chapter 4 data analysis and findings qualitative research pdf

Investigating AI Readiness in the Maltese Public Administration pp 33–41 Cite as

Qualitative Research and Findings

• Marvic Sciberras 11 &
• Alexiei Dingli 12  
• First Online: 28 January 2023

192 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 568))

Aspers and Corte (Qual Sociol 42:139–160, 2019) define qualitative research as a continuous practice whereby the researchers gain a better understanding of the subject being investigated, by identifying new important distinctions or enforcing relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Aspers P, Corte U (2019) What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qual Sociol 42(2):139–160

Article   Google Scholar  

Adams WC (2015) Conducting semi-structured interviews. In: Wholey JS, Hatry HP, Newcomer KE (eds) Handbook of practical program evaluation. Wiley & Sons Inc, CA, pp 492–505

Google Scholar  

Asiamah N, Mensah HK, Oteng-Abayie EF (2017) General, target and accessible population: demystifying the concepts for effective sampling. Qual Rep 22(6):1607–1622

Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS (2016) Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat 5(1):1–4

Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ (2017) Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods 16:1–13

Woiceshyn J, Daellenbach U (2018) Evaluating inductive vs deductive research in management studies: implications for authors, editors and reviewers. Qual Research Organ Manage Int J 13(2):183–195

Hanafizadeh P, Harati Nik MR (2020) Configuration of data monetization: a review of literature with thematic analysis. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 21:17–34

Cypress B (2017) Rigour or reliability and validity in qualitative research: perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization and recommendations. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 36(4):253–263

Hayashi PJ, Abib G, Hoppen N (2019) Validity in qualitative research: a processual approach. Qual Rep 24(1):98–112

Daniel BK (2019) What constitutes a good qualitative research study? Fundamental dimensions and indicators of rigour in qualitative reseach: the TACT Framework. Academic conferences international limited, Kidmore End

Creswell JW, Miller DL (2000) Determining validity in qualitaitve inquiry. Theory Pract 39(3):124–130

Nair LB (2020) From ‘Whodunit’ to How@: detective stories and auditability in qualitative business ethics research. J Bus Ethics 1:1–15

Stacey A (2019) Proceedings of the 18th European conference on research methodology for business and management studies, wits business school, Johannesburg, South Africa, 20–21 June 2019. Academic conference and publishing intenational ltd., Reading

Cope DG (2014) Methods and meanings: credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum 40(1):89–91

Forero R et al (2018) Application of four dimension criteria to assess the rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine. BMC Health Serv Res 18(1):1–11

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

IDEA Academy Malta, Mosta, Malta

Marvic Sciberras

University of Malta, Msida, Malta

Alexiei Dingli

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marvic Sciberras .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter.

Sciberras, M., Dingli, A. (2023). Qualitative Research and Findings. In: Investigating AI Readiness in the Maltese Public Administration. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 568. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19900-4_10

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19900-4_10

Published : 28 January 2023

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-19899-1

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-19900-4

eBook Packages : Intelligent Technologies and Robotics Intelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

CHAPTER 4 FINDINGS 4.1 Qualitative Data Source

Related Papers

Physiotherapy

Corinne Dalelio , Christina Selby

This chapter makes an argument for using qualitative methods for assessing students’ knowledge at the program level in order to observe their abilities and application of knowledge as demonstrated in an actual learning environment. A model for using focus groups to evaluate achievement of higher level learning outcomes is presented, drawing on a case study based on assessment of students in the communication major at Coastal Carolina University. Specifically, six focus groups with 8-12 students in each were conducted. Guided discussion, following presentations of an electronic and a print-based message led to a high level of student engagement. Case study findings showed that although students demonstrated proficiency in understanding basic communication principles and immediate implications of each message, students were less able to demonstrate higher-level critical evaluation by identifying the messages’ longer-term societal implications. This model provides an opportunity for assessors in different academic contexts to identify specific weaknesses in their students’ learning processes and to adjust curricula accordingly.

Sıdıka Gizir

English for Specific Purposes World Journal, Issue 2(18) Vol. 7, pp. 1-14, 2008.

Ourania Katsara

This article reports on the findings of a survey on students’ views of the ESP course in University of Ioannina. Four focus group interviews were conducted, each consisting of 5 students. These interviews were carried out in order to further explore in depth data gathered in the two previous stages of the research. The finding indicated that there is a consistency over time on certain issues identified in previous interpretation of in-depth interviews and content analysis of essays. The evidence shows that there are problems regarding policies of foreign language teaching in the state sector and culture specific attitudes concerning English language learning. It is apparent that more adequate and descriptive information on the ESP course is required both to students and to academic staff of university departments. Co-operation among all appears to facilitate an effort to make the ESP course useful and worth attending in University. Keywords Focus group Interviews, Qualitative analysis, English for Specific Purposes, Greek students, needs analysis, motivation

Peter Gibbings

Benefits of collecting student feedback on courses, programs, learning experiences, and their perceptions of teaching quality, are well documented in literature. In the higher education system, this feedback is generally collected via student evaluation surveys. During the past few years, the Faculty of Engineering and Surveying (FoES), one of five faculties at USQ, has identified problems of small response rates, possible bias, general questions over data validity, relevance and wording of survey questions, and systems problems such as timeliness of official reports. Due to these problems, the data may not be reliable and the views of those who respond may not be representative of the overall student cohort. It is therefore risky to base management decisions on student satisfaction, teaching quality, and course quality on these data. Clearly, a more robust and reliable method of gathering feedback from students was needed that would provide more confidence in the data. For various ...

Monica Stitt-Bergh

ABSTRACT To help us act on general education assessment results and create improvement plans, we included student focus groups in our assessment procedures. The presenter highlights results including (a) course elements that students stated would help them meet outcomes in written communication, symbolic reasoning, and global and multicultural perspectives; (b) how students used general education knowledge and skills learned during the first two years to complete third-year assignments; and (c) how we used these results to engage faculty in constructive conversations that led to curricular changes. The presentation also features focus-group formats with activities such as “course timelines” and concept maps. EXTENDED ABSTRACT Using assessment results to improve student learning is a necessary but difficult task. To help us take action and create improvement plans, we included student focus groups as part of our general education assessment procedures. We wanted to add student voices to general education assessment in order to explore why learning was or was not happening and identify ways to improve. First, we wanted students to describe which assignments, pedagogical approaches, class size, etc., helped them achieve the general education learning outcomes. Second, we wanted to know if students perceived the first-year general education curriculum as foundational to subsequent courses, particularly courses in their major. To answer these questions, in 2010 we started a longitudinal study of learning in the general education program that included an annual focus group. We invited all first-year, first-time students (N=1,956) in fall 2010 to participate. Out of 356 volunteers, we used stratified random sampling to select 251 who closely matched the fall 2010 freshman class on these characteristics: age, high school GPA, college entrance scores, ethnicity, gender, and residency. All participants complete six online surveys each year and in addition, half of the participants submit coursework/exams from their general education courses each semester and attend an annual focus group. In spring 2012, 83 students participated in one of 10 focus groups, and 70 students (estimated) participated in eight focus groups in spring 2013. Our first-year general education curriculum includes a course on written communication (e.g., English 100), a symbolic reasoning course (e.g., Math 100), and two global and multicultural perspectives courses (e.g., History 151, Anthropology 151). The goals of the first-year general education curriculum are that students have skills and knowledge that are fundamental to undertaking higher education and necessary for living and working in diverse communities. With these goals, the general education outcomes, and use of assessment results in mind, we developed research questions for the annual focus groups: 1. What course structures (e.g., assignments, class size) would help students meet the learning outcomes related to written communication (WC), symbolic reasoning (SR), and global and multicultural perspectives (GMP)? [2012] 2. What WC, SR, and GMP knowledge and skills learned during the first two years do third-year students identify as being valuable? [2013] 3. Are students using WC, SR, and GMP knowledge and skills learned during the first two years to complete assignments or meet professor expectations in their third year? [2013] Course Structures That Encouraged Learning Related to the First-year Outcomes. Near the end of their second year (spring 2012), participants attended a focus group session in which they designed a first-year general education course aimed at helping students achieve the learning outcomes. The participants saw clear differences among the three areas: WC, SR, and GMP. For example, while their ideal WC and SR courses were limited to 15-20 students, the ideal GMP course enrollment was either a 50-student lecture or a large lecture plus a small-enrollment recitation section. Participants had mixed perceptions of the effectiveness of peer review in writing courses but were positive that peer-to-peer learning was effective in SR courses. Participants were able to describe the current and future value of the WC and SR outcomes, but the majority found little value in the GMP outcomes. Valuable WC, SR, and GMP Knowledge and Skills Learned During the First Two Years. Near the end of their third year (spring 2013), participants attended a focus group session in which they identified valuable WC, SR, and GMP knowledge and skills learned during the first two years. Preliminary results indicated that learning about doing research, using the library, and citing sources were most valued. Knowledge and Skills Learned During the First Two Years Used to Complete Assignments in the Third Year. In the third-year focus group (spring 2013), participants also described if and how they were using the WC, SR, and GMP knowledge and skills learned during their first two years to complete assignments or meet professor expectations in their third year. Preliminary results were as follows: first-year WC knowledge and skills had the strongest connections to third-year assignments across all majors. Regarding SR and GMP, the student’s major influenced student responses. Only students in business, science, and engineering programs reported using SR knowledge and skills. While most students felt GMP was not useful for third-year courses, more students now believed GMP would be useful after graduation. Use of Results. Our results serve as an entry into conversations with faculty about how to create a first-year experience that subsequent years build upon. We have and continue to present results to faculty committees that are responsible for the general education curriculum and faculty in departments that teach the general education courses. The use of results has varied. For example, the Anthropology Department restructured its GMP course from a large lecture only to a lecture plus small recitation sections. The General Education Committee has taken the findings into consideration as it debates policy decisions about whether students should be required to complete the GMP requirement during the first year or allowed to complete it at any time during their academic career. Learning Outcomes. Attendees will leave knowing 1. Course structures (e.g., assignments, class size) that students believed would help them meet the learning outcomes related to written communication (WC), symbolic reasoning (SR), and global and multicultural perspectives (GMP); 2. Knowledge and skills related to WC, SR, and GMP that third-year students identified as valuable; 3. How students used WC, SR, and GMP knowledge and skills learned during their first two years to complete assignments in their third year; and 4. How we use this information to engage faculty in constructive discussions about improving teaching and learning in the general education program. "

Journal of Southeast Asian American Education and Advancement

Hanum Tyagita

Wayne Wright , Sovicheth Boun

Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute this article, as long as the work is attributed to the author (s) and the Journal of Southeast Asian American Education & Advancement, it is distributed for noncommercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. More details of this Creative Commons license are available at http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. All other uses must be approved by the author (s) or JSAAEA.

RELATED PAPERS

퀸카지노쿠폰〃〃GCN777。COM〃〃문카지노

Ariana Apezteguia

Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada

Ana Cristina Biondo Salomão

Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

Rozelle De Leon

Linguistics in the Netherlands

Marine Biology

Kara Hichem

Maryam Karimi

Henryk Bąkowski

Pharmacological Research

MARIA APARECIDA Cicilini

Jurnal pendidikan sains Indonesia

isnanik fitriyah

Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations

Sandrine Ponnelle

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Vishwas Kapoor

Johan Noldus

Alexander Pozhitkov

Frontiers in Public Health

raheleh ganjali

Akram Jalal

Colloid and Polymer Science

Rayna Bryaskova

Pharmacology Research & Perspectives

JUrjen Lagas

Vatan KARAKAYA

Parasites & Vectors

Norman A Ratcliffe

Hebat-Allah S . Tohamy

Journal of Personalized Medicine

Bruno Morgado

Journal of High Energy Physics

Haitang Yang

Journal of the American Chemical Society

jose fernando Andres

Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science

Leticia Cardoso

See More Documents Like This

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024