argumentative essay about effective communication

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• How to write an argumentative essay | Examples & tips

How to Write an Argumentative Essay | Examples & Tips

Published on July 24, 2020 by Jack Caulfield . Revised on July 23, 2023.

An argumentative essay expresses an extended argument for a particular thesis statement . The author takes a clearly defined stance on their subject and builds up an evidence-based case for it.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

When do you write an argumentative essay, approaches to argumentative essays, introducing your argument, the body: developing your argument, concluding your argument, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about argumentative essays.

You might be assigned an argumentative essay as a writing exercise in high school or in a composition class. The prompt will often ask you to argue for one of two positions, and may include terms like “argue” or “argument.” It will frequently take the form of a question.

The prompt may also be more open-ended in terms of the possible arguments you could make.

Argumentative writing at college level

At university, the vast majority of essays or papers you write will involve some form of argumentation. For example, both rhetorical analysis and literary analysis essays involve making arguments about texts.

In this context, you won’t necessarily be told to write an argumentative essay—but making an evidence-based argument is an essential goal of most academic writing, and this should be your default approach unless you’re told otherwise.

Examples of argumentative essay prompts

At a university level, all the prompts below imply an argumentative essay as the appropriate response.

Your research should lead you to develop a specific position on the topic. The essay then argues for that position and aims to convince the reader by presenting your evidence, evaluation and analysis.

• Don’t just list all the effects you can think of.
• Do develop a focused argument about the overall effect and why it matters, backed up by evidence from sources.
• Don’t just provide a selection of data on the measures’ effectiveness.
• Do build up your own argument about which kinds of measures have been most or least effective, and why.
• Don’t just analyze a random selection of doppelgänger characters.
• Do form an argument about specific texts, comparing and contrasting how they express their thematic concerns through doppelgänger characters.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

An argumentative essay should be objective in its approach; your arguments should rely on logic and evidence, not on exaggeration or appeals to emotion.

There are many possible approaches to argumentative essays, but there are two common models that can help you start outlining your arguments: The Toulmin model and the Rogerian model.

Toulmin arguments

The Toulmin model consists of four steps, which may be repeated as many times as necessary for the argument:

• Make a claim
• Provide the grounds (evidence) for the claim
• Explain the warrant (how the grounds support the claim)
• Discuss possible rebuttals to the claim, identifying the limits of the argument and showing that you have considered alternative perspectives

The Toulmin model is a common approach in academic essays. You don’t have to use these specific terms (grounds, warrants, rebuttals), but establishing a clear connection between your claims and the evidence supporting them is crucial in an argumentative essay.

Say you’re making an argument about the effectiveness of workplace anti-discrimination measures. You might:

• Claim that unconscious bias training does not have the desired results, and resources would be better spent on other approaches
• Cite data to support your claim
• Explain how the data indicates that the method is ineffective
• Anticipate objections to your claim based on other data, indicating whether these objections are valid, and if not, why not.

Rogerian arguments

The Rogerian model also consists of four steps you might repeat throughout your essay:

• Discuss what the opposing position gets right and why people might hold this position
• Highlight the problems with this position
• Present your own position , showing how it addresses these problems
• Suggest a possible compromise —what elements of your position would proponents of the opposing position benefit from adopting?

This model builds up a clear picture of both sides of an argument and seeks a compromise. It is particularly useful when people tend to disagree strongly on the issue discussed, allowing you to approach opposing arguments in good faith.

Say you want to argue that the internet has had a positive impact on education. You might:

• Acknowledge that students rely too much on websites like Wikipedia
• Argue that teachers view Wikipedia as more unreliable than it really is
• Suggest that Wikipedia’s system of citations can actually teach students about referencing
• Suggest critical engagement with Wikipedia as a possible assignment for teachers who are skeptical of its usefulness.

You don’t necessarily have to pick one of these models—you may even use elements of both in different parts of your essay—but it’s worth considering them if you struggle to structure your arguments.

Regardless of which approach you take, your essay should always be structured using an introduction , a body , and a conclusion .

Like other academic essays, an argumentative essay begins with an introduction . The introduction serves to capture the reader’s interest, provide background information, present your thesis statement , and (in longer essays) to summarize the structure of the body.

Hover over different parts of the example below to see how a typical introduction works.

The spread of the internet has had a world-changing effect, not least on the world of education. The use of the internet in academic contexts is on the rise, and its role in learning is hotly debated. For many teachers who did not grow up with this technology, its effects seem alarming and potentially harmful. This concern, while understandable, is misguided. The negatives of internet use are outweighed by its critical benefits for students and educators—as a uniquely comprehensive and accessible information source; a means of exposure to and engagement with different perspectives; and a highly flexible learning environment.

The body of an argumentative essay is where you develop your arguments in detail. Here you’ll present evidence, analysis, and reasoning to convince the reader that your thesis statement is true.

In the standard five-paragraph format for short essays, the body takes up three of your five paragraphs. In longer essays, it will be more paragraphs, and might be divided into sections with headings.

Each paragraph covers its own topic, introduced with a topic sentence . Each of these topics must contribute to your overall argument; don’t include irrelevant information.

This example paragraph takes a Rogerian approach: It first acknowledges the merits of the opposing position and then highlights problems with that position.

Hover over different parts of the example to see how a body paragraph is constructed.

A common frustration for teachers is students’ use of Wikipedia as a source in their writing. Its prevalence among students is not exaggerated; a survey found that the vast majority of the students surveyed used Wikipedia (Head & Eisenberg, 2010). An article in The Guardian stresses a common objection to its use: “a reliance on Wikipedia can discourage students from engaging with genuine academic writing” (Coomer, 2013). Teachers are clearly not mistaken in viewing Wikipedia usage as ubiquitous among their students; but the claim that it discourages engagement with academic sources requires further investigation. This point is treated as self-evident by many teachers, but Wikipedia itself explicitly encourages students to look into other sources. Its articles often provide references to academic publications and include warning notes where citations are missing; the site’s own guidelines for research make clear that it should be used as a starting point, emphasizing that users should always “read the references and check whether they really do support what the article says” (“Wikipedia:Researching with Wikipedia,” 2020). Indeed, for many students, Wikipedia is their first encounter with the concepts of citation and referencing. The use of Wikipedia therefore has a positive side that merits deeper consideration than it often receives.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

An argumentative essay ends with a conclusion that summarizes and reflects on the arguments made in the body.

No new arguments or evidence appear here, but in longer essays you may discuss the strengths and weaknesses of your argument and suggest topics for future research. In all conclusions, you should stress the relevance and importance of your argument.

Hover over the following example to see the typical elements of a conclusion.

The internet has had a major positive impact on the world of education; occasional pitfalls aside, its value is evident in numerous applications. The future of teaching lies in the possibilities the internet opens up for communication, research, and interactivity. As the popularity of distance learning shows, students value the flexibility and accessibility offered by digital education, and educators should fully embrace these advantages. The internet’s dangers, real and imaginary, have been documented exhaustively by skeptics, but the internet is here to stay; it is time to focus seriously on its potential for good.

If you want to know more about AI tools , college essays , or fallacies make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

• Ad hominem fallacy
• Post hoc fallacy
• Appeal to authority fallacy
• False cause fallacy
• Sunk cost fallacy

College essays

• Choosing Essay Topic
• Write a College Essay
• Write a Diversity Essay
• College Essay Format & Structure
• Comparing and Contrasting in an Essay

 (AI) Tools

• Grammar Checker
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Text Summarizer
• AI Detector
• Plagiarism Checker
• Citation Generator

An argumentative essay tends to be a longer essay involving independent research, and aims to make an original argument about a topic. Its thesis statement makes a contentious claim that must be supported in an objective, evidence-based way.

An expository essay also aims to be objective, but it doesn’t have to make an original argument. Rather, it aims to explain something (e.g., a process or idea) in a clear, concise way. Expository essays are often shorter assignments and rely less on research.

At college level, you must properly cite your sources in all essays , research papers , and other academic texts (except exams and in-class exercises).

Add a citation whenever you quote , paraphrase , or summarize information or ideas from a source. You should also give full source details in a bibliography or reference list at the end of your text.

The exact format of your citations depends on which citation style you are instructed to use. The most common styles are APA , MLA , and Chicago .

The majority of the essays written at university are some sort of argumentative essay . Unless otherwise specified, you can assume that the goal of any essay you’re asked to write is argumentative: To convince the reader of your position using evidence and reasoning.

In composition classes you might be given assignments that specifically test your ability to write an argumentative essay. Look out for prompts including instructions like “argue,” “assess,” or “discuss” to see if this is the goal.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Caulfield, J. (2023, July 23). How to Write an Argumentative Essay | Examples & Tips. Scribbr. Retrieved April 2, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/argumentative-essay/

Is this article helpful?

Jack Caulfield

Other students also liked, how to write a thesis statement | 4 steps & examples, how to write topic sentences | 4 steps, examples & purpose, how to write an expository essay, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Argumentative Essay on Communication Example

Sample essay on communication. This is an argumentative essay that informs us about the importance of communication and mastering more than one language to achieve greater work and academic success.

Title of the essay: “Communication and mastery of language”

Type of essay: argumentative essay, length: 420 words, topic: communication.

The nature of the human being motivates him to relate and interact with his peers, this makes interpersonal communication one of the most important aspects in the life of any person. Whether in the family, an educational center or meetings, the ability to transmit and interpret a message is essential for coexistence. The latter is called language, and in this essay, I will analyze it to understand its relevance in communication.

Through language people can understand the ideas and feelings that others express effectively, allowing them to communicate in different environments and situations. If there were no similar system, it would be impossible to exist in society, since the implementation of common projects and objectives would be hindered.

In this way, there are several languages ​​depending on the country or region where you live, making it necessary to learn them if you want to start a conversation fluently.

As the process of globalization in recent decades has made significant progress, it is inevitable that people seek the best way to communicate, both to share information and to carry out transactions.

Clearly it would be very difficult to learn all the languages ​​present in the world, so it is convenient to choose the most used and, in turn, be accepted by the majority.

There is no doubt that English is currently the most popular language, something that can be evidenced in the number of web pages that use it. So it is quite useful to learn it so as not to be limited when looking for information, especially when it comes to scientific or technical material.

Otherwise, the individual would be choosing to live a reality mired in partial ignorance, as he could only access automatically translated pages, and would be unable to establish adequate communication with people who do not speak their language.

English is used in virtually all areas of knowledge and it is essential for human development. Companies put it as a requirement when hiring new staff, and those who do not master it are at a clear disadvantage. It also represents the only way to be updated in real-time with technological advances and global political reality.

While in the academic field it is a requirement for obtaining degrees and certificates. It is a tool that should not be considered a luxury, but an obligation for professionals and anyone who wishes to communicate better in the world today.

Share this Post to Help Fellow Students

Useful Posts For Students

20 Best Laptops For Students

How I Won Eiffel Scholarship to Study For Free

16 Online Degree Programs From Top Universities

Should I Consolidate My Federal Student Loan?

8 Best Tablets For Students

Post navigation

Previous post.

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Choose Your Test

Sat / act prep online guides and tips, 3 strong argumentative essay examples, analyzed.

General Education

Need to defend your opinion on an issue? Argumentative essays are one of the most popular types of essays you’ll write in school. They combine persuasive arguments with fact-based research, and, when done well, can be powerful tools for making someone agree with your point of view. If you’re struggling to write an argumentative essay or just want to learn more about them, seeing examples can be a big help.

After giving an overview of this type of essay, we provide three argumentative essay examples. After each essay, we explain in-depth how the essay was structured, what worked, and where the essay could be improved. We end with tips for making your own argumentative essay as strong as possible.

What Is an Argumentative Essay?

An argumentative essay is an essay that uses evidence and facts to support the claim it’s making. Its purpose is to persuade the reader to agree with the argument being made.

A good argumentative essay will use facts and evidence to support the argument, rather than just the author’s thoughts and opinions. For example, say you wanted to write an argumentative essay stating that Charleston, SC is a great destination for families. You couldn’t just say that it’s a great place because you took your family there and enjoyed it. For it to be an argumentative essay, you need to have facts and data to support your argument, such as the number of child-friendly attractions in Charleston, special deals you can get with kids, and surveys of people who visited Charleston as a family and enjoyed it. The first argument is based entirely on feelings, whereas the second is based on evidence that can be proven.

The standard five paragraph format is common, but not required, for argumentative essays. These essays typically follow one of two formats: the Toulmin model or the Rogerian model.

• The Toulmin model is the most common. It begins with an introduction, follows with a thesis/claim, and gives data and evidence to support that claim. This style of essay also includes rebuttals of counterarguments.
• The Rogerian model analyzes two sides of an argument and reaches a conclusion after weighing the strengths and weaknesses of each.

3 Good Argumentative Essay Examples + Analysis

Below are three examples of argumentative essays, written by yours truly in my school days, as well as analysis of what each did well and where it could be improved.

Argumentative Essay Example 1

Proponents of this idea state that it will save local cities and towns money because libraries are expensive to maintain. They also believe it will encourage more people to read because they won’t have to travel to a library to get a book; they can simply click on what they want to read and read it from wherever they are. They could also access more materials because libraries won’t have to buy physical copies of books; they can simply rent out as many digital copies as they need.

However, it would be a serious mistake to replace libraries with tablets. First, digital books and resources are associated with less learning and more problems than print resources. A study done on tablet vs book reading found that people read 20-30% slower on tablets, retain 20% less information, and understand 10% less of what they read compared to people who read the same information in print. Additionally, staring too long at a screen has been shown to cause numerous health problems, including blurred vision, dizziness, dry eyes, headaches, and eye strain, at much higher instances than reading print does. People who use tablets and mobile devices excessively also have a higher incidence of more serious health issues such as fibromyalgia, shoulder and back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome, and muscle strain. I know that whenever I read from my e-reader for too long, my eyes begin to feel tired and my neck hurts. We should not add to these problems by giving people, especially young people, more reasons to look at screens.

Second, it is incredibly narrow-minded to assume that the only service libraries offer is book lending. Libraries have a multitude of benefits, and many are only available if the library has a physical location. Some of these benefits include acting as a quiet study space, giving people a way to converse with their neighbors, holding classes on a variety of topics, providing jobs, answering patron questions, and keeping the community connected. One neighborhood found that, after a local library instituted community events such as play times for toddlers and parents, job fairs for teenagers, and meeting spaces for senior citizens, over a third of residents reported feeling more connected to their community. Similarly, a Pew survey conducted in 2015 found that nearly two-thirds of American adults feel that closing their local library would have a major impact on their community. People see libraries as a way to connect with others and get their questions answered, benefits tablets can’t offer nearly as well or as easily.

While replacing libraries with tablets may seem like a simple solution, it would encourage people to spend even more time looking at digital screens, despite the myriad issues surrounding them. It would also end access to many of the benefits of libraries that people have come to rely on. In many areas, libraries are such an important part of the community network that they could never be replaced by a simple object.

The author begins by giving an overview of the counter-argument, then the thesis appears as the first sentence in the third paragraph. The essay then spends the rest of the paper dismantling the counter argument and showing why readers should believe the other side.

What this essay does well:

• Although it’s a bit unusual to have the thesis appear fairly far into the essay, it works because, once the thesis is stated, the rest of the essay focuses on supporting it since the counter-argument has already been discussed earlier in the paper.
• This essay includes numerous facts and cites studies to support its case. By having specific data to rely on, the author’s argument is stronger and readers will be more inclined to agree with it.
• For every argument the other side makes, the author makes sure to refute it and follow up with why her opinion is the stronger one. In order to make a strong argument, it’s important to dismantle the other side, which this essay does this by making the author's view appear stronger.
• This is a shorter paper, and if it needed to be expanded to meet length requirements, it could include more examples and go more into depth with them, such as by explaining specific cases where people benefited from local libraries.
• Additionally, while the paper uses lots of data, the author also mentions their own experience with using tablets. This should be removed since argumentative essays focus on facts and data to support an argument, not the author’s own opinion or experiences. Replacing that with more data on health issues associated with screen time would strengthen the essay.
• Some of the points made aren't completely accurate , particularly the one about digital books being cheaper. It actually often costs a library more money to rent out numerous digital copies of a book compared to buying a single physical copy. Make sure in your own essay you thoroughly research each of the points and rebuttals you make, otherwise you'll look like you don't know the issue that well.

Argumentative Essay Example 2

There are multiple drugs available to treat malaria, and many of them work well and save lives, but malaria eradication programs that focus too much on them and not enough on prevention haven’t seen long-term success in Sub-Saharan Africa. A major program to combat malaria was WHO’s Global Malaria Eradication Programme. Started in 1955, it had a goal of eliminating malaria in Africa within the next ten years. Based upon previously successful programs in Brazil and the United States, the program focused mainly on vector control. This included widely distributing chloroquine and spraying large amounts of DDT. More than one billion dollars was spent trying to abolish malaria. However, the program suffered from many problems and in 1969, WHO was forced to admit that the program had not succeeded in eradicating malaria. The number of people in Sub-Saharan Africa who contracted malaria as well as the number of malaria deaths had actually increased over 10% during the time the program was active.

One of the major reasons for the failure of the project was that it set uniform strategies and policies. By failing to consider variations between governments, geography, and infrastructure, the program was not nearly as successful as it could have been. Sub-Saharan Africa has neither the money nor the infrastructure to support such an elaborate program, and it couldn’t be run the way it was meant to. Most African countries don't have the resources to send all their people to doctors and get shots, nor can they afford to clear wetlands or other malaria prone areas. The continent’s spending per person for eradicating malaria was just a quarter of what Brazil spent. Sub-Saharan Africa simply can’t rely on a plan that requires more money, infrastructure, and expertise than they have to spare.

Additionally, the widespread use of chloroquine has created drug resistant parasites which are now plaguing Sub-Saharan Africa. Because chloroquine was used widely but inconsistently, mosquitoes developed resistance, and chloroquine is now nearly completely ineffective in Sub-Saharan Africa, with over 95% of mosquitoes resistant to it. As a result, newer, more expensive drugs need to be used to prevent and treat malaria, which further drives up the cost of malaria treatment for a region that can ill afford it.

Instead of developing plans to treat malaria after the infection has incurred, programs should focus on preventing infection from occurring in the first place. Not only is this plan cheaper and more effective, reducing the number of people who contract malaria also reduces loss of work/school days which can further bring down the productivity of the region.

One of the cheapest and most effective ways of preventing malaria is to implement insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs).  These nets provide a protective barrier around the person or people using them. While untreated bed nets are still helpful, those treated with insecticides are much more useful because they stop mosquitoes from biting people through the nets, and they help reduce mosquito populations in a community, thus helping people who don’t even own bed nets.  Bed nets are also very effective because most mosquito bites occur while the person is sleeping, so bed nets would be able to drastically reduce the number of transmissions during the night. In fact, transmission of malaria can be reduced by as much as 90% in areas where the use of ITNs is widespread. Because money is so scarce in Sub-Saharan Africa, the low cost is a great benefit and a major reason why the program is so successful. Bed nets cost roughly 2 USD to make, last several years, and can protect two adults. Studies have shown that, for every 100-1000 more nets are being used, one less child dies of malaria. With an estimated 300 million people in Africa not being protected by mosquito nets, there’s the potential to save three million lives by spending just a few dollars per person.

Reducing the number of people who contract malaria would also reduce poverty levels in Africa significantly, thus improving other aspects of society like education levels and the economy. Vector control is more effective than treatment strategies because it means fewer people are getting sick. When fewer people get sick, the working population is stronger as a whole because people are not put out of work from malaria, nor are they caring for sick relatives. Malaria-afflicted families can typically only harvest 40% of the crops that healthy families can harvest. Additionally, a family with members who have malaria spends roughly a quarter of its income treatment, not including the loss of work they also must deal with due to the illness. It’s estimated that malaria costs Africa 12 billion USD in lost income every year. A strong working population creates a stronger economy, which Sub-Saharan Africa is in desperate need of.  

This essay begins with an introduction, which ends with the thesis (that malaria eradication plans in Sub-Saharan Africa should focus on prevention rather than treatment). The first part of the essay lays out why the counter argument (treatment rather than prevention) is not as effective, and the second part of the essay focuses on why prevention of malaria is the better path to take.

• The thesis appears early, is stated clearly, and is supported throughout the rest of the essay. This makes the argument clear for readers to understand and follow throughout the essay.
• There’s lots of solid research in this essay, including specific programs that were conducted and how successful they were, as well as specific data mentioned throughout. This evidence helps strengthen the author’s argument.
• The author makes a case for using expanding bed net use over waiting until malaria occurs and beginning treatment, but not much of a plan is given for how the bed nets would be distributed or how to ensure they’re being used properly. By going more into detail of what she believes should be done, the author would be making a stronger argument.
• The introduction of the essay does a good job of laying out the seriousness of the problem, but the conclusion is short and abrupt. Expanding it into its own paragraph would give the author a final way to convince readers of her side of the argument.

Argumentative Essay Example 3

There are many ways payments could work. They could be in the form of a free-market approach, where athletes are able to earn whatever the market is willing to pay them, it could be a set amount of money per athlete, or student athletes could earn income from endorsements, autographs, and control of their likeness, similar to the way top Olympians earn money.

Proponents of the idea believe that, because college athletes are the ones who are training, participating in games, and bringing in audiences, they should receive some sort of compensation for their work. If there were no college athletes, the NCAA wouldn’t exist, college coaches wouldn’t receive there (sometimes very high) salaries, and brands like Nike couldn’t profit from college sports. In fact, the NCAA brings in roughly $1 billion in revenue a year, but college athletes don’t receive any of that money in the form of a paycheck. Additionally, people who believe college athletes should be paid state that paying college athletes will actually encourage them to remain in college longer and not turn pro as quickly, either by giving them a way to begin earning money in college or requiring them to sign a contract stating they’ll stay at the university for a certain number of years while making an agreed-upon salary.  

Supporters of this idea point to Zion Williamson, the Duke basketball superstar, who, during his freshman year, sustained a serious knee injury. Many argued that, even if he enjoyed playing for Duke, it wasn’t worth risking another injury and ending his professional career before it even began for a program that wasn’t paying him. Williamson seems to have agreed with them and declared his eligibility for the NCAA draft later that year. If he was being paid, he may have stayed at Duke longer. In fact, roughly a third of student athletes surveyed stated that receiving a salary while in college would make them “strongly consider” remaining collegiate athletes longer before turning pro.

Paying athletes could also stop the recruitment scandals that have plagued the NCAA. In 2018, the NCAA stripped the University of Louisville's men's basketball team of its 2013 national championship title because it was discovered coaches were using sex workers to entice recruits to join the team. There have been dozens of other recruitment scandals where college athletes and recruits have been bribed with anything from having their grades changed, to getting free cars, to being straight out bribed. By paying college athletes and putting their salaries out in the open, the NCAA could end the illegal and underhanded ways some schools and coaches try to entice athletes to join.

People who argue against the idea of paying college athletes believe the practice could be disastrous for college sports. By paying athletes, they argue, they’d turn college sports into a bidding war, where only the richest schools could afford top athletes, and the majority of schools would be shut out from developing a talented team (though some argue this already happens because the best players often go to the most established college sports programs, who typically pay their coaches millions of dollars per year). It could also ruin the tight camaraderie of many college teams if players become jealous that certain teammates are making more money than they are.

They also argue that paying college athletes actually means only a small fraction would make significant money. Out of the 350 Division I athletic departments, fewer than a dozen earn any money. Nearly all the money the NCAA makes comes from men’s football and basketball, so paying college athletes would make a small group of men--who likely will be signed to pro teams and begin making millions immediately out of college--rich at the expense of other players.

Those against paying college athletes also believe that the athletes are receiving enough benefits already. The top athletes already receive scholarships that are worth tens of thousands per year, they receive free food/housing/textbooks, have access to top medical care if they are injured, receive top coaching, get travel perks and free gear, and can use their time in college as a way to capture the attention of professional recruiters. No other college students receive anywhere near as much from their schools.

People on this side also point out that, while the NCAA brings in a massive amount of money each year, it is still a non-profit organization. How? Because over 95% of those profits are redistributed to its members’ institutions in the form of scholarships, grants, conferences, support for Division II and Division III teams, and educational programs. Taking away a significant part of that revenue would hurt smaller programs that rely on that money to keep running.

While both sides have good points, it’s clear that the negatives of paying college athletes far outweigh the positives. College athletes spend a significant amount of time and energy playing for their school, but they are compensated for it by the scholarships and perks they receive. Adding a salary to that would result in a college athletic system where only a small handful of athletes (those likely to become millionaires in the professional leagues) are paid by a handful of schools who enter bidding wars to recruit them, while the majority of student athletics and college athletic programs suffer or even shut down for lack of money. Continuing to offer the current level of benefits to student athletes makes it possible for as many people to benefit from and enjoy college sports as possible.

This argumentative essay follows the Rogerian model. It discusses each side, first laying out multiple reasons people believe student athletes should be paid, then discussing reasons why the athletes shouldn’t be paid. It ends by stating that college athletes shouldn’t be paid by arguing that paying them would destroy college athletics programs and cause them to have many of the issues professional sports leagues have.

• Both sides of the argument are well developed, with multiple reasons why people agree with each side. It allows readers to get a full view of the argument and its nuances.
• Certain statements on both sides are directly rebuffed in order to show where the strengths and weaknesses of each side lie and give a more complete and sophisticated look at the argument.
• Using the Rogerian model can be tricky because oftentimes you don’t explicitly state your argument until the end of the paper. Here, the thesis doesn’t appear until the first sentence of the final paragraph. That doesn’t give readers a lot of time to be convinced that your argument is the right one, compared to a paper where the thesis is stated in the beginning and then supported throughout the paper. This paper could be strengthened if the final paragraph was expanded to more fully explain why the author supports the view, or if the paper had made it clearer that paying athletes was the weaker argument throughout.

3 Tips for Writing a Good Argumentative Essay

Now that you’ve seen examples of what good argumentative essay samples look like, follow these three tips when crafting your own essay.

#1: Make Your Thesis Crystal Clear

The thesis is the key to your argumentative essay; if it isn’t clear or readers can’t find it easily, your entire essay will be weak as a result. Always make sure that your thesis statement is easy to find. The typical spot for it is the final sentence of the introduction paragraph, but if it doesn’t fit in that spot for your essay, try to at least put it as the first or last sentence of a different paragraph so it stands out more.

Also make sure that your thesis makes clear what side of the argument you’re on. After you’ve written it, it’s a great idea to show your thesis to a couple different people--classmates are great for this. Just by reading your thesis they should be able to understand what point you’ll be trying to make with the rest of your essay.

#2: Show Why the Other Side Is Weak

When writing your essay, you may be tempted to ignore the other side of the argument and just focus on your side, but don’t do this. The best argumentative essays really tear apart the other side to show why readers shouldn’t believe it. Before you begin writing your essay, research what the other side believes, and what their strongest points are. Then, in your essay, be sure to mention each of these and use evidence to explain why they’re incorrect/weak arguments. That’ll make your essay much more effective than if you only focused on your side of the argument.

#3: Use Evidence to Support Your Side

Remember, an essay can’t be an argumentative essay if it doesn’t support its argument with evidence. For every point you make, make sure you have facts to back it up. Some examples are previous studies done on the topic, surveys of large groups of people, data points, etc. There should be lots of numbers in your argumentative essay that support your side of the argument. This will make your essay much stronger compared to only relying on your own opinions to support your argument.

Summary: Argumentative Essay Sample

Argumentative essays are persuasive essays that use facts and evidence to support their side of the argument. Most argumentative essays follow either the Toulmin model or the Rogerian model. By reading good argumentative essay examples, you can learn how to develop your essay and provide enough support to make readers agree with your opinion. When writing your essay, remember to always make your thesis clear, show where the other side is weak, and back up your opinion with data and evidence.

What's Next?

Do you need to write an argumentative essay as well? Check out our guide on the best argumentative essay topics for ideas!

You'll probably also need to write research papers for school. We've got you covered with 113 potential topics for research papers.

Your college admissions essay may end up being one of the most important essays you write. Follow our step-by-step guide on writing a personal statement to have an essay that'll impress colleges.

Christine graduated from Michigan State University with degrees in Environmental Biology and Geography and received her Master's from Duke University. In high school she scored in the 99th percentile on the SAT and was named a National Merit Finalist. She has taught English and biology in several countries.

Student and Parent Forum

Our new student and parent forum, at ExpertHub.PrepScholar.com , allow you to interact with your peers and the PrepScholar staff. See how other students and parents are navigating high school, college, and the college admissions process. Ask questions; get answers.

Ask a Question Below

Have any questions about this article or other topics? Ask below and we'll reply!

Improve With Our Famous Guides

• For All Students

The 5 Strategies You Must Be Using to Improve 160+ SAT Points

How to Get a Perfect 1600, by a Perfect Scorer

Series: How to Get 800 on Each SAT Section:

Score 800 on SAT Math

Score 800 on SAT Reading

Score 800 on SAT Writing

Series: How to Get to 600 on Each SAT Section:

Score 600 on SAT Math

Score 600 on SAT Reading

Score 600 on SAT Writing

Free Complete Official SAT Practice Tests

What SAT Target Score Should You Be Aiming For?

15 Strategies to Improve Your SAT Essay

The 5 Strategies You Must Be Using to Improve 4+ ACT Points

How to Get a Perfect 36 ACT, by a Perfect Scorer

Series: How to Get 36 on Each ACT Section:

36 on ACT English

36 on ACT Math

36 on ACT Reading

36 on ACT Science

Series: How to Get to 24 on Each ACT Section:

24 on ACT English

24 on ACT Math

24 on ACT Reading

24 on ACT Science

What ACT target score should you be aiming for?

ACT Vocabulary You Must Know

ACT Writing: 15 Tips to Raise Your Essay Score

How to Get Into Harvard and the Ivy League

How to Get a Perfect 4.0 GPA

How to Write an Amazing College Essay

What Exactly Are Colleges Looking For?

Is the ACT easier than the SAT? A Comprehensive Guide

Should you retake your SAT or ACT?

When should you take the SAT or ACT?

Stay Informed

Get the latest articles and test prep tips!

Looking for Graduate School Test Prep?

Check out our top-rated graduate blogs here:

GRE Online Prep Blog

GMAT Online Prep Blog

TOEFL Online Prep Blog

Holly R. "I am absolutely overjoyed and cannot thank you enough for helping me!”

Argumentative Communication

Dive into the dynamic world of Argumentative Communication , a pivotal skill in both personal and professional realms. This comprehensive guide, enriched with practical communication examples , offers insights into mastering the art of persuasive and constructive arguments. Enhance your dialogue techniques, understand different perspectives, and learn how to present your ideas compellingly and respectfully. Perfect for anyone looking to refine their communication skills!

What is Argumentative Communication? – Definition

Argumentative communication is the process of presenting and defending a viewpoint in a clear, structured, and persuasive manner. It involves using logic, evidence, and reasoning to support one’s arguments while considering and responding to opposing viewpoints. This form of communication is essential in debates, discussions, and negotiations, where presenting and analyzing different perspectives is crucial.

What is the Best Example of Argumentative Communication?

A classic example of argumentative communication is a courtroom scenario where a lawyer presents a case. The lawyer uses clear, logical arguments backed by evidence and legal precedents to persuade the jury or judge. This involves not only presenting their client’s side but also anticipating and countering the arguments of the opposition. The lawyer’s ability to communicate effectively, argue persuasively, and respond to counterarguments exemplifies the essence of argumentative communication.

100 Argumentative Communication Examples

Discover the power of Argumentative Communication with these 100 unique and compelling examples. Each example showcases the art of persuasive dialogue, illustrating how to effectively present and defend viewpoints across various contexts. From daily interactions to professional debates, these examples provide a rich resource for anyone looking to enhance their argumentative skills. Learn to communicate with clarity, logic, and persuasion, making every conversation impactful and meaningful.

• “I believe renewable energy is key to our future, considering its sustainability and environmental benefits.”  This statement presents a clear stance on renewable energy, backed by reasons like sustainability and environmental benefits.
• “School uniforms limit students’ self-expression, which is crucial for personal development.”  Here, the argument against school uniforms is made by linking them to the restriction of self-expression and its impact on personal growth.
• “Implementing a four-day workweek can boost productivity, as it improves employee well-being.”  This argument supports a four-day workweek by correlating it with increased productivity and employee well-being.
• “Social media platforms should enhance privacy settings to protect user data.”  Advocates for stronger privacy measures on social media, emphasizing user data protection.
• “Telecommuting should be a standard option for employees, as it offers work-life balance and reduces commute time.”  This statement argues for telecommuting by highlighting its benefits like work-life balance and saved commuting time.
• “Fast food contributes to health issues; therefore, its consumption should be reduced.”  Links fast food to health problems, suggesting a reduction in its consumption for better health.
• “Art education is essential in schools to foster creativity and critical thinking in students.”  Argues for art education in schools, citing its role in developing creativity and critical thinking.
• “Public transport investment is crucial for sustainable urban development.”  Makes a case for investing in public transport, tying it to sustainable urban growth.
• “Animal testing for cosmetics is unethical and should be banned.”  This argument takes a stand against animal testing in cosmetics, labeling it as unethical.
• “Climate change action is not just a government responsibility; individuals also play a key role.”  Expands the responsibility for climate change action to include both government and individuals.
• “Online learning provides flexibility but lacks the interpersonal skills development found in traditional classrooms.”  Presents a balanced view of online learning, acknowledging its flexibility but noting the lack of interpersonal skill development.
• “Genetically modified foods can solve hunger issues, but their long-term effects are unknown.”  Discusses the potential of genetically modified foods to address hunger, while raising concerns about their long-term impacts.
• “Censorship in media is necessary for maintaining societal norms, but it can limit freedom of expression.”  This argument recognizes the role of media censorship in upholding societal norms, yet acknowledges its potential to restrict free speech.
• “Mandatory volunteering in high schools can cultivate a sense of community but may feel like an obligation.”  Argues that while mandatory volunteering can foster community spirit, it might not be well-received by all students.
• “Urban green spaces are vital for mental health, yet often overlooked in city planning.”  Highlights the importance of urban green spaces for mental health, critiquing their underrepresentation in urban planning.
• “Plastic bag bans are effective in reducing waste, but alternative solutions must be practical.”  Supports plastic bag bans for waste reduction, while calling for feasible alternatives.
• “Remote work is the future, yet it can lead to a sense of isolation among employees.”  Endorses remote work as a forward-looking approach, but notes the potential for employee isolation.
• “Vaccinations should be mandatory to ensure public health, considering their proven effectiveness.”  Advocates for mandatory vaccinations, emphasizing their role in safeguarding public health.
• “Cultural heritage sites must be preserved, even if it hinders modern development.”  Argues for the preservation of cultural heritage sites, despite potential conflicts with contemporary development.
• “Artificial intelligence can revolutionize industries, but ethical considerations must guide its development.”  Enthusiastic about AI’s potential in industry, yet insists on ethical guidelines for its advancement.
• “Bilingual education enhances cognitive abilities but may pose challenges in curriculum development.”  This argument supports bilingual education for its cognitive benefits while acknowledging the complexities in creating effective curricula.
• “Implementing a sugar tax can combat obesity, yet it may disproportionately affect low-income families.”  Advocates for a sugar tax as a measure against obesity, but raises concerns about its potential impact on less affluent families.
• “Nuclear energy is a powerful resource, but its safety risks cannot be ignored.”  Recognizes nuclear energy’s potential while emphasizing the importance of addressing its safety concerns.
• “Mandatory retirement ages should be abolished to respect individual work capacity and preferences.”  Argues against mandatory retirement, advocating for decisions based on personal ability and choice.
• “Space exploration is vital for scientific advancement, though it requires significant financial investment.”  Supports space exploration for its scientific benefits, yet notes the high costs involved.
• “Historical monuments should reflect a nation’s diverse history, not just a single narrative.”  Calls for inclusivity in historical monuments, representing the full spectrum of a nation’s past.
• “Standardized testing measures academic ability but can overlook students’ unique talents and skills.”  Critiques standardized testing for its potential to miss out on assessing diverse student abilities.
• “Urbanization offers economic growth, yet it can lead to environmental degradation.”  Balances the economic benefits of urbanization with concerns about its environmental impact.
• “Gender-neutral bathrooms promote inclusivity but may raise privacy concerns for some individuals.”  Advocates for gender-neutral bathrooms for inclusivity, while acknowledging privacy issues.
• “Electric vehicles are key to reducing emissions, but their widespread adoption depends on infrastructure development.”  Highlights the environmental benefits of electric vehicles, pointing out the need for supportive infrastructure.
• “Implementing dress codes in workplaces can ensure professionalism, but may suppress individuality.”  Supports workplace dress codes for professionalism, yet recognizes their potential to limit personal expression.
• “Affirmative action promotes diversity, but its fairness is often questioned.”  Endorses affirmative action for enhancing diversity, while acknowledging debates over its equity.
• “24-hour news channels can inform the public, but they also risk sensationalizing news.”  Notes the informative role of 24-hour news channels, cautioning against the tendency to sensationalize.
• “Renovating historic districts can boost tourism, yet it risks losing the authentic charm.”  Sees the economic potential in renovating historic areas, but warns against compromising their original allure.
• “Social media influencers can sway public opinion, but their credibility is not always assured.”  Acknowledges influencers’ impact on public opinion, questioning the reliability of their messages.
• “Organic farming is beneficial for the environment, but its higher costs can limit accessibility.”  Praises organic farming for its environmental friendliness, while pointing out the issue of higher prices.
• “Installing surveillance cameras enhances security, yet it raises concerns about privacy infringement.”  Supports the use of surveillance for security purposes, but cautions about potential privacy violations.
• “Homeschooling allows tailored education, but it may lack social interaction opportunities for children.”  Advocates for homeschooling’s customized approach, yet notes the possible shortfall in socializing.
• “Building more highways can ease traffic congestion, but it might encourage more car usage.”  Suggests building highways for traffic relief, but considers the possibility of increased vehicle use.
• “Legalizing marijuana can reduce illegal trade, but its health impacts need thorough research.”  Argues for legalizing marijuana to combat illicit trade, stressing the need for health impact studies.
• “Implementing a universal basic income can alleviate poverty, but it may impact work motivation.”  Sees universal basic income as a solution to poverty, yet ponders its effect on work drive.
• “Youth sports should focus on enjoyment, not just competition, to foster a love for the game.”  Emphasizes the importance of enjoyment in youth sports, rather than a sole focus on competitiveness.
• “Reducing class sizes can improve student learning, but it requires more resources and teachers.”  Supports smaller class sizes for better learning, acknowledging the need for additional resources.
• “Public art installations enhance city aesthetics, but they should reflect community values and history.”  Advocates for public art for city beautification, insisting it should resonate with community ethos.
• “Offering paternity leave is crucial for gender equality, but it challenges traditional workplace norms.”  Endorses paternity leave as a step towards gender equality, recognizing its disruption of conventional work practices.
• “Cycling lanes promote eco-friendly transport, yet they require careful urban planning to be effective.”  Encourages cycling lanes for environmental benefits, stressing the need for strategic urban design.
• “Implementing a carbon tax can drive eco-friendly practices, but it might burden small businesses.”  Proposes a carbon tax for environmental reasons, yet considers its potential strain on small enterprises.
• “Distance learning offers education accessibility, but it can lack the rigor of traditional schooling.”  Praises distance learning for its accessibility, yet questions its academic thoroughness compared to traditional methods.
• “Reducing meat consumption can benefit the environment, but dietary changes should be personal choices.”  Supports reducing meat for environmental gains, yet believes dietary decisions should remain individual.
• “Adopting renewable energy sources is crucial, but the transition must be economically feasible.”  Stresses the importance of shifting to renewable energy, while considering the economic aspects of such a transition.
• “Promoting telecommuting can reduce carbon emissions, but it might affect team dynamics and collaboration.”  Highlights the environmental benefits of telecommuting, while considering its potential impact on teamwork.
• “Animal testing for medical research is a complex ethical issue, balancing scientific progress and animal rights.”  Discusses the ethical dilemma of animal testing, weighing its necessity for medical advances against animal welfare.
• “Implementing stricter gun control laws can enhance public safety, but it raises questions about individual rights.”  Argues for tighter gun control for safety, yet acknowledges the debate around personal freedoms.
• “Urban green spaces are essential for quality of life, but they require significant maintenance and funding.”  Advocates for urban green spaces for their benefits to living standards, noting the need for upkeep and financial support.
• “Mandatory voting can increase democratic participation, but it may infringe on personal freedom of choice.”  Supports compulsory voting to boost democracy, yet recognizes potential conflicts with individual liberty.
• “Artificial intelligence can revolutionize industries, but it also raises concerns about job displacement.”  Sees AI as transformative for business, but is mindful of its implications for employment.
• “Preserving local languages and dialects is important for cultural diversity, but it can pose challenges in global communication.”  Stresses the importance of protecting local languages for cultural richness, while considering global communication issues.
• “Introducing coding in early education can foster tech skills, but it shouldn’t overshadow basic literacy and numeracy.”  Endorses coding in early education for tech proficiency, ensuring it doesn’t eclipse fundamental learning.
• “Public healthcare systems ensure access for all, but they require sustainable funding and management.”  Advocates for public healthcare for universal access, highlighting the need for viable funding.
• “Fast fashion offers affordable clothing, but it contributes to environmental damage and labor exploitation.”  Notes the affordability of fast fashion, yet points out its environmental and ethical downsides.
• “Censorship can protect societal morals, but it often leads to the suppression of free speech.”  Considers censorship for moral safeguarding, but cautions against its impact on freedom of expression.
• “Remote learning provides flexibility, but it may not cater to all learning styles and needs.”  Praises the adaptability of remote learning, yet acknowledges it might not suit every student.
• “Renewable energy subsidies can accelerate the green transition, but they must be carefully balanced with economic realities.”  Supports subsidies for renewable energy, stressing the need for economic balance.
• “Cultural exchange programs enhance mutual understanding, but they require careful planning to avoid cultural insensitivity.”  Endorses cultural exchange for fostering understanding, with a focus on sensitive planning.
• “Reducing plastic use is crucial for the environment, but alternatives must be practical and affordable.”  Advocates for cutting down plastic for environmental health, emphasizing the need for viable substitutes.
• “Mental health education in schools can destigmatize mental illness, but it requires proper resources and trained professionals.”  Supports mental health education in schools to combat stigma, noting the need for resources and expertise.
• “Public transportation improvements can reduce traffic congestion, but they demand significant investment and planning.”  Sees public transport upgrades as a solution to traffic, yet acknowledges the investment and planning needed.
• “Balancing work and life is essential for well-being, but it can be challenging in high-pressure careers.”  Stresses the importance of work-life balance for health, recognizing the difficulty in demanding jobs.
• “Community gardens can strengthen neighborhoods, but they require ongoing commitment and collaboration.”  Praises community gardens for enhancing local ties, while highlighting the need for continuous involvement.
• “Adopting a global language could facilitate communication, but it risks eroding linguistic diversity.”  Discusses the convenience of a global language, yet is wary of its potential to diminish language variety.
• “Universal childcare benefits working parents, but it’s a complex policy that requires substantial funding.”  Advocates for universal childcare to aid working parents, pointing out the complexity and funding needs.
• “Reducing food waste is environmentally crucial, but it requires changes in consumer habits and industry practices.”  Emphasizes the environmental need to cut food waste, calling for shifts in consumer behavior and industry methods.
• “Promoting local tourism can boost economies, but it must be balanced with preserving community integrity and environment.”  Sees local tourism as economically beneficial, yet stresses the importance of maintaining community and environmental health.
• “Implementing a four-day workweek can increase productivity, but it may not be feasible for all industries.”  Supports a shorter workweek for productivity gains, yet acknowledges its impracticality in certain sectors.
• “Gender quotas in politics can enhance representation, but they raise questions about meritocracy.”  Endorses gender quotas for political representation, while considering the implications for merit-based selection.
• “Building more libraries can foster a love for reading, but digital resources are also crucial in the modern age.”  Advocates for more libraries to encourage reading, alongside the importance of digital resources.
• “Promoting electric bikes can aid urban mobility, but infrastructure must support their safe use.”  Encourages the use of electric bikes for city travel, stressing the need for appropriate infrastructure.
• “Implementing a living wage can reduce poverty, but it might impact small business viability.”  Supports a living wage to combat poverty, yet considers its potential effects on small businesses.
• “Cultural festivals celebrate diversity, but they should be inclusive and respectful of all communities.”  Praises cultural festivals for showcasing diversity, emphasizing the need for inclusivity and respect.
• “Reducing screen time for children is beneficial, but it must be balanced with the educational value of digital media.”  Advocates for limiting children’s screen time, while recognizing the educational benefits of digital media.
• “Promoting bilingual education can enhance cognitive skills, but it requires adequate resources and trained teachers.”  Supports bilingual education for its cognitive benefits, emphasizing the need for resources and skilled educators.
• “Legalizing cannabis can reduce criminalization, but it necessitates strict regulatory frameworks.”  Argues for cannabis legalization to decrease criminal charges, stressing the importance of rigorous regulations.
• “Encouraging entrepreneurship can drive economic growth, but it also involves risk and uncertainty.”  Sees entrepreneurship as a catalyst for the economy, while acknowledging the inherent risks.
• “Mandatory military service can foster national unity, but it may conflict with individual freedoms.”  Advocates for compulsory military service for unity, yet recognizes potential clashes with personal liberties.
• “Investing in public art can beautify cities, but it should reflect community values and diversity.”  Supports public art investments for urban aesthetics, insisting on representation of community ethos and diversity.
• “Implementing dress codes in schools can promote discipline, but it might suppress individual expression.”  Endorses school dress codes for discipline, yet is cautious about limiting personal expression.
• “Urban farming initiatives can enhance food security, but they require community involvement and support.”  Advocates for urban farming for food security, highlighting the need for community participation.
• “Offering free public Wi-Fi can increase connectivity, but it raises concerns about privacy and security.”  Supports free public Wi-Fi for better connectivity, while being mindful of privacy and security issues.
• “Introducing universal basic income can address inequality, but it poses challenges for economic sustainability.”  Argues for universal basic income to tackle inequality, noting economic feasibility concerns.
• “Promoting carpooling can reduce traffic congestion, but it requires flexible planning and coordination.”  Encourages carpooling to ease traffic, emphasizing the need for adaptable planning.
• “Adopting renewable energy sources is crucial for sustainability, but it demands technological advancements and investment.”  Stresses the importance of renewable energy for sustainability, pointing out the need for tech progress and funding.
• “Implementing digital voting can increase accessibility, but it must ensure security and reliability.”  Advocates for digital voting for ease of access, with a focus on security and dependability.
• “Promoting sports in schools can enhance physical health, but it shouldn’t overshadow academic pursuits.”  Supports sports in education for health benefits, ensuring it doesn’t detract from academics.
• “Reducing meat consumption can benefit the environment, but dietary changes should be personal and considerate of health needs.”  Endorses less meat consumption for environmental reasons, while respecting individual dietary choices and health.
• “Encouraging youth political participation can invigorate democracy, but it requires education and engagement.”  Sees youth involvement in politics as vital for democracy, stressing the need for education and involvement.
• “Balancing technological advancement with ethical considerations is key to responsible innovation.”  Advocates for ethical mindfulness in tech progress, emphasizing responsible innovation.
• “Promoting gender equality in STEM fields can drive innovation, but it requires dismantling stereotypes and barriers.”  Supports gender equality in STEM for innovation, focusing on breaking down stereotypes and obstacles.
• “Investing in mental health services can improve societal well-being, but it needs to be prioritized and adequately funded.”  Endorses investment in mental health services for societal health, highlighting the need for prioritization and funding.
• “Encouraging sustainable fashion can reduce environmental impact, but consumer awareness and industry change are essential.”  Advocates for sustainable fashion to lessen environmental harm, stressing consumer education and industry transformation.
• “Promoting digital literacy is essential in the modern world, but it should not widen the digital divide.”  Supports digital literacy for its modern relevance, while being cautious about exacerbating the digital gap.

Argumentative Communication Sentence Examples

Argumentative communication involves presenting ideas assertively and logically to persuade or inform. It’s a skill that enhances debates, discussions, and presentations. Effective argumentative sentences are clear, concise, and backed by evidence, making them crucial in academic, professional, and personal settings.

• “Studies show that a plant-based diet significantly reduces carbon footprint, advocating for environmental sustainability.”  Presents a fact-based argument promoting a plant-based diet for environmental reasons.
• “Implementing a four-day workweek can boost productivity, as evidenced by recent trials in several companies.”  Uses evidence from company trials to argue for the productivity benefits of a shorter workweek.
• “Universal healthcare, while costly, ensures basic health rights for all citizens, outweighing the financial implications.”  Argues for universal healthcare by emphasizing its societal benefits over cost concerns.
• “Mandatory recycling programs, though initially challenging, can significantly reduce waste and environmental harm.”  Supports mandatory recycling, acknowledging initial challenges but focusing on long-term environmental benefits.
• “Educational reforms focusing on critical thinking skills can better prepare students for the modern workforce.”  Argues for educational reforms aimed at enhancing critical thinking for workforce readiness.
• “Investing in public transportation reduces urban congestion and pollution, making cities more livable.”  Advocates for public transport investment by highlighting its benefits in reducing congestion and pollution.
• “Flexible work arrangements lead to improved work-life balance, contributing to employee well-being and productivity.”  Supports flexible work policies by linking them to improved balance and productivity.
• “Adopting renewable energy is not just environmentally responsible but also economically viable in the long run.”  Makes a case for renewable energy, focusing on its environmental and economic benefits.
• “Early childhood education is crucial for cognitive development, setting a strong foundation for future learning.”  Argues for the importance of early education in cognitive development and lifelong learning.
• “Cybersecurity measures are essential in the digital age to protect personal and national security interests.”  Stresses the importance of cybersecurity in protecting personal and national interests.

Argumentative Communication Examples in Topics

Argumentative communication in topics involves discussing subjects where opinions may vary, requiring clear, logical, and evidence-based arguments. These topics often provoke thought and encourage deeper understanding, making them ideal for debates, essays, and discussions.

• “The impact of social media on mental health: a double-edged sword of connectivity and isolation.”  Discusses the dual effects of social media on mental health, encouraging a balanced view.
• “Climate change action: balancing economic growth and environmental responsibility.”  Explores the challenge of aligning economic development with environmental sustainability.
• “The role of artificial intelligence in shaping future job markets and ethical considerations.”  Debates the impact of AI on employment and the ethical implications involved.
• “Vaccination mandates: public health necessity versus individual freedom.”  Examines the conflict between public health needs and personal liberties in vaccination policies.
• “The gig economy: redefining work-life balance or exploiting labor?”  Analyzes the gig economy’s effects on work-life balance and labor rights.
• “Genetic engineering in food production: addressing hunger or risking natural balance?”  Discusses the benefits and risks of using genetic engineering in agriculture.
• “Privacy in the digital age: the trade-off between security and personal freedoms.”  Explores the delicate balance between digital security measures and privacy rights.
• “The influence of media on public opinion and democracy.”  Investigates the media’s role in shaping public opinion and its impact on democratic processes.
• “Renewable energy subsidies: necessary investment or market distortion?”  Debates the justification and impact of government subsidies in the renewable energy sector.
• “Education systems and global competitiveness: preparing students for a changing world.”  Discusses how education systems can adapt to prepare students for global challenges.

Argumentative Communication Examples in Essay

Argumentative essays require presenting a clear stance on a topic, supported by evidence and reasoning. They are critical in academic settings, helping students develop critical thinking and persuasive writing skills. A well-structured argumentative essay effectively convinces readers of the writer’s viewpoint.

• “The necessity of reforming the criminal justice system to address systemic biases and ensure fair treatment.”  Advocates for criminal justice reform, highlighting the need to address systemic biases.
• “The ethical implications of animal testing in medical research and the need for alternative methods.”  Argues against animal testing in medical research, citing ethical concerns and the need for alternatives.
• “The role of governments in regulating tech giants to protect consumer data and maintain market fairness.”  Discusses the need for government intervention in regulating large tech companies for data protection and market fairness.
• “The impact of globalization on local cultures and economies: a balance of benefits and losses.”  Explores the mixed effects of globalization on local cultures and economies.
• “The debate over gun control laws in the U.S.: public safety versus Second Amendment rights.”  Examines the contentious issue of gun control, balancing public safety and constitutional rights.
• “The future of work: adapting to automation and the changing nature of jobs.”  Discusses the challenges and opportunities presented by automation in the workforce.
• “Gender equality in the workplace: breaking the glass ceiling and ensuring fair opportunities.”  Advocates for gender equality in employment, focusing on breaking barriers and ensuring fairness.
• “The pros and cons of standardized testing in education: measuring achievement or stifling creativity?”  Weighs the benefits and drawbacks of standardized testing in schools.
• “The ethical and societal implications of using surveillance technology in public spaces.”  Debates the use of surveillance tech, considering its impact on society and ethics.
• “The role of renewable energy in combating climate change and its feasibility in the current economic landscape.”  Argues for renewable energy as a solution to climate change, assessing its economic viability.

Argumentative Communication Examples in Therapy

In therapy, argumentative communication is used to challenge and change unhelpful thinking patterns. Therapists employ this technique to help clients view situations from different perspectives, fostering personal growth and problem-solving skills. It’s a vital tool in cognitive-behavioral therapy and other therapeutic approaches.

• “Challenging the belief that failure is inherently negative, and reframing it as a learning opportunity.”  Encourages viewing failure as a chance for growth, altering negative thought patterns.
• “Questioning the assumption that others’ opinions define one’s self-worth, promoting self-acceptance.”  Helps clients question the impact of external validation on self-esteem, fostering self-acceptance.
• “Debating the idea that perfection is attainable and necessary, encouraging realistic self-expectations.”  Challenges the pursuit of perfection, advocating for more realistic and healthy self-expectations.
• “Disputing the notion that change is always negative, highlighting the potential for positive growth.”  Reframes change as an opportunity for positive development, rather than something to fear.
• “Confronting the belief that one must always be in control, promoting flexibility and adaptability.”  Challenges the need for constant control, encouraging adaptability and resilience.
• “Arguing against the idea that vulnerability is a weakness, showing its role in building relationships and resilience.”  Redefines vulnerability as a strength in forming connections and developing resilience.
• “Disputing the belief that being alone equates to loneliness, promoting the value of solitude.”  Differentiates between solitude and loneliness, highlighting the positive aspects of spending time alone.
• “Challenging the fear of rejection, emphasizing its role in personal growth and self-discovery.”  Helps clients see rejection as a part of growth and self-understanding, rather than something solely negative.
• “Debating the belief that one’s past dictates their future, encouraging a focus on present actions and possibilities.”  Encourages focusing on the present and future potential, rather than being bound by the past.
• “Questioning the idea that emotions are always rational, promoting emotional awareness and regulation.”  Helps clients understand that emotions aren’t always based on rationality, encouraging better emotional management.

Argumentative Communication Examples in Nonverbal

Nonverbal argumentative communication involves expressing disagreement or presenting a counterpoint through gestures, facial expressions, or body language, rather than words. It’s a subtle yet powerful way to convey dissent or challenge a viewpoint without verbal confrontation. This form of communication is crucial in situations where verbal arguments are not appropriate or possible.

• Furrowing brows while listening to a proposal.  Indicates skepticism or disagreement with the idea being presented, without verbally interrupting.
• Crossing arms during a debate.  A classic nonverbal sign of resistance or opposition to the ideas being discussed.
• Nodding head vigorously in disagreement.  A nonverbal cue that shows strong disapproval or rejection of the point being made.
• Rolling eyes in response to a statement.  Conveys disbelief or dismissiveness towards the speaker’s argument.
• Tapping fingers impatiently during a discussion.  Signals frustration or disagreement with the ongoing conversation.
• Shaking head while someone is speaking.  A clear nonverbal indication of disagreement or disapproval of the speaker’s point.
• Maintaining prolonged eye contact in a challenging manner.  Demonstrates confidence and a nonverbal challenge to the speaker’s assertions.
• Leaning back and looking away from the speaker.  Shows disinterest or disagreement with the speaker’s viewpoint.
• Sighing heavily during an argument.  Indicates exasperation or disagreement with the current line of reasoning.
• Pointing a finger while listening, without speaking.  A nonverbal way of highlighting disagreement or questioning the validity of the argument.

Argumentative Communication Examples in Literature

Literature often portrays argumentative communication through dialogues and monologues, showcasing characters’ conflicts, disagreements, and persuasive tactics. These examples highlight how argumentative communication drives narratives and reveals character dynamics.

• Atticus Finch in “To Kill a Mockingbird” challenging racial prejudices.  Uses logical and ethical arguments to confront societal biases, showcasing moral courage.
• Elizabeth Bennet’s witty repartee in “Pride and Prejudice.”  Elizabeth uses sharp wit and irony to challenge societal norms and personal prejudices.
• The courtroom exchanges in “The Crucible.”  Characters engage in heated debates, symbolizing the hysteria and injustice of the Salem witch trials.
• Hamlet’s soliloquies in “Hamlet.”  Hamlet’s internal debates reflect on existential and moral dilemmas, questioning life and death.
• Darcy’s proposal to Elizabeth in “Pride and Prejudice.”  A mix of pride and prejudice leads to a heated exchange, showcasing societal and personal conflicts.
• The debate over justice in “The Merchant of Venice.”  Characters argue over legal and moral aspects of justice, reflecting complex human emotions.
• Winston’s rebellion against the Party in “1984.”  Represents a mental struggle and argument against totalitarian control and loss of individuality.
• The philosophical arguments in “The Republic” by Plato.  Dialogues that explore justice, order, and the character of the just city and the just man.
• Jane Eyre’s defiance against Mr. Rochester in “Jane Eyre.”  Jane asserts her moral and emotional independence, challenging societal and personal constraints.
• The moral debates in “Les Misérables.”  Characters engage in internal and external conflicts over law, justice, love, and redemption.

Argumentative Communication Examples in Media

In media, argumentative communication is used to inform, persuade, or entertain the audience. It ranges from news debates to opinion pieces, reflecting diverse viewpoints and critical thinking.

• Editorial debates on climate change.  Media outlets present arguments for and against climate action, reflecting the complexity of the issue.
• Opinion pieces on economic policies.  Writers argue the merits and drawbacks of fiscal strategies, influencing public opinion.
• Television debates on healthcare reform.  Experts and politicians argue over the best approaches to healthcare, highlighting different ideologies.
• Social media campaigns on human rights.  Activists use argumentative communication to advocate for change and challenge injustices.
• News analysis on foreign policy.  Journalists and experts debate international relations, offering insights into global dynamics.
• Documentaries on social issues.  Filmmakers present arguments through narratives, exposing viewers to various perspectives.
• Radio talk shows discussing education reform.  Hosts and guests argue about the best methods to improve education systems.
• Podcasts debating technological advancements.  Tech experts argue the benefits and risks of emerging technologies.
• Columnists’ perspectives on political elections.  Writers use argumentative communication to sway public opinion during election seasons.
• Investigative reports on corporate ethics.  Journalists argue about corporate responsibility and the impact on society and the environment.

Argumentative Communication Examples for Workplace

In the workplace, argumentative communication is pivotal for problem-solving and decision-making. It involves presenting ideas assertively, backing them with evidence, and engaging in constructive debates. This approach fosters innovation and collaboration, helping teams navigate through challenges and disagreements effectively. It’s essential for leaders and employees to master this skill for a dynamic and productive work environment.

• “Implementing a four-day workweek can boost productivity, but it requires careful planning to ensure coverage.”  Proposes a shorter workweek for efficiency, highlighting the need for strategic scheduling.
• “Introducing remote working options can enhance work-life balance, but it demands robust communication systems.”  Suggests remote work for better balance, emphasizing the importance of effective communication tools.
• “Adopting agile methodologies can accelerate project completion, but it necessitates adaptability and continuous learning.”  Advocates for agile methods for faster project delivery, focusing on the need for flexibility and ongoing education.
• “Investing in employee training can lead to better performance, but it requires time and resources.”  Endorses training for improved performance, noting the investment of time and resources needed.
• “Implementing a transparent salary policy can promote fairness, but it must be handled with sensitivity.”  Proposes open salary policies for equity, stressing the need for careful communication.
• “Encouraging cross-departmental collaboration can spark innovation, but it needs clear objectives and roles.”  Supports interdepartmental teamwork for innovation, underlining the importance of defined goals and responsibilities.
• “Introducing a wellness program can improve employee health, but it should be inclusive and voluntary.”  Suggests wellness programs for health benefits, ensuring inclusivity and choice.
• “Adopting green practices can reduce environmental impact, but it requires commitment and initial investment.”  Advocates for eco-friendly measures for sustainability, highlighting commitment and upfront costs.
• “Offering flexible working hours can attract talent, but it demands trust and accountability.”  Recommends flexible hours to attract employees, focusing on the need for trust and responsibility.
• “Integrating AI in operations can enhance efficiency, but it should be balanced with human expertise.”  Proposes AI integration for efficiency, emphasizing the importance of human skill.

Argumentative Communication Examples in Classroom

Argumentative communication in the classroom is crucial for developing critical thinking and persuasive skills in students. It involves expressing opinions, supporting them with logical reasoning, and respectfully challenging others’ viewpoints. This method enhances student engagement, promotes deeper understanding, and prepares students for real-world discussions and debates.

• “Incorporating technology in education can enhance learning, but it must be aligned with educational goals.”  Supports tech use in education for enhanced learning, insisting on alignment with educational objectives.
• “Introducing debate clubs can improve public speaking skills, but it requires structured formats and guidance.”  Advocates for debate clubs to boost speaking skills, emphasizing the need for structure and mentorship.
• “Teaching critical thinking skills can foster independent thought, but it should encourage open-mindedness.”  Endorses critical thinking education for independence, stressing the importance of open-mindedness.
• “Implementing project-based learning can promote practical skills, but it needs resources and planning.”  Suggests project-based learning for practical skills, highlighting the necessity of resources and planning.
• “Encouraging student-led discussions can boost engagement, but it requires guidance to stay on topic.”  Supports student-led talks for engagement, underlining the need for topic-focused guidance.
• “Offering elective courses can broaden knowledge, but they should be diverse and accessible.”  Proposes elective courses for knowledge expansion, ensuring diversity and accessibility.
• “Integrating arts in the curriculum can stimulate creativity, but it must not overshadow core subjects.”  Advocates for arts in education for creativity, while maintaining focus on main subjects.
• “Promoting group projects can teach teamwork, but it should include individual accountability.”  Endorses group projects for teamwork lessons, emphasizing individual responsibility.
• “Teaching financial literacy can prepare students for adulthood, but it must be age-appropriate and practical.”  Suggests financial education for adult preparation, focusing on age suitability and practicality.
• “Incorporating environmental studies can raise awareness, but it needs to be engaging and informative.”  Recommends environmental studies for awareness, ensuring it’s captivating and educational.

Argumentative Communication Examples in TV Shows

TV shows often depict argumentative communication, showcasing characters engaging in debates, negotiations, and persuasive dialogues. These examples reflect real-life scenarios, demonstrating how to articulate viewpoints, listen to others, and reach conclusions. They provide viewers with insights into effective communication strategies and the dynamics of human interaction.

• “Negotiating contracts in ‘Suits’ demonstrates the importance of preparation and understanding legal nuances.”  ‘Suits’ highlights contract negotiations, emphasizing preparation and legal knowledge.
• “Debating social issues in ‘The West Wing’ showcases the need for informed arguments and respect.”   ‘The West Wing’ illustrates debates on social matters, stressing informed reasoning and respect.
• “Conflict resolution in ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ emphasizes empathy and understanding different perspectives.”  ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ focuses on resolving conflicts, underlining empathy and perspective-taking.
• “Strategic discussions in ‘Game of Thrones’ highlight the importance of alliances and foresight.”  ‘Game of Thrones’ shows strategic talks, pointing out the significance of alliances and foresight.
• “Legal arguments in ‘How to Get Away with Murder’ reveal the power of persuasive evidence and rhetoric.”  ‘How to Get Away with Murder’ presents legal arguments, demonstrating the impact of persuasive evidence and speech.
• “Family dynamics in ‘Modern Family’ illustrate negotiating personal and collective needs.”  ‘Modern Family’ depicts family interactions, showing how to balance personal and group needs.
• “Workplace debates in ‘The Office’ highlight humor and tact in handling disagreements.”  ‘The Office’ portrays workplace debates, emphasizing humor and tactfulness.
• “Political strategies in ‘House of Cards’ demonstrate the art of persuasion and power play.”  ‘House of Cards’ focuses on political strategies, illustrating persuasion and power dynamics.
• “Social justice discussions in ‘Orange is the New Black’ underscore the importance of advocacy and awareness.”  ‘Orange is the New Black’ discusses social justice, highlighting advocacy and consciousness.
• “Crisis management in ‘Scandal’ showcases quick thinking and effective communication under pressure.”  ‘Scandal’ presents crisis management, showing the need for quick thinking and efficient communication.

Argumentative Communication Examples in Board

Argumentative communication in board meetings is pivotal for effective decision-making. It involves presenting diverse viewpoints, challenging ideas, and reaching consensus through reasoned debate. This type of communication is essential in strategic planning, policy formulation, and resolving conflicts within an organization.

• “Considering the budget constraints, I propose we prioritize project A over B for better ROI.”  Presents a logical argument focusing on financial practicality and return on investment.
• “While the new policy might streamline processes, it could impact employee morale negatively.”  Challenges a policy by weighing its efficiency against potential impacts on staff well-being.
• “I suggest we conduct a risk assessment before expanding into new markets.”  Advocates for a cautious approach, emphasizing the importance of risk evaluation.
• “Our focus should be on sustainability, even if it means short-term financial sacrifices.”  Argues for long-term environmental responsibility over immediate financial gains.
• “Investing in employee training will yield long-term benefits, outweighing the initial costs.”  Supports employee development, highlighting its long-term advantages despite upfront expenses.
• “Adopting this technology might be costly, but it will keep us competitive in the long run.”  Argues for technological investment by emphasizing future competitiveness.
• “We should consider the legal implications of this decision to avoid potential lawsuits.”  Raises awareness about legal consequences to prevent future legal challenges.
• “Diversifying our portfolio is risky, but it’s necessary for growth and stability.”  Supports diversification, acknowledging risks but focusing on growth and stability.
• “Cutting costs in customer service could harm our brand reputation.”  Warns against cost-cutting in key areas that could negatively impact brand image.
• “Expanding our market share should be our priority, even if it requires aggressive strategies.”  Advocates for assertive approaches to increase market presence.

Argumentative Communication Examples in Movies

Movies often depict argumentative communication, showcasing characters engaging in debates, persuading others, or standing up for their beliefs. These examples reflect conflict resolution, moral dilemmas, and the power of persuasive speech.

• “Our survival depends on working together, not on individual heroics.” (From a survival-themed movie) Emphasizes teamwork over individual efforts in a crisis situation.
• “We must challenge the system to bring about change.” (From a political drama) Encourages challenging authority to initiate societal reforms.
• “True love is about sacrifice, not just happy moments.” (From a romantic film) Argues that love involves sacrifices, not just joyous experiences.
• “Justice isn’t about revenge, it’s about fairness and morality.” (From a legal drama) Differentiates between revenge and justice, focusing on fairness.
• “Innovation doesn’t come from playing it safe; it comes from risk-taking.” (From a biopic) Advocates for risk-taking as a catalyst for innovation.
• “We need to preserve our traditions, not just blindly follow modern trends.” (From a cultural film) Argues for valuing traditions amidst modern societal changes.
• “Education is the key to freedom, not just a path to employment.” (From an educational drama) Highlights education’s role in liberation beyond job prospects.
• “Heroes are defined by their choices, not just their powers.” (From a superhero movie) Stresses the importance of moral choices over superhuman abilities.
• “Art should provoke thought, not just entertain.” (From an art-themed movie) Argues that art’s purpose is to stimulate thinking, not just amuse.
• “Facing our fears is the first step to overcoming them.” (From a psychological thriller) Suggests confronting fears as a method to conquer them.

Argumentative Communication Examples in Everyday Life

Argumentative communication in everyday life involves expressing opinions, persuading others, and resolving conflicts in personal and social contexts. It’s about articulating viewpoints clearly and respectfully, whether in family discussions, social debates, or community issues.

• “Investing in renewable energy at home can cut costs and benefit the environment.”  Advocates for home-based renewable energy, citing financial and environmental advantages.
• “Educational reforms should focus more on practical skills than theoretical knowledge.”  Argues for a practical approach in education over traditional theoretical methods.
• “Community gardens can strengthen neighborhood bonds and promote healthy eating.”  Supports community gardens for their social and health benefits.
• “Limiting screen time for children can enhance their creativity and social skills.”  Proposes reducing children’s screen time to boost creativity and social interaction.
• “Public transport improvements can ease traffic congestion and reduce pollution.”  Suggests enhancing public transport to address traffic and environmental issues.
• “Supporting local businesses is crucial for community development and sustainability.”  Encourages patronizing local enterprises for community growth and sustainability.
• “Recycling and composting at home can significantly reduce waste.”  Promotes recycling and composting as effective waste reduction methods.
• “Regular family meetings can improve communication and resolve conflicts.”  Recommends family meetings for better communication and conflict resolution.
• “Adopting pets from shelters can save lives and combat animal overpopulation.”  Advocates for pet adoption from shelters to address overpopulation issues.
• “Participating in local politics is essential for community representation and change.”  Encourages involvement in local politics for community representation and progress.

Argumentative Communication Examples for Child

Argumentative communication with children involves presenting ideas and opinions in a manner that is both respectful and understandable to young minds. It’s about guiding them to think critically and express their views constructively. This approach helps in developing their reasoning skills and encourages healthy debate. It’s important to balance firmness with empathy, ensuring the child feels heard and valued.

• “Why do you think bedtime is important?”  Invites the child to consider the reasons behind bedtime, encouraging critical thinking.
• “Let’s discuss why sharing toys with your friends is beneficial.”  Opens a dialogue about the value of sharing, promoting empathy and understanding.
• “Can you explain why you prefer this game over that one?”  Encourages the child to articulate their preferences, fostering decision-making skills.
• “What are your thoughts on having a set time for TV watching?”  Engages the child in setting rules, teaching them about time management.
• “How do you think we can solve this puzzle together?”  Promotes teamwork and problem-solving skills through collaborative discussion.
• “Why do you think it’s important to do your homework?”  Encourages the child to understand the value of responsibility and education.
• “Let’s talk about why eating vegetables is good for your health.”  Initiates a conversation on healthy eating habits, emphasizing nutrition.
• “What are some ways we can take care of our pets?”  Discusses pet care responsibilities, teaching empathy and care for animals.
• “Why do you think lying is not a good habit?”  Guides the child to understand the moral implications of honesty.
• “How can we make cleaning up your room more fun?”  Turns a chore into a collaborative, engaging activity, encouraging creativity and participation.

Argumentative Communication Examples in Technology

Argumentative communication in technology involves discussing and debating technological advancements, their implications, and ethical considerations. It’s about critically analyzing the impact of technology on society, privacy, security, and lifestyle. This type of communication is essential for making informed decisions and fostering responsible innovation in the tech world.

• “How does artificial intelligence impact job opportunities?”  Sparks a debate on AI’s influence on employment, balancing technological progress with workforce implications.
• “Should personal data be used for targeted advertising?”  Initiates a discussion on privacy versus marketing benefits in the digital age.
• “Is dependence on technology reducing our problem-solving skills?”  Encourages a critical look at how technology affects human cognitive abilities.
• “What are the ethical considerations of facial recognition technology?”  Debates the moral aspects of using facial recognition, considering privacy and security.
• “How can we ensure cybersecurity in an increasingly digital world?”  Discusses strategies to protect against cyber threats in a technology-driven society.
• “Should social media platforms regulate fake news?”  Opens a dialogue on the responsibility of social media in controlling misinformation.
• “What is the role of technology in modern education?”  Examines the benefits and challenges of integrating technology in educational settings.
• “Can technology bridge the gap in healthcare accessibility?”  Debates how technology can improve healthcare delivery and access.
• “How do virtual reality and augmented reality change our perception of reality?”  Explores the psychological and social effects of immersive technologies.
• “Is the digital divide widening social inequality?”  Discusses the impact of unequal access to technology on societal disparities.

What is the Argumentative Communication Technique?

Argumentative communication is a method of expressing a viewpoint or stance on a particular subject, often involving a degree of debate or disagreement. This technique is not just about arguing; it’s about presenting ideas, evidence, and reasoning in a structured and persuasive manner. It requires a deep understanding of the topic, the ability to think critically, and the skill to communicate thoughts clearly and effectively.

In argumentative communication, the focus is on logical reasoning and evidence-based arguments rather than emotional appeals or personal biases. It involves a respectful exchange of ideas, where each party listens to the other’s perspective, analyzes the information, and responds thoughtfully. This technique is widely used in various settings, including academic discussions, legal debates, business negotiations, and everyday conversations.

The key components of argumentative communication include:

• Clarity : Presenting your argument in a clear and understandable way.
• Evidence : Supporting your points with facts, data, and reliable sources.
• Logic : Ensuring your argument follows a logical structure and reasoning.
• Rebuttal : Addressing and countering opposing viewpoints effectively.
• Persuasion : Convincing the audience or the other party of your viewpoint.

Effective argumentative communication is not about winning an argument; it’s about engaging in a meaningful dialogue that leads to a deeper understanding of the subject matter.

What are the Types of Argumentative Communication?

Argumentative communication can be categorized into various types, each with its unique characteristics and applications. Below is a table outlining the different types of argumentative communication:

Each type of argumentative communication serves a different purpose and is suited to different contexts. Understanding these types can help individuals choose the most effective approach for their specific communication needs.

What is the Importance of Augmentative Communication?

Augmentative communication plays a crucial role in enhancing the ability of individuals with speech or language impairments to express themselves. This form of communication can include everything from sign language and picture symbols to sophisticated electronic devices. It’s not just about providing a voice to those who struggle with traditional speech; it’s about empowering them to engage fully in social, educational, and professional environments. Augmentative communication aids in bridging communication gaps, fostering independence, and enhancing self-esteem. It allows individuals to participate more fully in their communities, making their thoughts, needs, and desires known. This form of communication is vital for inclusive education and workplace environments, ensuring everyone has the opportunity to contribute and be heard.

What is the Difference Between Argumentative and Aggressive Communication?

Understanding the difference between argumentative and aggressive communication is essential for effective interpersonal interactions. While argumentative communication can foster healthy debate and idea exchange, aggressive communication often leads to negative outcomes and damaged relationships.

What is an Argumentative Topic in Communication?

An argumentative topic in communication refers to a subject matter that invites differing opinions, perspectives, or viewpoints. These topics are often debatable, with no clear-cut right or wrong answers, allowing for a rich exchange of ideas and reasoning. Argumentative topics in communication are essential for stimulating critical thinking and analytical skills. They encourage individuals to articulate their thoughts, back them up with evidence, and listen to and evaluate opposing viewpoints.

In the realm of argumentative communication , these topics can range from social issues, ethical dilemmas, and political debates to technological advancements and environmental concerns. The key characteristic of an argumentative topic is its potential to spark a constructive debate, where participants engage in a structured exchange of ideas, challenging each other’s views while respecting differing opinions. This form of communication is not about winning an argument but rather about understanding different perspectives and reaching a more informed and nuanced understanding of the topic.

Why is an Argument an Important Part of Communication?

Arguments are a fundamental aspect of communication, playing a crucial role in our interactions and decision-making processes. They are important for several reasons:

• Promotes Critical Thinking: Arguments compel individuals to think critically. When formulating an argument, one must gather facts, analyze information, and construct a logical narrative. This process enhances critical thinking skills, which are essential in both personal and professional settings.
• Facilitates Problem-Solving: Many real-world problems are complex and multifaceted. Engaging in argumentative communication allows for the exploration of different solutions and approaches, leading to more effective problem-solving.
• Encourages Active Listening: Effective argumentation is not just about speaking; it’s also about listening. To argue effectively, one must understand the opposing viewpoint, which fosters active listening and empathy.
• Enhances Persuasion Skills: Argumentation is a key component of persuasion. By presenting coherent and compelling arguments, individuals can influence others’ opinions and decisions, a skill valuable in numerous contexts, from business negotiations to public speaking.
• Builds Confidence and Communication Competence: Regular participation in argumentative discussions can build confidence in expressing ideas and opinions. It also enhances overall communication competence, as individuals learn to articulate their thoughts clearly and respond to counterarguments effectively.
• Fosters Democratic Discourse: In a broader societal context, arguments are the backbone of democratic discourse. They allow for the exchange of diverse opinions and ideas, essential for a healthy and functioning democracy.

In summary, arguments are not just about confrontations or disagreements. They are a vital part of effective communication , enriching our understanding, enhancing our cognitive abilities, and playing a pivotal role in societal progress.

What are the Components of Argumentative Communication?

Argumentative communication is a critical skill, especially in contexts where presenting and defending a position is essential. Understanding its components is key to mastering this form of communication. Here are the fundamental elements:

• Claim: The central idea or thesis that the speaker wishes to argue. It’s the foundation of the argument.
• Evidence: This includes facts, data, and other forms of proof that support the claim. Effective argumentative communication relies heavily on credible and relevant evidence.
• Reasoning: The logical process of connecting the evidence to the claim. It involves explaining how and why the evidence supports the claim.
• Counterarguments: Acknowledging and addressing opposing viewpoints. This shows a comprehensive understanding of the topic and enhances the credibility of the argument.
• Refutation: Effectively countering the opposing arguments by providing evidence or reasoning that disproves them or diminishes their impact.
• Persuasive Language: Using language that is convincing and resonates with the audience. This includes rhetorical devices, emotional appeals, and ethical considerations.
• Conclusion: Summarizing the main points and restating the claim, often with a call to action or a final thought that leaves a lasting impression on the audience.
• Ethical Consideration: Ensuring that the argument respects ethical standards and avoids fallacies or manipulative tactics.

Understanding and effectively utilizing these components can significantly enhance the quality and impact of argumentative communication.

What are the Advantages of Argumentative Communications?

Argumentative communication, when done effectively, offers numerous advantages:

• Promotes Critical Thinking: It encourages individuals to analyze different perspectives, enhancing their problem-solving and decision-making skills.
• Improves Persuasion Skills: Mastery in argumentative communication equips individuals with the ability to persuade others effectively, a valuable skill in various professional and personal contexts.
• Enhances Clarity of Thought: Formulating arguments requires clear and structured thinking, which in turn improves overall communication skills.
• Facilitates Conflict Resolution: Argumentative skills are crucial in resolving disagreements by presenting and understanding different viewpoints, leading to more informed and mutually agreeable solutions.
• Encourages Research and Learning: To argue effectively, one must be well-informed about the subject, which fosters a culture of research and continuous learning.
• Builds Confidence: Successfully articulating and defending a position can significantly boost an individual’s confidence in their communication abilities.
• Supports Academic and Professional Growth: These skills are highly valued in academic settings and various careers, particularly in law, politics, education, and business.
• Fosters Open-Mindedness: Engaging in argumentative communication exposes individuals to diverse opinions and perspectives, promoting tolerance and open-mindedness.
• Improves Public Speaking Skills: Regular practice in argumentative communication enhances public speaking abilities, making individuals more effective and engaging speakers.
• Cultivates Negotiation Skills: Argumentative communication is a cornerstone of effective negotiation, helping individuals to advocate for their interests while understanding and considering the needs of others.

Incorporating argumentative communication into personal and professional life can lead to significant improvements in how individuals express, defend, and revise their ideas and opinions.

How to Improve Argumentative Communications

Improving argumentative communication is crucial for engaging in productive debates and discussions. It involves refining the way we present and defend our ideas, ensuring clarity, respect, and effectiveness. Here are key strategies to enhance your argumentative communication skills:

• Understand the Topic Thoroughly : Deep knowledge of the subject matter is essential. Research extensively to gather facts, statistics, and relevant information. This preparation not only boosts your confidence but also makes your arguments more convincing.
• Practice Active Listening : Effective argumentation is not just about speaking; it’s also about listening. Pay close attention to what others are saying. This helps in understanding their perspective and formulating a more informed response.
• Stay Calm and Respectful : Maintain a calm demeanor during discussions. Avoid getting emotionally charged as it can cloud judgment and hinder effective communication. Respect differing opinions, even when they contradict your own.
• Use Clear and Concise Language : Articulate your points clearly and avoid overly complex language. Clarity in communication ensures that your arguments are understood and taken seriously.
• Structure Your Arguments Logically : Present your arguments in a coherent and logical sequence. This makes it easier for your audience to follow and comprehend your points.
• Employ Critical Thinking : Analyze and evaluate arguments from all angles. Question assumptions and consider potential counterarguments. This critical approach strengthens your position and prepares you for rebuttals.
• Use Persuasive Techniques : Incorporate rhetorical strategies such as ethos, pathos, and logos. These techniques enhance the persuasiveness of your arguments.
• Seek Feedback and Reflect : After engaging in argumentative communication, seek feedback. Reflect on what worked well and areas for improvement. Continuous learning and adaptation are key to mastering argumentative communication.

Tips for Effective Argumentative Communications

To engage in argumentative communication effectively, consider these practical tips:

• Start with Common Ground : Begin discussions by acknowledging areas of agreement. This sets a collaborative tone and makes it easier to navigate through disagreements.
• Use Examples and Evidence : Support your arguments with concrete examples, evidence, and data. This substantiates your claims and makes your arguments more compelling.
• Be Open to Different Perspectives : Embrace different viewpoints. This openness not only enriches the discussion but also demonstrates your willingness to consider diverse opinions.
• Avoid Logical Fallacies : Be aware of common logical fallacies and strive to avoid them in your arguments. Fallacies weaken your position and can undermine your credibility.
• Ask Questions : Use questions to clarify points and probe deeper into the subject. Questions can also guide the conversation and uncover new insights.
• Adapt to Your Audience : Tailor your communication style to your audience. Understanding their background, values, and beliefs can help in framing your arguments more effectively.
• Practice Empathy : Try to understand where the other person is coming from. Empathy can help in addressing concerns and reducing conflicts.
• Focus on Solutions : Instead of just pointing out problems, propose solutions. This constructive approach is more likely to lead to positive outcomes.
• Stay Updated : Keep abreast of current events and developments related to your topics of interest. Being informed adds depth to your arguments.
• Engage in Regular Practice : Like any skill, argumentative communication improves with practice. Engage in debates, join discussion forums, or participate in public speaking clubs to hone your skills.

By incorporating these strategies and tips, you can significantly improve your argumentative communication skills, making your interactions more productive and your arguments more persuasive.

Mastering argumentative communication is a valuable skill that enhances dialogue and decision-making. By understanding effective techniques, embracing diverse perspectives, and employing clear, logical arguments, individuals can engage in more meaningful and productive discussions. This guide offers practical tips and examples to refine these skills, fostering a more informed, respectful, and persuasive communication style in various contexts.

AI Generator

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

10 Argumentative Communication Examples for Workplace

10 Argumentative Communication Examples in Therapy

Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance pp 3639–3644 Cite as

Effective Communication and Persuasion

• Mathew L. Sheep 2  
• Reference work entry
• First Online: 01 January 2023

16 Accesses

Leadership communication; Organizational communication; Persuasion; Rhetorical theory

Effective communication: communication that succeeds in accomplishing what it was intended to accomplish.

Introduction

Definitions of “communication” abound, but they are remarkably similar in basic components. One such definition is “the process of sending and receiving symbols with attached meanings” (Uhl-Bien et al. 2014 , p. 236). Of first importance, communication is not a “thing” but instead a process – one that involves the sending and receiving of messages. Messages may utilize words and other symbolic devices (such as pictures or sounds) or nonverbal ways of signifying meaning (such as facial expressions or body language). However, we have long known that conveying an intended meaning is not as straightforward as we might imagine. Much can “go right” or “go wrong” as an attempt is made to send messages between a sender and a receiver.

Notwithstanding its challenges,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Barrett D (2014) Leadership communication. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

Google Scholar  

Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday, Garden City

Bitzer LF (1992[1968]) The rhetorical situation. Philos Rhetor 25:1–14

Boden D (1994) The business of talk: organizations in action. Polity Press, Cambridge, MA

Denning S (2011) The springboard: how storytelling ignites action in knowledge-era organizations. Routledge, New York

Fairhurst GT (2011) The power of framing: creating the language of leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

Fairhurst GT, Putnam LL (2004) Organizations as discursive constructions. Commun Theory 14:5–26

Article   Google Scholar  

Fairhurst GT, Sarr R (1996) The art of framing: managing the language of leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

Fisher R, Ury WL, Patton B (2011) Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin, New York

Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: introduction of the theory of structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley

Goldsmith M (2007) What got you here won’t get you there: how successful people become even more successful. Hyperion, New York

Goleman D (2000) Leadership that gets results. Har Bus Rev 78(2):78–90

Gottschall J (2012) The storytelling animal: how stories make us human. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing, New York

Herrick J (2001) The history and theory of rhetoric. Allyn & Bacon, Boston

Mumford MD, Zaccaro SJ, Harding FD, Jacobs TO, Fleishman EA (2000) Leadership skills for a changing world: solving complex problems. Leadersh Q 11:11–35

Perelman C, Olbrechts-Tyteca L (1969) The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

Potter J, Wetherell M (1987) Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behavior. Sage, Beverly Hills

Uhl-Bien M, Schermerhorn JR, Osborn RN (2014) Organizational behavior. Wiley, Hoboken

Vatz RE (1973) The myth of the rhetorical situation. Philos Rhetor 6:154–161

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA

Mathew L. Sheep

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathew L. Sheep .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA

Ali Farazmand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Sheep, M.L. (2022). Effective Communication and Persuasion. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_2257

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_2257

Published : 06 April 2023

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-66251-6

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-66252-3

eBook Packages : Economics and Finance Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Share this entry

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Subject List
• Take a Tour
• For Authors
• Subscriber Services
• Publications
• African American Studies
• African Studies
• American Literature
• Anthropology
• Architecture Planning and Preservation
• Art History
• Atlantic History
• Biblical Studies
• British and Irish Literature
• Childhood Studies
• Chinese Studies
• Cinema and Media Studies

Communication

• Criminology
• Environmental Science
• Evolutionary Biology
• International Law
• International Relations
• Islamic Studies
• Jewish Studies
• Latin American Studies
• Latino Studies
• Linguistics
• Literary and Critical Theory
• Medieval Studies
• Military History
• Political Science
• Public Health
• Renaissance and Reformation
• Social Work
• Urban Studies
• Victorian Literature
• Browse All Subjects

How to Subscribe

• Free Trials

In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Argumentation

Introduction, general overviews.

• Anthologies
• Conferences
• Defining Argument
• Dialectical
• Informal Logic
• Normative Pragmatics
• Design Approaches
• Discourse Analysis
• Argument Schemes
• Multimodal Argument
• Domains of Argument
• Deliberation and Argumentation
• Argument and Style
• Argument and Emotion
• Presumption and Burden of Proof

Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about

About related articles close popup.

Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet

Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.

• Action-Implicative Discourse Analysis
• Deliberation
• Instructional Communication
• Message Characteristics and Persuasion
• Public Sphere
• Rhetoric and Communication
• Small-Group Communication
• Social Protest

Other Subject Areas

Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.

• Culture Shock and Communication
• LGBTQ+ Family Communication
• Queerbaiting
• Find more forthcoming titles...
• Export Citations
• Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Argumentation by Beth Innocenti LAST REVIEWED: 22 May 2017 LAST MODIFIED: 23 June 2023 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0013

Two broad divisions characterize orientations to studies of argumentation by communication scholars and scholars in other disciplines. First, communication scholars perform descriptive and normative studies of argumentation, as well as studies that attempt to integrate these two perspectives. Descriptive studies typically employ qualitative and social-scientific research methods and may analyze argumentation both in laboratory and in real-world settings. Normative studies typically employ humanistic research methods and analyze argumentation in the public communication. Second, scholars may view argumentation as more of an epistemological activity—one that generates knowledge or justifies belief—or as more of a practical activity that is designed to achieve a variety of outcomes, such as persuasion, consideration of a proposal, or acceptance of a premise. Various basic questions are addressed by argumentation research: How should we define “argumentation”? How should we analyze it? How should we evaluate it?

The interdisciplinary nature of Argumentation research may explain a dearth of general overviews. Wenzel 1990 continues to serve as a clarifying framework for approaching argumentation research. Van Eemeren, et al. 2014 is the most comprehensive overview. Dutlih Novael 2022 covers fundamental topics in argumentation research and mainly philosophical sources that address them. Hundleby 2021 also covers fundamental topics and mainly philosophical sources but from a feminist perspective.

Dutlih Novael, Catarina. 2022. Argument and Argumentation . In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy . Edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.

Overviews basic topics including definitions of argument, types of arguments (e.g., adversarial and cooperative, epistemic, consensus, conflict management), argumentation theory, argumentation with respect to various disciplines (e.g., computer science, psychology, communication), and more. Good resource for philosophical sources and a view of argumentation from a primarily philosophical perspective.

Hundleby, Catherine E. 2021. Feminist perspectives on argumentation . In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy . Edited by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.

Overviews basic topics, including the definition of argument, goals of arguing, informal logic and rhetorical perspectives, and fallacies. Describes feminist approaches and perspectives on these and other topics. Critiques assumptions and starting points of argumentation research. Focuses mainly on philosophical sources but includes sources in rhetoric and communication. Good introduction to feminist perspectives on argumentation for students and scholars.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans. 2014. Handbook of argumentation theory . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Verlag.

DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5

Comprehensive introduction to argumentation with pragma-dialectical orientation. Covers historical background and contemporary developments. Organized in part around approaches to argumentation, including dialectical, informal logic, communication studies and rhetoric, linguistics, and pragma-dialectics. This source is suited for institutional libraries but is cost prohibitive for most personal libraries.

Wenzel, Joseph W. 1990. Three perspectives on argument: Rhetoric, dialectic, logic. In Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede . Edited by Robert Trapp and Janice Schuetz, 9–26. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.

Outlines three perspectives on argument that can serve as a framework for understanding a wide array of argumentation research. Describes rhetoric, dialectic, and logic perspectives. Covers different views of argument (process, procedure, process) and different accounts of argument purposes, scope and focus, situations, resources, standards, and roles. A clear, broad overview accessible to newcomers.

back to top

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .

• About Communication »
• Meet the Editorial Board »
• Accounting Communication
• Acculturation Processes and Communication
• Action Assembly Theory
• Activist Media
• Adherence and Communication
• Adolescence and the Media
• Advertisements, Televised Political
• Advertising
• Advertising, Children and
• Advertising, International
• Advocacy Journalism
• Agenda Setting
• Annenberg, Walter H.
• Apologies and Accounts
• Applied Communication Research Methods
• Argumentation
• Artificial Intelligence (AI) Advertising
• Attitude-Behavior Consistency
• Audience Fragmentation
• Audience Studies
• Authoritarian Societies, Journalism in
• Bakhtin, Mikhail
• Bandwagon Effect
• Baudrillard, Jean
• Blockchain and Communication
• Bourdieu, Pierre
• Brand Equity
• British and Irish Magazine, History of the
• Broadcasting, Public Service
• Capture, Media
• Castells, Manuel
• Celebrity and Public Persona
• Civil Rights Movement and the Media, The
• Co-Cultural Theory and Communication
• Codes and Cultural Discourse Analysis
• Cognitive Dissonance
• Collective Memory, Communication and
• Comedic News
• Communication Apprehension
• Communication Campaigns
• Communication, Definitions and Concepts of
• Communication History
• Communication Law
• Communication Management
• Communication Networks
• Communication, Philosophy of
• Community Attachment
• Community Journalism
• Community Structure Approach
• Computational Journalism
• Computer-Mediated Communication
• Content Analysis
• Corporate Social Responsibility and Communication
• Crisis Communication
• Critical and Cultural Studies
• Critical Race Theory and Communication
• Cross-tools and Cross-media Effects
• Cultivation
• Cultural and Creative Industries
• Cultural Imperialism Theories
• Cultural Mapping
• Cultural Persuadables
• Cultural Pluralism and Communication
• Cyberpolitics
• Death, Dying, and Communication
• Debates, Televised
• Developmental Communication
• Diffusion of Innovations
• Digital Divide
• Digital Gender Diversity
• Digital Intimacies
• Digital Literacy
• Diplomacy, Public
• Distributed Work, Comunication and
• Documentary and Communication
• E-democracy/E-participation
• E-Government
• Elaboration Likelihood Model
• Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM)
• Embedded Coverage
• Entertainment
• Entertainment-Education
• Environmental Communication
• Ethnic Media
• Ethnography of Communication
• Experiments
• Families, Multicultural
• Family Communication
• Federal Communications Commission
• Feminist and Queer Game Studies
• Feminist Data Studies
• Feminist Journalism
• Feminist Theory
• Focus Groups
• Food Studies and Communication
• Freedom of the Press
• Friendships, Intercultural
• Gatekeeping
• Gender and the Media
• Global Englishes
• Global Media, History of
• Global Media Organizations
• Glocalization
• Goffman, Erving
• Habermas, Jürgen
• Habituation and Communication
• Health Communication
• Hermeneutic Communication Studies
• Homelessness and Communication
• Hook-Up and Dating Apps
• Hostile Media Effect
• Identification with Media Characters
• Identity, Cultural
• Image Repair Theory
• Implicit Measurement
• Impression Management
• Infographics
• Information and Communication Technology for Development
• Information Management
• Information Overload
• Information Processing
• Infotainment
• Innis, Harold
• Integrated Marketing Communications
• Interactivity
• Intercultural Capital
• Intercultural Communication
• Intercultural Communication, Tourism and
• Intercultural Communication, Worldview in
• Intercultural Competence
• Intercultural Conflict Mediation
• Intercultural Dialogue
• Intercultural New Media
• Intergenerational Communication
• Intergroup Communication
• International Communications
• Interpersonal Communication
• Interpersonal LGBTQ Communication
• Interpretation/Reception
• Interpretive Communities
• Journalism, Accuracy in
• Journalism, Alternative
• Journalism and Trauma
• Journalism, Citizen
• Journalism, Citizen, History of
• Journalism Ethics
• Journalism, Interpretive
• Journalism, Peace
• Journalism, Tabloid
• Journalists, Violence against
• Knowledge Gap
• Lazarsfeld, Paul
• Leadership and Communication
• Mass Communication
• McLuhan, Marshall
• Media Activism
• Media Aesthetics
• Media and Time
• Media Convergence
• Media Credibility
• Media Dependency
• Media Ecology
• Media Economics
• Media Economics, Theories of
• Media, Educational
• Media Effects
• Media Ethics
• Media Events
• Media Exposure Measurement
• Media, Gays and Lesbians in the
• Media Literacy
• Media Logic
• Media Management
• Media Policy and Governance
• Media Regulation
• Media, Social
• Media Sociology
• Media Systems Theory
• Merton, Robert K.
• Mobile Communication Studies
• Multimodal Discourse Analysis, Approaches to
• Multinational Organizations, Communication and Culture in
• Murdoch, Rupert
• Narrative Engagement
• Narrative Persuasion
• Net Neutrality
• News Framing
• News Media Coverage of Women
• NGOs, Communication and
• Online Campaigning
• Open Access
• Organizational Change and Organizational Change Communicat...
• Organizational Communication
• Organizational Communication, Aging and
• Parasocial Theory in Communication
• Participation, Civic/Political
• Participatory Action Research
• Patient-Provider Communication
• Peacebuilding and Communication
• Perceived Realism
• Personalized Communication
• Persuasion and Social Influence
• Persuasion, Resisting
• Photojournalism
• Political Advertising
• Political Communication, Normative Analysis of
• Political Economy
• Political Knowledge
• Political Marketing
• Political Scandals
• Political Socialization
• Polls, Opinion
• Product Placement
• Public Interest Communication
• Public Opinion
• Public Relations
• Queer Intercultural Communication
• Queer Migration and Digital Media
• Race and Communication
• Racism and Communication
• Radio Studies
• Reality Television
• Reasoned Action Frameworks
• Religion and the Media
• Reporting, Investigative
• Rhetoric and Intercultural Communication
• Rhetoric and Social Movements
• Rhetoric, Religious
• Rhetoric, Visual
• Risk Communication
• Rumor and Communication
• Schramm, Wilbur
• Science Communication
• Scripps, E. W.
• Selective Exposure
• Sense-Making/Sensemaking
• Sesame Street
• Sex in the Media
• Social Capital
• Social Change
• Social Cognition
• Social Construction
• Social Identity Theory and Communication
• Social Interaction
• Social Movements
• Social Network Analysis
• Sports Communication
• Stereotypes
• Strategic Communication
• Superdiversity
• Surveillance and Communication
• Symbolic Interactionism in Communication
• Synchrony in Intercultural Communication
• Tabloidization
• Telecommunications History/Policy
• Television, Cable
• Textual Analysis and Communication
• Third Culture Kids
• Third-Person Effect
• Time Warner
• Transgender Media Studies
• Transmedia Storytelling
• Two-Step Flow
• United Nations and Communication
• Urban Communication
• Uses and Gratifications
• Video Deficit
• Video Games and Communication
• Violence in the Media
• Virtual Reality and Communication
• Visual Communication
• Web Archiving
• Whistleblowing
• Whiteness Theory in Intercultural Communication
• Youth and Media
• Zines and Communication
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Legal Notice
• Accessibility

Powered by:

• [66.249.64.20|185.194.105.172]
• 185.194.105.172

Argumentative Essay

Definition of argumentative essay.

An argumentative essay is a type of essay that presents arguments about both sides of an issue. It could be that both sides are presented equally balanced, or it could be that one side is presented more forcefully than the other. It all depends on the writer, and what side he supports the most. The general structure of an argumentative essay follows this format:

• Introduction : Attention Grabber/ hook , Background Information , Thesis Statement
• Body : Three body paragraphs (three major arguments)
• Counterargument : An argument to refute earlier arguments and give weight to the actual position
• Conclusion : Rephrasing the thesis statement , major points, call to attention, or concluding remarks .

Models for Argumentative Essays

There are two major models besides this structure given above, which is called a classical model. Two other models are the Toulmin and Rogerian models.

Toulmin model is comprised of an introduction with a claim or thesis, followed by the presentation of data to support the claim. Warrants are then listed for the reasons to support the claim with backing and rebuttals. However, the Rogerian model asks to weigh two options, lists the strengths and weaknesses of both options, and gives a recommendation after an analysis.

Five Types of Argument Claims in Essay Writing  

There are five major types of argument claims as given below.

• A claim of definition
• A claim about values
• A claim about the reason
• A claim about comparison
• A claim about policy or position

A writer makes a claim about these issues and answers the relevant questions about it with relevant data and evidence to support the claim.

Three Major Types of Argument and How to Apply Them

Classical argument.

This model of applying argument is also called the Aristotelian model developed by Aristotle. This type of essay introduces the claim, with the opinion of the writer about the claim, its both perspectives, supported by evidence, and provides a conclusion about the better perspective . This essay includes an introduction, a body having the argument and support, a counter-argument with support, and a conclusion.

Toulmin Argument

This model developed by Stephen Toulmin is based on the claim followed by grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal . Its structure comprises, an introduction having the main claim, a body with facts and evidence, while its rebuttal comprises counter-arguments and a conclusion.

Rogerian Argument

The third model by Carl Rogers has different perspectives having proof to support and a conclusion based on all the available perspectives. Its structure comprises an introduction with a thesis, the opposite point of view and claim, a middle-ground for both or more perspectives, and a conclusion.

Four Steps to Outline and Argumentative Essay

There are four major steps to outlining an argumentative essay.

• Introduction with background, claim, and thesis.
• Body with facts, definition, claim, cause and effect, or policy.
• The opposing point of view with pieces of evidence.

Examples of Argumentative Essay in Literature

Example #1: put a little science in your life by brian greene.

“When we consider the ubiquity of cellphones, iPods, personal computers and the Internet, it’s easy to see how science (and the technology to which it leads) is woven into the fabric of our day-to-day activities . When we benefit from CT scanners, M.R.I. devices, pacemakers and arterial stents, we can immediately appreciate how science affects the quality of our lives. When we assess the state of the world, and identify looming challenges like climate change, global pandemics, security threats and diminishing resources, we don’t hesitate in turning to science to gauge the problems and find solutions. And when we look at the wealth of opportunities hovering on the horizon—stem cells, genomic sequencing, personalized medicine, longevity research, nanoscience, brain-machine interface, quantum computers, space technology—we realize how crucial it is to cultivate a general public that can engage with scientific issues; there’s simply no other way that as a society we will be prepared to make informed decisions on a range of issues that will shape the future.”

These two paragraphs present an argument about two scientific fields — digital products and biotechnology. It has also given full supporting details with names.

Example #2: Boys Here, Girls There: Sure, If Equality’s the Goal by Karen Stabiner

“The first objections last week came from the National Organization for Women and the New York Civil Liberties Union, both of which opposed the opening of TYWLS in the fall of 1996. The two groups continue to insist—as though it were 1896 and they were arguing Plessy v. Ferguson—that separate can never be equal. I appreciate NOW ’s wariness of the Bush administration’s endorsement of single-sex public schools, since I am of the generation that still considers the label “feminist” to be a compliment—and many feminists still fear that any public acknowledgment of differences between the sexes will hinder their fight for equality .”

This paragraph by Karen Stabiner presents an objection to the argument of separation between public schools. It has been fully supported with evidence of the court case.

Example #3: The Flight from Conversation by Sherry Turkle

“We’ve become accustomed to a new way of being “ alone together.” Technology-enabled, we are able to be with one another, and also elsewhere, connected to wherever we want to be. We want to customize our lives. We want to move in and out of where we are because the thing we value most is control over where we focus our attention. We have gotten used to the idea of being in a tribe of one, loyal to our own party.”

This is an argument by Sherry Turkle, who beautifully presented it in the first person plural dialogues . However, it is clear that this is part of a greater argument instead of the essay.

Function of Argumentative Essay

An argumentative essay presents both sides of an issue. However, it presents one side more positively or meticulously than the other one, so that readers could be swayed to the one the author intends. The major function of this type of essay is to present a case before the readers in a convincing manner, showing them the complete picture.

Synonyms of Argumentative Essay

Argumentative Essay synonyms are as follows: persuasive essays, research essays, analytical essays, or even some personal essays.

Related posts:

• Elements of an Essay
• Narrative Essay
• Definition Essay
• Descriptive Essay
• Types of Essay
• Analytical Essay
• Cause and Effect Essay
• Critical Essay
• Expository Essay
• Persuasive Essay
• Process Essay
• Explicatory Essay
• An Essay on Man: Epistle I
• Comparison and Contrast Essay

Post navigation

Nonverbal Communication and Body Language

Improving emotional intelligence (eq), conflict resolution skills.

• Empathy: How to Feel and Respond to the Emotions of Others

Anger Management

Managing conflict with humor.

• Gaslighting: Turning Off the Gas on Your Gaslighter

Setting Healthy Boundaries in Relationships

• Online Therapy: Is it Right for You?
• Mental Health
• Health & Wellness
• Children & Family
• Relationships

Are you or someone you know in crisis?

• Bipolar Disorder
• Eating Disorders
• Grief & Loss
• Personality Disorders
• PTSD & Trauma
• Schizophrenia
• Therapy & Medication
• Exercise & Fitness
• Healthy Eating
• Well-being & Happiness
• Weight Loss
• Work & Career
• Illness & Disability
• Heart Health
• Childhood Issues
• Learning Disabilities
• Family Caregiving
• Teen Issues
• Communication
• Emotional Intelligence
• Love & Friendship
• Domestic Abuse
• Healthy Aging
• Aging Issues
• Alzheimer’s Disease & Dementia
• Senior Housing
• End of Life
• Meet Our Team

What is effective communication?

Effective communication skill 1: become an engaged listener, skill 2: pay attention to nonverbal signals, skill 3: keep stress in check, skill 4: assert yourself, effective communication.

Want to communicate better? These tips will help you avoid misunderstandings, grasp the real meaning of what’s being communicated, and greatly improve your work and personal relationships.

Effective communication is about more than just exchanging information. It’s about understanding the emotion and intentions behind the information. As well as being able to clearly convey a message, you need to also listen in a way that gains the full meaning of what’s being said and makes the other person feel heard and understood.

Effective communication sounds like it should be instinctive. But all too often, when we try to communicate with others something goes astray. We say one thing, the other person hears something else, and misunderstandings, frustration, and conflicts ensue. This can cause problems in your home, school, and work relationships.

For many of us, communicating more clearly and effectively requires learning some important skills. Whether you’re trying to improve communication with your spouse, kids, boss, or coworkers, learning these skills can deepen your connections to others, build greater trust and respect, and improve teamwork, problem solving, and your overall social and emotional health.

What’s stopping you from communicating effectively?

Common barriers to effective communication include:

Stress and out-of-control emotion.  When you’re stressed or emotionally overwhelmed, you’re more likely to misread other people, send confusing or off-putting nonverbal signals, and lapse into unhealthy knee-jerk patterns of behavior. To avoid conflict and misunderstandings, you can learn how to quickly calm down before continuing a conversation.

Lack of focus.  You can’t communicate effectively when you’re multitasking. If you’re checking your phone , planning what you’re going to say next, or daydreaming, you’re almost certain to miss nonverbal cues in the conversation. To communicate effectively, you need to avoid distractions and stay focused.

Inconsistent body language.  Nonverbal communication should reinforce what is being said, not contradict it. If you say one thing, but your body language says something else, your listener will likely feel that you’re being dishonest. For example, you can’t say “yes” while shaking your head no.

[Read: Nonverbal Communication and Body Language]

Negative body language.  If you disagree with or dislike what’s being said, you might use negative body language to rebuff the other person’s message, such as crossing your arms, avoiding eye contact, or tapping your feet. You don’t have to agree with, or even like what’s being said, but to communicate effectively and not put the other person on the defensive, it’s important to avoid sending negative signals.

When communicating with others, we often focus on what we should say. However, effective communication is less about talking and more about listening. Listening well means not just understanding the words or the information being communicated, but also understanding the emotions the speaker is trying to convey.

There’s a big difference between engaged listening and simply hearing. When you really listen—when you’re engaged with what’s being said—you’ll hear the subtle intonations in someone’s voice that tell you how that person is feeling and the emotions they’re trying to communicate. When you’re an engaged listener, not only will you better understand the other person, you’ll also make that person feel heard and understood, which can help build a stronger, deeper connection between you.

By communicating in this way, you’ll also experience a process that  lowers stress and supports physical and emotional well-being. If the person you’re talking to is calm, for example, listening in an engaged way will help to calm you, too. Similarly, if the person is agitated, you can help calm them by listening in an attentive way and making the person feel understood.

If your goal is to fully understand and connect with the other person, listening in an engaged way will often come naturally. If it doesn’t, try the following tips. The more you practice them, the more satisfying and rewarding your interactions with others will become.

Tips for becoming an engaged listener

Focus fully on the speaker.  You can’t listen in an engaged way if you’re  constantly checking your phone or thinking about something else. You need to stay focused on the moment-to-moment experience in order to pick up the subtle nuances and important nonverbal cues in a conversation. If you find it hard to concentrate on some speakers, try repeating their words over in your head—it’ll reinforce their message and help you stay focused.

Favor your right ear.  As strange as it sounds, the left side of the brain contains the primary processing centers for both speech comprehension and emotions. Since the left side of the brain is connected to the right side of the body, favoring your right ear can help you better detect the emotional nuances of what someone is saying.

Avoid interrupting or trying to redirect the conversation to your concerns.  By saying something like, “If you think that’s bad, let me tell you what happened to me.” Listening is not the same as waiting for your turn to talk. You can’t concentrate on what someone’s saying if you’re forming what you’re going to say next. Often, the speaker can read your facial expressions and know that your mind’s elsewhere.

Show your interest in what’s being said.  Nod occasionally, smile at the person, and make sure your posture is open and inviting. Encourage the speaker to continue with small verbal comments like “yes” or “uh huh.”

Try to set aside judgment.  In order to communicate effectively with someone, you don’t have to like them or agree with their ideas, values, or opinions. However, you do need to set aside your judgment and withhold blame and criticism in order to fully understand them. The most difficult communication, when successfully executed, can often lead to an unlikely connection with someone.

[Read: Improving Emotional Intelligence (EQ)]

Provide feedback. If there seems to be a disconnect, reflect what has been said by paraphrasing. “What I’m hearing is,” or “Sounds like you are saying,” are great ways to reflect back. Don’t simply repeat what the speaker has said verbatim, though—you’ll sound insincere or unintelligent. Instead, express what the speaker’s words mean to you. Ask questions to clarify certain points: “What do you mean when you say…” or “Is this what you mean?”

Hear the emotion behind the words . It’s the higher frequencies of human speech that impart emotion. You can become more attuned to these frequencies—and thus better able to understand what others are really saying—by exercising the tiny muscles of your middle ear (the smallest in the body). You can do this by singing, playing a wind instrument, or listening to certain types of high-frequency music (a Mozart symphony or violin concerto, for example, rather than low-frequency rock, pop, or hip-hop).

The way you look, listen, move, and react to another person tells them more about how you’re feeling than words alone ever can. Nonverbal communication, or body language, includes facial expressions, body movement and gestures, eye contact, posture, the tone of your voice, and even your muscle tension and breathing.

Developing the ability to understand and use nonverbal communication can help you connect with others, express what you really mean, navigate challenging situations, and build better relationships at home and work.

• You can enhance effective communication by using open body language—arms uncrossed, standing with an open stance or sitting on the edge of your seat, and maintaining eye contact with the person you’re talking to.
• You can also use body language to emphasize or enhance your verbal message—patting a friend on the back while complimenting him on his success, for example, or pounding your fists to underline your message.

Improve how you  read nonverbal communication

Be aware of individual differences. People from different countries and cultures tend to use different nonverbal communication gestures, so it’s important to take age, culture, religion, gender, and emotional state into account when reading body language signals. An American teen, a grieving widow, and an Asian businessman, for example, are likely to use nonverbal signals differently.

Look at nonverbal communication signals as a group. Don’t read too much into a single gesture or nonverbal cue. Consider all of the nonverbal signals you receive, from eye contact to tone of voice to body language. Anyone can slip up occasionally and let eye contact go, for example, or briefly cross their arms without meaning to. Consider the signals as a whole to get a better “read” on a person.

Improve how you  deliver nonverbal communication

Use nonverbal signals that match up with your words rather than contradict them. If you say one thing, but your body language says something else, your listener will feel confused or suspect that you’re being dishonest. For example, sitting with your arms crossed and shaking your head doesn’t match words telling the other person that you agree with what they’re saying.

Adjust your nonverbal signals according to the context. The tone of your voice, for example, should be different when you’re addressing a child than when you’re addressing a group of adults. Similarly, take into account the emotional state and cultural background of the person you’re interacting with.

Avoid negative body language. Instead, use body language to convey positive feelings, even when you’re not actually experiencing them. If you’re nervous about a situation—a job interview, important presentation, or first date, for example—you can use positive body language to signal confidence, even though you’re not feeling it. Instead of tentatively entering a room with your head down, eyes averted, and sliding into a chair, try standing tall with your shoulders back, smiling and maintaining eye contact, and delivering a firm handshake. It will make you feel more self-confident and help to put the other person at ease.

How many times have you felt stressed during a disagreement with your spouse, kids, boss, friends, or coworkers and then said or done something you later regretted? If you can quickly relieve stress and return to a calm state, you’ll not only avoid such regrets, but in many cases you’ll also help to calm the other person as well. It’s only when you’re in a calm, relaxed state that you’ll be able to know whether the situation requires a response, or whether the other person’s signals indicate it would be better to remain silent.

In situations such as a job interview, business presentation, high-pressure meeting, or introduction to a loved one’s family, for example, it’s important to manage your emotions, think on your feet, and effectively communicate under pressure.

Communicate effectively by staying calm under pressure

Use stalling tactics to give yourself time to think. Ask for a question to be repeated or for clarification of a statement before you respond.

Pause to collect your thoughts. Silence isn’t necessarily a bad thing—pausing can make you seem more in control than rushing your response.

Make one point and provide an example or supporting piece of information. If your response is too long or you waffle about a number of points, you risk losing the listener’s interest. Follow one point with an example and then gauge the listener’s reaction to tell if you should make a second point.

Deliver your words clearly. In many cases, how you say something can be as important as what you say. Speak clearly, maintain an even tone, and make eye contact. Keep your body language relaxed and open.

Wrap up with a summary and then stop. Summarize your response and then stop talking, even if it leaves a silence in the room. You don’t have to fill the silence by continuing to talk.

Quick stress relief for effective communication

When a conversation starts to get heated, you need something quick and immediate to bring down the emotional intensity. By learning to quickly reduce stress in the moment, you can safely take stock of any strong emotions you’re experiencing, regulate your feelings, and behave appropriately.

Recognize when you’re becoming stressed. Your body will let you know if you’re stressed as you communicate. Are your muscles or stomach tight? Are your hands clenched? Is your breath shallow? Are you “forgetting” to breathe?

Take a moment to calm down before deciding to continue a conversation or postpone it.

Bring your senses to the rescue. The best way to rapidly and reliably relieve stress is through the senses—sight, sound, touch, taste, smell—or movement. For example, you could pop a peppermint in your mouth, squeeze a stress ball in your pocket, take a few deep breaths, clench and relax your muscles, or simply recall a soothing, sensory-rich image. Each person responds differently to sensory input, so you need to find a coping mechanism that is soothing to you.

[Read: Quick Stress Relief]

Look for humor in the situation. When used appropriately, humor is a great way to relieve stress when communicating . When you or those around you start taking things too seriously, find a way to lighten the mood by sharing a joke or an amusing story.

Be willing to compromise. Sometimes, if you can both bend a little, you’ll be able to find a happy middle ground that reduces the stress levels for everyone concerned. If you realize that the other person cares much more about an issue than you do, compromise may be easier for you and a good investment for the future of the relationship.

Agree to disagree, if necessary, and take time away from the situation so everyone can calm down. Go for a stroll outside if possible, or spend a few minutes meditating. Physical movement or finding a quiet place to regain your balance can quickly reduce stress.

Find your space for healing and growth

Regain is an online couples counseling service. Whether you’re facing problems with communication, intimacy, or trust, Regain’s licensed, accredited therapists can help you improve your relationship.

Direct, assertive expression makes for clear communication and can help boost your self-esteem and decision-making skills. Being assertive means expressing your thoughts, feelings, and needs in an open and honest way, while standing up for yourself and respecting others. It does NOT mean being hostile, aggressive, or demanding. Effective communication is always about understanding the other person, not about winning an argument or forcing your opinions on others.

To improve your assertiveness

Value yourself and your options. They are as important as anyone else’s.

Know your needs and wants. Learn to express them without infringing on the rights of others.

Express negative thoughts in a positive way. It’s  okay to be angry , but you must remain respectful as well.

Receive feedback positively. Accept compliments graciously, learn from your mistakes, ask for help when needed.

Learn to say “no.” Know your limits and don’t let others take advantage of you. Look for alternatives so everyone feels good about the outcome.

Developing assertive communication techniques

Empathetic assertion conveys sensitivity to the other person. First, recognize the other person’s situation or feelings, then state your needs or opinion. “I know you’ve been very busy at work, but I want you to make time for us as well.”

Escalating assertion can be employed when your first attempts are not successful. You become increasingly firm as time progresses, which may include outlining consequences if your needs are not met. For example, “If you don’t abide by the contract, I’ll be forced to pursue legal action.”

Practice assertiveness in lower risk situations to help build up your confidence. Or ask friends or family if you can practice assertiveness techniques on them first.

More Information

• Effective Communication: Improving Your Social Skills - Communicate more effectively, improve your conversation skills, and become more assertive. (AnxietyCanada)
• Core Listening Skills - How to be a better listener. (SucceedSocially.com)
• Effective Communication - How to communicate in groups using nonverbal communication and active listening techniques. (University of Maine)
• Some Common Communication Mistakes - And how to avoid them. (SucceedSocially.com)
• 3aPPa3 – When cognitive demand increases, does the right ear have an advantage? – Danielle Sacchinell | Acoustics.org . (n.d.). Retrieved May 22, 2022, from Link
• How to Behave More Assertively . (n.d.). 10. Weger, H., Castle Bell, G., Minei, E. M., & Robinson, M. C. (2014). The Relative Effectiveness of Active Listening in Initial Interactions.  International Journal of Listening , 28(1), 13–31. Link

More in Communication

How to read body language to build better relationships at home and work

Boost your emotional intelligence to help you be happy and successful

Tips for handling conflicts, arguments, and disagreements

How to feel and respond to the emotions of others

Tips and techniques for getting anger under control

Using laughter and play to resolve disagreements

Turning Off the Gas on Your Gaslighter

5 ways to deal with gaslighting

Strengthen your connections and improve your self-esteem

Professional therapy, done online

BetterHelp makes starting therapy easy. Take the assessment and get matched with a professional, licensed therapist.

Help us help others

Millions of readers rely on HelpGuide.org for free, evidence-based resources to understand and navigate mental health challenges. Please donate today to help us save, support, and change lives.

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

• Essay Database >
• Essay Examples >
• Essays Topics >
• Essay on Nursing

Free Effective Communication Skills Argumentative Essay Sample

Type of paper: Argumentative Essay

Topic: Nursing , Communication , Patient , Effective , Interaction , Autism , Care , Breastfeeding

Published: 03/30/2023

ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS

Communication in Nursing

Communication Argumentative Essay Introduction Communication encompasses a significant role in the nursing practices given the need for constant and clear interaction with the patients when providing care services. Furthermore, the areas of intervention, therapy, treatment, and health promotion rely on effective communication in order to develop strong interpersonal relationship with clients and stakeholders. Lastly, communication also provides opportunity in building competencies, collaboration, and teamwork. The discussion will demonstrate the key arguments about the importance of effective communication skills in various areas of nursing practice. In addition, the discussion will also determine the role of communication in enhancing interpersonal relationship between nurses and patients. At this point, it can be assumed that developing core competencies using the principles of communication, therapeutic communication, and informatics can enhance interpersonal relationship and improve outcomes.

Communication can be described as a bilateral process of exchanging information through various channels in a language that the receiver and source of information can both understand. There are basic principles applied in the communication process such as knowing the topic, knowing the purpose of information exchange, and knowing the audience. Some may argue that communication is not integral in the process of providing care because the instructions and procedures are exchanged between the clinician and the nurse. However, letting the patient know what involves in the care procedures, the considerations, and the outcomes enable the patient to exercise autonomy, which is part of the ethical practice of nursing. In this sense, communication and its principles are integral in the effective care delivery. Furthermore, effective communication also involves therapeutic communication where the care provider offers self, actively listens, provide broad openings, exploring, and encourage decision. In contrast to therapeutic communication, the non-therapeutic approach in communication involves demonstrating defensiveness, arguing, providing literal response, giving unprofessional remarks, and among others. The term therapeutic implies that the manner of communicating should contribute in the patient’s recovery outcomes instead of creating a more stressful environment for the patient . When in practice, therapeutic communication is apparently different in terms of demonstrating the interaction between nurses and colleagues and the patient. The therapeutic communication practice in interacting with the patient is geared towards aiding faster recovery. In contrast to the manner of interaction that therapeutic communication creates between nurses and colleagues, it involves an exchange of perceived effective practices and development of approaches towards patient recovery. It can be argued that the purpose of therapeutic communication in interpersonal interaction between nurses and patient is to emphasize communication as an instrument that aids treatment. Another important aspect of effective communication is the use of information technology in which the exchange of information was aided by a form of technology. An example of the integrated role of informatics in communication is by allowing the patients to access helpful information on platforms such as mobile and web. The three aspects of effective communication are not only limited within the nurse and patient interaction, but is also important in the professional work environment particularly in the collaboration process . In terms of the difference in interaction, informatics as a form of communication between nurses and patient through the use of available technological platform. In contrast to nurse and colleague interaction, informatics is a form of communication that enables collaboration. Through the use of information technology, nurses and clinicians are able to communicate and share findings about the patient’s condition and use the information as the basis of the decision-making process toward the patient’s treatment approach. Communication is an elemental skill for the nurse, to provide adequate care, build trust and provide satisfactory outcomes . The everyday interaction between co-workers strengthens teamwork, but any existence of potential problems in communication with co-workers and patients is likely to affect work outcomes, decision-making and problem solving. On the other hand, barriers do exist that comes in the way of effective communication. For example, differences in ethnic background may construe effective communication because of the language barrier. However, developing effective communication skills by leaning other language approach may improve the communication exchange, particularly in providing patient education or even for patient with hearing problems non-English speakers. SOAP and SBAR are also professional nursing practice where communication is used to prompt an effective exchange between healthcare workers and patients . According to Pepper’s (2014), the quality of communication between the nurse and the client is an essential determinant of a successful provider-to-patient relationship. This is because communication addresses the four standards of nursing practice such as environmental health, implementation, collaboration, and assessment . In relation to patient interaction, communicating and having a positive interaction increases their chance of survival as they develop a more positive attitude towards their health, hence, the process of recovery is quicker. On the other hand, the role of communication in nurse interaction with colleagues is to enable collaboration and effective care delivery .

Effective communication skills an important aspect of nursing practice as care delivery should also involve creating a positive interpersonal relationship with the patient. Developing effective communication skills increases patient outcomes, enables adequate care, minimizes errors, and enhances the nurses’ core competencies. Therefore, professional nursing practices should also focus on developing communication skills to become an effective care provider.

Boykins, D. (2014). Core Communication Competencies in Patient-Centered Care. ABNF Journal , 1-7. Retrieved from Chamberlain College of Nursing: http://web.b.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu Pepper's, L. &. (2014). Conceptual Bases of Professional Nursing. In L. J. Hood, Conceptual Bases of Professional Nursing (p. 625). Kansas City, Missouri: Wolters Kluwer Health/ Lippicott-Raven & Wilkins.

Cite this page

Share with friends using:

Removal Request

Finished papers: 2096

This paper is created by writer with

If you want your paper to be:

Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate

Original, fresh, based on current data

Eloquently written and immaculately formatted

275 words = 1 page double-spaced

Get your papers done by pros!

Other Pages

Conviction reports, session reports, charter reports, adaptability reports, sphere reports, attribute reports, licensing reports, tunnel reports, suspension reports, competitor reports, spices business plans, waterbury essays, written communication essays, hipaa essays, personal hygiene essays, hiv virus essays, my job essays, the pursuit of happiness essays, the iliad essays, remote sensing essays, genetically modified food essays, john lewis essays, fast food restaurants essays, my neighbor totoro essays, there will be blood essays, free course work on o j simpsons trial, creative writing on about us, assertiveness test essay examples, how to date a man research paper sample, good example of racial and ethnic groups in us essay, sample research paper on medicating children and its effects on child development, the immigration policy in america essay samples, free research paper about greek and roman theater buildings, good example of report on memory consolidation, critical analysis s essay, sample essay on victims in criminal proceedings, the prices of food and drinks at sporting venues across the us and how to make them report sample, free the risk of teenage pregnancy among transitioning foster youth implication for article review example, free essay on football and basketball, sample research paper on role of social media in mobilization a case study of egypt spring revolution outline, sample essay on give an argument for legalizing active euthanasia and an argument against it, argument essay, good essay on sr international logistics inc.

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .

Now you can download documents directly to your device!

Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.

or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone

The sample is NOT original!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline

Essay on Importance of Communication for Students and Children

500+ words essay on importance of communication:.

Communication is one of the important tools that aid us to connect with people. Either you are a student or a working professional, good communication is something that will connect you far ahead. Proper communication can help you to solve a number of issues and resolve problems. This is the reason that one must know how to communicate well. The skills of communication essential to be developed so that you are able to interact with people. And able to share your thoughts and reach out to them. All this needs the correct guidance and self-analysis as well.

Meaning of Communication

The word communication is basically a process of interaction with the people and their environment . Through such type of interactions, two or more individuals influence the ideas, beliefs, and attitudes of each other.

Such interactions happen through the exchange of information through words, gestures, signs, symbols, and expressions. In organizations, communication is an endless process of giving and receiving information and to build social relationships.

Importance of Communication

Communication is not merely essential but the need of the hour. It allows you to get the trust of the people and at the same time carry better opportunities before you. Some important points are as follows –

Help to Build Relationships 

No matter either you are studying or working, communication can aid you to build a relationship with the people. If you are studying you communicate with classmates and teachers to build a relationship with them. Likewise in offices and organizations too, you make relationships with the staff, your boss and other people around.

Improve the Working Environment 

There are a number of issues which can be handled through the right and effective communication. Even planning needs communication both written as well as verbal. Hence it is essential to be good in them so as to fill in the communication gap.

Foster strong team

Communication helps to build a strong team environment in the office and other places. Any work which requires to be done in a team. It is only possible if the head communicates everything well and in the right direction.

Find the right solutions

Through communication, anyone can find solutions to even serious problems. When we talk, we get ideas from people that aid us to solve the issues. This is where communication comes into play. Powerful communication is the strength of any organization and can help it in many ways.

Earns more respect

If your communication skills are admirable, people will love and give you respect. If there is any problem, you will be the first person to be contacted. Thus it will increase your importance. Hence you can say that communications skills can make a big change to your reputation in society.

Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas

Don’t Go Overboard With Your Point

The conversation is about to express your thoughts. And to let the other person know what you feel. It is not mean to prove that your point is correct and the other person is wrong. Don’t Overboard other With Your Point.

Watch Your Words

Before you say something to Watch Your Words. At times, out of anger or anxiousness, we say somethings that we must not say. Whenever you are in a professional meeting or in some formal place, where there is a necessity of communicating about your product or work then it is advised to practice the same beforehand

Communication is the greatest importance. It is important to sharing out one’s thoughts and feelings to live a fuller and happier life. The more we communicate the less we suffer and the better we feel about everything around. However, it is all the more necessary to learn the art of effective communication to put across ones point well.

Customize your course in 30 seconds

Which class are you in.

• Travelling Essay
• Picnic Essay
• Our Country Essay
• My Parents Essay
• Essay on Favourite Personality
• Essay on Memorable Day of My Life
• Essay on Knowledge is Power
• Essay on Gurpurab
• Essay on My Favourite Season
• Essay on Types of Sports

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download the App

634 Communication Essay Topics & Examples

If you’re searching for communication essay topics or examples, you’ve stumbled on the right page!