15 SOAP Note Examples and Templates in 2024

case study soap format

By Jamie Frew on Feb 29, 2024.

Fact Checked by Nate Lacson.

case study soap format

Introduction

SOAP notes are a helpful method of documentation designed to assist medical and mental health professionals in streamlining their  client notes . Using a template such as  SOAP notes  means that you can capture, store, and interpret your client's information consistently over time.

You probably already know this, but SOAP is an acronym that stands for subjective, objective, assessment, and plan. Each letter refers to the different components of a soap note and helps outline the information you need to include and where to put it.

Even though SOAP notes are a simple way to record your  progress notes , having an example or template is still helpful. That's why we've taken the time to collate some examples and SOAP note templates we think will help you write more detailed and concise SOAP notes.

SOAP Note acronym

  • Subjective (S):  The client's perspective regarding their experience and perceptions of symptoms, needs, and progress toward treatment goals. This section often includes direct quotes from the client/ patient, vital signs, and other physical data.
  • Objective (O):  Your observed perspective as the practitioner, i.e., objective data ("facts") regarding the client, like elements of a mental status exam or other screening tools, historical information, medications prescribed, x-rays results, or vital signs.
  • Assessment (A):  Your clinical assessment of the available subjective and objective information. The assessment summarizes the client's status and progress toward measurable treatment plan goals.
  • Plan (P):  The actions that the client and the practitioner have agreed upon to be taken due to the  clinician's assessment  of the client's current status, such as assessments, follow-up activities, referrals, and changes in the treatment.

How to write a SOAP note

Although every practitioner will have their preferred methods for writing SOAP notes, there are helpful ways to ensure you cover all the correct information. We've already covered the type of information that should be covered in each section of a SOAP note, but here are some additional ways to guarantee this is done well. 

The subjective section covers how the patient feels and what they report about their symptoms. The main topic, symptom, or issue that the patient describes is known as the Chief Complaint (CC). There may be more than one CC, and the primary CC may not be what the patient initially reports on. As their physician, you need to ask them as many questions as possible so you can identify the appropriate CC. 

A History of Present Illness (HPI) also belongs in this section. This includes questions like:

  • When did the symptoms begin?
  • When did you first notice the CC?
  • Where is the CC located?
  • What makes the CC better?
  • What makes the CC worse?

Pro tip #1 : It is a good idea to include direct quotes from the patient in this section. 

Pro tip #2:  Writing the subjective section needs to be concise. This may mean compacting the information the patient has given you to get the information across succinctly. 

The objective section includes the data that you have obtained during the session. This may include:

  • Vital signs
  • Laboratory results
  • X-ray results
  • Physical exam

Based on the subjective information that the patient has given you and the nature of their CC, you will respond appropriately and obtain objective data that indicates the signs of the CC. 

In addition to gathering test/lab results and vital signs, the objective section will include your observations about how the patient presents. This has their behavior, effect, engagement, conversational skills, and orientation. 

Pro tip #3 : Confusion between symptoms and signs is common. The patient's symptoms should be included in the subjective section. In contrast, signs refer to quantifiable measurements or objective observations you have gathered indicating the presence of the CC.

It can help to think of the assessment section of a SOAP note as the synthesis between the subjective and objective information you have gathered. Using your knowledge of the patient's symptoms and the signs you have identified will lead to a diagnosis or informed treatment plan. 

If there are several different CCs, you may want to list them as ‘Problems,' as well as the responding assessments. Practitioners frequently use the assessment section to compare their patients' progress between sessions, so you want to ensure this information is as comprehensive as possible while remaining concise. 

Pro tip #4 : Although the assessment plan synthesizes information you've already gathered, you should never repeat yourself. Don't just copy what you've written in the subjective and objective sections. 

The final section of a SOAP note covers the patient's treatment plan in detail based on the assessment section. You want to include immediate goals, the date of the next session (where applicable), and what the patient wants to achieve between their appointments. 

In future sessions, you can use the plan to identify the patient's progress and judge whether the treatment plan requires changing. 

The plan section may also include:

  • Referrals to specialists
  • Patient education
  • Medications
  • If further testing is required
  • Progression or regression made by the client

15 SOAP note examples and templates

Although the above sections help outline the  requirements of each SOAP notes section , having an example in front of you can be beneficial. That's why we've taken the time to collate some examples and SOAP note templates we think will help you write more detailed and concise SOAP notes.

SOAP note example for nurses or  Nurse practitioners

John reports that he is feeling 'tired' and that he 'can't seem to get out of bed in the morning.' John is 'struggling to get to work' and says that he 'constantly finds his mind wandering to negative thoughts.' John stated that his sleep had been broken and he does not wake feeling rested. He reports that he does not feel as though the medication is making any difference and thinks he is getting worse.

John was unable to come into the practice and so has been seen at home. John's personal hygiene does not appear to be intact; he was unshaven and dressed in track pants and a hooded jumper which is unusual as he typically takes excellent care in his appearance. John appears to be tired; he is pale in complexion and has large circles under his eyes.

John's compliance with his new medication is good, and he appears to have retained his food intake. Weight is stable and unchanged.

John presents with symptoms consistent with a major depressive episode. This is evidenced by his low mood, slowed speech rate and reduced volume, depressed body language, and facial expression. However, it's important to note that this assessment is based on the information presented and a full diagnosis can only be confirmed by a qualified mental health professional.

Further exploration is needed to understand the duration and severity of these symptoms, as well as any potential contributing factors such as life stressors, medical conditions, or personal history. Additionally, while suicidal ideation is currently denied, it is crucial to monitor for any changes and ensure appropriate safety measures are in place.

Diagnosis: Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Severe (F33.1 ICD-10) - Active

Problem: Depressed Mood

Rationale: John's depressed mood, evidenced by ongoing symptoms consistent with Major Depressive Disorder, significantly impacts his daily life and requires continued intervention.

Long-term goal: John will develop skills to recognize and manage his depression effectively.

Short-term goals and interventions:

  • Maintain treatment engagement: Continue attending weekly individual therapy sessions to address negative thinking patterns, build coping mechanisms, and monitor progress.
  • Optimize medication: Collaborate with the prescribing physician to continue titration of the SSRI fluoxetine as needed, ensuring optimal symptom control.
  • Engage in daily physical activity: Encourage participation in structured physical activity, such as walking Jingo once a day, to improve mood and energy levels.
  • Implement a safety plan: Develop a collaborative safety plan with John outlining clear steps and resources he can access in moments of suicidal ideation, ensuring his safety and well-being.

SOAP note example for  psychotherapists

Stacey reports that she is 'feeling good' and enjoying her time away. Stacey reports she has been compliant with her medication and using her meditation app whenever she feels her anxiety.

Stacey was unable to attend her session as she is on a family holiday this week. She was able to touch base with me over the phone and was willing and able to make the phone call at the set time. Stacey appeared to be calm and positive over the phone.

Stacey presented this afternoon with a relaxed mood. Her speech was normal in rate, tone, and volume. Stacey was able to articulate her thoughts and feelings coherently.

Stacey did not present with any signs of hallucinations or delusions. Insight and judgment are good. No sign of substance use was present.

Plan to meet again in person at 2 pm next Tuesday, 25th May. Stacey will continue on her current medication and has given her family copies of her safety plan should she need it.

SOAP note example for pediatricians

Mrs. Jones states that Julia is "doing okay." Mrs. Jones said her daughter seems to be engaging with other children in her class. Mrs. Jones said Julia is still struggling to get to sleep and that "she may need to recommence the magnesium." Despite this, Mrs. Jones states she is "not too concerned about Julia's depressive symptomatology.

Mrs. Jones thinks Julia's condition has improved.

Julia will require ongoing treatment.

Plan to meet with Julia and Mrs. Jones next week to review mx. To continue to meet with Julia.

SOAP note example for social workers

Martin reports experiencing a worsening of his depressive symptoms, describing them as "more frequent and more intense" compared to previous experiences. He feels the depressive state is constantly present, with no improvement in anhedonia, and a significant decrease in energy levels compared to the previous month. He describes feeling constantly fatigued, both mentally and physically, and reports difficulty concentrating and increased irritability.

Importantly, Martin also shared experiencing daily thoughts of suicide, although he denies having a specific plan or intention to act on them.

Martin denies any hallucinations, delusions, or other psychotic-related symptomatology. His compliance with medication is good. He appears to have gained better control over his impulsive behavior as they are being observed less frequently. Martin appears to have lost weight and reports a diminished interest in food and a decreased intake.

Martin presents with significant symptoms consistent with Major Depressive Disorder, including worsening mood, anhedonia, fatigue, difficulty concentrating, and daily thoughts of suicide. His verbal and cognitive functioning appears intact, with no signs of psychosis. He demonstrates some insight into his depression and denies any current plan or intent to act on his suicidal thoughts.

However, his nonverbal presentation paints a concerning picture, with listlessness, distractedness, slow physical movement, and depressed body language reflecting the severity of his depressive episode. It is crucial to monitor his safety closely and address the suicidal ideation with appropriate interventions, despite the lack of an immediate plan.

Therefore, continuing therapy sessions with a focus on developing coping mechanisms, managing suicidal ideation, and exploring potential contributing factors is highly recommended.

Diagnosis: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) - Active

Rationale: Martin's ongoing symptoms of depression, including daily suicidal ideation and significant functional impairment, necessitate continued intervention and support.

  • Increase treatment frequency: Schedule follow-up therapy session in two days, on Friday, May 20th, to provide immediate support and monitor safety.
  • Reinforce safety plan: Review and reinforce Martin's existing safety plan, ensuring he understands and has accessible resources to address suicidal thoughts.
  • Encourage communication with family: Discuss the importance of informing a trusted family member about his current state of mind and seeking their support, while respecting Martin's autonomy concerning disclosure.

Additional considerations:

  • Potential for medication management: Explore the potential benefits and risks of medication management, such as anti-depressants, in consultation with a physician, considering the severity and duration of symptoms.
  • Collaboration with support systems: Consider involving other healthcare providers, such as Martin's primary care physician, in a coordinated care approach, if deemed necessary.

SOAP note example for  psychiatrists

Ms. M. describes her current state as "doing okay" with a slight improvement in her depressive symptoms. While she still experiences persistent sadness, she acknowledges slight progress. Her sleep patterns remain disrupted, although she reports improved sleep quality and manages to get "4 hours sleep per night."

During the session, Ms. M. expressed discomfort with my note-taking, causing her anxiety. Additionally, she mentioned occasional shortness of breath and a general anxiety related to healthcare providers. Interestingly, she expressed concern about the location of her medical records.

Ms. M. is alert. Her mood is unstable but improved slightly, and she is improving her ability to regulate her emotions.

Ms. M. has a major depressive disorder.

Ms. M. will continue taking 20 milligrams of sertraline per day. If her symptoms do not improve in two weeks, the clinician will consider titrating the dose up to 40 mg. Ms. M. will continue outpatient counseling and patient education and handout. Comprehensive assessment and plan to be completed by Ms. M's case manager.

The SOAP note could include data such as Ms. M vital signs, patient's chart, HPI, and lab work under the Objective section to monitor his medication's effects.

SOAP note example for  therapists

"I'm tired of being overlooked for promotions. I don't know how to make them see what I can do." Frasier's chief complaint is feeling "misunderstood" by her colleagues.

Frasier is seated, her posture is rigid, eye contact is minimal. Frasier appears to be presented with a differential diagnosis.

Frasier is seeking practical ways of communicating her needs to her boss, asking for more responsibility, and how she could track her contributions.

Book in for a follow-up appointment. Work through some strategies to overcome communication difficulties and lack of insight. Request GP or other appropriate healthcare professionals to conduct a physical examination.

SOAP note example for  counselors

David states that he continues to experience cravings for heroin. He desperately wants to drop out of his methadone program and revert to what he was doing. David is motivated to stay sober by his daughter and states that he is "sober, but still experiencing terrible withdrawals" He stated that [he] "dreams about heroin all the time, and constantly wakes in the night drenched in sweat."

David arrived promptly for his appointment, completing his patient information sheet in the waiting room while exhibiting a pleasant demeanor during the session. He displayed no signs of intoxication.

While David still exhibits heightened arousal and some distractibility, his ability to focus has improved. This was evident during his sustained engagement in a fifteen-minute discussion about his partner and his capacity for self-reflection. Additionally, David demonstrated a marked improvement in personal hygiene and self-care. His recent physical exam also revealed a weight gain of 3 pounds.

David demonstrates encouraging progress in his treatment journey. He actively utilizes coping mechanisms, ranging from control techniques to exercises, resulting in a decrease in his cravings, dropping from "constant" to "a few times an hour." This signifies his active engagement and positive response to treatment.

However, it is crucial to acknowledge that David still experiences regular cravings, indicative of his ongoing struggle. Coupled with his history of five years of heroin use, it underscores the need for further support. To consolidate his gains and progress towards sustainable recovery, David would benefit from acquiring and implementing additional coping skills.

Therefore, considering both his current progress and the underlying factors related to his substance use, David would likely benefit from the addition of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) alongside his current methadone treatment. Integrating CBT can equip him with valuable tools for managing triggers, challenging negative thoughts, and developing healthy coping mechanisms, ultimately enhancing his long-term recovery potential.

David has received a significant amount of psychoeducation within his therapy session. The therapist will begin to use dialectical behavioral therapy techniques to address David's emotion dysregulation. David also agreed to continue to hold family therapy sessions with his wife. Staff will continue to monitor David regularly in the interest of patient care and his past medical history.

SOAP note example for  occupational therapists

Ruby stated that she feels 'energized' and 'happy.' She states that getting out of bed in the morning is markedly easier and she feels 'motivated to find work.' She has also stated that her 'eating and sleeping has improved,' but that she is concerned, she is 'overeating.'

Ruby attended her session and was dressed in a matching pink tracksuit. Her personal hygiene was good, and she had taken great care to apply her makeup and paint her nails. Ruby appeared fresh and lively. Her compliance with her medication is good, and she has been able to complete her jobseekers form.

Ruby presented this morning with markedly improved affect and mood. Her speech was normal in rate and pitch and appeared to flow easily. Her thoughts were coherent, and her conversation was appropriate. Ruby's appearance and posture were different from what they were in our last session. Ruby's medication appears to be assisting her mental health significantly.

  • Follow-up appointment: Schedule a follow-up session with Ruby in one week to monitor her progress and address any emerging concerns.
  • Open communication: Encourage Ruby to maintain open communication with me and contact me for any assistance or questions regarding her job search process. This fosters a collaborative approach and ensures timely support.
  • Medication adherence: Collaborate with Ruby to ensure continued adherence to her prescribed medication regimen, emphasizing its importance in managing her condition.
  • Multidisciplinary team (MDT) review: Share this latest session's information with Dr. Smith for review within the MDT meeting. This facilitates collaborative analysis, discussion of potential diagnoses, and formulation of a comprehensive treatment plan.
  • Exploring potential vocational support: Depending on Ruby's needs and the MDT's recommendations, exploration of additional vocational support services might prove beneficial. This could include career counseling, interview preparation workshops, or specialized job search resources tailored to her specific situation.
  • Addressing underlying factors: Further assessment is essential to identify any underlying factors contributing to Ruby's presentation, such as anxiety or depression, that might require additional interventions tailored to address them.

SOAP note example for dentists

Chief complaint: A 56-year-old woman presents with a chief complaint of "painful upper right back jaw for the past week or so."

History of present illness: The patient reports experiencing pain in her upper right back jaw for approximately one week. She describes the pain as [insert patient's description of the pain, e.g., sharp, dull, throbbing, aching]. She states that the pain is [insert patient's description of pain characteristics, e.g., constant, intermittent, worse with specific activities]. She denies any history of fever, chills, facial swelling, difficulty swallowing, or earache.

Past medical history: The patient denies any significant past medical history.

Medications: The patient denies taking any current medications.

Allergies: The patient reports an allergy to paracetamol.

Social history: The patient reports a history of [insert details of tobacco use, e.g., smoking cigarettes for 30 years, one pack per day] and [insert details of alcohol consumption, e.g., occasional social drinking].

  • Blood pressure: 133/91 mmHg
  • Heart rate: 87 beats per minute
  • Temperature: 98.7 °F (37.1 °C)

Clinical Examination:

  • No signs of swelling, asymmetry, pain, redness (erythema), numbness (paraesthesia), or tenderness to palpation (TMI) were observed in the external facial and jaw areas.
  • Tooth #17 (FDI #27) is supra-erupted and contacting (occluding) the pericoronal tissues (gum tissue surrounding the crown) of tooth #16.
  • Tooth #16 is partially erupted and exhibits:
  • Red, inflamed gum tissue (erythematous gingiva)
  • Presence of discharge (exudate)
  • Pain upon palpation
  • Pending - X-rays (including periapical (PA) and panoramic (Pano) views, or possibly a CT scan) are recommended to further evaluate the underlying anatomy and identify any potential bone involvement.
  • Pericoronitis: The patient exhibits clinical signs consistent with pericoronitis affecting tooth #16. This includes the presence of: Partial eruption of the tooth Inflamed gum tissue (erythema) Discharge (exudate) around the tooth Pain upon palpation * Supra-eruption of the opposing tooth (#17) and its contact with the affected tissue
  • Contributing factors: While a definitive cause cannot be established without further investigation, the patient's smoking history (one pack per week) could potentially contribute to the development of pericoronitis by compromising the immune response and increasing the risk of infection.
  • Additional considerations: Further information is necessary to fully understand the underlying factors. Pending X-rays (PA and panoramic) will provide valuable insights into the bone structure and identify any potential complications, such as impaction or bone loss.

Therefore, a definitive diagnosis and comprehensive treatment plan will be determined following the completion of the X-ray studies and considering the patient's full medical history and any additional information gathered.

  • Pain management: OTC pain meds (consider allergy) & warm compresses (10-15 min, several times/day).
  • Definitive treatment: Schedule extraction of #17 after X-ray review.
  • Antibiotics (pending): Consider 5-7 day course of amoxicillin based on X-ray and severity.
  • Follow-up: See patient in 3-5 days (healing, post-op concerns, oral hygiene).
  • Oral hygiene education: Instruct on proper brushing/flossing, gentle cleaning of affected area.
  • Smoking cessation: Encourage quitting to improve healing and reduce infection risk.

SOAP note example for  speech therapists

Jenny's mother stated, "Jenny's teacher can understand her better now" Jenny's mother is "stoked with Jenny's progress" and can "see the improvement is helpful for Jenny's confidence."

Jenny was able to produce /I/ in the final position of words with 80% accuracy.

Jenny's pronunciation has improved 20% since the last session with visual cues of tongue placement. Jenny has made marked improvements throughout the previous 3 sessions.

Jenny continues to improve with /I/ in the final position and is reaching the goal of /I/ in the initial position. Our next session will focus on discharge.

SOAP note example for  Physical Therapists  

At the time of the initial assessment, Bobby complained of dull aching in his upper back at the level of 3-4 on a scale of 10. Bobby stated that the "pain increases at the end of the day to a 6 or 7". Bobby confirmed he uses heat at home and finds that a "heat pack helps a lot."

The cervical spine range of motion is within functional limit with pain to the upper thoracic with flexion and extension. Cervical spine strength is 4/5. The right lateral upper extremity range of motion is within the functional limit, and strength is 5/5. Palpation is positive over paraspinal muscles at the level of C6 through to T4, with the right side being less than the left. The sensation is within normal limits.

Bobby is suffering from pain in the upper thoracic back.

To meet with Bobby on a weekly basis for modalities, including moist heat packs, ultrasound, and therapeutic exercises. The goal will be to decrease pain to a 0 and improve functionality.

SOAP note example for medical practitioners

66-year-old Darleene presents for a follow-up appointment regarding her hypertension. She reports feeling well, denying any dizziness, headaches, or fatigue.

Medical history: Darleene has no significant past medical history beyond hypertension. Her current medication regimen consists solely of HCTZ 25mg daily.

Lifestyle: Over the past three months, Darleene has successfully lost 53 pounds by implementing a low-fat diet and incorporating daily 10-minute walks. Notably, she also acknowledges consuming two glasses of wine nightly. Darleene denies using any over-the-counter medications like cold remedies or herbal supplements.

  • Vital signs:
  • BP: 153/80 mmHg
  • Pulse: 76 beats per minute
  • Weight: 155 lbs
  • Height: 55 inches
  • General appearance: Well-nourished, no acute distress.
  • HEENT: Normocephalic, atraumatic, atraumatic, atraumatic (head, eyes, ears, nose, throat - all normal).
  • Neck: Supple, no jugular venous distention (JVD).
  • Lungs: Clear to auscultation bilaterally.
  • Heart: Regular rate and rhythm, no murmurs.
  • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no organomegaly.
  • Extremities: No edema.

Darleene is here for a follow-up of her hypertension. It is not well-controlled since blood pressure is above the goal of 135/85. A possible trigger to her poor control of HTN may be her alcohol use or the presence of obesity.

1. Lifestyle modifications:

  • Continue low-fat diet and exercise: Encourage Darleene to maintain her current healthy diet.
  • Increase physical activity: Recommend gradually increasing walking duration to 20-30 minutes daily to further support weight loss and overall health.
  • Moderate alcohol intake: Discuss the potential negative impact of excessive alcohol consumption on blood pressure control. Darleene agrees to limit her wine intake to weekend evenings only as a trial to assess its effect on her BP.

2. Monitoring and follow-up:

  • Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring: Instruct Darleene to monitor her BP regularly at home and maintain a diary to document the readings.
  • Potassium level check: Schedule a blood test to assess her potassium level due to the potential electrolyte imbalance associated with diuretic use.
  • Follow-up appointment: Schedule a follow-up clinic visit in one month. At this visit, Darleene should bring her BP diary for review. Based on her progress, blood pressure readings, and overall evaluation, the addition of an ACE inhibitor medication might be considered if BP remains uncontrolled.

SOAP note example for  massage therapists

Fred stated that it had been about one month since his last treatment. Fred stated that he "has been spending a lot more time on his computer" and attributes his increased tension in his upper back and neck to this. Currently, Fred experiences a dull aching 4/10 in his left trapezius area. He "would like a relaxation massage with a focus on my neck and shoulders."

Tenderness at the left superior angle of the scapula. Gross BUE and cervical strength. A full body massage was provided. TrPs at right upper traps and scapula. Provided client with education on posture when at the computer. Issued handouts and instructed on exercises. All treatment kept within Pt.

Fred reported 1/10 pain following treatment. Good understanding, return demonstration of stretches and exercises—no adverse reactions to treatment.

To continue DT and TRP work on upper back and neck as required. Reassess posture and sitting at the next visit.

Benefits of using a SOAP note template

Using a SOAP note template will lead to many benefits for you and your practice. These include: 

  • Consistency : If you use a SOAP note template, your progress notes will have a consistent format. In addition to simplifying your writing process, using compatible templates will make it easier for other providers to read your notes. 
  • Accuracy : SOAP note templates haven't just been created to make things easier for practitioners and aim to improve the quality of your documentation. Separating your notes into four sections ensures you cover all the correct information and don't forget any crucial details. 
  • Save time:  Using SOAP note templates will also save you much time. Your documentation is already formatted well; you must fill in the missing information. 

SOAP note downloadable templates

Now you know the benefits of using a SOAP note template, here are some downloadable options for you to choose from:

  • Basic SOAP note template : Sometimes, simple is best. This SOAP note template separates the page into four relevant sections so you can lay out your information appropriately.  ‍
  • SOAP note template with a diagram :  Perfect for physiotherapists and massage therapists, this SOAP note template includes a body diagram so practitioners can be as specific with their information as possible.

Why go digital with SOAP Notes?

The healthcare landscape is changing, and technology offers clinicians exciting options. Software specifically designed for SOAP medical notes simplifies documentation, improves efficiency, and offers several key benefits:

  • Effortless templates: Access and customize pre-built SOAP templates to save time and ensure consistent formatting.
  • Secure storage: Ditch overflowing cabinets! SOAP note software offers secure, cloud-based storage solutions, keeping patient records readily accessible.
  • Streamlined compliance: Navigate HIPAA regulations with confidence. The right software handles data security and privacy protocols for you.
  • Time savings: Focus on what matters most—your patients. Streamline documentation and free up valuable time for patient care.

By adopting SOAP note software, you can modernize your practice, enhance efficiency, and ultimately, prioritize patient care.

Top 5 software solutions to write SOAP Notes

Many different software options are available for healthcare practitioners, and sometimes, it can be hard to know where to look. We've done some research and identified what we think to be the top 5 software solutions for writing SOAP notes. 

1. Carepatron

Carepatron  is our number one when it comes to healthcare software. Integrated with extensive progress note templates, clinical documentation resources, and storage capabilities, Carepatron is your one-stop shop. 

The platform offers additional practice management tools, including:

  • Appointment scheduling
  • Appointment reminders
  • Medical billing
  • Client portal
  • Dictation software

And most importantly, everything is HIPAA-compliant!

Carepatron has a free plan that is perfect for smaller businesses or start-up practices. If you want additional features, the  Professional Plan  is $12/month, and the Organization Plan is $19/month. 

2. TherapyNotes

TherapyNotes  is a platform that offers documentation templates, including SOAP, to healthcare practitioners. The system integrates with a documentation library, allowing clinicians to store all their progress notes safely. Due to their practical progress note tools, TherapyNotes facilitates effective communication and coordination of care across a client's providers. 

  • Solo Plan: $49/month
  • Group Plan: $59/month

3. TheraNest

TheraNest's  software gives clinicians unlimited group and individual therapy note templates. These notes are customizable and integrated with helpful tools like drop-down bars and DSM 5 codes.

  • Up to 30 clients: $39/month
  • Up to 40 clients: $50/month
  • Up to 50 clients: $60/month
  • Up to 80 clients: $90/month

Tebra is a widespread practice management software integrated with SOAP note templates. It allows clinicians to streamline documentation with valuable features, including autosave and drop-down options. 

If you are interested in pricing, you should contact Tebra directly. 

5. Simple Practice

Simple Practice is our final recommendation if you are looking for documentation software. Simple Practice offers a comprehensive selection of fully customizable note templates. Integrated with Wiley Treatment Planners, the platform allows you to choose from a wide range of pre-written treatment goals, objectives, and interventions. 

  • Starter Plan: $29/month
  • Essential Plan: $69/month
  • Plus Plan: $99/month

Drive your SOAP Note success with Carepatron

Empower your practice with Carepatron, the all-in-one solution for efficient and secure SOAP note management!

Carepatron's user-friendly software simplifies note-taking, saving precious time while ensuring precise and consistent documentation. Leverage pre-built templates, secure cloud storage, and built-in compliance features to streamline workflow and prioritize patient care.

Ready to experience the difference? Sign up for your free Carepatron trial today and see how easy SOAP notes can be!

Further reading: 

  • SOAP Notes for Physical Therapy
  • 10 Quick Tips for Chiropractors Writing SOAP Notes
  • SOAP Note - Example
  • Making Psychology SOAP Notes More Efficient
  • Introduction to Writing SOAP Notes with Examples (2022)

Nursing Software

Related Articles

30 Speech Therapy Games

Unleash the power of speech therapy! ️Our guide equips healthcare pros with everything they need to know: tips, strategies, & 30+ engaging speech therapy ideas & games!

RJ Gumban

Insights into Mental Health Crises: What you need to know

Explore the intricacies of a mental health crisis, understanding its signs, impacts, and intervention strategies for healthcare professionals.

Audrey Liz Perez

Speech Pathology vs Speech Therapy

Explore the distinctions between speech pathology and speech therapy, understanding their roles, objectives, and impacts in the healthcare profession.

Differential Diagnosis: definition and examples

Learn more about Differential Diagnosis across different symptom presentations and how to apply it in defining accurate diagnoses.

Gale Alagos

List of Thinking Errors

Explore our comprehensive guide on common thinking errors and learn practical strategies to counteract these cognitive distortions for a healthier mindset.

How to Start a Therapy Session

Discover essential steps to initiate a therapy session effectively, ensuring a supportive and productive environment for personal growth and healing.

30 Health Coach Questions to Ask During a Session

Drive behavior change and set health and wellness goals. Elevate your practice with 30 Health Coach Questions to Ask During a Session!

Karina Jimenea

How to Practice Mindful Meditation

Discover the art of mindful meditation to enhance your well-being. Our guide offers simple steps to practice mindfulness, improve focus, and reduce stress.

30 Anger Journal Prompts

Discover 30 insightful Anger Journal Prompts to navigate and understand your emotions constructively. Start your journey towards self-development today!

How to Get Coaching Clients

Discover effective strategies to attract coaching clients. Learn how to grow your coaching business successfully, from networking to online marketing.

Weight Loss Program for Lasting Results

Struggling with weight loss? Compare top programs, tailor to lifestyle, set goals, integrate activity & more for lasting results.

Joshua Napilay

Dietitian Skills

Dietitians are food experts in healthcare! Learn about their skills and how they help unlock the power of food for your health.

10 Health Coaching Skills

Discover essential health coach skills for guiding client transformations in health and wellness. Learn to offer practical support for lasting change.

Characteristics of a Good Therapist

Discover the characteristics of a good therapist. This insightful guide explores the counseling process and how they address mental problems.

Non-compliance in Healthcare

Explore non-compliance in healthcare, from patient behaviors to provider challenges. Learn how it impacts outcomes and strategies for improvement.

Discover the Most Effective Weight Loss Program for Lasting Results

Similarities Between EMR and EHR

Learn about the similarities between EMR and EHR systems. Find out which option is the best for your healthcare organization.

Ericka Pingol

10 Ethical Issues in Counseling

Explore the crucial role of ethics in counseling, ensuring trust, safety, and respect in the therapeutic relationship for client well-being.

Telita Montales

Join 10,000+ teams using Carepatron to be more productive

' src=

  • Therapy Tools

Writing SOAP Notes, Step-by-Step: Examples + Templates

soap notes examples templates

Documentation is never the main draw of a helping profession, but progress notes are essential to great patient care. By providing a helpful template for therapists and healthcare providers, SOAP notes can reduce admin time while improving communication between all parties involved in a patient’s care.

In a few sections, we’ll give a clear overview of how therapy SOAP notes are written, along with helpful templates and software you can use to streamline the process even further. If you’re looking for a more efficient, concise way to document your telehealth sessions, this helpful guide will be of value.

How To Write Therapy SOAP Notes

Therapy SOAP notes follow a distinct structure that allows medical and mental health professionals to organize their progress notes precisely. [1]

As standardized documentation guidelines, they help practitioners assess, diagnose, and treat clients using information from their observations and interactions.

Importantly, therapy SOAP notes include vital information on a patient’s health status. This information can be shared with other stakeholders involved in their wellbeing for a more informed, collaborative approach to their care, as shown:

Quenza SOAP Note Example Physical Therapy Software

It’s critical to remember that digital SOAP notes must be shared securely and privately, using a HIPAA-compliant teletherapy platform . Here, we used Quenza.

The S.O.A.P Acronym

SOAP is an acronym for the 4 sections, or headings, that each progress note contains:

  • Subjective: Where a client’s subjective experiences, feelings, or perspectives are recorded. This might include subjective information from a patient’s guardian or someone else involved in their care.
  • Objective: For a more complete overview of a client’s health or mental status, Objective information must also be recorded. This section records substantive data, such as facts and details from the therapy session.
  • Assessment: Practitioners use their clinical reasoning to record information here about a patient’s diagnosis or health status. A detailed Assessment section should integrate “subjective” and “objective” data in a professional interpretation of all the evidence thus far, and
  • Plan: Where future actions are outlined. This section relates to a patient’s treatment plan and any amendments that might be made to it.

A well-completed SOAP note is a useful reference point within a patient’s health record. Like BIRP notes , the SOAP format itself is a useful checklist for clinicians while documenting a patient’s therapeutic progress.[REFERENCE ITEM=”Sando, K. R., Skoy, E., Bradley, C., Frenzel, J., Kirwin, J., & Urteaga, E. (2017). Assessment of SOAP note evaluation tools in colleges and schools of pharmacy. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9 (4), 576.”]

In the next section, you’ll find an even more in-depth template for SOAP notes that can be used in a wide range of therapeutic sectors.

Therapy SOAP notes include vital information on a client’s health status; this can be shared with other stakeholders for more informed, collaborative patient care.

3 Helpful Templates and Formats

With a solid grasp of the SOAP acronym, you as a practitioner can improve the informative power of your P rogress Notes, as well as the speed with which you write them. 

This generally translates into more one-on-one patient time, reduced misunderstandings, and improved health outcomes overall – so the table below should be useful.

SOAP Notes: A Step-By-Step Guide

Podder and colleagues give a great overview of the different subsections that a SOAP progress note can include. Based on their extensive article, we’ve created the following example that you can use as guidance in your work. [1]

Occupational Therapy SOAP Notes

In Occupational Therapy , a SOAP Progress Note might include the patient’s injuries and their severity, home exercises, and their effectiveness.

Based on observations and interaction with their client, an OT professional might adjust their treatment program accordingly. [2]

Laid out in the S, O, A, P format on therapy notes software , they might look like this:

SOAP Note Example Quenza

Digital SOAP note tools like Quenza, which we’ve used here, will automatically create PDF copies for download, sharing, or HIPAA-compliant storage in a centralized place.

SOAP Note Template HIPAA

Because SOAP notes are best created while a session is still fresh in their minds, therapists might look for mobile-compatible software. This way, notes can be made on the spot from a tablet or smartphone.

Recommended: How to write Occupational Therapy SOAP Notes (+3 Examples)

Applied Behavior Analysis SOAP Notes

SOAP notes also play a valuable role in Applied Behavior Analysis , by allowing professionals to organize sessions better and communicate with a client’s other medical professionals. Legally, they may also accompany insurance claims to evidence the service being provided. [3]

It is important to remember that ABA SOAP notes , as psychotherapeutic documents, must be stored privately. They may form part of a client’s overall medical file other therapy notes.

These illustrative Occupational Therapy SOAP Notes and ABA SOAP Notes also exemplify how versatile SOAP notes can be. [4]

It’s why the framework is a commonly used standard in sectors such as Physical Therapy , Nursing, Rehabilitation, Speech Therapy , and more.

5 Examples of Effective Note-Taking

Many therapy software systems help to speed up the documentation of progress notes through in-built templates and diagnostic codes. At the end of the day, however, clinically valuable notes require careful thought and judgment when it comes to their content.

Effective notes are generally: [5]

  • Written immediately following a therapy session. This way, a practitioner’s in-session time is spent focused on patient engagement and care ; writing notes immediately after helps minimize common mistakes such as forgetting details or recall bias.
  • Professional. An important part of patient Electronic Health Records , SOAP notes should be legible and make use of professional jargon to serve as a common frame of reference. They should be written in the present tense.
  • Concise and specific. Overly wordy progress notes unnecessarily complicate the decision-making process for other practitioners involved in a patient’s care. Brief, but pertinent information helps other providers reach conclusions more efficiently.
  • Unbiased: In the Subjective section, particularly, there is little need for practitioners to use weighty statements, overly positive, negative, or otherwise judgmental language. SOAP notes are frequently used both as legal documents and in insurance claims.
  • Utilize appropriate details, such as direct quotes: For a more comprehensive document that includes all the salient facts of an encounter.
An effective SOAP note is a useful reference point in a patient’s health record, helping improve patient satisfaction and quality of care.

3 Smart Software Solutions

In this section, we’ve reviewed three of the top  practice management software systems offering helpful SOAP note functions.

These include SOAP note templates, discipline-specific codes, and treatment planning features that integrate with therapy progress notes.

Final Thoughts

With clear, consistent information on a patient’s health status and progress, therapists, psychiatrists, and counselors are much better equipped to manage their well-being. And while note-taking may not be glamorous, harnessing the right software can significantly reduce the time you spend on this vital part of healthcare .

SOAP notes play a pivotal role in streamlined, effective healthcare, and are a daily part of life for many practitioners. If you’ve tried and enjoyed using any particular templates, forms, or therapy notes solutions, let us know in a comment.

We hope this article has helped you streamline your note-taking. To put these tips into practice, don’t forget to try Quenza’s SOAP Notes tools for just $1 a month .

If you want to enhance the wellbeing of your clients more effectively, Quenza will give you everything you need to streamline your therapy notes, so you can focus on delivering the wellness results that matter.

  • ^ Podder, V., Lew, V., & Ghassemzadeh, S. (2020). SOAP Notes. StatPearls. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482263/
  • ^ Fusion Therapy. (2020). How To Write Therapy SOAP Notes.. Retrieved from: https://blog.fusionwebclinic.com/soap-notes-for-occupational-therapy
  • ^ WebABA. (2020). Simple Guidelines for Writing SOAP Notes. Retrieved from https://webaba.com/2020/07/01/aba-practice-daily-simple-guidelines-for-writing-soap-notes/
  • ^ Belden, J. L., Koopman, R. J., Patil, S. J., Lowrance, N. J., Petroski, G. F., & Smith, J. B. (2017). Dynamic electronic health record note prototype: seeing more by showing less. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 30 (6), 691.
  • ^ Fusion Therapy. (2020). How To Write Therapy SOAP Notes. Retrieved from: https://blog.fusionwebclinic.com/soap-notes-for-occupational-therapy

thanks for info

Leave a reply Cancel

Your email address will not be published.

case study soap format

Download free guide (PDF)

Discover how to engage your clients on autopilot while radically scaling your coaching practice.

Coach, This Changes Everything (Free PDF)

Accurate Clinical Documentation: Exploring SOAP Notes

case study soap format

Effortless clinical notes with speech recognition AI

Maintaining accurate clinical documentation, including SOAP notes, is fundamental to a thriving healthcare practice. As the medical landscape progresses, our methods for managing clinical records, such as the SOAP note format, must evolve in tandem. This article is a comprehensive guide aimed at enhancing clinical documentation skills, including understanding the SOAP acronym medical and the SOAP notes meaning, at any stage of your medical career.

The Rationale Behind Clinical Documentation

Often perceived as a tedious task within the bustling healthcare environment, clinical documentation, especially maintaining patient records, should be recognized for its importance. Medical records are a critical component, transcending a mere checkbox on your list of responsibilities.

Communication

A patient’s record, or patient note, is a vital tool for communication among healthcare providers. Thorough documentation provides subsequent providers, including yourself, with insights into the patient’s condition and the logic underpinning the chosen treatment plan, thereby ensuring continuity of high-quality patient care.

Legal Consideration

Medical records not only facilitate patient care but also act as legal documents, meeting regulatory requirements and subject to close examination in the face of a malpractice lawsuit. Precise documentation of sensitive conversations about treatment decisions, care limitations, and prognosis is imperative.

Reimbursement

Clinical notes, or clinic notes, are not just records but also service documents. The precision of these notes is pivotal for securing reimbursement, which in turn impacts the cost and revenue aspects of your healthcare business or the institution you represent.

Setting the Context Right

Prior to delving into the substance of a clinical note, such as a SOAP note, it’s essential to set the correct context. Confirm that you’re documenting in the appropriate patient chart, ensure the date and time are precise, and make it clear to future readers who is the author of the note.

Ensuring the accuracy of the patient’s name, date/time, heading, and signature in the SOAP note is crucial to avoid significant time loss and adverse health outcomes. It’s essential that these basic aspects of the SOAP note are clearly stated and correct to maintain the integrity of the soap note documentation.

SOAP Method for Clinical Note Writing

Begin your clinical note with a summary of the main presenting issues, followed by the SOAP method for documentation that is both clear and consistent. This approach, often referred to as the soap note format, helps in maintaining a structured clinical note and is integral to the soap acronym medical documentation process.

The patient’s account of their condition, often detailed in the HPI (History of Present Illness) section of a SOAP note, should be expressed in their own words. It’s important to include the chronology, quality, and severity of the symptoms, as well as details on the onset, to accurately reflect the hpi and history of present illness.

In the Objective section of your SOAP documentation, record measurable facts about the patient’s status, such as vital signs, observations, results from the physical exam findings, and any pertinent lab results. These objective data are critical for a comprehensive clinical assessment.

Your primary medical diagnosis or interpretation of the data should be included in the Assessment section, based on the subjective and objective information gathered. This is a critical part of clinical reasoning and diagnoses, which informs the subsequent steps in patient care.

Finally, outline a specific treatment plan in your SOAP note documentation, detailing the actions taken or to be taken following the consultation, which may include medications, procedures, referral, or education. This treatment plan is essential for guiding patient care and ensuring continuity.

Road to better Clinical Documentation

Although the SOAP note structure provides a helpful framework for a clinical note, it does not ensure perfection. Here are some additional recommendations to enhance your soap note documentation and ensure it meets the highest standards of medical record-keeping.

  • Document as soon as possible after providing care
  • Be thorough yet brief
  • Be clear and avoid ambiguous terms

Legal Aspects of Clinical Documentation

Strict regulatory requirements govern the management of clinical records to ensure their accuracy, legibility, and uphold data protection, while also facilitating patient access to their own medical records.

Accuracy and Legibility

From a legal perspective, it’s crucial to document relevant clinical findings, detail the record of decisions made, actions agreed upon, and outline the proposed treatment plan, all of which are often encapsulated in consult notes.

Confidentiality and Data Protection

In the digital age, confidentiality involves not only refraining from sharing patient data without consent but also implementing necessary measures to safeguard that data against unauthorized access.

Patient Access to Medical Records

Patients are entitled to patient access to their medical records, a right that is increasingly safeguarded by law to ensure transparency and patient empowerment.

Making Clinical Notes Open and Accessible

Under the 2021 Cures Rule , all U.S. hospitals and clinicians are mandated to ensure clinical notes are promptly accessible to patients, prompting some to revise their documentation content or tone to enhance patient access and understanding. Specifically, the rule requires that hospitals enable patients to easily access their full electronic health record, including physician notes, online without delays or fees. This aims to give patients more control over their health data to promote patient empowerment and care coordination. However, some clinicians worry that open access may require removing technical jargon, subjective remarks, or sensitive topics from notes to prevent confusion or distress. Ultimately though, transparency and health literacy are vital – striking an appropriate balance will likely require ongoing clinician training plus clear communication with patients on interpreting content.

Augnito: Revolutionizing SOAP Notes

Introducing Augnito , an AI-powered ambient clinical intelligence platform that streamlines the SOAP note-taking process. Augnito allows physicians to dictate patient encounters and assessments, which are then automatically documented in the EMR as a SOAP note.

Augnito integrates seamlessly with existing EMR systems, offering high transcription accuracy and coding accuracy without the need for infrastructure upgrades, thereby reducing errors and saving time otherwise spent on proofreading and ensuring data integrity.

Keeping Clinical Documentation Efficient

Efficiency is paramount in clinical documentation efficiency. Here are seven tips for ensuring your clinical notes are completed promptly and accurately:

  • Leverage the skills of your team members
  • Complete most documentation in the room
  • Know the E/M documentation guidelines
  • Use essential EHR functions
  • Perfect clinical notes won’t be perfect
  • Forget the “opus”
  • Time yourself

In conclusion, impeccable clinical notes, including SOAP notes, not only fulfill fundamental clinical and legal standards but also harmonize with your EHR workflow. As healthcare progresses, it’s vital to evolve your approach to documentation, embracing the SOAP format and comprehending the significance of what SOAP stands for in medical terms. Regularly reviewing your SOAP documentation practices and making the necessary updates is crucial to remain aligned with the evolving SOAP notes meaning and best practices.

Table of Contents

Featured Posts

Voices of Augnito featuring Kaustubh Limaye

Voices of Augnito – feat Kaustubh Limaye, Head of Product Design.

March 28, 2024

Deploying Medical Speech Recognition at Scale in Modern Hospitals – Part 2

Imran Shaikh

Deploying Medical Speech Recognition at Scale in Modern Hospitals – Part 2

March 25, 2024

Deploying Medical Speech Recognition at Scale in Modern Hospitals - Part 1

Deploying Medical Speech Recognition at Scale in Modern Hospitals – Part 1

March 21, 2024

  • Open access
  • Published: 24 May 2023

Comparing oral case presentation formats on internal medicine inpatient rounds: a survey study

  • Brendan Appold 1 ,
  • Sanjay Saint 1 , 2 ,
  • David Ratz 2 &
  • Ashwin Gupta 1 , 2  

BMC Medical Education volume  23 , Article number:  377 ( 2023 ) Cite this article

2651 Accesses

11 Altmetric

Metrics details

Oral case presentations – structured verbal reports of clinical cases – are fundamental to patient care and learner education. Despite their continued importance in a modernized medical landscape, their structure has remained largely unchanged since the 1960s, based on the traditional Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan (SOAP) format developed for medical records. We developed a problem-based alternative known as Events, Assessment, Plan (EAP) to understand the perceived efficacy of EAP compared to SOAP among learners.

We surveyed (Qualtrics, via email) all third- and fourth-year medical students and internal medicine residents at a large, academic, tertiary care hospital and associated Veterans Affairs medical center. The primary outcome was trainee preference in oral case presentation format. The secondary outcome was comparing EAP and SOAP on 10 functionality domains assessed via a 5-point Likert scale. We used descriptive statistics (proportion and mean) to describe the results.

The response rate was 21% (118/563). Of the 59 respondents with exposure to both the EAP and SOAP formats, 69% ( n  = 41) preferred the EAP format as compared to 19% ( n  = 11) who preferred SOAP ( p  < 0.001). EAP outperformed SOAP in 8 out of 10 of the domains assessed, including advancing patient care, learning from patients, and time efficiency.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that trainees prefer the EAP format over SOAP and that EAP may facilitate clearer and more efficient communication on rounds, which in turn may enhance patient care and learner education. A broader, multi-center study of the EAP oral case presentation will help to better understand preferences, outcomes, and barriers to implementation.

Peer Review reports

Excellent inter-physician communication is fundamental to both providing high-quality patient care and promoting learner education [ 1 ], and has been recognized as an important educational goal by the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine, the Association of American Medical Colleges, and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education [ 2 ]. Oral case presentations, structured verbal reports of clinical cases [ 3 ], have been referred to as the “currency with which clinicians communicate” [ 4 ]. Oral case presentations are a key element of experiential learning in clinical medicine, requiring learners to synthesize, assess, and convey pertinent patient information and to formulate care plans. Furthermore, oral case presentations allow supervising clinicians to identify gaps in knowledge or clinical reasoning and enable team members to learn from one another. Despite modernization in much of medicine, oral case presentation formats have remained largely unchanged, based on the traditional Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan (SOAP) format developed by Dr. Lawrence Weed in his Problem Oriented Medical Record in 1968 [ 5 ].

Given that the goals of a medical record are different than those of oral case presentations, it should not be assumed that they should share the same format. While Dr. Weed sought to make the medical record as “complete as possible,” [ 6 ] internal medicine education leaders have expressed desire for oral case presentations that are succinct, with an emphasis on select relevant details [ 2 ]. Using a common SOAP format between the medical record and oral case presentations risks conflating the distinct goals for each of these communication methods. Indeed, in studying how learners gain oral case presentation skills, Haber and Lingard [ 7 ] found differences in understanding of the fundamental purpose of oral case presentations between medical students and experienced physicians. While students believed the purpose of oral case presentations was to organize the large amount of data they collected about their patients, experienced physicians saw oral case presentations as a method of telling a story to make an argument for a particular conclusion [ 7 ].

In accordance with Dr. Weed’s “problem-oriented approach to data organization,” [ 6 ] but with an eye toward optimizing for oral case presentations, we developed an alternative to SOAP known as the Events, Assessment, Plan (EAP) format. The EAP format is used for patients who are already known to the inpatient team, and may also be utilized for newly admitted patients for whom the attending physician already has context (e.g., via handoff or review of an admission note). As the EAP approach is utilized by a subset of attending physicians at our academic hospital, we sought to understand the perceived effectiveness of the EAP format in comparison to the traditional SOAP format among learners (i.e., medical students and resident physicians).

EAP is a problem-based format used at the discretion of the attending physician. In line with suggested best practices [ 8 ], the EAP structure aims to facilitate transmission of data integrated within the context of clinical problem solving. In this format, significant interval events are discussed first (e.g., a fall, new-onset abdominal pain), followed by a prioritized assessment and plan for each relevant active problem. Subjective and objective findings are integrated into the assessment and plan as relevant to a particular problem. This integration of subjective and objective findings by problem is distinct from SOAP, where subjective and objective findings are presented separately as their own sections, with each section often containing information that is relevant to several problems (Fig.  1 , Additional file 1 : Appendix A).

figure 1

Overview: comparing EAP to SOAP

Settings and participants

We surveyed third- and fourth-year medical students, and first- through fourth-year internal medicine and internal medicine-pediatrics residents, caring for patients at a large, academic, tertiary care hospital and an affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center. Internal medicine is a 12-week core clerkship for all medical students in their second year, with 8 weeks spent on the inpatient wards. All student participants had completed their internal medicine clerkship rotation at the time of the survey. We did not conduct a sample size calculation at the outset of this study.

Data collection methods and processes

An anonymous, electronic survey (Qualtrics, Provo, UT) was created to assess student and resident experience with and preference between EAP and SOAP oral case presentation formats during inpatient internal medicine rounds (Additional file 2 : Appendix B). Ten domains were assessed via 5-point Likert scale (1 [strongly disagree] to 5 [strongly agree]), including the ability of the format to incorporate the patient’s subjective experience, the extent to which the format encouraged distillation and integration of information, the extent to which the format focused on the assessment and plan, the format’s ability to help trainees learn from their own patients and those of their peers, time efficiency, and ease of use. Duration of exposure to each format was also assessed, as were basic demographic data for the purposes of understanding outcome differences among respondents (e.g., students versus residents). For those who had experienced both formats, preference between formats was recorded as a binary choice. Participants additionally had the opportunity to provide explanation via free text. For participants with experience in both formats, the order of evaluation of EAP and SOAP formats were randomized by participant. For questions comparing EAP and SOAP formats directly, choice order was randomized.

The survey was distributed via official medical school email in October 2021 and was available to be completed for 20 days. Email reminders were distributed approximately one week after distribution and again 48 h prior to survey conclusion.

The primary outcome was trainee preference in oral case presentation format. Secondary outcomes included comparison between EAP and SOAP on content inclusion/focus, data integration, learning, time efficiency, and ease of use.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were used to describe the results (proportion and mean). For comparative analysis between EAP and SOAP, responses from respondents who had experience with both formats were compared using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test to evaluate differences. All statistical analyses were done using SAS V9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). We considered p  < 0.05 to be statistically significant.

The overall response rate was 21% (118/563). The response rate was 14% ( n  = 62/441) among medical students and 46% ( n  = 56/122) among residents. Respondents were 61% ( n  = 72) female. A total of 98% ( n  = 116) and 52% ( n  = 61) of respondents reported experience with SOAP and EAP formats, respectively. Among medical students, 60% ( n  = 37) reported experience with SOAP only while 39% ( n  = 24) had experience with both formats. Among residents, 36% ( n  = 20) and 63% ( n  = 35) had experience with SOAP only and both formats, respectively (Table 1 ). Most students (93%) and residents (96%) reported > 8 weeks of exposure to the SOAP format. Duration of exposure to the EAP format varied (0 to 2 weeks [32% of students, 17% of residents], 2 to 4 weeks [36% of students, 47% of residents], 4 to 8 weeks [16% of students, 25% of residents], and > 8 weeks [16% of students, 11% of residents]).

Of the 59 respondents with exposure to both the SOAP and EAP formats, 69% ( n  = 41) preferred the EAP format as compared to 19% ( n  = 11) preferring SOAP ( p  < 0.001). The remainder ( n  = 7, 12%) indicated either no preference between formats or indicated another preference. Among residents, 66% ( n  = 23) favored EAP, whereas 20% ( n  = 7) and 14% ( n  = 5) preferred SOAP or had no preference, respectively ( p  < 0.001). Among students, 75% ( n  = 18) favored EAP, whereas 17% ( n  = 4) and 8% ( n  = 2) favored SOAP or had no preference, respectively ( p  < 0.001).

Likert scale ratings for domains assessed by trainees who had experience in either format are shown in Table 2 . In general, scores for each domain were higher for EAP than SOAP, with the exception of perceived ease of use among students. Among those with experience using both formats, EAP outperformed SOAP most prominently in time efficiency (mean 4.39 vs 2.59, p  < 0.001) and encouragement to: focus on assessment and plan (4.64 vs 3.05, p  < 0.001), distill pertinent information (4.63 vs 3.17, p  < 0.001), and integrate data (4.58 vs 3.31, p  < 0.001) (Table 3 ). Respondents also ranked EAP higher in its effectiveness at advancing patient care (4.31 vs 3.71, p  < 0.001), its capacity to convey one’s thinking (4.53 vs 3.95, p  < 0.001), and its ability to facilitate learning from peers (4.10 vs 3.58, p  < 0.001) and one’s own patients (4.24 vs 3.78, p  = 0.003). There were no significant differences in the amount of time allotted for discussing the patient’s subjective experience or in ease of use.

Evaluation of trainee free text responses regarding oral case presentation preference revealed several general themes (Table 4 ). First, respondents generally felt that EAP was more time efficient and less repetitive, allowing for additional time to be spent discussing pertinent patient care decisions. Second, several respondents indicated that EAP aligns well with how trainees consider problems naturally (as a single problem in completion). Finally, respondents generally believed that EAP allowed learners to effectively communicate their thinking and demonstrate their knowledge. Those preferring SOAP most often cited format familiarity and the difficulty in switching between formats in describing their preference, though some also believed SOAP was more effective in describing a patient’s current status.

Our single site survey comparing 2 oral case presentation formats revealed a preference among respondents for EAP over SOAP for those medical students and internal medicine residents who had experience with both formats. Furthermore, EAP outperformed SOAP in 8 out of 10 of the functionality domains assessed, including areas such as advancing patient care, learning from patients, and, particularly, time efficiency. Such a constellation of findings implies that EAP may not only be a more effective means to accomplish the key goals of oral case presentations, but it may also provide an opportunity to save time in the process. In line with SOAP’s current de facto status as an oral case presentation format, almost all respondents reported exposure to the SOAP format. Still, indicative of EAP’s growing presence at our academic system, more than one third of medical students and more than one half of residents also reported having experience with the EAP format.

While limited data exist that compare alternative oral case presentations to SOAP on inpatient medicine rounds, such alternatives have been previously trialed in other clinical venues. One such format, the multiple mini-SOAP, developed for complex outpatient visits, encourages each problem to be addressed “in its entirety” before presenting subsequent problems, and emphasizes prioritization by problem pertinency [ 9 ]. The creators suggest that this approach encourages more active trainee participation in formulating the assessment and plan for each problem, by helping the trainee to avoid getting lost in an “undifferentiated jumble of problems and possibilities” [ 9 ] that accumulate when multiple problems are presented all at once. On the receiving end, the multiple mini-SOAP enables faculty to assess student understanding of specific clinical problems one at a time and facilitates focused teaching accordingly.

Another approach has been assessed in the emergency department. Specifically, Maddow and colleagues explored assessment-oriented oral case presentations to increase efficiency in communication between residents and faculty at the University of Chicago [ 10 ]. In the assessment-oriented format, instead of being presented in a stylized order, pertinent information was integrated into the analysis. The authors found that assessment-oriented oral case presentations were about 40% faster than traditional presentations without significant differences in case presentation effectiveness.

Prior to our study, the nature of the format for inpatient medicine oral case presentations had thus far escaped scrutiny. This is despite the fact that oral case presentations are time (and therefore resource) intensive, and that they play an integral role in patient care and learner education. Our study demonstrates that learners favor the EAP format, which has the potential to increase both the effectiveness and efficiency of rounding.

Still, it should be noted that a transition to EAP does present challenges. Implementing this problem-based presentation format requires a conscious effort to ensure a continued holistic approach to patient care: active problems should be defined and addressed in accordance with patient preferences, and the patient’s subjective experience should be meaningfully incorporated into the assessment and plan for each problem. During initial implementation, attending physicians and learners must internalize this new format, often through trial and error.

From there, on an ongoing basis, EAP may require more upfront preparation by attending physicians as compared to SOAP. While chart review by attendings in advance of rounding is useful regardless of the format utilized, this practice is especially important for the EAP format, where trainees are empowered to interpret and distill – rather than simply report a complete set of – information. Therefore, the attending physician must be aware of pertinent data prior to rounds to ensure that key information is not neglected. Specifically, attendings should pre-orient themselves with laboratory values, imaging, and other studies completed, and new suggestions from consultants. More extensive pre-work may be required if teams wish to employ the EAP format for newly admitted patients, as attending physicians must also familiarize themselves with a patient’s medical history and their current presentation prior to initial team rounds.

Our findings should be interpreted within the context of specific limitations. First, low response rates may have led to selection bias within our surveyed population. For instance, learners who desired change in the oral case presentation format may have been more motivated to engage with our survey. Second, there could be unmeasured confounding variables that could have skewed our results in favor of the EAP format. For example, attendings who utilized the EAP format may have been more likely to innovate in other ways to create a more positive experience for learners, which may have influenced the scoring of the oral case presentation format. Third, our findings were largely based on subjective experience. Objective measurement (e.g., duration of rounds, patient care outcomes) may lend additional credibility to our findings. Lastly, our study included only a single site, limiting our ability to generalize our findings.

Our study also had several strengths. Our learner participant pool was broad and included all third- and fourth-year medical students and all internal medicine residents at a major academic hospital. Participation was encouraged regardless of the nature of a participant’s prior exposure to different oral case presentation formats. Our survey was anonymous with randomization to mitigate order bias, and we focused our comparison analysis on those who had exposure to both the EAP and SOAP formats. We collected data to compare EAP with SOAP in 2 distinct ways: head-to-head preference and numeric ratings amongst key domains. Both of these methods demonstrated a significant preference for EAP among learners in aggregate, as well as for students and residents analyzed independently.

Our findings suggest a preference for the EAP format over SOAP, and that EAP may facilitate clearer and more efficient communication on rounds. These improvements may in turn enhance patient care and learner education. While our preliminary data are compelling, a broader, multi-center study of the EAP oral case presentation is necessary to better understand preferences, outcomes, and barriers to implementation. Further studies should seek to improve response rates, for the data to represent a larger proportion of trainees. One potential strategy to improve response rates among medical students and residents is to survey them directly at the end of each internal medicine clerkship period or rotation, respectively. Ultimately, EAP may prove to be a much-needed update to the “currency with which clinicians communicate.”

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, AG, upon reasonable request.

Kihm JT, Brown JT, Divine GW, Linzer M. Quantitative analysis of the outpatient oral case presentation: piloting a method. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6(3):233–6.

Article   Google Scholar  

Green EH, Durning SJ, DeCherrie L, Fagan MJ, Sharpe B, Hershman W. Expectations for oral case presentations for clinical clerks: opinions of internal medicine clerkship directors. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(3):370–3.

Daniel M, Rencic J, Durning SJ, Holmboe E, Santen SA, Lang V, et al. Clinical Reasoning Assessment Methods: A Scoping Review and Practical Guidance. Acad Med. 2019;94(6):902–12.

Lewin LO, Beraho L, Dolan S, Millstein L, Bowman D. Interrater reliability of an oral case presentation rating tool in a pediatric clerkship. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(1):31–8.

Wright A, Sittig DF, McGowan J, Ash JS, Weed LL. Bringing science to medicine: an interview with Larry Weed, inventor of the problem-oriented medical record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(6):964–8.

Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach. New Engl J Med. 1968;278(12):652–7.

Haber RJ, Lingard LA. Learning oral presentation skills: a rhetorical analysis with pedagogical and professional implications. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(5):308–14.

Wiese J, Saint S, Tierney LM. Using clinical reasoning to improve skills in oral case presentation. Semin Med Pract. 2002;5(3):29–36.

Google Scholar  

Schillinger E, LeBaron S. The multiple mini-SOAP format for student presentations of complex patients. Fam Med. 2003;35(1):13–4.

Maddow CL, Shah MN, Olsen J, Cook S, Howes DS. Efficient communication: assessment-oriented oral case presentation. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(8):842–7.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jason M. Engle, MPH, who helped edit, prepare, format, and submit this manuscript and supporting files.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Brendan Appold, Sanjay Saint & Ashwin Gupta

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA

Sanjay Saint, David Ratz & Ashwin Gupta

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: BA SS AG. Data curation: BA DR AG. Formal Analysis: BA SS DR AG. Funding acquisition: SS AG. Investigation: BA SS AG. Methodology: BA SS AG. Project administration: BA SS AG. Resources: SS AG. Software: DR. Supervision: SS AG. Validation: BA SS DR AG. Visualization: BA SS DR AG. Writing – original draft: BA AG. Writing – review & editing: BA SS DR AG. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashwin Gupta .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The need for ethical approval was waived by the ethics committee/Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan Medical School. The need for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee/Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan Medical School.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Dr. Saint, Mr. Ratz, and Dr. Gupta are employed by the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr. Saint reports receiving grants from the Department of Veterans Affairs and personal fees from ISMIE Mutual Insurance Company, Jvion, and Doximity. Dr. Appold, Mr. Ratz, and Dr. Gupta report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:.

Appendix A. Exemplar Transcripts (EAP, SOAP).

Additional file 2:

Appendix B. Survey Instrument.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Appold, B., Saint, S., Ratz, D. et al. Comparing oral case presentation formats on internal medicine inpatient rounds: a survey study. BMC Med Educ 23 , 377 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04292-3

Download citation

Received : 24 August 2022

Accepted : 22 April 2023

Published : 24 May 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04292-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Medical education
  • Oral case presentations

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

case study soap format

5 Perfect Nursing SOAP Note Examples + How to Write

case study soap format

One of the most important parts of a nurse’s job is documentation, and there are several types of nurses' notes used in nursing care today. Nursing notes are the way healthcare providers communicate and promote continuity of care. In this article, we will discuss one type of nursing notes, SOAP nursing notes. I will answer the question, “What is a nursing SOAP note?” I will also share the steps to writing a good SOAP nursing note and provide you with 5 perfect nursing SOAP note examples + how to write them.

WHAT IS A NURSING SOAP NOTE?

Who developed nursing soap notes, what is the purpose of writing a nursing soap note, what is the difference between a nursing soap note and a nursing progress note, 4 advantages of nursing soap notes, advantage #1: nursing soap notes facilitate clinical reasoning., advantage #2: soap nursing notes promote active listening., advantage #3: soap nursing notes help create a detailed medical history., advantage #4: nursing soap notes help facilitate communication between nurses and doctors., 3 disadvantages of nursing soap notes, disadvantage #1: many nurses and healthcare providers question the order of the soap nursing note format., disadvantage #2: patients may have several complaints that must be addressed., disadvantage #3: gathering information to determine patient progress can be time-consuming with soap nursing notes., what elements should be included in a nursing soap note, 1. subjective data (s):, 2. objective data (o):, 3. assessment findings (a):, 4. plan of care (p):, what elements should not be included in a nursing soap note, 1. information that is irrelevant to the patient’s current condition:, 2. speculations about the patient’s symptoms or feelings:, 3. confusing pronouns:, 4. avoid judgmental statements:, 5. avoid using slang terms or unprofessional phrases:, how to write a perfect nursing soap note, what are the perfect examples of nursing soap notes, 5 most common mistakes to avoid while writing nursing soap notes, mistake #1: not naming the source of information, about the mistake:, how to avoid:, mistake #2: not providing supporting objective data, mistake #3: repeating subjective and objective data in the assessment section, mistake #4: rewriting the whole treatment plan, mistake #5: assuming the first complaint is the “chief” complaint, bonus 5 expert tips for writing nursing soap notes faster, tip #1: write your note at an appropriate time., tip #2: use direct statements, avoiding overly wordy content., tip #3: be specific and to the point., tip #4: document each patient encounter as soon as possible., tip #5: connect interventions with your diagnosis., my final thoughts, frequently asked questions answered by our expert, 1. who can write a nursing soap note, 2. when to write a nursing soap note, 3. do nurses write soap notes every shift, 4. ideally, how long should nursing soap notes be, 5. what’s the most important part of a nursing soap note, 6. can i use abbreviations in a nursing soap note, 7. what tense do i write a nursing soap note, 8. are nursing soap notes handwritten or printed, 9. how to sign off a nursing soap note, 10. what happens if i forget to write a soap note on the time it should have been written, 11. can a nursing student write a nursing soap note.

case study soap format

SOAP Note Case Study

Subjective section, objective analysis, assessment analysis, nursing theorist.

R.A is a 16-year-old female with type 1diabetes first diagnosed 5 years ago. She is also obese and has hypothyroidism. She was binge drinking, but quit 2 years ago upon being advised that alcohol could worsen her health condition.

Unless when she has an emergency, she usually comes to the hospital for follow-up every month. Today, she has come for routine follow-up. Although she is asymptomatic, her blood pressure is 170/99 mmHg. She does not report any episodes or symptoms of hypoglycemia. She was using insulin, but stopped 8 months ago after she improved her condition.

R.A has a healthy appearance and she is not characterized by signs of acute distress. Upon being physically examined, it is shown that she has a height of 165cm, weight of 90kg and a pulse rate of 86 beats per minute. The physical examination also reveals that she has a blood pressure of 170/99 mmHg. She does not present with retinopathy or thyromegaly (the retina is healthy and the thyroid glands are not inflamed). Also, she does not have diabetic foot ulcers that are common in diabetic patients.

Laboratory tests show that she has proteinuria, a cholesterol level of 230mg/dL, normal TSH levels, Hb level of 9.5%, creatinine level of 1.7mg/dL, glucose level of 190mg/dL, HDL and LDL of 134 and 35mg/dL respectively. Also, laboratory results reveal that she has normal electrolytes.

Related complications

These are complications with which the patient presents. They are the following:

  • Hypertension
  • Dyslipidemia
  • Nephropathy that is confirmed by proteins in the blood. It is an indication that kidney nephrons are not functioning well to ultra-filter blood. Thus, excreted urine has traces of proteins (Ludvigsson et al., 2008).

Risk factors

Risk factors could worsen type 1 diabetes in the patient. They are the following factors:

  • Obesity, which is indicated by a body mass index (BMI) of greater than 25.
  • Kidney malfunction (indicated by a high creatinine value of 1.7mg/dL).
  • Hypertension (readings are greater than 140/90 mmHg).
  • A1C>/= 5.7%.

Therapeutic goals

  • Clinical efforts should focus on controlling glycemia to A1C level less than 7%. (However, caution should be taken so that hypoglycemia cannot be caused in the process of controlling blood sugar).
  • It should be a goal to prevent cardiovascular disease from occurring in the patient (This could be a serious complication).
  • Reduce blood pressure to values lower than 130/80 mmHg. This is the recommended upper limit of blood pressure for diabetic patients (Ludvigsson et al., 2008).
  • Cardiovascular disease risks should be reduced by encouraging the patient to feed on food that helps to maintain healthy cholesterol levels. For healthy persons, the low density lipoprotein (LDL) should not exceed 100 (Ludvigsson et al., 2008).

Current medication

R.A says that she is not on medications. A treatment should be initiated to lower A1C and help to control symptoms associated with type 1diabetes and other conditions. Other therapies may also be started to help to prevent complications that are foreseeable in the near future (Bergenstal et al., 2010).

Further laboratory tests and work-up

  • Tests to assess liver functions. Biochemical liver tests determine levels of biochemical compounds crucial in regulating normal physiological functions. Elevated levels of biochemical in the liver would indicate that liver functions are altered.
  • In order to confirm that the patient has hypertension, blood pressure test would be repeated. If found to be normal, then the test will have to be conducted by many laboratories to determine the true values (Ludvigsson et al., 2008, Bergenstal et al., 2010).
  • CBC should be conducted so that infections can be ruled out or monitored. It is important to rule out infections in the patient because they could lead to worsening of her condition. Also, it is important to manage the infections with the right medications.
  • List of effective and failed medications.
  • A detailed family history to establish whether there are any relatives who have suffered from the same condition (type 1 diabetes) and the time of onset.
  • Immunizations received in the past and their clinical implications. A review would be done to assess whether previous immunizations could have interfered with the normal immune system of the patient.
  • Trends of adhering to medications offered in the past and barriers that hindered the patient from adhering to the medications. The medical history will help to select the best therapies to provide and ways of addressing barriers that could make the patient not take medications as prescribed (Ludvigsson et al., 2008).

Treatment recommendations

The diabetic patient will be put on insulin. In addition, she needs to adopt a healthy lifestyle that will involve feeding on a balanced diet characterized by significant amounts of carbohydrates. Also, body exercises will greatly help the patient to live a healthy life (Chase et al., 2008). Her blood pressure problem could be addressed by taking lisinopril 10mg daily.

  • Insulin use requires routine monitoring of blood glucose levels (Bergenstal et al., 2010).
  • Carbohydrate and fat dietary intake should be monitored. Total fat dietary intake should not be greater than 7% of the total number of sources of calories (Bergenstal et al., 2010).

Health education

Educational approaches should aim to inform the patient about ways of using medications so that they could improve her condition. Also, she will be taught how to maintain a healthy lifestyle. Healthy lifestyle changes will involve a healthy diet and aerobic exercises like walking and running (Chase et al., 2008; Bergenstal et al., 2010).

Follow-up and referrals

  • A1C should be routinely monitored for a period of 3 months.
  • Hypertension should be assessed at every routine visit.
  • LDL follow-up assessments could be done every 1-2 years.
  • Referrals will be recommended when her conditions worsen. They would involve being referred to physicians or healthcare facilities dealing with specific health conditions.

Cultural interventions

No cultural interventions are recommended for this patient.

The care, core and cure nursing theory would be used to offer care to the diabetic patient. The nursing theory was formulated by Lydia E. Hall and it asserts that a patient should set his or her goals (George, 2010). If the patient in the case study sets her goals, then she would work toward achieving them, and she would be influenced by her feelings and value system. The nursing theory would greatly impact the patient to improve her condition.

Bergenstal, R. M., Tamborlane, W. V., Ahmann, A., Buse, J. B., Dailey, G., Davis, S. N…. & Wood, M. A. (2010). Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine, 363 (4), 311-320.

Chase, H. P., Fiallo-Scharer, R., Messer, L., Gage, V., Burdick, P., Laffel, L…. & Xing, D. (2008). Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 359 (14), 1464-76.

George, J. B. (2010). Nursing theories . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Ludvigsson, J., Faresjö, M., Hjorth, M., Axelsson, S., Chéramy, M., Pihl, M…. & Casas, R. (2008). GAD treatment and insulin secretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine, 359 (18), 1909-1920.

  • Chicago (A-D)
  • Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2024, January 16). SOAP Note. https://ivypanda.com/essays/soap-note-case-study/

"SOAP Note." IvyPanda , 16 Jan. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/soap-note-case-study/.

IvyPanda . (2024) 'SOAP Note'. 16 January.

IvyPanda . 2024. "SOAP Note." January 16, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/soap-note-case-study/.

1. IvyPanda . "SOAP Note." January 16, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/soap-note-case-study/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "SOAP Note." January 16, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/soap-note-case-study/.

  • "Sun Ra: A Joyful Noise" Documentary Analysis
  • "The Life and Times of Sun Ra" by John Szwed
  • Diabetes mellitus Education and hemoglobin A1C level
  • The Musculoskeletal System: Safety With Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes and Depression Treatment
  • The Hypertension Condition Analysis
  • Exercise Intensity Influence on Human Parameters
  • Stress Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
  • Diabetic Scenario: Dealing With High Blood Pressure
  • The Problem of Diabetes Among African Americans
  • A Career in Dentistry
  • Dental Hygienist: Reasons for Choosing This Career
  • Drug and Alcohol Testing
  • Family Tree and Its Importance
  • Hemoglobin A1C Test for Diabetes

Physician Assistant Student at CUNY York College

Didactic Coursework

  • Bioethics Paper
  • Health Policy
  • Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: Case Study
  • History and Physicals
  • Interviewing and Counseling: Patient Centered Interview
  • Public Health Program Development and Evaluation
  • Rotation # 9: Long Term Care
  • Rotation #1: Ambulatory Medicine
  • Rotation #4: Pediatrics
  • Rotation #5: Internal Medicine
  • Rotation #6: Family Medicine
  • Rotation #7: Surgery
  • Rotation #8: OBGYN
  • Rotations #2: Psychiatry
  • Rotations #3: Emergency Medicine

SOAP Note and Case Summary

Mr. W is a 30-year-old man who complains of having a sore throat for 3 days. Mr. W’s symptoms started abruptly 3 days ago when sore throat, pain with swallowing, fever, and headaches developed. He denies symptoms of cough, coryza, or rhinorrhea.

Mr. W is otherwise healthy. He has had no recent sick contacts and no recent travel. He is a heterosexual male, married, and monogamous with his wife. He has no history of blood transfusions or illicit drug use.

The physical exam is notable for temperature of 39.2°C, blood pressure is 130/70 mm Hg, pulse is 98 bpm, and respiratory rate is 12 breaths per minute. Sclera and conjunctiva are not injected. Oropharyngeal exam reveals bilateral tonsillar hypertrophy and exudates without ulcers. He has no cervical lymphadenopathy on exam. His abdominal is soft with normal bowel sounds. Skin exam is unremarkable.

Mr. W has 3 points on the modified Centor Score (fever, exudate, and absence of cough). A RADT test is performed.

A RADT test is performed and is positive. Mr. W has no allergies to antibiotics and he is treated with penicillin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days. Two days after starting treatment, he reports improvement in symptoms.

S: 30 y/o man complains of sore throat for the past 3 days.  Symptoms began abruptly 3 days ago when he developed a sore throat, pain with swallowing, fever, and headaches.  He denies symptoms of cough, coryza, or rhinorrhea. Patient is otherwise healthy. Denies recent contact with sick and recent travel.  Patient is a heterosexual male, married monogamous with his wife.  He has no history of blood transfusions or illicit drug use.

O: BP 130/70, RR 12, P 98, T 39.2 C

Optic exam: Sclera and conjunctiva not injected

Oropharyngeal exam: Bilateral tonsillar hypertrophy and exudates without ulcers. No cervical lymphadenopathy.

Abdominal Exam: Abdomen is soft with unremarkable bowel sounds.

Skin Exam: Unremarkable

A: Infectious Mononucleosis, Primary HIV Infection- Acute Retroviral Syndrome

Positive RADT test

P: Penicillin 500 mg BID x 10 days

Acute onset of sore throat is most often caused by infectious agents, while patients with chronic sore throats with no signs of infection, or those who don’t respond to treatment should be evaluated for noninfectious causes of sore throat. The common viral agents causing respiratory infections are rhinovirus and coronavirus.  Group A beta-hemolytic  streptococcus  (GABHS)   accounts for most incidences of acute bacterial pharyngitis. Less common infections should also be diagnosed as well as nonbacterial pathogens such as HIV, influenza A and B and mononucleosis.  Cough, rhinorrhea and coryza are common symptoms of viral pharyngitis, while patients with bacterial pharyngitis or mononucleosis suffer from fever, tender anterior cervical lymphadenopathy, tonsillar erythema.  Most patients suffering from influenza experience cough and myalgias.  Infectious mononucleosis, another possible diagnosis is most common in patients ages 15 to 24 and patients often experience malaise and marked adenopathy.  Primary HIV infection has similar nonspecific symptoms as pharyngitis and should be considered with high-risk patients. The textbook presentation of GABHS pharyngitis includes abrupt onset of severe throat pain, moderate fever, and headaches.  Edema and erythema is present in posterior pharynx and tonsils as well as gray-white exudates.  Anterior cervical lymph nodes are tender and gastrointestinal symptoms include nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. If untreated GABHS can last 8-10, when treated with antibiotics symptoms should improve within 48 hours.  It is important to treat patients with GABHS pharyngitis to prevent further complications such as acute rheumatic fever, acute glomerulonephritis and suppurative sequelae.  GABHS pharyngitis can be diagnosed using a throat culture which has a sensitivity of 90-95% and specificity of 95-99%, but takes 24-72 hours to process.  A faster option is rapid antigen detection test (RADT) which has a sensitivity range of 70-90% and specificity of 90-100%.  Results are available within minutes. Patients should be treated with antibiotics such as penicillin and amoxicillin.  In the event of an allergy, first-generation cephalosporins, clindamycin, clarithromycin or azithromycin can be used.  Severity of symptoms should improve, as well as ability to transmit and possibility of complications.  Patients who have had 4 or more episodes of severe pharyngitis in a year might consider a tonsillectomy.

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

This entry is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.

case study soap format

Need help with the Commons?

Email us at [email protected] so we can respond to your questions and requests. Please email from your CUNY email address if possible. Or visit our help site for more information:

CUNY Academic Commons logo

  • Terms of Service
  • Accessibility
  • Creative Commons (CC) license unless otherwise noted

CUNY logo

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • BMC Med Educ
  • PMC10210329

Logo of bmcmedu

Comparing oral case presentation formats on internal medicine inpatient rounds: a survey study

Brendan appold.

1 University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI USA

Sanjay Saint

2 VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA

Ashwin Gupta

Associated data.

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, AG, upon reasonable request.

Oral case presentations – structured verbal reports of clinical cases – are fundamental to patient care and learner education. Despite their continued importance in a modernized medical landscape, their structure has remained largely unchanged since the 1960s, based on the traditional Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan (SOAP) format developed for medical records. We developed a problem-based alternative known as Events, Assessment, Plan (EAP) to understand the perceived efficacy of EAP compared to SOAP among learners.

We surveyed (Qualtrics, via email) all third- and fourth-year medical students and internal medicine residents at a large, academic, tertiary care hospital and associated Veterans Affairs medical center. The primary outcome was trainee preference in oral case presentation format. The secondary outcome was comparing EAP and SOAP on 10 functionality domains assessed via a 5-point Likert scale. We used descriptive statistics (proportion and mean) to describe the results.

The response rate was 21% (118/563). Of the 59 respondents with exposure to both the EAP and SOAP formats, 69% ( n  = 41) preferred the EAP format as compared to 19% ( n  = 11) who preferred SOAP ( p  < 0.001). EAP outperformed SOAP in 8 out of 10 of the domains assessed, including advancing patient care, learning from patients, and time efficiency.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that trainees prefer the EAP format over SOAP and that EAP may facilitate clearer and more efficient communication on rounds, which in turn may enhance patient care and learner education. A broader, multi-center study of the EAP oral case presentation will help to better understand preferences, outcomes, and barriers to implementation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04292-3.

Excellent inter-physician communication is fundamental to both providing high-quality patient care and promoting learner education [ 1 ], and has been recognized as an important educational goal by the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine, the Association of American Medical Colleges, and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education [ 2 ]. Oral case presentations, structured verbal reports of clinical cases [ 3 ], have been referred to as the “currency with which clinicians communicate” [ 4 ]. Oral case presentations are a key element of experiential learning in clinical medicine, requiring learners to synthesize, assess, and convey pertinent patient information and to formulate care plans. Furthermore, oral case presentations allow supervising clinicians to identify gaps in knowledge or clinical reasoning and enable team members to learn from one another. Despite modernization in much of medicine, oral case presentation formats have remained largely unchanged, based on the traditional Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan (SOAP) format developed by Dr. Lawrence Weed in his Problem Oriented Medical Record in 1968 [ 5 ].

Given that the goals of a medical record are different than those of oral case presentations, it should not be assumed that they should share the same format. While Dr. Weed sought to make the medical record as “complete as possible,” [ 6 ] internal medicine education leaders have expressed desire for oral case presentations that are succinct, with an emphasis on select relevant details [ 2 ]. Using a common SOAP format between the medical record and oral case presentations risks conflating the distinct goals for each of these communication methods. Indeed, in studying how learners gain oral case presentation skills, Haber and Lingard [ 7 ] found differences in understanding of the fundamental purpose of oral case presentations between medical students and experienced physicians. While students believed the purpose of oral case presentations was to organize the large amount of data they collected about their patients, experienced physicians saw oral case presentations as a method of telling a story to make an argument for a particular conclusion [ 7 ].

In accordance with Dr. Weed’s “problem-oriented approach to data organization,” [ 6 ] but with an eye toward optimizing for oral case presentations, we developed an alternative to SOAP known as the Events, Assessment, Plan (EAP) format. The EAP format is used for patients who are already known to the inpatient team, and may also be utilized for newly admitted patients for whom the attending physician already has context (e.g., via handoff or review of an admission note). As the EAP approach is utilized by a subset of attending physicians at our academic hospital, we sought to understand the perceived effectiveness of the EAP format in comparison to the traditional SOAP format among learners (i.e., medical students and resident physicians).

EAP is a problem-based format used at the discretion of the attending physician. In line with suggested best practices [ 8 ], the EAP structure aims to facilitate transmission of data integrated within the context of clinical problem solving. In this format, significant interval events are discussed first (e.g., a fall, new-onset abdominal pain), followed by a prioritized assessment and plan for each relevant active problem. Subjective and objective findings are integrated into the assessment and plan as relevant to a particular problem. This integration of subjective and objective findings by problem is distinct from SOAP, where subjective and objective findings are presented separately as their own sections, with each section often containing information that is relevant to several problems (Fig.  1 , Additional file 1 : Appendix A).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 12909_2023_4292_Fig1_HTML.jpg

Overview: comparing EAP to SOAP

Settings and participants

We surveyed third- and fourth-year medical students, and first- through fourth-year internal medicine and internal medicine-pediatrics residents, caring for patients at a large, academic, tertiary care hospital and an affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center. Internal medicine is a 12-week core clerkship for all medical students in their second year, with 8 weeks spent on the inpatient wards. All student participants had completed their internal medicine clerkship rotation at the time of the survey. We did not conduct a sample size calculation at the outset of this study.

Data collection methods and processes

An anonymous, electronic survey (Qualtrics, Provo, UT) was created to assess student and resident experience with and preference between EAP and SOAP oral case presentation formats during inpatient internal medicine rounds (Additional file 2 : Appendix B). Ten domains were assessed via 5-point Likert scale (1 [strongly disagree] to 5 [strongly agree]), including the ability of the format to incorporate the patient’s subjective experience, the extent to which the format encouraged distillation and integration of information, the extent to which the format focused on the assessment and plan, the format’s ability to help trainees learn from their own patients and those of their peers, time efficiency, and ease of use. Duration of exposure to each format was also assessed, as were basic demographic data for the purposes of understanding outcome differences among respondents (e.g., students versus residents). For those who had experienced both formats, preference between formats was recorded as a binary choice. Participants additionally had the opportunity to provide explanation via free text. For participants with experience in both formats, the order of evaluation of EAP and SOAP formats were randomized by participant. For questions comparing EAP and SOAP formats directly, choice order was randomized.

The survey was distributed via official medical school email in October 2021 and was available to be completed for 20 days. Email reminders were distributed approximately one week after distribution and again 48 h prior to survey conclusion.

The primary outcome was trainee preference in oral case presentation format. Secondary outcomes included comparison between EAP and SOAP on content inclusion/focus, data integration, learning, time efficiency, and ease of use.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were used to describe the results (proportion and mean). For comparative analysis between EAP and SOAP, responses from respondents who had experience with both formats were compared using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test to evaluate differences. All statistical analyses were done using SAS V9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). We considered p  < 0.05 to be statistically significant.

The overall response rate was 21% (118/563). The response rate was 14% ( n  = 62/441) among medical students and 46% ( n  = 56/122) among residents. Respondents were 61% ( n  = 72) female. A total of 98% ( n  = 116) and 52% ( n  = 61) of respondents reported experience with SOAP and EAP formats, respectively. Among medical students, 60% ( n  = 37) reported experience with SOAP only while 39% ( n  = 24) had experience with both formats. Among residents, 36% ( n  = 20) and 63% ( n  = 35) had experience with SOAP only and both formats, respectively (Table ​ (Table1). 1 ). Most students (93%) and residents (96%) reported > 8 weeks of exposure to the SOAP format. Duration of exposure to the EAP format varied (0 to 2 weeks [32% of students, 17% of residents], 2 to 4 weeks [36% of students, 47% of residents], 4 to 8 weeks [16% of students, 25% of residents], and > 8 weeks [16% of students, 11% of residents]).

Quantifying trainees who only experienced SOAP versus those who experienced both formats

Of the 59 respondents with exposure to both the SOAP and EAP formats, 69% ( n  = 41) preferred the EAP format as compared to 19% ( n  = 11) preferring SOAP ( p  < 0.001). The remainder ( n  = 7, 12%) indicated either no preference between formats or indicated another preference. Among residents, 66% ( n  = 23) favored EAP, whereas 20% ( n  = 7) and 14% ( n  = 5) preferred SOAP or had no preference, respectively ( p  < 0.001). Among students, 75% ( n  = 18) favored EAP, whereas 17% ( n  = 4) and 8% ( n  = 2) favored SOAP or had no preference, respectively ( p  < 0.001).

Likert scale ratings for domains assessed by trainees who had experience in either format are shown in Table ​ Table2. 2 . In general, scores for each domain were higher for EAP than SOAP, with the exception of perceived ease of use among students. Among those with experience using both formats, EAP outperformed SOAP most prominently in time efficiency (mean 4.39 vs 2.59, p  < 0.001) and encouragement to: focus on assessment and plan (4.64 vs 3.05, p  < 0.001), distill pertinent information (4.63 vs 3.17, p  < 0.001), and integrate data (4.58 vs 3.31, p  < 0.001) (Table ​ (Table3). 3 ). Respondents also ranked EAP higher in its effectiveness at advancing patient care (4.31 vs 3.71, p  < 0.001), its capacity to convey one’s thinking (4.53 vs 3.95, p  < 0.001), and its ability to facilitate learning from peers (4.10 vs 3.58, p  < 0.001) and one’s own patients (4.24 vs 3.78, p  = 0.003). There were no significant differences in the amount of time allotted for discussing the patient’s subjective experience or in ease of use.

Domain ratings for the EAP and SOAP formats for all respondents with exposure to either format a

a Mean scores to the prompt: “The ‘___’ presentation format…”

(1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neither disagree nor agree, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree)

EAP vs SOAP head-to-head for all respondents who experienced both formats a

Evaluation of trainee free text responses regarding oral case presentation preference revealed several general themes (Table ​ (Table4). 4 ). First, respondents generally felt that EAP was more time efficient and less repetitive, allowing for additional time to be spent discussing pertinent patient care decisions. Second, several respondents indicated that EAP aligns well with how trainees consider problems naturally (as a single problem in completion). Finally, respondents generally believed that EAP allowed learners to effectively communicate their thinking and demonstrate their knowledge. Those preferring SOAP most often cited format familiarity and the difficulty in switching between formats in describing their preference, though some also believed SOAP was more effective in describing a patient’s current status.

Themes related to format preference

Our single site survey comparing 2 oral case presentation formats revealed a preference among respondents for EAP over SOAP for those medical students and internal medicine residents who had experience with both formats. Furthermore, EAP outperformed SOAP in 8 out of 10 of the functionality domains assessed, including areas such as advancing patient care, learning from patients, and, particularly, time efficiency. Such a constellation of findings implies that EAP may not only be a more effective means to accomplish the key goals of oral case presentations, but it may also provide an opportunity to save time in the process. In line with SOAP’s current de facto status as an oral case presentation format, almost all respondents reported exposure to the SOAP format. Still, indicative of EAP’s growing presence at our academic system, more than one third of medical students and more than one half of residents also reported having experience with the EAP format.

While limited data exist that compare alternative oral case presentations to SOAP on inpatient medicine rounds, such alternatives have been previously trialed in other clinical venues. One such format, the multiple mini-SOAP, developed for complex outpatient visits, encourages each problem to be addressed “in its entirety” before presenting subsequent problems, and emphasizes prioritization by problem pertinency [ 9 ]. The creators suggest that this approach encourages more active trainee participation in formulating the assessment and plan for each problem, by helping the trainee to avoid getting lost in an “undifferentiated jumble of problems and possibilities” [ 9 ] that accumulate when multiple problems are presented all at once. On the receiving end, the multiple mini-SOAP enables faculty to assess student understanding of specific clinical problems one at a time and facilitates focused teaching accordingly.

Another approach has been assessed in the emergency department. Specifically, Maddow and colleagues explored assessment-oriented oral case presentations to increase efficiency in communication between residents and faculty at the University of Chicago [ 10 ]. In the assessment-oriented format, instead of being presented in a stylized order, pertinent information was integrated into the analysis. The authors found that assessment-oriented oral case presentations were about 40% faster than traditional presentations without significant differences in case presentation effectiveness.

Prior to our study, the nature of the format for inpatient medicine oral case presentations had thus far escaped scrutiny. This is despite the fact that oral case presentations are time (and therefore resource) intensive, and that they play an integral role in patient care and learner education. Our study demonstrates that learners favor the EAP format, which has the potential to increase both the effectiveness and efficiency of rounding.

Still, it should be noted that a transition to EAP does present challenges. Implementing this problem-based presentation format requires a conscious effort to ensure a continued holistic approach to patient care: active problems should be defined and addressed in accordance with patient preferences, and the patient’s subjective experience should be meaningfully incorporated into the assessment and plan for each problem. During initial implementation, attending physicians and learners must internalize this new format, often through trial and error.

From there, on an ongoing basis, EAP may require more upfront preparation by attending physicians as compared to SOAP. While chart review by attendings in advance of rounding is useful regardless of the format utilized, this practice is especially important for the EAP format, where trainees are empowered to interpret and distill – rather than simply report a complete set of – information. Therefore, the attending physician must be aware of pertinent data prior to rounds to ensure that key information is not neglected. Specifically, attendings should pre-orient themselves with laboratory values, imaging, and other studies completed, and new suggestions from consultants. More extensive pre-work may be required if teams wish to employ the EAP format for newly admitted patients, as attending physicians must also familiarize themselves with a patient’s medical history and their current presentation prior to initial team rounds.

Our findings should be interpreted within the context of specific limitations. First, low response rates may have led to selection bias within our surveyed population. For instance, learners who desired change in the oral case presentation format may have been more motivated to engage with our survey. Second, there could be unmeasured confounding variables that could have skewed our results in favor of the EAP format. For example, attendings who utilized the EAP format may have been more likely to innovate in other ways to create a more positive experience for learners, which may have influenced the scoring of the oral case presentation format. Third, our findings were largely based on subjective experience. Objective measurement (e.g., duration of rounds, patient care outcomes) may lend additional credibility to our findings. Lastly, our study included only a single site, limiting our ability to generalize our findings.

Our study also had several strengths. Our learner participant pool was broad and included all third- and fourth-year medical students and all internal medicine residents at a major academic hospital. Participation was encouraged regardless of the nature of a participant’s prior exposure to different oral case presentation formats. Our survey was anonymous with randomization to mitigate order bias, and we focused our comparison analysis on those who had exposure to both the EAP and SOAP formats. We collected data to compare EAP with SOAP in 2 distinct ways: head-to-head preference and numeric ratings amongst key domains. Both of these methods demonstrated a significant preference for EAP among learners in aggregate, as well as for students and residents analyzed independently.

Our findings suggest a preference for the EAP format over SOAP, and that EAP may facilitate clearer and more efficient communication on rounds. These improvements may in turn enhance patient care and learner education. While our preliminary data are compelling, a broader, multi-center study of the EAP oral case presentation is necessary to better understand preferences, outcomes, and barriers to implementation. Further studies should seek to improve response rates, for the data to represent a larger proportion of trainees. One potential strategy to improve response rates among medical students and residents is to survey them directly at the end of each internal medicine clerkship period or rotation, respectively. Ultimately, EAP may prove to be a much-needed update to the “currency with which clinicians communicate.”

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jason M. Engle, MPH, who helped edit, prepare, format, and submit this manuscript and supporting files.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: BA SS AG. Data curation: BA DR AG. Formal Analysis: BA SS DR AG. Funding acquisition: SS AG. Investigation: BA SS AG. Methodology: BA SS AG. Project administration: BA SS AG. Resources: SS AG. Software: DR. Supervision: SS AG. Validation: BA SS DR AG. Visualization: BA SS DR AG. Writing – original draft: BA AG. Writing – review & editing: BA SS DR AG. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Declarations.

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The need for ethical approval was waived by the ethics committee/Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan Medical School. The need for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee/Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan Medical School.

Not applicable.

Dr. Saint, Mr. Ratz, and Dr. Gupta are employed by the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr. Saint reports receiving grants from the Department of Veterans Affairs and personal fees from ISMIE Mutual Insurance Company, Jvion, and Doximity. Dr. Appold, Mr. Ratz, and Dr. Gupta report no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Community Health Worker Curriculum

Documentation skills for chws: writing useful case notes.

At the end of this unit, participants will be able to:

  • Create documentation using the SOAP note format
  • Identify the purpose and common elements of good case notes
  • Identify the challenges associated with completing case notes in an effective manner
  • Identify best practices and what you as a CHW bring to the process
  • Practice writing a progress note based on a case study

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS:

Lesson plan and handouts (PDF)

PowerPoint slides (PPT)

IMAGES

  1. 40 Fantastic SOAP Note Examples & Templates ᐅ TemplateLab

    case study soap format

  2. Occupational therapy SOAP note

    case study soap format

  3. SOAP guide- Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan

    case study soap format

  4. Case Study

    case study soap format

  5. Case Study Soap Notes

    case study soap format

  6. (DOC) Chic soap case

    case study soap format

VIDEO

  1. Week 9 Soap Note and Case Presentation

  2. next box unboxing ,soap case ,and brush case,😊

  3. This Man Recycle Used Soap ♻️ #business #businesscasestudy #startup #casestudy

  4. Physiotherapy Assessment

  5. Case on Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

  6. Case Study on Uncontrolled Type 2 DM

COMMENTS

  1. 15 SOAP Note Examples and Templates in 2024

    Introduction. SOAP notes are a helpful method of documentation designed to assist medical and mental health professionals in streamlining their client notes.Using a template such as SOAP notes means that you can capture, store, and interpret your client's information consistently over time. You probably already know this, but SOAP is an acronym that stands for subjective, objective, assessment ...

  2. SOAP Notes

    The SOAP note is a way for healthcare workers to document in a structured and organized way.[1][2][3] ... One study found that the APSO order was better than the typical SOAP note order in terms of speed, task success (accuracy), and usability for physician users acquiring information needed for a typical chronic disease visit in primary care. ...

  3. Writing SOAP Notes, Step-by-Step: Examples + Templates

    A well-completed SOAP note is a useful reference point within a patient's health record. Like BIRP notes, the SOAP format itself is a useful checklist for clinicians while documenting a patient's therapeutic progress.[REFERENCE ITEM="Sando, K. R., Skoy, E., Bradley, C., Frenzel, J., Kirwin, J., & Urteaga, E. (2017). Assessment of SOAP ...

  4. How to Document a Patient Assessment (SOAP)

    The assessment section is where you document your thoughts on the salient issues and the diagnosis (or differential diagnosis), which will be based on the information collected in the previous two sections. Summarise the salient points: "Productive cough (green sputum)". "Increasing shortness of breath".

  5. Learning to Write Case Notes Using the SOAP Format

    Not only does this format allow for thorough documentation, but it also assists the counselor in representing client concerns in a holistic framework, thus permitting practitioners, paraprofessionals, and case managers to better understand the concerns and needs of the client.

  6. How to Write a SOAP Note (With Examples)

    Learning how to write a SOAP note can be one of the most effective ways for clinicians to track, assess, diagnose, and treat clients. Here's how to write SOAP notes.

  7. Learning to Write Case Notes Using the SOAP Format

    Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2016. TLDR. A new note format is described— CAPS-concern, assessment, plan, and supporting data-improves on the SOAP format to streamline the communication of the patient's problem, the practitioner's assessment and plan and the medical reasoning to support the plan. 3.

  8. Accurate Clinical Documentation: Exploring SOAP Notes

    As the medical landscape progresses, our methods for managing clinical records, such as the SOAP note format, must evolve in tandem. This article is a comprehensive guide aimed at enhancing clinical documentation skills, including understanding the SOAP acronym medical and the SOAP notes meaning, at any stage of your medical career.

  9. PDF Nutrition Care Process: Case Study A Examples of Charting in Various

    Narrative Format SOAP Format ADIME Format* Meal/snack pattern (FH-1.2.2.3) JO eats two meals and snacks throughout the day. Food intake (FH-1.2.2) includes most foods and has a high consumption of sugar based beverages during the day. Alcohol intake (FH-1.4.1) is limited to social occasions. Total energy intake

  10. Comparing oral case presentation formats on internal medicine inpatient

    Oral case presentations - structured verbal reports of clinical cases - are fundamental to patient care and learner education. Despite their continued importance in a modernized medical landscape, their structure has remained largely unchanged since the 1960s, based on the traditional Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan (SOAP) format developed for medical records.

  11. 5 Perfect Nursing SOAP Note Examples + How to Write

    The format used for SOAP notes prompts the nurse to review all evidence, including subjective and objective data and information from the assessment, before reaching a nursing diagnosis. This is essential because if the nurse considers all the subjective and objective data while performing an assessment, they can develop a care plan based on ...

  12. SOAP note case study

    Subjective section. R.A is a 16-year-old female with type 1diabetes first diagnosed 5 years ago. She is also obese and has hypothyroidism. She was binge drinking, but quit 2 years ago upon being advised that alcohol could worsen her health condition. We will write a custom essay on your topic.

  13. PDF SOAP CASE NOTES GUIDE

    you when you write your case notes. SOAP notes can provide consistent documentation to monitor the client's progress and to gain a holistic view of each session with the client. SOAP: S (Subjective), O (Objective), A (Assessment), P (Plan) All case notes start with the date and time of the session as well as the signature of the CCP staff. S ...

  14. SOAP Note and Case Summary

    SOAP Note: S: 30 y/o man complains of sore throat for the past 3 days. Symptoms began abruptly 3 days ago when he developed a sore throat, pain with swallowing, fever, and headaches. He denies symptoms of cough, coryza, or rhinorrhea. Patient is otherwise healthy. Denies recent contact with sick and recent travel.

  15. Learning to Write Case Notes Using the SOAP Format

    Not only does this format allow for thorough documentation, but it also assists the counselor in representing client concerns in a holistic framework, thus permitting practitioners, paraprofessionals, and case managers to better understand the concerns and needs of the client.

  16. Comparing oral case presentation formats on internal medicine inpatient

    Background. Oral case presentations - structured verbal reports of clinical cases - are fundamental to patient care and learner education. Despite their continued importance in a modernized medical landscape, their structure has remained largely unchanged since the 1960s, based on the traditional Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan (SOAP) format developed for medical records.

  17. Documentation Skills for CHWs: Writing Useful Case Notes

    Create documentation using the SOAP note format; Identify the purpose and common elements of good case notes; Identify the challenges associated with completing case notes in an effective manner; Identify best practices and what you as a CHW bring to the process; Practice writing a progress note based on a case study; DOWNLOAD MATERIALS:

  18. Case Study of SOAP note

    1. NURS 223 Case Study/SOAPIE Note Problem-Oriented Charting The common charting format SOAPIE is ideal for a narrative client record of the nursing process.. SOAPIE, a systematic approach, details a goal-oriented nursing care plan in a note. SOAPIE Note S Subjective (report what the client states) O Objective (record what the nurse observes (also measurable - vital signs, physical ...