dispute resolution essay

Presentations made painless

• Get Premium

117 Dispute Resolution Essay Topic Ideas & Examples

Inside This Article

Dispute resolution is an important aspect of any legal system, as it allows parties to resolve their conflicts in a peaceful and efficient manner. However, finding a suitable topic for a dispute resolution essay can be challenging. To help you brainstorm ideas for your essay, here are 117 dispute resolution essay topic ideas and examples:

• The role of arbitration in resolving commercial disputes
• Mediation as an effective alternative to litigation
• The impact of culture on dispute resolution practices
• Online dispute resolution: Pros and cons
• The use of restorative justice in resolving criminal disputes
• The role of negotiation in resolving labor disputes
• The effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution methods in family law cases
• The use of peer mediation in schools to resolve conflicts
• The role of technology in modern dispute resolution practices
• The impact of power dynamics on dispute resolution outcomes
• The importance of confidentiality in mediation processes
• The role of emotions in dispute resolution
• The impact of bias in dispute resolution processes
• The use of third-party neutrals in resolving disputes
• The role of empathy in resolving conflicts
• The impact of gender on dispute resolution outcomes
• The use of collaborative law in resolving divorce cases
• The role of trust in dispute resolution processes
• The effectiveness of restorative circles in resolving community disputes
• The impact of legal representation on dispute resolution outcomes
• The role of communication in resolving conflicts
• The use of interest-based negotiation in resolving disputes
• The impact of time pressure on dispute resolution processes
• The importance of procedural fairness in dispute resolution
• The role of power imbalances in dispute resolution outcomes
• The use of mediation-arbitration in resolving complex disputes
• The impact of cross-cultural communication on dispute resolution processes
• The effectiveness of online dispute resolution platforms
• The role of apologies in resolving disputes
• The impact of emotional intelligence on dispute resolution outcomes
• The use of transformative mediation in resolving workplace conflicts
• The importance of accountability in dispute resolution processes
• The role of legal ethics in dispute resolution
• The impact of non-verbal communication in resolving conflicts
• The effectiveness of shuttle diplomacy in resolving international disputes
• The role of power mapping in dispute resolution processes
• The use of restorative practices in resolving school bullying incidents
• The impact of legal precedent on dispute resolution outcomes
• The importance of transparency in dispute resolution processes
• The role of social media in modern dispute resolution practices
• The effectiveness of peer mediation in resolving peer conflicts
• The impact of organizational culture on dispute resolution outcomes
• The use of conciliation in resolving workplace disputes
• The role of cognitive biases in dispute resolution processes
• The importance of active listening in resolving conflicts
• The impact of language barriers on dispute resolution outcomes
• The effectiveness of collaborative problem-solving in resolving disputes
• The role of power dynamics in resolving family disputes
• The use of online mediation in resolving e-commerce disputes
• The impact of implicit bias on dispute resolution processes
• The importance of emotional regulation in resolving conflicts
• The role of trust-building in dispute resolution outcomes
• The effectiveness of peer review in resolving scientific disputes
• The impact of group dynamics on dispute resolution processes
• The use of interest-based bargaining in resolving labor disputes
• The role of empathy in resolving interpersonal conflicts
• The importance of cultural competence in dispute resolution practices
• The impact of legal frameworks on dispute resolution outcomes
• The effectiveness of transformative justice in resolving systemic conflicts
• The role of power dynamics in resolving environmental disputes
• The use of mindfulness in dispute resolution processes
• The impact of cognitive dissonance on dispute resolution outcomes
• The importance of procedural justice in resolving conflicts
• The role of restorative justice in resolving historical injustices
• The effectiveness of facilitated dialogue in resolving community disputes
• The use of conciliation in resolving workplace conflicts
• The importance of emotional intelligence in dispute resolution practices
• The impact of cultural differences on dispute resolution outcomes
• The effectiveness of restorative practices in resolving school conflicts
• The role of empathy in resolving workplace disputes
• The importance of trust-building in dispute resolution processes
• The use of interest-based negotiation in resolving complex disputes
• The role of emotional regulation in resolving conflicts
• The impact of cognitive biases on dispute resolution processes
• The importance of active listening in resolving interpersonal conflicts

Want to create a presentation now?

Instantly Create A Deck

Let PitchGrade do this for me

Hassle Free

We will create your text and designs for you. Sit back and relax while we do the work.

Explore More Content

• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Service

© 2023 Pitchgrade

Beyond Intractability

The Hyper-Polarization Challenge to the Conflict Resolution Field: A Joint BI/CRQ Discussion BI and the Conflict Resolution Quarterly invite you to participate in an online exploration of what those with conflict and peacebuilding expertise can do to help defend liberal democracies and encourage them live up to their ideals.

Follow BI and the Hyper-Polarization Discussion on BI's New Substack Newsletter .

Hyper-Polarization, COVID, Racism, and the Constructive Conflict Initiative Read about (and contribute to) the  Constructive Conflict Initiative  and its associated Blog —our effort to assemble what we collectively know about how to move beyond our hyperpolarized politics and start solving society's problems. 

By Eric Brahm Julian Ouellet

September 2003  

At the center of any society's culture are basic agreements about cooperation between its members. Many scholars have tried to define the core properties of these human social systems. Marx argued that the relationship of class, of the proletariat to the bourgeoisie, orders all modern social systems. Kenneth Boulding has argued that social systems are ordered by threat, exchange, and integration or love.[1] There are many more theories of social order, but they all make the same fundamental claim; at some point, an individual will need the help of another individual to accomplish a task. Convincing a person to aid in a task that is not his or her own can take multiple forms, and the forms that are most often used in a system will define that system.

Before addressing the topic of dispute-resolution systems, it is helpful to examine the concept of "systems." Boulding described a system as, "that which is not chaos,"[2] a definition that initially seems vague and indefinite, but on further reflection, proves quite useful. In examining intricate networks of causes and effects, one can identify linked sets of causes and effects. The complete set of causes and effects comprises a system. For example, the human body is a system that relies on interconnected subsystems (nervous, respiratory, digestive, etc.) to enable life. One can speak of any society in similar terms, as a system of causes and effects.

We know from our own day-to-day experiences that people fail to cooperate as often as they do cooperate. Dispute resolution is a part of every society's culture, and in each society some methods are favored over others. Each culture in the world may be unique, but underlying each culture is its own specific -- though usually tacit -- agreement or system that determines how to resolve disputes. Yet Ury, Brett, and Goldberg argue that some systems of dispute resolution lead to consistently inefficient outcomes,[3] by encouraging and reinforcing actions that are not in the best interests of everyone involved.

In this essay, we focus on explaining how inefficient dispute-resolution systems can be identified, and how effective replacements can be designed. We can think of this process as the design of new, more efficient ways of agreeing not to agree. It does not imply eliminating dissent, or encouraging constant cooperation. Instead, it argues that when cooperation breaks down there are better and worse ways of resolving the resulting conflict. Third parties who work with intractable conflicts often focus on designing new dispute-settlement systems, tailored to the situation, using best practices of conflict resolution. In this essay, we first consider dispute systems design as it has developed in the United States (where it was used first), and then examine how these principles have been and can be extended to other countries.

Dispute Systems Design

Ury, Brett, and Goldberg pioneered Dispute Systems Design (DSD) in the 1980s, as a method for resolving intractable or frequent conflicts in troubled organizations, businesses, or entire industries. Their pioneering work was done at the Caney Creek Coal Mine, a mine that had been plagued by strikes in the 1970s.[4] At the center of their method were three heuristics for analyzing conflicts and designing new systems, which could deal with these conflicts quickly and efficiently, before they escalated into the frequent strikes, and lockouts that had been occurring at this mine almost routinely.

The first heuristic involves the relationship between three ways of resolving disputes: by negotiating interests, by adjudicating rights, or by pursuing power options (such as strikes or lockouts). Ideally, disputes should be resolved at the lowest level, through negotiating interests. Claims of interest focus on the desires of the actors in any given dispute. Rather than focusing on what a person can do based on their rights and power, Ury, Brett, and Goldberg argue that actors should focus on what they would like to do based on their own interests. Interest-based claims are more negotiable, and hence less likely to become intractable. Only if interest negotiation doesn't work, should the parties try a rights-based approach (such as a legal suit). And power-based approaches, such as strikes, should be reserved for those few conflicts that cannot be resolved either through interest or rights-based approaches.

At the Caney Creek mine, most disputes, even minor ones, were resolved with power struggles. The employees found the grievance procedures so cumbersome and ineffectual, that they just started a wildcat (impromptu) strike whenever an affront occurred, because they found this to be the best and quickest way to get response from management. But this approach is very costly for both sides.[5]

The following diagram shows a distressed conflict management system, such as the one found at Caney Creek before it was improved, and a healthy dispute management system that resolves most disputes at the interest level, fewer at the rights level, and fewest through power options. This is healthy for several reasons.

• Negotiating interests is less expensive than adjudicating rights or pursuing power options.
• Negotiating interests results in mutually satisfactory solutions, while the other two approaches are win-lose, meaning one side wins and the other side loses.
• When power-based approaches are tried, the losing side often is angry, and may try to "get back" at the other side whenever they get the chance.
• Interest-based negotiation is usually less time consuming than the other approaches.

Six System Design Principles

The second heuristic incorporates six design principles for new dispute-resolution systems, which follow directly from the first heuristic. The six principles are as follows:

1. Put the focus on interests. This means any dispute resolution should start with a process (either direct negotiation or mediation) where the parties try to solve the problem using interest-based bargaining. This is the best way to find a solution that satisfies everyone. Only when this doesn't work, do you move on to rights-based processes (such as arbitration) or power-based processes (such as elections).

2. Provide low-cost rights and power backups. Arbitration, voting, and protests are low-cost alternatives to rights and power contests. Although they are higher in cost than negotiation, they are less costly than adjudication or violent force.

3. Build in "loop-backs" to negotiation . Rights-based and power-based strategies for resolving disputes seldom need to be played out to the end. Rather, as soon as it is clear who is going to "win," parties can return (the authors call this "loop-back" to negotiation to develop a solution which best meets their needs, as well as their rights). A common example of such a "loop-back" process is when parties settle a lawsuit out of court. As soon as it becomes clear who is likely to win, it is advantageous for both sides to avoid the costs and uncertainty of further litigation, and negotiate a solution to their dispute.

4. Build in consultation before, feedback after . Increasing shared information is a basic strategy in ameliorating all conflicts. Consultation and feedback mechanisms between parties provide a consistent and reliable method of sharing information.

5. Arrange procedures in a low-to-high-cost sequence. Dispute-resolution systems typically have a series of steps. If one has a grievance or a conflict with another person or an organization, first you try to solve it on your own, and then you seek the help of a lawyer, etc. Ury, Brett, and Goldberg advise that by arranging dispute-resolution procedures in a low-to-high-cost sequence one can reduce the probability of rapid escalation, as had been happening at Caney Creek, when workers organized "wildcat" strikes over small conflicts. Minimizing this tendency toward rapid escalation had the added benefit of reducing enmity and increasing faith in the ability of the system to resolve basic disputes.

6. Provide the necessary motivation, skills, and resources .[6] An alternative system can function only if people buy into it. People are creatures of habit, and this is the greatest limit to broad-based systemic change. While there may be active resistance from some groups to new dispute-resolution systems, the greater problem is spreading the skills, knowledge, and habits that reinforce the new system. It is incumbent on the elites in the conflict, and third-party interveners, to provide the resources and time necessary to generate cooperation with the new system.

Timing and Process

The third heuristic is a set of four stages for implementing the new dispute-resolution system. The four stages are:

• implementation
• exit, evaluation, and diffusion[7]

These stages are self-explanatory, but they are helpful for explaining the changing roles that third-party interveners must perform in designing new dispute-resolution systems.

The third heuristic focuses more on the process of designing dispute-resolution systems than the content. It implies that there is no single approach to designing dispute-resolution systems; the findings over the course of implementation should determine the specific content of each dispute-resolution system. Each system must be tailored to the groups involved. Further, it implies that a well-designed system should be self-sustaining. Once the system is in place, the process should be successful.

Challenges of Dispute Systems Design

Constantino and Merchant argue that the dispute systems design is problematic because it focuses on individual disputes rather than underlying systemic problems.[8] We would expect conflict to occur in any system, and in most systems, specific patterns of conflict will recur, indicating a problem with the system itself. DSD is focused on managing disputes once they arise, but Constantino and Merchant argue that interveners should focus instead on resolving underlying systemic conflicts.[9]

For example, some actions have lower costs than others. Inefficient social systems will consistently attach lower costs to actions that result in inefficient outcomes. This can be a major source of systemic conflict. One goal of DSD is to attach different costs to the standard set of actions that an actor might take, so that the actor becomes more likely to engage in efficient behavior. In the Caney Creek case, Ury, Brett, and Goldberg found that mineworkers chose "wildcat strikes" rather than the prearranged grievance process,[10] indicating that the existing system of costs led to inefficient outcomes. If it was easier for a worker to go on strike than to go through a grievance process, and the likely outcome of the strike was better than that of the grievance process, then clearly the dispute-resolution system in place needed to be redesigned. The goal of Ury, Brett, and Goldberg's DSD process was to change the costs attached to actions, such that the new process of rapid mediation was the most favorable option.

Yet, although Ury, Brett, and Goldberg designed a system that discouraged inefficient dispute resolution, the system design failed to address the source of basic problems. For example, in Caney Creek, if one of the major sources of disputes was stolen property, the system that should be redesigned was not the dispute-resolution system itself, but rather the aspects of the system that led to theft. Constantino and Merchant suggest that new dispute-resolution systems should incorporate not only processes that encourage mediation, conciliation, and other interest-based dispute-resolution methods, but also ongoing processes that identify inefficient outcomes and attempt to resolve them.[11]

Extensions of Dispute Systems Design

Several authors advocate refinements to make dispute systems design more effective.[12] For example, Rowe suggests that an effective dispute-resolution system should incorporate:

• commitment to the values of fairness and freedom from reprisal;
• interest- and rights-based options;
• multiple access points;
• an organizational ombudsperson;
• wide scope; and
• continuous improvement via an oversight committee.[13]

Lynch argues that an effective system should incorporate:

• responding to stakeholder interest;
• reflecting important values;
• promoting the mission of the new agency;
• providing visible support by the organization's leadership;
• loop-backs forward and back between interest- and rights-based options;
• a system that is fair, flexible, friendly, and fast;
• the goal of resolution at a low level; and
• mechanisms by which the organization can shift from conflict resolution to management.[14]

Slaikeu and Hasson outline four principles for an effective system:[15]

it should acknowledge four means of resolution (essentially, power, rights, interest, and avoidance);

• it should include prevention and early-intervention options;
• it should seek to build collaborative strength through seven checkpoints;
• it should utilize the mediation model in order to build consensus among those involved.

They go on to outline steps through which conflict can be resolved,[16] and to identify seven subsystems of a successful conflict-management system.[17]

Finally, the Society for Professionals in Dispute Resolution has also put forward its vision of an effective system.[18] A dispute system should:

• contain options for preventing, identifying, and resolving issues;
• promote a culture that works to solve problems at the lowest level through direct negotiation;
• allow multiple access points;
• empower employees to select from a range of options for addressing the conflict;
• contain effective structure and support to maintain options.

The Society goes on to identify ten other necessary elements:

• leadership support;
• an oversight body composed of representatives from all stakeholder groups;
• evaluation processes;
• a central coordinator;
• alignment of the "philosophy of conflict competency" with the mission, vision, values, and policies;
• institutionalized incentives for effective operation;
• a communication strategy;
• incentives for early resolution; and
• adequate resources for the system to function properly.

It has also been suggested that DSD is most effective when:

• conflict prevention, rather than conflict management, is emphasized.[19] This requires increasing the capacity of organizations to understand sources of potential conflict and deal with them early, before they escalate.
• outside designers do not play too prominent a role.
• the existing organizational culture is recognized.[20]
• attention is paid to the narratives people tell about conflict.[21]

Many of these issues are discussed in more detail below, with respect to application of DSD principles outside the United States.

Dispute Resolution in Intractable Conflicts

Intractable conflicts, by their nature, are resistant to system redesign. It is difficult to imagine, for example, how designing a dispute-resolution system might help the abortion debate in the United States. This debate occurs at such a basic moral level that dispute systems design is unlikely to resolve the underlying conflict.

In the U.S., most intractable conflicts tend to revolve around the discussion of rights. As Mary Ann Glendon notes, "rights talk" has come to include most actions to which most people feel entitled. Thus, disputes over action quickly devolve to rights-oriented disputes, because all interests tend to be viewed in terms of rights. This is clearly problematic. A key task for third-party interveners is to separate the concept of rights from that of interests, in the dispute-system-design process. This is clearly difficult in cases like the abortion debate, where control of the courts is the pivot point in the power struggle between the two sides. However, there is hope for resolution of less-contentious disputes attached to the abortion debate, which might ease general tensions surrounding the core debate.

Applying Dispute System Design Outside the U.S.

Though it was developed in the U.S. in the context of labor disputes, dispute systems design has recently been applied abroad as a way to design new conflict management and governing processes in countries that are trying to adopt democracy .[22] Democratization makes effective conflict-resolution processes all the more important, because democracy is by its nature conflictual, but requires ways of channeling conflict in positive, creative directions.[23]

DSD initiatives have also been suggested as useful in addressing ethnic conflict, an issue that became highly significant in the 1990s.[24] Moore argues that a properly designed dispute system for dealing with ethnic conflict requires elements of peacekeeping , peacemaking , and peace building .[25]

At the same time as Western practitioners have seized the opportunity to utilize DSD principles in new contexts, other societies have been rediscovering traditional forms of conflict resolution. The traditional conflict-resolution mechanisms of the Kalahari Bushmen, for example, are very similar to the DSD practices outlined by Ury et al.[26]

These trends have resulted in a greater effort on the part of conflict-management practitioners to produce culturally compatible procedures.[27] The resulting systemic approach to conflict management has spurred the evolution of DSD and the integration of conflict-management principles into democratic decision-making.

However, the potential for cultural imperialism, and the adoption of systems inappropriate to particular cultures, are real challenges to these efforts to "export" the DSD model. External consultants coming in to promote DSD face challenges including: controlling resources, thereby disempowering local participants; timing and performance constraints by funders; not practicing democratic principles in relationships with clients; and arrogance of the American way of doing things, especially after the Cold War, when we were the only remaining "super-power."[28] Wildau et al. argue that practitioners tend to follow either the prescriptive paradigm (the camp into which Americans typically fall), meaning they believe culture is not a barrier and processes are readily transferable, or the elicitive paradigm, in which cultures are seen as unique and having their own mechanisms of dispute management that do not translate easily.[29] An integrative approach is most likely to be successful.

As a result, several scholars and practitioners have offered principles that should be followed when working in other cultural contexts. Moore, for example, warns practitioners working abroad to be aware that cultures differ as to:

• direct vs. indirect negotiations;
• attitudes toward cooperation, competition, and conflict;
• the nature and desire for preservation of relationships amongst disputants;
• authority, social rank, status, and caste issues;
• high-context and low-context communications;
• concepts and management of time;
• attitudes toward third parties; and
• the broader social and institutional environment in which the dispute system will operate. [30]

Practitioners must not only be aware of the culture in which they are operating, but also of the peculiarities of their own culture.[31] In addition, Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms (ADRs), often based on DSD notions, face unique challenges in different national contexts.[32]

One might imagine that the structure of effective intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) would be modeled on DSD principles. Yet a cursory glance at existing IGOs shows that they generally do a poor job of moving conflicts to interest-based disputes, to minimize intractability. Peck has applied DSD principles to the United Nations (U.N.) and finds it lacking.[33] She argues that the U.N. has not been a very effective dispute-settlement system, although since the end of the Cold War it has used a greater variety of tools. Most types of dispute settlement used by the U.N. fall within power- or rights-based approaches, but mediation, negotiation, and good offices are significant interest-based approaches that have been used. Given the role that power plays both in creating IGOs and in their operation, the probability of reform to make procedures more congruent with DSD principles seems remote.

[1] Kenneth Boulding, "Towards a Pure Theory of Threat Systems," The American Economic Review 53(2) (May 1963): 424-34.

[2] Kenneth Boulding, The World as a Total System , (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985).

[3] William Ury, Jeanne Bret, and Stephen Goldberg, Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict , (London: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1988).

[6] William Ury, Jeanne Bret, and Stephen Goldberg, Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict , (London: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1988).

[8] Cathy Constantino and Christina Merchant, Designing Conflict Management Systems: A Guide to Creating Productive and Healthy Organizations , (London: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1996).

[10] William Ury, Jeanne Bret, and Stephen Goldberg, Getting Disputes Resolved:Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict , (London: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1988).

[11] Cathy Constantino and Christina Merchant, Designing Conflict Management Systems: A Guide to Creating Productive and Healthy Organizations , (London: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1996).

[12] For a review of much of this literature, see Conbere, John P. "Theory Building for Conflict Management System Design" Conflict Resolution Quarterly 19(2)(2001): 215-36.

[13] M. Rowe, "Dispute Resolution in the Non-Union Environment," in S. Gleason, ed. Frontiers in Dispute Resolution in Labor Relations and Human Resources . (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1997).

[14] J. Lynch, CCRA: Contemporary Conflict Resolution Approaches . (Ottawa: Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, 1998),

[15] Slaikeu, Karl A., and Ralph H. Hasson. Controlling the Costs of Conflict: How to Design a System for Your Organization . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.

[16] Slaikeu and Hasson argue that the steps should be taken in the following order, making allowances for loop-back and forward: individual initiative; attempt negotiation; attempt mediation; appeal to higher authority; use of power play.

[17] They are: clear policy; clear roles and responsibilities; documentation; establish selection criteria; training and education; support systems for early resolution; and evaluation.

[18] SPIDR (Society for Professionals in Dispute Resolution), Guidelines for the Design of Integrated Conflict Management Systems Within Organizations (SPIDR, 2000).

[19] Kolb, Deborah M. and Susan S. Silbey. "Enhancing the Capacity of Organizations to Deal with Disputes." Negotiation Journal 6(4)(October 1990): 297-305.

[20] "Culture: The Missing Link in Dispute Systems Design," Corinne Bendersky, Negotiation Journal , 14:4 (October 1998), pp. 307-311.

[21] Cloke, Kenneth, and Joan Goldsmith. Resolving Personal and Organizational Conflict: Stories of Transformation & Forgiveness . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.

[22] Moore, Christopher W. 1993. "Have Process Will Travel: Reflections on Democratic Decision Making and Conflict Management Practice Abroad." Forum (National Institute for Dispute Resolution) (Winter): 1-12.

[23] Susan Wildau, Christopher W. Moore, and Bernard S. Mayer. 1993. "Democratic Decision-Making and Dispute Resolution Procedures Abroad." Mediation Quarterly 10 (3) (Spring): 303-320.

[24] Moore, Christopher. "Dispute Systems Design: A Pragmatic Approach for the Development of Procedures and Structures to Manage Ethnic and Political Conflicts." Pacifica Review 6(2)(1994): 43-55.

[25] For a discussion of examples of these processes, see Moore, C.W. 1993. "Implementing Peace Accords on the Ground." Track II , 2 (2): 10-13.

[26] William L. Ury, "Conflict Resolution among the Bushmen: Lessons in Dispute Systems Design," Negotiation Journal vol. 11, no. 4 (October 1995), pp. 379-389.

[27] Moore, Christopher W. 1993. "Have Process Will Travel: Reflections on Democratic Decision Making and Conflict Management Practice Abroad." Forum (National Institute for Dispute Resolution) (Winter): 1-12.

[28] Susan Wildau, Christopher W. Moore, and Bernard S. Mayer. 1993. "Democratic Decision-Making and Dispute Resolution Procedures Abroad." Mediation Quarterly 10 (3) (Spring): 303-320.

[29] Susan Wildau, Christopher W. Moore, and Bernard S. Mayer. 1993. "Democratic Decision-Making and Dispute Resolution Procedures Abroad." Mediation Quarterly 10 (3) (Spring): 307.

[30] Moore, Christopher W. 1993. "Have Process Will Travel: Reflections on Democratic Decision Making and Conflict Management Practice Abroad." Forum (National Institute for Dispute Resolution) (Winter): 1-12.

[31] Moore, Charles W., and Peter Woodrow. 2002. "What Do I Need to Know about Culture: Practitioners Suggest..." In Handbook for International Peacebuilding: Into the Eye of the Storm , edited by J.P.Lederach and J. Moomaw Jenner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[32] Brown, Scott, Christine Cervenak, and David Fairman. Alternative Dispute Resolution Practitioners Guide . Cambridge, MA: Conflict Management Group, 1998. Online at USAid http://transition.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/pnacb895.pdf

[33] Connie Peck, The United Nations as a Dispute Settlement System: Improving Mechanisms for the Prevention and Resolution of Conflict , (Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1996).

Use the following to cite this article: Brahm, Eric and Julian Ouellet. "Designing New Dispute Resolution Systems." Beyond Intractability . Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Posted: September 2003 < http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/designing-dispute-systems >.

Additional Resources

The intractable conflict challenge.

Our inability to constructively handle intractable conflict is the most serious, and the most neglected, problem facing humanity. Solving today's tough problems depends upon finding better ways of dealing with these conflicts.   More...

Selected Recent BI Posts Including Hyper-Polarization Posts

• Heidi Burgess Talks With James Coan about Taking De-Polarization Work "to Scale." -- Dialogue is great for the few participants, but it simply cannot be scaled up enough to change societal attitudes and behaviors. James Coan and Heidi Burgess discuss alternative ways to scale depolarization work.
• Colleague and Context Links for the Week of March 17, 2024 -- Submissions from readers, activities and publications from colleagues, and interesting articles from allied fields about conflict, peace, and democracy.
• Gaza, Ukraine, Increasing Global Tensions, and the Nature of War -- An exploration of Quincy Wright's image of total war, reasons why it is so much more dangerous than lesser armed conflicts, and mechanisms through which it could quickly spread around the world.

Get the Newsletter Check Out Our Quick Start Guide

Educators Consider a low-cost BI-based custom text .

Constructive Conflict Initiative

Join Us in calling for a dramatic expansion of efforts to limit the destructiveness of intractable conflict.

Things You Can Do to Help Ideas

Practical things we can all do to limit the destructive conflicts threatening our future.

Conflict Frontiers

A free, open, online seminar exploring new approaches for addressing difficult and intractable conflicts. Major topic areas include:

Scale, Complexity, & Intractability

Massively Parallel Peacebuilding

Authoritarian Populism

Constructive Confrontation

Conflict Fundamentals

An look at to the fundamental building blocks of the peace and conflict field covering both “tractable” and intractable conflict.

Beyond Intractability / CRInfo Knowledge Base

Home / Browse | Essays | Search | About

BI in Context

Links to thought-provoking articles exploring the larger, societal dimension of intractability.

Colleague Activities

Information about interesting conflict and peacebuilding efforts.

Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Beyond Intractability or the Conflict Information Consortium.

Beyond Intractability 

Unless otherwise noted on individual pages, all content is... Copyright © 2003-2022 The Beyond Intractability Project c/o the Conflict Information Consortium All rights reserved. Content may not be reproduced without prior written permission.

Guidelines for Using Beyond Intractability resources.

Citing Beyond Intractability resources.

Photo Credits for Homepage, Sidebars, and Landing Pages

Contact Beyond Intractability    Privacy Policy The Beyond Intractability Knowledge Base Project  Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess , Co-Directors and Editors  c/o  Conflict Information Consortium Mailing Address: Beyond Intractability, #1188, 1601 29th St. Suite 1292, Boulder CO 80301, USA Contact Form

Powered by  Drupal

production_1

The Edvocate

• Lynch Educational Consulting
• Dr. Lynch’s Personal Website
• Write For Us
• The Tech Edvocate Product Guide
• The Edvocate Podcast
• Terms and Conditions
• Privacy Policy
• Assistive Technology
• Best PreK-12 Schools in America
• Child Development
• Classroom Management
• Early Childhood
• EdTech & Innovation
• Education Leadership
• First Year Teachers
• Gifted and Talented Education
• Special Education
• Parental Involvement
• Policy & Reform
• Best Colleges and Universities
• Best College and University Programs
• HBCU’s
• Higher Education EdTech
• Higher Education
• International Education
• The Awards Process
• Finalists and Winners of The 2022 Tech Edvocate Awards
• Finalists and Winners of The 2021 Tech Edvocate Awards
• Finalists and Winners of The 2020 Tech Edvocate Awards
• Finalists and Winners of The 2019 Tech Edvocate Awards
• Finalists and Winners of The 2018 Tech Edvocate Awards
• Finalists and Winners of The 2017 Tech Edvocate Awards
• Award Seals
• GPA Calculator for College
• GPA Calculator for High School
• Cumulative GPA Calculator
• Grade Calculator
• Weighted Grade Calculator
• Final Grade Calculator
• The Tech Edvocate
• AI Powered Personal Tutor

How to Set Up and Start Using a Cash App Account

Jazz research questions, interesting essay topics to write about japanese culture, good research topics about japanese art, jane eyre essay topics, most interesting invisible man essay topics to write about, most interesting jaguar essay topics to write about, most interesting jackson pollock essay topics to write about, good essay topics on italian renaissance, good research topics about islamophobia, dispute resolution essay topics.

Dispute Resolution Essay Titles

• Resolution of Conflicts Among Various Business Cultures
• Advanced Procurement and Dispute Resolution Overview
• Construction Conflict Resolution and Resolution
• Self-Selection and Dispute Resolution In the Public Service
• Issues and Challenges In Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution In India
• Resolution of Conflicts: Increasing Mediation In the Oil and Gas Sector
• A Comparison of Alternative Dispute Resolution and Traditional Litigation
• Mediation As A Means of Dispute Resolution In the Credit Card Sector
• Dispute Resolution Alternatives: Pros and Cons In Civil Justice
• A Critical Evaluation of Alternative Commercial Dispute Resolution
• Business and Corporation Law: Dispute Resolution and Contract Law
• Clause Regarding Alternative Dispute Resolution For Learning Teams
• Business Concerns and Alternative Dispute Resolution Are Related
• Mediation and Conciliation Are Forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution.
• Analysis of Conflict Resolution and Alternative Dispute Resolution
• Alternative Dispute Resolution and Business Negotiation Relationships
• Some Procedures Used In Alternative Dispute Resolution
• Overview of Construction Industry Dispute Resolution
• The Various Forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution
• Business Conflict Management and Dispute Resolution

Fascinating Research Topics About Dispute Resolution

• Construction Procurement and Dispute Resolution Relationships
• Competencies In Alternative Dispute Resolution
• African Manufacturing: Contract Flexibility and Dispute Resolution
• Methods of Alternative Dispute Resolution and Procurement
• Resolution of Intercultural Conflicts: Brockton Neighborhood Health Center
• Forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution To Resolve Civil Cases.
• The National Arbitration Forum Is A Forum For Alternative Dispute Resolution.
• The Various Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures
• When Is Alternative Dispute Resolution Appropriate?
• Benefits of Mediation and Biblical Approaches
• Dispute Resolution Overview and Employment Discrimination
• The Relationship between Non-Adjudicative Procedures and Dispute Resolution
• Resolution of Conflict, Negotiation, and Case Selection For Trial
• Developing Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques
• Resolution of Disputes Regarding Japan’s Harbor Practices: Governments and Private Actors
• Mechanisms and Bodies For Dispute Resolution In International Business
• Contracts For International Construction and Dispute Resolution
• Key Individuals, Organizational Structure, and Dispute Resolution In the Healthcare Sector
• Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures and the Legal Dispute Resolution Process

Interesting Electrical Engineering Essay Topics

E-learning localization: everything you need to know.

Matthew Lynch

Related articles more from author, simple and easy neoclassicism and 19th-century neoclassicism’s politics essay topics, essay topics on elder abuse, essay topics for ethical dilemmas, sleep essay topic ideas & examples, good research topics about idealism, research topics about classroom.

• Browse Topics
• Executive Committee
• Affiliated Faculty
• Harvard Negotiation Project
• Great Negotiator
• American Secretaries of State Project
• Awards, Grants, and Fellowships
• Negotiation Programs
• Mediation Programs
• One-Day Programs
• In-House Training and Custom Programs
• In-Person Programs
• Online Programs
• Advanced Materials Search
• Contact Information
• The Teaching Negotiation Resource Center Policies
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Negotiation Journal
• Harvard Negotiation Law Review
• Working Conference on AI, Technology, and Negotiation
• Free Reports and Program Guides

Free Videos

• Upcoming Events
• Past Events
• Event Series
• Our Mission
• Keyword Index

PON – Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School - https://www.pon.harvard.edu

Team-Building Strategies: Building a Winning Team for Your Organization

Discover how to build a winning team and boost your business negotiation results in this free special report, Team Building Strategies for Your Organization, from Harvard Law School.

What is Alternative Dispute Resolution?

Familiarize yourself with mediation, arbitration, and a hybrid approach using alternative dispute resolution..

By Katie Shonk — on August 22nd, 2023 / Dispute Resolution

So, you’re stuck in a serious dispute, but you’re desperate to avoid the hassle and expense of a court case. You’ve heard about alternative dispute resolution but are not sure what it entails.

Claim your FREE copy: Dispute Resolution

Discover how to improve your dispute resolution skills in this free report, Dispute Resolution: Working Together Toward Conflict Resolution on the Job and at Home , from Harvard Law School.

What is alternative dispute resolution? Alternative dispute resolution, or ADR, is a process in which a neutral third party—a mediator or arbitrator—helps parties who are embroiled in a dispute come to an agreement. Mediation and arbitration (see also Arbitration vs Mediation and the Conflict Resolution Process in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) ) are types of alternative dispute resolution because they offer an alternative to litigation.

In this article, we describe the two basic types of alternative dispute resolution in addition to introducing a mediation-arbitration hybrid that may be beneficial in resolving certain disputes.

What is mediation?

In mediation, a neutral third party tries to help disputants come to a consensus on their own. Rather than imposing a solution, a professional mediator seeks to assist the conflicting sides in exploring the interests underlying their positions. Working with parties together and sometimes separately, mediators try to help them hammer out a resolution that is sustainable, voluntary, and non-binding.

Mediators can help disputants break an impasse in the following ways, according to Harvard Law School professor emeritus Frank E. A. Sander:

1. Finding additional information that parties were unwilling to share with each other; 2. Overcoming parties’ resistance to communicating and reaching an agreement by presenting offers to both sides; 3. Contributing impartial, specialized expertise; and 4. Brainstorming options to find a resolution that satisfies both parties.

Mediators can be largely facilitative, engaging primarily in shuttle diplomacy and keeping their own views hidden. Other mediators are more evaluative, offering their own knowledge and opinions to guide parties toward agreement. “The most skilled mediators blend the two techniques according to the nature of the problem and the stage of the mediation,” writes Sanders in an article in the Negotiation Briefings newsletter.

What is arbitration?

In arbitration, the other primary form of alternative dispute resolution, a neutral third party serves as a judge who is responsible for resolving the dispute. The arbitrator listens as each side argues its case and presents relevant evidence, then renders a binding decision.

Disputants can negotiate virtually any aspect of the arbitration guidelines, including whether lawyers will be present and which standards of evidence to use. Arbitrators hand down decisions that are usually confidential, that is binding, and that cannot be appealed. Arbitration tends to be more expensive than mediation but less expensive than litigation.

Disputants can give the arbitrator the authority to determine who will win the case and what the award, if any, will be. The following are three specifics types of arbitration that are available to disputants, as described by Sander:

1. Hi-lo arbitration. In hi-lo arbitration, parties attempt to reduce the risk of making extreme decisions by agreeing ahead of time on the upper and lower limits of any monetary award that the arbitrator will grant. This strategy limits the risk to parties who are worried about giving total control over the outcome to an arbitrator.

2. Final-offer, or baseball, arbitration. In final-offer arbitration, which is often referred to as baseball arbitration because of its use in Major League Baseball contract disputes, both parties present a last, best offer to the arbitrator, who must choose one of the two offers. Because final-offer arbitration typically seems risky, it often gives parties incentives to negotiate a reasonable resolution. As a consequence, it increases disputants’ participation in a negotiation while still ensuring a decision will be reached if they are unable to agree. This type of arbitration is often used in labor negotiations for police officers and firefighters because communities cannot tolerate the risk of a strike arising from an impasse with such essential employees—an argument that some make about professional baseball players as well.

3. Tripartite arbitration. In tripartite arbitration, there are three arbitrators, one named by each party and one chosen by both of them. Tripartite arbitration is useful in highly complex cases where the parties want advice from three individuals with differing expertise (such as a lawyer, a businessperson, and a scientist). It is also used in cases in which the parties lack full confidence in a neutral arbitrator and prefer an arbitrator who will forcefully represent their interests.

What is med-arb?

An often-overlooked alternative dispute resolution process is med-arb, a mediation-arbitration hybrid. In med-arb, disputants hire a neutral mediator. If she is unable to resolve the dispute through mediation, she puts on her arbitration hat and renders a decision, explains Sander.

While this blended process ensures that parties will reach a resolution, it brings with it a certain level of risk. Disputants may be reluctant to be candid with a mediator who could later use the information they share against them in the arbitration phase of the process. They may be able to avoid this objection by having different individuals filled the mediation and arbitration roles, though this solution comes requires additional time and cost.

In sum, mediation, arbitration, and med-arb offer compelling alternatives to litigation the next time you are embroiled in a conflict that seems impossible to resolve on your own.

What are your thoughts on alternative dispute resolution? Leave us a comment.

Related Article: Arbitration vs Mediation: Team-building, ADR, and Using Negotiation Examples from Real Life

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and Negotiations: Negotiating for the Right Mediator

Examples of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): How Mediation Works

Related Posts

• Choose the Right Dispute Resolution Process
• Union Strikes and Dispute Resolution Strategies
• What Is an Umbrella Agreement?
• What is Dispute System Design?
• Top 10 Dispute Resolution Skills

Click here to cancel reply.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Negotiation and Leadership

• Learn More about Negotiation and Leadership

NEGOTIATION MASTER CLASS

• Learn More about Harvard Negotiation Master Class

Negotiation Essentials Online

• Learn More about Negotiation Essentials Online

Beyond the Back Table: Working with People and Organizations to Get to Yes

• Download Program Guide: March 2024
• Register Online: March 2024
• Learn More about Beyond the Back Table

Select Your Free Special Report

• Negotiation and Leadership Fall 2024 Program Guide
• Negotiation Essentials Online (NEO) Spring 2024 Program Guide
• Beyond the Back Table Spring 2024 Program Guide
• Negotiation Master Class May 2024 Program Guide
• Negotiation and Leadership Spring 2024 Program Guide
• Make the Most of Online Negotiations
• Managing Multiparty Negotiations
• Getting the Deal Done
• Salary Negotiation: How to Negotiate Salary: Learn the Best Techniques to Help You Manage the Most Difficult Salary Negotiations and What You Need to Know When Asking for a Raise
• Overcoming Cultural Barriers in Negotiation: Cross Cultural Communication Techniques and Negotiation Skills From International Business and Diplomacy

Teaching Negotiation Resource Center

• Teaching Materials and Publications

Stay Connected to PON

Preparing for negotiation.

Understanding how to arrange the meeting space is a key aspect of preparing for negotiation. In this video, Professor Guhan Subramanian discusses a real world example of how seating arrangements can influence a negotiator’s success. This discussion was held at the 3 day executive education workshop for senior executives at the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.

Guhan Subramanian is the Professor of Law and Business at the Harvard Law School and Professor of Business Law at the Harvard Business School.

Articles & Insights

• For Sellers, The Anchoring Effects of a Hidden Price Can Offer Advantages
• BATNA Examples—and What You Can Learn from Them
• Taylor Swift: Negotiation Mastermind?
• Power and Negotiation: Advice on First Offers
• The Good Cop, Bad Cop Negotiation Strategy
• How to Set Negotiation Goals as a Manager
• Selling the Deal to Outsiders
• In a Price Negotiation, Should You Make the First Offer?
• Increase Your Power in Negotiation
• In the Negotiation Planning Process, to Capture the Force, be Patient
• Conflict-Management Styles: Pitfalls and Best Practices
• Causes of Conflict: When Taboos Create Trouble
• Mediation and the Conflict Resolution Process
• Managing Expectations in Negotiations
• Elements of Conflict: Diagnose What’s Gone Wrong
• Negotiating Change During the Covid-19 Pandemic
• AI Negotiation in the News
• Crisis Communication Examples: What’s So Funny?
• Crisis Negotiation Skills: The Hostage Negotiator’s Drill
• Police Negotiation Techniques from the NYPD Crisis Negotiations Team
• Managing Difficult Employees, and Those Who Just Seem Difficult
• How to Deal with Difficult Customers
• Negotiating with Difficult Personalities and “Dark” Personality Traits
• Consensus-Building Techniques
• Ethics in Negotiations: How to Deal with Deception at the Bargaining Table
• How to Counter Offer Successfully With a Strong Rationale
• Negotiation Techniques: The First Offer Dilemma in Negotiations
• 5 Dealmaking Tips for Closing the Deal
• Managing a Multiparty Negotiation
• What Leads to Renegotiation?
• Prompting Peace Negotiations
• Political Negotiation: Negotiating with Bureaucrats
• Top International Negotiation Examples: The East China Sea Dispute
• Best Negotiators in History: Nelson Mandela and His Negotiation Style
• Cross Cultural Negotiations in International Business: Four Negotiation Tips for Bargaining in China
• The Contingency Theory of Leadership: A Focus on Fit
• Servant Leadership and Warren Buffett’s Giving Pledge
• How to Negotiate in Cross-Cultural Situations
• Counteracting Negotiation Biases Like Race and Gender in the Workplace
• The Trait Theory of Leadership
• What Makes a Good Mediator?
• Why is Negotiation Important: Mediation in Transactional Negotiations
• The Mediation Process and Dispute Resolution
• Negotiations and Logrolling: Discover Opportunities to Generate Mutual Gains
• How Mediation Can Help Resolve Pro Sports Disputes
• 5 Types of Negotiation Skills
• 5 Tips for Improving Your Negotiation Skills
• 10 Negotiation Failures
• When a Job Offer is “Nonnegotiable”
• In Negotiation, How Much Do Personality and Other Individual Differences Matter?
• Ethics and Negotiation: 5 Principles of Negotiation to Boost Your Bargaining Skills in Business Situations
• 10 Negotiation Training Skills Every Organization Needs
• Trust in Negotiation: Does Gender Matter?
• Use a Negotiation Preparation Worksheet for Continuous Improvement
• Collaborative Negotiation Examples: Tenants and Landlords
• Renegotiate Salary to Your Advantage
• How to Counter a Job Offer: Avoid Common Mistakes
• Salary Negotiation: How to Ask for a Higher Salary
• How to Ask for a Salary Increase
• Setting Standards in Negotiations
• Planning for Cyber Defense of Critical Urban Infrastructure
• New Simulation: Negotiating a Management Crisis
• New Great Negotiator Case and Video: Christiana Figueres, former UNFCCC Executive Secretary
• Download Your Next Mediation Video
• Bidding in an International Business Negotiation: Euro-Idol
• How to Win at Win-Win Negotiation
• Labor Negotiation Strategies
• How to Create Win-Win Situations
• For NFL Players, a Win-Win Negotiation Contract Only in Retrospect?
• Win-Lose Negotiation Examples

PON Publications

• Negotiation Data Repository (NDR)
• New Frontiers, New Roleplays: Next Generation Teaching and Training
• Negotiating Transboundary Water Agreements
• Learning from Practice to Teach for Practice—Reflections From a Novel Training Series for International Climate Negotiators
• Insights From PON’s Great Negotiators and the American Secretaries of State Program
• Gender and Privilege in Negotiation

Remember Me This setting should only be used on your home or work computer.

Lost your password? Create a new password of your choice.

Copyright © 2024 Negotiation Daily. All rights reserved.

Home / Essay Samples / Business / Management / Dispute Resolution

Dispute Resolution Essay Examples

Alternative dispute resolution – the best avenue for settling disputes.

On any other given day, reading the sentence “faster, easier and cheaper” might mean someone is advertising a new vacuum cleaner. In the case of this essay, the same words could be used to describe ADR — Alternative Dispute Resolution. ADR is a general term...

The Concepts of Litigation & Arbitration

El-Adaway and Ezeldin (2007) have labelled both litigation and arbitration as traditional dispute resolution procedures. This methods particularly being used in construction industry long before the existence of other dispute resolution mechanism. Litigation is the oldest method of resolving disputes. This method involves a lengthy...

Advantages and Disadvantages of Alternative Dispute Resolution

Until very recently, conflict was seen as something negative that had to be avoided. This may be so because we perceive more the destructive consequences that are used to resolve the disputes, and not so much the conflict itself. On the other hand, we also...

Personal Statement for Masters in Dispute Resolution

I am applying for admission into your Master of Dispute Resolution program because I believe it will provide me with the opportunity to be effective in my career. I come from a rather scientific background, holding a Bachelor of Science from California State University, Los...

Alternative Dispute Resolution in Healthcare

The purpose of alternative dispute resolution in healthcare is that not healthcare professionals view things the same, especially when it comes to considering their religious beliefs. Alternative dispute resolution allows helps provide different approaches to identify solutions to conflicts. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to...

Mediation and Arbitration: the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (adr) in Healthcare

Medical malpractice has existed for many years and will continue to happen with the passage of time in the United States of America as in other parts of the world, due to human error or some medical negligence. The work of health professionals is to...

Online Dispute Resolution on Warranties

Mechanisms to end consumer disputes have been documented over time and a major focus on the necessity to come up with alternative means to deal with these disputes is on the rise. Scholars have spent a considerable amount of time piecing up shreds of evidence...

Online Dispute Resolution: Advantages and Disadvantages

Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) is a voluntary confidential mediation process in which disputants communicate online to resolve a conflict. Nonetheless, as this form is still in its early stages, many questions its reliability and its future. Hence, this essay will first look at the advantages,...

Trying to find an excellent essay sample but no results?

Don’t waste your time and get a professional writer to help!

You may also like

• Walt Disney
• Andrew Carnegie
• Comparative Analysis Essays
• Total Quality Management Essays
• Accounting Essays
• Outsourcing Essays
• Decision Making Essays
• Leadership Essays
• Leadership and Management Essays
• Human Resource Management Essays
• Cost Accounting Essays
• Management By Objectives Essays

samplius.com uses cookies to offer you the best service possible.By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .--> -->