essay of war communism

Sign Up Today

Start your 14 day free trial today

The History Hit Miscellany of Facts, Figures and Fascinating Finds

• 20th Century

War Communism: Lenin’s Plan to Bolster the Red Army

Lucy Davidson

21 jan 2022, @lucejuiceluce.

From 1918 to 1921, Russia was embroiled in a Civil War, fought between the Bolsheviks’ Red Army and their various enemies, known collectively as the White Army. To sustain the Bolshevik war effort, Vladimir Lenin introduced the economic policy of ‘war communism’, which involved nationalising industrial output, banning private enterprise and requisitioning surplus grain.

Ultimately, the Bolsheviks won the war. But by the time war communism came to an end 2 years after its conception, the policy had caused Russia’s industrial output to plummet, the collapse of the ruble and millions of famine-related deaths. It was replaced with the New Economic Policy in 1921.

But how exactly did war communism work, and what were its aims? Here’s the history of war communism during the Russian Civil War.

The aims of war communism are debated

War communism included the following policies:

• Nationalization of all industries and the introduction of strict centralised management
• State control of foreign trade
• Strict discipline for workers, with strikes forbidden
• Obligatory labour duty by non-working classes (“militarisation of labour”, including an early version of the Gulag)
• Prodrazvyorstka – requisition of agricultural surplus (in excess of an absolute minimum) from peasants for centralised distribution among the remaining population
• Rationing of food and most commodities, with centralised distribution in urban centres
• Private enterprise banned
• Military-style control of the railways

Though these measures may appear coherent, the government implemented them during a time of civil war, with the result being that the policies were often poorly-coordinated, if at all. Large areas of Russia were outside of Bolshevik control, while poor communications from Moscow meant that even those loyal to the government often had to act individually.

Distributing fuel rations on 5 January 1921.

Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Many have argued that war communism didn’t represent an actual economic policy, and instead was a set of measures intended to win the civil war.

Indeed, though war communism proved successful in achieving its primary purpose – aiding the Red Army in halting the advance of the White Army , and reclaiming most of the territory of the former Russian Empire – the economic strength of Russia in all areas fell below the 1914 level. War communism turned into a disaster.

Famine was widespread

Peasant farmers knew that any excess crops would be seized by the state, so grew only for themselves. People in the countryside refused to co-operate in giving food for the war effort, while bad harvests compounded the hardships that the war caused. Malnutrition and disease were common.

‘Famine’ by Ivan Vladimirov (1870-1947).

The result was that industrial cities were starved of food, and workers started moving to the countryside to grow their own food, which further decreased the possibility of barter of industrial goods for food and worsened the plight of the remaining urban population.

Between 1918 and 1920, Petrograd lost 70% of its population, while Moscow lost over 50% and the number working in factories and mines dropped by 50%. In total, in those 2 years, Russia lost 33% of its urban population to the countryside.

Moreover, most countryside lands were used for the growth of food at the time, meaning crops such as cotton and flax weren’t favoured. Without the necessary supply, factories in urban centres were deprived of basic manufacturing commodities.

In all, food requisitioning combined with the effects of seven years of war and a severe drought contributed to a devastating famine that caused a staggering 3-10 million deaths.

Strikes and rebellions broke out

Worker and peasant strikes and rebellions broke out across the country. The Kronstadt Rebellion of March 1921 particularly startled Lenin , who regarded the sailors there as the ‘reddest of the reds’. These uprisings were of further concern since they were led by opportunist leftists, which created competition with the Bolsheviks.

Suppression of the Kronstadt mutiny. Soldiers of the Red Army attack the island fortress of Kronstadt on the ice of the Gulf of Finland.

In February 1921, the Communist Party’s secret police, the Cheka , reported 118 peasant uprisings. In spite of these protests, the Russian government actually suffered relatively few effective or potentially disruptive uprisings while implementing its policy of war communism.

A black market emerged

The ruble collapsed, meaning that barter increasingly replaced money as a medium of exchange, and 90% of wages were paid with goods rather than money. A black market emerged, in spite of the threat of martial law against profiteering.

Though also illegal, private trade became commonplace, and more people were engaged in it than during any other time in Russia’s history. Above board, by 1920 the average worker had a productivity rate that was around 44% less than the 1913 figure.

The strangulation on goods and money was exacerbated by a disastrous rail system, which, by the end of 1918, meant that it was difficult to transport anything of value across Russia.

Attitudes towards the government differed

Within urban areas, many were convinced that their leaders were right and the collective failure of the system was the fault of the White Army . It was also easy to blame international capitalists, since no foreign country was prepared to trade with a Bolshevik-run Russia, and between 1918 and November 1920, the Allies formally blockaded Russia.

Many in Bolshevik territories were genuinely keen to see a Bolshevik civil war victory, so were prepared to do whatever was necessary to avoid a White Army victory.

A Bolshevik requisitioning brigade on 6 January 1921.

The Bolsheviks were also able to blame a lot of Russia’s troubles on the Whites as they controlled the areas which would have supplied the factories with produce. The Urals, which normally provided Petrograd and Tula with coal and iron, were cut off from Bolshevik Russia from spring 1918 to November 1919.

Similarly, oil fields were in the hands of the Whites, while the Bolsheviks’ Red Army took the majority of supplies in their fight against them.

Lenin put a stop to war communism

While the civil war raged, the harshness of war communism was, in the eyes of Russia’s rulers, justifiable. When it had finished, there was no such justification, and a government claiming to represent the people now found itself on the verge of being overthrown by the workers it purported to serve.

The crisis undermined widespread loyalty to the government: Lenin needed to take decisive action. In February 1921, Lenin replaced war communism with his New Economic Policy , which he characterised as comprising of “a free market and capitalism, both subject to state control”.

The incentive to produce for money was re-introduced, and the horrors of years of war communism were consigned to history.

You May Also Like

Mac and Cheese in 1736? The Stories of Kensington Palace’s Servants

The Peasants’ Revolt: Rise of the Rebels

10 Myths About Winston Churchill

Medusa: What Was a Gorgon?

10 Facts About the Battle of Shrewsbury

5 of Our Top Podcasts About the Norman Conquest of 1066

How Did 3 People Seemingly Escape From Alcatraz?

5 of Our Top Documentaries About the Norman Conquest of 1066

1848: The Year of Revolutions

What Prompted the Boston Tea Party?

15 Quotes by Nelson Mandela

The History of Advent

More results...

War Communism

War Communism was the name given to the economic system that existed in Russia from 1918 to 1921. War Communism was introduced by Lenin to combat the economic problems brought on by the civil war in Russia. It was a combination of emergency measures and socialist dogma.

One of the first measures of War Communism was the nationalisation of land . Banks and shipping were also nationalised and foreign trade was declared a state monopoly. This was the response when Lenin realised that the Bolsheviks were simply unprepared to take over the whole economic system of Russia. Lenin stressed the importance of the workers showing discipline and a will to work hard if the revolution was to survive. There were those in the Bolshevik hierarchy who wanted factory managers removed and the workers to take over the factories for themselves but on behalf of the people. It was felt that the workers would work better if they believed they were working for a cause as opposed to a system that made some rich but many poor. The civil war had made many in the Bolsheviks even more class antagonistic, as there were many of the old guard who were fighting to destroy the Bolsheviks.

On June 28th, 1918, a decree was passed that ended all forms of private capitalism. Many large factories were taken over by the state and on November 29th, 1920, any factory/industry that employed over 10 workers was nationalised.

War Communism also took control of the distribution of food. The Food Commissariat was set up to carry out this task. All co-operatives were fused together under this Commissariat.

War Communism had six principles:

1)   Production should be run by the state. Private ownership should be kept to the minimum. Private houses were to be confiscated by the state.

2)   State control was to be granted over the labour of every citizen. Once a military army had served its purpose, it would become a labour army.

3)   The state should produce everything in its own undertakings. The state tried to control the activities of millions of peasants.

4)   Extreme centralisation was introduced. The economic life of the area controlled by the Bolsheviks was put into the hands of just a few organisations. The most important one was the Supreme Economic Council. This had the right to confiscate and requisition. The speciality of the SEC was the management of industry. Over 40 head departments (known as glavki) were set up to accomplish this. One glavki could be responsible for thousands of factories. This frequently resulted in chronic inefficiency. The Commissariat of Transport controlled the railways. The Commissariat of Agriculture controlled what the peasants did.

5)   The state attempted to become the soul distributor as well as the sole producer. The Commissariats took what they needed to meet demands. The people were divided into four categories – manual workers in harmful trades, workers who performed hard physical labour, workers in light tasks/housewives and professional people. Food was distributed on a 4:3:2:1 ratio. Though the manual class was the favoured class, it still received little food. Many in the professional class simply starved. It is believed that about 0% of all food consumed came from an illegal source. On July 20th 1918, the Bolsheviks decided that all surplus food had to be surrendered to the state. This led to an increase in the supply of grain to the state. From 1917 to 1928, about ¾ million ton was collected by the state. In 1920 to 1921, this had risen to about 6 million tons. However, the policy of having to hand over surplus food caused huge resentment in the countryside, especially as Lenin had promised “all land to the people” pre-November 1917. While the peasants had the land, they had not been made aware that they would have to hand over any extra food they produced from their land. Even the extra could not meet demand. In 1933, 25 million tons of grain was collected and this only just met demand.

6)   War Communism attempted to abolish money as a means of exchange. The Bolsheviks wanted to go over to a system of a natural economy in which all transactions were carried out in kind. Effectively, bartering would be introduced. By 1921, the value of the rouble had dropped massively and inflation had markedly increased. The government’s revenue raising ability was chronically poor, as it had abolished most taxes. The only tax allowed was the ‘Extraordinary Revolutionary Tax’, which was targeted at the rich and not the workers.

War Communism was a disaster. In all areas, the economic strength of Russia fell below the 1914 level. Peasant farmers only grew for themselves, as they knew that any extra would be taken by the state. Therefore, the industrial cities were starved of food despite the introduction of the 4:3:2:1 ratio. A bad harvest could be disastrous for the countryside – and even worse for cities. Malnutrition was common, as was disease. Those in the cities believed that their only hope was to move out to the countryside and grow food for themselves. Between 1916 and 1920, the cities of northern and central Russia lost 33% of their population to the countryside. Under War Communism, the number of those working in the factories and mines dropped by 50%.

In the cities, private trade was illegal, but more people were engaged in this than at any other time in Russia’s history. Large factories became paralysed through lack of fuel and skilled labour.

Small factories were in 1920 producing just 43% of their 1913 total. Large factories were producing 18% of their 1913 figure. Coal production was at 27% of its 1913 figure in 1920. With little food to nourish them, it could not be expected that the workers could work effectively. By 1920, the average worker had a productivity rate that was 44% less than the 1913 figure.

Even if anything of value could be produced, the ability to move it around Russia was limited. By the end of 1918, Russia’s rail system was in chaos.

In the countryside, most land was used for the growth of food. Crops such as flax and cotton simply were not grown. Between 1913 and 1920, there was an 87% drop in the number of acres given over to cotton production. Therefore, those factories producing cotton related products were starved of the most basic commodity they needed.

How did the people react to War Communism? Within the cities, many were convinced that their leaders were right and the failings being experienced were the fault of the Whites and international capitalists. There were few strikes during War Communism – though Lenin was quick to have anyone arrested who seemed to be a potential cause of trouble. Those in Bolshevik held territory were also keen to see a Bolshevik victory in the civil war, so they were prepared to do what was necessary. The alternate – a White victory – was unthinkable.

Also the Bolshevik hierarchy could blame a lot of Russia’s troubles on the Whites as they controlled the areas, which would have supplied the factories with produce. The Urals provided Petrograd and Tula with coal and iron for their factories. The Urals was completely separated from Bolshevik Russia from the spring of 1918 to November 1919. Oil fields were in the hands of the Whites. Also the Bolshevik’s Red Army took up the majority of whatever supplies there were in their fight against the Whites.

No foreign country was prepared to trade with the Russia controlled by the Bolsheviks, so foreign trade ceased to exist. Between 1918 and November 1920, the Allies formally blockaded Russia.

The harshness of War Communism could be justified whilst the civil war was going on. When it had finished, there could be no such justification. There were violent rebellions in Tambov and in Siberia. The sailors in Kronstadt mutinied. Lenin faced the very real risk of an uprising of workers and peasants and he needed to show the type of approach to the problem that the tsarist regime was incapable of doing. In February 1921, Lenin had decided to do away with War Communism and replace it with a completely different system – the New Economic Policy . This was put to the 10th Party Conference in March and accepted. War Communism was swept away. During War Communism, the people had no incentive to produce as money had been abolished. They did what needed to be done because of the civil war, but once this had ended Lenin could not use it as an excuse any longer.

• Search Menu
• Browse content in Arts and Humanities
• Browse content in Archaeology
• Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Archaeology
• Archaeological Methodology and Techniques
• Archaeology by Region
• Archaeology of Religion
• Archaeology of Trade and Exchange
• Biblical Archaeology
• Contemporary and Public Archaeology
• Environmental Archaeology
• Historical Archaeology
• History and Theory of Archaeology
• Industrial Archaeology
• Landscape Archaeology
• Mortuary Archaeology
• Prehistoric Archaeology
• Underwater Archaeology
• Urban Archaeology
• Zooarchaeology
• Browse content in Architecture
• Architectural Structure and Design
• History of Architecture
• Residential and Domestic Buildings
• Theory of Architecture
• Browse content in Art
• Art Subjects and Themes
• History of Art
• Industrial and Commercial Art
• Theory of Art
• Biographical Studies
• Byzantine Studies
• Browse content in Classical Studies
• Classical History
• Classical Philosophy
• Classical Mythology
• Classical Literature
• Classical Reception
• Classical Art and Architecture
• Classical Oratory and Rhetoric
• Greek and Roman Papyrology
• Greek and Roman Epigraphy
• Greek and Roman Law
• Greek and Roman Archaeology
• Late Antiquity
• Religion in the Ancient World
• Digital Humanities
• Browse content in History
• Colonialism and Imperialism
• Diplomatic History
• Environmental History
• Genealogy, Heraldry, Names, and Honours
• Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing
• Historical Geography
• History by Period
• History of Emotions
• History of Agriculture
• History of Education
• History of Gender and Sexuality
• Industrial History
• Intellectual History
• International History
• Labour History
• Legal and Constitutional History
• Local and Family History
• Maritime History
• Military History
• National Liberation and Post-Colonialism
• Oral History
• Political History
• Public History
• Regional and National History
• Revolutions and Rebellions
• Slavery and Abolition of Slavery
• Social and Cultural History
• Theory, Methods, and Historiography
• Urban History
• World History
• Browse content in Language Teaching and Learning
• Language Learning (Specific Skills)
• Language Teaching Theory and Methods
• Browse content in Linguistics
• Applied Linguistics
• Cognitive Linguistics
• Computational Linguistics
• Forensic Linguistics
• Grammar, Syntax and Morphology
• Historical and Diachronic Linguistics
• History of English
• Language Evolution
• Language Reference
• Language Acquisition
• Language Variation
• Language Families
• Lexicography
• Linguistic Anthropology
• Linguistic Theories
• Linguistic Typology
• Phonetics and Phonology
• Psycholinguistics
• Sociolinguistics
• Translation and Interpretation
• Writing Systems
• Browse content in Literature
• Bibliography
• Children's Literature Studies
• Literary Studies (Romanticism)
• Literary Studies (American)
• Literary Studies (Asian)
• Literary Studies (European)
• Literary Studies (Eco-criticism)
• Literary Studies (Modernism)
• Literary Studies - World
• Literary Studies (1500 to 1800)
• Literary Studies (19th Century)
• Literary Studies (20th Century onwards)
• Literary Studies (African American Literature)
• Literary Studies (British and Irish)
• Literary Studies (Early and Medieval)
• Literary Studies (Fiction, Novelists, and Prose Writers)
• Literary Studies (Gender Studies)
• Literary Studies (Graphic Novels)
• Literary Studies (History of the Book)
• Literary Studies (Plays and Playwrights)
• Literary Studies (Poetry and Poets)
• Literary Studies (Postcolonial Literature)
• Literary Studies (Queer Studies)
• Literary Studies (Science Fiction)
• Literary Studies (Travel Literature)
• Literary Studies (War Literature)
• Literary Studies (Women's Writing)
• Literary Theory and Cultural Studies
• Mythology and Folklore
• Shakespeare Studies and Criticism
• Browse content in Media Studies
• Browse content in Music
• Applied Music
• Dance and Music
• Ethics in Music
• Ethnomusicology
• Gender and Sexuality in Music
• Medicine and Music
• Music Cultures
• Music and Media
• Music and Religion
• Music and Culture
• Music Education and Pedagogy
• Music Theory and Analysis
• Musical Scores, Lyrics, and Libretti
• Musical Structures, Styles, and Techniques
• Musicology and Music History
• Performance Practice and Studies
• Race and Ethnicity in Music
• Sound Studies
• Browse content in Performing Arts
• Browse content in Philosophy
• Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art
• Epistemology
• Feminist Philosophy
• History of Western Philosophy
• Metaphysics
• Moral Philosophy
• Non-Western Philosophy
• Philosophy of Language
• Philosophy of Mind
• Philosophy of Perception
• Philosophy of Science
• Philosophy of Action
• Philosophy of Law
• Philosophy of Religion
• Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic
• Practical Ethics
• Social and Political Philosophy
• Browse content in Religion
• Biblical Studies
• Christianity
• East Asian Religions
• History of Religion
• Judaism and Jewish Studies
• Qumran Studies
• Religion and Education
• Religion and Health
• Religion and Politics
• Religion and Science
• Religion and Law
• Religion and Art, Literature, and Music
• Religious Studies
• Browse content in Society and Culture
• Cookery, Food, and Drink
• Cultural Studies
• Customs and Traditions
• Ethical Issues and Debates
• Hobbies, Games, Arts and Crafts
• Lifestyle, Home, and Garden
• Natural world, Country Life, and Pets
• Popular Beliefs and Controversial Knowledge
• Sports and Outdoor Recreation
• Technology and Society
• Travel and Holiday
• Visual Culture
• Browse content in Law
• Arbitration
• Browse content in Company and Commercial Law
• Commercial Law
• Company Law
• Browse content in Comparative Law
• Systems of Law
• Competition Law
• Browse content in Constitutional and Administrative Law
• Government Powers
• Judicial Review
• Local Government Law
• Military and Defence Law
• Parliamentary and Legislative Practice
• Construction Law
• Contract Law
• Browse content in Criminal Law
• Criminal Procedure
• Criminal Evidence Law
• Sentencing and Punishment
• Employment and Labour Law
• Environment and Energy Law
• Browse content in Financial Law
• Banking Law
• Insolvency Law
• History of Law
• Human Rights and Immigration
• Intellectual Property Law
• Browse content in International Law
• Private International Law and Conflict of Laws
• Public International Law
• IT and Communications Law
• Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law
• Law and Politics
• Law and Society
• Browse content in Legal System and Practice
• Courts and Procedure
• Legal Skills and Practice
• Primary Sources of Law
• Regulation of Legal Profession
• Medical and Healthcare Law
• Browse content in Policing
• Criminal Investigation and Detection
• Police and Security Services
• Police Procedure and Law
• Police Regional Planning
• Browse content in Property Law
• Personal Property Law
• Study and Revision
• Terrorism and National Security Law
• Browse content in Trusts Law
• Wills and Probate or Succession
• Browse content in Medicine and Health
• Browse content in Allied Health Professions
• Arts Therapies
• Clinical Science
• Dietetics and Nutrition
• Occupational Therapy
• Operating Department Practice
• Physiotherapy
• Radiography
• Speech and Language Therapy
• Browse content in Anaesthetics
• General Anaesthesia
• Neuroanaesthesia
• Clinical Neuroscience
• Browse content in Clinical Medicine
• Acute Medicine
• Cardiovascular Medicine
• Clinical Genetics
• Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
• Dermatology
• Endocrinology and Diabetes
• Gastroenterology
• Genito-urinary Medicine
• Geriatric Medicine
• Infectious Diseases
• Medical Toxicology
• Medical Oncology
• Pain Medicine
• Palliative Medicine
• Rehabilitation Medicine
• Respiratory Medicine and Pulmonology
• Rheumatology
• Sleep Medicine
• Sports and Exercise Medicine
• Community Medical Services
• Critical Care
• Emergency Medicine
• Forensic Medicine
• Haematology
• History of Medicine
• Browse content in Medical Skills
• Clinical Skills
• Communication Skills
• Nursing Skills
• Surgical Skills
• Browse content in Medical Dentistry
• Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
• Paediatric Dentistry
• Restorative Dentistry and Orthodontics
• Surgical Dentistry
• Medical Ethics
• Medical Statistics and Methodology
• Browse content in Neurology
• Clinical Neurophysiology
• Neuropathology
• Nursing Studies
• Browse content in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
• Gynaecology
• Occupational Medicine
• Ophthalmology
• Otolaryngology (ENT)
• Browse content in Paediatrics
• Neonatology
• Browse content in Pathology
• Chemical Pathology
• Clinical Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics
• Histopathology
• Medical Microbiology and Virology
• Patient Education and Information
• Browse content in Pharmacology
• Psychopharmacology
• Browse content in Popular Health
• Caring for Others
• Complementary and Alternative Medicine
• Self-help and Personal Development
• Browse content in Preclinical Medicine
• Cell Biology
• Molecular Biology and Genetics
• Reproduction, Growth and Development
• Primary Care
• Professional Development in Medicine
• Browse content in Psychiatry
• Addiction Medicine
• Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
• Forensic Psychiatry
• Learning Disabilities
• Old Age Psychiatry
• Psychotherapy
• Browse content in Public Health and Epidemiology
• Epidemiology
• Public Health
• Browse content in Radiology
• Clinical Radiology
• Interventional Radiology
• Nuclear Medicine
• Radiation Oncology
• Reproductive Medicine
• Browse content in Surgery
• Cardiothoracic Surgery
• Gastro-intestinal and Colorectal Surgery
• General Surgery
• Neurosurgery
• Paediatric Surgery
• Peri-operative Care
• Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• Surgical Oncology
• Transplant Surgery
• Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery
• Vascular Surgery
• Browse content in Science and Mathematics
• Browse content in Biological Sciences
• Aquatic Biology
• Biochemistry
• Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
• Developmental Biology
• Ecology and Conservation
• Evolutionary Biology
• Genetics and Genomics
• Microbiology
• Molecular and Cell Biology
• Natural History
• Plant Sciences and Forestry
• Research Methods in Life Sciences
• Structural Biology
• Systems Biology
• Zoology and Animal Sciences
• Browse content in Chemistry
• Analytical Chemistry
• Computational Chemistry
• Crystallography
• Environmental Chemistry
• Industrial Chemistry
• Inorganic Chemistry
• Materials Chemistry
• Medicinal Chemistry
• Mineralogy and Gems
• Organic Chemistry
• Physical Chemistry
• Polymer Chemistry
• Study and Communication Skills in Chemistry
• Theoretical Chemistry
• Browse content in Computer Science
• Artificial Intelligence
• Computer Architecture and Logic Design
• Game Studies
• Human-Computer Interaction
• Mathematical Theory of Computation
• Programming Languages
• Software Engineering
• Systems Analysis and Design
• Virtual Reality
• Browse content in Computing
• Business Applications
• Computer Security
• Computer Games
• Computer Networking and Communications
• Digital Lifestyle
• Graphical and Digital Media Applications
• Operating Systems
• Browse content in Earth Sciences and Geography
• Atmospheric Sciences
• Environmental Geography
• Geology and the Lithosphere
• Maps and Map-making
• Meteorology and Climatology
• Oceanography and Hydrology
• Palaeontology
• Physical Geography and Topography
• Regional Geography
• Soil Science
• Urban Geography
• Browse content in Engineering and Technology
• Agriculture and Farming
• Biological Engineering
• Civil Engineering, Surveying, and Building
• Electronics and Communications Engineering
• Energy Technology
• Engineering (General)
• Environmental Science, Engineering, and Technology
• History of Engineering and Technology
• Mechanical Engineering and Materials
• Technology of Industrial Chemistry
• Transport Technology and Trades
• Browse content in Environmental Science
• Applied Ecology (Environmental Science)
• Conservation of the Environment (Environmental Science)
• Environmental Sustainability
• Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Environmental Science)
• Management of Land and Natural Resources (Environmental Science)
• Natural Disasters (Environmental Science)
• Nuclear Issues (Environmental Science)
• Pollution and Threats to the Environment (Environmental Science)
• Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Environmental Science)
• History of Science and Technology
• Browse content in Materials Science
• Ceramics and Glasses
• Composite Materials
• Metals, Alloying, and Corrosion
• Nanotechnology
• Browse content in Mathematics
• Applied Mathematics
• Biomathematics and Statistics
• History of Mathematics
• Mathematical Education
• Mathematical Finance
• Mathematical Analysis
• Numerical and Computational Mathematics
• Probability and Statistics
• Pure Mathematics
• Browse content in Neuroscience
• Cognition and Behavioural Neuroscience
• Development of the Nervous System
• Disorders of the Nervous System
• History of Neuroscience
• Invertebrate Neurobiology
• Molecular and Cellular Systems
• Neuroendocrinology and Autonomic Nervous System
• Neuroscientific Techniques
• Sensory and Motor Systems
• Browse content in Physics
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
• Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
• Biological and Medical Physics
• Classical Mechanics
• Computational Physics
• Condensed Matter Physics
• Electromagnetism, Optics, and Acoustics
• History of Physics
• Mathematical and Statistical Physics
• Measurement Science
• Nuclear Physics
• Particles and Fields
• Plasma Physics
• Quantum Physics
• Relativity and Gravitation
• Semiconductor and Mesoscopic Physics
• Browse content in Psychology
• Affective Sciences
• Clinical Psychology
• Cognitive Psychology
• Cognitive Neuroscience
• Criminal and Forensic Psychology
• Developmental Psychology
• Educational Psychology
• Evolutionary Psychology
• Health Psychology
• History and Systems in Psychology
• Music Psychology
• Neuropsychology
• Organizational Psychology
• Psychological Assessment and Testing
• Psychology of Human-Technology Interaction
• Psychology Professional Development and Training
• Research Methods in Psychology
• Social Psychology
• Browse content in Social Sciences
• Browse content in Anthropology
• Anthropology of Religion
• Human Evolution
• Medical Anthropology
• Physical Anthropology
• Regional Anthropology
• Social and Cultural Anthropology
• Theory and Practice of Anthropology
• Browse content in Business and Management
• Business Ethics
• Business Strategy
• Business History
• Business and Technology
• Business and Government
• Business and the Environment
• Comparative Management
• Corporate Governance
• Corporate Social Responsibility
• Entrepreneurship
• Health Management
• Human Resource Management
• Industrial and Employment Relations
• Industry Studies
• Information and Communication Technologies
• International Business
• Knowledge Management
• Management and Management Techniques
• Operations Management
• Organizational Theory and Behaviour
• Pensions and Pension Management
• Public and Nonprofit Management
• Strategic Management
• Supply Chain Management
• Browse content in Criminology and Criminal Justice
• Criminal Justice
• Criminology
• Forms of Crime
• International and Comparative Criminology
• Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
• Development Studies
• Browse content in Economics
• Agricultural, Environmental, and Natural Resource Economics
• Asian Economics
• Behavioural Finance
• Behavioural Economics and Neuroeconomics
• Econometrics and Mathematical Economics
• Economic History
• Economic Systems
• Economic Methodology
• Economic Development and Growth
• Financial Markets
• Financial Institutions and Services
• General Economics and Teaching
• Health, Education, and Welfare
• History of Economic Thought
• International Economics
• Labour and Demographic Economics
• Law and Economics
• Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
• Microeconomics
• Public Economics
• Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
• Welfare Economics
• Browse content in Education
• Adult Education and Continuous Learning
• Care and Counselling of Students
• Early Childhood and Elementary Education
• Educational Equipment and Technology
• Educational Strategies and Policy
• Higher and Further Education
• Organization and Management of Education
• Philosophy and Theory of Education
• Schools Studies
• Secondary Education
• Teaching of a Specific Subject
• Teaching of Specific Groups and Special Educational Needs
• Teaching Skills and Techniques
• Browse content in Environment
• Applied Ecology (Social Science)
• Climate Change
• Conservation of the Environment (Social Science)
• Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Social Science)
• Natural Disasters (Environment)
• Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Social Science)
• Browse content in Human Geography
• Cultural Geography
• Economic Geography
• Political Geography
• Browse content in Interdisciplinary Studies
• Communication Studies
• Museums, Libraries, and Information Sciences
• Browse content in Politics
• African Politics
• Asian Politics
• Chinese Politics
• Comparative Politics
• Conflict Politics
• Elections and Electoral Studies
• Environmental Politics
• European Union
• Foreign Policy
• Gender and Politics
• Human Rights and Politics
• Indian Politics
• International Relations
• International Organization (Politics)
• International Political Economy
• Irish Politics
• Latin American Politics
• Middle Eastern Politics
• Political Behaviour
• Political Economy
• Political Institutions
• Political Methodology
• Political Communication
• Political Philosophy
• Political Sociology
• Political Theory
• Politics and Law
• Public Policy
• Public Administration
• Quantitative Political Methodology
• Regional Political Studies
• Russian Politics
• Security Studies
• State and Local Government
• UK Politics
• US Politics
• Browse content in Regional and Area Studies
• African Studies
• Asian Studies
• East Asian Studies
• Japanese Studies
• Latin American Studies
• Middle Eastern Studies
• Native American Studies
• Scottish Studies
• Browse content in Research and Information
• Research Methods
• Browse content in Social Work
• Addictions and Substance Misuse
• Adoption and Fostering
• Care of the Elderly
• Child and Adolescent Social Work
• Couple and Family Social Work
• Developmental and Physical Disabilities Social Work
• Direct Practice and Clinical Social Work
• Emergency Services
• Human Behaviour and the Social Environment
• International and Global Issues in Social Work
• Mental and Behavioural Health
• Social Justice and Human Rights
• Social Policy and Advocacy
• Social Work and Crime and Justice
• Social Work Macro Practice
• Social Work Practice Settings
• Social Work Research and Evidence-based Practice
• Welfare and Benefit Systems
• Browse content in Sociology
• Childhood Studies
• Community Development
• Comparative and Historical Sociology
• Economic Sociology
• Gender and Sexuality
• Gerontology and Ageing
• Health, Illness, and Medicine
• Marriage and the Family
• Migration Studies
• Occupations, Professions, and Work
• Organizations
• Population and Demography
• Race and Ethnicity
• Social Theory
• Social Movements and Social Change
• Social Research and Statistics
• Social Stratification, Inequality, and Mobility
• Sociology of Religion
• Sociology of Education
• Sport and Leisure
• Urban and Rural Studies
• Browse content in Warfare and Defence
• Defence Strategy, Planning, and Research
• Land Forces and Warfare
• Military Administration
• Military Life and Institutions
• Naval Forces and Warfare
• Other Warfare and Defence Issues
• Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution
• Weapons and Equipment

• < Previous chapter
• Next chapter >

3 (page 72) p. 72 War Communism

• Published: February 2002
• Cite Icon Cite
• Permissions Icon Permissions

The October revolution was followed by deep economic collapse. To mobilize the battered forces of industry and agriculture to meet the needs of war, the Bolsheviks set in place the policies that were later termed ‘War Communism’. ‘War Communism’ examines how far the Bolsheviks were able to impose state regulation on the economy along socialist lines and their achievements and failures. From the beginning, they were beset with problems in terms of industrial productivity and supply. The most critical problem was that of food supply. This led to the breakdown of urban life which caused civil war. The civil war saw the hardening conviction that the state was the modality through which socialism would be built.

Signed in as

Institutional accounts.

• GoogleCrawler [DO NOT DELETE]
• Google Scholar Indexing

Personal account

• Sign in with email/username & password
• Get email alerts
• Save searches
• Purchase content
• Activate your purchase/trial code

Institutional access

• Sign in with a library card Sign in with username/password Recommend to your librarian
• Institutional account management
• Get help with access

Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:

IP based access

Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.

Sign in through your institution

Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.

• Click Sign in through your institution.
• Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
• When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
• Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.

If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.

Sign in with a library card

Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.

Society Members

Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:

Sign in through society site

Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:

• Click Sign in through society site.
• When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.

If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.

Sign in using a personal account

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.

A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.

Viewing your signed in accounts

Click the account icon in the top right to:

• View your signed in personal account and access account management features.
• View the institutional accounts that are providing access.

Signed in but can't access content

Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.

For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.

Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.

• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Rights and permissions
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Explaining History Podcast

Modern history podcasts for students and enthusiasts

Explaining Lenin’s Policy of War Communism and the New Economic Policy

Lenin’s policy of War Communism and the New Economic Policy (NEP) were two major economic policies implemented in the Soviet Union during the early 20th century. These policies were introduced in response to the economic and social challenges faced by the Soviet Union, particularly in the aftermath of World War I and the Russian Revolution of 1917.

War Communism was implemented during the Russian Civil War (1918-1921) and was characterized by the nationalization of industry, the requisitioning of grain from peasants, and the establishment of strict state control over the economy. This policy was designed to centralize economic decision-making and provide resources for the Red Army. However, it had a devastating impact on the Soviet economy, leading to widespread famine, economic collapse, and social unrest.

In response to the failures of War Communism, Lenin introduced the New Economic Policy in 1921. This policy was designed to stimulate economic recovery by allowing limited free market activity, including the reintroduction of private trade and the establishment of a mixed economy. The NEP was successful in reviving the Soviet economy, but it also led to the emergence of a wealthy class of entrepreneurs, known as the Nepmen, and created tensions within the Communist Party.

Background on War Communism

War Communism was a policy implemented by the Bolshevik government during the Russian Civil War from 1918 to 1921. This policy was a response to the dire economic and social conditions that existed in Russia at the time. The country was facing a severe shortage of food and other essential goods, and the economy was in shambles due to the devastation caused by World War I and the Russian Revolution.

The main goal of War Communism was to ensure that the Red Army was adequately supplied with food, weapons, and other resources needed to fight the White Army and other anti-Bolshevik forces. This policy involved the nationalization of industry and the forced requisition of grain and other agricultural products from peasants. The Bolsheviks also implemented strict price controls and rationing to ensure that resources were distributed fairly.

However, War Communism had severe consequences for the Russian people. The forced requisition of grain led to widespread famine, and the nationalization of industry resulted in a decline in production and quality of goods. The policy also led to a breakdown in trade and commerce, which further exacerbated the economic crisis.

Despite its shortcomings, War Communism played a crucial role in securing Bolshevik victory in the Civil War. However, the policy was unsustainable in the long term and was eventually replaced by the New Economic Policy (NEP) in 1921.

Features of War Communism

War Communism was a policy implemented by the Bolsheviks during the Russian Civil War from 1918 to 1921. This policy was characterized by a series of measures that aimed to centralize and nationalize the economy, as well as to mobilize resources for the war effort. Here are some of the key features of War Communism:

• State control of industry:  The state took control of all industries, including factories, mines, and railroads. Private ownership was abolished, and workers were organized into state-controlled labor unions.
• Centralized planning:  The state planned and directed the economy through a centralized system, with decisions made by government officials rather than market forces.
• Forced requisitioning:  The state requisitioned grain and other foodstuffs from peasants to feed the army and the urban population. This often led to violent clashes between peasants and government officials.
• Monetary reform:  The old currency was replaced with a new currency, the chervonets, which was not backed by gold or silver. This led to hyperinflation and a sharp decline in the value of money.
• Military communism:  The state used military-style discipline to enforce its policies, including the use of summary executions and forced labor.

These measures were designed to create a socialist economy and to win the war against the White Army and other anti-Bolshevik forces. However, they had a devastating impact on the Russian economy and society, leading to widespread famine, economic collapse, and social unrest.

Impact of War Communism

Lenin’s policy of War Communism had a significant impact on the Soviet Union. Here are some of the effects:

• Economic Collapse:  War Communism led to the collapse of the Russian economy. The government requisitioned grain and other agricultural products from peasants, leaving them with little or no food to eat. This led to a famine that killed millions of people.
• Industrialization:  Despite the economic collapse, War Communism did encourage industrialization. The government nationalized all industries and centralized production. This led to the creation of large factories and a more efficient industrial system. However, the quality of the goods produced was poor, and the workers were poorly treated.
• Political Repression:  War Communism was also marked by political repression. The government suppressed all opposition, including the Bolsheviks’ former allies, the Left Socialist Revolutionaries. The Cheka, the secret police, carried out mass executions and imprisonments of political opponents.
• Civil War:  War Communism was implemented during the Russian Civil War, which lasted from 1918 to 1922. The policy was designed to support the Red Army and to prevent the White Army from gaining control of the country. The Civil War was devastating, with millions of people killed or displaced.

Overall, War Communism was a disastrous policy that led to economic collapse, political repression, and the loss of millions of lives. Lenin recognized the need for change and implemented the New Economic Policy in 1921.

Introduction of New Economic Policy

After the devastation of World War I and the Russian Civil War, Lenin’s policy of War Communism had left the country’s economy in shambles. The centralized system of War Communism had failed to provide enough food and supplies for the population, leading to widespread famine and social unrest.

In 1921, Lenin introduced the New Economic Policy (NEP) as a way to revive the economy and address the urgent needs of the people. The NEP was a shift away from the strict centralization of War Communism and towards a more market-oriented approach.

Under the NEP, small businesses and private ownership were allowed to exist alongside state-owned enterprises. Farmers were allowed to sell their surplus crops on the open market, and the government allowed for foreign investment and trade. The NEP also introduced a new currency, the chervonets, which was more stable and allowed for greater economic activity.

The NEP was seen as a pragmatic response to the economic crisis facing the Soviet Union. While it was criticized by some as a betrayal of socialist principles, Lenin argued that it was a necessary step in the country’s development towards socialism. The NEP was successful in reviving the economy and improving the standard of living for many, but it also led to increased inequality and corruption.

Overall, the NEP represented a significant shift in Soviet economic policy and marked a turning point in the country’s history. While it was eventually replaced by Stalin’s policy of collectivization and industrialization, the NEP remains an important part of the Soviet legacy.

Features of New Economic Policy

The New Economic Policy (NEP) was introduced by Lenin in 1921, after the Russian Civil War had ended. It was a significant departure from the War Communism policy that had been implemented during the war. The primary objective of the NEP was to revive the economy, which had been severely damaged during the war.

The following are some of the key features of the NEP:

• Private ownership:  Private ownership of small-scale industries, trade, and agriculture was allowed. This was a significant change from the War Communism policy, which had nationalized all industries.
• Market economy:  The NEP allowed for a market economy, with the price of goods being determined by supply and demand. This was in contrast to the War Communism policy, which had fixed prices for goods.
• State control:  While private ownership was allowed, the state maintained control over large-scale industries and foreign trade.
• Taxation:  The NEP introduced a tax system based on profits, which was intended to encourage private enterprise.
• Foreign investment:  Foreign investment was allowed in the NEP, and foreign companies were permitted to operate in Russia.

The NEP was successful in reviving the economy, with agricultural and industrial production increasing significantly. However, the policy was criticized by some members of the Communist Party, who saw it as a retreat from the socialist principles of the revolution.

Impact of New Economic Policy

The New Economic Policy (NEP) was implemented in 1921 and was a significant shift in the economic policies of the Soviet Union. It was a response to the failure of War Communism, which had led to economic collapse, widespread famine, and social unrest.

The NEP allowed for some capitalist practices, such as private ownership of small businesses and trade, while maintaining state control over key industries. This policy led to a significant improvement in the economy, as production increased, and famine was alleviated.

The NEP also had a positive impact on the Soviet Union’s relationship with other countries. The policy allowed for foreign investment and trade, which helped to improve the country’s international standing and economic growth.

However, the NEP was not without its drawbacks. While it allowed for some capitalist practices, it also led to the emergence of a wealthy class of entrepreneurs, known as the NEPmen. This created social inequality and threatened the communist ideology of the Soviet Union.

Overall, the impact of the NEP was mixed. While it led to economic improvement and improved international relations, it also created social inequality and threatened the communist ideology. The policy was eventually abandoned in favor of more centralized economic planning under Stalin’s leadership.

Comparison of War Communism and New Economic Policy

Lenin’s policies of War Communism and the New Economic Policy (NEP) were two different approaches to economic management in the Soviet Union. War Communism was implemented during the Russian Civil War from 1918 to 1921, while the NEP was introduced in 1921 to stabilize the economy.

There were significant differences between these two policies:

• Ownership:  During War Communism, the government took control of all industries, while the NEP allowed some private ownership and entrepreneurship.
• Distribution:  Under War Communism, the government controlled the distribution of goods and services, while the NEP allowed market forces to determine prices and distribution.
• Agriculture:  War Communism enforced a policy of requisitioning grain from peasants, while the NEP allowed farmers to sell their produce on the open market.
• Industrialization:  War Communism focused on heavy industry, while the NEP allowed for a more balanced approach to industrialization.

While War Communism was necessary for the survival of the Soviet Union during the Civil War, it caused significant economic hardship and social unrest. The NEP, on the other hand, allowed for greater economic freedom and stability, but it also led to a rise in inequality and corruption.

Overall, both policies had their advantages and disadvantages, and their legacies can still be felt in the economic and political systems of modern Russia.

Lenin’s policy of War Communism was a necessary response to the challenges faced by the Soviet Union during the Civil War. The policy aimed to centralize the economy and mobilize resources to support the war effort. However, it had several negative consequences, including hyperinflation, famine, and social unrest.

The New Economic Policy, introduced in 1921, marked a significant shift in Soviet economic policy. It allowed for greater market freedoms and encouraged private enterprise, while still maintaining state control over key industries. The policy helped to stabilize the economy and improve living standards for many Soviet citizens.

While both policies had their strengths and weaknesses, it is clear that the New Economic Policy was a more sustainable and successful approach to economic management. It allowed for greater flexibility and innovation, while still maintaining state control over key industries. Ultimately, the policy paved the way for Soviet industrialization and modernization in the decades to come.

Share this:

Leave a comment cancel reply.

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

The answers to this question and all your GCSE/iGCSE history topics is only a click away.

Download our FREE app for Android and iOS .

War Communism, 1918-1921

• ❖ The economy had collapsed due to the disruption caused by the First World War and the civil war, and the Bolsheviks needed a way to deal with the shortages of food and goods.
• ❖ War Communism as a policy seemed to fit the communist theory as no one individual made a profit from their labour, the state controlled the means of production (the factories), and the state distributed produce according to the needs of the individual.
• ❖ The peasants were seen as resisting the Bolsheviks by not supplying enough food for the cities, towns and the Red Army.
• ❖ The policy would ensure that the Red Army was supplied to fight in the civil war.
• ❖ To gain control of the economy to enable them to win the war.
• ❖ To ensure enough supplies to resource the Red Army.
• ❖ To increase the Communist Party's control of the country.
• ❖ All industries were nationalised under the control of the Supreme Council of the Economy, or Vesenkha, in December 1917. Factories were set production targets.
• ❖ Military-style discipline was brought into the factories, which meant strikes were banned and there were harsh labour laws.
• ❖ Food rationing was introduced. Soldiers got the most, then workers, while the bourgeois and clergy received the least.
• ❖ Forced requisitioning of agricultural produce by 150,000 Bolsheviks . There was strict price controls on all agricultural produce.
• ❖ All private trade was banned.
• ❖ They were able to supply and feed the Red Army during the civil war which helped them to defeat the Whites and the Greens.
• ❖ They were able to centralise their control of the economy.
• ❖ Production levels collapsed even more. For example, coal production was 29 million tons in 1913 but by 1921 it was only 9 million.
• ❖ Food production collapsed to 48% of the 1913 productions levels. In 1913, 80 million tons of grain had been produced but in 1921, it was 37.6 million.
• ❖ There was an increase in violence and unrest in the countryside as peasants resisted food requisitioning. They hid their grain and slaughtered their animals rather than handing them over to the Bolsheviks .
• ❖ By 1921, some regions faced famine . 29 million experienced famine and 5 million died.
• ❖ Workers from the cities and towns migrated to the countryside in search of food because there was less food in the towns.
• ❖ It resulted in peasant uprisings in 1920 and 1921, including the Tambov Uprising , and the Kronstadt Uprising by sailors in March 1921.
• ❖ A black market developed because of the shortages in goods and food.

Welcome to Clever Lili!

Turbocharge your history revision with our revolutionary new app! Clever Lili is here to help you ace your exams.

Enhanced Learning

Study guides, android and ios app, alexa and google home, ask question in facebook messenger, gcse history.

A text and voice app that allows you to easily revise for your GCSE/IGCSE exams wherever you are. Whether you’re at home or on the bus, GCSE History provides you with thousands of convenient bite-sized facts to help you pass your exams with flying colours. Great for student and teachers.

Home — Essay Samples — Government & Politics — Communism — The Rise of Communism during the Cold War

The Rise of Communism During The Cold War

• Categories: Cold War Communism

About this sample

Words: 528 |

Published: Mar 6, 2024

Words: 528 | Page: 1 | 3 min read

The Impact of Communism on Global Politics

The legacy of communism.

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Karlyna PhD

Verified writer

• Expert in: War Government & Politics

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 543 words

1 pages / 403 words

3 pages / 1372 words

3 pages / 1532 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Communism

Communism, as an ideological and economic system, has been the subject of extensive debate and experimentation throughout the 20th century. Advocates of communism argue for a classless society with shared resources, but history [...]

In the tumultuous landscape of 20th-century political ideologies, two polarizing forces emerged: communism and fascism. While seemingly diametrically opposed in their principles, these two ideologies share striking similarities [...]

Some claim the domino theory was the key reason for the US intervention in Asia as it halted communist progress, The Domino Theory was the belief that communism was spread from one nation to its neighbours and so on. It was [...]

Marx’s and Engels’ book talks extensively from the Conflict perspective, which deals with the Proletariat and the Bourgeoisie. The purpose of it is to expose the viewpoint and workings of the Communist Party. The Proletariat is [...]

Capitalism and communism have long been at the center of political and economic debates, with proponents of each system arguing for its superiority. While both systems have their merits, capitalism has proven to be the most [...]

In January 1961, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushschev delivered a speech in Moscow in which he predicted that there would be a global movement towards socialism and mentioned that‘ wars of national liberation’ were instrumental in [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

• TOP CATEGORIES
• AS and A Level
• University Degree
• International Baccalaureate
• Uncategorised
• 5 Star Essays
• Study Tools
• Study Guides
• Meet the Team
• Modern European History, 1789-1945

War Communism was a complete failure. How valid is this statement?

Úna Richards 10/03/2013

War Communism was a failure in that it led to famine in the Russian countryside, as well as widespread opposition from the Russian population, most notably from the Kronstadt sailors. However, this is not to say it was a complete failure. There were some aspects of success to War Communism; it established equality of men and women; the economic policy equipped and fed the Red Army, and as a result, the Red Army was able to defeat the Whites. Therefore, War Communism was not a complete failure.

There were several reasons for the introduction of War Communism. It was used in a pragmatic sense, as it was a response to the military exigencies of the civil war. Indeed, it aimed to feed and equip the Red Army and increase the likelihood of a White Army defeat. The effectiveness of this particular aim of War Communism was demonstrated through the success of the Red Army during the civil war. The Whites never came close to the military organisation of the Red Army, despite external aid from countries such as the United States. In spite of War Communism’s success in military matters, the policies of that actually helped achieve the Bolshevik’s civil war triumph created problems in the rural areas of Russia. The new policy meant that the peasants were being made to produce a quota of crops in an attempt to get food for the soldiers in the Red Army. Cheka requisition squads were sent into the countryside to take the peasantry’s grain by force. During the years between 1918-21 the sqads systematically terrorised peasants after Lenin’s order to ‘mercilessly surpress’ them; kulaks were targeted for particularly brutal treatment and whole villages would be massacred. Even less food became available as a result and by 1921, War Communism had triggered a national famine. A fifth of the population was starving, whilst many even resorted to cannibalism. Therefore, War Communism can be considered a failure in that its supposedly pragmatic aims caused a national famine, but it can also be seen as a success, as its methods largely led to the Red Army’s success in the civil war. This means it can’t be seen as a complete  failure.

This is a preview of the whole essay

Although War Communism was primarily used as a pragmatic response to the civil war, it was also used to strengthen and consolidate the role and power of Lenin and his Bolshevik party, it also intended to ensure and maintain the newly established Communist regime. The heavily enforced policy was able to eliminate capitalist aspects of Russia, e.g. private property, and implement communist economics instead. War Communism, in this sense, was a fundamental aspect of the Bolsheviks’ revolutionary strategy. The cheka senselessly stamped out any political opposition groups or political resistance that they encountered or rooted out. Arguably, this aim within War Communism wasn’t a failure and was largely successful, as Bolsheviks remained in power, and the communist regime was kept until 1991-2. In spite of the successful maintenance of Bolshevik power, some of the methods used as part of the policy were massively unpopular. This was demonstrated through the Kronstadt uprising that took place in March 1921, the naval soldiers wanted greater freedom. Many took part but the Red Army quickly and brutally put it down, many died. This incident was particularly significant, as the people that resided in the area of Kronstadt previously formed the ‘pride and glory of the Russian revolution’ but were now extremely unhappy with the conditions of War Communism, as well as the communist regime in general. War Communism was a failure in the sense that it was massively unpopular. Many of the Russian population were negatively effected by it; it had brought a national three-year famine and general oppression to the people. Although it must be stressed that War Communism wasn’t a complete failure, it was successful in its aim able to establish government stability.

The forced labour as part of War Communism meant many women had to assume the factory positions typically held by men whilst their husbands were away fighting the white menace, in order to equip the army and provide some kind of financial support for their families. This policy established a sense of equality between men and women, as many women were previously based in the home doing domestic chores because it was the expected role of them, and never before had experienced any other type of labour. Although the policy under War Communism didn’t create absolute equality, it was one of the first steps in creating a more visual sense of equality between the sexes during the 20 th  century. The growth of work opportunities created by War Communism had increased the feeling of sexual equality but the output of manufactured goods and other factory items fell. Workers were now in control of the factories but were seriously inefficient, general problems in the cities also had a negative effect on the factories’ outputs. The shortage of goods led to soaring price inflation and the value of the rouble collapsed, over half of Petrograd’s workforce had fled from the city by 1919. As a result, there were simply not enough workers to run fully functioning factories. This was a key failure of War Communism; Lenin’s decision to hand over control of factories to the workers proved detrimental to the Russian economy. It wasn’t a complete failure, however, Lenin’s decision and policy of War Communism allowed women to take on different jobs, helping to increase sexual equality.

Overall, War Communism had both successes and failures and therefore cannot be called a complete failure or a complete success. Its failures; however seem more major, such as the 1921-4 famine. Food output decreased dramatically in the three years, and many died as a result. This is not to say that its successes weren’t significant, War Communism’s role in sexual equality triggered further positive changes for the women of Russia. Arguably then, Lenin’s policy wasn’t a complete  failure but due to the severity of the problems created by War Communism it can be categorised as a failure that had some successes albeit of small-scale.

Document Details

• Author Type Student
• Word Count 1023
• Page Count 2
• Level AS and A Level
• Subject History
• Type of work Homework assignment

Related Essays

Trotsky was the key reason for the Red Victory in the Civil War How valid i...

How far do you agree that Mussolinis foreign policy in the Years 1933-41 wa...

Russian failure during the Russo-Japanese war was the principal catalyst fo...

War communism and NEP

DeSantis signs Florida communism bill. What is communism?

A new bill signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis this week requires Florida kindergarteners to be taught "the evils of communism."

On Wednesday, which was also the 63rd anniversary of the launch of the Bay of Pigs invasion, the United States' ill-fated attempt to overthrow Fidel Castro's dictatorship in Cuba, DeSantis signed SB 1264 to require the history of communism and its "increasing threat" to the country to be taught in lower grades. The topic was previously already taught in high school courses.

"We know that the Bay of Pigs was launched because the island of Cuba had succumb to communist tyranny," DeSantis said at a press conference at the  Hialeah Gardens Museum , which honors the efforts of the Bay of Pigs'  Assault Brigade 2506 . "We're going to tell the truth about communism in the state of Florida. We're going to tell the truth about the evils of communism."

What is communism?

Communism proposes that people as a whole, or in groups such as villages or communes, should own all the means of production such as land, houses, factories, railroads, canals, etc. with "the fruits of their labor" distributed appropriately, according to Richard T. Ely in his 1883 book "French and German Socialisms in Modern Times."

Communists believe that when the means of production are owned by the powerful (called the bourgeoisie) they have too much power over their workers (called the proletariat).

This was in reaction to the abuses of workers during the Industrial Revolution, according to Sarah Pruitt of history.com , which saw industrialists gaining massive wealth while workers grew increasingly poor. The concept of socialism arose, which would require industrial production to be owned by a democratically elected government. German philosopher Karl Marx, the father of communism, took that several steps further.

In an ideal communist society, there is no government or private property, no money, and no different social classes. Wealth is divided among citizens "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs," in a phrase popularized by Marx, who wrote "The Communist Manifesto" in 1848 with Friedrich Engels.

The governments of different countries such as Russia (which combined with other surrounding countries to become for much of the 20th Century the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics or the Soviet Union), China and Cuba were overthrown in the 20th Century in the name of workers' states in a worldwide movement called Social Democracy which was influenced by Marx's ideas.

However, the authoritarian leaders of these countries were not chosen democratically and used force and propaganda to maintain power.

What was the Cold War?

About a third of the world's countries had rejected capitalism and tried to build communist states by the 1960s, which led to a battle of ideologies between those countries and the rest of the world. This was known as "The Cold War" as no firepower was exchanged, although the U.S. and the Soviet Union entered into a fierce arms race (and space race) for supremacy.

Communism under authoritarian leaders didn't last in most countries. The Soviet Union broke up in 1991, although Russia remained a communist country. China is communist but uses some capitalistic methods to compete on the world market. Other Communist countries include Cuba. Vietnam, Laos and North Korea.

What is the difference between communism and socialism?

This can be endlessly debated, and even Karl Marx used both terms interchangeably. Both ideologies put industrial production and the chief means of generating wealth under the control of the people, either directly or under a democratically elected government.

But Marx saw two phases of communism. In the first transitional phase, the working class controls the government and individuals could still own property and be paid for their work. For many people, this stage, which can work in tandem with capitalism, is widely regarded as socialism. Socialism is generally considered to be a gradual effort as socialists working within the political and social systems to effect change.

In contrast, communism calls for a violent revolution by the workers rising against the middle and upper classes to achieve a pure, classless, moneyless state with no private property.

What are the evils of communism?

The Florida Department of Education has not yet provided its new curriculum, but critics of communism have historically pointed to several flaws:

• Communism has been easily subverted by authoritarian and totalitarian leaders who use the promise of a glorious, unachievable future to justify current tyranny and oppression, leading to state-controlled media, mass surveillance, repression of free speech, dissent and other rights, harsh laws and armed state force.
• The ease in which strong personalities (Stalin, Mao, Castro) rise to the top of communist countries.
• The existence of human nature and greed to corrupt the system.
• Communism calls for violent revolutions.
• Marx and Engles never worked out exactly how a communist economy would work in practical terms.
• Despite the promises, countries calling themselves communist don't always economically outperform capitalist countries

There has never been a pure communist country. Countries calling themselves communist are generally a mix of socialism and capitalism with the state controlling employment, production and the economy to varying degrees.

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Guest Essay

What Began as a War on Theater Won’t End There

By James Shapiro

Mr. Shapiro is the author of the forthcoming “The Playbook: A Story of Theater, Democracy, and the Making of a Culture War.”

Productions of plays in America’s high schools have been increasingly under attack. In 2023, Anton Chekhov’s “Three Sisters” was rejected in Tennessee (since it deals with adultery); “August: Osage County,” the Pulitzer Prize-winning play by Tracy Letts, was canceled in Iowa after rehearsals had begun (the community was deemed not ready for it); and in Kansas, students were not even allowed to study, let alone stage, “The Laramie Project ,” a play by Moisés Kaufman and members of the Tectonic Theater Project about the murder of a gay student, Matthew Shepard.

It should come as no surprise, then, that in the Educational Theater Association’s most recent survey, 85 percent of American theater teachers expressed concern about censorship . Even Shakespeare is at risk: In Florida, new laws led to the restriction of “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” to grades 10 through 12 and “Romeo and Juliet” could not be taught in full to avoid falling afoul of legislation targeting “sexual conduct.” Kill off young people’s exposure to theater, and you kill off a generation of playgoers, along with the empathy and camaraderie (already in short supply) that are intrinsic to theater. According to the latest report from the National Endowment for the Arts , from 2017 to 2022 the percentage of Americans who went even once a year to see a nonmusical play dropped by roughly half, from about 10 percent to less than 5 percent.

What begins as a war on theater never ends there.

The current attacks on theater in American schools have their origins in a struggle that took place in the late 1930s, when America’s political leadership believed that the arts, no less than industry and agriculture, were vital to the health of the Republic and deserving of its financial support. There was still an implicit understanding that theater and democracy — twinborn in ancient Greece, spheres where competing visions of society could be aired and debated — were mutually dependent. Funded by Congress as part of a Works Progress Administration relief bill and established in 1935, the Federal Theater Project by 1939 had staged over 1,000 productions in 29 states, seen free or for a pittance by 30 million spectators, or roughly one in four Americans, two-thirds of whom had never seen a play before.

It brought children’s plays on touring trucks to kids in crowded cities. It staged works in Spanish, Yiddish and Italian to reach immigrants. It established what it called Negro units from Hartford, Conn., to Seattle to support Black actors and playwrights. It staged Christmas plays and classics by Shakespeare and Euripides and nurtured young playwrights and directors, including Arthur Miller and Orson Welles. It brought free theater to asylums, orphanages, hospitals, prisons and veterans’ homes. It revived playgoing in rural states where the movies had all but ended it. Ten million listeners a week tuned in to its radio broadcasts. It established ties with hundreds of educational, fraternal, civic and religious groups, strengthening communal bonds.

It turned out that Americans were hungry for plays about issues that mattered to their lives, topics largely shunned by Hollywood and the commercial stage. So they flocked to see new plays about substandard housing and the plight of struggling farmers. One of the most remarkable Federal Theater ventures was a stage version of Sinclair Lewis’s novel “It Can’t Happen Here ,” in which a fascist is elected president of the United States. It opened on the same day, Oct. 27, 1936, in 18 cities across the country, and by the time it closed, more than 379,000 Americans had seen it. The cost of these thousand or so productions to taxpayers was roughly the price of building a single battleship.

The program’s popularity contributed to its undoing. Many of those in Congress who had voted to fund the Federal Theater became frightened by its reach and impact, its interracial casting, its challenge to the status quo — frightened, too, perhaps, by the prospect of Americans across racial, economic and political divides sitting cheek by jowl in packed playhouses.

Three years after the creation of the Federal Theater, Congress authorized the establishment of what would become the House Un-American Activities Committee, chaired by Martin Dies of Texas. It was to supposed to spend seven months investigating the rise of Nazism, fascism and communism in America and submit a report. The ambitious Mr. Dies, desperate to have his committee’s life extended, instead focused much of his attention on a more vulnerable target: the Federal Theater, accusing it of disseminating offensive and communistic and therefore un-American values. In the course of waging and winning this battle, he assembled a right-wing playbook so pervasive that it now seems timeless. He succeeded wildly: All Federal Theater productions were abruptly terminated in 1939, and the House Un-American Activities Committee lasted until 1975. With a nascent national theater now destroyed, targeting theater in schools was the inevitable next step for his successors, who — whether cynical politicians or school board members eager to police what offends their sensibilities — have all stolen a page from the Dies playbook.

It’s hard to imagine what America would be like today had support for the Federal Theater continued and Mr. Dies’s committee not been renewed. Counterfactual history is best left to novelists. But a more vibrant theatrical culture extending across the land might well have led to a more informed citizenry and, by extension, a less divided and more equitable and resilient democracy. What happened instead was that Mr. Dies begat Joseph McCarthy, who begat Roy Cohn, who begat Donald Trump.

Some of those familiar with this history haven’t given up. Right now, artists are preparing projects that on July 27 will open simultaneously in 18 U.S. cities and towns, much as “It Can’t Happen Here” did in 1936 . Under the rubric of Arts for EveryBody, the initiative is bringing together performers, audiences, community leaders and local officials. It is a small start and a promising one. So, too, is legislation coming before Congress, the STAGE Act of 2024, that would provide badly needed support for endangered nonprofit theaters across the land. Passing it should be a no-brainer, but there’s a likelihood that the Dies playbook will be used to defeat it. Until those in power in this country pivot from suppressing theater to investing in it, it’s not just the arts but also democracy itself that remains vulnerable.

James Shapiro teaches English at Columbia University and is the author of the forthcoming “ The Playbook: A Story of Theater, Democracy, and the Making of a Culture War .”

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips . And here’s our email: [email protected] .

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook , Instagram , TikTok , WhatsApp , X and Threads .

We've detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot.

Why did this happen?

Please make sure your browser supports JavaScript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. For more information you can review our Terms of Service and Cookie Policy .

For inquiries related to this message please contact our support team and provide the reference ID below.