critical analysis of research reports and articles ppt

Write a Critical Review of a Scientific Journal Article

1. identify how and why the research was carried out, 2. establish the research context, 3. evaluate the research, 4. establish the significance of the research.

• Writing Your Critique

Ask Us: Chat, email, visit or call

Video: How to Integrate Critical Voice into Your Literature Review

Video: Note-taking and Writing Tips to Avoid Plagiarism

Get assistance

The library offers a range of helpful services.  All of our appointments are free of charge and confidential.

• Book an appointment

Read the article(s) carefully and use the questions below to help you identify how and why the research was carried out. Look at the following sections: 

Introduction

• What was the objective of the study?
• What methods were used to accomplish this purpose (e.g., systematic recording of observations, analysis and evaluation of published research, assessment of theory, etc.)?
• What techniques were used and how was each technique performed?
• What kind of data can be obtained using each technique?
• How are such data interpreted?
• What kind of information is produced by using the technique?
• What objective evidence was obtained from the authors’ efforts (observations, measurements, etc.)?
• What were the results of the study? 
• How was each technique used to obtain each result?
• What statistical tests were used to evaluate the significance of the conclusions based on numeric or graphic data?
• How did each result contribute to answering the question or testing the hypothesis raised in the introduction?
• How were the results interpreted? How were they related to the original problem (authors’ view of evidence rather than objective findings)? 
• Were the authors able to answer the question (test the hypothesis) raised?
• Did the research provide new factual information, a new understanding of a phenomenon in the field, or a new research technique?
• How was the significance of the work described?
• Do the authors relate the findings of the study to literature in the field?
• Did the reported observations or interpretations support or refute observations or interpretations made by other researchers?

These questions were adapted from the following sources:  Kuyper, B.J. (1991). Bringing up scientists in the art of critiquing research. Bioscience 41(4), 248-250. Wood, J.M. (2003). Research Lab Guide. MICR*3260 Microbial Adaptation and Development Web Site . Retrieved July 31, 2006.

Once you are familiar with the article, you can establish the research context by asking the following questions:

• Who conducted the research? What were/are their interests?
• When and where was the research conducted?
• Why did the authors do this research?
• Was this research pertinent only within the authors’ geographic locale, or did it have broader (even global) relevance?
• Were many other laboratories pursuing related research when the reported work was done? If so, why?
• For experimental research, what funding sources met the costs of the research?
• On what prior observations was the research based? What was and was not known at the time?
• How important was the research question posed by the researchers?

These questions were adapted from the following sources: Kuyper, B.J. (1991). Bringing up scientists in the art of critiquing research. Bioscience 41(4), 248-250. Wood, J.M. (2003). Research Lab Guide. MICR*3260 Microbial Adaptation and Development Web Site . Retrieved July 31, 2006.

Remember that simply disagreeing with the material is not considered to be a critical assessment of the material.  For example, stating that the sample size is insufficient is not a critical assessment.  Describing why the sample size is insufficient for the claims being made in the study would be a critical assessment.

Use the questions below to help you evaluate the quality of the authors’ research:

• Does the title precisely state the subject of the paper?
• Read the statement of purpose in the abstract. Does it match the one in the introduction?

Acknowledgments

• Could the source of the research funding have influenced the research topic or conclusions?
• Check the sequence of statements in the introduction. Does all the information lead coherently to the purpose of the study?
• Review all methods in relation to the objective(s) of the study. Are the methods valid for studying the problem?
• Check the methods for essential information. Could the study be duplicated from the methods and information given?
• Check the methods for flaws. Is the sample selection adequate? Is the experimental design sound?
• Check the sequence of statements in the methods. Does all the information belong there? Is the sequence of methods clear and pertinent?
• Was there mention of ethics? Which research ethics board approved the study?
• Carefully examine the data presented in the tables and diagrams. Does the title or legend accurately describe the content? 
• Are column headings and labels accurate? 
• Are the data organized for ready comparison and interpretation? (A table should be self-explanatory, with a title that accurately and concisely describes content and column headings that accurately describe information in the cells.)
• Review the results as presented in the text while referring to the data in the tables and diagrams. Does the text complement, and not simply repeat data? Are there discrepancies between the results in the text and those in the tables?
• Check all calculations and presentation of data.
• Review the results in light of the stated objectives. Does the study reveal what the researchers intended?
• Does the discussion clearly address the objectives and hypotheses?
• Check the interpretation against the results. Does the discussion merely repeat the results? 
• Does the interpretation arise logically from the data or is it too far-fetched? 
• Have the faults, flaws, or shortcomings of the research been addressed?
• Is the interpretation supported by other research cited in the study?
• Does the study consider key studies in the field?
• What is the significance of the research? Do the authors mention wider implications of the findings?
• Is there a section on recommendations for future research? Are there other research possibilities or directions suggested? 

Consider the article as a whole

• Reread the abstract. Does it accurately summarize the article?
• Check the structure of the article (first headings and then paragraphing). Is all the material organized under the appropriate headings? Are sections divided logically into subsections or paragraphs?
• Are stylistic concerns, logic, clarity, and economy of expression addressed?

These questions were adapted from the following sources:  Kuyper, B.J. (1991). Bringing up scientists in the art of critiquing research. Bioscience 41(4), 248-250. Wood, J.M. (2003). Research Lab Guide. MICR*3260 Microbial Adaptation and Development Web Site. Retrieved July 31, 2006.

After you have evaluated the research, consider whether the research has been successful. Has it led to new questions being asked, or new ways of using existing knowledge? Are other researchers citing this paper?

You should consider the following questions:

• How did other researchers view the significance of the research reported by your authors?
• Did the research reported in your article result in the formulation of new questions or hypotheses (by the authors or by other researchers)?
• Have other researchers subsequently supported or refuted the observations or interpretations of these authors?
• Did the research make a significant contribution to human knowledge?
• Did the research produce any practical applications?
• What are the social, political, technological, medical implications of this research?
• How do you evaluate the significance of the research?

To answer these questions, look at review articles to find out how reviewers view this piece of research. Look at research articles and databases like Web of Science to see how other people have used this work. What range of journals have cited this article?

These questions were adapted from the following sources:

Kuyper, B.J. (1991). Bringing up scientists in the art of critiquing research. Bioscience 41(4), 248-250. Wood, J.M. (2003). Research Lab Guide. MICR*3260 Microbial Adaptation and Development Web Site . Retrieved July 31, 2006.

• << Previous: Start Here
• Next: Writing Your Critique >>
• Last Updated: Jan 11, 2024 12:42 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uoguelph.ca/WriteCriticalReview

Suggest an edit to this guide

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

• My presentations

Auth with social network:

Download presentation

We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles

Published by Elmer Vernon Kennedy Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles"— Presentation transcript:

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process

The Robert Gordon University

Jane Long, MA, MLIS Reference Services Librarian Al Harris Library.

Business Research BUS020N532Y

Dr Ronni Michelle Greenwood Autumn  Introduction  Method  Results  Discussion.

Publishers of original thinking. What kinds of academic writing are there? There are many kinds of writing that originates from academia. In my view there.

Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.

Workshop for Literature Review

Group 4 extended Essays An Introduction. A Group 4 Extended Essay can be successful As Percentages Group Number ABCDE

Improving Learning, Persistence, and Transparency by Writing for the NASPA Journal Dr. Cary Anderson, Editor, NASPA Journal Kiersten Feeney, Editorial.

8. Evidence-based management Step 3: Critical appraisal of studies

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: any public.

Critiquing Research Articles For important and highly relevant articles: 1. Introduce the study, say how it exemplifies the point you are discussing 2.

First, let’s talk about some of your introductions from last time: – What did you think was good about it? – What did you think was poor about it? What.

Dissemination and Critical Evaluation of Published Research Peg Bottjen, MPA, MT(ASCP)SC.

Powerpoint Presentation 1. The topic of the presentation meets the requirements of the assignment. (/5) 1. The topic of the presentation meets the requirements.

SOCI 380 INSTRUCTIONS RE. RESEARCH PAPER DUE DATE: The research paper is due on the last day of class You are required to write and submit a detailed research.

1 Reading (and Writing) About Research Studies  Is this fun? Not usually but we can be duped by others if we don’t know the research!!!  Peer-reviewed.

Research Methods for Business Students

Research Proposal Development of research question

About project

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.

Writing a Critical Analysis

What is in this guide, definitions, putting it together, tips and examples of critques.

• Background Information
• Cite Sources

Library Links

• Ask a Librarian
• Library Tutorials
• The Research Process
• Library Hours
• Online Databases (A-Z)
• Interlibrary Loan (ILL)
• Reserve a Study Room
• Report a Problem

This guide is meant to help you understand the basics of writing a critical analysis. A critical analysis is an argument about a particular piece of media. There are typically two parts: (1) identify and explain the argument the author is making, and (2), provide your own argument about that argument. Your instructor may have very specific requirements on how you are to write your critical analysis, so make sure you read your assignment carefully.

Critical Analysis

A deep approach to your understanding of a piece of media by relating new knowledge to what you already know.

Part 1: Introduction

• Identify the work being criticized.
• Present thesis - argument about the work.
• Preview your argument - what are the steps you will take to prove your argument.

Part 2: Summarize

• Provide a short summary of the work.
• Present only what is needed to know to understand your argument.

Part 3: Your Argument

• This is the bulk of your paper.
• Provide "sub-arguments" to prove your main argument.
• Use scholarly articles to back up your argument(s).

Part 4: Conclusion

• Reflect on  how  you have proven your argument.
• Point out the  importance  of your argument.
• Comment on the potential for further research or analysis.
• Cornell University Library Tips for writing a critical appraisal and analysis of a scholarly article.
• Queen's University Library How to Critique an Article (Psychology)
• University of Illinois, Springfield An example of a summary and an evaluation of a research article. This extended example shows the different ways a student can critique and write about an article
• Next: Background Information >>
• Last Updated: Feb 14, 2024 4:33 PM
• URL: https://libguides.pittcc.edu/critical_analysis

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF A RESEARCH ARTICLE

Oct 05, 2014

1.42k likes | 4.12k Views

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF A RESEARCH ARTICLE. By : Noor Shareeza Azzura Binti Shahruddin MPU 101513 Cik Ku Rohaya B inti Che Ku Ali MPU 101424 Presented to : Prof. Dr. Baharuddin Bin Aris. 03-Article-037-NorAziah-UiTM version 2[1]. pdf. TITLE. T itle is written in general

Share Presentation

• learningnet system
• concern profiles
• concern profile
• learning management system
• adopting learning management system

Presentation Transcript

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF A RESEARCH ARTICLE By : NoorShareezaAzzuraBintiShahruddin MPU 101513 Cik Ku RohayaBintiChe Ku Ali MPU 101424 Presented to : Prof. Dr. Baharuddin Bin Aris

03-Article-037-NorAziah-UiTM version 2[1].pdf

TITLE • Title is written in general • The experimental variables are not clearly stated

A Good Title • Written as specific as possible • Have the experimental variables (independent and dependent variables) • Maybe the writer can change the title to “The use of adopting Learning Management System towards the attitude in teaching and learning”.

ABSTRACT problem statement sample method result

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION • Terms Definition • Research Questions / Problem Statements • Previous Study & Theories • Aim • Objectives / Purposes • Hypothesis

Terms Definition

Research Questions /Problem Statements

Previous Study & Theories

Objectives / Purposes

Hypothesis • There is no hypothesis or any expected findings included in the study

METHODOLOGY

VARIABLES • The main variable incorporated in the study is the lecturer’s concern at the early stage of the diffusion and adoption process • Independent Variable : Learning Management System • Dependent Variable : Stages of concerns in CBAM

Stages of Concerns

SAMPLE • 12 of INSTEAD lecturers who have either used the LMS or attended a training session on the IIUM LearningNet System

DATA GATHERING • 35 items of SoCQ (Stages of Concern Questionnaire) from CBAM (Concern Based Adoption Model) using eight-point Likert scale. • Means of indicating reflects the participants present concerns • Score from the responses are being summarise into 5 items of stages

DATA ANALYSIS • The total for each stage is the raw stage score. • Percentile tables will convert raw stage scores to percentile figures. • From these percentile figures, the researcher plotted stages of concern profiles.

Stages of concern profile : • identify the peak or predominant stages of concern and the relative intensity of other concerns • Represent the user at different stages of concern (such as nonuser or very early user)

Raw Stage Scores

Stage of Concern Profile

High Stage Scores of Participants

RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS • According to the researchers, the size and non random selection of sample does not justify the use of any statistical test. • Hence, they reported all findings as a descriptive but sufficient to answer the research questions posed.

FINDINGS • The participants’ concern profiles and predominant stages of concerns • Technology based education concerns

The participants’ concern profiles and predominant stages of concerns • The researcher use the raw scores table to gives displays of the raw scores of all the participants at each stage of concern. • The mean raw stage scores for the entire group of participant determines the composite stages of concern profile for the INSTED group of lecturers.

They derived the Interpretations of the sample profiles from instrument administration guidelines by Hall & Hord (2001) and its Stages of Concern theoretical framework. • The High Stage Scores are also examined for the participants. • These scores are important primary indicators in the interpretation of concerns.

To demonstrate participant’s concern, individual concern profile is also generated. • The participants’ profiles show a strong dip where management is concerned but rather high concern at the awareness level. • This is probably due to the fact that INSTED is at the early stage of introducing the LearningNet System to the faculty members.

Technology based education concerns • A qualitative analysis of the responses given by the participants gives an insight to their most pressing concern. • The researcher quotes the participant response to determine their concern about the LMS.

CONCLUSIONS • The concerns among the participants with regard to the use of the LearningNet system centres on the human issues • Show an open mindedness among the participants when dealing with the new technology • There is a positive attitude and a high likelihood that the LearningNet System will be adopted by the participants.

SUGGESTIONS • It is important to determine the design and content for staff development programs aimed at integrating the LMS online environment into their teaching realms. • It is imperative that potential adopters know what the MiTechLearningNet System is.

It is also pertinent to carry out an analysis of the potential users’ level of computer and technology competency. • An emphasis on innovation, rather than the technology should be adopted

REFERENCES • The researcher included a list of twenty one references. • However, three of the references are comparatively old and this does not get by with the fast advancement of technology and education especially that in most cases newer studies usually report older studies if they are related.

COMPARATIVELY OLD REFERENCES

• More by User

Summarizing a Research Article

Summarizing a Research Article. Taken From: University of Washington Psychology Writing Center. Journal Article. Title Abstract Introduction Method Results Discussion References. Reading the Articles. Scan the article Identify the research question and reason for the study (Intro)

704 views • 12 slides

CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF DIAGNOSTIC ARTICLE

JOURNAL CLUB. CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF DIAGNOSTIC ARTICLE. ALI A. ALBALUSHI EMERGENCY MEDICINE R- 4. Does End Tidal CO2 Monitoring During Emergency Department Procedural Sedation and Analgesia With Propofol Decrease the Incidence of Hypoxic Events?. Randomized, Controlled Trial.

1.11k views • 64 slides

Anatomy of a Research Article

Anatomy of a Research Article. AbstractPurposeSubjectProcedureData analysisResultsEvaluation: Is information about these major aspects of the research included?. Anatomy of a Research Article. Introduction and backgroundIdentify the problem areaReview of related LiteraturePurpose of the stu

394 views • 10 slides

WRITING A RESEARCH ARTICLE

WRITING A RESEARCH ARTICLE. Dr. Rob Danin Senior English Language Fellow www.robdanin.com. FORMAT FOR THE PAPER. TITLE Make your title specific enough to describe the contents of the paper. The title should be appropriate for the intended audience.

477 views • 22 slides

The Basics of Reading A Research Article

The Basics of Reading A Research Article. Amy Gutman MD ~ EMS Medical Director [email protected] / www.TEAEMS.com. EMS Research History Definitions Breaking down research articles E vidence-based medicine Research resources Summary.

698 views • 52 slides

The Analysis of a Journal Article

The Analysis of a Journal Article. Anindia Lokitavera Episiasi Pratama Irwin Talenta Wendi Kufrabawa. Effects of Culture and Gender in Comprehension of Speech Acts of Indirect Request . Rabe’a Shams &amp; Akbar Afghari

580 views • 30 slides

CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF ARTICLE ON HARM

CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF ARTICLE ON HARM. Discontinuing Rheumatic Fever Prophylaxis in Selected Adolescents and Young Adults: A Prospective Study Ximena Berrios , MD; Emilo del Campo , MD; Beatriz Guzman , RN; and Alan L. Bisno , MD .

400 views • 10 slides

Computer Research – Article Analysis

Computer Research – Article Analysis. Review the following 3 articles: Part 1: The Virus Creates a Generation of Orphans AIDS in Africa – The Orphaned Continent AIDS Orphan's Preventable Death Challenges Those Left Behind Select 1 article to create a 1-page fact sheet

190 views • 4 slides

Reading a Research Article

Reading a Research Article. Reading Reasearch Articles. Rarely will you ever read straight through a paper in a linear fashion - from introduction to the discussion section.

151 views • 3 slides

Critical Appraisal of an Article on HARM

Critical Appraisal Is there potential harm after administering allopurinol in patients with gout and azotemia ? PUBMED Mesh Terms: Allopurinol Gout Adverse Events Kidney Function. Critical Appraisal of an Article on HARM. Catmaker. Validity Guidelines

272 views • 7 slides

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF A RESEARCH ARTICLE. By : Noor Shareeza Azzura Binti Shahruddin MP 101513 Cik Ku Rohaya Binti Che Ku Ali MP 101424 Presented to : Prof. Dr. Baharuddin Bin Aris. 03-Article-037-NorAziah-UiTM version 2[1]. pdf. TITLE. T itle is written in general

729 views • 44 slides

Basic Structure of a Research Article

Basic Structure of a Research Article. Why am I am doing this? Why should you be interested? What did I do – top level questions, goals of paper? Who else has done similar things? How does my work fit in? How did I go about answering my questions: (details) : A. sample, research method

443 views • 16 slides

A Critical Analysis

A Critical Analysis. Dr. Walter Dorn Canadian Forces College 3 December 2007. Origins. General Charles Krulak Marine Corps Commandant (1995-99).

671 views • 54 slides

Anatomy of a Research Article. Five (or six) major sections Abstract Introduction (without a heading!) Method (and procedures) Results Discussion and conclusions References. Anatomy of a Research Article. Abstract Purpose Subject Procedure Data analysis Results

206 views • 9 slides

WRITING A RESEARCH ARTICLE. Dr. Rob Danin Senior English Language Fellow http://robdanin.wix.com/elfellow. FORMAT FOR THE PAPER. TITLE Make your title specific enough to describe the contents of the paper. The title should be appropriate for the intended audience.

614 views • 22 slides

Critical Appraisal of a Scientific Article on Therapy

Critical Appraisal of a Scientific Article on Therapy. Nihal Thomas MD DNB (Endo) MNAMS FRACP (Endo) FRCP(Edin) Professor, Dept of Endocrinology, Christian Medical College , Vellore, India. Phases of Trials.

520 views • 32 slides

Publication of Research Article

Dr. S. Umesha, PhD. Associate Professor DOS in Biotechnology University of Mysore Manasagangotri Mysore- 570006. Publication of Research Article. Nov, 2011. Table of Contents. Introduction Part I: Publication &amp; Peer Review Deciding to Publish Submitting Your Paper After Submission

836 views • 43 slides

Research Paper Critical Analysis

Research Paper Critical Analysis. 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical analysis. NUR 599T Human Factors In Healthcare Engineering. Dr. Vincent Duffy Research Paper Analysis Submitted by RuthAnn Smolen, RN, MS Ed, HNP, July 19, 2007.

616 views • 13 slides

research article analysis sample

498 views • 4 slides

Article Research

169 views • 5 slides

Hey loook a cool description

130 views • 4 slides

412 views • 32 slides

Researched by Consultants from Top-Tier Management Companies

Powerpoint Templates

Icon Bundle

Kpi Dashboard

Professional

Business Plans

Swot Analysis

Gantt Chart

Business Proposal

Marketing Plan

Project Management

Business Case

Business Model

Cyber Security

Business PPT

Digital Marketing

Digital Transformation

Human Resources

Product Management

Artificial Intelligence

Company Profile

Acknowledgement PPT

PPT Presentation

Reports Brochures

One Page Pitch

Interview PPT

All Categories

Top 5 Critical Analysis Templates with Samples and Examples

Critical analysis is crucial for every business. It involves evaluating information, ideas, or situations to understand their components, implications, and potential outcomes. It helps different organizations in informed decision-making, problem-solving, and strategic planning.

Critical analysis reduces the reliance on assumptions and biases; instead, it encourages effective solutions to every challenge based on data and examining processes. It is also helpful in efficiently allocating resources by identifying areas of inefficiency or redundancy.

Being so vital for every organization, critical analysis cannot be achieved without hurdles. The biggest challenge most firms face is communicating it properly in an easy-to-understand manner. It often involves intricate details and multifaceted data, making it challenging to simplify and communicate clearly to diverse stakeholders.

If you are looking to present a project gap analysis, this blog can be a great help.

Thus, it is more challenging for employees or stakeholders to adapt critical analysis-driven changes due to fear of the unknown or reluctance to abandon established practices. With the help of a pre-designed PPT template, you can seamlessly convey the complexities and implications of critical analysis.

Best Critical Analysis Templates for Strategic Thinking

This blog presents you the top 5 editable PPT templates that can be a tool to achieve a culture that values critical thinking and open dialogue and significantly contributes to successful communication and application of critical analysis within organizations.

Template 1: Critical Analysis Model for Evaluating Business Information

Explore this template to navigate a four-stage process encompassing critical analysis, model evaluation, business, and information. It provides a systematic approach to evaluating business information to uncover the nuances of methodologies, understand the model for evaluating business information, and gain insights into leveraging this process to make informed business decisions. With its user-friendly interface and adaptable features, this presentation is a powerful tool to impress and engage your audience. Thanks to its color-coded charts, which easily present critical, persuasive, analytical, and descriptive categories. Creative charts make it easy to understand and thus help every employee and stakeholder to align with the proposed methodology. Download and empower your team with a structured model for analyzing and evaluating crucial business information.

Click to download now.

Template 2: Critical Path Analysis Showing Task Completion by Months

Unveil the dynamics of task completion and project timelines with this visually engaging and easily understandable PowerPoint Slide. With this template, you can seamlessly explore the intricacies of the Critical Path Methodology, illustrating the sequential stages of task completion by months. Showcase your project timelines or discuss task dependencies; this versatile template is a powerful visual aid to convey complex concepts with simplicity and clarity. Download now to help your team navigate project timelines effectively.

To communicate current state analysis, trying these templates can be a time-saver.

Template 3: Critical Business Process Change Impact Analysis

Uncover the comprehensive analysis of change impacts, including recovery time, financial implications, and consumer response; all encapsulated in this creative PowerPoint template. This slide delves into evaluating business processes and their effects on financial metrics, quality processes, and marketing research.

Easily present gap analysis reports with these templates. Learn more about it in this blog.

Whether discussing financial implications, evaluating quality process changes, or understanding the impact on marketing research, this structured template is a powerful visual aid. It helps to elevate your presentations, strategy discussions, or stakeholder meetings with a comprehensive analysis of critical business process change impacts, enabling your team to navigate organizational transformations with precision and foresight. Download the template now for a practical analysis.

Template 4: Critical Path Analysis Showing Various Activities Involved in The Project

Let this comprehensive PPT template bring to light a structured six-stage process centered around Critical Path Analysis, emphasizing the Critical Path Method (CPM) and its application in project management. This visual aid not only helps to communicate the complicated web of project activities and their interdependencies but also explores the sequential stages involved in Critical Path Analysis, showcasing the various activities pivotal to project completion.

With this template, you can make clear presentations in no time to deliver a coherent understanding of the Critical Path Analysis, highlighting the sequential nature of project activities and their criticality in achieving project milestones. Download this template to make sure your team can manage projects more effectively.

Template 5: Critical Path Analysis Showing Three Paths to Complete Projects.

This set of slides unveils an eleven-stage process highlighting Critical Path Analysis, emphasizing the Critical Path Method (CPM) and its application in project management. Its visually appealing charts make understanding the complicated multiple stages embedded within Critical Path Analysis simple. It smoothly showcases the diverse paths pivotal to project completion. The marking of days with the tasks included in flow diagrams makes it attractive yet simple to comprehend. Download now to help your team navigate projects with precision and insight.

Click to download now

Final Thoughts!

Mastering critical analysis is essential for businesses, yet conveying its intricacies involves challenges. Communication, aligned with different stakeholders' needs, is crucial. Pre-designed templates aid in simplifying complexities, fostering understanding, and aligning teams with proposed methodologies. Overcoming these hurdles involves clear strategies, training, and data presentation. These templates, with color-coded charts and creative visuals, simplify complex concepts. They facilitate the analysis of business information, project timelines, and change impacts, fostering precision in decision-making. Implementing these templates cultivates a culture valuing critical thinking and fosters effective communication of analyses within organizations, ensuring informed, streamlined operations.

Related posts:

• Maximize Your Creative Potential With The Help Of Our Top 10 Brainstorming Google Slides Templates
• Top 20 Big Data and Analytics Templates for Machine Learning, Cloud Computing and Artificial Intelligence PPT Presentations
• What is the Bowman’s Strategy Clock and How to Use It (Best Templates Included)
• [Updated 2023] 20 Pie Chart Templates to Draw Intuitive Comparisons

Liked this blog? Please recommend us

Top 10 Yes-No Decision Tree Templates with Samples and Examples

Top 10 Recruiting Scorecard Templates with Examples and Samples

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA - the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Digital revolution powerpoint presentation slides

Sales funnel results presentation layouts

3d men joinning circular jigsaw puzzles ppt graphics icons

Business Strategic Planning Template For Organizations Powerpoint Presentation Slides

Future plan powerpoint template slide

Project Management Team Powerpoint Presentation Slides

Brand marketing powerpoint presentation slides

Launching a new service powerpoint presentation with slides go to market

Agenda powerpoint slide show

Four key metrics donut chart with percentage

Engineering and technology ppt inspiration example introduction continuous process improvement

Meet our team representing in circular format

• Preferences

Critical review of articles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Critical review of articles

How do we collect available knowledge ('evidence based medicine') books. review articles ... results gave more presentations and articles (high 'impact ... – powerpoint ppt presentation.

• Torben Jørgensen
• Diabetology Research Course in Epidemiology and Biostatistics
• Mumbai, India
• Critical evaluation of an article
• Publication bias
• How do we collect available knowledge (evidence based medicine)
• Review articles
• Systematic reviews
• To gather the existing knowledge
• Do we need further research into this area?
• the dream of a researcher
• An article published in journals with high impact factor?
• An article written by a known famous researcher?
• No - not necessarily!
• Introduction
• why the study was undertaken
• Material and method
• how it was done
• what was found
• what it meant
• Why was the study done?
• What is the problem? - in a nutshell
• Short summary of published literature
• Why another study? - hypothesis?
• What type of study was done?
• Case study, case-control study, cohort study, controlled trial, randomised trial
• Was this design appropriate to the research question addressed?
• Read the introduction and the method section
• If the method is wrong - the interest value of the hypothesis, the results and the speculations in the discussion are less important
• If you are going to trash an article you should do so before reading results and discussion
• Is the study original?
• Which group of people/patients?
• Design of the study?
• Is systematic bias avoided or minimised?
• Is the study large enough and continued for sufficient long time?
• Are the statistical tests used correctly?
• Are you dealing with an original study?
• (Compare aim of the study with review of literature)
• Are former studies
• of insufficient methodology
• too small, too short follow-up .
• Is the present study (compared to former studies)
• focusing on other groups of persons/patients
• (can you recognise the population?)
• Recruitment
• Population-based, primary health services, hospitals
• In- and exclusion criteria
• Age, sex, ethnicity, alcoholism etc.
• Design of the study
• (Did it make any sense?)
• Which manoeuvre was considered?
• Examples of insufficient description and wrong design
• Measurement of outcome - which and how?
• Surrogate end-point gtlt end-points relevant for patients and health care system
• Blind assessment of outcome?
• Is bias avoided or minimised?
• Randomised clinical trial
• Table comparing the randomised groups?
• Non-randomised clinical trials
• Selection of patients, comparing the groups
• Cohort studies
• non-responders, confounder control
• Case-control studies
• as cohort studies plus selection of cases and controls
• Sample size
• Is power calculation mentioned?
• Duration of follow-up
• Does it make sense? (cricket match between India and England)
• Completeness of follow-up
• How were drop-outs treated in the analyses?
• (common tests, explain why they use these tests?)
• Simple table for the most common problems
• Parametric gtlt non-parametric tests
• Paired gtlt unpaired test
• Multivariate tests
• mixed soup? or
• working according to one or more models
• Hierarchy of effect
• ex antihypertensive treatment
• Stroke, IHD, mortality
• Blood pressure, minute volume of heart
• Contraction of vessels
• ion effusion over a membrane
• 487 trials registered at the ethical committee in Oxford - 1984-87
• In May 1990, 285 (59) studies were analysed and only 148 (30) were published
• Significant results were published more often (OR2,32 95 c.l. 1,25-4,28)
• Significant results gave more presentations and articles (high impact factor)
• How were they performed?
• All articles?
• All language?
• Systematic reviews a.m. Cochrane
• Scientific protocol
• A scientific protocol
• Aim, material, in- and exclusion, plan of analysis .
• All articles are gathered
• translation to a language understood by reviewer
• additional data asked for
• Analysis performed
• Meta analysis, test for heterogeneity
• Discussion of results

PowerShow.com is a leading presentation sharing website. It has millions of presentations already uploaded and available with 1,000s more being uploaded by its users every day. Whatever your area of interest, here you’ll be able to find and view presentations you’ll love and possibly download. And, best of all, it is completely free and easy to use.

You might even have a presentation you’d like to share with others. If so, just upload it to PowerShow.com. We’ll convert it to an HTML5 slideshow that includes all the media types you’ve already added: audio, video, music, pictures, animations and transition effects. Then you can share it with your target audience as well as PowerShow.com’s millions of monthly visitors. And, again, it’s all free.

About the Developers

PowerShow.com is brought to you by  CrystalGraphics , the award-winning developer and market-leading publisher of rich-media enhancement products for presentations. Our product offerings include millions of PowerPoint templates, diagrams, animated 3D characters and more.

Home Blog Presentation Ideas How to Create and Deliver a Research Presentation

How to Create and Deliver a Research Presentation

Every research endeavor ends up with the communication of its findings. Graduate-level research culminates in a thesis defense , while many academic and scientific disciplines are published in peer-reviewed journals. In a business context, PowerPoint research presentation is the default format for reporting the findings to stakeholders.

Condensing months of work into a few slides can prove to be challenging. It requires particular skills to create and deliver a research presentation that promotes informed decisions and drives long-term projects forward.

Table of Contents

What is a Research Presentation

Key slides for creating a research presentation, tips when delivering a research presentation, how to present sources in a research presentation, recommended templates to create a research presentation.

A research presentation is the communication of research findings, typically delivered to an audience of peers, colleagues, students, or professionals. In the academe, it is meant to showcase the importance of the research paper , state the findings and the analysis of those findings, and seek feedback that could further the research.

The presentation of research becomes even more critical in the business world as the insights derived from it are the basis of strategic decisions of organizations. Information from this type of report can aid companies in maximizing the sales and profit of their business. Major projects such as research and development (R&D) in a new field, the launch of a new product or service, or even corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives will require the presentation of research findings to prove their feasibility.

Market research and technical research are examples of business-type research presentations you will commonly encounter.

In this article, we’ve compiled all the essential tips, including some examples and templates, to get you started with creating and delivering a stellar research presentation tailored specifically for the business context.

Various research suggests that the average attention span of adults during presentations is around 20 minutes, with a notable drop in an engagement at the 10-minute mark . Beyond that, you might see your audience doing other things.

How can you avoid such a mistake? The answer lies in the adage “keep it simple, stupid” or KISS. We don’t mean dumbing down your content but rather presenting it in a way that is easily digestible and accessible to your audience. One way you can do this is by organizing your research presentation using a clear structure.

Here are the slides you should prioritize when creating your research presentation PowerPoint.

1.  Title Page

The title page is the first thing your audience will see during your presentation, so put extra effort into it to make an impression. Of course, writing presentation titles and title pages will vary depending on the type of presentation you are to deliver. In the case of a research presentation, you want a formal and academic-sounding one. It should include:

• The full title of the report
• The date of the report
• The name of the researchers or department in charge of the report
• The name of the organization for which the presentation is intended

When writing the title of your research presentation, it should reflect the topic and objective of the report. Focus only on the subject and avoid adding redundant phrases like “A research on” or “A study on.” However, you may use phrases like “Market Analysis” or “Feasibility Study” because they help identify the purpose of the presentation. Doing so also serves a long-term purpose for the filing and later retrieving of the document.

Here’s a sample title page for a hypothetical market research presentation from Gillette .

2. Executive Summary Slide

The executive summary marks the beginning of the body of the presentation, briefly summarizing the key discussion points of the research. Specifically, the summary may state the following:

• The purpose of the investigation and its significance within the organization’s goals
• The methods used for the investigation
• The major findings of the investigation
• The conclusions and recommendations after the investigation

Although the executive summary encompasses the entry of the research presentation, it should not dive into all the details of the work on which the findings, conclusions, and recommendations were based. Creating the executive summary requires a focus on clarity and brevity, especially when translating it to a PowerPoint document where space is limited.

Each point should be presented in a clear and visually engaging manner to capture the audience’s attention and set the stage for the rest of the presentation. Use visuals, bullet points, and minimal text to convey information efficiently.

3. Introduction/ Project Description Slides

In this section, your goal is to provide your audience with the information that will help them understand the details of the presentation. Provide a detailed description of the project, including its goals, objectives, scope, and methods for gathering and analyzing data.

You want to answer these fundamental questions:

• What specific questions are you trying to answer, problems you aim to solve, or opportunities you seek to explore?
• Why is this project important, and what prompted it?
• What are the boundaries of your research or initiative? 
• How were the data gathered?

Important: The introduction should exclude specific findings, conclusions, and recommendations.

4. Data Presentation and Analyses Slides

This is the longest section of a research presentation, as you’ll present the data you’ve gathered and provide a thorough analysis of that data to draw meaningful conclusions. The format and components of this section can vary widely, tailored to the specific nature of your research.

For example, if you are doing market research, you may include the market potential estimate, competitor analysis, and pricing analysis. These elements will help your organization determine the actual viability of a market opportunity.

Visual aids like charts, graphs, tables, and diagrams are potent tools to convey your key findings effectively. These materials may be numbered and sequenced (Figure 1, Figure 2, and so forth), accompanied by text to make sense of the insights.

5. Conclusions

The conclusion of a research presentation is where you pull together the ideas derived from your data presentation and analyses in light of the purpose of the research. For example, if the objective is to assess the market of a new product, the conclusion should determine the requirements of the market in question and tell whether there is a product-market fit.

Designing your conclusion slide should be straightforward and focused on conveying the key takeaways from your research. Keep the text concise and to the point. Present it in bullet points or numbered lists to make the content easily scannable.

6. Recommendations

The findings of your research might reveal elements that may not align with your initial vision or expectations. These deviations are addressed in the recommendations section of your presentation, which outlines the best course of action based on the result of the research.

What emerging markets should we target next? Do we need to rethink our pricing strategies? Which professionals should we hire for this special project? — these are some of the questions that may arise when coming up with this part of the research.

Recommendations may be combined with the conclusion, but presenting them separately to reinforce their urgency. In the end, the decision-makers in the organization or your clients will make the final call on whether to accept or decline the recommendations.

7. Questions Slide

Members of your audience are not involved in carrying out your research activity, which means there’s a lot they don’t know about its details. By offering an opportunity for questions, you can invite them to bridge that gap, seek clarification, and engage in a dialogue that enhances their understanding.

If your research is more business-oriented, facilitating a question and answer after your presentation becomes imperative as it’s your final appeal to encourage buy-in for your recommendations.

A simple “Ask us anything” slide can indicate that you are ready to accept questions.

1. Focus on the Most Important Findings

The truth about presenting research findings is that your audience doesn’t need to know everything. Instead, they should receive a distilled, clear, and meaningful overview that focuses on the most critical aspects.

You will likely have to squeeze in the oral presentation of your research into a 10 to 20-minute presentation, so you have to make the most out of the time given to you. In the presentation, don’t soak in the less important elements like historical backgrounds. Decision-makers might even ask you to skip these portions and focus on sharing the findings.

2. Do Not Read Word-per-word

Reading word-for-word from your presentation slides intensifies the danger of losing your audience’s interest. Its effect can be detrimental, especially if the purpose of your research presentation is to gain approval from the audience. So, how can you avoid this mistake?

• Make a conscious design decision to keep the text on your slides minimal. Your slides should serve as visual cues to guide your presentation.
• Structure your presentation as a narrative or story. Stories are more engaging and memorable than dry, factual information.
• Prepare speaker notes with the key points of your research. Glance at it when needed.
• Engage with the audience by maintaining eye contact and asking rhetorical questions.

3. Don’t Go Without Handouts

Handouts are paper copies of your presentation slides that you distribute to your audience. They typically contain the summary of your key points, but they may also provide supplementary information supporting data presented through tables and graphs.

The purpose of distributing presentation handouts is to easily retain the key points you presented as they become good references in the future. Distributing handouts in advance allows your audience to review the material and come prepared with questions or points for discussion during the presentation.

4. Actively Listen

An equally important skill that a presenter must possess aside from speaking is the ability to listen. We are not just talking about listening to what the audience is saying but also considering their reactions and nonverbal cues. If you sense disinterest or confusion, you can adapt your approach on the fly to re-engage them.

For example, if some members of your audience are exchanging glances, they may be skeptical of the research findings you are presenting. This is the best time to reassure them of the validity of your data and provide a concise overview of how it came to be. You may also encourage them to seek clarification.

5. Be Confident

Anxiety can strike before a presentation – it’s a common reaction whenever someone has to speak in front of others. If you can’t eliminate your stress, try to manage it.

People hate public speaking not because they simply hate it. Most of the time, it arises from one’s belief in themselves. You don’t have to take our word for it. Take Maslow’s theory that says a threat to one’s self-esteem is a source of distress among an individual.

Now, how can you master this feeling? You’ve spent a lot of time on your research, so there is no question about your topic knowledge. Perhaps you just need to rehearse your research presentation. If you know what you will say and how to say it, you will gain confidence in presenting your work.

All sources you use in creating your research presentation should be given proper credit. The APA Style is the most widely used citation style in formal research.

In-text citation

Add references within the text of your presentation slide by giving the author’s last name, year of publication, and page number (if applicable) in parentheses after direct quotations or paraphrased materials. As in:

The alarming rate at which global temperatures rise directly impacts biodiversity (Smith, 2020, p. 27).

If the author’s name and year of publication are mentioned in the text, add only the page number in parentheses after the quotations or paraphrased materials. As in:

According to Smith (2020), the alarming rate at which global temperatures rise directly impacts biodiversity (p. 27).

Image citation

All images from the web, including photos, graphs, and tables, used in your slides should be credited using the format below.

Creator’s Last Name, First Name. “Title of Image.” Website Name, Day Mo. Year, URL. Accessed Day Mo. Year.

Work cited page

A work cited page or reference list should follow after the last slide of your presentation. The list should be alphabetized by the author’s last name and initials followed by the year of publication, the title of the book or article, the place of publication, and the publisher. As in:

Smith, J. A. (2020). Climate Change and Biodiversity: A Comprehensive Study. New York, NY: ABC Publications.

When citing a document from a website, add the source URL after the title of the book or article instead of the place of publication and the publisher. As in:

Smith, J. A. (2020). Climate Change and Biodiversity: A Comprehensive Study. Retrieved from https://www.smith.com/climate-change-and-biodiversity.

1. Research Project Presentation PowerPoint Template

A slide deck containing 18 different slides intended to take off the weight of how to make a research presentation. With tons of visual aids, presenters can reference existing research on similar projects to this one – or link another research presentation example – provide an accurate data analysis, disclose the methodology used, and much more.

Use This Template

2. Research Presentation Scientific Method Diagram PowerPoint Template

Whenever you intend to raise questions, expose the methodology you used for your research, or even suggest a scientific method approach for future analysis, this circular wheel diagram is a perfect fit for any presentation study.

Customize all of its elements to suit the demands of your presentation in just minutes.

3. Thesis Research Presentation PowerPoint Template

If your research presentation project belongs to academia, then this is the slide deck to pair that presentation. With a formal aesthetic and minimalistic style, this research presentation template focuses only on exposing your information as clearly as possible.

Use its included bar charts and graphs to introduce data, change the background of each slide to suit the topic of your presentation, and customize each of its elements to meet the requirements of your project with ease.

4. Animated Research Cards PowerPoint Template

Visualize ideas and their connection points with the help of this research card template for PowerPoint. This slide deck, for example, can help speakers talk about alternative concepts to what they are currently managing and its possible outcomes, among different other usages this versatile PPT template has. Zoom Animation effects make a smooth transition between cards (or ideas).

5. Research Presentation Slide Deck for PowerPoint

With a distinctive professional style, this research presentation PPT template helps business professionals and academics alike to introduce the findings of their work to team members or investors.

By accessing this template, you get the following slides:

• Introduction
• Problem Statement
• Research Questions
• Conceptual Research Framework (Concepts, Theories, Actors, & Constructs)
• Study design and methods
• Population & Sampling
• Data Collection
• Data Analysis

Check it out today and craft a powerful research presentation out of it!

A successful research presentation in business is not just about presenting data; it’s about persuasion to take meaningful action. It’s the bridge that connects your research efforts to the strategic initiatives of your organization. To embark on this journey successfully, planning your presentation thoroughly is paramount, from designing your PowerPoint to the delivery.

Take a look and get inspiration from the sample research presentation slides above, put our tips to heart, and transform your research findings into a compelling call to action.

Like this article? Please share

Academics, Presentation Approaches, Research & Development Filed under Presentation Ideas

Related Articles

Filed under Design • March 27th, 2024

How to Make a Presentation Graph

Detailed step-by-step instructions to master the art of how to make a presentation graph in PowerPoint and Google Slides. Check it out!

Filed under Presentation Ideas • February 29th, 2024

How to Make a Fundraising Presentation (with Thermometer Templates & Slides)

Meet a new framework to design fundraising presentations by harnessing the power of fundraising thermometer templates. Detailed guide with examples.

Filed under Presentation Ideas • February 15th, 2024

How to Create a 5 Minutes Presentation

Master the art of short-format speeches like the 5 minutes presentation with this article. Insights on content structure, audience engagement and more.

Leave a Reply

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF AN EXPLORING ITEM

Oct 05, 2014

1.42k liked | 4.06k Views

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ADENINE RESEARCH RELATED. By : Noor Shareeza Azzura Binti Shahruddin MPU 101513 Cik Ku Rohaya BORON inti Che Ko Ali MPU 101424 Presents up : Prof. Dr. Baharuddin Waste Alice. 03-Article-037-NorAziah-UiTM version 2[1]. pdf. TITLE. T itle is written in general PRIMER Collaboration: PRESENTATION AND TRANSLATION OF MEDICAL RESEARCH. Group that aims to improve which design of student, them presentation, interpretation ...

Share Feature

Embedded code.

• learningnet system
• interested profiles
• concern profile
• learning management arrangement
• adopting learning management system

IMPORTANT ANALYSIS OF ONE RESEARCH ARTICLE

Presentation log.

KRITISCHER ANALYSIS OF A RESEARCH ARTICLE Until : NoorShareezaAzzuraBintiShahruddin MPU 101513 Cik Ku RohayaBintiChe Kit Ali MPU 101424 Presented to : Prof. Dr. Baharuddin Bin Aris

03-Article-037-NorAziah-UiTM version 2[1].pdf

TITLES • Title is written in popular • Who test variables become not clearly stated

A Good Heading • Written as specific as possible • Have the experimental variables (independent and dependent variables) • Maybe the writer can change the title on “The use of adopting Learning Management System heading the opinion in teaching and learning”.

ABSTRACT trouble statements sample method product

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION • Footing Definition • Research Questions / Problem Statements • Previous Study & Theories • Aspiration • Objectives / Purposes • Hypothesis

Terms Definition

Research Questions /Problem Affirmations

Previous Study & Theories

Objectives / Purposes

Hypothesis • In is does hypothesis alternatively any expected findings included at the study

METHODOLOGY

VARIABLES • The main variation incorporated within one study your the lecturer’s concern to the early stage of the diffusion and adoption process • Independent Variable : Learning Management System • Dependent Varia : Stages from worries with CBAM

Stages the Concerns

SAMPLE • 12 von INSTEAD lecturers who must either used the LMS or attended a training session turn the IIUM LearningNet Systematischer

DATA RALLYING • 35 items of SoCQ (Stages of Concern Questionnaire) upon CBAM (Concern Bases Adoption Model) using eight-point Likert scale. • Means is pointing reflects the participants present concerns • Score from the responses are being summarise into 5 items concerning stages

DATA ANALYSIS • The total for each stage be the crude stage score. • Per tables desire convert raw stage lots to percentile figures. • From these percentile figures, the researcher plotted stages of concern profile.

Stages of concern profile : • identify the peak or predominantly stages on concerns and the relative intensive of other concerns • Presented the user at different stages of concern (such such nonuser or very early user)

Raw Stage Scores

Scene of Concern Profile

High Level Scores of Participants

RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS • According to the investigators, the sizing and non random selection of sample does not justify the use of any statistical test. • Resulting, they reported all findings as a descriptive still sufficient to answer the find questions posed.

OUTCOME • The participants’ concern outlines and vorwiegen arenas of concerns • Technology based education concerns

The participants’ care profiles and predominant stages of concerns • The researcher application of raw score table to gives view von the raw scores of select the participants at each stage of concern. • The mean raw stage scores for the entire group off participant determines the mixture steps of concern profile for the INSTED user of lecturers.

Your derived the Interpretations of the sample profiles from instrument administration guidelines for Dining & Hord (2001) real their Stages of About theoretical framework. • The High Stage Scores are also exams to the participants. • These scores are important primary indicators in the interpretation of concerns.

To demonstration participant’s business, individual concern contour is also generated. • The participants’ profiles exhibit a strong dip where management is concerned but likely high interest at the public level. • These is probably due to the fact that INSTED is at the initial stage of implementing the LearningNet System until the faculty members.

Technics based education concerns • ONE qual analysis of which responses given by that participants gives an insight to their most pressing concern. • An scientist quotes the participants response until determine their concern about the LMS.

CONCLUSIONS • The concerns among the participants with regard to the use of the LearningNet systeme centres switch the human issues • Display in opening mindedness among the participants when dealing with the new technology • There is one positive position and a high likelihood the the LearningNet System will be adopted by the participants.

SUGGESTIONS • It the important to set this designation and list for staff development programs aimed at integrating the LMS online environment on their teaching realms. • It is imperative that potential adopters know what the MiTechLearningNet System is.

It a also corresponding to carry out an analysis of aforementioned potential users’ level of computer and technic ability. • An emphasizing on innovation, very than the tech must exist adopted

PROFESSIONAL • The researcher inserted a list are twentieth one mentions. • Nevertheless, third of the references are comparatively old and is does not get by with an fast advancement on technology and education especially that on many casing newer studies usually reports older studies if they live related.

COMPARATIVELY OLD REFERENCES

• More by User

Summarizing a Explore Story

Summarizing a Find Article. Taken Since: Universities for Washington Psychology Writing Home. Journal Article. Title Abstract Introduction Method Results Discussion Recommendations. Liest the Articles. Scan the article Identify of research question and reason for the study (Intro) Critical Research of Choose Reports and Articles

689 view • 12 slide

CRITICAL RATING OF DIAGNOSTIC ARTICLE

JOURNAL CUDGEL. CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF DIAGNOSTIC RELATED. ALI A. ALBALUSHI EMERGENCY MEDICINE R- 4. Does End Tidal CO2 Supervisory During Emergency Department Procedural Sedation and Analgesia With Propofol Decrease and Incidence the Hypoxic Events?. Randomized, Controlled Free. Critical analysis away research report

1.1k show • 64 declines

Anatomy of a Research Article

Anatomy of a Investigation Article. AbstractPurposeSubjectProcedureData analysisResultsEvaluation: Is information about these key aspects of the research included?. Anatomy of a Doing Article. Introduction additionally backgroundIdentify the item areaReview of related LiteraturePurpose of the stu

387 views • 10 slides

LETTER AMPERE RESEARCH FEATURED

WRITING A RESEARCH PIECE. Dr. Rob Danin Senior English Language Fellow www.robdanin.com. FORMAT FOR THE PAPER. TITLE Make your page specific enough to describing the contents of one paper. Which title should been appropriate for the intended audience. Data are usually collected in a roughly structure furthermore thus the inherent information is difficult to understand. Therefore, raw data need to are summarized, processed, and analyzed. However, no matter how well manipulated, the information related from the raw ...

469 viewpoint • 22 slides

That Basics of How A Choose Article

The Basics of Reading A Research Article. Amy Gutman MD ~ EMS Heilkunde Film [email protected] / www.TEAEMS.com. EMS Research History Technical Breaking down research articles E vidence-based medicine Research technical Summarize.

696 views • 52 slides

The Review away a Journal Article

That Analysis of adenine Journal Blog. Anindia Lokitavera Episiasi Pratama Irwin Talenta Wendi Kufrabawa. Influences of Culture and Sexes in Comprehension from Speech Acts of Indirect Request . Rabe’a Shams &amp; Acquaint Afghari

569 views • 30 slides

CRITICAL PROFESSIONAL OF ARTICLE ON HARM

CRITICIZE APPRAISAL OF ARTICLE ON HARM. Discontinuing Rheumatic Fever Preventative in Selected Adolescents and Young Adults: AMPERE Prospective Studying Ximena Berrios , MD; Emilo del Campo , MD; Beatriz Gumman , RN; and Alan L. Bisno , MD .

398 views • 10 slides

Computer Research – Product Analysis

Computer Research – Product Analysis. Review the following 3 article: Parts 1: The Germ Creator a Generation of Orphans AIDS in Africa – The Orphaned Continent AIDS Orphan's Prevented Death Challenges Diese Left Behind Select 1 article to create a 1-page fact sheet Research critique is a mechanize to deliver feedback for ... Criticism after verbal powerpoint of studies. Critiques after published find gutachten.

187 views • 4 slides

Reading a Research Article

Reading adenine Research Article. Reading Reasearch Articles. Little will you continually read straight through a paper the a linear fashion - from introduction to the discussion paragraph. Critical analysis of research article - Download the a PDF or viewing online for free

149 views • 3 slides

Critical Appraisal of an Article on HARM

Wichtig Appraisal Is on potential harm after administering allopurinol in patients with gout and azotemia ? PUBMED Mesh Terms: Allopurinol Gout Adverse Events Renne Function. Critical Appraisal of an Products up HARM. Catmaker. Validity Guidelines ... analysis and the conclusions of of paper. To second reason has that an formal style will... Education. 16:9.

272 views • 7 flip

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF A RESEARCH ARTICLE

KRITISCHEN ANALYSIS THE A RESEARCH ARTICLE. By : Noor Shareeza Azzura Binti Shahruddin MP 101513 Cik Kuka Rohaya Binti Che Ku Alice MP 101424 Presented to : Prof. Dr. Baharuddin Bin Aris. 03-Article-037-NorAziah-UiTM version 2[1]. pdf. TITLE. T itle is written inside general Free Research Google Slides plus Byer templates

727 views • 44 rolling

Basic Structure of a Research Article

Basic Structure of a Research Related. Why m I am doing this? Why shoud you be interested? What did ME do – top level questions, goals are photo? Which else has complete equivalent things? How does my work fit in? How did EGO go about answering my questions: (details) : A. print, explore method

432 views • 16 slides

A Critical Analysis

A Kritischer Analysis. Dr. Walter Dorner Canadians Forces College 3 December 2007. Origins. General Charles Krulak Marine Corps Commandant (1995-99).

669 views • 54 slides

Anatomy of a Research Article. Five (or six) major sections Abstract Introduction (without one heading!) Method (and procedures) Results Discussion furthermore conclusions References. Anatomy of a Research Article. Abstract Purpose Subject Procedure Data analysis Results

205 views • 9 slides

WRITING A RESEARCH ARTICLE

WRITING A RESEARCH ARTICLE. Dr. Rob Danin Senior English Words Fellow http://robdanin.wix.com/elfellow. FORMAT AVAILABLE THE PAPER. TITLE Make your page specific sufficiently to delineate the contents of the paper. The title should be suitable for the intended audience.

611 views • 22 slides

Critical Appraisal of a Scientific Item on Therapy

Critical Appraisal of a Scientific Article on Therapy. Nihal Thomas MD DNB (Endo) MNAMS FRACP (Endo) FRCP(Edin) Professor, Department of Endocrinology, Christian Medical Your , Vellore, India. Phase of Trials. Essential examination of choose report - Download as adenine PDF or view online fork free

518 views • 32 flip

Publication of Research Product

Dr. S. Umesha, PhD. Associate Profs DOS in Biotechnology University of Mysore Manasagangotri Mysore- 570006. Publication of Research Article. Nov, 2011. Postpone of Contents. Introducing Part ME: Publication &amp; Peer Review Deciding to Publish Submitting Your Paper By Submission Critical appraisal is the proceed of carefully. And systematically examine the exploration paper to. judge its trustworthiness, and its set and. relevance within a ...

836 opinions • 43 slides

Investigate Paper Critical Investigation

Research Paper Critical Analysis. 10 ways to look at a research paper systematically for critical data. NUR 599T Human Factors In Healthcare Engineering. Dr. Vincent Duffy Research Paper Analysis Submitting due RuthAnn Smolen, RN, MS Ed, HNP, Jump 19, 2007. Statistical data presentation

611 watch • 13 image

research article analysis sample

doing article analysis sample

488 see • 4 dias

Magazine Investigation

Article research.

169 views • 5 slides

Hey loook an cool description

130 views • 4 slides

Critical Appraisal of a Scientific Article on Therapy

Criticism Appraisal of a Scientific Article on Therapy. Nihal Thomas MD DNB (Endo) MNAMS FRACP (Endo) FRCP(Edin) Prof, Dept from Endocrinology, Christian Medical College , Vellore, Indians. Phase of Trials.

404 views • 32 slides