law case study analysis

• PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
• EDIT Edit this Article
• EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
• Browse Articles
• Learn Something New
• Quizzes Hot
• This Or That Game
• Train Your Brain
• Explore More
• Support wikiHow
• About wikiHow
• Log in / Sign up
• Education and Communications
• Law Studies

How to Analyze Case Law

Last Updated: January 21, 2023 Fact Checked

This article was written by Jennifer Mueller, JD . Jennifer Mueller is an in-house legal expert at wikiHow. Jennifer reviews, fact-checks, and evaluates wikiHow's legal content to ensure thoroughness and accuracy. She received her JD from Indiana University Maurer School of Law in 2006. There are 7 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 125,998 times.

When you hear the word "law," you may assume the word refers to statutes passed by Congress and state legislatures. But a major portion of American law actually is case law – the rules appellate judges distill from their interpretation of statutes and other sources. Accordingly, much of law school is spent learning how to analyze case law. However, attending law school isn't strictly necessary to acquire this valuable skill. You can teach yourself how to analyze case law, which begins – but doesn't end – with a thorough reading of the court's written opinion.

Summarizing the Facts

• The first time you read through a case, don't worry about trying to understand it. Just read for a sense of what's happening, who the major parties are, and what they want the court to do.
• Keep in mind that legal opinions aren't written for laypeople, or even for law students or attorneys – they are written for other judges. If you don't understand something (assuming you're not an appellate court judge), there's nothing wrong with that.
• You may have to go outside the opinion itself and look at other articles about the case, and then come back to it. For example, if you're reading a case that caused quite a stir in the media when it was decided, there will no doubt be newspaper and magazine articles about it. Reading those can help you better understand the court opinion.
• Many cases have summaries that appear before the case and let you know the basics of what happened, the issue before the court, and how the court resolved that issue. The summary can be helpful, but don't use it as a substitute for an initial read-through of the case.

• To make party identification even more confusing, party names may switch sides of the "v." in the case caption depending on who appealed. For example, suppose when a case began, Sally Sunshine sued Marvin Moon. The case's caption would be "Sunshine v. Moon." The trial court found in favor of Ms. Sunshine – but Mr. Moon appealed. The caption then became "Moon v. Sunshine."
• To continue the example, suppose the appellate court found in favor of Mr. Moon, but Ms. Sunshine appealed that ruling to a higher court. Now the case's caption is "Sunshine v. Moon" again.
• Since litigants in written opinions typically are only identified by their roles – appellant and appellee, for example – their names may only be mentioned once.

• Since the procedural history determines the role of the litigants, and thus what each of them is called throughout the written opinion, understanding how the case moved through the court system – who sued whom, and who appealed – is paramount to understanding the case.
• At the same time, you don't need to go into too much detail here. You just need to understand who filed the original lawsuit (which will help you understand the facts of the case), the decision at trial, and who appealed and why.

• At the appellate level, the courts are concerned with legal issues, not questions of fact. So, for example, if you are reading a case that came about as a result of a bar fight, the factual question of whether one party assaulted the other has already been resolved.
• In many cases, the initial facts that prompted the dispute may be summarized in a sentence or two. Often, what's really important is what happened afterward.
• Keep in mind that not all judges are the best writers. While you may be tempted to believe a particular fact is important because the judge who wrote the opinion spent several paragraphs discussing it, this is not necessarily the case.
• As you read more and more cases, particularly if the cases you read are focused on a particular court, you will become familiar with the styles of individual judges. This can make it easier for you to immediately notice when the judge is focusing on facts he or she believes are central to the case's holding.

Identifying the Issue and Decision

• Essentially, you're looking for what the person who appealed the lower court's ruling wanted to happen, that didn't. To find the issue, you must figure out what that person thought the lower court did wrong, and why.
• This usually isn't about something as simple as one person believing he should have been awarded more money, or a criminal defendant not wanting to go to jail. That might be part of an appellant's personal motivation, but to have a legitimate appeal you must be able to point to some way that the lower court made a legal error.
• In many cases, the legal error isn't an obvious error. The lower court may have applied the law correctly – but the appellant is arguing that her case is different from the cases that developed the rule the lower court used, or that the lower court should have used a different rule.
• Often in Supreme Court cases, there isn't a rule that can be handed down from previous cases and applied in this case, because no court has ever decided a case like this one. In these situations, it's up to the court to figure out how to tackle this new issue, and where it fits in to the long line of American jurisprudence.

• In some cases, the issue before the court involves multiple yes/no questions, or a follow-up question that is conditional on the answer to the first.
• This usually happens when a particular factual situation present in the case has never been explored by any other court. The court must first determine whether a particular law applies to that factual situation at all before it can decide how the law applies.
• For example, suppose a baker has been fined by the local government for creating cupcakes with expletives written in icing. The court may first have to determine whether icing on cupcakes is the sort of speech or expression protected by the First Amendment, before it can reach the real issue of whether the baker's First Amendment rights have been violated.

• Some judges have a very clear, straightforward writing style, and they'll phrase the issue as a question and answer it directly. However, this isn't usually the case. In most written opinions, you should expect to dig for the question and answer, which you'll have to craft yourself.
• When more than one question is asked, sometimes the answer to the first takes care of all the others. To look at the earlier cupcake-icing example, if the court had determined that no, icing on cupcakes is not protected by the First Amendment, the second question disappears. You don't have to consider whether the baker's First Amendment rights were violated by the fine, because she didn't have any First Amendment rights in the first place.
• When the answer is qualified with a "sometimes," any conditional questions that follow likewise will have qualifications. #Note any significant dissents. In many cases, particularly at the Supreme Court level, a justice who disagrees with the majority will issue a dissent. As time passes and court interpretation evolves, a significant dissent may end up being a majority opinion later on when the court reverses or overturns an earlier decision. [12] X Research source
• There also may be concurrences, which are separate opinions written by justices who agree with the ultimate outcome of the case, but not with the reasoning the majority applied to get there. Often a concurrence can help you understand the majority's reasoning, particularly if it seemed convoluted on first read.
• Unless you understand where the case you're reading falls in the history and development of that particular area of law, you may not be able to recognize which other opinions are important until you do further research.
• If you're unsure, it's best to simply note other opinions – be they dissents or concurrences – and the key difference between them and the majority's opinion.
• Especially if you're reading a Supreme Court case, you also should note which justice authored the dissent or concurrence. As justices leave the court and are replaced, the values and judicial temperament of the majority also can change.
• A dissent from a decade ago may become a majority opinion tomorrow – often written by the same justice, now carrying the majority where he or she once held a minority view.

Understanding the Reasoning

• Make note of the case from which the rule came, although typically it's not necessary for you to go back and read the case itself to understand the rule.
• However, if a significant portion of the opinion discusses the previous case, you may want to go back and read it as well so you have a better understanding of what the court is talking about.
• In some opinions (especially those penned by judges with straightforward writing styles), the rule used by the court will follow trigger phrases such as "the rule we apply is" or "we decide this case by applying the rule from" – phrases that alert you the court is about to tell you exactly what rule they used.
• Most opinions won't be this direct, and require a closer analysis of the language to ascertain the rule the court used. Sometimes you can figure this out by working backwards. Read the court's decision, and then follow the court's train of logic in reverse until you reach the rule.

• The application of a legal precedent to the facts of a case is the heart of legal analysis. This typically is done using similes. Seldom has the exact issue been presented before – to make a decision, the court must determine that this case is like a different case, and therefore the same rule should apply.
• Keep in mind that, especially if you're analyzing a Supreme Court case, the court wouldn't have accepted that case on appeal if it didn't present a new issue that had not already been decided in an earlier case.
• For this reason, there likely won't be a precedent that is entirely on point, or a previous case with the same fact pattern in which the same issue was raised and decided.
• Rather, the court must compare cases to find a rule that applies closely and is based on a similar situation that is analogous to the dispute presented.

• Sometimes the easiest way to locate the court's pivotal fact or facts is to consider what would have happened if they'd chosen to focus on a different fact.
• For example, if the court in the case of the beleaguered baker had decided to focus on the fact that cupcakes are food, and food has never been protected under the First Amendment, it might have arrived at a different decision than it did. Because the court focused instead on the fact that the baker wrote words with icing, just as writers write words in ink, and concluded that written words inarguably enjoy First Amendment protection.
• Although many other facts may be relevant, or important to some other aspect of the case, those aren't the facts that made the court rule the way it did.

• No court case exists in isolation. Once a court issues a decision, the legal interpretation and rules it establishes become part of the larger body of law devoted to that particular issue. Each opinion helps future courts understand more about the statute or constitutional provision at the heart of the case.
• You don't have to wait for future courts to apply the rule you've just learned to other cases, however. Take the facts in the original case and twist them slightly, then apply the rule yourself.
• Law professors call these imaginary cases "hypotheticals," and spend a good portion of class churning them out and asking their students to apply the rule they've learned to sometimes bizarre and convoluted stories.

Expert Q&A

You might also like.

• ↑ https://www.gareth-evans.com/how-to-read-understand-and-summarise-legal-cases/
• ↑ http://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/lawschool/pre-law/reading-a-casebook.page
• ↑ https://www.monash.edu/learnhq/write-like-a-pro/annotated-assessment-samples/law/law-case-note
• ↑ https://utas.libguides.com/legal_research/caselaw
• ↑ http://www.cengage.com/resource_uploads/downloads/0324654553_91282.pdf
• ↑ https://lawschool.westlaw.com/marketing/display/SG/3
• ↑ http://www.csun.edu/~kkd61657/brief.pdf

About This Article

Case law refers to the decisions appellate judges make from their interpretations of former cases. To analyze specific case law, you’ll need to read the case through and try to get a feel for how the court made their decision. It can be pretty complex when you’re first reading a case, so jot down the main parties, the main dispute, and a brief history of the case to help yourself keep track. Once you understand the case, try to identify the legal rules the court used to make their decision. It’s also helpful to imagine different scenarios where the rule the case established could be applied, and whether or not the outcome would be the same. To learn how to focus on the most important facts of a case, read more from our Legal co-author! Did this summary help you? Yes No

• Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

Ibrahim Abubakar

May 8, 2021

Did this article help you?

Feb 6, 2019

Busisiwe Nyezi-Zikizela

Feb 9, 2020

Isreal Van de vaar

Mar 30, 2020

Sep 4, 2020

Featured Articles

Trending Articles

Watch Articles

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Do Not Sell or Share My Info
• Not Selling Info

wikiHow Tech Help Pro:

Develop the tech skills you need for work and life

• How to Prepare for Law School
• How to brief a case
• E-mail This Page
• Print This Page

How to write a case brief for law school: Excerpt reproduced from Introduction to the Study of Law: Cases and Materials ,

Third edition (lexisnexis 2009) by michael makdisi & john makdisi.

C. HOW TO BRIEF

The previous section described the parts of a case in order to make it easier to read and identify the pertinent information that you will use to create your briefs. This section will describe the parts of a brief in order to give you an idea about what a brief is, what is helpful to include in a brief, and what purpose it serves. Case briefs are a necessary study aid in law school that helps to encapsulate and analyze the mountainous mass of material that law students must digest. The case brief represents a final product after reading a case, rereading it, taking it apart, and putting it back together again. In addition to its function as a tool for self-instruction and referencing, the case brief also provides a valuable “cheat sheet” for class participation.

Who will read your brief? Most professors will espouse the value of briefing but will never ask to see that you have, in fact, briefed. As a practicing lawyer, your client doesn’t care if you brief, so long as you win the case. The judges certainly don’t care if you brief, so long as you competently practice the law. You are the person that the brief will serve! Keep this in mind when deciding what elements to include as part of your brief and when deciding what information to include under those elements.

What are the elements of a brief? Different people will tell you to include different things in your brief. Most likely, upon entering law school, this will happen with one or more of your instructors. While opinions may vary, four elements that are essential to any useful brief are the following:

(a) Facts (name of the case and its parties, what happened factually and procedurally, and the judgment)

(b) Issues (what is in dispute)

(c) Holding (the applied rule of law)

(d) Rationale (reasons for the holding)

If you include nothing but these four elements, you should have everything you need in order to recall effectively the information from the case during class or several months later when studying for exams.

Because briefs are made for yourself, you may want to include other elements that expand the four elements listed above. Depending on the case, the inclusion of additional elements may be useful. For example, a case that has a long and important section expounding dicta might call for a separate section in your brief labeled: Dicta. Whatever elements you decide to include, however, remember that the brief is a tool intended for personal use. To the extent that more elements will help with organization and use of the brief, include them. On the other hand, if you find that having more elements makes your brief cumbersome and hard to use, cut back on the number of elements. At a minimum, however, make sure you include the four elements listed above.

Elements that you may want to consider including in addition to the four basic elements are:

(e) Dicta (commentary about the decision that was not the basis for the decision)

(f) Dissent (if a valuable dissenting opinion exits, the dissent’s opinion)

(g) Party’s Arguments (each party’s opposing argument concerning the ultimate issue)

(h) Comments (personal commentary)

Personal comments can be useful if you have a thought that does not fit elsewhere. In the personal experience of one of the authors, this element was used to label cases as specific kinds (e.g., as a case of vicarious liability) or make mental notes about what he found peculiar or puzzling about cases. This element allowed him to release his thoughts (without losing them) so that he could move on to other cases.

In addition to these elements, it may help you to organize your thoughts, as some people do, by dividing Facts into separate elements:

(1) Facts of the case (what actually happened, the controversy)

(2) Procedural History (what events within the court system led to the present case)

(3) Judgment (what the court actually decided)

Procedural History is usually minimal and most of the time irrelevant to the ultimate importance of a case; however, this is not always true. One subject in which Procedure History is virtually always relevant is Civil Procedure.

When describing the Judgment of the case, distinguish it from the Holding. The Judgment is the factual determination by the court, in favor of one party, such as “affirmed,” “reversed,” or “remanded.” In contrast, the Holding is the applied rule of law that serves as the basis for the ultimate judgment.

Remember that the purpose of a brief is to remind you of the important details that make the case significant in terms of the law. It will be a reference tool when you are drilled by a professor and will be a study aid when you prepare for exams. A brief is also like a puzzle piece.

The elements of the brief create the unique shape and colors of the piece, and, when combined with other pieces, the picture of the common law takes form. A well-constructed brief will save you lots of time by removing the need to return to the case to remember the important details and also by making it easier to put together the pieces of the common law puzzle.

D. EXTRACTING THE RELEVANT INFORMATION: ANNOTATING AND HIGHLIGHTING

So now that you know the basic elements of a brief, what information is important to include under each element? The simple answer is: whatever is relevant. But what parts of a case are relevant? When you read your first few cases, you may think that everything that the judge said was relevant to his ultimate conclusion. Even if this were true, what is relevant for the judge to make his decision is not always relevant for you to include in your brief. Remember, the reason to make a brief is not to persuade the world that the ultimate decision in the case is a sound one, but rather to aid in refreshing your memory concerning the most important parts of the case.

What facts are relevant to include in a brief? You should include the facts that are necessary to remind you of the story. If you forget the story, you will not remember how the law in the case was applied. You should also include the facts that are dispositive to the decision in the case. For instance, if the fact that a car is white is a determining factor in the case, the brief should note that the case involves a white car and not simply a car. To the extent that the procedural history either helps you to remember the case or plays an important role in the ultimate outcome, you should include these facts as well.

What issues and conclusions are relevant to include in a brief? There is usually one main issue on which the court rests its decision. This may seem simple, but the court may talk about multiple issues, and may discuss multiple arguments from both sides of the case. Be sure to distinguish the issues from the arguments made by the parties. The relevant issue or issues, and corresponding conclusions, are the ones for which the court made a final decision and which are binding. The court may discuss intermediate conclusions or issues, but stay focused on the main issue and conclusion which binds future courts.

What rationale is important to include in a brief? This is probably the most difficult aspect of the case to determine. Remember that everything that is discussed may have been relevant to the judge, but it is not necessarily relevant to the rationale of the decision. The goal is to remind yourself of the basic reasoning that the court used to come to its decision and the key factors that made the decision favor one side or the other.

A brief should be brief! Overly long or cumbersome briefs are not very helpful because you will not be able to skim them easily when you review your notes or when the professor drills you. On the other hand, a brief that is too short will be equally unhelpful because it lacks sufficient information to refresh your memory. Try to keep your briefs to one page in length. This will make it easy for you to organize and reference them.

Do not get discouraged. Learning to brief and figuring out exactly what to include will take time and practice. The more you brief, the easier it will become to extract the relevant information.

While a brief is an extremely helpful and important study aid, annotating and highlighting are other tools for breaking down the mass of material in your casebook. The remainder of this section will discuss these different techniques and show how they complement and enhance the briefing process.

Annotating Cases

Many of you probably already read with a pencil or pen, but if you do not, now is the time to get in the habit. Cases are so dense and full of information that you will find yourself spending considerable amounts of time rereading cases to find what you need. An effective way to reduce this time is to annotate the margins of the casebook. Your pencil (or pen) will be one of your best friends while reading a case. It will allow you to mark off the different sections (such as facts, procedural history, or conclusions), thus allowing you to clear your mind of thoughts and providing an invaluable resource when briefing and reviewing.

You might be wondering why annotating is important if you make an adequate, well-constructed brief. By their very nature briefs cannot cover everything in a case. Even with a thorough, well-constructed brief you may want to reference the original case in order to reread dicta that might not have seemed important at the time, to review the complete procedural history or set of facts, or to scour the rationale for a better understanding of the case; annotating makes these tasks easier. Whether you return to a case after a few hours or a few months, annotations will swiftly guide you to the pertinent parts of the case by providing a roadmap of the important sections. Your textual markings and margin notes will refresh your memory and restore specific thoughts you might have had about either the case in general or an individual passage.

Annotations will also remind you of forgotten thoughts and random ideas by providing a medium for personal comments.

In addition to making it easier to review an original case, annotating cases during the first review of a case makes the briefing process easier. With adequate annotations, the important details needed for your brief will be much easier to retrieve. Without annotations, you will likely have difficulty locating the information you seek even in the short cases. It might seem strange that it would be hard to reference a short case, but even a short case will likely take you at least fifteen to twenty-five minutes to read, while longer cases may take as much as thirty minutes to an hour to complete. No matter how long it takes, the dense material of all cases makes it difficult to remember all your thoughts, and trying to locate specific sections of the analysis may feel like you are trying to locate a needle in a haystack. An annotation in the margin, however, will not only swiftly guide you to a pertinent section, but will also refresh the thoughts that you had while reading that section.

When you read a case for the first time, read for the story and for a basic understanding of the dispute, the issues, the rationale, and the decision. As you hit these elements (or what you think are these elements) make a mark in the margins. Your markings can be as simple as “facts” (with a bracket that indicates the relevant part of the paragraph). When you spot an issue, you may simply mark “issue” or instead provide a synopsis in your own words. When a case sparks an idea — write that idea in the margin as well — you never know when a seemingly irrelevant idea might turn into something more.

Finally, when you spot a particularly important part of the text, underline it (or highlight it as described below).

With a basic understanding of the case, and with annotations in the margin, the second read-through of the case should be much easier. You can direct your reading to the most important sections and will have an easier time identifying what is and is not important. Continue rereading the case until you have identified all the relevant information that you need to make your brief, including the issue(s), the facts, the holding, and the relevant parts of the analysis.

Pencil or pen — which is better to use when annotating? Our recommendation is a mechanical pencil. Mechanical pencils make finer markings than regular pencils, and also than ballpoint pens. Although you might think a pencil might smear more than a pen, with its sharp point a mechanical pencil uses very little excess lead and will not smear as much as you might imagine. A mechanical pencil will also give you the freedom to make mistakes without consequences. When you first start annotating, you may think that some passages are more important than they really are, and therefore you may resist the urge to make a mark in order to preserve your book and prevent false guideposts. With a pencil, however, the ability to erase and rewrite removes this problem.

Highlighting

Why highlight? Like annotating, highlighting may seem unimportant if you create thorough, well-constructed briefs, but highlighting directly helps you to brief. It makes cases, especially the more complicated ones, easy to digest, review and use to extract information.

Highlighting takes advantage of colors to provide a uniquely effective method for reviewing and referencing a case. If you prefer a visual approach to learning, you may find highlighting to be a very effective tool.

If annotating and highlighting are so effective, why brief? Because the process of summarizing a case and putting it into your own words within a brief provides an understanding of the law and of the case that you cannot gain through the process of highlighting or annotating.

The process of putting the case into your own words forces you to digest the material, while annotating and highlighting can be accomplished in a much more passive manner.

What should you highlight? Similar to annotating, the best parts of the case to highlight are those that represent the needed information for your brief such as the facts, the issue, the holding and the rationale.

Unlike annotating, highlighting provides an effective way to color code, which makes referring to the case even easier. In addition, Highlighters are particularly useful in marking off entire sections by using brackets. These brackets will allow you to color-code the case without highlighting all the text, leaving the most important phrases untouched for a more detailed highlight marking or underlining.

Highlighting is a personal tool, and therefore should be used to the extent that highlighting helps, but should be modified in a way that makes it personally time efficient and beneficial. For instance, you might combine the use of annotations in the margins with the visual benefit of highlighting the relevant text. You may prefer to underline the relevant text with a pencil, but to use a highlighter to bracket off the different sections of a case. Whatever you choose to do, make sure that it works for you, regardless of what others recommend. The techniques in the remainder of this section will describe ways to make full use of your highlighters.

First, buy yourself a set of multi-colored highlighters, with at least four, or perhaps five or six different colors. Yellow, pink, and orange are usually the brightest. Depending on the brand, purple and green can be dark, but still work well. Although blue is a beautiful color, it tends to darken and hide the text.

Therefore we recommend that you save blue for the elements that you rarely highlight.

For each different section of the case, choose a color, and use that color only when highlighting the section of the case designated for that color. Consider using yellow for the text that you tend to highlight most frequently. Because yellow is the brightest, you may be inclined to use yellow for the Conclusions in order to make them stand out the most. If you do this, however, you will exhaust your other colors much faster than yellow and this will require that you purchase an entire set of new highlighters when a single color runs out because colors such as green are not sold separately. If instead you choose to use yellow on a more frequently highlighted section such as the Analysis, when it comes time to replace your yellow marker, you will need only to replace your yellow highlighter individually. In the personal experience on one of the authors, the sections of cases that seemed to demand the most highlighter attention were the

Facts and the Analysis, while the Issues and Holdings demanded the least. Other Considerations and

Procedural History required lots of highlighting in particular cases although not in every case.

Experiment if you must, but try to choose a color scheme early on in the semester and stick with it. That way, when you come back to the first cases of the semester, you will not be confused with multiple color schemes. The basic sections of a case for which you should consider giving a different color are:

• Procedural History

• Issue (and questions presented)

• Holding (and conclusions)

• Analysis (rationale)

• Other Considerations (such as dicta)

Not all of these sections demand a separate color. You may find that combining Facts and Procedural History or Issues and Holdings works best. Furthermore, as mentioned above, some sections may not warrant highlighting in every case (e.g., dicta probably do not need to be highlighted unless they are particularly important). If you decide that a single color is all that you need, then stick to one, but if you find yourself highlighting lots of text from many different sections, reconsider the use of at least a few different colors. Highlighters make text stand out, but only when used appropriately. The use of many colors enables you to highlight more text without reducing the highlighter’s effectiveness. Three to four colors provides decent color variation without the cumbersomeness of handling too many markers.

Once you are comfortable with your color scheme, determining exactly what to highlight still may be difficult. Similar to knowing what to annotate, experience will perfect your highlighting skills. Be careful not to highlight everything, thus ruining your highlighters’ effectiveness; at the same time, do not be afraid to make mistakes.

Now that we have covered the basics of reading, annotating, highlighting, and briefing a case, you are ready to start practicing. Keep the tips and techniques mentioned in this chapter in mind when you tackle the four topics in the remainder of this book. If you have difficultly, refer back to this chapter to help guide you as you master the case method of study and the art of using the common law.

Have questions about law school? Check out our Facebook page , follow us on Twitter or start networking with law students and lawyers on LexTalk .

More Helpful Links

• The American Legal System
• How to Brief a Case
• How to Read a Casebook 101
• Top 20 Things You Need to Know About Law School
• Learn to Spot Issues Like a Lawyer
• Why an Internet Search is Not Legal Research
• Why go to Law School?
• What’s the Most Challenging Part of Law School?
• What advice would you give yourself about law school?

Get advice about law school from law students and legal professionals at the LexTalk legal community

Legal Research & Practical Guidance

Build your legal strategy and do vital work using authoritative primary law, analysis, guidance, court records and validation tools.

Search vast LexisNexis resources without selecting sources or using search commands.

Federal and state court dockets and documents for research, tracking, and profiling.

Practical Guidance

Current practical guidance from leading practitioners for managing transactional matters.

Lexis Securities Mosaic

Track and analyze SEC filings, U.S. agency information, industry news and current awareness.

News, Company Research & Media Monitoring Solutions

Quickly uncover up-to-date facts, news and insight essential to your decisions and business development.

LexisNexis Newsdesk

A fresh take on media monitoring & analysis to help you find the hidden gems that can impact your business.

Current, authoritative news, social media, company, financial and industry sources.

Media Intelligence Research & Analytics

Identify prospects and compile business profiles that help you close more deals.

Lexis Diligence

Corporate due diligence research tool.

• Intellectual Property

Stay up to speed with trends, track your competition, promote innovation and protect your intellectual assets.

TotalPatent One

The world's largest collection of full-text and bibliographic patent databases.

Patent Advisor

Predictive and revealing analytics for more efficient patent prosecution.

PatentOptimizer

Patent application drafting and analysis tools.

The CaseMap Suite of Litigation Tools

Comprised of four unique components, the CaseMap Suite can help you organize, analyze and present your entire case.

Compile relevant case facts, documents, research and issues into a centralized location for better assessment.

Manage litigation documents—share, search, review, produce, etc.—across your discovery team.

Quickly assemble your data and produce impactful timelines for pennies apiece.

See case presentations from a new angle with technology-driven Sanction software.

Practice & Legal Department Management

Address the business side of your legal activities with solutions to manage, track and analyze matters, finances, critical processes, relationships and performance.

CounselLink

A centralized repository for matter, e-billing and spend management.

Dashboards that display, track and manage your practice, clients and business tasks.

TimeMatters

Organize, associate and track case contacts, documents, events, phone calls, billing, etc.

InterAction

Comprehensive customer relationship management system for law firms.

Compliance & Due Diligence

Stay on top of regulatory and legislative changes, perform due diligence and manage compliance with ease, speed and confidence.

Customizable tools for tracking and reporting legislative and regulatory activity.

IntegraCheck | Integrity Due Diligence

In-depth due-diligence investigation reports.

Just for you Solutions & resources for your organization, department, role or individual work:

• Corporate Communications
• Information Professional
• Marketing & Competitive Intelligence
• Media Organizations
• Political Organizations
• Third-Party Due Diligence
• Sales & Business Development Professionals
• Strategy & Business Development Professionals
• Non-Profit Organizations
• Professional Services
• Technology Professionals
• Librarians & Information Professionals
• Paralegals & Legal Assistants
• Marketing Directors
• Law Department Management
• Litigation Management
• Tax Accounting
• View All »
• Faculty & Adminstration
• Public Libraries
• University & High School Students
• Law School Student Publications
• Portal Sign In

Browse by Industry

• Financial Services
• Health Care
• Life Sciences
• Manufacturing
• Retail & Sales

Browse by Department

• Corporate Compliance
• Corporate Counsel
• Procurement & Supply Chain
• Tax & Accounting

Visit the LexisNexis Store to purchase products that will assist you in your professional success Shop by :

• Jurisdiction
• Practice Area
• Banking Compliance
• Immigration
• Real Estate
• Workers' Comp
• Business Solutions
• Partner Products
• American Health Lawyers Association
• NITA: National Institute for Trial Advocacy
• The Florida Bar

Support & Training

Quick links.

• Lexis+ Support
• Lexis Support
• Nexis Support
• Practical Guidance Support
• CourtLink Support
• Lexis Securities Mosaic Support
• Digital Library Support
• LexTalk: Gain peer-to-peer, product support
• LexisNexis University
• Request Telephonic Training
• Support Center Resources
• Training on the Go

Communities & Blogs

Our Blogs and Communities feature a broad array of trending news and topics within socially interactive environments. Connect, explore and find the answers you need to further your goals.

• Blogs & Newsletters
• Blog Mosaic
• Business of Law Blog
• Corporate Law Advisory
• Legal Content Insider
• State Net Capitol Journal
• News & Trending Topics
• Legal Insights & Trends
• Practical Guidance Journal
• Professional Communities
• Business Insight Solutions – Partner Portal
• Corporate InfoPro (Corporate Information Professionals)
• InfoPro (Legal Information Professionals)
• LexisNexis for Developers
• Litigators Verdict & Settlement Exchange

• Platform Overview All-in-one legal research and workflow software
• Legal Research Unmetered access to primary and secondary sources
• Workflow Tools AI-powered tools for smarter workflows
• News & Analysis Paywall-free premium Bloomberg news and coverage
• Practical Guidance Ready-to-use guidance for any legal task
• Contract Solutions New: Streamlined contract workflow platform
• Introducing Contract Solutions Experience contract simplicity
• Watch product demo
• Law Firms Find everything you need to serve your clients
• In-House Counsel Expand expertise, reduce cost, and save time
• Government Get unlimited access to state and federal coverage
• Law Schools Succeed in school and prepare for practice
• Customer Cost Savings and Benefits See why GCs and CLOs choose Bloomberg Law
• Getting Started Experience one platform, one price, and continuous innovation
• Our Initiatives Empower the next generation of lawyers
• Careers Explore alternative law careers and join our team
• Press Releases See our latest news and product updates
• DEI Framework Raising the bar for law firms
• Request Pricing
• Legal Solutions

How to Conduct Legal Research

September 21, 2021

Conducting legal research can challenge even the most skilled law practitioners.

As laws evolve across jurisdictions, it can be a difficult to keep pace with every legal development. Equally daunting is the ability to track and glean insights into stakeholder strategies and legal responses. Without quick and easy access to the right tools, the legal research upon which case strategy hinges may face cost, personnel, and litigation outcome challenges.

Bloomberg Law’s artificial intelligence-driven tools drastically reduce the time to perform legal research. Whether you seek quick answers to legal research definitions, or general guidance on the legal research process, Bloomberg Law’s Core Litigation Skills Toolkit has you covered.

What is legal research?

Legal research is the process of uncovering and understanding all of the legal precedents, laws, regulations, and other legal authorities that apply in a case and inform an attorney’s course of action.

Legal research often involves case law research, which is the practice of identifying and interpreting the most relevant cases concerning the topic at issue. Legal research can also involve a deep dive into a judge’s past rulings or opposing counsel’s record of success.

Research is not a process that has a finite start and end, but remains ongoing throughout every phase of a legal matter. It is a cornerstone of a litigator’s skills.

[Learn how our integrated, time-saving litigation research tools allow litigators to streamline their work and get answers quickly.]

Where do I begin my legal research?

Beginning your legal research will look different for each assignment. At the outset, ensure that you understand your goal by asking questions and taking careful notes. Ask about background case information, logistical issues such as filing deadlines, the client/matter number, and billing instructions.

It’s also important to consider how your legal research will be used. Is the research to be used for a pending motion? If you are helping with a motion for summary judgment, for example, your goal is to find cases that are in the same procedural posture as yours and come out favorably for your side (i.e., if your client is the one filing the motion, try to find cases where a motion for summary judgment was granted, not denied). Keep in mind the burden of proof for different kinds of motions.

Finally, but no less important, assess the key facts of the case. Who are the relevant parties? Where is the jurisdiction? Who is the judge? Note all case details that come to mind.

What if I’m new to the practice area or specific legal issue?

While conducting legal research, it is easy to go down rabbit holes. Resist the urge to start by reviewing individual cases, which may prove irrelevant. Start instead with secondary sources, which often provide a prevailing statement of the law for a specific topic. These sources will save time and orient you to the area of the law and key issues.

Litigation Practical Guidance provides the essentials including step-by-step guidance, expert legal analysis, and a preview of next steps. Source citations are included in all Practical Guidance, and you can filter Points of Law, Smart Code®, and court opinions searches to get the jurisdiction-specific cases or statutes you need.

Searching across Points of Law will help to get your bearings on an issue before diving into reading the cases in full. Points of Law uses machine learning to identify key legal principles expressed in court opinions, which are easily searchable by keyword and jurisdiction. This tool helps you quickly find other cases that have expressed the same Point of Law, and directs you to related Points of Law that might be relevant to your research. It is automatically updated with the most recent opinions, saving you time and helping you quickly drill down to the relevant cases.

How do I respond to the opposing side’s brief?

Whether a brief is yours or that of the opposing party, Bloomberg Law’s Brief Analyzer is an essential component in the legal research process. It reduces the time spent analyzing a brief, identifying relevant authorities, and preparing a solid response.

To start, navigate to Brief Analyzer available from the Bloomberg Law homepage, within the Litigation Intelligence Center , or from Docket Key search results for briefs.

Simply upload the opposing side’s brief into the tool, and Brief Analyzer will generate a report of the cited authorities and arguments contained in the brief.

You can easily view a comparison with the brief and analysis side by side. It will also point you directly to relevant cases, Points of Law, and Practical Guidance to jump start your research.

[ How to Write a Legal Brief – Learn how to shorten the legal research cycle and give your legal brief a competitive advantage.]

How to optimize your search.

Crafting searches is a critical skill when it comes to legal research. Although many legal research platforms, including Bloomberg Law, offer natural language searching, terms and connectors (also called Boolean) searching is still a vital legal research skill and should be used when searching across court opinions, dockets, Points of Law, and other primary and secondary sources.

When you conduct a natural language search, the search engine applies algorithms to rank your results. Why a certain case is ranked as it is may not be obvious. This makes it harder to interpret whether the search is giving you everything you need. It is also harder to efficiently and effectively manipulate your search terms to zero in on the results you want. Using Boolean searching gives you better control over your search and greater confidence in your results.

The good news? Bloomberg Law does not charge by the search for court opinion searches. If your initial search was much too broad or much too narrow, you do not have to worry about immediately running a new and improved search.

Follow these tips when beginning a search to ensure that you do not miss relevant materials:

• Make sure you do not have typos in your search string.
• Search the appropriate source or section of the research platform. It is possible to search only within a practice area, jurisdiction, secondary resource, or other grouping of materials.
• Make sure you know which terms and connectors are utilized by the platform you are working on and what they mean – there is no uniform standard set of terms of connectors utilized by all platforms.
• Include in your search all possible terms the court might use, or alternate ways the court may address an issue. It is best to group the alternatives together within a parenthetical, connected by OR between each term.
• Consider including single and multiple character wildcards when relevant. Using a single character wildcard (an asterisk) and/or a multiple character wildcard (an exclamation point) helps you capture all word variations – even those you might not have envisioned.
• Try using a tool that helps you find additional relevant case law. When you find relevant authority, use BCITE on Bloomberg Law to find all other cases and/or sources that cite back to that case. When in BCITE, click on the Citing Documents tab, and search by keyword to narrow the results. Alternatively, you can use the court’s language or ruling to search Points of Law and find other cases that addressed the same issue or reached the same ruling.

[Bloomberg Law subscribers can access a complete checklist of search term best practices . Not a subscriber? Request a Demo .]

How can legal research help with drafting or strategy?

Before drafting a motion or brief, search for examples of what firm lawyers filed with the court in similar cases. You can likely find recent examples in your firm’s internal document system or search Bloomberg Law’s dockets. If possible, look for things filed before the same judge so you can get a quick check on rules/procedures to be followed (and by the same partner when possible so you can get an idea of their style preferences).

Careful docket search provides a wealth of information about relevant cases, jurisdictions, judges, and opposing counsel. On Bloomberg Law, type “Dockets Search” in the Go bar or find the dockets search box in the Litigation Intelligence Center .

If you do not know the specific docket number and/or court, use the docket search functionality Docket Key . Select from any of 20 categories, including motions, briefs, and orders, across all 94 federal district courts, to pinpoint the exact filing of choice.

Dockets can also help you access lots of information to guide your case strategy. For example, if you are considering filing a particular type of motion, such as a sanctions motion, you can use dockets to help determine how frequently your judge grants sanctions motions. You can also use dockets to see how similar cases before your judge proceeded through discovery.

If you are researching expert witnesses, you can use dockets to help determine if the expert has been recently excluded from a case, or whether their opinion has been limited. If so, this will help you determine whether the expert is a good fit for your case.

Dockets are a powerful research tool that allow you to search across filings to support your argument. Stay apprised of docket updates with the “Create Alert” option on Bloomberg Law.

Dive deeper into competitive research.

For even more competitive research insights, dive into Bloomberg Law’s Litigation Analytics – this is available in the Litigation tab on the homepage. Data here helps attorneys develop litigation strategy, predict possible outcomes, and better advise clients.

To start, under Litigation Analytics , leverage the Attorney tab to view case history and preview legal strategies the opposition may practice against you. Also, within Litigation Analytics, use the Court tab to get aggregate motion and appeal outcome rates across all federal courts, with the option to run comparisons across jurisdictions, and filter by company, law firm, and attorney.

Use the Judge tab to glean insights from cited opinions, and past and current decisions by motion and appeal outcomes. Also view litigation analytics in the right rail of court opinions.

Docket search can also offer intel on your opponent. Has your opponent filed similar lawsuits or made similar arguments before? How did those cases pan out? You can learn a lot about an opponent from past appearances in court.

How do I validate case law citations?

Checking the status of case law is essential in legal research. Rely on Bloomberg Law’s proprietary citator, BCITE. This time-saving tool lets you know if a case is still good law.

Under each court opinion, simply look to the right rail. There, you will see a thumbnail icon for “BCITE Analysis.” Click on the icon, and you will be provided quick links to direct history (opinions that affect or are affected by the outcome of the case at issue); case analysis (citing cases, with filter and search options), table of authorities, and citing documents.

How should I use technology to improve my legal research?

A significant benefit of digital research platforms and analytics is increased efficiency. Modern legal research technology helps attorneys sift through thousands of cases quickly and comprehensively. These products can also help aggregate or summarize data in a way that is more useful and make associations instantaneously.

For example, before litigation analytics were common, a partner may have asked a junior associate to find all summary judgment motions ruled on by a specific judge to determine how often that judge grants or denies them. The attorney could have done so by manually searching over PACER and/or by searching through court opinions, but that would take a long time. Now, Litigation Analytics can aggregate that data and provide an answer in seconds. Understanding that such products exist can be a game changer. Automating parts of the research process frees up time and effort for other activities that benefit the client and makes legal research and writing more efficient.

[Read our article: Six ways legal technology aids your litigation workflow .]

Tools like  Points of Law ,  dockets  and  Brief Analyzer  can also increase efficiency, especially when narrowing your research to confirm that you found everything on point. In the past, attorneys had to spend many hours (and lots of money) running multiple court opinion searches to ensure they did not miss a case on point. Now, there are tools that can dramatically speed up that process. For example, running a search over Points of Law can immediately direct you to other cases that discuss that same legal principle.

However, it’s important to remember that digital research and analytical tools should be seen as enhancing the legal research experience, not displacing the review, analysis, and judgment of an attorney. An attorney uses his or her knowledge of their client, the facts, the precedent, expert opinions, and his or her own experiences to predict the likely result in a given matter. Digital research products enhance this process by providing more data on a wider array of variables so that an attorney can take even more information into consideration.

[Get all your questions answered, request a Bloomberg Law demo , and more.]

Recommended for you

See bloomberg law in action.

From live events to in-depth reports, discover singular thought leadership from Bloomberg Law. Our network of expert analysts is always on the case – so you can make yours. Request a demo to see it for yourself.

• Litigation Support in Law Firm: An Informational Guide
• Intellectual Property Law: Document Drafting in Law Firm Context
• Statutory Research in Law Firm: The Essentials of Legal Research
• Legal Funding Options for Law Firm: A Comprehensive Guide to Legal Loans
• Document Drafting in Law Firm: An Informative Guide
• Contract Negotiations in Law Firm: An Overview of Document Drafting
• Effective: Client Communication: Strategies and Tips for Law Firm Case Management
• Negotiating Terms: Contract Negotiation in Law Firms

Case Law Analysis: A Comprehensive Guide for Law Firms in Legal Research

The field of law is built upon a foundation of case law, where previous legal decisions serve as precedents for future rulings. For law firms engaged in legal research, the analysis and understanding of case law are crucial to providing effective representation for their clients. This comprehensive guide aims to equip law firms with the necessary tools and techniques to conduct thorough case law analysis.

Consider a hypothetical scenario: A client has been accused of copyright infringement in an online publication they authored. To mount a strong defense, the lawyers representing this client must delve into relevant case laws that have addressed similar issues in the past. By conducting a meticulous analysis of these cases, the attorneys can identify key arguments, potential defenses, and strategies that may be applicable to their client’s situation.

In this guide, we will explore various aspects of case law analysis, including how to effectively search for pertinent cases using online databases and legal resources. Additionally, we will discuss methods for critically analyzing court opinions and extracting essential information from them. Furthermore, we will examine different approaches to synthesizing multiple cases and creating persuasive legal arguments based on precedents set by previous courts. With these skills at hand, law firms can enhance their ability to provide accurate and informed advice to their clients while navigating complex legal landscapes.

By following By following the step-by-step instructions and utilizing the tips provided in this guide, law firms can develop a systematic approach to case law analysis. This will enable them to efficiently locate relevant cases, thoroughly analyze court opinions, extract key information, and synthesize multiple cases to build persuasive legal arguments. With these skills honed, law firms will be better equipped to provide effective representation for their clients and achieve favorable outcomes in their cases involving copyright infringement or any other legal matter.

Understanding Case Law

Case law is a crucial aspect of legal research and plays a pivotal role in shaping the decisions made by courts. By analyzing previous court cases, legal professionals gain insights into how judges have interpreted and applied laws in specific situations. This section will provide an overview of case law analysis, its importance in legal research, and the methods used to effectively comprehend and utilize it.

To illustrate the significance of case law analysis, let us consider a hypothetical scenario involving a dispute over copyright infringement between two software companies. Company A claims that Company B has copied their proprietary code without permission. To determine whether this claim holds merit, lawyers from both sides would delve into relevant case law precedents dealing with similar intellectual property disputes. By examining past rulings and the reasoning behind them, they can develop arguments based on established legal principles or identify any distinguishing factors unique to their case.

When conducting case law analysis, several key points should be considered:

• Precedent: Court decisions serve as binding precedents for future cases with similar facts or issues. Analyzing prior rulings allows lawyers to understand the application of laws in different contexts.
• Legal Principles: Case law often elucidates underlying legal principles that guide judicial decision-making. Identifying these principles aids lawyers in constructing persuasive arguments grounded in well-established norms.
• Judicial Reasoning: Examining the rationale employed by judges helps attorneys anticipate potential counterarguments or weaknesses in their own positions while highlighting strengths and weaknesses within existing jurisprudence.
• Evolving Interpretations: Over time, interpretations of laws may change due to societal developments or evolving perspectives. Monitoring changes in case law ensures attorneys remain current on applicable standards and trends.

To further illustrate these concepts visually, we present a table summarizing important aspects of case law analysis:

Understanding the significance of case law analysis is fundamental to effective legal research. By engaging with prior court decisions, legal professionals can navigate complex legal issues and develop informed arguments supported by established precedents and principles.

Importance of Case Law Analysis

Understanding Case Law: An Essential Component of Legal Research

In the previous section, we explored the concept of case law and its significance within the legal field. Now, let us delve deeper into why comprehending case law is crucial for effective legal analysis and decision-making.

Imagine a scenario where a defendant has been accused of copyright infringement in an online music-sharing platform. To build a strong defense strategy, it is essential for the defendant’s legal team to study relevant case law precedents that have addressed similar issues in the past. By examining these cases, they can gain valuable insights into how courts have interpreted copyright laws and applied them to comparable situations. This understanding allows them to anticipate potential arguments from the opposing counsel and prepare counter-arguments based on established legal principles.

To further emphasize the importance of case law analysis, consider the following key points:

• Precedential Value : Case law creates binding precedents that shape future interpretations of statutes and regulations.
• Legal Predictability : Analyzing case law enables lawyers to predict how courts are likely to rule on specific issues or disputes.
• Clarification of Ambiguities : Case law often helps resolve ambiguities or gaps present in legislation by providing guidance through judicial decisions.
• Evolutionary Nature : The body of case law evolves over time as society changes, ensuring that legal principles remain relevant and adaptable to contemporary circumstances.

To illustrate this topic visually, refer to the table below which highlights different aspects of case law analysis:

By studying case law diligently, attorneys can navigate complex legal terrain more effectively while offering their clients the best possible legal advice and representation. In the subsequent section, we will explore the essential steps involved in conducting a comprehensive case law analysis.

[Transition Sentence]: Now that we understand the significance of understanding case law, let us turn our attention to the step-by-step process of conducting thorough case law analysis.

Steps in Conducting Case Law Analysis

To effectively conduct legal research, law firms must undertake a comprehensive analysis of relevant case law. This section will explore the steps involved in conducting an in-depth case law analysis and highlight its significance in guiding legal strategies. Additionally, we will examine a hypothetical example that illustrates the practical application of this process.

The Process of Case Law Analysis:

Identification of Key Cases: The initial step in case law analysis is identifying key cases that are applicable to the legal issue at hand. By examining precedents set by higher courts or decisions made on similar matters, attorneys can gain valuable insights into the interpretation and application of relevant laws.

Reviewing Case Facts and Rationale: Once the key cases have been identified, it is crucial to thoroughly review their facts and underlying rationale. This involves analyzing how different aspects of the case contributed to the court’s decision-making process. Understanding these details helps lawyers assess which arguments were persuasive and ascertain how certain factors influenced judicial reasoning.

Evaluating Legal Principles Established: Another critical aspect of case law analysis is evaluating the legal principles established within each case studied. Lawyers need to determine whether these principles align with their client’s interests or if they conflict with their desired outcomes. Moreover, by assessing both supporting and dissenting opinions within a particular case, attorneys can anticipate potential counterarguments from opposing parties.

Example Hypothetical Scenario:

Consider a hypothetical scenario where a law firm specializes in employment discrimination cases. In one such matter, they are representing an employee who alleges gender-based pay disparity against her employer. To build a strong legal strategy, the firm engages in meticulous case law analysis involving prominent rulings related to equal pay rights for employees across various jurisdictions.

• Uncovering hidden biases
• Strengthening argumentation through precedent
• Ensuring fairness and justice prevail
• Empowering clients seeking redress

Table: Significant Cases in Gender Pay Disparity Litigation

By conducting a thorough case law analysis, attorneys can effectively identify relevant cases that will serve as building blocks for shaping their legal arguments. In the subsequent section, we will explore the process of identifying such relevant cases without repeating any steps already mentioned previously.

Identifying Relevant Cases

Section H2: Steps in Conducting Case Law Analysis

In the previous section, we explored the essential steps involved in conducting case law analysis. Now, let us delve deeper into the process of identifying relevant cases to ensure a comprehensive and effective legal research strategy.

To illustrate this step, consider a hypothetical scenario where a law firm is handling a personal injury case involving a slip and fall accident at a grocery store. The first task would be to identify relevant cases that have addressed similar issues or principles of law related to premises liability. By analyzing these cases, attorneys can gain insights into how courts have interpreted and applied the law in comparable situations.

When it comes to identifying relevant cases, there are several key strategies that can prove helpful:

• Keyword search: Begin by using specific keywords related to your legal issue when searching through databases or online resources. This will help filter out irrelevant cases and narrow down your results.
• Jurisdictional filters: Depending on your jurisdiction, apply appropriate filters such as state or federal court decisions to focus on precedents applicable within your desired scope.
• Citation tracing: Once you find an influential case on your topic, review its citations both before and after the decision date. This technique allows you to trace backward (precedential authority) and forward (subsequent interpretation) for additional relevant cases.
• Secondary sources: Consult secondary legal resources like academic articles, treatises, or practice guides that discuss similar legal concepts or areas of law related to your case.

By utilizing these strategies effectively, legal researchers can save time and effort while ensuring they unearth pertinent precedents crucial for their clients’ cases.

Table Example:

Understanding the significance of precedent is crucial for effective case law analysis.

Now that we have identified relevant cases, let’s explore the process of analyzing case precedents and its role in constructing persuasive legal arguments.

Analyzing Case Precedents

Analyzing case precedents is a crucial step in legal research as it allows law firms to extract valuable insights and establish persuasive arguments. Building upon the identification of relevant cases, this section dives deeper into the process of analyzing case precedents. To illustrate this process, let’s consider a hypothetical scenario involving a contract dispute between two parties.

When analyzing case precedents, one must begin by carefully examining the facts and issues involved in each case. For instance, in our hypothetical scenario, Party A claims that Party B breached their contractual obligations by failing to deliver goods within the agreed-upon timeframe. By reviewing similar cases where breach of contract was alleged, legal researchers can identify patterns and key elements that contributed to successful outcomes for plaintiffs or defendants.

To further facilitate understanding and engagement with this topic, here are some important considerations when analyzing case precedents:

• Legal Principles : Identify the legal principles established or applied in previous cases that are relevant to your own situation.
• Factual Distinctions : Determine if there are any factual distinctions between prior cases and your current matter that could impact how precedent should be interpreted.
• Judicial Reasoning : Carefully analyze the reasoning behind court decisions in order to comprehend how judges arrived at their conclusions.
• Counterarguments : Consider potential counterarguments based on conflicting decisions or alternative interpretations of existing precedents.

As part of an effective analysis process, organizing information through visual aids like tables can enhance comprehension. The following table demonstrates various aspects commonly examined during case precedent analysis:

By considering these factors and organizing information systematically, law firms can conduct a comprehensive analysis of case precedents to inform their legal strategies.

Transitioning into the subsequent section on applying case law analysis in legal practice, it is important to note that analyzing case precedents is just one step towards building strong arguments. By leveraging the insights gained from this rigorous process, lawyers can effectively apply relevant case law principles in real-world scenarios, thus enhancing their ability to advocate for their clients’ interests.

Applying Case Law Analysis in Legal Practice

Transitioning from the previous section on analyzing case precedents, we now turn our attention to the practical application of case law analysis in legal practice. To illustrate this process, let us consider a hypothetical scenario involving a dispute over intellectual property rights between two companies.

Imagine that Company A has developed a new technology and believes that Company B is infringing upon their patent. In order to build a strong legal argument, it becomes crucial for Company A’s legal team to effectively apply case law analysis. This involves examining relevant case precedents and using them as persuasive authorities to support their position.

In applying case law analysis in such situations, there are several key considerations:

Identification of Relevant Precedents:

• Thoroughly research and identify cases with similar factual circumstances or legal issues.
• Assess the jurisdictional relevance of each precedent based on its alignment with local laws and court decisions.
• Evaluate the persuasiveness of each precedent by considering factors such as the reputation of the court rendering the decision or any subsequent appellate rulings.

Dissecting Key Legal Principles:

• Analyze the reasoning behind each precedent’s decision-making process.
• Identify overarching legal principles established within these decisions.
• Understand how these principles can be applied or distinguished in relation to your client’s case.

Drawing Analogies and Creating Persuasive Arguments:

• Craft compelling arguments by drawing analogies between your client’s situation and relevant precedents.
• Highlight similarities in facts, legal issues, or underlying policy concerns.
• Emphasize why applying these precedents supports your client’s position ethically, legally, and commercially.

Anticipating Counterarguments:

• Consider potential counterarguments that opposing counsel may raise against your reliance on specific precedents.
• Develop strategic responses backed by additional supporting authorities or sound legal reasoning.

To further enhance your understanding of the practical application of case law analysis, refer to the following table which outlines a comparative analysis of select precedents relevant to our hypothetical intellectual property dispute:

By incorporating these key considerations and leveraging relevant precedents, legal professionals can effectively apply case law analysis in practice to build persuasive arguments for their clients’ cases.

Through this section, we have explored the process of applying case law analysis in legal practice by dissecting key principles, drawing analogies, anticipating counterarguments, and utilizing relevant precedents as persuasive authorities. By implementing such strategies thoughtfully and strategically, lawyers can enhance their ability to advocate successfully for their clients within the complex realm of case law.

Related posts:

• Legal Databases: Enhancing Law Firm Legal Research
• Legal Research in Law Firm: A Comprehensive Guide
• Legal Research Software: A Guide for Law Firms
• Legal Writing: A Guide to Effective Legal Research at Law Firms

About Author

Comments are closed.

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Assignments

• Annotated Bibliography
• Analyzing a Scholarly Journal Article
• Group Presentations
• Dealing with Nervousness
• Using Visual Aids
• Grading Someone Else's Paper
• Types of Structured Group Activities
• Group Project Survival Skills
• Leading a Class Discussion
• Multiple Book Review Essay
• Reviewing Collected Works
• Writing a Case Analysis Paper
• Writing a Case Study
• About Informed Consent
• Writing Field Notes
• Writing a Policy Memo
• Writing a Reflective Paper
• Writing a Research Proposal
• Generative AI and Writing
• Acknowledgments

Definition and Introduction

Case analysis is a problem-based teaching and learning method that involves critically analyzing complex scenarios within an organizational setting for the purpose of placing the student in a “real world” situation and applying reflection and critical thinking skills to contemplate appropriate solutions, decisions, or recommended courses of action. It is considered a more effective teaching technique than in-class role playing or simulation activities. The analytical process is often guided by questions provided by the instructor that ask students to contemplate relationships between the facts and critical incidents described in the case.

Cases generally include both descriptive and statistical elements and rely on students applying abductive reasoning to develop and argue for preferred or best outcomes [i.e., case scenarios rarely have a single correct or perfect answer based on the evidence provided]. Rather than emphasizing theories or concepts, case analysis assignments emphasize building a bridge of relevancy between abstract thinking and practical application and, by so doing, teaches the value of both within a specific area of professional practice.

Given this, the purpose of a case analysis paper is to present a structured and logically organized format for analyzing the case situation. It can be assigned to students individually or as a small group assignment and it may include an in-class presentation component. Case analysis is predominately taught in economics and business-related courses, but it is also a method of teaching and learning found in other applied social sciences disciplines, such as, social work, public relations, education, journalism, and public administration.

Ellet, William. The Case Study Handbook: A Student's Guide . Revised Edition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2018; Christoph Rasche and Achim Seisreiner. Guidelines for Business Case Analysis . University of Potsdam; Writing a Case Analysis . Writing Center, Baruch College; Volpe, Guglielmo. "Case Teaching in Economics: History, Practice and Evidence." Cogent Economics and Finance 3 (December 2015). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1120977.

How to Approach Writing a Case Analysis Paper

The organization and structure of a case analysis paper can vary depending on the organizational setting, the situation, and how your professor wants you to approach the assignment. Nevertheless, preparing to write a case analysis paper involves several important steps. As Hawes notes, a case analysis assignment “...is useful in developing the ability to get to the heart of a problem, analyze it thoroughly, and to indicate the appropriate solution as well as how it should be implemented” [p.48]. This statement encapsulates how you should approach preparing to write a case analysis paper.

Before you begin to write your paper, consider the following analytical procedures:

• Review the case to get an overview of the situation . A case can be only a few pages in length, however, it is most often very lengthy and contains a significant amount of detailed background information and statistics, with multilayered descriptions of the scenario, the roles and behaviors of various stakeholder groups, and situational events. Therefore, a quick reading of the case will help you gain an overall sense of the situation and illuminate the types of issues and problems that you will need to address in your paper. If your professor has provided questions intended to help frame your analysis, use them to guide your initial reading of the case.
• Read the case thoroughly . After gaining a general overview of the case, carefully read the content again with the purpose of understanding key circumstances, events, and behaviors among stakeholder groups. Look for information or data that appears contradictory, extraneous, or misleading. At this point, you should be taking notes as you read because this will help you develop a general outline of your paper. The aim is to obtain a complete understanding of the situation so that you can begin contemplating tentative answers to any questions your professor has provided or, if they have not provided, developing answers to your own questions about the case scenario and its connection to the course readings,lectures, and class discussions.
• Determine key stakeholder groups, issues, and events and the relationships they all have to each other . As you analyze the content, pay particular attention to identifying individuals, groups, or organizations described in the case and identify evidence of any problems or issues of concern that impact the situation in a negative way. Other things to look for include identifying any assumptions being made by or about each stakeholder, potential biased explanations or actions, explicit demands or ultimatums , and the underlying concerns that motivate these behaviors among stakeholders. The goal at this stage is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the situational and behavioral dynamics of the case and the explicit and implicit consequences of each of these actions.
• Identify the core problems . The next step in most case analysis assignments is to discern what the core [i.e., most damaging, detrimental, injurious] problems are within the organizational setting and to determine their implications. The purpose at this stage of preparing to write your analysis paper is to distinguish between the symptoms of core problems and the core problems themselves and to decide which of these must be addressed immediately and which problems do not appear critical but may escalate over time. Identify evidence from the case to support your decisions by determining what information or data is essential to addressing the core problems and what information is not relevant or is misleading.
• Explore alternative solutions . As noted, case analysis scenarios rarely have only one correct answer. Therefore, it is important to keep in mind that the process of analyzing the case and diagnosing core problems, while based on evidence, is a subjective process open to various avenues of interpretation. This means that you must consider alternative solutions or courses of action by critically examining strengths and weaknesses, risk factors, and the differences between short and long-term solutions. For each possible solution or course of action, consider the consequences they may have related to their implementation and how these recommendations might lead to new problems. Also, consider thinking about your recommended solutions or courses of action in relation to issues of fairness, equity, and inclusion.
• Decide on a final set of recommendations . The last stage in preparing to write a case analysis paper is to assert an opinion or viewpoint about the recommendations needed to help resolve the core problems as you see them and to make a persuasive argument for supporting this point of view. Prepare a clear rationale for your recommendations based on examining each element of your analysis. Anticipate possible obstacles that could derail their implementation. Consider any counter-arguments that could be made concerning the validity of your recommended actions. Finally, describe a set of criteria and measurable indicators that could be applied to evaluating the effectiveness of your implementation plan.

Use these steps as the framework for writing your paper. Remember that the more detailed you are in taking notes as you critically examine each element of the case, the more information you will have to draw from when you begin to write. This will save you time.

NOTE : If the process of preparing to write a case analysis paper is assigned as a student group project, consider having each member of the group analyze a specific element of the case, including drafting answers to the corresponding questions used by your professor to frame the analysis. This will help make the analytical process more efficient and ensure that the distribution of work is equitable. This can also facilitate who is responsible for drafting each part of the final case analysis paper and, if applicable, the in-class presentation.

Framework for Case Analysis . College of Management. University of Massachusetts; Hawes, Jon M. "Teaching is Not Telling: The Case Method as a Form of Interactive Learning." Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education 5 (Winter 2004): 47-54; Rasche, Christoph and Achim Seisreiner. Guidelines for Business Case Analysis . University of Potsdam; Writing a Case Study Analysis . University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center; Van Ness, Raymond K. A Guide to Case Analysis . School of Business. State University of New York, Albany; Writing a Case Analysis . Business School, University of New South Wales.

Structure and Writing Style

A case analysis paper should be detailed, concise, persuasive, clearly written, and professional in tone and in the use of language . As with other forms of college-level academic writing, declarative statements that convey information, provide a fact, or offer an explanation or any recommended courses of action should be based on evidence. If allowed by your professor, any external sources used to support your analysis, such as course readings, should be properly cited under a list of references. The organization and structure of case analysis papers can vary depending on your professor’s preferred format, but its structure generally follows the steps used for analyzing the case.

Introduction

The introduction should provide a succinct but thorough descriptive overview of the main facts, issues, and core problems of the case . The introduction should also include a brief summary of the most relevant details about the situation and organizational setting. This includes defining the theoretical framework or conceptual model on which any questions were used to frame your analysis.

Following the rules of most college-level research papers, the introduction should then inform the reader how the paper will be organized. This includes describing the major sections of the paper and the order in which they will be presented. Unless you are told to do so by your professor, you do not need to preview your final recommendations in the introduction. U nlike most college-level research papers , the introduction does not include a statement about the significance of your findings because a case analysis assignment does not involve contributing new knowledge about a research problem.

Background Analysis

Background analysis can vary depending on any guiding questions provided by your professor and the underlying concept or theory that the case is based upon. In general, however, this section of your paper should focus on:

• Providing an overarching analysis of problems identified from the case scenario, including identifying events that stakeholders find challenging or troublesome,
• Identifying assumptions made by each stakeholder and any apparent biases they may exhibit,
• Describing any demands or claims made by or forced upon key stakeholders, and
• Highlighting any issues of concern or complaints expressed by stakeholders in response to those demands or claims.

These aspects of the case are often in the form of behavioral responses expressed by individuals or groups within the organizational setting. However, note that problems in a case situation can also be reflected in data [or the lack thereof] and in the decision-making, operational, cultural, or institutional structure of the organization. Additionally, demands or claims can be either internal and external to the organization [e.g., a case analysis involving a president considering arms sales to Saudi Arabia could include managing internal demands from White House advisors as well as demands from members of Congress].

Throughout this section, present all relevant evidence from the case that supports your analysis. Do not simply claim there is a problem, an assumption, a demand, or a concern; tell the reader what part of the case informed how you identified these background elements.

Identification of Problems

In most case analysis assignments, there are problems, and then there are problems . Each problem can reflect a multitude of underlying symptoms that are detrimental to the interests of the organization. The purpose of identifying problems is to teach students how to differentiate between problems that vary in severity, impact, and relative importance. Given this, problems can be described in three general forms: those that must be addressed immediately, those that should be addressed but the impact is not severe, and those that do not require immediate attention and can be set aside for the time being.

All of the problems you identify from the case should be identified in this section of your paper, with a description based on evidence explaining the problem variances. If the assignment asks you to conduct research to further support your assessment of the problems, include this in your explanation. Remember to cite those sources in a list of references. Use specific evidence from the case and apply appropriate concepts, theories, and models discussed in class or in relevant course readings to highlight and explain the key problems [or problem] that you believe must be solved immediately and describe the underlying symptoms and why they are so critical.

Alternative Solutions

This section is where you provide specific, realistic, and evidence-based solutions to the problems you have identified and make recommendations about how to alleviate the underlying symptomatic conditions impacting the organizational setting. For each solution, you must explain why it was chosen and provide clear evidence to support your reasoning. This can include, for example, course readings and class discussions as well as research resources, such as, books, journal articles, research reports, or government documents. In some cases, your professor may encourage you to include personal, anecdotal experiences as evidence to support why you chose a particular solution or set of solutions. Using anecdotal evidence helps promote reflective thinking about the process of determining what qualifies as a core problem and relevant solution .

Throughout this part of the paper, keep in mind the entire array of problems that must be addressed and describe in detail the solutions that might be implemented to resolve these problems.

Recommended Courses of Action

In some case analysis assignments, your professor may ask you to combine the alternative solutions section with your recommended courses of action. However, it is important to know the difference between the two. A solution refers to the answer to a problem. A course of action refers to a procedure or deliberate sequence of activities adopted to proactively confront a situation, often in the context of accomplishing a goal. In this context, proposed courses of action are based on your analysis of alternative solutions. Your description and justification for pursuing each course of action should represent the overall plan for implementing your recommendations.

For each course of action, you need to explain the rationale for your recommendation in a way that confronts challenges, explains risks, and anticipates any counter-arguments from stakeholders. Do this by considering the strengths and weaknesses of each course of action framed in relation to how the action is expected to resolve the core problems presented, the possible ways the action may affect remaining problems, and how the recommended action will be perceived by each stakeholder.

In addition, you should describe the criteria needed to measure how well the implementation of these actions is working and explain which individuals or groups are responsible for ensuring your recommendations are successful. In addition, always consider the law of unintended consequences. Outline difficulties that may arise in implementing each course of action and describe how implementing the proposed courses of action [either individually or collectively] may lead to new problems [both large and small].

Throughout this section, you must consider the costs and benefits of recommending your courses of action in relation to uncertainties or missing information and the negative consequences of success.

The conclusion should be brief and introspective. Unlike a research paper, the conclusion in a case analysis paper does not include a summary of key findings and their significance, a statement about how the study contributed to existing knowledge, or indicate opportunities for future research.

Begin by synthesizing the core problems presented in the case and the relevance of your recommended solutions. This can include an explanation of what you have learned about the case in the context of your answers to the questions provided by your professor. The conclusion is also where you link what you learned from analyzing the case with the course readings or class discussions. This can further demonstrate your understanding of the relationships between the practical case situation and the theoretical and abstract content of assigned readings and other course content.

Problems to Avoid

The literature on case analysis assignments often includes examples of difficulties students have with applying methods of critical analysis and effectively reporting the results of their assessment of the situation. A common reason cited by scholars is that the application of this type of teaching and learning method is limited to applied fields of social and behavioral sciences and, as a result, writing a case analysis paper can be unfamiliar to most students entering college.

After you have drafted your paper, proofread the narrative flow and revise any of these common errors:

• Unnecessary detail in the background section . The background section should highlight the essential elements of the case based on your analysis. Focus on summarizing the facts and highlighting the key factors that become relevant in the other sections of the paper by eliminating any unnecessary information.
• Analysis relies too much on opinion . Your analysis is interpretive, but the narrative must be connected clearly to evidence from the case and any models and theories discussed in class or in course readings. Any positions or arguments you make should be supported by evidence.
• Analysis does not focus on the most important elements of the case . Your paper should provide a thorough overview of the case. However, the analysis should focus on providing evidence about what you identify are the key events, stakeholders, issues, and problems. Emphasize what you identify as the most critical aspects of the case to be developed throughout your analysis. Be thorough but succinct.
• Writing is too descriptive . A paper with too much descriptive information detracts from your analysis of the complexities of the case situation. Questions about what happened, where, when, and by whom should only be included as essential information leading to your examination of questions related to why, how, and for what purpose.
• Inadequate definition of a core problem and associated symptoms . A common error found in case analysis papers is recommending a solution or course of action without adequately defining or demonstrating that you understand the problem. Make sure you have clearly described the problem and its impact and scope within the organizational setting. Ensure that you have adequately described the root causes w hen describing the symptoms of the problem.
• Recommendations lack specificity . Identify any use of vague statements and indeterminate terminology, such as, “A particular experience” or “a large increase to the budget.” These statements cannot be measured and, as a result, there is no way to evaluate their successful implementation. Provide specific data and use direct language in describing recommended actions.
• Unrealistic, exaggerated, or unattainable recommendations . Review your recommendations to ensure that they are based on the situational facts of the case. Your recommended solutions and courses of action must be based on realistic assumptions and fit within the constraints of the situation. Also note that the case scenario has already happened, therefore, any speculation or arguments about what could have occurred if the circumstances were different should be revised or eliminated.

Bee, Lian Song et al. "Business Students' Perspectives on Case Method Coaching for Problem-Based Learning: Impacts on Student Engagement and Learning Performance in Higher Education." Education & Training 64 (2022): 416-432; The Case Analysis . Fred Meijer Center for Writing and Michigan Authors. Grand Valley State University; Georgallis, Panikos and Kayleigh Bruijn. "Sustainability Teaching using Case-Based Debates." Journal of International Education in Business 15 (2022): 147-163; Hawes, Jon M. "Teaching is Not Telling: The Case Method as a Form of Interactive Learning." Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education 5 (Winter 2004): 47-54; Georgallis, Panikos, and Kayleigh Bruijn. "Sustainability Teaching Using Case-based Debates." Journal of International Education in Business 15 (2022): 147-163; .Dean,  Kathy Lund and Charles J. Fornaciari. "How to Create and Use Experiential Case-Based Exercises in a Management Classroom." Journal of Management Education 26 (October 2002): 586-603; Klebba, Joanne M. and Janet G. Hamilton. "Structured Case Analysis: Developing Critical Thinking Skills in a Marketing Case Course." Journal of Marketing Education 29 (August 2007): 132-137, 139; Klein, Norman. "The Case Discussion Method Revisited: Some Questions about Student Skills." Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 6 (November 1981): 30-32; Mukherjee, Arup. "Effective Use of In-Class Mini Case Analysis for Discovery Learning in an Undergraduate MIS Course." The Journal of Computer Information Systems 40 (Spring 2000): 15-23; Pessoa, Silviaet al. "Scaffolding the Case Analysis in an Organizational Behavior Course: Making Analytical Language Explicit." Journal of Management Education 46 (2022): 226-251: Ramsey, V. J. and L. D. Dodge. "Case Analysis: A Structured Approach." Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 6 (November 1981): 27-29; Schweitzer, Karen. "How to Write and Format a Business Case Study." ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/how-to-write-and-format-a-business-case-study-466324 (accessed December 5, 2022); Reddy, C. D. "Teaching Research Methodology: Everything's a Case." Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 18 (December 2020): 178-188; Volpe, Guglielmo. "Case Teaching in Economics: History, Practice and Evidence." Cogent Economics and Finance 3 (December 2015). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1120977.

Writing Tip

Ca se Study and Case Analysis Are Not the Same!

Confusion often exists between what it means to write a paper that uses a case study research design and writing a paper that analyzes a case; they are two different types of approaches to learning in the social and behavioral sciences. Professors as well as educational researchers contribute to this confusion because they often use the term "case study" when describing the subject of analysis for a case analysis paper. But you are not studying a case for the purpose of generating a comprehensive, multi-faceted understanding of a research problem. R ather, you are critically analyzing a specific scenario to argue logically for recommended solutions and courses of action that lead to optimal outcomes applicable to professional practice.

To avoid any confusion, here are twelve characteristics that delineate the differences between writing a paper using the case study research method and writing a case analysis paper:

• Case study is a method of in-depth research and rigorous inquiry ; case analysis is a reliable method of teaching and learning . A case study is a modality of research that investigates a phenomenon for the purpose of creating new knowledge, solving a problem, or testing a hypothesis using empirical evidence derived from the case being studied. Often, the results are used to generalize about a larger population or within a wider context. The writing adheres to the traditional standards of a scholarly research study. A case analysis is a pedagogical tool used to teach students how to reflect and think critically about a practical, real-life problem in an organizational setting.
• The researcher is responsible for identifying the case to study; a case analysis is assigned by your professor . As the researcher, you choose the case study to investigate in support of obtaining new knowledge and understanding about the research problem. The case in a case analysis assignment is almost always provided, and sometimes written, by your professor and either given to every student in class to analyze individually or to a small group of students, or students select a case to analyze from a predetermined list.
• A case study is indeterminate and boundless; a case analysis is predetermined and confined . A case study can be almost anything [see item 9 below] as long as it relates directly to examining the research problem. This relationship is the only limit to what a researcher can choose as the subject of their case study. The content of a case analysis is determined by your professor and its parameters are well-defined and limited to elucidating insights of practical value applied to practice.
• Case study is fact-based and describes actual events or situations; case analysis can be entirely fictional or adapted from an actual situation . The entire content of a case study must be grounded in reality to be a valid subject of investigation in an empirical research study. A case analysis only needs to set the stage for critically examining a situation in practice and, therefore, can be entirely fictional or adapted, all or in-part, from an actual situation.
• Research using a case study method must adhere to principles of intellectual honesty and academic integrity; a case analysis scenario can include misleading or false information . A case study paper must report research objectively and factually to ensure that any findings are understood to be logically correct and trustworthy. A case analysis scenario may include misleading or false information intended to deliberately distract from the central issues of the case. The purpose is to teach students how to sort through conflicting or useless information in order to come up with the preferred solution. Any use of misleading or false information in academic research is considered unethical.
• Case study is linked to a research problem; case analysis is linked to a practical situation or scenario . In the social sciences, the subject of an investigation is most often framed as a problem that must be researched in order to generate new knowledge leading to a solution. Case analysis narratives are grounded in real life scenarios for the purpose of examining the realities of decision-making behavior and processes within organizational settings. A case analysis assignments include a problem or set of problems to be analyzed. However, the goal is centered around the act of identifying and evaluating courses of action leading to best possible outcomes.
• The purpose of a case study is to create new knowledge through research; the purpose of a case analysis is to teach new understanding . Case studies are a choice of methodological design intended to create new knowledge about resolving a research problem. A case analysis is a mode of teaching and learning intended to create new understanding and an awareness of uncertainty applied to practice through acts of critical thinking and reflection.
• A case study seeks to identify the best possible solution to a research problem; case analysis can have an indeterminate set of solutions or outcomes . Your role in studying a case is to discover the most logical, evidence-based ways to address a research problem. A case analysis assignment rarely has a single correct answer because one of the goals is to force students to confront the real life dynamics of uncertainly, ambiguity, and missing or conflicting information within professional practice. Under these conditions, a perfect outcome or solution almost never exists.
• Case study is unbounded and relies on gathering external information; case analysis is a self-contained subject of analysis . The scope of a case study chosen as a method of research is bounded. However, the researcher is free to gather whatever information and data is necessary to investigate its relevance to understanding the research problem. For a case analysis assignment, your professor will often ask you to examine solutions or recommended courses of action based solely on facts and information from the case.
• Case study can be a person, place, object, issue, event, condition, or phenomenon; a case analysis is a carefully constructed synopsis of events, situations, and behaviors . The research problem dictates the type of case being studied and, therefore, the design can encompass almost anything tangible as long as it fulfills the objective of generating new knowledge and understanding. A case analysis is in the form of a narrative containing descriptions of facts, situations, processes, rules, and behaviors within a particular setting and under a specific set of circumstances.
• Case study can represent an open-ended subject of inquiry; a case analysis is a narrative about something that has happened in the past . A case study is not restricted by time and can encompass an event or issue with no temporal limit or end. For example, the current war in Ukraine can be used as a case study of how medical personnel help civilians during a large military conflict, even though circumstances around this event are still evolving. A case analysis can be used to elicit critical thinking about current or future situations in practice, but the case itself is a narrative about something finite and that has taken place in the past.
• Multiple case studies can be used in a research study; case analysis involves examining a single scenario . Case study research can use two or more cases to examine a problem, often for the purpose of conducting a comparative investigation intended to discover hidden relationships, document emerging trends, or determine variations among different examples. A case analysis assignment typically describes a stand-alone, self-contained situation and any comparisons among cases are conducted during in-class discussions and/or student presentations.

The Case Analysis . Fred Meijer Center for Writing and Michigan Authors. Grand Valley State University; Mills, Albert J. , Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010; Ramsey, V. J. and L. D. Dodge. "Case Analysis: A Structured Approach." Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 6 (November 1981): 27-29; Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods . 6th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2017; Crowe, Sarah et al. “The Case Study Approach.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 11 (2011):  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100; Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods . 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 1994.

• << Previous: Reviewing Collected Works
• Next: Writing a Case Study >>
• Last Updated: Mar 6, 2024 1:00 PM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/assignments

Importance of Case Analysis and Understanding of Cases in Legal Studies

This article explains the importance of analyzing cases in the legal field and the purpose of case analysis. It also provides a guide on how to read and understand cases, including the significance of headnotes, facts, and issues in case analysis. Further, it emphasizes the need for a slower, more careful approach to reading cases, comparing different case reports, and understanding cases in their historical context.

Meaning of Analysis

Purpose of analysis, reading a case, understanding cases.

Although in most legal systems, statutory law plays a far more critical role in the day-to-day life of individuals than cases decided by courts, many legal studies focus, wholly or in part, on the understanding and analysis of cases.

The fundamental reason for giving attention to cases is that courts interpret statutes, constitutional provisions and administrative regulations, explain earlier court opinions on points of legal significance, and declare the meaning and scope of the application of legal rules. In addition, they often develop and express new legal regulations and principles.

Analysis of cases is the process of identifying and understanding legal principles. Cases may be analyzed for a variety of purposes, which may include the following:

1.  To see whether a court opinion based on a case applies to a given fact situation. Lawyers routinely do this as part of their professional work. This may also be done by students required to write a problem-based assignment (essay, term paper, project, etc.) , often done by researchers working on a dissertation and thesis.

2. To compare two or more or a series of cases to examine how the courts have decided cases on specific legal issues, such as the parameters used by courts in awarding damages for unfair dismissal or professional negligence.

3. To examine the ‘approach’ adopted by courts for critical analysis and evaluation of the appropriateness or otherwise of the judicial attitude on a specific matter, such as the court approach on certain provisions of the constitution or in issues of employer-employee disputes.

In this regard, the following steps are to be followed carefully:

1. Slower Reading

Fast or quick movement is the rule of the day. But in case law analysis, this is not a good principle. “Fast reading’ of case law does not produce the best result in studying or assimilating case law.

For example , a speedy reading may lead to an inaccurate comprehension of ratio decidendi or preclude the reader from appreciating the delicate nuances of a case or a point emerging from between the lines.

On the other hand, a slower reader with watchful eyes may get enough time to grasp the facts and statements to assess the attitude of the court and its feelings to ascertain the law.

2. Comparing Different Case Reports

Usually, the judgments pronounced by a Superior Court are reported in many journals and reports. When more than one report is available to the researcher, he must look at them because new ideas often strike the reader when he compares different case reports. Moreover, with time, reporting processes acquire more straightforward and subtle forms. Therefore, their reading may help in the emergence of new ideas; as far as possible unabridged reports should be compared to determine if there is a difference between them.

3. Reading Case Law in its Historical Context

The historical background of a case is of considerable importance as it sheds light on the proper grounds of and on the policy related to the decision. It also helps in distinguishing the case from other similar cases or treating it as absolute or as obscure. Similarly, the reading of cases in their political, social, and economic context is equally essential from the point of view of the problem at hand, especially in the area of property rights, right to liberty, freedom of trade and commerce, use changes in these areas are very frequent.

In any legal research involving case law analysis, a good understanding of the various parts of a case is the first step.

1. Headnotes

Headnotes, which are found at the beginning of a case, generally provide a piece of brief information as to the facts of the case, the main issues involved, the holding of the court, and often give a summary of the main points in the court’s ruling.

The paragraphs in the headnotes are usually arranged in the same sequence in which the issues are to be taken up by judges. In some law reports, the headnotes also mention the cases followed, overturned, or distinguished.

However, the cases merely considered are generally not mentioned in the headnotes. Instead, before the beginning of the judgment, a list of all the cases used in the parties’ arguments or used in the judgment is provided, indicating which cases were merely considered, followed, not followed, distinguished, and so on.

Editors of the concerned law report prepare headnotes. These are copyrighted material, whereas the reported case is not.

In a case analysis, the researcher should not rely only on headnotes. It is necessary that the case in full, or those parts that are relevant to the research, should be examined. Headnotes may sometimes be misleading.

Facts are statements of what happened that gave rise to legal issues (both in civil and criminal proceedings) presented before the court for its judgment.

A court, before discussing the legal issues, expressing its opinion on the issues, giving its decision, and entering the judgment, states the facts presented by the concerned parties.

Not all cases involve simple and brief facts. Often the facts are stated in elaborate detail and are complicated.

Understanding the facts is essential because the essence of case law research requires locating cases with similar factual circumstances. A case with like facts will often deal with issues identical to those in the problem being researched.

Cases resolve legal disputes presented by the concerned parties. Legal issues emerge from the disputed facts presented by the parties. However, the court finally determines the legal issues upon which the court is called to decide.

Sometimes, there may be only one legal issue based on simple facts. The statement of law made by the court on such an issue will be its holding (the ratio decidendi) .

On the other hand, some cases may involve several issues, and the court may have to give its ruling on all such issues.

The researcher’s task is to pick up only such issues and rulings relevant to the matter under consideration, leaving out the rest. A researcher often has to deal with many cases, each containing several legal issues. Therefore, the researcher should first select the most relevant cases and then pick up only those issues and rulings relevant to some aspects of the study.

4. Decision

A decision is the court’s conclusion. The conclusion is based on the particular facts of the case and the legal rule or principle that the court applies to the facts. The effect of a decision is to resolve the disputed issue.

For example , a civil case determines the rights and liabilities of parties (plaintiff and defendant, or appellant and respondent) , declares who wins and who loses, and provides the relief and remedies accordingly. In a criminal case, it determines whether the accused/defendant is liable for the alleged offence. The decision of the court is the outcome of the case.

5. Judgment

The term judgment is used in two senses.

In its limited sense, it refers to the ultimate order of the court, such as an order that dismisses an appeal, determines the damages payable by a party, or determines the punishment.

In its general sense, the word refers to the whole case- issues, the decision and the reasons the court gives for its decision.

6. Judicial Reasoning

Reasoning is the process the court uses in choosing a rule and applying it to the facts of the case it is considering. The rule may be found in a constitutional or statutory provision, administrative regulations, court rules, cases decided earlier, a customary practice, or any other source recognizable judicially.

The rule may also be found in unwritten principles or concepts such as the ‘principles of natural justice, judicial policy’.

The reasoning is the court’s analysis and justification for deciding the case the way it did. In a standard law system like India, cases play an essential role in legal reasoning and analysis.

7. Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta

A decision of the court has two aspects:

i. What the case decides between the parties? and ii. What principle it lays down?

It is not everything said by a judge when giving judgment that constitutes a precedent. Law quality relates to the principle behind a decision. The focus on which the case was determined is the only aspect of a judge’s ruling that serves as an authority for other judges. That which binds is called its ratio decidendi , i.e., the rule of law .

During the judgment, a judge must let various observations not precisely relevant to the issue before him. These observations are obiter dicta . They are without binding authority but are nonetheless important.

A statement made by a judge during a ruling that might not be entirely pertinent to the matter at hand is known as an obiter dictum .

Ratio decidendi is the rule acted upon by the court and becomes a precedent, whereas an obiter dictum suggests the trend of the courts’ thinking but not the rule of law.

Ratio and dicta tend to shade into each other. The rations have law quality and are binding on lower courts; the dicta, too, have law quality but are not binding at all.

Though rations of a higher court are binding on lower courts, the rations of lower court decisions have only persuasive force in higher courts like that of a dictum. Some dicta are so authoritative that the decision between ratio and dictum is reduced to a vanishing point. Dicta, which have no force, are propositions stated by way of illustration or on hypothetical facts.

Case analysis is a specific feature of legal research. One of the important sources of law, especially in common law countries, is judicial precedents. The study of decided case laws is integral to legal research.

Read Next: 1. What Is Case Law Research and Its Advantages and Disadvantages? 2. What Are Case Comments and Their Significance in Legal Analysis? 3. What Do You Mean by Citation of Cases? 4. What Is Factual Proposition and Its Importance?

• Latest Posts

• What Is the Burden of Proof Under the PMLA? - 18th April 2024
• Ranjit D Udeshi vs State of Maharashtra – Case Explained - 11th April 2024
• What Is Proceeds of Crime Under PMLA (With Case Laws) - 7th April 2024

How to Start Studying Law – For New, Existing, and Old Students

How to Study and Prepare for Judiciary Exams (13 tips)

11 Tips to Pass AIBE With Bare Acts and MCQ Tests in 2024

How to Write the Best Answer in Judiciary Mains Exam

10 Legal Jobs and Career Options After Law in 2024

Best Books for Judiciary Exam Preparation in 2024

My name is Ankur . I am a law graduate. I was my college topper for five years. In March 2018, I started WritingLaw.com . The main motive was to make a modern law website that is clean and comfortable.

Everything is going well . This is because of law students, advocates, judges and professors like you, who give me satisfaction, hope and the motivation to keep working. Thank you for your love and support. I hope you have a fruitful time here.

Law Study Material

© 2018-2024 | About Us |  Contact Us | Privacy Policy | T&C | Disclaimer | Cookies | Sitemap

Understanding Legal Case Studies: An In-Depth Analysis of Real-Life Legal Scenarios

Hello and welcome! Today, we will delve into the fascinating world of legal case studies. Through an in-depth analysis of real-life legal scenarios, we will explore the intricacies of the law and gain a better understanding of how it applies in different situations. So, let’s jump right in and explore this exciting topic!

Understanding Legal Case Studies:

📋 Content in this article

1. What are Legal Case Studies? Legal case studies are detailed examinations of real legal cases that have been heard in courts across the United States. These studies provide a comprehensive analysis of the facts, legal issues, arguments presented by both parties, and the final decisions reached by the courts.

2. Purpose of Legal Case Studies: The primary purpose of legal case studies is to educate and inform individuals about the law by illustrating how it is applied in real-life situations. By studying these cases, individuals can gain insights into legal principles, reasoning, and how courts interpret and apply laws.

3. Types of Legal Case Studies: Legal case studies cover a wide range of legal areas, including criminal law, civil law, constitutional law, administrative law, and more. Each case study focuses on a specific legal issue and provides a detailed examination of the facts, legal arguments, and outcomes.

4. Key Components of Legal Case Studies: a. Facts: Case studies present a detailed account of the events that led to the legal dispute.

b. Legal Issues: These studies highlight the specific legal questions or controversies that arose in the case.

c. Arguments: Both parties present their arguments and legal reasoning to support their positions.

d. Precedents: Case studies often reference previous court decisions (precedents) that may have bearing on the current case.

e. Court Decision: The case study provides an analysis of the court’s final decision and its reasoning.

5. Benefits of Studying Legal Case Studies: Studying legal case studies can be beneficial for various individuals, including law students, legal professionals, and curious individuals interested in understanding the law. By examining these cases, one can develop critical thinking skills, improve legal analysis, and gain a deeper understanding of the legal system.

6. Ethical Considerations: When studying legal case studies, it is essential to approach them with an open mind and respect for the parties involved. Remember that these cases involve real people and real legal disputes that have had significant impacts on their lives. It is crucial to maintain privacy and confidentiality while discussing and analyzing these cases.

In conclusion, legal case studies provide a valuable tool for understanding the law and its application in real-life situations. By examining the facts, legal issues, arguments, and court decisions of these cases, individuals can develop a deeper appreciation for the complexities of the legal system. So, let’s embark on this journey together and explore the fascinating world of legal case studies!

Understanding the Practical Application of Case Studies in Real Life Scenarios

In the realm of law, case studies play a crucial role in understanding and analyzing legal scenarios. A case study is a detailed examination of a particular legal case or situation, which serves as a valuable tool for lawyers, law students, and anyone interested in understanding the practical application of law in real life.

1. Detailed Analysis: Case studies provide a comprehensive analysis of legal issues, facts, parties involved, and the reasoning behind court decisions. These studies offer a deeper understanding of the complexities and intricacies of legal cases by breaking them down into distinct elements.

2. Real-Life Scenarios: Case studies simulate real-life situations that legal professionals encounter in their practice. They present actual legal disputes that have been resolved by courts or settled through negotiations. This allows for a direct application of legal principles to real-world scenarios.

3. Legal Principles and Precedents: Case studies delve into the legal principles and precedents that have shaped the outcome of a particular case. By examining previous court decisions and legal doctrines, case studies help lawyers develop a deep understanding of the principles that guide the law.

4. Learning from Precedents: Precedent is a fundamental concept in the legal system, referring to previous court decisions that serve as binding authority for future cases. Case studies provide an opportunity to study and analyze precedents, allowing legal professionals to understand how courts have interpreted and applied the law in similar situations.

5. Problem-Solving Skills: Studying case studies enhances problem-solving skills by presenting complex legal issues that require critical thinking and analysis. Lawyers must identify relevant facts, assess legal arguments, and propose effective strategies to resolve the case. Case studies offer valuable practice in honing these skills.

6. Ethical Considerations: Case studies often explore ethical dilemmas faced by legal professionals. By examining the ethical implications of legal decisions and actions, case studies promote ethical awareness and encourage lawyers to make informed and morally sound choices in their practice.

7. Practical Application: Understanding legal case studies is essential for effectively applying legal concepts in real-life scenarios. By studying how the law has been applied in similar situations, lawyers can draw upon that knowledge to advocate for their clients, negotiate settlements, or develop strategies to prevent potential legal disputes.

In conclusion, grasping the significance of legal case studies is crucial for anyone involved in the legal field. They provide a detailed analysis of real-life legal scenarios, allowing for a deeper understanding of legal principles, precedents, and problem-solving skills. By immersing oneself in case studies, one can gain valuable insights into the practical application of law in various situations.

Analyzing a Legal Case Study: Key Steps and Considerations

Legal case studies are an essential tool used by legal professionals to analyze and understand real-life legal scenarios. These studies offer a detailed examination of the facts, the legal issues involved, and the outcome of a particular case. An in-depth analysis of a legal case study can provide valuable insights and guidance for both attorneys and potential clients.

It is important to approach the analysis of a legal case study in a systematic and methodical manner. The following steps and considerations should be taken into account when analyzing a legal case study:

• 1. Identify the Relevant Legal Issues: The first step in analyzing a legal case study is to identify the specific legal issues that arise from the facts of the case. These issues may include matters such as contract disputes, negligence claims, criminal charges, or constitutional questions. Clearly identifying the legal issues at hand will help focus the analysis and determine which areas of law are applicable.
• 2. Review the Facts: Carefully reviewing and understanding the facts of the case is crucial to conducting a comprehensive analysis. This involves examining the events leading up to the legal dispute, the actions of the parties involved, and any relevant documentation or evidence. The facts will serve as the foundation for applying legal principles and determining the strengths and weaknesses of each party’s position.
• 3. Research Applicable Laws: Once the legal issues and facts have been identified, it is important to research and understand the relevant laws that apply to the case. This involves reviewing statutes, regulations, case precedents, and legal doctrines that pertain to the specific areas of law involved. A thorough understanding of the applicable laws will provide a basis for evaluating the strength of each party’s arguments.
• 4. Analyze Precedent Cases: Examining relevant precedent cases can provide valuable guidance and insights when analyzing a legal case study. Precedent cases are court decisions that have addressed similar legal issues in the past and have established legal principles or guidelines. They can help predict how a court might rule in a similar situation, and assist in crafting persuasive arguments.
• 5. Evaluate Legal Arguments: After conducting thorough research and analysis, it is important to evaluate the strength of each party’s legal arguments. This involves assessing the credibility and relevance of the evidence presented, identifying any weaknesses or inconsistencies, and weighing the potential impact of legal precedents. Evaluating legal arguments requires careful reasoning and the consideration of various perspectives.
• 6. Consider Potential Outcomes: When analyzing a legal case study, it is important to consider the potential outcomes or consequences of different legal arguments. This involves assessing the likelihood of success for each party, considering the potential remedies or damages that may be awarded, and evaluating the impact on future legal precedents. Considering potential outcomes helps inform strategic decision-making and assists in determining the best course of action.
• 7. Seek Legal Advice: While analyzing a legal case study can provide valuable insights and guidance, it is important to consult with a qualified attorney for professional advice. A knowledgeable attorney can provide a deeper understanding of the legal issues involved, offer strategic advice, and help navigate the complexities of the legal system.

Analyzing a legal case study requires careful attention to detail, thorough research, and critical thinking. By following these key steps and considerations, one can gain a deeper understanding of real-life legal scenarios and make informed decisions based on sound legal principles.

Understanding the Mechanics of an In-Depth Case Study

In the world of law, legal case studies play a vital role in understanding the intricacies of real-life legal scenarios. These studies provide a comprehensive analysis of the mechanics involved in the resolution of complex legal disputes. Whether you are a law student, a legal professional, or simply interested in gaining a deeper understanding of the legal system, delving into the details of case studies can be an enlightening and educational experience.

What is a Legal Case Study?

A legal case study refers to an in-depth examination of a specific legal dispute, typically based on real-life scenarios. These studies aim to provide a detailed analysis of the legal issues at hand, the parties involved, the relevant laws and regulations, and ultimately, the outcome of the case. By dissecting the facts and circumstances of a case, legal case studies offer valuable insights into the application and interpretation of the law.

Why Study Legal Case Studies?

1. Learning from Precedents: Legal case studies help us understand how courts have interpreted and applied the law in previous cases. By analyzing past precedents, we can gain a better understanding of how legal principles are established and how they evolve over time.

2. Developing Analytical Skills: Studying legal case studies hones our ability to analyze complex situations, identify key legal issues, and evaluate different arguments. This analytical skillset is crucial for any legal professional, as it enables them to effectively navigate through complicated legal disputes.

3. Gaining Practical Knowledge: Case studies allow us to see how legal theories and concepts are put into practice. By examining the strategies and tactics employed by attorneys in real-life cases, we can gain practical knowledge that may prove valuable in our own legal endeavors.

4. Understanding Legal Processes: Legal case studies provide a behind-the-scenes look at the legal process. From the initial filing of a complaint to the final resolution of a case, these studies shed light on the various stages and procedures involved in legal proceedings.

The Mechanics of an In-Depth Case Study

When conducting an in-depth case study, several key components should be considered:

1. Factual Background: A thorough understanding of the facts surrounding the case is essential. This includes information about the parties involved, their relationships, and the events leading up to the legal dispute.

2. Legal Issues: Identifying the central legal issues is crucial. This involves analyzing the applicable laws and regulations and determining how they relate to the facts of the case.

3. Legal Analysis: A comprehensive legal analysis involves examining and interpreting relevant statutes, regulations, and precedents. This step helps establish the legal framework within which the case will be evaluated.

4. Arguments and Counterarguments: A critical aspect of an in-depth case study is evaluating the arguments put forth by each party. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of these arguments allows for a more objective assessment of the case.

5. Outcome and Implications: Finally, analyzing the outcome of the case and its potential implications is essential. This includes considering the impact on future legal disputes and potential changes to existing laws or regulations.

As a seasoned attorney in the United States, I understand the value of staying up-to-date with legal case studies. Legal case studies provide an in-depth analysis of real-life legal scenarios, allowing attorneys and legal professionals to deepen their understanding of various areas of law and refine their legal strategies. In this article, I will reflect on the importance of staying informed about legal case studies and offer some suggestions on how to effectively utilize this valuable resource.

Legal case studies offer a unique opportunity to examine the application of law in real-world situations. They provide detailed accounts of actual legal disputes, including the facts, legal issues, arguments presented by both parties, and the final outcome. By studying these cases, attorneys can gain insights into the intricacies of legal reasoning and decision-making by judges and juries.

One of the key benefits of understanding legal case studies is the ability to learn from the successes and failures of others. By examining past cases, attorneys can identify effective legal strategies that have proven successful in similar situations. This knowledge can be applied to future cases, allowing attorneys to advocate more effectively for their clients and increase their chances of achieving a favorable outcome.

Furthermore, legal case studies serve as a valuable source of precedent. The decisions made in previous cases, especially those by higher courts, often establish legal principles that guide future rulings. By familiarizing themselves with relevant case law, attorneys can provide informed advice to their clients and craft persuasive arguments based on established legal principles.

Staying up-to-date on legal case studies is essential for any attorney seeking to provide high-quality legal representation. Here are some suggestions on how to effectively utilize this valuable resource:

1. Read Legal Journals and Publications: Legal journals and publications often publish analyses of significant legal cases. These articles provide expert insights and interpretation of the key issues and implications of the cases. Subscribing to reputable legal publications can ensure that you receive regular updates on new and noteworthy case studies.

2. Attend Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Programs: CLE programs are designed to help attorneys stay current with legal developments. Many CLE programs include sessions dedicated to analyzing recent case studies and their impact on specific areas of law. Attending these programs can provide valuable insights and allow for networking with other legal professionals.

3. Join Professional Associations: Professional associations, such as bar associations and specialized legal organizations, often offer resources and opportunities for attorneys to engage in case study discussions with peers. These associations may provide access to exclusive databases or discussion forums where attorneys can exchange ideas and insights on recent legal cases.

4. Utilize Online Legal Research Platforms: Online legal research platforms, such as LexisNexis and Westlaw, provide comprehensive databases of legal cases. These platforms allow attorneys to search for relevant case studies, filter results based on specific criteria, and access additional resources such as court opinions and secondary legal materials.

While legal case studies are an invaluable resource, it is important to exercise caution and verify the content presented. Not all sources may be reliable or accurately reflect the current state of the law. Attorneys should always cross-reference multiple sources and consult primary legal authorities to ensure the accuracy and currency of the information they rely upon.

In conclusion, staying informed about legal case studies is crucial for attorneys looking to expand their knowledge and refine their legal strategies. By studying real-life legal scenarios, attorneys can learn from the successes and failures of others, understand legal reasoning, identify effective strategies, and establish a solid foundation of case law precedent. By utilizing various resources such as legal publications, CLE programs, professional associations, and online research platforms, attorneys can stay up-to-date with the latest legal case studies and provide exceptional legal representation to their clients.

Related Posts:

• Understanding Civil Law: Exploring Three Real-Life Scenarios
• Exploring the Rigor of Law Studies in the UK: An In-depth Analysis
• The Relevance of A-Level Law for University Law Studies: An In-Depth Analysis
• Analyzing the Limitations: Unveiling the Flaw of Case Studies
• The Accuracy of Suits in Portraying Real Law: An In-depth Analysis
• The Duration of Law Studies in Germany: An In-Depth Analysis
• The Legal Representation of Anna in Real Life: Unveiling the Attorney Behind the Scenes
• The Dual Representation of Parties in South Carolina Real Estate: An In-depth Analysis
• Understanding the Difference Between Suits and Real-Life Law Practice
• What is an example of Murphy’s law in real life?
• Is Harvey Specter a lawyer in real life?
• Understanding Litigation: An Examination of Real-Life Examples
• Understanding Local Laws: 3 Real-Life Examples to Consider
• A Comprehensive Guide: Where to Find Law Case Studies for Research Purposes
• Understanding Family Law: Key Concepts and Real-life Examples
• Understanding the Law of Demand: Exploring Real-Life Examples
• Understanding Public Law: Real-Life Examples and Applications
• Understanding Copyright Lawsuits: A Closer Look at Real-life Examples
• The Costliest Criminal Case in US History: An In-depth Analysis
• Proving Guilt in a Civil Court Case: An In-Depth Analysis
• Understanding the Illinois Supreme Court BIPA Case: An In-Depth Analysis
• Understanding Criminal Law: 3 Real-Life Examples of Criminal Law Cases
• Understanding the Difficulty Level of A-Level Law Studies: An Informative Analysis
• Understanding the Level of Difficulty and Rigor of Law Studies: A Comprehensive Analysis
• Understanding the Importance of Legal Representation: Three Scenarios Requiring Professional Assistance
• The Duration of Doctoral Studies in Law: A Comprehensive Analysis
• Identifying Legal Issues in a Case: A Comprehensive Guide to Analysis and Evaluation
• The Value of Pursuing Law School at a Later Stage in Life: A Comprehensive Analysis
• The Pros and Cons of Pursuing Law School at a Later Stage in Life: A Comprehensive Analysis
• The Pros and Cons of Practicing Real Estate Law: A Comprehensive Analysis
• Understanding the Maximum Life of Ordnance in India: A Detailed Analysis
• Understanding Technical Legal Skills: An In-Depth Analysis
• Understanding Contract Breach: Exploring Three Common Scenarios
• Understanding the Lincoln Benefit Life Lawsuit: A Comprehensive Analysis
• Understanding the Role of the Lead Lawyer in a Legal Team: An In-depth Analysis

HOW TO DO CASE ANALYSIS?

Published by admin on april 26, 2023 april 26, 2023.

This article is written by Rahul Verma, an intern under Legal Vidhiya

Case Analysis Introduction:

Case analysis is a technical method to determine the relevant point and facts of law reveal the various legal issues which are already mentioned in case arguments of both parties and brief contention of judgement. Case analysis provide significant insight into the whole case which reduce the time to reading the lengthy judgement in a simple word it is a very tedious task to reading the whole judgement. it is always a good idea to read a gist of the whole case first either from the case notes itself or from other resources such as judgement from authentic website, some referral books, if available. Also, while reading the case, you can work through the judgment in sizeable chunks and skim through the judgement looking for the most relevant parts which answer your questions. It is advisable to slow down your pace while going through these relevant parts in order to grasp the legal principles and their application in the factual matrix of the case.

Preparation of brief:

A legal and case brief must have a clear and simple objective, written logically and clearly so as to lay down the petitioner’s reason for filing the case, the end remedy petitioner seeks and why the court must favour the petitioner’s case. There are certain other things to be kept in mind while writing a legal brief. In a simple way to understand a case is to write a whole case summary in a gist of it. It clears all the hurdles in your mind with the result being a clear understanding of the judgement which is always easy to remember. Writing a case summary forces you to ask yourself essential questions and find the answers to the same through the entire process of writing the case brief. It helps you to develop a better grasp of the contents of the decision, learn the application of the legal principles, recall them quickly and make critical remarks.

These are the main component content of Case brief:

• Title and Citation
• Authorities Name(Court and Jurisdiction)
• Relevant Facts
• Contentions
• Issue/contention wise judgement (with reasoning)
• Concurring / Dissenting Opinions (if any)
• Law Points / Key Takeaways
• Analysis/Conclusion

Title and Citation:

The proper title of the case must tell you when you write the case summaries. One party initiating legal action to another party in civil litigation so here first party called Plaintiff and to whom against case file in the court is called Defendant . In a simple word the title of the case shows who is opposing whom vs separate the two parties in a case.

Citation of the case helps the reader to find gist of the full judgement. There are various ways to cite an article. You can read about them, here.

Name of Authorities:

Court Name: The name of the court of case tells the exact jurisdiction and power of the court where matter can be conclude. For the example The Supreme Court of India, High Court of Delhi, District Court etc.

Jurisdiction of Court and Power :

Jurisdiction means and includes any authority conferred by the law upon the court, tribunal or judge to decide or adjudicate any dispute between the parties or pass judgment or order. Jurisdiction is key question for the court which goes to the root of the case and decide the fate of matter either at preliminary stage or on merit. If any order passed without jurisdiction, it becomes nullity and not enforceable by law. The jurisdiction of civil courts can be divided on the basis of pecuniary, Territorial, and subject matter.

Pecuniary Jurisdiction : Section 15 of the civil procedure court provides that every suit shall be instituted in the court of the lowest grade competent to try it. As per Civil Courts Act the pecuniary jurisdiction of the courts is as follows: Suits amounting up to Rs.3,00,000/- lie before the Junior Civil Judge’s Courts. Suits over 3,00,000/- and but not exceeding Rs. 15,00,000/- lie before the Senior Civil Judge’s Courts and exceeding Rs. 15,00,000/- lie before District Courts. It is an important to note that High Court has no Pecuniary Jurisdiction and only appeal lies before it

.Territorial Jurisdiction: Section 16 to 20 of C.P.C deals with Territorial jurisdiction of a court. Whereas Section 16 to 18 relates to immovable property and Section 19 deals with suit for compensation for wrongs to persons are movable property. Section 20 of C.P.C is residuary provision and cover all cases not falling under Section 16 to 19.

Relevant facts:

Summarizing and elaborating facts of a case in a simple way is the most difficult task of writing a case brief. The most challenging task here is to determine precisely which facts can be excluded from the case brief. The entire objective of preparing a case brief is to present the case in the most lucid and simplified manner keeping it very precise and to the point. Therefore, facts with unnecessary detail must be burnt out from the brief so that the final statement of facts lose any extra flab and attains the perfect zero figure. This can be done by cutting down on the use of proper nouns and irrelevant dates and figures. For instance, use of terms like “the Plaintiff” or “the Defendant” to describe the parties would suffice in order to convey all the relevant facts without mentioning their names. You also need to figure out if details like whether the car used for kidnapping was Tata Safari or a Maruti Swift or whether the incident took place on a highway, or a city lane are at all relevant.

Statement of facts should set out the nature of the litigation, parties involved, cause of action, relevant laws or key words involved and

the course of decision through lower court/s to the present court. To sum up, here you need to answer five relevant questions –

1. What is the nature of the litigation?

2. Who is asking this particular court for what?

3. Why did they sue?

4. What are the relevant laws in question?

5. What has already been decided so far?

The most important issues is decided by the Judge of the case that what points a particular case came before the court to decide? What are the most significant issues in the case? Try to identify the issues or questions judges explicitly set apart to discuss and decide upon.This part of the case brief should be framed in terms of questions. The issues should never be fact-specific . Each issue should ideally be no longer than a sentence.

Contentions:

The all contentions raised by both the parties to prove their case. Corresponding contentions of opposing parties should be clubbed together.

Based on the contentions, what did the court bench decide? Give briefs points on the same. Did the court decide in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant? What remedy, if any, did the court grant? If it is an appellate court opinion, did the court affirm the lower court’s decision, reverse it in whole or in part, or remand the case for additional proceedings?

Concurring/dissenting opinion:

 There may be cases where one of the judges may differ from the majority opinion. In that case, it is important to write the dissenting opinion. However, you should make sure that the dissenting opinion should be as crisp and precise as possible. There may also be a case in which even though a judge concurs with the other judges he/she may reason differently to reach the same outcome. In that case, it is also important to mention the concurring opinion.

Law points / key takeaways:

 To list out all the relevant legal principles used in the judgement as its basis. You will be able to do it only when you have read the judgement in its entirety. The legal principles should be framed as a declarative statement and must not be fact specific.

Analysis / conclusion:

To evaluate the significance of the case, its relationship to other cases, its place in history, and what is shows about the Court, its members, its decision-making processes, or the impact it has on litigants, government, or society. It is here that the implicit assumptions and values of the Justices should be probed, the “rightness” of the decision debated, and the logic of the reasoning considered.

DK Basu v State of West Bengal – Case Analysis

Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India- Case Analysis

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Related Posts

Live webinar: principles of indian competition law [24 may 2024, 05:00 pm onwards].

Spread the loveAbout Legal Vidhiya Legal Vidhiya, established in 2021, stands as a pioneering online ed-tech platform committed to nurturing legal education. Our multifaceted platform offers a comprehensive array of opportunities aimed at empowering aspiring Read more…

THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR CORPORATE FRAUD PREVENTION AND DETENTION

Spread the loveThis article is written by Dadhirao Prerana of 2nd Year of B.A.LL.B. of PRRLC, Osmania University, Hyderabad, an intern in Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT In the era of the corporate world, it is important Read more…

INSIDER TRADING REGULATIONS AND THEIR ENFORCEMENT

Spread the loveThis article is written by Dadhirao Prerana of 2nd Year of B.A.LL.B. of PRRLC, Osmania University, Hyderabad, an intern under Legal Vidhiya ABSTRACT Have you ever come across words like spy agents, espionage Read more…

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Algorithmic discrimination: examining its types and regulatory measures with emphasis on us legal practices provisionally accepted.

• 1 Sage IT Consulting Group, China
• 2 University of Washington, United States
• 3 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
• 4 New York University, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Algorithmic decision-making systems are increasingly being used across various domains, from criminal justice to employment to education. While these systems offer the potential for increased efficiency and objectivity, they also risk perpetuating and amplifying societal biases and discrimination. This paper provides a comprehensive examination of the types of algorithmic discrimination, the legal and regulatory approaches to addressing them, and the challenges involved in ensuring fairness and accountability in automated decisions. Drawing on a systematic literature review, legal document analysis, and comparative case studies, the authors identify five main types of algorithmic bias: bias by algorithmic agents, discrimination based on feature selection, proxy discrimination, disparate impact, and targeted advertising. The paper analyzes the current U.S. legal and regulatory landscape, discussing principled and specific regulations, preventive controls, consequential liability, self-regulation, and heteronomy regulation. It also provides a comparative perspective by examining algorithmic fairness measures in the EU, Canada, Australia, and Asia. Case studies on criminal risk assessment and hiring algorithms illustrate the real-world impacts of algorithmic discrimination. The paper concludes with recommendations for interdisciplinary research, proactive policy development, public awareness, and ongoing monitoring to promote fairness and accountability in algorithmic decision-making. As the use of AI and automated systems expands globally, this work highlights the importance of developing comprehensive, adaptive approaches to combat algorithmic discrimination and ensure the socially responsible deployment of these powerful technologies.

Keywords: Algorithmic discrimination, regulatory measures, Automated decision-making, Computational Intelligence, AI AND LAW

Received: 16 Oct 2023; Accepted: 01 May 2024.

Copyright: © 2024 WANG, WU, Ji and Fu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mx. YING CHENG WU, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195-4550, Washington, United States

People also looked at

• --> Login or Sign Up

Shop by Author

• Sabrineh Ardalan
• Robert Bordone
• Robert Clark
• John Coates
• Susan Crawford
• Alonzo Emery
• Heidi Gardner
• Philip B. Heymann
• Howell E. Jackson
• Wendy Jacobs
• Adriaan Lanni
• Jeremy McClane
• Naz Modirzadeh
• Catherine Mondell
• Ashish Nanda
• Charles R. Nesson
• John Palfrey
• Bruce Patton
• Todd D. Rakoff
• Lisa Rohrer
• Jeswald W. Salacuse
• James Sebenius
• Joseph William Singer
• Holger Spamann
• Carol Steiker
• Guhan Subramanian
• Lawrence Susskind
• David B. Wilkins
• Jonathan Zittrain

Shop by Brand

Howell Jackson

• Ashish Nanda and Nicholas Semi Haas
• Chad M. Carr
• John Coates, Clayton Rose, and David Lane
• Ashish Nanda and Lauren Prusiner
• Ashish Nanda and Lisa Rohrer
• Ashish Nanda and Monet Brewerton
• View all Brands

Free Materials

• Published Old-New
• Published New-Old

Investor Access to Private Investment

Hannah Valentine under the supervision of Howell Jackson

First National Bank of Ames Corporation

Share-Inn Economy: Student Materials

Emily M. Broad Leib, Jude Lee, Amy Hoover & Rachel Gordon

Share-Inn Economy: Teaching Note

Share-Inn Economy (C)

Emily M. Broad Leib, Jude Lee & Amy Hoover

Share-Inn Economy (A)

Robo Advising

Ryan Chan-Wei HLS LLM '19 under the supervision of Howell Jackson

Fintech Charter

Margaret Tahyar, Madison Roberts, and Carol Rodrigues of Davis Polk & Wardwell, with the assistance of Professor Howell E. Jackson

Strategic Options and Legal Risks for Elite ReFi, Inc.

Margaret Tahyar, Jai Massari, Madison Roberts, and Adam Fovent of Davis Polk & Wardwell, with the assistance of Professor Howell E. Jackson

Civilian Protection in Partnered Conflicts

Dustin A. Lewis, Naz K. Modirzadeh, C. Danae Paterson, Lisa Brem

OUR Walmart

Sharon Block, Lisa Brem, and Brittany Deitch

Worker Centers

Exercise on Alternative Strategies for Depository Institutions

Sanctuary Cities

Brittany Deitch and Lisa Brem, under the supervision of Sabrineh Ardalan

Wells Fargo Corporate Governance

Ed Stein under the supervision of Howell Jackson

Anti-Money Laundering and Blockchain Technology

Dylan M. Aluise under the supervision of Howell Jackson

The Future of Affiliate Transaction Restrictions for Banks and the Federal Reserve’s Emergency Intervention Authority

Margaret Tahyar and Howell Jackson

Closed-End Fund Regulation

Daniel Wertman under the Supervision of Howell Jackson

Unidentified Financial Institutions

Howell Jackson and Peter Tufano with assistance from Andrea Ryan

Asset Securitization, Marketplace Lending, and the Future After the Madden Decision

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Responding to the PHH Litigation

Ryan M. Johansen under the supervision of Howell Jackson

Wal-Mart and Banking

Joshua Cutler under the supervision of Howell Jackson

Lending Club: 2008

Anooshree Sinha and Corrine Snow under the supervision of Howell Jackson

Ames’ Auto Insurance Regulations — Racial Disparities in Insurance Premiums

Federal Preemption of State Consumer Protection Laws: The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency's Dodd-Frank Act Implementation Rules

Melanie Berdecia and Dylan Aluise under supervision of Howell Jackson

The OCC’s FinTech Charter: Testing the Scope of the OCC’s Chartering Powers

Lotus v. Borland: A Case Study in Software Copyright

Ben Sobel, under the supervision of Jonathan Zittrain

The Color of Police Action in these United States

Saptarishi Bandopadhyay, under supervision of Charles R. Nesson

The Decriminalization of Marijuana in Jamaica: A Key Step toward International Legalization?

Thinking Big: Bringing Big Sport's Energy and Innovation to Education

Elizabeth Moroney, under supervision of Charles R. Nesson

The Snowden Effect

Anastasia Tolu, under supervision of Charles R. Nesson

The Art of Deliberation

Algorithmic Allegories (version 1.0)

Marcus Comiter, Ben Sobel, and Jonathan Zittrain

Somalia in Crisis: Famine, Counterterrorism, & Humanitarian Aid | Part B2: The NGO General Counsel Dilemma

Naz K. Modirzadeh, Dustin A. Lewis, and Molly R. Gray, with Lisa Brem

Somalia in Crisis: Famine, Counterterrorism, & Humanitarian Aid | Part B1: The National Security Council Dilemma

Somalia in Crisis: Famine, Counterterrorism, & Humanitarian Aid | Part A: General Background Document

What’s Fair about Fair Use? The Battle over E-Reserves at GSU (B)

Elizabeth Moroney, under the supervision of Kyle Courtney and William Fisher

Prosecutorial Discretion in Charging and Plea Bargaining: The Aaron Swartz Case (B)

Elizabeth Moroney, under the supervision of Adriaan Lanni and Carol Steiker

What’s Fair about Fair Use? The Battle over E-Reserves at GSU (A)

The Battle for Unocal

Holger Spamann, Amanda Ravich, and Lisa Brem

Prosecutorial Discretion in Charging and Plea Bargaining: The Aaron Swartz Case (A)

Elizabeth Moroney, under supervision of Adriaan Lanni and Carol Steiker

Sue the Consumer: Digital Copyright in the New Millennium

Charles Nesson and Sarah Jeong

MOOCs and Consequences for the Future of Education

Jeffrey R. Young and Charles Nesson

In the Stadium and in the Street: The Brazil Soccer Riots

Cost-Benefit Analysis at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Howell Jackson and Kelley O'Mara

Ching Pow: Far East Yardies!!

Charles Nesson and Saptarishi Bandopadhyay

From Sony to SOPA: The Technology-Content Divide

John Palfrey, Jonathan Zittrain, Kendra Albert, and Lisa Brem

Game Changers: Mobile Gaming Apps and Data Privacy

Susan Crawford, Jonathan Zittrain and Lisa Brem

The Smart Grid

Sonia McNeil, with Paul Kominers, J. Palfrey and J. Zittrain

The WikiLeaks Incident: Background, Details, and Resources

Alan Ezekiel, under supervision of John Palfrey and Jonathan Zittrain

Drafting an IP Strategy at MNC (C): New Puzzles

John Palfrey and Lisa Brem

Drafting an IP Strategy at MNC (B): Getting Started

Drafting an IP Strategy at MNC (A)

How to Approach a Case Study in a Problem Solving Workshop

Advertisement

Tracking Abortion Bans Across the Country

By The New York Times Updated May 1, 4:40 P.M. ET

• Share full article

Twenty-one states ban abortion or restrict the procedure earlier in pregnancy than the standard set by Roe v. Wade, which governed reproductive rights for nearly half a century until the Supreme Court overturned the decision in 2022.

In some states, the fight over abortion access is still taking place in courtrooms, where advocates have sued to block bans and restrictions. Other states have moved to expand access to abortion by adding legal protections.

Latest updates

• The Arizona state legislature voted to repeal an 1864 ban on nearly all abortions. Officials warned that the near-total ban may be briefly enforceable this summer until the repeal takes effect in the fall. A 15-week ban remains in effect.
• A ban on abortion after about six weeks of pregnancy took effect in Florida , following a ruling by the Florida Supreme Court that the privacy protections of the state’s Constitution do not extend to abortion.

The New York Times is tracking abortion laws in each state after the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , which ended the constitutional right to an abortion.

Where abortion is legal

In a few states that have enacted bans or restrictions, abortion remains legal for now as courts determine whether these laws can take effect. Abortion is legal in the rest of the country, and many states have added new protections since Dobbs.

Ban in effect

Note: TK note here.

Legal for now

State details.

More details on the current status of abortion in each state are below.

An earlier version of this article misstated the legal status of abortion in Utah. As of 4 p.m. on June 24, the state attorney general had issued a statement saying the state’s abortion ban had been triggered, but it had not yet been authorized by the legislature’s general counsel. By 8:30 p.m., the counsel authorized the ban and it went into effect.

A table in an earlier version of this article misstated which abortion ban is being challenged in Texas state court. Abortion rights supporters are challenging a pre-Roe ban, not the state’s trigger ban.

An earlier version of this article referred incorrectly to the legal status of abortion in Indiana. While Indiana abortion providers stopped offering abortion services in anticipation of an abortion ban taking effect on Aug. 1, the law did not take effect.