communication barriers in nursing essay

school Campus Bookshelves
menu_book Bookshelves
perm_media Learning Objects
login Login
how_to_reg Request Instructor Account
hub Instructor Commons
Download Page (PDF)
Download Full Book (PDF)
Periodic Table
Physics Constants
Scientific Calculator
Reference & Cite
Tools expand_more
Readability

selected template will load here

This action is not available.

3.7: Barriers to Effective Communication

Last updated
Save as PDF
Page ID 49264

Nilgun Ulutasdemir Ed. and contributing authors

Maureen Nokuthula Sibiya
Gümüşhane University via IntechOpen

Effective communication skills and strategies are important for nurses. Clear communication means that information is conveyed effectively between the nurse, patients, family members and colleagues. However, it is recognized that such skills are not always evident and nurses do not always communicate well with patients, family members and colleagues. The message sent may not be the message received. The meaning of a message depends on its literal meaning, the non-verbal indicators accompanying it and the context in which it is delivered. It is therefore, easy to misinterpret the message, or to interpret it correctly, but to decide not to pursue its hidden meaning this leads to obstruction to communication. Continuous barriers to effective communication brings about a gradual breakdown in relationships. The barriers to effective communication outlined below will help nurses to understand the challenges [ 8 ].

Language Barrier

Language differences between the patient and the nurse are another preventive factor in effective communication. When the nurse and the patient do not share a common language, interaction between them is strained and very limited [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Consequently, a patient may fail to understand the instructions from a nurse regarding the frequency of taking medication at home.

Cultural Differences

Culture is another hindrance. The patient’s culture may block effective nurse–patient interactions because perceptions on health and death are different between patients [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. The nurse needs to be sensitive when dealing with a patient from a different culture [ 9 , 15 , 16 ]. What is acceptable for one patient may not be acceptable for another. Given the complexity of culture, no one can possibly know the health beliefs and practices of every culture. The nurse needs check with the patient whether he/she prefers to be addressed by first name or surname. The use of eye contact, touching and personal space is different in various cultures and rules about eye contact are usually complex, varying according to race, social status and gender. Physical contact between sexes is strictly forbidden in some cultures and can include handshakes, hugging or placing a hand on the arm or shoulder. A ‘yes’ does not always mean ‘yes’. A smile does not indicate happiness, recognition or agreement. Whenever people communicate, there is a tendency to make value judgements regarding those perceived as being different. Past experiences can change the meaning of the message. Culture, background and bias can be good if they allow one to use past experiences to understand something new; it is when they change meaning of the message that they interfere with the communication process [ 12 ]. It is important for nurses to think about their own experiences when considering cultural differences in communication and how these can challenge health professionals and service users.

Conflict is a common effect of two or more parties not sharing common ground. Conflict can be healthy in that it offers alternative views and values. However, it becomes a barrier to communication when the emotional ‘noise’ detracts from the task or purpose. Nurses aim for collaborative relationships with patients, families and colleagues.

Setting in Which Care is Provided

The factors in care setting may lead to reduction in quality of nurse–patient communication. Increased workload and time constraints restrict nurses from discussing their patients concerns effectively [ 16 ]. Nurses work in busy environments where they are expected to complete a specific amount of work in a day and work with a variety of other professionals, patients and their families. The roles are hard, challenging and tiring. There is a culture to get the work done. Some nurses may consider colleagues who spend time talking with patients to be avowing the ‘real’ work and lazy. Nurses who might have been confident in spending time with patients in an area where this was valued, when faced with a task-orientated culture have the dilemma of fitting into the group or being outside the group and spending time engaging with patients. Lack of collaboration between the nurses and the doctors in information sharing also hinder effective communication. This leads to inconsistencies in the information given to patients making comprehension difficult for the patient and their families.

Internal Noise, Mental/Emotional Distress

Internal noise has an impact on the communication process. Fear and anxiety can affect the person’s ability to listen to what the nurse is saying. People with feelings of fear and anger can find it difficult to hear. Illness and distress can alter a person’s thought processes. Reducing the cause of anxiety, distress, and anger would be the first step to improving communication.

If a healthcare professional feels that the person is talking too fast, not fluently, or does not articulate clearly etc., he/she may dismiss the person. Our preconceived attitudes affect our ability to listen. People tend to listen uncritically to people of high status and dismiss those of low status.

Difficulty With Speech and Hearing

People can experience difficulty in speech and hearing following conditions like stroke or brain injury. Stroke or trauma may affect brain areas that normally enable the individual to comprehend and produce speech, or the physiology that produces sound. These will present barriers to effective communication.

Medication can have a significant effect on communication for example it may cause dry mouth or excess salivation, nausea and indigestion, all of which influence the person’s ability and motivation to engage in conversation. If patients are embarrassed or concerned that they will not be able to speak properly or control their mouth, they could be reluctant to speak.

Equipment or environmental noise impedes clear communication. The sender and the receiver must both be able to concentrate on the messages they send to each other without any distraction.

Open access
Published: 03 September 2021

A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward

Abukari Kwame 1 &
Pammla M. Petrucka 2

BMC Nursing volume 20 , Article number: 158 ( 2021 ) Cite this article

314k Accesses

140 Citations

96 Altmetric

Metrics details

Providing healthcare services that respect and meet patients’ and caregivers’ needs are essential in promoting positive care outcomes and perceptions of quality of care, thereby fulfilling a significant aspect of patient-centered care requirement. Effective communication between patients and healthcare providers is crucial for the provision of patient care and recovery. Hence, patient-centered communication is fundamental to ensuring optimal health outcomes, reflecting long-held nursing values that care must be individualized and responsive to patient health concerns, beliefs, and contextual variables. Achieving patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient clinical interactions is complex as there are always institutional, communication, environmental, and personal/behavioural related barriers. To promote patient-centered care, healthcare professionals must identify these barriers and facitators of both patient-centered care and communication, given their interconnections in clinical interactions. A person-centered care and communication continuum (PC4 Model) is thus proposed to orient healthcare professionals to care practices, discourse contexts, and communication contents and forms that can enhance or impede the acheivement of patient-centered care in clinical practice.

Peer Review reports

Providing healthcare services that respect and meet patients’ and their caregivers’ needs are essential in promoting positive care outcomes and perceptions of quality of care, thus constituting patient-centered care. Care is “a feeling of concern for, or an interest in, a person or object which necessitates looking after them/it” [ 1 ]. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) noted that to provide patient-centered care means respecting and responding to individual patient’s care needs, preferences, and values in all clinical decisions [ 2 ]. In nursing care, patient-centered care or person-centered care must acknowledge patients’ experiences, stories, and knowledge and provide care that focuses on and respects patients’ values, preferences, and needs by engaging the patient more in the care process [ 3 ]. Healthcare providers and professionals are thus required to fully engage patients and their families in the care process in meaningful ways. The IOM, in its 2003 report on Health Professions Education , recognized the values of patient-centered care and emphasized that providing patient-centered care is the first core competency that health professionals’ education must focus on [ 4 ]. This emphasis underscored the value of delivering healthcare services according to patients’ needs and preferences.

Research has shown that effective communication between patients and healthcare providers is essential for the provision of patient care and recovery [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Madula et al. [ 6 ], in a study on maternal care in Malawi, noted that patients reported being happy when the nurses and midwives communicated well and treated them with warmth, empathy, and respect. However, other patients said poor communication by nurses and midwives, including verbal abuse, disrespect, or denial from asking questions, affected their perceptions of the services offered [ 6 ]. Similarly, Joolaee et al. [ 9 ] explored patients’ experiences of caring relationships in an Iranian hospital where they found that good communication between nurses and patients was regarded as “more significant than physical care” among patients.

According to Boykins [ 10 ], effective communication is a two-way dialogue between patients and care providers. In that dialogue, both parties speak and are listened to without interrupting; they ask questions for clarity, express their opinions, exchange information, and grasp entirely and understand what the others mean. Also, Henly [ 11 ] argued that effective communication is imperative in clinical interactions. He observed that health and illness affect the quality of life, thereby making health communication critical and that the “intimate and sometimes overwhelming nature of health concerns can make communicating with nurses and other healthcare providers very challenging” [ 11 ]. Furthermore, Henly [ 11 ] added that patient-centered communication is fundamental to ensuring optimal health outcomes, reflecting long-held nursing values that care must be individualized and responsive to patient health concerns. Given the prevalence of face-to-face and device-mediated communications and interactions in healthcare settings, we must explore and clarify who, what, where, when, why, and how interactions with individuals, families, and communities are receiving care and health services [ 11 ].

The value of effective communication in nurse-patient clinical interactions cannot be overemphasized, as “research has shown that communication processes are essential to more accurate patient reporting and disclosure” [ 12 ]. Respectful communication between nurses and patients can reduce uncertainty, enhance greater patient engagement in decision making, improve patient adherence to medication and treatment plans, increase social support, safety, and patient satisfaction in care [ 12 , 13 ]. Thus, effective nurse-patient clinical communication is essential to enhancing patient-centered care and positive care outcomes.

Patient-centered communication, also known as person-centered communication or client-centered communication, is defined as a process that invites and encourages patients and their families to actively participate and negotiate in decision-making about their care needs, as cited in [ 7 ]. Patient-centered communication is crucial in promoting patient-centered care and requires that patients and their caregivers engage in the care process. As McLean [ 14 ] observed, patient-centered care can be enhanced through patient-centered communication by valuing patients’ dignity and rights. Through open communication and collaboration, where information and care plans are shared among care providers, patients, and their families, care provision becomes patient-centered [ 14 ].

Given the interconnected nature of patient-centered care and communication, we must identify the barriers and enablers of patient-centered care and communication and proposed efficient ways to enhance that because patient-centered communication is essential in achieving patient-centered care. Our aim in this paper is to identify the barriers and facilitators of patient-centered care and communication and propose and present a patient-centered care and communication continuum (PC4) Model to explain how patient-centered care can be enhanced in nurse-patient clinical interactions. As Grant and Booth argued, critical reviews are often used to present, analyse, and synthesized research evidence from diverse sources, the outcome of which is a hypothesis or a model as an interpretation of existing data to enhance evidence-based practice [ 15 ]. Thus, this critical literature review study explores the questions: what are the barriers and facilitators of patient-centered care and how can patient-centered care be enhanced through effective clinical communication?

An earlier version of this study was submitted as part of author AK’s doctoral comprehensive exams in February 2021. An interdisciplinary doctoral committee recommended many of the included literature and the questions explored in this study based on the current discourse of patient-centered care advocated for in many healthcare facilities and in recognition of the universal healthcare access objective of the health sustainable development goal. Additional searches for literature were conducted between September and November 2020 using keywords such as barriers and facilitators of nurse-patient interaction, patient-centered care, patient-centered communication , and nurse-patient communication . Databases searched included CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar. Included studies in this critical review were empirical research on nurse-patient interactions in different care settings published in English and open access. All relevant articles were read, and their main findings relevant to our review questions were identified and organized into themes and subthemes discussed in this paper. Other published studies were read, and together with those that addressed the review question, a model was developed regarding how to enhance patient-centered care through effective communication.

Barriers to Patient-Centered Care and Communication

Nurses constitute a significant workforce of care providers whose practices can severely impact care outcomes (both positive and negative). Nurses spend much time with patients and their caregivers. As a result, positive nurse-patient and caregiver relationships are therapeutic and constitute a core component of care [ 9 , 13 ]. In many instances, nurses serve as translators or patients’ advocates, in addition to performing their primary care duties. Although good nurse-patient relationships positively impact nurse-patient communication and interaction, studies have shown that several factors impede these relationships with significant consequences on care outcomes and quality [ 6 , 16 , 17 ]. Thus, these barriers limit nurses’ and other care providers’ efforts to provide healthcare that meets patients’ and caregivers’ needs. We categorize the barriers to patient-centered care and communication into four kinds: institutional and healthcare system-related, communication-related, environment-related, and personal and behaviour-related barriers. Although these barriers are discussed in separate subheadings, they are interlinked in complex ways during clinical practice.

Institutional and Healthcare System Related Barriers

Many barriers to providing patient-centered care and communication during nurse-patient interactions emanate from healthcare institutional practices or the healthcare system itself. Some of these factors are implicated in healthcare policy or through management styles and strategies.

Shortage of nursing staff, high workload, burnout, and limited-time constituted one complex institutional and healthcare system-level barrier to effective care delivery [ 18 , 19 ]. For instance, Loghmani et al. [ 20 ] found that staffing shortages prevented nurses from having adequate time with patients and their caregivers in an Iranian intensive care unit. Limitations in nursing staff, coupled with a high workload, led to fewer interactions between nurses, patients, and caregivers. Similarly, Anoosheh et al. [ 16 ] found that heavy nursing workload was ranked highest as a limiting factor to therapeutic communication in nurse-patient interactions in Iran.

In a study on communication barriers in two hospitals affiliated with Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Norouzinia et al. [ 21 ] found that shortage of nurses, work overload, and insufficient time to interact with patients were significant barriers to effective nurse-patient interactions. Similar factors are identified as barriers to nurse-patient communication and interactions in other studies [ 13 , 16 , 18 ]. For instance, Amoah et al. [ 16 ] reported that nursing staff shortage and high workload were barriers to patient-centered care and therapeutic communication among Ghanaian nurses and patients. Amoah and colleagues reported a patient’s statement that:

[B]ecause there are few nurses at the ward, sometimes you would want a nurse to attend to you, but he or she might be working on another patient, so in such case, the nurse cannot divide him or herself into two to attend to you both [ 16 ].

Nurses and patients and their caregivers have noted that limited time affects nurse-patient interactions, communication, and care quality. Besides, Yoo et al. [ 22 ] reported that limited visiting hours affected communications between caregivers and nurses in a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea. Since the caregivers had limited time to spend with patients, they had little knowledge about the intensive care unit and distrusted the nurses.

Although nursing staff shortage is a significant barrier to patient-centered care and communication that healthcare institutions and managers must know, some healthcare scholars have critique nurses’ complaints of time limitation. For instance, McCabe [ 7 ] argued that the quality of nurse-patient interactions is what matters and not the quantity of time spent with patients and their caregivers. McCabe maintained that “spending long periods with patients does not always result in positive nurse-patient relationships” [ 7 ]. He argued that implementing patient-centered care does not require additional time; hence, nurses’ perceptions of being too busy cannot excuse poor therapeutic communication during clinical interactions. Instead, nurses are encouraged to develop self-awareness, self-reflection, and a commitment to ensuring that patients receive the needed care.

Another institution-related barrier to patient-centered care and communication is the healthcare system’s emphasis on task-centered care. Care providers are more focused on completing care procedures than satisfying patients’ and caregivers’ needs and preferences. This barrier to patient-centered care and communication is acknowledged in several studies [ 7 , 14 , 20 , 22 , 23 ]. For example, McLean [ 14 ] studied dementia care in nursing homes in the United States. She found that patient-centered care and communication in one nursing home (Snow I) were severely affected when nurses, physicians, and care managers focused on completing tasks or observing care and institutional routines to the detriment of satisfying patients’ care needs. However, in the other care home (Snow II), patient-centered care was enhanced as nurses, physicians, and the care home managers focused on addressing patients’ needs and values rather than completing care routines and tasks.

Similarly, Yoo and colleagues [ 22 ] observed that nurse-patient communication was affected when the ICU nurses placed urgency on completing tasks linked directly to patients’ health (e.g., stabilizing vital signs) than communicating to addressed patients’ specific needs. This evidence shows that when nurses are more task-focused, patients and caregivers are treated as bodies and objects, on which medical and care practices must be performed to restore health. Research has shown that when nurses focus on task-oriented care, it becomes hard to provide holistic care to patients or teach and communicate with patients even when nurses are less busy [ 20 ].

Nursing managers and their management styles can affect patient-centered care and communication. Studies have revealed that the management styles that nursing managers implement can either facilitate or impede patient-centered care [ 14 , 22 ]. When nurse managers orient their nursing staff towards task-centered care practices, it affects nurse-patient interaction and communication. Moreover, when nurse managers fail to address their staff’s mental health needs and personal challenges, it influences how nurses attend to patients’ care needs. For example, nurses have indicated that nurse-patient communication is affected when nurse managers are unsupportive or unresponsive to their needs [ 20 ].

In a study exploring nursing and midwifery managers’ perspectives on obstacles to compassion giving and therapeutic care across 17 countries, Papadopoulos et al. [ 24 ] discovered that nurses and midwifery managers’ characteristics and experiences could facilitate or impede compassion and therapeutic interactions in nursing care. Negative personal attitudes, including selfishness, arrogance, self-centeredness, rudeness, lack of leadership skills, the desire for power, and feelings of superiority among nurses and midwifery managers, were obstacles to compassion building. The study further showed that managers who emphasize rules, tasks, and results do not prioritize relationship-building and see their staff as workers rather than team members [ 24 ]. Therefore, nurse managers and care administrators must monitor nurse-patient interaction and communication to address nurses’ concerns and support them, especially in resource-constrained and high patient turnover contexts [ 25 , 26 ].

Communication-Related Barriers

Effective communication is essential to providing patient-centered care. Studies have shown that poor communication between care providers and patients and their caregivers affects care outcomes and perceptions of care quality [ 7 , 16 , 27 , 28 ]. A consistent communication-related barrier in nurse-patient interaction is miscommunication, which often leads to misunderstandings between nurses, patients, and their families [ 20 ]. Other communication-related barriers include language differences between patients and healthcare providers [ 6 , 16 , 27 ], poor communication skills, and patients’ inability to communicate due to their health state, especially in ICU, dementia, or end-of-life care contexts [ 13 , 22 ]. For instance, in their maternity care study, Madula et al. [ 6 ] noted that language barriers significantly affected effective communication between nurses/midwives and expectant mothers. A patient in their study indicated that although many nurses were polite and communicated well, some nurses had challenges communicating with patients in the Chitumbuka language, which affected those nurses’ ability to interact effectively with patients [ 6 ].

Furthermore, Norouzinia et al. [ 21 ] asserted that effective communication could not be established when nurses and patients have a language difference. Moreover, the meanings of certain non-verbal communication acts (e.g., head nodding, eye gaze, touch) can invoke different interpretations across different cultures, which could impede the interactions between patients and nurses. Even in healthcare contexts where nurses and patients speak the same language, “differences in vocabulary, rate of speaking, age, background, familiarity with medical technology, education, physical capability, and experience can create a huge cultural and communication chasm” between nurses and patients [ 12 ]. In ICU and other similar care settings, nurses find it difficult to effectively communicate with patients because the mechanical ventilators made it hard for patients to talk [ 22 ].

To overcome the communication-related barriers, healthcare institutions must make it a responsibility to engage translators and interpreters to facilitate nurse-patient interactions where a language barrier exists. Moreover, nurses working in ICU and other similar settings should learn and employ alternative forms of communication to interact with patients.

Environment-Related Barriers

The environment of the care setting can impact nurse-patient communication and the resulting care. Thus, “good health care experiences start with a welcoming environment” [ 29 ]. Mastors believed that even though good medicine and the hands working to provide care and healing to the sick and wounded are essential, we must not “forget the small things: a warm smile, an ice chip, a warm blanket, a cool washcloth. A pillow flipped to the other side and a boost in bed” [ 29 ]. The environment-related barriers are obstacles within the care setting that inhibit nurse-patient interaction and communication and may include a noisy surrounding, unkept wards, and beds, difficulties in locating places, and navigating care services. Noisy surroundings, lack of privacy, improper ventilation, heating, cooling, and lighting in specific healthcare units can affect nurse-patient communication. These can prevent patients from genuinely expressing their healthcare needs to nurses, which can subsequently affect patient disclosure or make nursing diagnoses less accurate [ 13 , 18 , 21 ]. For instance, Amoah et al. [ 16 ] revealed that an unconducive care environment, including noisy surroundings and poor ward conditions, affected patients’ psychological states, impeding nurse-patient relationships and communication. Moreover, when care services are not well-coordinated, new patients and their caregivers find it hard to navigate the care system (e.g., locating offices for medical tests and consultations), which can constrain patient-centered care and communication.

Reducing the environment-related barriers will require making the care setting tidy/clean, less noisy, and coordinating care services in ways that make it easy for patients and caregivers to access. Coordinating and integrating care services, making care services accessible, and promoting physical comfort are crucial in promoting patient-centered care, according to Picker’s Eight Principles of Patient-Centered Care [ 30 ].

Personal and Behaviour Related Barriers

The kind of nurse-patient relationships established between nurses and patients and their caregivers will affect how they communicate. Since nurses and patients may have different demographic characteristics, cultural and linguistic backgrounds, beliefs, and worldviews about health and illnesses, nurses’, patients’, and caregivers’ attitudes can affect nurse-patient communication and care outcomes. For instance, differences in nurses’ and patients’ cultural backgrounds and belief systems have been identified as barriers to therapeutic communication and care [ 12 , 13 , 21 ]. Research shows that patients’ beliefs and cultural backgrounds affected their communication with nurses in Ghana [ 16 ]. These scholars found that some patients refused a blood transfusion, and Muslim patients refused female nurses to attend to them because of their religious beliefs [ 16 ]. Further, when nurses, patients, or their caregivers have misconceptions about one another due to past experiences, dissatisfaction about the care provided, or patients’ relatives and caregivers unduly interfere in the care process, nurse-patient communication and patient-centered care were affected [ 16 , 21 ].

Similarly, nurse-patient communication was affected when patients or caregivers failed to observe nurses’ recommendations or abuse nurses due to misunderstanding [ 20 ], while patients’ bad attitudes or disrespectful behaviours towards nurses can inhibit nurses’ ability to provide person-centered care [ 31 ]. The above-reviewed studies provided evidence on how patients’ and caregivers’ behaviours can affect nurses’ ability to communicate and deliver patient-centered care.

On the other hand, nurses’ behaviours can also profoundly affect communication and care outcomes in the nurse-patient dyad. When nurses disrespect, verbally abuse (e.g., shouting at or scolding), and discriminate against patients based on their social status, it affects nurse-patient communication, care outcomes, and patient disclosure [ 6 , 32 ]. For instance, Al-Kalaldeh et al. [ 18 ] believe that nurse-patient communication is challenged when nurses become reluctant to hear patients’ feelings and expressions of anxiety. When nurses ignore patients’ rights to share ideas and participate in their care planning, such denials may induce stress, discomfort, lack of trust in nurses, thereby leading to less satisfaction of care [ 18 ].

Furthermore, when nurses fail to listen to patients’ and caregivers’ concerns, coerce patients to obey their rules and instructions [ 16 , 17 , 20 ], or fail to provide patients with the needed information, nurse-patient communication and patient-centered care practices suffer. To illustrate, in Ddumba-Nyanzia et al.‘s study on communication between HIV care providers and patients, a patient remarked that: “I realized no matter how much I talked to the counselor, she was not listening. She was only hearing her point of view and nothing else, [and] I was very upset” [ 17 ]. This quote indicates how care provider attitudes can constrain care outcomes. Due to high workload, limited time, poor remunerations, and shortage of personnel, some nurses can develop feelings of despair, emotional detachment, and apathy towards their job, which can lead to low self-esteem or poor self-image, with negative consequences on nurse-patient interactions [ 13 , 18 ].

Given the significance of effective communication on care, overcoming the above personal and behaviour related barriers to patient-centered care and communication is crucial. Nurses, patients, and caregivers need to reflect on the consequences of their behaviours on the care process. Thus, overcoming these barriers begins with embracing the facilitators of patient-centered care and communication, which we turn to in the next section.

Facilitators of patient-centered care and communication

Patient-centered care and communication can be facilitated in several ways, including building solid nurse-patient relationships.

First, an essential facilitator of patient-centered care and communication is overcoming practical communication barriers in the nurse-patient dyad. Given the importance of communication in healthcare delivery, nurses, patients, caregivers, nursing managers, and healthcare administrators need to ensure that effective therapeutic communication is realized in the care process and becomes part of the care itself. Studies have shown that active listening among care providers is essential to addressing many barriers to patient-centered care and communication [ 7 , 13 ]. Although handling medical tasks promptly in the care process is crucial, the power of active listening is critical, meaningful, and therapeutic [ 22 ]. By listening to patients’ concerns, nurses can identify patients’ care needs and preferences and address their fears and frustrations.

Another facilitator of patient-centered care is by understanding patients and their unique needs [ 25 ], showing empathy and attending attitudes [ 7 , 13 ], expressing warmth and respect [ 22 ], and treating patients and caregivers with dignity and compassion as humans. For instance, McCabe [ 7 ] noted that attending, which obligates nurses to demonstrate that they are accessible and ready to listen to patients, is a patient-centered care process; a fundamental requirement for nurses to show genuineness and empathy, despite the high workload. Showing empathy, active listening, respect, and treating patients with dignity are core to nursing and care, and recognized in the Code of Ethics for Nurses [ 33 ], and further emphasized in the ongoing revision of the Code of Ethics for nurses [ 34 ].

Besides, engaging patients and caregivers in the care process through sharing information, inviting their opinion, and collaborating with them constitutes another facilitator of patient-centered care and communication. When patients and caregivers are engaged in the care process, misunderstandings and misconceptions are minimized. When information is shared, patients and caregivers learn more about their health conditions and the care needed. As McLean [ 14 ] argued, ensuring open communication between care providers and patients and their families is essential to enhancing patient-centered care. Conflicts ensue when patients or their families are denied information or involvement in the care process. As a result, the Harvard Medical School [ 30 ] identified patient engagement, information sharing, and nurse-patient collaboration during care as essential patient-centered care principles.

Finally, health policy must be oriented towards healthcare practices and management to facilitate patient-centered care and communication. These policies, at a minimum, can involve changes in management styles within healthcare institutions, where nurse managers and healthcare administrators reflect on nursing and care practices to ensure that the Code of Ethics of Nurses and patients’ rights are fully implemented. Resource constraints, staff shortages, and ethical dilemmas mainly affect care practices and decision-making. Nonetheless, if patients are placed at the center of care and treated with dignity and respect, most of the challenges and barriers of patient-centered care will diminish. Empowering practicing nurses, equipping them with interpersonal communication skills through regular in-service training, supporting them to overcome their emotional challenges, and setting boundaries during nurse-patient interactions will enhance patient-centered care practices.

In line with the above discussion, Camara et al. [ 25 ] identify three core dimensions that nurses, patients, and caregivers must observe to enhance patient-centered care: treating the patient as a person and seeing the care provider as a person and a confidant. Regarding the first dimension, care providers must welcome patients, listen to them, share information with them, seek their consent, and show them respect when providing care. The second dimension requires that the healthcare provider be seen and respected as a person, and negative perceptions about care providers must be demystified. According to Camara et al. [ 25 ], care providers must not overemphasize their identities as experts but rather establish good relationships with patients to understand patients’ personal needs and problems. Lastly, patients and caregivers must regard care providers as confidants who build and maintain patients’ trust and encourage patients’ participation in care conversations. With this dimension, patients and caregivers must know that nurses and other care providers have the patient at heart and work to meet their care needs and recovery process.

Camara et al.‘s [ 25 ] three dimensions are essential and position patients, their caregivers, and nurses as partners who must engage in dialogic communication to promote patient-centered care. As a result, effective communication, education, and increased health literacy among patients and caregivers will be crucial in that direction.

Enhancing Patient-Centered Care and Communication: A Proposed Model

Nursing care practices that promote patient-centered communication will directly enhance patient-centered care, as patients and their caregivers will actively engage in the care process. To enhance patient-centered communication, we propose person-centered care and communication continuum (PC4) as a guiding model to understand patient-centered communication, its pathways, and what communication and care practices healthcare professionals must implement to achieve person-centered care. In this PC4 Model, we emphasize the person instead of the patient because they are a person before becoming a patient. Moreover, the PC4 Model is supposed to apply to all persons associated with patient care; thus, respect for the dignity of their personhood is crucial.

Although much is written about patient-centered communication in the healthcare literature, there is a gap regarding its trajectory and what communication content enhances patient-centered communication. Also, little is known about how different clinical discourse spaces influence communication and its content during nurse-patient clinical interactions. Using evidence from Johnsson et al. [ 3 ], Murira et al. [ 23 ], and Liu et al. [ 35 ], among other studies, we outline the components of the PC4 Model and how different discourse spaces in the clinical setting and the content of communication impact patient-centered care and communication.

The proposed PC4 Model in this paper has three unbounded components based on the purpose of and how communication is performed among care providers, patients, and their caregivers. Figure 1 illustrates the PC4 Model, its features, and trajectory.

A Person-Centered Care and Communication Continuum (PC4 Model)

Task-Centered Communication

At the lowest end of the PC4 Model is task-centered communication. Here, the care provider’s role is to complete medical tasks as fast as possible with little or no communication with the patient and their caregivers. Patients and caregivers are treated as bodies or objects whose disease symptoms need to be studied, identified, recorded, treated, or cured. As Johnsson et al. [ 3 ] observed, communication content at this stage is mainly biomedically oriented, where nurses and other healthcare professionals focus on the precise medical information (e.g., history taking, medical examination, test results, medication, etc.) about the patient. With a task-centered orientation, nurses make journal entries about their patients’ disease state and ensure that treatment plans, diagnostic tests, and medical prescriptions are completed. Communication at this stage is often impersonal or rigid (see [ 23 ] for details). Care providers may address patients and their caregivers by using informal attributes (e.g., bed 12, the woman in the red shirt, card 8, etc.), thereby ignoring patients’ and caregivers’ personal and unique identities. Patients’ and caregivers’ nonverbal communication signs are mostly overlooked.

Motivations for task-centered communication can be attributed to time limitation, high workload, and staff shortage, thereby pushing nurses and other care providers to reach as many patients as possible. Moreover, the healthcare system’s orientation towards and preference for biomedically-focused care seems to favour task-centered communication [ 7 , 14 ].

Depending on the clinical discourse space under which patient-provider interactions occur, different forms of communication are employed. Clinical discourse spaces can be public (e.g., in the ward, patient bedside), private (e.g., consulting rooms, medical test labs, nurse staff station, etc.), or semi-private (e.g., along the corridor) [ 35 ]. In these clinical discourse spaces, nurse-patient communication can be uninformed (patients or caregivers are not informed about patients’ care conditions or why specific data and routines are performed). It can be non-private (others can hear what the nurse and patient are talking about) or authoritative (care providers demonstrate power and control and position themselves as experts) [ 23 ]. Finally, in task-centered communication, healthcare providers often use medical jargon or terminologies [ 3 ] since the goal of communication is not to engage the patient in the process. Usually, patients or their caregivers are not allowed to ask questions, or their questions get ignored or receive superficial, incomprehensible responses.

Process-Centered Communication

Process-centered communication is an intermediate stage on the continuum, which could slip back into the task-centered or leap forward into person-centered communication. Through process-centered communication, care providers make an effort to know patients and their caregivers as they perform care routines. Care providers ask patients or their caregivers questions to understand the care conditions but may not encourage patients or caregivers to express their thoughts about their care needs. Patients and caregivers are recognized as persons with uniques care needs but may not have the agency to influence the care process. Care providers may chit-chat with patients or their caregivers to pass the time as they record patients’ medical records or provide care. Unlike task-centered communication, there is informative and less authoritative communication between nurses and patients and their caregivers. The goal of process-centered communication could be a mixture of instrumental and relational, with less display of power and control by nurses.

Person-Centered Communication

This is the highest point of the PC4 Model, where patient-centered care is actualized. At this stage of the communication continuum, patients and caregivers are treated as unique persons with specific care needs and are seen as collaborators in the care process. As McLean [ 14 ] observed, caregiving becomes a transactional relationship between the care provider and receiver at the person-centered stage of the continuum. The care itself becomes intersubjective, a mutual relational practice, and an ongoing negotiation for care providers and receivers [ 14 ].

The content of communication at this stage of the continuum is both “personal” and “explanatory” [ 3 ]. Nurses and other healthcare providers create meaningful relationships with patients and their caregivers, understand patients’ concerns, needs, and problems, use open-ended questions to encourage patients or caregivers to express their thoughts and feelings about the care situation. Nurses and other healthcare professionals explain care routines, patients’ health conditions, and management plans in lay language to patients and caregivers through person-centered communication. Accomplishing this level includes employing alternative forms of communication to meet the needs of intensive care unit patients, deaf patients, and ventilated and intubated patients. For instance, it has been shown that “deaf people […] frequently do not have access to clear and efficient communication in the healthcare system, which deprives them of critical health information and qualified health care” [ 36 ]. Empathetic communication practices, including active listening, showing genuine interest in patients’ care, and respect and warmth, become a significant part of nursing care [ 3 , 7 , 14 , 22 ].

Different communication strategies are employed based on the care situation and context. Chit-chatting, as a form of personal communication [ 3 ], use of humor as a communication strategy [ 7 , 8 ], and even maintaining silence [ 28 ] are essential in enhancing person-centered care and communication. Both care providers and patients or their caregivers use relationship-building and -protecting humor (see [ 28 ] for details) to address difficult situations in the care process.

Implications of the PC4 Model for Nursing Practice

Given the values of effective communication in nurse-patient interactions and care outcomes, nurses and other healthcare providers must ensure that they develop therapeutic relationships with patients, their families, and caregivers to promote person-centered care and communication. Achieving that begins with knowing and reflecting on the barriers of therapeutic communication and ways to minimize them. The PC4 Model draws nurses and all healthcare providers’ attention to patient-centered care pathways and how effective communication is necessary. Healthcare professionals, including nurses, must be aware of how their communication orientation–––either oriented toward completing tasks, following care processes or toward addressing patients’ and their caregivers’ needs––can impact patient-centered care. Healthcare providers must observe the care context, patients’ unique situations, their non-verbal language and action, and whether they belong to historically marginalized groups or cultures.

Mastors [ 29 ] has offered healthcare providers some guidance to reflect on as they communicate and interact with patients and caregivers. Thus, (a) instead of asking patients, “What’s the matter?“ care providers must consider asking them, “What’s important to you?“ With this question, the patient is given a voice and empowered to contribute to their own care needs. Care providers should (b) check with patients in the waiting room to update patients whose waiting time has been longer than usual, based on the care context. They should also (c) try to remember their conversations with patients to build on them during subsequent interactions. This continuity can be enhanced by nurse managers reexamining how they deploy care providers to patients. The same nurse can be assigned to the same patients for the duration of the patient’s stay to help patients feel valued and visible [ 29 ].

Knowledge of cultural competence, sensitivity, humility, and interpersonal communication skills will help achieve and implement the PC4 Model. As Cuellar [ 37 ] argues, “[h]umility is about understanding and caring for all people [and] being empathetic.“ Cultural competence is a “dynamic process of acquiring the ability to provide effective, safe, and quality care to the patients through considering their different cultural aspects” [ 38 ]. The concept of cultural competence entails “cultural openness, awareness, desire, knowledge and sensitivity” during care [ 39 ]. It demands that care providers respect and tailor care to align with patients’ and caregivers’ values, needs, practices, and expectations, based on care and moral ethics and understanding [ 39 ]. Active listening and showing compassion as therapeutic relationship-building skills are essential, and continuous education and mentorship will be crucial to developing these skills among healthcare providers.

We invite qualitative and quantitative studies, especially on language use and communication strategies, to explore and evaluate the PC4 Model. Providing in-depth and experiential data on ways to increase its effectiveness as a tool to guide healthcare providers is highly desired. More knowledge can support healthcare providers in offering evidence-based patient-centered care in different healthcare settings and units.

Conclusions

Effective communication is an essential factor in nurse-patient interactions and a core component of nursing care. When communication in the nurse-patient dyad is patient-centered, it becomes therapeutic. It allows for trust and mutual respect in the care process, thereby promoting care practices that address patients’ and caregivers’ needs, concerns, and preferences. We have identified the barriers and facilitators of patient-centered care and communication and proposed a person-centered care and communication continuum (PC4 Model) to demonstrate how patient-centered communication intersects with patient-centered care.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

Intensive Care Unit

Institution of Medicine

Person-Centered Care and Communication Continuum

Etheredge HR. “Hey sister! Where’s my kidney?“ Exploring ethics and communication in organ transplantation in Gauteng, South Africa, Ph.D. dissertation, Johannesburg. University of the Witwatersrand; 2015.

Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press; 2001.

Johnsson A, Wagman P, Boman A, Pennbrant S. What are they talking about? Content of the communication exchanges between nurses, patients and relatives in a department of medicine for older people: An ethnographic study. J Clin Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(7–9):e1651-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14315 .

Long KA. The Institute of Medicine report on health professions education: A bridge to quality. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2003 Nov;4(4):259–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154403258304 .

Crawford T, Candlin S, Roger P. (2017). New perspectives on understanding cultural diversity in nurse-patient communication. Collegian, 2017 Feb 1;24(1):63 – 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2015.09.001 .

Madula P, Kalembo WF, Yu H, Kaminga CA. Healthcare provider-patient communication: A qualitative study of women’s perceptions during childbirth. Reprod Health. 2018 Dec;15(135):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0580-x .

McCabe C. Nurse-patient communication: An exploration of patients’ experiences. J Clin Nurs. 2004 Jan;13(1):41–9.

Schöpf AC, Martin GS, Keating MA. Humor as a communication strategy in provider-patient communication in a chronic care setting. Qual Health Res. 2017 Feb;27(3):374–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315620773 .

Joolaee S, Joolaei A, Tschudin V, Bahrani N, Nikbakht NA. Caring relationship: the core component of patients’ rights practice as experienced by patients and their companions. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2010;3(4):1–7.

Google Scholar

Boykins AD. Core communication competences in patient-centered care. The ABNF J. 2014 Apr 1;25(2):40 – 5.

Henly SJ. Health communication research for nursing science and practice. Nurs Res [Editorial] 2016:257–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000171 .

Ruben BD. Communication theory and health communication practice: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Health Commun. 2016 Jan 2;31(1):1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.923086 .

Bello P. Effective communication in nursing practice: A literature review. BSc Nursing Thesis. Arcada; 2017. Available at https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84798372.pdf Accessed 20 Jan 2021.

McLean A. The person in dementia: A study of nursing home care in the US. Toronto, University of Toronto Press; 2007.

Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libraries J. 2009;26:91–108. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x .

Article Google Scholar

Amoah KMV, Anokye R, Boakye SD, Acheampong E, Budu-Ainooson A, Okyere E, Kumi-Boateng G, Yeboah C, Afriyie OJ. A qualitative assessment of perceived barriers to effective therapeutic communication among nurses and patients. BMC Nurs. 2019 Dec;18(4)1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0328-0 .

Ddumba-Nyanzia I, Kaawa-Mafigiria D, Johannessen H. Barriers to communication between HIV care providers (HCPs) and women living with HIV about childbearing: A qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May 1:99(5):754–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.023 .

Al-Kalaldeh M, Amro N, Qtait M. Barriers to effective nurse-patient communication in the emergency department. Emerg Nurse. 2021 Mar 2;29(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.7748/en.2020.e1969 .

Sethi D, Rani MK. Communication barrier in health care setting as perceived by nurses and patient. Int J Nurs Educ 2017 Oct. 2016;9(4):30. doi: https://doi.org/10.5958/j.2320-8651.2.1.001 .

Loghmani L, Borhani F, Abbaszadeh A. Factors affecting the nurse-patients’ family communication in intensive care unit of Kerman: A qualitative study. J Caring Sci. 2014 Mar;3(1):67–2. doi: https://doi.org/10.5681/jcs.2014.008 .

Norouzinia R, Aghabarari M, Shiri M, Karimi M, Samami E. Communication barriers perceived by nurses and patients. Glob J Health Sci. 2016 Jun;8(6):65–4. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n6p65 .

Yoo HJ, Lim OB, Shim JL. Critical care nurses’ communication experiences with patients and families in an intensive care unit: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0235694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235694 .

Murira N, Lützen K, Lindmark G, Christensson K. Communication patterns between healthcare providers and their clients at an antenatal clinic in Zimbabwe. Health Care Women Int. 2003 Feb 1;24(2):83 – 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330390170060 .

Papadopoulos I, Lazzarino R, Koulouglioti C, Aagard M, Akman O, Alpers L-M, Apostolara P, Araneda Bernal J, Biglete-Pangilinan S, Eldar-Regev O, Gonzalez-Gil MT, Kouta C, Zorba A. Obstacles to compassion-giving among nursing and midwifery managers: An international study. Int Nurs Rev. 2020 Aug;11:1–13.

Camara BS, Belaid L, Manet H, Kolie D, Guilard E, Bigirimana T, Delamou A. What do we know about patient-provider interactions in sub-Saharan Africa? A scoping review. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;88(88):1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.37.88.24009 .

Kwame A, Petrucka PM. Communication in nurse-patient interaction in healthcare settings in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2020 Jan 1;12:100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100198 .

Anoosheh M, Zarkhah S, Faghihzadeh S, Vaismoradi M. Nurse-patient communication barriers in Iranian nursing. Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Jun;56(2):243–9.

Vuković M, Gvozdenović BS, Stamatović-Gajić B, Ilić M, Gajić T. Development and evaluation of the nurse quality of communication with patient questionnaire. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010;138(1–2):79–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.2298/SARH1002079V .

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Mastors P. (2018). What do patients want, need, and have the right to expect? Nurs Adm Q. 2018 Jul 1;42(3):192-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000297 .

Harvard Medical School. The Eight Principles of Patient Centered Care; 2015 Nov 18. Available from OneView: https://www.oneviewhealthcare.com/the-eight-principles-of-patient-centered-care/ Accessed 28 Dec 2020.

White J, Phakoe M, Rispel LC. ‘Practice what you preach’: Nurses’ perspectives on the Code of Ethics and Service Pledge in five South African hospitals. Glob Health Action. 2015 Dec 1;8(1):26341. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.26341 .

Kruger L-M, Schoombee C. The other side of caring: abuse in a South African maternity ward. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2010 Feb 1;28(1):84–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830903294979 .

International Council of Nurses. ICN Code of Ethics for Nurses; 2012. Available from www.icn.ch/images/stories/documents/about/icncode_english.pdf . Accessed 20 Dec 2020.

Stievano A, Tschudin V. The ICN code of ethics for nurses: A time for revision. Nurs Health Policy Perspect. 2019 Jun;66(2):154–6.

Liu W, Manias E, Gerdtz M. Medication communication during ward rounds on medical wards: Power relations and spatial practices. Health 2012 Mar. 2012;17(2):113–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459312447257 .

Hoglind TA. Healthcare language barriers affect deaf people, too. 2018 Oct 11. Retrieved from Boston University [BU] School of Public Health: Available from https://www.bu.edu/sph/news/articles/2018/healthcare-language-barriers-affect-deaf-people-too/ Accessed 15 Jan 2021.

Cuellar NG. Humility. A concept in cultural sensitivity. JTranscult Nurs [Editorial]. 2018 Apr 26; 29(4):317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659618772384 .

Sharifi N, Adib-Hajbaghery M, Najafi M. Cultural competence in nursing: A concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Nov 1;99(103386):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103386 .

Henderson S, Horne M, Hills R, Kendall E. Cultural competence in healthcare in the community: A concept analysis. Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jul;26(4):590–603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12556 .

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the first author’s doctoral committee members for their valuable comments, suggestions, and critique of an earlier version of this paper. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for the insightful comments and suggestions that have helped us improve the study’s quality.

Authors' information

Abukari Kwame is a Ph.D. candidate in Interdisciplinary Studies in the College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, University of Saskatchewan, interested in patients' rights in nurse-patient clinical communications and interactions in the hospital setting. He holds two Master of Philosophy degrees in Indigenous Studies and English Linguistics. Abukari's research interests include language use in social interaction, health communication, First/Second language acquisition, African traditional medical knowledge, and Indigenous and qualitative research methodologies.

Pammla M. Petrucka is a professor in Nursing and has international research experience with many of her graduate students from Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean. Pammla has published extensively in the field of nursing. Her research interests are vast, including child and maternal health, Indigenous peoples' health, global health, and vulnerable populations, with extensive experiences in qualitative research and indigenous research methodologies. Pammla is co-editor of the BMC Nursing journal and a reviewer for many other academic journals.

The authors have not received any funding for the conduct, preparation, and publication of this paper.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

Abukari Kwame

College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Regina Campus, Regina, Canada

Pammla M. Petrucka

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors conceived the topic. PMP recommended the literature, AK searched and added more sources, and drafted the paper. PMP reviewed the paper for intellectual content. Both AK and PMP read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abukari Kwame .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Kwame, A., Petrucka, P.M. A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nurs 20 , 158 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2

Download citation

Received : 05 May 2021

Accepted : 18 August 2021

Published : 03 September 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Patient-centered care
Therapeutic communication
Nurse-patient interactions
Clinical discourse space
Patient-centered care and communication continuum

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

General enquiries: [email protected]

Barriers to Effective Communication Analytical Essay

Communication is the process through which information is transferred from the sender the receiver via a given medium. Under normal circumstance, the expectation is that the receiver will successfully decode the message and send it back to the sender as feedback (Mehrabian, 1971, p. 9).

In order to operate at an efficient level, all organizations need effective communication. On the other hand, workplace communication has not always been easy. This is because the workplace constitutes individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds and aspirations (Mehrabian, 1971, p. 15).

It is the wish of every organization therefore that effective communication would thrive in the working environment. However, there are various challenges that might be encountered in the process. If at all we wish to achieve effective communication, there is need to convey information in a clear and unambiguous manner. This means that there should be no distortion of messages.

On the other hand, if your message is not well received then you are facing a barrier to effective communication. These barriers to effective communication have always acted as roadblocks to our personal and professional lives (Barnlund, 2008, p. 19).

An effective communication barrier remains one of the greatest challenges that organizations have to encounter in their day- to- day operations. It has been proven that there is a 50% to 70 % loss of meaning to messages conveyed from one individual or group of individuals to another (Barnlund, 2008, p. 25).

This therefore helps to explain why there are various barriers to effective communication in any given organization. These barriers may vary from different organizations in relation to how they handle communication. They include; physical barriers, emotions, language, lack of subject knowledge and stress.

Physical barrier to communication can be viewed from different perspectives. It may be in the form of a large working area that is physically separated from the other (Barnlund, 2008, p. 28). As a matter of fact, it will not be easy for communication to take place because on most occasions, individuals may end up not relaying their messages well.

There are also other distractions that may cause physical barriers in a given organization, such as noise. Noise does not allow effective communication to thrive because there will be a lot of distractions that may lead to distortion (Mehrabian, 1971, p. 23). The environment might not facilitate effective communication in a broad perspective. This can be the office environment an individual is exposed to, such as the allocation of tasks and other things.

Language becomes a barrier to effective communication when people cannot understand each other while communicating (Berlo, 1997, p. 18). This is especially the case when there is an inability to converse in a language that is understood by both the sender and the receiver within an organization. People can sometimes write or speak in a language that is not understood well by another individual and this means that there will be some misunderstanding in as far as communication is concerned.

There should be a common language either in written or spoken from, and such a common language should be understood by everybody within the organization. Although this can be achieved, nevertheless, it has been complicated by the fact that there are some organizations that operate on a global market. Such organizations are normally exposed to different language and cultural backgrounds that end up hindering effective communication in a broad way (Berlo, 1997, p. 25).

Emotions have also proved to be a barrier to effective communication in different perspectives of an organization. If one’s emotions are engrossed he/she will not be in a good position to express or converse in an understandable way, and this will create a big misunderstanding (Schramm, 1994, p. 11). In such a situation, one will have a big problem in understanding what others are saying or still they will not be in a good position to listen carefully to what is being communicated.

Emotional interferences vary from individual to individual depending on their personalities. In some scenarios, it might be necessary for organizations to ensure that they understand their employees well and in the process come up with good mechanisms that will facilitate communication (Schramm, 1994, p. 18).

Lack of subject knowledge has also come out as a barrier to effective communication in different ways. It is quite obvious that if one is not in a good position to understand a subject knowledge, he will not be able to convey or explain what a particular message was meant or intended for. If both the receiver and sender are not in a position to understand the subject knowledge, then it is obvious that they will not communicate well and this will be a barrier to their communication (Berlo, 1997, p. 35).

Stress has also been mentioned as a barrier to effective communication in many organizations. It is undeniable that an individual may not communicate well if he/she is under stress. Employees might be subjected to stress depending on the tasks that they have been assigned to accomplish. This means that if an employee is under a lot of stress he/she might find it hard to understand a message and this will lead to distortion (Schramm, 1994, p. 23).

It can be explained that in times of stress, our psychological frame of mind will depend on different things. This can be our experiences, beliefs, values and goals which may make us not to realize the essence of effective communication (Schramm, 1994, p. 29). All these barriers to effective communication must be deal with for organizations and the society to reap the full benefits of communication. An effective and active listening process seems like the only remedy to triumphing over barriers to effective communication.

Effective listening

Possession of the right skills of listening acts as the foundation to becoming a good listener. This means that they should strive to become effective listeners. Effective listening can not be done concurrently with speaking but should be enhanced for good communication to take place (Handel, 1989. P. 12).

There is need for one to cultivate the right skills of listening through being quite attentive at social engagements and in conversations in order to achieve maximum benefits. In any given society, most people prefer talking to listening. There is a common feeling that people will prefer to be approved, understood and appreciated from what they say rather than what others say (Handel, 1989. P. 16).

Conversely, speaking helps individuals to express their thoughts and desires. People will always see a lot of advantages in speaking rather than listening to what others are saying (Handel, 1989. P. 18). The importance of listening has therefore been ignored save for academic and professional fields (Schramm, 1994, p. 31).

It is important to cultivate the right direction that will guide us on when to talk and listen. Effective listening should be cultivated not out of fear of speaking but the desire to have good communication skills. It should be understood that we don’t listen to impress others but rather to have a good understanding of the individuals we are communicating with.

People who are good in communication have always attested to the fact that it is very important to listen than to talk. When an individual listens attentively, he/she will be in a good position to understand the situations at hand, people and the world around thereby forming a good opinion and judgment. This will result in good communication that will enhance our relations (Handel, 1989. P. 22).

To achieve effective listening, we must be able to concentrate on what others are saying. On the other hand, we must also be in a good position to send a non verbal message that we are actually interested in what others are saying and in real sense listening to it (Handel, 1989. P. 26). In addition, it also necessary that we avoid early evaluations when people are talking so that we can listen to them well and get what they really meant.

Effective listening demands that individuals avoid being defensive when they are conversing. This will enable them to listen to each other well and enhance communication. It is also good to practice paraphrasing so that you can easily give out information that will be understood by the recipient (Handel, 1989. P. 28). This can also be enhanced by listening for feelings that will enable us to have a good judgment.

Reference List

Barnlund, D. C. (2008). A transactional model of communication . New Jersey: Transaction.

Berlo, D. K. (1997). The process of communication . New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

Handel, S. (1989) Listening: An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent Messages . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Schramm, W. (1994). How communication works: The process and effects of communication. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

Chicago (A-D)
Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2023, December 18). Barriers to Effective Communication. https://ivypanda.com/essays/barriers-to-effective-communication/

"Barriers to Effective Communication." IvyPanda , 18 Dec. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/barriers-to-effective-communication/.

IvyPanda . (2023) 'Barriers to Effective Communication'. 18 December.

IvyPanda . 2023. "Barriers to Effective Communication." December 18, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/barriers-to-effective-communication/.

1. IvyPanda . "Barriers to Effective Communication." December 18, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/barriers-to-effective-communication/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Barriers to Effective Communication." December 18, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/barriers-to-effective-communication/.

Non-Verbal Communication: Sender to Receiver Effectiveness
Journalism: Message Distortion in Articles
The Implications of False Memory and Memory Distortion
Common Barriers to Effective Communication
Organizational Communication and Its Definition
Historical Distortion in Broken Arrow by Frank Manchel
Theories of Communication: Observed Event
Communication, Its Definition and Reasons
What One Key Issue Hinders Sustainable Organizational Performance?
The Process of E-Communication
Seven Habits of High Successful People by Stephen Covey
Successful Business Communication: Chapter Overview
Factors Influencing Communication in Organizations Research Paper
Lessons from a Course on Online Business Communication
Impact of Culture on Communication Reflective Essay

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Publications
Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

Advanced Search
Journal List

A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward

Abukari kwame.

1 College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

Pammla M. Petrucka

2 College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Regina Campus, Regina, Canada

Associated Data

Not applicable.

Research has shown that effective communication between patients and healthcare providers is essential for the provision of patient care and recovery [ 5 – 8 ]. Madula et al. [ 6 ], in a study on maternal care in Malawi, noted that patients reported being happy when the nurses and midwives communicated well and treated them with warmth, empathy, and respect. However, other patients said poor communication by nurses and midwives, including verbal abuse, disrespect, or denial from asking questions, affected their perceptions of the services offered [ 6 ]. Similarly, Joolaee et al. [ 9 ] explored patients’ experiences of caring relationships in an Iranian hospital where they found that good communication between nurses and patients was regarded as “more significant than physical care” among patients.

Barriers to Patient-Centered Care and Communication

Institutional and Healthcare System Related Barriers

[B]ecause there are few nurses at the ward, sometimes you would want a nurse to attend to you, but he or she might be working on another patient, so in such case, the nurse cannot divide him or herself into two to attend to you both [ 16 ].

Communication-Related Barriers

Environment-Related Barriers

Personal and Behaviour Related Barriers

Facilitators of patient-centered care and communication

Patient-centered care and communication can be facilitated in several ways, including building solid nurse-patient relationships.

Enhancing Patient-Centered Care and Communication: A Proposed Model

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 12912_2021_684_Fig1_HTML.jpg

A Person-Centered Care and Communication Continuum (PC4 Model)

Task-Centered Communication

Process-Centered Communication

Person-Centered Communication

Implications of the PC4 Model for Nursing Practice

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Authors' information

Abbreviations

Authors’ contributions.

The authors have not received any funding for the conduct, preparation, and publication of this paper.

Availability of data and materials

Declarations.

Not Applicable.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Essay on Barriers To Effective Communication

Students are often asked to write an essay on Barriers To Effective Communication in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Barriers To Effective Communication

Introduction.

Communication is a key part of our lives. It’s how we share ideas, feelings, and information. But sometimes, things can get in the way of clear communication. These obstacles are called barriers to effective communication.

Physical Barriers

Physical barriers are things like distance, noise, or poor technology. If you’re trying to talk to someone far away, or in a loud place, it can be hard to hear and understand them. Bad phone or internet connection can also make communication difficult.

Language Barriers

Sometimes, people don’t speak the same language. This can make it hard to communicate. Even if you both speak the same language, different accents or use of slang can create misunderstandings.

Emotional Barriers

Emotions can also be a barrier. If someone is upset, angry, or scared, they might not be able to communicate clearly. They might also misunderstand what others are trying to say.

Cultural Barriers

Different cultures have different ways of communicating. What might be polite in one culture could be rude in another. These differences can lead to confusion and misunderstandings.

Recognizing these barriers is the first step to better communication. With understanding and patience, we can work to overcome these obstacles and communicate more effectively.

250 Words Essay on Barriers To Effective Communication

Understanding communication.

Communication is the process of sharing or exchanging information, ideas, or feelings. It plays a key role in our daily lives. But sometimes, we face problems in communicating effectively. These problems are known as barriers to effective communication.

Physical barriers are the first type of barriers. They include distance, noise, or any other physical hindrance that stops the message from being delivered or understood. For instance, a loud noise in the background can make it hard for someone to hear what another person is saying.

Language barriers happen when people speak different languages or use complex words that others cannot understand. If the receiver doesn’t understand the language or words used by the sender, the message will not be understood.

Emotional barriers occur when people’s feelings or emotions stop them from understanding the message. If a person is angry, upset, or stressed, they might not understand or interpret the message correctly.

Cultural barriers come into play when people from different cultures communicate. Different cultures have different ways of communicating, and this can lead to misunderstandings.

Overcoming Barriers

To overcome these barriers, we can use simple language, make sure the environment is suitable for communication, try to understand others’ feelings, and respect different cultures. By doing this, we can communicate more effectively.

In conclusion, understanding and overcoming these barriers can make our communication more effective. It helps us to share our ideas and feelings more clearly and makes our daily lives easier.

500 Words Essay on Barriers To Effective Communication

Communication is like a bridge that connects people. It allows us to share ideas, feelings, and information. But sometimes, this bridge can have problems. These problems are called barriers to effective communication.

Physical barriers are the first type of problem. These can be anything that stops the message from reaching the other person. For example, if you are trying to talk to someone in a noisy room, they might not hear you. This is a physical barrier. Other examples include distance, poor lighting, or bad signal on your phone.

The second type of barrier is language. If two people don’t speak the same language, they can’t understand each other. Even if they do speak the same language, they might use different words or phrases. This can cause confusion. For example, in English, the word “biscuit” means different things in the UK and the US.

Emotional barriers are the third type. These happen when feelings get in the way of communication. For example, if someone is angry, they might not listen to what you’re saying. Or if they’re scared, they might not speak up. Emotions can make it hard to send or receive messages clearly.

The fourth type of barrier is cultural. Different cultures have different ways of communicating. What is polite in one culture might be rude in another. For example, in some cultures, it’s rude to make eye contact. In others, it’s a sign of respect. These differences can cause misunderstandings.

Personal Barriers

The last type of barrier is personal. These are things like beliefs, attitudes, or prejudices. For example, if someone believes that all teenagers are lazy, they might not listen to a teenager’s ideas. This is a personal barrier.

In conclusion, effective communication can face many barriers. These include physical, language, emotional, cultural, and personal barriers. By understanding these, we can work to overcome them. This will help us to build stronger bridges of communication with others. This is important because good communication helps us to understand each other better. It helps us to solve problems, make decisions, and build relationships. So, let’s all try to break down these barriers and communicate more effectively.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

Essay on Bargaining
Essay on Barbie Doll
Essay on Basketball Passion

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

communication barriers in nursing essay

IMAGES

VIDEO

COMMENTS

3.7: Barriers to Effective Communication

Language Barrier

Cultural Differences

Setting in Which Care is Provided

Internal Noise, Mental/Emotional Distress

Difficulty With Speech and Hearing

A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward

Barriers to Patient-Centered Care and Communication

Institutional and Healthcare System Related Barriers

Communication-Related Barriers

Environment-Related Barriers

Personal and Behaviour Related Barriers

Facilitators of patient-centered care and communication

Enhancing Patient-Centered Care and Communication: A Proposed Model

Task-Centered Communication

Process-Centered Communication

Person-Centered Communication

Implications of the PC4 Model for Nursing Practice

Conclusions

Availability of data and materials

Abbreviations

Acknowledgments

Authors' information

Author information

Contributions

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Additional information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Share this article

BMC Nursing

Barriers to Effective Communication Analytical Essay

Effective listening

Reference List

A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward

Pammla M. Petrucka

Associated Data

Barriers to Patient-Centered Care and Communication

Institutional and Healthcare System Related Barriers

Communication-Related Barriers

Environment-Related Barriers

Personal and Behaviour Related Barriers

Facilitators of patient-centered care and communication

Enhancing Patient-Centered Care and Communication: A Proposed Model

Task-Centered Communication

Process-Centered Communication

Person-Centered Communication

Implications of the PC4 Model for Nursing Practice

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Authors' information

Abbreviations

Availability of data and materials

Essay on Barriers To Effective Communication

100 Words Essay on Barriers To Effective Communication

Physical Barriers

Language Barriers

Emotional Barriers

Cultural Barriers

250 Words Essay on Barriers To Effective Communication

Overcoming Barriers

500 Words Essay on Barriers To Effective Communication

Personal Barriers

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

IMAGES

VIDEO

COMMENTS