animals for entertainment essay

Law & Policy Policy

Resources for Journalists

• Food & Farming Media Network
• How to Pitch Us
• Freelance Charter
• Work With Us

Sentient Media

• Environmental Policy
• Code of Ethics
• Testimonials

Is Using Animals for Entertainment Unethical?

Should animals be used in zoos, rodeos, circuses, and other forms of entertainment? Read more about their time in captivity, and then answer the question.

Explainer • Entertainment • Policy

Words by Hemi Kim

If you click through photos and videos of animals doing funny, poignant, or strange things on social media, you are enjoying animals on display for your entertainment, and the videos may cause you to wonder what is left out of the frame. Who is behind the camera? What were the animals’ conditions before and after the recording? Asking these types of questions is practicing media literacy —questioning the messages in the websites we read and the shows we watch.

One tool for questioning the depiction of animals is keeping in mind that people involved in animal protection encourage us to be cautious when supporting the use of nonhuman animals in videos, rodeos, circuses, zoos, and other forms of entertainment. Using animals for entertainment is a classic example of behavior resulting from the hierarchy that humans developed as they learned to dominate other animals. This hierarchy is the same one that results in vast numbers of animals being killed through animal agriculture, medical experimentation, and breeding operations. This hierarchy has historically also been combined with and worked alongside those used to otherize humans based on their race, gender, sexuality, disability status, and wealth. Yet there are alternatives to roadside zoos, animal parks, petting zoos, and shoving a four-hooved herbivore into yet another Christmas display, thanks to innovation in technology and the performing arts.

What Is Using Animals for Entertainment?    

Using animals for entertainment means that the animals are being taken advantage of, suffering, and even dying, for the amusement and pleasure of onlookers. The animals involved do not have a choice in their vocation as entertainers, and frequently bear emotional and physical wounds or are killed on the job. Examples of when people use animals for entertainment include zoos and aquariums, marine mammal parks, rodeos and bull riding, bullfighting, and the use of trained animals in circuses, films and shows.

The History of Animals in Entertainment: When Were Animals First Used for Entertainment?    

In Matthieu Ricard’s book “A Plea for the Animals” he describes the use of animals for human entertainment as far back as the Mesopotamian empires, by the Kings of Babylon and Assyria. Wild animals were confined in enclosures and hunted by humans in chariots, with the help of packs of dogs.

Should Animals Be Used for the Purpose of Entertainment?    

Depending on who you ask, you’ll get different answers to the question of whether animals should be used in zoos, rodeos, circuses, and other forms of entertainment. From the perspective of people speaking up for the protection of animals, the answer is usually “no.” Philosopher Peter Singer, in his landmark animal rights book “Animal Liberation,” urges readers to make major changes in how they treat animals in “areas of entertainment like circuses, rodeos, and zoos.” 

Singer chose to focus on examples of killing animals for meat and medical experimentation to make a case against speciesism —the idea that one animal species is more important than any other. But he writes that animals suffer just as much when humans are “tormenting them to make them learn tricks for circuses and tormenting them to make them entertain the audiences at rodeos.” 

Which Animals Are Used in Entertainment and Why?    

People pay to watch shows and events featuring all types of animals. Iconic animals used in circuses can be found on boxes of animal crackers : a zebra, elephant, lion, giraffe, and gorilla. Meanwhile, famous marine mammal parks have historically featured trained dolphins and orcas in their advertising. Zoo animals can be almost any type of animal but tend to include large wild animals , such as pandas, hippos, koalas, primates, giraffes, big cats, birds, zebras, camels, snakes, reptiles, and more . In rodeos and bullfighting, horses and cows are the primary objects of entertainment. Meanwhile, the roster of animal actors in the film industry have included bears, dogs, monkeys, chimpanzees, dolphins, a whale, equines, cats, crows, farmed animals, and the casts of the Dr. Dolittle series.

What’s Wrong With Circuses?

Circuses have historically left audiences awestruck by making elephants march in a line using one’s trunk to hold another’s tail, or having a lion tamer stick his head in a big cat’s mouth. Yet as Ricard explains, the elegance of the elephants’ performances are an illusion enabled by a sharp iron hook disguised as a wand with flowers, “that will quickly come jabbing into the pachyderm’s ear at the least sign of disobedience.” Former circus trainers like Vladimir Deriabkine have testified that the pleasure that animals give to circus audiences around the world is the result of training practices based on animal cruelty and violence. Deriabkine once saw a trainer who killed a bear for refusing to perform his number. Iconic animals in circuses have also included tigers, bears, lemurs, chimpanzees, horses, and birds such as parrots, doves, peacocks, and cockatoos. 

Is Seaworld Really That Bad?

Writer and animal advocate Krista Kihlander explains that attractions like SeaWorld seem like perfect places “to bring children for them to learn about animals.” SeaWorld fostered Kihlander’s love for orcas: “I was in awe of their majesty, and utterly infatuated with their sheer size.” Yet in these parks, dolphins and orcas are deprived of their natural habitat, freedom, and social relations, and they ultimately experience high rates of mortality. In their natural environments, they love to swim 60 to 90 miles per day. 

What About Zoos?

The appeal of zoos is similar to why people enjoy SeaWorld. Curious families can learn about animals by seeing them alive but caged, so as not to pose any threat. In the past, zoos have even held human exhibits—of melanated, colonized people kept behind bars for public viewing by lighter-skinned humans. That zoos held humans behind bars is an explicit historical example of the racialized hierarchy of humans over nonhumans. Zoos are also historically responsible for supporting illicit animal trade that has resulted in “10 deaths for every animal that is finally exhibited,” due to the harms to animals from transport and the difficulty of adapting to their new environment, Ricard writes.

Rodeos and Bull Riding

A rodeo is a festive arena where people watch each other ride bucking horses and cows (technically speaking, bulls). The horses and cows are rebelling against their treatment. They are normally calm and docile, and when there is space to do so they are more likely to flee situations that bother them than fight back. In rodeo activities such as bull riding , the frightened animal flails their spine and torso vertically and sideways, jumping and kicking, trying to remove sources of pain and irritation imposed on them by the show organizers. 

According to the ALDF website, rodeos use electric prods, metal spurs, and bucking straps to cause intense pain, the bucking straps burning the cow’s “abdomen and groin area.” The bucking and extreme bodily gesticulation “can lead to back and leg injuries.” 

Bullfighting

The corrida is a festival focused on the exhilarating “twists and turns” of a rigged fight between a torero (usually a man) and a bull, in which the bull is wounded and ultimately dies, explains Matthieu Ricard in his book “A Plea for the Animals.” An estimated 180,000 to 250,000 bulls die in bullfights worldwide, according to CAS International and The Humane Society International, respectively, but more are likely to have been killed outside of the arena. 

The honor of killing the bull is usually cloaked in values like courage in meeting an adversary head-on. However, cows are herbivores who are hard to provoke, and who would more likely run away from a predator in nature than try to defend themselves as they do when repeatedly attacked in the confines of an arena. 

Films and Television

In the end title credits of a movie, you may have seen a statement that read “no animals were harmed in the making of this film.” The reason this certification is needed is that animal abuse was rampant in the early 20th century during the start of the film industry. Early television shows and films have historically used animal actors such as dogs, cats, sheep, pigs, horses, bears, elephants, donkeys, monkeys, birds, and even a lion. Modern films and shows continue to use animals , whose welfare continues to be compromised in the hands of animal suppliers. PETA reports that animals who are deemed useless as actors are discarded at “seedy roadside zoos and substandard facilities” that fail to provide proper food and medical care to the retired animals.

Why Is Animal Entertainment Wrong? 

Animals are sensitive species with natural habitats that are hard to replicate and that are necessary to make them happy. Trying to get them to do things for the benefit of human entertainment turns them into unwilling workers in ways that typically rely on cruelty and abuse.

Animal Cruelty in Entertainment

The definition of animal cruelty is as simple as causing harm to an animal. It can be purposeful or the result of neglect. One of the cruelest forms of entertainment at a rodeo is calf roping . In this activity, three-month-old cows “are chased at high speed, roped around the neck, dragged to a sudden stop with the rope choking their neck, then thrown to the ground; a horrific experience causing stress, fear, pain and sometimes injury,” according to SAFE’s website.

Animal Abuse in the Entertainment Industry

Animal abuse , like animal cruelty, is when an animal is harmed, whether the act is intentional or simply the result of failing to do something. The abuse of animals in the entertainment industry is an ongoing source of suffering, according to animal rights activists. An animal supplier for shows on the USA Network, Disney+, AMC, and Netflix, was keeping “more than a dozen dogs kept in kennels stacked on top of one another in a garage, animals crammed into closets, and an alligator […] held in a small, filthy outdoor pit,” reported Katherine Sullivan for PETA in 2020.

Restriction of Natural Behavior and Its Consequences

Consistent across all use of animals in entertainment is the inability of animals to display their natural behavior because of how they are confined . In 1974 Phillipe Diolé wrote a series of articles condemning zoos, quoted by Ricard : “an animal loses the space where his complex life was organized: its behavior is thrown off, its state of mind is shaken. There is no other outcome for it than madness,” resulting in zoo captives who are, with few exceptions, mentally ill.

What Are Animal Entertainment Alternatives?    

In the case of using animals for the purposes of entertainment, modern technology can provide powerful alternatives to the real thing. Choosing to go with forms of animal-friendly entertainment can open doors to new types of shows as well as opportunities for self-reflection.

Families who want to teach children to have empathy for the plight of circus animals while also celebrating them on display may enjoy holographic shows. Circus Roncalli has used laser beams to create “incredibly realistic three-dimensional illusions” of “performing elephants, horses, and fish without involving real animals,” according to Hannah McKay for Sentient Media.

Animatronics

Another festive way to replicate the animal experience without causing harm by exhibiting them is to use robots. McKay reported that The Seasonal Group developed “interactive, programmable, life-size animatronic reindeer,” and that Edge Innovations has created a realistic animatronic dolphin. Delle, the robotic dolphin, swims, performs tricks and interacts with people. 

Cirque Du Soleil

Human circuses display the acrobatic skills of performance artists without the use of nonhuman animals. The National Humane Education Society lists Cirque du Soleil, The New Pickle Family Circus, and Circus Oz as examples of circuses free of nonhuman animals. 

Safari-Style Zoos

Among people who speak up to protect animals from abuse and cruelty, zoos are less preferred than sanctuaries, reserves, and national parks. While there has been reform in zoos towards wildlife conservation, they still trouble us with the question Ricard poses, “Is it moral to capture an animal and imprison it?”

Animal Entertainment Cruelty Facts 

• Animal protection advocates warn against luxurious dolphinariums that advertise “dolphin therapy.” Dolphins kept in captivity are controlled through food restriction and have become agitated and aggressive towards humans in swim programs . 
• Was the last film you streamed certified humane? You can check out the American Humane database at https://humanehollywood.org to find out if the last film you watched was certified by them for following animal welfare standards.
• SeaWorld and other marine mammal parks have come under fire from animal advocates and filmmakers over the last decade, with campaigns and movies such as Blackfish and The Cove. 

How Can We Help?  

Maintaining compassion for humans as well as nonhuman animals is key to effective advocacy and communication. In an interview with lauren Ornelas of the Food Empowerment Project, long-time activist Sukie recommends that, in the face of an angry person who has become ugly toward you, remember “You are not going to change that person’s mind, but if others see you being angry and ugly, they get turned off and you won’t reach them. If we claim to be compassionate to animals, we need to be compassionate to human animals. Most of them are not aware of all the cruelty involved, and the reason you are there is to sow the seeds.”

What’s Next 

Forms of entertainment that abuse animals continue to exist, but they are also being challenged by animal rights activists, proponents of animal welfare, legislators, filmmakers, and former animal trainers. These cultural practices have proven to be highly influenced by public campaigns that are the result of organized, like-minded people who encourage each other to subvert the human-animal divide .

Independent Journalism Needs You

Hemi is a writer and educator.

Beagles Are Bred by the Thousands on Factory Farms, and It’s Perfectly Legal

Justice • 4 min read

More Law & Policy

New Supreme Court Case Threatens Legal Protections for Animals

Law & Policy • 7 min read

‘The Smell of Money’ Film Is Bringing Together Environmental and Food Justice Advocates

A new documentary chronicles the damage hog farm pollution has caused communities of Eastern North Carolina.

Justice • 5 min read

5 Ways Taxpayers Bail Out Factory Farms

The way we produce meat and dairy is responsible for all sorts of damage, and taxpayers end up footing the bill.

Law & Policy • 6 min read

Dairy Digesters Promise to Cut Methane — Unfortunately, They Might Be an Inefficient Band-Aid

Climate • 8 min read

Why Coconut Milk Isn’t the Most Ethical Plant-Based Milk

Food • 8 min read

How Much Protein You Need to Be Healthy, Explained

Diet • 10 min read

Fish Feel Pain, Science Shows — But Humans Are Reluctant To Believe It

Science • 9 min read

Most Read Today

• Back to Previous Menu
• Animals in Laboratories
• Animal Testing
• Be Cruelty-Free Campaign
• Biomedical Research
• Animal Protection & Crisis Response
• Abuse/Neglect

Cruelty in Entertainment

• Disaster Response
• Companion Animals

Dogfighting

• Dog and Cat Welfare
• Dog Meat Trade
• Farm Animals
• Animal Agriculture and Climate Change
• Factory Farming
• Plant-Based Eating
• Human-Wildlife Coexistence
• Rhino and Elephant Protection
• Seal Slaughter
• Shark Finning

Trophy Hunting

• Wildlife Trade
• Other Ways We Help
• Education and Training
• Legislation/Political Advocacy
• Policy and Treaties
• How You Can Help
• Ways to Give
• Donate Monthly
• Donate Once
• Leave a Gift in Your Will
• Give in Honor of Someone
• Workplace Giving
• Give Stocks or Bonds
• Get Involved
• Take Action
• Our Leadership
• Where We Work
• Financial Information
• News and Resources
• Media Contacts

You can help

Sign the pledge: Don't Buy Wild

Number of countries still hosting bullfights

Lions are suffering in captivity in South Africa

How long birds might suffer during cockfights

Every day, Humane Society International is fighting the injustice of cruelty to animals. While each culture has different beliefs and customs, some practices deserve no tolerance. The inhumane use of animals in entertainment is pervasive and includes bullfights, elephant rides, lion walks, cockfights, and marine and land wildlife “performances.” Avoid unwittingly taking part in this mistreatment.

Facts about the use of animals for entertainment:

• Bullfights are not “fair fights,” but highly staged forms of government-subsidized animal cruelty that perpetuate the idea that torturing and killing animals for amusement is acceptable.
• Bull fiestas and bullfighting are not supported by Spanish citizens: 74% oppose the Toro de la Vega bull fiesta (IpsosMORI, 2014); only 29% support bullfighting; and 76% oppose the use of public funds to support the bullfighting industry (IpsosMORI, 2013).
• Tourists who get involved in South Africa’s lion cub petting industry are inadvertently supporting the supply of lions to the canned hunting and lion bone trade industries.
• Wild animals in circuses, traveling shows and attractions often receive insufficient water, food and shelter, lack veterinary care and can become a public safety issue.
• Camels, elephants, donkeys and horses used for tourism for rides and safaris are often malnourished and physically abused, and suffer open wounds.
• Elephants rides are cruel. Often stolen from the wild when young, elephants are illegally trafficked, broken after capture, punished with bullhooks, carry excessive weight, suffer sores and diseases, and receive inadequate care.
• The natural habitat of orcas simply cannot be replicated in captivity.
• Swimming with dolphins increases demand for captive animals, including from including brutal “drive fisheries” in Japan.

Our work in action

Over 30 organizations and experts renew call for bc government to end wildlife killing contests in open letter.

“These contests exploit misunderstanding and fear surrounding species like wolves and coyotes and are a transparent means to kill animals for fun.” -Kelly Butler, wildlife campaign manager for HSI/Canada

Major win! US Senate passes the Big Cat Public Safety Act

“When signed into law by President Biden, the Big Cat Public Safety Act will sound the death knell for the cub petting industry, and eliminate the terrible risks posed by the private possession of such animals.” -Kitty Block and Sara Amundson, HSUS

Victory! World’s largest bullfighting arena no longer holds bullfights

“This is the first time in its 76-year history that the 50,000-seat Monumental Plaza de Toros has been legally prevented from staging bullfights.” -HSI CEO Kitty Block

Animals rescued from a Canadian roadside zoo are living the good life at a Texas sanctuary

“It was like most roadside zoos—to a visitor it may have seemed okay as most of the cruelty was hidden from paying customers. But we saw failing, dangerous fences and cages, chewed stalls holding malnourished and lonely animals, dead animals just below the soil, and animals who need to be in social groups anxious and alone.” -Kelly Donithan, director of animal disaster response for HSI

Tiger King: What we discovered undercover

“All of this may sound outlandish, but the fact is dozens of other roadside zoos like these operate with impunity across the country, with thousands of big cats and other large wild animals held in captivity for public display and interaction.” -Kitty Block and Sara Amundson

Don’t Buy Wild: Tourist attractions and live animals

“Be aware of what you may find so that you don’t contribute to the illegal wildlife trade, harm wildlife populations or patronize facilities where animals are suffering.” -Dr. Teresa Telecky, vice president of HSI Wildlife

Urge South Africa to protect big cats

Urge the South African government to prohibit keeping big cats as pets and commodities and ban public contact with them.

Discover more

Trophy hunters pay huge sums of money to kill wild animals for in-home display. HSI works to raise public awareness and end corporate support of trophy hunters’ interests, as well as improve legal protections and encourage alternatives.

HSI works to ensure there’s no safe haven for dogfighters worldwide by facilitating legislation to criminalize and sufficiently penalize dogfighting, strengthening existing law enforcement, and providing training and resources in countries with significant dogfighting issues.

Bullfighting: A long, cruel death

Every year, approximately 180,000 bulls are killed in bullfights around the world, with many more killed or injured in bull fiesta events.

Make a difference

Learn more button inserter.

The Use of Animals in Entertainment Research Paper

Introduction.

The use of animals in entertainment has a long history, starting from the amphitheaters of the Roman Empire. At that time, along with gladiators’ combats, the entries of hunting and killing bears, bulls, and exotic African animals, were often presented to the public.

However, at present, the ethical issues in this field became the matter of utmost importance, perhaps due to mass character and an unprecedentedly wide variety of the ways the animals are used in the entertainment industry. It has been proven that the level of animals’ life in such circumstances is deplorable; apart from being withdrawn from their natural environment, they experience abuse and exploitation by people. Their basic needs, such as their natural habitat and appropriate alimentation, are not met, and they are affected physically and mentally. With this concern, the measures to be taken against it often become a matter of discussion, with the question of whether the use of animals for entertainment be continued.

In this paper, the position which denies the right to continue animals’ use for entertainment purpose is taken. First, the various methods of such use will be discussed. After that, there will be examined several aspects of the problem. It will include the arguments in support of this position, such as the impact of the unnatural environment on animals, and the forms of their exploitation and their correlation with ethical norms. In turn, the concern of moral rights will lead to the question about animals’ mental and cognitive abilities.

Methods of the Use of Animals in Entertainment

The first group of institutions of the entertainment industry includes zoos, aquaria, and animal parks. As argued by Scanes, two approaches might be considered here, in the mode of people’s interaction with the animals. The first, “noncaptive” wildlife tourism includes ecotourism, nature adventure, and photographic safari, while “captive” related to visiting zoos, animal parks, aquaria, i.e., the places where animals are in some way under observation and control, experiencing different levels of human intervention (Scanes).

Modern zoos were developed from public menageries, such as Tiergarten Schönbrunn in Vienna, established in 1752, and the Ménagerie du Jardin des Plantes in Paris, which opened in 1793; later they were followed by the London Zoo and the Berlin Zoo. Initially, zoos were created for scientific purposes, as well as conservational as many of them contained endangered animals. Along with that, they served as a place for public education, where the visitors could explore the fragment of the wild nature and its inhabitants. At the same time, aquaria were constructed “for public enjoyment, profit, civic/national pride, and as anchors for economic development” (Scanes 227). As it could be observed, these institutions from the very beginning of their existence were expected to serve the purpose of humans, rather than animals.

The second group contains circuses, animal TV shows and movies, animal riding, or racing (using dogs, horses, camels, or pigeons). The shows are often organized in the form of competition; thus, the USA state fair usually includes livestock, poultry, horse, and rabbit competitions; dog show is one of the most common and publically appreciated practices. In this group, pleasure carriages may also be considered, which are horse-driven vehicles for tourist entertainment.

The third group includes “consumptive” (Scanes) types of entertainment, such as hunting, shooting, and fishing. A famous example is fox hunting in the UK, which is a matter of extensive discussion, considering the question of animal ethics. In addition, some less common, exotic types of entertainment with animals involved, could be named, such as bullfighting. It can be found in Spain, Venezuela, Peru, Columbia, Mexico, and Ecuador. In many countries or provinces, it is banned now, which tells about raising awareness of moral issues in this regard.

The Impact of the Artificial Environment on Animals

The most obvious case of changing the natural environment and its implementation in animals’ welfare is the zoo. Though many zoos, mostly in major cities, well-founded and caring for their prestige, claim to be able to create the conditions as close as possible to the natural habitat of animals, it is possible only to some extent. Unfortunately, many of them are not due to the inevitable limitations of the resources but due to the lack of awareness and ethical concern of the staff. The following case study, described by Berkoff, will illustrate it.

The Smithsonian National Zoo in Washington decided to double the number of animals without the preparation for the space allocated for the new animals. As there were no exhibit slots for them, the newly acquired animals were placed together with previous exponents, often mixing them. In this way, the hornbill birds were put in the wallaby exhibit,

which stressed the wallaby and made him bloody his nose as he tries to run away. Thus, the results of this campaign were tragic, and many animals got injured or died.

As Berkoff (98) further discusses, zoos take primary care of animals, which are “fed and watered,” but the problem is that all their life activities are scheduled by people. They are fed “at set times,” their “social grouping are manipulated,” even “deaths are scheduled and orchestrated by veterinarians” (Berkoff 98). In such circumstances, the instincts of animals fail to find stimuli, and it causes a change in behavior, which alters their biological system.

Berkoff (106) asks: “What do zooed animals want?” if they seem to be adequately fed and maintained. The answer is, “they want to live in a setting in which they can engage the repertoire of evolved behaviors that define them as a species” (106). Moreover, created for the purpose of public education, zoos, in fact, cannot provide it as the human-made environment is far from the authentic habitat (Malamud 397). It indicates that the zoo, even when providing comfort, cannot fulfill the basic need of animals; therefore, it is an argument against its existence.

The Forms of Exploitation of Animals in Entertainment

In the history use of animals in the entertainment industry, different kinds of cruelty, abuse, and exploitation were observed. It includes deliberate abuse, such as shooting, stabbing, and beating, torturing, or setting on fire. They can also be neglected to be provided with necessary food or veterinary care, which should include not only disease treatment, but also prophylactic and prevention measures. Overall, it may be observed that human interests are mostly considered more than those of animals.

It is interesting to mention scientists’ observations on the connection between animal cruelty and criminal violence; a large number of criminals are observed to commit acts of animal cruelty before, especially in their childhood (Scane 241). Thus, animals become the subjects for expression the aggression, anger, as they are those who cannot reply to human actions and, along with that, are supposed not to be conscious, which is the matter of the section of the discussion.

The Question of Animal Cognition

The matter of presence on animals’ cognitive abilities is long discussed among scientists problem. The process of cognition refers to “mental processes that are presumed to occur within animals, but which cannot be observed directly” (Benz-Schwarzburg 15). Cognition, in turn, is defined as an ability of “manipulation of explicit knowledge” (Benz-Schwarzburg 15), which results in some kinds of social interaction, problem-solving, and language.

At present many scientists find proof of the presence of these phenomena in animals; however, the issue needs further investigation. In light of this, the ethical concern about animal treatment becomes more distinct. The presence of thought and feeling in animals makes it closer to humans, eliminating the borderline between them (Fischer) and making reconsider the difference in human and animal law (Kelch). As a result of this reconsideration, the use of animals without concern about their rights becomes incompatible with the norms of the moral community.

In this paper, the problem of the use of animals in entertainment was investigated from the position that it is contradictory to the ethical norms of modern society. Methods of such use, as well as entertainment institutions, are considered with the benefit and interests of humans, rather than animals. As a result, cruelty and exploitation of animals become common practices. However, considering the modern scientific theory about the presence of cognitive abilities in animals, this practice has to be eradicated according to the norms of society based on moral principles and law.

Works Cited

Bekoff, Mark, and Jessica Pierce. The Animals’ Agenda: Freedom, Compassion, and Coexistence in the Human Age . Beacon Press, 2017.

Benz-Schwarzburg, Judith. Cognitive Kin, Moral Strangers? Linking Animal Cognition, Animal Ethics & Animal Welfare. BRILL, 2019.

Fischer, Bob. The Routledge Handbook of Animal Ethics . Routledge, 2019.

Kelch, Thomas G. Globalization and Animal Law: Comparative Law, International Law and International Trade . 2nd ed., Wolters Kluwer, 2017.

Malamud, Randy. “The problem with Zoos.” The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies , edited by Linda Kalof, Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 297-410.

Scanes, Colin. “Animals in Entertainment.” Animals and Human Society , edited by Colin G. Scanes and Samia Toukhsati, Academic Press, 2017, pp. 225–255.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2022, February 12). The Use of Animals in Entertainment. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-use-of-animals-in-entertainment/

"The Use of Animals in Entertainment." IvyPanda , 12 Feb. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/the-use-of-animals-in-entertainment/.

IvyPanda . (2022) 'The Use of Animals in Entertainment'. 12 February.

IvyPanda . 2022. "The Use of Animals in Entertainment." February 12, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-use-of-animals-in-entertainment/.

1. IvyPanda . "The Use of Animals in Entertainment." February 12, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-use-of-animals-in-entertainment/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "The Use of Animals in Entertainment." February 12, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-use-of-animals-in-entertainment/.

• Defamations on BUGusa Inc. Company
• Zoos: Cruel or Educational?
• The Future for Zoos and Aquariums Bibliography
• Should Animals Be Kept in Zoos?
• The Harm That Zoos Do to Animals
• Setting Up a Safari Zoo in the UAE
• The Role of Zoos in Endangered Species Protection
• Zoos: Advantages and Disadvantages
• The Australia Zoo Rescue Unit Project
• The Effectiveness of Sustainable Practices, Plans, Programs and Initiatives Implemented by Australian Zoo
• Animal Ethics From the Buddhist Perspective
• Laboratory Experiments on Animals: Argument Against
• Animal Rights in Whistler, British Columbia: A Case Study of 100 Slaughtered Sledge Dogs
• Fur Coat as a Controversial Fashion Garment
• Interview About Controversial Garments

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

The Ethics of Entertainment with Animals: Zoos, Circuses, Sport and Pets

2022, Concilium - International Journal of Theology

The article deals with the current debate about the (non-lethal) use of animals for purposes of human entertainment, as pets, in zoos, circuses and sport. The question "Is there an ethical problem in using animals to entertain us?" is analysed through the four classical approaches of moral philosophy, utilitarian ethics, deontology, contractual ethics and virtue ethics.

Related Papers

Martin Stefanov

The study is intended to contribute to our understanding of the current perspectives of the human – non-human relationship with animals in captivity in the tourism industry, in the notion of the more ethical and critical turn in tourism studies. Natural Science has already held research on zoos and Animal studies, and we have already witnessed a vivid moral shift also within the studies in Social Science. However, there is a notable lack of research of zoos within the (still new) ethical turn in tourism studies. Covering the gap of knowledge on animals in captivity in the notion of the ethical turn is well beyond the scope of this study. However, the intended outcome of this research is to bring awareness of the need for re-thinking the human non-human relationship in tourism studies. This thesis is not another research on the ethical issues related to the captivity, but rather about how the evergreen zoo advocates’ arguments stand within the more ethical notion in contemporary tour...

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management

Marthe Kiley-Worthington

Derecho Animal. Forum of Animal Law Studies

Oliver Wookey

irena kennedy

Journal of Academic Ethics

Nibedita Priyadarshini jena

N. Almiron, Animal Suffering and Public Relations, Routledge

Paula Casal , Macarena Montes Franceschini

Abstract: The animal entertainment industry includes different practices. Some consist in torturing an animal to death, as in bullfighting and countless other popular traditions, while others involve watching an animal in captivity, which can be another form of torture. Perhaps the most profitable practice is forcing very intelligent animals to perform the same routine several times daily in zoos and aquariums containing marine mammals, or in circuses containing terrestrial mammals. These businesses then present the animals in whatever way makes the practice appear less immoral, claim to have education and conservation as their mission, and present their entertainment businesses as altruistic charities. Disseminating their misleading discourse is unethical.

jozef keulartz

The animal world is under increasing pressure, given the magnitude of anthropogenic environmental stress. There is a global wave of species extinctions and declines in local species abundance. To stop or even reverse this so-called ‘defaunation’ process, in situ conservation (in the wild) is no longer effective without ex situ conservation (in captivity). Consequently, the zoo is to play an ever-greater role in the conservation of endangered species and wildlife. However, the integration of zoo-based tools and techniques in species conservation has led to manifold conflicts between wildlife conservationists and animal protectionists. Both sides view animals through different lenses and address different concerns. Whereas animal ethicists focus on individual organisms, and are concerned about the welfare and liberty of animals, wildlife conservationists perceive animals as parts of greater wholes such as species or ecosystems, and consider biodiversity and ecological integrity as key topics. This seemingly intractable controversy can be overcome by developing a bifocal view in which zoo animals are perceived as individuals in need of specific care and, at the same time, as members of a species in need of protection. Based on such a bifocal approach, the modern zoo can only achieve its conservation mission if it finds a morally acceptable balance between animal welfare concerns and species conservation commitments. The prospects for the zoo to achieve such a balance are promising. Over the past decade or so, zoos have made serious and sustained efforts to ensure and enhance animal welfare. At the same time, the zoo’s contribution to species conservation has also improved considerably.

Between the Species: An Online Journal for the Study of Philosophy and Animals

David Favre

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Colleen Tygh's Blog

Engl137h section 9.

The Use (or Abuse) of Animals for Entertainment

For my last Civic Issues post, I want to focus on the topic of my persuasive essay, the use of animals for entertainment, because I have become more and more passionate about the topic the more I have written about it. In my essay, I focused on the mistreatment of animals in zoos, circuses, and rodeos, three of the most common forms of animal entertainment in the modern-day world. In my conclusion, I think I presented the strongest of all my arguments: that the use of animals for entertainment is absolutely unnecessary and only fills human leisure time. Unlike the use of animals for science or agriculture, the use of animals for entertainment does not help save human or animal lives and really provides no benefit to society other than human amusement.

Circuses and zoos are just as bad. Circus animals spend over 90% of their time in chains or in cages, and zoo animals spend their whole lives enclosed by cages and glass walls. Although people argue that most of these animals are born in captivity and therefore know no other way of life, this fact does not mean that the animals are necessarily happy. Animals instinctively desire social groups amongst their own species, space to roam and explore, and the opportunity to overcome challenges that they are presented with in the wild. Zoos and circuses take animals from their natural habitats and pretend to improve the quality of the animals’ lives when really they just want to use them to make money and amuse humans.

Zoo supporters commonly argue that zoos are forums of conservation and education. After researching, I really do not think that they are. Zoos allegedly save endangered species by displaying them in zoos and breeding them with the intention of building the species’ numbers so that they can release the animals back into the wild one day. However, zoos often find that they cannot support a growing number of the species and instead ship the animals to other zoos or to game ranches, where people hunt and kill the animals as prizes. Zoos also do not educate. Watching a polar bear play with a ball does not teach humans about the true problems that exist for these animals in the wild; although the zoo exhibits appear similar to natural environments, they will never provide a real view into what it is like to be an animal living in the wild.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You appear to be using an old browser Please ensure you update your browser to be able to experience our site properly.

Animal rights GO -->

Animal rights, using animals for entertainment.

Should animals be given more rights, to live without suffering, in the way that humans are allowed to? Or are their feelings less important than those of people?

• What do we Mean by Animal Rights?
• Using Animals for Vivisection
• Using Animals for Food
• Killing Animals for Sport
• Using Animals in war and for Labour
• Using Animals as Pets
• Some useful Websites

Nowadays, manycircuses do not feature animals in their performances but it used to be very common.  Elephants, lions, zebras and camels would move all around the country in small cages transported on the back of trucks, perform for the crowds and then move on again.  Animal rights campaigners have been protesting about this practice for decades and, in May 2019, the government introduced The Wild Animals in Circuses Bill to ban the use of wild animals in travelling circuses in the UK.

Animals in the circus are made to perform unnatural tricks for entertainment and are kept in conditions very different to their natural habitats.  It can be said that many circus owners and workers care for and love their animals very much, but the question still remains if it is 'right' to use and keep animals in this way for human entertainment. 

A very interesting case came up in 2014 about Sandra, an orangutan who had been kept in a zoo in Argentina for 20 years.  Sandra was shy and often hid from the public.  A landmark case was settled in a Buenos Aires court granting her some of the legal rights that we have as humans. The singular case hung on whether the animal was a "thing" or a "person". Here is an excerpt from a BBC article;

Lawyers for Argentina's Association of Professional Lawyers for Animal Rights (Afada) said Sandra was "a person" in the philosophical, not biological, sense.

She was, they argued, in a situation of illegal deprivation of freedom as a "non-human person.”

Another issue for animal rights campaigners is whether animals such as dogs and horses should be raced for human entertainment. People enjoy watching and gambling on races between animals. Horse racing with jumps is especially contentious as many horses die or break their legs during such races each year. It is very difficult to fix the leg of a racing horse, especially in a way that will allow it to be useful in racing any more, so horses which do break their legs are often shot.  Arguments have also been made against the use of whips and other devices for forcing horses to speed up during races. Some people argue that with certain changes, animal racing could be made more humane, others argue that humans have no right to use animals for their own entertainment at all.

Related Resources

Vivisection Factsheet

Hunter-Gatherers Factsheet

Seal (Harp) Factsheet

Seal (Grey) Factsheet

Fox (Red) Factsheet

Endangered Animals of the World Factsheet

Conservation Education 14 - Endangered Animals of the World Download

Conservation Factsheet

Please donate £5 to help YPTE to continue its work of inspiring young people to look after our world.

Animals Should Not Be Used For Entertainment Essay

Essay on Animal Performance Should Be Banned in Circus Argument against public performances by animals. We humans especially the scientists have turned the Earth’s color green to gray. In geography, we often read that Earth is the only planet to live in. We are not just affecting ourselves we are also affecting the innocent animals who don’t even know what is going on the Earth. These animals are not always affected by pollution but by the public performances.

Essay Example on Using Animals For Entertainment Should Be Banned

They are too much mistreated by us and we must stop it, because they are the essential part of our eco-system.

Animals that are used for entertainment often endure many hours of long distance traveling in small confined cages with no climate controls, sleeping, eating, etc. Although some say that the animals get to stretch out after the trip, which is not generally the case. The animals must be contained prior to the start of the performance.

Virtually 96 % of their lives are spent in chains or cages.

These animals are also trained using extreme discipline such as whipping, hitting, poking and shocking with electrical prods. Check out more essay samples at Altheadlines.com! Many times the animals used in circuses are injured and are killed when they are no more useful. Circuses that exploit animals make lofty claims about their educational values and their contributions to conservations. It is not good for humans to use animals in entertainment shows, because such act is equivalent to exploitations.

Proficient in: Animals

“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”

While humans and animals belong to different species, both are capable of feeling pain or pleasure.

Both could feel emotions like happiness, loneliness, etc. Both could also feel thirst and hunger. Animals shouldn’t be used in public performances, because naturally they also have the right to live their life as they want. It should be noted that the right of animals could be different from the rights of humans. When animal circuses do come to town, we should write letters to newspaper editors and to the sponsors telling them circuses don’t need to feature wild animals to be entertaining.

We must take particular notice of stores to stop supporting circuses with animal acts. We must also support local animal-free circuses. These steps must be taken to stop public performances by animals. We must spread awareness among peoples about this. They should know that circus elephants may carry tuberculosis, and can infect human with the bacterial diseases.

This awareness may cause a fear between the peoples and stop them from going to circuses. The government should ban animal circuses. Since 1990s the circuses have been responsible for over 100 human injuries, worldwide. If we can live our own life so why can’t the animals? They are also creature of God. They should also have the right to live their own life.

God made Earth for joy not only to humans but to animals.

Cite this page

Animals Should Not Be Used For Entertainment Essay. (2019, Nov 27). Retrieved from https://paperap.com/paper-on-essay-argument-public-performances-animals/

"Animals Should Not Be Used For Entertainment Essay." PaperAp.com , 27 Nov 2019, https://paperap.com/paper-on-essay-argument-public-performances-animals/

PaperAp.com. (2019). Animals Should Not Be Used For Entertainment Essay . [Online]. Available at: https://paperap.com/paper-on-essay-argument-public-performances-animals/ [Accessed: 24 Mar. 2024]

"Animals Should Not Be Used For Entertainment Essay." PaperAp.com, Nov 27, 2019. Accessed March 24, 2024. https://paperap.com/paper-on-essay-argument-public-performances-animals/

"Animals Should Not Be Used For Entertainment Essay," PaperAp.com , 27-Nov-2019. [Online]. Available: https://paperap.com/paper-on-essay-argument-public-performances-animals/. [Accessed: 24-Mar-2024]

PaperAp.com. (2019). Animals Should Not Be Used For Entertainment Essay . [Online]. Available at: https://paperap.com/paper-on-essay-argument-public-performances-animals/ [Accessed: 24-Mar-2024]

• Should Animals Be Used For Research Pages: 3 (710 words)
• Not All Animals Are Suitable for the Zoo Pages: 5 (1275 words)
• Should Colorum Vehicles be Allowed to be Used by Commuters Pages: 5 (1409 words)
• Should Contract Law Be Used For The Purposes Of The Replacement Deal? Pages: 2 (575 words)
• Why Cell Phones Should Be Used Sparingly in School Pages: 5 (1450 words)
• Youngsters Are Not Useless They Are Used Less Pages: 1 (210 words)
• Essay On Killing Animals Pages: 2 (483 words)
• Violence in Media Entertainment Pages: 8 (2176 words)
• Bad Hair Day Solutions Entertainment Speech Pages: 3 (616 words)
• Entertainment Motion Pictures Pages: 6 (1580 words)

Essay on Use Of Animals For Entertainment

Students are often asked to write an essay on Use Of Animals For Entertainment in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Use Of Animals For Entertainment

What is animal entertainment.

In animal entertainment, animals perform tricks or acts for human enjoyment. This can include animals performing in circuses, zoos, rodeos, or even movies.

Why Is Animal Entertainment Controversial?

Some people believe that it is wrong to use animals for entertainment because it can be cruel and inhumane. Animals may be forced to perform tricks that they don’t want to do, and they may be kept in cramped and unsanitary conditions.

Arguments In Favor Of Animal Entertainment

Some people argue that animal entertainment can be educational and fun. They say that it can teach people about animals and their habitats. They also say that it can provide a sense of wonder and excitement.

Arguments Against Animal Entertainment

Others argue that animal entertainment is cruel and exploitative. They say that animals are forced to perform tricks that they don’t want to do and that they are often kept in cramped and unsanitary conditions. They also say that animal entertainment can teach people the wrong lessons about animals, such as the idea that they are objects to be used for our entertainment.

The debate over animal entertainment is complex and there are strong arguments on both sides. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to support animal entertainment is a personal one.

250 Words Essay on Use Of Animals For Entertainment

What is animal entertainment.

Animal entertainment is when animals are used to perform tricks or acts for human enjoyment. This can happen in a circus, on television, or in a zoo.

Why are Animals Used for Entertainment?

There are many reasons why animals are used for entertainment. Some people find it funny to watch animals do tricks, while others enjoy the beauty and grace of animals. Animals are also often used to teach children about the natural world.

Is it Good for Animals?

Using animals for entertainment can be harmful to them. Animals may be forced to perform unnatural acts, which can cause them stress and pain. They may also be kept in cramped and unsanitary conditions. In some cases, animals may even be killed for entertainment.

What Can We Do?

There are many things we can do to help stop the use of animals for entertainment. We can refuse to attend circuses or zoos that use animals. We can also write letters to our local representatives and ask them to pass laws that protect animals from being used for entertainment.

The use of animals for entertainment is a cruel and outdated practice that has no place in our society. We should all do our part to help end the use of animals for entertainment.

500 Words Essay on Use Of Animals For Entertainment

Animals in entertainment.

The use of animals for entertainment has been a topic of debate for many years. Some people believe that it is cruel and exploitative, while others argue that it can be a form of education and conservation.

Pros Of Animal Use In Entertainment

One of the main arguments in favor of using animals for entertainment is that it can educate people about animals and their habitats. Zoos and aquariums, for example, allow people to see animals up close and learn about their behavior and biology. This can help to foster a sense of respect and appreciation for animals, and it can also help to raise awareness of the importance of conservation.

Another argument in favor of animal use in entertainment is that it can provide economic benefits to local communities. Zoos and aquariums, for example, can create jobs and generate revenue for local businesses. This can help to support the local economy and improve the quality of life for people in the community.

Cons Of Animal Use In Entertainment

However, there are also a number of arguments against the use of animals for entertainment. One of the main concerns is that it can be cruel and exploitative. Animals that are used for entertainment are often subjected to stressful and unnatural conditions. They may be forced to perform tricks that they do not want to do, and they may be kept in cramped and unsanitary conditions. This can lead to a number of health problems, both physical and psychological.

Another concern is that using animals for entertainment can contribute to the decline of animal populations. Animals that are used for entertainment are often taken from the wild, and this can disrupt natural ecosystems. Additionally, the demand for animals for entertainment can lead to the breeding of animals in captivity, which can result in genetic problems and other health issues.

The use of animals for entertainment is a complex issue with both pros and cons. While it is true that animals can be used to educate and entertain people, it is also true that using animals for entertainment can be cruel and exploitative. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to use animals for entertainment is a personal one. However, it is important to be aware of the arguments on both sides of the issue before making a decision.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

• Essay on Urbanization In America
• Essay on Urbanization Boon Or Bane
• Essay on Urban Development

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Animals should not be used for entertainment. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

• Paragraph 1 - Introduction
• Sentence 1 - Background statement
• Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
• Sentence 3 - Thesis
• Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
• Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
• Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
• Sentence 2 - Example
• Sentence 3 - Discussion
• Sentence 4 - Conclusion
• Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
• Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
• Sentence 1 - Summary
• Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
• Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

* free ebook for Premium users

• Check your IELTS essay »
• Find essays with the same topic
• View collections of IELTS Writing Samples
• Show IELTS Writing Task 2 Topics

Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth rather than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement, with an increasing number of people eating fast food, which, if eating too regularly can cause health issues, some people think that the only solution is to ban it completely. to what extent do you agree, some believe that people should make efforts to fight climate change while others think it is better to learn to live with it. discuss both views and give your own opinion., it has been said that the world is becoming a global village in which there are no boundaries to trade and communication. do the benefits of globalisation outweigh the drawbacks.

• Environment
• Information Science
• Social Issues
• Argumentative
• Cause and Effect
• Classification
• Compare and Contrast
• Descriptive
• Exemplification
• Informative
• Controversial
• Exploratory
• What Is an Essay
• Length of an Essay
• Generate Ideas
• Types of Essays
• Structuring an Essay
• Outline For Essay
• Essay Introduction
• Thesis Statement
• Body of an Essay
• Writing a Conclusion
• Essay Writing Tips
• Drafting an Essay
• Revision Process
• Fix a Broken Essay
• Format of an Essay
• Essay Examples
• Essay Checklist
• Essay Writing Service
• Pay for Research Paper
• Write My Research Paper
• Write My Essay
• Custom Essay Writing Service
• Admission Essay Writing Service
• Pay for Essay
• Academic Ghostwriting
• Write My Book Report
• Case Study Writing Service
• Dissertation Writing Service
• Coursework Writing Service
• Lab Report Writing Service
• Do My Assignment
• Buy College Papers
• Capstone Project Writing Service
• Buy Research Paper
• Custom Essays for Sale

Can’t find a perfect paper?

• Free Essay Samples
• Law Enforcement

Animal Use in Entertainment and Sports

Updated 18 July 2023

Subject Law Enforcement ,  Identity

Downloads 34

Category Sociology ,  Sports

Topic Animal Ethics ,  Animal Cruelty ,  Recreation and Sports

There is ample proof that animal rights are not upheld. There are a number of drawbacks to using animals in entertainment and athletics. These effects have sparked conversations and debates about animal rights, particularly the use of animals in entertainment and sports. The phrase "animal use" refers to a number of activities and forms of entertainment. (Hughes 321). Elephants, tigers, dolphins, and many other exotic creatures are used for entertainment. These animals are mistreated in order for them to function and act as expected. (Regan 7). Mistreating an animal for one's own gain or profit is unethical. Additionally, many people would accept that watching animal act for entertainment is fun. This paper seeks to examine whether to use an animal in sports and entertainment is justifiable and ethical. The paper further investigates whether it is ethical to use animals in sports and entertainment. Animals have rights, and humans should be ethical enough to stop using animals for sports and entertainment for various reason.

The first negative impact of animal use in sports and entertainment is that animals are part of the distinctive species which human being should not take them out of their habitat so that they can entertain people (Waters 107). These animals should be removed out of their habitat only when human beings have good intentions of treating them or giving them medical assistance if they are hurt or sick. The implication is that animals should not be used in sports and entertainment because it is hard to know when they are affected mentally and emotionally. Besides, animals in sports and entertainment have no opportunity to defend themselves. For instance, when certain animals fail to perform as they are expected of, some of the trainers harm or physically overwork them, so that they can play accordingly. These animals, who do not act quickly, can also get physically abused from their trainers. Moreover, these coaches can take their anger out on such animals.

However, the pro animals in entertainment argue that using the animal in a show is morally reasonable if the animals do not suffer and experience proper treatment. They claim that the reason why animals exist is to benefit human beings. Waters supports claims that people feel euphoric after watching animals fight (107). Similarly, opponents of animals in all types of entertainment and sports argue that should be banned. They assert that animals like human beings have stress, fear .pain as well as exhaustion. It implies that the animal usage for the amusement of people, whether hunting them to make them perform to us or rather for sports and entertainment, it is demeaning for both the animals and individuals (Hughes 321). We should be responsible enough to use our authority over them to abuse such animals for our right (Breslin 297). Therefore, using animals in sports and entertainment can be termed as the highest level of misuse of our great responsibilities of protecting those animals. We brutalize our nature and animals.

Also, those who support the use of animals in sports and entertainment argue that every culture throughout the historical time have used the animals for sports and entertainment (Kopnina, & Cherniak 368). This dates back from the Roman periods when the chariots races and games were used to the modern day circuses, hunting as well as racing. We have the responsibilities to use these animals. Further, they argue that the only thing that should be banned is if we show cruelty to animals (Waters 107). However, if there is no element of cruelty that is shown towards the animals then using them is sports should not be taken negatively. Finally, these proponents assert that if animals are used to entertain human beings in a manner that not mistreatment or cruelty is done to them, then we should embrace the culture.

The second negative impact is that dogs and horses have always been exploited to the advantage of human beings. These animals have been used so that human can have the desire for gambling (Jones 469). It means that the safety and the welfare of the animal come second after people are being entertained. It is tough to convince that these animals enjoy these races. Unfortunately, if these animals fail to win these races or earn a competition on, in general, they may be subjected to torture, mistreatment and even slaughtered. They may also be neglected entirely. Moreover, horses may also be compelled to participate in risky sports that involve contacts of polo whereby collision, as well as a hard quick movement, puts the animal under risk to its life. It is opposed to their riders how can decide to participate in such games.

Other views of the proponents of the animal use in sports and entertainment assert that there is the need to strike a balance between animal welfare as well as human pleasure and entertainment. They argue that the views on animal use are too way unbalanced (Jones 467). If the animals are not satisfied, then they would not perform well. They say that the pleasure these animals shows before and after completion will tell everyone about the welfare of these animals.

The third negative impact is that circus is one area where human beings have the opportunity to abuse animals. In this field, animals are trained to act some tricks while using whips, sticks or even electric rods (Kopnina, & Cherniak 367). Also, animals such as tigers and lions are caged under a small place they are not used to. The truth is that circus does not have the capacity to provide the adequate natural home for these wild animals. Further, these animals are made to travel the longer distance in such squalid environment to an extent they end up being physically as well as mentally sickened. Equally, those who supports circus argue that it is from this circus that the children began to love animals (Beirne, & South 55). They argue that animals can enjoy performing and forms the close relationship with the audience and their trainers.

The fourth negative impact is that it is barbaric exploitation of animal for our personal pleasure. They claim that in every fight a bull dies at the end. Before these bulls die, they undergo severe injuries and pain. Unfortunately, the defeated bull if not slaughtered gets mistreated and eventually killed. So, if there much such entertainment in a day then how many bull are prepared to injure, kill or abandon. On the other hand, those who support bullfighting claim that the opponents of this activity are insensitive to differences in culture as well as being faithful to the spirits of sports (Kopnina, & Cherniak 363).They argue that bullfighting remains to be part and parcel of the traditional Spanish culture and tradition which should be shown respect to just as slaughtering animals is accepted by many people. Bullfighting depicts symbolically that exist between beats and human beings. Finally, the supporters of bullfighting assert that since these Bulls would eventually get slaughter, so it should not matter how it is killed. Therefore the manner in which these animals die in the fight is what the opponents of this activities term as inhumane (Beirne, & South 55).

In addition, the animals are not exploited in the free natural environment without interference from human beings (Jones 467). On the other hand, those who oppose the ban of the animal use, argue that the animal enjoys participating in these games, they further argue that they are given fair treatment before and during the games (Jones 467). Additionally, they argue that its natural to use animals is sports and games since it is part and parcel of our cultures. This implies that if we are cultural sensitive as well as appreciating other people culture, then we should not oppose bullfighting among other animal use in sports and entertainment.

In conclusion, it is important for human beings to observe the rights and welfare of the animals. If our entertainment is going to harm the animals, then we should seek for another means of entertainment rather than risk the life of the animal for our selfish gains. Animals deserve peace and calmness in their natural environment. In my view, animals should not be sued in entertainment because first we animals must gate hurt or mistreated during these games. Second, it is hard to tell whether these animals have consented or o not. We are not sure whether they are happy or not. As most studies have revealed, these animals get emotional as well as physical abuse. Since we have higher thinking than the animals, we should protect them and treat them well. For instance, we should get animals out of their natural environment only if we want to help them medically in case they get sick or hurt.

Works Cited

Beirne, Piers, & South, Nathan. "Animal Rights, Animal Abuse and Green Criminology." Issues in Green Criminology 12(2007): 55-83.

Hughes, Peter. "Animals, Values, and Tourism—Structural Shifts in UK Dolphin Tourism Provision." Tourism Management 22.4 (2001): 321-329.

Jones, Robert C. "Animal Rights is a Social Justice Issue." Contemporary Justice Review 18.4 (2015): 467-482.

Kopnina, Helen, and Cherniak, Brett. "Cultivating a Value for Non-Human Interests through the Convergence of Animal Welfare, Animal Rights, and Deep Ecology in Environmental Education." Education Sciences 5.4 (2015): 363-379.

Regan, Tom. Empty Cages: Facing the Challenge of Animal Rights. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.

Waters, James. "Ethics and the Choice of Animal Advocacy Campaigns." Ecological Economics 119 (2015): 107-117.

Deadline is approaching?

Wait no more. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Related Essays

Related topics.

Find Out the Cost of Your Paper

Type your email

By clicking “Submit”, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy policy. Sometimes you will receive account related emails.

In Broadway’s ‘Water for Elephants,’ circus parts are good, songs are meh

The new musical based on the bestselling novel incorporates acrobatics, along with puppets to portray animals.

NEW YORK — The new Broadway musical “Water for Elephants” looks patched together. In a good way.

After all, the Benzini Brothers’ Depression-era traveling circus, where the show is set, is no tiptop big top. The animals are malnourished, and some might be a little mangy. The performers form a tightknit skilled ensemble, but a few carry a lot of miles and seem a little weary. Both the tent and the traveling quarters are on the ragtag side. It’s only fitting, then, that the puppets representing the menagerie appear stitched from well-worn pieces, the company is made of disparate but complementary moving parts, and simple scaffolds bring to life an environment far from Ringling razzmatazz.

The Style section

Not everything works in Jessica Stone’s production — there’s a reason the words “dream sequence” tend to set off alarm bells — but at least it summons a coherent theatrical universe. And more often than not, the show (whose world premiere was this past June in Atlanta) captures the unabashed mix of romance and pathos that made its source material, a bestseller by Sara Gruen, so wildly popular.

Like the novel, Rick Elice’s book toggles between the present of the elderly Jacob Jankowski (Gregg Edelman) and 1931, the fateful year he joined the circus. Having dropped out of veterinary school just before his final exams, the young Jacob (an appealing Grant Gustin, who played the title character on the CW series “The Flash”) finds a job, and a refuge from a life in flux, with the Benzini Brothers.

The outfit’s owner and ringmaster, August (Paul Alexander Nolan), is a sleek charmer, but the character was played by Christoph Waltz in the movie adaptation from 2011, so you know he has a dark side. To drive the point home, every time August opens his mouth to sing, the score, by the seven-men group PigPen Theatre Co. , suddenly sounds like sub-Kander and Ebb, those masters of ominous charm.

On the receiving end of August’s brutality are, well, everybody and everything at the circus, but mainly his wife, Marlena (a silver-voiced Isabelle McCalla, confirming the promise she showed in “The Prom”), and the crowd-drawing elephant, Rosie.

Like all the musical’s beasties, Rosie is a puppet, and the production’s use of that artistic device is deftly integrated. This does mean that “Water for Elephants” will draw comparisons to “The Lion King” or even the undervalued “Life of Pi,” but the new show uses puppets a little differently. Because the circus is both a setting and a storytelling tool here, the border between spectacle and life is porous, and it makes narrative sense for humans and animals to mesh into one another. The most striking example is the horse Silver Star, brought to life by the acrobat Antoine Boissereau. The scene in which Boissereau performs an aerial number while Marlena sings the aching ballad “Easy,” cradling a puppet horse’s head, might as well be sponsored by Kleenex.

Similarly, acrobatics fill the Benzini acts, but the cast’s precision and physicality also buoy seemingly mundane tasks such as the hammering of stakes to pull up the tent: This is a life of ever-present risk, necessitating ever-present athleticism. Those elements are fluidly woven into the show by Shana Carroll, a founder and artistic director of the Montreal collective the 7 Fingers who is credited with circus design, and choreographed with Jesse Robb. (Carroll’s 7 Fingers colleague Gypsy Snider worked on Diane Paulus’s circus-inflected revival of “Pippin” a decade ago.)

Sharp. Witty. Thoughtful. Sign up for the Style Memo newsletter.

It is telling that it has taken me so long to circle back to the music, because it is not what makes the strongest impression. At their best, the numbers sound like the 1930s filtered through the folk rock of the late 1960s and early ’70s: “Wild,” a duet between Jacob and Marlena, emulates early Joni Mitchell romanticism, while a few songs’ melodic melancholia and period atmosphere recall Randy Newman’s explorations of Americana. The lyrics never come remotely close to Newman’s sharp angles, though, and too often succumb to bland earnestness. If only the score had been willing to be as untethered from gravity as the rest of the show.

Water for Elephants , ongoing at the Imperial Theatre in New York. 2 hours, 40 minutes. waterforelephantsthemusical.com .

• Laurence Fishburne’s solo show somehow needs more Laurence Fishburne March 22, 2024 Laurence Fishburne’s solo show somehow needs more Laurence Fishburne March 22, 2024
• This ‘Little Shop of Horrors’ is a bit too cheerful, but don’t overthink it March 22, 2024 This ‘Little Shop of Horrors’ is a bit too cheerful, but don’t overthink it March 22, 2024
• In Broadway’s ‘Water for Elephants,’ circus parts are good, songs are meh March 21, 2024 In Broadway’s ‘Water for Elephants,’ circus parts are good, songs are meh March 21, 2024

Columbus Zoo's 'Unextinct' brings extinct and endangered animals to all ages

When the sun goes down at the Columbus Zoo and Aquarium, animals not usually seen there come to life, some of them for the first time in centuries.

"Unextinct," the zoo's new interactive digital experience , is composed of 15 areas where projected illusions of extinct species and critically endangered critters swim, jump, frolic, fly and roam.

A scattered selection of hardy souls braved the bitter cold on Thursday night to walk through the wildlife wonderland.

"It really offers something different to do," zoo guest Liz Gruhalla, of Columbus, said.

Eggs, Paws and Claws at the zoo: Where to find Easter egg hunts in the Columbus area

The display, which debuted on March 14, drew more than 1,000 guests on its opening weekend, according to Anthony Sabo, the zoo's vice president of operations and guest services.

"(The experience) is the first of its kind in Ohio and the second in the United States," Sabo said. "It's a completely different way to see the zoo, a totally different vibe than what the zoo usually has."

The immersive event will be open from 7:30-10:30 p.m. on select Thursdays (March 21 and March 28), Fridays and Saturdays through April 6, after which it will run Fridays and Saturdays through April 27.

When guests arrive, they are greeted by the Living Water display at the central pond, where ghost-like visions of coelacanths , sawtooth sharks, humpback whales and other underwater denizens soar through the air, an effect achieved with a semi-translucent aqua screen.

The 14 other "worlds" in "Unextinct" include Arachnoglitch, an exhibit of eight-legged crawlies; Soaring Panorama, a world of long-extinct birds; and an ultraviolet art tunnel where African and Asian elephants , a Javan green magpie and other winged creatures, vultures and more burst from the scene in DayGlo colors.

The ground-breaking technological wonder is the work of Mangolin Creative , a Los Angeles-based studio specializing in immersive experiential design.

Mangolin co-founder Morgan Lee Richardson said "Unextinct" was six years in the making, shifting and morphing before it was unveiled at the Sacramento Zoo last year.

Zoo opens elephant lab: Lab at Columbus Zoo and Aquarium aims to detect and prevent deadly elephant virus

"'It was built off the notion that animals perceive the world differently than we do," Richardson said, adding that besides blending art and entertainment, "Unextinct" is meant to call attention to global wildlife conservation .

The installation is indeed equal parts entertaining, educational and environmentally edifying, with fact-filled narratives accompanying the visuals at each stop.

Though the project is his baby, Richardson admitted he was slightly biased when he selected the species to feature in "Unextinct."

"I was playing favorites when I picked the animals I wanted to include. I also wanted to choose animals you would not see in a zoo," he said, listing the hellbender salamander among his favorites.

Richardson said public reaction to "Unextinct" thus far has been positive. "It feels great. It's always fantastic to see and hear the guests chattering," he said.

Sabo said the experience has attracted guests from preschoolers to grandparents. "'Unextinct' is great for all ages," he said.

As evidence of this, Tad and Vernonica Delicath, of Columbus, turned out with their three sons, Hal, 4, Xavier, 2, and Remy, 6 weeks. "We love glow-in-the dark stuff, so when we heard about this, we said, 'We're there,'" Veronica said.

Citing the Living Water exhibition, her husband agreed: "That was so cool!"

General admission to "Unextinct," which is separate from zoo admission, costs $28.99 for those 10 and older and $25.99 for children ages 3-9. Upgrade to a premium ticket for $38.99 and receive an interactive glow bracelet and souvenir cup. Members of the zoo, Zoombezi Bay and The Wilds receive discounts on admission prices.

Before you go, you can download the zoo's free mobile app from the Apple or Google Play store to see the animals featured in "Unextinct," along with conservation information about each.

For more information about "Unextinct," go to columbuszoo.org .

[email protected]

Current Weather

Partly Cloudy

Latest Weathercast

Interactive Radar

Tennessee governor signs bill to ban untrained service animals from restaurants

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WZTV) — A Tennessee bill that would prohibit untrained service animals from being inside restaurants has been signed by Governor Bill Lee.

Gov. Lee signed HB1635/SB1595 on March 15. The legislation would keep some live animals out of food service establishments and would give restaurants power to turn away some patrons with pets.

The bill would prohibit "emotional support animals that are not trained, or being trained, to perform tasks or work for a person with a disability" from indoor food service establishments.

Some lawmakers have argued too many pet owners are calling their dogs “service animals” or “emotional support animals.”

Lawmakers are hoping to bring a similar bill to grocery stores next year.

Get reports like this and all the news of the day in Middle Tennessee delivered to your inbox each morning with the FOX 17 News Daily Newsletter.

10 hilarious unseen photos from the Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards

• The Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards highlight hilarious, candid photos of wild animals.
• The 2024 competition is now open for submissions.
• Its organizers shared previously unseen images from past years of the competition to celebrate.

Since 2015, the annual Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards have determined the funniest photos of animals in their natural habitats.

To celebrate the 2024 contest opening for submissions, the Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards shared previously unseen images from past years of the competition .

Beyond making people laugh with amusing photos of animals, the contest also supports the Whitley Fund for Nature. This UK charity has distributed over £20 million, or $25.3 million, to 200 conservationists in 80 countries.

The contest is open for entries through its official website until July 31, and the winners will be announced in November.

Here are 10 hilarious wildlife photos finally getting their moment to shine .

A bird in the background appeared to glare at its peers in 'If Looks Could Kill' by Alex Pansier.

Alvin Tarkmees photographed a hawk with a purposeful walk in 'A Tough Guy: Flying Is for the Weak.'

In 'Seriously?' by Anna Wiazowska, a bird seemed to struggle to understand the concept of personal space.

'Pilgrimage' by Atsuyuki Ohshima captured monkeys climbing on top of each other.

An otter struck an adorable pose in Emeline Robert-Pottorff's photo, 'I Just Think You're Otter This World.'

A penguin leaned away from Francis Glassup as he snapped this photo, making it appear 'Headless.'

The monkey in Jo De Pauw's photo made a facial expression as if to say, 'Oops, Did I Pick Your Candy?'

Michael Rigney photographed an eye-catching optical illusion in 'Sea Flyin'' — a bird swimming behind a sea lion, making it appear to have wings.

Sidra Monreal Burshteyn imagined a humorous exchange between bears in this photo, titled 'Bear Jokes.'

The prairie dog in 'Sleepy' by Tímea Ambrus looked satiated with a bundle of grass stuffed in its cheeks.

• Main content

Pet Rock Fest seeks new home for its event in September — suggestions welcome

The organizers of the annual Pet Rock Fest have announced that they are looking for a new location for the event, which is usually held on the Sunday following Labor Day weekend.

On its website, Pet Rock Fest Inc. states that "much like that doggie or kitty at the shelter, we are looking for a new home." A similar message is conveyed in a newsletter emailed to followers at the end of February.

Last year the festival took place Sept. 10 at the  Scandinavian Athletic Club Park  in Shrewsbury.

Pet Rock Fest Inc. was founded in 1999 as an animal welfare nonprofit and event, and organizers say it is now the largest animal festival in New England and a leading animal welfare organization. The co-founding partners since the beginning have been Charlene Arsenault and Jeannie Hebert.

The festival features live music, vegetarian food, games, children's activities, pet-themed events, vendors and animal-welfare organizations.  The musical headliner in 2023 was Ricky Duran. Proceeds are distributed to Massachusetts-based groups, including shelters, cruelty watchdogs and rescue leagues.

However, the festival has had difficulties finding a permanent home. Starting with Hebert Candy Mansion Mansion in Shrewsbury for several years until traffic problems led to the need to relocate, the festival has been held at venues including the  Sturbridge Host Hotel,  the  former Becker College in Leicester, Quinsigamond Community College in Worcester,  and  Wyman-Gordon fields in Grafton.   Pet Rock Fest went online during the pandemic in 2020 and also was virtual   in 2022 after Wyman-Gordon in Grafton, where the festival had been held for several years, sold the field where the festival took place. Last year it was at SAC Park for the first time and there were hopes it could be Pet Rock Fest's forever home.

"We’re in search of a new permanent location and we’re hoping you can help.  What we are hoping to achieve in reaching out to you is some insight into ideas of venues in your town or surrounding areas that may be able to accommodate our next festival in September 2024," the Pet Rock Fest web site states.

"We have hosted our annual festival in a select few venues, and through no fault of our own, are searching again," the web site states. The relationships at the places the festival has taken place " have been wonderful, and we’d be happy to connect you with representatives from the venues for references," organizers state.

"We are a well-oiled machine, and Pet Rock Fest organizers professionally coordinate, set up, and break down the event with the utmost respect and consideration for the venue and its owners," the website statement continues. 

"Not only would the collaboration be beneficial to us, but is a positive alliance for the town and/or venue that ultimately hosts us. Our reputation is stellar, and we’ve helped hundreds of charities with thousands of dollars since we started."

Asked on Friday if there have been any new developments since the web site and newsletter announcements, Arsenault said, "Nothing concrete. We're hoping on something to come through ... but await an answer with our fingers crossed."  

For more information, visit PetRockFest.org . Contact organizers at [email protected] .

• Search Please fill out this field.
• Manage Your Subscription
• Give a Gift Subscription
• Sweepstakes
• Entertainment

John Janssen Sues Ex Shannon Beador for $75K She Allegedly Borrowed for Facelift (Exclusive)

Beador and Janssen dated for three and half years before splitting in January 2023

Dave Quinn is a Senior Editor for PEOPLE. He has been working at the brand since 2016, and is the author of the No. 1 New York Times best-selling book, Not All Diamonds and Rosé: The Inside Story of the Real Housewives from the People Who Lived It.

Shannon Storm Beador ’s relationship with John Janssen is costing her more than just heartache. 

On Wednesday, the Real Housewives of Orange County star’s ex-boyfriend filed a lawsuit in Orange County Superior Court against her for breach or oral contract and promissory fraud, among other things, to recover $75,000 he claims she failed to repay him. 

In the complaint, obtained by PEOPLE, Janssen, 61, alleges that Beador, 59, turned to him for financial support in early 2022, borrowing $40,000 via wire transfer on Jan. 23, 2022 for a facelift procedure. Then, on May 20, 2023, he gave her another $35,000 via personal check. 

Albert L. Ortega/Getty

In both instances, Janssen claims in the docs, Beador agreed to pay back the loan with interest. But despite multiple requests in 2023 and 2024, Janseen claims she has yet to.

Janssen is seeking the full amount, plus accrued interest, costs, and reasonable attorneys’ fees.

Beador sent the following statement to PEOPLE on Friday in response to Janssen's lawsuit:

"I am shocked and disappointed that John has a filed a lawsuit. My attorney has been in constant communication with his counsel. I agreed to pay John what he wanted because I knew that attorneys fees would surpass the amount sought, but more importantly to eliminate the negative emotional components that come with a lawsuit. It is important that I continue to focus on the positive aspects of my life and move forward," the statement read.

"John declined the offer because he refused to sign a mutual non-disparagement agreement. I was hoping that if I met his baseless demand we could at least use this as an opportunity to bring complete closure to this chapter in my life," the statement concluded.

The suit will come as a surprise to RHOC fans, who have heard through Beador in the past that Janssen was financially dependent on her during their time together. 

She’s also said, according to Janssen’s council, that the money was a “gift” — something her ex disputes and allegedly has proof of otherwise. 

“Ms. Beador’s defense that Mr. Janssen paid her the $75,000 as a ‘gift’ is completely meritless, which their e-mails and text messages will show,” Edson K. McClellan, Rutan & Tucker LLP, tells PEOPLE. “Mr. Janssen is saddened that Ms. Beador’s unwillingness to repay the loans made it necessary to file this lawsuit.”

Janssen and Beador dated for three and a half years. He pulled the plug on their romance in November 2022 , a week after filming wrapped on season 17 of the hit Bravo series. The two remained friends but stopped speaking in late September, not long after her she was arrested for a DUI .

He’s since moved on, finding love with Beador’s now-costar Alexis Bellino , 47. The two met through mutual friends in November 2023. PEOPLE confirmed the two were dating that December, sharing an exclusive photo of them posing arm in arm.

Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

That same month, Beador slammed Janssen in the press for dating Bellino, telling E! News in December that she's "hurt" and still trying to figure out "how to process" their romance after Janssen told her he didn't want to be in the public eye anymore.

But Janssen insists his romance with Bellino is not about fame. “I've been accused of wanting to be in front of the camera, but you'll have to watch the show and see if that's true," he told PEOPLE earlier this month at the DIRECTV Streaming with the Stars Oscars viewing party, where he and Bellino made their red carpet couple debut. 

"You won't really see him,” Bellino said. “We're focused on each other and our future, not a show. And we couldn't be happier or more in love."