research paper on consumer behavior

The past, present, and future of consumer research

• Published: 13 June 2020
• Volume 31 , pages 137–149, ( 2020 )

Cite this article

• Maayan S. Malter   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0383-7925 1 ,
• Morris B. Holbrook 1 ,
• Barbara E. Kahn 2 ,
• Jeffrey R. Parker 3 &
• Donald R. Lehmann 1  

44k Accesses

35 Citations

3 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

In this article, we document the evolution of research trends (concepts, methods, and aims) within the field of consumer behavior, from the time of its early development to the present day, as a multidisciplinary area of research within marketing. We describe current changes in retailing and real-world consumption and offer suggestions on how to use observations of consumption phenomena to generate new and interesting consumer behavior research questions. Consumption continues to change with technological advancements and shifts in consumers’ values and goals. We cannot know the exact shape of things to come, but we polled a sample of leading scholars and summarize their predictions on where the field may be headed in the next twenty years.

Similar content being viewed by others

Social media influencer marketing: foundations, trends, and ways forward

Yatish Joshi, Weng Marc Lim, … Satish Kumar

Research in marketing strategy

Neil A. Morgan, Kimberly A. Whitler, … Simos Chari

Customer experience: fundamental premises and implications for research

Larissa Becker & Elina Jaakkola

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

Beginning in the late 1950s, business schools shifted from descriptive and practitioner-focused studies to more theoretically driven and academically rigorous research (Dahl et al. 1959 ). As the field expanded from an applied form of economics to embrace theories and methodologies from psychology, sociology, anthropology, and statistics, there was an increased emphasis on understanding the thoughts, desires, and experiences of individual consumers. For academic marketing, this meant that research not only focused on the decisions and strategies of marketing managers but also on the decisions and thought processes on the other side of the market—customers.

Since then, the academic study of consumer behavior has evolved and incorporated concepts and methods, not only from marketing at large but also from related social science disciplines, and from the ever-changing landscape of real-world consumption behavior. Its position as an area of study within a larger discipline that comprises researchers from diverse theoretical backgrounds and methodological training has stirred debates over its identity. One article describes consumer behavior as a multidisciplinary subdiscipline of marketing “characterized by the study of people operating in a consumer role involving acquisition, consumption, and disposition of marketplace products, services, and experiences” (MacInnis and Folkes 2009 , p. 900).

This article reviews the evolution of the field of consumer behavior over the past half century, describes its current status, and predicts how it may evolve over the next twenty years. Our review is by no means a comprehensive history of the field (see Schumann et al. 2008 ; Rapp and Hill 2015 ; Wang et al. 2015 ; Wilkie and Moore 2003 , to name a few) but rather focuses on a few key thematic developments. Though we observe many major shifts during this period, certain questions and debates have persisted: Does consumer behavior research need to be relevant to marketing managers or is there intrinsic value from studying the consumer as a project pursued for its own sake? What counts as consumption: only consumption from traditional marketplace transactions or also consumption in a broader sense of non-marketplace interactions? Which are the most appropriate theoretical traditions and methodological tools for addressing questions in consumer behavior research?

2 A brief history of consumer research over the past sixty years—1960 to 2020

In 1969, the Association for Consumer Research was founded and a yearly conference to share marketing research specifically from the consumer’s perspective was instituted. This event marked the culmination of the growing interest in the topic by formalizing it as an area of research within marketing (consumer psychology had become a formalized branch of psychology within the APA in 1960). So, what was consumer behavior before 1969? Scanning current consumer-behavior doctoral seminar syllabi reveals few works predating 1969, with most of those coming from psychology and economics, namely Herbert Simon’s A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice (1955), Abraham Maslow’s A Theory of Human Motivation (1943), and Ernest Dichter’s Handbook of Consumer Motivations (1964). In short, research that illuminated and informed our understanding of consumer behavior prior to 1969 rarely focused on marketing-specific topics, much less consumers or consumption (Dichter’s handbook being a notable exception). Yet, these works were crucial to the rise of consumer behavior research because, in the decades after 1969, there was a shift within academic marketing to thinking about research from a behavioral or decision science perspective (Wilkie and Moore 2003 ). The following section details some ways in which this shift occurred. We draw on a framework proposed by the philosopher Larry Laudan ( 1986 ), who distinguished among three inter-related aspects of scientific inquiry—namely, concepts (the relevant ideas, theories, hypotheses, and constructs); methods (the techniques employed to test and validate these concepts); and aims (the purposes or goals that motivate the investigation).

2.1 Key concepts in the late - 1960s

During the late-1960s, we tended to view the buyer as a computer-like machine for processing information according to various formal rules that embody economic rationality to form a preference for one or another option in order to arrive at a purchase decision. This view tended to manifest itself in a couple of conspicuous ways. The first was a model of buyer behavior introduced by John Howard in 1963 in the second edition of his marketing textbook and quickly adopted by virtually every theorist working in our field—including, Howard and Sheth (of course), Engel-Kollat-&-Blackwell, Franco Nicosia, Alan Andreasen, Jim Bettman, and Joel Cohen. Howard’s great innovation—which he based on a scheme that he had found in the work of Plato (namely, the linkages among Cognition, Affect, and Conation)—took the form of a boxes-and-arrows formulation heavily influenced by the approach to organizational behavior theory that Howard (University of Pittsburgh) had picked up from Herbert Simon (Carnegie Melon University). The model represented a chain of events

where I = inputs of information (from advertising, word-of-mouth, brand features, etc.); C = cognitions (beliefs or perceptions about a brand); A = Affect (liking or preference for the brand); B = behavior (purchase of the brand); and S = satisfaction (post-purchase evaluation of the brand that feeds back onto earlier stages of the sequence, according to a learning model in which reinforced behavior tends to be repeated). This formulation lay at the heart of Howard’s work, which he updated, elaborated on, and streamlined over the remainder of his career. Importantly, it informed virtually every buyer-behavior model that blossomed forth during the last half of the twentieth century.

To represent the link between cognitions and affect, buyer-behavior researchers used various forms of the multi-attribute attitude model (MAAM), originally proposed by psychologists such as Fishbein and Rosenberg as part of what Fishbein and Ajzen ( 1975 ) called the theory of reasoned action. Under MAAM, cognitions (beliefs about brand attributes) are weighted by their importance and summed to create an explanation or prediction of affect (liking for a brand or preference for one brand versus another), which in turn determines behavior (choice of a brand or intention to purchase a brand). This took the work of economist Kelvin Lancaster (with whom Howard interacted), which assumed attitude was based on objective attributes, and extended it to include subjective ones (Lancaster 1966 ; Ratchford 1975 ). Overall, the set of concepts that prevailed in the late-1960s assumed the buyer exhibited economic rationality and acted as a computer-like information-processing machine when making purchase decisions.

2.2 Favored methods in the late-1960s

The methods favored during the late-1960s tended to be almost exclusively neo-positivistic in nature. That is, buyer-behavior research adopted the kinds of methodological rigor that we associate with the physical sciences and the hypothetico-deductive approaches advocated by the neo-positivistic philosophers of science.

Thus, the accepted approaches tended to be either experimental or survey based. For example, numerous laboratory studies tested variations of the MAAM and focused on questions about how to measure beliefs, how to weight the beliefs, how to combine the weighted beliefs, and so forth (e.g., Beckwith and Lehmann 1973 ). Here again, these assumed a rational economic decision-maker who processed information something like a computer.

Seeking rigor, buyer-behavior studies tended to be quantitative in their analyses, employing multivariate statistics, structural equation models, multidimensional scaling, conjoint analysis, and other mathematically sophisticated techniques. For example, various attempts to test the ICABS formulation developed simultaneous (now called structural) equation models such as those deployed by Farley and Ring ( 1970 , 1974 ) to test the Howard and Sheth ( 1969 ) model and by Beckwith and Lehmann ( 1973 ) to measure halo effects.

2.3 Aims in the late-1960s

During this time period, buyer-behavior research was still considered a subdivision of marketing research, the purpose of which was to provide insights useful to marketing managers in making strategic decisions. Essentially, every paper concluded with a section on “Implications for Marketing Managers.” Authors who failed to conform to this expectation could generally count on having their work rejected by leading journals such as the Journal of Marketing Research ( JMR ) and the Journal of Marketing ( JM ).

2.4 Summary—the three R’s in the late-1960s

Starting in the late-1960s to the early-1980s, virtually every buyer-behavior researcher followed the traditional approach to concepts, methods, and aims, now encapsulated under what we might call the three R’s —namely, rationality , rigor , and relevance . However, as we transitioned into the 1980s and beyond, that changed as some (though by no means all) consumer researchers began to expand their approaches and to evolve different perspectives.

2.5 Concepts after 1980

In some circles, the traditional emphasis on the buyer’s rationality—that is, a view of the buyer as a rational-economic, decision-oriented, information-processing, computer-like machine for making choices—began to evolve in at least two primary ways.

First, behavioral economics (originally studied in marketing under the label Behavioral Decision Theory)—developed in psychology by Kahneman and Tversky, in economics by Thaler, and applied in marketing by a number of forward-thinking theorists (e.g., Eric Johnson, Jim Bettman, John Payne, Itamar Simonson, Jay Russo, Joel Huber, and more recently, Dan Ariely)—challenged the rationality of consumers as decision-makers. It was shown that numerous commonly used decision heuristics depart from rational choice and are exceptions to the traditional assumptions of economic rationality. This trend shed light on understanding consumer financial decision-making (Prelec and Loewenstein 1998 ; Gourville 1998 ; Lynch Jr 2011 ) and how to develop “nudges” to help consumers make better decisions for their personal finances (summarized in Johnson et al. 2012 ).

Second, the emerging experiential view (anticipated by Alderson, Levy, and others; developed by Holbrook and Hirschman, and embellished by Schmitt, Pine, and Gilmore, and countless followers) regarded consumers as flesh-and-blood human beings (rather than as information-processing computer-like machines), focused on hedonic aspects of consumption, and expanded the concepts embodied by ICABS (Table 1 ).

2.6 Methods after 1980

The two burgeoning areas of research—behavioral economics and experiential theories—differed in their methodological approaches. The former relied on controlled randomized experiments with a focus on decision strategies and behavioral outcomes. For example, experiments tested the process by which consumers evaluate options using information display boards and “Mouselab” matrices of aspects and attributes (Payne et al. 1988 ). This school of thought also focused on behavioral dependent measures, such as choice (Huber et al. 1982 ; Simonson 1989 ; Iyengar and Lepper 2000 ).

The latter was influenced by post-positivistic philosophers of science—such as Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend, and Richard Rorty—and approaches expanded to include various qualitative techniques (interpretive, ethnographic, humanistic, and even introspective methods) not previously prominent in the field of consumer research. These included:

Interpretive approaches —such as those drawing on semiotics and hermeneutics—in an effort to gain a richer understanding of the symbolic meanings involved in consumption experiences;

Ethnographic approaches — borrowed from cultural anthropology—such as those illustrated by the influential Consumer Behavior Odyssey (Belk et al. 1989 ) and its discoveries about phenomena related to sacred aspects of consumption or the deep meanings of collections and other possessions;

Humanistic approaches —such as those borrowed from cultural studies or from literary criticism and more recently gathered together under the general heading of consumer culture theory ( CCT );

Introspective or autoethnographic approaches —such as those associated with a method called subjective personal introspection ( SPI ) that various consumer researchers like Sidney Levy and Steve Gould have pursued to gain insights based on their own private lives.

These qualitative approaches tended not to appear in the more traditional journals such as the Journal of Marketing , Journal of Marketing Research , or Marketing Science . However, newer journals such as Consumption, Markets, & Culture and Marketing Theory began to publish papers that drew on the various interpretive, ethnographic, humanistic, or introspective methods.

2.7 Aims after 1980

In 1974, consumer research finally got its own journal with the launch of the Journal of Consumer Research ( JCR ). The early editors of JCR —especially Bob Ferber, Hal Kassarjian, and Jim Bettman—held a rather divergent attitude about the importance or even the desirability of managerial relevance as a key goal of consumer studies. Under their influence, some researchers began to believe that consumer behavior is a phenomenon worthy of study in its own right—purely for the purpose of understanding it better. The journal incorporated articles from an array of methodologies: quantitative (both secondary data analysis and experimental techniques) and qualitative. The “right” balance between theoretical insight and substantive relevance—which are not in inherent conflict—is a matter of debate to this day and will likely continue to be debated well into the future.

2.8 Summary—the three I’s after 1980

In sum, beginning in the early-1980s, consumer research branched out. Much of the work in consumer studies remained within the earlier tradition of the three R’s—that is, rationality (an information-processing decision-oriented buyer), rigor (neo-positivistic experimental designs and quantitative techniques), and relevance (usefulness to marketing managers). Nonetheless, many studies embraced enlarged views of the three major aspects that might be called the three I’s —that is, irrationality (broadened perspectives that incorporate illogical, heuristic, experiential, or hedonic aspects of consumption), interpretation (various qualitative or “postmodern” approaches), and intrinsic motivation (the joy of pursuing a managerially irrelevant consumer study purely for the sake of satisfying one’s own curiosity, without concern for whether it does or does not help a marketing practitioner make a bigger profit).

3 The present—the consumer behavior field today

3.1 present concepts.

In recent years, technological changes have significantly influenced the nature of consumption as the customer journey has transitioned to include more interaction on digital platforms that complements interaction in physical stores. This shift poses a major conceptual challenge in understanding if and how these technological changes affect consumption. Does the medium through which consumption occurs fundamentally alter the psychological and social processes identified in earlier research? In addition, this shift allows us to collect more data at different stages of the customer journey, which further allows us to analyze behavior in ways that were not previously available.

Revisiting the ICABS framework, many of the previous concepts are still present, but we are now addressing them through a lens of technological change (Table 2 )

. In recent years, a number of concepts (e.g., identity, beliefs/lay theories, affect as information, self-control, time, psychological ownership, search for meaning and happiness, social belonging, creativity, and status) have emerged as integral factors that influence and are influenced by consumption. To better understand these concepts, a number of influential theories from social psychology have been adopted into consumer behavior research. Self-construal (Markus and Kitayama 1991 ), regulatory focus (Higgins 1998 ), construal level (Trope and Liberman 2010 ), and goal systems (Kruglanski et al. 2002 ) all provide social-cognition frameworks through which consumer behavior researchers study the psychological processes behind consumer behavior. This “adoption” of social psychological theories into consumer behavior is a symbiotic relationship that further enhances the theories. Tory Higgins happily stated that he learned more about his own theories from the work of marketing academics (he cited Angela Lee and Michel Pham) in further testing and extending them.

3.2 Present Methods

Not only have technological advancements changed the nature of consumption but they have also significantly influenced the methods used in consumer research by adding both new sources of data and improved analytical tools (Ding et al. 2020 ). Researchers continue to use traditional methods from psychology in empirical research (scale development, laboratory experiments, quantitative analyses, etc.) and interpretive approaches in qualitative research. Additionally, online experiments using participants from panels such as Amazon Mechanical Turk and Prolific have become commonplace in the last decade. While they raise concerns about the quality of the data and about the external validity of the results, these online experiments have greatly increased the speed and decreased the cost of collecting data, so researchers continue to use them, albeit with some caution. Reminiscent of the discussion in the 1970s and 1980s about the use of student subjects, the projectability of the online responses and of an increasingly conditioned “professional” group of online respondents (MTurkers) is a major concern.

Technology has also changed research methodology. Currently, there is a large increase in the use of secondary data thanks to the availability of Big Data about online and offline behavior. Methods in computer science have advanced our ability to analyze large corpuses of unstructured data (text, voice, visual images) in an efficient and rigorous way and, thus, to tap into a wealth of nuanced thoughts, feelings, and behaviors heretofore only accessible to qualitative researchers through laboriously conducted content analyses. There are also new neuro-marketing techniques like eye-tracking, fMRI’s, body arousal measures (e.g., heart rate, sweat), and emotion detectors that allow us to measure automatic responses. Lastly, there has been an increase in large-scale field experiments that can be run in online B2C marketplaces.

3.3 Present Aims

Along with a focus on real-world observations and data, there is a renewed emphasis on managerial relevance. Countless conference addresses and editorials in JCR , JCP , and other journals have emphasized the importance of making consumer research useful outside of academia—that is, to help companies, policy makers, and consumers. For instance, understanding how the “new” consumer interacts over time with other consumers and companies in the current marketplace is a key area for future research. As global and social concerns become more salient in all aspects of life, issues of long-term sustainability, social equality, and ethical business practices have also become more central research topics. Fortunately, despite this emphasis on relevance, theoretical contributions and novel ideas are still highly valued. An appropriate balance of theory and practice has become the holy grail of consumer research.

The effects of the current trends in real-world consumption will increase in magnitude with time as more consumers are digitally native. Therefore, a better understanding of current consumer behavior can give us insights and help predict how it will continue to evolve in the years to come.

4 The future—the consumer behavior field in 2040

The other papers use 2030 as a target year but we asked our survey respondents to make predictions for 2040 and thus we have a different future target year.

Niels Bohr once said, “Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future.” Indeed, it would be a fool’s errand for a single person to hazard a guess about the state of the consumer behavior field twenty years from now. Therefore, predictions from 34 active consumer researchers were collected to address this task. Here, we briefly summarize those predictions.

4.1 Future Concepts

While few respondents proffered guesses regarding specific concepts that would be of interest twenty years from now, many suggested broad topics and trends they expected to see in the field. Expectations for topics could largely be grouped into three main areas. Many suspected that we will be examining essentially the same core topics, perhaps at a finer-grained level, from different perspectives or in ways that we currently cannot utilize due to methodological limitations (more on methods below). A second contingent predicted that much research would center on the impending crises the world faces today, most mentioning environmental and social issues (the COVID-19 pandemic had not yet begun when these predictions were collected and, unsurprisingly, was not anticipated by any of our respondents). The last group, citing the widely expected profound impact of AI on consumers’ lives, argued that AI and other technology-related topics will be dominant subjects in consumer research circa 2040.

While the topic of technology is likely to be focal in the field, our current expectations for the impact of technology on consumers’ lives are narrower than it should be. Rather than merely offering innumerable conveniences and experiences, it seems likely that technology will begin to be integrated into consumers’ thoughts, identities, and personal relationships—probably sooner than we collectively expect. The integration of machines into humans’ bodies and lives will present the field with an expanding list of research questions that do not exist today. For example, how will the concepts of the self, identity, privacy, and goal pursuit change when web-connected technology seamlessly integrates with human consciousness and cognition? Major questions will also need to be answered regarding philosophy of mind, ethics, and social inequality. We suspect that the impact of technology on consumers and consumer research will be far broader than most consumer-behavior researchers anticipate.

As for broader trends within consumer research, there were two camps: (1) those who expect (or hope) that dominant theories (both current and yet to be developed) will become more integrated and comprehensive and (2) those who expect theoretical contributions to become smaller and smaller, to the point of becoming trivial. Both groups felt that current researchers are filling smaller cracks than before, but disagreed on how this would ultimately be resolved.

4.2 Future Methods

As was the case with concepts, respondents’ expectations regarding consumer-research methodologies in 2030 can also be divided into three broad baskets. Unsurprisingly, many indicated that we would be using many technologies not currently available or in wide use. Perhaps more surprising was that most cited the use of technology such as AI, machine-learning algorithms, and robots in designing—as opposed to executing or analyzing—experiments. (Some did point to the use of technologies such as virtual reality in the actual execution of experiments.) The second camp indicated that a focus on reliable and replicable results (discussed further below) will encourage a greater tendency for pre-registering studies, more use of “Big Data,” and a demand for more studies per paper (versus more papers per topic, which some believe is a more fruitful direction). Finally, the third lot indicated that “real data” would be in high demand, thereby necessitating the use of incentive-compatible, consequential dependent variables and a greater prevalence of field studies in consumer research.

As a result, young scholars would benefit from developing a “toolkit” of methodologies for collecting and analyzing the abundant new data of interest to the field. This includes (but is not limited to) a deep understanding of designing and implementing field studies (Gerber and Green 2012 ), data analysis software (R, Python, etc.), text mining and analysis (Humphreys and Wang 2018 ), and analytical tools for other unstructured forms of data such as image and sound. The replication crisis in experimental research means that future scholars will also need to take a more critical approach to validity (internal, external, construct), statistical power, and significance in their work.

4.3 Future Aims

While there was an air of existential concern about the future of the field, most agreed that the trend will be toward increasing the relevance and reliability of consumer research. Specifically, echoing calls from journals and thought leaders, the respondents felt that papers will need to offer more actionable implications for consumers, managers, or policy makers. However, few thought that this increased focus would come at the expense of theoretical insights, suggesting a more demanding overall standard for consumer research in 2040. Likewise, most felt that methodological transparency, open access to data and materials, and study pre-registration will become the norm as the field seeks to allay concerns about the reliability and meaningfulness of its research findings.

4.4 Summary - Future research questions and directions

Despite some well-justified pessimism, the future of consumer research is as bright as ever. As we revised this paper amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, it was clear that many aspects of marketplace behavior, consumption, and life in general will change as a result of this unprecedented global crisis. Given this, and the radical technological, social, and environmental changes that loom on the horizon, consumer researchers will have a treasure trove of topics to tackle in the next ten years, many of which will carry profound substantive importance. While research approaches will evolve, the core goals will remain consistent—namely, to generate theoretically insightful, empirically supported, and substantively impactful research (Table 3 ).

5 Conclusion

At any given moment in time, the focal concepts, methods, and aims of consumer-behavior scholarship reflect both the prior development of the field and trends in the larger scientific community. However, despite shifting trends, the core of the field has remained constant—namely, to understand the motivations, thought processes, and experiences of individuals as they consume goods, services, information, and other offerings, and to use these insights to develop interventions to improve both marketing strategy for firms and consumer welfare for individuals and groups. Amidst the excitement of new technologies, social trends, and consumption experiences, it is important to look back and remind ourselves of the insights the field has already generated. Effectively integrating these past findings with new observations and fresh research will help the field advance our understanding of consumer behavior.

Beckwith, N. E., & Lehmann, D. R. (1973). The importance of differential weights in multiple attribute models of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (2), 141–145.

Article   Google Scholar  

Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry Jr., J. F. (1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: theodicy on the odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (1), 1–38.

Dahl, R. A., Haire, M., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1959). Social science research on business: product and potential . New York: Columbia University Press.

Ding, Y., DeSarbo, W. S., Hanssens, D. M., Jedidi, K., Lynch Jr., J. G., & Lehmann, D. R. (2020). The past, present, and future of measurements and methods in marketing analysis. Marketing Letters, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09527-7 .

Farley, J. U., & Ring, L. W. (1970). An empirical test of the Howard-Sheth model of buyer behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (4), 427–438.

Farley, J. U., & Ring, L. W. (1974). “Empirical” specification of a buyer behavior model. Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (1), 89–96.

Google Scholar  

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research . Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2012). Field experiments: design, analysis, and interpretation . New York: WW Norton.

Gourville, J. T. (1998). Pennies-a-day: the effect of temporal reframing on transaction evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 395–408.

Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30 , 1–46.

Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior . New York: Wiley.

Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (1), 90–98.

Humphreys, A., & Wang, R. J. H. (2018). Automated text analysis for consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (6), 1274–1306.

Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6), 995–1006.

Johnson, E. J., Shu, S. B., Dellaert, B. G., Fox, C., Goldstein, D. G., Häubl, G., et al. (2012). Beyond nudges: tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Letters, 23 (2), 487–504.

Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002). A theory of goal systems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34 , 311–378.

Lancaster, K. (1966). A new theory of consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 74 , 132–157.

Laudan, L. (1986). Methodology’s prospects. In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1986 (2), 347–354.

Lynch Jr., J. G. (2011). Introduction to the journal of marketing research special interdisciplinary issue on consumer financial decision making. Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (SPL) Siv–Sviii.

MacInnis, D. J., & Folkes, V. S. (2009). The disciplinary status of consumer behavior: a sociology of science perspective on key controversies. Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (6), 899–914.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98 (2), 224–253.

Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14 (3), 534–552.

Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The red and the black: mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17 (1), 4–28.

Rapp, J. M., & Hill, R. P. (2015). Lordy, Lordy, look who’s 40! The Journal of Consumer Research reaches a milestone. Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (1), 19–29.

Ratchford, B. T. (1975). The new economic theory of consumer behavior: an interpretive essay. Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (2), 65–75.

Schumann, D. W., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Davidson, E. (2008). History of consumer psychology. In Haugtvedt, C. P., Herr, P. M., & Kardes, F. R. eds.  Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 3-28). New York: Erlbaum.

Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (2), 158–174.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117 (2), 440–463.

Wang, X., Bendle, N. T., Mai, F., & Cotte, J. (2015). The journal of consumer research at 40: a historical analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (1), 5–18.

Wilkie, W. L., & Moore, E. S. (2003). Scholarly research in marketing: exploring the “4 eras” of thought development. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22 (2), 116–146.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Maayan S. Malter, Morris B. Holbrook & Donald R. Lehmann

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Barbara E. Kahn

Department of Marketing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

Jeffrey R. Parker

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maayan S. Malter .

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Malter, M.S., Holbrook, M.B., Kahn, B.E. et al. The past, present, and future of consumer research. Mark Lett 31 , 137–149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09526-8

Download citation

Published : 13 June 2020

Issue Date : September 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09526-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Consumer behavior
• Information processing
• Judgement and decision-making
• Consumer culture theory
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Browse All Articles
• Newsletter Sign-Up

ConsumerBehavior →

No results found in working knowledge.

• Were any results found in one of the other content buckets on the left?
• Try removing some search filters.
• Use different search filters.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection

Impact of COVID‐19 on changing consumer behaviour: Lessons from an emerging economy

Debadyuti das.

1 Faculty of Management Studies, Delhi University, Delhi India

Ashutosh Sarkar

2 Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode, Kozhikode India

Arindam Debroy

3 Symbiosis Institute of Business Management Nagpur, Nagpur Maharashtra, India

Associated Data

The authors declare that the data used in the paper is collected through a questionnaire survey and have not used any proprietary data from any source. The data collected through the primary survey may be made available on demand.

The present study investigates the impact of COVID‐19 on Consumers' changing way of life and buying behaviour based on their socio‐economic backgrounds. A questionnaire survey was carried out to understand the impact of COVID‐19 on consumers' affordability, lifestyle, and health awareness and how these effects influenced their buying behaviour. A total of 425 usable responses were analysed using the structural equation modelling considering Consumers' socio‐economic background as exogenous variables and Consumers' changing way of life and Adaptation in consumers’ buying behaviour as endogenous variables. The study reveals that COVID‐19 has affected the consumers in the unorganised sectors more than others and induced an increase in the demand for affordable substitutes for daily necessities. The demand for wellness and entertainment products is found to depend upon the occupation and family earning status of consumers which is jointly mediated by affordability and lifestyle changes. Further, the findings show that the demand for health and hygiene products depends on the current employment status and family earning status of consumers which is jointly mediated by affordability and awareness towards health and hygiene. The model developed in the present study allows the decision‐makers to identify which segments of the population with certain socio‐economic backgrounds could be targeted for wellness products and which ones could be targeted for health and hygiene products. In addition, the model provides rich insights to the managers as to what kind of product substitution would be viable in the market during the pandemic.

1. INTRODUCTION

COVID‐19 has disrupted humankind in a manner not seen in recent times, infecting 6.5 million people while leaving millions unemployed (Hensher,  2020 ). While the loss of life, occupation, and livelihood are well‐articulated impacts of COVID‐19, the loss of routine social and economic life over a prolonged period is having long‐lasting effects on people (Chriscaden,  2020 ). COVID‐19‐imposed ‘self‐isolation and social lockdown’ has increased mental stress and inflicted psychological and behavioural changes (Witteveen,  2020 ). Under constant fear of infection and restricted mobility, people are becoming more aware of health and changing their lifestyles and eating habits (Sánchez‐Sánchez et al.,  2020 ). Reported preliminary studies also suggest that the nature and extent of the impact of COVID‐19 is not similar across all citizens and depend on their condition of poverty, age, residential status, and other demographic variables (U n ited Nations, n.d.).

As a consequence of the economic, social, and psychological impact of COVID‐19, people have altered how and where they should spend their money (Rogers & Cosgrove,  2020 ). Kirk and Rifkin ( 2020 ) argued that consumers react, cope, and adapt to environmentally‐imposed constraints such as the COVID‐19 pandemic. During the pandemic, consumers have displayed a variety of unusual behaviours (Laato et al.,  2020 ; Pantano et al.,  2020 ) and forced them to spend more on essentials while cutting back discretionary spending. Consumers are also observed to have changed brands and products, substituted spends when stocked out, and become more sensitive towards health and hygiene. Market studies pertaining to the impact of COVID‐19 on consumers have also indicated increased spending on groceries, and health and hygiene products (Rogers & Cosgrove,  2020 ). The above changes have motivated researchers to explore how the consumers behaved during the pandemic and the reasons for such behaviour.

Some of the COVID‐19‐induced behaviours that were studied include consumption shifts (Kansiime et al.,  2021 ; Pakravan‐Charvadeh et al.,  2021 ), impulsive buying (Naeem,  2020 ), stockpiling, and panic buying (Billore & Anisimova,  2021 ; Keane & Neal,  2021 ; Naeem,  2020 ; Prentice et al.,  2021 ), product and brand substitution (Knowles et al.,  2020 ), and shifts in channel preferences (Mehrolia et al.,  2021 ; Pantano et al.,  2020 ). Researchers have attributed such behaviour to COVID‐19‐induced impacts on consumers' socio‐economic status, changing way of life, and influence on predisposed beliefs (Milaković, 2021 ), changes in the consumers' buying environment such as stockouts, supply and demand disruptions (Prentice et al., 2021 ), and external stimuli such as information and social media exposure. (Laato et al.,  2020 ; Naeem,  2020 ). It was also reported that a significant number of people have lost their jobs (Montenovo et al.,  2020 ) and family income dwindled as a consequence of COVID‐19 (Kansiime et al.,  2021 ). COVID‐19 has affected consumers' disposable income or affordability (Mahmud & Riley,  2021 ), lifestyle (Sánchez‐Sánchez et al.,  2020 ), and awareness (Li et al.,  2021 )—in short, their way of life—making them change their pre‐COVID spending habits. We, however, did not come across research studies that analysed the nature of changes in consumer behaviour due to changes in consumers' affordability, lifestyle changes, and awareness level. This suggests an opportunity to investigate the impact of COVID‐19 on Consumers' changing way of life and consequently on their buying behaviour based on the varying socio‐economic background of the population. Our research primarily focuses on studying consumption shifts and substitution behaviour and connects such changes to the changes in consumers' way of life. Such studies are very important for market researchers and firms in terms of segmentation of the market when a pandemic of this nature affects the entire population. Such studies would help firms in devising targeted marketing strategies during the ongoing pandemic and beyond. With this background, the present study seeks to address the following research questions:

• How has the socio‐economic background influenced Consumers' way of life including affordability, lifestyle changes, and awareness towards health and hygiene arising out of COVID‐19?
• To what extent has the Consumers' changing way of life arising out of COVID‐19 influenced Adaptation in their buying behaviour?
• How has the socio‐economic background led to the Adaptation in consumers' buying behaviour arising out of COVID‐19?

The methodology followed in this study involves investigating the influence of exogenous variables including occupation, current employment status, and family earning status on the intervening variables representing Consumers' changing way of life and finally on the dependent variables which reflect the Adaptation in consumers' buying behaviour. The study provides important insights to managers in terms of designing affordable substitute products of daily necessities for the vulnerable section of the society. In addition, it also provides insights to the policy planners in terms of developing appropriate intervention strategies for the affected consumers.

2. BACKGROUND LITERATURE

Adaptations in people's buying behaviour due to COVID‐19 are in line with the existing literature encompassing changes in consumers' needs and preferences induced by events that are environmental, social, biological, cognitive, and behavioural in nature (Mathur et al.,  2006 ). Such disruptions often force consumers to seek stability (Minton & Cabano,  2021 ) and, as a result, they display conservative and planned behaviour (Sarmento et al.,  2019 ). Such stability‐seeking behaviour induces austerity measures among consumers affected by economic recession or slowdown making consumers more price‐sensitive (Hampson & McGoldrick,  2013 ). While, in the past, pandemics such as influenza have affected economic activities significantly (Verikios et al.,  2016 ), some changes in consumers’ behaviour are not entirely due to the economic impacts. For example, during the outbreak of the Asian flu, consumers have displayed risk‐coping strategies that influenced their consumption of chicken meat (Yeung & Yee,  2012 ). Similarly, natural disasters such as Hurricane Katrina contributed to stress‐induced compulsive and impulsive buying behaviour among the affected residents of the US Gulf Coast (Sneath et al.,  2009 ). During natural disasters, consumers have been observed to have spent on luxury brands and premium categories displaying both cross‐category indulgence (Mark et al.,  2016 ) and impulsive buying behaviour (Kennett‐Hensel et al.,  2012 ).

Recently, adaptations in consumers' buying behaviour due to COVID‐19 have been studied under various themes (Kansiime et al.,  2021 ; Laato et al.,  2020 ; Pakravan‐Charvadeh et al.,  2021 ; Pantano et al.,  2020 ; Rayburn et al.,  2021 ). Gordon‐Wilson ( 2021 ) noted that external influences such as COVID‐19 affected ‘consumer's feelings for self‐control’ by changing their shopping behaviour, type of shopping and preference of store format, and consumption of unhealthy snacks and alcohol. Kim et al. ( 2021 ) highlighted the influence of protection motivation in explaining consumers' commitment to hygienic behaviour, prioritization of local restaurants, and conscious consumption. Guthrie et al. ( 2021 ) employed the react‐cope‐adapt framework to understand how consumer behaviour has evolved in terms of their usage of e‐commerce as a result of stressful events such as the COVID‐19. Eroglu et al. ( 2022 ) revealed that the crowding in retail stores significantly affects the shopping satisfaction of consumers during COVID‐19, which is mediated by customer‐employee rapport. They further argued that such relationships significantly differ based on consumers' perceptions about the appropriateness of retailer precautions, the severity of threats, and vulnerability to COVID‐19. Milaković ( 2021 ) demonstrated the moderating effect of consumer adaptability in explaining the influence of consumer vulnerability and consumer resilience on purchase satisfaction and finally on the repurchase intention of consumers. Yap et al. ( 2021 ) introduced a new dimension called technology‐mediated consumption as a coping strategy adopted by consumers in coping with pandemic‐induced stress and anxiety during the pandemic. They further discussed paradoxes explaining the nexus between the consumption of technology and consumer vulnerability. Nayal et al. ( 2021 ) identified various coping strategies for firms to take care of the employee and customer well‐being. Digitalization and innovation emerged as the two focus areas for adoption by firms for their survival post‐COVID‐19. In addition, the study further revealed that consumers have demonstrated a shift in their consumption behaviour during the present pandemic in favour of hygiene, sustainability, and local products.

The present study also deals with the shifts in consumption behaviour and product substitution behaviour among consumers that were observed during COVID‐19. However, our study is quite different from the existing studies in the sense that we attribute such shifts in consumption and product substitution behaviour to how COVID‐19 has impacted the Consumers' way of life. COVID‐19 pandemic has induced changes in consumers' demand—both in magnitude as well as in their preference (del Rio‐Chanona et al.,  2020 ). The pandemic has also resulted in increased consumption of certain products which were either consumed in lesser quantities or not consumed at all before the event (Kirk & Rifkin,  2020 ). Such effects have led to significant upward shifts in the market demand for these products. We refer to such shifts as ‘new demand’. Examples of ‘new demand’ include cleaning and personal hygiene products such as Lysol and hand sanitizers (Chaudhuri,  2020 ), health and wellness products such as vitamins, healthy foods, and other immunity boosters (Hess,  2020 ), packaged goods and beverages, household care products, fresh and organic foods, personal care products (Knowles et al.,  2020 ) and digital platforms (Debroy,  2020 ), which displayed a surge in demand during COVID‐19. Consumers have also displayed substitution behaviour during the pandemic (Knowles et al.,  2020 ) thereby changing significantly the consumption both by volume as well as product preference. Product substitution is also observed during this pandemic due to lifestyle changes while the change of preference is observed due to awareness of health. The literature on product substitution is characterized by several factors prompting substitution behaviour by consumers (Hamilton et al.,  2014 ). However, while studying new demand and product substitution behaviour under disruptive events, we observed that most of these studies are limited to the economic impacts of the events (Martin et al.,  2020 ) and hence, there is still scope for studying such behaviour considering the non‐economic impacts of the pandemic.

Disruption affects people's lives in a variety of ways derailing their normal ways of living. Earlier studies on disruptions dealt with disruption‐induced depression, lifestyle changes, changes in information, awareness, and education (Mathur et al.,  2006 ; Sneath et al.,  2009 ). During the present pandemic also, significant changes in lifestyle and health awareness (Arora & Grey,  2020 ) were observed. The fear of getting infected with COVID‐19 and the government‐imposed lockdowns have reduced mobility and physical activities (Sánchez‐Sánchez et al.,  2020 ); changed dietary and consumption behaviour (Kansiime et al.,  2021 ; Pakravan‐Charvadeh et al.,  2021 ), and sleep behaviour (Chopra et al.,  2020 ). COVID‐19 has also increased health concerns and awareness impacting consumption of health and wellness products in a significant manner (Baiano et al.,  2020 ; Hess,  2020 ). However, lifestyle changes, awareness towards health, and change in consumption behaviour arising out of COVID‐19 were not found to be uniform across people of diverse socio‐economic groups (Laato et al.,  2020 ). As COVID‐19 has affected the entire population in varying degrees based on their socio‐economic background, there exists a scope for research as to how different consumer groups have adapted their buying behaviour.

3. THEORETICAL MODEL AND DEVELOPMENT OF HYPOTHESES

In order to understand how COVID‐19 has impacted consumers’ way of life and consumer buying behaviour, we mainly draw from preliminary studies, market surveys, and published research articles on the impact of COVID‐19. This study mainly has three dimensions: (1) Consumers' socio‐economic background, (2) Consumers' changing way of life, and (3) Adaptation in consumers' buying behaviour as shown in Figure  1 , which serves as the theoretical model of the present work. Consumers' changing way of life has been captured through ‘Change in affordability’, ‘Lifestyle changes’ and ‘Awareness towards health and hygiene’ arising out of COVID‐19 while Adaptation in consumers' buying behaviour has been represented through ‘Creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products’, ‘Creation of new demand for health and hygiene products’, ‘Substitution of daily necessities due to affordability’ and ‘Substitution of daily necessities due to awareness towards health’.

Theoretical model of the impact of COVID‐19 on consumer behaviour

3.1. Consumers' socio‐economic background and affordability

COVID‐19 has significantly influenced individual and household incomes and spending habits. However, such economic hardships varied based on their occupation, employment status, and socio‐demographic background (Witteveen,  2020 ). The adverse effects are estimated to be strongest for those occupations that are characterized by lower levels of skill, education, and income, have lesser possibilities of working remotely (Adams‐Prassl et al.,  2020 ), and require more face‐to‐face interpersonal contacts (Avdiu & Nayyar,  2020 ; Montenovo et al.,  2020 ). We have observed that some people have received lower than the regular salary in their current employment while a few others have lost their jobs during lockdowns which has adversely affected their capacity to sustain the household expenditure. Many studies have observed that family income, personal savings, and occupational status affected the ability of a household to continue their pre‐COVID spending (Kansiime et al.,  2021 ; Pakravan‐Charvadeh et al.,  2021 ; Piyapromdee & Spittal,  2020 ). In addition, the ability to support the household expenditure is found to depend upon the number of earning members, which further reflects the earning potential of a family (Addabbo,  2000 ). Hence, based on the above discussion, we postulate the following hypotheses:

Occupation significantly influences the affordability of consumers.

Current employment status significantly influences the affordability of consumers.

Family earning status significantly influences the affordability of consumers.

3.2. Consumers' socio‐economic background and lifestyle changes

COVID‐19 has brought a dramatic change in the lifestyle of people. However, the change is different for people belonging to different socio‐economic backgrounds. While occupations such as travel, restaurants, Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSME) have seen reduced business activities, there are people in other occupations, for whom work from home during the pandemic is like a much‐needed break from their monotonous schedule. Thus, the nature of occupation seems to have an impact on the work schedule and lifestyle changes of people. Many studies have noted that occupational social class and status are associated with the lifestyle of people (García‐Mayor et al.,  2021 ). Likewise, receiving a reduced salary or having lost their job during lockdown seems to have had a considerable influence on consumers' lifestyles in terms of daily routine, thought process, and social habits (Khubchandani et al.,  2020 ; PTI,  2020 ). On the other hand, the lifestyle of a family with multiple earning members may be significantly different from a family with a sole earning member (Pew Research,  2008 ). Thus, we advance the following hypotheses:

Occupation significantly influences the lifestyle changes of consumers.

Current employment status significantly influences the lifestyle changes of consumers.

Family earning status significantly influences the lifestyle changes of consumers.

3.3. Consumers' socio‐economic background and awareness towards health and hygiene

COVID‐19 has resulted in people becoming more conscious about their health and personal hygiene (Baiano et al.,  2020 ; Hess,  2020 ). Government advisories and campaigns for maintaining personal hygiene through regular hand washes and wearing masks have resulted in people becoming concerned about their hygiene like never before. However, as occupation varies with the level of education, so does the awareness towards health and hygiene (Teisl et al.,  1999 ). Similarly, awareness towards health and hygiene varies with employment status and family earning status (Prasad et al.,  2008 ). Based on this, we posit the following hypotheses:

Occupation significantly influences the awareness level of consumers towards their health and hygiene.

Current employment status significantly influences the awareness level of consumers towards their health and hygiene.

Family earning status significantly influences the awareness level of consumers towards their health and hygiene.

3.4. Affordability and consumers' buying behaviour

Due to reduced affordability, a large number of people are restricting their expenditure to mostly essentials and healthcare products while cutting down on non‐discretionary products (Martin et al.,  2020 ). This has led to a reduction in sales of many non‐essentials. The pandemic, however, has witnessed a significant rise in the demand for wellness and entertainment products delivered through digital platforms (Bakhtiani,  2021 ; Madnani et al.,  2020 ). Since such subscriptions by consumers are discretionary (Singh,  2020 ), we expect an influence of reduced affordability due to the pandemic on the creation of new demand. Equivalently, it could also be stated that a positive change in affordability would have a positive impact on the usage of such products (Bakhtiani,  2021 ; Madnani et al.,  2020 ). Earlier studies in economics and public health have noted that family income significantly influences demand for hygiene products and associated practices (Aunger et al.,  2016 ; Jacob et al.,  2014 ). In many cases, consumers with lower affordability also explored cheaper alternatives such as private labels and affordable brands (Mishra & Balsara,  2020 ). Therefore, based on the above arguments, we postulate the following hypotheses:

Creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products is significantly associated with the change in affordability.

Creation of new demand for products relating to health and hygiene is significantly associated with the change in affordability.

The demand for affordable substitute products of daily necessities is significantly associated with the change in affordability.

3.5. Lifestyle changes and demand for wellness and entertainment products

Lifestyle changes due to COVID‐19 have made people more sensitive to fitness that caused a surge in demand for wellness products (Ojha,  2020 ). Many people are now preferring organic and herbal products and are subscribing to fitness classes and channels (Wernau & Gasparro,  2020 ). Furthermore, institutional lockdowns imposed by governments have forced people to stay at home and spend time with their families (Debroy,  2020 ). Additionally, with a regular source of entertainment such as restaurants and movie theatres remaining restricted, people have turned to online platforms for recreation. Even online yoga classes have experienced a spike in their viewership with the spread of this virus (Debroy,  2020 ). Thus, we propose the following hypothesis:

Creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products is positively associated with Lifestyle changes.

3.6. Awareness towards health and hygiene and demand for health and hygiene products

Marketing experts have always emphasized the importance of increasing awareness among consumers to increase product demand (Baiano et al.,  2020 ; Hess,  2020 ). COVID‐19 has resulted in people becoming more conscious about their health and personal hygiene. As part of maintaining a proper and healthy lifestyle, regular hand washes and wearing masks are considered to be the defence mechanisms of protecting oneself from the virus. Common people have been spending more on buying healthcare products (Rakshit,  2020 ). Moreover, the current times have witnessed an incomparable urge in people to substitute unhealthy food items and daily necessities with healthy ones (Master,  2020 ; Renner et al.,  2020 ). Thus, the following hypotheses are advanced:

Creation of new demand for products relating to health and hygiene is positively associated with consumers' awareness towards health and hygiene.

The demand for healthy substitute products of daily necessities is positively associated with consumers' awareness towards health and hygiene.

3.7. Consumers' socio‐economic background and creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products

During this pandemic, fitness and wellness products, and digital platforms such as Netflix have become very popular (Debroy,  2020 ). However, the nature of demand for wellness and entertainment products varied across people with different socio‐economic backgrounds. A person's occupation, employment status, and family income influence consumers' preference for wellness products (Suresh & Ravichandran,  2011 ) and also have a considerable impact on the creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products (Madnani et al.,  2020 ). Therefore, we propose to investigate further the relationship between consumers with diverse socio‐economic backgrounds and the creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products. Thus, we postulate the following hypotheses:

Occupation significantly influences the creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products.

Current employment status significantly influences the creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products.

Family earning status significantly influences the creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products.

3.8. Consumers' socio‐economic background and creation of new demand for health and hygiene products

This pandemic has also seen an increased demand for health and hygiene products (Dsouza,  2020 ). People have been forced to spend on hand washes, sanitizers, and masks to protect against this rapidly spreading virus. As there are occupations that would put an individual and her/his family into different levels of vulnerabilities (Avdiu & Nayyar,  2020 ), we expect variations in the consumption of health and hygiene products based on their occupation (Riise et al.,  2003 ). Earlier research has established the relationship between family income and consumers' preference for healthy food (Galati et al.,  2019 ; Pakravan‐Charvadeh et al.,  2021 ). The reduced income and job losses would have a significant bearing on both mental stress as well as disposable income (Witteveen,  2020 ) which, in turn, influence the choice of consumers for health and hygiene products (Khubchandani et al.,  2020 ). Therefore, the creation of new demand for health and hygiene products seems to vary depending on the types of occupation, current employment status, and family earning status. Thus, we propose the following hypotheses:

Occupation significantly influences the creation of new demand for products relating to health and hygiene.

Current employment status significantly influences the creation of new demand for products relating to health and hygiene.

Family earning status significantly influences the creation of new demand for products relating to health and hygiene.

4. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

4.1. design of survey instrument and its reliability.

The findings of Paul and Bhukya ( 2021 ) reveal that the impact of COVID‐19 on consumer behaviour is one of the important contemporary topics of research. However, we could not find any suitable questionnaire in the extant literature with specific reference to the hypothesized research model depicted in Figure  1 which could be directly utilized for data collection purposes. We came across several items in the literature for other kinds of disasters, which were found relevant for our study. In addition, we also observed through newspapers, electronic media, and social media the challenges faced by the consumers in respect of reduced salary, job losses, health issues, the surge in demand for products relating to health and hygiene, etc. arising out of COVID‐19. We took cognizance of all these aspects and framed an open‐ended questionnaire in the initial phase to develop an understanding of different types of challenges faced by the consumers and their impact on changing consumer behaviour. The open‐ended questionnaire was translated into Hindi, Malayalam, and Bengali with the help of three bilingual experts having expertise in Hindi, Malayalam, and Bengali languages respectively along with English. We administered this questionnaire to consumers with different linguistic and socio‐economic backgrounds. We identified five respondents from Government/Public Sector organisations, five from Multinational/Private sector firms, and five from MSMEs. In addition, we identified three independent businessmen and seven daily wage‐earners. All these respondents were requested to participate in the study after thoroughly explaining to them the purpose of undertaking this particular exercise. They agreed to take part in the study. However, the daily wage‐earners had to be given INR100/‐ each to motivate them to take part in the study. Amongst these respondents, some of them could understand Hindi well, some of them could understand Malayalam well while a few others could understand Bengali well. In the case of employees of Public sector and Private sector firms, the questionnaire was sent through email with the request to provide unambiguous responses within a week. In the case of the employees of MSMEs and independent businessmen, we took separate appointments through telephonic calls and requested that one of the authors would seek responses from them in person by maintaining the protocol of social distancing. One author from Delhi and another author from Kozhikode separately conducted this exercise in Delhi and Kozhikode respectively. Finally, in the case of daily wage‐earners, we directly talked to a few rickshaw‐pullers, a few street vendors, and a few masons and managed to secure their responses after incentivizing them. We asked the questions verbally to this category of respondents and they replied to the specific questions based on their experience. Thus, we had to record the conversations which were later transcribed.

Based on the responses received from the preliminary study, we summarized them under different sections and designed another open‐ended questionnaire. The purpose of designing the second‐round open‐ended questionnaire was to cross‐check the same with the experts and to ensure adequate and appropriate coverage of the items under different sections thereby taking care of the content validity of the questionnaire. For example, we identified several items reflecting the financial distress faced by the common people due to COVID‐19 and put them under ‘Affordability’. We requested the experts to exercise their judgment in terms of whether those items represent the essence of ‘Affordability’. Those experts were chosen who had considerable experience in selling essential items either through the offline or online channel. In addition, a few more experts were also selected who conducted research in consumer behaviour for a sufficient period. Accordingly, we selected experts from both academia and industry, which included one Professor of Marketing, two researchers doing research in consumer behaviour, one manager from an offline store selling essential items, and one executive from an online retailer. These experts were known to be thoroughly conversant with the impact of COVID‐19 on the consumers’ way of life and also their changing buying behaviour across consumers of varying socio‐economic backgrounds. The experts recommended the retention of most of the items and the removal of very few ones. Subsequently, we designed the close‐ended questionnaire based on the recommendation of the experts. The close‐ended questionnaire was divided into three sections. The first section contained questions relating to the socio‐demographic profile and earning status of the respondents. The second section carried questions about the factors influencing Consumers' changing way of life arising out of COVID‐19. Finally, the third section contained questions pertaining to the adaptations on consumers' buying behaviour due to COVID‐19. A five‐point Likert scale ranging from 1 = Not at all True to 5 = Absolutely True was used as a response format in the second and third sections. The questionnaire was shown to the same experts once again to elicit their opinion for evaluating its ease of understanding from the perspective of potential respondents. Based on the recommendation of experts, some questions were rephrased. This exercise helped us in ensuring the content validity of the questionnaire. Table  1 presents the first part of the questionnaire while Appendices  1 and 2 show the second and third parts of the questionnaire respectively.

Distribution of the respondents based on socio‐demographic background ( n  = 425)

Subsequently, the reliability of the questionnaire was tested by administering the survey on 30 respondents chosen carefully. Cronbach's alpha of the scale representing Consumers' changing way of life turned out to be 0.795 while the same for the scale showing Adaptation in consumers’ buying behaviour was found to be 0.895. Both the scales showed high corrected item‐to‐total correlations which indicated the presence of high internal consistency. Since the alpha value of both scales was well above the threshold level of 0.7, these scales were considered reliable (Hair et al.,  2009 ).

4.2. Target respondents and collection of data

The survey was administered amongst the respondents with diverse socio‐economic backgrounds in India. The questionnaire was circulated among people working in Government organisations, private sector organisations, MSMEs, and also among the daily wage‐earners. Given the diversity of the languages, we administered the survey in four languages including, English, Hindi, Malayalam, and Bengali. The above languages were chosen as a substantial percentage of the population of India speaks these languages. Efforts were also made to ensure that only one response is received from a single household. Because of the lockdown and the restrictions on mobility, we chose a variety of mediums to reach out to the potential respondents. We approached the potential respondents both through online and offline mode. In the case of online mode, the questionnaire was circulated on social media mainly through LinkedIn, WhatsApp, and Facebook urging people to respond to the questionnaire. These mediums were chosen for their immense popularity in India in terms of the number of users. They were further selected as the authors also have their active networks and groups in these platforms. In the case of offline mode, some respondents were sent questionnaires via email while others were administered through hard copies of the questionnaire in a language of their choice. Field‐workers were hired against remuneration who physically received the responses directly by visiting the respondents' doorsteps or by reaching out to them in public places like, malls, popular restaurants, and shops. Field‐workers were clearly instructed to explain the essence of the questionnaire to the respondents thoroughly before asking them to fill out the questionnaire. They were further advised not to fill out the questionnaire on behalf of the respondents. The questionnaire survey was administered over two months during August and September 2020. During this period, different parts of India were experiencing a variety of restrictions depending on the number and severity of COVID‐19 cases in different places. A total of 494 responses were received out of which 69 responses were found to be incomplete and incoherent. Thus, we were left with 425 usable responses for the final analysis.

4.3. Tests for potential bias in survey data

Non‐response bias was assessed by performing a t ‐test on the scores of early and late respondents based on the assumption that the opinions of late respondents are representative of the opinions of non‐respondents (Krause et al.,  2001 ). A total of 241 responses (56.7%) were received in the first month (i.e., August 2020) while 184 responses (43.3%) were received in the second month (i.e., September 2020). Respondents giving responses in the first month were considered as early respondents while those giving responses in the second month were treated as late respondents. T ‐tests were carried out between early respondents with 241 responses and late respondents with 184 responses on individual items. The results did not reveal any significant difference between the two groups for most of the items. This indicates that the data was relatively free from non‐response bias.

As this study relied on single respondents for doing the final analysis, the potential for common method bias to influence the results was also evaluated. We applied Harman's one‐factor test to evaluate common method bias separately on the scale representing Consumers’ changing way of life and the scale reflecting Adaptation in consumers’ buying behaviour . We carried out the above test separately for both the scales in IBM SPSS (version 25) by doing exploratory factor analysis without rotation. All 13 items representing Consumers’ changing way of life were allowed to be loaded into one single factor and again all 16 items reflecting Adaptation in consumers' buying behaviour were loaded into another single factor. It was found that the common factor representing Consumers' changing way of life explained only 25% of the total variance while the common factor capturing Adaptation in consumers' buying behaviour explained only 30.4% of the total variance. Since the total variance of a single factor was less than 50% in both the scales, the common method bias did not seem to be a concern for the present study (Podsakoff et al.,  2003 ).

5. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

The 425 usable responses were also checked for missing values and inconsistency. An overview of the respondents' demographic profile, descriptive statistics, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and the validation of the conceptual model using the Structured Equation Modelling (SEM) is presented in the following sub‐sections. We utilized IBM SPSS (version 25) for finding out the descriptive statistics of manifest variables and the demographic profile of the respondents. In addition, we also employed IBM SPSS AMOS (version 24) for carrying out CFA and SEM. Regarding descriptive statistics, we determined the minimum score, maximum score, mean and standard deviation of all items of both the scales and presented the same in Appendices  1 and 2 .

5.1. Demographic profile

The socio‐economic profile of 425 respondents revealed that most of them were of working age with a sizeable number of respondents (71.53%) turning out to be male. A majority of the respondents were employed (74.83%). However, a substantial portion of respondents lost their jobs or was receiving reduced salaries after the imposition of lockdown (35.76%). In terms of educational qualification, a major portion of the respondents (69.88%) were graduates with 56% of them having earned their degree in a professional course. The family earning status of the respondents showed that 29.88% were the sole earners in their family. The details of the demographic profile are provided in Table  1 .

5.2. Confirmatory factor analysis

The questionnaire developed through several rounds of an iterative process and validated by the experts allowed us to determine the underlying constructs. We observed that Consumers' changing way of life consists of three constructs while Adaptation in consumers' buying behaviour comprises four constructs. We applied CFA to assess how well the observed variables including 13 items relating to the Consumers' changing way of life and another 16 items representing Adaptation in consumers' buying behaviour arising out of COVID‐19 reflect unobserved or latent constructs in the hypothesized structure. In the CFA model, all seven constructs were allowed to be correlated with each other forming a composite measurement scale representing the Consumers' changing way of life and Adaptation in consumers' buying behaviour due to COVID‐19. The model was assessed by utilizing the maximum likelihood (ML) method. One of the prerequisites of the ML method is the normality of the endogenous variables (Kline,  2016 ). Thus, for ascertaining whether the data of the endogenous variables follow a normal distribution or not, we computed the kurtosis value. We observed that the values of almost all variables remained within the range of −7 to +7, which assuaged the concern regarding the non‐normality of the data (Mueller & Hancock,  2019 ).

All items were evaluated based on several criteria including items standardized regression weights, squared multiple correlations, and standardized residual covariance. In addition, the theoretical importance and practical significance of every item were taken into consideration while refining the model. This resulted in the removal of five variables of the Consumers' changing way of life and another three variables of Consumers' buying behaviour from the model thereby leaving eight items of Consumers' changing way of life and another 13 items of Consumers' buying behaviour in the final measurement model. This, however, did not significantly affect the content validity of the scale. Rather the model became further parsimonious. We found that one construct namely ‘lifestyle changes’ was left with only two items. However, it did not give rise to the problem of under‐identification of the measurement model. The findings of Das ( 2018 ) and Pullman et al. ( 2009 ) revealed several constructs which contain only two items. The presence of such constructs with two items did not create the problem of under‐identification of measurement models in the above research findings. Goodness of fit (GOF) measures of the final measurement model were as follows: χ 2  = 338.939, degrees of freedom ( df ) = 162, p  = .00, χ 2 / df  = 2.092, goodness fit index (GFI) = 0.931, Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.902, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.951, Tucker‐Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.937, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) [90% CI] = 0.051 [0.043, 0.058], Standardized Root Mean Residual (SRMR) = 0.0512. For an adequate model fit, the fit indices of GFI, CFI, and TLI should be at least 0.9 while the same of RMSEA and SRMR should be less than 0.08 (Hair et al.,  2009 ). Thus, based on the fit indices, it could be inferred that the measurement model fits well with the data on all major indices. The details of the measurement results are shown in Table  2 , which includes the descriptive statistics of the constructs pertaining to the Consumers' changing way of life and Adaptation to consumers' buying behaviour . This includes the mean, standard deviation, and reliability value (Cronbach's alpha) of each construct and also the inter‐construct correlations.

Summary of the measurement results and inter‐construct correlations

The above table shows that Cronbach's alpha coefficients of six constructs out of seven have exceeded 0.7 thereby indicating sound reliability of these constructs (Hair et al.,  2009 ). Alpha coefficient of the remaining one construct reveals acceptable reliability value over 0.6 (Hair et al.,  2009 ). In addition, Table  2 also shows that almost all inter‐construct correlations are significant at 0.1% or 1% level. Only one inter‐construct correlation is significant at 10% level. These inter‐construct correlations help us in ascertaining the discriminant validity of all the constructs, which is discussed in the later part of this section.

This model was systematically evaluated for Construct Reliability (CR), convergent validity, and discriminant validity in order to validate the constructs of the Consumers' changing way of life and Adaptation to consumers' buying behaviour due to COVID‐19. In the present study, we have estimated the CR coefficient of all constructs which is shown in Table  3 . The estimate of CR lying between 0.6 to 0.7 is considered acceptable while the value above 0.7 suggests good reliability of a construct (Hair et al.,  2009 ). Thus, the six constructs may be considered to possess excellent reliability while the remaining one construct is characterized by an acceptable level of reliability.

Results of Reliability, Convergent and Discriminant validity of the consumers' changing way of life and consumers' buying behaviour

Abbreviations: AVE, average variance extracted; CR, construct reliability.

Convergent validity requires that the indicator variables of a given construct share a high proportion of variance in common. It was evaluated by following two different approaches. The first method involves the inspection of estimated factor loadings of items on the constructs in the final CFA model (Anderson & Gerbing,  1988 ). It was found that the standardized loadings of all items are greater than 0.5 and statistically significant ( p  < .001). The second method involves the assessment of convergent validity with the help of Average Variance Extracted (AVE). An AVE of 0.5 or more of a construct indicates a high level of convergent validity (Hair et al.,  2009 ). The seven constructs have AVE ranging from 0.477 to 0.648 as shown in Table  3 . Six constructs have more than the threshold level of AVE (0.5), thus indicating a high convergent validity of the above constructs. Only the lifestyle changes construct is found to have an AVE slightly below the threshold value. However, since this construct meets the criteria of convergent validity in the first method and in the second method, the value of AVE is somewhat close to the threshold value, the lifestyle changes construct may be considered to possess a reasonable level of convergent validity.

Discriminant validity is a measure of how a construct is distinct from other constructs in the same model and whether each construct is measuring different concepts (Hair et al.,  2009 ). Discriminant validity was also assessed by following two different approaches. The first method involves the investigation of the correlation between each pair of constructs in the CFA model. If the correlations between constructs are well below 0.9; then there is very little possibility that a group of items loading significantly on one construct would also load on another construct (Kline,  2016 ). The correlations between the constructs occurred within the range of −0.282 to 0.616, which were well below 0.9. This is reported in Table  2 . The second method involves the comparison of the AVE of each construct with the shared variance of each pair of constructs. If the square root of the AVE of each construct is more than the correlation of each pair of constructs, then this implies that the constructs account for a greater proportion of variance of the items that are assigned to them (Fornell & Larcker,  1981 ). Table  3 shows that the lowest value of AVE of a construct is 0.477. Its square root is 0.690, which exceeds the maximum correlation coefficient of 0.616 between a pair of constructs as reported in Table  2 . Thus, the seven construct CFA model demonstrates a satisfactory level of discriminant validity. This facilitated the SEM on the final measurement model to be carried out for investigating the relationships hypothesized in Section  3 .

5.3. Structural equation modelling

The final measurement model has been taken as the main input for developing the structural model. In the structural model, demographic variables of the respondents including occupation, current employment status, and family earning status were considered as the exogenous variables while Consumers' changing way of life and consumers’ buying behaviour arising out of COVID‐19 were treated as endogenous variables. This was investigated through SEM and the hypotheses formulated earlier were tested. The model was assessed utilizing the ML estimation method. GOF measures of the structural model were as follows: χ 2  = 887.533, df  = 324, p  = .00, χ 2 / df  = 2.739, GFI = 0.878, AGFI = 0.825, TLI = 0.840, CFI = 0.881, RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.064 [0.059, 0.069], SRMR = 0.075. The fit indices indicate that TLI and CFI are below the acceptable level of 0.9 while RMSEA and SRMR are within the acceptable range of 0.08 (Hair et al.,  2009 ). In this context, it is to be mentioned that the model complexity in terms of the number of observed variables, number of parameters estimated, etc. has a significant negative impact on GFI, AGFI, and CFI. Thus, the general rules of thumb with the cut‐off values of GFI or CFI being at least 0.9 may sometimes be misleading for complex models (Baumgartner & Homburg,  1996 ). A similar observation was also made by Srinivasan et al. ( 2002 ) in respect of model complexity. In one of the measurement models developed by them, both CFI and TLI were found below 0.9. However, since both RMSEA and SRMR remained within the acceptable range of 0.08, the model was considered reasonably fitting to the data. Based on the above argument, we can infer that the present findings indicate an acceptable level of fit to the above indices. The final structural model is shown in Figure  2 . We have shown only the significant paths in this model, which include both direct effects and total effects covering both direct and indirect effects. The interpretation of these paths has been provided in appropriate places of the following section.

Final model of the impact of COVID‐19 on consumer behaviour

6. MAJOR FINDINGS

6.1. influence of occupation, employment status and earning status on affordability.

The profile of the socio‐demographic and economic background of the respondents provided in Table  1 reveals that they differ in terms of their occupations, current employment status, and also their earning status. The respondents were categorized into five types of occupations described as Job1 through Job5. In terms of employment status, they were categorized into four types which have been shown as Emp1 through Emp4. Finally, the respondents were classified into three categories in terms of the earning potential of their family, which have been designated as Earn1 through Earn3. All these categorizations in terms of occupation, employment status, and earning status have been indicated in Table  4 . The categorical variables were transformed into binary variables individually before considering them as exogenous variables. In the structural model, Job1, Emp1, and Earn2 were considered as the reference categories for occupation, employment status, and earning status respectively following Cohen et al. ( 2003 ), as each one of them was the most dominant category in the respective socio‐economic classes and least likely to be affected compared to other categories by the pandemic. Out of 21 hypotheses formulated in Section  3 , 15 hypotheses had a direct effect while the remaining six hypotheses involved both direct and indirect (mediating) effects. Tables  4 and ​ and5 5 present the results of hypotheses that only have a direct effect, based on standardized regression weights (β), critical ratios (t‐value), and p values. Table  4 specifically describes the results of the effect of Consumers' socio‐economic background on their changing way of life. The results of Hypothesis  1a showing the relationship between occupation and affordability reveal that the affordability of people with four types of occupations (Job2 through Job5) was negatively affected due to COVID‐19 compared to the affordability of people belonging to the reference category, i.e., Job1. However, the negative effect was found to be significant only for people with occupation categories Job3 and Job5. This suggests that the lockdown affected the affordability of people in the unorganised sector more than the organised sector. The results of Hypothesis  1b explaining the relationship between current employment status and affordability indicate that there was a significant negative effect on the affordability of people of three types of employment (Emp2 through Emp4) due to COVID‐19 compared to the same belonging to the reference category, i.e., Emp1. This directly demonstrates that people having lost their job or receiving reduced salaries due to COVID‐19 were severely affected in terms of their affordability compared to the people who were receiving full salaries. Hypothesis  1c describing the relationship between family earning status and affordability shows that the affordability of people with two categories of earning status (Earn1 and Earn3) was not affected due to COVID‐19 compared to the reference category, i.e., Earn2. This further illustrates the fact that the respondents with a single earning member, multiple earning members, or non‐earning members cannot be differentiated in terms of their affordability due to COVID‐19. The significant impact of occupation with categories Job3 and Job5 on affordability and again the significant effect of employment status including categories Emp2 through Emp4 have been indicated in the final structural model (Figure  2 ).

Results of structural model for socio‐economic factors (direct effects) ( n  = 425)

Job1: Respondents who are working in government or public sector jobs; Job2: Respondents who are working in private sector jobs; Job3: Respondents who are working in MSME sectors/ Contractors/ Daily wage earners;

Job4: Respondents who own their own business or startups; Job5: Respondents with other job profiles.

Emp1: Respondents who are currently employed and getting full salary; Emp2: Respondents who are currently employed but are getting reduced salary; Emp3: Respondents who have lost their jobs during lockdown; Emp4: Respondents with other employment status;

Earn1: Respondents who are the sole earners of the family; Earn2: Respondents who are one of the earning members of the family; Earn3: Respondents who are the non‐earning members of the family.

Results of structural model of consumers' way of life (direct effects) ( n  = 425)

6.2. Influence of occupation, employment status and earning status on lifestyle changes

Following a similar approach, we investigated the influence of occupation, current employment status, and earning status on lifestyle changes of people due to COVID‐19. Hypothesis  2a showing the relationship between occupation and lifestyle changes reveals that the lifestyle changes of people with Job2 through Job5 were significantly affected in opposite direction compared to the lifestyle changes of people with reference category, i.e., Job1. This demonstrates that people other than those engaged in the Government or Public sector did not indulge themselves in lifestyle changes arising out of COVID‐19. Hypothesis  2b explaining the relationship between current employment status reveals that the lifestyle changes of people with Emp2 and Emp3 were positively affected compared to the lifestyle changes of people with reference category, i.e., Emp1. The effect was found to be significant. This signifies that the people receiving a reduced salary or having lost their jobs are becoming more concerned with doing yoga and using herbal products in their day‐to‐day life compared to the people receiving full salary. Hypothesis  2c delineating the relationship between family earning status and lifestyle changes shows that the lifestyle changes of people with Earn1 and Earn3 were not affected compared to the reference category, i.e., Earn2. This indicates that the lifestyle changes of people cannot be differentiated based on their earning status. The significant effect of occupation with categories Job2 through Job5 on lifestyle changes and further the significant effect of employment with categories Emp2 and Emp3 on lifestyle changes have been shown in Figure  2 .

6.3. Influence of occupation, employment status and earning status on awareness towards health

Hypothesis  3a describing the relationship between occupation and awareness towards health reveals that the health awareness of people with occupations Job2 through Job5 was negatively affected compared to the awareness of people with reference category, i.e., Job1. However, the effect was found significant only in the case of Job2. Hypothesis  3b showing the relationship between employment status and awareness towards health indicates that the awareness of people with categories Emp2, Emp3, and Emp4 was not affected compared to the reference category, i.e., Emp1. This implies that the awareness of people towards health cannot be distinguished based on their employment status. Finally, Hypothesis  3c outlining the relationship between earning status and awareness towards health shows that the awareness of people with Earn1 and Earn3 was not affected compared to the reference category, Earn2. This further explains that the awareness of people towards health cannot be discriminated against based on their earning status. The significant effect of occupation with category Job2 on awareness towards health is shown in Figure  2 .

6.4. Association of Affordability, Lifestyle Changes and Health Awareness with Demand for Wellness Products, Health Products, Substitution of Affordable necessities etc

Table  5 presents the results of the impact of different constructs constituting Consumers' changing way of life on the Adaptation in consumers’ buying behaviour . Hypothesis  4a reveals that the increase in demand for wellness and entertainment products was associated with a fall in affordability. However, the effect was not significant. Similarly, the increase in demand for products relating to health and hygiene was associated with a non‐significant decrease in affordability as specified in Hypothesis  4b . Hypothesis  4c shows that the fall in affordability had a significant influence on the demand for affordable substitute products of daily necessities. Hypothesis  5 shows that lifestyle changes had a significant positive influence on the demand for wellness products which explains the reported rise in demand for wellness and entertainment products during the pandemic. Further, increased awareness towards health and hygiene had a significant positive influence on the demand for products relating to health and hygiene as also on the demand for healthy substitute products of daily necessities as described in Hypotheses  6a and 6b respectively. The significant results of Hypotheses  4c , 5 , 6a , and 6b have been delineated in Figure  2 . Thus, our study validates many of the anecdotal explanations that are observed in market surveys and news reports on the effect of COVID‐19 on consumers' changing buying behaviour.

6.5. Influence of occupation on the demand for wellness products

Test results of the remaining six hypotheses involving both direct and indirect effects of socio‐economic background , Consumers’ changing way of life, and consumers' buying behaviour have been shown individually in Tables  6 , ​ ,7, 7 , ​ ,8, 8 , ​ ,9. 9 . These tables show the direct effect, indirect effect, and total effect of the relationships. We utilized the AMOS plugin developed by Gaskin and Lim ( 2018 ) for estimating the specific indirect effect in IBM SPSS AMOS (version 24). Table  6 presents the results of Hypothesis  7 explaining the influence of occupation on the demand for wellness and entertainment products. We considered Job1 as the reference category and tested the scores obtained by categories Job2 through Job5 against the reference category. The results show that the occupation with category Job3 had a significant negative influence on the creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products compared to the reference category. The association is moderate which is mediated through two mediating constructs: (1) Change in affordability and (2) Lifestyle changes. Further, the mediation is partial. However, it was observed that the creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products by the remaining categories of occupations including Job2, Job4, and Job5 did not significantly differ from the demand created by the reference category. We present the results of Hypothesis  7 in Table  6 for occupation with category Job3 only. We further show the results of the total significant effect of occupation with category Job3 on the demand for wellness and entertainment products in Figure  2 through a bold arrow.

Hypothesis  7 Influence of occupation on the demand for wellness products (direct, indirect and total effects) ( n  = 425)

Hypothesis  9 Influence of earning status on the demand for wellness products (direct, indirect and total effects) ( n  = 425)

Hypothesis  11 Influence of emp. Status on the creation of new demand for health products (direct, indirect and total effects) ( n  = 425)

Hypothesis  12 Influence of earning status on the creation of new demand for health products (direct, indirect and total effects) ( n  = 425)

6.6. Influence of employment status and earning status on the demand for wellness products

We investigated the results of Hypothesis  8 describing the influence of current employment status on the demand for wellness products considering Emp1 as the reference category and observed that the current employment status of people with categories Emp2 through Emp4 did not have a significant influence on the creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products compared to the reference category. Since the results of Hypothesis  8 involving all categories of employment status were insignificant, we have not reported the results. We analysed the results of Hypothesis  9 explaining the influence of family earning status on the demand for wellness products considering Earn2 as the reference category. The results are presented in Table  7 . The results reveal that the earning status of people of category Earn1 had a significant negative influence on the creation of new demand for wellness and entertainment products compared to the reference category. The relationship is mediated by two mediating constructs: (1) Change in affordability and (2) Lifestyle changes and the mediation is full. It was further observed that the earning status of people of category Earn3 did not have any significant influence on the demand for wellness and entertainment products compared to the reference category. The significant effect of Hypothesis  9 explaining the influence of earning status with category Earn1 on the demand for wellness and entertainment products is represented in Figure  2 .

6.7. Influence of occupation, employment status and earning status on the demand for health products

We analysed the influence of occupation on the creation of new demand for health and hygiene products considering Job1 as the reference category and found that the occupation with categories Job2 through Job5 did not have a significant influence on the creation of new demand for health and hygiene products compared to the reference category. We, therefore, have not reported the results of Hypothesis  10 . We investigated the results of Hypothesis  11 delineating the influence of current employment status on the creation of new demand for health and hygiene products considering Emp1 as the reference category. The results show that the employment status of category Emp3 had a significant positive influence on the creation of new demand for health and hygiene products compared to the reference category. The association is mediated by two constructs: (1) Change in affordability and (2) Awareness towards health and hygiene and the mediation is partial. We did not observe any significant influence of employment status with categories Emp2 and Emp4 on the creation of new demand for health and hygiene products compared to the reference category. Table  8 presents the results of hypothesis Hypothesis  11 for employment status with category Emp3 only. We have further shown the total significant effect of Hypothesis  11 in respect of employment status of category Emp3 in Figure  2 . Finally, Table  9 outlines the results of Hypothesis  12 explaining the influence of earning status on the creation of new demand for health and hygiene products considering Earn2 as the reference category. The results reveal that the family earning status of category Earn3 had a significant positive influence on the creation of new demand for health and hygiene products compared to the reference category. The association is mediated by two constructs: (1) Change in affordability and (2) Awareness towards health and hygiene and the mediation is partial. The significant total effect of Hypothesis  12 in respect of earning status of category Earn3 is depicted in Figure  2 . The earning status of people of category Earn1 did not have any significant influence on the demand for health and hygiene products compared to the reference category.

7. DISCUSSION

7.1. theoretical contributions.

The main theoretical contribution of the study involves understanding the impact of the socio‐economic background of the respondents in terms of their occupation, employment status, and family earning status on Consumers’ changing way of life and subsequently on consumers’ changing buying behaviour at a granular level in the context of the pandemic. While earlier researchers had studied consumption shifts during the pandemic (Laato et al.,  2020 ; Pakravan‐Charvadeh et al.,  2021 ), we are not aware of any study that investigated the Consumers' changing way of life and their changing buying behaviour arising out of COVID‐19 based on the socio‐economic background of the consumers. Although the survey was carried out in India in the backdrop of COVID‐19 pandemic, the findings of the study could provide important insights to other emerging economies afflicted with COVID‐19. Thus, it may be considered as a significant contribution to the existing body of consumer behaviour literature.

Second , we have gone beyond panic buying and stockpiling behaviour, which are extensively covered in the earlier works (Kirk & Rifkin,  2020 ; Laato et al.,  2020 ), with an attempt to link affordability, lifestyle changes, and health awareness with consumer behaviour. The findings of the study demonstrating the impact of consumers' socio‐economic background on their affordability, lifestyle changes, and awareness towards health and finally on the adaptation in consumers' buying behaviour arising out of COVID‐19 have enabled us to develop a theoretical model which seems to be generalisable for other similar kinds of pandemics in the emerging economies. Third , the extant literature suggests that during the period of the pandemic, consumers focus mostly on essential products and exercise control on discretionary expenditure. However, the present study notes that the demand for some discretionary products (e.g., the demand for wellness and entertainment products) has shown a varying pattern depending on the occupation and earning potential of a family during the pandemic. We have further demonstrated that this change in demand for wellness products among consumers of certain socio‐economic groups is not merely due to the economic impacts but also due to the pandemic‐induced lifestyle changes. By including lifestyle changes, we have added a new dimension to the understanding of consumers’ behaviour during the pandemic and enriched similar studies by earlier researchers such as Naeem ( 2020 ) who attributed consumers’ impulsive buying to information overload. Fourth, the study reveals that the creation of new demand for health and hygiene products was found to depend upon the current employment status and family earning status of consumers which is jointly mediated by affordability and awareness towards health and hygiene. These findings enrich our understanding of consumers' behaviour in terms of their demand for wellness products as also the demand for health and hygiene products during the pandemic (Pakravan‐Charvadeh et al.,  2021 ). Finally , the study further reveals that the consumers demonstrated product substitution behaviour due to the availability of affordable substitutes of daily necessities and also due to the availability of healthy substitutes of daily necessities. Therefore, our study confirms product substitution behaviour during the pandemic as noted by Knowles et al. ( 2020 ). Thus, it may also be considered to be another unique contribution of the present study.

7.2. Managerial implications

The study reveals that the affordability of the most vulnerable section of people including daily wage earners and those working in MSMEs has been affected due to COVID‐19. The study also finds that the affordability of the people receiving a reduced salary or having lost their jobs has also been severely affected. This provides an important insight to the policy planners in terms of developing targeted intervention strategies with a view to providing economic aid to the affected people. In addition, the study provides insights to marketing managers in terms of designing and introducing affordable substitute products of daily necessities for a substantial section of the population. Thus, there lies an opportunity to penetrate the market with inexpensive substitutes in a market already occupied by established brands.

The study shows that people engaged in most of the occupations other than Government or public sector jobs are not much concerned with lifestyle changes arising out of COVID‐19. However, it shows that people receiving a reduced salary or having lost their jobs have become quite active in practicing yoga and utilizing herbal products. This possibly indicates that these consumers have become sensitive in maintaining their health due to the fear of contagion despite the challenging situation faced by them in their professional lives. On further scrutiny, we observed that the demand for wellness products by people working in the unorganised sectors is significantly lower than those working in the organised sectors. It is significantly less in a family with a sole earning member than in a family with multiple earning members. In addition, the demand for wellness products by people receiving a reduced salary or having lost their jobs does not significantly differ from people receiving full salary. Thus, the market planners need to carefully take into consideration the socio‐economic factors of the consumers including occupation, employment status, and family earning status while introducing wellness products in the market. Increased awareness towards health and hygiene motivates marketing managers to introduce innovative products relating to health and hygiene and healthy substitute products of daily necessities. To boost demand, designing appropriate awareness campaigns would be very useful. It is observed that the demand for health and hygiene products by people belonging to different occupations does not significantly differ from the people working in the government or public sector jobs. Further, the people who lost their jobs exhibited significantly more demand for health and hygiene products than those receiving full salary. In addition, the demand for such products by the non‐earning members of a family has significantly increased compared to the multiple earning members of a family. This is quite surprising. This probably indicates that even though the pandemic has negatively affected the economies across the globe, the sale of products relating to health and hygiene has significantly increased. The companies selling products relating to health and hygiene should go all out in their efforts to advertise and increase their sales during such a crisis. Finally, there is an opportunity to introduce healthy substitutes of daily necessities in a market already occupied by established brands.

Given that emerging economies such as India, where this study was carried out, have a large share of the unorganised or informal sector (Murthy,  2019 ), our findings are indicative of the nature of the economic impact that the unorganised sector has experienced during this pandemic. Post‐COVID it would be essential for firms dealing with daily necessities to expand their product assortments to include cheaper alternatives. Emerging economies are further characterized by a smaller market for health and hygiene as well as the wellness and digital entertainment market (Sood,  2020 ). The study observed that it is lifestyle and health awareness that affect the demand for wellness and entertainment products, and hygiene products respectively. Hence, firms dealing with such products in emerging markets should realise that it is important to focus on market creation through lifestyle changes and health awareness in addition to regular promotions. The study also gives enough insights into the customer segments that could be targeted for such efforts.

8. CONCLUSION

In this paper, we have carried out a questionnaire survey to understand the impact of COVID‐19 on consumers' affordability, lifestyle, and health awareness and how these effects influenced their buying behaviour. Analysis of the survey data revealed several interesting facts about the impact of COVID‐19 and how the consumers behaved. Some of the major findings of this study include: (1) COVID‐19 affected the affordability of consumers employed in the unorganised sectors more than those who were employed in the organised sector, (2) Type of occupation, current employment status, and the earning potential of a family had a varying degree of impact on lifestyle changes undergone by consumers, and (3) the health awareness was significantly higher for consumers who lost their jobs or had lower family earning status. It was observed that the demand for wellness and entertainment products was not affected much by affordability but by lifestyle changes while the demand for health and hygiene products was more influenced by consumer awareness towards health. Affordability, on the other hand, influenced the demand for affordable substitutes of daily necessities. Therefore, this study and the findings would be very useful for studying the effects of disruptive events on the nature of the shift in consumption behaviour and substitution behaviour exhibited by consumers. Further, the findings of this study would help organizations formulate appropriate strategies to cope with the shift in consumption and substitution behaviour as a result of the pandemic.

The study is not free from certain limitations. The imposition of lockdown in different parts of India at different points of time made it very difficult for us to carry out the survey. Further given the diversity and the large geographical size of India, we could not reach out to all the diverse groups, communities, and cultures. Increasing reach possibly could have generated more insights into consumer behaviour and market segmentation. Moreover, our study was limited to wellness, entertainment, and health products as also the products of daily necessities. Therefore, extending this research to include more diversity in terms of the nature of products would be useful in further refinement of marketing strategies under disruption.

The observations of Paul and Bhukya ( 2021 ) encourage us to propose extension of the present research primarily along the following directions: (1) cross‐country studies for understanding how the pandemic‐induced disruptions have affected consumer behaviour across various social groups based on culture, region, and age, (2) studies on how organizations cope with such adaptations in consumers' needs during pandemic, and (3) studies focusing on understanding how and to what extent consumers' consumption shifts influence retailers' strategies related to product selection, channel choice, promotions, and discounts. It can also be expected that the choice of the above strategies would differ based on retailers' location, the scale of operations, and the target segments. A major influence on the Consumers' changing way of life during such pandemic‐induced disruptions includes government interventions in the form of schemes, aids, and subsidies. An important extension of the present research would be to understand how such interventions were able to mitigate the adverse impacts of the pandemic on consumers' life and at the same time maintain the sustainability of business organizations.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Biographies.

Debadyuti Das is a Professor at the Faculty of Management Studies, Delhi University in the Operations Management Area. He received his Ph.D. from IIT BHU. He has a rich blend of experience in both industry and academics spanning over more than two and half decades. He has extensive experience in executive education and management development programs. His current areas of research include Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Managing Carbon Footprint in Supply Chain, Distribution Network Design in Public Health, Efficient Sourcing and Distribution of water etc.

Ashutosh Sarkar is an Associate Professor at the Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode in the Quantitative Methods & Operations Management Area. He received his Ph.D. from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur and was a Fulbright Visiting Scholar at the Naveen Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas. Earlier, Dr. Sarkar has served as a faculty member at IIT Kharagpur and Institute of Technology‐Banaras Hindu University (now IIT BHU). He has extensive experience in executive education and training. His areas of interests include Inventory and Supply Chain Optimization, Application of Stochastic Dynamic Programming in Operations Management Problems, Purchasing and Supply Chain Risk Management.

Arindam Debroy is an Assistant Professor at the Symbiosis Institute of Business Management Nagpur in the Operations Management Area. He received his Ph.D. from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. He has also received the Institute Fellowship during his doctoral program at IIT Kharagpur. His areas of interests include Inventory and Logistics & Supply Chain Management, Purchase Management, and Project Management.

APPENDIX 1. DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING CONSUMERS' CHANGING WAY OF LIFE

Appendix 2. descriptive statistics of adaptation in consumers' buying behaviour.

Das, D. , Sarkar, A. , & Debroy, A. (2022). Impact of COVID‐19 on changing consumer behaviour: Lessons from an emerging economy . International Journal of Consumer Studies , 46 , 692–715. 10.1111/ijcs.12786 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

• Adams‐Prassl, A. , Boneva, T. , Golin, M. , & Rauh, C. (2020, April 1). Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: New survey evidence for the UK . Cambridge‐INET Working Paper Series. IZA Institute of Labor Economics. [ Google Scholar ]
• Addabbo, T. (2000). Poverty dynamics: Analysis of household incomes in Italy . Labour , 14 ( 1 ), 119–144. 10.1111/1467-9914.00127 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Anderson, J. C. , & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two‐step approach . Psychological Bulletin , 103 ( 3 ), 411–423. 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Arora, T. , & Grey, I. (2020). Health behaviour changes during COVID‐19 and the potential consequences: A mini‐review . Journal of Health Psychology , 25 ( 9 ), 1155–1163. 10.1177/1359105320937053 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Aunger, R. , Greenland, K. , Ploubidis, G. , Schmidt, W. , Oxford, J. , & Curtis, V. (2016). The determinants of reported personal and household hygiene behaviour: A multi‐country study . PLoS One , 11 ( 8 ), e0159551. 10.1371/journal.pone.0159551 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Avdiu, B. , & Nayyar, G. (2020). When face‐to‐face interactions become an occupational hazard: Jobs in the time of COVID‐19 . Economics Letters , 197 , 109648. [ Google Scholar ]
• Baiano, C. , Zappullo, I. , & Conson, M. (2020). Tendency to worry and fear of mental health during Italy's COVID‐19 lockdown . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 17 ( 16 ), 5928. 10.3390/ijerph17165928 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bakhtiani, G. (2021). How the wellness market in India is witnessing a meteoric rise . Financial Express , February 6. https://www.financialexpress.com/brandwagon/how‐the‐wellness‐market‐in‐india‐is‐witnessing‐a‐meteoric‐rise/2189156/
• Baumgartner, H. , & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review . International Journal of Research in Consumer Marketing , 13 , 139–161. 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Billore, S. , & Anisimova, T. (2021). Panic buying research: A systematic literature review and future research agenda . International Journal of Consumer Studies , 45 , 777–804. 10.1111/ijcs.12669 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chaudhuri, S. (2020, July 28). Lysol maker seeks to capitalize on Covid hygiene concerns in hotels, on planes . The Wall Street Journal . https://www.wsj.com/articles/lysol‐maker‐seeks‐to‐capitalize‐on‐covid‐hygiene‐concerns‐in‐hotels‐on‐planes‐11595939726
• Chopra, S. , Ranjan, P. , Singh, V. , Kumar, S. , Arora, M. , Hasan, M. S. , Kasiraj, R. , Kaur, D. , Vikram, N. K. , Malhotra, A. , Kumari, A. , Klanidhi, K. B. , & Baitha, U. (2020). Impact of COVID‐19 on lifestyle‐related behaviours—A cross‐sectional audit of responses from nine hundred and ninety‐five participants from India . Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews , 14 ( 6 ), 2021–2030. 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.09.034 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chriscaden, K. (2020). Impact of COVID‐19 on people’s livelihoods, their health and our food system . World Health Organization , October 13. https://www.who.int/news/item/13‐10‐2020‐impact‐of‐covid‐19‐on‐people's‐livelihoods‐their‐health‐and‐our‐food‐systems
• Cohen, J. , Cohen, P. , West, S. G. , & Aiken, L. S. . (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences . Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. [ Google Scholar ]
• Das, D. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in Indian organisations: An empirical investigation . International Journal of Production Research , 56 ( 17 ), 5776–5794. 10.1080/00207543.2017.1421326 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Debroy, L. (2020, April 3). How online exercise sessions are keeping India fit during lockdown . Outlook . https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/india‐news‐how‐online‐exercise‐sessions‐are‐keeping‐india‐fit‐during‐the‐lockdown/350026
• del Rio‐Chanona, R. M. , Mealy, P. , Pichler, A. , Lafond, F. , & Farmer, J. D. (2020). Supply and demand shocks in the COVID‐19 pandemic: An industry and occupation perspective . Oxford Review of Economic Policy , 36 ( Supplement_1 ), S94–S137. 10.1093/oxrep/graa033 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dsouza, S. (2020, March 30). Government expands lists of essential items to include hygiene products . Bloomberg . https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/government‐expands‐list‐of‐essential‐items‐to‐include‐hygiene‐products
• Eroglu, S. A. , Machleit, K. A. , & Neybert, E. G. (2022). Crowding in the time of COVID: Effects on rapport and shopping satisfaction . Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , 64 , 102760. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102760 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fornell, C. , & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error . Journal of Marketing Research , 8 ( 3 ), 382–388. [ Google Scholar ]
• Galati, A. , Moavero, P. , & Crescimanno, M. (2019). Consumer awareness and acceptance of irradiated foods: The case of Italian consumers . British Food Journal , 121 ( 6 ), 1398–1412. 10.1108/BFJ-05-2018-0336 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• García‐Mayor, J. , Moreno‐Llamas, A. , & De la Cruz‐Sánchez, E. (2021). High educational attainment redresses the effect of occupational social class on health‐related lifestyle: Findings from four Spanish national health surveys . Annals of Epidemiology , 58 , 29–37. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.02.010 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gaskin, J. , & Lim, J. (2018). “Indirect effects”, AMOS Plugin . Gaskination's StatWiki. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gordon‐Wilson, S. (2021). Consumption practices during the COVID‐19 crisis . International Journal of Consumer Studies . 10.1111/ijcs.12701 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Guthrie, C. , Fosso‐Wamba, S. , & Arnaud, J. B. (2021). Online consumer resilience during a pandemic: An exploratory study of e‐commerce behavior before, during and after a COVID‐19 lockdown . Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , 61 , 102570. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102570 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hair, J. F., Jr. , Black, W. C. , Babin, B. J. , Anderson, R. E. , & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Multivariate data analysis . Pearson Education. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hamilton, R. W. , Thompson, D. V. , Arens, Z. G. , Blanchard, S. J. , Häubl, G. , Kannan, P. K. , Khan, U. , Lehmann, D. R. , Meloy, M. G. , Roese, N. J. , & Thomas, M. (2014). Consumer substitution decisions: An integrative framework . Marketing Letters , 25 ( 3 ), 305–317. 10.1007/s11002-014-9313-2 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hampson, D. P. , & McGoldrick, P. J. (2013). A typology of adaptive shopping patterns in recession . Journal of Business Research , 66 ( 7 ), 831–838. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.008 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hensher, M. (2020). Covid‐19, unemployment, and health: Time for deeper solutions? The BMJ , 371 , m3687. 10.1136/bmj.m3687 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hess, A. (2020, April 6). Our health is in danger: Wellness wants to fill the void . The New York Times . https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/06/arts/virus‐wellness‐self‐care.html
• Jacob, I. , Khanna, M. , & Yadav, N. (2014). Beyond poverty: A study of diffusion & adoption of feminine hygiene products among low income group women in Mumbai . Procedia‐Social and Behavioral Sciences , 148 , 291–298. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kansiime, M. K. , Tambo, J. A. , Mugambi, I. , Bundi, M. , Kara, A. , & Owuor, C. (2021). COVID‐19 implications on household income and food security in Kenya and Uganda: Findings from a rapid assessment . World Development , 137 , 105199. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105199 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Keane, M. , & Neal, T. (2021). Consumer panic in the COVID‐19 pandemic . Journal of Econometrics , 220 ( 1 ), 86–105. 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.045 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kennett‐Hensel, P. A. , Sneath, J. Z. , & Lacey, R. (2012). Liminality and consumption in the aftermath of a natural disaster . Journal of Consumer Marketing , 29 ( 1 ), 52–63. 10.1108/07363761211193046 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Khubchandani, J. , Kandiah, J. , & Saiki, D. (2020). The COVID‐19 pandemic, stress, and eating practices in the United States . European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education , 10 ( 4 ), 950–956. 10.3390/ejihpe10040067 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim, J. , Yang, K. , Min, J. , & White, B. (2021). Hope, fear, and consumer behavioral change amid COVID‐19: Application of protection motivation theory . International Journal of Consumer Studies . 10.1111/ijcs.12700 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kirk, C. P. , & Rifkin, L. S. (2020). I'll trade you diamonds for toilet paper: Consumer reacting, coping and adapting behaviors in the COVID‐19 pandemic . Journal of Business Research , 117 , 124–131. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.028 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Knowles, J. , Ettenson, R. , Lynch, P. , & Dollens, J. (2020, May 5). Growth opportunities for brands during covid‐19 opportunities . MIT Sloan Management Review . https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/growth‐opportunities‐for‐brands‐during‐the‐covid‐19‐crisis/ [ Google Scholar ]
• Krause, D. R. , Pagell, M. , & Curkovic, S. (2001). Toward a measure of competitive priorities for purchasing . Journal of Operations Management , 19 ( 4 ), 497–512. 10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00047-X [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Laato, S. , Islam, A. N. , Farooq, A. , & Dhir, A. (2020). Unusual purchasing behavior during the early stages of the COVID‐19 pandemic: The stimulus‐organism‐response approach . Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , 57 , 102224. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102224 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Li, X. , Zhang, D. , Zhang, T. , Ji, Q. , & Lucey, B. (2021). Awareness, energy consumption and pro‐environmental choices of Chinese households . Journal of Cleaner Production , 279 , 123734. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123734 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Madnani, D. , Fernandes, S. , & Madnani, N. (2020). Analysing the impact of COVID‐19 on over‐the‐top media platforms in India . International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications , 16 ( 5 ), 457–475. 10.1108/IJPCC-07-2020-0083 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mahmud, M. , & Riley, E. (2021). Household response to an extreme shock: Evidence on the immediate impact of the Covid‐19 lockdown on economic outcomes and well‐being in rural Uganda . World Development , 140 , 105318. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105318 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mark, T. , Southam, C. , Bulla, J. , & Meza, S. (2016). Cross‐category indulgence: Why do some premium brands grow during recession? Journal of Brand Management , 23 ( 5 ), 114–129. 10.1057/s41262-016-0004-6 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Martin, A. , Markhvida, M. , Hallegatte, S. , & Walsh, B. (2020). Socio‐economic impacts of COVID‐19 on household consumption and poverty . Economics of Disasters and Climate Change , 49 ( 3 ), 453–479. 10.1007/s41885-020-00070-3 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Master, F. (2020). Asia pivots toward plants for protein as coronavirus stirs meat safety fears . Reuters , April 22. https://www.reuters.com/article/us‐health‐coronavirus‐asia‐food/asia‐pivots‐toward‐plants‐for‐protein‐as‐coronavirus‐stirs‐meat‐safety‐fears‐idUKKCN224047?edition‐redirect=uk
• Mathur, A. , Moschis, G. P. , & Lee, E. (2006). Life events and brand preference changes . Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review , 3 ( 2 ), 129–141. 10.1002/cb.128 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mehrolia, S. , Alagarsamy, S. , & Solaikutty, V. M. (2021). Customers response to online food delivery services during COVID‐19 outbreak using binary logistic regression . International Journal of Consumer Studies , 45 ( 3 ), 396–408. 10.1111/ijcs.12630 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Milaković, I. K. (2021). Purchase experience during the COVID‐19 pandemic and social cognitive theory: The relevance of consumer vulnerability, resilience, and adaptability for purchase satisfaction and repurchase . International Journal of Consumer Studies , 45 ( 6 ), 1425–1442. 10.1111/ijcs.12672 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Minton, E. A. , & Cabano, F. G. (2021). Religiosity’s influence on stability‐seeking consumption during times of great uncertainty: The case of the coronavirus pandemic . Marketing Letters , 32 ( 2 ), 135–148. 10.1007/s11002-020-09548-2 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mishra, P. , & Balsara, F. (2020). COVID‐19 and emergence of a new consumer products landscape in India . Earnst and Young . https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey‐sites/ey‐com/en_in/topics/consumer‐products‐retail/2020/06/covid‐19‐and‐emergence‐of‐new‐consumer‐products‐landscape‐in‐india.pdf?download
• Montenovo, L. , Jiang, X. , Rojas, F. L. , Schmutte, I. M. , Simon, K. I. , Weinberg, B. A. , & Wing, C. (2020). Determinants of disparities in covid‐19 job losses (No. w27132), National Bureau of Economic Research. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mueller, R. O. , & Hancock, G. R. (2019). Structural equation modeling. In Hancock G. R., Stapleton L. M., & Mueller R. O. (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in social sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. [ Google Scholar ]
• Murthy, S. R. (2019). Measuring informal economy in India: Indian experience. In Seventh IMF Statistical Forum , Washington, DC. https://www.imf.org/‐/media/Files/Conferences/2019/7th‐statistics‐forum/session‐ii‐murthy.ashx#:∼:text=In_terms_of_employment_share,indicating_the_level_of_outsourcing [ Google Scholar ]
• Naeem, M. (2020). Understanding the customer psychology of impulse buying during COVID‐19 pandemic: Implications for retailers . International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management , 49 ( 3 ), 377–393. 10.1108/IJRDM-08-2020-0317 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nayal, P. , Pandey, N. , & Paul, J. (2021). Covid‐19 pandemic and consumer‐employee‐organization wellbeing: A dynamic capability theory approach . Journal of Consumer Affairs . 10.1111/joca.12399 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ojha, A. (2020, October 17). How COVID‐19 changed fitness regime of Indians; here’s what a survey revealed . Financial Express . https://www.financialexpress.com/lifestyle/health/how‐covid‐19‐changed‐fitness‐regime‐of‐indians‐heres‐what‐a‐survey‐revealed/2107825/
• Pakravan‐Charvadeh, M. R. , Mohammadi‐Nasrabadi, F. , Gholamrezai, S. , Vatanparast, H. , Flora, C. , & Nabavi‐Pelesaraei, A. (2021). The short‐term effects of COVID‐19 outbreak on dietary diversity and food security status of Iranian households (A case study in Tehran province) . Journal of Cleaner Production , 281 , 124537. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124537 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pantano, E. , Pizzi, G. , Scarpi, D. , & Dennis, C. (2020). Competing during a pandemic? Retailers' ups and downs during the COVID‐19 outbreak . Journal of Business Research , 116 , 209–213. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.036 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Paul, J. , & Bhukya, R. (2021). Forty‐five years of International Journal of Consumer Studies: A bibliometric review and directions for future research . International Journal of Consumer Studies , 45 ( 5 ), 937–963. 10.1111/ijcs.12727 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pew Research . (2008, October 19). Family social activities and togetherness . https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2008/10/19/family‐social‐activities‐and‐togetherness/ [ Google Scholar ]
• Piyapromdee, S. , & Spittal, P. (2020). The income and consumption effects of covid‐19 and the role of public policy . Fiscal Studies , 41 ( 4 ), 805–827. 10.1111/1475-5890.12252 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Lee, J. Y. , & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies . Journal of Applied Psychology , 88 ( 5 ), 879–903. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Prasad, A. , Strijnev, A. , & Zhang, Q. (2008). What can grocery basket data tell us about health consciousness? International Journal of Research in Marketing , 25 ( 4 ), 301–309. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.05.001 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Prentice, C. , Nguyen, M. , Nandy, P. , Winardi, M. A. , Chen, Y. , Le Monkhouse, L. , Sergio, D. , & Stantic, B. (2021). Relevant, or irrelevant, external factors in panic buying . Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , 61 , 102587. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102587 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• PTI . (2020). COVID‐19 pandemic leads to worries about job loss, anxiety on lack of social interactions: surveys . The Economic Times , September 29. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics‐and‐nation/covid‐19‐pandemic‐leads‐to‐worries‐about‐job‐loss‐anxiety‐on‐lack‐of‐social‐interactions‐surveys/articleshow/78391128.cms?from=mdr
• Pullman, M. E. , Maloni, M. J. , & Carter, C. R. (2009). Food for thought: Social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes . Journal of Supply Chain Management , 45 ( 4 ), 38–54. 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03175.x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rakshit, A. (2020, May 10). Covid‐19 impact: demand for personal hygiene, homecare products set to rise . Business Standard . https://www.business‐standard.com/article/current‐affairs/covid‐19‐impact‐demand‐for‐personal‐hygiene‐homecare‐products‐set‐to‐rise‐120051000431_1.html
• Rayburn, S. W. , McGeorge, A. , Anderson, S. , & Sierra, J. J. (2021). Crisis‐induced behavior: From fear and frugality to the familiar . International Journal of Consumer Studies . 10.1111/ijcs.12698 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Renner, B. , Baker, B. , Cook, J. , & Mellinger, J. (2020). The future of fresh: Patterns from the pandemic . Deloitte Insights , October 13. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/retail‐distribution/future‐of‐fresh‐food‐sales/pandemic‐consumer‐behavior‐grocery‐shopping.html
• Riise, T. , Moen, B. E. , & Nortvedt, M. W. (2003). Occupation, lifestyle factors and health‐related quality of life: The Hordaland Health Study . Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine , 45 ( 3 ), 324–332. 10.1097/01.jom.0000052965.43131.c3 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rogers, K. , & Cosgrove, A. (2020, April 16). Future consumer index: How Covid‐19 is changing consumer behaviors . Ernst & Young . https://www.ey.com/en_gl/consumer‐products‐retail/how‐covid‐19‐could‐change‐consumer‐behavior
• Sánchez‐Sánchez, E. , Ramírez‐Vargas, G. , Avellaneda‐López, Y. , Orellana‐Pecino, J. I. , García‐Marín, E. , & Díaz‐Jimenez, J. (2020). Eating habits and physical activity of the Spanish population during the COVID‐19 pandemic period . Nutrients , 12 ( 9 ), 2826. 10.3390/nu12092826 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sarmento, M. , Marques, S. , & Galan‐Ladero, M. (2019). Consumption dynamics during recession and recovery: A learning journey . Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , 50 , 226–234. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.021 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Singh, D. (2020). How is coronavirus impacting the streaming platforms with an increasing appetite of viewers? Financial Express , April 04. https://www.financialexpress.com/brandwagon/how‐is‐coronavirus‐impacting‐the‐streaming‐platforms‐with‐an‐increasing‐appetite‐of‐viewers/1919916/
• Sneath, J. Z. , Lacey, R. , & Kennett‐Hensel, P. A. (2009). Coping with a natural disaster: Losses, emotions, and impulsive and compulsive buying . Marketing Letters , 20 ( 1 ), 45–60. 10.1007/s11002-008-9049-y [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sood, D. (2020). India has the potential to become a health and wellness hub . The Hindu Business Line , July 29. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/india‐has‐the‐potential‐to‐become‐a‐health‐and‐wellness‐hub/article32220274.ece
• Srinivasan, R. , Lilien, G. L. , & Rangaswamy, A. (2002). Technological opportunism and radical technology adoption: An application to E‐Business . Journal of Marketing , 66 , 47–60. 10.1509/jmkg.66.3.47.18508 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Suresh, S. , Ravichandran, S. , & P, G. (2011). Understanding wellness center loyalty through lifestyle analysis . Health Marketing Quarterly , 28 ( 1 ), 16–37. 10.1080/07359683.2011.545307 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Teisl, M. F. , Levy, A. S. , & Derby, B. M. (1999). The effects of education and information source on consumer awareness of diet–disease relationships . Journal of Public Policy & Marketing , 18 ( 2 ), 197–207. 10.1177/074391569901800206 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• United Nations . (n.d.). Everyone included: Social impact of COVID‐19 . https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/everyone‐included‐covid‐19.html [ Google Scholar ]
• Verikios, G. , Sullivan, M. , Stojanovski, P. , Giesecke, J. , & Woo, G. (2016). Assessing regional risks from pandemic influenza: A scenario analysis . The World Economy , 39 ( 8 ), 1225–1255. 10.1111/twec.12296 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wernau, J. , & Gasparro, A. (2020, October 5), People are eating healthier and cooking more, food execs say . The Wall Street Journal . https://www.wsj.com/articles/consumers‐are‐eating‐healthier‐and‐cooking‐more‐food‐execs‐say‐11601926763
• Witteveen, D. (2020). Sociodemographic inequality in exposure to COVID‐19‐induced economic hardship in the United Kingdom . Research in Social Stratification and Mobility , 69 , 100551. 10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100551 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yap, S. F. , Xu, Y. , & Tan, L. (2021). Coping with crisis: The paradox of technology and consumer vulnerability . International Journal of Consumer Studies , 45 , 1239–1257. 10.1111/ijcs.12724 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yeung, R. , & Yee, W. M. (2012). Food safety concern: Incorporating marketing strategies into consumer risk coping framework . British Food Journal , 114 ( 1 ), 40–53. 10.1108/00070701211197356 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

Consumer Behavior Research Paper Topics

Consumer behavior research paper topics are essential to students studying this field. This comprehensive guide from iResearchNet provides a comprehensive list of consumer behavior research paper topics divided into 10 categories, expert advice on selecting a relevant topic, and a step-by-step guide on writing a successful research paper. Additionally, iResearchNet offers writing services with expert degree-holding writers, custom written works, in-depth research, custom formatting, top quality, customized solutions, flexible pricing, short deadlines, timely delivery, 24/7 support, absolute privacy, easy order tracking, and a money-back guarantee. By following the expert advice provided and using iResearchNet’s writing services, students can produce high-quality research papers that make meaningful contributions to the field of consumer behavior.

Understanding Consumer Behavior Research

Consumer behavior research is an essential field of study that explores the processes and activities that individuals undertake when making decisions related to purchasing goods and services. This field is particularly important for marketers, advertisers, and sales professionals who seek to understand how consumers make purchasing decisions and how they can influence these decisions.

Academic Writing, Editing, Proofreading, And Problem Solving Services

Get 10% off with 24start discount code.

For students studying consumer behavior, research papers are a common assignment that require them to explore various topics related to this field. However, selecting a relevant and feasible research paper topic can be challenging. Furthermore, writing a successful research paper requires attention to detail and adherence to academic standards. This comprehensive guide from iResearchNet is designed to assist students in selecting appropriate consumer behavior research paper topics and providing expert advice on how to write a successful research paper. The guide also provides information on iResearchNet’s writing services, which offer students a valuable resource for producing high-quality research papers that meet the academic standards of their instructors. By following the guidelines and using iResearchNet’s writing services, students can produce research papers that make meaningful contributions to the field of consumer behavior.

100 Consumer Behavior Research Paper Topics

Consumer behavior research encompasses a wide range of topics, each of which explores different aspects of how individuals make decisions related to purchasing goods and services. Here are ten categories of consumer behavior research paper topics that students can consider when selecting a research topic, along with ten sample topics for each category:

Perception and consumer behavior:

• The impact of package design on consumer perception of food products
• The effect of product display on consumer attention and purchase intention
• The role of brand familiarity in consumer perception of luxury goods
• The influence of product color on consumer perception and behavior
• The effect of music in advertising on consumer perception and recall
• The impact of celebrity endorsement on consumer perception of products
• The effect of font type on consumer perception of brand personality
• The role of scent in retail environments on consumer behavior
• The influence of product label claims on consumer perception of health and wellness
• The impact of product design on consumer perception of eco-friendliness

Motivation and consumer behavior:

• The influence of brand personality on consumer motivation to purchase
• The role of scarcity in marketing on consumer motivation and behavior
• The impact of rewards and incentives on consumer motivation and loyalty
• The effect of social proof on consumer motivation to purchase
• The influence of emotions on consumer motivation to purchase
• The role of self-congruity in consumer motivation and brand preference
• The impact of brand trust on consumer motivation to purchase
• The effect of personalized marketing on consumer motivation and engagement
• The influence of product involvement on consumer motivation and purchase intention
• The role of value perception in consumer motivation and price sensitivity

Attitudes and consumer behavior:

• The impact of brand image on consumer attitudes and loyalty
• The role of social responsibility in consumer attitudes towards brands
• The influence of culture on consumer attitudes towards luxury goods
• The effect of perceived risk on consumer attitudes and behavior
• The impact of celebrity endorsement on consumer attitudes towards products
• The role of nostalgia in shaping consumer attitudes towards brands
• The influence of brand authenticity on consumer attitudes and behavior
• The effect of word-of-mouth communication on consumer attitudes and behavior
• The impact of service quality on consumer attitudes and loyalty
• The role of price perception in shaping consumer attitudes towards products

Learning and consumer behavior:

• The impact of advertising on consumer learning and recall
• The role of sensory marketing in consumer learning and behavior
• The influence of online reviews on consumer learning and purchase decisions
• The effect of product placement in movies on consumer learning and recall
• The impact of social media on consumer learning and brand awareness
• The role of brand familiarity in consumer learning and recall
• The influence of product packaging on consumer learning and memory
• The effect of information overload on consumer learning and decision making
• The impact of brand slogans on consumer learning and recall
• The role of perceived value in consumer learning and purchase behavior

Memory and consumer behavior:

• The influence of brand familiarity on consumer memory and recall
• The role of nostalgia in consumer memory and brand preference
• The impact of product design on consumer memory and recall
• The effect of advertising repetition on consumer memory and brand awareness
• The influence of mood on consumer memory and recall of advertising
• The role of social media in consumer memory and brand awareness
• The impact of story-telling in advertising on consumer memory and recall
• The effect of novelty in advertising on consumer memory and recall
• The influence of age on consumer memory and recall of advertising
• The role of emotions in consumer memory and recall of advertising

Culture and consumer behavior:

• The impact of cultural differences on consumer behavior and preferences
• The role of religion in shaping consumer behavior and preferences
• The influence of gender roles on consumer behavior and preferences
• The effect of country-of-origin on consumer behavior and brand perception
• The impact of subcultures on consumer behavior and preferences
• The role of ethnicity in shaping consumer behavior and preferences
• The influence of language on consumer behavior and perception
• The effect of cross-cultural marketing on consumer behavior and perception
• The impact of cultural values on consumer behavior and decision making
• The role of consumer ethnocentrism in shaping consumer behavior and preferences

Emotions and consumer behavior:

• The impact of emotions on consumer decision making and behavior
• The role of mood on consumer decision making and purchase intention
• The influence of emotional branding on consumer behavior and loyalty
• The effect of emotional appeals in advertising on consumer behavior
• The impact of emotions on consumer satisfaction and loyalty
• The role of self-expression in shaping consumer emotional responses to brands
• The influence of nostalgia on consumer emotional responses to brands
• The effect of humor in advertising on consumer emotional responses and behavior
• The impact of product design on consumer emotional responses and behavior
• The role of perceived authenticity in shaping consumer emotional responses to brands

Social Influence and consumer behavior:

• The impact of social norms on consumer behavior and preferences
• The role of social comparison in shaping consumer behavior and preferences
• The influence of reference groups on consumer behavior and brand perception
• The effect of social media on consumer behavior and decision making
• The impact of social identity on consumer behavior and brand loyalty
• The role of social class in shaping consumer behavior and preferences
• The influence of social networks on consumer behavior and brand perception
• The effect of social proof in marketing on consumer behavior and preferences
• The impact of peer pressure on consumer behavior and decision making
• The role of social responsibility in shaping consumer behavior and brand perception

Decision Making and consumer behavior:

• The impact of information overload on consumer decision making
• The role of decision heuristics in shaping consumer behavior and preferences
• The influence of product complexity on consumer decision making and preferences
• The effect of decision context on consumer decision making and behavior
• The impact of decision fatigue on consumer behavior and decision making
• The role of decision-making style in shaping consumer behavior and preferences
• The influence of decision-making strategies on consumer behavior and preferences
• The effect of cognitive dissonance on consumer behavior and decision making
• The impact of choice architecture on consumer decision making and behavior
• The role of decision framing in shaping consumer behavior and preferences

Ethics and consumer behavior:

• The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior and brand perception
• The role of ethical consumption in shaping consumer behavior and preferences
• The influence of perceived ethicality on consumer behavior and brand loyalty
• The effect of green marketing on consumer behavior and purchase intention
• The impact of fair trade on consumer behavior and brand perception
• The role of animal welfare in shaping consumer behavior and preferences
• The influence of social justice issues on consumer behavior and brand perception
• The effect of cause-related marketing on consumer behavior and brand loyalty
• The impact of transparency in marketing on consumer behavior and trust
• The role of consumer activism in shaping consumer behavior and preferences

These ten categories provide a broad range of consumer behavior research paper topics for students to explore within the field of consumer behavior. By selecting a topic that aligns with their interests and research goals, students can produce a high-quality research paper that contributes to the knowledge base of consumer behavior.

Choosing a Consumer Behavior Topic

Choosing a topic for a research paper in consumer behavior can be a challenging task, especially given the vast array of potential topics. To help students navigate this process, it is important to consider a few key factors when selecting a topic.

• First , it is essential to choose a topic that aligns with your interests and passions. When you are passionate about a topic, it is easier to stay engaged throughout the research process and to produce high-quality work. Additionally, having a personal connection to the topic can inspire new and unique perspectives, leading to original research.
• Second , consider the relevance and significance of the topic. The best research papers are those that make a meaningful contribution to the field of consumer behavior. Look for topics that are timely, relevant, and offer a new perspective on existing theories or practices. A topic that is of current interest to industry professionals, policymakers, or academics can also provide opportunities for real-world impact.
• Third , consider the available resources and access to data. Research papers require a significant amount of data and research, so it is important to choose a topic that allows for access to relevant data and resources. Consider the availability of data sources, academic journals, and industry reports that may be needed to support your research.
• Fourth , consider the scope and focus of the research paper. A topic that is too broad or too narrow can make the research process more challenging. It is essential to identify a specific research question or hypothesis that can be effectively addressed within the scope of the research paper. Additionally, it is important to consider the level of analysis, such as individual or group-level behaviors, and whether the research will be qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods.
• Fifth , consider seeking guidance from your instructor or a research advisor. They can provide valuable insight and feedback on potential topics and can help guide the research process. Additionally, they may be able to offer suggestions for data sources or research methodologies that can strengthen the research paper.

Ultimately, the key to choosing a successful topic for a consumer behavior research paper is to identify a topic that aligns with your interests, offers relevance and significance, has available data sources and resources, has a focused research question or hypothesis, and seeks guidance from a research advisor or instructor. By carefully considering these factors, students can select a topic that inspires them and leads to a high-quality research paper.

How to Write a Consumer Behavior Research Paper

When it comes to writing a research paper on consumer behavior, there are several key steps to follow to ensure a successful outcome. Here are some tips to help guide you through the writing process:

• Develop a clear and concise research question : The first step in writing a research paper on consumer behavior is to develop a clear and concise research question. This question should be focused and specific, and should guide your research and analysis throughout the writing process.
• Conduct a thorough literature review : Before beginning your research, it is important to conduct a thorough literature review to identify existing theories and research related to your topic. This review will help you to identify any gaps in the existing research that your paper can address.
• Choose appropriate research methods : There are a variety of research methods that can be used in consumer behavior research, including surveys, experiments, and case studies. Choose the appropriate method(s) based on your research question and the data you are trying to collect.
• Collect and analyze data : Once you have identified your research question and chosen your research method, it is time to collect and analyze your data. This may involve conducting surveys or experiments, analyzing existing data sets, or conducting interviews or focus groups.
• Organize and present your findings : After analyzing your data, it is important to organize your findings in a clear and concise manner. This may involve creating charts or graphs to visually represent your data, or using tables to compare and contrast your findings. It is also important to provide a clear and concise summary of your findings in your conclusion.
• Use appropriate formatting and citation styles : When writing a research paper on consumer behavior, it is important to use appropriate formatting and citation styles. Most papers in this field will use either APA or MLA style formatting and citations.
• Revise and edit your paper : Once you have completed your first draft, it is important to revise and edit your paper to ensure clarity, conciseness, and accuracy. This may involve reorganizing sections, cutting out extraneous information, or rephrasing sentences for clarity.

By following these steps, you can produce a high-quality research paper on consumer behavior that contributes to the field and provides valuable insights for academics, policymakers, and industry professionals alike.

iResearchNet Writing Services

At iResearchNet, we understand the challenges that students face when it comes to writing high-quality research papers on consumer behavior. That’s why we offer custom writing services designed to help students produce well-researched, well-written papers on any topic related to consumer behavior.

Here are some of the features and benefits of our writing services:

• Expert writers : Our team of writers includes experienced professionals with advanced degrees in marketing, consumer behavior, and related fields. They have the expertise and knowledge to produce high-quality, original research papers that meet your specific requirements.
• Custom written works : Our writers will work with you to create a custom research paper that meets your specific needs and requirements. This includes selecting a research question, conducting a literature review, and collecting and analyzing data to support your thesis.
• In-depth research : Our writers will conduct extensive research to ensure that your paper is well-supported with data and evidence from credible sources.
• Custom formatting : Our writers are well-versed in a variety of formatting styles and will ensure that your paper meets the specific requirements of your instructor or academic program.
• Top quality, customized solutions : We take pride in producing high-quality, customized research papers that meet your specific needs and exceed your expectations.
• Flexible pricing : We understand that students have different budgets, which is why we offer flexible pricing options to fit your needs and budget.
• Short deadlines : We can work with tight deadlines and will ensure that your research paper is delivered on time, even if you have a deadline of just a few hours.
• Timely delivery : We understand the importance of deadlines and will ensure that your research paper is delivered on time, every time.
• 24/7 support : Our customer support team is available 24/7 to answer any questions or concerns you may have about your research paper.
• Absolute Privacy : We take your privacy seriously and will ensure that your personal information and research paper are kept confidential.
• Easy order tracking : You can easily track the progress of your research paper and communicate with your writer through our online platform.
• Money back guarantee : We stand behind the quality of our work and offer a money-back guarantee if you are not satisfied with the final product.

Whether you need help developing a research question, conducting a literature review, or writing the final paper, our team of expert writers can help. Contact us today to learn more about our custom writing services for consumer behavior research papers.

Order Your Custom Research Paper Today!

In conclusion, writing a research paper on consumer behavior can be a challenging task, but it is also a rewarding one. By following the steps outlined in this guide, you can produce a high-quality research paper that contributes to the field and provides valuable insights for academics, policymakers, and industry professionals alike.

Remember to choose a clear and concise research question, conduct a thorough literature review, choose appropriate research methods, collect and analyze data, and organize and present your findings in a clear and concise manner. Additionally, using appropriate formatting and citation styles and revising and editing your paper are also important steps in producing a successful research paper on consumer behavior.

If you need additional help with your research paper, iResearchNet offers custom writing services designed to help students produce high-quality, well-researched papers on any topic related to consumer behavior. Our team of expert writers has the knowledge and expertise to help you produce a paper that meets your specific needs and exceeds your expectations.

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER