argumentative essay for euthanasia

• Galileo Galilei: sample essay
• Kids and violence: sample essay
• Sample essay about Muhammad Ali
• Learning for adults: essay sample
• Breast cancer: sample essay
• Ulysses S. Grant: essay sample
• Sample essay about muckrakers
• Teen pragnency: essay sample
• Sample essay aabout a soul
• Paper sample about happiness
• Schizophrenia: essay sample
• Essay example about death penalty
• Sample paper about corruption
• Gender on business: sample essay
• Mozart: essay sample
• An essay sample on Illicit traffic in drugs
• Analyzing the generation gap
• Pit bulls and fighting
• Reasons for a belief in God
• Italian dessert Tiramisu
• Terrorism in Pakistan
• Lives on the boundary
• History of fingerprints
• If I were Lyndon Johnson
• The Western expansion
• Workplace violence
• Compare & contrast paper ideas
• College cause and effect essay topics
• Good descriptive paper topics
• GED paper topics
• Catchy essay paper topics
• Capital punishment essay topics
• Ideas for your descriptive paper
• Choosing topics for a law paper
• Death of a Salesman essay ideas
• Huckleberry Finn: argument paper topics
• College persuasive essay topic ideas
• Unique illustration essay topic prompts
• Topics for an essay on Nicholas Sparks
• Business cause and effect essay topics
• Informative essay topic ideas
• Choosing topics for a profile essay
• Argumentative essay topics on politics
• Selecting paper topics about the military
• Process analysis essay topics
• College essay topics in accounting
• Ideas about violent video games
• Argumentative paper topic suggestions
• Offbeat topic ideas on Macbeth
• Essay prompts on Streetcar Named Desire
• Selection of topics about Dorian Gray
• Argumentative essay ideas on bullying
• 23 topics on a Midsummer Night’s Dream
• Essay ideas on yourself in 10 years
• Choosing topics about global warming
• Environmental science essay prompts
• Argumentative essay ideas on psychology
• Picking topics about religion & belief
• Best essay ideas on euthanasia
• Writing service
• Essay on a book
• Writing companies

writing rogue

10 thought-provoking topics for an argumentative essay on euthanasia.

Euthanasia is the process in which medical professionals take in order to end one’s life (with the patient’s discretion and/or guardian’s decision). Everyone has mixed opinions about whether euthanasia is an ethical practice that should take place. Many debates and arguments have formed based around this to the point that the practice is illegal in many countries around the world.

In this article, we are going to list off 10 thought provoking topics that you could question/think of when writing your essay on euthanasia.

• Why are many countries from around the world banning the practice of euthanasia?
• If the patient previously stated clearly for themselves (whether it is written, verbally, or through video) that if such situation was to occur that they are okay with euthanasia, then why are individuals not upholding the patient's wishes?
• What countries currently ban the practice of euthanasia? Do they have any specific reasons as to why they will not accept licensed medical professionals to carry out such procedures?
• Who is the individual(s) that are capable of making the decision of euthanasia if the patient is unable to verbally express the decision for himself or herself?
• What are the exact methods used with euthanasia?
• Is the practice of euthanasia humane?
• Throughout the deciding process of this practice, is there a certain amount of time that is allocated to licensed professionals/caretakers/patients saying yes to carry out euthanasia?
• Should we be required to clearly state our decision to be okay or not okay with euthanasia in the worse case scenario if we ever become seriously ill?
• Are doctors capable of making this decision without the “okay” from family members/caretakers/friends?
• Should this practice only be set in place for those that are physically ill with life threatening sicknesses such as cancer, AIDS, etc.?

When writing your argumentative essay on euthanasia, put yourself on both sides of the perspective. How do you feel being the person to make the decision for your loved one? Are you okay with designating a significant other/family member to make the decision for you, in the worse case scenario you face a life-threatening illness?

Writing Ideas

• Personal statement writing guide
• Boosting geography essay writing skills
• Literary essay about Animal Farm
• Document based question essay
• How to settle down with a good service
• Writing about Tommy Hilfiger
• Paper writing help: disadvantages
• Looking for a cheap custom essay
• Writing a literary essay conclusion
• Informative explanatory essay
• Essay about school environment

Writing help

Popular essay writing service for generation Z - Zessay.com - very quality service and nice website.

Hints for beginners

• Ways to improve your grades
• Pay someone to write my paper
• Free pesuasive paper
• Life without technology paper
• Finding trusted paper writing help
• Long essay about summer vacation
• Finding a paper sample about market
• Pros and cons of writing services
• Where to buy cheap papers?
• How to complete an IB literary essay

Paper topics

• Persuasive essay topics for 5th grade
• High school paper ideas
• Choosing definition essay topics
• Informative essay topics on caffeine
• Medical argumentative essay topics
• Picking topics related to entertainment
• Essay topics on Scottish independence
• Good ideas about Internet privacy

Mar 31, 2024 © WritingRogue.com. | Developing Strong Writing Habits For Students

• How It Works
• All Projects
• Write my essay
• Buy essay online
• Custom coursework
• Creative writing
• Custom admission essay
• College essay writers
• IB extended essays
• Buy speech online
• Pay for essays
• College papers
• Do my homework
• Write my paper
• Custom dissertation
• Buy research paper
• Buy dissertation
• Write my dissertation
• Essay for cheap
• Essays for sale
• Non-plagiarized essays
• Buy coursework
• Term paper help
• Buy assignment
• Custom thesis
• Custom research paper
• College paper
• Coursework writing
• Edit my essay
• Nurse essays
• Business essays
• Custom term paper
• Buy college essays
• Buy book report
• Cheap custom essay
• Argumentative essay
• Assignment writing
• Custom book report
• Custom case study
• Doctorate essay
• Finance essay
• Scholarship essays
• Essay topics
• Research paper topics
• Top queries link

Best Ethics Essay Examples

Euthanasia argumentative essay.

1067 words | 4 page(s)

I agree with the concept of euthanasia for multiple reasons. Euthanasia is when an individual decides to end his or her life. This is normally due to severe, debilitating and usually terminal medical conditions. Euthanasia involves the use of medicine as a means to achieve this end. It differs from suicide in that it is more acceptable to many. In addition, many want a medical professional to aid them in their death. The word actually derives from the root words for “good” and “death.” Euthanasia represent a good death for the individual. Unfortunately, many terminal diseases, such as cancer and Lou Gherig’s disease, represent horrific deaths. This is also true for Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease and countless others. Individuals suffer horrifically at the end. Their family suffers as they watch the loved one endure physical and emotional pain. It is only humane to allow an individual a good death, rather than to force him or her to endure a brutal death. If we want to be a humane society, we need to recognize the need for humanity until the end of the person’s life.

Euthanasia is a controversial topic for a number of reasons. Many groups, such as the Catholic Church, believe that all life is sacred. Even if the individual is suffering a painful life where even strong pain medications do not offer relief. Others do not believe that a physician and other health care providers should participate in the death of an individual. Physicians and health care providers have sworn oaths to protect life. In some countries, euthanasia is clearly illegal. A physician who participates may be sent to jail or lose his or her medical license. This threat of punishment prevents many physicians from assisting their patients at the most difficult part of life. Other physicians may assist an individual by providing a number of medications; however, they must find a “legitimate” medical reason to prescribe the medication and the sufficient dosage. The death is then ruled an accidental overdose or a suicide. Doctors participate in these secret killings in all cultures. However, it is a secret and not openly discussed by physicians (Traynor).

Use your promo and get a custom paper on "Euthanasia Argumentative Essay".

Other countries, such as the Netherlands, have a more accepting view of euthanasia. They recognize the need for it and that it allows an individual to decide how and when to end life and the pain of an illness. Euthanasia has been legal in these countries for over ten years. The process, of course, is strictly controlled. This ensures that the use of euthanasia will not be taken lightly by anyone. It requires a justification for the euthanasia. However, it does allow the potential for an individual to escape excruciating pain and suffering (Traynor).

One of the most cherished beliefs in health care focuses on patient autonomy. Autonomy, as a concept, demands respect for the individual. The individual is allowed to decide what occurs to him or her medically. This requires the individual to make an informed decision. An informed decision requires the patient to be aware of both the risks and benefits of all procedures. The individual must be aware of any alternative treatments. The individual cannot be coerced into making a decision. The decision must be made freely by the individual who is fully cognizant of all facts. In philosophy, the concept of autonomy recognizes that an individual should be allowed to live his or her life based upon the individual’s values and beliefs. These decisions must be free of any external motivation or forces. For humanity, autonomy is one of the most crucial concepts. It allows the human to truly be free in the world (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).

True respect for autonomy demands that an individual be allowed to choose not only how to live his or her life, but also how to end it. By all means, suicide is something different. Suicide often results due to depression, financial difficulties, divorce and other more emotional aspects of humanity. Individuals may choose suicide as a means to escape a situation that they do not believe they can address. This is not the same as euthanasia. Financial problems are temporary often. Divorce is a stage of life for many individuals. Depression can be treated with medications and therapy. However, terminal cancer or Huntington’s disease do not offer an alternative for the individual. The individual is at a dead end. If the individual chooses to spend more or less time in this dead end, it should be the person’s choice. Some individuals want to live as long as possible, despite pain and serious health issues. They may find other things in life that they believe make the suffering worthwhile. However, others may have come to accept their inevitable death and choose to hasten it, rather than prolong it. It is not for another person to judge this decision or this belief. Unless an individual is in the same pain or physically debilitated state, that person cannot truly understand what initiates this decision for the person. The person should have the right to decide his or her own life.

Overall, approximately eighty percent of Americans agree with the concept of allowing a person to die with dignity. Allowing a physician to prescribe a lethal dose of narcotics to individuals can give this person a dignified death. The person can die, free of pain, when he or she chooses to do so. Part of the reason that euthanasia remains illegal is because of the power of the Catholic Church. They often threaten to excommunicate any politicians who support ideas antithetical to the Church’s beliefs. This is coercion. It is the perfect example of why euthanasia should be legal. The Catholic Church is forcing beliefs on individuals. No one can or should be forced to believe anything (Kingsbury).

By all means, euthanasia remains a controversial topic. Some individuals believe that all life is sacred. These individuals may change their opinions if they find themselves in agonizing pain as they wait to die from terminal cancer. Until a person experiences something, he or she cannot truly judge it. Individuals have a right to their personal autonomy.

• Kingsbury, Kathleen. “A New Fight to Legalize Euthanasia.” Time. 16 May 2008. 11 December 2013.
• Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. “Autonomy.” 11 August 2009. 11 December 2013.
• Traynor, Ian. “Secret Killings of Newborn Babies Trap Dutch Doctors in Moral Maze.” The Guardian. 21 December 2004. 11 December 2013.

Have a team of vetted experts take you to the top, with professionally written papers in every area of study.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Indian J Med Res
• v.136(6); 2012 Dec

Euthanasia: Right to life vs right to die

Suresh bada math.

Department of Psychiatry National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Sciences (Deemed University) Bangalore 560 029, India

Santosh K. Chaturvedi

The word euthanasia, originated in Greece means a good death 1 . Euthanasia encompasses various dimensions, from active (introducing something to cause death) to passive (withholding treatment or supportive measures); voluntary (consent) to involuntary (consent from guardian) and physician assisted (where physician's prescribe the medicine and patient or the third party administers the medication to cause death) 2 , 3 . Request for premature ending of life has contributed to the debate about the role of such practices in contemporary health care. This debate cuts across complex and dynamic aspects such as, legal, ethical, human rights, health, religious, economic, spiritual, social and cultural aspects of the civilised society. Here we argue this complex issue from both the supporters and opponents’ perspectives, and also attempts to present the plight of the sufferers and their caregivers. The objective is to discuss the subject of euthanasia from the medical and human rights perspective given the background of the recent Supreme Court judgement 3 in this context.

In India abetment of suicide and attempt to suicide are both criminal offences. In 1994, constitutional validity of Indian Penal Code Section (IPC Sec) 309 was challenged in the Supreme Court 4 . The Supreme Court declared that IPC Sec 309 is unconstitutional, under Article 21 (Right to Life) of the constitution in a landmark judgement 4 . In 1996, an interesting case of abetment of commission of suicide (IPC Sec 306) came to Supreme Court 5 . The accused were convicted in the trial court and later the conviction was upheld by the High Court. They appealed to the Supreme Court and contended that ‘right to die’ be included in Article 21 of the Constitution and any person abetting the commission of suicide by anyone is merely assisting in the enforcement of the fundamental right under Article 21; hence their punishment is violation of Article 21. This made the Supreme Court to rethink and to reconsider the decision of right to die. Immediately the matter was referred to a Constitution Bench of the Indian Supreme Court. The Court held that the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution does not include the right to die 5 .

Regarding suicide, the Supreme Court reconsidered its decision on suicide. Abetment of suicide (IPC Sec 306) and attempt to suicide (IPC Sec 309) are two distinct offences, hence Section 306 can survive independent of Section 309. It has also clearly stated that a person attempts suicide in a depression, and hence he needs help, rather than punishment. Therefore, the Supreme Court has recommended to Parliament to consider the feasibility of deleting Section 309 from the Indian Penal Code 3 .

Arguments against euthanasia

Eliminating the invalid : Euthanasia opposers argue that if we embrace ‘the right to death with dignity’, people with incurable and debilitating illnesses will be disposed from our civilised society. The practice of palliative care counters this view, as palliative care would provide relief from distressing symptoms and pain, and support to the patient as well as the care giver. Palliative care is an active, compassionate and creative care for the dying 6 .

Constitution of India : ‘Right to life’ is a natural right embodied in Article 21 but suicide is an unnatural termination or extinction of life and, therefore, incompatible and inconsistent with the concept of ‘right to life’. It is the duty of the State to protect life and the physician's duty to provide care and not to harm patients. If euthanasia is legalised, then there is a grave apprehension that the State may refuse to invest in health (working towards Right to life). Legalised euthanasia has led to a severe decline in the quality of care for terminally-ill patients in Holland 7 . Hence, in a welfare state there should not be any role of euthanasia in any form.

Symptom of mental illness : Attempts to suicide or completed suicide are commonly seen in patients suffering from depression 8 , schizophrenia 9 and substance users 10 . It is also documented in patients suffering from obsessive compulsive disorder 11 . Hence, it is essential to assess the mental status of the individual seeking for euthanasia. In classical teaching, attempt to suicide is a psychiatric emergency and it is considered as a desperate call for help or assistance. Several guidelines have been formulated for management of suicidal patients in psychiatry 12 . Hence, attempted suicide is considered as a sign of mental illness 13 .

Malafide intention : In the era of declining morality and justice, there is a possibility of misusing euthanasia by family members or relatives for inheriting the property of the patient. The Supreme Court has also raised this issue in the recent judgement 3 . ‘Mercy killing’ should not lead to ‘killing mercy’ in the hands of the noble medical professionals. Hence, to keep control over the medical professionals, the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 discusses euthanasia briefly in Chapter 6, Section 6.7 and it is in accordance with the provisions of the Transplantation of Human Organ Act, 1994 14 . There is an urgent need to protect patients and also medical practitioners caring the terminally ill patients from unnecessary lawsuit. Law commission had submitted a report (no-196) to the government on this issue 15 .

Emphasis on care : Earlier majority of them died before they reached the hospital but now it is converse. Now sciences had advanced to the extent, life can be prolonged but not to that extent of bringing back the dead one. This phenomenon has raised a complex situation. Earlier diseases outcome was discussed in terms of ‘CURE’ but in the contemporary world of diseases such as cancer, Aids, diabetes, hypertension and mental illness are debated in terms best ‘CARE’, since cure is distant. The principle is to add life to years rather than years to life with a good quality palliative care. The intention is to provide care when cure is not possible by low cost methods. The expectation of society is, ‘cure’ from the health professionals, but the role of medical professionals is to provide ‘care’. Hence, euthanasia for no cure illness does not have a logical argument. Whenever, there is no cure, the society and medical professionals become frustrated and the fellow citizen take extreme measures such as suicide, euthanasia or substance use. In such situations, palliative and rehabilitative care comes to the rescue of the patient and the family. At times, doctors do suggest to the family members to have the patient discharged from the hospital wait for death to come, if the family or patient so desires. Various reasons are quoted for such decisions, such as poverty, non-availability of bed, futile intervention, resources can be utilised for other patients where cure is possible and unfortunately majority of our patient's family do accordingly. Many of the terminally ill patients prefer to die at home, with or without any proper terminal health care. The societal perception needs to be altered and also the medical professionals need to focus on care rather in addition to just cure. The motive for many euthanasia requests is unawareness of alternatives. Patients hear from their doctors that ‘nothing can be done anymore’. However, when patients hear that a lot can be done through palliative care, that the symptoms can be controlled, now and in the future, many do not want euthanasia anymore 16 .

Commercialisation of health care : Passive euthanasia occurs in majority of the hospitals across the county, where poor patients and their family members refuse or withdraw treatment because of the huge cost involved in keeping them alive. If euthanasia is legalised, then commercial health sector will serve death sentence to many disabled and elderly citizens of India for meagre amount of money. This has been highlighted in the Supreme Court Judgement 3 , 17 .

Research has revealed that many terminally ill patients requesting euthanasia, have major depression, and that the desire for death in terminal patients is correlated with the depression 18 . In Indian setting also, strong desire for death was reported by 3 of the 191 advanced cancer patients, and these had severe depression 19 . They need palliative and rehabilitative care. They want to be looked after by enthusiastic, compassionate and humanistic team of health professionals and the complete expenses need to be borne by the State so that ‘Right to life’ becomes a reality and succeeds before ‘Right to death with dignity’. Palliative care actually provides death with dignity and a death considered good by the patient and the care givers.

Counterargument of euthanasia supporters

Caregivers burden : ‘Right-to-die’ supporters argue that people who have an incurable, degenerative, disabling or debilitating condition should be allowed to die in dignity. This argument is further defended for those, who have chronic debilitating illness even though it is not terminal such as severe mental illness. Majority of such petitions are filed by the sufferers or family members or their caretakers. The caregiver's burden is huge and cuts across various domains such as financial, emotional, time, physical, mental and social. Hence, it is uncommon to hear requests from the family members of the person with psychiatric illness to give some poison either to patient or else to them. Coupled with the States inefficiency, apathy and no investment on health is mockery of the ‘Right to life’.

Refusing care : Right to refuse medical treatment is well recognised in law, including medical treatment that sustains or prolongs life. For example, a patient suffering from blood cancer can refuse treatment or deny feeds through nasogastric tube. Recognition of right to refuse treatment gives a way for passive euthanasia. Many do argue that allowing medical termination of pregnancy before 16 wk is also a form of active involuntary euthanasia. This issue of mercy killing of deformed babies has already been in discussion in Holland 20 .

Right to die : Many patients in a persistent vegetative state or else in chronic illness, do not want to be a burden on their family members. Euthanasia can be considered as a way to upheld the ‘Right to life’ by honouring ‘Right to die’ with dignity.

Encouraging the organ transplantation : Euthanasia in terminally ill patients provides an opportunity to advocate for organ donation. This in turn will help many patients with organ failure waiting for transplantation. Not only euthanasia gives ‘Right to die’ for the terminally ill, but also ‘Right to life’ for the organ needy patients.

Constitution of India reads ‘right to life’ is in positive direction of protecting life. Hence, there is an urgent need to fulfil this obligation of ‘Right to life’ by providing ‘food, safe drinking water and health care’. On the contrary, the state does not own the responsibility of promoting, protecting and fulfilling the socio-economic rights such as right to food, right to water, right to education and right to health care, which are basic essential ingredients of right to life. Till date, most of the States has not done anything to support the terminally ill people by providing for hospice care.

If the State takes the responsibility of providing reasonable degree of health care, then majority of the euthanasia supporters will definitely reconsider their argument. We do endorse the Supreme Court Judgement that our contemporary society and public health system is not matured enough to handle this sensitive issue, hence it needs to be withheld. However, this issue needs to be re-examined again after few years depending upon the evolution of the society with regard to providing health care to the disabled and public health sector with regard to providing health care to poor people.

The Supreme Court judgement to withhold decision on this sensitive issue is a first step towards a new era of health care in terminally ill patients. The Judgment laid down is to preserve harmony within a society, when faced with a complex medical, social and legal dilemma. There is a need to enact a legislation to protect terminally ill patients and also medical practitioners caring for them as per the recommendation of Law Commission Report-196 15 . There is also an urgent need to invest in our health care system, so that poor people suffering from ill health can access free health care. Investment in health care is not a charity; ‘Right to Health’ is bestowed under ‘Right to Life’ of our constitution.

• EssayBasics.com
• Pay For Essay
• Write My Essay
• Homework Writing Help
• Essay Editing Service
• Thesis Writing Help
• Write My College Essay
• Do My Essay
• Term Paper Writing Service
• Coursework Writing Service
• Write My Research Paper
• Assignment Writing Help
• Essay Writing Help
• Call Now! (USA) Login Order now
• EssayBasics.com Call Now! (USA) Order now
• Writing Guides

Euthanasia (Argumentative Essay Sample)

Euthanasia is one of the subjects that have faced intense debate over time, the legalization of euthanasia have been debated for many years with different views presented in terms of  ethical and legal consideration for both patients and health care providers. Healthcare providers are faced with ethical dilemmas when caring for terminally ill patients. They are forced to make tough decisions by using their moral reasoning to overcome some of the ethical dilemmas related to euthanasia.

Euthanasia is viewed as murder, however, ethically; physician has the moral obligation to comply with patients’ decisions. Making such decision to either withhold or withdraw treatment for any patient is not an easy decision to make based on the cultural, religious and legal factors.  Death resulting to euthanasia is different between countries. Patients who experience extreme pain due to the nature of their illness are permitted to die with dignity in several countries while other countries totally condemn the use of euthanasia. Therefore, such individuals are among the few cases that continue to convince stakeholders to legalize euthanasia.

From a religious perspective; religious leaders see euthanasia to be unnecessary because for them, pain and suffering are not only a medical problem it is more than physical pain.  Pain and suffering are as a result of several factors; these include psychosocial, cultural and spiritual. Such views have changed the perspective of the debate about euthanasia.  The other aspect of euthanasia that has been ignored. It is a fact that the doctor has an obligation to fulfill patient’s request.

By not legalizing euthanasia is viewed as violating patient rights as the doctor refuses to help patients die. Even though many people are against euthanasia because it is viewed as murder, those who advocate for its usage view euthanasia from a different perspective. For them, the issue of cost and violation of human rights are the two most important arguments presented during euthanasia debates.  Even though those who support Euthanasia argue that it helps patients die with and help in containing the overall cost of treatment, others view Euthanasia as an immoral act. Other people view euthanasia as patient’s choice, not a physician; therefore, killing patients even when physicians have signed the code of ethics, is in line with the healthcare standards because the patient has the final say. The physician does not violate human rights.

I believe that there are valid reasons for patients to consider euthanasia because it saves both the patient and their family members from many financial burdens associated with terminal diseases. Euthanasia is the choice, and an alternative for patients who suffer immensely and their decision should be respected to help them alleviate suffering.  In many countries where euthanasia is permitted health care cost have been significantly contained. Patients with chronic illnesses do not have much choice but to die peacefully and with dignity.  Terminally ill patients are permitted to request from euthanasia to stop suffering.

Euthanasia remains one of the hot topics among many interest groups; some people believe that it is the only humane way to end suffering. Christians believe that humans have to undergo suffering because it’s part of God’s plan. In this debate considering the political, religious, legal and personal views all these people want to justify their reasons as to why euthanasia should be legalized or not. Euthanasia remains a debatable subject because of the varied views that might be valid to a certain point.

EssayEmpire

Argumentative essay on euthanasia.

Euthanasia means gentle or easy death for those who are incurably ill and in pain. So should a person have the right to take another person’s life or his own when he/she is incurably ill and in pain. That is what whole of Australia is trying to decide. The N.T all ready has passed a law that legalize euthanasia in that state. Now other government leaders and members are in support of this are pushing for an Australian euthanasia law. Christian Groups and Anti-Euthanasia have seen euthanasia as a sin and a choice that no-body should make. Some doctors have taken ill patients life’s as a request from the patient should this now be openly done.

On the 06/18/96, The head of the NT chapter of the Australia Medical Association, Dr. Chris Wake, and Aboriginal leader Rev. Djiniynni Gondarra put forward the NT euthanasia law .But was dismissed by the NT Supreme Court. After appealing and with the support of three major party leaders the law was passed. Prime Minister John Howard disapproved with the Law and saying that he has no problem reconciling his views on federalism with his views on life and death by voting to overturn the law. Also Kevin Andrews was strongly not in favor and with Howard’s support he introduced a bill overriding the N.T laws. But still in the end the law was still standing. If our leaders are divided we could say that the citizens of Australia would have been divided on this Issue. Maybe a referendum would have been appropriate, but still euthanasia would still occurs illegal and secrecy.

Christian groups and Christian have strongly supported their view on euthanasia, they have seen it as a sin. For a Christian his life is not just his because his life is part of god’s. In the Bible, chapter of (Romans 14:18) it states “If we live, we are responsible to the Lord and when we die we are responsible to the Lord. Both in life and death we belong to the lord. Christian views the death of a human person as their turn to meet god.” As Christian Rights groups and Anti- euthanasia believe in these views they have protested in a number of occasions to stop any euthanasia Laws going ahead. As Christian’s try to obey these laws it is wisely to say that most Christian’s are not going to support euthanasia.

As in the advancement in technology and medicine why would people end their life? There is always hope, miracles such as a Sydney man in 1990 with cancer was predicted to die in months, but instead he was cured of cancer. Also new drugs are been invented each year. Drugs these days relieve pain and suffering. How about if a person has to much pressure to deal with and can’t cope, they might want to end their life, can euthanasia be used? So where do we draw the line. If euthanasia was illegalized or used, what should the reason be: medical, physical or mental states? Most people that want to die are assisted by doctor of some medical profession. Should those people who save lives as occupation end them too? In the United States Dr Jack Kevorkian has brought a lot of publicity to euthanasia. He has assisted in about 40 deaths and been trailed for many but only convicted for less than 10% of those mercy killings. If this is happening everywhere wouldn’t it be better if it was brought out in the open so it can be monitored.

People that support euthanasia see that life is there’s and theirs only. They might view that suffering people are less than human. Terms like a “vegetable” is used often. Are they really vegetables then you can tell me what kind? A cucumber? Carrot? A human being is always a human no matter what. Supporters of euthanasia might think that killing a terminally ill that wants to end this life would benefit the nation by decrease of unnecessary medical cost and etc. But if this nation support’s these view, then we are a nation without a heart.

So should this whole nation legalize euthanasia? If they do some serious question must be answered like, when should a life be terminated? Put as a nation of about 55% of Christian’s I cannot see this happening to the whole of Australia. In my heart I truly hope this is the case. Human’s are never vegetables and should never be considered as vegetables. If they are in pain there are always drugs that can relieve that pain. So euthanasia should not be legalized throughout the rest of Australia. They have already made one mistake letting the N.T .Remember we were not the one to decided the time or manner in which we came into the world, why should we decided the time to leave this world.

• How to Write an Argumentative Essay
• Argumentative Essay Writing Service
• Argumentative Essay Topics

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER

Special offer!

GET 10% OFF WITH  24START  DISCOUNT CODE

Related posts.

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Assisted Suicide — Euthanasia Has A Positive Influence: Arguments

Euthanasia Has a Positive Influence: Arguments

• Categories: Assisted Suicide

About this sample

Words: 835 |

Published: Mar 18, 2021

Words: 835 | Pages: 2 | 5 min read

Table of contents

Introduction, why is euthanasia good.

• BBC (2004). Retrieved form www.bbc.com/ethics/euthanasia/overview/introduction.shtml
• Hausmann, E. (2004). How press discourse justifies euthanasia. Mortality, 9(3), 206- 222. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13576270412331272798
• Swarte, N. B., Van Der Lee, M. L., van der Bom, J. G., Van Den Bout, J., & Heintz,
• A. P. M. (2003). Effects of euthanasia on the bereaved family and friends: a cross sectional study. Bmj, 327 (7408), 189. Retrieved form https://www.bmj.com/content/327/7408/189.short
• Christian Barnard, cardiac surgeon September 24, 1984 – Nice France – Presentation at Federation of Associations for the Right to Die. Retrieved from https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Euthanasia
• Norwood F. (2005). Euthanasia talk. Euthanasia discourse, general practice and end-of-life care in the Netherlands. Dissertation: University of California. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10730-007-9048-z?LI=true
• Friedrich Nietzsche, The Twilight of the Idols and The Anti-Christ, 1889.
• DeMarco, D. (1999). The Sacredness of Human Life in a Desacralized World.
• The Linacre Quarterly, 66(1), 49-55. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/20508549.1999.11877529

Should follow an “upside down” triangle format, meaning, the writer should start off broad and introduce the text and author or topic being discussed, and then get more specific to the thesis statement.

Provides a foundational overview, outlining the historical context and introducing key information that will be further explored in the essay, setting the stage for the argument to follow.

Cornerstone of the essay, presenting the central argument that will be elaborated upon and supported with evidence and analysis throughout the rest of the paper.

The topic sentence serves as the main point or focus of a paragraph in an essay, summarizing the key idea that will be discussed in that paragraph.

The body of each paragraph builds an argument in support of the topic sentence, citing information from sources as evidence.

After each piece of evidence is provided, the author should explain HOW and WHY the evidence supports the claim.

Should follow a right side up triangle format, meaning, specifics should be mentioned first such as restating the thesis, and then get more broad about the topic at hand. Lastly, leave the reader with something to think about and ponder once they are done reading.

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Social Issues

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 670 words

4 pages / 1865 words

2 pages / 1011 words

1 pages / 484 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Assisted Suicide

Euthanasia, a topic fraught with moral and ethical complexity, stands at the intersection of personal autonomy, suffering, compassion, and empathy. In this in-depth exploration, we will delve into the profound moral and ethical [...]

Euthanasia, the act of intentionally ending a person's life to relieve their suffering, has been a topic of ethical debate for decades. This essay explores the nuanced and multifaceted arguments in favor of euthanasia, delving [...]

Assisted suicide, also known as physician-assisted death, is a controversial and sensitive topic that has sparked heated debates in the medical, ethical, and legal realms. The practice involves a physician providing a terminally [...]

Death with Dignity National Center. (2019). 2019 Death with Dignity Act report. Death with Dignity National Center.

Some people agree with euthanasia or mercy killing because "It frees up hospital beds and resources". However, just because hospital beds are needed by other patients, that does not mean it is ok to allow people to die in order [...]

Relief from pain, and preservation of health and or life is the basic role of medicine and all the technologies associated with it. However, in some instances where the disease is a terminal one with no known cure, pain is the [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

We've detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot.

Why did this happen?

Please make sure your browser supports JavaScript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. For more information you can review our Terms of Service and Cookie Policy .

For inquiries related to this message please contact our support team and provide the reference ID below.