkhateeb, M. A., & Milhem, O, A. (2020). Student's Concepts of and Approaches to Learning and the Relationships Between them. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3),620-doi:10.21831/cp.v39i3.33277

Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2014). Developing Dialogic Argumentation Skills: A 3-year Intervention Study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15 (2), 363. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725187

Eskin, H., Bekiroglu, F, O. (2013). Argumentation as a Strategy for Conceptual Learning of Dynamics. Research in Science Education, 43 (5), 1939-1956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9339-5

Garad, A., Abdullah, M., Al-Ansi & Ika, N. (2021). The Role of E-Learning Infrastructure and Cognitive Competence in Distance Learning Effectiveness During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33474

Hasanah, M. D. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Tandur dengan Memperhatikan Kemampuan Akademik terhadap Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Kelas X SMAN 5 Padang. Tesis (tidak diterbitkan). Pascasarjana UNP.

Hidjrawan, Y., Khaldun, I., & Sari, S, A. (2016). Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik pada Materi Larutan Penyangga di SMA Negeri 7 Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 4 (2), 154-165. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JPSI/article/view/6592

Kirmizi, F, S., Saygi, C., & Yurdakal, I, H. (2014). Determine the Relationship Between the Disposition of Critical Thinking and the Perception about Problem Solving Skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 657-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.719

Latif, S., & Akib, I. 2016. Mathematical Connection Ability in Solving Mathematics Problem Based on Initial Abilities of Students at SMPN 10 Bulukumba. Jurnal Daya Matematis, 4 (2), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v4i2.2899

Listiani, R., Ara, H., & Meti, M. (2017). Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving dan Problem Based Learning terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Sistem Reproduksi Manusia. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi. Vol. 7 (1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15575/bioeduin.v7i1.2445

Madjid, A., Dian, P, & Sadam, R, S. (2021). Academic Procrastination among Students: The Influence of Social Support and Resilience Mediated by Religious Character. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.34641

Mayasari, R., dan R. Adawiyah. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Masalah Pada Pembelajaran Biologi Terhadap Hasil Belajar dan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi di SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 1(3), 255-262. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v1i3.2658

Noviyanti, N. I., et all. (2019). Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills Based on Differences in Academic Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241 (1), 012034. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012034

Nurabadi, A., et all. (2021). The Effect of Instructional, Transformational and Spiritual Leadership on Elementary School Teachers’ Performance and Students’ Achievements. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.35641

Osborne, J., Eduran, S., & Simon, S. (2016). Enhancing the Quality of Argumentation in Science Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (10), 994-1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035

Permana, T, I., Hindun, I., Rofi'ah, N, L., & Azizah, A, S. N. (2019). Critical Thinking Skills: The Academic Ability, Mastering Concepts, and Analytical Skill of Undergraduate Students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5 (1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7626

Prayitno, B.A., Corebima, D., Susilo, H., Zubaidah, S., & Ramli, M. (2017). Closing the Science Process Skills Gap Between Students with High and Low Level Academic Achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16 (2), 266-277. Retrieved from http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/564

Rahmi, Y. L., Alberida, H., & Astuti, M. Y. (2019, October). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through inquiry-based learning model. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1317, No. 1, p. 012193). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012193

Rasyid, A, dkk. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe NHT (Numbered Heads Together) dan Kemampuan Awal terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMK Negeri 2 Poso. E-Jurnal Mitra Sains, 3 (1), 61–68. http://mrtg.untad.ac.id/index.php/MitraSains/article/view/64

Razali. (2017). The Effect of Teaching Styles and Initial Ability Towards Learning Outcomes of Badminton Skills. International Conference on Innovative Pedagogy STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena, ISBN 978-602-08985-3-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.47494/ijpst.v21.2.1975

Ruci, G. W. (2020). Development of Student Worksheet Based on Problem Solving the on the Topic of Enviromental Changes to Train Critical Thinking Skills and Written Argumentation Skills of Tenth Grade Students. Journal Bioedu Berkala Ilmu Pendidikan Biologi, 9 (1), 65-72.

Rumi, E. (2017). Efforts to Improve Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking Using Problem Solving. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPA. Vol. 4 (2): 41-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.30738/natural.v4i2.1853

Saifulloh, M., Z. Muhibbin, dan Hermanto. (2012). Strategi Peningkatan Mutu Penidikan di Sekolah. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora. 5(2), 206-217.

Setiawati, H., & Corebima, A, D. (2017). Empowering Critical Thinking Skills of the Students Having Different Academic Ability in Biology Learning of Senior High School Through PQ4R -TPS Strategy. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 4(5), 3521–3526. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/be01/71d640066bb04e936e105b299f4768de4ee4.pdf

Suhandri., Hayatun,N., & Erdawati, N. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika berdasarkan Level Kemampuan Akademik. Jurnal Analisa, 3 (2),115-129. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v3i2.2012

Surif, J., Ibrahim, N.H., Mokhtar, M. (2012). Conceptual and Prosedural Knowledge in Problem Solving. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 416-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.671

Suyitno, I., et all. (2021). Foreign Learners’ Perception, Satisfaction, and Learning Outcome in Learning Indonesian Language. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40 (1). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.32311

Syamsurizal, S. (2019). Pengembangan Asesmen Berbasis Kelas untuk Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru IPA SMP dan MTs Kecamatan Koto Tangah. Pelita Eksakta, 1 (02). https://doi.org/10.24036/pelitaeksakta/vol1-iss02/3

Wang, J., & Buck, G, A. (2016). Understanding a High School Physics Teachers Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27, 577-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9476-1

Heffi Alberida, Universitas Negeri Padang

Mutia sari, universitas negeri padang, abdul razak, universitas negeri padang, syamsuriza syamsuriza, universitas negeri padang, yosi laila rahmi, universitas negeri paadang.

Copyright (c) 2022 Heffi Alberida, Mutia Sari, Abdul Razak, Syamsuriza Syamsuriza, Yosi Laila Rahmi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:

• Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License) . This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
• Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA .
• Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access ).

Nationally Accredited

menueditorialteam

Journal StatCounter

Journals Publisher

This journals is published by Postgraduate University of Mataram. University of Mataram is a higher education institution under the Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia.

•     Phone. 081936732708
•     Mail. [email protected]
•     Web. https://jppipa.unram.ac.id

Information

• For Authors
• For Readers
• For Librarians

• Search Search Search …
• Search Search …

Critical Thinking Models: A Comprehensive Guide for Effective Decision Making

Critical thinking models are valuable frameworks that help individuals develop and enhance their critical thinking skills . These models provide a structured approach to problem-solving and decision-making by encouraging the evaluation of information and arguments in a logical, systematic manner. By understanding and applying these models, one can learn to make well-reasoned judgments and decisions.

Various critical thinking models exist, each catering to different contexts and scenarios. These models offer a step-by-step method to analyze situations, scrutinize assumptions and biases, and consider alternative perspectives. Ultimately, the goal of critical thinking models is to enhance an individual’s ability to think critically, ultimately improving their reasoning and decision-making skills in both personal and professional settings.

Key Takeaways

• Critical thinking models provide structured approaches for enhancing decision-making abilities
• These models help individuals analyze situations, scrutinize assumptions, and consider alternative perspectives
• The application of critical thinking models can significantly improve one’s reasoning and judgment skills.

Fundamentals of Critical Thinking

Definition and Importance

Critical thinking is the intellectual process of logically, objectively, and systematically evaluating information to form reasoned judgments, utilizing reasoning , logic , and evidence . It involves:

• Identifying and questioning assumptions,
• Applying consistent principles and criteria,
• Analyzing and synthesizing information,
• Drawing conclusions based on evidence.

The importance of critical thinking lies in its ability to help individuals make informed decisions, solve complex problems, and differentiate between true and false beliefs .

Core Cognitive Skills

Several core cognitive skills underpin critical thinking:

• Analysis : Breaking down complex information into smaller components to identify patterns or inconsistencies.
• Evaluation : Assessing the credibility and relevance of sources, arguments, and evidence.
• Inference : Drawing conclusions by connecting the dots between analyzed information.
• Synthesis : Incorporating analyzed information into a broader understanding and constructing one’s argument.
• Logic and reasoning : Applying principles of logic to determine the validity of arguments and weigh evidence.

These skills enable individuals to consistently apply intellectual standards in their thought process, which ultimately results in sound judgments and informed decisions.

Influence of Cognitive Biases

A key aspect of critical thinking is recognizing and mitigating the impact of cognitive biases on our thought processes. Cognitive biases are cognitive shortcuts or heuristics that can lead to flawed reasoning and distort our understanding of a situation. Examples of cognitive biases include confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and availability heuristic.

To counter the influence of cognitive biases, critical thinkers must be aware of their own assumptions and strive to apply consistent and objective evaluation criteria in their thinking process. The practice of actively recognizing and addressing cognitive biases promotes an unbiased and rational approach to problem-solving and decision-making.

The Critical Thinking Process

Stages of Critical Thinking

The critical thinking process starts with gathering and evaluating data . This stage involves identifying relevant information and ensuring it is credible and reliable. Next, an individual engages in analysis by examining the data closely to understand its context and interpret its meaning. This step can involve breaking down complex ideas into simpler components for better understanding.

The next stage focuses on determining the quality of the arguments, concepts, and theories present in the analyzed data. Critical thinkers question the credibility and logic behind the information while also considering their own biases and assumptions. They apply consistent standards when evaluating sources, which helps them identify any weaknesses in the arguments.

Values play a significant role in the critical thinking process. Critical thinkers assess the significance of moral, ethical, or cultural values shaping the issue, argument, or decision at hand. They determine whether these values align with the evidence and logic they have analyzed.

After thorough analysis and evaluation, critical thinkers draw conclusions based on the evidence and reasoning gathered. This step includes synthesizing the information and presenting a clear, concise argument or decision. It also involves explaining the reasoning behind the conclusion to ensure it is well-founded.

Application in Decision Making

In decision making, critical thinking is a vital skill that allows individuals to make informed choices. It enables them to:

• Analyze options and their potential consequences
• Evaluate the credibility of sources and the quality of information
• Identify biases, assumptions, and values that may influence the decision
• Construct a reasoned, well-justified conclusion

By using critical thinking in decision making, individuals can make more sound, objective choices. The process helps them to avoid pitfalls like jumping to conclusions, being influenced by biases, or basing decisions on unreliable data. The result is more thoughtful, carefully-considered decisions leading to higher quality outcomes.

Critical Thinking Models

Critical thinking models are frameworks that help individuals develop better problem-solving and decision-making abilities. They provide strategies for analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing information to reach well-founded conclusions. This section will discuss four notable models: The RED Model, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Paul-Elder Model, and The Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment.

The RED Model

The RED Model stands for Recognize Assumptions, Evaluate Arguments, and Draw Conclusions. It emphasizes the importance of questioning assumptions, weighing evidence, and reaching logical conclusions.

• Recognize Assumptions: Identify and challenge assumptions that underlie statements, beliefs, or arguments.
• Evaluate Arguments: Assess the validity and reliability of evidence to support or refute claims.
• Draw Conclusions: Make well-reasoned decisions based on available information and sound reasoning.

The RED Model helps individuals become more effective problem solvers and decision-makers by guiding them through the critical thinking process ^(source) .

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Bloom’s Taxonomy is a hierarchical model that classifies cognitive skills into six levels of complexity. These levels are remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. By progressing through these levels, individuals can develop higher-order thinking skills.

• Remembering: Recall information or facts.
• Understanding: Comprehend the meaning of ideas, facts, or problems.
• Applying: Use knowledge in different situations.
• Analyzing: Break down complex topics or problems into sub-parts.
• Evaluating: Assess the quality, relevance, or credibility of information, ideas, or solutions.
• Creating: Combine elements to form a new whole, generate new ideas, or solve complex issues.

Paul-Elder Model

The Paul-Elder Model introduces the concept of “elements of thought,” focusing on a structured approach to critical thinking. This model promotes intellectual standards, such as clarity, accuracy, and relevance. It consists of three stages:

• Critical Thinking: Employ the intellectual standards to problem-solving and decision-making processes.
• Elements of Thought: Consider purpose, question at issue, information, interpretation and inference, concepts, assumptions, implications, and point of view.
• Intellectual Traits: Develop intellectual traits, such as intellectual humility, intellectual empathy, and intellectual perseverance.

This model fosters a deeper understanding and appreciation of critical thinking ^(source) .

The Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment

The Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment is a standardized test developed by Diane Halpern to assess critical thinking skills. The evaluation uses a variety of tasks to measure abilities in core skill areas, such as verbal reasoning, argument analysis, and decision making. Pearson, a leading publisher of educational assessments, offers this test as a means to assess individuals’ critical thinking skills ^(source) .

These four critical thinking models can be used as frameworks to improve and enhance cognitive abilities. By learning and practicing these models, individuals can become better equipped to analyze complex information, evaluate options, and make well-informed decisions.

Evaluating Information and Arguments

In this section, we will discuss the importance of evaluating information and arguments in the process of critical thinking, focusing on evidence assessment, logic and fallacies, and argument analysis.

Evidence Assessment

Evaluating the relevance, accuracy, and credibility of information is a vital aspect of critical thinking. In the process of evidence assessment, a thinker should consider the following factors:

• Source reliability : Research and understand the expertise and credibility of the source to ensure that biased or inaccurate information is not being considered.
• Currency : Check the date of the information to make sure it is still relevant and accurate in the present context.
• Objectivity : Analyze the information for potential bias and always cross-reference it with other credible sources.

When practicing critical thinking skills, it is essential to be aware of your own biases and make efforts to minimize their influence on your decision-making process.

Logic and Fallacies

Logic is crucial for deconstructing and analyzing complex arguments, while identifying and avoiding logical fallacies helps maintain accurate and valid conclusions. Some common fallacies to watch out for in critical thinking include:

• Ad Hominem : Attacking the person making the argument instead of addressing the argument itself.
• Strawman : Misrepresenting an opponent’s argument to make it easier to refute.
• False Dilemma : Presenting only two options when there may be multiple viable alternatives.
• Appeal to Authority : Assuming a claim is true simply because an authority figure supports it.

Being aware of these fallacies enables a thinker to effectively evaluate the strength of an argument and make sound judgments accordingly.

Argument Analysis

Analyzing an argument is the process of evaluating its structure, premises, and conclusion while determining its validity and soundness. To analyze an argument, follow these steps:

• Identify the premises and conclusion : Determine the main point is being argued, how it is related and substance of the argument.
• Evaluate the validity : Assess whether the conclusion logically follows from the premises and if the argument’s structure is sound.
• Test the soundness : Evaluate the truth and relevance of the premises. This may require verifying the accuracy of facts and evidence, as well as assessing the reliability of sources.
• Consider counter-arguments : Identify opposing viewpoints and counter-arguments, and evaluate their credibility to gauge the overall strength of the original argument.

By effectively evaluating information and arguments, critical thinkers develop a solid foundation for making well-informed decisions and solving problems.

Enhancing Critical Thinking

Strategies for improvement.

To enhance critical thinking, individuals can practice different strategies, including asking thought-provoking questions, analyzing ideas and observations, and being open to different perspectives. One effective technique is the Critical Thinking Roadmap , which breaks critical thinking down into four measurable phases: execute, synthesize, recommend, and communicate. It’s important to use deliberate practice in these areas to develop a strong foundation for problem-solving and decision-making. In addition, cultivating a mindset of courage , fair-mindedness , and empathy will support critical thinking development.

Critical Thinking in Education

In the field of education, critical thinking is an essential component of effective learning and pedagogy. Integrating critical thinking into the curriculum encourages student autonomy, fosters innovation, and improves student outcomes. Teachers can use various approaches to promote critical thinking, such as:

• Employing open-ended questions to stimulate ideas
• Incorporating group discussions or debates to facilitate communication and evaluation of viewpoints
• Assessing and providing feedback on student work to encourage reflection and improvement
• Utilizing real-world scenarios and case studies for practical application of concepts

Developing a Critical Thinking Mindset

To truly enhance critical thinking abilities, it’s important to adopt a mindset that values integrity , autonomy , and empathy . These qualities help to create a learning environment that encourages open-mindedness, which is key to critical thinking development. To foster a critical thinking mindset:

• Be curious : Remain open to new ideas and ask questions to gain a deeper understanding.
• Communicate effectively : Clearly convey thoughts and actively listen to others.
• Reflect and assess : Regularly evaluate personal beliefs and assumptions to promote growth.
• Embrace diversity of thought : Welcome different viewpoints and ideas to foster innovation.

Incorporating these approaches can lead to a more robust critical thinking skillset, allowing individuals to better navigate and solve complex problems.

Critical Thinking in Various Contexts

The workplace and beyond.

Critical thinking is a highly valued skill in the workplace, as it enables employees to analyze situations, make informed decisions, and solve problems effectively. It involves a careful thinking process directed towards a specific goal. Employers often seek individuals who possess strong critical thinking abilities, as they can add significant value to the organization.

In the workplace context, critical thinkers are able to recognize assumptions, evaluate arguments, and draw conclusions, following models such as the RED model . They can also adapt their thinking to suit various scenarios, allowing them to tackle complex and diverse problems.

Moreover, critical thinking transcends the workplace and applies to various aspects of life. It empowers an individual to make better decisions, analyze conflicting information, and engage in constructive debates.

Creative and Lateral Thinking

Critical thinking encompasses both creative and lateral thinking. Creative thinking involves generating novel ideas and solutions to problems, while lateral thinking entails looking at problems from different angles to find unique and innovative solutions.

Creative thinking allows thinkers to:

• Devise new concepts and ideas
• Challenge conventional wisdom
• Build on existing knowledge to generate innovative solutions

Lateral thinking, on the other hand, encourages thinkers to:

• Break free from traditional thought patterns
• Combine seemingly unrelated ideas to create unique solutions
• Utilize intuition and intelligence to approach problems from a different perspective

Both creative and lateral thinking are essential components of critical thinking, allowing individuals to view problems in a holistic manner and generate well-rounded solutions. These skills are highly valued by employers and can lead to significant personal and professional growth.

In conclusion, critical thinking is a multifaceted skill that comprises various thought processes, including creative and lateral thinking. By embracing these skills, individuals can excel in the workplace and in their personal lives, making better decisions and solving problems effectively.

Overcoming Challenges

Recognizing and addressing bias.

Cognitive biases and thinking biases can significantly affect the process of critical thinking . One of the key components of overcoming these challenges is to recognize and address them. It is essential to be aware of one’s own beliefs, as well as the beliefs of others, to ensure fairness and clarity throughout the decision-making process. To identify and tackle biases, one can follow these steps:

• Be self-aware : Understand personal beliefs and biases, acknowledging that they may influence the interpretation of information.
• Embrace diverse perspectives : Encourage open discussions and invite different viewpoints to challenge assumptions and foster cognitive diversity.
• Reevaluate evidence : Continuously reassess the relevance and validity of the information being considered.

By adopting these practices, individuals can minimize the impact of biases and enhance the overall quality of their critical thinking skills.

Dealing with Information Overload

In today’s world, information is abundant, and it can become increasingly difficult to demystify and make sense of the available data. Dealing with information overload is a crucial aspect of critical thinking. Here are some strategies to address this challenge:

• Prioritize information : Focus on the most relevant and reliable data, filtering out unnecessary details.
• Organize data : Use tables, charts, and lists to categorize information and identify patterns more efficiently.
• Break down complex information : Divide complex data into smaller, manageable segments to simplify interpretation and inferences.

By implementing these techniques, individuals can effectively manage information overload, enabling them to process and analyze data more effectively, leading to better decision-making.

In conclusion, overcoming challenges such as biases and information overload is essential in the pursuit of effective critical thinking. By recognizing and addressing these obstacles, individuals can develop clarity and fairness in their thought processes, leading to well-informed decisions and improved problem-solving capabilities.

Measuring Critical Thinking

Assessment tools and criteria.

There are several assessment tools designed to measure critical thinking, each focusing on different aspects such as quality, depth, breadth, and significance of thinking. One example of a widely used standardized test is the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal , which evaluates an individual’s ability to interpret information, draw conclusions, and make assumptions. Another test is the Cornell Critical Thinking Tests Level X and Level Z , which assess an individual’s critical thinking skills through multiple-choice questions.

Furthermore, criteria for assessing critical thinking often include precision, relevance, and the ability to gather and analyze relevant information. Some assessors utilize the Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment , which measures the application of cognitive skills such as deduction, observation, and induction in real-world scenarios.

The Role of IQ and Tests

It’s important to note that intelligence quotient (IQ) tests and critical thinking assessments are not the same. While IQ tests aim to measure an individual’s cognitive abilities and general intelligence, critical thinking tests focus specifically on one’s ability to analyze, evaluate, and form well-founded opinions. Therefore, having a high IQ does not necessarily guarantee strong critical thinking skills, as critical thinking requires additional mental processes beyond basic logical reasoning.

To build and enhance critical thinking skills, individuals should practice and develop higher-order thinking, such as critical alertness, critical reflection, and critical analysis. Using a Critical Thinking Roadmap , such as the four-phase framework that includes execution, synthesis, recommendation, and the ability to apply, individuals can continuously work to improve their critical thinking abilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main steps involved in the paul-elder critical thinking model.

The Paul-Elder Critical Thinking Model is a comprehensive framework for developing critical thinking skills. The main steps include: identifying the purpose, formulating questions, gathering information, identifying assumptions, interpreting information, and evaluating arguments. The model emphasizes clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance, depth, breadth, logic, and fairness throughout the critical thinking process. By following these steps, individuals can efficiently analyze and evaluate complex ideas and issues.

Can you list five techniques to enhance critical thinking skills?

Here are five techniques to help enhance critical thinking skills:

• Ask open-ended questions : Encourages exploration and challenges assumptions.
• Engage in active listening: Focus on understanding others’ viewpoints before responding.
• Reflect on personal biases: Identify and question any preconceived notions or judgments.
• Practice mindfulness: Develop self-awareness and stay present in the moment.
• Collaborate with others: Exchange ideas and learn from diverse perspectives.

What is the RED Model of critical thinking and how is it applied?

The RED Model of critical thinking consists of three key components: Recognize Assumptions, Evaluate Arguments, and Draw Conclusions. To apply the RED Model, begin by recognizing and questioning underlying assumptions, being aware of personal biases and stereotypes. Next, evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of different arguments, considering evidence, logical consistency, and alternative explanations. Lastly, draw well-reasoned conclusions that are based on the analysis and evaluation of the information gathered.

How do the ‘3 C’s’ of critical thinking contribute to effective problem-solving?

The ‘3 C’s’ of critical thinking – Curiosity, Creativity, and Criticism – collectively contribute to effective problem-solving. Curiosity allows individuals to explore various perspectives and ask thought-provoking questions, while Creativity helps develop innovative solutions and unique approaches to challenges. Criticism, or the ability to evaluate and analyze ideas objectively, ensures that the problem-solving process remains grounded in logic and relevance.

What characteristics distinguish critical thinking from creative thinking?

Critical thinking and creative thinking are two complementary cognitive skills. Critical thinking primarily focuses on analyzing, evaluating, and reasoning, using objectivity and logical thinking. It involves identifying problems, assessing evidence, and drawing sound conclusions. Creative thinking, on the other hand, is characterized by the generation of new ideas, concepts, and approaches to solve problems, often involving imagination, originality, and out-of-the-box thinking.

What are some recommended books to help improve problem-solving and critical thinking skills?

There are several books that can help enhance problem-solving and critical thinking skills, including:

• “Thinking, Fast and Slow” by Daniel Kahneman: This book explores the dual process theory of decision-making and reasoning.
• “The 5 Elements of Effective Thinking” by Edward B. Burger and Michael Starbird: Offers practical tips and strategies for improving critical thinking skills.
• “Critique of Pure Reason” by Immanuel Kant: A classic philosophical work that delves into the principles of reason and cognition.
• “Mindware: Tools for Smart Thinking” by Richard E. Nisbett: Presents a range of cognitive tools to enhance critical thinking and decision-making abilities.
• “The Art of Thinking Clearly” by Rolf Dobelli: Explores common cognitive biases and errors in judgment that can affect critical thinking.

You may also like

What is logical thinking

We observe many things in our life with intention or without. This is the usual tendency of all human beings from all […]

Critical Thinking & Language Learning

From a very young age, learning a language is of utmost importance. Starting from our mother tongue, we then learn another language […]

What is Non-Critical Thinking?

Think about the last time you had to take a stand on an important issue, or make a decision while not knowing […]

Parents Teaching Critical Thinking: Effective Strategies for Raising Independent Thinkers

Parents play a vital role in fostering the cognitive development of their children, and one of the most essential skills they can […]

Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL)

• Eka Ariyati Program Doktor Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Negeri Malang, Prodi Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Tanjungpura
• Herawati Susilo Program Doktor Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Negeri Malang
• Hadi Suwono Program Doktor Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Negeri Malang
• Fatchur Rohman Program Doktor Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Negeri Malang

This study aims to examine the potential of the process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) model in empowering students' critical thinking skills in learning. This research is a library research on relevant theories and research results. The results showed that so far learning has not taught critical thinking in class. Critical thinking skills is a basic skill that can help students analyze arguments, make conclusions using reasoning, assess or evaluate, and make decisions or solve problems. Through POGIL, students actively think critically at each stage of their learning. The POGIL stages are orientation, exploration, concept formation, application, and closure.

-, R., Ramdani, A., & Sedijani, P. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (Pogil) Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Ipa, Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Smp Negeri 3 Pringgabaya Lombok Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v3i2.90

Anugrahana, A. (2018). Tinjauan Deskriptif Penerapan Higher Order Thinking dan Problem-Based Learning Pada Mata Kuliah Geometri Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika Mahasiswa. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2018.v8.i2.p142-156

Arifani, N. H. (2017). Proses Berpikir Siswa Kelas Viii dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika TIMSS Materi Besar Sudut dalam Bentuk Geometris. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(1973), 946–954.

Asari, A. R., Malang, U. N., & Timur, J. (2016). Editor : Dr . Abdur Rahman As ’ ari , M . Pd , MA (Issue December).

Bustami, Y., & Corebima, A. D. (2017). The Effect of Jirqa Learning Strategy on Critical Thinking Skills of Multiethnic Students in Higher Education, Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 4(3), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0403003

Carlgren, T. (2013). Communication, Critical Thinking, Problem Solving: A Suggested Course for All High School Students in the 21st Century. Interchange, 44(1–2), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-013-9197-8

Cekin, A. (2015). The Investigation of Critical Thinking Dispositions of Religious Culture and Ethics Teacher Candidates. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 9(2), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v9i2.1718

Chukwuyenum, A. N. (2013). Impact of Critical thinking on Performance in Mathematics among Senior Secondary School Students in Lagos State. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 3(5), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0351825

DeWaelsche, S. A. (2015). Critical thinking, questioning and student engagement in Korean university English courses. Linguistics and Education, 32, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.10.003

Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543594

Facione, P. a. (2011). Critical Thinking : What It Is and Why It Counts. In Insight assessment (Issue ISBN 13: 978-1-891557-07-1.). https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF

Faradila, R., Fauzi, & Vitoria, L. (2017). Pengaruh kemampuan berpikir kritis terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas V SDN 3 Banda Aceh. Journal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2(4), 119–126. http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/pgsd/article/view/7738/3351

Flores, K. L., Matkin, G. S., Burbach, M. E., Quinn, C. E., & Harding, H. (2012). Deficient Critical Thinking Skills among College Graduates: Implications for leadership. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(2), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00672.x

Hadi, S. A., Susantini, E., & Agustini, R. (2018). Training of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills through the implementation of a Modified Free Inquiry Model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012063

Hale, D., & Mullen, L. G. (2009). Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities: A New Innovationl for Marketing Classes. Marketing Education Review, 19(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2009.11489063

Hanson, D. M. (n.d.). Instructor ’ s Guide to Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning by.

Hanson, D. M. (2015). Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities. January 2007.

Hanson, D. M., & Apple, D. K. (n.d.). P R O C E S S - O R I E N T E D GUID E D I N Q U I R Y L E A R N I N G - A S S E S S M E N T PROCESS - THE MISSING ELEMENT Both Content and Process Are Essential P R O C E S S - O R I E N T E D GUID E D I N Q U I R Y L E A R N I N G - A S S E S S M E N T .

Hashemi, S. A. (2011). The Use of Critical Thinking in Social Science Textbooks of High School: A Field Study of Fars Province in Iran. Online Submission, 4(1), 63–78.

Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., Widjajanti, E., & Suyanta. (2017). Students’ science process skill and analytical thinking ability in chemistry learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(August 2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995100

Kalelioǧlu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2013). The effect of instructional techniques on critical thinking and critical thinking dispositions in online discussion. Educational Technology and Society, 17(1), 248–258.

Liliasari, M. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Ipa Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Calon Guru Sebagai Kecenderungan Baru Pada Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 2(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v2i1.392

Listiana, L., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Suarsini, E. (2016). Empowering students’ metacognitive skils through new teaching strategy (group investigation integrated with think talk write) in biology classroom. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(3), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.391

Mahapoonyanont, N. (2010). Factors related to critical thinking abilities; A meta-analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9(May), 986–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.272

Marin, L. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.002

McGregor, D. (2007). Developing Thinking Developing learning : a guide to thinking skills in education.

Mulyanto, H., Gunarhadi, G., & Indriayu, M. (2018). The Effect of Problem Based Learning Model on Student Mathematics Learning Outcomes Viewed from Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(2), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.408454

Munawwarah, M., Laili, N., & Tohir, M. (2020). Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Keterampilan Abad 21. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2020.v2i1.37-58

Page, D., & Mukherjee, A. (2007). Promoting Critical-Thinking Skills By Using Negotiation Exercises. Journal of Education for Business, 82(5), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.82.5.251-257

Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L., & Wasis, L. (2018). Critical inquiry based learning: A model of learning to promote critical thinking among prospective teachers of physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10220a

Purba, R. T. (2015). Sebuah Tinjauan Mengenai Stimulus Berpikir Kritis Bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 5(3), 59. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2015.v5.i3.p59-64

Rege, P., Havaldar, F., & Shaikh, G. (2016). An Effective Use of POGIL in Improving Academic Performance of Students and Their Approach in Organic Chemistry. International Journal of Science and Research Methodology, 4(1), 45–61.

Rohmawatiningsih, W., Rachman, I., & Kodama, Y. (2018). Improving Critical Thinking Skills and Environment Caring Attitude Through Integrated Environment-Based Learning Model. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsder.v2i1.12360

Sari, R. M., Sumarmi, Komang Astina, I., Utomo, D. H., & Ridhwan. (2019). Measuring students scientific learning perception and critical thinking skill using paper-based testing: School and gender differences. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(19), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i19.10968

Slamet, A., Tapilouw, F. sudargo, Rohman, I., & Adianto. (2014). Critical Thinking Ability Analysis Beginning Teacher Candidates Of Biology in the Animal Physiology Material At Biology Education Program Fkip Sriwijaya University. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 3(7), 1038–1042.

Snyder, L. G., & Snyder, M. J. (2008). Teaching Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skills How Critical Thinking Relates to Instructional Design. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 1(2), 90–100.

Susilowati, Sajidan, & Ramli, M. (2017). Analisis keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa madrasah aliyah negeri di Kabupaten Magetan. Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains), 21(2000), 223–231.

Taghva, F., Rezaei, N., Ghaderi, J., & Taghva, R. (2014). Studying the Relationship between Critical Thinking Skills and Students’ Educational Achievement (Eghlid Universities as Case Study). International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 25, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.25.18

Trevathan, J., Myers, T., & Gray, H. (2014). Scaling-Up Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Techniques for Teaching Large Information Systems Courses. Journal of Learning Design, 7(3), 23–38.

Villagonzalo, E. C. (2014). Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning: An Effective Approach in Enhancing Students’ Academic Performance. The DLSU Research Congress, 2009, 1–6.

Zawadzki, R. (2010). Is process-oriented guided-inquiry learning (POGIL) suitable as a teaching method in Thailand’s higher education? Asian Journal on Education and Learning, 1(2), 66–74. www.ajel.info

Zubaidah, S. (2010). Berfikir Kritis : Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Yang dapat Dikembangkan Melalui Pembelajaran Sains. Seminar Nasional Sains 2010 Dengan Tema “Optimalisasi Sains Untuk Memberdayakan Manusia,” January 2010, 11.

How to Cite

• Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

• Natalia Rosa Keliat, Herawati Susilo, Utami Sri Hastuti, Ibrohim Ibrohim, Kajian Teori-Teori Belajar Berdasarkan Sintaks Model Pembelajaran PQDiS-CSR Serta Validasi Model Pembelajaran Model PQDiS-CS: Suatu Penelitian Pendahuluan Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran PQDiS-CSR untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Metakognitif , Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan: Vol. 11 No. 2 (2021)

sidebar_menu

• Editorial Team
• Peer Reviewers
• Focus and Scope
• Author Guidelines
• Publication Ethics
• Publishing System

Make a Submission

citation_statistic

visitor_statistics