endangered species research paper outline

Home — Essay Samples — Environment — Human Impact — Endangered Species

Essays on Endangered Species

Endangered species essay topics and outline examples, essay title 1: vanishing wonders: the plight of endangered species and conservation efforts.

Thesis Statement: This essay explores the critical issue of endangered species, delving into the causes of endangerment, the ecological significance of these species, and the conservation strategies aimed at preserving them for future generations.

• Introduction
• Understanding Endangered Species: Definitions and Criteria
• Causes of Endangerment: Habitat Loss, Climate Change, Poaching, and Pollution
• Ecological Significance: The Role of Endangered Species in Ecosystems
• Conservation Strategies: Protected Areas, Breeding Programs, and Legal Protections
• Success Stories: Examples of Species Recovery and Reintroduction
• Ongoing Challenges: Balancing Conservation with Human Needs
• Conclusion: The Urgent Need for Global Action in Protecting Endangered Species

Essay Title 2: Beyond the Numbers: The Ethical and Moral Imperatives of Endangered Species Preservation

Thesis Statement: This essay examines the ethical dimensions of endangered species preservation, addressing questions of human responsibility, intrinsic value, and the moral imperative to protect and restore these species.

• The Ethical Dilemma: Balancing Human Needs and Species Preservation
• Intrinsic Value: Recognizing the Inherent Worth of All Species
• Interconnectedness: Understanding the Ripple Effects of Species Loss
• Human Responsibility: The Moral Imperative to Protect Endangered Species
• Conservation Ethics: Ethical Frameworks and Philosophical Perspectives
• Legislation and International Agreements: Legal Approaches to Ethical Conservation
• Conclusion: Embracing Our Role as Stewards of Biodiversity

Essay Title 3: The Economic Value of Biodiversity: Endangered Species and Sustainable Development

Thesis Statement: This essay explores the economic aspects of endangered species conservation, highlighting the potential economic benefits of preserving biodiversity, sustainable ecotourism, and the long-term economic consequences of species loss.

• Economic Importance of Biodiversity: Ecosystem Services and Human Well-being
• Sustainable Ecotourism: How Endangered Species Can Drive Local Economies
• Case Studies: Success Stories of Economic Benefits from Species Conservation
• The Costs of Inaction: Economic Consequences of Species Extinction
• Corporate Responsibility: Businesses and Conservation Partnerships
• Balancing Economic Growth with Conservation: The Path to Sustainable Development
• Conclusion: The Interplay Between Biodiversity, Economics, and a Sustainable Future

Giant Pandas Ailuropoda

Circle of life: why should we protect endangered species, made-to-order essay as fast as you need it.

Each essay is customized to cater to your unique preferences

+ experts online

Endangered Species: The African Elephant

Endangered species: the factors and the ways to prevent, loss of habitat as one of the main factors of the increase in endangered species, endangered animals: the causes and how to protect, let us write you an essay from scratch.

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Endangered Species in Vietnam: South China Tiger and Asian Elephant

Funding and support for people responsible for protecting endangered species, endangered animals and the acts to protect them, keystone species and the importance of raising endangered species awareness, get a personalized essay in under 3 hours.

Expert-written essays crafted with your exact needs in mind

De-extinction Can Help to Protect Endangered Species

Protection of endangered species can help us to survive, the way zoos helps to protect endangered species, ways of protection endangered species, sharks demand protection just like endangered species, the reasons why the koala species is endangered, the issue of philippine eagle endangerment, the issue of conserving endangered animals in the jungles of southeast asia, primates research project: the bushmeat crisis, the negative impact of the food culture on the environment and jani actman article that fish on your dinner plate may be an endangered species, nesting and population ecology of western chimpanzee in bia conservation area, human impact on red panda populations , the impact of climate change on the antarctic region, the ethics of bengal tigers, poaching and the illegal trade.

Endangered species are living organisms that face a high risk of extinction in the near future. They are characterized by dwindling population numbers and a significant decline in their natural habitats. These species are vulnerable to various factors, including habitat destruction, pollution, climate change, overexploitation, and invasive species, which disrupt their ecological balance and threaten their survival.

The early stages of human civilization witnessed a relatively harmonious coexistence with the natural world. Indigenous cultures across the globe held deep reverence for the interconnectedness of all living beings, fostering a sense of stewardship and respect for the environment. Nevertheless, with the rise of industrialization and modernization, the exploitation of natural resources escalated at an unprecedented pace. The late 19th and early 20th centuries marked a turning point, as rapid urbanization, deforestation, pollution, and overhunting posed significant threats to numerous species. The dawn of globalization further accelerated these challenges, as international trade in exotic species intensified and habitats faced relentless encroachment. In response to this growing concern, conservation movements emerged worldwide. Influential figures such as John Muir, Rachel Carson, and Aldo Leopold championed the cause of environmental preservation, raising awareness about the fragility of ecosystems and the need for proactive measures. International conventions and treaties, such as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), were established to regulate and monitor the trade of endangered species across borders. As our understanding of ecological dynamics deepened, scientific advancements and conservation efforts gained momentum. Endangered species recovery programs, habitat restoration initiatives, and the establishment of protected areas have all played a vital role in safeguarding vulnerable populations. However, the struggle to protect endangered species continues in the face of ongoing challenges. Climate change, habitat destruction, poaching, and illegal wildlife trade persist as formidable threats. Efforts to conserve endangered species require a multi-faceted approach, encompassing scientific research, policy development, sustainable practices, and international collaboration.

Leonardo DiCaprio: An acclaimed actor and environmental activist, DiCaprio has been an outspoken advocate for wildlife conservation. Through the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation, he has supported various initiatives aimed at protecting endangered species and their habitats. Sigourney Weaver: Besides her notable acting career, Sigourney Weaver has been a passionate environmental activist. She has advocated for the protection of endangered species, particularly in her role as an honorary co-chair of the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund. Prince William: The Duke of Cambridge, Prince William, has shown a deep commitment to wildlife conservation. He has actively supported initiatives such as United for Wildlife, which aims to combat the illegal wildlife trade and protect endangered species. Edward Norton: Actor and environmental activist Edward Norton has been actively involved in various conservation efforts. He co-founded the Conservation International's Marine Program and has been vocal about the need to protect endangered species and their habitats.

Amur Leopard (Panthera pardus orientalis) Sumatran Orangutan (Pongo abelii) Javan Rhino (Rhinoceros sondaicus) Vaquita (Phocoena sinus) Cross River Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) Yangtze River Dolphin (Lipotes vexillifer) Philippine Eagle (Pithecophaga jefferyi) Sumatran Tiger (Panthera tigris sumatrae) African Elephant (Loxodonta africana)

1. Habitat Loss and Fragmentation 2. Climate Change 3. Pollution 4. Overexploitation and Illegal Wildlife Trade 5. Invasive Species 6. Disease and Pathogens 7. Lack of Conservation Efforts and Awareness 8. Genetic Issues 9. Natural Factors

The majority of the public recognizes the significance of conserving endangered species. Many people believe that it is our moral obligation to protect and preserve the Earth's diverse wildlife. They understand that losing species not only disrupts ecosystems but also deprives future generations of the natural beauty and ecological services they provide. Some individuals view endangered species conservation through an economic lens. They understand that wildlife and ecosystems contribute to tourism, provide ecosystem services like clean water and air, and support local economies. These economic arguments often align with conservation efforts, highlighting the potential benefits of protecting endangered species. Additionally, public opinion on endangered species is often shaped by awareness campaigns, education initiatives, and media coverage. Increased access to information about the threats faced by endangered species and the consequences of their decline has resulted in a greater understanding and concern among the public. Many people support the implementation and enforcement of laws and regulations aimed at protecting endangered species. They believe that legal frameworks are essential for ensuring the survival of vulnerable species and holding individuals and industries accountable for actions that harm wildlife. Moreover, individuals increasingly feel a sense of personal responsibility in addressing the issue of endangered species. This includes making conscious choices about consumption, supporting sustainable practices, and engaging in activities that contribute to conservation efforts, such as volunteering or donating to wildlife organizations. Public opinion can vary when it comes to instances where the protection of endangered species conflicts with human interests, such as land use, agriculture, or development projects. These situations can lead to debates and differing perspectives on how to balance conservation needs with other societal needs.

"Silent Spring" by Rachel Carson: Published in 1962, this influential book is credited with launching the modern environmental movement. Carson's seminal work highlighted the devastating impacts of pesticides, including their effects on wildlife and the environment. It drew attention to the need for conservation and sparked widespread concern for endangered species. "Gorillas in the Mist" by Dian Fossey: Fossey's book, published in 1983, chronicled her experiences studying and protecting mountain gorillas in Rwanda. It shed light on the challenges faced by these endangered primates and brought their conservation needs to the forefront of public consciousness. "March of the Penguins" (2005): This acclaimed documentary film depicted the annual journey of emperor penguins in Antarctica. By showcasing the hardships and perils these penguins face, the film garnered widespread attention and empathy for these remarkable creatures, raising awareness about their vulnerability and the impacts of climate change. "The Cove" (2009): This documentary exposed the brutal practice of dolphin hunting in Taiji, Japan. It not only brought attention to the mistreatment of dolphins but also highlighted the interconnectedness of species and the urgent need for their protection. "Racing Extinction" (2015): This documentary film by the Oceanic Preservation Society addressed the issue of mass species extinction and the human-driven factors contributing to it. It aimed to inspire viewers to take action and make positive changes to protect endangered species and their habitats.

1. It is estimated that around 26,000 species are currently threatened with extinction, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2. The illegal wildlife trade is the fourth largest illegal trade globally, following drugs, counterfeiting, and human trafficking. It is a significant contributor to species endangerment. 3. The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) reports that since 1970, global wildlife populations have declined by an average of 68%. 4. Habitat loss is the primary cause of species endangerment, with deforestation alone accounting for the loss of around 18.7 million acres of forest annually. 5. The poaching crisis has pushed some iconic species to the brink of extinction. For example, it is estimated that only about 3,900 tigers remain in the wild. 6. The Hawaiian Islands are considered the endangered species capital of the world, with more than 500 endangered or threatened species due to habitat loss and invasive species. 7. Coral reefs, one of the most diverse ecosystems on the planet, are under significant threat. It is estimated that 75% of the world's coral reefs are currently threatened, primarily due to climate change, pollution, and overfishing. 8. The illegal pet trade is a significant threat to many species. It is estimated that for every live animal captured for the pet trade, several die during capture or transport. 9. The IUCN Red List, a comprehensive inventory of the conservation status of species, currently includes more than 38,000 species, with approximately 28% of them classified as threatened with extinction.

The topic of endangered species holds immense importance for writing an essay due to several compelling reasons. Firstly, endangered species represent a vital component of the Earth's biodiversity, playing crucial roles in maintaining ecosystem balance and functioning. Exploring this topic allows us to understand the interconnectedness of species and their habitats, emphasizing the intricate web of life on our planet. Secondly, the issue of endangered species is a direct reflection of human impacts on the environment. It brings attention to the consequences of habitat destruction, climate change, pollution, and unsustainable practices. By studying this topic, we can delve into the root causes of species endangerment and contemplate the ethical and moral dimensions of our responsibility towards other living beings. Moreover, the plight of endangered species evokes strong emotional responses, prompting discussions on the intrinsic value of nature and our duty to conserve it for future generations. Writing about endangered species enables us to raise awareness, foster empathy, and advocate for sustainable practices and conservation initiatives.

1. Dudley, N., & Stolton, S. (Eds.). (2010). Arguments for protected areas: Multiple benefits for conservation and use. Earthscan. 2. Fearn, E., & Butler, C. D. (Eds.). (2019). Routledge handbook of eco-anxiety. Routledge. 3. Groombridge, B., & Jenkins, M. D. (2002). World atlas of biodiversity: Earth's living resources in the 21st century. University of California Press. 4. Hoekstra, J. M., Boucher, T. M., Ricketts, T. H., & Roberts, C. (2005). Confronting a biome crisis: Global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecology Letters, 8(1), 23-29. 5. Kiesecker, J. M., & Copeland, H. E. (Eds.). (2018). The biogeography of endangered species: Patterns and applications. Island Press. 6. Laurance, W. F., Sayer, J., & Cassman, K. G. (2014). Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(2), 107-116. 7. Meffe, G. K., & Carroll, C. R. (Eds.). (1997). Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates. 8. Primack, R. B. (2014). Essentials of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates. 9. Soulé, M. E., & Terborgh, J. (Eds.). (1999). Continental conservation: Scientific foundations of regional reserve networks. Island Press. 10. Wilson, E. O. (2016). Half-earth: Our planet's fight for life. Liveright Publishing.

Relevant topics

• Fast Fashion
• Air Pollution
• Water Pollution
• Deforestation
• Plastic Bags
• Nuclear Energy
• Global Warming
• Climate Change

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts

Collection  03 May 2022

Editor's choice: threatened species

Biodiversity is in crisis and according to some estimates tens of thousands of species disappear every year. Many others are on the verge of extinction. We can only halt this decline if we have a fundamental understanding of threatened species and are able to put in place effective conservation plans to guarantee their survival.

Following the IUCN Red List categories, this collection brings together some of the latest research on the biology and conservation efforts of a wide variety of threatened species from around the world.

Critically Endangered

State-space models reveal a continuing elephant poaching problem in most of Africa

• Scott Schlossberg
• Michael J. Chase
• Keith Lindsay

Enhanced, coordinated conservation efforts required to avoid extinction of critically endangered Eastern Pacific leatherback turtles

• The Laúd OPO Network

The conservation value of admixed phenotypes in a critically endangered species complex

• Keren R. Sadanandan
• Gabriel W. Low
• Frank E. Rheindt

Molecular phylogeny of one extinct and two critically endangered Central Asian sturgeon species (genus Pseudoscaphirhynchus ) based on their mitochondrial genomes

• Artem V. Nedoluzhko
• Fedor S. Sharko
• Nikolai S. Mugue

First use of artificial canopy bridge by the world’s most critically endangered primate the Hainan gibbon Nomascus hainanus

• Bosco Pui Lok Chan
• Yik Fui Philip Lo

Wild Bornean orangutans experience muscle catabolism during episodes of fruit scarcity

• Caitlin A. O’Connell
• Andrea L. DiGiorgio
• Erin R. Vogel

Chimpanzees balance resources and risk in an anthropogenic landscape of fear

• Elena Bersacola
• Catherine M. Hill
• Kimberley J. Hockings

Fine-scale genetic structure in the critically endangered red-fronted macaw in the absence of geographic and ecological barriers

• Guillermo Blanco
• Francisco Morinha
• José L. Tella

Mapping silver eel migration routes in the North Sea

• Pieterjan Verhelst
• Jan Reubens
• David Righton

Genome-wide SNPs redefines species boundaries and conservation units in the freshwater mussel genus Cyprogenia of North America

• Kyung Seok Kim
• Kevin J. Roe

Defining priority areas for blue whale conservation and investigating overlap with vessel traffic in Chilean Patagonia, using a fast-fitting movement model

• Luis Bedriñana-Romano
• Rodrigo Hucke-Gaete
• Daniel M. Palacios

High resolution biologging of breaching by the world’s second largest shark species

• Jessica L. Rudd
• Owen M. Exeter
• Lucy A. Hawkes

Deep genetic structure at a small spatial scale in the endangered land snail Xerocrassa montserratensis

• Cristina Català
• Vicenç Bros
• Marta Pascual

Shrub and vegetation cover predict resource selection use by an endangered species of desert lizard

• Christopher J. Lortie
• Jenna Braun
• H. Scott Butterfield

The endocast of the Night Parrot ( Pezoporus occidentalis ) reveals insights into its sensory ecology and the evolution of nocturnality in birds

• Andrew N. Iwaniuk
• Aubrey R. Keirnan
• Vera Weisbecker

Uncovering unique plasticity in life history of an endangered centenarian fish

• Martin J. Hamel
• Jonathan J. Spurgeon
• Mark A. Pegg

Effects of both climate change and human water demand on a highly threatened damselfly

• Rassim Khelifa
• Hayat Mahdjoub
• Michael J. Samways

Changes in diving behaviour and habitat use of provisioned whale sharks: implications for management

• Gonzalo Araujo
• Jessica Labaja
• Alessandro Ponzo

Protecting nursery areas without fisheries management is not enough to conserve the most endangered parrotfish of the Atlantic Ocean

• Natalia C. Roos
• Guilherme O. Longo
• Adriana R. Carvalho

Heterogeneity in patterns of helminth infections across populations of mountain gorillas ( Gorilla beringei beringei )

• Klara J. Petrželková
• Carine Uwamahoro
• David Modrý

Faecal DNA to the rescue: Shotgun sequencing of non-invasive samples reveals two subspecies of Southeast Asian primates to be Critically Endangered species

• Dewi Imelda Roesma

Oil palm cultivation critically affects sociality in a threatened Malaysian primate

• Anna Holzner
• Krishna N. Balasubramaniam
• Anja Widdig

Environmental DNA detection tracks established seasonal occurrence of blacktip sharks ( Carcharhinus limbatus ) in a semi-enclosed subtropical bay

• Bautisse D. Postaire
• Judith Bakker
• Demian D. Chapman

Slow life history leaves endangered snake vulnerable to illegal collecting

• Chris J. Jolly
• Brenton Von Takach
• Jonathan K. Webb

Free-roaming dogs limit habitat use of giant pandas in nature reserves

• Ramana Callan
• Jacob R. Owens
• Zhihe Zhang

Seasonal influence on the bathymetric distribution of an endangered fish within a marine protected area

Identifying priority conservation areas in a Saharan environment by highlighting the endangered Cuvier’s Gazelle as a flagship species

• F. Javier Herrera-Sánchez
• Jose María Gil-Sánchez
• Teresa Abáigar

Temperature stress and disease drives the extirpation of the threatened pillar coral, Dendrogyra cylindrus , in southeast Florida

• Nicholas P. Jones
• Lystina Kabay
• David S. Gilliam

Defining intraspecific conservation units in the endemic Cuban Rock Iguanas ( Cyclura nubila nubila )

• Kyle J. Shaney
• L. Grisell Diaz-Ramirez
• Ella Vázquez-Domínguez

Habitat preferences of Southern Ground-hornbills in the Kruger National Park: implications for future conservation measures

• Leigh Combrink
• Hendrik J. Combrink
• Colleen T. Downs

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

REPORTS, ARTICLES AND RESEARCH PAPERS

Endangered species.

    • Paving the Road to Extinction: Congress’ Expanded Assault on Endangered Species Through Appropriations Poison-Pill Riders .Kurose, S., and Hartl, B., Center for Biological Diversity, January 2024.     • Recovery of the Grizzly Bear at the Intersection of Law and Science . Greenwald, N. August 2023.     • No Refuge: How America’s National Wildlife Refuges Are Needlessly Sprayed With Nearly Half a Million Pounds of Pesticides Each Year . Connor, H. May 2018.     • Mexico's 10 Most Iconic Endangered Species . Olivera, A. April 2018.      • A Wall in the Wild: The Disastrous Impacts of Trump's Border Wall on Wildlife . Greenwald, N., Segee, B., Curry, T. and Bradley, C. May 2017.      • Pollinators in Peril: A Systematic Status Review of North American and Hawaiian Native Bees . Kopec, K., Center for biological Diversity, February 2017.      • Removing the Walls to Recovery: Top 10 Species Priorities for a New Administration. Endangered Species Coalition (including the Center). December 2016.      • Shortchanged: Funding Needed to Save America's Most Endangered Species . Greenwald, N., Hartl, , B., Mehrhoff, L., Pang, J. December 2016.      • Taxa, Petitioning Agency, and Lawsuits Affect Time Spent Awaiting Listing Under the US Endangered Species Act . Greenwald, N., Kesler, D., Puckett, E. Biological Conservation . September 2016.      • Fishing Down Nutrients on Coral Reefs . Allgeier, J.E., Valdivia,A., Cox, C. & Layman, C.A. Nature Communications . August 2016.      • A Wild Success: A Systematic Review of Bird Recovery Under the Endangered Species Act . Suckling, K., Mehrhoff, L., 2016. Beam, R. & Hartl, B. June 2016.      • Poisoned Waters: How Cyanide Fishing and the Aquarium Trade Are Devastating Coral Reefs and Tropical Fish . Center for Biological Diversity & For the Fishes. June 2016.     • Lethal Loophole: How the Obama Administration Is Increasingly Allowing Special Interests to Endanger Rare Wildlife . Sanerib, T., Elkins, C., and Greenwald, N. February 2016.     • Biodiversity on the Brink: The Role of “Assisted Migration" in Managing Endangered Species Threatened With Rising Seas . Lopez, J. Harvard Environmental Law Review Vol. 39. 2015.     • Politics of Extinction: The Unprecedented Republican Attack on Endangered Species and the Endangered Species Act . Pand, J., and Greenwald, N. July 2015.     • Runaway Risks: Oil Trains and the Government's Failure to Protect People, Wildlife and the Environments . Margolis, J., 2015.     • Sea-Level Rise and Species Survival along the Florida Coast . Lopez, J. 2014.     • Collision Course: The Government's Failing System for Protecting Florida Manatees from Deadly Boat Strikes . Center for Biological Diversity. September 2014.      • Nourished by Wildfire: The Ecological Benefits of the Rim Fire and the Threat of Salvage Logging . Center for Biological Diversity and John Muir Projejct, January 2014.      • Deadly Waters: How Rising Seas Threaten 233 Endangered Species . Center for Biological Diversity. 2013.     • In Harm's Way: How the U.S. State Department and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Have Ignored the Dangers of the Keystone XL Pipeline to Endangered Species . Burd, L., Greenwald, N., & Bradley, C., 2013.     • Dying for Protection: The 10 Most Vulnerable, Least Protected Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States . Adkins Giese, C. 2013.     • On Thin Ice: After Five Years on the Endangered Species List, Polar Bears Still Face a Troubling Future . Center for Biological Diversity. 2013.     • A Poor Track Record, but a Chance to Excel . Snape, W., 2013. The Environmental FORUM   Environmental Law Institute, www.eli.org ) 30(1): 53.     • Can A Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan Save San Diego's Vulnerable Vernal Pool Species? Buse, J., 2012. Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal 6(1): 52-80.     • On Time, On Target: How the Endangered Species Act Is Saving America's Wildlife . Suckling, K., Greenwald, N., Curry, T. 2012.     • Protecting Rare Amphibians Under the U.S. Endangered Species Act . Adkins Giese, C., FrogLog (May 2012): 21-23.     • White-nose Syndrome Headed to a Cave Near You . Matteson, M. Desert Report (June 2011): 6-7.     • Impact of Dunes Sagebrush Lizard on Oil and Gas Activities in New Mexico . Lininger, J. & Bradley, C., 2011.    • Assessing Protection for Imperiled Species of Nevada, U.S.A.: Are Species Slipping Through the Cracks of Existing Protections? Bradley, C. & Greenwald, N., 2008.     • Not Too Late to Save the Polar Bear: A Rapid Action Plan to Address the Arctic Meltdown . Siegel, K., Cummings, B., Moritz, A. & Nowicki, B., 2007.     • Status of the Bald Eagle in the Lower 48 States and the District of Columbia: 1963-2007 . Suckling, K. & Hodges, W., 2007.     • The Bureaucratically Imperiled Mexican Wolf . Povilitis, A., Parsons, D.R., Robinson, M.J., & Becker, C.D., 2006.     • A Review of Northern Goshawk Habitat Selection in the Home Range and Implications for Forest Management in the Western United States . Greenwald, D. N., Crocker-Bedford, C., Broberg, l., & Suckling, K., 2005.     • Suitable Habitat for Jaguars in New Mexico . Robinson, M., Bradley, C., Boyd, J., 2005.     • Impacts of the 2003 Southern California Wildfires on Four Species Listed as Threatened or Endangered Under the Federal Endangered Species Act: Quino Checkerspot Butterfly, Mountain Yellow-legged Frog, Coastal California Gnatcatcher, Least Bell's Vireo . Bond, M. & Bradley, C., 2003.     • A Conservation Alternative for the Management of the Four Southern California National Forests (Los Padres, Angeles, San Bernardino, Cleveland) . Penrod, K., et al., 2002.     • Analysis of Compliance by U.S. Forest Service Southwestern Region with Incidental Take Statements Issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Three Biological Opinions of 1999 . Taylor, M. 2001.

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

   • Taxa, Petitioning Agency, and Lawsuits Affect Time Spent Awaiting Listing Under the US Endangered Species Act . Greenwald, N., Kesler, D., Puckett, E. Biological Conservation . September 2016.     • A Wild Success: A Systematic Review of Bird Recovery Under the Endangered Species Act . Suckling, K., Mehrhoff, L., Beam, R. & Hartl, B. June 2016.     • Saving Species and Wild Spaces: 10 Extraordinary Places Saved by the Endangered Species Act , Pang, J. & Hartl, B. May 2016.     • Politics of Extinction: The Unprecedented Republican Attack on Endangered Species and the Endangered Species Act . Pang, J., and Greenwald, N. July 2015.     • A Different Perspective on the Endangered Species Act at 40 Responding to Damien M. Schiff . Buse, J., 2015. University of California, Davis 38(1): 145-166.     • Making Room for Wolf Recovery: The Case for Maintaining Endangered Species Act Protections for America's Wolves . Weiss, A., Greenwald, N. & Bradey, C. Center for Biological Diversity, November 2014.     • A Wild Success: American Voices on the Endangered Species Act at 40 . Center for Biological Diversity, Endangered Species Coalition, Defenders of Wildlife, February 2014.     • On Time, On Target: How the Endangered Species Act Is Saving America's Wildlife . Suckling, K., Greenwald, N., Curry, T., 2012.     • A Future for All: A Blueprint for Strengthening the Endangered Species Act . 2011.     • Effects on Species' Conservation of Reinterpreting the Phrase “Significant Portion of its Range” in the U.S. Endangered Species Act . Greenwald, N., 2009. Conservation Biology 23(6): 1375-1377.     • State Endangered Species Acts . In Baur, D.C. & Irvin, W.R. (eds.), Endangered Species Act: Law, Policy, and Perspectives , second edition. American Bar Association. George, S. & Snape, W., 2010.     • Politicizing Extinction: The Bush Administration's Dangerous Approach to Endangered Wildlife . Greenwald, N., 2007.     • Measuring the Success of the Endangered Species Act, Recovery Trends in the Northeastern United States . Suckling, K.F., 2006.     • Factors Affecting the Rate and Taxonomy of Species Listings under the US Endangered Species Act . In Gobel, D, Scott, M.J. & Davis, F.W. (eds.), The Endangered Species Act at Thirty: Renewing the Conservation Commitment . Island Press. Greenwald, D.N., Suckling, K.F. & Taylor, M.F.J., 2006.     • Critical Habitat and Recovery . In: Gobel, D., Scott, M.J. & Davis, F.W. (eds.), The Endangered Species Act at Thirty: Renewing the Conservation Commitmen t. Island Press. Suckling, K.F. & Taylor, M.F.J., 2006.     • The Listing Record . In Gobel, D., Scott, M.J., & Davis, F.W. (eds.), The Endangered Species Act at Thirty: Renewing the Conservation Commitmen t. Island Press. Greenwald, D.N., K.F. Suckling and M.F.J. Taylor, 2006.      • Progress or Extinction? A Systematic Review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Endangered Species Act Listing Program. 1974-2004 . Greenwald, D. N. & Suckling, K. F., 2005     • The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis . Taylor, M.F.J., Suckling, K.F. & Rachlinski, J.J., 2005. BioScience 55(4): 360-367.     • Extinction and the Endangered Species Act . Suckling, K., Nowicki, B. & Slack, R., 2004.     • A Review of the Bush Critical Habitat Record . 2003.     • Bush Administration Attacks Endangered Species Act .     • Safeguarding Citizen Rights Under the Endangered Species Act . Senatore, M., & Suckling, K., 2001.

BIODIVERSITY

    • Hidden In Plain Sight: California's Native Habitats Are Valuable Carbon Sinks . Yap, T., Prabhala, A., Anderson, I. Center for Biological Diversity. July 2023.     • Bullfrogs: A Trojan Horse for a Deadly Fungus? Yap, T., Koo, M., Ambrose, R., Vredenburg, V.T. Science Journal for Kids . October 2018.     • Mexico's 10 Most Iconic Endangered Species . Olivera, A. April 2018.     • A Multi-method Approach to Delineate and Validate Migratory Corridors . Bond, M., Bradley, C., Kiffner, C., Morrison, T., and Lee, D. Landscape Ecology . May 2017.    • Biodiversity on the Brink: The Role of “Assisted Migration" in Managing Endangered Species Threatened With Rising Seas . Lopez, J. Harvard Environmental Law Review Vol. 39. 2015.    • Nourished by Wildfire: The Ecological Benefits of the Rim Fire and the Threat of Salvage Logging . Center for Biological Diversity and John Muir Projejct, January 2014.    • Joining the Convention on Biological Diversity: A Legal and Scientific Overview of Why the United States Must Wake Up . Snape, B., 2010. Sustainable Development Law & Policy 10(3): 6-18.    • Highways to Hell: A Critical Examination of the Environmental Impacts of the Security and Prosperity Partnership . Lopez, J., 2009. [3 MB version]    • Rana Aurora (Northern Red-legged Frog) Egg Mass Disturbance. Curry, T. R., and Hayes, M. P., 2009. Herpetological Review 40(2): 208-209.    • Greenwashing Risks to Baby-boomers Abroad: An Assessment of Available Strategies to Address “Green” Marketing Misrepresentation to U.S. Retiree Real Estate Investors Overseas. 2009.    • Life History Diversity and Protection of the Southwestern Washington/Columbia River Distinct Population Segment of the Coastal Cutthroat Trout . Greenwald, N. & Mashuda, S., 2008.     • Predation on the Coastal Tailed Frog ( Ascaphus truei ) by a Shrew ( Sorex spp.) in Washington State . Lund, E., Hayes, M., Curry, T., Marsten, J. & Young, 2008. Northwestern Naturalist 89(3): 200-202.     • Assessing Protection for Imperiled Species of Nevada, U.S.A.: Are Species Slipping Through the Cracks of Existing Protections? Greenwald, N. & Bradley, C., 2008.     • Medicinal Plants at Risk — Nature's Pharmacy, Our Treasure Chest: Why We Must Preserve Our Natural Heritage . Roberson, E., 2008.     • Species of Concern of the Tillamook Rainforest and North Coast, Oregon . Greenwald, N. & Garty, A., 2007.     • The Bering Sea: A Biodiversity Assessment of Vertebrate Species . Greenwald, N., Callimanis, S., Garty, A. & Peters, E., 2006.     • Saving All the Parts: Protecting Species of Northwest Old-growth Forests . Greenwald, N. & Greason, S., 2004.     • Imperiled Western Trout and the Importance of Roadless Areas . 2001.     • A Conservation Alternative for the Management of the Four Southern California National Forests (Los Padres, Angeles, San Bernardino, Cleveland) . Penrod, K., et al., 2002.     • Principles of Wildlife Corridor Design . Bond, M., 2003.

    • A  Wall  of  Lights  Through the Wild: 1,800 Stadium Lights on Arizona Conservation Lands Threaten Wildlife . McSpadden, R., Jordahl, L., and Bradley, C. Center for Biological Diversity. June 2023.     • Hidden In Plain Sight: California's Native Habitats Are Valuable Carbon Sinks . Yap, T., Prabhala, A., Anderson, I. Center for Biological Diversity. July 2023.     • Deadpool Highway: How Interstate 11 Would Worsen Arizona’s Water Crisis . McSpadden, R., and Bradley, C. Center for Biological Diversity. May 2023.     • State of Utom River 2022: Challenges, Opportunities for Southern California’s Signature River . Center for Biological Diversity. August 2022.     • A Wall in the Wild: The Disastrous Impacts of Trump's Border Wall on Wildlife . Greenwald, N., Segee, B., Curry, T. and Bradley, C. May 2017.     • A Multi-Method Approach to Delineate and Validate Migratory Corridors . Bond, M., Bradley, C., Kiffner, C., Morrison, T., and Lee, D. Landscape Ecology . May 2017.     • Public Lands Enemies: 15 Federal Lawmakers Plotting to Seize, Destroy and Privatize America's Public Lands . Spivak, R. & Beam, R. March 2017.     • Runaway Risks: Oil Trains and the Government's Failure to Protect People, Wildlife and the Environments . Margolis, J., 2015.     • Nourished by Wildfire: The Ecological Benefits of the Rim Fire and the Threat of Salvage Logging . Center for Biological Diversity and John Muir Projejct, January 2014.     • Groups Join Together to Confront Water-rights Issue . Mrowka, R. Desert Report (June 2011): 2, 13.     • Saving Our National Legacy: The Future of America's Last Heritage Forests . Fink, M., Kassar, C., Matteson, M., and McKinnon, T., July 2009.     • America's Newest Fossil Beds National Monument: Tule Springs/Upper Las Vegas Wash . Mrowka, R. and Davis, L., 2009.     • Wild at Heart: Saving the Last of America's Backcountry . 2008.     • Imperiled Western Trout and the Importance of Roadless Areas . 2001.     • Protection and Conservation of Roadless Areas in the Southwest . Greenwald, N.     • A Conservation Alternative for the Management of the Four Southern California National Forests (Los Padres, Angeles, San Bernardino, Cleveland) . Penrod, K., et al., 2002.

CLIMATE CHANGE

   • Flight Path: A Trajectory for U.S. Aviation to Meet Global Climate Goals . Center for Biological Diversity. October 2020.    • From Bailout to Righting the Course: The Commonsense Action the United States Must Take to Address the Flood Crisis . Lopez, J. 2020.    • Stealing California's Future: How Monterey County's Dirty Oil Business Worsens the Climate Crisis . Center for Biological Diversity. September 2016.    • Throwing Shade: 10 Sunny States Blocking Distributed Solar Development . Greer, R. April 2016.    • Up in the Air: How Airplane Carbon Pollution Jeopardizes Global Climate Goals . Pardee, V. December 2015.    • Biodiversity on the Brink: The Role of “Assisted Migration" in Managing Endangered Species Threatened With Rising Seas . Lopez, J. Harvard Environmental Law Review Vol. 39. 2015.    • Grounded: The President's Power to Fight Climate Change, Protect Public Lands by Keeping Publicly Owned Fossil Fuels in the Ground . Saul, M., McKinnon, T., Spivak, R., 2015.    • What Happens When Species Move But Reserves Do Not? Creating Climate Adaptive Solutions to Climate Change . Whipps, N., 2015. Hastings Law Journal Vol. 66.    • Runaway Risks: Oil Trains and the Government's Failure to Protect People, Wildlife and the Environments . Margolis, J., 2015.    • The Potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions From U.S. Federal Fossil Fuels . Ecoshift Consulting, Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth. August 2015.    • Troubled Waters: Offshore Fracking's Threat to California's Ocean, Air and Seismic Stability . Center for Biological Diversity, 2014.    • On Shaky Ground: Fracking, Acidizing, and Increased Earthquake Risk in California . Earthworks, Center for Biological Diversity, Clean Water Action, 2014.    • Deadly Waters: How Rising Seas Threaten 233 Endangered Species . Center for Biological Diversity, 2013.    • The New Normal: Climate Change Victims in Post- Kiobel United States Federal Courts . Lopez, J., 2013. Charleston Law Review 8(1).    • Not Just a Number: Achieving a CO 2 Concentration of 350 ppm or Less to Avoid Catastrophic Climate Impacts. Center for Biological Diversity and 350.org, 2010.    • Extinction: It's Not Just for Polar Bears. A Center for Biological Diversity and Care for the Wild International report. Wolf, S., 2010.    • Yes, He Can: President Obama's Power to Make an International Climate Commitment Without Waiting for Congress . Bundy, K., Cummings, B., Pardee, V. & Siegel, K., 2009.    • 350 Reasons We Need to Get to 350: Species Threatened by Global Warming; An Interactive Installation by the Center for Biological Diversity . 2009.    • No Reason to Wait: Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Through the Clean Air Act . Siegel, K., Snape, W., and Vespa, M., June 2009.    • Why 350? Climate Policy Must Aim to Stabilize Greenhouse Gases at the Level Necessary to Minimize the Risk of Catastrophic Outcomes . Vespa, M., 2009. Ecology Law Currents 36(1): 185-194. • Fuel to Burn: The Climate and Public Health Implications of Off-road Vehicle Pollution in California . Kassar, C. & Spitler, P., 2008.     • Not Too Late to Save the Polar Bear: A Rapid Action Plan to Address the Arctic Meltdown . Siegel, K., Cummings, B., Moritz, A. & Nowicki, B., 2007.     • The California Environmental Quality Act: On the Front Lines of California's Fight Against Global Warming . Siegel, K., Vespa, M. & Nowicki, B., 2007.

    • Powerless in the United States: How Utilities Drive Shutoffs and Energy Injustice . Center for Biological Diversity, March 2023.     • Rooftop-Solar Justice: Why Net Metering is Good for People and the Planet and Why Monopoly Utilities Want to Kill It . Crystal,. H., Lin, R., and Su, J., Center for Biological Diversity, Energy and Policy Institute, BailoutWatch, January 2023.    • Fueling Extinction: How Dirty Energy Drives Wildlife to the Brink . Endangered Species Coalition (incl. the Center for Biological Diversity), 2012.    • A Deadly Toll: The Gulf Oil Spill and the Unfolding Wildlife Disaster . 2011. Center for Biological Diversity.    • What We Should Learn From the BP Spill . Lopez, J., 2011. Environmental Law News 20 (1): 35.    • Too Much Oil for the Rubber Stamp: The Government's Role in the BP Oil Spill . Lopez, J., 2011.    • BP's Well Evaded Environmental Review: Categorical Exclusion Policy Remains Unchanged . Lopez, J., 2010. Ecology Law Currents 37 (93): 93-103.    • Corporate Profile of Salt River Project . Draffan, G., 2001.    • Ecological and Community Problems with Biomass-to-Energy . Schulke, T.

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH/POLLUTION

    • Collateral Damage: How Factory Farming Drives Upthe Use of Toxic Agricultural Pesticides . Center for Biological Diversity, World Animal Protection, 2022.     • Pesticides and Environmental Injustice in the USA: Root Causes, Current Regulatory Reinforcement and a Path Forward . Donley, N., Bullard, R., Economos, J., Figueroa, I., Lee, J., Liebman, A., Navarro Martinez, D., & Shafiei, F. BMC Public Health , April 2022.     • Toxic Hangover: How the EPA Is Approving New Products With Dangerous Pesticides It Committed to Phasing Out . Donley, N., Jan. 2020.     • A Menace to Monarchs: Drift-prone Dicamba Poses a Dangerous New Threat to Monarch Butterflies . Donley, N., March 2018.     • Toxic Concoctions: How the EPA Ignores the Dangers of Pesticide Cocktails . Donley, N., July 2016.     • Can't We Just All Get Along: Reconciling Pesticide Use and Species Protection . Lopez, J. 2015.     • Lost in the Mist: How Glyphosate Use Disproportionately Threatens California's Most Impoverished Counties . Center for Biological Diversity, 2015.       • Perdido en la niebla: Como El uso de glifosato desproporcionadamente amenaza los condados más pobres de California . Center for Biological Diversity, 2015.     • Dispersants: The Lesser of Two Evils or a Cure Worse Than the Disease? Kilduff, C. and Lopez, J., 2012. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 16 (2): 375-394.     • Endocrine-disrupting Chemical Pollution: Why the EPA Should Regulate These Chemicals Under the Clean Water Act . Lopez, J., 2010. Sustainable Development Law & Policy 10(3): 19-23.     • Poisoning Our Imperiled Wildlife: San Francisco Bay Area Endangered Species at Risk from Pesticides . Miller, J., Miller, J., Beeland, T.D. & Bradley, C., 2006.     • Silent Spring Revisited: Pesticide Use and Endangered Species . Litmans, B. & Miller, J, 2004.

POPULATION AND SUSTAINABILITY

    • Alternative Economies: Uplifting Activities for a Sustainable Future . Dennings, K., Adoma, A.; 2023.     • At What Cost: Unraveling the Harms of the Fast Fashion Industry . Shedlock, K., Feldstein, S.; 2023.     • Too Hot for Knitwear: Climate Crisis, Biodiversity and Fashion Brands Using Woll and Synthetics . Feldstein, S., Hakansson, E.; 2023.     • Talking Trash: U.S. Perspectives on the Language of Waste Reduction . Dennings, K., Adoma, A.; 2023.     • Unwrapped: Perceptions of Winter Holiday Consumerism, Gift Giving and Waste . Dennings, K., Adoma, A; 2023.     • The Influence of Environmental Toxicity, Inequity and Capitalism on Reproductive Health . Dennings, K., Grossman, A; 2022.     • Gender and the Climate Crisis: Equitable Solutions for Climate Plans . Dennings, K., Baillie, S., and Baxter, C; 2022.     • Public Perceptions on Population: US Survey Results . Dennings, K., Baillie, S., Ricciardi, R. and Addo, A; 2022; Population and Sustainability 6(1): 1-23.     • Sheer Destruction: Wool, Fashion and the Biodiversity Crisis . Feldstein, S., Hakansson, E., Katcher, J., Vance, V.; 2021.     • Endangered Species Condoms: A Social Marketing Tool for Starting Conversations About Population . Baillie, S., Dennings, K. and Feldstein S.; 2020; Journal of Population and Sustainability 4(2): 31-44.     • Contraception and Consumption in the Age of Extinction: U.S. Survey Results . Dennings, K., 2020.     • Appetite for Change: A Policy Guide to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions of U.S. Diets by 2030 . Feldstein, S., 2020.     • Catering to the Climate: How Earth-Friendly Menus at Events Can Help Save the Planet . Molidor, J., Emery., I., 2019.     • Towards a Psychology of the Food‐Energy‐Water Nexus: Costs and Opportunities . Dreyer, S.J., Kurz, T., Prosser, A.M.B., Abrash, A.W., Dennings, K., McNeill, I., Saber, D.A., Swim, J.K., 2019. Journal of Social Issues 76(1).     • Slow Road to Zero: A Report Card on U.S. Supermarkets’ Path to Zero Food Waste . Molidor, J., Feldstein, S., Figueiredo, J., 2019.     • Checked Out: How U.S. Supermarkets Fail to Make the Grade in Reducing Food Waste . Molidor, J., Feldstein, S., 2018.     • Wasting Biodiversity: Why Food Waste Needs to Be a Conservation Priority . Feldstein, S., 2017. Biodiversity 18 (2-3): 75-77.     • Habitat-Fed Food: Grass-fed Beef and Sustainable Solutions . Molidor, J., 2017. Biodiversity 18 (2-3): 78-81.

FIRE AND FOREST RESTORATION

    • Nourished by Wildfire: The Ecological Benefits of the Rim Fire and the Threat of Salvage Logging . Center for Biological Diversity and John Muir Projejct, January 2014.     • Influence of Pre-Fire Tree Mortality on Fire Severity in Conifer Forests of the San Bernardino Mountains, California , 2009. Bond, M., Lee, D. E., Bradley, C. & Hanson, T. Open Forest Science Journal 2:41-47.     • Impacts of the 2003 Southern California Wildfires on Four Species Listed as Threatened or Endangered Under the Federal Endangered Species Act: Quino Checkerspot Butterfly, Mountain Yellow-legged Frog, Coastal California Gnatcatcher, Least Bell's Vireo . Bond, M. & Bradley, C., 2003.     • Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems: A Broad Perspective . Allen, C.D., Savage, M., Falk, D.A., Suckling, K. F., Swetnam, T. W., Schulke, T., Stacey, P. B., Morgan, P., Hoffman, M. & Klingel, J. T., 2002. Ecological Applications 12(5): 1418-1433.     • Prelude to Catastrophe: Recent and Historic Land Management within the Rodeo-Chedeski Fire Area .     • Effectively Treating the Wildland-Urban Interface to Protect Houses and Communities from the Threat of Forest Fire . Nowicki, B., 2002.     • Protection and Conservation of Roadless Areas in the Southwest . Greenwald, N.     • An Ecologically Integrated Approach to Managing Dwarf Mistletoe (Arceuthobium) in Southwest Forests .  Pollock, Michael M., Ph. D.  Kieran Suckling, 1995.      • A Conservation Alternative for the Management of the Four Southern California National Forests (Los Padres, Angeles, San Bernardino, Cleveland) . Penrod, K., et al., 2002.     • Fire & Forest Ecosystem Health in the American Southwest . Suckling, K., 1996.

LIVESTOCK GRAZING

    • Costs and Consequences: The Real Price of Livestock Grazing on America's Public Lands . Glaser, C., Romaniello, C. & Moskowitz, K. (prepared for the Center for Biological Diversity), 2015.     • Assessing the Full Cost of the Federal Grazing Program . Moskowitz, K., & Romaniello, C., 2002.     • Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems: A Broad Perspective . Allen, C.D., Savage, M., Falk, D.A., Suckling, K.F., Swetnam, T.W., Schulke, T., Stacey, P.B., Morgan, P., Hoffman, M. & Klingel, J.T., 2002. Ecological Applications 12(5): 1418-1433.     • Cattle Grazing and the Loss of Biodiversity in the East Bay .      • Livestock Grazing, Fire Regimes, and Tree Densities: A Literature Review .

    • Frogs . In Bernheimer, K. (ed.), Brothers and Beasts: An Anthology of Men on Fairy Tales. Wayne State University Press. Suckling, K.F., 2007.     • Biodiversity, Linguistic Diversity and Identity — Toward an Ecology of Language in an Age of Extinction . Suckling, K., 2000. Langscape 17: 14-20.     • A House on Fire: Connecting the Biological and Linguistic Diversity Crises . 2002. Animal Law 6: 193-202.

Get the latest on our work for biodiversity and learn how to help in our free weekly e-newsletter.

The Center for Biological Diversity is a 501(c)(3) registered charitable organization. Tax ID: 27-3943866.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Extinction and the U.S. Endangered Species Act

Noah greenwald.

1 Center for Biological Diversity, Portland, OR, USA

Kieran F. Suckling

2 Center for Biological Diversity, Tucson, AZ, USA

Brett Hartl

3 Center for Biological Diversity, Washington, DC, USA

Loyal A. Mehrhoff

4 Center for Biological Diversity, Honolulu, HI, USA

Associated Data

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are available in a Supplementary File and include a complete list of the species we identified as extinct or possibly extinct along with all supporting information.

The U.S. Endangered Species Act is one of the strongest laws of any nation for preventing species extinction, but quantifying the Act’s effectiveness has proven difficult. To provide one measure of effectiveness, we identified listed species that have gone extinct and used previously developed methods to update an estimate of the number of species extinctions prevented by the Act. To date, only four species have been confirmed extinct with another 22 possibly extinct following protection. Another 71 listed species are extinct or possibly extinct, but were last seen before protections were enacted, meaning the Act’s protections never had the opportunity to save these species. In contrast, a total of 39 species have been fully recovered, including 23 in the last 10 years. We estimate the Endangered Species Act has prevented the extinction of roughly 291 species since passage in 1973, and has to date saved more than 99% of species under its protection.

Introduction

Passed in 1973, the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) includes strong protections for listed threatened and endangered species and has helped stabilize and recover hundreds of listed species, such as the bald eagle and gray whale ( Taylor, Suckling & Rachlinski, 2005 ; Schwartz, 2008 ; Suckling et al., 2016 ). In part because of its strong protections, the ESA has engendered substantial opposition from industry lobby groups, who perceive the law as threatening their profits and have been effective in generating opposition to species protections among members of the U.S. Congress. One common refrain from opponents of the ESA in Congress and elsewhere is that the law is a failure because only 2% of listed species have been fully recovered and delisted ( Bishop, 2013 ).

The number of delistings, however, is a poor measure of the success of the ESA because most species have not been protected for sufficient time such that they would be expected to have recovered. Suckling et al. (2016) , for example, found that on average listed birds had been protected just 36 years, but their federal recovery plans estimated an average of 63 years for recovery. Short of recovery, a number of studies have found the ESA is effectively stabilizing or improving the status of species, using both biennial status assessments produced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Congress and abundance trends ( Male & Bean, 2005 ; Taylor, Suckling & Rachlinski, 2005 ; Gibbs & Currie, 2012 ; Suckling et al., 2016 ).

In addition to recovering species, one of the primary purposes of the ESA is to prevent species extinction. Previous studies indicate the ESA has been successful in this regard ( McMillan & Wilcove, 1994 ; Scott et al., 2006 ). As of 2008, the ESA was estimated to have prevented the extinction of at least 227 species and the number of species delisted due to recovery outnumbered the number of species delisted for extinction by 14–7 ( Scott et al., 2006 ). In this study, we identified all ESA listed species that are extinct or possibly extinct to quantify the number of species for which ESA protections have failed and use these figures to update the estimated number of species extinctions prevented. This is the first study in over 20 years to compile data on extinction of ESA listed species, providing an important measure of one of the world’s strongest conservation laws ( McMillan & Wilcove, 1994 ).

To identify extinct or possibly extinct ESA listed species, we examined the status of all 1,747 (species, subspecies and distinct population segments) U.S. listed or formerly listed species, excluding species delisted based on a change in taxonomy or new information showing the original listing to have been erroneous. We determined species to be extinct or possibly extinct based on not being observed for at least 10 years, the occurrence of adequate surveys of their habitat, and presence of threats, such as destruction of habitat of the last known location or presence of invasive species known to eliminate the species.

To differentiate extinct and possibly extinct species we relied on determinations by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, IUCN, species experts and other sources. In most cases, these determinations were qualitative rather quantitative. Species were considered extinct if surveys since the last observation were considered sufficient to conclude the species is highly likely to no longer exist, and possibly extinct if surveys were conducted after the last observation, but were not considered sufficient to conclude that extinction is highly likely ( Butchart, Stattersfield & Brooks, 2006 ; Scott et al., 2008 ).

Source information included 5-year reviews, listing rules and critical habitat designations by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (for aquatic and terrestrial species) or NOAA Fisheries (for marine species), published and gray literature, personal communication with species experts and classifications and accounts by NatureServe, IUCN and the Hawaiian Plant Extinction Prevention program. For each species, we identified year of listing, year last seen, NatureServe and IUCN ranking, taxonomic group, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service region. For species last seen after listing, we also searched for abundance estimates at time of listing in order to give a sense of likelihood of survival regardless of ESA protection.

Following previously developed methods, we estimated the number of species extinctions prevented by the ESA by assuming that listed threatened and endangered species have a comparable extinction risk to IUCN endangered species, which was estimated as an average of 67% over 100 years ( Mace, 1995 ; Schwartz, 1999 ; Scott et al., 2006 ). We believe this estimate of extinction risk is conservative based on similarity of IUCN criteria to factors considered in ESA listings, observed low numbers for species at time of ESA listing and observed correspondence between ESA listed species and species classified as endangered or critically endangered by the IUCN ( Wilcove, McMillan & Winston, 1993 ; Wilcove & Master, 2005 ; Harris et al., 2012 ). Presumed extinction risk was then multiplied by the number of extant listed species and the proportion of a century in which species were protected by the ESA. Previous studies used the length of time the ESA has been in existence (1973-present) for the proportion of a century species have been protected ( Schwartz, 1999 ; Scott et al., 2006 ), but because many species have not been protected the entire 45 years the law has existed, we instead used the more conservative average length species were protected (25 years). This corresponds to the following formula:

We identified a total of 97 ESA listed species that are extinct (23) or possibly extinct (74). Of these, we found 71 extinct (19) or possibly extinct (52) species were last observed before they were listed under the ESA and thus are not relevant to determining the Act’s success in preventing extinction ( Table S1 ). These species were last seen an average of 24 years before protection was granted with a range of one to more than 80 years prior.

A total of 26 species were last seen after listing, of which four are confirmed extinct and 22 are possibly extinct ( Table S2 ). On average, these species were last seen 13 years after listing with a range of 2–23 years. We were able to find an abundance estimate at the time of listing for 19 of these species, ranging from one individual to more than 2,000 with an average of 272. In several cases, these estimates were based on extrapolations from very few sightings.

The distribution of extinct and possibly extinct species was non-random with 64 of the 97 species from Hawaii and other Pacific Islands, followed by 18 from the southeast ( Fig. 1 ). This was also the case for taxonomy. A total of 40 of the 97 species were mollusks dominated by Hawaiian tree snails and southeast mussels, followed by birds (18) and plants (17) ( Fig. 2 ).

Extinct or possibly extinct listed species by taxonomic group.

Extinct or possibly extinct listed species by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region.

We identified several other species that have been missing for more than 10 years, but for which there has not been any effective surveys and thus classifying them as possibly extinct did not seem appropriate, including two Hawaiian yellow-faced bees ( Hylaeus facilis and Hylaeus hilaris ) (K. Magnacca, 2018, personal communication) and Fosberg’s love grass ( Eragrostis fosbergii ) ( U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2011 ). If indeed extinct, all three were lost prior to protection under the ESA.

Including updated figures for number of listed species, time of protection and species extinctions, we estimate the ESA has prevented the extinction of roughly 291 species in its 45 year history. Based on the number of confirmed extinctions following listing, we further estimate that the ESA has to date prevented the extinction of more than 99% of species under its protection. To date, a total of 39 species have been delisted for recovery compared to four species that are extinct and 22 that are potentially extinct.

The few number of listed species that have gone extinct following protection combined with an estimated 291 species for which extinction was prevented demonstrate the ESA has achieved one of its core purposes—halting the loss of species. We will not attempt to catalog them here, but numerous individual examples provide further support for this conclusion. Well known species like the California condor ( Gymnogyps californianus ), black-footed ferret ( Mustela nigripes ) and Hawaiian monk seal ( Neomonachus schauinslandi ), as well as lesser known species like the yellowfin madtom ( Noturus flavipinnis ), are but a few of the species that likely would have been lost were it not for the ESA.

The madtom is a case in point. Wrongly presumed extinct when described in 1969, individual madtom were found in the Powell River in Tennessee and Copper Creek in Virginia and the species was protected under the ESA in 1977 ( U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1977 ). Following protection, federal and state officials worked with a non-governmental organization, Conservation Fisheries Inc., to discover additional populations and repatriate the species to rivers and streams in its historic range and there are now populations of the yellowfin madtom in three different watersheds ( U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2012a ). The history of the ESA is replete with similar such stories.

The distribution of extinct or possibly extinct listed species largely tracks those regions with the highest rates of species endangerment, including Hawaii and the Northern Mariana Islands with 64 of the 97 extinctions or possible extinctions, and the Southeast with 18 of the extinctions or possible extinctions, mostly freshwater species. The fragility of Hawaii’s endemic fauna to introduced species and habitat destruction and high degree of species imperilment is well recognized ( Duffy & Kraus, 2006 ). Similarly, the extinction and endangerment of freshwater fauna in the southeast is well documented ( Benz & Collins, 1997 ). To avoid further extinctions, these areas should be priorities for increased funding and effort.

Protection under the ESA came too late for the 71 species last seen prior to listing. It’s possible that some of these species survived undetected following listing, but we find this unlikely for most if not all of the species. It is very difficult to document extinction, but all of the species were the subject of survey both before and after listing, which is described in the listing rules and subsequent status surveys. In addition, the 71 species were last seen an average of 24 years prior to listing, providing a long window for detection prior to listing. If some of these species did survive after listing it was likely at very low numbers, such that recovery would have been difficult at best.

That these 71 species were lost before protections were applied clearly highlights the need to move quickly to protect species. Indeed, Suckling, Slack & Nowicki (2004) identified 42 species that went extinct while under consideration for protection. Since that analysis was completed, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has determined five additional species did not qualify for protection because they were extinct, including the Tacoma pocket gopher ( Thomomys mazama tacomensis ), Tatum Cave beetle ( Pseudanophthalmus parvus ), Stephan’s riffle beetle ( Heterelmis stephani), beaverpond marstonia ( Marstonia castor ) and Ozark pyrg ( Marstonia ozarkensis ), meaning there are now 47 species that have gone extinct waiting for protection ( U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2012b , 2016 , 2017 , 2018a ).

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service currently faces a backlog of more than 500 species that have been determined to potentially warrant protection, but which await a decision ( U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2018b ). Under the ESA, decisions about protection for species are supposed to take 2 years, but on average it has taken the Fish and Wildlife Service 12 years ( Puckett, Kesler & Greenwald, 2016 ). Such lengthy wait times are certain to result in loss of further species and run counter to the purpose of the statute. This problem can be addressed by streamlining the Service’s process for listing species, which has become increasingly cumbersome, and by increasing funding for the listing program. For every species listed, the Service’s process includes review by upward of 20 people, including numerous individuals who have no specific knowledge of the species and in a number of cases are political appointees. We instead recommend that the Service adopt a process similar to scientific peer review, involving review by two to three qualified individuals.

The loss of 26 species after they were protected is indicative of conservation failure. This failure, however, in most cases cannot be wholly attributed to the ESA because most of these species were reduced to very low numbers by the time they were protected, making recovery difficult to impossible. Of the 19 species we could find an abundance estimate for at the time of listing, 13 had an estimated population fewer than 100 with eight having fewer than 10 individuals. Of the six other species, two Hawaiian birds, Oahu creeper ( Paroreomyza maculate ) and ‘O’u ( Psittirostra psittacea ) had estimated populations in the hundreds, but this was based on sightings of single individuals. Given the lack of further sightings and the presence of disease carrying mosquitoes throughout their habitat, these estimates were likely optimistic. The other four species, the dusky seaside sparrow ( Ammodramus maritimus nigrescens ), Morro Bay kangaroo rat ( Dipodomys heermanni morroensis ), pamakani ( Tetramolopium capillare ) and Curtis’ pearlymussel ( Epioblasma florentina curtisii ), had populations at the time of listing ranging from 100 to 3,000 individuals, but sufficient action was not taken to save them, making them true conservation failures.

At some level, all of the 97 ESA listed species that we identified as possibly extinct or extinct are conservation failures. For 42 of these species, the law itself was too late because they were last seen before the ESA was passed in 1973. But for others, there may have been time and we did not act quickly enough or dedicate sufficient resources to saving them. There are many examples of species both in the U.S. and internationally that have been successfully recovered even after dropping to very small numbers, but this can only occur with fast, effective action, resources and in many cases luck. The Mauritius kestrel ( Falco punctatus) , for example, was brought back from just two pairs ( Cade & Jones, 1993 ) and the Hawaiian plant extinction prevention program, which focuses on saving plants with fewer than 50 individuals, has rediscovered many species believed extinct, brought 177 species into cultivation, constructed fences to protect species from non-native predators and reintroduced many species into the wild ( Wood, 2012 , http://www.pepphi.org/ ).

The failure to provide sufficient resources for conservation of listed species, however, continues to the present. As many as 27 species of Oahu tree snail ( achatinella spp. ) are extinct or possibly extinct, yet expenditures for the species that still survive are inadequate to support minimal survey and captive propagation efforts. Likewise, the Hawaiian plant extinction prevention program, which has been so effective in saving species on the brink of extinction, is facing a budget cut of roughly 70% in 2019 ( http://www.pepphi.org/ ), which very likely could mean the extinction of dozens of plants that otherwise could be saved. Overall, Greenwald et al. (2016) estimate current recovery funding is roughly 3% of estimated recovery costs from federal recovery plans. We can save species from extinction, but it must be more of a priority for federal spending. Nevertheless, despite funding shortfalls and the tragedy of these species having gone extinct, the ESA has succeeded in preventing the extinction of the vast majority of listed species and in this regard is a success.

Management implications

Of the 97 species we identified as extinct or potentially extinct, only 11 have been delisted for extinction. Another 11 have been recommended for delisting due to extinction. The San Marcos gambusia ( Gambusia georgei ) could also be delisted since there is very little hope it survives. For the other 74 possibly extinct species, we recommend retaining protections in the hope that some will be rediscovered and because there is little cost in retaining listing.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental information 1.

Extinct or possibly extinct species broken out by whether last seen before or after protection was enacted, including relevant source data and literature cited.

Funding Statement

The authors received no funding for this work.

Additional Information and Declarations

All authors are employed by the Center for Biological Diversity which works to protect endangered species and their habitats.

Noah Greenwald conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Kieran F. Suckling conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Brett Hartl conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Loyal A. Mehrhoff conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Too few, too late: U.S. Endangered Species Act undermined by inaction and inadequate funding

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America

Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliations Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America, Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America

Affiliations Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America, Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States of America

• Erich K. Eberhard, 
• David S. Wilcove, 
• Andrew P. Dobson

• Published: October 12, 2022
• https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275322
• Reader Comments

This year, the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity will meet to finalize a post 2020-framework for biodiversity conservation, necessitating critical analysis of current barriers to conservation success. Here, we tackle one of the enduring puzzles about the U.S. Endangered Species Act, often considered a model for endangered species protection globally: Why have so few species been successfully recovered? For the period of 1992–2020, we analyzed trends in the population sizes of species of concern, trends in the time between when species are first petitioned for listing and when they actually receive protection, and trends in funding for the listing and recovery of imperiled species. We find that small population sizes at time of listing, coupled with delayed protection and insufficient funding, continue to undermine one of the world’s strongest laws for protecting biodiversity.

Citation: Eberhard EK, Wilcove DS, Dobson AP (2022) Too few, too late: U.S. Endangered Species Act undermined by inaction and inadequate funding. PLoS ONE 17(10): e0275322. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275322

Editor: Laurentiu Rozylowicz, University of Bucharest, ROMANIA

Received: June 10, 2022; Accepted: September 14, 2022; Published: October 12, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Eberhard et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All data are within the paper and Supporting Information files. The species data and appropriations data underlying the results presented in this study were collected from notices published by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and annual budget legislation, all of which are publicly available through the Federal Registrar ( www.federalregistrar.gov ). The author's accessed FWS Notices through the Service's Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS), which organizes documents by species name. This data base is also publicly accessible ( https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ ).

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Accelerating rates of species extinction are a matter of global concern [ 1 ] as exemplified in the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) report that predicted the loss of over 1 million species in the foreseeable future, which will also have significant impacts on the delivery of ecosystem services [ 2 ]. The prevention of species extinction is a primary goal of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. In the United States, the strongest law to prevent species extinctions is the Endangered Species Act (ESA) [ 3 ], which has served as a model for other nations since its passage by the Nixon Administration in 1973. A longstanding concern of both supporters and opponents of the law has been the relatively low number of listed species that have successfully recovered to the point where they no longer need protection. In the 48 years since enactment of the ESA, only 54 US species have been declared fully recovered and delisted [ 4 ].

Multiple explanations have been given for this low rate of recovery including: (a) a pattern of not protecting species until their populations have reached very low levels, which increases both the time to recovery and the likelihood that species will vanish entirely due to environmental, genetic, and demographic stochasticity [ 5 ]; (b) a lack of incentives to landowners to participate actively in efforts to increase populations of endangered species [ 6 ]; and (c) inadequate funding for recovery actions [ 7 ]. Here, we have used data from the Federal Register to examine trends in the population sizes of species at time of listing and the levels of funding available to list and recover them.

Evidence that species are not being protected under the ESA until their populations have reached dangerously low levels was initially provided in a 1993 paper by Wilcove et al. [ 8 ]. The authors found that the median population size at time of listing during the second decade of ‘legal protection’ by the ESA (1985–1991) was just 1075 for vertebrates and 999 individuals for invertebrates. The median population size at listing for plant species was less than 120 individuals. We repeated their methodology to determine whether the US Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) has become more proactive as we approach the 50 th anniversary of the ESA and roughly 30 years since attention was first drawn to this problem.

We also examined trends in the length of time between when a species is identified as potentially deserving of protection and when it actually receives that protection under the ESA (hereafter, “wait times”). It should be noted that, in recent years, most of the species added to the ESA have been the result of petitions from non-governmental entities to FWS requesting protection of a given species. Frequently, listing follows litigation brought by environmental organizations when petition decisions are overdue or petitions are denied [ 9 ].

Finally, we examined trends in funding for the listing and recovery of imperiled species (we use “imperiled” to include both Endangered and Threatened species protected under the ESA, and, unless indicated otherwise, we use the word “species” to refer to any entity protected under the ESA, including subspecies and vertebrate populations). We give particular attention to trends in funding per species , in order to account for changes in the number of species listed each year.

Materials and methods

The list of plants and animals granted protection under the ESA was collated from annual listing records available through the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS). Population data were obtained from Final and Proposed Listing Notices issued by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Our analysis was restricted to wild populations of plants and animals known to occur in the United States and its territories and did not include captive populations.

When presented with a range of values, or an upper limit, for the total number of individuals or populations at time of listing, we favored interpretations that maximized population size. For example, if a population was said to be “between 500 and 1000” individuals, we recorded the population as being 1000 individuals at time of listing. Similarly, a population said to be “<1000” was recorded as being 999 individuals at time of listing. This was done in order to obtain the largest possible estimate of each plant and animal population at time of listing, making our subsequent analyses an optimistic “best case scenario”. Six species were listed with no known individuals or populations surviving in the wild. In these instances, the total number of individuals or total number of populations was recorded as being zero. Population data for plants and animals listed between 1985–1991 were obtained from Wilcove et al. in order to facilitate comparison with their results. We performed a non-parametric Wilcoxon Rank-sum Test to compare the medians of continuous variable x , the number of individuals at time of listing for species listed between 1985–1992, and continuous variable y , the number of individuals at time of listing for species listed between 1993–2020. The same approach was used to compare the median number of populations at time of listing for each time period. We adopted a significance threshold of p = 0.05.

Data for Resource Management Appropriations (discretionary funding that supports the management and recovery of imperiled species by FWS) and Section 4 Appropriations (funding allocated specifically to ESA listing activities) were obtained from the text of annual federal budget legislation and corrected for inflation to 2019 USD. These documents are publicly accessible through the Federal Registrar . Funding per species was defined as the average funding available for the management of each species in a given year. We calculated this value by dividing annual Resource Management Appropriations by the total number of species protected under the ESA as of the first day of that calendar year.

From 1992–2020, the FWS listed a total of 970 species for protection under the ESA; 68% of these listings were plants, 18% were invertebrates, and 14% were vertebrates. Full species accounted for the majority of listings during this period (80%). Of the species listed, 602 had data on their total population size (total number of individuals) at time of listing, and 843 had data on the number of populations at time of listing. For each taxonomic group analyzed, the total population size at time of listing ( Fig 1A ) did not differ significantly between the 1985–1991 and 1992–2020 time periods (Wilcox Test values of p = 0.08, p = 0.41, and p = 0.66, for plants, vertebrates and invertebrates respectively). For plants and invertebrates, the total number of populations at time of listing ( Fig 1B ) also did not differ significantly between the 1985–1991 and 1992–2020 time periods (p = 0.91 and p = 0.06, respectively). However, the median number of vertebrate populations at time of listing was slightly greater in the 1992–2020 time period, increasing from 2 to 4 populations (p = 0.04).

• PPT PowerPoint slide
• PNG larger image
• TIFF original image

(A) Comparison of population size at time of listing for plants and animals. There are no significant differences between the two periods (Wilcox Test values of p = 0.08, p = 0.41, and p = 0.66, for plants, vertebrates and invertebrates respectively). (B) Comparison of number of populations at time of listing. There are no significant differences between the two periods for plants and invertebrates. Values of zero indicate species for which there were either no known individuals or no known populations at time of listing. Median values shown above each plot.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275322.g001

Our analysis revealed longer wait times for species petitioned for listing during the 2000–2009 period (median = 9.1 years), compared to those petitioned for listing during the 1992–1999 period (median = 5.9 years), followed by shorter wait times for species petitioned for listing during the 2010–2020 period (median 3.0 years). The number of petitions received during each period also varied greatly ( n = 49, 203 and 26 for 1992–1999, 2000–2009 and 2010–2020, respectively). While wait times seem to decrease when fewer species are listed, there are insufficient data to test whether this effect is significant.

Resource Management Appropriations climbed modestly from 1996–2010 before beginning a decade-long decline that was halted only in 2020 ( Fig 2A ). The same trend is observed in Section 4 Appropriations, which peaked in 2010 at $25.9 million USD before dropping to $20.1 million USD by 2020. Concurrently, the number of species listed for protection under the ESA increased by over 300% between 1985–2020. As such, Resource Management Appropriations, when measured on a per species basis, have dropped by nearly 50% since 1985.

(A) Change in cumulative number of ESA listings compared to change in Resource Management Appropriations. The lower timeline illustrates political control of the Presidency and, by a majority, each house of Congress. (B) Number of species delisted for various reasons.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275322.g002

Our analysis of trends in the protection of imperiled species under the US Endangered Species Act warrants a limited amount of optimism and a larger amount of pessimism: Most species are not receiving protection until they have reached dangerously low population sizes. First reported in 1993, this pattern has persisted throughout the intervening quarter century. We suspect that most of the species listed since 1993 had fallen to low population levels well before the time span of our study, a reflection of past anthropogenic activities. Their protection under the ESA implies a painfully slow process of clearing a backlog of rare but unprotected species as opposed to a failure to respond to recent, rapid population declines in formerly more common species.

The wait-times between when a species is first petitioned for protection under the ESA and when it finally receives that protection have waxed and waned since 1992. The period with the longest median wait time (2000–2009, with a median wait-time of 9.1 years), was also the period when the greatest number of petitions were received by FWS ( n = 203). The period with the shortest median wait time (2010–2020 with a median wait-time of 3.0 years) was the period when the fewest number of petitions were received ( n = 26). This suggests that wait times may be exacerbated when limited resources for listing are strained by a large influx of petitions. Consistently, very few species have received protection in the two-year period that is prescribed in the ESA. For species with very small or rapidly declining populations, a multi-year delay in receiving protection increases the risk of extinction.

Our data suggest that inadequate funding has persisted for decades, with no clear relationship as to which political party is in power ( Fig 2A ). The unfortunate conclusion is that FWS is being asked to do more with less resources. The combination of delays in listing rare species, the typically mall population sizes of species at time of listing, and inadequate funding for recovery actions, are the key factors that can explain the relatively small number of listed species that have fully recovered ( Fig 2B ). Resource allocation frameworks and other decision-support tools can help FWS make the most efficient use of the funds it receives [ 10 ], but increased funding is essential for sustained, substantial progress in protecting imperiled species [ 11 , 12 ]. Studies have shown that government expenditures for imperiled species management do contribute to an improvement in recovery status and averted extinctions [ 13 ].

Although the US is one of only a handful of nations that have failed to ratify the Convention on Biological Diversity, its commitment to preventing the loss of its own “non-voting” species dates back nearly half a century to the passage of the ESA in 1973. In December 2022, when international leaders gather in Montréal, Canada for the 15 th meeting of the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, the failure of the US to have solved the funding gaps that hamper the ESA will stand as a stark reminder of the difference between a visionary promise and its functional implementation.

Supporting information

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275322.s001

• View Article
• PubMed/NCBI
• Google Scholar
• 2. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, (IPBES). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat. 2019. Available from: https://ipbes.net/global-assessment
• 3. United States. The Endangered Species Act, Public Law 93–205, Section 3. Washington D.C. 1973.

93 Endangered Species Essay Topic Ideas & Examples

🏆 best endangered species topic ideas & essay examples, ⭐ good research topics about endangered species, 👍 simple & easy endangered species essay titles, ❓ research questions about endangered species.

• Endangered Species: Modern Environmental Problem Some of the activities which cause danger to these species include the following; This refers to loss of a place to live for the animals and can also be expressed as the ecosystem or the […]
• Senegal River Delta: An Endangered Ecosystem According to Kotschoubey, the primary reason for the degradation of the area is the lack of water due to human activity. We will write a custom essay specifically for you by our professional experts 808 writers online Learn More
• Zoos for Conservation of Endangered Species However, at the moment, they could be considered important scientific and research centers that investigate the current situation related to species and create conditions needed for their survival and further preservation.
• Environment: Endangered Species Global warming also increases the risk of storms and drought, affecting food supply, which may cause death to both humans and animals.
• Javan Rhinos: Wildlife Trading of Endangered Animals Out of the five rhino species, Javan rhinoceros is the most threatened species despite being in the ecosystem for millions of years, playing a crucial role in shaping the landscape by its feeding style.
• Endangered Silverback Gorillas Central Africa is the only place where mountain gorillas can be found, and the area of concern is confined to about 780 square kilometers of medium altitude forests northwest of Rwanda, southwest of Uganda, and […]
• The Santa Ana Sucker as an Endangered Organism The Santa Ana Sucker is one of the endangered fish species and it is found in the freshwaters of California. For instance, the International Union for Conservation of Nature listed the Santa Ana Sucker as […]
• Australia’s Endangered Diverse Marine Ecosystem Climate Change and population increase are becoming increasingly difficult to perceive distinctly, especially when the question is about the loss of a diverse marine environment.
• Can Cloning Technology Be Useful for Endangered Species? This is because animal cloning is popularly understood as the creation of a copy of another animal, much the same way as the capability to create twins but in the laboratory.
• Building a Sanctuary for Endangered Species It is proposed that the power generation in the island would utilize solar and wind resources with the intention of complying with environmental standards and establishing a pollution free green way of living on the […]
• Endangered Wild Equids by Patricia D. Moehlman The article is focused primarily on what can be done to try to save these species for the future and presents a plan that has been adopted by the IUCN The World Conservation Union.
• Endangered Species Act’s Effects on Real Estate S; the ability to obtain permits, entitlement, and approvals necessary for the development of real projects, and unexpected delays in the timing thereof; and implementation of laws as Endangered Species Act.
• Endangered Species Act for Ecosystem Management Despite the importance and significant impact of ESA, the policy is inherently flawed and remains criticized by experts who emphasize the need for an overhaul of the legislation. The ESA continues to function and serve […]
• Invasive and Endangered Species: Kudzu and Gopher Frog Kudzu was introduced from Asia in 1876 for fodder and prevention of soil erosion. It favors areas with ample sunlight and thrives in almost any type of soil.
• The Role of Zoos in Endangered Species Protection Adopting the endangered species requires the zoos to have sufficient funds to meet the needs of the animals and to maintain the facilities.
• Ivory-Billed Woodpecker, Endangered Species Some laws that cover the endangered species have been declared controversial in the way they place the species in the lists and the criteria used when removing the animals from the lists.
• Irish Red Deer as an Endangered Species The red deer spends most of the time feeding and it has the ability of maintaining fat reserves to use during the winter season when there is scarcity of food. The color of the red […]
• Environmental Studies: Saving Endangered Species One of the major concerns of the XXI century, the shrinkage of the Atlantic Forest, will inevitably trigger the disappearance of an even greater number of species populations.
• The History of the Endangered Languages and the Ways of Their Preservation The aim of this report is to discuss the problem of the endangered languages preservation taking into account the historic and cultural conditions of their development as well as the impact of the modern time. […]
• Endangered Species Issue in the United States Thus, the extinction of wolves in our ecosystem will results in an increase in the ungulates population comprising of unhealthy and undesired preys. With more wolves in an ecosystem, the number of ungulates will reduce.
• Should the Endangered Species Act Be Strengthened? The main reasons why the endangered species act act should be strengthened in United States are the act is the only piece of legislation that is responsible for the protection of flora and fauna and […]
• The Ocean’s Rarest Mammal Vaquita – An Endangered Species The vaquita looks like a curved stocky porpoise, and it is the smallest of all the porpoises in the world. This is a matter of concern and ought to be investigated if the survival of […]
• Vaquita – Endangered Species The vaquita looks like a star curved stocky porpoise and it is the smallest of all the porpoises in the world.
• Environmental Attitudes, Motivations, and Contingent Valuation of Nonuse Values: Endangered Species
• Irreversible Land Use and the Preservation of Endangered Species
• Service Providing Units, Existence Values, and the Valuation of Endangered Species
• Closing the Barn Door: Construction and Endangered Species Restrictions
• Engaging Fishers’ Ecological Knowledge for Endangered Species Conservation: Four Advantages to Emphasizing Voice in Participatory Action Research
• Public Preferences for Endangered Species Recovery: An Examination of Geospatial Scale and Non-market Values
• Endangered Species and Uncertainty: The Economics of a Safe Minimum Standard
• Keystone Species and the Importance of Raising Endangered Species Awareness
• Endangered Species and Natural Resource Exploitation: Extinction vs. Coexistence
• How Trophy Hunting Can Help Many Endangered Species
• Agricultural Water Security and Instream Flows for Endangered Species
• Endangered Species Conservation, Cultural, Economic, and Political Constraints
• Integrating Land Cover Modeling and Adaptive Management to Conserve Endangered Species and Reduce Catastrophic Fire Risk
• Funding and Support for People Responsible for Protecting Endangered Species
• Strategies for Improving the Cost-Effectiveness of Endangered Species Management
• Elephant Ivory and the Convention on International Trade In Endangered Species
• General Information About the Endangered Species Act in the United States of America
• Endangered Species and Environment: Human Moral Obligations
• Allocating Scarce Resources for Endangered Species Recovery
• Optimal Compensation for Endangered Species Protection Under Asymmetric Information
• Economic Growth and Threatened and Endangered Species
• Biodiversity and Endangered Species: Bald Eagle
• Takings, Compensation, and Endangered Species Protection on Private Lands
• Financial Issues and the Protection of Endangered Species
• Interspecies Management and Land Use Strategies to Protect Endangered Species
• Human Overpopulation and Its Effects on Endangered Species
• External Causes That Affect the Survival of Endangered Species
• Preemptive Habitat Destruction Under the Endangered Species Act
• Endangered Species: Keystone Law or Waste of Money
• Threatened Species and Endangered Species: What’s Different
• Charismatic Megafauna: How These Species Are Influencing the Endangered Species Act
• Black Rhino: Critically Endangered Species
• Allocating Conservation Resources Under the Endangered Species Act
• Horizontal Implementation, Divided Government, and Other Forms of Public Policy Involved With Clean Water Act and Endangered Species
• Cloning Animals and the Salvation of Endangered Species
• Habitat Conservation Plan: Endangered Species, Biodiversity, and Environmental Problems
• Conserving Endangered Species Through Regulation of Urban Development
• Perverse Incentives and Safe Harbors in the Endangered Species Act: Evidence From Timber Harvests Near Woodpeckers
• Animal Rights and Endangered Species
• Political, Economic, and Cultural Constraints That Limit the Application of Ecology in Conserving Endangered Species
• What Types of Species Are Included in the Endangered Species Act?
• What Is the Important Role of Zoos in the Conservation of Endangered Species?
• How Does the Endangered Species Act Protect the Environment?
• Endangered Species: Are Animal Rights Respected?
• How Many Endangered Animal Species Are There on the Planet?
• Are All Conservation Measures for Endangered Species Legitimate?
• What Kinds of Species Are Endangered?
• Can Minnesota Justify Taking the Grey Wolf off the Endangered Species List?
• What Changes Should Be Made to the Endangered Species Act?
• What Are the Causes and Effects of Endangered Species?
• What Are the Benefits of Endangered Species?
• Can Animal Cloning Save Endangered Species?
• What External Causes Affect the Survival of Endangered Species?
• How Overpopulation Caused Animal Extinction and Endangerment?
• Why Is It Important to Save Endangered Species?
• What Is the Convention on International Trade In Endangered Species?
• How Do Environmental Problems Affect Endangered Species?
• How Does Pollution Cause Endangered Species?
• How Do Endangered Species Affect People’s Lives?
• How Does Logging Affect Endangered Species?
• Is the Government Doing Enough to Protect Endangered Species?
• What Are the Cultural, Economic, and Political Constraints on Species Conservation?
• Why Is the Topic of Endangered Species Controversial in Modern Society?
• Why Does the US Have So Many Endangered Species?
• How Is the Recovery of Endangered Species?
• What Are the Tasks of the Endangered Species Working Group?
• How Many Species Are on the Endangered and Threatened List?
• What Are the Moral Obligations of Humans to Endangered Species?
• How Can Protect and Management of Endangered Plant Species?
• What Are the Facts About the Endangered Species of Grizzly Bears?
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2024, February 27). 93 Endangered Species Essay Topic Ideas & Examples. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/endangered-species-essay-topics/

"93 Endangered Species Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." IvyPanda , 27 Feb. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/topic/endangered-species-essay-topics/.

IvyPanda . (2024) '93 Endangered Species Essay Topic Ideas & Examples'. 27 February.

IvyPanda . 2024. "93 Endangered Species Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." February 27, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/endangered-species-essay-topics/.

1. IvyPanda . "93 Endangered Species Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." February 27, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/endangered-species-essay-topics/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "93 Endangered Species Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." February 27, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/endangered-species-essay-topics/.

• Animal Testing Topics
• Extinction Research Topics
• Zoo Research Ideas
• Oceanography Research Ideas
• Coral Reef Essay Topics
• Landfill Essay Titles
• Hunting Questions
• Biodiversity Research Topics
• Animal Ethics Research Ideas
• Wildlife Ideas
• Ecosystem Essay Topics
• Botany Essay Titles
• Animal Welfare Ideas
• Medical Anthropology Paper Topics
• Deforestation Research Ideas

• Subscription Information
• Terms of Use
• Excellence in Ecology Books
• Marine Ecology Books
• Diseases of Marine Animals Books
• Author Guidelines
• Authorship Policy
• Conflict of Interest Policy
• Open Access
• Rights & Permissions
• Transformative Journals
• For Librarians
• Ecology Institute
• Otto Kinne Foundation
• Job Openings
• Contact the journal
• Mailing List
• Latest Volume
• About the Journal

ESR 44:291-325 (2021)   -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esr01115

Review marine mammal conservation: over the horizon, sarah e. nelms 1, *, joanna alfaro-shigueto 2,3 , john p. y. arnould 4 , isabel c. avila 5 , susan bengtson nash 6 , elizabeth campbell 1,2 , matt i. d. carter 7 , timothy collins 8 , rohan j. c. currey 9 , camila domit 10 , valentina franco-trecu 11 , mariana m. p. b. fuentes 12 , eric gilman 13 , robert g. harcourt 14 , ellen m. hines 15 , a. rus hoelzel 16 , sascha k. hooker 7 , david w. johnston 17 , nachiket kelkar 18 , jeremy j. kiszka 19 , kristin l. laidre 20 , jeffrey c. mangel 1,2 , helene marsh 21 , sara m. maxwell 22 , aubrie b. onoufriou 23,24 , daniel m. palacios 25,26 , graham j. pierce 1,27 , louisa s. ponnampalam 28 , lindsay j. porter 29 , debbie j. f. russell 7,30 , karen a. stockin 31 , dipani sutaria 22 , nina wambiji 32 , caroline r. weir 33 , ben wilson 34 , brendan j. godley 1.

ABSTRACT: Marine mammals can play important ecological roles in aquatic ecosystems, and their presence can be key to community structure and function. Consequently, marine mammals are often considered indicators of ecosystem health and flagship species. Yet, historical population declines caused by exploitation, and additional current threats, such as climate change, fisheries bycatch, pollution and maritime development, continue to impact many marine mammal species, and at least 25% are classified as threatened (Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable) on the IUCN Red List. Conversely, some species have experienced population increases/recoveries in recent decades, reflecting management interventions, and are heralded as conservation successes. To continue these successes and reverse the downward trajectories of at-risk species, it is necessary to evaluate the threats faced by marine mammals and the conservation mechanisms available to address them. Additionally, there is a need to identify evidence-based priorities of both research and conservation needs across a range of settings and taxa. To that effect we: (1) outline the key threats to marine mammals and their impacts, identify the associated knowledge gaps and recommend actions needed; (2) discuss the merits and downfalls of established and emerging conservation mechanisms; (3) outline the application of research and monitoring techniques; and (4) highlight particular taxa/populations that are in urgent need of focus.

KEY WORDS: Conservation · Marine mammals · Priority setting · Management · Research techniques · Threats

Finished Papers

Customer Reviews

From a high school essay to university term paper or even a PHD thesis

Free essays categories

Will i get caught if i buy an essay.

The most popular question from clients and people on the forums is how not to get caught up in the fact that you bought an essay, and did not write it yourself. Students are very afraid that they will be exposed and expelled from the university or they will simply lose their money, because they will have to redo the work themselves.

If you've chosen a good online research and essay writing service, then you don't have to worry. The writers from the firm conduct their own exploratory research, add scientific facts and back it up with the personal knowledge. None of them copy information from the Internet or steal ready-made articles. Even if this is not enough for the client, he can personally go to the anti-plagiarism website and check the finished document. Of course, the staff of the sites themselves carry out such checks, but no one can forbid you to make sure of the uniqueness of the article for yourself.

Thanks to the privacy policy on web platforms, no one will disclose your personal data and transfer to third parties. You are completely safe from start to finish.