Main navigation
- Graduate Students
- Faculty & Staff
- General requirements
- Preparation of a thesis
- Initial Thesis Submission
- Thesis examiners
- Evaluation of written thesis
- Thesis examination failures
- Doctoral oral defence
- Final Thesis Submission
- Thesis Writing and Support Resources
- Letters of Completion/PGWP
Evaluation of a Written Thesis
Examiners are asked to evaluate the thesis in myThesis, according to the criteria in the respective thesis examiner report for a Master's or Doctoral thesis. For an example of the criteria, please see the forms: see: Master's Examiner report form ; Doctoral Examiner report form (note these forms are now integrated in myThesis).
Examiners provide an overall judgment of 'passed' or ‘not passed’, in addition to a written report. For Master's students, this evaluation determines whether or not the thesis is ready for final submission, even if minor changes are recommended. For Doctoral candidates, this evaluation determines whether or not the candidate is ready to proceed to the oral defence.
If the thesis meets the general criteria for the degree sought, as well as those listed on the examiner's report form it should be evaluated as 'Passed', even if some changes are recommended.
If the overall judgement is 'Passed', examiners are asked to provide:
- A report that includes any recommendations for minor revisions to the thesis (i.e., stylistic or editorial changes that can be completed in three weeks or less).
- For doctoral theses, External Examiners who will not be at the oral defence must also provide a list of questions to be asked of the candidate at the oral defence.
An evaluation of 'Not Passed' should be given if:
- the need for a new study, experimentation, or significant additional research or reformulation.
- the need to address major problems with the presentation of the work. Stylistic or editorial changes are not normally considered to be major revisions, but if the quality of the presentation is so poor that extensive rewriting is required, the thesis should not be passed.
- At least one of the Criteria for the Evaluation of the Thesis (see Master's Examiner report form ; Doctoral Examiner report form ) is judged as unsatisfactory.
Examiners are asked to identify required changes clearly in their reports. The supervisor or another designated person will ensure that the student corrects the thesis and that it appropriately reflects the examiners' suggestions for revisions prior to re-submission of the thesis.
The candidate will normally revise and re-submit the thesis for re-assessment, usually by the same examiner. If/when review of the revised thesis is required, the Thesis Unit will contact the initial examiner to determine their availability. In rare cases, a revised thesis may be sent to a new examiner if the first examiner is not available to re-examine the thesis. For more, please see Thesis examination failures.
If the revised thesis is again ‘not passed’, the student will be withdrawn from the University unless the decision is reversed through an appeal to the Hearing Committee (Bias, Error, or Misrepresentation ).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License . Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, McGill University .
Department and University Information
Graduate and postdoctoral studies.
- {{ service.text }}
PhD Thesis Evaluation Report Writing
Thesis writing plays a vital role in completing your academic study in any research area. In this thesis, among all the chapters, the evaluation is important that is illustrated in this blog.
Our technical team is available 24/7 for research assistance
Send your techinical enquiries directly to our technical team via mail - [email protected] or you can send it to support team via WhatsApp
PhD Thesis Evaluation Report is a blog that gives you information about an evaluation report in the thesis. The significance of evaluation in the thesis is illustrated, start to read this blog.
What is a Thesis?
The thesis is a technical write-up of research work as a single strength from the introduction to the conclusion. A thesis consists of sequential chapters to give a deep understanding of the concept. In simple, a thesis is a report of research to illustrate methods and their results in detail.
Importance of Evaluation in Thesis
- At first, the metrics for evaluation in a research concept need to be relevant to the objectives of the work.
- It depicts the efficiency of the proposed methodologies and their best on that system.
- The comparison to previous methodologies and algorithms will make sure that the proposed method operates at higher performances.
- The result evaluation in the thesis depicts tabulated values and graphical plotted values.
The evaluation is not only important in a thesis, in basic it is used to identify the performance of the proposed research. The improvement in the research reflects in the evaluation report. We have experts to write PhD Thesis Evaluation Report in any research field. The research fields in PhD for thesis are given below.
Fields in PhD Thesis Writing
- Network and Communication
- Processing of Images
- Mining different types of Data
- Management of all Data
- Analysis of Banking Records
In this way, there are many other research fields of study to write a thesis. According to the major course, the research field depends upon. We offer support for writing only evaluation reports for the thesis. It is a special opportunity for all scholars and doctorates. We are here to assist you in completing your PhD thesis on time.
Did you find it helpful ?
Leave a reply.
Free Base papers and Topics for your Research
PhD services using Research Domain with important areas
Cloud Computing with Blockchain technology for Security in PhD
Image Processing Integrates with Blockchain Technology for Security
Security by Blockchain and Proof of Blocks for PhD Thesis Writing
Submission and evaluation
Steps to submission.
Students should be aware that in each term there is a cut-off date for submitting the thesis for evaluation. If the student misses this date, there are financial and possibly other consequences. Students are advised to verify applicable deadlines.
Prior to submitting the thesis, the student must have fulfilled all of the program's requirements and have submitted the list of examiners.
If the student is in a cotutelle arrangement, he or she should read their cotutelle agreement and check with the academic units of each institution regarding the submission procedures for both universities.
Examiners nomination arrow_drop_down
The list of examiners is proposed by the student in consultation with his or her supervisor. The student must ensure that the nomination form of the examiners has been completed and forwarded using a Service request in his or her Candidate Center (uoZone). The list must be submitted at least one month before the filing date. Any delay in the submission of this form will delay the entire evaluation and defence process and may have financial consequences since the submission of the thesis can not be accepted if the list of examiners has not been submitted .
- Form - List of examiners for the evaluation of the thesis (PDF)
PhD thesis external examiner arrow_drop_down
Each PhD thesis has an external examiner in addition to the internal examiners. The proposed external examiner should be at arm’s length from the PhD candidate, from the thesis research and from the thesis supervisor. Examiners must be seen to be able to examine the student and the thesis free of substantial conflict of interest.
To enable the faculty to check that external examiners have appropriate expertise and to validate that they are not in conflict of interest, a curriculum vitae must be provided for each proposed examiner. The curriculum vitae should include, the rank, supervisions and a list of publications.
In signing the form with the names of the proposed examiners, the director of the academic unit or delegate is indicating that, to the best of their knowledge, no conflict of interest exists.
For more information, or if there is any question about whether a potential external examiner is at arm’s length, please contact your faculty.
- Examples of conflict of interest
Submission for evaluation arrow_drop_down
When submitting a thesis for evaluation, the student must be enrolled. It is important that the student submits the final draft to his or her thesis supervisor sufficiently early in the term. By doing so the supervisor can read it, provide feedback and deliver it to the student in a timely manner. Consequently, the student can then make the latest revisions or corrections and submit his or her thesis for evaluation, after having obtained approval from the supervisor that the thesis is ready for evaluation .
Thesis submission method arrow_drop_down
The student has to submit an electronic copy of the thesis in the Candidate Center accessible through uoZone .
Statement of the thesis supervisor arrow_drop_down
The supervisor acknowledges having examined the thesis and propose to submit it to the jury. The thesis supervisor will approve or refute the thesis submission throughout the uoCampus portal.
The thesis supervisor will approve the submission of the thesis if he or she is convinced that the thesis meets the standards of the program of studies. In some cases, the thesis supervisor may ask the student to further develop his or her work.
Students who wish to know their status at this stage must log in to the Candidate Center (uoZone).
Steps to evaluation
Evaluation by the thesis jury.
The jury examiners must evaluate the thesis independently and, during the evaluation process, must not contact other examiners, the thesis supervisor, or the student to discuss the thesis evaluation before they submit their report to the office organizing the evaluation and defence.
- Written evaluation of master’s thesis without oral defence and verdicts: See regulation C-7.10.2 of the Academic Regulation on thesis.
- Written evaluation of master’s thesis with oral defence and verdicts: See regulation C-7.10.2 of the Academic Regulation on thesis.
- Written evaluation of a doctoral thesis and verdicts: See regulation C-7.10.2 of the Academic Regulation on thesis.
For theses with an oral defence component, the thesis will be evaluated and then defended in person before a jury composed of professors other than the thesis director. Jury members read and evaluate the thesis. They must express their opinion on the thesis, and indicate whether they consider it ready for defence.
Thesis evaluation report with oral defence requirement
All examiners must submit a written and detailed evaluation report. All reports and examiner's name will be sent to the student and the thesis supervisor(s) and to the other examiners, including the president of the defence, prior to the thesis defence.
The examiner's reports must be sufficiently detailed to allow student to prepare for the defence or, if necessary, to make revisions. It is therefore very important for examiners to write relevant comments. An examiner who judges that the thesis is not ready to go to the defence must specify what gaps need to be filled.
- Are there any flaws in the interpretation of the results or in the method?
- The presentation is problematic and harms the comprehension of certain passages?
Note that the examiner's comments are also considered when a student is recommended for a prize (thesis with or without oral defence requirement).
Typographical errors should not be listed in the report itself but on a separate page.
Students who wish to know their status at this stage can connect to the Candidate center (uoZone).
Research guidance, Research Journals, Top Universities
PhD thesis evaluation report sample | Download external examiner report sample
In this blog post, you will be able to download the PhD thesis evaluation report sample.
PhD thesis evaluation report sample
ZZZZ UNIVERSITY, HIMACHAL PRADESH.
Summary of Examiners Report
A summary in this format should accompany the examiner’s full report to the Research Committee. Criteria to be used as the basis of recommendations and advice on the format of your report are provided in separate guidelines. Written reports are required to be 1-2 pages in length. Reasons for recommendation 4 and 5 should stand scrutiny in an appeal process.
Name of Candidate:
Title of Thesis:
Recommendation:
Commendation:
If you believe it is merited, please tick one box only:
The candidate’s thesis will be considered as an example of outstanding work when either box is checked.
Place: Signature of the Examiner
Format of PhD Thesis
Share this:
Leave a comment cancel reply.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
the PhD thesis and determines often the success or failure of the whole PhD project. In the introductory part of this evaluation, I commended author´s choice of the topic. Unfortunately, I consider the definition of the goals and the scope of the thesis rather vague. I admit that the scope
Often, you can't answer all the research question (s) even with a PhD and so you need to write what you could not do in the final part of the thesis as suggestions for further research. Otherwise an examiner may bring up the gaps and absences as negatives in their assessment of the thesis. You need to have thought about this and noted these gaps.
Evaluation Report of PhD Thesis Name of Research Scholar : Registration Number : Department/Centre : ... The thesis is acceptable after minor revisions as specified to the satisfaction of the Oral Board during viva-voce examination.
Skim them to identify which of the elements in the Introduction model on page 9 are present in each one. Label the main parts B (Background to the Research), RES (the Research), and REP (the Report). Then see which of the more detailed labels (e.g. identifying a research 'gap' or aims) you can apply.
Thesis Title: As a thesis examiner, you will complete this form and attach a written report providing a detailed justification of your evaluation. The deadline to send this form and your written report to Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (email: [email protected]) is _____. A late report has serious academic and financial ...
abstract. Traditionally, examiners 'reports on theses at the doctoral and Masters level consist of two. components: firstly, summative assessment where a judgement is made about whether. the ...
Template for PhD evaluation reports To facilitate the composition of a synthetic evaluation report, PhD committee members are asked to follow the present template when preparing their individual reports. Specific comments (that would be more like ... • In more substantive terms, what does the thesis achieve (or not), and why is this
the thesis. Your evaluation report therefore is meant to focus on the written performance in the thesis and not on the Doctoral student in general. The evaluation report needs to be transparent and comprehensible. For reasons of transparency, present your perception of the main contents of the thesis separate from the assessment section.
Evaluation of a Written Thesis. Examiners are asked to evaluate the thesis in myThesis, according to the criteria in the respective thesis examiner report for a Master's or Doctoral thesis. For an example of the criteria, please see the forms: see: Master's Examiner report form; Doctoral Examiner report form (note these forms are now integrated ...
The dissertation contains an introduction, three chapters, conclusion, bibliography and 4 appendices. The distribution of text in the three chapters is disproportionate (100/28/22 pp). The methods used in the thesis are in general adequate and justified. Taking the thesis as a whole, the author demonstrates sufficiently the ability to choose
REPORT THE DOCTORAL THESIS EVALUATION The evaluation report is given and submitted on the basis of an unbound copy of the doctoral thesis, and consists of four parts, namely: I. OVERVIEW OF THE DISSERTATION Here, briefly describe the content of the doctoral thesis in the same form as that of the
3.Thesis submission. Within 30 days of submission of synopsis the students submits soft copy (pdf) of the thesis for evaluation. A student can be asked to submit the hard copy of the thesis if required by the examiner. The format for preparation of Ph.D. thesis is placed at Annexure-II.
The Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) is a research degree which comprises a thesis to the value of 360 credits. ... discuss the thesis or the report with anyone prior to the oral examination. If you have any questions/ concerns pleas e contact the Graduate Research School. ... riteria for evaluation of the thesis to be used as the basis for the ...
Evaluation Report of Ph.D. Thesis 1. Name of Student: 2. Roll No.: 3. Department: 4. General Features of Thesis (i) Organisation and Get up: ... The thesis is acceptable in the present form for the award of the Ph.D. degree. (ii) The thesis is acceptable and the corrections, modifications, and improvement ...
The result evaluation in the thesis depicts tabulated values and graphical plotted values. The evaluation is not only important in a thesis, in basic it is used to identify the performance of the proposed research. The improvement in the research reflects in the evaluation report. We have experts to write PhD Thesis Evaluation Report in any ...
PhD Thesis Evaluation Report By Prof. Milena Staneva Staneva, MD, PhD Head of Angiology Clinic, Acibadem City Clinic MHAT Tokuda EAD of the dissertation for obtaining the educational and scientific degree "Doctor" in the field of higher education 7. Health and sport, professional field 7.1. Medicine, Doctoral Program in Internal Medicine.
Your anonymized thesis evaluation report will only be disclosed to fellow committee members when the PhD t hesis is considered for a cum laude. The (co-)promotor(s) will receive your anonymised thesis evaluation report: - in case the thesis is graded as 'unacceptable', to allow the candidate to improve the thesis.
All examiners must submit a written and detailed evaluation report. All reports and examiner's name will be sent to the student and the thesis supervisor (s) and to the other examiners, including the president of the defence, prior to the thesis defence. The examiner's reports must be sufficiently detailed to allow student to prepare for the ...
4. The thesis is not acceptable for the award of the Ph.D. degree. At IIT Guwahati, theses are considered for the award of "Best Ph.D. thesis". The basis for this award is the excellence in doctoral research reflected by the quality of research produced as documented in the Ph.D. thesis as well as in the public domain.
subjective and objective sleep quality) and evaluation of the therapeutic effect of NSAID thus, the thesis forms a coherent whole. Detailed notices: Chapter 1: Chapter 1.1: A short description about the menstrual cycle is adequate, no further comments. Chapter 1.2:
Your technical report reached 6,000 reads Achieved on October 1, 2020 Technical report: A Sample; M. Sc. Thesis Evaluation Report . View full-text. Data. Full-text available.
PhD thesis evaluation report sample. ZZZZ UNIVERSITY, HIMACHAL PRADESH. Summary of Examiners Report. A summary in this format should accompany the examiner's full report to the Research Committee. Criteria to be used as the basis of recommendations and advice on the format of your report are provided in separate guidelines.
thesis, and also notices its limitations, showing clearly that the PhD student has a comprehensive understanding of the context of her work. Maybe an overview of all the investigated catalysts in a table or in a graphical representation would be a good idea here. Final evaluation statement This thesis represents a great deal of work.