what type of analysis is used in phenomenological research

What is phenomenology in qualitative research?

Last updated

7 February 2023

Reviewed by

Take a closer look at this type of qualitative research along with characteristics, examples, uses, and potential disadvantages.

Analyze your phenomenological research

Use purpose-built tools to surface insights faster

• What is phenomenological qualitative research?

Phenomenological research is a qualitative research approach that builds on the assumption that the universal essence of anything ultimately depends on how its audience experiences it .

Phenomenological researchers record and analyze the beliefs, feelings, and perceptions of the audience they’re looking to study in relation to the thing being studied. Only the audience’s views matter—the people who have experienced the phenomenon. The researcher’s personal assumptions and perceptions about the phenomenon should be irrelevant.

Phenomenology is a type of qualitative research as it requires an in-depth understanding of the audience’s thoughts and perceptions of the phenomenon you’re researching. It goes deep rather than broad, unlike quantitative research . Finding the lived experience of the phenomenon in question depends on your interpretation and analysis.

• What is the purpose of phenomenological research?

The primary aim of phenomenological research is to gain insight into the experiences and feelings of a specific audience in relation to the phenomenon you’re studying. These narratives are the reality in the audience’s eyes. They allow you to draw conclusions about the phenomenon that may add to or even contradict what you thought you knew about it from an internal perspective.

• How is phenomenology research design used?

Phenomenological research design is especially useful for topics in which the researcher needs to go deep into the audience’s thoughts, feelings, and experiences.

It’s a valuable tool to gain audience insights, generate awareness about the item being studied, and develop new theories about audience experience in a specific, controlled situation.

• Examples of phenomenological research

Phenomenological research is common in sociology, where researchers aim to better understand the audiences they study.

An example would be a study of the thoughts and experiences of family members waiting for a loved one who is undergoing major surgery. This could provide insights into the nature of the event from the broader family perspective.

However, phenomenological research is also common and beneficial in business situations. For example, the technique is commonly used in branding research. Here, audience perceptions of the brand matter more than the business’s perception of itself.

In branding-related market research, researchers look at how the audience experiences the brand and its products to gain insights into how they feel about them. The resulting information can be used to adjust messaging and business strategy to evoke more positive or stronger feelings about the brand in the future.

• The 4 characteristics of phenomenological research design

The exact nature of phenomenological research depends on the subject to be studied. However, every research design should include the following four main tenets to ensure insightful and actionable outcomes:

A focus on the audience’s interpretation of something . The focus is always on what an experience or event means to a strictly defined audience and how they interpret its meaning.

A lack of researcher bias or prior influence . The researcher has to set aside all prior prejudices and assumptions. They should focus only on how the audience interprets and experiences the event.

Connecting objectivity with lived experiences . Researchers need to describe their observations of how the audience experienced the event as well as how the audience interpreted their experience themselves.

• Types of phenomenological research design

Each type of phenomenological research shares the characteristics described above. Social scientists distinguish the following three types:

Existential phenomenology —focuses on understanding the audience’s experiences through their perspective. 

Hermeneutic phenomenology —focuses on creating meaning from experiences through the audience’s perspective.

Transcendental phenomenology —focuses on how the phenomenon appears in one consciousness on a broader, scientific scale.

Existential phenomenology is the most common type used in a business context. It’s most valuable to help you better understand your audience.

You can use hermeneutic phenomenology to gain a deeper understanding of how your audience perceives experiences related to your business.

Transcendental phenomenology is largely reserved for non-business scientific applications.

• Data collection methods in phenomenological research

Phenomenological research draws from many of the most common qualitative research techniques to understand the audience’s perspective.

Here are some of the most common tools to collect data in this type of research study:

Observing participants as they experience the phenomenon

Interviewing participants before, during, and after the experience

Focus groups where participants experience the phenomenon and discuss it afterward

Recording conversations between participants related to the phenomenon

Analyzing personal texts and observations from participants related to the phenomenon

You might not use these methods in isolation. Most phenomenological research includes multiple data collection methods. This ensures enough overlap to draw satisfactory conclusions from the audience and the phenomenon studied.

Get started collecting, analyzing, and understanding qualitative data with help from quickstart research templates.

• Limitations of phenomenological research

Phenomenological research can be beneficial for many reasons, but its downsides are just as important to discuss.

This type of research is not a solve-all tool to gain audience insights. You should keep the following limitations in mind before you design your research study and during the design process:

These audience studies are typically very small. This results in a small data set that can make it difficult for you to draw complete conclusions about the phenomenon.

Researcher bias is difficult to avoid, even if you try to remove your own experiences and prejudices from the equation. Bias can contaminate the entire outcome.

Phenomenology relies on audience experiences, so its accuracy depends entirely on how well the audience can express those experiences and feelings.

The results of a phenomenological study can be difficult to summarize and present due to its qualitative nature. Conclusions typically need to include qualifiers and cautions.

This type of study can be time-consuming. Interpreting the data can take days and weeks.

Get started today

Go from raw data to valuable insights with a flexible research platform

Editor’s picks

Last updated: 21 December 2023

Last updated: 16 December 2023

Last updated: 6 October 2023

Last updated: 5 March 2024

Last updated: 25 November 2023

Last updated: 15 February 2024

Last updated: 11 March 2024

Last updated: 12 December 2023

Last updated: 6 March 2024

Last updated: 10 April 2023

Last updated: 20 December 2023

Latest articles

Related topics, log in or sign up.

Get started for free

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Chapter 6: Phenomenology

Darshini Ayton

Learning outcomes

Upon completion of this chapter, you should be able to:

• Identify the key terms, concepts and approaches used in phenomenology.
• Explain the data collection methods and analysis for phenomenology.
• Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of phenomenological research.

What is phenomenology ?

The key concept in phenomenological studies is the individual .

Phenomenology is a method and a philosophical approach, influenced by different paradigms and disciplines. 1

Phenomenology is the everyday world from the viewpoint of the person. In this viewpoint, the emphasis is on how the individual constructs their lifeworld and seeks to understand the ‘taken for granted-ness’ of life and experiences. 2,3 Phenomenology is a practice that seeks to understand, describe and interpret human behaviour and the meaning individuals make of their experiences; it focuses on what was experienced and how it was experienced. 4 Phenomenology deals with perceptions or meanings, attitudes and beliefs, as well as feelings and emotions. The emphasis is on the lived experience and the sense an individual makes of those experiences. Since the primary source of data is the experience of the individual being studied, in-depth interviews are the most common means of data collection (see Chapter 13). Depending on the aim and research questions of the study, the method of analysis is either thematic or interpretive phenomenological analysis (Section 4).

Types of phenomenology

Descriptive phenomenology (also known as ‘transcendental phenomenology’) was founded by Edmund Husserl (1859–1938). It focuses on phenomena as perceived by the individual. 4 When reflecting on the recent phenomenon of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is clear that there is a collective experience of the pandemic and an individual experience, in which each person’s experience is influenced by their life circumstances, such as their living situation, employment, education, prior experiences with infectious diseases and health status. In addition, an individual’s life circumstances, personality, coping skills, culture, family of origin, where they live in the world and the politics of their society also influence their experience of the pandemic. Hence, the objectiveness of the pandemic is intertwined with the subjectiveness of the individual living in the pandemic.

Husserl states that descriptive phenomenological inquiry should be free of assumption and theory, to enable phenomenological reduction (or phenomenological intuiting). 1 Phenomenological reduction means putting aside all judgements or beliefs about the external world and taking nothing for granted in everyday reality. 5 This concept gave rise to a practice called ‘bracketing’ — a method of acknowledging the researcher’s preconceptions, assumptions, experiences and ‘knowing’ of a phenomenon. Bracketing is an attempt by the researcher to encounter the phenomenon in as ‘free and as unprejudiced way as possible so that it can be precisely described and understood’. 1(p132) While there is not much guidance on how to bracket, the advice provided to researchers is to record in detail the process undertaken, to provide transparency for others. Bracketing starts with reflection: a helpful practice is for the researcher to ask the following questions and write their answers as they occur, without overthinking their responses (see Box 1). This is a practice that ideally should be done multiple times during the research process: at the conception of the research idea and during design, data collection, analysis and reporting.

Box 6.1 Example s of bracketing prompts

How does my education, family background (culture), religion, politics and job relate to this topic or phenomenon?

What is my previous experience of this topic or phenomenon? Do I have negative and/or positive reactions to this topic or phenomenon? What has led to this reaction?

What have I read or understood about this topic or phenomenon?

What are my beliefs and attitudes about this topic or phenomenon? What assumptions am I making?

Interpretive or hermeneutic phenomenology was founded by Martin Heidegger (1889–1976), a junior colleague of Husserl. It focuses on the nature of being and the relationship between an individual and their lifeworld. While Heidegger’s initial work and thinking aligned with Husserl’s, he later challenged several elements of descriptive phenomenology, leading to a philosophical separation in ideas. Husserl’s descriptive phenomenology takes an epistemological (knowledge) focus while Heidegger’s interest was in ontology 4 (the nature of reality), with the key phrase ‘being-in-the-world’ referencing how humans exist, act or participate in the world. 1 In descriptive phenomenology, the practice of bracketing is endorsed and experience is stripped from context to examine and understand it.

Interpretive or hermeneutic phenomenology embraces the intertwining of an individual’s subjective experience with their social, cultural and political contexts, regardless of whether they are conscious of this influence. 4 Interpretive or hermeneutic phenomenology moves beyond description to the interpretation of the phenomenon and the study of meanings through the lifeworld of the individual. While the researcher’s knowledge, experience, assumptions and beliefs are valued, they do need to be acknowledged as part of the process of analysis. 4

For example, Singh and colleagues wanted to understand the experiences of managers involved in the implementation of quality improvement projects in an assisted living facility, and thus they conducted a hermeneutic phenomenology study. 6 The objective was to ‘understand how managers define the quality of patient care and administrative processes’, alongside an exploration of the participant’s perspectives of leadership and challenges to the implementation of quality improvement strategies. (p3) Semi-structured interviews (60–75 minutes in duration) were conducted with six managers and data was analysed using inductive thematic techniques.

New phenomenology , or American phenomenology , has initiated a transition in the focus of phenomenology from the nature and understanding of the phenomenon to the lived experience of individuals experiencing the phenomenon. This transition may seem subtle but fundamentally is related to a shift away from the philosophical approaches of Husserl and Heidegger to an applied approach to research. 1 New phenomenology does not undergo the phenomenological reductionist approach outlined by Husserl to examine and understand the essence of the phenomenon. Dowling 1 emphasises that this phenomenological reduction, which leads to an attempt to disengage the researcher from the participant, is not desired or practical in applied research such as in nursing studies. Hence, new phenomenology is aligned with interpretive phenomenology, embracing the intersubjectivity (shared subjective experiences between two or more people) of the research approach. 1

Another feature of new phenomenology is the positioning of culture in the analysis of an individual’s experience. This is not the case for the traditional phenomenological approaches 1 ;  hence, philosophical approaches by European philosophers Husserl and Heidegger can be used if the objective is to explore or understand the phenomenon itself or the object of the participant’s experience. The methods of new phenomenology, or American phenomenology, should be applied if the researcher seeks to understand a person’s experience(s) of the phenomenon. 1

See Table 6.1. for two different examples of phenomenological research.

Advantages and disadvantages of phenomenological research

Phenomenology has many advantages, including that it can present authentic accounts of complex phenomena; it is a humanistic style of research that demonstrates respect for the whole individual; and the descriptions of experiences can tell an interesting story about the phenomenon and the individuals experiencing it. 7 Criticisms of phenomenology tend to focus on the individuality of the results, which makes them non-generalisable, considered too subjective and therefore invalid. However, the reason a researcher may choose a phenomenological approach is to understand the individual, subjective experiences of an individual; thus, as with many qualitative research designs, the findings will not be generalisable to a larger population. 7,8

Table 6.1. Examples of phenomenological studies

Phenomenology focuses on understanding a phenomenon from the perspective of individual experience (descriptive and interpretive phenomenology) or from the lived experience of the phenomenon by individuals (new phenomenology). This individualised focus lends itself to in-depth interviews and small scale research projects.

• Dowling M. From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. Int J Nurs Stud . 2007;44(1):131-42. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.026
• Creswell J, Hanson W, Clark Plano V, Morales A. Qualitative research designs: selection and implementation. Couns Psychol . 2007;35(2):236-264. doi:10.1177/0011000006287390
• Morse JM, Field PA. Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals. 2nd ed. SAGE; 1995.
• Neubauer BE, Witkop CT, Varpio L. How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspect Med Educ . 2019;8(2):90-97. doi:10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
• Merleau-Ponty M, Landes D, Carman T, Lefort C. Phenomenology of Perception . 1st ed. Routledge; 2011.
• Singh J, Wiese A, Sillerud B. Using phenomenological hermeneutics to understand the experiences of managers working with quality improvement strategies in an assisted living facility. Healthcare (Basel) . 2019;7(3):87. doi:10.3390/healthcare7030087
• Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. Qualitative Research Methods: A Health Focus . Oxford University Press; 1999.
• Liamputtong P. Qualitative Research Methods . 5th ed. Oxford University Press; 2020.
• Abbaspour Z, Vasel G, Khojastehmehr R. Investigating the lived experiences of abused mothers: a phenomenological study. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences . 2021;10(2)2:108-114. doi:10.22062/JQR.2021.193653.0
• Engberink AO, Mailly M, Marco V, et al. A phenomenological study of nurses experience about their palliative approach and their use of mobile palliative care teams in medical and surgical care units in France. BMC Palliat Care . 2020;19:34. doi:10.1186/s12904-020-0536-0

Qualitative Research – a practical guide for health and social care researchers and practitioners Copyright © 2023 by Darshini Ayton is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

• Privacy Policy

Buy Me a Coffee

Home » Phenomenology – Methods, Examples and Guide

Phenomenology – Methods, Examples and Guide

Table of Contents

Phenomenology

Definition:

Phenomenology is a branch of philosophy that is concerned with the study of subjective experience and consciousness. It is based on the idea that the essence of things can only be understood through the way they appear to us in experience, rather than by analyzing their objective properties or functions.

Phenomenology is often associated with the work of philosopher Edmund Husserl, who developed a method of phenomenological inquiry that involves suspending one’s preconceptions and assumptions about the world and focusing on the pure experience of phenomena as they present themselves to us. This involves bracketing out any judgments, beliefs, or theories about the phenomena, and instead attending closely to the subjective qualities of the experience itself.

Phenomenology has been influential not only in philosophy but also in other fields such as psychology, sociology, and anthropology, where it has been used to explore questions of perception, meaning, and human experience.

History of Phenomenology

Phenomenology is a philosophical movement that began in the early 20th century, primarily in Germany. It was founded by Edmund Husserl, a German philosopher who is often considered the father of phenomenology.

Husserl’s work was deeply influenced by the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, particularly his emphasis on the importance of subjective experience. However, Husserl sought to go beyond Kant’s transcendental idealism by developing a rigorous method of inquiry that would allow him to examine the structures of consciousness and the nature of experience in a systematic way.

Husserl’s first major work, Logical Investigations (1900-1901), laid the groundwork for phenomenology by introducing the idea of intentional consciousness, or the notion that all consciousness is directed towards objects in the world. He went on to develop a method of “bracketing” or “epoche,” which involved setting aside one’s preconceptions and assumptions about the world in order to focus on the pure experience of phenomena as they present themselves.

Other philosophers, such as Martin Heidegger and Jean-Paul Sartre, built on Husserl’s work and developed their own versions of phenomenology. Heidegger, in particular, emphasized the importance of language and the role it plays in shaping our understanding of the world, while Sartre focused on the relationship between consciousness and freedom.

Today, phenomenology continues to be an active area of philosophical inquiry, with many contemporary philosophers drawing on its insights to explore questions of perception, meaning, and human experience.

Types of Phenomenology

There are several types of phenomenology that have emerged over time, each with its own focus and approach. Here are some of the most prominent types of phenomenology:

Transcendental Phenomenology

This is the type of phenomenology developed by Edmund Husserl, which aims to investigate the structures of consciousness and experience in a systematic way by using the method of epoche or bracketing.

Existential Phenomenology

This type of phenomenology, developed by philosophers such as Martin Heidegger and Jean-Paul Sartre, focuses on the subjective experience of individual existence, emphasizing the role of freedom, authenticity, and the search for meaning in human life.

Hermeneutic Phenomenology

This type of phenomenology, developed by philosophers such as Hans-Georg Gadamer and Paul Ricoeur, emphasizes the role of interpretation and understanding in human experience, particularly in the context of language and culture.

Phenomenology of Perception

This type of phenomenology, developed by Maurice Merleau-Ponty, emphasizes the embodied and lived nature of perception, arguing that perception is not simply a matter of passive reception but is instead an active and dynamic process of engagement with the world.

Phenomenology of Sociality

This type of phenomenology, developed by philosophers such as Alfred Schutz and Emmanuel Levinas, focuses on the social dimension of human experience, exploring how we relate to others and how our understanding of the world is shaped by our interactions with others.

Methods of Phenomenology

Here are some of the key methods that phenomenologists use to investigate human experience:

Epoche (Bracketing)

This is a key method in phenomenology, which involves setting aside one’s preconceptions and assumptions about the world in order to focus on the pure experience of phenomena as they present themselves. By bracketing out any judgments, beliefs, or theories about the phenomena, one can attend more closely to the subjective qualities of the experience itself.

Introspection

Phenomenologists often rely on introspection, or a careful examination of one’s own mental states and experiences, as a way of gaining insight into the nature of consciousness and subjective experience.

Descriptive Analysis

Phenomenology also involves a careful description and analysis of subjective experiences, paying close attention to the way things appear to us in experience, rather than analyzing their objective properties or functions.

Another method used in phenomenology is the variation technique, in which one systematically varies different aspects of an experience in order to gain a deeper understanding of its structure and meaning.

Phenomenological Reduction

This method involves reducing a phenomenon to its essential features or structures, in order to gain a deeper understanding of its nature and significance.

Epoché Variations

This method involves examining different aspects of an experience through the process of epoché or bracketing, to gain a more nuanced understanding of its subjective qualities and significance.

Applications of Phenomenology

Phenomenology has a wide range of applications across many fields, including philosophy, psychology, sociology, education, and healthcare. Here are some of the key applications of phenomenology:

• Philosophy : Phenomenology is primarily a philosophical approach, and has been used to explore a wide range of philosophical issues related to consciousness, perception, identity, and the nature of reality.
• Psychology : Phenomenology has been used in psychology to study human experience and consciousness, particularly in the areas of perception, emotion, and cognition. It has also been used to develop new forms of psychotherapy, such as existential and humanistic psychotherapy.
• Sociology : Phenomenology has been used in sociology to study the subjective experience of individuals within social contexts, particularly in the areas of culture, identity, and social change.
• Education : Phenomenology has been used in education to explore the subjective experience of students and teachers, and to develop new approaches to teaching and learning that take into account the individual experiences of learners.
• Healthcare : Phenomenology has been used in healthcare to explore the subjective experience of patients and healthcare providers, and to develop new approaches to patient care that are more patient-centered and focused on the individual’s experience of illness.
• Design : Phenomenology has been used in design to better understand the subjective experience of users and to create more user-centered products and experiences.
• Business : Phenomenology has been used in business to better understand the subjective experience of consumers and to develop more effective marketing strategies and user experiences.

Purpose of Phenomenology

The purpose of phenomenology is to understand the subjective experience of human beings. Phenomenology is concerned with the way things appear to us in experience, rather than their objective properties or functions. The goal of phenomenology is to describe and analyze the essential features of subjective experience, and to gain a deeper understanding of the nature of consciousness, perception, and human existence.

Phenomenology is particularly concerned with the ways in which subjective experience is structured, and with the underlying meanings and significance of these structures. Phenomenologists seek to identify the essential features of subjective experience, such as intentionality, embodiment, and lived time, and to explore the ways in which these features give rise to meaning and significance in human life.

Phenomenology has a wide range of applications across many fields, including philosophy, psychology, sociology, education, healthcare, and design. In each of these fields, phenomenology is used to gain a deeper understanding of human experience, and to develop new approaches and strategies that are more focused on the subjective experiences of individuals.

Overall, the purpose of phenomenology is to deepen our understanding of human experience and to provide insights into the nature of consciousness, perception, and human existence. Phenomenology offers a unique perspective on the subjective aspects of human life, and its insights have the potential to transform our understanding of ourselves and the world around us.

Examples of Phenomenology

Phenomenology has many real-life examples across different fields. Here are some examples of phenomenology in action:

• Psychology : In psychology, phenomenology is used to study the subjective experience of individuals with mental health conditions. For example, a phenomenological study might explore the experience of anxiety in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder, or the experience of depression in individuals with major depressive disorder.
• Healthcare : In healthcare, phenomenology is used to explore the subjective experience of patients and to develop more patient-centered approaches to care. For example, a phenomenological study might explore the experience of chronic pain in patients, in order to develop more effective pain management strategies that are based on the patient’s individual experience of pain.
• Education : In education, phenomenology is used to study the subjective experience of students and to develop more effective teaching and learning strategies. For example, a phenomenological study might explore the experience of learning in students, in order to develop teaching methods that are more focused on the individual needs and experiences of learners.
• Business : In business, phenomenology is used to better understand the subjective experience of consumers, and to develop more effective marketing strategies and user experiences. For example, a phenomenological study might explore the experience of using a particular product or service, in order to identify areas for improvement and to create a more user-centered experience.
• Design : In design, phenomenology is used to better understand the subjective experience of users, and to create more user-centered products and experiences. For example, a phenomenological study might explore the experience of using a particular app or website, in order to identify ways to improve the user interface and user experience.

When to use Phenomenological Research

Here are some situations where phenomenological research might be appropriate:

• When you want to explore the meaning and significance of an experience : Phenomenological research is particularly useful when you want to gain a deeper understanding of the subjective experience of individuals and the meanings and significance that they attach to their experiences. For example, if you want to understand the experience of being a first-time parent, phenomenological research can help you explore the various emotions, challenges, and joys that are associated with this experience.
• When you want to develop more patient-centered healthcare: Phenomenological research can be useful in healthcare settings where there is a need to develop more patient-centered approaches to care. For example, if you want to improve pain management strategies for patients with chronic pain, phenomenological research can help you gain a better understanding of the individual experiences of pain and the different ways in which patients cope with this experience.
• When you want to develop more effective teaching and learning strategies : Phenomenological research can be used in education settings to explore the subjective experience of students and to develop more effective teaching and learning strategies that are based on the individual needs and experiences of learners.
• When you want to improve the user experience of a product or service: Phenomenological research can be used in design settings to gain a deeper understanding of the subjective experience of users and to develop more user-centered products and experiences.

Characteristics of Phenomenology

Here are some of the key characteristics of phenomenology:

• Focus on subjective experience: Phenomenology is concerned with the subjective experience of individuals, rather than objective facts or data. Phenomenologists seek to understand how individuals experience and interpret the world around them.
• Emphasis on lived experience: Phenomenology emphasizes the importance of lived experience, or the way in which individuals experience the world through their own unique perspectives and histories.
• Reduction to essence: Phenomenology seeks to reduce the complexities of subjective experience to their essential features or structures, in order to gain a deeper understanding of the nature of consciousness, perception, and human existence.
• Emphasis on description: Phenomenology is primarily concerned with describing the features and structures of subjective experience, rather than explaining them in terms of underlying causes or mechanisms.
• Bracketing of preconceptions: Phenomenology involves bracketing or suspending preconceptions and assumptions about the world, in order to approach subjective experience with an open and unbiased perspective.
• Methodological approach: Phenomenology is both a philosophical and methodological approach, which involves a specific set of techniques and procedures for studying subjective experience.
• Multiple approaches: Phenomenology encompasses a wide range of approaches and variations, including transcendental phenomenology, hermeneutic phenomenology, and existential phenomenology, among others.

Advantages of Phenomenology

Phenomenology offers several advantages as a research approach, including:

• Provides rich, in-depth insights: Phenomenology is focused on understanding the subjective experiences of individuals in a particular context, which allows for a rich and in-depth exploration of their experiences, emotions, and perceptions.
• Allows for participant-centered research: Phenomenological research prioritizes the experiences and perspectives of the participants, which makes it a participant-centered approach. This can help to ensure that the research is relevant and meaningful to the participants.
• Provides a flexible approach: Phenomenological research offers a flexible approach that can be adapted to different research questions and contexts. This makes it suitable for use in a wide range of fields and research areas.
• Can uncover new insights : Phenomenological research can uncover new insights into subjective experience and can challenge existing assumptions and beliefs about a particular phenomenon or experience.
• Can inform practice and policy: Phenomenological research can provide insights that can be used to inform practice and policy decisions in fields such as healthcare, education, and design.
• Can be used in combination with other research approaches : Phenomenological research can be used in combination with other research approaches, such as quantitative methods, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of a particular phenomenon or experience.

Limitations of Phenomenology

Despite the many advantages of phenomenology, there are also several limitations that should be taken into account, including:

• Subjective nature: Phenomenology is focused on subjective experience, which means that it can be difficult to generalize findings to a larger population or to other contexts.
• Limited external validity: Because phenomenological research is focused on a specific context or experience, the findings may have limited external validity or generalizability.
• Potential for researcher bias: Phenomenological research relies heavily on the researcher’s interpretations and analyses of the data, which can introduce potential for bias and subjectivity.
• Time-consuming and resource-intensive: Phenomenological research is often time-consuming and resource-intensive, as it involves in-depth data collection and analysis.
• Difficulty with data analysis: Phenomenological research involves a complex process of data analysis, which can be difficult and time-consuming.
• Lack of standardized procedures: Phenomenology encompasses a range of approaches and variations, which can make it difficult to compare findings across studies or to establish standardized procedures.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Cluster Analysis – Types, Methods and Examples

Questionnaire – Definition, Types, and Examples

Discriminant Analysis – Methods, Types and...

Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

MANOVA (Multivariate Analysis of Variance) –...

Observational Research – Methods and Guide

Phenomenological Research: Methods And Examples

Ravi was a novice, finding it difficult to select the right research design for his study. He joined a program…

Ravi was a novice, finding it difficult to select the right research design for his study. He joined a program to improve his understanding of research. As a part of his assignment, he was asked to work with a phenomenological research design. To execute good practices in his work, Ravi studied examples of phenomenological research. This let him understand what approaches he needed and areas he could apply the phenomenological method.

What Is Phenomenological Research?

Phenomenological research method, examples of phenomenological research.

A qualitative research approach that helps in describing the lived experiences of an individual is known as phenomenological research. The phenomenological method focuses on studying the phenomena that have impacted an individual. This approach highlights the specifics and identifies a phenomenon as perceived by an individual in a situation. It can also be used to study the commonality in the behaviors of a group of people.  

Phenomenological research has its roots in psychology, education and philosophy. Its aim is to extract the purest data that hasn’t been attained before. Sometimes researchers record personal notes about what they learn from the subjects. This adds to the credibility of data, allowing researchers to remove these influences to produce unbiased narratives. Through this method, researchers attempt to answer two major questions:

• What are the subject’s experiences related to the phenomenon?
• What factors have influenced the experience of the phenomenon?

A researcher may also use observations, art and documents to construct a universal meaning of experiences as they establish an understanding of the phenomenon. The richness of the data obtained in phenomenological research opens up opportunities for further inquiry.

Now that we know what is phenomenological research , let’s look at some methods and examples.

Phenomenological research can be based on single case studies or a pool of samples. Single case studies identify system failures and discrepancies. Data from multiple samples highlights many possible situations. In either case, these are the methods a researcher can use:

• The researcher can observe the subject or access written records, such as texts, journals, poetry, music or diaries
• They can conduct conversations and interviews with open-ended questions, which allow researchers to make subjects comfortable enough to open up
• Action research and focus workshops are great ways to put at ease candidates who have psychological barriers

To mine deep information, a researcher must show empathy and establish a friendly rapport with participants. These kinds of phenomenological research methods require researchers to focus on the subject and avoid getting influenced.

Phenomenological research is a way to understand individual situations in detail. The theories are developed transparently, with the evidence available for a reader to access. We can use this methodology in situations such as:

• The experiences of every war survivor or war veteran are unique. Research can illuminate their mental states and survival strategies in a new world.
• Losing family members to Covid-19 hasn’t been easy. A detailed study of survivors and people who’ve lost loved ones can help understand coping mechanisms and long-term traumas.
• What’s it like to be diagnosed with a terminal disease when a person becomes a parent? The conflict of birth and death can’t be generalized, but research can record emotions and experiences.

Phenomenological research is a powerful way to understand personal experiences. It provides insights into individual actions and motivations by examining long-held assumptions. New theories, policies and responses can be developed on this basis. But, the phenomenological research design will be ineffective if subjects are unable to communicate due to language, age, cognition or other barriers. Managers must be alert to such limitations and sharp to interpret results without bias.

Harappa’s Thinking Critically program prepares professionals to think like leaders. Make decisions after careful consideration, engage with opposing views and weigh every possible outcome. Our stellar faculty will help you learn how to back the right strategies. Get the techniques and tools to build an analytical mindset. Effective thinking will improve communication. This in turn can break down barriers and open new avenues for success. Take a step forward with Harappa today!

Explore Harappa Diaries to learn more about topics such as What Are The Objectives Of Research , Fallacy Meaning , Kolb Learning Styles and How to Learn Unlearn And Relearn to upgrade your knowledge and skills.

Reskilling Programs

L&D leaders need to look for reskilling programs that meet organizational goals and employee aspirations. The first step to doing this is to understand the skills gaps and identify what’s necessary. An effective reskilling program will be one that is scalable and measurable. Companies need to understand their immediate goals and prepare for future requirements when considering which employees to reskill.

Are you still uncertain about the kind of reskilling program you should opt for?  Speak to our expert   to understand what will work best for your organization and employees.

Proceedings of the 1992 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference pp 394–398 Cite as

Phenomenological Research: Procedures and Analysis

• James G. Helgeson 2 &
• John Mager 3  
• Conference paper
• First Online: 01 January 2014

1568 Accesses

1 Citations

Part of the book series: Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science ((DMSPAMS))

Use of the phenomenological approach to research has been advanced as a way of "getting closer to customers" by seeing events as they are lived and experienced. A summary of the procedures and techniques of this methodology is presented here. This summary starts with the individual protocol moves on to the "individual psychological structure" (IPS) then to the "general psychological structure" (GPS) of the respondents as a group. If a group of researchers are involved, the final step is to determine the "interpretative group structure" (IGS) wherein an interpretation synthesis among the group is developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Churchill, Scott D. and Frederick J. Wertz (1985), "An Introduction to Phenomenological Psychology for Consumer Research: Historical, Conceptual, and Methodological Foundations, "in Advances in Consumer Research ," Vol. XII, eds., Elizabeth C. Hirschman and Morris B. Holbrook, Provo, Utah: Association for Consumer Research, 550–555.

Google Scholar  

Giorgi, Amedeo (1986), "The Context of Discovery-Context of Justification: Distinction and Descriptive Science," Journal of Phenomenological Psychology , 17 (Fall) 151–167.

Article   Google Scholar  

Heidegger, Martin (1962), Being and Time , New York: Harper and Row,

Hunt, Shelby (1990), "Truth in Marketing Theory and Research," Journal of Marketing , 54,3 (July) 1–15.

Husserl, Edmund (1962), Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phemonenology New York: Collier.

Kvale, Steinar (1983), "The Qualitative Research Interview: A Phenomenological and a Hermeutical Mode of Understanding " Journal of Phenomenological Psychology , 14 (Fall), 171– 196.

O’Guinn, Thomas L. and Ronald J. Faber (1989), "Compulsive Buying: A Phenomenological Exploration," Journal of Consumer Research , 16, September, 147–157.

Sartre, Jean P. (1962), Being and Nothingness , New York: Washington Square Press.

Thompson, Craig J., William B. Locander, and Howard R. Pollio (1989), "Putting Consumer Experience Back into Consumer Research: The Philosophy and Method of Existential-Phenomenology " Journal of Consumer Research , 16 (September) 133–144.

Valle, Ronald S. and Mark King (1978), "An Introduction to Existential-Phenomenological Thought in Psychology " in Existential-Phenomenological Alternative for Psychology eds. Ronald S. Valle and Mark King, New York: Oxford University Press, 6–17.

Wertz, Frederick J. (1983), "From Everyday to Psychological Description: Analyzing the Moments of a Qualitative Data Analysis," Journal of Phenomenological Psychology , 14 (Fall), 197–242.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Gonzaga University, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA

James G. Helgeson

Eastern Washington University, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of Marketing, Boston College Carroll School of Management, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA

Victoria L. Crittenden

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Helgeson, J.G., Mager, J. (2015). Phenomenological Research: Procedures and Analysis. In: Crittenden, V.L. (eds) Proceedings of the 1992 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13248-8_80

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13248-8_80

Published : 06 November 2014

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-13247-1

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-13248-8

eBook Packages : Business and Economics Business and Management (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

6 Common Leadership Styles — and How to Decide Which to Use When

• Rebecca Knight

Being a great leader means recognizing that different circumstances call for different approaches.

Research suggests that the most effective leaders adapt their style to different circumstances — be it a change in setting, a shift in organizational dynamics, or a turn in the business cycle. But what if you feel like you’re not equipped to take on a new and different leadership style — let alone more than one? In this article, the author outlines the six leadership styles Daniel Goleman first introduced in his 2000 HBR article, “Leadership That Gets Results,” and explains when to use each one. The good news is that personality is not destiny. Even if you’re naturally introverted or you tend to be driven by data and analysis rather than emotion, you can still learn how to adapt different leadership styles to organize, motivate, and direct your team.

Much has been written about common leadership styles and how to identify the right style for you, whether it’s transactional or transformational, bureaucratic or laissez-faire. But according to Daniel Goleman, a psychologist best known for his work on emotional intelligence, “Being a great leader means recognizing that different circumstances may call for different approaches.”

• RK Rebecca Knight is a journalist who writes about all things related to the changing nature of careers and the workplace. Her essays and reported stories have been featured in The Boston Globe, Business Insider, The New York Times, BBC, and The Christian Science Monitor. She was shortlisted as a Reuters Institute Fellow at Oxford University in 2023. Earlier in her career, she spent a decade as an editor and reporter at the Financial Times in New York, London, and Boston.

Partner Center

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• v.6(3); 2019 Jul

Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology

Annelie j. sundler.

1 Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden

Elisabeth Lindberg

Christina nilsson, lina palmér.

The aim of this paper was to discuss how to understand and undertake thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Methodological principles to guide the process of analysis are offered grounded on phenomenological philosophy. This is further discussed in relation to how scientific rigour and validity can be achieved.

This is a discursive article on thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology.

This paper takes thematic analysis based on a descriptive phenomenological tradition forward and provides a useful description on how to undertake the analysis. Ontological and epistemological foundations of descriptive phenomenology are outlined. Methodological principles are explained to guide the process of analysis, as well as help to understand validity and rigour. Researchers and students in nursing and midwifery conducting qualitative research need comprehensible and valid methods to analyse the meaning of lived experiences and organize data in meaningful ways.

1. INTRODUCTION

Qualitative research in health care is an increasingly complex research field, particularly when doing phenomenology. In nursing and midwifery, qualitative approaches dealing with the lived experiences of patients, families and professionals are necessary. Today, there are number of diverse research approaches. Still, the clarity regarding approaches for thematic analysis is not yet fully described in the literature and only a few papers describe thematic analysis (Ho, Chiang, & Leung, 2017 ; Vaismoradi, Turunen, & Bondas, 2013 ). It may be difficult to find a single paper that can guide researchers and students in doing thematic analysis in phenomenology.

From our research experiences, it may be complex to read and understand phenomenological approaches. Similarly, the process of analysis can be challenging to comprehend. This makes methodological issues related to the clarity of ontological and epistemological underpinnings and discussions of validity and rigour complex. Norlyk and Harder ( 2010 ) points to difficulties finding a guide for phenomenological research. There is a need for understandable guidelines to take thematic analysis forward. Useful approaches are required to provide researchers and students guidance in the process of thematic analysis. With this paper, we hope to clarify some important methodological stances related to the thematic analysis of meaning from lived experiences that are grounded in descriptive phenomenology and useful to teachers and researchers in nursing and midwifery.

1.1. Background

Phenomenology has been widely used to understand human phenomena in nursing and midwifery practices (Matua, 2015 ). Today, there are several phenomenological approaches available. When using phenomenology, the researcher needs an awareness of basic assumptions to make important methodological decisions. Thus, it is important to understand the underpinnings of the approach used (Dowling & Cooney, 2012 ). Phenomenological underpinnings may, however, be difficult to understand and apply in the research process.

Thematizing meaning has been emphasized as one of a few shared aspects across different qualitative approaches (Holloway & Todres, 2003 ), suggesting that some qualitative research strategies are more generic than others. Although different approaches sometimes overlap, they have different ontological and epistemological foundations. A range of approaches are used to thematize meaning, but some of them would benefit from clarifying ontological and epistemological assumptions. In hermeneutic phenomenological traditions, thematizing meaning can be understood as related to the interpretation of data, illuminating the underlying or unspoken meanings embodied or hidden in lived experiences (Ho et al., 2017 ; van Manen, 2016 ). Another commonly used approach to thematic analysis is the method presented in the psychology literature by Braun and Clarke ( 2006 ). The method is frequently used to find repeated patterns of meaning in the data. However, there is a lack of thematic analysis approaches based on the traditions of descriptive phenomenology.

Researchers must make methodological considerations. In phenomenology, an awareness of the philosophical underpinning of the approach is needed when it is used in depth (Dowling & Cooney, 2012 ; Holloway & Todres, 2003 ). This places demands on methods to be comprehensible and flexible yet consistent and coherent. Questions remain regarding how thematic analysis can be further clarified and used based on descriptive phenomenology.

In this discursive paper, we provide guidance for thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology, which, to our knowledge, has not been made explicit in this way previously. This can be used as a guiding framework to analyse lived experiences in nursing and midwifery research. The aim of this paper was to discuss how to understand and undertake thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Methodological principles to guide the process of analysis are offered grounded on phenomenological philosophy. This is further discussed in relation to how scientific rigour and validity can be achieved.

2. ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF DESCRIPTIVE PHENOMENOLOGY

Phenomenology consists of a complex philosophical tradition in human science, containing different concepts interpreted in various ways. One main theme among phenomenological methods is the diversity between descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology (Norlyk & Harder, 2010 ). Both traditions are commonly used in nursing and midwifery research. Several phenomenological methods have been recognized in the descriptive or interpretative approaches (Dowling, 2007 ; Dowling & Cooney, 2012 ; Norlyk & Harder, 2010 ). The descriptive tradition of phenomenology originated from the writings of Husserl was further developed by Merleau‐Ponty, while the interpretive approach was developed mainly from Heidegger and Gadamer.

The thematic analysis in this paper uses a descriptive approach with focus on lived experience, which refers to our experiences of the world. The philosophy of phenomenology is the study of a phenomenon, for example something as it is experienced (or lived) by a human being that means how things appear in our experiences. Consequently, there is a strong emphasis on lived experiences in phenomenological research (Dowling & Cooney, 2012 ; Norlyk & Harder, 2010 ). In this paper, lived experience is understood from a lifeworld approach originating from the writing of Husserl (Dahlberg, Dahlberg, & Nyström, 2008 ). The lifeworld is crucial and becomes the starting point for understanding lived experiences. Hence, the lifeworld forms the ontological and epistemological foundation for our understanding of lived experiences. In the lifeworld, our experiences must be regarded in the light of the body and the lifeworld of a person (i.e., our subjectivity). Consequently, humans cannot be reduced to a biological or psychological being (Merleau‐Ponty, 2002 /1945). When understanding the meaning of lived experiences, we need to be aware of the lifeworld, our bodily being in the world and how we interact with others.

The understanding of lived experiences is closely linked to the idea of the intentionality of consciousness, or how meaning is experienced. Intentionality encompasses the idea that our consciousness is always directed towards something, which means that when we experience something, the “thing” is experienced as “something” that has meaning for us. For example, a birthing woman's experience of pain or caregiving as it is experienced by a nurse. In a descriptive phenomenological approach, based on the writing of Husserl (Dahlberg et al., 2008 ) such meanings can be described. From this point of view, there are no needs for interpretations of these meanings, although this may be argued differently in interpretive phenomenology. Intentionality is also linked to our natural attitude. In our ordinary life, we take ourselves and our life for granted, which is our natural attitude and how we approach our experiences. We usually take for granted that the world around us is as we perceive it and that others perceive it as we do. We also take for granted that the world exists independently of us. Within our natural attitude, we normally do not constantly analyse our experiences. In phenomenology, an awareness of the natural attitude is important.

3. METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES

In the ontological and epistemological foundations of descriptive phenomenology, some methodological principles can be recognized and how these are managed throughout the research process. Phenomenological studies have been criticized for lacking in clarity on philosophical underpinnings (Dowling & Cooney, 2012 ; Norlyk & Harder, 2010 ). Thus, philosophical stances must be understood and clarified for the reader of a study. Our suggestion is to let the entire research process, from data gathering to data analysis and reporting the findings, be guided by the methodological principles of emphasizing openness , questioning pre‐understanding and adopting a reflective attitude . We will acknowledge that the principles presented here may not be totally distinct from, or do follow, a particular phenomenological research approach. However, the outlined approach has some commonalities with the approaches of, for example, Dahlberg et al. ( 2008 ) and van Manen ( 2016 ).

When researching lived experiences, openness to the lifeworld and the phenomenon focused on must be emphasized (i.e., having curiosity and maintaining an open mind when searching for meaning). The researcher must adopt an open stance with sensitivity to the meaning of the lived experiences currently in focus. Openness involves being observant, attentive and sensitive to the expression of experiences (Dahlberg et al., 2008 ). It also includes questioning the understanding of data (Dahlberg & Dahlberg, 2003 ). Thus, researchers must strive to maintain an attitude that includes the assumption that hitherto the researcher does not know the participants experience and the researcher wants to understand the studied phenomenon in a new light to make invisible aspects of the experience become visible.

When striving for openness, researchers need to question their pre‐understanding , which means identifying and becoming aware of preconceptions that might influence the analysis. Throughout the research process and particularly the analysis, researchers must deal with the natural attitude and previous assumptions, when analysing and understanding the data. Questioning involves attempting to set aside one's experiences and assumptions as much as possible and means maintaining a critical stance and reflecting on the understanding of data and the phenomenon. This is similar to bracketing, a commonly used term in descriptive phenomenology based on Husserl, but it has been criticized (Dowling & Cooney, 2012 ). Some would argue that bracketing means to put aside such assumptions, which may not be possible. Instead, Gadamer ( 2004 ) deals with this in a different way, arguing that such assumptions are part of our understanding. Instead of using bracketing, our intention is to build on questioning as a representative way to describe what something means. Accordingly, researchers need to recognize personal beliefs, theories or other assumptions that can restrict the researcher's openness. Otherwise, the researcher risks describing his or her own pre‐understanding instead of the participants' experiences. Our pre‐understanding, described as “prejudice” in interpretive phenomenology by Gadamer ( 2004 ), is what we already know or think we know about a phenomena. As humans, we always have such a pre‐understanding or prejudice and Gadamer ( 2004 ) posits this is the tradition of our lived context and emphasizes that our tradition has a powerful influence on us. This means that it might be more difficult to see something new in the data than describe something already known by the researcher. Therefore, an open and sensitive stance is needed towards oneself, one's pre‐understanding and the understanding of data. However, one must be reflective and critical towards the data, as well as how to understand meanings from the data. Questioning can help researchers become aware of their pre‐understanding and set aside previous assumptions about the phenomenon (Dahlberg et al., 2008 ).

Questioning one's pre‐understanding is closely linked to having a reflective attitude . With a reflective attitude, the researcher needs to shift from the ordinary natural understanding of everyday life to a more self‐reflective and open stance towards the data (Dahlberg et al., 2008 ). An inquiring approach throughout the research process helps researchers become more aware of one's assumptions and reflect regarding the context of the actual research. For instance, researchers may need to reflect on why some meanings occur, how meanings are described and if meanings are grounded in the data. In striving for an awareness of the natural attitude, a reflective attitude becomes imperative. By having such an awareness, some of the pitfalls related to our natural attitude can be handled in favour of an open and reflective mind.

To summarize, methodological principles have been described in terms of emphasizing openness, questioning pre‐understanding and adopting a reflective attitude, which are three related concepts. To emphasis openness, one needs to reflect on preconceptions and judgements concerning the world and our experiences with a reflective approach to become aware of the natural attitude and process of understanding. Engaging in critical reflection throughout the research process may facilitate an awareness of how the researcher influences the research process. These methodological principles, related to ontological and epistemological foundations of phenomenology, are suggested to guide the research process, particularly the analysis.

4. THEMATIC ANALYSIS OF LIVED EXPERIENCES

The thematic analysis approach described in this paper is inductive. A prerequisite for the analysis is that it includes data on lived experiences, such as interviews or narratives. Themes derived from the analysis are data driven (i.e., grounded in data and the experience of the participants). The analysis begins with a search for meaning and goes on with different meanings being identified and related to each other. The analysis is aimed to try to understand the complexity of meanings in the data rather than measure their frequency. It involves researcher engaging in the data and the analysis. The analysis contains a search for patterns of meanings being further explored and determining how such patterns can be organized into themes. Moreover, the analysis must be guided by openness. Thus, the analysis involves a reflective process designed to illuminate meaning. Although the process of analysis is similar to descriptive phenomenological approaches focusing on the understanding and description of meaning‐oriented themes (Dahlberg et al., 2008 ; van Manen, 2016 ), there are important differences. While the thematic analysis in this paper focuses on how to organize patterns of meaning into themes, some would argue that an essential, general structure of meaning, rather than fragmented themes, is preferred (van Wijngaarden, Meide, & Dahlberg, 2017 ) and that such an essential meaning structure is a strength. We argue that meaning‐oriented themes can contribute to robust qualitative research findings. Still, it is important that the findings move between concrete expressions and descriptive text on meanings of lived experiences.

4.1. The process of analysis

The goal of the thematic analysis is to achieve an understanding of patterns of meanings from data on lived experiences (i.e., informants' descriptions of experiences related to the research question in, e.g., interviews or narratives). The analysis begins with data that needs to be textual and aims to organize meanings found in the data into patterns and, finally, themes. While conducting the analysis, the researcher strives to understand meanings embedded in experiences and describe these meanings textually. Through the analysis, details and aspects of meaning are explored, requiring reading and a reflective writing. Parts of the text need to be understood in terms of the whole and the whole in terms of its parts. However, the researcher also needs to move between being close to and distant from the data. Overall, the process of analysis can be complex and the researcher needs to be flexible. This process is summarized in Figure ​ Figure1 1 and detailed in the description below.

Summary of thematic analysis

To begin the analysis, the researcher needs to achieve familiarity with the data through open‐minded reading. The text must be read several times in its entirety. This is an open‐ended reading that puts the principle of openness into practice with the intention of opening one's mind to the text and its meanings. When reading, the researcher starts to explore experiences expressed in the data, such as determining how these are narrated and how meanings can be understood. The goal is to illuminate novel information rather than confirm what is already known while keeping the study aim in mind.

Thereafter, the parts of the data are further illuminated and the search for meanings and themes deepens. By moving back and forth between the whole and its parts, a sensitive dialogue with the text may be facilitated. While reading, meanings corresponding to the study's aim are marked. Notes and short descriptive words can be used to give meanings a preliminary name. As the analysis progresses, meanings related to each other are compared to identify differences and similarities. Meanings need to be related to each other to get a sense of patterns. Patterns of meanings are further examined. It is important to not make meanings definite too rapidly, slow down the understanding of data and its meanings. This demands the researcher's openness to let meanings emerge.

Lastly, the researcher needs to organize themes into a meaningful wholeness. Methodological principles must remind the researcher to maintain a reflective mind, while meanings are further developed into themes. Meanings are organized into patterns and, finally, themes. While deriving meaning from text, it is helpful to compare meanings and themes derived from the original data. Nothing is taken for granted, and the researcher must be careful and thoughtful during this part of the process. It can be valuable to discuss and reflect on tentative themes emerging from the data. Findings need to be meaningful, and the naming and wording of themes becomes important. The writing up of the themes is aimed to outline meanings inherent in the described experiences. At this point, findings are written and rewritten. Faithful descriptions of meanings usually need more than a single word, and the writing is important.

To conclude, the process of thematic analysis, based in a descriptive phenomenological approach, goes from the original data to the identification of meanings, organizing these into patterns and writing the results of themes related to the study aim and the actual context. When the findings are reported, these are described conversely (i.e., starting with the themes and the descriptive text, illustrated with quotes). Thus, meanings found from participants experiences are described in a meaningful text organized in themes.

4.2. Validity and Rigour

Hereby follows our discussion on scientific quality in terms of validity and rigour in the thematic analysis process. There is no consensus on which concepts should be used regarding validity in qualitative and phenomenological research. The term validity is typically used in relation to quantitative methods; however, qualitative researchers claim that the term is suitable in all paradigms as a generic term implying whether the research conclusions are sound, just and well‐founded (Morse, 2015 ; Whittemore, Chase, & Mandle, 2001 ). Rolfe ( 2006 ) states that scientific rigour can be judged based on how the research is presented for the reader and appraising research lies with both the reader and the writer of the research. Thus, clarity regarding methodological principles used becomes necessary. Porter ( 2007 ) argues that a more realistic approach is needed and that scientific rigour needs to be taken seriously in qualitative research (Porter, 2007 ). It has been stressed that strategies are needed to ensure rigour and validity; such strategies must be built into the research process and not solely evaluated afterwards (Cypress, 2017 ). Therefore, we further discuss scientific rigour and phenomenological validity in relation to reflexivity , credibility and transferability .

Reflexivity is strictly connected to previously described methodological principles of a reflective attitude and questioning one's pre‐understanding. Reflexivity must be maintained during the entire process, and the researcher needs to sustain a reflective attitude. Particularly, reflexivity must involve questioning the understanding of data and themes derived. Qualitative researchers are closely engaged in this process and must reflect on what the data actually state that may be different from the researcher's understanding. This means the researcher should question the findings instead of taking them for granted. Malterud ( 2001 ) claims that multiple researchers might strengthen the study since they can give supplementary views and question each other's statements, while an independent researcher must find other strategies. Another way to maintain reflexivity is comparing the original data with the descriptive text of themes derived. Moreover, findings need to be illustrated with original data to demonstrate how the derived descriptions are grounded in the data rather than in the researcher's understanding. Furthermore, information is needed on the setting so the reader can understand the context of the findings.

Credibility refers to the meaningfulness of the findings and whether these are well presented (Kitto, Chesters, & Grbich, 2008 ). Credibility and reflexivity are not totally distinct but are correlated with each other. Credibility stresses that nothing can be taken for granted and is associated with the methodological principles described above. The researcher needs to emphasize how the analysis and findings are presented for the reader. The analysis needs to be transparent, which means that the researcher should present it as thoroughly as possible to strive for credibility. The reader needs information concerning the methodology used and methodological decisions and considerations made. This includes, for instance, how the thematic analysis was performed, descriptions of how meanings were derived from the data and how themes were identified. Descriptions need to be clear and consistent. However, it must be possible to agree with and understand the logic of the findings and themes. Credibility lies in both the methodology and in the presentation of findings. Thus, in striving for credibility, the procedures and methods need to be presented as thoroughly and transparently as possible. Themes described must be illustrated with quotes to ensure the content and described meanings are consistent.

Transferability refers to the usefulness and relevance of the findings. However, the method used does not guarantee transferability in itself. Transferability is not explicitly related to any of the methodological principles, but it may be a result of them. Transferability is a measure of whether the findings are sound and if the study adds new knowledge to what is already known. The clarity of findings is also important. Thus, findings must be understandable and transferable to other research (i.e., findings need to be recognizable and relevant to a specific or broader context other than the original study). Specifically, the relevance, usefulness and meaningfulness of research findings to other contexts are important components of the study's transferability.

To conclude, reflexivity, credibility and transferability are concepts important to acknowledge and consider throughout the research process to engender validity and rigour. We maintain that meaning‐oriented themes can contribute to robust findings, if reported in a text describing patterns of meanings illustrated with examples of expressions from lived experiences. Questions researchers need to ask themselves in relation to validity when conducting a thematic analysis are presented in Figure ​ Figure2. 2 . Since the method in itself is no guarantee of validity and rigour, discussions related to these areas are needed.

Overview of questions useful to the uphold reflexivity, credibility and transferability of the research process in the thematic analysis of meanings

5. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND MIDWIFERY

In this paper, a method for thematic analysis based on phenomenology has been outlined. Doing phenomenological research is challenging. Therefore, we hope this paper contributes to the understanding of phenomenological underpinnings and methodological principles of thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. This approach can be useful for teachers and researchers in nursing and midwifery. The thematic analysis presented can offer guidance on how to understand meaning and analyse lived experiences. Methodological stances of descriptive phenomenology are clarified, linking the process of analysis with theoretical underpinnings. Methodological principles are explained to give guidance to the analysis and help understand validity and rigour. Thus, this paper has the potential to provide researchers and students who have an interest in research on lived experiences with a comprehensive and useful method to thematic analysis in phenomenology. Nurses and midwives conducting qualitative research on lived experiences need robust methods to ensure high quality in health care to benefit patients, childbearing women and their families.

6. CONCLUSION

We provide researchers in nursing and midwifery with some clarity regarding thematic analysis grounded in the tradition of descriptive phenomenology. We argue that researchers need to comprehend phenomenological underpinnings and be guided by these in the research process. In thematic analysis, descriptive phenomenology is a useful framework when analysing lived experiences with clarified applicable ontological and epistemological underpinnings. Emphasizing openness, questioning pre‐understanding and adopting a reflective attitude were identified as important methodological principles that can guide researchers throughout the analysis and help uphold scientific rigour and validity. For novice researchers, the present paper may serve as an introduction to phenomenological approaches.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

AS, EL, CN, LP: Made substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content; given final approval of the version to be published and each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Sundler AJ, Lindberg E, Nilsson C, Palmér L. Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology . Nursing Open . 2019; 6 :733–739. 10.1002/nop2.275 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

• Braun, V. , & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology . Qualitative Research in Psychology , 3 ( 2 ), 77–101. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cypress, B. S. (2017). Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: Perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization and recommendations . Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing , 36 ( 4 ), 253–263. 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000253 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dahlberg, H. , & Dahlberg, K. (2003). To not make definite what is indefinite: A phenomenological analysis of perception and its epistemological consequences . Journal of the Humanistic Psychologist , 31 ( 4 ), 34–50. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dahlberg, K. , Dahlberg, H. , & Nyström, M. (2008). Reflective lifeworld research . Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dowling, M. (2007). From Husserl to van Manen: A review of different phenomenological approaches . International Journal of Nursing Studies , 44 ( 1 ), 131–142. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.026 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dowling, M. , & Cooney, A. (2012). Research approaches related to phenomenology: Negotiating a complex landscape . Nurse Researcher , 20 ( 2 ), 21–27. 10.7748/nr2012.11.20.2.21.c9440 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and method . London, UK: Continuum. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ho, K. H. M. , Chiang, V. C. L. , & Leung, D. (2017). Hermeneutic phenomenological analysis: The ‘possibility’ beyond ‘actuality’ in thematic analysis . Journal of Advanced Nursing , 73 ( 7 ), 1757–1766. 10.1111/jan.13255 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Holloway, I. , & Todres, L. (2003). The status of method: Flexibility, consistency and coherence . Qualitative Research , 3 ( 3 ), 345–357. 10.1177/1468794103033004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kitto, S. C. , Chesters, J. , & Grbich, C. (2008). Quality in qualitative research . The Medical Journal of Australia , 188 ( 4 ), 243–246. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges and guidelines . Lancet , 358 ( 9280 ), 483–488. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Matua, G. A. (2015). Choosing phenomenology as a guiding philosophy for nursing research . Nurse Researcher , 22 ( 4 ), 30–34. 10.7748/nr.22.4.30.e1325 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Merleau‐Ponty, M. (2002/1945). Phenomenology of perception . London, UK: Routledge Classics. [ Google Scholar ]
• Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry . Qualitative Health Research , 9 , 1212–1222. 10.1177/1049732315588501 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Norlyk, A. , & Harder, I. (2010). What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An analysis of peer‐reviewed empirical nursing studies . Qualitative Health Research , 20 ( 3 ), 420–431. 10.1177/1049732309357435 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Porter, S. (2007). Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Reasserting realism in qualitative research . Journal of Advanced Nursing , 60 ( 1 ), 79–86. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04360.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rolfe, G. (2006). Validity, trustworthiness and rigor: Quality and the idea of qualitative research . Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53 , 304–310. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Vaismoradi, M. , Turunen, H. , & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study . Nursing & Health Sciences , 5 ( 3 ), 398–405. 10.1111/nhs.12048 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Van Manen, M. (2016). Phenomenology of practice . New York, NY: Routlege. [ Google Scholar ]
• van Wijngaarden, E. , Meide, H. V. , & Dahlberg, K. (2017). Researching health care as a meaningful practice: Toward a nondualistic view on evidence for qualitative research . Qualitative Health Research , 11 , 1738–1747. 10.1177/1049732317711133 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Whittemore, R. , Chase, S. K. , & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research . Qualitative Health Research , 11 ( 4 ), 522–537. 10.1177/104973201129119299 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]