action research topics for esl teachers

• Search Menu
• Advance articles
• Editor's Choice
• Key Concepts
• The View From Here
• Author Guidelines
• Submission Site
• Open Access
• Why Publish?
• About ELT Journal
• Editorial Board
• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network
• Self-Archiving Policy
• Dispatch Dates
• Terms and Conditions
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

• < Previous

Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching. A Guide for Practitioners

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

Simon Borg, Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching. A Guide for Practitioners, ELT Journal , Volume 65, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages 485–487, https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr052

• Permissions Icon Permissions

Anne Burns has been strongly associated with action research (AR) in ELT for several years and this volume draws on the wealth of her accumulated experience in explaining and illustrating what AR is and how to do it. Designed as a practical introduction for pre-service and in-service teachers, the book opens with a chapter entitled ‘What is action research?’ and then deals in turn with the different stages in a typical AR cycle: planning (Chapter 2), acting (Chapter 3), observing (Chapter 4), and reflecting (Chapter 5). The volume concludes with a postscript containing two full examples of AR reports and a section with further reading and resources. The discussion is helpfully supported throughout with pre-reading questions, reflection points, and ‘classroom voices’: actual examples of AR and of teachers talking about their experiences as action researchers. The writing is very accessible throughout.

Chapter 1 starts by exploring what AR is and AR's concern with the understanding of local contexts is rightfully emphasized. The distinction between AR and ‘teacher research’ more generally is an issue that could have been explored further in order to help readers see that AR offers practitioners (in various disciplines, not just teaching) one way of studying their own contexts. Other forms of teacher research exist, though, and what defines AR from these is the cyclical nature of its processes, as Burns elaborates on throughout this book. In Chapter 1, reference is also made to what is perhaps the most common reason English language teachers give for not engaging in research (see Borg 2009 ), a lack of time. Teachers clearly need strategies for integrating AR into their work so that it minimizes the extra burden it will create and here too, I would have welcomed more concrete advice on how teachers might achieve this. In fact, one overall observation about the text is that while it does an excellent job of explaining how teachers might go about the various stages in AR, less is said about how the kinds of conditions that support AR might be created in teachers’ workplaces. Clearly, unless such conditions exist teachers will struggle to apply the very practical suggestions this book offers.

Chapter 2 moves on to consider the first stage of the AR cycle, planning. Building on a point introduced in Chapter 1, here we read that ‘The starting point for AR is identifying a problem you want to focus on’ (p. 22). Burns takes time to explain that her use of ‘problem’ here does not imply deficient teaching, but none the less the repeated references to the search for a problem may perhaps outweigh such explanations. Would perhaps referring to the focus of AR as an ‘issue’ avoid possible negative associations altogether? The challenges of finding a focus are discussed in detail and an excellent list of starter questions to help teachers define their focus is provided. This chapter on planning also covers the use of resources and in particular how to find literature. Burns takes readers through an example of searching the Eric database at http:// www.eric.ed.gov . I did not find this helpful given that Eric in many cases only provides abstracts, and readers may have been more usefully directed to a range of freely available full-text, online journals (for example Asian EFL Journal , TESL-EJ , English Teaching Forum, and Prospect ; the latter, while no longer published, still provides access to many good articles).

In Chapter 2, Burns also touches on the theme of collaboration. I expected this theme to feature strongly in the book given Burns’ earlier work ( Burns 1999 ), yet here she is strangely ambivalent, first acknowledging the limited attention she pays to it, then stating that it is ‘a much preferred way to do AR’ (p. 45), before going on to give some reasons why collaboration might not be effective. Readers, then, interested in a detailed discussion and illustration of collaborative AR will be better served by Burns’ earlier text.

Chapter 3 focuses on putting the plan into action. This substantial chapter accounts for about a quarter of the book and provides a very detailed account of different ways in which data can be collected. Using a distinction that has featured in her earlier work, Burns divides data collection strategies into two groups: observational and non-observational. This is a helpful division, though the parallel distinction she offers between ‘what I need to see’ (for observational strategies) and ‘what I need to know’ (for the non-observational) is, I feel, a less illuminating way of categorizing methods for collecting data.

This chapter is illustrated with many helpful examples of ‘classroom voices’, and these draw on a range of published examples of AR, particularly TESOL's Language Teacher Research series. However, the chapter is in essence a general overview of data collection strategies, i.e. there is nothing specific to AR about the material covered here (AR, after all, is not defined by particular data collection methods). This point is emphasized in the way that some of the classroom voices extracts in this chapter come from papers that are not actually examples of AR (for example Al-Fahdi 2006 ; Banda 2009 ). This does not reduce the value of these examples, but does highlight the fact that AR's distinctiveness lies in its overall purposes and processes rather than in how data are collected. This point is perhaps masked somewhat by the fact that so much of this book is about the technical side of AR.

Chapter 4 is entitled ‘Observe—observing the results of the plan’. The focus here is on analysing data and perhaps ‘observing the results of the action ’ would have been a more appropriate title. Once again Burns provides a detailed discussion of different ways of working with data and many concrete illustrations of these. Again, though, one does not get a sense of there being anything unique to AR about the material covered here; this is once more simply a reflection of the fact that AR is not characterized by any particular way of analysing data. Burns’ account is full, covering both qualitative and quantitative data. In places, the commentary becomes a bit heavier than it needs to for the intended audience (for example references to different ways of analysing discourse such as interactional sociolinguistics and to concepts such as ‘emic’ research) and some of the detail provided on quantitative analysis is perhaps of limited practical use to teachers doing research (for example medians, modes, and certainly the formula for calculating the standard deviation). I have some reservations again here about the extent to which the classroom voices used to illustrate ways of presenting data are actually AR (for example Al-Farsi 2006 on p. 123 is not, while the research questions from Malcolm 2009 on p. 119 are not particularly evocative of AR). The chapter ends with a very good section on enhancing quality in AR. This is an issue of paramount importance because poor quality research is a rather pointless exercise and it is essential that teachers engaging in AR appreciate that assuring quality in the work they do is critical to the value of the entire enterprise.

Chapter 5 focuses on reflecting and planning further action. The strength of this chapter lies in its excellent discussion of ways of sharing the findings of AR. In defining research of any type, I would always emphasize the fact that it needs to be shared (private inquiry, thus, is not research) and readers will find very helpful Burns’ discussion of a range of strategies through which AR can be publicized. The opening part of Chapter 5 though, is less effective. It covers various forms of reflection teachers can engage in through and as a result of AR, but the key issues are somewhat obscured here by references to a range of related concepts that are not really clarified; in the space of a few pages, we encounter ‘personal professional knowledge’ , ‘personal knowledge’ , ‘personal practical knowledge’ , ‘practical knowledge’ , and ‘practical theories’.

Overall, this volume is a welcome addition to the literature that aims to support teachers who are interested in (or who are required to) conduct systematic enquiries into their own work and certainly meets its goals of providing an accessible and practical introduction to AR for English language teachers. I have already noted specific additional issues I feel could have usefully been addressed. One additional point missing here is a discussion of (and possibly a response to) some common criticisms of AR. Dörnyei (2007: 191) , for example, claims that ‘there is one big problem with action research: there is too little of it’. I would have been interested in Burns’ response to this and other similarly critical assertions about AR.

Google Scholar

Google Preview

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

• Recommend to Your Library

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1477-4526
• Print ISSN 0951-0893
• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

• Help & FAQ

Doing action research in English language teaching: a guide for practitioners

• Aston Centre for Applied Linguistics (ACAL)
• School of Social Sciences and Humanities

Research output : Book/Report › Book

Publication series

• ESL teachers
• teacher educators outlines
• EFL teachers

Other files and links

• http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415991452/

Fingerprint

• action research Social Sciences 100%
• English language Social Sciences 93%
• Teaching Social Sciences 48%
• teacher Social Sciences 20%
• classroom Social Sciences 16%
• research process Social Sciences 15%
• educator Social Sciences 9%

T1 - Doing action research in English language teaching

T2 - a guide for practitioners

AU - Burns, Anne C.

PY - 2009/11/10

Y1 - 2009/11/10

N2 - This hands-on, practical guide for ESL/EFL teachers and teacher educators outlines, for those who are new to doing action research, what it is and how it works. Straightforward and reader friendly, it introduces the concepts and offers a step-by-step guide to going through an action research process, including illustrations drawn widely from international contexts. Specifically, the text addresses: •action research and how it differs from other forms of research •the steps involved in developing an action research project •ways of developing a research focus •methods of data collection •approaches to data analysis •making sense of action research for further classroom action. Each chapter includes a variety of pedagogical activities: •Pre-Reading questions ask readers to consider what they already know about the topic •Reflection Points invite readers to think about/discuss what they have read •action points ask readers to carry out action-research tasks based on what they have read •Classroom Voices illustrate aspects of action research from teachers internationally •Summary Points provide a synopsis of the main points in the chapter

AB - This hands-on, practical guide for ESL/EFL teachers and teacher educators outlines, for those who are new to doing action research, what it is and how it works. Straightforward and reader friendly, it introduces the concepts and offers a step-by-step guide to going through an action research process, including illustrations drawn widely from international contexts. Specifically, the text addresses: •action research and how it differs from other forms of research •the steps involved in developing an action research project •ways of developing a research focus •methods of data collection •approaches to data analysis •making sense of action research for further classroom action. Each chapter includes a variety of pedagogical activities: •Pre-Reading questions ask readers to consider what they already know about the topic •Reflection Points invite readers to think about/discuss what they have read •action points ask readers to carry out action-research tasks based on what they have read •Classroom Voices illustrate aspects of action research from teachers internationally •Summary Points provide a synopsis of the main points in the chapter

KW - ESL teachers

KW - teacher educators outlines

KW - EFL teachers

UR - http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415991452/

SN - 978-0-415-99145-2

SN - 978-0-415-99144-5

T3 - ESL &amp; Applied Linguistics Professional Series

BT - Doing action research in English language teaching

CY - New York

21 Action Research Examples (In Education)

Action research is an example of qualitative research . It refers to a wide range of evaluative or investigative methods designed to analyze professional practices and take action for improvement.

Commonly used in education, those practices could be related to instructional methods, classroom practices, or school organizational matters.

The creation of action research is attributed to Kurt Lewin , a German-American psychologist also considered to be the father of social psychology.

Gillis and Jackson (2002) offer a very concise definition of action research: “systematic collection and analysis of data for the purpose of taking action and making change” (p.264).

The methods of action research in education include:

• conducting in-class observations
• taking field notes
• surveying or interviewing teachers, administrators, or parents
• using audio and video recordings.

The goal is to identify problematic issues, test possible solutions, or simply carry-out continuous improvement.

There are several steps in action research : identify a problem, design a plan to resolve, implement the plan, evaluate effectiveness, reflect on results, make necessary adjustment and repeat the process.

Action Research Examples

• Digital literacy assessment and training: The school’s IT department conducts a survey on students’ digital literacy skills. Based on the results, a tailored training program is designed for different age groups.
• Library resources utilization study: The school librarian tracks the frequency and type of books checked out by students. The data is then used to curate a more relevant collection and organize reading programs.
• Extracurricular activities and student well-being: A team of teachers and counselors assess the impact of extracurricular activities on student mental health through surveys and interviews. Adjustments are made based on findings.
• Parent-teacher communication channels: The school evaluates the effectiveness of current communication tools (e.g., newsletters, apps) between teachers and parents. Feedback is used to implement a more streamlined system.
• Homework load evaluation: Teachers across grade levels assess the amount and effectiveness of homework given. Adjustments are made to ensure a balance between academic rigor and student well-being.
• Classroom environment and learning: A group of teachers collaborates to study the impact of classroom layouts and decorations on student engagement and comprehension. Changes are made based on the findings.
• Student feedback on curriculum content: High school students are surveyed about the relevance and applicability of their current curriculum. The feedback is then used to make necessary curriculum adjustments.
• Teacher mentoring and support: New teachers are paired with experienced mentors. Both parties provide feedback on the effectiveness of the mentoring program, leading to continuous improvements.
• Assessment of school transportation: The school board evaluates the efficiency and safety of school buses through surveys with students and parents. Necessary changes are implemented based on the results.
• Cultural sensitivity training: After conducting a survey on students’ cultural backgrounds and experiences, the school organizes workshops for teachers to promote a more inclusive classroom environment.
• Environmental initiatives and student involvement: The school’s eco-club assesses the school’s carbon footprint and waste management. They then collaborate with the administration to implement greener practices and raise environmental awareness.
• Working with parents through research: A school’s admin staff conduct focus group sessions with parents to identify top concerns.Those concerns will then be addressed and another session conducted at the end of the school year.
• Peer teaching observations and improvements: Kindergarten teachers observe other teachers handling class transition techniques to share best practices.
• PTA surveys and resultant action: The PTA of a district conducts a survey of members regarding their satisfaction with remote learning classes.The results will be presented to the school board for further action.
• Recording and reflecting: A school administrator takes video recordings of playground behavior and then plays them for the teachers. The teachers work together to formulate a list of 10 playground safety guidelines.
• Pre/post testing of interventions: A school board conducts a district wide evaluation of a STEM program by conducting a pre/post-test of students’ skills in computer programming.
• Focus groups of practitioners : The professional development needs of teachers are determined from structured focus group sessions with teachers and admin.
• School lunch research and intervention: A nutrition expert is hired to evaluate and improve the quality of school lunches.
• School nurse systematic checklist and improvements: The school nurse implements a bathroom cleaning checklist to monitor cleanliness after the results of a recent teacher survey revealed several issues.
• Wearable technologies for pedagogical improvements; Students wear accelerometers attached to their hips to gain a baseline measure of physical activity.The results will identify if any issues exist.
• School counselor reflective practice : The school counselor conducts a student survey on antisocial behavior and then plans a series of workshops for both teachers and parents.

Detailed Examples

1. cooperation and leadership.

A science teacher has noticed that her 9 th grade students do not cooperate with each other when doing group projects. There is a lot of arguing and battles over whose ideas will be followed.

So, she decides to implement a simple action research project on the matter. First, she conducts a structured observation of the students’ behavior during meetings. She also has the students respond to a short questionnaire regarding their notions of leadership.

She then designs a two-week course on group dynamics and leadership styles. The course involves learning about leadership concepts and practices . In another element of the short course, students randomly select a leadership style and then engage in a role-play with other students.

At the end of the two weeks, she has the students work on a group project and conducts the same structured observation as before. She also gives the students a slightly different questionnaire on leadership as it relates to the group.

She plans to analyze the results and present the findings at a teachers’ meeting at the end of the term.

2. Professional Development Needs

Two high-school teachers have been selected to participate in a 1-year project in a third-world country. The project goal is to improve the classroom effectiveness of local teachers. 

The two teachers arrive in the country and begin to plan their action research. First, they decide to conduct a survey of teachers in the nearby communities of the school they are assigned to.

The survey will assess their professional development needs by directly asking the teachers and administrators. After collecting the surveys, they analyze the results by grouping the teachers based on subject matter.

They discover that history and social science teachers would like professional development on integrating smartboards into classroom instruction. Math teachers would like to attend workshops on project-based learning, while chemistry teachers feel that they need equipment more than training.

The two teachers then get started on finding the necessary training experts for the workshops and applying for equipment grants for the science teachers.

3. Playground Accidents

The school nurse has noticed a lot of students coming in after having mild accidents on the playground. She’s not sure if this is just her perception or if there really is an unusual increase this year.  So, she starts pulling data from the records over the last two years. She chooses the months carefully and only selects data from the first three months of each school year.

She creates a chart to make the data more easily understood. Sure enough, there seems to have been a dramatic increase in accidents this year compared to the same period of time from the previous two years.

She shows the data to the principal and teachers at the next meeting. They all agree that a field observation of the playground is needed.

Those observations reveal that the kids are not having accidents on the playground equipment as originally suspected. It turns out that the kids are tripping on the new sod that was installed over the summer.

They examine the sod and observe small gaps between the slabs. Each gap is approximately 1.5 inches wide and nearly two inches deep. The kids are tripping on this gap as they run.

They then discuss possible solutions.

4. Differentiated Learning

Trying to use the same content, methods, and processes for all students is a recipe for failure. This is why modifying each lesson to be flexible is highly recommended. Differentiated learning allows the teacher to adjust their teaching strategy based on all the different personalities and learning styles they see in their classroom.

Of course, differentiated learning should undergo the same rigorous assessment that all teaching techniques go through. So, a third-grade social science teacher asks his students to take a simple quiz on the industrial revolution. Then, he applies differentiated learning to the lesson.

By creating several different learning stations in his classroom, he gives his students a chance to learn about the industrial revolution in a way that captures their interests. The different stations contain: short videos, fact cards, PowerPoints, mini-chapters, and role-plays.

At the end of the lesson, students get to choose how they demonstrate their knowledge. They can take a test, construct a PPT, give an oral presentation, or conduct a simulated TV interview with different characters.

During this last phase of the lesson, the teacher is able to assess if they demonstrate the necessary knowledge and have achieved the defined learning outcomes. This analysis will allow him to make further adjustments to future lessons.

5. Healthy Habits Program

While looking at obesity rates of students, the school board of a large city is shocked by the dramatic increase in the weight of their students over the last five years. After consulting with three companies that specialize in student physical health, they offer the companies an opportunity to prove their value.

So, the board randomly assigns each company to a group of schools. Starting in the next academic year, each company will implement their healthy habits program in 5 middle schools.

Preliminary data is collected at each school at the beginning of the school year. Each and every student is weighed, their resting heart rate, blood pressure and cholesterol are also measured.

After analyzing the data, it is found that the schools assigned to each of the three companies are relatively similar on all of these measures.

At the end of the year, data for students at each school will be collected again. A simple comparison of pre- and post-program measurements will be conducted. The company with the best outcomes will be selected to implement their program city-wide.

Action research is a great way to collect data on a specific issue, implement a change, and then evaluate the effects of that change. It is perhaps the most practical of all types of primary research .

Most likely, the results will be mixed. Some aspects of the change were effective, while other elements were not. That’s okay. This just means that additional modifications to the change plan need to be made, which is usually quite easy to do.

There are many methods that can be utilized, such as surveys, field observations , and program evaluations.

The beauty of action research is based in its utility and flexibility. Just about anyone in a school setting is capable of conducting action research and the information can be incredibly useful.

Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Gillis, A., & Jackson, W. (2002). Research Methods for Nurses: Methods and Interpretation . Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.

Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of SocialIssues, 2 (4), 34-46.

Macdonald, C. (2012). Understanding participatory action research: A qualitative research methodology option. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 13 , 34-50. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v13i2.37 Mertler, C. A. (2008). Action Research: Teachers as Researchers in the Classroom . London: Sage.

Dave Cornell (PhD)

Dr. Cornell has worked in education for more than 20 years. His work has involved designing teacher certification for Trinity College in London and in-service training for state governments in the United States. He has trained kindergarten teachers in 8 countries and helped businessmen and women open baby centers and kindergartens in 3 countries.

• Dave Cornell (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/dave-cornell-phd/ 25 Positive Punishment Examples
• Dave Cornell (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/dave-cornell-phd/ 25 Dissociation Examples (Psychology)
• Dave Cornell (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/dave-cornell-phd/ 15 Zone of Proximal Development Examples
• Dave Cornell (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/dave-cornell-phd/ Perception Checking: 15 Examples and Definition

Chris Drew (PhD)

This article was peer-reviewed and edited by Chris Drew (PhD). The review process on Helpful Professor involves having a PhD level expert fact check, edit, and contribute to articles. Reviewers ensure all content reflects expert academic consensus and is backed up with reference to academic studies. Dr. Drew has published over 20 academic articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education and holds a PhD in Education from ACU.

• Chris Drew (PhD) #molongui-disabled-link 25 Positive Punishment Examples
• Chris Drew (PhD) #molongui-disabled-link 25 Dissociation Examples (Psychology)
• Chris Drew (PhD) #molongui-disabled-link 15 Zone of Proximal Development Examples
• Chris Drew (PhD) #molongui-disabled-link Perception Checking: 15 Examples and Definition

2 thoughts on “21 Action Research Examples (In Education)”

Where can I capture this article in a better user-friendly format, since I would like to provide it to my students in a Qualitative Methods course at the University of Prince Edward Island? It is a good article, however, it is visually disjointed in its current format. Thanks, Dr. Frank T. Lavandier

Hi Dr. Lavandier,

I’ve emailed you a word doc copy that you can use and edit with your class.

Best, Chris.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

• Professional development
• Knowing the subject
• Teaching Knowledge database A-C

Action research

Action research is a development tool for a teacher that involves observing or gathering other data about a class through interviews, case studies, and questionnaires.

A teacher can establish a cycle of identifying problems, planning changes in response, implementing changes and gathering and analysing data to evaluate the implementation. Action research can be used to help general development or to resolve specific problems with teaching or learners.

Example A teacher has problems with giving feedback to learners on speaking problems and decides to record their classes. They then analyse the recordings to identify more effective ways of correction. They implement changes based on this, and collect data to analyse whether feedback is now more useful to learners.

In the classroom Peer observations, learner and teacher diaries, audio and video recordings, case studies, questionnaires and interviews with learners are all methods that can be used to gather data for action research.

Further links:

https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/action-research

https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/action-research-easy-1-2-3

https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/action-research-panel-discussion

https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/a-handbook-exploratory-action-research

https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/action-research-stop-start-continue

Research and insight

Browse fascinating case studies, research papers, publications and books by researchers and ELT experts from around the world.

See our publications, research and insight

Second Handbook of English Language Teaching pp 1–15 Cite as

Action Research in English Language Teaching: Contributions and Recent Developments

• Anne Burns 2  
• Living reference work entry
• First Online: 27 November 2018

1258 Accesses

1 Citations

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Action research, as part of a more general movement toward “teacher research,” has become increasingly prevalent in the field of English language teaching (ELT) over the last two decades. It can be considered as a form of professional learning for language teachers which takes a socioconstructivist approach in which teachers are seen as agentive actors within their own social contexts. After providing an account of the conceptual features of action research and a brief overview of its origins, this chapter considers how it relates to other forms of research in ELT. It outlines the development of action research within the field of English language teaching. It then considers what various studies have shown about the impact of conducting action research on teachers. The chapter also considers some of the more recent initiatives that have contributed to the spread of this form of research in the field of English language teaching.

• Action research
• Teacher research
• Language teaching
• Professional development
• Teacher education

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Allwright D (1988) Observation in the language classroom. Longman, London

Google Scholar  

Allwright D (1997) Quality and sustainability in teacher-research. TESOL Q 31(2):368–370

Article   Google Scholar  

Allwright D, Bailey K (1991) Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Allwright D, Hanks J (2009) The developing language learner: an introduction to exploratory practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

Book   Google Scholar  

Anderson GL, Herr K, Nihlen AS (1994) Studying your own school: an educator’s guide to qualitative practitioner research. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks

Argyris C, Schön D (1991) Participatory action research and action science compared: a commentary. In: Whyte WF (ed) Participatory action science. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 85–98

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Auerbach E (1994) Participatory action research. TESOL Q 28(4):693–697

Bailey K (1998) Approaches to empirical research in instructional settings. In: Byrnes H (ed) Perspectives in research and scholarship in second language teaching. The Modern Language Association of America, New York, pp 123–178

Bailey K (2001) Action research, teacher research, and classroom research in language teaching. In: Celce-Murcia M (ed) Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 3rd edn. Heinle & Heinle, Boston, pp 489–498

Bailey K, Omaggio-Hadley A, Magnan S, Swaffer J (1991) Research in the 1990s: focus on theory building, instructional innovation and collaboration. Foreign Lang Ann 24:89–100

Bennett CK (1993) Teacher-researchers: all dressed up and no place to go? Educ Leadersh 51(2):69–70

Borg S (2013) Teacher research in language teaching. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Borg S (2015) Professional development through the Cambridge English/English UK Action Research Scheme. Res Notes 61:3–5

Breen MP, Candlin CN (1980) The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Appl Linguis 1:89–112

Brindley G (1990) Towards a research agenda for TESOL. Prospect 6(1):7–26

Brumfit C, Mitchell R (1989) The language classroom as a focus for research. In: Brumfit C, Mitchell R (eds) Research in the language classroom. ELT Documents 133. Modern English Publications and The British Council, London, pp 3–15

Burns A (1999) Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Burns A (2007) Action research: contributions and future directions in ELT. In: Cummins J, Davison C (eds) The international handbook of English language teaching. Springer, New York, pp 987–1002

Burns A (2010) Doing action research in English language teaching: a guide for practitioners. Routledge, New York

Burns A (2011) Action research in the field of second language teaching and learning. In: Hinkel E (ed) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, vol II. Routledge, New York, pp 237–253

Burns A (in press) Action research: developments, characteristics and future directions. In: Benati A, Schwieter JW (eds) The Cambridge handbook of language learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Burns A, Khalifa H (eds) (2017) Second language assessment and action research. SiLT series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Burns A, Dikilitaş K, Smith R, Wyatt M (eds) (2017) Developing insights into teacher-research. IATEFL, Faversham. Downloadable from http://resig.weebly.com/developing-insights-into-teacher-research.html

Castro Garcés AY, Martínez Granada L (2016) The role of collaborative action research in teachers’ professional development. Profile Issues Teach Prof Dev 18(1):39–54

Coghlan D, Shani AB (eds) (2016) Action research in business and management. Sage, London

Collier J (1945) United States Indian administration as a laboratory of ethnic relations. Soc Res 12(3):265–303

Cortina-Pérez B, Solano-Tenorio L-M (2013) The effect of using out-of-class contexts on EFL learners: an action research. Calidoscópio 11(2):167–117

Cumming A (1994) Alternatives in TESOL research: descriptive, interpretive and ideological orientations. TESOL Q 28(4):673–676

Dana NF, Yendol-Hoppey D (2008) The reflective educator’s guide to professional development: coaching inquiry-oriented learning communities. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks

Denos C, Toohey K, Neilson K, Waterstone B (2009) Collaborative research in multilingual classrooms. Multilingual Matters, Bristol

Dörnyei Z (2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Edge J (ed) (2001) Action research. TESOL, Alexandria

Edge J, Richards K (eds) (1993) Teachers develop teachers’ research. Heinemann, London

Farrell TSC (2018) Research on reflective practice in TESOL. Routledge, New York

Freeman D (1998) Doing teacher research: from inquiry to understanding. Heinle & Heinle, Boston

Gass S, Mackey A, Ross-Feldman L (2011) Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Lang Learn 61:189–220

Graves K (1996) Teachers as course developers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Grundy S (1987) Curriculum: product or praxis. Falmer Press, London

Halsey AH (ed) (1972) Educational priority. Volume 1. E. P.A. Problems and policies. HMSO, London

Jarvis S (2002a) Research in TESOL Part I. TESOL Res Interest Sect Newsl 8(3):1–2

Jarvis S (2002b) Research in TESOL Part II. TESOL Res Interest Sect Newsl 9(1):1–2

Kemmis S, McTaggart R (eds) (1982) The action research reader. Deakin University Press, Geelong

Kemmis S, McTaggart R (eds) (1988a) The action research planner, 3rd edn. Deakin University Press, Geelong

Kemmis S, McTaggart R (eds) (1988b) The action research reader, 3rd edn. Deakin University Press, Geelong

Koshy E, Koshy V, Waterman H (2011) Action research in healthcare. Sage, London

Lewin K (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics: II. Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Hum Relat II:142–153

Long M (1983) Training the second language teacher as classroom researcher. In: Alatis JE, Stern HH, Strevens P (eds) Applied linguistics and the preparation of teachers: towards a rationale. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp 281–297

Marrow A (1969) The practical theorist: the life and work of Kurt Lewin. Basic Books, New York

Masters J (2000) The history of action research. Retrieved 5 Oct 2002 from http://casino.cchs.usyd.edu.au/arow//arer/00

Mathew R, Eapen RL, Tharu J (eds) (2000) The language curriculum: dynamics of change, Vol 1. The outsider perspective. Report of the International Seminar 1995. Central Institute for English and Foreign Language Studies, Orient Longman, Hyderabad

Maurer M, Githens RP (2010) Toward a reframing of action research for human resource and organization development: moving beyond problem solving and toward dialogue. Action Res 8:267–292

McPherson P (1997) Action research: exploring learner diversity. Prospect 12(1):50–62

McTaggart R (1991) Action research. A short modern history. Deakin University Press, Geelong

Miller J (1990) Creating spaces and finding voices: teachers collaborating for empowerment. State University of New York Press, Albany

Nunan D (1989) Understanding language classrooms: a guide for teacher-initiated action. Prentice Hall, New York

Nunan D (1997) Developing standards for teacher-research in TESOL. TESOL Q 31(2):365–337

Nunan D, Bailey KM (2009) Exploring second language classroom research. Heinle/Cengage Learning, Boston

Richards JC, Nunan D (eds) (1990) Second language teacher education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Schwab J (1969) College curricula and student protest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Smith R, Connelly T, Robolledo P (2014) Teacher research as continuing professional development: a project with Chilean secondary school teachers. In: Hayes D (ed) Innovations in the continuing professional development of English language teachers. British Council, London, pp 111–132

Stenhouse L (1971) The humanities curriculum project: the rationale. Theory Pract X(3):154–162

Tinker-Sachs G (2002) Action research. Fostering and furthering effective practices in the teaching of English. City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Toohey K (1998) “Breaking them up, taking them away”: ESL students in Grade 1. TESOL Q 32(1):61–84

van Lier L (1988) The classroom and the language learner. Longman, London

van Lier L (1994) Action research. Sintagma 6:31–37

van Lier L (2011) Language learning: an ecological-semiotic approach. In: Hinkel E (ed) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, vol II. Routledge, New York, pp 383–394

Verduin J (1967) Cooperative curriculum improvement. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

Wallace M (1991) Training foreign language teachers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Wallace M (1998) Action research for language teachers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Wang Q (2002) Action research for English teachers. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing

Winter R, Munn-Giddings C (2001) A handbook for action research in health and social care. Routledge, Abingdon

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Burns .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

The University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong

Xuesong Gao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Burns, A. (2019). Action Research in English Language Teaching: Contributions and Recent Developments. In: Gao, X. (eds) Second Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_52-1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_52-1

Received : 13 September 2018

Accepted : 13 September 2018

Published : 27 November 2018

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-58542-0

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-58542-0

eBook Packages : Springer Reference Education Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Education

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

200+ List of Topics for Action Research in the Classroom

In the dynamic landscape of education, teachers are continually seeking innovative ways to enhance their teaching practices and improve student outcomes. Action research in the classroom is a powerful tool that allows educators to investigate and address specific challenges, leading to positive changes in teaching methods and learning experiences. 

Selecting the right topics from the list of topics for action research in the classroom is crucial for ensuring meaningful insights and improvements. In this blog post, we will explore the significance of action research in the classroom, the criteria for selecting impactful topics, and provide an extensive list of potential research areas.

Understanding: What is Action Research

Table of Contents

Action research is a reflective process that empowers teachers to systematically investigate and analyze their own teaching practices. Unlike traditional research, action research is conducted by educators within their own classrooms, emphasizing a collaborative and participatory approach. 

This method enables teachers to identify challenges, implement interventions, and assess the effectiveness of their actions.

How to Select Topics From List of Topics for Action Research in the Classroom

Choosing the right topic is the first step in the action research process. The selected topic should align with classroom goals, address students’ needs, be feasible to implement, and have the potential for positive impact. Teachers should consider the following criteria when selecting action research topics:

• Alignment with Classroom Goals and Objectives: The chosen topic should directly contribute to the overall goals and objectives of the classroom. Whether it’s improving student engagement, enhancing learning outcomes, or fostering a positive classroom environment, the topic should align with the broader educational context.
• Relevance to Students’ Needs and Challenges: Effective action research addresses the specific needs and challenges faced by students. Teachers should identify areas where students may be struggling or where improvement is needed, ensuring that the research directly impacts the learning experiences of the students.
• Feasibility and Practicality: The feasibility of the research is crucial. Teachers must choose topics that are practical to implement within the constraints of the classroom setting. This includes considering available resources, time constraints, and the level of support from school administrators.
• Potential for Positive Impact: The ultimate goal of action research is to bring about positive change. Teachers should carefully assess the potential impact of their research, aiming for improvements in teaching methods, student performance, or overall classroom dynamics.

List of Topics for Action Research in the Classroom

• Impact of Mindfulness Practices on Student Focus
• The Effectiveness of Peer Tutoring in Mathematics
• Strategies for Encouraging Critical Thinking in History Classes
• Using Gamification to Enhance Learning in Science
• Investigating the Impact of Flexible Seating Arrangements
• Assessing the Benefits of Project-Based Learning in Language Arts
• The Influence of Classroom Decor on Student Motivation
• Examining the Use of Learning Stations for Differentiation
• Implementing Reflective Journals to Enhance Writing Skills
• Exploring the Impact of Flipped Classroom Models
• Analyzing the Effects of Homework on Student Performance
• The Role of Positive Reinforcement in Classroom Behavior
• Investigating the Impact of Classroom Libraries on Reading Proficiency
• Strategies for Fostering a Growth Mindset in Students
• Assessing the Benefits of Cross-Curricular Integration
• Using Technology to Enhance Vocabulary Acquisition
• The Impact of Outdoor Learning on Student Engagement
• Investigating the Relationship Between Attendance and Academic Success
• The Role of Parental Involvement in Homework Completion
• Assessing the Impact of Classroom Rituals on Community Building
• Strategies for Increasing Student Participation in Discussions
• Exploring the Influence of Classroom Lighting on Student Alertness
• Investigating the Impact of Daily Agendas on Time Management
• The Effectiveness of Socratic Seminars in Social Studies
• Analyzing the Use of Graphic Organizers for Concept Mapping
• Implementing Student-Led Conferences for Goal Setting
• Examining the Effects of Mind Mapping on Information Retention
• The Influence of Classroom Temperature on Academic Performance
• Investigating the Benefits of Cooperative Learning Strategies
• Strategies for Addressing Test Anxiety in Students
• Assessing the Impact of Positive Affirmations on Student Confidence
• The Use of Literature Circles to Enhance Reading Comprehension
• Exploring the Effects of Classroom Noise Levels on Concentration
• Investigating the Benefits of Cross-Grade Collaborations
• Analyzing the Impact of Goal Setting on Student Achievement
• Implementing Interactive Notebooks for Conceptual Understanding
• The Effectiveness of Response to Intervention (RTI) Programs
• Strategies for Integrating Social-Emotional Learning (SEL)
• Investigating the Impact of Classroom Discussions on Critical Thinking
• The Role of Brain Breaks in Enhancing Student Focus
• Assessing the Benefits of Inquiry-Based Learning in Science
• Exploring the Effects of Music on Studying and Retention
• Investigating the Use of Learning Contracts for Individualized Learning
• The Influence of Classroom Colors on Mood and Learning
• Strategies for Promoting Collaborative Problem-Solving
• Analyzing the Impact of Flexible Scheduling on Student Productivity
• The Effectiveness of Mindful Breathing Exercises on Stress Reduction
• Investigating the Benefits of Service Learning Projects
• The Role of Peer Assessment in Improving Writing Skills
• Exploring the Impact of Field Trips on Cultural Competency
• Assessing the Benefits of Personalized Learning Plans
• Strategies for Differentiating Instruction in Large Classrooms
• Investigating the Influence of Teacher-Student Relationships on Learning
• The Effectiveness of Vocabulary Games in Foreign Language Classes
• Analyzing the Impact of Classroom Discussions on Civic Engagement
• Implementing Goal-Setting Strategies for Test Preparation
• The Role of Classroom Celebrations in Building a Positive Environment
• Strategies for Enhancing Student Reflection and Metacognition
• Investigating the Effects of Positive Behavior Supports (PBS)
• The Influence of Classroom Humor on Student Engagement
• Assessing the Benefits of Student-Led Research Projects
• Exploring the Impact of Timed vs. Untimed Tests on Anxiety
• Investigating the Use of Educational Podcasts for Learning
• The Effectiveness of Debate Activities in Developing Persuasive Skills
• Analyzing the Impact of Mindful Walking Breaks on Concentration
• Strategies for Promoting Digital Citizenship in the Classroom
• The Role of Visualization Techniques in Mathematics Learning
• Assessing the Benefits of Classroom Agreements for Behavior
• Exploring the Effects of Goal-Setting in Physical Education
• Investigating the Influence of Classroom Seating Charts on Behavior
• The Effectiveness of Peer Editing in Improving Writing Skills
• Strategies for Integrating Cultural Competency in History Lessons
• Analyzing the Impact of Classroom Pets on Student Well-Being
• The Role of Morning Meetings in Building Classroom Community
• Investigating the Benefits of Using Learning Centers in Elementary Schools
• Exploring the Effects of Virtual Reality in Geography Education
• Assessing the Impact of Homework Choice on Student Motivation
• Strategies for Promoting Growth Mindset in Mathematics
• The Influence of Classroom Layout on Group Collaboration
• Investigating the Benefits of Mindful Listening Practices
• The Effectiveness of Using Real-World Examples in Science Lessons
• Analyzing the Impact of Student-Led Assessments on Accountability
• Exploring the Use of Learning Contracts for Student Responsibility
• Investigating the Benefits of Teaching Digital Literacy Skills
• Strategies for Implementing Peer Mentoring Programs
• The Role of Graphic Novels in Promoting Literacy
• Assessing the Impact of Flexible Grouping in Mathematics Classes
• The Effectiveness of Using Storytelling for Conceptual Understanding
• Investigating the Influence of Classroom Rituals on Attendance
• Exploring the Benefits of Mindfulness Practices in Physical Education
• Strategies for Integrating Social Justice Education in the Curriculum
• Analyzing the Impact of Goal-Setting on Homework Completion
• The Role of Classroom Mindfulness Activities in Stress Reduction
• Investigating the Benefits of Using Educational Apps for Vocabulary
• The Effectiveness of Using Drama in History Lessons
• Assessing the Impact of Classroom Routines on Time Management
• Exploring the Influence of Teacher-Student Rapport on Academic Achievement
• Strategies for Promoting Active Listening Skills in the Classroom
• Investigating the Benefits of Using Concept Mapping in Science
• The Role of Classroom Socratic Seminars in Developing Critical Thinking
• Assessing the Impact of Mindful Eating Practices on Student Focus
• Exploring the Effects of Flipped Learning in Physical Education
• Investigating the Benefits of Using Educational Games for Math Fluency
• The Effectiveness of Peer Assessment in Art Classes
• Strategies for Fostering Creativity in Science Education
• Analyzing the Impact of Morning Stretches on Student Alertness
• The Role of Classroom Discussions in Enhancing Social Studies Learning
• Investigating the Benefits of Using Augmented Reality in History Lessons
• Assessing the Impact of Growth Mindset Interventions on Test Anxiety
• Strategies for Incorporating Environmental Education in the Curriculum
• The Effectiveness of Using Conceptual Maps in Literature Analysis
• Exploring the Influence of Classroom Lighting on Reading Comprehension
• Investigating the Benefits of Using Learning Apps for Language Acquisition
• The Role of Classroom Experiments in Science Education
• Analyzing the Impact of Mindful Breathing Exercises on Test Performance
• Strategies for Promoting Collaborative Problem-Solving in Mathematics
• Assessing the Benefits of Mindfulness Practices in Physical Education
• Exploring the Effects of Flexible Seating on Student Collaboration
• Investigating the Influence of Homework Choice on Student Motivation
• The Effectiveness of Using Educational Podcasts for History Learning
• Strategies for Integrating Sustainability Education Across Subjects
• Analyzing the Impact of Mindful Writing Practices on Language Arts Skills
• The Role of Peer Teaching in Enhancing Understanding of Complex Concepts
• Investigating the Benefits of Using Digital Storytelling in Literature Classes
• The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Learning in Social Studies
• Assessing the Impact of Student-Led Book Clubs on Reading Engagement
• Strategies for Incorporating Financial Literacy in Mathematics Education
• Exploring the Influence of Classroom Decor on Science Interest
• Investigating the Benefits of Mindful Movement Breaks in the Classroom
• The Role of Reflection Journals in Developing Critical Thinking Skills
• Analyzing the Impact of Virtual Field Trips on Geography Learning
• Strategies for Promoting Inclusive Physical Education Practices
• Assessing the Benefits of Using Educational Board Games for Learning
• The Effectiveness of Mindfulness Practices in Foreign Language Classes
• Investigating the Influence of Classroom Rituals on Academic Rigor
• Exploring the Impact of Student-Led Conferences on Goal Setting
• The Role of Mindful Listening Practices in Improving Communication Skills
• Investigating the Benefits of Using Educational Apps for Science Exploration
• Analyzing the Effectiveness of Socratic Seminars in Philosophy Classes
• Strategies for Promoting Gender Equity in STEM Education
• Assessing the Impact of Classroom Celebrations on Student Well-Being
• The Effectiveness of Using Debate Activities in Language Arts
• Exploring the Influence of Positive Affirmations on Classroom Climate
• Investigating the Benefits of Using Concept Mapping in History Essays
• Strategies for Incorporating Media Literacy in Social Studies
• Analyzing the Impact of Mindful Reflection Practices on Homework Completion
• The Role of Peer Collaboration in Enhancing Artistic Skills
• Investigating the Benefits of Using Educational Apps for Vocabulary Acquisition
• The Effectiveness of Mindful Breathing Exercises in Test Preparation
• Assessing the Impact of Flipped Learning in Science Laboratories
• Strategies for Promoting Civic Engagement in Social Studies Classes
• Exploring the Influence of Outdoor Learning on Scientific Inquiry
• Investigating the Benefits of Using Learning Stations for Literature Analysis
• The Role of Mindful Movement in Improving Physical Education Experiences
• Analyzing the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Language Learning
• Strategies for Incorporating Global Perspectives in Geography Education
• Assessing the Impact of Mindful Coloring Activities on Stress Reduction
• The Effectiveness of Using Educational Games for History Review
• Investigating the Benefits of Mindful Breathing Exercises in Mathematics
• Exploring the Influence of Classroom Rituals on Study Habits
• The Role of Mindful Listening Practices in Enhancing Oral Communication
• Analyzing the Impact of Student-Led Workshops on Study Skills
• Strategies for Promoting Critical Media Literacy in Language Arts
• Assessing the Benefits of Mindfulness Practices in Physical Fitness
• The Effectiveness of Using Educational Apps for Music Appreciation
• Investigating the Influence of Classroom Decor on Artistic Expression
• Exploring the Impact of Mindful Eating Practices on Nutrition Awareness
• The Role of Peer Assessment in Improving Science Fair Projects
• Analyzing the Benefits of Mindful Breathing Exercises in History Classes
• Strategies for Promoting Teamwork in Physical Education
• Assessing the Impact of Classroom Celebrations on Cultural Understanding
• The Effectiveness of Using Conceptual Maps in Geography Education
• Investigating the Benefits of Mindful Movement Breaks in Mathematics
• The Role of Mindful Listening Practices in Improving Musical Skills
• Analyzing the Impact of Student-Led Discussions in Philosophy Classes
• Strategies for Incorporating Environmental Stewardship in Science Education
• Assessing the Benefits of Using Educational Games for Physical Fitness
• Exploring the Influence of Classroom Decor on Mathematical Interest
• Investigating the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Art Appreciation
• The Role of Mindful Movement in Enhancing Physical Education Experiences
• Strategies for Promoting Cultural Competency in Language Arts
• Analyzing the Impact of Mindful Breathing Exercises on Test Anxiety
• The Effectiveness of Using Educational Apps for Science Exploration
• Investigating the Benefits of Peer Teaching in Mathematics Classes
• Exploring the Influence of Classroom Rituals on Language Arts Skills
• Assessing the Impact of Mindful Coloring Activities on Creative Expression
• The Role of Mindful Listening Practices in Improving Public Speaking
• Investigating the Benefits of Using Learning Stations for History Learning
• The Effectiveness of Peer Assessment in Improving Writing Skills
• Strategies for Promoting Digital Literacy in Geography Education
• Analyzing the Impact of Mindful Eating Practices on Healthy Habits
• Assessing the Benefits of Using Educational Games for Social Studies
• The Effectiveness of Mindful Movement Breaks in Science Education
• Exploring the Influence of Classroom Decor on Writing Motivation
• Investigating the Role of Mindfulness Practices in Mathematics Anxiety
• Strategies for Incorporating Financial Literacy in Social Studies
• Analyzing the Benefits of Using Concept Mapping in Science Labs
• The Role of Mindful Breathing Exercises in Improving Music Education
• Exploring the Impact of Virtual Reality on Foreign Language Acquisition
• Assessing the Benefits of Mindful Movement Breaks in History Classes

Tips for Conducting Action Research in the Classroom

• Setting Clear Research Goals and Objectives: Clearly define the goals and objectives of the research to ensure a focused and purposeful investigation.
• Involving Stakeholders in the Research Process: Engage students, parents, and colleagues in the research process to gather diverse perspectives and insights.
• Collecting and Analyzing Relevant Data: Use a variety of data collection methods, such as surveys, observations, and assessments, to gather comprehensive and meaningful data.
• Reflecting on Findings and Adjusting Teaching Practices: Regularly reflect on the research findings and be open to adjusting teaching practices based on the insights gained from the research.

Case Studies or Examples

Highlighting successful action research projects provides inspiration and practical insights for teachers. 

Sharing case studies or examples of impactful research can demonstrate the positive outcomes and improvements that can result from well-conducted action research.

In conclusion, action research is a valuable tool for educators seeking to enhance their teaching practices and improve student outcomes. 

Selecting the right topics from a list of topics for action research in the classroom is crucial for the success of action research projects, and teachers should consider alignment with goals, relevance to students, feasibility, and potential impact. 

By exploring a diverse range of topics, teachers can embark on meaningful action research journeys, contributing to the continuous improvement of education.

Related Posts

Step by Step Guide on The Best Way to Finance Car

The Best Way on How to Get Fund For Business to Grow it Efficiently

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

1 What is Action Research for Classroom Teachers?

ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS

• What is the nature of action research?
• How does action research develop in the classroom?
• What models of action research work best for your classroom?
• What are the epistemological, ontological, theoretical underpinnings of action research?

Educational research provides a vast landscape of knowledge on topics related to teaching and learning, curriculum and assessment, students’ cognitive and affective needs, cultural and socio-economic factors of schools, and many other factors considered viable to improving schools. Educational stakeholders rely on research to make informed decisions that ultimately affect the quality of schooling for their students. Accordingly, the purpose of educational research is to engage in disciplined inquiry to generate knowledge on topics significant to the students, teachers, administrators, schools, and other educational stakeholders. Just as the topics of educational research vary, so do the approaches to conducting educational research in the classroom. Your approach to research will be shaped by your context, your professional identity, and paradigm (set of beliefs and assumptions that guide your inquiry). These will all be key factors in how you generate knowledge related to your work as an educator.

Action research is an approach to educational research that is commonly used by educational practitioners and professionals to examine, and ultimately improve, their pedagogy and practice. In this way, action research represents an extension of the reflection and critical self-reflection that an educator employs on a daily basis in their classroom. When students are actively engaged in learning, the classroom can be dynamic and uncertain, demanding the constant attention of the educator. Considering these demands, educators are often only able to engage in reflection that is fleeting, and for the purpose of accommodation, modification, or formative assessment. Action research offers one path to more deliberate, substantial, and critical reflection that can be documented and analyzed to improve an educator’s practice.

Purpose of Action Research

As one of many approaches to educational research, it is important to distinguish the potential purposes of action research in the classroom. This book focuses on action research as a method to enable and support educators in pursuing effective pedagogical practices by transforming the quality of teaching decisions and actions, to subsequently enhance student engagement and learning. Being mindful of this purpose, the following aspects of action research are important to consider as you contemplate and engage with action research methodology in your classroom:

• Action research is a process for improving educational practice. Its methods involve action, evaluation, and reflection. It is a process to gather evidence to implement change in practices.
• Action research is participative and collaborative. It is undertaken by individuals with a common purpose.
• Action research is situation and context-based.
• Action research develops reflection practices based on the interpretations made by participants.
• Knowledge is created through action and application.
• Action research can be based in problem-solving, if the solution to the problem results in the improvement of practice.
• Action research is iterative; plans are created, implemented, revised, then implemented, lending itself to an ongoing process of reflection and revision.
• In action research, findings emerge as action develops and takes place; however, they are not conclusive or absolute, but ongoing (Koshy, 2010, pgs. 1-2).

In thinking about the purpose of action research, it is helpful to situate action research as a distinct paradigm of educational research. I like to think about action research as part of the larger concept of living knowledge. Living knowledge has been characterized as “a quest for life, to understand life and to create… knowledge which is valid for the people with whom I work and for myself” (Swantz, in Reason & Bradbury, 2001, pg. 1). Why should educators care about living knowledge as part of educational research? As mentioned above, action research is meant “to produce practical knowledge that is useful to people in the everyday conduct of their lives and to see that action research is about working towards practical outcomes” (Koshy, 2010, pg. 2). However, it is also about:

creating new forms of understanding, since action without reflection and understanding is blind, just as theory without action is meaningless. The participatory nature of action research makes it only possible with, for and by persons and communities, ideally involving all stakeholders both in the questioning and sense making that informs the research, and in the action, which is its focus. (Reason & Bradbury, 2001, pg. 2)

In an effort to further situate action research as living knowledge, Jean McNiff reminds us that “there is no such ‘thing’ as ‘action research’” (2013, pg. 24). In other words, action research is not static or finished, it defines itself as it proceeds. McNiff’s reminder characterizes action research as action-oriented, and a process that individuals go through to make their learning public to explain how it informs their practice. Action research does not derive its meaning from an abstract idea, or a self-contained discovery – action research’s meaning stems from the way educators negotiate the problems and successes of living and working in the classroom, school, and community.

While we can debate the idea of action research, there are people who are action researchers, and they use the idea of action research to develop principles and theories to guide their practice. Action research, then, refers to an organization of principles that guide action researchers as they act on shared beliefs, commitments, and expectations in their inquiry.

Reflection and the Process of Action Research

When an individual engages in reflection on their actions or experiences, it is typically for the purpose of better understanding those experiences, or the consequences of those actions to improve related action and experiences in the future. Reflection in this way develops knowledge around these actions and experiences to help us better regulate those actions in the future. The reflective process generates new knowledge regularly for classroom teachers and informs their classroom actions.

Unfortunately, the knowledge generated by educators through the reflective process is not always prioritized among the other sources of knowledge educators are expected to utilize in the classroom. Educators are expected to draw upon formal types of knowledge, such as textbooks, content standards, teaching standards, district curriculum and behavioral programs, etc., to gain new knowledge and make decisions in the classroom. While these forms of knowledge are important, the reflective knowledge that educators generate through their pedagogy is the amalgamation of these types of knowledge enacted in the classroom. Therefore, reflective knowledge is uniquely developed based on the action and implementation of an educator’s pedagogy in the classroom. Action research offers a way to formalize the knowledge generated by educators so that it can be utilized and disseminated throughout the teaching profession.

Research is concerned with the generation of knowledge, and typically creating knowledge related to a concept, idea, phenomenon, or topic. Action research generates knowledge around inquiry in practical educational contexts. Action research allows educators to learn through their actions with the purpose of developing personally or professionally. Due to its participatory nature, the process of action research is also distinct in educational research. There are many models for how the action research process takes shape. I will share a few of those here. Each model utilizes the following processes to some extent:

• Plan a change;
• Take action to enact the change;
• Observe the process and consequences of the change;
• Reflect on the process and consequences;
• Act, observe, & reflect again and so on.

Figure 1.1 Basic action research cycle

There are many other models that supplement the basic process of action research with other aspects of the research process to consider. For example, figure 1.2 illustrates a spiral model of action research proposed by Kemmis and McTaggart (2004). The spiral model emphasizes the cyclical process that moves beyond the initial plan for change. The spiral model also emphasizes revisiting the initial plan and revising based on the initial cycle of research:

Figure 1.2 Interpretation of action research spiral, Kemmis and McTaggart (2004, p. 595)

Other models of action research reorganize the process to emphasize the distinct ways knowledge takes shape in the reflection process. O’Leary’s (2004, p. 141) model, for example, recognizes that the research may take shape in the classroom as knowledge emerges from the teacher’s observations. O’Leary highlights the need for action research to be focused on situational understanding and implementation of action, initiated organically from real-time issues:

Figure 1.3 Interpretation of O’Leary’s cycles of research, O’Leary (2000, p. 141)

Lastly, Macintyre’s (2000, p. 1) model, offers a different characterization of the action research process. Macintyre emphasizes a messier process of research with the initial reflections and conclusions as the benchmarks for guiding the research process. Macintyre emphasizes the flexibility in planning, acting, and observing stages to allow the process to be naturalistic. Our interpretation of Macintyre process is below:

Figure 1.4 Interpretation of the action research cycle, Macintyre (2000, p. 1)

We believe it is important to prioritize the flexibility of the process, and encourage you to only use these models as basic guides for your process. Your process may look similar, or you may diverge from these models as you better understand your students, context, and data.

Definitions of Action Research and Examples

At this point, it may be helpful for readers to have a working definition of action research and some examples to illustrate the methodology in the classroom. Bassey (1998, p. 93) offers a very practical definition and describes “action research as an inquiry which is carried out in order to understand, to evaluate and then to change, in order to improve educational practice.” Cohen and Manion (1994, p. 192) situate action research differently, and describe action research as emergent, writing:

essentially an on-the-spot procedure designed to deal with a concrete problem located in an immediate situation. This means that ideally, the step-by-step process is constantly monitored over varying periods of time and by a variety of mechanisms (questionnaires, diaries, interviews and case studies, for example) so that the ensuing feedback may be translated into modifications, adjustment, directional changes, redefinitions, as necessary, so as to bring about lasting benefit to the ongoing process itself rather than to some future occasion.

Lastly, Koshy (2010, p. 9) describes action research as:

a constructive inquiry, during which the researcher constructs his or her knowledge of specific issues through planning, acting, evaluating, refining and learning from the experience. It is a continuous learning process in which the researcher learns and also shares the newly generated knowledge with those who may benefit from it.

These definitions highlight the distinct features of action research and emphasize the purposeful intent of action researchers to improve, refine, reform, and problem-solve issues in their educational context. To better understand the distinctness of action research, these are some examples of action research topics:

Examples of Action Research Topics

• Flexible seating in 4th grade classroom to increase effective collaborative learning.
• Structured homework protocols for increasing student achievement.
• Developing a system of formative feedback for 8th grade writing.
• Using music to stimulate creative writing.
• Weekly brown bag lunch sessions to improve responses to PD from staff.
• Using exercise balls as chairs for better classroom management.

Action Research in Theory

Action research-based inquiry in educational contexts and classrooms involves distinct participants – students, teachers, and other educational stakeholders within the system. All of these participants are engaged in activities to benefit the students, and subsequently society as a whole. Action research contributes to these activities and potentially enhances the participants’ roles in the education system. Participants’ roles are enhanced based on two underlying principles:

• communities, schools, and classrooms are sites of socially mediated actions, and action research provides a greater understanding of self and new knowledge of how to negotiate these socially mediated environments;
• communities, schools, and classrooms are part of social systems in which humans interact with many cultural tools, and action research provides a basis to construct and analyze these interactions.

In our quest for knowledge and understanding, we have consistently analyzed human experience over time and have distinguished between types of reality. Humans have constantly sought “facts” and “truth” about reality that can be empirically demonstrated or observed.

Social systems are based on beliefs, and generally, beliefs about what will benefit the greatest amount of people in that society. Beliefs, and more specifically the rationale or support for beliefs, are not always easy to demonstrate or observe as part of our reality. Take the example of an English Language Arts teacher who prioritizes argumentative writing in her class. She believes that argumentative writing demonstrates the mechanics of writing best among types of writing, while also providing students a skill they will need as citizens and professionals. While we can observe the students writing, and we can assess their ability to develop a written argument, it is difficult to observe the students’ understanding of argumentative writing and its purpose in their future. This relates to the teacher’s beliefs about argumentative writing; we cannot observe the real value of the teaching of argumentative writing. The teacher’s rationale and beliefs about teaching argumentative writing are bound to the social system and the skills their students will need to be active parts of that system. Therefore, our goal through action research is to demonstrate the best ways to teach argumentative writing to help all participants understand its value as part of a social system.

The knowledge that is conveyed in a classroom is bound to, and justified by, a social system. A postmodernist approach to understanding our world seeks knowledge within a social system, which is directly opposed to the empirical or positivist approach which demands evidence based on logic or science as rationale for beliefs. Action research does not rely on a positivist viewpoint to develop evidence and conclusions as part of the research process. Action research offers a postmodernist stance to epistemology (theory of knowledge) and supports developing questions and new inquiries during the research process. In this way action research is an emergent process that allows beliefs and decisions to be negotiated as reality and meaning are being constructed in the socially mediated space of the classroom.

Theorizing Action Research for the Classroom

All research, at its core, is for the purpose of generating new knowledge and contributing to the knowledge base of educational research. Action researchers in the classroom want to explore methods of improving their pedagogy and practice. The starting place of their inquiry stems from their pedagogy and practice, so by nature the knowledge created from their inquiry is often contextually specific to their classroom, school, or community. Therefore, we should examine the theoretical underpinnings of action research for the classroom. It is important to connect action research conceptually to experience; for example, Levin and Greenwood (2001, p. 105) make these connections:

• Action research is context bound and addresses real life problems.
• Action research is inquiry where participants and researchers cogenerate knowledge through collaborative communicative processes in which all participants’ contributions are taken seriously.
• The meanings constructed in the inquiry process lead to social action or these reflections and action lead to the construction of new meanings.
• The credibility/validity of action research knowledge is measured according to whether the actions that arise from it solve problems (workability) and increase participants’ control over their own situation.

Educators who engage in action research will generate new knowledge and beliefs based on their experiences in the classroom. Let us emphasize that these are all important to you and your work, as both an educator and researcher. It is these experiences, beliefs, and theories that are often discounted when more official forms of knowledge (e.g., textbooks, curriculum standards, districts standards) are prioritized. These beliefs and theories based on experiences should be valued and explored further, and this is one of the primary purposes of action research in the classroom. These beliefs and theories should be valued because they were meaningful aspects of knowledge constructed from teachers’ experiences. Developing meaning and knowledge in this way forms the basis of constructivist ideology, just as teachers often try to get their students to construct their own meanings and understandings when experiencing new ideas.  

Classroom Teachers Constructing their Own Knowledge

Most of you are probably at least minimally familiar with constructivism, or the process of constructing knowledge. However, what is constructivism precisely, for the purposes of action research? Many scholars have theorized constructivism and have identified two key attributes (Koshy, 2010; von Glasersfeld, 1987):

• Knowledge is not passively received, but actively developed through an individual’s cognition;
• Human cognition is adaptive and finds purpose in organizing the new experiences of the world, instead of settling for absolute or objective truth.

Considering these two attributes, constructivism is distinct from conventional knowledge formation because people can develop a theory of knowledge that orders and organizes the world based on their experiences, instead of an objective or neutral reality. When individuals construct knowledge, there are interactions between an individual and their environment where communication, negotiation and meaning-making are collectively developing knowledge. For most educators, constructivism may be a natural inclination of their pedagogy. Action researchers have a similar relationship to constructivism because they are actively engaged in a process of constructing knowledge. However, their constructions may be more formal and based on the data they collect in the research process. Action researchers also are engaged in the meaning making process, making interpretations from their data. These aspects of the action research process situate them in the constructivist ideology. Just like constructivist educators, action researchers’ constructions of knowledge will be affected by their individual and professional ideas and values, as well as the ecological context in which they work (Biesta & Tedder, 2006). The relations between constructivist inquiry and action research is important, as Lincoln (2001, p. 130) states:

much of the epistemological, ontological, and axiological belief systems are the same or similar, and methodologically, constructivists and action researchers work in similar ways, relying on qualitative methods in face-to-face work, while buttressing information, data and background with quantitative method work when necessary or useful.

While there are many links between action research and educators in the classroom, constructivism offers the most familiar and practical threads to bind the beliefs of educators and action researchers.  

Epistemology, Ontology, and Action Research

It is also important for educators to consider the philosophical stances related to action research to better situate it with their beliefs and reality. When researchers make decisions about the methodology they intend to use, they will consider their ontological and epistemological stances. It is vital that researchers clearly distinguish their philosophical stances and understand the implications of their stance in the research process, especially when collecting and analyzing their data. In what follows, we will discuss ontological and epistemological stances in relation to action research methodology.

Ontology, or the theory of being, is concerned with the claims or assumptions we make about ourselves within our social reality – what do we think exists, what does it look like, what entities are involved and how do these entities interact with each other (Blaikie, 2007). In relation to the discussion of constructivism, generally action researchers would consider their educational reality as socially constructed. Social construction of reality happens when individuals interact in a social system. Meaningful construction of concepts and representations of reality develop through an individual’s interpretations of others’ actions. These interpretations become agreed upon by members of a social system and become part of social fabric, reproduced as knowledge and beliefs to develop assumptions about reality. Researchers develop meaningful constructions based on their experiences and through communication. Educators as action researchers will be examining the socially constructed reality of schools. In the United States, many of our concepts, knowledge, and beliefs about schooling have been socially constructed over the last hundred years. For example, a group of teachers may look at why fewer female students enroll in upper-level science courses at their school. This question deals directly with the social construction of gender and specifically what careers females have been conditioned to pursue. We know this is a social construction in some school social systems because in other parts of the world, or even the United States, there are schools that have more females enrolled in upper level science courses than male students. Therefore, the educators conducting the research have to recognize the socially constructed reality of their school and consider this reality throughout the research process. Action researchers will use methods of data collection that support their ontological stance and clarify their theoretical stance throughout the research process.

Koshy (2010, p. 23-24) offers another example of addressing the ontological challenges in the classroom:

A teacher who was concerned with increasing her pupils’ motivation and enthusiasm for learning decided to introduce learning diaries which the children could take home. They were invited to record their reactions to the day’s lessons and what they had learnt. The teacher reported in her field diary that the learning diaries stimulated the children’s interest in her lessons, increased their capacity to learn, and generally improved their level of participation in lessons. The challenge for the teacher here is in the analysis and interpretation of the multiplicity of factors accompanying the use of diaries. The diaries were taken home so the entries may have been influenced by discussions with parents. Another possibility is that children felt the need to please their teacher. Another possible influence was that their increased motivation was as a result of the difference in style of teaching which included more discussions in the classroom based on the entries in the dairies.

Here you can see the challenge for the action researcher is working in a social context with multiple factors, values, and experiences that were outside of the teacher’s control. The teacher was only responsible for introducing the diaries as a new style of learning. The students’ engagement and interactions with this new style of learning were all based upon their socially constructed notions of learning inside and outside of the classroom. A researcher with a positivist ontological stance would not consider these factors, and instead might simply conclude that the dairies increased motivation and interest in the topic, as a result of introducing the diaries as a learning strategy.

Epistemology, or the theory of knowledge, signifies a philosophical view of what counts as knowledge – it justifies what is possible to be known and what criteria distinguishes knowledge from beliefs (Blaikie, 1993). Positivist researchers, for example, consider knowledge to be certain and discovered through scientific processes. Action researchers collect data that is more subjective and examine personal experience, insights, and beliefs.

Action researchers utilize interpretation as a means for knowledge creation. Action researchers have many epistemologies to choose from as means of situating the types of knowledge they will generate by interpreting the data from their research. For example, Koro-Ljungberg et al., (2009) identified several common epistemologies in their article that examined epistemological awareness in qualitative educational research, such as: objectivism, subjectivism, constructionism, contextualism, social epistemology, feminist epistemology, idealism, naturalized epistemology, externalism, relativism, skepticism, and pluralism. All of these epistemological stances have implications for the research process, especially data collection and analysis. Please see the table on pages 689-90, linked below for a sketch of these potential implications:

Again, Koshy (2010, p. 24) provides an excellent example to illustrate the epistemological challenges within action research:

A teacher of 11-year-old children decided to carry out an action research project which involved a change in style in teaching mathematics. Instead of giving children mathematical tasks displaying the subject as abstract principles, she made links with other subjects which she believed would encourage children to see mathematics as a discipline that could improve their understanding of the environment and historic events. At the conclusion of the project, the teacher reported that applicable mathematics generated greater enthusiasm and understanding of the subject.

The educator/researcher engaged in action research-based inquiry to improve an aspect of her pedagogy. She generated knowledge that indicated she had improved her students’ understanding of mathematics by integrating it with other subjects – specifically in the social and ecological context of her classroom, school, and community. She valued constructivism and students generating their own understanding of mathematics based on related topics in other subjects. Action researchers working in a social context do not generate certain knowledge, but knowledge that emerges and can be observed and researched again, building upon their knowledge each time.

Researcher Positionality in Action Research

In this first chapter, we have discussed a lot about the role of experiences in sparking the research process in the classroom. Your experiences as an educator will shape how you approach action research in your classroom. Your experiences as a person in general will also shape how you create knowledge from your research process. In particular, your experiences will shape how you make meaning from your findings. It is important to be clear about your experiences when developing your methodology too. This is referred to as researcher positionality. Maher and Tetreault (1993, p. 118) define positionality as:

Gender, race, class, and other aspects of our identities are markers of relational positions rather than essential qualities. Knowledge is valid when it includes an acknowledgment of the knower’s specific position in any context, because changing contextual and relational factors are crucial for defining identities and our knowledge in any given situation.

By presenting your positionality in the research process, you are signifying the type of socially constructed, and other types of, knowledge you will be using to make sense of the data. As Maher and Tetreault explain, this increases the trustworthiness of your conclusions about the data. This would not be possible with a positivist ontology. We will discuss positionality more in chapter 6, but we wanted to connect it to the overall theoretical underpinnings of action research.

Advantages of Engaging in Action Research in the Classroom

In the following chapters, we will discuss how action research takes shape in your classroom, and we wanted to briefly summarize the key advantages to action research methodology over other types of research methodology. As Koshy (2010, p. 25) notes, action research provides useful methodology for school and classroom research because:

Advantages of Action Research for the Classroom

• research can be set within a specific context or situation;
• researchers can be participants – they don’t have to be distant and detached from the situation;
• it involves continuous evaluation and modifications can be made easily as the project progresses;
• there are opportunities for theory to emerge from the research rather than always follow a previously formulated theory;
• the study can lead to open-ended outcomes;
• through action research, a researcher can bring a story to life.

Action Research Copyright © by J. Spencer Clark; Suzanne Porath; Julie Thiele; and Morgan Jobe is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

225+ Action Research Topics In Education (Updated 2023)

Action research in education offers a powerful tool for educators to actively engage in improving their teaching practices and student outcomes. By combining research and action, this approach encourages teachers to become reflective practitioners and agents of change within their classrooms and schools. Action research topics in education encompass a wide range of issues that educators can investigate to address specific challenges and enhance their instructional strategies.

From examining the impact of technology integration to exploring innovative assessment methods, action research empowers teachers to develop evidence-based solutions tailored to their unique educational contexts. By conducting small-scale studies, educators can gather data, analyze it, and implement targeted interventions to make tangible improvements in student learning.

In this blog, we will delve into a variety of action research topics in education, exploring how they can empower educators to drive meaningful change and foster a dynamic and effective learning environment for their students.

Table of Contents

Format of action research paper in education

Please note that this table provides a general outline and can be customized based on the specific requirements and guidelines of your research paper.

What to consider while selecting action research topics in education

When selecting action research topics in education, it is important to consider several factors to ensure that your research is meaningful, relevant, and feasible. Here are some key considerations to keep in mind:

Personal Interest

Choose action research topics in education that genuinely interests you. When you are passionate about the subject matter, you will be more motivated and engaged throughout the research process.

Educational Context

Consider the specific educational context in which you work or are interested in. Reflect on the challenges, needs, or areas of improvement within that context. Your research should address a problem or issue that is relevant and impactful within the educational setting.

Research Gap

Review existing literature and research in your chosen area to identify any gaps or unanswered questions. Select action research topics in education that contributes to the existing knowledge base and fills a research gap.

Feasibility

Evaluate the feasibility of conducting the research within the available resources, time frame, and constraints. Consider factors such as access to participants, data collection methods, ethical considerations, and potential support from colleagues or institutions.

Relevance and Impact

Choose action research topics in education that have practical implications and can lead to positive changes in teaching practices, student learning, or educational policies. Aim for research that can make a difference in the educational field.

Collaboration Opportunities

Consider if there are opportunities for collaboration with colleagues, researchers, or educational organizations. Collaborative research can provide additional support, expertise, and diverse perspectives.

Ethical Considerations

Ensure that your research topic aligns with ethical guidelines and regulations. Consider the potential impact on participants and ensure their rights, privacy, and confidentiality are protected.

Remember, selecting an action research topic is an important decision, so take the time to thoroughly evaluate and choose a topic that aligns with your goals and the needs of the educational community you serve.

200+ Action research topics in education

• The impact of technology integration on student engagement in the classroom.
• Strategies to improve reading comprehension in elementary school students.
• Enhancing parental involvement in student learning and academic success.
• Investigating the effectiveness of cooperative learning strategies in promoting peer interaction and collaboration.
• Addressing the achievement gap in mathematics between different student groups.
• Examining the impact of inclusive education on the academic and social development of students with disabilities.
• Enhancing critical thinking skills through project-based learning.
• Implementing differentiated instruction to meet the diverse needs of students in the classroom.
• Investigating the effects of homework on student learning and academic performance.
• Promoting positive classroom behavior and reducing disruptive behaviors.
• Assessing the effectiveness of teacher feedback in improving student writing skills.
• Strategies to promote a growth mindset and enhance student motivation.
• Examining the impact of physical activity on student concentration and academic performance.
• Enhancing teacher-student relationships and its impact on student engagement and achievement.
• Investigating the effects of arts integration on student creativity and academic achievement.
• Strategies to support English language learners in mainstream classrooms.
• Examining the impact of peer tutoring on student learning and academic achievement.
• Enhancing teacher collaboration and its impact on instructional practices and student outcomes.
• Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry-based science instruction in promoting student understanding.
• Promoting gender equity in STEM education.
• Examining the impact of mindfulness practices on student well-being and academic success.
• Strategies for reducing test anxiety and promoting test-taking skills.
• Investigating the effects of the classroom environment on student learning and engagement.
• Enhancing student self-regulation skills through metacognitive strategies.
• Promoting multicultural education and inclusivity in the classroom.
• Examining the impact of flipped classroom models on student learning outcomes.
• Strategies for integrating technology effectively in early childhood education.
• Investigating the effects of outdoor education on student engagement and academic achievement.
• Enhancing teacher professional development programs to improve instructional practices.
• Promoting environmental education and sustainable practices in schools.
• Examining the impact of social-emotional learning programs on student behavior and well-being.
• Strategies for supporting students with ADHD in the classroom.
• Investigating the effects of classroom management strategies on student behavior and academic performance.
• Enhancing parental involvement in early childhood education settings.
• Promoting digital literacy skills among students.
• Examining the impact of peer assessment on student learning and achievement.
• Strategies for fostering creativity and innovation in the classroom.
• Investigating the effects of inclusive literature on promoting empathy and cultural understanding.
• Enhancing the use of formative assessment in the classroom.
• Promoting critical media literacy skills among students.
• Examining the impact of outdoor learning on student engagement and academic achievement.
• Strategies for promoting positive social skills and reducing bullying in schools.
• Investigating the effects of flexible seating arrangements on student behavior and learning outcomes.
• Enhancing the use of educational technology in special education settings.
• Promoting student self-efficacy and academic motivation.
• Examining the impact of project-based learning on student problem-solving skills.
• Strategies for promoting positive school climate and student well-being.
• Investigating the effects of parental involvement on student homework completion and academic performance.
• Enhancing teacher feedback practices to improve student learning and achievement.
• Promoting inclusive practices for students with diverse cultural backgrounds.
• Examining the impact of arts education on student creativity and academic success.
• Strategies for supporting students with learning disabilities
• Investigating the effects of gamification on student motivation and engagement.
• Enhancing collaborative learning in online education settings.
• Promoting effective study habits and time management skills among students.
• Examining the impact of parental involvement on early literacy skills development.
• Strategies for promoting positive teacher-student relationships in high school settings.
• Investigating the effects of mindfulness practices on reducing stress and anxiety in students.
• Enhancing student self-esteem and self-confidence through targeted interventions.
• Promoting gender equality in science education.
• Examining the impact of teacher-led professional learning communities on instructional practices and student outcomes.
• Strategies for supporting students with autism spectrum disorder in inclusive classrooms.
• Investigating the effects of project-based learning on student problem-solving skills in mathematics.
• Enhancing cultural competency among educators to meet the needs of diverse student populations.
• Promoting digital citizenship and online safety education.
• Examining the impact of restorative justice practices on reducing disciplinary incidents and promoting a positive school climate.
• Strategies for integrating social justice education across the curriculum.
• Investigating the effects of parental involvement on student transitions from elementary to middle school.
• Enhancing teacher collaboration for effective interdisciplinary instruction.
• Promoting global citizenship and cross-cultural understanding in the classroom.
• Examining the impact of music education on student cognitive development and academic performance.
• Strategies for supporting students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in mainstream classrooms.
• Investigating the effects of cooperative learning strategies on improving students’ social skills.
• Enhancing the use of educational technology for students with visual impairments.
• Promoting inclusive practices for students with diverse learning needs.
• Examining the impact of teacher-led professional development on instructional practices and student outcomes.
• Strategies for promoting positive classroom behavior in early childhood settings.
• Investigating the effects of growth mindset interventions on student resilience and academic achievement.
• Enhancing parent-teacher communication for improved student support and academic success.
• Promoting environmental sustainability education in primary schools.
• Examining the impact of outdoor play on children’s physical and cognitive development.
• Strategies for supporting students with English language learning difficulties.
• Investigating the effects of mindfulness practices on reducing test anxiety in students.
• Enhancing the use of educational technology for students with learning disabilities.
• Promoting critical thinking and problem-solving skills in mathematics education.
• Examining the impact of peer mentoring programs on student academic and social-emotional development.
• Strategies for creating inclusive classrooms for students with hearing impairments.
• Investigating the effects of student-led conferences on student ownership of learning.
• Enhancing the use of formative assessment for personalized instruction.
• Promoting positive classroom discourse and student participation.
• Examining the impact of outdoor experiential learning on student environmental awareness and action.
• Strategies for supporting students with emotional and behavioral disorders in inclusive settings.
• Investigating the effects of teacher self-reflection on instructional practices and student outcomes.
• Enhancing the use of assistive technology for students with physical disabilities.
• Promoting media literacy education to develop critical media consumers.
• Examining the impact of service-learning on student civic engagement and social responsibility.
• Strategies for creating inclusive classrooms for students with specific learning disabilities.
• Investigating the effects of inquiry-based science instruction on student scientific inquiry skills.
• Enhancing teacher-parent partnerships for collaborative support of student learning.
• Promoting cultural diversity education in secondary schools.
• Examining the impact of cooperative learning on student academic achievement in science education.
• Strategies for promoting inclusive practices for students with speech and language disorders.
• Investigating the effects of flipped classroom models on student engagement and learning outcomes in social studies.
• Enhancing teacher feedback practices to improve student writing skills in English language arts.
• Promoting social-emotional learning through mindfulness-based interventions in elementary schools.
• Examining the impact of project-based learning on student creativity and problem-solving skills in the arts.
• Strategies for supporting students with executive functioning difficulties in the classroom.
• Investigating the effects of differentiated instruction on student motivation and academic achievement in mathematics.
• Enhancing parental involvement in supporting early literacy development at home.
• Promoting inclusive practices for students with physical disabilities in physical education classes.
• Examining the impact of teacher-student relationships on student attendance and classroom behavior.
• Strategies for promoting positive peer relationships and reducing social isolation in middle school.
• Investigating the effects of drama-based pedagogy on student engagement and understanding in literature studies.
• Enhancing the use of educational technology for students with learning difficulties in computer science education.
• Promoting character education and ethical decision-making in schools.
• Examining the impact of teacher self-efficacy on instructional practices and student outcomes.
• Strategies for supporting students with English language learning difficulties in content area classes.
• Investigating the effects of arts integration on student motivation and academic achievement in history education.
• Enhancing family-school partnerships for students with special educational needs.
• Promoting critical digital literacy skills for responsible online information consumption.
• Examining the impact of inclusive physical education on student attitudes towards fitness and physical activity.
• Strategies for supporting students with dyslexia in reading instruction.
• Investigating the effects of outdoor education on student environmental attitudes and behaviors.
• Enhancing the use of educational technology for students with autism spectrum disorder.
• Promoting career readiness and employability skills in high school education.
• Examining the impact of parent-led reading interventions on early literacy skills in kindergarten.
• Strategies for promoting positive teacher-student relationships in online learning environments.
• Investigating the effects of arts integration on student creativity and academic achievement in science education.
• Enhancing teacher collaboration for effective co-teaching in inclusive classrooms.
• Promoting global perspectives and intercultural understanding in social studies education.
• Examining the impact of cooperative learning on student social skills and peer relationships.
• Strategies for supporting students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in physical education classes.
• Investigating the effects of project-based learning on student problem-solving skills in computer science.
• Enhancing cultural competence among educators for working with diverse student populations.
• Promoting digital citizenship and online safety in digital media literacy education.
• Examining the impact of restorative practices on reducing disciplinary incidents and fostering a positive school climate.
• Strategies for supporting students with emotional and behavioral challenges in mainstream classrooms.
• Investigating the effects of growth mindset interventions on student academic resilience in mathematics education.
• Enhancing parent-teacher communication for effective student support and academic success.
• Promoting environmental sustainability education in secondary schools.
• Examining the impact of outdoor experiential learning on student STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) interest and career aspirations.
• Strategies for creating inclusive classrooms for students with visual impairments.
• Investigating the effects of student-led conferences on student self-evaluation and goal setting.
• Enhancing the use of formative assessment for personalized instruction in physical education.
• Promoting positive classroom management strategies.
• Examining the impact of cooperative learning on student academic achievement in foreign language education.
• Strategies for promoting inclusive practices for students with autism spectrum disorder in inclusive classrooms.
• Investigating the effects of blended learning models on student engagement and learning outcomes in mathematics.
• Enhancing teacher feedback practices to improve student oral communication skills in language arts.
• Promoting social-emotional learning through mindfulness-based interventions in high schools.
• Examining the impact of project-based learning on student creativity and problem-solving skills in technology education.
• Strategies for supporting students with learning difficulties in inclusive science classrooms.
• Investigating the effects of differentiated instruction on student motivation and academic achievement in social studies.
• Enhancing parental involvement in supporting numeracy development at home.
• Promoting inclusive practices for students with sensory impairments in inclusive classrooms.
• Examining the impact of teacher-student relationships on student motivation and academic achievement in physical education.
• Strategies for promoting positive peer relationships and reducing bullying in high schools.
• Investigating the effects of arts integration on student motivation and academic achievement in mathematics education.
• Enhancing the use of educational technology for students with learning difficulties in science education.
• Promoting character education and ethical decision-making in elementary schools.
• Examining the impact of teacher self-efficacy on instructional practices and student outcomes in music education.
• Strategies for supporting students with English language learning difficulties in mathematics classes.
• Investigating the effects of arts integration on student creativity and academic achievement in social-emotional learning.
• Enhancing family-school partnerships for students with special educational needs in inclusive settings.
• Promoting critical digital literacy skills for responsible online communication in language arts education.
• Examining the impact of inclusive physical education on student attitudes towards physical fitness and well-being.
• Strategies for supporting students with dyscalculia in mathematics instruction.
• Investigating the effects of outdoor education on student environmental knowledge and sustainability practices.
• Enhancing the use of educational technology for students with hearing impairments in inclusive classrooms.
• Promoting career exploration and development in middle school education.
• Examining the impact of parent-led science experiments on student interest and learning outcomes in science education.
• Strategies for promoting positive teacher-student relationships in virtual learning environments.
• Investigating the effects of arts integration on student creativity and academic achievement in language arts.
• Enhancing teacher collaboration for effective co-planning and instructional delivery in inclusive classrooms.
• Promoting global citizenship and cultural competence in foreign language education.
• Examining the impact of cooperative learning on student social-emotional development and well-being.
• Strategies for supporting students with physical disabilities in adaptive physical education classes.
• Investigating the effects of project-based learning on student problem-solving skills in engineering education.
• Enhancing cultural competence among educators for working with diverse student populations in social studies.
• Promoting digital literacy skills for responsible online research and information evaluation.
• Examining the impact of restorative practices on reducing conflicts and promoting positive relationships in middle schools.
• Strategies for supporting students with emotional and behavioral challenges in inclusive classrooms.
• Investigating the effects of growth mindset interventions on student academic resilience in language arts.
• Enhancing parent-teacher communication for effective collaboration and student support in mathematics education.
• Promoting environmental sustainability education in primary schools through cross-curricular integration.
• Examining the impact of outdoor experiential learning on student ecological literacy and environmental stewardship.
• Strategies for creating inclusive classrooms for students with cognitive impairments.
• Investigating the effects of student-led conferences on student self-reflection and goal-setting in science education.
• Enhancing the use of formative assessment for personalized instruction in social studies.
• Promoting positive classroom management strategies for students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
• Examining the impact of cooperative learning on student academic achievement in physical sciences.
• Strategies for promoting inclusive practices for students with speech and language difficulties in inclusive classrooms.
• Investigating the effects of blended learning models on student engagement and learning outcomes in language arts.
• Enhancing teacher feedback practices to improve student presentation skills in communication studies.
• Promoting social-emotional learning through mindfulness-based interventions in middle schools.
• Examining the impact of project-based learning on student creativity and problem-solving skills in fine arts.
• Strategies for supporting students with learning difficulties in inclusive social-emotional learning programs.
• Investigating the effects of differentiated instruction on student motivation and academic achievement in physical education.
• Enhancing parental involvement in supporting STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education at home.
• Promoting inclusive practices for students with intellectual disabilities in inclusive classrooms.
• Examining the impact of teacher-student relationships on student motivation and academic achievement in music education.
• Strategies for promoting positive peer relationships and fostering social-emotional development in high schools.
• Investigating the effects of arts integration on student motivation and academic achievement in physical sciences.
• Enhancing the use of educational technology for students with learning difficulties in social studies education.
• Promoting character education and ethical decision-making in secondary schools.
• Examining the impact of teacher self-efficacy on instructional practices and student outcomes in physical education.
• Strategies for supporting students with English language learning difficulties in science classes.
• Investigating the effects of arts integration on student creativity and academic achievement in physical education.
• Enhancing family-school partnerships for students with special educational needs in inclusive physical education settings.
• Promoting critical digital literacy skills for responsible online communication in social studies education.
• Strategies for supporting students with dysgraphia in writing instruction.
• Investigating the effects of outdoor education on student environmental knowledge and sustainable practices in science education.
• Enhancing the use of educational technology for students with visual impairments in inclusive classrooms.
• Promoting career exploration and development in high school education.
• Examining the impact of parent-led math activities on student interest and learning outcomes in mathematics education.
• Investigating the effects of arts integration on student creativity and academic achievement in social sciences.
• Enhancing teacher collaboration for effective co-planning and instructional delivery in inclusive physical education settings.
• Promoting global citizenship and cultural competence in history education.
• Examining the impact of cooperative learning on student social-emotional development and well-being in language arts.
• Strategies for supporting students with physical disabilities in inclusive arts education classes.
• Investigating the effects of project-based learning on student problem-solving skills in computer programming education.
• Enhancing cultural competence among educators for working with diverse student populations in mathematics education.
• Promoting digital literacy skills for responsible online communication and information sharing.
• Examining the impact of restorative practices on reducing conflicts and promoting positive relationships in high schools.
• Strategies for supporting students with emotional and behavioral challenges in inclusive language arts classrooms.
• Investigating the effects of growth mindset interventions on student academic resilience in social sciences.
• Enhancing parent-teacher communication for effective collaboration and student support in science education.
• Promoting environmental sustainability education in elementary schools through interdisciplinary integration.

Tips to write appealing action research paper in education

Here are some tips to write an appealing action research paper in education:

• Select a Relevant and Engaging Topic: Choose action research topics in education that is relevant to the field of education and aligns with your interests and goals. Select a topic that has practical implications and can contribute to improving educational practices.
• Clearly Define the Problem: Clearly define the problem or issue you want to address through your action research. Provide a concise and focused problem statement that highlights the specific area you aim to investigate.
• Set Clear Objectives: State clear and measurable objectives for your research. Identify what you want to achieve through your study and how you plan to measure your outcomes.
• Conduct a Literature Review: Conduct a thorough review of existing literature related to your research topic. Identify gaps in current knowledge and highlight how your research will contribute to filling those gaps.
• Use a Rigorous Research Design: Choose an appropriate research design that aligns with your research objectives. Consider whether a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods approach is most suitable for your study.
• Collect and Analyze Data: Collect relevant data through appropriate methods, such as surveys, interviews, observations, or document analysis. Use rigorous data analysis techniques to derive meaningful findings from your data.
• Reflect and Take Action: Reflect on your findings and consider their implications for educational practice. Based on your findings, develop actionable recommendations or interventions that can be implemented to address the identified problem.
• Write Clearly and Concisely: Present your research in a clear and concise manner. Use appropriate academic language and structure your paper logically. Clearly explain your methodology, findings, and conclusions.
• Support Findings with Evidence: Use evidence from your data analysis to support your findings and conclusions. Use graphs, charts, or quotes from participants to enhance the credibility of your research.
• Discuss Limitations and Future Directions: Acknowledge the limitations of your study and discuss areas for future research. Address any potential biases or challenges that may have influenced your findings.
• Consider the Audience: Keep in mind the intended audience for your research paper, which may include educators, researchers, or policymakers. Write in a way that engages and appeals to your target audience.
• Revise and Edit: Proofread your paper for any grammatical or spelling errors. Revise your content to ensure clarity and coherence. Seek feedback from peers or mentors to improve the quality of your paper.

Remember, an appealing action research paper in education is one that not only presents valuable findings but also offers practical insights and recommendations for improving educational practices.

In conclusion, action research topics in education provide a powerful framework for addressing real-world issues and improving teaching and learning practices. This research approach empowers educators to take an active role in identifying challenges, implementing interventions, and evaluating their impact within their own classrooms or educational settings. 

By engaging in systematic inquiry, educators can generate valuable insights, evidence-based strategies, and meaningful changes that positively influence student outcomes. Action research promotes a reflective and collaborative approach, encouraging teachers to continuously refine their instructional methods, adapt to diverse student needs, and create inclusive learning environments. 

Ultimately, action research in education empowers educators to be agents of change, fostering innovation and improvement in education while enhancing student engagement, achievement, and well-being.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Research reveals language barriers limit effectiveness of cybersecurity resources

Online guidance that provides the most effective educational tools and reporting forms is only available in english.

The idea for Fawn Ngo's latest research came from a television interview.

Ngo, a University of South Florida criminologist, had spoken with a Vietnamese language network in California about her interest in better understanding how people become victims of cybercrime.

Afterward, she began receiving phone calls from viewers recounting their own experiences of victimization.

"Some of the stories were unfortunate and heartbreaking," said Ngo, an associate professor in the USF College of Behavioral and Community Sciences. "They made me wonder about the availability and accessibility of cybersecurity information and resources for non-English speakers. Upon investigating further, I discovered that such information and resources were either limited or nonexistent."

The result is what's believed to be the first study to explore the links among demographic characteristics, cyber hygiene practices and cyber victimization using a sample of limited English proficiency internet users.

Ngo is the lead author of an article, "Cyber Hygiene and Cyber Victimization Among Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Internet Users: A Mixed-Method Study," which just published in the journal Victims & Offenders . The article's co-authors are Katherine Holman, a USF graduate student and former Georgia state prosecutor, and Anurag Agarwal, professor of information systems, analytics and supply chain at Florida Gulf Coast University.

Their research, which focused on Spanish and Vietnamese speakers, led to two closely connected main takeaways:

• LEP Internet users share the same concern about cyber threats and the same desire for online safety as any other individual. However, they are constrained by a lack of culturally and linguistically appropriate resources, which also hampers accurate collection of cyber victimization data among vulnerable populations.
• Online guidance that provides the most effective educational tools and reporting forms is only available in English. The most notable example is the website for the Internet Crime Complaint Center, which serves as the FBI's primary apparatus for combatting cybercrime.

As a result, the study showed that many well-intentioned LEP users still engage in risky online behaviors like using unsecured networks and sharing passwords. For example, only 29 percent of the study's focus group participants avoided using public Wi-Fi over the previous 12 months, and only 17 percent said they had antivirus software installed on their digital devices.

Previous research cited in Ngo's paper has shown that underserved populations exhibit poorer cybersecurity knowledge and outcomes, most commonly in the form of computer viruses and hacked accounts, including social media accounts. Often, it's because they lack awareness and understanding and isn't a result of disinterest, Ngo said.

"According to cybersecurity experts, humans are the weakest link in the chain of cybersecurity," Ngo said. "If we want to secure our digital borders, we must ensure that every member in society, regardless of their language skills, is well-informed about the risks inherent in the cyber world."

The study's findings point to a need for providing cyber hygiene information and resources in multiple formats, including visual aids and audio guides, to accommodate diverse literacy levels within LEP communities, Ngo said. She added that further research is needed to address the current security gap and ensure equitable access to cybersecurity resources for all Internet users.

In the meantime, Ngo is preparing to launch a website with cybersecurity information and resources in different languages and a link to report victimization.

"It's my hope that cybersecurity information and resources will become as readily accessible in other languages as other vital information, such as information related to health and safety," Ngo said. "I also want LEP victims to be included in national data and statistics on cybercrime and their experiences accurately represented and addressed in cybersecurity initiatives."

• Communications
• Computers and Internet
• Information Technology
• Privacy Issues
• STEM Education
• Security and Defense
• World Development
• Cyber-bullying
• Cyber security standards
• Voice over IP
• Massively multiplayer online game
• National Security Agency
• World Wide Web
• Scientific method
• HTTP cookie

Story Source:

Materials provided by University of South Florida . Original written by John Dudley. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference :

• Fawn T. Ngo, Anurag Agarwal, Katherine Holman. Cyber Hygiene and Cyber Victimization Among Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Internet Users: A Mixed-Method Study . Victims & Offenders , 2024; 1 DOI: 10.1080/15564886.2024.2329765

Cite This Page :

Explore More

• Simple Brain-Computer Link: Gaming With Thoughts
• Clinical Reasoning: Chatbot Vs Physicians
• Understanding People Who Can't Visualize
• Illuminating Oxygen's Journey in the Brain
• DNA Study IDs Descendants of George Washington
• Heart Disease Risk: More Than One Drink a Day
• Unlocking Supernova Stardust Secrets
• Why Do Some Memories Become Longterm?
• Cell Division Quality Control 'Stopwatch'
• What Controls Sun's Differential Rotation?

Trending Topics

Strange & offbeat.