• Bipolar Disorder
  • Therapy Center
  • When To See a Therapist
  • Types of Therapy
  • Best Online Therapy
  • Best Couples Therapy
  • Best Family Therapy
  • Managing Stress
  • Sleep and Dreaming
  • Understanding Emotions
  • Self-Improvement
  • Healthy Relationships
  • Student Resources
  • Personality Types
  • Verywell Mind Insights
  • 2023 Verywell Mind 25
  • Mental Health in the Classroom
  • Editorial Process
  • Meet Our Review Board
  • Crisis Support

What Is the Great Man Theory of Leadership?

Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

great man thesis

Amy Morin, LCSW, is a psychotherapist and international bestselling author. Her books, including "13 Things Mentally Strong People Don't Do," have been translated into more than 40 languages. Her TEDx talk,  "The Secret of Becoming Mentally Strong," is one of the most viewed talks of all time.

great man thesis

  • Contemporary Views

The great man theory of leadership suggests that some individuals are born with characteristics that naturally make them skilled leaders. According to this view, leaders are born, not made. It also suggests that leaders assume authority when their leadership traits are needed.

Have you ever heard the phrase, "Great leaders are born, not made"? This quote sums up the basic tenet of the great man theory of leadership, which suggests that leadership capacity is innate. According to this theory, you're either a natural-born leader or not.

The term "great man" was used because, at the time, ​ leadership was thought of primarily as a male quality, especially in terms of military leadership.

Origins of the Great Man Theory of Leadership

The great man theory of leadership became popular during the 19th century. The mythology behind some of the world's most famous leaders, such as Abraham Lincoln, Julius Caesar, Mahatma Gandhi, and Alexander the Great, helped contribute to the notion that great leaders are born and not made.

Carlyle's Views on Leadership

In many examples, it seems as if the right man for the job seems to emerge almost magically to take control of a situation and lead a group of people into safety or success. Historian Thomas Carlyle also had a major influence on this theory of leadership. He stated, "The history of the world is but the biography of great men."

According to Carlyle, effective leaders are those gifted with divine inspiration and the right characteristics.

Early Leadership Reasearch

Some of the earliest research on leadership looked at people who were already successful leaders. These individuals often included aristocratic rulers who achieved their position through birthright. Because people of a lesser social status had fewer opportunities to practice and achieve leadership roles, it contributed to the idea that leadership is an inherent ability.

Even today, people often describe prominent leaders as having the right qualities or personality for the position. This implies that inherent characteristics are what make these people effective leaders.

Nature vs. Nurture

The great man theory of leadership is an example of using 'nature' to explain human behavior. The nature vs. nurture debate in psychology suggests that some skills are innate while others are acquired through learning and experience. In this case, great man theory suggests that nature plays the dominant role in leadership ability.

Examples of the Great Man Theory of Leadership

Some examples of famous historical figures who are often cited as examples of "great men" include:

  • Abraham Lincoln : The 16th president of the United States shepherded the Union through the Civil War and signed the Emancipation Proclamation. His leadership through this tumultuous period is often seen as an example of how great leaders seem to be born with specific skills that make them destined to lead.
  • Martin Luther King, Jr .: The civil rights leader was influential in the fight for civil rights during the 1960s. His leadership characteristics, including his persuasive abilities and charisma, are often cited as examples of how innate traits contribute to leadership ability.
  • Mahatma Gandhi : The spiritual and political leader who led the successful movement for India's independence from British rule advocated non-violent resistance. His resilience, wisdom, and vision made him an inspiration in the fight for freedom in India and across the globe.

Other leaders often used as examples of the great man theory of leadership include George Washington, Winston Churchill, and Nelson Mandela. Carlyle cited other figures in his book "Heroes and Hero-Worship," including Odin, Muhammad, William Shakespeare, Martin Luther, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Napoleon Bonaparte.  

Criticisms of the Great Man Theory of Leadership

The great man theory of leadership has been the subject of considerable debate and criticism. The following are some of the major critiques of this approach to explaining leadership.

Herbert Spencer's Response

Sociologist Herbert Spencer suggested that the leaders were products of the society in which they lived. In "The Study of Sociology," Spencer wrote:

"You must admit that the genesis of a great man depends on the long series of complex influences which has produced the race in which he appears, and the social state into which that race has slowly grown…Before he can remake his society, his society must make him."

Incomplete Account of Leadership

One of the critical problems with the Great Man theory of leadership is that not all people who possess the so-called natural leadership qualities become great leaders. If leadership were simply an inborn quality, all people who possess the ​ necessary traits would eventually find themselves in leadership roles.

Ignores Situational Factors

Research has instead found that leadership is a surprisingly complex subject and numerous factors influence how successful a particular leader may or may not be. Characteristics of the group, the leader in power, and the situation all interact to determine what type of leadership is needed and the effectiveness of this leadership.

Neglects Skill Development

The great man theory of leadership also fails to explain how leadership skills can be developed. It oversimplifies leadership and focuses on a very narrow set of skills that may not be effective or appropriate in every context or situation. Modern views emphasize that leadership abilities can be learned and honed with practice.

The psychologist William James defended Carlyle's ideas, suggesting that it is the innate characteristics of individuals that then shape their environments. The theory was critiqued by others in literary form, including in Leo Tolstoy's "War and Peace." 

Contemporary Views of the Great Man Theory

The great man theory was an influential early theory of leadership, but it has fallen out of favor in modern leadership research. Contemporary ideas take a more nuanced and complex view of the many factors that influence leadership, including the characteristics of group members and the role of the situation .

While the great man theory has been largely replaced by other ideas, elements of it are still relevant today. The theory does not fully explain or account for the many aspects of leadership, but the existence of specific traits that contribute to great leadership is still of interest to contemporary researchers.

Today, experts recognize that leadership is complex and that innate traits alone do not account for how and why some leaders are successful.

Halaychik CS. Leadership theories . In: Lessons in Library Leadership . Elsevier; 2016:1-56. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-100565-1.00001-7

Spector BA. Carlyle, Freud, and the Great Man Theory more fully considered .  Leadership . 2015;12(2):250-260. doi:10.1177/1742715015571392.

Carlyle T. On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History. Fredrick A. Stokes & Brother, 1988.

Spencer, H. The Study of Sociology . Appleton, 1874.​

Yukl G. Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention .  Acad Manag Perspect . 2012;26(4):66-85. doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0088.

James W. Great men, great thoughts, and the environment . The Atlantic .

Kets de Vries M, Cheak-Baillargeon A. Leadership in organizations, sociology of . In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences . Elsevier; 2015:664-669. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.73080-7

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

The Great Man Theory of Leadership Explained

"Great Man Theory" in large white title text with the subtitle "great leaders: natural ability or learned behavior?" on a dark blue background.

Last Updated January 8, 2015

What makes a man or woman rise above others to assume the mantle of leadership? Why are some more drawn to the burdens of the job than others? What set history’s great leaders apart from their contemporaries and enabled them to navigate often tumultuous waters, defying the odds to achieve their goals on behalf of themselves and their people Some theorists have argued that these questions are answered by the Great Man Theory of Leadership.

What is the Great Man Theory of Leadership?

The Great Man Theory of Leadership espouses that great leaders are born, not made. These individuals come into the world possessing certain characteristics and traits not found in all people. These abilities enable them to lead while shaping the very pages of history. Under great man theory, prominent leaders throughout the course of history were born to lead and deserved to do so as a result of their natural abilities and talents.

The Great Man Theory of Leadership centers on two main assumptions:

  • Great leaders are born possessing certain traits that enable them to rise and lead.
  • Great leaders can arise when the need for them is great.

Those who support the great man theory say leaders are born with the attributes necessary to set them apart from those around them and that these traits enable them to assume roles of authority and power. Great leaders are heroes, according to this theory, that accomplish great feats against the odds on behalf of followers. The Great Man Theory of Leadership essentially implies that those in power deserve to lead because of the traits they’ve been endowed with.

History of the Great Man Theory

The Great Man Theory was established in the 19 th century by proponents such as historian Thomas Carlyle, who put forth the idea that the world’s history is nothing more than a collection of biographies belonging to great men.

Carlyle and contemporaries gained recognition for the theory in their time, as evidenced by such works as the Encyclopedia Britannica Eleventh Edition , published in 1911. This encyclopedia told the story of world history through biographies of the great men that led during different historical periods. Not everyone in Carlyle’s time, however, agreed with the theory’s assumptions.

Opposing Views to the Great Man Theory

Herbert Spencer, a noted philosopher, sociologist, biologist and political theorist of the Victorian era, countered that the Great Man Theory was childish, primitive and unscientific. He believed leaders were products of their environment. He advocated that before a “great man” can remake his society, that society has to make him.

Despite Spencer’s arguments to the contrary, the Great Man Theory remained the popular and predominant theory for explaining and understanding leadership until the mid-20 th century. As the behavioral sciences grew, so did the idea that leadership is more of a science that can be learned and nurtured. Those with opposing views say great leaders are shaped and molded by their times as the traits necessary to lead are learned and honed .

However, much like the question of nature versus nurture, there are those who still support the Great Man Theory of Leadership and the idea that men and women leaders are born, not made.

great man thesis

Related Articles

great man thesis

Take the next step in your career with a program guide!

By completing this form and clicking the button below, I consent to receiving calls, text messages and/or emails from BISK, its client institutions, and their representatives regarding educational services and programs. I understand calls and texts may be directed to the number I provide using automatic dialing technology. I understand that this consent is not required to purchase goods or services. If you would like more information relating to how we may use your data, please review our privacy policy .

  • Media Center

Great Man Theory

The basic idea, theory, meet practice.

TDL is an applied research consultancy. In our work, we leverage the insights of diverse fields—from psychology and economics to machine learning and behavioral data science—to sculpt targeted solutions to nuanced problems.

If someone asked you to think of a great leader, who would come to mind? If asked to explain your reasoning, are there certain characteristics you would point out, or certain choices you would say proved their leadership abilities?

According to the Great Man Theory, great leaders are born, not made. 1 Leadership traits are inherent and cannot be learned. Great leaders come forward when they’re most needed, in order to become the foundation upon which history is built. Essentially, according to the Great Man Theory, people in positions of power deserve to lead because of characteristics granted to them at birth, which ultimately help them become heroes.

No great man lives in vain. The history of the world is but the biography of great men. – Thomas Carlyle, Scottish historian and author of On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History

The Great Man Theory is mostly associated with Thomas Carlyle, who looked for a source of strength and direction during the Napoleonic wars. 1 Carlyle put his faith in the Great Man: someone who was “unmistakably” sent to earth by God. Expanding on his beliefs, Carlyle delivered a series of lectures on the role heroes play in shaping history. These lectures were synthesized into a single work in 1841, titled On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History. In his work, a deep respect for strength combined with the conviction of a God-given mission emerged. 2

Ultimately, there could be six archetypes: the hero as divinity (i.e. pagan myths), prophet (i.e. Muhammad), poet (i.e. William Shakespeare), priest (i.e. John Knox), man of letters (i.e. Jean-Jacques Rousseau), and king (i.e. Oliver Cromwell). 2 Carlyle argued that studying great men was profitable to our own heroic sides: examining heroes’ lives and greatness could help us uncover aspects of our character. 3

Carlyle went on to do much subsequent work regarding his heroes. Oliver Cromwell, English soldier and statesman who led parliamentary forces in the English Civil Wars, was Carlyle’s ideal man. 2 4 Frederick the Great - King of Prussia from 1740 to 1786 and a military campaigner - was another “hero as king” in Carlyle’s eyes. 5 Carlyle wrote Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches in 1845 and The History of Friedrich II of Prussia, Called Frederick the Great in 1857, detailing the men’s heroic accomplishments. 2

Due to Carlyle’s work, the Great Man Theory was most prominent in the 19th century, popularized in the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition of 1911. This book is filled with detailed biographies about the great men of history. 6 Early research related to Carlyle’s work considered successful leaders, often aristocratic rulers who were granted their positions through birthright. 1 Of course, people of lower social status did not have the same opportunities to achieve leadership roles; this was blindly considered to be evidence that leadership ability is inherent.

Thomas Carlyle

Scottish historian and writer Thomas Carlyle is most known for his book, On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History, in which he argued the key role in history played by the actions of great men. 2 Carlyle grew up in a family with strong Calvinist beliefs, and was expected to be a minister. Although he distanced from his faith while at the University of Edinburgh, he held onto some Calvinist values which shaped his later work, such as a desire to denounce evil. Carlyle’s work was highly influential - albeit controversial - during the Victorian era.

Consequences

The idea that leaders are born (and not made) is still a common and hotly debated idea. Those who believe in the original notion of innate superiority may be reluctant to take on positions of leadership if they believe they don’t have what it takes.

Most contemporary support for the Great Man Theory rests in its assertion that great leaders possess certain characteristics. 1 7 An extension of appreciation for the theory, rather than direct support of it, may be more fitting, as Carlyle’s work inspired the development of theoretical approaches of leadership, such as leadership styles and trait theories. 8 9

For example, the Big Five personality traits are frequently cited in contemporary research about leaders. 10 11 12 The five traits themselves are: (1) extraversion: the tendency to be outgoing, assertive, and active; (2) agreeableness: the tendency to be kind and trustworthy; (3) conscientiousness: determined by achievement and dependability; (4) neuroticism: the tendency to be anxious and fearful; and (5) openness to experiences: the tendency to be creative and perceptive. Researchers assess the five traits and determine which contribute to effective leadership, and which may be ineffective (i.e. neuroticism).

The Big Five personality traits and their bearing on leadership shares some common assumptions with Great Man Theory. The debate between nature and nurture when it comes to leadership still exists, but Carlyle’s work was certainly influential on leadership research.

Controversies

Due to the lack of empirical, scientific evidence for the Great Man Theory, 7 there remains a lot of criticism. When the theory was first popularized, one of the most prominent critics was biologist and sociologist Herbert Spencer. Spencer held that attributing historical successes to individual decisions was primitive and unscientific, and that the so-called “great men” were solely products of their social environment. 16 Before a “great man” could shape and build his society, the same society had to shape and build him.

There is also a sense of survivorship bias attached to the Great Man Theory: there are likely more people who possess “leadership qualities” than there are “great” historical leaders. If leadership was truly innate, then this should not be the case. Rather, research has shown that successful leadership is complex, influenced by many different factors. 17 Similarly, the theory excludes those who may not have necessarily been prominent leaders, but without whom history would not exist as we know it. 18 Carlyle’s concept thus raises philosophical concerns about the role of the individual versus the collective, and brings to light the psychological debate of nature versus nurture.

Aside from the tenets of the Great Man Theory, Carlyle has also been criticized for the way his work was written in On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History. 1 Of course, the use of “man” itself in his theory reflects a gender bias: a perception that history lies on the backs of dominant males, combined with conviction that leadership is inherently masculine. There is also a deep religiosity to Carlyle’s language in this text, especially in his warning that - for those who were not divinely appointed by God to become heroes - our jobs are to recognize and uplift “great men” into their positions of prominence. Only by obeying the rulings of these leaders can the “sick” world be healed, according to Carlyle. The Great Man thesis may ultimately say more about the patriarchal and individualistic assumptions of Western society in the 19th century than it informs about the progression of historical events. It demonstrates how historians and academics reflect the prejudices of their age in their work.

Leadership effectiveness

Due to the complexity of leadership, associated research tends to be limited in its breadth and clarity of core leader attributes. In particular, different studies tend to focus on varying, narrow categories of individual differences. 19 In an attempt to organize the existing literature on the effects of individual differences on leadership, recent frameworks have distinguished between trait-like and state-like differences. While research on trait-like differences would be dispositional and thus an extension of the Great Man Theory, research on state-like differences shifts its focus to buildable skills.

In order to assess the conceptually varied research on individual differences and leadership effectiveness, a group of psychology and management researchers set out to compare the roles of trait-like (i.e. personality and intelligence) and state-like differences (i.e. knowledge and skills) in leaders. 19 They conducted a meta-analysis of 1,846 articles across 25 individual differences proposed to be related to effective leadership.

Out of the 25 individual differences they assessed, 13 were found to be essential for effective leadership: seven trait-like individual differences (achievement motivation, charisma, creativity, dominance, energy, honesty and integrity, and self-confidence), and six state-like individual differences (decision making, interpersonal skills, management skills, oral communication, problem-solving skills, and written communication).

Ultimately, the researchers found that although both types of individual differences were important predictors of effective leadership, their relative impacts didn’t differ much. 19 Additionally, the amount of variance in leadership effectiveness that was explained by individual differences was typically influenced by the leader’s organizational level and organization type. For organizational level, variances in effectiveness were better explained by individual differences for those in lower levels of leadership, rather than higher levels. Organization type also mattered, such that a willingness to adjust to change was more strongly related to leadership effectiveness in government and military settings.

The findings from this 2011 meta-analysis suggest the existence of a dispositional component to effective leadership, supporting Carlyle’s Great Man Theory. However, buildable knowledge and skills are also important for effective leadership, which suggests that leadership models should expand to include these more coachable characteristics.

Great man or great myth? It really does seem like it is a mix of the two perspectives. Of course, “great man” refers to innate traits here, rather than support of the idea that only male heroes deserve credit or respect.

Related TDL Content

The Business Case for Women Leaders

“No great man lives in vain” - what about women? This article delves into the lack of women in leadership positions today and considers how attention to implicit gender biases can help us start to bridge the gap, and capitalize on women.

Are great leaders born or made? Take a look through some of The Decision Lab’s many thinker pieces: consider their stories, and decide for yourself!

Want to Innovate? Stop Hiring the Safest Option

Is there room for innovation within Carlyle’s six archetypes? This article offers leaders a fresh perspective on innovative hiring practices and may be something to consider for your next move in leadership.

  • Spector, B. A. (2016). Carlyle, Freud, and the Great Man Theory more fully considered. Leadership, 12 (2), 250-260.
  • Cockshut, A. O. J. (2021, February 1). Thomas Carlyle. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Thomas-Carlyle
  • Carlyle, T. (1888). On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History. Frederick A. Stokes.
  • Morrill, J. S. (2021, April 21). Oliver Cromwell. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Oliver-Cromwell
  • Anderson, M. S. (2021, February 24). Frederick II. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Frederick-II-king-of-Prussia
  • Boyles, D. (2016). Everything explained that is explainable: On the creation of the Encyclopædia Britannica’s celebrated eleventh edition, 1910-1911.
  • Halaychik, C. S. (2016). Chapter 1 - Leadership theories. Lessons in Library Leadership. 
  • De Vries, M. K., & Cheak-Baillargeon, A. (2015). Sociology of leadership in organizations. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). 
  • Kumaran, M. (2012). Chapter 3 - Leadership styles. Leadership in Libraries. 
  • Hassan, H., Asad, S., & Hoshino, Y. (2016). Determinants of leadership style in big five personality dimensions. Universal Journal of Management, 4 (4), 161-179.
  • De Hoogh, A. H., Den Hartog, D. N., & Koopman, P. L. (2005). Linking the big five‐factors of personality to charismatic and transactional leadership; Perceived dynamic work environment as a moderator. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior , 26 (7), 839-865.
  • Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology , 85 (5), 751-765.
  • Germain, M. L. (2012). Traits and skills theories as the nexus between leadership and expertise: Reality or fallacy? Performance Improvement, 51 (5), 32-39.
  • Kumar, S., Adhish, V. S., & Deoki, N. (2014). Making sense of theories of leadership for capacity building. Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Official Publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine , 39 (2), 82-86.
  • Youngjohn, R. M. (2000). Is leadership trait theory fact or fiction? A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between individual differences and leader effectiveness.
  • Spencer, H. (1874). The Study of Sociology.
  • Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26 (4), 66-85.
  • Is There Still Value in ‘Great Man’ History? (2019, September 9). History Today. https://www.historytoday.com/archive/head-head/there-still-value-‘great-man’-history
  • Hoffman, B. J., Woehr, D. J., Maldagen-Youngjohn, R., & Lyons, B. D. (2011). Great man or great myth? A quantitative review of the relationship between individual differences and leadership effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84 (2), 347-381.

great man thesis

Mental Models

great man thesis

Card Sorting

great man thesis

Empathy Mapping

Notes illustration

Eager to learn about how behavioral science can help your organization?

Get new behavioral science insights in your inbox every month..

  • Organizational Behaviour

Great Man Theory of Leadership

Are some people born to lead? If we look at the great leaders of the past such as Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Napoleon, Queen Elizabeth I, and Abraham Lincoln , we will find that they do seem to differ from ordinary human beings in several aspects. The same applies to the contemporary leaders like George W. Bush and Mahatma Gandhi. They definitely possess high levels of ambition coupled with clear visions of precisely where they want to go.

These leaders are cited as naturally great leaders, born with a set of personal qualities that made them effective leaders. Even today, the belief that truly great leaders are born is common.

Top executives, sports personalities, and even politicians often seem to possess an aura that sets them apart from others. According to the contemporary theorists, leaders are not like other people. They do not need to be intellectually genius or omniscient prophets to succeed, but they definitely should have the right stuff which is not equally present in all people. This orientation expresses an approach to the study of leadership known as the great man theory .

Assumptions

  • The leaders are born and not made and posses certain traits which were inherited
  • Great leaders can arise when there is a great need.

Much of the work on this theory was done in the 19th century and is often linked to the work of the historian Thomas Carlyle who commented on the great men or heroes of the history saying that “the history of the world is but the biography of great men”. According to him, a leader is the one gifted with unique qualities that capture the imagination of the masses.

Earlier leadership was considered as a quality associated mostly with the males, and therefore the theory was named as the great man theory. But later with the emergence of many great women leaders as well, the theory was recognized as the Great Person Theory .

The great man theory of leadership states that some people are born with the necessary attributes that set them apart from others and that these traits are responsible for their assuming positions of power and authority. A leader is a hero who accomplishes goals against all odds for his followers.

The theory implies that those in power deserve to be there because of their special endowment. Furthermore, the theory contends that these traits remain stable over time and across different groups. Thus, it suggests that all great leaders share these characteristic regardless of when and where they lived or the precise role in the history they fulfilled.

Many of the traits cited as being important to be an effective leader are typical masculine traits. In contemporary research, there is a significant shift in such a mentality.

Prompted by the great man theory of leadership, and the emerging interest in understanding what leadership is, researchers focused on the leader - Who is a leader? What are the distinguishing characteristics of great and effective leaders? This gave rise to the early research efforts to the trait approach to leadership.

  Related Articles

  • Leadership Theories
  • Blake and Mouton’s Managerial Grid
  • House’s Path Goal Theory
  • Trait Theory

View All Articles

Authorship/Referencing - About the Author(s)

The article is Written By “Prachi Juneja” and Reviewed By Management Study Guide Content Team . MSG Content Team comprises experienced Faculty Member, Professionals and Subject Matter Experts. We are a ISO 2001:2015 Certified Education Provider . To Know more, click on About Us . The use of this material is free for learning and education purpose. Please reference authorship of content used, including link(s) to ManagementStudyGuide.com and the content page url.
  • Leadership - Introduction
  • Importance of Leadership
  • Role of a Leader
  • Qualities of a Leader
  • Leadership and Management
  • Leader versus Manager
  • Authority vs Leadership
  • Leadership and Motivation
  • Emotional Intelligence for Leaders
  • Organizational Leadership
  • Leadership Ethics
  • Leadership Strategy
  • Leadership Styles
  • Personal Leadership Brand
  • Level 5 Leadership
  • Situational Leadership
  • Situational Leadership and Motivation
  • Leadership & Subordinate Development
  • Leadership Development - Introduction
  • Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Motivation
  • Inside Leaders vs. Outside Leaders
  • Transformational Leadership
  • Leadership for the 21st Century
  • The Transleader
  • Three Traits of Effective Leadership
  • Importance of Compassion in Leadership
  • An Important Advice to Future Leaders
  • Avoiding Focus on Quarterly Earnings
  • Reinventing Management for 21st Century
  • Ambidextrous Leadership
  • Invest in Oneself
  • Social Media Skills for Leaders
  • Social Stratification and Hierarchy
  • The Ethical Imperative
  • Leadership in the Face of Adversity
  • Emotional and Spiritual Intelligence
  • Great Man Theory
  • Transactional Leadership
  • Continuum of Leadership Behaviour
  • Likert’s Management System
  • Hersey Blanchard Model
  • Fiedler’s Contingency Model
  • Leadership and Trust
  • How to be a Good Leader ?
  • Effective Leadership Skills
  • Leadership Vision
  • Different Types of Power
  • Women and Leadership
  • What are the Challenges in Leadership ?
  • Tips to Overcome Challenges in Leadership
  • Role of Communication in Overcoming Leadership Challenges
  • Role of Management/Organization in Overcoming Leadership Challenges
  • Tips to Strengthen Bond Among Employees
  • Vision of Leaders has to be Actualized by Middle Management for Organizational Success
  • Leadership in the Time of Epic Changes and Struggles Over Ethics and Values
  • Great Leadership is about Initiating, Sustaining, and Carrying through Ones Vision
  • Cultural Dimensions of Leadership
  • Scarcity vs. Abundant Mindsets in Leaders
  • Different Folks, Different Strokes! The Many Leadership Styles in the Real World
  • Persuasion and the Art of Changing Minds are Essential for Contemporary Leaders
  • Managing in Chaos: A Necessary Skill for Managers and Leaders
  • Leadership in the Contemporary World
  • Need to Develop Network Thinking and Seventh Sense for Success in the 21st Century
  • Why Do Some Business Leaders Attain Greatness Whereas Others Fail?
  • Hands on Approach to Leadership: The Need for Leaders to be Good Administrators
  • How Great Leaders Transform Organizations, Nations, Societies, and the World
  • Why Business and Political Leaders Must be Institution Builders to Ensure Longevity
  • Qualities of an Inspirational Leader and their Benefits
  • Foundation Pillars of Successful Leaders
  • Self Assessment for Leadership: Assessing the Strengths and Vulnerabilities for Improving Leadership Effectiveness
  • Self Motivation for Leaders
  • Techniques for Developing Self-Motivation
  • Leadership Development Plan
  • Writing a Leadership Development Plan
  • When Hope Meets Reality: The Challenges for Leaders to Sustain the Momentum
  • The Challenge for Contemporary Leaders is to Restore Trust and Faith in Institutions
  • The Ever Shortening Business Cycles and What They Mean for Business Leaders
  • Leadership Case Study: Steve Jobs - The Man Who Ushered in the Smartphone Revolution
  • Why Leaders Must be in Control over the Direction and Pace of Organizational Change
  • The 4Cs of Leadership Styles for Leadership in the Digital Age
  • Lessons for Business Leaders from the Downfall of Charles Ghosn of Renault - Nissan
  • Truly Great Leadership is All about Walking the Talk in All Aspects of Being Leaders
  • Examining the Crisis of the Leader – Follower Relationship in the Present Times
  • How Great Leaders use a Mix of Micromanagement and Hands off Approaches
  • Leadership during Crises is what Distinguishes Great Leaders from Manager Leaders
  • What the Dalai Lama can teach Corporate Honchos about Leadership and Management
  • Why we Need more Emotionally Intelligent Leaders and Managers in Chaotic Times
  • Why the Digital Age Calls for a New Approach to Leadership and Team Management
  • Business Leadership in the Age of Nationalism and Populism and the Rocky Road Ahead
  • Leadership in a Collapsing World When Faced with Insurmountable Problems
  • The Importance of Thought Leaders and Influencers in the Age of Social Media
  • Leadership by Optics Management: Taking the Howdy Modi Event as a Case Study
  • What Should Leaders do in Low Growth and Recessionary Times
  • What Ails India Inc. and is it a Crisis of Leadership or a Structural Issue to be Addressed?
  • The Tyranny of the Quarterly Results: Why Business Leaders must Avoid Short-Termism
  • The Perils of Leaders and Their Personality Cults in Times of Authoritarian Rulers
  • Leadership in the Digital Age and Why Contemporary Leaders Must Master These Skills
  • Misdemeanours by Senior Leaders Must Be Handled Firmly and the Right Message Sent
  • When Hope Meets Reality: Why Visionary Leaders Have to Balance Dreams with Realities
  • Power as a Managerial Tool
  • Why We Need More Self Aware and Less Self Centred Leaders, Who Can Self Evaluate

CrowJack

  • Calculators
  • Swot Analysis
  • Pestle Analysis
  • Five Forces Analysis
  • Organizational Structure
  • Copywriting
  • Research Topics
  • Student Resources

CrowJack

Services We Provide

proof-reading

Resources We Provide

blog

Login / Register

login

  • A Comprehensive Guide on The Great Man Theory of Leadership
  • The Ultimate Guide to Top Leadership Theories

Kiara Miller - Image

There are a lot of proponents of the assertion that excellence in leadership is an endowment that people are born with. Having said that, these proponents do not believe in the fact that leadership skills can be acquired through learning, development, and experience. The Great Man Theory of Leadership that emerged in the 19th century endorses this belief in the most comprehensive way.

The Great Man Theory of leadership was proposed by Thomas Carlyle, the same behind the origin of the Trait Theory of Leadership . Thomas Carlyle encouraged the idea that the history of the world is majorly influenced by great heroes who were born with natural leadership abilities that have changed the world forever.

The paramount beliefs that inspired this theory are listed below.

Table of Contents

Key features of the great man theory of leadership, relevance of the theory in the contemporary corporate world, a real-world example of a born leader.

Key features of the Great Man Theory of leadership

The theory views leadership entirely as an innate ability that people are born with and hence, it states that leaders who aren’t born with natural qualities cannot become leaders.

Another key aspect of the theory is that people who are in power or in leadership roles are entitled to that power purely because of their inherent abilities to lead people and causes of collective welfare. This leadership style is likely to be more prevalent in countries with a high power distance index .

Besides, another interesting aspect that the theory underlines is that great leaders or heroes will arise whenever the need for fine leadership arises. When the need for leadership will be great, exceptional leaders will rise to the occasion.

Going forward, it is also important to shed light on one of the fiercest criticisms of the theory. The Great Man Theory since its inception has always associated the idea of iconic and heroic leadership with men. Therefore, the theory as it emerged in the 19th century was highly misogynist. However, over centuries, the theory has evolved to be more synonymous with ‘The Great Person Theory’ as strong and powerful women leaders came to the forefront as highly successful entrepreneurs, political leaders, social change-makers, and so on.

So, in the modern context, we can replace men with people to understand the theory. The contemporary implication is that people irrespective of their genders rise as strong leaders from the virtue of their natural talents and capabilities. Further, with these capabilities, they battle all odds and confront unprecedented challenges with effective change management to achieve great things on behalf of their sympathizers, followers, or subordinates.

The contemporary corporate world is changing at a rampant pace and there are versatile challenges for organizations to navigate as they aim to win the enormous competition. To name a few challenges, there is high disengagement among employees, digital transformation ongoing in the corporate world, and ever-evolving customer expectations. As per the theory, in such a scenario where organizations need to build strong competitive advantages, men and women with natural leadership talents and extraordinary visions will emerge to the scene. Also, if we look at another implication of the theory, identifying people with natural leadership potential in coherence with modern-day leadership skills can be a great way to find future leaders.

Contemporary business leadership is a lot different than traditional leadership. In this new age, leadership is about more versatile natural abilities like empathy, emotional intelligence , public speaking, and so on. Seeking inspiration from this theory, organizations can choose the finest leaders.

Elon Musk leadership style analysis

Elon-musk.jpg

Can you think of an example of a natural leader in the contemporary business world? Well, there is certainly one man who can be looked at as the epitome of natural leadership. He is none other than the man behind Tesla and SpaceX. . Elon Musk’s leadership style is exceptional and inspiring for the entire world.

He displays excellent leadership skills that he seems to have been born with given his natural charisma and bold personality. If you look at Tesla’s mission statement, it sta tes that the company wants to accelerate the transition of the world to sustainable transportation. For someone to have such a vision almost 10 years ago seems highly unthinkable when no other person really envisaged sustainable transportation. Similarly, if we assess the mission and vision of SpaceX, Elon Musk wants to make mankind a multi-planetary phenomenon.

Seldom does someone have such innate intelligence, a knack for excellence, creativity, confidence, and focus to make Tesla and SpaceX possible. In fact, both these companies are industry leaders in their own way with market capitalizations of USD 1.047 trillion and more than USD 100 billion respectively. It is unthinkable to believe in the idea of colonizing Mars and actually working relentlessly in that direction. It does take natural talent and inherent skills to make such extraordinary visions feasible. His unique natural traits as an effective leader have taken Tesla and SpaceX from being incredible ideas to highly successful companies. In fact, SpaceX is the only private entity in the aerospace industry that has the capability to return spacecraft from low earth orbit.

He leads by fine example and both Tesla and SpaceX are over-dependent on his unparalleled and intrinsic leadership qualities that are indeed hard for others to emulate. Intellect, consistency, resilience, self-awareness , optimism, and confidence come naturally to him which makes him a great leader. How he works for 80 to 100 hours per week and the passion with which he believes in his ideas speak for his consistency.

Elon Musk can be looked at as the best leader among a pack of leaders. The kind of influence he has on the world, how so many people look up to him and how he is transforming the world are testament to his natural leadership that is almost impossible to replicate. Any company that he heads will definitely have a natural competitive advantage because of his innate traits as a leader.

What are the limitations of the Great Man Theory?

The Great Man Theory has several limitations. It oversimplifies leadership by attributing it solely to inherent traits, neglecting the impact of context, experience, and learning. It also promotes a hierarchical and elitist view of leadership, overlooking the potential of leadership in ordinary individuals.

What are the assumptions of the Great Man Theory?

The assumption made by the Great Man Theory is that Great leaders possess certain traits that help them rise and lead in their lives. Another assumption made by this theory is, that great leaders can easily emerge whenever needed.

Previous Theory

Next Theory

Facebook

Copyright © 2023 CrowJack. All Rights Reserved

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Life is a journey, not a destination.

I T IS NATURAL to believe in great men. If the companions of our childhood should turn out to be heroes, and their condition regal it would not surprise us. All mythology opens with demigods, and the circumstance is high and poetic; that is, their genius is paramount. In the legends of the Gautama, the first men ate the earth and found it deliciously sweet.

Nature seems to exist for the excellent. The world is upheld by the veracity of good men: they make the earth wholesome. They who lived with them found life glad and nutritious. Life is sweet and tolerable only in our belief in such society; and, actually or ideally, we manage to live with superiors. We call our children and our lands by their names. Their names are wrought into the verbs of language, their works and effigies are in our houses, and every circumstance of the day recalls an anecdote of them.

The search after the great man is the dream of youth and the most serious occupation of manhood. We travel into foreign parts to find his works,- if possible, to get a glimpse of him. But we are put off with fortune instead. You say, the English are practical; the Germans are hospitable; in Valencia the climate is delicious; and in the hills of the Sacramento there is gold for the gathering. Yes, but I do not travel to find comfortable, rich and hospitable people, or clear sky, or ingots that cost too much. But if there were any magnet that would point to the countries and houses where are the persons who are intrinsically rich and powerful, I would sell all and buy it, and put myself on the road today.

The race goes with us on their credit. The knowledge that in the city is a man who invented the railroad, raises the credit of all the citizens. But enormous populations, if they be beggars, are disgusting, like moving cheese, like hills of ants or of fleas,- the more, the worse.

Ralph Waldo Emerson

If now we proceed to inquire into the kinds of service we derive from others, let us be warned of the danger of modern studies, and begin low enough. We must not contend against love, or deny the substantial existence of other people. I know not what would happen to us. We have social strengths. Our affection toward others creates a sort of vantage or purchase which nothing will supply. I can do that by another which I cannot do alone. I can say to you what I cannot first say to myself. Other men are lenses through which we read our own minds. Each man seeks those of different quality from his own, and such as are good of their kind; that is, he seeks other men, and the otherest. The stronger the nature, the more it is reactive. Let us have the quality pure. A little genius let us leave alone. A main difference betwixt men is, whether they attend their own affair or not. Man is that noble endogenous plant which grows, like the palm, from within outward. His own affair, though impossible to others, he can open with celerity and in sport. It is easy to sugar to be sweet and to nitre to be salt. We take a great deal of pains to waylay and entrap that which of itself will fall into our hands. I count him a great man who inhabits a higher sphere of thought, into which other men rise with labor and difficulty; he has but to open his eyes to see things in a true light and in large relations, whilst they must make painful corrections and keep a vigilant eye on many sources of error. His service to us is of like sort. It costs a beautiful person no exertion to paint her image on our eyes; yet how splendid is that benefit! It costs no more for a wise soul to convey his quality to other men. And every one can do his best thing easiest. "Peu de moyens, beaucoup d'effet." He is great who is what he is from nature, and who never reminds us of others.

But he must be related to us, and our life receive from him some promise of explanation. I cannot tell what I would know; but I have observed there are persons who, in their character and actions, answer questions which I have not skill to put. One man answers some question which none of his contemporaries put, and is isolated. The past and passing religions and philosophies answer some other questions. Certain men affect us as rich possibilities, but helpless to themselves and to their times,- the sport perhaps of some instinct that rules in the air;- they do not speak to our want. But the great are near; we know them at sight. They satisfy expectation and fall into place. What is good is effective, generative; makes for itself room, food and allies. A sound apple produces seed,- a hybrid does not. Is a man in his place, he is constructive, fertile, magnetic, inundating armies with his purpose, which is thus executed. The river makes its own shores, and each legitimate idea makes its own channels and welcome,- harvests for food, institutions for expression, weapons to fight with and disciples to explain it. The true artist has the planet for his pedestal; the adventurer, after years of strife, has nothing broader than his own shoes.

Our common discourse respects two kinds of use or service from superior men. Direct giving is agreeable to the early belief of men; direct giving of material or metaphysical aid, as of health, eternal youth, fine senses, arts of healing, magical power and prophecy. The boy believes there is a teacher who can sell him wisdom. Churches believe in imputed merit. But, in strictness, we are not much cognizant of direct serving. Man is endogenous, and education is his unfolding. The aid we have from others is mechanical compared with the discoveries of nature in us. What is thus learned is delightful in the doing, and the effect remains. Right ethics are central and go from the soul outward. Gift is contrary to the law of the universe. Serving others is serving us. I must absolve me to myself. "Mind thy affair," says the spirit:- "coxcomb, would you meddle with the skies, or with other people?" Indirect service is left. Men have a pictorial or representative quality, and serve us in the intellect. Behmen *(1) and Swedenborg saw that things were representative. Men are also representative; first, of things, and secondly, of ideas.

As plants convert the minerals into food for animals, so each man converts some raw material in nature to human use. The inventors of fire, electricity, magnetism, iron, lead, glass, linen, silk, cotton; the makers of tools; the inventor of decimal notation; the geometer; the engineer; the musician,- severally make an easy way for all, through unknown and impossible confusions. Each man is by secret liking connected with some district of nature, whose agent and interpreter he is; as Linnaeus, of plants; Huber, of bees; Fries, of lichens; Van Mons, of pears; Dalton, of atomic forms; Euclid, of lines; Newton, of fluxions.

A man is a centre for nature, running out threads of relation through every thing, fluid and solid, material and elemental. The earth rolls; every clod and stone comes to the meridian: so every organ, function, acid, crystal, grain of dust, has its relation to the brain. It waits long, but its turn comes. Each plant has its parasite, and each created thing its lover and poet. Justice has already been done to steam, to iron, to wood, to coal, to loadstone, to iodine, to corn and cotton; but how few materials are yet used by our arts The mass of creatures and of qualities are still hid and expectant. It would seem as if each waited, like the enchanted princess in fairy tales, for a destined human deliverer. Each must be disenchanted and walk forth to the day in human shape. In the history of discovery, the ripe and latent truth seems to have fashioned a brain for itself. A magnet must be made man in some Gilbert *(2) , or Swedenborg , or Oerstad, before the general mind can come to entertain its powers.

Nature always wear

If we limit ourselves to the first advantages, a sober grace adheres to the mineral and botanic kingdoms, which, in the highest moments, comes up as the charm of nature,- the glitter of the spar, the sureness of affinity, the veracity of angles. Light and darkness, heat and cold, hunger and food, sweet and sour, solid, liquid and gas, circle us round in a wreath of pleasures, and, by their agreeable quarrel, beguile the day of life. The eye repeats every day the first eulogy on things,- "He saw that they were good." We know where to find them; and these performers are relished all the more, after a little experience of the pretending races. We are entitled also to higher advantages. Something is wanting to science until it has been humanized. The table of logarithms is one thing, and its vital play in botany, music, optics and architecture, another. There are advancements to numbers, anatomy, architecture, astronomy, little suspected at first, when, by union with intellect and will, they ascend into the life and reappear in conversation, character and politics.

But this comes later. We speak now only of our acquaintance with them in their own sphere and the way in which they seem to fascinate and draw to them some genius who occupies himself with one thing, all his life long. The possibility of interpretation lies in the identity of the observer with the observed. Each material thing has its celestial side; has its translation, through humanity, into the spiritual and necessary sphere where it plays a part as indestructible as any other. And to these, their ends, all things continually ascend. The gases gather to the solid firmament: the chemic lump arrives at the plant, and grows; arrives at the quadruped, and walks; arrives at the man, and thinks. But also the constituency determines the vote of the representative. He is not only representative, but participant. Like can only be known by like. The reason why he knows about them is that he is of them; he has just come out of nature, or from being a part of that thing. Animated chlorine knows of chlorine, and incarnate zinc, of zinc. Their quality makes his career; and he can variously publish their virtues, because they compose him. Man, made of the dust of the world, does not forget his origin; and all that is yet inanimate will one day speak and reason. Unpublished nature will have its whole secret told. Shall we say that quartz mountains will pulverize into innumerable Werners, Von Buchs and Beaumonts, and the laboratory of the atmosphere holds in solution I know not what Berzeliuses and Davys?

Thus we sit by the fire and take hold on the poles of the earth. This quasi omnipresence supplies the imbecility of our condition. In one of those celestial days when heaven and earth meet and adorn each other, it seems a poverty that we can only spend it once: we wish for a thousand heads, a thousand bodies, that we might celebrate its immense beauty in many ways and places. Is this fancy? Well, in good faith, we are multiplied by our proxies. How easily we adopt their labors! Every ship that comes to America got its chart from Columbus. Every novel is a debtor to Homer. Every carpenter who shaves with a fore-plane borrows the genius of a forgotten inventor. Life is girt all round with a zodiac of sciences, the contributions of men who have perished to add their point of light to our sky. Engineer, broker, jurist, physician, moralist, theologian, and every man, inasmuch as he has any science,- is a definer and map-maker of the latitudes and longitudes of our condition. These roadmakers on every hand enrich us. We must extend the area of life and multiply our relations. We are as much gainers by finding a new property in the old earth as by acquiring a new planet.

We are too passive in the reception of these material or semi-material aids. We must not be sacks and stomachs. To ascend one step,- we are better served through our sympathy. Activity is contagious. Looking where others look, and conversing with the same things, we catch the charm which lured them. Napoleon said, "You must not fight too often with one enemy, or you will teach him all your art of war." Talk much with any man of vigorous mind, and we acquire very fast the habit of looking at things in the same light, and on each occurrence we anticipate his thought.

Men are helpful through the intellect and the affections. Other help I find a false appearance. If you affect to give me bread and fire, I perceive that I pay for it the full price, and at last it leaves me as it found me, neither better nor worse: but all mental and moral force is a positive good. It goes out from you, whether you will or not, and profits me whom you never thought of. I cannot even hear of personal vigor of any kind, great power of performance, without fresh resolution. We are emulous of all that man can do. Cecil's saying of Sir Walter Raleigh, "I know that he can toil terribly," is an electric touch. So are Clarendon's portraits,- of Hampden, "who was of an industry and vigilance not to be tired out or wearied by the most laborious, and of parts not to be imposed on by the most subtle and sharp, and of a personal courage equal to his best parts";- of Falkland, "who was so severe an adorer of truth, that he could as easily have given himself leave to steal, as to dissemble." We cannot read Plutarch without a tingling of the blood; and I accept the saying of the Chinese Mencius: "A sage is the instructor of a hundred ages. When the manners of Loo are heard of, the stupid become intelligent, and the wavering, determined."

This is the moral of biography; yet it is hard for departed men to touch the quick like our own companions, whose names may not last as long. What is he whom I never think of? Whilst in every solitude are those who succor our genius and stimulate us in wonderful manners. There is a power in love to divine another's destiny better than that other can, and, by heroic encouragements, hold him to his task. What has friendship so signal as its sublime attraction to whatever virtue is in us? We will never more think cheaply of ourselves, or of life. We are piqued to some purpose, and the industry of the diggers on the railroad will not again shame us.

Under this head too falls that homage, very pure as I think, which all ranks pay to the hero of the day, from Coriolanus and Gracchus down to Pitt, Lafayette, Wellington, Webster, Lamartine. Hear the shouts in the street! The people cannot see him enough. They delight in a man. Here is a head and a trunk! What a front! what eyes! Atlantean shoulders, and the whole carriage heroic, with equal inward force to guide the great machine! This pleasure of full expression to that which, in their private experience, is usually cramped and obstructed, runs also much higher, and is the secret of the reader's joy in literary genius. Nothing is kept back. There is fire enough to fuse the mountain of ore. Shakespeare's principal merit may be conveyed in saying that he of all men best understands the English language, and can say what he will. Yet these unchoked channels and floodgates of expression are only health or fortunate constitution. Shakespeare's name suggests other and purely intellectual benefits.

Led by your dreams - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Senates and sovereigns have no compliment, with their medals, swords and armorial coats, like the addressing to a human being thoughts out of a certain height, and presupposing his intelligence. This honor, which is possible in personal intercourse scarcely twice in a lifetime, genius perpetually pays; contented if now and then in a century the proffer is accepted. The indicators of the values of matter are degraded to a sort of cooks and confectioners, on the appearance of the indicators of ideas. Genius is the naturalist or geographer of the supersensible regions, and draws their map; and, by acquainting us with new fields of activity, cools our affection for the old. These are at once accepted as the reality, of which the world we have conversed with is the show.

We go to the gymnasium and the swimming-school to see the power and beauty of the body; there is the like pleasure and a higher benefit from witnessing intellectual feats of all kinds; as feats of memory, of mathematical combination, great power of abstraction, the transmutings of the imagination, even versatility and concentration,- as these acts expose the invisible organs and members of the mind, which respond, member for member, to the parts of the body. For we thus enter a new gymnasium, and learn to choose men by their truest marks, taught, with Plato, "to choose those who can, without aid from the eyes or any other sense, proceed to truth and to being." Foremost among these activities are the summersaults, spells and resurrections wrought by the imagination. When this wakes, a man seems to multiply ten times or a thousand times his force. It opens the delicious sense of indeterminate size and inspires an audacious mental habit. We are as elastic as the gas of gunpowder, and a sentence in a book, or a word dropped in conversation, sets free our fancy, and instantly our heads are bathed with galaxies, and our feet tread the floor of the Pit. And this benefit is real because we are entitled to these enlargements, and once having passed the bounds shall never again be quite the miserable pedants we were.

The high functions of the intellect are so allied that some imaginative power usually appears in all eminent minds, even in arithmeticians of the first class, but especially in meditative men of an intuitive habit of thought. This class serve us, so that they have the perception of identity and the perception of reaction. The eyes of Plato, Shakespeare, Swedenborg , Goethe , never shut on either of these laws. The perception of these laws is a kind of metre of the mind. Little minds are little through failure to see them.

Even these feasts have their surfeit. Our delight in reason degenerates into idolatry of the herald. Especially when a mind of powerful method has instructed men, we find the examples of oppression. The dominion of Aristotle, the Ptolemaic astronomy, the credit of Luther, of Bacon, of Locke;- in religion the history of hierarchies, of saints, and the sects which have taken the name of each founder, are in point. Alas! every man is such a victim. The imbecility of men is always inviting the impudence of power. It is the delight of vulgar talent to dazzle and to blind the beholder. But true genius seeks to defend us from itself. True genius will not impoverish, but will liberate, and add new senses. If a wise man should appear in our village he would create, in those who conversed with him, a new consciousness of wealth, by opening their eyes to unobserved advantages; he would establish a sense of immovable equality, calm us with assurances that we could not be cheated; as every one would discern the checks and guaranties of condition. The rich would see their mistakes and poverty, the poor their escapes and their resources.

But nature brings all this about in due time. Rotation is her remedy. The soul is impatient of masters and eager for change. Housekeepers say of a domestic who has been valuable, "She had lived with me long enough." We are tendencies, or rather, symptoms, and none of us complete. We touch and go, and sip the foam of many lives. Rotation is the law of nature. When nature removes a great man, people explore the horizon for a successor; but none comes, and none will. His class is extinguished with him. In some other and quite different field the next man will appear; not Jefferson, not Franklin, but now a great salesman, then a road-contractor, then a student of fishes, then a buffalo-hunting explorer, or a semi-savage Western general. Thus we make a stand against our rougher masters; but against the best there is a finer remedy. The power which they communicate is not theirs. When we are exalted by ideas, we do not owe this to Plato, but to the idea, to which also Plato was debtor.

I must not forget that we have a special debt to a single class. Life is a scale of degrees. Between rank and rank of our great men are wide intervals. Mankind have in all ages attached themselves to a few persons who either by the quality of that idea they embodied or by the largeness of their reception were entitled to the position of leaders and law-givers. These teach us the qualities of primary nature,- admit us to the constitution of things. We swim, day by day, on a river of delusions and are effectually amused with houses and towns in the air, of which the men about us are dupes. But life is a sincerity. In lucid intervals we say, "Let there be an entrance opened for me into realities; *(3) I have worn the fool's cap too long." We will know the meaning of our economies and politics. Give us the cipher, and if persons and things are scores of a celestial music, let us read off the strains. We have been cheated of our reason; yet there have been sane men, who enjoyed a rich and related existence. What they know, they know for us. With each new mind, a new secret of nature transpires; nor can the Bible be closed until the last great man is born. These men correct the delirium of the animal spirits, make us considerate and engage us to new aims and powers. The veneration of mankind selects these for the highest place. Witness the multitude of statues, pictures and memorials which recall their genius in every city, village, house and ship:-

"Ever their phantoms arise before us, Our loftier brothers, but one in blood; At bed and table they lord it o'er us With looks of beauty and words of good."

How to illustrate the distinctive benefit of ideas, the service rendered by those who introduce moral truths into the general mind?- I am plagued, in all my living, with a perpetual tariff of prices. If I work in my garden and prune an apple-tree, I am well enough entertained, and could continue indefinitely in the like occupation. But it comes to mind that a day is gone, and I have got this precious nothing done. I go to Boston or New York and run up and down on my affairs: they are sped, but so is the day. I am vexed by the recollection of this price I have paid for a trifling advantage. I remember the peau d'ane on which whoso sat should have his desire, but a piece of the skin was gone for every wish. I go to a convention of philanthropists. Do what I can, I cannot keep my eyes off the clock. But if there should appear in the company some gentle soul who knows little of persons or parties, of Carolina or Cuba, but who announces a law that disposes these particulars, and so certifies me of the equity which checkmates every false player, bankrupts every self-seeker, and apprises me of my independence on any conditions of country, or time, or human body,- that man liberates me; I forget the clock. I pass out of the sore relation to persons. I am healed of my hurts. I am made immortal by apprehending my possession of incorruptible goods. Here is great competition of rich and poor. We live in a market, where is only so much wheat, or wool, or land; and if I have so much more, every other must have so much less. I seem to have no good without breach of good manners. Nobody is glad in the gladness of another, and our system is one of war, of an injurious superiority. Every child of the Saxon race is educated to wish to be first. It is our system; and a man comes to measure his greatness by the regrets, envies and hatreds of his competitors. But in these new fields there is room: here are no self-esteems, no exclusions.

Adopt the pace of nature: her secret is patience.

I admire great men of all classes, those who stand for facts, and for thoughts; I like rough and smooth, "Scourges of God," and "Darlings of the human race." I like the first Caesar; and Charles V, of Spain; and Charles XII, of Sweden; Richard Plantagenet; and Bonaparte, in France. I applaud a sufficient man, an officer equal to his office; captains, ministers, senators. I like a master standing firm on legs of iron, wellborn, rich, handsome, eloquent, loaded with advantages, drawing all men by fascination into tributaries and supporters of his power. Sword and staff, or talents sword-like or staff-like, carry on the work of the world. But I find him greater when he can abolish himself and all heroes, by letting in this element of reason, irrespective of persons, this subtilizer and irresistible upward force, into our thought, destroying individualism; the power so great that the potentate is nothing. Then he is a monarch who gives a constitution to his people; a pontiff who preaches the equality of souls and releases his servants from their barbarous homages; an emperor who can spare his empire.

But I intended to specify, with a little minuteness, two or three points of service. Nature never spares the opium or nepenthe, but wherever she mars her creature with some deformity or defect, lays her poppies plentifully on the bruise, and the sufferer goes joyfully through life, ignorant of the ruin and incapable of seeing it, though all the world point their finger at it every day. The worthless and offensive members of society, whose existence is a social pest, invariably think themselves the most ill-used people alive, and never get over their astonishment at the ingratitude and selfishness of their contemporaries. Our globe discovers its hidden virtues, not only in heroes and archangels, but in gossips and nurses. Is it not a rare contrivance that lodged the due inertia in every creature, the conserving, resisting energy, the anger at being waked or changed? Altogether independent of the intellectual force in each is the pride of opinion, the security that we are right. Not the feeblest grandame, not a mowing idiot, but uses what spark of perception and faculty is left, to chuckle and triumph in his or her opinion over the absurdities of all the rest. Difference from me is the measure of absurdity. Not one has a misgiving of being wrong. Was it not a bright thought that made things cohere with this bitumen, fastest of cements? But, in the midst of this chuckle of self-gratulation, some figure goes by which Thersites too can love and admire. This is he that should marshal us the way we were going. There is no end to his aid. Without Plato we should almost lose our faith in the possibility of a reasonable book. We seem to want but one, but we want one. We love to associate with heroic persons, since our receptivity is unlimited; and, with the great, our thoughts and manners easily become great. We are all wise in capacity, though so few in energy. There needs but one wise man in a company and all are wise, so rapid is the contagion.

Great men are thus a collyrium to clear our eyes from egotism and enable us to see other people and their works. But there are vices and follies incident to whole populations and ages. Men resemble their contemporaries even more than their progenitors. It is observed in old couples, or in persons who have been housemates for a course of years, that they grow like, and if they should live long enough we should not be able to know them apart. Nature abhors these complaisances which threaten to melt the world into a lump, and hastens to break up such maudlin agglutinations. The like assimilation goes on between men of one town, of one sect, of one political party; and the ideas of the time are in the air, and infect all who breathe it. Viewed from any high point, this city of New York, yonder city of London, the Western civilization, would seem a bundle of insanities. We keep each other in countenance and exasperate by emulation the frenzy of the time. The shield against the stingings of conscience is the universal practice, or our contemporaries. Again, it is very easy to be as wise and good as your companions. We learn of our contemporaries what they know without effort, and almost through the pores of the skin. We catch it by sympathy, or as a wife arrives at the intellectual and moral elevations of her husband. But we stop where they stop. Very hardly can we take another step. The great, or such as hold of nature and transcend fashions by their fidelity to universal ideas, are saviors from these federal errors, *(4) and defend us from our contemporaries. They are the exceptions which we want, where all grows like. A foreign greatness is the antidote for cabalism.

Thus we feed on genius, and refresh ourselves from too much conversation with our mates, and exult in the depth of nature in that direction in which he leads us. What indemnification is one great man for populations of pigmies! Every mother wishes one son a genius, though all the rest should be mediocre. But a new danger appears in the excess of influence of the great man. His attractions warp us from our place. We have become underlings and intellectual suicides. Ah! yonder in the horizon is our help;- other great men, new qualities, counterweights and checks on each other. We cloy of the honey of each peculiar greatness. Every hero becomes a bore at last. Perhaps Voltaire was not bad-hearted, yet he said of the good Jesus, even, "I pray you, let me never hear that man's name again." They cry up the virtues of George Washington,- "Damn George Washington!" is the poor Jacobin's whole speech and confutation. But it is human nature's indispensable defence. The centripetence augments the centrifugence. We balance one man with his opposite, and the health of the state depends on the see-saw.

There is however a speedy limit to the use of heroes. Every genius is defended from approach by quantities of unavailableness. They are very attractive, and seem at a distance our own: but we are hindered on all sides from approach. The more we are drawn, the more we are repelled. There is something not solid in the good that is done for us. The best discovery the discoverer makes for himself. It has something unreal for his companion until he too has substantiated it. It seems as if the Deity dressed each soul which he sends into nature in certain virtues and powers not communicable to other men, and sending it to perform one more turn through the circle of beings, wrote, "Not transferable" and "Good for this trip only," on these garments of the soul. There is somewhat deceptive about the intercourse of minds. The boundaries are invisible, but they are never crossed. There is such good will to impart, and such good will to receive, that each threatens to become the other; but the law of individuality collects its secret strength: you are you, and I am I, and so we remain.

For nature wishes every thing to remain itself; and whilst every individual strives to grow and exclude and to exclude and grow, to the extremities of the universe, and to impose the law of its being on every other creature, Nature steadily aims to protect each against every other. Each is self-defended. Nothing is more marked than the power by which individuals are guarded from individuals, in a world where every benefactor becomes so easily a malefactor only by continuation of his activity into places where it is not due; where children seem so much at the mercy of their foolish parents, and where almost all men are too social and interfering. We rightly speak of the guardian angels of children. How superior in their security from infusions of evil persons, from vulgarity and second thought! They shed their own abundant beauty on the objects they behold. Therefore they are not at the mercy of such poor educators as we adults. If we huff and chide them they soon come not to mind it and get a self-reliance ; and if we indulge them to folly, they learn the limitation elsewhere.

We need not fear excessive influence. A more generous trust is permitted. Serve the great. Stick at no humiliation. Grudge no office thou canst render. Be the limb of their body, the breath of their mouth. Compromise thy egotism. Who cares for that, so thou gain aught wider and nobler? Never mind the taunt of Boswellism: the devotion may easily be greater than the wretched pride which is guarding its own skirts. Be another: not thyself, but a Platonist; not a soul, but a Christian; not a naturalist, but a Cartesian; not a poet, but a Shakespearean. In vain, the wheels of tendency will not stop, nor will all the forces of inertia, fear, or of love itself hold thee there. On, and forever onward! The microscope observes a monad or wheel-insect among the infusories circulating in water. Presently a dot appears on the animal, which enlarges to a slit, and it becomes two perfect animals. The ever-proceeding detachment appears not less in all thought and in society. Children think they cannot live without their parents. But, long before they are aware of it, the black dot has appeared and the detachment taken place. Any accident will now reveal to them their independence.

But great men:- the word is injurious. Is there caste? Is there fate? What becomes of the promise to virtue? The thoughtful youth laments the superfoetation of nature. "Generous and handsome," he says, "is your hero; but look at yonder poor Paddy, whose country is his wheelbarrow; look at his whole nation of Paddies." Why are the masses, from the dawn of history down, food for knives and powder? The idea dignifies a few leaders, who have sentiment, opinion, love, self-devotion; and they make war and death sacred;- but what for the wretches whom they hire and kill? The cheapness of man is every day's tragedy. It is as real a loss that others should be as low as that we should be low; for we must have society.

Is it a reply to these suggestions to say, Society is a Pestalozzian school: all are teachers and pupils in turn? We are equally served by receiving and by imparting. Men who know the same things are not long the best company for each other. But bring to each an intelligent person of another experience, and it is as if you let off water from a lake by cutting a lower basin. It seems a mechanical advantage, and great benefit it is to each speaker, as he can now paint out his thought to himself. We pass very fast, in our personal moods, from dignity to dependence. And if any appear never to assume the chair, but always to stand and serve, it is because we do not see the company in a sufficiently long period for the whole rotation of parts to come about. As to what we call the masses, and common men,- there are no common men. All men are at last of a size; and true art is only possible on the conviction that every talent has its apotheosis somewhere. Fair play and an open field and freshest laurels to all who have won them! But heaven reserves an equal scope for every creature. Each is uneasy until he has produced his private ray unto the concave sphere and beheld his talent also in its last nobility and exaltation.

The heroes of the hour are relatively great; of a faster growth; or they are such in whom, at the moment of success, a quality is ripe which is then in request. Other days will demand other qualities. Some rays escape the common observer, and want a finely adapted eye. Ask the great man if there be none greater. His companions are; and not the less great but the more that society cannot see them. Nature never sends a great man into the planet without confiding the secret to another soul.

Laugh as much you breath and love as long as you live

One gracious fact emerges from these studies,- that there is true ascension in our love. The reputations of the nineteenth century will one day be quoted to prove its barbarism. The genius of humanity is the real subject whose biography is written in our annals. We must infer much, and supply many chasms in the record. The history of the universe is symptomatic, and life is mnemonical. No man, in all the procession of famous men, is reason or illumination or that essence we were looking for; but is an exhibition, in some quarter, of new possibilities. Could we one day complete the immense figure which these flagrant *(5) points compose! The study of many individuals leads us to an elemental region wherein the individual is lost, or wherein all touch by their summits. Thought and feeling that break out there cannot be impounded by any fence of personality. This is the key to the power of the greatest men,- their spirit diffuses itself. A new quality of mind travels by night and by day, in concentric circles from its origin, and publishes itself by unknown methods: the union of all minds appears intimate; what gets admission to one, cannot be kept out of any other; the smallest acquisition of truth or of energy, in any quarter, is so much good to the commonwealth of souls. If the disparities of talent and position vanish when the individuals are seen in the duration which is necessary to complete the career of each, even more swiftly the seeming injustice disappears when we ascend to the central identity of all the individuals, and know that they are made of the substance which ordaineth and doeth.

The genius of humanity is the right point of view of history. The qualities abide; the men who exhibit them have now more, now less, and pass away; the qualities remain on another brow. No experience is more familiar. Once you saw phoenixes: they are gone; the world is not therefore disenchanted. The vessels on which you read sacred emblems turn out to be common pottery; but the sense of the pictures is sacred, and you may still read them transferred to the walls of the world. For a time our teachers serve us personally, as metres or milestones of progress. Once they were angels of knowledge and their figures touched the sky. Then we drew near, saw their means, culture and limits; and they yielded their place to other geniuses. Happy, if a few names remain so high that we have not been able to read them nearer, and age and comparison have not robbed them of a ray. But at last we shall cease to look in men for completeness, and shall content ourselves with their social and delegated quality. All that respects the individual is temporary and prospective, like the individual himself, who is ascending out of his limits into a catholic existence. We have never come at the true and best benefit of any genius so long as we believe him an original force. In the moment when he ceases to help us as a cause, he begins to help us more as an effect. Then he appears as an exponent of a vaster mind and will. The opaque self becomes transparent with the light of the First Cause.

Yet, within the limits of human education and agency, we may say great men exist that there may be greater men. The destiny of organized nature is amelioration, and who can tell its limits? It is for man to tame the chaos; on every side, whilst he lives, to scatter the seeds of science and of song, that climate, corn, animals, men, may be milder, and the germs of love and benefit may be multiplied. *(6)

Ralph Waldo Emerson Self Reliance

Ralph Waldo Emerson left the ministry to pursue a career in writing and public speaking. Emerson became one of America's best known and best-loved 19th-century figures. More About Emerson

Quick Links

Self-reliance.

  • Address at Divinity College
  • English Traits
  • Representative Men
  • The American Scholar
  • The Conduct of Life
  • Essays: First Series
  • Essays: Second Series
  • Nature: Addresses/Lectures
  • Lectures / Biographies
  • Letters and Social Aims

Early Emerson Poems

  • Uncollected Prose
  • Government of Children

Emerson Quotes

"Every man has his own courage, and is betrayed because he seeks in himself the courage of other persons." – Ralph Waldo Emerson

“Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.” – Ralph Waldo Emerson

“The purpose of life is not to be happy. It is to be useful, to be honorable, to be compassionate, to have it make some difference that you have lived and lived well.”  – Ralph Waldo Emerson

Emerson's Essays

Research the collective works of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Read More Essay

Emerson's most famous work that can truly change your life. Check it out

America's best known and best-loved poems. More Poems

Great Man, Trait, and Other Leadership Theories Case Study

There is no use denying the fact that the world is ruled by people who are able to make other people follow them. There is a great number of different ways to become a ruler, however, if a person is able to do it without force, just using his/her personal qualities, it means that he/she is a good leader and is able to make people believe him/her and follow any ideas which are suggested by him/her. That is why, the issue of leadership obtains great importance. It is vital to understand what qualities are peculiar to a good leader and what makes him/her so convincing and powerful. There is a great number of different approaches to leadership analysis of which can help to understand the nature of leadership better.

One of the first theories connected with leadership is called Great Man theory . It states that some people are born to be leaders and, moreover, they appear in times when they are needed most of all. That is why, they are able to develop qualities which make people follow them and listen to their words. (Northouse 2013). However, nowadays this theory is considered to be outdated as it is believed that leadership qualities can be developed. Trait theory appeared later and, that is why, it states that people are “either born or are made with certain qualities that will make them excel in leadership roles” ( Leadership theories n.d., para.3).

That is why, some qualities are important for a good leader. Additionally, there is a Behavioural theory which states that actions of a leader are the most important aspect which makes people follow a person. Moreover, Instrumental theory suggests that leadership depends on the attention given to details and tasks (Antonakis & House 2014), while the theory of Expressive leadership determines a leader as a person who gives more attention to people. With this in mind, it is possible to analyse the issue of leadership taking into account great number of different theories.

Nevertheless, it should be said that according to these theories different qualities make a person a good leader. Instrumental leaders should be organised and, moreover, be able to make people work efficiently by outlining certain tasks and showing what steps should be done in order to accomplish these tasks, while expressive leaders have such personal qualities as enthusiasm. charisma and good rhetoric ( Transactional Leadership n.d). That is why, instrumental leaders can sometimes be similar to efficient managers ( Leadership vs. Management n.d).

It is obvious, that different leaders have different impact on people. It depends on the set of qualities which these leaders possess and the way in which they prefer to manage people. If a leader encourages his/her followers with the help of emotional support or motivation, people will feel relief and confidence, while other leaders can use another methods such as pressure or some other ways of stimulating which will increase efficiency though will not stabilise emotional state of a person.

Having analysed these different approaches, it is possible to make certain conclusion. It should be said that knowledge obtained from this analysis can be used n practice. It is possible for a person to analyse his/her own qualities and, taking into account different theories of leadership and different kinds of leaders, try to develop some certain traits of his/her character to be able to create some special approach which can be used in business in order to increase incomes of some company by engaging people..

Reference List

Antonakis, J & House, R 2014, ‘Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory’, The Leadership Quarterly , vol. 25, pp. 746-771.

Leadership theories n.d. Web.

Leadership vs. Management n.d. Web.

Northouse, P 2013, Leadership: theory and practice , SAGE publications, Thousand Oaks.

Transactional Leadership n.d. Web.

  • Chicago (A-D)
  • Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2020, August 13). Great Man, Trait, and Other Leadership Theories. https://ivypanda.com/essays/great-man-trait-and-other-leadership-theories/

"Great Man, Trait, and Other Leadership Theories." IvyPanda , 13 Aug. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/great-man-trait-and-other-leadership-theories/.

IvyPanda . (2020) 'Great Man, Trait, and Other Leadership Theories'. 13 August.

IvyPanda . 2020. "Great Man, Trait, and Other Leadership Theories." August 13, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/great-man-trait-and-other-leadership-theories/.

1. IvyPanda . "Great Man, Trait, and Other Leadership Theories." August 13, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/great-man-trait-and-other-leadership-theories/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Great Man, Trait, and Other Leadership Theories." August 13, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/great-man-trait-and-other-leadership-theories/.

  • Critically Analyse the UK Government's Strategy towards Work Training and Skills in the Light of the Current Economic Downturn
  • Expressive Therapies in Trauma Treatment
  • Expressive Language Development in Special Children
  • Art Appreciation: Analytical Art and Expressive Art
  • Aleatory Writing: Making Works More Expressive
  • The Effects of Cochlear Implants on Expressive Language
  • Different Expressive Means and Stylistic Devices
  • Openness to Experience as a Personality Trait
  • Managing People: The Case of Virgin Atlantic
  • Organizational Challenge from Two Perspectives
  • China's Cultural Differences and Leadership
  • Leadership Expectations in China's Workplace
  • Transformational Leaders Influence on Performance
  • Transformational Leadership and Shared Values
  • Bill Campbell's Input to Intuit Company's Culture

IMAGES

  1. Great Man Theory of Leadership: Examples, Pros and Cons (2024)

    great man thesis

  2. Great Man theory of history

    great man thesis

  3. Great Man Theory Wallpapers

    great man thesis

  4. The great man theory of leadership explained with examples

    great man thesis

  5. Great Man Theory of Leadership

    great man thesis

  6. PPT

    great man thesis

COMMENTS

  1. Great man theory

    Napoleon, a typical great man, said to have created the "Napoleonic" era through his military and political genius.. The great man theory is an approach to the study of history popularised in the 19th century according to which history can be largely explained by the impact of great men, or heroes: highly influential and unique individuals who, due to their natural attributes, such as superior ...

  2. Great Man Theory of Leadership: Definition and Examples

    The great man theory of leadership is an example of using 'nature' to explain human behavior. The nature vs. nurture debate in psychology suggests that some skills are innate while others are acquired through learning and experience. In this case, great man theory suggests that nature plays the dominant role in leadership ability.

  3. The Great Man Theory of Leadership Explained

    The Great Man Theory of Leadership espouses that great leaders are born, not made. These individuals come into the world possessing certain characteristics and traits not found in all people. These abilities enable them to lead while shaping the very pages of history. Under great man theory, prominent leaders throughout the course of history ...

  4. Great Man Theory

    The Great Man thesis may ultimately say more about the patriarchal and individualistic assumptions of Western society in the 19th century than it informs about the progression of historical events. It demonstrates how historians and academics reflect the prejudices of their age in their work.

  5. 02. Great Man Theory

    Great man theory is essentially when a leader is recognized as "great" by their. followers, however, the reason they are recognized as a leader is undefined. For example, if you were to see a firefighter saving a family, you would think "hey, that's a leader". 2.

  6. Carlyle, Freud, and the Great Man Theory more fully considered

    Abstract. Contemporary surveys of leadership scholarship will occasionally mention the Great Man theory before moving on to more rigorous academic categories. Less a theory than a statement of faith, the Great Man theory does not fit into the rigorous scholarly theory and research that makes up the contemporary canon of leadership discourse.

  7. Great Man Theory of Leadership

    The great man theory of leadership states that some people are born with the necessary attributes that set them apart from others and that these traits are responsible for their assuming positions of power and authority. A leader is a hero who accomplishes goals against all odds for his followers. The theory implies that those in power deserve ...

  8. A literary perspective on the limits of leadership: Tolstoy's critique

    The Great Man theory of leadership, in the form it was first codified by Carlyle (1841) in On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History, maddens the modern mind (Spector, 2016: 250-251).Any contemporary intellectual who categorically insisted that "the history of the world is but the biography of great men" (Carlyle, 1841: 47) would surely be promptly accused, and probably ...

  9. What is Great Man Theory?

    Definition and origins. Popularized in the 19th century, the great man theory is a historical methodological approach that explains history through the lens of heroes or great men and their actions in historic events. These heroes are characterized by their influence in history, their courage in such historic events as battles, their intellect ...

  10. Leadership: The great man theory revisited

    " The Great Man (or Woman) notion of leadership was said to be anecdotal and "unscientific." Fortunately, in light of new evidence, a fair assessment of the old data, and, most notably, a willingness to admit what everyday observation and common sense tell us, management scholars and organizational psychologists now feel comfortable again ...

  11. Great man or great myth? A meta-analysis of the ...

    The 'Great Man' theory dominated in the 1940s and focuses on the leader's personality traits. Over the past three decades, research with an emphasis on the individual characteristics of leaders ...

  12. Leadership Theories and Styles: A Literature Review

    Vol.16, 2016. 1. Leadership Theories and Styles: A Litera ture Review. Zakeer Ahmed Khan_PhD Dr. Allah Na waz. Irfanullah Khan_PhD. Department of Public Administration, Go mal University, Dera ...

  13. The great man theory of leadership explained with examples

    Intellect, consistency, resilience, self-awareness, optimism, and confidence come naturally to him which makes him a great leader. How he works for 80 to 100 hours per week and the passion with which he believes in his ideas speak for his consistency. Elon Musk can be looked at as the best leader among a pack of leaders.

  14. The Great Man Theory of Emancipation

    THE GREAT MAN THEORY OF EMANCIPATION by Charles H- W esley The Great Man Theory of history has still wide ac ceptance among Americans. In fact, Americans love to ... the well-known essays of Thomas Carlyle is devoted to "Hero Worship", and reveals clearly how mankind en deavors continuously to make heroes for worship. It has

  15. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEADERSHIP THEORIES: A REVIEW

    from great man and trait theories ending at transactional and transformational theories. Despite, the previous t heories of leadership focused on behaviors and characteristics of effective leaders .

  16. PDF Great Man Theory: A personal account of attraction

    opportunity for an andocentric bias in the early leadership literature. Great Man Theory is considered by many to derive from Trait Theory (Northouse, 2004) where leaders are born and look, act, and lead by preset, often genetic, fundamentals. Mann (1959) examined more than 1,400 findings and the results were that.

  17. The Great Man Theory of History

    This idea, known as "the great man theory of history," was extensively argued during the 19th century, when Western support for heroism was still pronounced. ... In short, the thesis that some individuals "make" an individual, is hopelessly entangled in an infinite regress of causes. For, the individuals that made Napoleon were ...

  18. Uses of Great Men

    Summary of the essay Uses of Great Men by Ralph Waldo Emerson: "Uses of Great Men" is an essay by Ralph Waldo Emerson that was first published in 1841. In this work, Emerson reflects on the role of great men in society and the impact they have on the world. He argues that great men serve as examples of what is possible for the rest of humanity ...

  19. A literary perspective on the limits of leadership: Tolstoy's critique

    The traditional Great Man theory of leadership is treated with scant respect, yet it is still widely in use. This article reconstructs and reevaluates Tolstoy's critique of the claim that great ...

  20. 'Napoleon: A Life' Review: He Thought He Was Napoleon

    Mr. Zamoyski rejects the Great Man thesis and Thomas Carlyle's idea that history can be explained largely through the actions of heroic men.

  21. What is the name of the theory opposite to the Great Man theory?

    The early sociologist Herbert Spencer directly critiqued the Great Man theory. A key theme that sociology, anthropology and other social sciences share with history is the question of structure versus agency. The Great Man Thesis is an approach which strongly emphasizes a specific form of agency, in contrast with more structural approaches.

  22. Great Man, Trait, and Other Leadership Theories Case Study

    We will write a custom essay on your topic. One of the first theories connected with leadership is called Great Man theory. It states that some people are born to be leaders and, moreover, they appear in times when they are needed most of all. That is why, they are able to develop qualities which make people follow them and listen to their words.

  23. Do you think LOGH bases it's thesis in the "Big Man Theory"

    I haven't really considered the Great Man Theory as a real historical analytic framework before, more as a fictional stance for storytelling, so I didn't realize you were contrasting them as peers. edit: to explain my position wrt the OP, I don't think it's based on Great Man Theory, I think it's how effective character driven stories are told ...