research methodology in economics books

Methods of Economic Research

Craftsmanship and Credibility in Applied Microeconomics

  • © 2018
  • Darren Grant 0

Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, USA

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

  • Presents a basic framework for thinking about craftsmanship in microeconomic research
  • Reinforces the connection between theory and econometric models
  • Provides instruction on how to organize analysis and empirical results into a cohesive, persuasive, and satisfying narrative
  • Presents a unified and thorough discussion of techniques for blending research elements together to maximize the credibility and impact of resultant findings

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics (STBE)

10k Accesses

2 Citations

1 Altmetric

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

About this book

This textbook articulates the elements of good craftsmanship in applied microeconomic research and demonstrates its effectiveness with multiple examples from economic literature. Empirical economic research is a combination of several elements: theory, econometric modelling, institutional analysis, data handling, estimation, inference, and interpretation. A large body of work demonstrates how to do many of these things correctly, but to date, there is no central resource available which articulates the essential principles involved  and ties them together.  In showing how these research elements can be best blended to maximize the credibility and impact of the findings that result, this book presents a basic framework for thinking about craftsmanship. This framework lays out the proper context within which the researcher should view the analysis, involving institutional factors, complementary policy instruments, and competing hypotheses that can influence or explain the phenomena being studied. It also emphasizes the interconnectedness of theory, econometric modeling, data, estimation, inference, and interpretation, arguing that good craftsmanship requires strong links between each. Once the framework has been set, the book devotes a chapter to each element of the analysis, providing robust instruction for each case. Assuming a working knowledge of econometrics, this text is aimed at graduate students and early-career academic researchers as well as empirical economists looking to improve their technique.

Similar content being viewed by others

research methodology in economics books

The Present State of Economics: Errors and Omissions Excepted

research methodology in economics books

Alan’s approach to research and his colleagues

research methodology in economics books

Sraffa Versus Keynes on the Method of Economics: Measurement, Homogeneity and Independence

  • craftsmanship
  • applied econometrics
  • empirical economic research
  • microeconomics

Table of contents (11 chapters)

Front matter, craftsmanship and credibility in economic research.

Darren Grant

Ways of Thinking

Ways of seeing, vernacular knowledge, ways of doing, theory and models, description, econometric modeling, ways of knowing, the ends of your means, the narrative in the numbers, back matter, authors and affiliations, about the author.

Darren Grant has worked as a Navy contractor, a health management program administrator, a high school teacher and coach, and an economics professor, in various towns and cities across the South.  He has published applied research in leading field journals in policy analysis, health economics, the economics of education, industrial organization, public choice, behavioral economics, and labor economics, using models that run the gamut of those found in the profession: parametric and nonparametric, linear and nonlinear, reduced form and structural, and everything in-between.  Much of what he has learned about doing economic research he has learned the hard way.

Bibliographic Information

Book Title : Methods of Economic Research

Book Subtitle : Craftsmanship and Credibility in Applied Microeconomics

Authors : Darren Grant

Series Title : Springer Texts in Business and Economics

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01734-7

Publisher : Springer Cham

eBook Packages : Economics and Finance , Economics and Finance (R0)

Copyright Information : Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Hardcover ISBN : 978-3-030-01733-0 Published: 05 February 2019

eBook ISBN : 978-3-030-01734-7 Published: 25 January 2019

Series ISSN : 2192-4333

Series E-ISSN : 2192-4341

Edition Number : 1

Number of Pages : XIX, 203

Number of Illustrations : 11 b/w illustrations, 10 illustrations in colour

Topics : Microeconomics , Econometrics , History of Economic Thought/Methodology

  • Publish with us

Policies and ethics

  • Find a journal
  • Track your research

University Libraries

  • University Libraries
  • Research Guides
  • Subject Guides
  • Methods, Books & References
  • US Data & Statistics
  • International Data & Info
  • US & International Health Data This link opens in a new window
  • Trade Statistics & Data
  • Articles & Journals

Research Methodologies

Sample of economic books & e-books, search for books & e-books.

  • Historical Data
  • New Mexico Data & Stats

NetID required or On campus

  • Call Number

A few suggested subject searches Economic Theory      Labor         Economic, Methodology

Econometrics      Economic History      Land Use     Value

Research Methodology in Applied Economics

Organizing, planning and conducting economic research, by don e. ethridge.

  • ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5.00 ·
  • 36 Want to read
  • 3 Currently reading
  • 2 Have read

Research Methodology in Applied Economics by Don E. Ethridge

My Reading Lists:

Use this Work

Create a new list

My book notes.

My private notes about this edition:

Check nearby libraries

  • Library.link

Buy this book

This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one ?

Showing 2 featured editions. View all 2 editions?

Add another edition?

Book Details

First sentence.

"Economic research, in its most fundamental form, is the process by which we discover, evaluate, and confirm the stock of economic knowledge."

Classifications

The physical object, community reviews (0).

Cover of: fjolla tirana

  • Created April 30, 2008
  • 8 revisions

Wikipedia citation

Copy and paste this code into your Wikipedia page. Need help?

  • Architecture and Design
  • Asian and Pacific Studies
  • Business and Economics
  • Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
  • Computer Sciences
  • Cultural Studies
  • Engineering
  • General Interest
  • Geosciences
  • Industrial Chemistry
  • Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies
  • Jewish Studies
  • Library and Information Science, Book Studies
  • Life Sciences
  • Linguistics and Semiotics
  • Literary Studies
  • Materials Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Social Sciences
  • Sports and Recreation
  • Theology and Religion
  • Publish your article
  • The role of authors
  • Promoting your article
  • Abstracting & indexing
  • Publishing Ethics
  • Why publish with De Gruyter
  • How to publish with De Gruyter
  • Our book series
  • Our subject areas
  • Your digital product at De Gruyter
  • Contribute to our reference works
  • Product information
  • Tools & resources
  • Product Information
  • Promotional Materials
  • Orders and Inquiries
  • FAQ for Library Suppliers and Book Sellers
  • Repository Policy
  • Free access policy
  • Open Access agreements
  • Database portals
  • For Authors
  • Customer service
  • People + Culture
  • Journal Management
  • How to join us
  • Working at De Gruyter
  • Mission & Vision
  • De Gruyter Foundation
  • De Gruyter Ebound
  • Our Responsibility
  • Partner publishers

research methodology in economics books

Your purchase has been completed. Your documents are now available to view.

Methods Used in Economic Research: An Empirical Study of Trends and Levels

The methods used in economic research are analyzed on a sample of all 3,415 regular research papers published in 10 general interest journals every 5th year from 1997 to 2017. The papers are classified into three main groups by method: theory, experiments, and empirics. The theory and empirics groups are almost equally large. Most empiric papers use the classical method, which derives an operational model from theory and runs regressions. The number of papers published increases by 3.3% p.a. Two trends are highly significant: The fraction of theoretical papers has fallen by 26 pp (percentage points), while the fraction of papers using the classical method has increased by 15 pp. Economic theory predicts that such papers exaggerate, and the papers that have been analyzed by meta-analysis confirm the prediction. It is discussed if other methods have smaller problems.

1 Introduction

This paper studies the pattern in the research methods in economics by a sample of 3,415 regular papers published in the years 1997, 2002, 2007, 2012, and 2017 in 10 journals. The analysis builds on the beliefs that truth exists, but it is difficult to find, and that all the methods listed in the next paragraph have problems as discussed in Sections 2 and 4. Hereby I do not imply that all – or even most – papers have these problems, but we rarely know how serious it is when we read a paper. A key aspect of the problem is that a “perfect” study is very demanding and requires far too much space to report, especially if the paper looks for usable results. Thus, each paper is just one look at an aspect of the problem analyzed. Only when many studies using different methods reach a joint finding, we can trust that it is true.

Section 2 discusses the classification of papers by method into three main categories: (M1) Theory , with three subgroups: (M1.1) economic theory, (M1.2) statistical methods, and (M1.3) surveys. (M2) Experiments , with two subgroups: (M2.1) lab experiments and (M2.2) natural experiments. (M3) Empirics , with three subgroups: (M3.1) descriptive, (M3.2) classical empirics, and (M3.3) newer empirics. More than 90% of the papers are easy to classify, but a stochastic element enters in the classification of the rest. Thus, the study has some – hopefully random – measurement errors.

Section 3 discusses the sample of journals chosen. The choice has been limited by the following main criteria: It should be good journals below the top ten A-journals, i.e., my article covers B-journals, which are the journals where most research economists publish. It should be general interest journals, and the journals should be so different that it is likely that patterns that generalize across these journals apply to more (most?) journals. The Appendix gives some crude counts of researchers, departments, and journals. It assesses that there are about 150 B-level journals, but less than half meet the criteria, so I have selected about 15% of the possible ones. This is the most problematic element in the study. If the reader accepts my choice, the paper tells an interesting story about economic research.

All B-level journals try hard to have a serious refereeing process. If our selection is representative, the 150 journals have increased the annual number of papers published from about 7,500 in 1997 to about 14,000 papers in 2017, giving about 200,000 papers for the period. Thus, the B-level dominates our science. Our sample is about 6% for the years covered, but less than 2% of all papers published in B-journals in the period. However, it is a larger fraction of the papers in general interest journals.

It is impossible for anyone to read more than a small fraction of this flood of papers. Consequently, researchers compete for space in journals and for attention from the readers, as measured in the form of citations. It should be uncontroversial that papers that hold a clear message are easier to publish and get more citations. Thus, an element of sales promotion may enter papers in the form of exaggeration , which is a joint problem for all eight methods. This is in accordance with economic theory that predicts that rational researchers report exaggerated results; see Paldam ( 2016 , 2018 ). For empirical papers, meta-methods exist to summarize the results from many papers, notably papers using regressions. Section 4.4 reports that meta-studies find that exaggeration is common.

The empirical literature surveying the use of research methods is quite small, as I have found two articles only: Hamermesh ( 2013 ) covers 748 articles in 6 years a decade apart studies in three A-journals using a slightly different classification of methods, [1] while my study covers B-journals. Angrist, Azoulay, Ellison, Hill, and Lu ( 2017 ) use a machine-learning classification of 134,000 papers in 80 journals to look at the three main methods. My study subdivide the three categories into eight. The machine-learning algorithm is only sketched, so the paper is difficult to replicate, but it is surely a major effort. A key result in both articles is the strong decrease of theory in economic publications. This finding is confirmed, and it is shown that the corresponding increase in empirical articles is concentrated on the classical method.

I have tried to explain what I have done, so that everything is easy to replicate, in full or for one journal or one year. The coding of each article is available at least for the next five years. I should add that I have been in economic research for half a century. Some of the assessments in the paper will reflect my observations/experience during this period (indicated as my assessments). This especially applies to the judgements expressed in Section 4.

2 The eight categories

Table 1 reports that the annual number of papers in the ten journals has increased 1.9 times, or by 3.3% per year. The Appendix gives the full counts per category, journal, and year. By looking at data over two decades, I study how economic research develops. The increase in the production of papers is caused by two factors: The increase in the number of researchers. The increasing importance of publications for the careers of researchers.

The 3,415 papers

2.1 (M1) Theory: subgroups (M1.1) to (M1.3)

Table 2 lists the groups and main numbers discussed in the rest of the paper. Section 2.1 discusses (M1) theory. Section 2.2 covers (M2) experimental methods, while Section 2.3 looks at (M3) empirical methods using statistical inference from data.

The 3,415 papers – fractions in percent

The change of the fractions from 1997 to 2017 in percentage points

Note: Section 3.4 tests if the pattern observed in Table 3 is statistically significant. The Appendix reports the full data.

2.1.1 (M1.1) Economic theory

Papers are where the main content is the development of a theoretical model. The ideal theory paper presents a (simple) new model that recasts the way we look at something important. Such papers are rare and obtain large numbers of citations. Most theoretical papers present variants of known models and obtain few citations.

In a few papers, the analysis is verbal, but more than 95% rely on mathematics, though the technical level differs. Theory papers may start by a descriptive introduction giving the stylized fact the model explains, but the bulk of the paper is the formal analysis, building a model and deriving proofs of some propositions from the model. It is often demonstrated how the model works by a set of simulations, including a calibration made to look realistic. However, the calibrations differ greatly by the efforts made to reach realism. Often, the simulations are in lieu of an analytical solution or just an illustration suggesting the magnitudes of the results reached.

Theoretical papers suffer from the problem known as T-hacking , [2] where the able author by a careful selection of assumptions can tailor the theory to give the results desired. Thus, the proofs made from the model may represent the ability and preferences of the researcher rather than the properties of the economy.

2.1.2 (M1.2) Statistical method

Papers reporting new estimators and tests are published in a handful of specialized journals in econometrics and mathematical statistics – such journals are not included. In our general interest journals, some papers compare estimators on actual data sets. If the demonstration of a methodological improvement is the main feature of the paper, it belongs to (M1.2), but if the economic interpretation is the main point of the paper, it belongs to (M3.2) or (M3.3). [3]

Some papers, including a special issue of Empirical Economics (vol. 53–1), deal with forecasting models. Such models normally have a weak relation to economic theory. They are sometimes justified precisely because of their eclectic nature. They are classified as either (M1.2) or (M3.1), depending upon the focus. It appears that different methods work better on different data sets, and perhaps a trade-off exists between the user-friendliness of the model and the improvement reached.

2.1.3 (M1.3) Surveys

When the literature in a certain field becomes substantial, it normally presents a motley picture with an amazing variation, especially when different schools exist in the field. Thus, a survey is needed, and our sample contains 68 survey articles. They are of two types, where the second type is still rare:

2.1.3.1 (M1.3.1) Assessed surveys

Here, the author reads the papers and assesses what the most reliable results are. Such assessments require judgement that is often quite difficult to distinguish from priors, even for the author of the survey.

2.1.3.2 (M1.3.2) Meta-studies

They are quantitative surveys of estimates of parameters claimed to be the same. Over the two decades from 1997 to 2017, about 500 meta-studies have been made in economics. Our sample includes five, which is 0.15%. [4] Meta-analysis has two levels: The basic level collects and codes the estimates and studies their distribution. This is a rather objective exercise where results seem to replicate rather well. [5] The second level analyzes the variation between the results. This is less objective. The papers analyzed by meta-studies are empirical studies using method (M3.2), though a few use estimates from (M3.1) and (M3.3).

2.2 (M2) Experimental methods: subgroups (M2.1) and (M2.2)

Experiments are of three distinct types, where the last two are rare, so they are lumped together. They are taking place in real life.

2.2.1 (M2.1) Lab experiments

The sample had 1.9% papers using this method in 1997, and it has expanded to 9.7% in 2017. It is a technique that is much easier to apply to micro- than to macroeconomics, so it has spread unequally in the 10 journals, and many experiments are reported in a couple of special journals that are not included in our sample.

Most of these experiments take place in a laboratory, where the subjects communicate with a computer, giving a controlled, but artificial, environment. [6] A number of subjects are told a (more or less abstract) story and paid to react in either of a number of possible ways. A great deal of ingenuity has gone into the construction of such experiments and in the methods used to analyze the results. Lab experiments do allow studies of behavior that are hard to analyze in any other way, and they frequently show sides of human behavior that are difficult to rationalize by economic theory. It appears that such demonstration is a strong argument for the publication of a study.

However, everything is artificial – even the payment. In some cases, the stories told are so elaborate and abstract that framing must be a substantial risk; [7] see Levitt and List ( 2007 ) for a lucid summary, and Bergh and Wichardt ( 2018 ) for a striking example. In addition, experiments cost money, which limits the number of subjects. It is also worth pointing to the difference between expressive and real behavior. It is typically much cheaper for the subject to “express” nice behavior in a lab than to be nice in the real world.

(M2.2) Event studies are studies of real world experiments. They are of two types:

(M2.2.1) Field experiments analyze cases where some people get a certain treatment and others do not. The “gold standard” for such experiments is double blind random sampling, where everything (but the result!) is preannounced; see Christensen and Miguel ( 2018 ). Experiments with humans require permission from the relevant authorities, and the experiment takes time too. In the process, things may happen that compromise the strict rules of the standard. [8] Controlled experiments are expensive, as they require a team of researchers. Our sample of papers contains no study that fulfills the gold standard requirements, but there are a few less stringent studies of real life experiments.

(M2.2.2) Natural experiments take advantage of a discontinuity in the environment, i.e., the period before and after an (unpredicted) change of a law, an earthquake, etc. Methods have been developed to find the effect of the discontinuity. Often, such studies look like (M3.2) classical studies with many controls that may or may not belong. Thus, the problems discussed under (M3.2) will also apply.

2.3 (M3) Empirical methods: subgroups (M3.1) to (M3.3)

The remaining methods are studies making inference from “real” data, which are data samples where the researcher chooses the sample, but has no control over the data generating process.

(M3.1) Descriptive studies are deductive. The researcher describes the data aiming at finding structures that tell a story, which can be interpreted. The findings may call for a formal test. If one clean test follows from the description, [9] the paper is classified under (M3.1). If a more elaborate regression analysis is used, it is classified as (M3.2). Descriptive studies often contain a great deal of theory.

Some descriptive studies present a new data set developed by the author to analyze a debated issue. In these cases, it is often possible to make a clean test, so to the extent that biases sneak in, they are hidden in the details of the assessments made when the data are compiled.

(M3.2) Classical empirics has three steps: It starts by a theory, which is developed into an operational model. Then it presents the data set, and finally it runs regressions.

The significance levels of the t -ratios on the coefficient estimated assume that the regression is the first meeting of the estimation model and the data. We all know that this is rarely the case; see also point (m1) in Section 4.4. In practice, the classical method is often just a presentation technique. The great virtue of the method is that it can be applied to real problems outside academia. The relevance comes with a price: The method is quite flexible as many choices have to be made, and they often give different results. Preferences and interests, as discussed in Sections 4.3 and 4.4 below, notably as point (m2), may affect these choices.

(M3.3) Newer empirics . Partly as a reaction to the problems of (M3.2), the last 3–4 decades have seen a whole set of newer empirical techniques. [10] They include different types of VARs, Bayesian techniques, causality/co-integration tests, Kalman Filters, hazard functions, etc. I have found 162 (or 4.7%) papers where these techniques are the main ones used. The fraction was highest in 1997. Since then it has varied, but with no trend.

I think that the main reason for the lack of success for the new empirics is that it is quite bulky to report a careful set of co-integration tests or VARs, and they often show results that are far from useful in the sense that they are unclear and difficult to interpret. With some introduction and discussion, there is not much space left in the article. Therefore, we are dealing with a cookbook that makes for rather dull dishes, which are difficult to sell in the market.

Note the contrast between (M3.2) and (M3.3): (M3.2) makes it possible to write papers that are too good, while (M3.3) often makes them too dull. This contributes to explain why (M3.2) is getting (even) more popular and the lack of success of (M3.3), but then, it is arguable that it is more dangerous to act on exaggerated results than on results that are weak.

3 The 10 journals

The 10 journals chosen are: (J1) Can [Canadian Journal of Economics], (J2) Emp [Empirical Economics], (J3) EER [European Economic Review], (J4) EJPE [European Journal of Political Economy], (J5) JEBO [Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization], (J6) Inter [Journal of International Economics], (J7) Macro [Journal of Macroeconomics], (J8) Kyklos, (J9) PuCh [Public Choice], and (J10) SJE [Scandinavian Journal of Economics].

Section 3.1 discusses the choice of journals, while Section 3.2 considers how journals deal with the pressure for publication. Section 3.3 shows the marked difference in publication profile of the journals, and Section 3.4 tests if the trends in methods are significant.

3.1 The selection of journals

They should be general interest journals – methodological journals are excluded. By general interest, I mean that they bring papers where an executive summary may interest policymakers and people in general. (ii) They should be journals in English (the Canadian Journal includes one paper in French), which are open to researchers from all countries, so that the majority of the authors are from outside the country of the journal. [11] (iii) They should be sufficiently different so that it is likely that patterns, which apply to these journals, tell a believable story about economic research. Note that (i) and (iii) require some compromises, as is evident in the choice of (J2), (J6), (J7), and (J8) ( Table 4 ).

The 10 journals covered

Note. Growth is the average annual growth from 1997 to 2017 in the number of papers published.

Methodological journals are excluded, as they are not interesting to outsiders. However, new methods are developed to be used in general interest journals. From studies of citations, we know that useful methodological papers are highly cited. If they remain unused, we presume that it is because they are useless, though, of course, there may be a long lag.

The choice of journals may contain some subjectivity, but I think that they are sufficiently diverse so that patterns that generalize across these journals will also generalize across a broader range of good journals.

The papers included are the regular research articles. Consequently, I exclude short notes to other papers and book reviews, [12] except for a few article-long discussions of controversial books.

3.2 Creating space in journals

As mentioned in the introduction, the annual production of research papers in economics has now reached about 1,000 papers in top journals, and about 14,000 papers in the group of good journals. [13] The production has grown with 3.3% per year, and thus it has doubled the last twenty years. The hard-working researcher will read less than 100 papers a year. I know of no signs that this number is increasing. Thus, the upward trend in publication must be due to the large increase in the importance of publications for the careers of researchers, which has greatly increased the production of papers. There has also been a large increase in the number of researches, but as citations are increasingly skewed toward the top journals (see Heckman & Moktan, 2018 ), it has not increased demand for papers correspondingly. The pressures from the supply side have caused journals to look for ways to create space.

Book reviews have dropped to less than 1/3. Perhaps, it also indicates that economists read fewer books than they used to. Journals have increasingly come to use smaller fonts and larger pages, allowing more words per page. The journals from North-Holland Elsevier have managed to cram almost two old pages into one new one. [14] This makes it easier to publish papers, while they become harder to read.

Many journals have changed their numbering system for the annual issues, making it less transparent how much they publish. Only three – Canadian Economic Journal, Kyklos, and Scandinavian Journal of Economics – have kept the schedule of publishing one volume of four issues per year. It gives about 40 papers per year. Public Choice has a (fairly) consistent system with four volumes of two double issues per year – this gives about 100 papers. The remaining journals have changed their numbering system and increased the number of papers published per year – often dramatically.

Thus, I assess the wave of publications is caused by the increased supply of papers and not to the demand for reading material. Consequently, the study confirms and updates the observation by Temple ( 1918 , p. 242): “… as the world gets older the more people are inclined to write but the less they are inclined to read.”

3.3 How different are the journals?

The appendix reports the counts for each year and journal of the research methods. From these counts, a set of χ 2 -scores is calculated for the three main groups of methods – they are reported in Table 5 . It gives the χ 2 -test comparing the profile of each journal to the one of the other nine journals taken to be the theoretical distribution.

The methodological profile of the journals –  χ 2 -scores for main groups

Note: The χ 2 -scores are calculated relative to all other journals. The sign (+) or (−) indicates if the journal has too many or too few papers relatively in the category. The P -values for the χ 2 (3)-test always reject that the journal has the same methodological profile as the other nine journals.

The test rejects that the distribution is the same as the average for any of the journals. The closest to the average is the EJPE and Public Choice. The two most deviating scores are for the most micro-oriented journal JEBO, which brings many experimental papers, and of course, Empirical Economics, which brings many empirical papers.

3.4 Trends in the use of the methods

Table 3 already gave an impression of the main trends in the methods preferred by economists. I now test if these impressions are statistically significant. The tests have to be tailored to disregard three differences between the journals: their methodological profiles, the number of papers they publish, and the trend in the number. Table 6 reports a set of distribution free tests, which overcome these differences. The tests are done on the shares of each research method for each journal. As the data cover five years, it gives 10 pairs of years to compare. [15] The three trend-scores in the []-brackets count how often the shares go up, down, or stay the same in the 10 cases. This is the count done for a Kendall rank correlation comparing the five shares with a positive trend (such as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5).

Trend-scores and tests for the eight subgroups of methods across the 10 journals

Note: The three trend-scores in each [ I 1 , I 2 , I 3 ]-bracket are a Kendall-count over all 10 combinations of years. I 1 counts how often the share goes up. I 2 counts when the share goes down, and I 3 counts the number of ties. Most ties occur when there are no observations either year. Thus, I 1 + I 2 + I 3 = 10. The tests are two-sided binominal tests disregarding the zeroes. The test results in bold are significant at the 5% level.

The first set of trend-scores for (M1.1) and (J1) is [1, 9, 0]. It means that 1 of the 10 share-pairs increases, while nine decrease and no ties are found. The two-sided binominal test is 2%, so it is unlikely to happen. Nine of the ten journals in the (M1.1)-column have a majority of falling shares. The important point is that the counts in one column can be added – as is done in the all-row; this gives a powerful trend test that disregards differences between journals and the number of papers published. ( Table A1 )

Four of the trend-tests are significant: The fall in theoretical papers and the rise in classical papers. There is also a rise in the share of stat method and event studies. It is surprising that there is no trend in the number of experimental studies, but see Table A2 (in Appendix).

4 An attempt to interpret the pattern found

The development in the methods pursued by researchers in economics is a reaction to the demand and supply forces on the market for economic papers. As already argued, it seems that a key factor is the increasing production of papers.

The shares add to 100, so the decline of one method means that the others rise. Section 4.1 looks at the biggest change – the reduction in theory papers. Section 4.2 discusses the rise in two new categories. Section 4.3 considers the large increase in the classical method, while Section 4.4 looks at what we know about that method from meta-analysis.

4.1 The decline of theory: economics suffers from theory fatigue [16]

The papers in economic theory have dropped from 59.5 to 33.6% – this is the largest change for any of the eight subgroups. [17] It is highly significant in the trend test. I attribute this drop to theory fatigue.

As mentioned in Section 2.1, the ideal theory paper presents a (simple) new model that recasts the way we look at something important. However, most theory papers are less exciting: They start from the standard model and argue that a well-known conclusion reached from the model hinges upon a debatable assumption – if it changes, so does the conclusion. Such papers are useful. From a literature on one main model, the profession learns its strengths and weaknesses. It appears that no generally accepted method exists to summarize this knowledge in a systematic way, though many thoughtful summaries have appeared.

I think that there is a deeper problem explaining theory fatigue. It is that many theoretical papers are quite unconvincing. Granted that the calculations are done right, believability hinges on the realism of the assumptions at the start and of the results presented at the end. In order for a model to convince, it should (at least) demonstrate the realism of either the assumptions or the outcome. [18] If both ends appear to hang in the air, it becomes a game giving little new knowledge about the world, however skillfully played.

The theory fatigue has caused a demand for simulations demonstrating that the models can mimic something in the world. Kydland and Prescott pioneered calibration methods (see their 1991 ). Calibrations may be carefully done, but it often appears like a numerical solution of a model that is too complex to allow an analytical solution.

4.2 Two examples of waves: one that is still rising and another that is fizzling out

When a new method of gaining insights in the economy first appears, it is surrounded by doubts, but it also promises a high marginal productivity of knowledge. Gradually the doubts subside, and many researchers enter the field. After some time this will cause the marginal productivity of the method to fall, and it becomes less interesting. The eight methods include two newer ones: Lab experiments and newer stats. [19]

It is not surprising that papers with lab experiments are increasing, though it did take a long time: The seminal paper presenting the technique was Smith ( 1962 ), but only a handful of papers are from the 1960s. Charles Plott organized the first experimental lab 10 years later – this created a new standard for experiments, but required an investment in a lab and some staff. Labs became more common in the 1990s as PCs got cheaper and software was developed to handle experiments, but only 1.9% of the papers in the 10 journals reported lab experiments in 1997. This has now increased to 9.7%, so the wave is still rising. The trend in experiments is concentrated in a few journals, so the trend test in Table 6 is insignificant, but it is significant in the Appendix Table A2 , where it is done on the sum of articles irrespective of the journal.

In addition to the rising share of lab experiment papers in some journals, the journal Experimental Economics was started in 1998, where it published 281 pages in three issues. In 2017, it had reached 1,006 pages in four issues, [20] which is an annual increase of 6.5%.

Compared with the success of experimental economics, the motley category of newer empirics has had a more modest success, as the fraction of papers in the 5 years are 5.8, 5.2, 3.5, 5.4, and 4.2, which has no trend. Newer stats also require investment, but mainly in human capital. [21] Some of the papers using the classical methodology contain a table with Dickey-Fuller tests or some eigenvalues of the data matrix, but they are normally peripheral to the analysis. A couple of papers use Kalman filters, and a dozen papers use Bayesian VARs. However, it is clear that the newer empirics have made little headway into our sample of general interest journals.

4.3 The steady rise of the classical method: flexibility rewarded

The typical classical paper provides estimates of a key effect that decision-makers outside academia want to know. This makes the paper policy relevant right from the start, and in many cases, it is possible to write a one page executive summary to the said decision-makers.

The three-step convention (see Section 2.3) is often followed rather loosely. The estimation model is nearly always much simpler than the theory. Thus, while the model can be derived from a theory, the reverse does not apply. Sometimes, the model seems to follow straight from common sense, and if the link from the theory to the model is thin, it begs the question: Is the theory really necessary? In such cases, it is hard to be convinced that the tests “confirm” the theory, but then, of course, tests only say that the data do not reject the theory.

The classical method is often only a presentation devise. Think of a researcher who has reached a nice publishable result through a long and tortuous path, including some failed attempts to find such results. It is not possible to describe that path within the severely limited space of an article. In addition, such a presentation would be rather dull to read, and none of us likes to talk about wasted efforts that in hindsight seem a bit silly. Here, the classical method becomes a convenient presentation device.

The biggest source of variation in the results is the choice of control/modifier variables. All datasets presumably contain some general and some special information, where the latter depends on the circumstances prevailing when the data were compiled. The regression should be controlled for these circumstances in order to reach the general result. Such ceteris paribus controls are not part of the theory, so many possible controls may be added. The ones chosen for publication often appear to be the ones delivering the “right” results by the priors of the researcher. The justification for their inclusion is often thin, and if two-stage regressions are used, the first stage instruments often have an even thinner justification.

Thus, the classical method is rather malleable to the preferences and interests of researchers and sponsors. This means that some papers using the classical technique are not what they pretend, as already pointed out by Leamer ( 1983 ), see also Paldam ( 2018 ) for new references and theory. The fact that data mining is tempting suggests that it is often possible to reach smashing results, making the paper nice to read. This may be precisely why it is cited.

Many papers using the classical method throw in some bits of exotic statistics technique to demonstrate the robustness of the result and the ability of the researcher. This presumably helps to generate credibility.

4.4 Knowledge about classical papers reached from meta-studies

Individual studies using the classical method often look better than they are, and thus they are more uncertain than they appear, but we may think of the value of convergence for large N s (number of observations) as the truth. The exaggeration is largest in the beginning of a new literature, but gradually it becomes smaller. Thus, the classical method does generate truth when the effect searched for has been studied from many sides. The word research does mean that the search has to be repeated! It is highly risky to trust a few papers only.

Meta-analysis has found other results such as: Results in top journals do not stand out. It is necessary to look at many journals, as many papers on the same effect are needed. Little of the large variation between results is due to the choice of estimators.

A similar development should occur also for experimental economics. Experiments fall in families: A large number cover prisoner’s dilemma games, but there are also many studies of dictator games, auction games, etc. Surveys summarizing what we have learned about these games seem highly needed. Assessed summaries of old experiments are common, notably in introductions to papers reporting new ones. It should be possible to extract the knowledge reached by sets of related lab experiments in a quantitative way, by some sort of meta-technique, but this has barely started. The first pioneering meta-studies of lab experiments do find the usual wide variation of results from seemingly closely related experiments. [25] A recent large-scale replicability study by Camerer et al. ( 2018 ) finds that published experiments in the high quality journal Nature and Science exaggerate by a factor two just like regression studies using the classical method.

5 Conclusion

The study presents evidence that over the last 20 years economic research has moved away from theory towards empirical work using the classical method.

From the eighties onward, there has been a steady stream of papers pointing out that the classical method suffers from excess flexibility. It does deliver relevant results, but they tend to be too good. [26] While, increasingly, we know the size of the problems of the classical method, systematic knowledge about the problems of the other methods is weaker. It is possible that the problems are smaller, but we do not know.

Therefore, it is clear that obtaining solid knowledge about the size of an important effect requires a great deal of papers analyzing many aspects of the effect and a careful quantitative survey. It is a well-known principle in the harder sciences that results need repeated independent replication to be truly trustworthy. In economics, this is only accepted in principle.

The classical method of empirical research is gradually winning, and this is a fine development: It does give answers to important policy questions. These answers are highly variable and often exaggerated, but through the efforts of many competing researchers, solid knowledge will gradually emerge.

Home page: http://www.martin.paldam.dk

Acknowledgments

The paper has been presented at the 2018 MAER-Net Colloquium in Melbourne, the Kiel Aarhus workshop in 2018, and at the European Public Choice 2019 Meeting in Jerusalem. I am grateful for all comments, especially from Chris Doucouliagos, Eelke de Jong, and Bob Reed. In addition, I thank the referees for constructive advice.

Conflict of interest: Author states no conflict of interest.

Appendix: Two tables and some assessments of the size of the profession

The text needs some numbers to assess the representativity of the results reached. These numbers just need to be orders of magnitude. I use the standard three-level classification in A, B, and C of researchers, departments, and journals. The connections between the three categories are dynamic and rely on complex sorting mechanisms. In an international setting, it matters that researchers have preferences for countries, notably their own. The relation between the three categories has a stochastic element.

The World of Learning organization reports on 36,000 universities, colleges, and other institutes of tertiary education and research. Many of these institutions are mainly engaged in undergraduate teaching, and some are quite modest. If half of these institutions have a program in economics, with a staff of at least five, the total stock of academic economists is 100,000, of which most are at the C-level.

The A-level of about 500 tenured researchers working at the top ten universities (mainly) publishes in the top 10 journals that bring less than 1,000 papers per year; [27] see Heckman and Moktan (2020). They (mainly) cite each other, but they greatly influence other researchers. [28] The B-level consists of about 15–20,000 researchers who work at 4–500 research universities, with graduate programs and ambitions to publish. They (mainly) publish in the next level of about 150 journals. [29] In addition, there are at least another 1,000 institutions that strive to move up in the hierarchy.

The counts for each of the 10 journals

Counts, shares, and changes for all ten journals for subgroups

Note: The trend-scores are calculated as in Table 6 . Compared to the results in Table 6 , the results are similar, but the power is less than before. However, note that the results in Column (M2.1) dealing with experiments are stronger in Table A2 . This has to do with the way missing observations are treated in the test.

Angrist, J. , Azoulay, P. , Ellison, G. , Hill, R. , & Lu, S. F. (2017). Economic research evolves: Fields and styles. American Economic Review (Papers & Proceedings), 107, 293–297. 10.1257/aer.p20171117 Search in Google Scholar

Bergh, A. , & Wichardt, P. C. (2018). Mine, ours or yours? Unintended framing effects in dictator games (INF Working Papers, No 1205). Research Institute of Industrial Econ, Stockholm. München: CESifo. 10.2139/ssrn.3208589 Search in Google Scholar

Brodeur, A. , Cook, N. , & Heyes, A. (2020). Methods matter: p-Hacking and publication bias in causal analysis in economics. American Economic Review, 110(11), 3634–3660. 10.1257/aer.20190687 Search in Google Scholar

Camerer, C. F. , Dreber, A. , Holzmaster, F. , Ho, T.-H. , Huber, J. , Johannesson, M. , … Wu, H. (27 August 2018). Nature Human Behaviour. https://www.nature.com/articles/M2.11562-018-0399-z Search in Google Scholar

Card, D. , & DellaVigna, A. (2013). Nine facts about top journals in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 144–161 10.3386/w18665 Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, G. , & Miguel, E. (2018). Transparency, reproducibility, and the credibility of economics research. Journal of Economic Literature, 56, 920–980 10.3386/w22989 Search in Google Scholar

Doucouliagos, H. , Paldam, M. , & Stanley, T. D. (2018). Skating on thin evidence: Implications for public policy. European Journal of Political Economy, 54, 16–25 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.03.004 Search in Google Scholar

Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14, 583–610 10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7 Search in Google Scholar

Fiala, L. , & Suentes, S. (2017). Transparency and cooperation in repeated dilemma games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 20, 755–771 10.1007/s10683-017-9517-4 Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

Hamermesh, D. (2013). Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how? Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 162–172 10.3386/w18635 Search in Google Scholar

Heckman, J. J. , & Moktan, S. (2018). Publishing and promotion in economics: The tyranny of the top five. Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 419–470 10.3386/w25093 Search in Google Scholar

Ioannidis, J. P. A. , Stanley, T. D. , & Doucouliagos, H. (2017). The power of bias in economics research. Economic Journal, 127, F236–F265 10.1111/ecoj.12461 Search in Google Scholar

Johansen, S. , & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration – with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x Search in Google Scholar

Justman, M. (2018). Randomized controlled trials informing public policy: Lessons from the project STAR and class size reduction. European Journal of Political Economy, 54, 167–174 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.04.005 Search in Google Scholar

Kydland, F. , & Prescott, E. C. (1991). The econometrics of the general equilibrium approach to business cycles. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 93, 161–178 10.2307/3440324 Search in Google Scholar

Leamer, E. E. (1983). Let’s take the con out of econometrics. American Economic Review, 73, 31–43 Search in Google Scholar

Levitt, S. D. , & List, J. A. (2007). On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field. Canadian Journal of Economics, 40, 347–370 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00412.x Search in Google Scholar

Paldam, M. (April 14th 2015). Meta-analysis in a nutshell: Techniques and general findings. Economics. The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 9, 1–4 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2015-11 Search in Google Scholar

Paldam, M. (2016). Simulating an empirical paper by the rational economist. Empirical Economics, 50, 1383–1407 10.1007/s00181-015-0971-6 Search in Google Scholar

Paldam, M. (2018). A model of the representative economist, as researcher and policy advisor. European Journal of Political Economy, 54, 6–15 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.03.005 Search in Google Scholar

Smith, V. (1962). An experimental study of competitive market behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 111–137 10.1017/CBO9780511528354.003 Search in Google Scholar

Stanley, T. D. , & Doucouliagos, H. (2012). Meta-regression analysis in economics and business. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203111710 Search in Google Scholar

Temple, C. L. (1918). Native races and their rulers; sketches and studies of official life and administrative problems in Nigeria. Cape Town: Argus Search in Google Scholar

© 2021 Martin Paldam, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  • X / Twitter

Supplementary Materials

  • Supplementary material

Please login or register with De Gruyter to order this product.

Economics

Journal and Issue

Articles in the same issue.

research methodology in economics books

Tel: 012 342 2765 | [email protected]

Research methods for economics

  • Mishi S, Maredza A
  • ISBN: 9780627040030
  • ePub ISBN: 9780627040047
  • 318 Pages | Published: 2024
  • Print: R550.00 ePub: R495.00

For a long time, Economics research and research teaching have concentrated on Econometrics, which has been dominated by the quantitative analysis of secondary data. When Economics graduates enter the world of work and are asked to produce a certain report, the first thing they ask is “where can I download the data?”, not knowing how to generate the data themselves. Research methods for economics hopes to build a graduate who will say “how can I generate robust data?” and “how can I process these data to answer the key questions?”

Research methods for economics introduces the novice to the world of research, specifically as applied to the discipline of Economics. It starts with what research entails and then branches out into the different approaches, concluding with chapters on how students should write and structure their academic work. The text provides step-by-step examples using different types of case study, data and analytical tools, and is user-friendly for both students and instructors.

Contents include the following:

-        Understanding research as decoded into Business and Economic Sciences

-        Research types, designs and methodology

-        Ethics in research

-        Art of writing in economics research

-        Understanding quantitative research techniques

-        Cross-sectional data analysis

-        Times series methods

-        Qualitative research methods

-        Mixed methods research

-        Writing a research proposal

-        Harvesting papers from treatises, dissertations and theses

Research methods for economics is aimed at senior undergraduate level to postgraduate level students. 

  • LSM Resources

PART 1 UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS AND RELATED DISCIPLINES

Chapter 1 Understanding research as decoded into Business and Economic Sciences

Chapter 2 Research types, designs and methodology

Chapter 3 Ethics in research

Chapter 4 Art of writing in economics research

PART 2 RESEARCH METHODS

Chapter 5 Understanding quantitative research techniques

Chapter 6 Cross-sectional data analysis

Chapter 7 Times series methods

Chapter 8 Qualitative research methods

Chapter 9 Mixed methods research

PART 3 ACADEMIC WRITING

Chapter 10 Writing a research proposal

Presentation Outlines

Suggested answers to textbook questions

  • Technical Support
  • Find My Rep

You are here

100 Questions (and Answers) About Research Methods

100 Questions (and Answers) About Research Methods

  • Neil J. Salkind
  • Description

"How do I create a good research hypothesis?"

"How do I know when my literature review is finished?"

"What is the difference between a sample and a population?"

"What is power and why is it important?"

In an increasingly data-driven world, it is more important than ever for students as well as professionals to better understand the process of research. This invaluable guide answers the essential questions that students ask about research methods in a concise and accessible way.

See what’s new to this edition by selecting the Features tab on this page. Should you need additional information or have questions regarding the HEOA information provided for this title, including what is new to this edition, please email [email protected] . Please include your name, contact information, and the name of the title for which you would like more information. For information on the HEOA, please go to http://ed.gov/policy/highered/leg/hea08/index.html .

For assistance with your order: Please email us at [email protected] or connect with your SAGE representative.

SAGE 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 www.sagepub.com

"This is a concise text that has good coverage of the basic concepts and elementary principles of research methods. It picks up where many traditional research methods texts stop and provides additional discussion on some of the hardest to understand concepts."

"I think it’s a great idea for a text (or series), and I have no doubt that the majority of students would find it helpful. The material is presented clearly, and it is easy to read and understand. My favorite example from those provided is on p. 7 where the author provides an actual checklist for evaluating the merit of a study. This is a great tool for students and would provide an excellent “practice” approach to learning this skill. Over time students wouldn’t need a checklist, but I think it would be invaluable for those students with little to no research experience."

I already am using 3 other books. This is a good book though.

Did not meet my needs

I had heard good things about Salkind's statistics book and wanted to review his research book as well. The 100 questions format is cute, and may provide a quick answer to a specific student question. However, it's not really organized in a way that I find particularly useful for a more integrated course that progressively develop and builds upon concepts.

comes across as a little disorganized, plus a little too focused on psychology and statistics.

This text is a great resource guide for graduate students. But it may not work as well with undergraduates orienting themselves to the research process. However, I will use it as a recommended text for students.

Key Features

· The entire research process is covered from start to finish: Divided into nine parts, the book  guides readers from the initial asking of questions, through the analysis and interpretation of data, to the final report

· Each question and answer provides a stand-alone explanation: Readers gain enough information on a particular topic to move on to the next question, and topics can be read in any order

· Most questions and answers supplement others in the book: Important material is reinforced, and connections are made between the topics

· Each answer ends with referral to three other related questions: Readers are shown where to go for additional information on the most closely related topics

Sample Materials & Chapters

Question #16: Question #16: How Do I Know When My Literature Review Is Finished?

Question #32: How Can I Create a Good Research Hypothesis?

Question #40: What Is the Difference Between a Sample and a Population, and Why

Question #92: What Is Power, and Why Is It Important?

For instructors

Select a purchasing option.

research methodology in economics books

Forgot Password

Don’t have an account?

or Connect With Social Media

Book Categories

research methodology in economics books

Research Methodology

Author : Arvind Shende & Vijay Upagade

  • ISBN : 9788121932226
  • Pages : 312
  • Binding : Paperback
  • Language : English
  • Imprint : S Chand Publishing
  • © year : 2010
  • Size : 6.75''X9.5''

Price : 350.00 280.00 You save 20%

  • ADD TO CART
  • Add to Wishlist
  • e-Book also available : Buy e-Book
  • About the Book
  • Table of Content

• For MBA, M.Phil., B.Ed., M.Ed., MCA, CA, CS as per the Latest UGC Syllabus.

• This book is a moderate attempt by authors to make the entire topic from indentification of problems to analysing the problem as simple as possible.

• We have made modest contribution in this direction specially for students and teachers community.

•Introduction To Research Methodology •Research Design •Sample Design •Methods Of Data Collection •Levels Of Measurement And Scaling •Processing Of Data •Hypotheses •Analysis Of Variance •Chi-Square Test •Research Report And Presentation •Computer Application In Research

Be the first one to review

Submit Your Review

Your email address will not be published.

Your rating for this book :

Sign Up for Newsletter

Head office.

S Chand And Company Limited

Building No. D-92, Fifth Floor, Sector – 02, Noida 201301, Uttar Pradesh (India)

1800 1031 926

[email protected]

About S Chand

  • Vision & Mission
  • Corporate Policies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Publisher’s Warranty
  • Terms & Conditions

Useful Links

  • S Chand My StudyGear
  • Learnflix Learning Apps
  • Teacher Resources
  • School Books
  • Higher Academic Books
  • Technical & Professional
  • Competitive Exam Books
  • Social Media Contest T&C
  • Scratch and Win

Customer Account

  • Bookseller’s Login
  • Register for Special Offers
  • ICSE/ISC 2024
  • BPI School Catalogue 2022
  • CBSE 9-12 – 2024
  • S Chand - Civil & Mechanical Engineering 2024
  • S Chand - Commerce & Management 2024
  • S Chand - Competitive Examinations-TestPrep 2024
  • S Chand - Core Engineering & Computer Science 2024
  • S Chand - Electrical, Electronics & Tele. Engineering 2024
  • S Chand - Humanities & Social Sciences 2024
  • S Chand - Life Sciences 2024
  • S Chand - Physics & Mathematics 2024
  • Vikas - Commerce & Management 2024
  • Vikas - Engineering & Technology 2024
  • Vikas - Humanities, Social Science & Education 2024
  • Vikas - Science 2024
  • S Chand School Books Pricelist 2023
  • S Chand HE books Pricelist 2022
  • Vikas Pricelist 2022
  • Higher Education
  • Tech Professional
  • Competitive Books
  • Children Books
  • Our Offices
  • Publish With Us
  • Request A Specimen
  • Enquiry/Feedback

research methodology in economics books

Powered by Cyberspace Networking Systems Pvt. Ltd

research methodology in economics books

  • Business & Money

Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Image Unavailable

Research Methodology in Economics

  • To view this video download Flash Player

Research Methodology in Economics Paperback

Purchase options and add-ons.

  • Language English
  • Publisher Deep & Deep Publications,India
  • ISBN-10 8176299022
  • ISBN-13 978-8176299022
  • See all details

The Amazon Book Review

Product details

  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 8176299022
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-8176299022
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 13.7 ounces

Customer reviews

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

No customer reviews

  • Amazon Newsletter
  • About Amazon
  • Accessibility
  • Sustainability
  • Press Center
  • Investor Relations
  • Amazon Devices
  • Amazon Science
  • Sell on Amazon
  • Sell apps on Amazon
  • Supply to Amazon
  • Protect & Build Your Brand
  • Become an Affiliate
  • Become a Delivery Driver
  • Start a Package Delivery Business
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Self-Publish with Us
  • Become an Amazon Hub Partner
  • › See More Ways to Make Money
  • Amazon Visa
  • Amazon Store Card
  • Amazon Secured Card
  • Amazon Business Card
  • Shop with Points
  • Credit Card Marketplace
  • Reload Your Balance
  • Amazon Currency Converter
  • Your Account
  • Your Orders
  • Shipping Rates & Policies
  • Amazon Prime
  • Returns & Replacements
  • Manage Your Content and Devices
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Notice
  • Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
  • Even more »

Account Options

research methodology in economics books

  • Try the new Google Books
  • Advanced Book Search

Get this book in print

  • Access Online via Elgaronline
  • Barnes&Noble.com
  • Books-A-Million
  • Find in a library
  • All sellers  »

Selected pages

Page 9

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases, bibliographic information.

research methodology in economics books

  • Business & Economics

research methodology in economics books

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Image Unavailable

Research Methodology in Economics

  • To view this video download Flash Player

Research Methodology in Economics Paperback – 30 September 2007

Save extra with 2 offers, 10 days replacement, replacement instructions.

research methodology in economics books

Purchase options and add-ons

  • ISBN-10 8176299022
  • ISBN-13 978-8176299022
  • Publisher Deep & Deep Publications
  • Publication date 30 September 2007
  • Language English
  • Print length 208 pages
  • See all details

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Deep & Deep Publications (30 September 2007)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 208 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 8176299022
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-8176299022
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 387 g
  • Country of Origin ‏ : ‎ India
  • #1,274 in Theory & Philosophy

Customer reviews

No customer reviews.

  • Press Releases
  • Amazon Science
  • Sell on Amazon
  • Sell under Amazon Accelerator
  • Protect and Build Your Brand
  • Amazon Global Selling
  • Become an Affiliate
  • Fulfilment by Amazon
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Amazon Pay on Merchants
  • COVID-19 and Amazon
  • Your Account
  • Returns Centre
  • 100% Purchase Protection
  • Amazon App Download
  • Conditions of Use & Sale
  • Privacy Notice
  • Interest-Based Ads

Columbia University Libraries

Research at the rbml | glenda sluga uses the wellington koo papers to tell a story of economic development.

Professor Glenda Sluga , author of  The Invention of International Order: Remaking Europe After Napoleon,   recently visited the RBML to extend her research on the intellectual foundations of international cooperation into the twentieth century. Examining the Wellington Koo and David Owen collections, Sluga is investigating how ideas about economic development were expressed in the founding of the United Nations.  Below, Sluga describes her archival approach and some of her finds.

How long have you been using RBML materials (for this and/or previous research)?

The RBML has amazing archives when it comes to the history of the UN, because so many people who worked there, or had some association with the UN have left their papers to the RBML.

What have you found? Did you come here knowing this material was here?

I discovered all sorts of interesting things – Gunnar Myrdal, the head of the UN economic commission for Europe, writing to David Owen, who is running the Economic and Social Council (and to whom Myrdal answers), about an ‘old lady’ who comes into his office to encourage him to be involved in a Moscow Conference in 1952 that is meant to open up trade between East and West. The old lady, it turns out, is a famous Australian, Jessie Street. She was a vocal advocate for women’s rights, and indigenous rights, and one of the few women in the original Australian delegation to the UNCIO, in San Francisco in 1945 – the conference that was to draft a UN Charter. Street is so interesting, and to see her moving in and out of these offices gives this whole period and the fraught politics of the Cold War at the UN a human cast.

What have you found that’s surprised or perplexed you?

I found a Chinese bureaucrat at the UN advocating for a planetary politics in 1945. This is extraodinary, and it speaks to the range of economic thinking that international organizations inspired through the 20th century. My project wants to capture that history.

What advice do you have for other researchers or students interested in using RBML’s special collections?

Use it ambitiously and intuitively to find really exciting information about all kinds of topics that we cannot always get a sense of by sticking to institutional or state archives.

CUL Blogs Home CUL Blogs Dashboard

IMAGES

  1. Research Methodology in Applied Economics: Organizing, Planning, and

    research methodology in economics books

  2. Encyclopedia of Economics Research (2 Volume Set)

    research methodology in economics books

  3. Economic Methodology : Understanding Economics as a Science : Boumans

    research methodology in economics books

  4. Research Methodology in Applied Economics (Hardcover, 2nd Edition): Don

    research methodology in economics books

  5. PERSPECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY OF ECONOMICS

    research methodology in economics books

  6. Workbook for Research Methods in Economics

    research methodology in economics books

VIDEO

  1. Economics Hon's 4th year

  2. 经济学入门好书推荐,帮助你快速了解世界运作的方式|Economics Book Recommendations: A Quick Guide to How the World Works

  3. BEST BOOKS OF RESEARCH METHODOLOGY أفضل كتب منهجية البحث انجليزية

  4. Research methodology economics

  5. Research Methodology Best Book In Hindi || Research Methodology For Phd Course Work

  6. biology methodology new books for AP Dsc

COMMENTS

  1. Research Methodology in Applied Economics

    Focused attention on how to organize and conduct research can increase the efficiency of the research process and its outcomes. The second edition of Research Methodology in Applied Economics provides time-tested guidelines to instruct graduate students in the research process.. Emphasizing research methodology as it applies to economics, Ethridge provides (1) an overview of the conceptual and ...

  2. Research Methodology in Applied Economics

    Focused attention on how to organize and conduct research can increase the efficiency of the research process and its outcomes. The second edition of Research Methodology in Applied Economics provides time-tested guidelines to instruct graduate students in the research process. Emphasizing research methodology as it applies to economics, Ethridge provides (1) an overview of the conceptual and ...

  3. Research Methodology in Applied Economics, 2nd Edition

    Focused attention on how to organize and conduct research can increase the efficiency of the research process and its outcomes. The second edition of Research Methodology in Applied Economics provides time-tested guidelines to instruct graduate students in the research process. Emphasizing research methodology as it applies to economics, Ethridge provides (1) an overview of the conceptual and ...

  4. Methods of Economic Research: Craftsmanship and Credibility ...

    Hardcover Book USD 109.99. Price excludes VAT (USA) This textbook articulates the elements of good craftsmanship in applied microeconomic research and demonstrates its effectiveness with multiple examples from economic literature. This text is aimed at graduate students, early-career academic researchers, and practicing economists.

  5. Research Methods in Economics

    In this Handbook, Peter Rule and Vaughn M. John bring together international experts to provide a thorough overview of case study research in the social sciences. Analysing both historical and contemporary examples, the Handbook contains... Hardback (October 2024) List price £195.00. Member price £175.50. Not yet published.

  6. Research Guides: Economics: Methods, Books & References

    This 170-page book in seven chapters covers, 1) The life, 2) Keynes's philosophy of practice, 3) The monetary reformer, 4) The General Theory, 5) Economic statesmanship, etc. Skidelsky considers Keynes's legacy on today's society. A good introduction to Keynes work. A work of extraordinary ambition, originality, and rigor, the book reorients ...

  7. Research Methodology in Applied Economics

    With this book students and researchers can increase their proficiency and effectiveness in economic research. The author provides an introduction to the conceptual and philosophical bases of research methodology as it applies to research in economics. He also gives procedural guidelines on how to plan, design, and conduct research projects in ...

  8. Research Methodology in Applied Economics

    Books. Research Methodology in Applied Economics. Don Ethridge. Wiley, Mar 25, 1999 - Technology & Engineering - 271 pages. With this book students and researchers can increase their proficiency and effectiveness in economic research. The author provides an introduction to the conceptual and philosophical bases of research methodology as it ...

  9. Research Methodology in Applied Economics: Organizing, Planning, and

    Focused attention on how to organize and conduct research can increase the efficiency of the research process and its outcomes. The second edition of Research Methodology in Applied Economics provides time-tested guidelines to instruct graduate students in the research process.. Emphasizing research methodology as it applies to economics, Ethridge provides (1) an overview of the conceptual and ...

  10. Research Methodology in Applied Economics

    Research Methodology in Applied Economics: Organizing, Planning and Conducting Economic Research. May 31, 2004, Blackwell Publishing Professional, Wiley-Blackwell. Hardcover in English - 2 edition. 0813829941 9780813829944.

  11. PDF Research Methods in Economics

    Research Methods in Economics 1 Nicholas Shunda University of Connecticut 15 February 2007. Today's Agenda • Purpose of research ... - Examples: Books, book chapters, edited volumes, journal articles, technical reports, working papers - Problem: Sometimes too mathematical or too

  12. Methods Used in Economic Research: An Empirical Study of Trends and Levels

    The methods used in economic research are analyzed on a sample of all 3,415 regular research papers published in 10 general interest journals every 5th year from 1997 to 2017. The papers are classified into three main groups by method: theory, experiments, and empirics. The theory and empirics groups are almost equally large. Most empiric papers use the classical method, which derives an ...

  13. Van Schaik

    Research methods for economics introduces the novice to the world of research, specifically as applied to the discipline of Economics. It starts with what research entails and then branches out into the different approaches, concluding with chapters on how students should write and structure their academic work.

  14. 100 Questions (and Answers) About Research Methods

    Key Features · The entire research process is covered from start to finish: Divided into nine parts, the book guides readers from the initial asking of questions, through the analysis and interpretation of data, to the final report · Each question and answer provides a stand-alone explanation: Readers gain enough information on a particular topic to move on to the next question, and topics ...

  15. (PDF) Research Methods for Economics

    Applied research can also vary according to the nature of method. used in analysis. There are mainly four categories of applied research: 1) statistical and econometric. analysis 2) calibration ...

  16. Research Methodology for Economists

    Agricultural Economics badness behavior C. I. Lewis Chapter consequences decision makers decision rules descriptive disciplinary peers disciplinary research disciplines durability economic research empirical experience human capital I/O analysis important institutional institutional economics institutionalists interdependent interpersonally ...

  17. PDF MEC-109 Research Methods in Economics

    in Economics RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES UNIT 1 Research Methodology: Conceptual Foundation 7 UNIT 2 Approaches to Scientific Knowledge: Positivism and Post Positivism 21 ... 1.12 Some Useful Books 1.13 Answer or Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises 1.0 OBJECTIVES After going through this unit, you will be able to: ...

  18. (Pdf) Handbook of Research Methodology

    This textbook provides students with an understanding of the concepts and techniques of qualitative and quantitative research, grants for research, report writing, data collection etc. It uses ...

  19. Research Methodology

    Research Methodology. • For MBA, M.Phil., B.Ed., M.Ed., MCA, CA, CS as per the Latest UGC Syllabus. • This book is a moderate attempt by authors to make the entire topic from indentification of problems to analysing the problem as simple as possible. • We have made modest contribution in this direction specially for students and teachers ...

  20. Research Methodology in Economics: 9788176299022: Amazon.com: Books

    #150,660 in Economics (Books) Customer Reviews: 2.0 2.0 out of 5 stars 2 ratings. Brief content visible, double tap to read full content. Full content visible, double tap to read brief content. Videos. Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video! Upload your video.

  21. Research Methods in Economics

    Edited by Pranee Liamputtong. Explaining both the theoretical and practical aspects of doing qualitative research, the book uses examples from real-world research projects to emphasise how to conduct qualitative research in the social sciences. Pranee Liamputtong dra... Hardback (2023) List price $145.00.

  22. Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Heterodox Economics

    Despite the important methodological critiques of the mainstream offered by heterodox economics, the dominant research method taught in heterodox programmes remains econometrics. This compelling Handbook provides a comprehensive introduction to a range of alternative research methods, invaluable for analysing the data prominent in heterodox studies.Providing a solid basis for a mixed methods ...

  23. Research Methodology in Economics : Dasgupta, Manas: Amazon.in: Books

    Publisher ‏ : ‎ Deep & Deep Publications (30 September 2007) Language ‏ : ‎ English. Paperback ‏ : ‎ 208 pages. ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 8176299022. ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-8176299022. Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 387 g. Country of Origin ‏ : ‎ India. Best Sellers Rank: #697,295 in Books ( See Top 100 in Books) #1,227 in Theory & Philosophy.

  24. Full article: Investigating the environmental and economic dimensions

    On the economic dimension, the results show that commercial and industrial section energy intensities are detrimental to economic expansion while energy efficiency promotes economic expansion. Importantly, it is revealed that increased expenditure on energy efficiency is a significant catalyst to improve the country's output.

  25. News from Columbia's Rare Book & Manuscript Library

    Professor Glenda Sluga, author of The Invention of International Order: Remaking Europe After Napoleon, recently visited the RBML to extend her research on the intellectual foundations of international cooperation into the twentieth century. Examining the Wellington Koo and David Owen collections, Sluga is investigating how ideas about economic development were expressed in the founding of the ...

  26. US economic outlook: cooling economy sets the stage for easing policy

    US economic outlook: getting back to normal. The US economy's ongoing normalization has progressed further through the second quarter. Amid healthy consumer fundamentals, we have revised up our GDP forecast for 2024 by 30 basis points (bp) to 2.5%, and for 2025 by 20 bp to 2.1%. CPI inflation remains stubborn, prompting a 40 bp upward revision ...