• Search Search Please fill out this field.
  • Corporate Finance
  • Corporate Debt

Debt Assignment: How They Work, Considerations and Benefits

Daniel Liberto is a journalist with over 10 years of experience working with publications such as the Financial Times, The Independent, and Investors Chronicle.

assignment of debt a

Charlene Rhinehart is a CPA , CFE, chair of an Illinois CPA Society committee, and has a degree in accounting and finance from DePaul University.

assignment of debt a

Katrina Ávila Munichiello is an experienced editor, writer, fact-checker, and proofreader with more than fourteen years of experience working with print and online publications.

assignment of debt a

Investopedia / Ryan Oakley

What Is Debt Assignment?

The term debt assignment refers to a transfer of debt , and all the associated rights and obligations, from a creditor to a third party. The assignment is a legal transfer to the other party, who then becomes the owner of the debt. In most cases, a debt assignment is issued to a debt collector who then assumes responsibility to collect the debt.

Key Takeaways

  • Debt assignment is a transfer of debt, and all the associated rights and obligations, from a creditor to a third party (often a debt collector).
  • The company assigning the debt may do so to improve its liquidity and/or to reduce its risk exposure.
  • The debtor must be notified when a debt is assigned so they know who to make payments to and where to send them.
  • Third-party debt collectors are subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), a federal law overseen by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

How Debt Assignments Work

When a creditor lends an individual or business money, it does so with the confidence that the capital it lends out—as well as the interest payments charged for the privilege—is repaid in a timely fashion. The lender , or the extender of credit , will wait to recoup all the money owed according to the conditions and timeframe laid out in the contract.

In certain circumstances, the lender may decide it no longer wants to be responsible for servicing the loan and opt to sell the debt to a third party instead. Should that happen, a Notice of Assignment (NOA) is sent out to the debtor , the recipient of the loan, informing them that somebody else is now responsible for collecting any outstanding amount. This is referred to as a debt assignment.

The debtor must be notified when a debt is assigned to a third party so that they know who to make payments to and where to send them. If the debtor sends payments to the old creditor after the debt has been assigned, it is likely that the payments will not be accepted. This could cause the debtor to unintentionally default.

When a debtor receives such a notice, it's also generally a good idea for them to verify that the new creditor has recorded the correct total balance and monthly payment for the debt owed. In some cases, the new owner of the debt might even want to propose changes to the original terms of the loan. Should this path be pursued, the creditor is obligated to immediately notify the debtor and give them adequate time to respond.

The debtor still maintains the same legal rights and protections held with the original creditor after a debt assignment.

Special Considerations

Third-party debt collectors are subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The FDCPA, a federal law overseen by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), restricts the means and methods by which third-party debt collectors can contact debtors, the time of day they can make contact, and the number of times they are allowed to call debtors.

If the FDCPA is violated, a debtor may be able to file suit against the debt collection company and the individual debt collector for damages and attorney fees within one year. The terms of the FDCPA are available for review on the FTC's website .

Benefits of Debt Assignment

There are several reasons why a creditor may decide to assign its debt to someone else. This option is often exercised to improve liquidity  and/or to reduce risk exposure. A lender may be urgently in need of a quick injection of capital. Alternatively, it might have accumulated lots of high-risk loans and be wary that many of them could default . In cases like these, creditors may be willing to get rid of them swiftly for pennies on the dollar if it means improving their financial outlook and appeasing worried investors. At other times, the creditor may decide the debt is too old to waste its resources on collections, or selling or assigning it to a third party to pick up the collection activity. In these instances, a company would not assign their debt to a third party.

Criticism of Debt Assignment

The process of assigning debt has drawn a fair bit of criticism, especially over the past few decades. Debt buyers have been accused of engaging in all kinds of unethical practices to get paid, including issuing threats and regularly harassing debtors. In some cases, they have also been charged with chasing up debts that have already been settled.

Federal Trade Commission. " Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ." Accessed June 29, 2021.

Federal Trade Commission. " Debt Collection FAQs ." Accessed June 29, 2021.

assignment of debt a

  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices

Debt Assignment and Assumption Agreement

How does it work?

1. choose this template.

Start by clicking on "Fill out the template"

2. Complete the document

Answer a few questions and your document is created automatically.

3. Save - Print

Your document is ready! You will receive it in Word and PDF formats. You will be able to modify it.

Debt Assignment and Assumption Agreement

Rating: 4.7 - 23 votes

A Debt Assignment and Assumption Agreement is a very simple document whereby one party assigns their debt to another party, and the other party agrees to take that debt on. The party that is assigning the debt is the original debtor; they are called the assignor. The party that is assuming the debt is the new debtor; they are called the assignee.

The debt is owed to a creditor.

This document is different than a Debt Settlement Agreement , because there, the original debtor has paid back all of the debt and is now free and clear. Here, the debt still stands, but it will just be owed to the creditor by another party.

This is also different than a Debt Acknowledgment Form , because there, the original debtor is simply signing a document acknowledging their debt.

How to use this document

This document is extremely short and to-the-point. It contains just the identities of the parties, the terms of the debt, the debt amount, and the signatures. It is auto-populated with some important contract terms to make this a complete agreement.

When this document is filled out, it should be printed, signed by the assignor and the creditor, and then signed by the assignee in front of a notary. It is important to have the assignee's signature notarized, because that is the party that is taking on the debt.

Applicable law

Debt Assignment and Assumption Agreements are generally covered by the state law where the debt was originally incurred.

How to modify the template

You fill out a form. The document is created before your eyes as you respond to the questions.

At the end, you receive it in Word and PDF formats. You can modify it and reuse it.

Other names for the document:

Agreement to Assign Debt, Agreement to Assume Debt, Assignment and Assumption of Debt, Assumption and Assignment of Debt Agreement, Debt Assignment Agreement

Country: United States

General Business Documents - Other downloadable templates of legal documents

  • Amendment to Agreement
  • Loan Agreement
  • Loan Agreement Modification
  • Release of Loan Agreement
  • Non-Compete Agreement
  • Partnership Dissolution Agreement
  • Notice of Withdrawal from Partnership
  • Power Of Attorney
  • Debt Acknowledgment Form
  • Meeting Minutes
  • Request to Alter Contract
  • Release Agreement
  • Guaranty Agreement
  • Joint Venture Agreement
  • Contract Assignment Agreement
  • Debt Settlement Agreement
  • Breach of Contract Notice
  • Corporate Proxy
  • Mutual Rescission and Release Agreement
  • Notice for Non-Renewal of Contract
  • Other downloadable templates of legal documents

assignment of debt a

Assignment Of Debt Agreement

Jump to section, what is an assignment of debt agreement.

An assignment of debt agreement is a legal document between a debtor and creditor that outlines the repayment terms. An assignment of debt agreement can be used as an alternative to bankruptcy, but several requirements must be met for it to work.

In addition, if obligations are not met under a debt agreement, it might still be necessary to file for bankruptcy later on. Therefore, consulting with an attorney specializing in debt agreements is always recommended before entering into one of these contracts.

Assignment Of Debt Agreement Sample

Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10 5 exhibit1024f10qsbmay04.htm EXHIBIT 10.24 , Viewed December 20, 2021, View Source on SEC .

Who Helps With Assignment Of Debt Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on assignment of debt agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with an assignment of debt agreement?

Post a project  in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate assignment of debt agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

Meet some of our Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers

Kim G. on ContractsCounsel

Attorney and mediator with extensive experience in negotiating, drafting, and managing contracts in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors.

Michael C. on ContractsCounsel

40+ years handling litigation matters for employers and employees, defense and prosecution of personal injury matters, CalOsha defense, prepare employment contracts, non-compete clauses, established drug policies and franchise agreements. represented banks in commercial litigation , asset retrieval matters. conducted audits of insurance company claims on behalf of employers, defended contractors in toxic tort cases, handled appeals to the insurance commissioner on workers compensation rate classification matters

Christian D. on ContractsCounsel

Christian D.

Christian Davila received his Juris Doctorate from St. Mary’s University and becoming a member of the State Bar of Texas in 2013. Before law school, he studied at Texas A&M International University (TAMIU), and participated in multiple programs across various fields of study, including the University of Texas Medical Branch-School of Medicine’s “Early Medical School Acceptance Program,” and the Hispanic Association of Colleges & Universities’ “National Internship Program” at the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Christian’s legal experience includes criminal law (both prosecution and defense), family law, transactional law, business litigation, real estate litigation, and general civil litigation. Christian was previously in-house counsel for a multi-million dollar apartment construction and management company, handling all property acquisition, document drafting, negotiations, and litigation. Christian is a former member of the American Association for Justice (formerly the Association of Trial Lawyers of America), and he has been distinguished by the National Trial Lawyers as one of their TOP 40 Civil Plaintiff attorneys in Texas UNDER 40 years old. He likes weightlifting, reading comicbooks, and being silly with his kids in his spare time.

Kahlee S. on ContractsCounsel

I opened Hestia Legal when I was 6 months pregnant with the focus on educating and assisting families in my community. While the majority of my practice revolves around Estate Planning, I have a history of experience with contract and general business agreement drafting, discovery drafting, and general litigation document drafting.

Nadir C. on ContractsCounsel

I am a licensed attorney in Illinois, I am currently a Regulatory Compliance Analyst.

Torrey L. on ContractsCounsel

Torrey Livenick, Esq. is a fourth generation Colorado lawyer. Although she was born in California and raised in Nevada, she spent every summer in Colorado and knew she planned to make Denver her home. After graduating from Bryn Mawr College with a degree in Classical Culture and Society, she returned to Las Vegas to work as a paralegal. Once she spent five years building her skills and confirming her interest, she attended Emory University School of Law. Torrey’s interests include trivia (she even was a contestant on Jeopardy! during her law school days), video games, playing with her cats, and the arts. She is active in pro bono organizations including Metro Volunteer Lawyers.

Peter H. on ContractsCounsel

Haber Law Firm, APC, is a transactional business law firm with a focus on small/mid-market business purchases and sales, outside general counsel, and start-up assistance for businesses in their early stages. Peter Haber started Haber Law Firm, APC after several years as a legal executive at Popcornopolis, a gourmet popcorn brand sold at groceries and stadiums nationwide. In this role, Peter served as the company’s sole in-house legal advisor as it related to all functions of the company’s operations, including dispute resolution, compliance, and employment law, to name a few. With his help and guidance, the company relocated its entire corporate and manufacturing operation, developed a new factory and warehouse, and was successfully acquired by private equity. Prior to this, Peter was a litigator and business attorney with distinguished Los Angeles litigation boutiques. Such matters included the representation of numerous businesses in litigation and in the resolution of pre-litigation disputes as well as the representation of professionals in liability defense matters, including hospitals, physicians, and brokers.

Find the best lawyer for your project

How it works.

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Financial lawyers by top cities

  • Austin Financial Lawyers
  • Boston Financial Lawyers
  • Chicago Financial Lawyers
  • Dallas Financial Lawyers
  • Denver Financial Lawyers
  • Houston Financial Lawyers
  • Los Angeles Financial Lawyers
  • New York Financial Lawyers
  • Phoenix Financial Lawyers
  • San Diego Financial Lawyers
  • Tampa Financial Lawyers

Assignment Of Debt Agreement lawyers by city

  • Austin Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Boston Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Chicago Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Dallas Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Denver Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Houston Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Los Angeles Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • New York Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Phoenix Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • San Diego Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Tampa Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers

related contracts

  • Accredited Investor Questionnaire
  • Adverse Action Notice
  • Bridge Loan
  • Bridge Loan Contract
  • Collateral Assignment
  • Commercial Loan
  • Convertible Bonds
  • Convertible Note
  • Convertible Preferred Stock
  • Cumulative Preferred Stock

other helpful articles

  • How much does it cost to draft a contract?
  • Do Contract Lawyers Use Templates?
  • How do Contract Lawyers charge?
  • Business Contract Lawyers: How Can They Help?
  • What to look for when hiring a lawyer

assignment of debt a

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

What is an Assignment of Debt?

' decoding=

By Vanessa Swain Senior Lawyer

Updated on February 22, 2023 Reading time: 5 minutes

This article meets our strict editorial principles. Our lawyers, experienced writers and legally trained editorial team put every effort into ensuring the information published on our website is accurate. We encourage you to seek independent legal advice. Learn more .

Perfecting Assignment

  • Enforcing an Assigned Debt 

Recovery of an Assigned Debt

  • Other Considerations 

Key Takeaways

Frequently asked questions.

I t is common for creditors, such as banks and other financiers, to assign their debt to a third party. Usually, an assig nment of debt is done in an effort to minimise the costs of recovery where a debtor has been delinquent for some time. This article looks at:

  • what it means to ‘assign a debt’;
  • the legal requirements to perfecting an assignment; and
  • common problems with enforcing an assigned debt. 

Front page of publication

Whether you’re a small business owner or the Chief Financial Officer of an ASX-listed company, one fact remains: your customers need to pay you.

This manual aims to help business owners, financial controllers and credit managers best manage and recover their debt.

An assignment of debt, in simple terms, is an agreement that transfers a debt owed to one entity, to another. A creditor does not need the consent of the debtor to assign a debt.

Once a debt is properly assigned, all rights and responsibilities of the original creditor (the assignor ) transfer to the new owner (the assignee ). Once an assignment of debt has been perfected, the assignee can collect the full amount of the debt owed . This includes interest recoverable under the original contract, as if they were the original creditor. A debtor is still responsible for paying the outstanding debt after an assignment. However, now, the debt or must pay the debt to the assignee rather than the original creditor.

Purchasing debt can be a lucrative business. Creditors will generally sell debt at a loss, for example, 20c for each dollar owed. Although, the amount paid will vary depending on factors such as the age of the debt and the likelihood of recovery. This can be a tax write off for the assignor, while the assignee can take steps to recover 100% of the debt owed. 

In New South Wales, the requirements for a legally binding assignment of debt are set out in the Conveyancing Act :

  • the assignment must be in writing. You do this in the form of a deed (deed of assignment) and both the assignor and assignee sign it; and
  • the assignor must provide notice to the debtor. The requirement for notice must be express and must be in writing. The assignor must notify the debtor advising them of the debt’ s assign ment and to who it has been assigned. The assignee will send a separate notice to the debtor, putting them on notice that the debt is due and payable. They will also provide them with the necessary information to make payment. 

The assignor must send the notices to the debtor’s last known address.  

Debtor as a Joined Party

In some circumstances, a debtor will be joined as a party to the deed of assignment . There can be a great benefit in this approach . This is because the debtor can provide warranties that the debt is owed and has clear notice of the assignment. However, it is not always practical to do so for a few reasons:

  • a debtor may not be on speaking terms with the assignor; 
  • a debtor may not be prepared to co-operate or provide appropriate warranties; and
  • the assignor or the assignee may not want the debtor to be made aware of the sale price . This occurs particularly where the sale price is at a significant discount.

If the debtor is not a party to the deed of assignment, proper notice of the assignment must be provided.  

An assignment of debt that has not been properly perfected will not constitute a legal debt owing to the assignee. Rather, the legal right to recover the debt will remain with the assignor. Only an equitable interest in the debt will transfer to the assignee.  

Enforcing an Assigned Debt 

After validly assigning a debt (in writing and notice has been provided to the debtor’s last known place of residence), the assignee is entitled to take any legal steps available to them to recover the outstanding debt. These recovery options include:

  • commencing court proceedings;
  • obtaining a judgment; and 
  • enforcement of that judgment.

Suppose court proceedings have been commenced or judgment already entered in favour of the assignor. In that case, the assignee must take steps to have the proceedings or judgment formally changed into the assignee’s name.  

In our experience, recovery of an assigned debt can be problematic because:  

  • debtors often do not understand the concept of debt assignment and may not be aware that their credit contract contains an assignment of debt clause;
  • disputes can arise as to whether a lawful assignment of debt has arisen. A debtor may claim that the assignor did not provide them with the requisite notice of the assignment, or in some cases, a contract will specifically exclude the creditor from legally assigning a debt;
  • proper records of the notice of assignment provided to the debtor must be maintained. If proper records have not been kept, it may be difficult to prove that notice has been properly given, which may invalidate the legal assignment; and
  • the debtor has the right to make an offsetting claim in defence to any recovery action taken by the assignee. A debtor may raise an offsetting claim which has arisen out of a previous arrangement with the assignor (which the assignee may not be aware of). For example, the debtor may have entered into an agreement with the assignor whereby the assignor agreed to accept a lesser amount of the debt owed by way of settlement. Because the assignee acquires the same rights and obligations of the assignor, the terms of that previous settlement agreement will bind the assignee. The court may find that there is no debt owing by the debtor. In this case, the assignee will have been assigned nothing of value. 

Other Considerations 

When assigning a debt, it is essential that the assignee, in particular, considers relevant statutory limitation periods for commencing proceedings or enforcing a judgment debt . In New South Wales, the time limit:

  • to file legal proceedings to recover debts is six years from the date of last payment or when the debtor admitted in writing that they owed the debt; and
  • for enforcing a judgment debt is 12 years from the date of judgment.

An assignment of a debt does not extend these limitation periods.  

While there can be benefits to both the assignor and the assignee, an assignment of debt will be unenforceable if done incorrectly. Therefore, if you are considering assigning or being assigned a debt, it is important to seek legal advice. If you need help with drafting or reviewing a deed of assignment or wish to recover a debt that has been assigned to you, contact LegalVision’s debt recovery lawyers on 1300 544 755 or fill out the form on this page.  

An assignment of debt is an agreement that transfers a debt owed to one entity, to another. A creditor does not need the consent of the debtor to assign a debt.

Once the assignee has validly assigned a debt, they are entitled to take any legal steps available to them to recover the outstanding debt. This includes commencing court proceedings, obtaining a judgment and enforcement of that judgment.

We appreciate your feedback – your submission has been successfully received.

Register for our free webinars

Privacy law reform: how the proposed changes affect in-house counsel obligations, avoiding common legal and tax pitfalls for online businesses in australia, cyber attack how to prevent and manage a breach in your business, sealing the deal: in-house counsel’s guide to streamlining corporate transactions, contact us now.

Fill out the form and we will contact you within one business day

Related articles

' decoding=

Dealing With Proceedings in the Small Claims Division of the NSW Local Court

' decoding=

What Are the Pros and Cons of a Writ for Levy of Property? 

' decoding=

I’m a Judgment Debtor. What are the Next Steps?

' decoding=

How Can I Enforce a Judgment Debt in New South Wales?

We’re an award-winning law firm

Award

2023 Fast Firms - Australasian Lawyer

Award

2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards

Award

2021 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards

Award

2020 Excellence in Technology & Innovation Finalist - Australasian Law Awards

Award

2020 Employer of Choice Winner - Australasian Lawyer

  • Insights & events

Assigning debts and other contractual claims - not as easy as first thought

Updates to UK Money laundering rules - key changes

Harking back to law school, we had a thirst for new black letter law. Section 136 of the Law of the Property Act 1925 kindly obliged. This lays down the conditions which need to be satisfied for an effective legal assignment of a chose in action (such as a debt). We won’t bore you with the detail, but suffice to say that what’s important is that a legal assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor, must be absolute (i.e. no conditions attached) and crucially that written notice of the assignment must be given to the debtor.

When assigning debts, it’s worth remembering that you can’t legally assign part of a debt – any attempt to do so will take effect as an equitable assignment. The main practical difference between a legal and an equitable assignment is that the assignor will need to be joined in any legal proceedings in relation to the assigned debt (e.g. an attempt to recover that part of the debt).

Recent cases which tell another story

Why bother telling you the above?  Aside from our delight in remembering the joys of debating the merits of legal and equitable assignments (ehem), it’s worth revisiting our textbooks in the context of three recent cases. Although at first blush the statutory conditions for a legal assignment seem quite straightforward, attempts to assign contractual claims such as debts continue to throw up legal disputes:

  • In  Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp Europe Ltd v Euler Hermes Europe SA (NV) [2019] EWHC 2250 (Comm),  the High Court held that a performance bond issued under a construction contract was not effectively assigned despite the surety acknowledging a notice of assignment of the bond. Sadly, the notice of assignment failed to meet the requirements under the bond instrument that the assignee confirm its acceptance of a provision in the bond that required the employer to repay the surety in the event of an overpayment. This case highlights the importance of ensuring any purported assignment meets any conditions stipulated in the underlying documents.
  • In  Promontoria (Henrico) Ltd v Melton [2019] EWHC 2243 (Ch) (26 June 2019) , the High Court held that an assignment of a facility agreement and legal charges was valid, even though the debt assigned had to be identified by considering external evidence. The deed of assignment in question listed the assets subject to assignment, but was illegible to the extent that the debtor’s name could not be deciphered. The court got comfortable that there had been an effective assignment, given the following factors: (i) the lender had notified the borrower of its intention to assign the loan to the assignee; (ii) following the assignment, the lender had made no demand for repayment; (iii) a manager of the assignee had given a statement that the loan had been assigned and the borrower had accepted in evidence that he was aware of the assignment. Fortunately for the assignee, a second notice of assignment - which was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment - did not invalidate the earlier assignment, which was found to be effective. The court took a practical and commercial view of the circumstances, although we recommend ensuring that your assignment documents clearly reflect what the parties intend!
  • Finally, in Nicoll v Promontoria (Ram 2) Ltd [2019] EWHC 2410 (Ch),  the High Court held that a notice of assignment of a debt given to a debtor was valid, even though the effective date of assignment stated in the notice could not be verified by the debtor. The case concerned a debt assigned by the Co-op Bank to Promontoria and a joint notice given by assignor and assignee to the debtor that the debt had been assigned “on and with effect from 29 July 2016”. A subsequent statutory demand served by Promontoria on the debtor for the outstanding sums was disputed on the basis that the notice of assignment was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment. Whilst accepting that the documentation was incapable of verifying with certainty the date of assignment, the Court held that the joint notice clearly showed that both parties had agreed that an assignment had taken place and was valid. This decision suggests that mistakes as to the date of assignment in a notice of assignment may not necessarily be fatal, if it is otherwise clear that the debt has been assigned.

The conclusion from the above? Maybe it’s not quite as easy as first thought to get an assignment right. Make sure you follow all of the conditions for a legal assignment according to the underlying contract and ensure your assignment documentation is clear.

Contact our experts for further advice

View profile for Matthew Padian

Search our site

What Is an Assignment of Debt?

George Simons | December 02, 2022

George Simons

Co-Founder of SoloSuit George Simons, JD/MBA

George Simons is the co-founder and CEO of SoloSuit. He has helped Americans protect over $1 billion from predatory debt lawsuits. George graduated from BYU Law school in 2020 with a JD-MBA. In his spare time, George likes to cook, because he likes to eat.

Edited by Hannah Locklear

Hannah Locklear

Editor at SoloSuit Hannah Locklear, BA

Hannah Locklear is SoloSuit’s Marketing and Impact Manager. With an educational background in Linguistics, Spanish, and International Development from Brigham Young University, Hannah has also worked as a legal support specialist for several years.

Summary: Have a debt collection agency coming after you for a past due account? Not convinced that they have the right to sue you? Learn about the assignment of debt and how you can beat a debt collector in court.

Assignment of debt means that the debt has been transferred, including all obligations and rights, from the creditor to another party. The debt assignment means there has been a legal transfer to another party, who now owns the debt. Usually, the debt assignment involves a debt collector who takes the responsibility to collect your debt.

How does a debt assignment work?

When the creditor lends you money, it does so thinking that what it lends you as well as interest will be paid back according to the legal agreement. The lender will wait to get the money back according to the contract.

When the debt is assigned to another party, you must be notified when it happens so you know who owns the debt and where to send your payments. If you send payments to the previous creditor, the payments probably will be rejected and you could default.

When the debtor gets this notice, it's wise for them to check that the creditor has the right balance and the payment that you should pay each month. Sometimes, you may be able to offer changes to the terms of the loan. If you decide to try this, the creditor must respond.

Respond to debt collection lawsuit in 15 minutes with SoloSuit.

Why creditors assign debts

Note that debt assignments and debt collectors must adhere to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act . This is a law overseen by the FTC that restricts when the debtor can contact you and how. For example, they only can call you between 8 am and 9 pm and they cannot call you at work if you tell them not to do so.

If the FDCPA is broken by the debt collector, you can file a countersuit and may get them to pay damages and your attorney fees.

There are many reasons why the creditor may assign a debt. The most common reason is to boost their liquidity and reduce risk. The creditor could need capital, so they'll sell off some of their debts to debt collection companies.

Also, the creditor may have many higher-risk loans and they could be worried they could have a lot of defaults. In these situations, the creditor may be ok with selling debts for pennies on the dollar if it enhances their financial outlook and reassures investors.

Or, the creditor may think the debt is too old to worry about and may not assign it at all.

Different perspectives on debt assignment

Debt assignment is often criticized, especially in the past 30 years. Debt buyers often engage in shady practices. For example, some debt collectors may call consumers in the middle of the night and harass them to pay debts. Or, they may call friends and family looking for you. Some debt collectors even use foul language with consumers and threaten them.

Sometimes the debt is sold several times, so the consumer is chased for a debt she doesn't owe. Or, the debt amount could be different than what the debt collector claims.

Don't let debt collectors harass you. Respond with SoloSuit.

What to do if a debt collector comes after you

If you owe a debt and the debt has been assigned to a debt collector, you may be getting a lot of phone calls at all hours to get you to pay what you allegedly owe. This can continue for months or even years.

Sometimes, you can just ignore the phone calls and nothing happens. However, if enough money is involved, the debt collector could file a lawsuit against you. The worst thing you can do in this situation is to ignore the lawsuit.

What you should do is use the debt assignment game against them. What happens is this: The debt was probably sold a few times. You want to make the debt collector prove that the debt is yours and that you owe what they say you owe.

When the debt has been sold several times, it can be difficult for them to track down all that paperwork. You need to respond to the lawsuit by filing an answer with your clerk of court and then mail that answer to the debt collector by certified mail.

If you are being pursued for a debt that has been purchased by a third party debt buyer, there is a good chance you can get the issue resolved fairly easily. For example, in many instances, you may be able to negotiate a fairly low settlement on the debt, if you prefer to do so. This is because many companies who specialize in debt assignments actually purchased the debt for pennies on the dollar and are not actually looking to collect on the full amount owed.

Even if you cannot negotiate a settlement, make sure to log all of your interaction with the debt buyer since the collection agents they employ are notorious for routinely violating provisions contained within the FDCPA, which means you may have grounds to file a counterclaim and demand compensatory damages.

What is SoloSuit?

SoloSuit makes it easy to respond to a debt collection lawsuit.

How it works: SoloSuit is a step-by-step web-app that asks you all the necessary questions to complete your answer. Upon completion, you can either print the completed forms and mail in the hard copies to the courts or you can pay SoloSuit to file it for you and to have an attorney review the document.

Respond with SoloSuit

"First time getting sued by a debt collector and I was searching all over YouTube and ran across SoloSuit, so I decided to buy their services with their attorney reviewed documentation which cost extra but it was well worth it! SoloSuit sent the documentation to the parties and to the court which saved me time from having to go to court and in a few weeks the case got dismissed!" – James

>>Read the FastCompany article: Debt Lawsuits Are Complicated: This Website Makes Them Simpler To Navigate

>>Read the NPR story on SoloSuit: A Student Solution To Give Utah Debtors A Fighting Chance

How to answer a summons for debt collection in your state

Here's a list of guides for other states.

All 50 states .

Guides on how to beat every debt collector

Being sued by a different debt collector? We're making guides on how to beat each one.

  • Waypoint Resource Group

Win against credit card companies

Is your credit card company suing you? Learn how you can beat each one.

  • Wells Fargo

Going to Court for Credit Card Debt — Key Tips

How to Negotiate Credit Card Debts

How to Settle a Credit Card Debt Lawsuit — Ultimate Guide

Get answers to these FAQs

Need more info on statutes of limitations? Read our 50-state guide.

Why do debt collectors block their phone numbers?

How long do debt collectors take to respond to debt validation letters?

What are the biggest debt collector companies in the US?

Is Zombie Debt Still a Problem in 2019?

SoloSuit FAQ

If a car is repossessed, do I still owe the debt?

Is Portfolio Recovery Associates Legit?

Is There a Judgment Against Me Without my Knowledge?

Should I File Bankruptcy Before or After a Judgment?

What is a default judgment?— What do I do?

Summoned to Court for Medical Bills — What Do I Do?

What Happens If Someone Sues You and You Have No Money?

What Happens If You Never Answer Debt Collectors?

What Happens When a Debt Is Sold to a Collection Agency

What is a Stipulated Judgment?

What is the Deadline for a Defendant's Answer to Avoid a Default Judgment?

Can a Judgement Creditor Take my Car?

Can I Settle a Debt After Being Served?

Can I Stop Wage Garnishment?

Can You Appeal a Default Judgement?

Do I Need a Debt Collection Defense Attorney?

Do I Need a Payday Loans Lawyer?

Do student loans go away after 7 years? — Student Loan Debt Guide

Am I Responsible for My Spouse's Medical Debt?

Should I Marry Someone With Debt?

Can a Debt Collector Leave a Voicemail?

How Does Debt Assignment Work?

What Happens If a Defendant Does Not Pay a Judgment?

Can You Serve Someone with a Collections Lawsuit at Their Work?

What Is a Warrant in Debt?

How Many Times Can a Judgment be Renewed in Oklahoma?

Can an Eviction Be Reversed?

Does Debt Consolidation Have Risks?

What Happens If You Avoid Getting Served Court Papers?

Does Student Debt Die With You?

Can Debt Collectors Call You at Work in Texas?

How Much Do You Have to Be in Debt to File for Chapter 7?

What Is the Statute of Limitations on Debt in Washington?

How Long Does a Judgment Last?

Can Private Disability Payments Be Garnished?

Can Debt Collectors Call From Local Numbers?

Does the Fair Credit Reporting Act Work in Florida?

The Truth: Should You Never Pay a Debt Collection Agency?

Should You Communicate with a Debt Collector in Writing or by Telephone?

Do I Need a Debt Negotiator?

What Happens After a Motion for Default Is Filed?

Can a Process Server Leave a Summons Taped to My Door?

Learn More With These Additional Resources:

Need help managing your finances? Check out these resources.

How to Make a Debt Validation Letter - The Ultimate Guide

How to Make a Motion to Compel Arbitration Without an Attorney

How to Stop Wage Garnishment — Everything You Need to Know

How to File an FDCPA Complaint Against Your Debt Collector (Ultimate Guide)

Defending Yourself in Court Against a Debt Collector

Tips on you can to file an FDCPA lawsuit against a debt collection agency

Advice on how to answer a summons for debt collection.

Effective strategies for how to get back on track after a debt lawsuit

New Hampshire Statute of Limitations on Debt

Sample Cease and Desist Letter Against Debt Collectors

The Ultimate Guide to Responding to a Debt Collection Lawsuit in Utah

West Virginia Statute of Limitations on Debt

What debt collectors cannot do — FDCPA explained

Defending Yourself in Court Against Debt Collector

How to Liquidate Debt

Arkansas Statute of Limitations on Debt

You're Drowning in Debt — Here's How to Swim

Help! I'm Being Sued by My Debt Collector

How to Make a Motion to Vacate Judgment

How to Answer Summons for Debt Collection in Vermont

North Dakota Statute of Limitations on Debt

ClearPoint Debt Management Review

Indiana Statute of Limitations on Debt

Oregon Eviction Laws - What They Say

CuraDebt Debt Settlement Review

How to Write a Re-Aging Debt Letter

How to Appear in Court by Phone

How to Use the Doctrine of Unclean Hands

Debt Consolidation in Eugene, Oregon

Summoned to Court for Medical Bills? What to Do Next

How to Make a Debt Settlement Agreement

Received a 3-Day Eviction Notice? Here's What to Do

How to Answer a Lawsuit for Debt Collection

Tips for Leaving the Country With Unpaid Credit Card Debt

Kansas Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection

How to File in Small Claims Court in Iowa

How to File a Civil Answer in Kings County Supreme Court

Roseland Associates Debt Consolidation Review

How to Stop a Garnishment

Debt Eraser Review

It only takes 15 minutes. And 50% of our customers' cases have been dismissed in the past.

"Finding yourself on the wrong side of the law unexpectedly is kinda scary. I started researching on YouTube and found SoloSuit's channel. The videos were so helpful, easy to understand and encouraging. When I reached out to SoloSuit they were on it. Very professional, impeccably prompt. Thanks for the service!" – Heather

Not sued yet? Use our Debt Validation Letter.

Our Debt Validation Letter is the best way to respond to a collection letter. Many debt collectors will simply give up after receiving it.

Assignment Of Debt Agreement

Jump to section, what is an assignment of debt agreement.

An assignment of debt agreement is a legal document between a debtor and creditor that outlines the repayment terms. An assignment of debt agreement can be used as an alternative to bankruptcy, but several requirements must be met for it to work.

In addition, if obligations are not met under a debt agreement, it might still be necessary to file for bankruptcy later on. Therefore, consulting with an attorney specializing in debt agreements is always recommended before entering into one of these contracts.

Assignment Of Debt Agreement Sample

Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10 5 exhibit1024f10qsbmay04.htm EXHIBIT 10.24 , Viewed December 20, 2021, View Source on SEC .

Who Helps With Assignment Of Debt Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on assignment of debt agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with an assignment of debt agreement?

Post a project  in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate assignment of debt agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

Meet some of our Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers

William W. on ContractsCounsel

An entrepreneurial, results-oriented advocate, legal and compliance professional with a successful track record of providing strategic legal advice and operational support to high growth national companies. Well established expertise in commercial transactions, acquisitions, and compliance oversight and policy development, including specialized expertise in sales, marketing and advertising compliance.

Elexius E. on ContractsCounsel

My name is Elexius. I’ve been practicing since 2016. I began my career doing defense work for insurance companies. I handled worker’s compensation cases, insurance subrogation claims and a number of related employment issues including wage and hour disputes, resignation, termination and release of claims. I also handled employee contract matters and revised contracts as needed for my clients. In my current role I draft contracts and related agreements, including cease and desist, letters of understanding, and various notices. I also handle contractual interference issues.

Jarrid C. on ContractsCounsel

I’m the Managing Attorney at The Coaxum Firm LLC, a small firm located in Alabama that handles Family Law, Criminal Defense, and Personal Injury cases. My law partner is my older brother, Louis Coaxum, and we’ve been practicing together as a firm for over 8 years.

Jerry C. on ContractsCounsel

Jerry has been practicing law in Hawaii for over twenty years which includes the areas of labor and employment.

Raquel G. on ContractsCounsel

I have practiced law for 20+ years. I am knowledgeable, skilled, and experienced in IP related matters; contract drafting and revisions; trial preparation (including ITC Section 337 trials); and many other legal areas. Further, I earned a bachelor of science degree in electrical engineering and worked as a junior and primary patent examiner for over a decade. Furthermore, I have produced a feature film and set up and maintained the production office before, during, and after filming.

Kimm M. on ContractsCounsel

Kimm Massey, Esq. is a graduate of Harvard Law School, who has almost thirty years of experience practicing law. Her background includes litigation work for large multinational corporate law firms, the federal government, and the District of Columbia government. She founded Massey Law Group a decade ago. Attorney Kimm Massey has been admitted to the Bars of Washington DC, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Florida, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, the United States Court of Federal Claims, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans’ Claims, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Michelle M. on ContractsCounsel

Michelle M.

Ms. Marshall practices primarily in the areas of commercial and residential real estate, business/corporate, estate planning and tax. She spent the first 10 years of her career also practicing in civil litigation, collections and personal injury. Ms. Marshall concentrates her practice on the needs of individuals, entrepreneurs and small to medium sized businesses. During the course of her career Ms. Marshall has earned recognition as a Central Ohio Top Lawyer.

Find the best lawyer for your project

How it works.

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Financial lawyers by top cities

  • Austin Financial Lawyers
  • Boston Financial Lawyers
  • Chicago Financial Lawyers
  • Dallas Financial Lawyers
  • Denver Financial Lawyers
  • Houston Financial Lawyers
  • Los Angeles Financial Lawyers
  • New York Financial Lawyers
  • Phoenix Financial Lawyers
  • San Diego Financial Lawyers
  • Tampa Financial Lawyers

Assignment Of Debt Agreement lawyers by city

  • Austin Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Boston Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Chicago Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Dallas Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Denver Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Houston Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Los Angeles Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • New York Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Phoenix Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • San Diego Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
  • Tampa Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers

related contracts

  • Accredited Investor Questionnaire
  • Adverse Action Notice
  • Bridge Loan
  • Bridge Loan Contract
  • Collateral Assignment
  • Commercial Loan
  • Convertible Bonds
  • Convertible Note
  • Convertible Preferred Stock
  • Cumulative Preferred Stock

other helpful articles

  • How much does it cost to draft a contract?
  • Do Contract Lawyers Use Templates?
  • How do Contract Lawyers charge?
  • Business Contract Lawyers: How Can They Help?
  • What to look for when hiring a lawyer

assignment of debt a

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

Group of people in a conference room

English law assignments of part of a debt: Practical considerations

United Kingdom |  Publication |  December 2019

Enforcing partially assigned debts against the debtor

The increase of supply chain finance has driven an increased interest in parties considering the sale and purchase of parts of debts (as opposed to purchasing debts in their entirety).

While under English law part of a debt can be assigned, there is a general requirement that the relevant assignee joins the assignor to any proceedings against the debtor, which potentially impedes the assignee’s ability to enforce against the debtor efficiently.

This note considers whether this requirement may be dispensed with in certain circumstances.

Can you assign part of a debt?

Under English law, the beneficial ownership of part of a debt can be assigned, although the legal ownership cannot. 1  This means that an assignment of part of a debt will take effect as an equitable assignment instead of a legal assignment.

Joining the assignor to proceedings against the debtor

While both equitable and legal assignments are capable of removing the assigned asset from the insolvency estate of the assignor, failure to obtain a legal assignment and relying solely on an equitable assignment may require the assignee to join the relevant assignor as a party to any enforcement action against the debtor.

An assignee of part of a debt will want to be able to sue a debtor in its own name and, if it is required to join the assignor to proceedings against the debtor, this could add additional costs and delays if the assignor was unwilling to cooperate. 2

Kapoor v National Westminster Bank plc

English courts have, in recent years, been pragmatic in allowing an assignee of part of a debt to sue the debtor in its own name without the cooperation of the assignor.

In Charnesh Kapoor v National Westminster Bank plc, Kian Seng Tan 3 the court held that an equitable assignee of part of a debt is entitled in its own right and name to bring proceedings for the assigned debt. The equitable assignee will usually be required to join the assignor to the proceedings in order to ensure that the debtor is not exposed to double recovery, but the requirement is a procedural one that can be dispensed with by the court.

The reason for the requirement that an equitable assignee joins the assignor to proceedings against the debtor is not that the assignee has no right which it can assert independently, but that the debtor ought to be protected from the possibility of any further claim by the assignor who should therefore be bound by the judgment.

Application of Kapoor

It is a common feature of supply chain finance transactions that the assigned debt (or part of the debt) is supported by an independent payment undertaking. Such independent payment undertaking makes it clear that the debtor cannot raise defences and that it is required to pay the relevant debt (or part of a debt) without set-off or counterclaim. In respect of an assignee of part of an independent payment undertaking which is not disputed and has itself been equitably assigned to the assignee, we believe that there are good grounds that an English court would accept that the assignee is allowed to pursue an action directly against the debtor without needing the assignor to be joined, as this is likely to be a matter of procedure only, not substance.

This analysis is limited to English law and does not consider the laws of any other jurisdiction.

Notwithstanding the helpful clarifications summarised in Kapoor, as many receivables financing transactions involve a number of cross-border elements, assignees should continue to consider the effect of the laws (and, potentially court procedures) of any other relevant jurisdictions on the assignment of part of a debt even where the sale of such partial debt is completed under English law.

Legal title cannot be assigned in respect of part of a debt. A partial assignment would not satisfy the requirements for a legal assignment of section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

If an assignor does not consent to being joined as a plaintiff in proceedings against the debtor it would be necessary to join the assignor as a co-defendant. However, where an assignor has gone into administration or liquidation, there may be a statutory prohibition on joining such assignor as a co-defendant (without the leave of the court or in certain circumstances the consent of the administrator).

[2011] EWCA Civ 1083

Tudor Plapcianu

  • Financial institutions

Recent publications

assignment of debt a

Publication

Major overhaul to environmental legislation: What does it mean for you?

Penalties for many environmental crimes will double under the Environment Protection Legislation Amendment (Stronger Regulation and Penalties) Bill 2024.

Australia | March 18, 2024

office building

Canadian Sustainability Standards Board publishes sustainability and climate-related disclosure exposure drafts

On March 13, the Canadian Sustainability Standards Board (CSSB) published two Canadian sustainability standard exposure drafts – CSDS 1, General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information and CSDS 2, Climate-related Disclosures (Draft Canadian Standards).

Canada | March 15, 2024

Financial-institution-banks-building-generic-blue-sky-offices

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issues “buy now, pay later” guidance to banks

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued guidance (Bulletin 2023-37) on December 6, 2023.

United States | March 15, 2024

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .

© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023

  • Canada (English)
  • Canada (Français)
  • United States
  • Deutschland (Deutsch)
  • Germany (English)
  • The Netherlands
  • Türkiye
  • United Kingdom
  • South Africa
  • Hong Kong SAR
  • Marshall Islands
  • Nordic region

What is an Assignment of Debt?

' decoding=

By Sej Lamba

Updated on 26 February 2024 Reading time: 5 minutes

This article meets our strict editorial principles. Our lawyers, experienced writers and legally trained editorial team put every effort into ensuring the information published on our website is accurate. We encourage you to seek independent legal advice. Learn more .

When Could an Assignment of Debt Happen?

Key issues on assignment of debt, drafting the correct documentation, giving notice, key takeaways.

Debts are increasingly common in today’s financial climate, and unfortunately, many people struggle to repay what they owe. Debts owed can be sold to third parties and a lot of companies in the UK purchase debts. However, this can be complicated as specific legal formalities apply when assigning debts. This article will explain some of the critical issues around the assignment of debt. 

Debt collection can be a complex process. There are various reasons as to why debt is assigned. For example, a company owed debt may want to avoid putting in time and effort to chase it or want to take legal action to recover it. 

To picture a scenario, imagine this:

  • Joe Bloggs gets a brand-new shiny credit card. Joe purchases lots of nice things for his family with the credit card. Usually, he can keep up with payments as he keeps track of them and earns enough to pay them back;
  • suddenly, Joe has an injury and cannot work anymore. He has to give up his job and now can’t afford to pay the credit card company back;
  • Joe ignores various letters chasing the debt and hopes the problem will disappear. Ultimately, after months, the credit card company gives up and sells Joe’s debt to a debt collection agency.  

So, in summary – after the debt sale, Joe now owes money to a different company. 

In practice, debt assignments can be complex, and the parties must follow the relevant legal rules and draft the correct documentation.

An assignment of debt essentially transfers the debt from one party (the assignor) to a third party (an assignee). 

In practice, this will mean the original debtor (e.g. Joe Bloggs) will now owe the debt to a new third-party creditor (e.g. the debt collection business). Therefore, in the scenario above, Joe must now repay the debt to the third-party debt collection business.

This process can be complex. There have been several legal cases in the courts where this process has given rise to disputes.

There are two different types of assignment of debt – a legal assignment of debt and an equitable assignment of debt. 

In simple terms:

  • a legal assignment of debt will transfer the right for enforcement of the debt; and
  • an equitable assignment of debt will transfer only the benefit of the debt without the right to enforce it. 

Let us explore each type below.

Legal Assignment of Debt 

If the assignment complies with specific legal requirements under the Law of Property Act 1925, it will be a ‘legal assignment’. This means that the assignee will be the new owner of the debt. 

A legal assignment requires various formalities to be effective. For example, it must:

  • be in writing and signed by the assignor;
  • the debtor must be given written notice of the assignment;
  • be absolute with no conditions attached to it;
  • relate to the whole of the debt and not just part of it; and
  • not be a charge.

After the transfer of the debt, the assignor can sue the debtor in its own name. 

Equitable Assignment of Debt

It is also possible to have an equitable debt transfer – the requirements for this are much less strict. For example, this can be done informally by the assignor informing the assignee that the rights are transferred to them. 

Front page of publication

Download this free Commercial Contracts Checklist to ensure your contracts will meet your business’ needs.

For an equitable assignment, giving notice is not essential, but still always highly advisable. 

Where an equitable assignment is made, the assignee won’t have the right to pursue court action for the debt. In this case, the assignee will have to join forces with the assignor to sue for the debt to sue for the debt. 

The debtor should receive notice of any debt transfer so they know to whom the money is owed. Following notice, the new debt owner can pursue the debt owed. 

A legal assignment is the best option for an assignee of debt – this will give them full rights to enforce the debt. 

Assignments of debts can be very complex. For a legal assignment of debt, you need to follow various formalities. Otherwise, it may be unenforceable and lead to disputes. If you need help executing a debt assignment correctly, you should seek legal advice from an experienced lawyer.

If you need help with an assignment of debt, LegalVision’s experienced business lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. You will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents for a low monthly fee. Call us today on 0808 196 8584 or visit our membership page .

We appreciate your feedback – your submission has been successfully received.

Register for our free webinars

Spam, cookies and content: legal considerations when leveraging digital marketing, capital raising essentials for startups, contact us now.

Fill out the form and we will contact you within one business day

Related articles

' decoding=

3 Key Considerations to Manage Contract Risks

' decoding=

3 Business Benefits of Working With a Specialist Commercial Contracts Lawyer

' decoding=

 What Are the Risks of a Verbal Contract With Your Customers?

' decoding=

3 Points Your Business Should Consider to Minimise Risk Before Signing a New Contract

We’re an award-winning law firm

Award

2023 Economic Innovator of the Year Finalist - The Spectator

Award

2023 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

Award

2023 Future of Legal Services Innovation - Legal Innovation Awards

Award

2021 Fastest Growing Law Firm in APAC - Financial Times

Assignment of Debt – What You Need to Know

By aqila zulaiqha zulkifli ~ 23 june 2023.

Assignment of Debt – What You Need to Know

Share this article:

assignment of debt a

Aqila Zulaiqha Zulkifli

Email Me  |  View Profile

Occasionally, to ensure liquidity and to reduce financial risk, a creditor may assign its rights to a debt repayment to another party. Such an arrangement is known as the assignment of debt.

An assignment generally means the transfer of contractual rights and liabilities to a third party without the concurrence of the other party to the contract. [1] The assigning party is known as the assignor, whereas the recipient party is known as the assignee.

Once an assignment occurs, the assignee stands in the exact position as the assignor and has the legal right to a debt, other remedies therein, and even the power to discharge the debt. The debtor must then, make all payments to the assignee, and not the assignor. In fact, if the debtor pays the assignor without the consent of the assignee, the debtor may risk having to pay the assignee all over again. [2]

An assignment of debt is governed by Section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 (the “Act”) (cited with approval in the Federal Court case of UMW Industries Sdn Bhd v Ah Fook [3] , in which, the elements of a statutory assignment of debt can be summarized as follows:

  • the assignment must be in writing under the hand of the assignor (and not, i.e the agent of the assignor);
  • the assignment must be absolute and not by way of charge only; and
  • the express notice in writing must have been given to the person liable to the assignor (i.e the debtor).

The effect of a statutory assignment is that the assignee possesses the legal right to the debt and the right to sue the debtor in respect of the debt without needing to join the assignor. [4]

However, rest assured, an assignment that is not in compliance with Section 4(3) of the Act is not automatically invalid. A non-statutory assignment could still be valid in equity [5] , though the assignee would have to join the assignor in the proceeding, either as a plaintiff or defendant [6] . This is to ensure a just disposal of the action, by ensuring that all relevant parties are before the Court so that the assignor would not make a claim against the debtor in respect of the same debt.

As such, in conclusion, before accepting an assignment of debt, it is prudent for an assignee to ensure that the elements in Section 4(3) of the Act abovementioned are fulfilled. If the assignment is meant to be absolute, such terms should be clearly reflected in the deed of assignment, or the assignee runs the risk of being crippled in a legal proceeding to recover the debt in the absence of the assignor.

[1] United General Insurance Co Sdn Bhd v Progress Credit Sdn Bhd [1988] 2 MLJ 297

[2] malayawata steel berhad v government of malaysia & anor [1980] 2 mlj 103, [3] [1996] 1 mlj 365, [4] mbf factors sdn bhd v tay hing ju (t/a new general trading) [2002] 5 mlj 536, [5] khaw poh chhuan v ng gaik peng & ors [1996] 1 mlj 761 (fc), [6] chan min swee v melawangi sdn bhd [2000] 7 clj 1.

RESOURCES /

  • Recent Reported Cases
  • Talks by Thomas Philip
  • TP Legal Clinic

assignment of debt a

Assignment Involves Transfer of Rights to Collect Outstanding Debts

Does the law allow a creditor to sell a debt to someone else, debt can be bought and sold or otherwise transferred from a creditor who is owed money to another person who then becomes the assignee creditor with the right to collect the outstanding debt., understanding what constitutes as a legally binding assignment of creditor rights to collect a debt.

Loan Application Document

Right to Collect on Debts

Within the decision of Clark v. Werden , 2011 ONCA 619 the Court of Appeal confirmed the existence of the right to transfer debts as an assignment in accordance to the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. C.34 , which prescribes the various requirements when a creditor transfers ownership of rights involving monies owed, among other things. Specifically, the Court of Appeal stated:

Clark v. Werden , 2011 ONCA 619 at paragraph 13

[13]   The ability to assign a debt or legal chose in action is codified in s. 53 of the  Conveyancing and Law of Property Act , which provides that a debt is assignable subject to the equities between the original debtor and creditor and reads as follows:
53 (1) Any absolute assignment made on or after the 31st day of December, 1897, by writing under the hand of the assignor, not purporting to be by way of charge only, of any debt or other legal chose in action of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to receive or claim such debt or chose in action is effectual in law, subject to all equities that would have been entitled to priority over the right of the assignee if this section had not been enacted, to pass and transfer the legal right to such debt or chose in action from the date of such notice, and all legal and other remedies for the same, and the power to give a good discharge for the same without the concurrence of the assignor.

Partially Assigned

It is notable that the statute makes mention of " absolute assignment " without clearly addressing the rights and method of treatment for a partial assignment of a debt.  In this circumstance, where more than one assignee may obtain or assume the rights of the creditor (or earlier assignee), a partial assignee is required to join all assignees when bringing legal action against the debtor.  This view was stated by the Court of Appeal in  DiGuilo v. Boland , 1958 CanLII 92 where it was said:

DiGuilo v. Boland , 1958 CanLII 92

The main reason why an assignee of a part of a debt is required to join all parties interested in the debt in an action to recover the part assigned to him is in my opinion because the Court cannot adjudicate completely and finally without having such parties before it.  The absence of such parties might result in the debtor being subjected to future actions in respect of the same debt, and moreover might result in conflicting decisions being arrived at concerning such debt.

Failed Notice

Of potentially grave concern to creditors, and potentially with great relief to debtors, for an assignee to retain the right to pursue the debtor, express written notice of the assignment is required.  This requirement was stated in 1124980 Ontario Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Inco Ltd. , 2003 CanLII 45266  as part of the four part test to establish the right to pursue an assigned debt:

1124980 Ontario Inc.  v. Liberty Mutual , 2003 CanLII 45266 at paragraph 44

[44]   Accordingly, for there to be a valid legal assignment under  section 53(1) of the  CLPA , four requirements must be met:
a)  there must be debt or chose in action;
b)  the assignment must be absolute;
c)  the assignment must be written; and
d)  written notice of the assignment must be given to the debtor.

Where there is a failure of notice, and therefore failure to comply with the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act , it is said that the right to assign fails in law; however, relief in equity, via an equitable assignment may be available to an assignee affected by failure of notice.  Generally, in equity, when failure of notice occurs, the assignee is unable, in law, to bring an action in the name of the assignee and may do so only in the name of the creditor; however, even in the absence of proper notice as results in failure of assignment in law, and failure ot enjoin the creditor in an action pursued as an equitable assignment, the court may remain prepared to waive such a requirement whereas such occurred in the matter of  Landmark Vehicle Leasing Corporation v. Mister Twister Inc. , 2015 ONCA 545 wherein it was stated:

Landmark v. Mister Twister , 2015 ONCA 545 at paragraphs 10 to 16

[10]    Section 53(1) requires “ express notice in writing ” to the debtor.  Although there is some ambiguity in her reasons, it would appear that the trial judge found that Mr.  Blazys had express notice of the assignment, but not notice in writing.  Ross Wemp Leasing therefore did not assign the leases to Landmark in law: see  80 Mornelle Properties Inc.  v. Malla Properties Ltd. , 2010 ONCA 850 (CanLII) , 327 D.L.R.  (4th) 361, at para.  22 .  Ross Wemp Leasing did, however, assign the leases to Landmark in equity.  An equitable assignment does not require any notice, let alone written notice:  Bercovitz Estate v. Avigdor , [1961] O.J.  No.  20 (C.A.), at paras.  16, 25.
[11]   The appellants, relying on  DiGuilo v. Boland , 1958 CanLII 92 (ON CA), [1958] O.R.  384 (C.A.), aff’d, [1961] S.C.C.A.  vii, argue that as the appellants did not have written notice of the assignment, Landmark could not sue on its own.  Instead, Landmark had to join Ross Wemp Leasing in the action.  The appellants argue that the failure to join Ross Wemp Leasing requires that the judgment below be set aside.
[12]    DiGuilo does in fact require that the assignor of a chose in action be joined in the assignee’s claim against the debtor when the debtor has not received written notice of the assignment.  The holding in DiGuilo tracks rule 5.03(3) of the  Rules of Civil Procedure , R.R.O.  1990, Reg.  194 : In a proceeding by the assignee of a debt or other chose in action, the assignor shall be joined as a party unless,
(a) the assignment is absolute and not by way of charge only; and
(b) notice in writing has been given to the person liable in respect of the debt or chose in action that it has been assigned to the assignee.  [Emphasis added.]
[13]   Yet the assignee’s failure to join the assignor does not affect the validity of the assignment or necessarily vitiate a judgment obtained by the assignee against the debtor.  Rule 5.03(6) reads:
The court may by order relieve against the requirement of joinder under this rule.
[14]   The joinder requirement is intended to guard the debtor against a possible second action by the assignor and to permit the debtor to pursue any remedies it may have against the assignor without initiating another action:  DiGuilo , at p.  395.  Where the assignee’s failure to join the assignor does not prejudice the debtor, the court may grant the relief in rule 5.03(6) : see  Gentra Canada Investments Inc.  v. Lipson , 2011 ONCA 331 (CanLII), 106 O.R.  (3d) 261, at paras.  59 - 65 , leave to appeal refused, [2011] S.C.C.A.  No.  327.
[15]   In this case, the trial judge found that Mr.  Blazys, and effectively all of the appellants, gained actual notice of the lease assignments very shortly after the assignments were made and well before Landmark sued.  Armed with actual, albeit not written, notice of the assignment, the appellants could fully protect themselves against any prejudice from Landmark’s failure to join Ross Wemp Leasing.  Had the appellants seen any advantage in joining Ross Wemp Leasing, either to defend against Landmark’s claim or to advance a claim against Ross Wemp Leasing, the appellants could have moved for joinder under rule 5.03(4).  The appellants’ failure to bring a motion to add Ross Wemp Leasing speaks loudly to the absence of any prejudice caused by Landmark’s failure to join the assignor.
[16]   Ross Wemp Leasing perhaps should have been a party to the proceeding.  Landmark’s failure to join Ross Wemp Leasing, however, did not prejudice the appellants and should have had no impact on the trial judgment.  If requested, this court will make a  nunc pro tunc order relieving Landmark from the requirement of joining Ross Wemp Leasing in the action.

Summary Comment

The rights to collect on a debt can be sold and transferred from the original creditor to a substitute creditor or assignee who then takes on the rights of the original creditor.  Indeed, the selling and buying of individual debts, or debts within an entire portfolio debts is common within business.  The entire collection services industry is based on the concept of buying outstanding debt and then standing in the shoes of the original creditor and pursuing the payment of the debt.  Other forms of buying and selling debt includes mortgage swaps, among other things.

Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

Send a Message Directly to SFG Paralegal Services LLP

I retained Samantha on two related landlord and tenant matters. Samantha resolved the issues to my complete satisfaction. I highly recommend Samantha and SFG Paralegal Services.

~ Ira Smith

I definitely recommend SFG Paralegal Services. Samantha Glass was very warm and easy to talk too. She remained attentive and very supportive. She was available to me at her office and even responded to my calls at home. I recommend Samantha Glass ...

~ Carmela Sorbara

Samantha goes out of her way to support people even if they are not clients. Once you ARE a client you know you are in the best hands possible!

~ Tonie Ogilvie

I spoke to Samantha in regard to a potential matter against me, and I was filled with anxiety and dread as I have never encountered such an issue before. As a law-abiding citizen, I just could not understand how this could happen to me. ...

~ Facebook

Dan took time out of his busy day to come to my office and discuss matters with my partner and I as we both can't leave the office ... I'm looking forward to dealing with Dan and his team and I feel we are going to get 120% professional service.

~ Matthew Ber

A goal of SFG Paralegal Services LLP is to provide each client with noteworthy service in effort to earn client opinions that SFG Paralegal Services LLP is the best Paralegal in Richmond Hill, York Region, Vaughan, Ajax, and surrounding areas.

A goal of SFG Paralegal Services LLP is to provide each client with noteworthy service in effort to earn client opinions that SFG Paralegal Services LLP is the best Paralegal in Richmond Hill, Whitby, Brampton, Toronto, and surrounding areas.

SFG Paralegal Services LLP

10265 Yonge Street, Suite 200 Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4C 4Y7

P: (888) 398-0121 E: [email protected]

Hours of Business:

09:00AM - 05:00PM 09:00AM - 05:00PM 09:00AM - 05:00PM 09:00AM - 05:00PM 09:00AM - 05:00PM Mon day : Tue sday : Wed nesday : Thu rsday : Fri day :

By appointment only.  Call for details. Messages may be left anytime.

Richmond Hill York Region Whitby Newmarket Pickering

Markham Vaughan Durham Region Ajax and more.

Image of AI Bot Searching Website

  • Practical Law

Assignment of debt

Practical law uk legal update 1-100-2291  (approx. 2 pages).

  • General Contract and Boilerplate
  • United Kingdom

Help & Advice

  • Debt help in Scotland
  • What are the fees involved?
  • How to avoid further debt
  • How debt affects your benefits
  • How debt affects your home
  • How debt affects your credit score
  • Joint and inherited debt
  • Debt collection help and advice
  • Sheriff Officer help and advice

Debt Solutions

  • Administration Order
  • Debt Arrangement Scheme
  • Debt Consolidation Loans
  • Debt Management Plan
  • Debt Relief Order (DRO)
  • Debt Settlement Offer
  • Sequestration
  • Process Map

Types of Debt

  • Business Debt
  • Council Tax Debt
  • Credit Card Debt
  • Festive Period
  • Gambling Debt
  • Income Tax Debt
  • Logbook Loans
  • Payday Loans
  • Secured Loans
  • Student loans
  • Utility Bills
  • Unsecured Debt
  • Customer Stories
  • Tips & Advice

Notice of Assignment: Debt Terms explained

Our team is responsible for verifying the accuracy of content as it’s created. Facts, figures, and eligibility requirements evolve over time, however, so there may be occasional oversights. We would always advise you to review the terms and conditions of any product before submitting an application.

Does a Debt Relief Order Affect My Credit Rating?

A Notification of Assignment is employed to notify debtors that a third party has ‘acquired’ their debt. The new company (assignee) assumes responsibility for the collection processes, occasionally engaging a debt collection agency to retrieve the funds on their behalf.

Maxine McCreadie

2nd May 2019

A creditors’ main goal is to lend you money and to collect it, so they’re not the biggest fan of chasing those who fall into arrears. As such, sometimes they’ll pass arrears on to other companies.

Being in debt can get confusing as it is, but especially so if a situation arises where you owe money to your mortgage lender, then a letter comes through your door from a company you’ve never heard of asking you to make payments to them instead.

This is what’s known as a Notice of Assignment (NOA) . They are sent to inform you that a third party has bought a debt that you owe from the company you borrowed it from.

If your debt is assigned to a new owner, they will then take over the previous company’s responsibility for debt collection and will sometimes hire a collection agency to work on their behalf.

Write off up to 70% of your debt – Check if you qualify

What is a notice of assignment

A Notice of Assignment, in relation to debt, is a document used to inform debtors that their debt has been ‘purchased’ by a third party.

The notice serves to notify the debtor that a new company (known as the assignee) has taken over the responsibility of collecting the debt.

This means that the debtor should direct their future payments and communications regarding the debt to the assignee instead of the original creditor. T

he assignee may choose to handle the debt collection procedures themselves or may engage a debt collection agency to recover the outstanding amount on their behalf.

Types of assignment

There are two types of assignment that a creditor can make – Legal and equitable.

Both of them fall under the Law of Property Act 1925 and both require the creditor to notify you of the change in writing.

It also isn’t possible to assign only part of a debt to a third party. If a creditor is ‘selling’ your debt, they have to sell the debt as a whole, and that debt will become one of the purchasing company’s obligations.

We set out the differences between legal and equitable assignments below.

A legal assignment gives the purchasing party the power to enforce the debt. You will also then make payments to this company instead of the original creditor.

When a debt goes through an equitable assignment, it is only the amount owed that is transferred.

In these instances, the purchasing company cannot enforce the debt and the original creditor will still retain their original rights and responsibilities.

Why do creditors sell debts?

One of the most common questions asked when a notice of assignment is received is why? Why have they sold it and how can they?

The answer is that is it is actually perfectly legal for them to sell your debt to another company.

When you sign a credit agreement there will have been a clause within the fine print. This will have stated that they are able to assign their rights to a third party .

As you have signed for this, they do not need to ask your permission to ‘sell’ the debt and you are unfortunately unable to dispute it.

The only exception to this rule is if the lender pledges to the Standards of Lending Practice and you have given evidence of mental health issues previously.

In these instances, your debt should not have been sold and you should seek advice on this.

A massive thank you

“I’d like to say a massive thank you to Carrington Dean for helping me. It feels like I have control of my life again.”

assignment of debt a

What does a notice of assignment mean for you?

If a creditor passes one of your debts to a third party, they will notify the credit reference agencies that they are now responsible for the collection.

The previous company’s name will be removed from your credit file and that any defaults will also be registered in their name.

Many people often find that having a debt being passed to a third party is a blessing in disguise.

The new company might be easier to deal with or be more flexible. They may offer to freeze interest on your debts, for example, giving you more scope to repay what you owe more quickly.

Ultimately, getting your debt paid off is in both yours and the creditors best interests.

Agreeing to a manageable payment plan gives you some breathing space and it can often mean they won’t need to take any further action against you.

It’s also worth noting that this also does not reset the six-year period for the debt to become statute-barred and debts that are already in this category will remain as such.

Assignment and debt collection agencies

Sometimes, the purchasing company will employ a debt collection agency to act on their behalf or the debt will be purchased by an agency themselves

They will take over the full rights to the debt and attempt to collect it from you in full.

As such, they will contact you by letter, phone calls, texts or emails. It also means that they can take further action against you should you continue to default on the account.

However, unless it is stated otherwise, debt collection agencies only work on behalf of a company.

The purchasing company will still own the debt, although some collection agencies do deal in debt purchasing also.

It’s also important to remember that although they can contact you for payment, they still have to abide by creditor etiquette.

They cannot pretend to have certain legal powers or lie to you, break data protection laws or search for you on social media.

You’ll likely find that debt collection agencies are often open to negotiations, so it is always best to contact them as soon as possible when they contact you for payment.

assignment of debt a

Find out if you qualify to write off up to 70% of your unsecured debt!

Assignment and debt solutions.

If you are already in some form of debt solution such as an IVA , Trust Deed or a DMP that is run privately by a company, you must notify the company running your agreement.

They will make the necessary updates to their records and contact the company to arrange payment to the new company.

If you are managing your own debts, you will need to cancel any payment to the original company and set up a new one to the purchasing company or debt collection agency.

In this instance, you may be asked to show them an up to date state of affairs in case any changes need to be made.

If you’re receiving notices of assignment and struggling with debt collection, call us today. A qualified adviser will be on hand to give you free confidential advice and help you find the right solution for your debts.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Creditors often transfer arrears to other companies to handle debt collection.
  • A Notice of Assignment (NOA) informs debtors that their debt has been purchased by a third party.
  • The assignee, the new company, assumes responsibility for collecting the debt.
  • Debtors should direct future payments and communication regarding the debt to the assignee.
  • The assignee may handle debt collection internally or engage a debt collection agency.

Maxine is an experienced writer, specialising in personal insolvency. With a wealth of experience in the finance industry, she has written extensively on the subject of Individual Voluntary Arrangements, Protected Trust Deed's, and various other debt solutions.

How we reviewed this article:

Our debt experts continually monitor the personal finance and debt industry, and we update our articles when new information becomes available.

Current Version

Written by Maxine McCreadie

Edited by Ben McCormack

Edited by Maxine McCreadie

Latest Articles

Private renters urged to know their rights

Private renters urged to know their rights

Budget-friendly family fun: weekend activities that won’t break the bank

Budget-friendly family fun: weekend activities that won’t break the bank

Valentine’s Day 2024: 5 low-cost date ideas

Valentine’s Day 2024: 5 low-cost date ideas

assignment of debt a

To find out more about managing your money and getting free advice, visit Money Helper, independent service set up to help people manage their money.

Customer Information

All calls are recorded for training and monitoring purposes. This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to cookies being placed on your computer or any device you are using to visit this site. To find out more about managing your money and getting free advice, visit Money Helper, independent service set up to help people manage their money.

Fees & Information

There are fees associated with our services. It is important these are fully explained before entering into a debt solution. You will always find us open about these fees and how they are charged.

© 2023 The Carrington Dean Group Limited. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA No: 674395. Registered in Scotland, Company Registration No SC 225672. Registered Address: Regent House, 5th Floor, 76 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 1NQ Samantha Warburton is authorised in the UK to act as Insolvency Practitioners by the Insolvency Practitioners Association IP Number: 12430

* A debt write off amount of between 25% and 70% is realistic, however, the debt write off amount for each customer differs depending upon their individual financial circumstances and is subject to the approval of their creditors. The example provided has been achieved by 15% of Trust Deed customers in the least 12 months. Carrington Dean: provides insolvency solutions to individuals, specialising in Trust Deeds, DAS ( Debt Arrangement Scheme) and Sequestration. We do not administer or provide advice relating to debt management products, such as Debt Management Plans. Advice and information on all options will be provided following an initial fact find where the individual(s) concerned meets the criteria for a Trust Deed, DAS(Debt Arrangement Scheme) or Sequestration and wishes to pursue it further. All advice given is based on formal options available in Scotland and is therefore provided in reasonable contemplation of an appointment.

assignment of debt a

  • News and insights
  • Training services

Assignment of debts, statutory demands and offsetting claims

It is not uncommon for a creditor (assignor) to transfer their right to receive payment of a debt (assignment) to a third party (assignee). The assignee will then seek payment from the debtor.

The assignee of the debt can issue to the debtor company a statutory demand for the payment of the debt if the debt exceeds the statutory minimum, which is currently $2,000.

For the assignee issuing the statutory demand, there will be threshold issues as to whether notice of the assignment has been given to the debtor and whether appropriate details of the assignment are contained in the statutory demand.

Assignee has the same rights and obligations as the assignor

The assignee of the debt takes the assignment subject to the rights and obligations of the assignor.

This was demonstrated in the recent decision of Mascarene Pty Ltd v Slater [2016] VSC 395 relating to a building dispute.

In Mascarene a judgment debt was assigned and the assignee issued a statutory demand.

The Court held that the assignee was not prevented from seeking payment of interest as it had the same rights as the assignor, as if the assignment had not taken place.

However, the assignee also took the assignment subject to the obligations that would have applied to the assignor in respect of the debt.

In seeking to set aside the statutory demand the debtor company claimed it had an offsetting claim against the assignor for reinstatement costs relating to building works.

Although the assignee was not a party to the building contract and not personally liable for the reinstatement costs, the debtor company was successful in claiming the setoff and reducing the amount of the statutory demand by the amount of the reinstatement costs.

It is clear that an offsetting claim cannot be sidestepped by assigning the debt.

The assignee of a debt receives the benefit of the debt subject to the rights of the assignor but also subject to the assignor’s obligations in respect of the debt.

A statutory demand can be issued in respect of an assigned debt however the assignment does not prevent the debtor company from disputing the existence or amount of the alleged debt or seeking to raise an offsetting claim.

If you would like more information about these issues, please contact Graham Roberts on +61 7 3231 2404.

Like this article? Share it via:

This publication is for information only and is not legal advice. You should obtain advice that is specific to your circumstances and not rely on this publication as legal advice. If there are any issues you would like us to advise you on arising from this publication, please let us know.

Stay up to date with CGW

Subscribe to our interest lists to receive legal alerts, articles, event invitations and offers.

Key contacts

Graham-Roberts1

Areas of expertise

assignment of debt a

It Depends – Proposed tax on super balances over $3 million or Div 296 tax

assignment of debt a

Podcast: SMSFs with CGW – Proposed tax on super balances over $3 million or Div 296 tax

assignment of debt a

Hannah’s Law – Qld criminalises coercive control

Acknowledgment of country.

Cooper Grace Ward acknowledges and pays respect to the past, present and future Traditional Custodians and Elders of this nation and the continuation of cultural, spiritual and educational practices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Quick Links

  • Client hubs

Customer Service

  • Global connections
  • Online payments
  • Security notice

assignment of debt a

Fast, accurate and flexible entities including companies, self-managed superannuation funds and trusts.

Connect with us

©2024 Cooper Grace Ward. All rights reserved. Website by Digital8.

  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Privacy collection statement
  • CGW team login

Fannie Mae logo

  • Business Partners
  • Homeowners & Renters
  • Research & Insights

Single Family

  • Originating & Underwriting
  • Pricing & Execution
  • Learning Center
  • Apps & Technology
  • News & Events

Selling Guide

Have selling questions ask poli.

Fannie Mae customers! Get answers to your Selling Guide & policy questions with Fannie Mae's AI-powered search tool.

Launch Ask Poli for Sellers  

Guide Resources

View Resources  

  • / Selling Guide
  • / Origination through Closing
  • / Subpart B3: Underwriting Borrowers
  • / Chapter B3-6: Liability Assessment

B3-6-05, Monthly Debt Obligations (05/04/2022)

Introduction.

This topic describes obligations that should be considered in underwriting the loan, including:

  • Alimony, Child Support, and Separate Maintenance Payments 
  • Bridge / Swing Loans 
  • Business Debt in Borrower’s Name 
  • Court-Ordered Assignment of Debt 
  • Debts Paid by Others 
  • Non-Applicant Accounts 
  • Deferred Installment Debt 
  • Federal Income Tax Installment Agreements 
  • Garnishments 
  • Home Equity Lines of Credit 
  • Installment Debt 
  • Lease Payments 
  • Rental Housing Payment 
  • Loans Secured by Financial Assets 
  • Open 30–Day Charge Accounts 
  • Other Real Estate Owned—Qualifying Impact 
  • Revolving Charge/Lines of Credit 
  • Student Loans 

Alimony, Child Support, and Separate Maintenance Payments

When the borrower is required to pay alimony, child support, or separate maintenance payments under a divorce decree, separation agreement, or any other written legal agreement—and those payments must continue to be made for more than ten months—the payments must be considered as part of the borrower’s recurring monthly debt obligations. However, voluntary payments do not need to be taken into consideration and an exception is allowed for alimony. A copy of the divorce decree, separation agreement, court order, or equivalent documentation confirming the amount of the obligation must be obtained and retained in the loan file.

For alimony and separate maintenance obligations, the lender has the option to reduce the qualifying income by the amount of the obligation in lieu of including it as a monthly payment in the calculation of the DTI ratio.

Note : For loan casefiles underwritten through DU, when using the option of reducing the borrower’s monthly qualifying income by the alimony or separate maintenance payment, the lender must enter the amount of the monthly obligation as a negative alimony or separate maintenance income amount. (If the borrower also receives alimony or separate maintenance income, the amounts should be combined and entered as a net amount.)

Bridge / Swing Loans

When a borrower obtains a bridge (or swing) loan, the funds from that loan can be used for closing on a new principal residence before the current residence is sold. This creates a contingent liability that must be considered part of the borrower’s recurring monthly debt obligations and included in the DTI ratio calculation.

Fannie Mae will waive this requirement and not require the debt to be included in the DTI ratio if the following documentation is provided:

a fully executed sales contract for the current residence, and

confirmation that any financing contingencies have been cleared.

Business Debt in Borrower’s Name

When a self-employed borrower claims that a monthly obligation that appears on their personal credit report (such as a Small Business Administration loan) is being paid by the borrower’s business, the lender must confirm that it verified that the obligation was actually paid out of company funds and that this was considered in its cash flow analysis of the borrower’s business.

The account payment does not need to be considered as part of the borrower’s DTI ratio if:

the account in question does not have a history of delinquency,

the business provides acceptable evidence that the obligation was paid out of company funds (such as 12 months of canceled company checks), and

the lender’s cash flow analysis of the business took payment of the obligation into consideration.

The account payment must be considered as part of the borrower’s DTI ratio in any of the following situations:

If the business does not provide sufficient evidence that the obligation was paid out of company funds.

If the business provides acceptable evidence of its payment of the obligation, but the lender’s cash flow analysis of the business does not reflect any business expense related to the obligation (such as an interest expense—and taxes and insurance, if applicable—equal to or greater than the amount of interest that one would reasonably expect to see given the amount of financing shown on the credit report and the age of the loan). It is reasonable to assume that the obligation has not been accounted for in the cash flow analysis.

If the account in question has a history of delinquency. To ensure that the obligation is counted only once, the lender should adjust the net income of the business by the amount of interest, taxes, or insurance expense, if any, that relates to the account in question.

Court-Ordered Assignment of Debt

When a borrower has outstanding debt that was assigned to another party by court order (such as under a divorce decree or separation agreement) and the creditor does not release the borrower from liability, the borrower has a contingent liability. The lender is not required to count this contingent liability as part of the borrower’s recurring monthly debt obligations.

The lender is not required to evaluate the payment history for the assigned debt after the effective date of the assignment. The lender cannot disregard the borrower’s payment history for the debt before its assignment.

Debts Paid by Others

Certain debts can be excluded from the borrower’s recurring monthly obligations and the DTI ratio:

When a borrower is obligated on a non-mortgage debt - but is not the party who is actually repaying the debt - the lender may exclude the monthly payment from the borrower's recurring monthly obligations. This policy applies whether or not the other party is obligated on the debt, but is not applicable if the other party is an interested party to the subject transaction (such as the seller or real estate agent). Non-mortgage debts include installment loans, student loans, revolving accounts, lease payments, alimony, child support, and separate maintenance. See below for treatment of payments due under a federal income tax installment agreement.

When a borrower is obligated on a mortgage debt - but is not the party who is actually repaying the debt - the lender may exclude the full monthly housing expense (PITIA) from the borrower’s recurring monthly obligations if

the party making the payments is obligated on the mortgage debt,

there are no delinquencies in the most recent 12 months, and

the borrower is not using rental income from the applicable property to qualify.

In order to exclude non-mortgage or mortgage debts from the borrower’s DTI ratio, the lender must obtain the most recent 12 months' canceled checks (or bank statements) from the other party making the payments that document a 12-month payment history with no delinquent payments.

When a borrower is obligated on a mortgage debt, regardless of whether or not the other party is making the monthly mortgage payments, the referenced property must be included in the count of financed properties (if applicable per B2-2-03, Multiple Financed Properties for the Same Borrower .

Non-Applicant Accounts

Credit reports may include accounts identified as possible non-applicant accounts (or with other similar notation). Non-applicant accounts may belong to the borrower, or they may truly belong to another individual.

Typical causes of non-applicant accounts include:

applicants who are Juniors or Seniors,

individuals who move frequently,

unrelated individuals who have identical names, and

debts the borrower applied for under a different Social Security number or under a different address. These may be indicative of potential fraud.

If the debts do not belong to the borrower, the lender may provide supporting documentation to validate this, and may exclude the non-applicant debts for the borrower’s DTI ratio. If the debts do belong to the borrower, they must be included as part of the borrower’s recurring monthly debt obligations.

Deferred Installment Debt

Deferred installment debts must be included as part of the borrower’s recurring monthly debt obligations. For deferred installment debts other than student loans, if the borrower’s credit report does not indicate the monthly amount that will be payable at the end of the deferment period, the lender must obtain copies of the borrower’s payment letters or forbearance agreements so that a monthly payment amount can be determined and used in calculating the borrower’s total monthly obligations.

For information about deferred student loans, see Student Loans below.

Federal Income Tax Installment Agreements

When a borrower has entered into an installment agreement with the IRS to repay delinquent federal income taxes, the lender may include the monthly payment amount as part of the borrower’s monthly debt obligations (in lieu of requiring payment in full) if:

There is no indication that a Notice of Federal Tax Lien has been filed against the borrower in the county in which the subject property is located.

The lender obtains the following documentation:

an approved IRS installment agreement with the terms of repayment, including the monthly payment amount and total amount due; and

evidence the borrower is current on the payments associated with the tax installment plan. Acceptable evidence includes the most recent payment reminder from the IRS, reflecting the last payment amount and date and the next payment amount owed and due date. At least one payment must have been made prior to closing.

As a reminder, lenders remain responsible under the life-of-loan representations and warranties for clear title and first-lien enforceability in accordance with A2-2-07, Life-of-Loan Representations and Warranties .

The payments on a federal income tax installment agreement can be excluded from the borrower’s DTI ratio if the agreement meets the terms in Debts Paid by Others or Installment Debt described above. If any of the above conditions are not met, the borrower must pay off the outstanding balance due under the installment agreement with the IRS in accordance with B3-6-07, Debts Paid Off At or Prior to Closing

Garnishments

All garnishments with more than ten months remaining must be included in the borrower’s recurring monthly debt obligations for qualifying purposes.

Home Equity Lines of Credit

When the mortgage that will be delivered to Fannie Mae also has a home equity line of credit (HELOC) that provides for a monthly payment of principal and interest or interest only, the payment on the HELOC must be considered as part of the borrower’s recurring monthly debt obligations. If the HELOC does not require a payment, there is no recurring monthly debt obligation so the lender does not need to develop an equivalent payment amount.

Installment Debt

All installment debt that is not secured by a financial asset—including student loans, automobile loans, personal loans, and timeshares—must be considered part of the borrower’s recurring monthly debt obligations if there are more than ten monthly payments remaining. However, an installment debt with fewer monthly payments remaining also should be considered as a recurring monthly debt obligation if it significantly affects the borrower’s ability to meet their credit obligations. See below for treatment of payments due under a federal income tax installment agreement.

Note: A timeshare account should be treated as an installment debt regardless of how it is reported on the credit report or other documentation (that is, even if reported as a mortgage loan).

Lease Payments

Lease payments must be considered as recurring monthly debt obligations regardless of the number of months remaining on the lease. This is because the expiration of a lease agreement for rental housing or an automobile typically leads to either a new lease agreement, the buyout of the existing lease, or the purchase of a new vehicle or house.

Rental Housing Payment

The housing payment for each borrower’s principal residence must be considered when underwriting the loan. For the following scenarios, the borrower’s monthly rental housing payment must be evaluated (if the borrower does not otherwise have a mortgage payment or no housing expense):

for non-occupant borrowers, and

for second homes or investment properties.

The following list provides examples of acceptable documentation to verify the rental payment:

six months canceled checks or equivalent payment source;

six months bank statements reflecting a clear and consistent payment to an organization or individual;

direct verification of rent from a management company or individual landlord; or

a copy of a current, fully executed lease agreement and two months canceled checks (or equivalent payment source) supporting the rental payment amount.

Note: Refer to B3-5.4-03, Documentation and Assessment of a Nontraditional Credit History for rental payment history requirements when using non-traditional credit.

Loans Secured by Financial Assets

When a borrower uses their financial assets—life insurance policies, 401(k) accounts, individual retirement accounts, certificates of deposit, stocks, bonds, etc.—as security for a loan, the borrower has a contingent liability.

The lender is not required to include this contingent liability as part of the borrower’s recurring monthly debt obligations provided the lender obtains a copy of the applicable loan instrument that shows the borrower’s financial asset as collateral for the loan. If the borrower intends to use the same asset to satisfy financial reserve requirements, the lender must reduce the value of the asset (the account balance, in most cases) by the proceeds from the secured loan and any related fees to determine whether the borrower has sufficient reserves.

Note: Payment on any debt secured by virtual currency is an exception to the above policy and must be included when calculating the debt-to-income ratio.

Open 30–Day Charge Accounts

Open 30–day charge accounts require the balance to be paid in full every month. Fannie Mae does not require open 30–day charge accounts to be included in the debt-to-income ratio.

See B3-6-07, Debts Paid Off At or Prior to Closing , for additional information on open 30–day charge accounts.

Other Real Estate Owned—Qualifying Impact

For details regarding the qualifying impact of other real estate owned, see B3-6-06, Qualifying Impact of Other Real Estate Owned .

Revolving Charge/Lines of Credit

Revolving charge accounts and unsecured lines of credit are open-ended and should be treated as long-term debts and must be considered part of the borrower's recurring monthly debt obligations. These tradelines include credit cards, department store charge cards, and personal lines of credit. Equity lines of credit secured by real estate should be included in the housing expense.

If the credit report does not show a required minimum payment amount and there is no supplemental documentation to support a payment of less than 5%, the lender must use 5% of the outstanding balance as the borrower's recurring monthly debt obligation.

For DU loan casefiles, if a revolving debt is provided on the loan application without a monthly payment amount, DU will use the greater of $10 or 5% of the outstanding balance as the monthly payment when calculating the total debt-to-income ratio.

Student Loans

If a monthly student loan payment is provided on the credit report, the lender may use that amount for qualifying purposes. If the credit report does not reflect the correct monthly payment, the lender may use the monthly payment that is on the student loan documentation (the most recent student loan statement) to qualify the borrower.

If the credit report does not provide a monthly payment for the student loan, or if the credit report shows $0 as the monthly payment, the lender must determine the qualifying monthly payment using one of the options below.

If the borrower is on an income-driven payment plan, the lender may obtain student loan documentation to verify the actual monthly payment is $0. The lender may then qualify the borrower with a $0 payment.

For deferred loans or loans in forbearance, the lender may calculate

a payment equal to 1% of the outstanding student loan balance (even if this amount is lower than the actual fully amortizing payment), or

a fully amortizing payment using the documented loan repayment terms.

Recent Related Announcements

The table below provides references to recently issued Announcements that are related to this topic.

Have You Tried Ask Poli?

Poli knows. just ask..

Ask Poli features exclusive Q&As and more—plus official Selling & Servicing Guide content.

Try Ask Poli

Related Articles

assignment of debt a

Customers Recommend Ask Poli

If you have additional questions, Fannie Mae customers can visit Ask Poli to get information from other Fannie Mae published sources.

For a comprehensive list of resources such as access forms, announcements, lender letters, notices and more.

Visit Selling and Servicing Guide Communications and Forms

Working with Fannie Mae

  • Customer Login
  • Password Reset
  • Not a customer? Get Started

Products & Solutions

  • Mortgage Products & Options
  • Technology Apps & Solutions

Support & Resources

  • Customer Service
  • Guide Forms

Other Sites

  • The Marketing Center
  • Know Your Options
  • Duty to Serve

IndiaCorpLaw

  • Submission Guidelines

Assignment of Debts under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

[ Aayush Mitruka  is a lawyer based in Delhi]

Synergies Dooray Automotive, the first corporate entity to be resolved under the new Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code ( Code ) posed a few very interesting questions and highlighted some grey areas in Code. In the present post I intend to discuss one important issue that came up in the context of assignment of debts.

To put things in perspective, the Code stipulates that after the National Company Law Tribunal ( NCLT ) admits an insolvency application, the Insolvency Resolution Professional ( IRP ), among other things, constitutes a committee of creditors ( CoC ) on the basis of claims received against the corporate debtor. The committee comprises all the financial creditors of the corporate debtor, and they are assigned voting shares based on the size of their debt. However, a related party to whom a corporate debtor owes a financial debt does not have any right of representation, participation or voting in the meetings of the CoC.

Before discussing the issue, it will be beneficial to allude to the brief facts of the Synergies Dooray case. In November 2016, just a week before the Code became operational, Synergies Castings, a sister concern of Synergies Dooray, assigned a major portion of its debt to third-party Millennium Finance by way of three assignment deeds. Note that Synergies Castings had acquired the debt from a consortium of banks by way of a one-time settlement in 2011. In the usual course, Synergies Castings, being a related party would not have been permitted to participate/vote in the meetings of the CoC. Therefore, the maneuvering had secured Millennium Finance ( Millennium ) a place in the CoC.

Understandably, there is no reason to complain when a creditor (related party or otherwise) assigns its loan to somebody, as that is well within their rights. However the important question is whether the assignee should get a seat in the CoC by virtue of the assignment? The Code does not seem to directly provide any answer in this regard. [1]

This particular question came up for consideration in an application filed by Edelweiss Asset Restructuring Company Limited ( Edelweiss ) against Synergies Dooray. Edelweiss challenged the assignment and the constitution of the CoC (which included Millennium), alleging that the assignment of debt by Synergies Casting to Millennium was carried out with the ulterior motive of reducing its (i.e. Edelweiss’) voting rights. It was also argued that the assignment deeds were inadequately stamped and unregistered. However, Edelweiss’ argument did not find favour with the NCLT, Hyderabad and while rejecting the application, the NCLT remarked :

“29. Therefore, the assignment deeds between the two entities also legal and permissible. At most it can be said to be similar to “tax planning” rather tax avoiding. Because of this assignment deed, not only the applicant’s share in total debt is reduced, but other financial creditors/Assignees share also proportionately reduced and they did not object to the same but only the applicant agitates with oblique motive/reasons best known to it. Therefore, a fraudulent attempt made to reduce the Applicant’s share in the total voting rights is not a plausible plea by the Applicant. In the absence of any documentary proof/evidence to the claim of the Applicant, the same is liable to be rejected. Accordingly, the bench rejects the above allegations/claim of the applicant.”

[Emphasis supplied]

Although the NCLT held that such an assignment was legal and permissible, it did not delve into the critical aspect of whether such an assignment would secure the assignee a seat in the CoC. The reasoning provided does not appear very convincing. This question ought to have been discussed at length. A reading of the above quoted paragraph also brings to fore that the decision lends it approval to an assignment undertaken even with the sole objective of securing a seat in the CoC because it is akin to “tax planning”. Edelweiss has preferred an appeal before the NCLAT and the matter is currently pending for its decision.

This issue was once again considered by the NCLT, Mumbai in the case of Fortune Pharma Private Limited . Interestingly, in this case, after filing applications initiating the corporate insolvency resolution process ( CIRP ) but before its admission, two related party creditors assigned their debts to an unrelated third party. Naturally, this diminished the voting share of the applicant creditor, who then filed an application contending that the assignments were executed with an ulterior motive. The NCLT held that disqualification that existed at the time of initiating the CIRP cannot be removed by a mere assignment. It noted that assignment is transfer of one’s right to recover debt to another person and that the rights of the ‘assignee’ are no better than those of an ‘assignor’. Accordingly, the assignee does not get the right to change its status from ‘related’ to ‘unrelated.’

In other words, the NCLT, Mumbai reasoned that since at the inception of the debt it belonged to a related party (who is barred to participate in the proceedings of CoC), the assignment of such a debt will not remove the bar. In my view, though the NCLT was correct in debarring the assignee from participating in the proceedings of the CoC, however the reasoning provided does not appear to inspire much confidence because of the following reasons.

First, it is important to understand that the bar is on the person who is holding the debt and not the nature of the debt per se. It will not be entirely correct to bar somebody (who is otherwise eligible) from voting just because it bought the debt from a related party. Imagine a situation where an original creditor (unrelated) assigns a debt to a related party. Now when this related party creditor assigns a debt to an unrelated X in the usual course of business, will X in this case be barred since at some point in time the debt was held by a related party?  The answer to this has to be in the negative.

Second, this will prove to be counter-productive and have unintended repercussions. It will strongly discourage genuine asset reconstruction companies or other interested parties from buying the debt from any related party creditor. Surely, the Code could not have intended to hinder assignments which are undertaken in the usual course of the business.

Third, how do we exactly deal with situations when a CIRP application is being made by an operational creditor under section 9 of the Code? An operational creditor needs to deliver to the corporate debtor a demand notice as per section 8 before invoking section 9. Do we, in these cases, also allow an assignment before filing of an application? It would be impractical to have a one-size-fits-all approach.

The two views and the approaches adopted by two benches of the NCLT on this critical question throws open a can of worms. Let us try to closely examine this issue.

Assignment is essentially a contractual concept and refers to an agreement by which the rights and obligations of one party can be transferred to another. By virtue of assignment, the assignee steps into the shoes of her assignor and agrees to be both bound by it and is entitled to enforce it. Further, to be valid, an assignment agreement must satisfy the requirements under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 ( Act ). Accordingly, an assignment agreement can be declared void under section 23 of the Act if the object of the assignment agreement is (a) of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law; or (b) fraudulent; or (c) involves or implies injury to the person or property of another; or (d) the court regards it as immoral, or opposed to public policy.

At this juncture, it is significant to examine if the NCLT (which exercises summary jurisdiction) would have the power to undertake such an investigation or would it be the prerogative of a civil court? The language of section 60(5)(c) of the Code seem to suggest that the NCLT will have the authority since this will be a “ question of law or facts, arising out of or in relation to the insolvency resolution or liquidation proceedings of the corporate debtor or corporate person under this Code .”

It cannot be the intention of the Code to allow the promoters to appoint a proxy on the CoC by means of an assignment. It is a well settled principle of law that what may not be done directly cannot be permitted to be done indirectly. However, at the same time it must also be borne in mind that the Code does not aim to discourage any bona fide assignments. In the absence of any guidance in the Code, in order to determine the validity of such assignments, the NCLT ought to investigate the objective behind the assignment. In this regard, the time and the circumstances under which the assignment is made would be one relevant factor. Among other factors, the NCLT may also consider if the assignment is executed in the usual and ordinary course of the business.

This issue undermines the efficiency of the Code and therefore warrants serious consideration. The Code envisages provisions for scrutinizing certain transactions which may compromise the CIRP. One way to address this issue could be by amending the law to include such assignments also within its ambit. Pertinently, under section 240 of the Code, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India has the power to make regulations. However, since Parliament has been quite proactive in the past in preventing the promoters trying to game the system, it would not be surprising if an amendment is brought in to bring some clarity. It remains to be seen how and when this issue does gets finally elucidated.

– Aayush Mitruka 

[1] Regulation 28 of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 does not address this issue.

About the author

assignment of debt a

Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Thanks for the above post. Its very helpful. Can you share a draft Assignment Agreement as per IBC?

Ad Mr Ayush. Sir.we have settlements our loans with J.M Arc on 12.8.15 in rs 7 Cr.J.M ARC not given permission to sell extra open land to deposit upfront 25% payments. Hence company not sine agreement. B.J.M ARC revoked on 11.12.15.J.M ARC file petition with NCLt for rs 14.5 cr in application. Pls advice your view.

With respect to Mr Mitruka’s views on the issue of assignment, I humbly submit that no amendment in the Code is called for. The Code, in several places, has expressly equated a creditor (by virtue of a business deal) with a creditor who has simply acquired a debt from another, say through assignment. Once the assignment agreement comes out unscathed, the assignee (of any debt) is as much a creditor as any other creditor. So, post the assignment, Millenium is a creditor in his own right. This way there is no question of any ‘related party’. A financial creditor gets a seat in the CoC, irrespective of his lineage. This should be looked at in this simple manner. In the proceedings before NCLT, Hyderabad, all that was said was that these 3 Agreements smacked of malafide because their date of signing was so close to the date of SICA Repeal . To be sure, I fail to see the connection between the two. It was known to all and sundry that SICA Repeal will be brought into force as soon as NCLTs got ready to be constituted.What was the fault of the Assignor or Assignee , even if agreements were signed on the very day on which SICA Repeal was made effective. Edelweiss does not appear to have led any evidence to show that the parties were planning to get around the section 21(2) by signing those assignment agreements. In fact, if the objective was just to get around this section, the date of signing did not need to be close to the date of SICA Repeal coming into effect. Neither NCLT nor the RP could afford to waste time on mere allegations unsupported by any evidence.

Please sir help…. Bank insolvency pr assignment ready krna h… So plz explain I am so very confused..

Invoking India’s Money Laundering Regime for Environmental Crimes: Impact on Businesses

Data-protection in the international arbitration regime.

  • ‘Beneficial Owner’ is not a ‘Related Party’ under the IBC

The Unavailability of Writ Jurisdiction for Interference with One-Time Settlements

SUBSCRIBE TO BLOG VIA EMAIL Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Top Posts & Pages

  • Supreme Court on the Regularization of Temporary Employees
  • A Stamp Paper – What Good is it Beyond Six Months?
  • SEBI’s Order in the DLF Case: A Summary
  • Section 14, SARFAESI Act: Settling A Jurisdictional Conundrum
  • Foreign Jurisdiction Clauses in Commercial Contracts: An Indian Perspective
  • Creditors with Rejected Claims: Methods to Address Inadequacies under the IBC
  • Termination of Worker For ‘Loss of Confidence’ Does Not Amount To Retrenchment
  • Validity of Employment Bonds in India

Recent Comments

  • Umakanth Varottil on Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Permit Withdrawal of CIRP
  • Araz Mirbavandi on Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Permit Withdrawal of CIRP
  • Hari Prakash on Guest Post: Reduction of Provident Fund Contributions to Statutory Limits
  • Adv Ragav on Secondment Taxation and the Northern Operating Systems Case
  • Suchith on Coffee Plantations under SARFAESI: A Bitter Brew

web analytics

Social Media

  • View @IndiaCorpLaw’s profile on Twitter

What is debt? Get to know the common types of loans, credit

assignment of debt a

If you've ever borrowed money, you've had debt. Whether it's the money you paid a friend when they spotted the lunch tab or the student loans you owe to the government, that's debt.

Debt is all around us, from credit cards to car payments to home mortgages . But there's more to debt than just owing money. There are several types of debt that can add up for the average American.

Here is a quick primer on debt.

What is debt?

In short, debt is the money you owe to someone or something. It's money that you borrowed and must pay back, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau .

Learn more: Best personal loans

"Consumer debt" is categorized by the goods and services consumed by individuals or households. This includes:

  • Credit card debt.
  • Home equity lines of credit (HELOCs).
  • Auto loans.
  • Student loans.
  • Medical debt.
  • Personal loans.

In 2023, the total consumer debt balances in the U.S. were  $17.06 trillion , according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Average debt in America: See the 2023 statistics.

Examples of debt

There is more than one type of debt and each operates differently. According to Capital One, the most common forms of debt include:

  • Secured debt.
  • Unsecured debt.
  • Revolving debt.
  • Installment debt.

Secured debt is backed by collateral, meaning something of equal value to the debt is given in its place. If someone does not properly pay off the debt, the collateral is taken away. For example, if someone fails to make mortgage payments, their house (in this case, the collateral) could be foreclosed on.

Unsecured debt, on the other, has no collateral backing. Common examples of this type include student loans and some credit cards.

Revolving debt, also called open-ended credit, lets someone borrow money and pay back the loans at their discretion so long as their account is in good standing.

Installment debt is when you receive the total loan amount at the beginning and pay it off over a period of time, or in installments.

Just Curious for more? We've got you covered

USA TODAY is exploring the questions you and others ask every day. From " What is net pay? " to " What is inflation? " to " What causes a recession? " − we're striving to find answers to the most common questions you ask every day. Head to our  Just Curious section  to see what else we can answer for you.

  • Study Guides
  • Homework Questions

Financial system assignment 3

IMAGES

  1. Debt Assignment Agreement Template

    assignment of debt a

  2. Debt Assignment: How They Work, Considerations and Benefits

    assignment of debt a

  3. Free Debt Settlement Agreement Template

    assignment of debt a

  4. Assignment Debt Form

    assignment of debt a

  5. Debt Assignment Agreement Template

    assignment of debt a

  6. Debt Assignment Agreement Template

    assignment of debt a

VIDEO

  1. Chicken Flavored Fruit Snacks

  2. Cost Of Debt

  3. flight failure night assignment debt uncle association shape north

  4. Cost of debt (part 1) /Financial management

  5. ZOMBIE DEBT ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT FORMS FOR CPN!

  6. Securitization

COMMENTS

  1. Debt Assignment: How They Work, Considerations and Benefits

    Debt Assignment: A transfer of debt, and all the rights and obligations associated with it, from a creditor to a third party . Debt assignment may occur with both individual debts and business ...

  2. Assignment Of Debt: Definition & Sample

    Assignment of debt is an agreement that transfer debt, rights, and obligations from a creditor to a third party. Assignment of debt agreements are commonly found when a creditor issues past due debt to a debt collection agency. The original lender will be relieved of all obligations and the agency will become the new owner of the debt.

  3. Debt Assignment and Assumption Agreement

    A Debt Assignment and Assumption Agreement is a very simple document whereby one party assigns their debt to another party, and the other party agrees to take that debt on. The party that is assigning the debt is the original debtor; they are called the assignor. The party that is assuming the debt is the new debtor; they are called the assignee.

  4. Assignment Of Debt Agreement: Definition & Sample

    An assignment of debt agreement is a legal document between a debtor and creditor that outlines the repayment terms. An assignment of debt agreement can be used as an alternative to bankruptcy, but several requirements must be met for it to work. In addition, if obligations are not met under a debt agreement, it might still be necessary to file ...

  5. Debt Assignment and Assumption Agreement

    The debt that is being transferred requires definition. If the total amount of the debt owed by the Debtor will be transferred to the Assuming Party, then the "All Of The Debt" checkbox should be selected. (7) Assignment Of Portion Of Debt. If the Assuming Party will only take on part of the concerned debt then select the "Portion ...

  6. What is an Assignment of Debt?

    An assignment of debt, in simple terms, is an agreement that transfers a debt owed to one entity, to another. A creditor does not need the consent of the debtor to assign a debt. Once a debt is properly assigned, all rights and responsibilities of the original creditor (the assignor) transfer to the new owner (the assignee).

  7. Assigning debts and other contractual claims

    Section 136 of the Law of the Property Act 1925 kindly obliged. This lays down the conditions which need to be satisfied for an effective legal assignment of a chose in action (such as a debt). We won't bore you with the detail, but suffice to say that what's important is that a legal assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor ...

  8. How Does Debt Assignment Work?

    Debt assignment refers to a transfer of debt. This includes all of the associated rights and obligations, as it goes from a creditor to a third party. Debt assignment is essentially the legal transfer of debt to a debt collector (or debt collection agency). After this agency purchases the debt, they will have the responsibility to collect the debt, meaning you will pay your debt to them.

  9. What Is an Assignment of Debt?

    Debt Eraser Review. Assignment of debt means that the debt has been transferred, including all obligations and rights, from the creditor to another party. The debt assignment means there has been a legal transfer to another party, who now owns the debt. Usually, the debt assignment involves a debt collector who takes the responsibility to ...

  10. Assignment Of Debt Agreement: Definition & Sample

    An assignment of debt agreement is a legal document between a debtor and creditor that outlines the repayment terms. An assignment of debt agreement can be used as an alternative to bankruptcy, but several requirements must be met for it to work. In addition, if obligations are not met under a debt agreement, it might still be necessary to file ...

  11. PDF SAMPLE Debt Assignment and Assumption with Release

    II. ASSIGNMENT OF DEBT. It is known that the Debtor is indebted to the Creditor, under a separate agreement, for the current principal sum of $150,000.00, plus any interest ("Debt"). Under this Agreement, the Assuming Party agrees to assume: (choose one) ☒ - All of the Debt. ☐ - Portion of the Debt. The Assuming Party agrees to assume ...

  12. English law assignments of part of a debt: Practical considerations

    While under English law part of a debt can be assigned, there is a general requirement that the relevant assignee joins the assignor to any proceedings against the debtor, which potentially impedes the assignee's ability to enforce against the debtor efficiently. ... although the legal ownership cannot. 1 This means that an assignment of part ...

  13. What is an Assignment of Debt?

    An assignment of debt essentially transfers the debt from one party (the assignor) to a third party (an assignee). In practice, this will mean the original debtor (e.g. Joe Bloggs) will now owe the debt to a new third-party creditor (e.g. the debt collection business). Therefore, in the scenario above, Joe must now repay the debt to the third ...

  14. Assignment of Debt

    An assignment of debt is governed by Section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 (the "Act") (cited with approval in the Federal Court case of UMW Industries Sdn Bhd v Ah Fook, in which, the elements of a statutory assignment of debt can be summarized as follows:

  15. Assignment of Debt Agreement Sample Contracts

    Services-business services, nec. MANHATTAN ASSETS CORP., a company incorporated under the laws of Nevada with an executive office at 132 Via Havre, Newport Beach, California, 92663. Sample 1. DIRECT CAPITAL GROUP INC ASSIGNMENT OF DEBT AGREEMENT THIS ASSIGNMENT OF DEBT AGREEMENT DATED April 12, 2016. Contract Type.

  16. What is required for court-ordered assignment of debt?

    Court-Ordered Assignment of Debt. When a borrower has outstanding debt that was assigned to another party by court order (such as under a divorce decree or separation agreement) and the creditor does not release the borrower from liability, the borrower has a contingent liability. The lender is not required to count this contingent liability as ...

  17. Assignment Involves Transfer of Rights to Collect Outstanding Debts

    The ability to assign a debt or legal chose in action is codified in s. 53 of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act, which provides that a debt is assignable subject to the equities between the original debtor and creditor and reads as follows:. 53 (1) Any absolute assignment made on or after the 31st day of December, 1897, by writing under the hand of the assignor, not purporting to be by ...

  18. Assignment of debt

    Assignment of debt. The assignment of debt in good faith is not invalid even if the necessity for litigation to recover it is contemplated by the parties.

  19. Notice of Assignment: Debt Terms explained

    A Notice of Assignment, in relation to debt, is a document used to inform debtors that their debt has been 'purchased' by a third party. The notice serves to notify the debtor that a new company (known as the assignee) has taken over the responsibility of collecting the debt. This means that the debtor should direct their future payments ...

  20. Assignment of debts, statutory demands and offsetting claims

    A statutory demand can be issued in respect of an assigned debt however the assignment does not prevent the debtor company from disputing the existence or amount of the alleged debt or seeking to raise an offsetting claim. If you would like more information about these issues, please contact Graham Roberts on +61 7 3231 2404.

  21. B3-6-05, Monthly Debt Obligations (05/04/2022)

    The lender cannot disregard the borrower's payment history for the debt before its assignment. Debts Paid by Others. Certain debts can be excluded from the borrower's recurring monthly obligations and the DTI ratio: When a borrower is obligated on a non-mortgage debt - but is not the party who is actually repaying the debt - the lender may ...

  22. Deed of Assignment of Debt Template Agreement: to Assign a Debt

    4. Sign. Use our Deed of Assignment of Debt template in order to transfer (or sell) the right to recover a debt. To transfer a debt legally between parties, it is necessary to enter into a written transfer document. Once the transfer document has been signed by the Assignee (the party transferring the debt) and the Assignee (the party receiving ...

  23. Assignment of Debts under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

    In November 2016, just a week before the Code became operational, Synergies Castings, a sister concern of Synergies Dooray, assigned a major portion of its debt to third-party Millennium Finance by way of three assignment deeds. Note that Synergies Castings had acquired the debt from a consortium of banks by way of a one-time settlement in 2011.

  24. What is debt? Here's how it works and the common types

    "Consumer debt" is categorized by the goods and services consumed by individuals or households. This includes: Credit card debt. Mortgages. Home equity lines of credit (HELOCs).

  25. Financial system assignment 3 (pdf)

    Assignment 3: Why is the debt market in Nepal not as well established as the stock market? Critically analyze the process of issue of the debt and equity securities and why corporations would be willing to provide a portion of the shares to the public rather than issuing debt securities? Nepal's financial system consists of a stock market and a debt market, each of which has a unique function ...